The Prepper Broadcasting Network - Patriot Power Hour #259

Episode Date: April 24, 2024

Each week on Patriot Power Hour, Ben ‘The Breaker of Banksters’ and Future Dan explore the latest Liberty, Security, Economic & Natural news, providing the situational awareness needed to execute your preparedness plans. Questions, Feedback, News Tips, or want to be a Guest? Reach out!Ben “The Breaker of Banksters” @BanksterBreaker on Twitter; [e-mail] Future Dan@FutureDanger6 on Twitter

The American Pronunciation Guide Presents ''How to Pronounce Cuban Refugee'' Not too long ago, two friends of mine were talking to a Cuban refugee, a businessman who had escaped from Castro. And in the midst of his story, one of my friends turned to the other and said, we don't know how lucky we are. And the Cuban stopped and said, how lucky you are. I had some place to escape to. And in that sentence, he told us the entire story. If we lose freedom here, there's no place to escape to. And in that sentence, he told us the entire story.

If we lose freedom here, there's no place to escape to. This is the last stand on Earth. This is the last stand on Earth. The last stand on earth. SILENT PRAGUE ¶¶ You are now listening to the Patriot Power Hour. This live episode features the situational awareness you need to practice self-reliance and independence. Introducing your hosts, Ben, the Breaker of Banksters, and Future Dan, the editor of FutureDanger.com. Patriot Power Hour.

We are live April 24th, 2024. Ben, the Breaker of Banksters here with Future Dan, episode 259. We are, and we lost 258. 258 is just gone. I did not record an offline version of it, and even though I got to the end screen of Spreaker, and it said, congratulations on your 56-plus minute show. I knew it was 56 because that's my favorite number.

I was like, oh, great. 56 minutes, yeah, cool. But it, long story short, it never worked. So we just did a test and it was working. We better go look right now and make sure we're live. But I'll do that on the side. Long story short, it was a good show last week, but it's gone and we're going to leave the number in the timeline.

If we do say so ourselves, because only we heard it. Good conversation. We talked all about the strikes by Iran on Israel, and then after we had that talk, Israel struck Iran, and they're beating up on hezbollah tonight so mostly focused on that and i uh would be happy to recap some of that conversation but uh yeah it's a lost episode it's okay it's all right after uh well we're on episode 259 now and we've only had i we've definitely had two lost episodes, this being the second.

I don't think we had three, so less than 1% lost. We've had a lot of.5s where the system quit and we had to pick up with a new broadcast right afterwards. Yes, and there's been times where for example i had us muted the whole time so it was like an hour of dead air that didn't even happen last time it just didn't even show up which whatever i'm seeing right now that patriot power hour is live it's been broadcasting four minutes ago so we are live on this april 24th episode 259 we'll get into the dashboard we'll get into that heat map in the second segment. But before we do that, do you want to recap at least just a little bit about what we talked about last week

and maybe talk about some of those developments? Sure. Well, the big point I was trying to make was nuclear-armed belligerents haven't fought yet. It doesn't mean they can't, but it's never happened. For good reason. There's no way to really contain it once you start using nukes. Both sides are at threat of losing their potential to continue to use them. So to de-escalate after exchanging nukes is no one knows how to do it.

That also has never been done, right? So the point I was trying to make last week is that if Iran has achieved a nuclear arsenal, any systems that Israel is confident could strike Israel, then what you're going to see is something hotter than anything we saw in the Cold War between the United States and the Soviet Union, right? They are bombing and using drones on each other. At least, you know, we had that instance of Iran, you know, striking Israeli territory directly for the first time, and Israel doing the same to Iran since we last talked. But it doesn't seem to escalate further, and it could be because

we're looking at a nuclear standoff. And the term I was using last week is, this is resembling at times ritualistic push-button warfare where neither side can lose faith or face, or face for that matter. And so they're bound to respond, but they're doing it in a way that's exceedingly Middle Eastern, right? You know, yeah. So another point I made was, you know gotta look at from the you know a middle eastern perspective if you try to start with where did this all begin you know what my question to you

is like all right what what century do you want to start in which millennia practically but definitely the century is the place to start uh One thing I remember you saying that I was like, oh, well, great point. I guess it's right in front of our noses. Islam and Iran doesn't want a parking lot, glass. Israel, it's their holy land too. So that might be into the calculus. It's their holy land too. So that might be into the calculus.

One question I have is how much leeway is there between, you know, full-out nuclear Armageddon and just the use of only an E-bomb, you know, essentially only used for EMP effect, or even Bunker Buster where that nuke only destroys a mountainside that only has a bunker in there. No civilian casualties. It's not like they're laying a 10 megaton in the middle of Tehran. Is that, you know,

if either of those scenarios happened, that would be unprecedented. Do you think at that point you would enact your bug-out plans or your next echelon of preparedness in enacting that? If you saw an EMP-type of bomb or a nuclear bunker buster there in Iran? About my prepping response, let me get to that in a minute I can answer that but what I'd like to say is you know a nuclear-armed country has a deep state you know you can't like democratically and in the open manage a nuclear arsenal you got you

got to keep secrets about it right I mean but mean, by its very nature, right? So when we split the atom in the weapon in 1945, that changed. There was National Security Act of 47 came shortly afterwards. The deep state got established, and it's true of every country that has a nuclear arsenal, including Israel, and probably including Iran. And, you know, within the deep state, there's planners, strategic planners, usually in the militaries, who have to consider what their opponent military leadership might do with their nuclear weapons relative to ours, right? And then there's other parts of the deep state and the elected representatives who know that, you know, just can't really trust that if you start walking down that road

with a nuclear bunker buster or an EMP or thermal barrack weapons that, you know, have nuclear, you have nuclear in conjunction, like very devastating weapons. How do you know one of them doesn't, in fact, result in mass casualties that make the other side think, all right, now they're really attacking us full out and we've got to use them or lose them. So this nuclear kind of strategic problem solving, we went through it. The Soviets went through it first.

Britain and France got nukes shortly afterwards and were under our umbrella and part of our planning, although the French did withdraw their nuclear arsenal from NATO's control in the 50s. But, you know, in every other country that's come along, India and Pakistan, North Korea, you know, how do you start a nuclear war without it finishing itself, right? So we talked about that last week, and now we've kind of recapped it this week. My prepping response, what would escalate it? What would I have to see in the Middle East to say, all right, now's not normal. I'm going into hyperdrive. not normal i'm going into hyperdrive um something where it's pretty obvious on all sources of media that nobody knows what has happened and strikes have happened like like if if there's because

what we saw a couple saturday nights ago and what we saw Israel do again, very much a PR campaign with drone strikes that hit infrastructure, or in the Iranians' case, they didn't succeed in hitting anything because the missile defense, by all visible evidence, was superior, right? And they had, as you said, kind of of a couple hour window where everyone knew it was going to happen and exactly great point where it's like oh the media doesn't have a tailor-made ready to go off the shelf story because they don't even know what the hell happened or is happening that's definitely a warning sign i can see see that. Things are getting out of control. Yeah, when things start slipping out of control,

then you know. There's no message behind it. Israel's gone radio silent. The government is not telling the world what it's doing. Not anybody is getting an idea. In fact, there is a very rare and never used before future danger indicator in column two, and it's called Israel Goes Radio Silent. And it's this idea that if they were ever

thought to be pushed into a corner before they do whatever they do next, nobody's going to know. Nobody's going to know. And it was like that in 67 when they went to war and took over the West Bank. That's what happened then. When they're about to act in a way that shows us that the real fear is there. They're all thinking in that deep state of survival. That starts to get pretty dangerous and would escalate what I'm doing. Perfect segue.

We're about ready to go to break. And then we're going to hit the news blitz. Israel radio silent is not an active indicator, but we got more than a dozen, including a couple really high levels. So we'll get to those in just a couple minutes here on the Patriot Power Hour. Stick with us. Patriot Power Hour Interception January 28th, 2020, episode 81. This coronavirus outbreak, last week we were barely talking about it. Probably two pieces of news.

It has exploded in importance. The type of genetic makeup of this thing does not resemble a bird or pig flu. A few days ago, a Wuhan hospital doctor died from the virus. China has locked down millions. 14 cities in central China quarantined. 4,500 cases as of this afternoon. Contagious without symptoms.

Up to eight days you could pass this along. Everyone should be aware that central china city of wuhan has a sars and ebola lab and it has been suspected of leaking this virus remember previous discussions on paper tree power hour about crisper and genetic editing what can be done digitally to any form of life these days at the genetic level? Well, that's happening in the city where this outbreak started. We are the Prepper Broading Network. And once you go down, I got mine too. So welcome to my house.

Cause these are my people. And this is my life. This is what we pray for. And this is God's plan. This is God's plan If you ain't from here Then you won't understand This is my country This is who I am So welcome to my house. Time for the news blitz. Let's do it. April 24th, 2024, episode 259.

Let's start with the fourth column, the rightmost column on future danger, health and natural news. IQs begin to fall for first time ever recorded history. First time ever recorded history. Shallow 6.1 and 6.0 magnitude earthquakes hit Taiwan within six minutes of each other. North Carolina court rules federal prep act protects, protects forced vaccination. Again, a North Carolina court rules that the Federal Prep Act protects forced vax. We'll review more details soon. How about this one?

Multiple COVID shots linked to higher mortality rates in 18 to 39-year-olds. New study. We'll come back to some of that, but let's hit some economic news for now. In fact, it's pretty quiet out there, relatively speaking, but let's run through some of the latest uh stats and numbers oil 82.78 relatively high especially the fact we're not even into summer Silver, $27. Gold, $2,300. Up 20 plus percent year to date.

Bitcoin has gone through the halving. Sits at $64,000. How about the debt? Let's take a real quick snapshot. $34.68 trillion with a T. $34.68 trillion. That comes out to $103,000 per citizen. U.S. federal tax revenue. This is the revenue.

This is about $14,000 per citizen. So $14,000 in revenue, we got about $103,000 in debt. And of course we got the current bills. It's all adding up, it's adding up quick, and interest rates are not going any lower anytime soon. At least that's what the Federal Reserve is saying. We'll be watching that all summer, spring into the summer. I expect something to take place more in June, July. On the rate side of things, we'll see, though.

As I've always said, they may lower in case of emergency. For now, that's where we stand economically, geopolitically. A lot of activity. Nothing SHTF level at this point, but really all over the place. Let's just start with U.S. considering sending military advisors to Ukraine. Russia vows to ramp up attacks on Western weapons in Ukraine. Hezbollah deepens rocket and drone attacks on northern Israeli border after commander eliminated by the IDF.

North Korea conducts first nuclear trigger simulation drills that's what their state media is saying US commander says that China is fast becoming more and more aggressive Chinese military work on marine toxins

raising new fears of bio-warfare weapons. And we have a little bit of rioting going on. Yale, Columbia, other left-leaning universities having all types of riots and protests. Mostly peaceful protests. Anti-Israel protests going on. Police yale campus with riot gear and arrest students 100 plus were arrested yesterday in columbia and let's go to the first column and the last for tonight liberty

congressional candidate wishes death on political opponent First column and the last for tonight, liberty. Congressional candidate wishes death on political opponent. I guess opponent's plural. Any political opponent. That's some angry words. Former Obama and Clinton senior policy advisor charged with child sex offenses. Federal judge appears ready to reimpose January 6th disinformation monitoring. I didn't even really plan it this way, but the highest rated article, most dangerous and actualized happening right now, SHTF level.

President signs two-year extension of FISA warrantless surveillance program. Imminent and actual threat going on right now to your rights in America. Future Dan, that's the News Blitz for today. Yeah, it sure is. I like to pop every one of those open and just pick on them a little bit.

There are a lot. Let's just start with the FISA court. We kind of ended the News Blitz with it, but let's start our analysis. What was the highest? What do you say we go right on back in reverse order and finish off the show? Let's do every one of them. Deal.

Let's make it happen. President Joe Biden on Saturday signed the Reforming Intelligence and Securing America Act hours after its passage in the Senate, renewing a controversial but reformed warrantless surveillance law. What can you tell us about this, Future Dan, both kind of the history of this and what has been revised about or reformed about this and how this is a threat right now?

You know, I've lost track of the details since the Russian dossier uh the russian dossier but the crimes that were committed the lies that were um and false oaths made to that court um just a matter of history of just the destruction of the fourth amendment and you know i don't know do you think there's a uniparty in Washington, D.C. that for some reason, you know, wants it? Or is it really that there's a deep state and the Democrats control it and they're not going to change it?

I've been hearing a lot of people say uniparty these days, and that definitely describes some of it. You do have bipartisan support with senate majority leader chuck schumer and minority leader mitch mcconnell both urging support for its passage to protect national security so that's pretty rare that's kind of interesting yeah i i'd have to guess at the at the stories that are told in the secure information rooms, the skiffs at Capitol Hill, that caused those votes to result in that way. And obviously there's a ton of speculation that members of Congress are straight up blackmailed by the intelligence community. So, not good.

The chamber, the Senate, voted 60 to 34 to approve it, so it actually did not get unanimous support per se. A way I have always looked at the surveillance state, security state, even the military industrial complex for some reason is there are legitimate threats out there, and we do need a way to prevent and fight back in this nasty world of ours. Not everything is roses. So, yes, there are very dangerous, scary things that maybe this warrantless surveillance law will

or could potentially prevent, but the mission creep, the scope of it at a minimum, expands way too quickly. That's putting it nicely. But we also have many examples of it being weaponized, whether it's politically or even just people spying on their ex-girlfriend or something weird. So, yeah, it's a slippery slope, and a lot of it's done in darkness, and something I certainly am not trusting here uh so this is uh continuing on a couple more years of it yeah and so yep two

more years how about this for a prognostication in two years what what has a higher probability of happening? That there's a tipping point on this and the next Congress does not reauthorize it? And that would blow the system apart and expose a lot of what has happened. Or bring about, you just let it happen on purpose, terror attacks. So it wouldn't probably end nicely. Higher probability of that or the debt Ponzi scheme just has absolutely blown up the economy. Oh, man. Either or would probably bring about the other in a way.

It's just like all hell breaks loose. Which one's more likely in two years? More likely that this gets re-signed and they're able to keep the debt Ponzi going. I still think both the surveillance Ponzi, the medical Ponzi, and the financial Ponzi will go another couple years at least. Yeah, I think they're not. If one happens before the other, and versa is not equal if there's a economic blowout this entire surveillance state problem with visor will get completely overlooked for a generation but if it comes apart because it's unsustainable level of just tyranny, then

I think that sort of doesn't necessarily lead to an economic collapse. I think the economics is independent in that sense. Yeah, good. I probably lumped them together too much. I just see the economic as just inevitable for sure, and this is not as inevitable

that we overthrow it, especially in the next couple of years, I guess. Or let me change it to rebel against it. At a certain point, a vicious enough surveillance state that blackmailed politicians of certain states

to keep them in minority power, eventually there'd be a revolt to that. That's our only hope, I suppose, because they're building the robot armies already. Anything else on that topic? Get your flamethrower robot dog. Did you see that? I sent that over the signal.

I forgot. I glanced at it. I wasn't able to look at it that second, and I forgot about it. But explain that again. Yeah, Dave gave the thumbs up. Well, it's the Boston Dynamics-style robotic four-walking dog, which is pretty protected right now, or perfected. In the ability to walk around and carry things and shoot.

Well, somebody put a flamethrower on there. It's like $10,000. Apparently, you can buy it. I'm wondering for how long. That's super cheap. The Apocalypse Boston Dynamic Zombie Dog, you can get that and a flamethrower for $10,000. Holy cow, I expected another zero on the end of that number. I might have to buy one.

I'm sure it's pretty much a remotely piloted vehicle. I mean, it's not just like turn it on, leave it in your yard, and let it stalk around at night and torch anybody that comes nearby. You'd probably have to drive it. But for $10,000, you can get one. Drive it. But for $10,000, you can get one. The ultimate toy.

And maybe even useful in the apocalypse. I don't know. Probably a little too fancy. Got a lot of other things to invest in before that, but sounds fun. I'm going to have to go back and look at that article that you sent around. You want to move on? Yeah, let's go back through time to the beginning of the blitzkrieg what else are we talking about this one's pretty lame uh a democrat running for congressional office has received fierce backlash for wishing death on supporters of Donald Trump. I mean, certainly a bad look,

and probably means it, to be honest. But, you know, to be expected these days, this type of craziness, even from people running for office. Yeah, I mean, people are crossing lines, though, right? Like, those are historical comments. It's only if thing to say, but someone running for

one of the major parties in the country saying that now. Not safe. No, not a sign of safety. Certainly not. How about this? IQs dropping. IQs dropping.

IQs begin to fall first time ever. Teachers warn. That's not world history. Okay. Yes, you're right. It says Americans. See, I'm getting stupider too.

Funny enough, this is Daily Mail, so they're making fun of us. Jerks. Several, well, they tie this to handwriting. That's not as important, but it is what it is. Several U.S. states are trying to prevent handwriting from going extinct as classrooms

increasingly swap pen and paper. Well, I agree. People need to be able to write by hand, but let's fast forward a little bit to the article where we're talking about IQs dropping for the first time in a century, essentially since they've been recorded in America. Those IQ points, that drop started in about 2006 and really manifested through 2018. And the biggest drop was in the younger cohort, makes sense, and those who are less well-educated.

So pretty much the haves and have-nots of intelligence and education is splitting further looking at this data. Yep. And after many decades in the middle of the last century where really the best and the brightest from abroad emigrated to the United States, it is absolute Fidel Castro emptied the jails and just let them go to america time right you know the millions and millions of immigrants that came under obama and now biden are not sent here for the accolades they've achieved in life and in education, right? So, you know, that's what the Daily Mail is pointing out, really.

They don't say it, but that's how that's happening. Federal judge appears ready to reimpose January 6th disinformation monitoring, January 6th disinformation monitoring despite being slapped down by the US Court of Appeals for ordering a January 6th probationer's computer be used

for monitoring of so-called disinformation a senior federal judge in DC is going to try to essentially reimpose that restriction on Daniel Goodwin of Texas. So you're not allowed to say what you think happened at that time, and you're going to be, I guess, I know gag order is not a gag order per se.

That's a different thing, but you're being gagged. You're not allowed to say because the Minister of Disinformation said so. Yeah, the absurdity of this in the face of the First Amendment means that it very well is being propelled to be a test case to get this sort of thing ripped apart at the seams. But the fact that our country has judges that can't just uphold the First Amendment at lower courts and will just ignore it to persecute political enemies, dangerous. To persecute political enemies? Dangerous. So Mr. Goodwin went to January 6th events as a citizen journalist for his website StopHate.com.

He pleaded guilty to one count of entering and remaining in a restricted building or grounds January 6th, which is pretty dumb, of course. And, you know, you've got to deal with that. Going into the Senate building for 36 seconds, according to security video. Didn't destroy anything, but yeah, that is against the law. But a 60-day prison sentence and pretty much, I'm trying to see if this is a lifetime, disinformation monitoring. Really, they're saying that we can go into your computer at any time and we find any evidence that

you are spreading disinformation about January 6th or presumably anything anti-establishment then you could I guess violate the terms and go back to jail yeah I don't think the framers

considered political speech to be bannable as a form of your punishment. You can't be punished by the withdrawal of your First Amendment. That's absurd. It just doesn't make sense.

I really want to say as a D.C. judge, those don't even really count as judges in my mind. I know that's just not how things work, but D.C.'s not even a state, so what the hell. Yeah. Yep. A little fiefdom. Resemble the magistrates and appointed officials

from the British crown and the colonies. Yeah, that's kind of what I was thinking. Right. Yeah. resemble the magistrates and appointed officials from the British crown in the colonies. Like that. That's kind of what I was here. Right. Yeah. I've seen that out of DC and really the Southern district of New York too, but DC takes a cake in that regard,

I think. Yeah. Just suppressing people for their political, uh, differences is that's, that's not America. That's how those people behaved and were ridden of by the revolution. Yeah, there you go. I like how you say that.

Former Obama and Clinton senior policy advisor charged with child sex offenses. So this wasn't just some random aide or intern or friend of a friend. He's a senior policy advisor who coordinated the strategy to combat Al-Qaeda and the Taliban under Obama. And then Secretary of State Hillary Clinton is accused of arranging the commission of a child, the sex offense, and possession of indecent images of children and other nasty stuff. So, yeah, senior policy advisor, Obama White House, worked with Hillary and Obama. Nasty, man.

Yeah, and it's widely speculated that the reason that FISA Act passes Congress like that is, you know, deep state could just put those images on devices and tag it to you and bring it down. That's true. So even though I kind of even have my own bias and just presume this guy is guilty, he could totally be getting framed up because for whatever reason. According to LinkedIn, he's a graduate of Columbia University and now works for Citi. Oh, one of the top banks or groups right out of New York, New York.

Executive Financial Services, Global Strategist, and Thought Leader. I love thought leaders. And to you, it's all just one uniparty, but to me, that's a Democrat. I mean, you can just call the uniparty Democrats that I can understand. That's how you kind of see it, and it makes sense to me, too.

I'm almost more pissed. I don't want to go down a diatribe, but I'm more pissed at the quote-unquote Republicans who fold like this Mike Johnson fool, or really almost any Republican. I get almost pissed at Rand Paul for not being hardcore enough, but at least he's kind of up there swinging the bat. But yeah, yeah, yeah.

Republican, quote-unquote Republicans are weak. It's pretty sad. They're like Democrats. How many of them have already have a dossier that they're handed that just shows here's all the ways that you're going to be exposed if you defy certain things, right? It has to be. I mean, we already got devices that your family members and friends and you have had that are loaded with kiddie porn.

So here's how it works, buddy. I mean, it's true. But it's not Republicans that control the people that are doing that. That's my point. It's just needing one or two whistleblowers that's willing to get probably killed for it, but gets all the information out about some of this stuff. But clearly, it's clear that one party is being subjugated by another by these means. I can give you that. Or it's just all one party that's doing it together.

That doesn't look that way anymore to me. That made sense for a little while last decade. That doesn't make sense now. That guy worked for the Obamas and the Clintons. It's pretty clear to me that, you know, a coup d'etat took place at the end of the Clinton term. What was left inside of all the intelligence agencies has metastasized under Obama and is coming full force against its political enemies

under Biden. And it's controlled by only one of these parties. Trump's going to trial every day. I mean, it's pretty obvious. Well, what came to my mind was, I don't know the name of the fish, but you get that real big fish, then you get the little parasite one

that relies on the big one to live, and they kind of live in some symbiotic relationship and the big dog is definitely a Democrat and half the Republican leadership like the Lindsey Grahams of the world I wouldn't be surprised if their aides are doing the same stuff

so yeah but to me they're just Democrats I wouldn't be surprised if their aides are doing the same stuff. Yeah, but to me, they're just Democrats. They may be hiding as Republicans, but they're part of that. And it's controlled by who? Yes. Not the Republicans. I think Marjorie Taylor Greene was saying they might need to just abolish the Republican Party, come up with the American Party or some other name.

I'm like, maybe a full rebranding is necessary. Because there's got to be something after Trump. Even if Trump wins and fights the good fight and get some shit overturned and we do reverse some things and keep fighting well four years isn't it's gonna take a lot longer than four years so better build something up so besides just trump i guess so have you heard of these uh solar systems they've found to have a twin star rotating? Definitely, yeah. They've got binary and even trinary stars. So the twin stars that rotate, those things are sometimes unstable. We've understood they fracture and come apart.

But the gravitational forces, it just usually brings it back into two objects, right? Or one. But, you know, our political system has always got a result, just like France and then in Britain, the left and the right, you know, just two sides. Tends to work that way. Not everywhere. Israel's different. Some continental Europeans, you know, parliaments are multi-party, for sure, Germany, much as Scandinavia. But our system, British system, I think it always goes back to two. One of them might rename itself, but just the pull to keep it at two, really hard.

And I met a lot of people that, that you know just maybe not to be fair but in my experience probably don't spend as much time thinking about politics politics as other people who think that that could be a third party and that maybe there could be for decades and maybe it could be for for for the best of the country I think it always kind of just pulls back to being one side against the other. It's just part of the way it just works, I think. I can see a lot of arguments and a lot of reason why it would always come down to two major parties in the long run. in the long run. I think the goal of a third party would be to destroy

one of the other parties in all effect, which has not been successful for quite a while in America. And you can go back between the establishment in the United States and the Civil War and the Whigs, and there was other parties and factions that sometimes flipped,

and it kind of looked like a multi-party system in the legislatures you know it could happen but i think it doesn't last it doesn't last a lifetime but it might very much be in effect during essentially a slow motion collapse of poly crisis we can talk about this all day but we only got about 10 minutes left we got a lot of articles to keep grinding through how about we do that which geopolitical hot spot

or potential hot spot would you prefer to talk about we can talk about any or all of them we got Russia Iran and Israel which we already did discuss but we can talk a little more if you want korea or china good chinese bioweapon article let's let's open that up and and talk about the source talk about the author that that's some legit reporting right there and that's not really something I've not seen very often or at all. The other articles for other countries

kind of updates on what's going on. Oh, I'm getting the Washington Times subscriber page. So, unable to access right now. I might have to summarize what i read then although i think if you uh do what almost everybody does and go incognito and search on chinese bioweapons washington times a pretty recent article in view for you anyhow um the chinese are looking at algaes because it's known some of these algaes are the absolute most lethal substances. And it's been long understood that our intelligence

agencies know that they're researching it, but it's one of those kind of public displays that right now we're making it known in official documentation that we know that they've been looking at these neurotoxins that they can generate from various seed production of algae, really. I want to say that when I first saw the headline, I had a much worse idea go through my head, which is not really what the article is talking about. The article is talking about how they can make just general bioweapons that are highly lethal and presumably can be deployed in any setting. But when I was thinking about it at first, I thought, are we talking about bioweapons that would just destroy the seabeds, the fisheries around other countries? And the article's not clear on that, but think of how would that affect your preps if you live near the coast? It would be, it might ruin your plans, to say the least. Now, being near the coast when stuff hits the fans,

probably not a great idea, in my opinion, in the first place. But I was able to find one of these kind of pirated articles on the times of india incognito mode good tip there how about everything going on uh with with the riots you think this will be a summer of rage i hate that term i don't even know why I said it. I just had to. Whether it's for Palestine or for the upcoming election or just general malaise and economic destruction in the inner cities, what's your outlook on riots right now. Well, let me ask you this. How in our political system does the incumbent party make riots beneficial to them? And if you can think of any scenario where that's plausible,

then ask yourself, could the Democrats benefit from that? And then the answer is no possible way they could, then I don't think they will be. But if there's a way that they would benefit, I'm like, Trump's in office, and they could burn down the whole summer of 2020, then they've shown that they'll do that.

One scenario that has always popped into my mind, I think it's just so realistic and i just can't believe they haven't used this but they now we're getting conspiratorially here people but the shooting at the border by either a real person who's sick and tired of people coming in and goes crazy and just starts shooting people coming across the border. Or a setup, equal or more likely, where, let's just call it what it is, false flag, somebody, some sniper team goes out there,

kills 50 or 100 migrants, blames it on MAGA. That's where kind of a riot or a you know a situation where there's already unrest and then something like that happens or even you know women's vote MAGA guy quote unquote again more than likely would be fake if that did happen uh went to one of these college campuses and started unloading. We did see someone light themselves on fire at Trump's trial, and he had some interesting viewpoints to share. I did read a little bit of his manifesto or whatever. But anyway, that's one way where if Biden is in power now,

they might be able to flip it. But generally, like burning everything down, yeah, they would probably try to avoid that. I would think going into election year with Biden in there. If we go look at it, who are the swing voters? And it has to be a big enough number to overcome the margin they can cheat by. But, you know, if they're concerned about it, I'm not sure a scenario like that... There could be just wild rioting in many, many, many cities.

And then it wouldn't be like an intellectual argument to a swing voter of, you know, I've got to vote against MAGA. It's more of a... Everything is unsafe for now. I guess a lie hop like that, you know, God forbid it. That is a potential threat this summer, though,

what you just laid out. We only got a few minutes. How about, we gotta hit this one. Multiple COVID shots linked to higher mortality rates in the 18 to 39-year-old cohort. So multiple COVID shots. Not just the first one, but you had to get at least one of the boosters as well.

And a lot of people just got one. A lot of people got zero. But a fair amount got two or more. So looking at people that got multiple, according to the UK's Office for National Statistics, so actual data from the UK's Office of National Statistics, shows that those with multiple COVID jabs were significantly more likely to die. As someone who's had deep training in statistics,

you've got to say, well, that doesn't prove causation causation it could just be correlation maybe those that were already really sick were the ones that got multiple covid shots and that's why it shows that data blah blah blah but we do know that they were pushing the boosters on everyone all people and a lot of healthy people got multiple. But this shows that they track that those who received four COVID, not just two or three, but four, had a 318% higher mortality rate than the unvaccinated. So it's almost like fool me once, blah, blah, blah. Fool me twice, blah, blah, blah. Fool me four times.

I have a 318% higher mortality rate. No doubt. The ability of the Democrats to just ignore things that they don't want to discuss and pretend like positions they held only months ago don't even exist. And the dominance of so much media channel that they can get away with that means that it's possible that in potentially a Trump second term, the boomerang swings all the way back and they embrace the research that explains how dangerous it is dangerous it is just disown their own push to have everybody have have taken the shots and then try to bring it right on back to trump for for having rolled them out and and and by that time the big pharma will be

sacrificial lambs to whatever political objective. Well, the political objective of that would be, you know, get back the White House. Yeah. It's real, though. Those things are dangerous for young people's hearts. Yes. And, again, this 318% is for the 18 to 39-year-olds. No, for a fact.

The 40-, 50-, 60-year-old age groups, oh, you've got to imagine that would really hurt them even worse for those that got two, three, four jabs, right? So that's the official numbers. I think economic data take that with a grain of salt it doesn't show up in the numbers as starkly because the older you get the higher probability anyone has of dying from many other causes right but 1839 it's pretty easy to see the correlation, right? Yes. Yes. Alright.

I think I have one more, maybe. Where was it? Where was it? What's going on with this? The North Carolina Court, speaking of vaccines, North Carolina Court rules Federal PREP Act protects forced vaccination without parental consent.

A North Carolina court of appeals found that a clinic where personnel gave a 14-year-old boy a COVID-19 shot without his consent, well, because he's 14 and can't give consent, or parental consent, was protected by the Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act. Oh my God, if I've ever seen anything Orwellian, it's the PREP Act, Feature Dan. Yeah, yeah. Act on your prep because of things like the PREP Act. I wasn't even aware. I've got to be honest.

I wasn't even aware that was in place. And that's some law. That's some judge just saying, all right, I got an easy way out. I don't have to, I don't even have to get into this legal issue because we'll just pass it off on a federal law that says it's okay. It's obviously going to be appealed. So we're going to watch this one, see how the appeals turn out. turn out but if uh this goes to a dead end my god it would you know the next pandemic with the next vaccination that think of the jurisdictions that'll just throw throw it into the arms of the children i mean get your kids out of public school now if if if this doesn't get overturned

clinic worker said give it to them anyway yeah all right well this was the uh pfizer covid shot apparently um but yeah it will be appealed we gotta try to i'm gonna put a note down to try to follow the appeal process of this i'm sure it would show up in the news blitz down the road anyway, but I want to make sure of that. That's all we got tonight future Dan. Good show. Yeah, it's been good talking to you and with

any luck, it actually recorded as a show today. Fingers crossed. With any luck, we'll be live next Wednesday, which looks like it'd be may 1st time is ticking it'd be episode 260 as well so good show have a good night future day in catch you on this side ben Go to his side, Ben. Thank you. I am paying for this microphone