The Prepper Broadcasting Network - Patriot Power Hour #252

Episode Date: January 11, 2024

Not too long ago, two friends of mine were talking to a Cuban refugee, a businessman who had escaped from Castro. And in the midst of his story, one of my friends turned to the other and said, we don't know how lucky we are. And the Cuban stopped and said, how lucky you are. I had some place to escape to. And in that sentence, he told us the entire story. If we lose freedom here, there's no place to escape to. This is the last stand on earth. This is the last

stand on earth. The last stand on Earth. SILENT PRAGUE © BF-WATCH TV 2021 You are now listening to the Patriot Power Hour. This live episode features the situational awareness you need to practice self-reliance and independence. Introducing your hosts, Ben, the Breaker of Banksters, and Future Dan, the editor of FutureDanger.com. We're live, Patriot Power Hour, January 10th, 2024, Ben the Breaker of Banksters, episode 252. Future Dan, got a fair amount of news today We do I got breaking news Go for it

I'm declaring the Patriot Power Hour A systematically Important Liberty institution With all the rights and prerogatives That come with such a status And I feel it's fit to do that Because you know That's what the Federal Reserve does,

just names banks so they can't fail. Well, I'm saying that Patriot Power Hour is therefore in that category. We cannot fail in our mission. Talk about liberty every 7 p.m., 8 p.m., 9 p.m., wherever we feel like, Wednesday nights, these days. We're a little bit late tonight. Slightly, but we've been cranking them out.

I mean, we had our first show of the year last week. We're back here again. A lot of news to get through, and I second that motion. Systemically important to freedom, pitch to Power Hour and PBN as a whole. I second that. We're thus designated. And for that matter, the SEC designated or tried to and then screwed it up on

Twitter and then did grant permission for electronically traded funds. Is that what ETF stands for? Exchange. Did I misunderstand what an ETF is? Exchange traded funds. So basically, derivatives of the price of Bitcoin are in the official system of Wall Street. Am I correct? Absolutely.

Today was the day, so i won't go too deep into it because we got a ton of news and people i know a couple people that listen to the show don't want to hear much about bitcoin but today is a milestone literally january 10th 2024 the sec securities exchange commission i'm not a fan of them but even they can't deny that Bitcoin is a legit commodity. And now billions and billions of dollars is going to be rushing in. It's now been, I guess you could say, proven kosher for pensions and all types of other official insurance companies, let alone the average retail investor and mom and pop who's like, let alone the average retail investor and mom and pop who's like huh well if this is officially on fidelity.com or e-trade as an etf that i'm gonna you know i'm in on bitcoin like my boy johnny said

a few years ago right but you know so those type of folks will come in for people like me i still think if you don't hold it you don't own it whether that's gold or silver in your hands same thing with bitcoin if you don't have the private keys to them you don't own it, whether that's gold or silver in your hands. Same thing with Bitcoin. If you don't have the private keys to them, you don't have that secret private key, that cryptography that allows you to access it, then it doesn't count. So people can get access to it now, essentially, through Wall Street and all the little bets and gimmicks,

which is cool. That is a milestone. But, you know, I'm happy prices going up, et cetera. But also, on the other hand, which is cool. That is a milestone. But, you know, I'm happy prices going up, et cetera. But also, on the other hand, it doesn't change the way I look at Bitcoin as a way to defund the dollar and get away from the fiat dollar yourself as a person if our country won't do it.

Yep, yep. So the systematically important financial institutions have to be concerned about their exposure to Bitcoin from now on. It's so funny that Jamie Dimon, who I've talked about many a time on this and other shows of J.P. Morgan itself, Jamie Dimon said today that Bitcoin has no value, it has no intrinsic value, etc., etc. Meanwhile, JP Morgan's participating in a lot of these different ETFs. There's several of these funds being set up. I think there's at least six.

There's probably more follow-on to come. But the JP Morgans and Jane Street and Fidelity and all the big names you've heard of and a lot you haven't that have offices in downtown New York and other financial centers are all in on this, even out of one side of their mouth, they're saying it's bogus, it has no value, no way it can challenge the system. But on the other hand, they're getting their money while they can.

So it hasn't been so long ago. Tucker Carlson had this sort of way of describing contemporary deep state kind of behavior, which is to say they're acting like the kidnapper takes their mask off because at that point you know they're going to kill you. You know they don't even try to hide it anymore. They're being that bad. So explain to me what happened with that Twitter account last night and the official explanation for it

and what the mainstream media is repeating as the official explanation for it and then what else you should know if you don't just watch CNN? So SEC, again, Securities Exchange Commission, they're supposed to be the watchdogs for the American financial system, stop a Great Depression or some crazy collapse or scam from happening. Of course, they don't do a great job of it, but they do actually persecute and prosecute legitimately and not a lot of people out there and a lot of companies. So regardless, they're the watchdog. They're like the FBI of the financial system, you could say, I suppose. And their Twitter was hacked yesterday, or their ex was hacked or compromised yesterday, allegedly.

Well, what happened was they announced. Alleged by them. Alleged by them, and ex-cooperated that. I believe I said that word correctly. Cooperated that. Oh, I didn't catch that news. That came out today? Yeah, I saw it yesterday. uh it stated that they didn't came out today yeah i saw yesterday they said that confirmed

this was accessed by some kind of outside ip or something and they did not have multi-factor authentication on their sec account so which they should have said that well yeah for sure every person should let alone the SEC. So what happened? Bitcoin went up $2,000 in like a few minutes and then dropped $2,500 or $3,000. Massive market manipulation. Both of those moves. Yes, and both of those moves could have easily made millionaires. For sure, because people can leverage up 5 000 x if they wanted to uh or at least you

know 500 x 50 x whatever even just putting in just money on it itself would be all right if you had enough and uh so anyway the head of the sec gary gensler on his X about 15 minutes later said, oh, it's not true. The Bitcoin has not been approved yet. The SEC account was compromised. And then 24 hours, 25 hours later, it does come out and it is approved. So definitely shenanigans, you know? Mask is off. They did that on purpose.

They don't care anymore. That's my analysis. Yeah. Yeah, they deliberately left their two-factor off and then deliberately set up a situation that would, you know, just a cheap tactic to try to do some kind of pressure and exposure of Musk. And meanwhile, some corrupt parties out there might just become millionaires. There's definitely a fair amount of money made off of it.

As far as I know. Yeah, there was definitely some money made off of it. So anyway, money lost for sure. People would be pissed. I believe they said about $1 billion back and forth. A lot of profit, a lot of loss. Sounds like a lawsuit against the SEC. There's lawsuits that the SEC

brings against companies for manipulation and insider trading for just a couple million dollars, let alone $1 billion. Actually, there was a senator. I don't have this on hand right now, but he was a senator. Maybe he was a congressman. Regardless, there was a senator. I don't have this on hand right now, but he was a senator. Maybe he was a congressman.

Regardless, he said, SEC needs to be looked at for this market manipulation. Then they have sovereign immunity. They can't be sued for this. They're established by Congress. That's going to happen for it.

The bastards get away with doing that and the mask is off it's ugly yeah well whatever i'm gonna keep stacking my bitcoin just like stacking prep stacking gold stacking knowledge like we try to do here on patriot power hour i mean we spread some knowledge but i learned as much or more on this show myself. So just keep on stacking it. Don't look the other way when there's naked tyranny in America. That's what I'm calling out tonight.

I laugh at them, but you're right. It is tyranny. I'm laughing at ever no clothes, but maybe they're just so much hubris that they're doing this on purpose to kind of demoralize us. It's the opposite to me. I think it's, you know, screw them. We don't need them.

We don't even need these ETFs, in my opinion. But it is kind of funny what's going on. But to throw it onto Musk and X and the narrative that it was a flop, you know, X was hacked, not them, that's immediately where it went. It was stunning to see how fast they threw it that direction, too. And CNBC repeated it within minutes. Minutes. They had the line that that was X's fault.

You know, that's Third Reich-ish to me. Yeah, sad. Expected, unfortunately, so I don't want to have a blind eye to it or get tunnel vision because I expect this now that the mask is off. I'm like, oh, yeah, well, I expected this moment to happen, but we've got to hold them accountable anyway, folks. We're going to our first break.

252nd episode of Patriot Power Hour. We're going to go through the news blitz. We've got quite a dashboard here, Future Dan. Episode 252 coming right back. ¶¶ Are you prepared to be the family doctor in a disaster or emergency? This is the Intrepid Commander, and I'm holding The Prepper's Medical Handbook by William W. Forgy, M.D. In this great book, you'll learn how to prepare for medical care off the grid. You'll learn about assessment and stabilization.

for medical care off the grid. You'll learn about assessment and stabilization. You'll even deal with things like bioterrorism response, radiation, and how to build the off-grid medical kit at home. Look, 2020 taught us a lot about the limitations of our medical infrastructure in America. Get the Prepper's Medical Handbook today at Amazon.com. Again, that's the Prepper's Medical Handbook today at Amazon.com. Again, that's the Prepper's Medical Handbook by William W. Ford. A person who advocates and practices preparedness.

One ready for any event that would disrupt their daily routine. That is a Prepper. The pictures tell the story This life had many shades I'd wake up every morning And before I'd start each day I'd take a drag from last night's cigarette that smoldered in its tray Down a little something and then be on my way I'd travel far and wide and lay this head in many ports

I was guided by a compass. I saw beauty to the north. I drew the tales of many lives and wore the faces of my own. I have these memories all around me so I wouldn't be alone. Some may be from showing up. Others are from growing up. Sometimes I was all messed up and didn't have a clue. I ain't winning no one over I wear it just for you

I got your name written here in a rose tattoo In a rose tattoo In a rose tattoo I got your name written here in a rose tattoo Petri Power Hour, we're live and we are back. Time for that news blitz. January 10th, 2024. Florida Surgeon General warns against using mRNA COVID vaccines due to a possible cancer risk. Scientists detect spike protein from COVID vaccine in long COVID patients.

And research shows long COVID a direct consequence of Vax. That's really all in the nature and health besides a little bit of volcanic activity. So COVID Vax news. But that's about it. Let's go to economics. We already covered the Bitcoin ETF. Let's talk some other stuff. 1.5 million crash in full-time jobs.

Meanwhile, multiple job holders soar to a record and native-born employees plunge. We have bankruptcies jumping 18% in 2023. High interest rates are a big cause of that. 28 states didn't have enough money to cover their bills. In fiscal year 2022, so 28 states had a deficit, some larger than others. With regard to geopolitics and national security,

man, we got a lot going on here. Let's get rolling on it. There were major protests in New York City. The NYPD arrested 325 Hamas supporters. Congressman calls January 6th riot a conspiracy at the highest level. Just had the three-year anniversary of that Justice Department sues Texas to prevent states crackdown on illegal immigrants North Korea fires hundreds of artillery rounds towards South's border islands.

South Korea is accusing North of firing artillery shells itself. And it's the third straight day, actually, that North's been firing these artillery shells. South Korea is not firing back at this point. Hezbollah strikes Israeli intel base with 60 or more rockets. Meanwhile, Israel kills a senior Hezbollah commander in Lebanon. And Epstein, we talked about this last week to start the year. We had breaking news literally while Patriot Power Hour was on last week with Epstein lists coming out, etc.

Some of that's been digested. Let's just run through several of these here. U.S. Navy sailor. Oh, excuse me, wrong one. Thursday, Epstein dump goes deeper into the rabbit hole. on Thursday, Epstein dump goes deeper into the rabbit hole. There's a claim that the State Department rented property to Epstein in 1996. U.S. scientists held secret talks with COVID batwoman amid drive to make coronavirus more deadly.

What do these all have in common? We'll maybe get to that later but they're all under the same foreign black ops suspected both epstein as well as other articles a lot going on back to epstein though epstein accuser claims pedophile had sex tape of presidents Of presidents. Apparently or allegedly. FBI lost. Epstein's safe. So a lot of that evidence. Is gone.

And the final under. Foreign black ops suspected. U.S. Navy sailor given 27 months in jail for sharing military data with China. Espionage, sabotage, blackmail going on. British Prince accused of participating in underage orgy on Epstein Island. DNA Genetics Company blames affected users for data breach. Are you in the car market? Well, these digital cars, essentially you are consenting to being recorded and your personal data being stored, shared, and sold. Privacy betrayed.

Pennsylvania state government raids small Amish farmer who refuses to participate in the industrial meat and milk complex. Lawsuit alleges that the CIA obstructed the handover of COVID-19 records. And finally, last but not least, because it is of the highest grade tonight of all the news, the Supreme Court declines X, or Twitter, formerly known as Twitter, X. Well, X, Elon Musk, was challenging the government's surveillance gag order. The Supreme Court has declined X's challenge to the surveillance gag order. Free speech abridged. That was the news blitz for today, Future Dan.

Yeah, what strikes you is a pattern. You see any patterns there? The pattern that I kind of not discovered as I went through, but just seeing the interplay between not just the Epstein rabbit hole, but the COVID bat woman and the U.S. sailor that was given 27 months in jail for sharing military data with China. All this kind of going through us makes me feel like

our government is pretty compromised from top to bottom, left to right. That's a pattern. Do you think we'll ever know who the last person that touched Epstein's safe was before the FBI lost it? I don't think so.

I'm surprised this much has come out, though, so I never would have thought this much would have come out. So they're not able to cover up as much as they would have liked. In decades, you don't think people will talk? They'll brag about it after it's too late to do anything about it. That they were the one who threw the safe into the ocean or something? Somebody will come out and just boast about it in sort of an admission kind of way. You know, after many other people that would go to jail have died,

and just maybe even of old age, it'll come out. The truth will get out. I hope so. Well, there's a lot of false positives, people that would say that too. That is not true. But, I mean, you're right. History, truth usually comes out in history in a long enough time at least. Sometimes it can take a while.

Think about governments that actually have versions of those tapes. Think about the long-term leverage of that coming out. That's valuable for a long time. Oh, pretty much forever. You've got to wonder what the West has on those adversaries to keep them quiet, to keep them in mutually assured destruction, I guess, not just with nukes. Yeah, yeah, it's just blackmail and national disgrace. And that's why I don't think there is a Trump tape.

They'd use it, right? Yeah, they would have had to have used it by now, right? What are they going to wait this long? They would have used it in 2016 if they had it, let alone 2020, let alone 2024, I would expect. Yeah, and I don't think I've seen tricked anybody. I think it was willing participation like just mutually assured destruction at that kind of level

human intelligence level that you know led Clinton to do it in the first place I don't get into conspiracies and stuff like that at all but what I understand of secret societies is you absolutely commit yourself to it, and you have to be willing. You can't be tricked into it, so there's no deception.

That's about as far as I would go. Yeah, well, it's out there now. What a disgrace. And every headline you read, you know, if you you're a patriot you know these things you you're not happy about them you might have expected them but at least when they're happening you know about them that's why it's the patriot power hour and you can watch them evolve and some of them diffuse or fall into the ether unfortunately not as many as we would like a lot of these continue to build on themselves over the months and years.

But we do document them and chronicle them and try to help figure out not only what to prep for, but when to enact your prepper plans when stuff hits the fan. Featured Dan, we got a swath to go through. I do want to state this real quick, though. a swath to go through. I do want to state this real quick, though. Last week we did the 2023 prediction review show,

kind of graded ourselves, right? So today, and we're going to wait until the last 15 minutes or so because I want to talk about this news blitz for another 10 minutes at least with you. But we have the 2024 predictions so today's actually i buried the lead today's the 2024 predictions show so we're going to spend at least 15 minutes at the end of the show going through uh some probabilities and predictions for the upcoming year are you all right i'm ready i'm ready for that what else in the contemporary environment did you want to touch on?

Awesome. I want to get to COVID vax, the good old vax. I wrote this down in the show notes when I was prepping today, looking at some of these articles. COVID vax effects. I believe you can pretty simply categorize these into three time frames, right? You have short term, which is oftentimes within a day or less. But I'm just going to say that's within a month.

Then you have midterm or medium length. And I classify that as actually under five years. So right now we're just in the middle of the mid-length side effects from the COVID vax. But then you have the long term, which is five plus years, which we don't even know what's coming down that pike. I think the data is starting to show that that short term, that month to month, and over the aggregate with all the different people, that year or two when those vaxes were just being pumped into people, there was a massive amount of uptick in not just deaths,

but hospital visits and heart attacks, etc. But now we're starting to see the midterm, and that's what a lot of these articles are showing, and that's that long COVID. And it's also people being really susceptible to other diseases like even just the regular old flu. The point is immune systems are lowering. or excuse me, the Surgeon General of Florida warned about cancer risk. That's a preview of that long-term five-plus-year, three-, five-, ten-year category. So he's kind of getting in front of the news with regard to the cancer.

So I just wanted to kind of put that out there and see what you had to say. Can you run back to me again the splits in time yeah short-term effects from the vaccine which a lot of them i said are within 24 hours but i'm kind of putting in that first month you know first week first month first couple hours but anyway pretty acute pretty immediate and then it's after that it's kind of that less than five years, maybe less than three years, kind of where we are now, but we're not past this yet. And then the long-term, I thought it was more of a five-year. Why did I do this? Well, it's just simple to divide it into three. I'll say that. But I do, just from my other studies of asbestos and all types of other exposure to toxins and chemicals,

it seems like there's very long-term effects, very short-term effects, and then we're kind of that middle ground. I'm seeing a lot of middle ground right now. Yeah, yeah. And perhaps the question is, is it a matter of the actual effects being observable or a matter of consensus gained nationally that the problems are here. Because I think that long-term effects past five years are just going to be confirming what's already being seen now.

It's just a matter of how many people believe it. now. It's just a matter of how many people believe it. I guess one way I'd put it is we're just going to continue to see more stress put on the medical system as more people get sick, more and more cancer comes through.

I'll give you that. It'll become increasingly measurable, but I think it's measurable enough to know what the effects are. It's negative on millions and millions of people's health. Yep, and you'll need some data scientists to truly prove it, and I like that. I don't want just a bunch of what people think is happening. Let's look at the actual data sets, and that will take many years. These are clinical studies.

But these are clinical studies. The correlation is, you know, the evidence is growing to causation, right? Study after study after study done in, you know, in a manner that you'd expect and respect,

it's starting to show that, you know, there's linkages with the vaccine with many, many bad things. Yes, and that's only going to prove out more and more and more as years go on. The actuary tables, yeah. But similar to Epstein, it's like, okay, at the end they'll admit it, and then, well, that's okay. It's old news by then. All the damage has been done.

We've got to try to hold them to account before then and try to learn some lessons from it now, too. Yeah, yeah, and it's one of the most dystopian indicators on future danger, but for lack of a different title, it was given the title of soft kill depopulation. And I think we're seeing it. I think so, too. How about the jobs report last week? 1.5 million crashing full-time jobs.

However, lots of multiple job holders. Allegedly that's good news. I don't know, but there was not a total collapse in the market. It was almost the opposite. Some people thought it was a good jobs report. Did you get a chance to look deep in it? What do you think about these numbers they're putting out here? You know, as a proponent of free enterprise and markets my entire life, you know, there is a case to be made that if people prefer to work multiple jobs, then there should be

no interference. They should be allowed to. And, you know, I would say that culturally, not by regulation, but culturally the lifestyle and career habit of having just one job and sticking to it and one employer, if that's changing, I don't think that's intrinsically bad. What you fear, though, though is that you know haven't you know people go from one good job to crappy jobs right and that and that's and that's bad economic news but on a theoretical level if that's the way free society wants to reform you know labor relations with employers in and of itself i I'm not against it.

Great way to explain it. You know, it's, it's the data is what it is. It's a lot deeper than that. You got to understand the context. And my assumption and intuition is either it's people losing their job and replacing it with being both an Uber driver and maybe a part-time at Subway, right? Or keeping the current job but going for 40 hours a week or 35 hours a week down to 15 or 20 hours a week and having to become an Uber driver or having to do something else. And I'm sure some of them, some people do have side hustles and have a great 40 hour a week job and that's awesome and that would be great

I don't think it's the majority of these multiple job holders some of it is that gig economy and decentralization which I'm all about decentralization but I think it's more of a cope than actual growth here

yeah and time will tell right I think it's more of a cope than actual growth here. Yeah, and time will tell, right? I think it's some of all of it. It goes down as grade one level bad economic news. We keep an eye on the labor markets. There isn't mass unemployment in 2024 yet. There's no real economic crisis in 2024 yet. It's presidential year, and Bitcoin just got green lit to be in derivatives so trump came out and said that he hopes the economy crashes

and that's just speaking out loud about you know saying things out loud that ahead of other people but you know it's sort of you've said it before too you feel like it's a ticking time bomb and who's who's holding the time bomb when it goes off as president is probably a concern for anybody wanting that office yes and i've certainly said they could keep that uh it's almost like they could add fuse to the bomb but they only have so much they can do but they they still have some more fuse that could that could be added and that would be you know emergency bailouts and lowering interest rates to zero again but as i said i think they can only do that once more and i don't think that they're gonna have that won't be without collapse in the next

eight i don't think they'll collapse in the eight months well actually it's almost a good segue to our predictions on that um but i don't expect them before collapse in the eight months. Actually, it's almost a good segue to our predictions on that. But I don't expect them before the election for there to be a great recession or market collapse. Not on a Democrat's watch. No, not at all. If there is, they'll bail it out just like they did last March with Silicon Valley Bank. Just throw a couple trillion at it. Hopefully, it stems the tide a few more months so they can get through.

That's my intuition. I've been right and I've been wrong in the past. Yeah, Rahm and Emanuel's never let a good crisis go to waste type behavior is definitely in play. And looking at the cowardly, idiotic, craven SEC social media activity is just heads up. This isn't going to be done. You're going to have less trust in how the next financial crisis goes down than the last election. That's for sure.

For sure. For sure. Well, let's use that as our first category for 2024, if you're ready, unless there's any other articles you really wanted to hit on. Yeah, well, just a little follow-up. 20-something states are running massive deficits, you read to us. Yep, 28, more than half. 28, more than half. The state-level safety nets out there for people who win the gig economy meets financial crisis to end all financial crisis, there'll be pain.

The Fed can't prevent pain the next time it all crashes. There will be massive layoffs. And the states don't have the cash to afford it, and the federal financial, you know, it'll all end up in federal debt. That'll be, you know, make $32 trillion tonight. Pale in comparison. Definitely make it pale in comparison. I suggest, here's some homework for listeners.

Go look at what your state's fiscal year 2022 deficit was. Or did they have a surplus? There were, what, 22 states that had a surplus. I know Texas had quite a large surplus, which is nice. Maybe the lower taxes are refunded. I know some states actually send checks out when they have a surplus. Not that many, but I've heard that. Predictions. 2024. Predictions.

2024. Let's quantify it. How would you quantify an economic collapse, or should we just leave it ambiguous? What's the percentage chance there will be an economic collapse by December 31st, 2024? I think the methodology is you make a statement of potential fact, right? A future prediction of fact. And then we apply our confidence rating to like what percent confident we are that that fact is going to materialize.

All right. Well, do you want to use Dow Jones as a marker for that, or what marker do you want to use for economic collapse? That's the hard question. So a prediction for 2024 would be that the stock market crashes by top five one-day drops in percentage. I believe that was in the 20-plus percent, right? top five one-day drops in percentage. We're talking it being the same. I think it would share the same kind of situation as three or four of the days of March of 2020,

and certainly the Black Friday of October 29th, 1929. Friday of October 29th, 1929, I think it was 29th, but the last Friday of October of 29 was one of the all-time greatest drops. Until March of 2020, it was the single day worst crash one day. Yep, and 1987, that was a bad one, but you're right. COVID actually had like two or three of the worst 10 days that March time. So if the year ended on election day, my prediction would be the confidence rating of like 10% or less. Because you always got to factor in whether it happens

and nobody could have controlled it. But I think this is a highly manipulated market, and it's controlled by elite Democrats in the main. and nobody could have controlled it. But I think this is a highly manipulated market, and it's controlled, and it's controlled by elite Democrats in the main, if not rhinos that are cooperating in the system to bring about somebody besides Trump. So if the election ended the year, it's a 10%. But because Trump might win in late November or December of next year, there's a chance that someone uses it as an excuse to just blow the system up

and leave him with an absolute crisis. So higher than 10% because the year continues under a period of time, which would be an election, you know, recount nightmare 2020 repeat, right? Cheating going on or suspected cheating going on, widespread, all easily, you know, I'm putting that at 90% confidence that we're going to have massive allegations of fraud with voter mail-in votes and aliens voting. So I'm making that call 90% next November.

That's with us. With a top five stock market crash in that same period, I'll go out and say I'm 30% confident that that's a possibility. I'm 30% confident that that's a possibility. So from January through early November, only a 10%, but just that two-month period thereafter, it goes from 10% to 30%. That just means huge risk after the election. I like that logic. Makes sense to me.

I'll stick with those numbers. How about that? That would give Biden the freedom with a lame duck Congress to do anything. And they would probably take that. If the system has to collapse, they'd probably take that because Biden will have lost

his re-election and they'd have written him off and his administration off. Pull the ripcord. Historically. And the massive claim of election fraud, do you want to say that's equal or greater than 2020? I know it's hard to pin that down, but would that be fair?

Equivalent to 2020. On that basis, I'm 90% confident that that's true. It's going to be a bet. We're going to review this in a year's time, so I've got to make sure I've got some notes. Equal or greater. I'm actually only leaving the 10% there

because I have observed in some states, you know, red states, have dramatically cracked down on their voter rolls. They purge their rolls. There's lots of states that, you know, it might not be as bad of a problem as it was in 2020. But there's so many states, and we can name them, where they're going to try as hard as they can to do it again. Might even, yeah, pull out the stops even more in certain states, even though other states might have put the kibosh on it. Okay.

Not even to talk about the voting machines and the tabulations that are electronic. And those accusations are going to be there no matter what. Argentina is allegedly moving to paper ballots. Maybe we should look that way. I don't know. Well, your birth certificate is only in its legal valid form when it's sealed and printed from your state, right?

I mean, something has to be in paper to count. The DMV tells me. All right. We've got about ten minutes to go, so we might have to run through these relatively quick but the good news is most of the rest that i have here are repeats of what we had last year but that's only because they're very relevant topics well let's start with well this one isn't from last year what's the percent chance that trump wins the presidential election and is president-elect by the end of december 2024 well what's your estimate partner what's your prediction i'm

gonna put 40 because i think there's a great percentage chance that something will occur where he wasn't either allowed or he's assassinated or other causes cause him to not even be around. I think if he actually makes it to election day, he's got better than 50% chance to win. But to actually get all the way there and stand there and win and make it all the way through end of December, I'm only putting that at 40%. Yeah, I concur. If you want to have a different question of what's the chances he'll actually stand for election as the Republican nominee on the federal ballot, that I'd say right now looks like a 75% chance. Yep. I was pretty much going to say 70% to 80%. So that's right in the middle, 75%.

I pretty much baked that in with if he actually makes it to the election, I think he's got like a two-third chance to win. Because, I mean, Democrats just got no momentum. I don't think they can steal it that big. But we'll see. I mean, that's why we don't guarantee anything. So 40% that he wins the election. And we think 75% that he actually is on the final ballot on Election Day.

I'll go out and give you a certain prediction. All right. If you stand for election and within 48 hours of the polls closing, he has states that have preliminary results that say he wins, 100% chance of street violence. Okay. Is there a way we can quantify that or are we just looking for any street violence? Like a couple broken windows won't count, but maybe like BLM level or higher?

Dozens of arrests in multiple cities. Dozens of arrests in two or more cities. 24 or more arrests in two or more cities. 24 or more arrests in two or more cities. How's that for quantification? Pretty specific. I think that's an easy bar to hit too, unfortunately, so that's pretty high.

In terms of like thousands of people in the street destroying stuff, I think that is much higher than 0%. Yeah, there's upside on that prediction in a negative way. Right, for sure. All right, a few minutes left here. What do you...

All right, so I was not a voting age in the year 2000, but that was kind of one of the first elections I really paid attention to with the hanging chads and the Supreme Court and Florida and all that. When did that resolve? That resolved like December, right? It took 40 days or something? Early December of that year. So technically that would count as successful in this,

what I'm trying to say here. If that extends, something like that extends, where there's not a declared winner or not an agreed upon winner, there continues to be those appeals through 1231 24 and there's no presidential elect or at least there's serious controversy uh that there who is president what is what are the odds of that um well i think an easier way to look it is what are the odds of massive crowds around the Capitol the next time Congress convenes? Because in what you just said, you know, it's not decided. Well, constitutionally, that's the body who decides it.

It's always been, you know, just a pro forma, you know, in our democracy. democracy well not always like in the in the 1900s or in the no not 19 1800s there was uh definitely you know it came down to congress to decide right so what's the chances that you know there's going to be you know massive crowds and it'll be undecided on that day you want to go with that kind of scenario to potential future fact to weigh in on and would that day take place in january of 25 always yeah it's in the constitution right first tuesday in january or something something like that january 6th obviously that's why that was that yeah um but so not even to get to that yeah not even to get to that or i guess it's pretty much if we get to that day and it's still like very controversial um i mean i guess first would you have considered january 6

2021 to have been no you know no president-elect at that time yet would that have qualified that itself let alone let's predict next year congress Congress has to produce the president-elect. Congress has to count the ballots that come from the states, right, in the official state-transmitted delegates, right? And what didn't happen last time that should have happened is that certain state plates of ballots should have been voted out. Congress shouldn't have accepted them. Right? But all that got canceled, and Ted Cruz and others were getting ready to do that sort of thing.

Then it all got canceled when the riot erupted. Right? So letting the riot happen on purpose really circumvented that process. But I think there's a greater than 50% chance that they're going to secure the grounds of the Capitol and then different different, you know, legislative legislative initiatives like that. You know, they got to vote in Congress if they can't agree that certain state results are legitimate, right? So I think there's a greater 50% chance that we could see that mechanic in Congress, in the Constitution, happen next January. Perfect. I like the way you totally transformed and improved upon that. So greater than 50% chance that Congress' vote on the legitimacy of this

is going to take place with massive controversy going on you know no in the congressional process they they end up deciding the president of the life they do votes right and state state delegations vote with one vote that's how that works so all the senators and all the house members of the state vote in that process it could come down to that but it would take something like the Supreme Court to rule an absolutely illegitimate voting process in a state renders the entire state's electoral votes null and void. And then neither Biden nor Trump get the required number.

Then it throws it to Congress. We only got about 30 seconds left. I'm going to launch this one. Bitcoin, right now it is $46,700. What's the odds it's greater than $70,000 by the end of the year next year? I think that's going to be a solid 45%. Pretty good. Double your money in one year, 45% chance.

What's the chance it crashes below 30K, which is very easy. That's only a couple months ago when it was 30K. I'm going to put that at a nice 25%. All right, let's bound that in in our time left give me the 100 percent numbers 100 chance high 100 chance low commit commit oh well the breaker everything else in between that is that's going to be between 30 to 70k so i think there's a 30 chance it'll just be kind of bouncing between 30 to 70k like it has been the last couple years i think there's a 45 chance it'll just be kind of bouncing between $30K to $70K like it has been the last couple years. I think there's a 45% chance it's going to break out to all-time highs, and I think there's

a 25% chance it'll crash big time, more than a third from here. But trust me, I'm all in on that as well as gold. I think gold has a good chance to have a positive year i think it has greater than 50 chance to have a positive year and same with silver but uh i don't know we might have to fit it we had to go right now because intrepid commander is coming on but we might have finished those predictions to end the next show if that's all right i'll write them down now though for proof 57k bitcoin high and year. I'm making the call. 57K. 100%. Holy cow. Alright, buddy.

With that said, everybody, we're going to get out of here. Patriot Power Hour 252 has been quite a success. We'll be back next week. What do you say? I say I'll be there. 253 with you, Ben. Great show. Systemically important to freedom. Patriot Power Hour. We'll be there, 253 with you, Ben. Great show. Systemically important to freedom.

Patriot Power Hour. We'll be right back next week. See you.