The Prepper Broadcasting Network - Patriot Power Hour 294 - Trump's Rampage in DC

Episode Date: February 6, 2025

Statement of purpose? Should I email you? Should I put this on your action item list? You decide your own level of involvement! We are the Prepper Broadcasting Network. The You are now listening to the Patriot Power Hour, the newest show of the Prepper Broadcasting Network. the newest show of the Prepper Patreon power hour. We are live. It's February 5th, 2025 episode 294 of Patreon power hour. I'm Ben the Breaker of Banksters here with future Dan. What's going on, sir? Yeah, what is going on? What's going on tonight in our country? It is an absolute rampage out there and those that are watching video, we're live here on Rumble X and I think we got some footage here might even

come across an audio. Trump is in DC right now rampaging. He is and these buildings represent the agencies that Elon Musk is inside and there's the Democrats running that that's that's pretty much what's happening in DC right now. For those that are only listening already, we got Godzilla here rampaging through Japan. You got the Democrat Liptards running away just scared, getting about it ready to get blown by some fire breathing doge. It seems like holy cow. But just in the last week, so much has happened just in the last day or two, even us a ID.

I mean, they're moving on to department of education. It's just, there's so much we'll talk about it. Of course we got the dashboard, but future Dan, we got, we got a Trump and associates just rampaging through DC through the federal government. What's some of the biggest, uh biggest items of the last few days? If you can summarize them and what are you looking forward to here? The next few as well. Well, we know that Doge has been in the Treasury looking at the payment system,

you know, going right to where the money is. They picked on USAID, which I didn't actually know this, but it was created by Kennedy under executive order so it could be struck away by a later president. Never was until now. It's getting absorbed by the State Department. They're going into the General Services Administration, which I've learned it was

Instrumental in resisting Trump during his first presidency. They're not playing around they're going right after the GSA Of course, there's the Department of Justice with people being outright fired and up to 5,000 FBI employees had worked on the J6 cases. Those names are due to the White House. They probably have them. And the CIA, CIA, which USAID was well understood to be a kind of a joint operation between the CIA and the State Department.

CIA has had to turn over several thousand new employees under probationary period. So when you work for the CIA, the first two years you're under probationary status and it can easily be fired. So that's what's happening is Trump is going through these bureaucracies like Godzilla through Tokyo just crushing them right now and this and we could either use this as the transition or do it a little later I know you have

an article about why this is legal and lawful and maybe you can explain why a few of the Democrats attempts to say this is you know bogus unconstitutional etc is wrong I don't know you want to get into that right now I think we should save it after the news but I will just preview it a little bit, if if what Trump's doing on many of these from fronts is ultimately upheld by the Supreme Court and Inevitably there's there's court cases That are getting to the Supreme Court without a doubt that is happening how fast I don't know

It could be like two June's from now before you know, the opinions are rendered right but That's the path that has started very quickly on two big fronts impoundment the president's power to not spend money that Congress authorized and also the firing of federal employees been very much settled law since the 30s on the firings and from the 70s on impoundment.

But Trump could have all of that overturned. Like the long-term lasting jurisprudence, constitutional jurisprudence, constitutional jurisprudence effects of what he's doing could last, you know, as long as it's been in place now, lifetimes, right? Centuries really, hopefully the Republic will last for centuries at this rate. It seems more likely than if you asked me a few years ago,

same like on the precipice. I don't think we've won at all yet. I've tried to pick apart as much as I can. Trump and I like like from the last 15 days, it's been like 16 now, very difficult to do and every issue I could try to nitpick. There's pretty good arguments against it. But that said, is there anything that you think he's not delivering on? Or are you giving him like, you know, an A plus essentially? So I think it's it delivering on more of what he promises virtually impossible. They just that right there's so much throughput. And a lot of people talked about how little he Right. There's always so much throughput.

And a lot of people talked about how little he sleeps and how well he can keep going without sleep. So, you know, at this pace, how long before they take a breather? I don't know. And so many issues still left to uncover. But JD Vance put out, you know, this week that the plan is to have this level of reform constantly going for four straight years. And they obviously have their political opposition on their heels. Like, like, you just tune into MSNBC or CNN to watch what they're reacting to. It's three news cycles ago while they're trying to mount a defense on one thing. There's at the same time executive orders and announcements coming out over the top of that. So they are it's shock and awe to establishment deep state Democrat New World Order. It truly is growing up always hearing about the first hundred days first hundred days first

year first two years before midterms. I mean we're in week starting a week number three right now and there is I again very hard for me to to nitpick on anything so far that there is only so much throughput and the amount they've put through in the last 15 16 days is pretty awesome I hope it keeps going I'm sure at some point the the enemy will consolidate and try to hold some ground but it is I just keep coming back to the

breakthrough concept of land war and that's why they're just keep pushing pushing maybe they'll never be able to consolidate a position try to hold their ground maybe for four years it will keep driving the stake right into the

vampire heart politically that would be freaking awesome. But man, I just, I don't know, a little part of me. Maybe I'm just paranoid and just jaded, but I'm just like, what's going on that we don't know about? Or like, I don't know. I just feel it's almost too good to be true, but that doesn't mean we shouldn't just keep fighting like we're winning because we certainly are at this point. Yeah. Well, you know, the Constitution has a certain design here and every two years the House of Representatives is re-elected and I believe one-third of the Senate so Midterms got you know, the clock is running to those midterms And if Trump loses one or both houses even by the slimmest of majorities

All this comes to a grinding stop. But right now There's not going to be committee hearings There's not going to be any rhino resistance to this because trump mastered one thing after his first term is You go after Opposition within the republican party in primaries you fight the primary fight you have robust primary elections, right and They got a lot to do to but if he can buck the trend and and maintain even the same Majority in either house just control just control the houses

The second two years of his last term are gonna be you know the majority in either house. Just control. Just control of the houses. Uh the second two years of his last term are going to be, you know, very consequential. The another big part is why they're pushing so hard again. Hopefully, they can keep this pace up but it seems like that could be tough but so that the evidence isn't destroyed and the tracks aren't covered. You gotta think if you are still around in

the corrupt way in certain parts of the government that maybe haven't had a doge visit yet. By the way, apparently they're at the FBI headquarters. Um so does everywhere at this point, but not just the cutting spending and rooting out the corruption, but there's a lot of crimes that have been committed and there's a lot of evidence of that. So every day that it's not rooted out

is just another day that they can do what Hillary did and destroy the hard drives figuratively or literally. Oh, that's why you got to really push fast right now. Destroying the hardware by late that breaks so many federal laws, like whoever falls on the sword and does that is signed it up for obviously, you know, 20 years of prison. Will they be that fanatical will in the bowels of some of these agencies?

Will they? Destroy the hardware because Trump or I'm sorry Musk, you know tweeted this week about how you know, the the digital forensics is You know Absolutely possible. There's no there's no deleting any any any documents and not having the ability to bring them back Right if you have the right technology, you got to physically You know hillarly clinton, you know pound the hard drive with a hammer To get to where they might need to go

But that's just cold like obvious like like the person who did it will be caught having done it. So do they have fanatics inside the bureaucracy? All I know is if there was a resistance that was planned before this inauguration, they are on their heels. Trying to, you know, they're just, there's just absolute shock. 1% of the federal workforce, 20,000 workers took the early buyout They're gonna quit now and get to work on severance through the end of the fiscal year the end of next September And I think Trump's just gonna leave that door open and I saw a headline yesterday that the CIA was offered this

Which doesn't make sense if all federal workers were offered that then obviously the CIA is included as Federal employees so that was like a a new offer of the same offer To make new headlines that now the CIA has been offered this right so the deep state all the Institutions that we've talked about on page of power hour for years They are All the institutions that we've talked about on Patreon power hour for years. They are, you know, it's judgment day is what it is. It's the, I don't want to go too deep into it because we'll talk about it later, but the impoundment are not really using the, the funds is an interesting part of it and I my understanding at a very high level is that by offering these settlements or buyouts if they're refused then that allows the Trump administration to restructure with less penalties and fees

in the long term and or these people have to do exactly what Trump and them want and that could be relocating, taking on a lot more work. Obviously everybody returning to the office, a lot of folks don't wanna do that five days a week, but they would have to. So definitely leverage play. You said we were talking in the back channel some today and you're like, Trump is big time using that leverage

and that's huge leverage from where I come from in my professional careers. Like you offer these settlements in good faith and all that. And then they reject it. That I'm not a lawyer, but in like the legal sphere that is important for like a checklist of, hey, we gave them this offer and they refused it or didn't respond.

So we can proceed to the next stage, you know? I don't think much of that really matters. With all due respect, I don't think constitutionally any of that is sound. I think the constitution is clear that executive power is rest exclusively and completely in the President of the United States. And there's so much architecture since the Great Depression, since even before that, since the establishment of the Federal Reserve, since the establishment

of the income tax, since 1913 onwards, so to speak, heavily, um, uh, fortified by Democrat regimes in the thirties, sixties and seventies. There's this facade that was never constitutional. And, and, and, and like the unions and stuff. Yeah. Yeah, absolutely. That's pretty much what I was thinking of as being the big issue but you totally could be right that those unions could just be

totally thrown out and so that might as well at this point, that's the level that he's bringing it. It's thrown out, right? You have freedom of association. It's First Amendment. You can you can unionize but the power of that union in the context of the federal government. It's gonna be, you know, the subject of historic Supreme Court cases soon. So you think it's going that level? Oh, yeah.

Oh, yeah. What's happening right now? Yeah. The FBI, anonymous FBI employees suing to you know prevent names like What'll happen is they're gonna you know, the Democrats will shop for friendly courts And get the injunctions get the stays get the you know, do the blocks, right and Like everything, you know, this is, you know, you know, you've, we've always heard the term

counterinsurgency counter in our top narcotics, like military operations that are countering something on the, you know, certain scale warfare, right? Usually low intensity conflict. This is counter lawfare, right? Right. Trump suffered the lawfare tremendously, right? From the beginning of his first term with the Russia hoax, right? And the FISA warrants all that straight through to J six and what happened to him as a private citizen. This is counter lawfare, and they've had a lot of time to think about how to bring the right cases before the current Supreme Court and absolutely upturn decades like federal statutes that no party, no president has objected to since they were established from the 30s through the 70s.

And, you know, even into this century, some of that jurisprudence can be absolutely wiped out by what Trump's trying to do. Do you think like offering to the CIA and offering to the federal government workers would a pretty small percentage like only one I think only one percent of federal employees is accepted but of those that are actually eligible realistically was it was like 2%. Still, very low. The deadline I think is tomorrow, so maybe a few percent total. That's not very much, it's like early retirement for probably half of them.

But anyway, is that just to say, why is he doing that? To look a little better publicly and pace people off? Or why doesn't he just go for the jugular there instead of kind of give this offer? Uh, because it's gonna, you know, come at him and give them an easy way out, see how many will take it. After that, the remnants, the resistance that stays in there are going to come

up with, you know, the hard reality of Article 2, Section 1 of the US Constitution, which I will quote, the executive power shall be vested in a president of the United States. The executive power. So all of these supposedly independent agencies that Congress created that were outside of the purview of the president of the United States the the supposedly independent agencies that Congress created

that were, you know, outside of the purview of the president of the United States have, it's never been constitutional. Great stuff. Alright, we're going to get into a lot more of this but I think since we're already nice uh 19 minutes in,

you want to get into the news blitz? You wanna blitz? Let's blitz. Let's make it happen. By the way, for those listening on the podcast, we are live and we're planning to be live streaming every Wednesday night. You can get in on YouTube X or rumble. Put some questions or comments, suggestions, feedback, etcetera into the comments section. So, anyone out there listening live right now, we'll be looking out for any of your comments. Without further ado though, let's go and move away from this pretty awesome slideshow. And there's Godzilla again. And let's go straight here. You want to run us through this news blitz tonight?

I will. And one thing I want to say before we start on news blitzes, I'm anticipating a lot less active indicators in columns one and two Liberty and security. It's column three and four that are going to be heavy on headlines throughout this, this term. Right. And we see that tonight. We see none in the library column

You know, we got three indicators heating up in security three in economics actually four in In Column two then a couple in column three interesting though, Ben we have three SHFT Grade one happening now in the heat map. So I'll start there. Foreign black ops suspected, I know you're going to want to talk about this one if you scroll down below. What was Russia starts?

It's a yes, not activated yet, but it will be shortly We got a senior advisor to the Federal Reserve and it's dited on charges of economic espionage for the People's Republic of China and We're gonna have to talk about that one in the middle minute also column one Protests heating up Democrats getting ready to progress across the country against POTUS 47's executive orders on the rioting front we do have protesters recently as just a few nights ago they're probably doing it continuously across several blue cities blocking freeways, right and Violence being advocated at mass protests. We got a New Jersey congresswoman in particular saying we're at war Against POTUS 47 the house minority Leader Jeffries indicated that fighting in the streets is coming up. So look out for riots

violence at mass protests extremely large protests. That is the reality we face in the security front. It's all at home right now. In the economic front, gold hit an all time high. Currently got it quoted on future danger at $2,865 per ounce. I know it has hit a little bit higher recently, it's peaking gold bullion is peaking this week The true federal government financial liabilities has been estimated at 158 trillion

So when we throw around this 36 trillion dollar figure for current deficit, you know debt This article explains, well, it's actually a lot more so long as our country intends to keep paying for things like Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid. And the trade deficit is soaring, it's going to soar even higher with all kinds of tariffs that are getting thrown on. but all the tariffs are getting paused or negotiated. So we don't see an actual trade war that, that, that constitutes, you know, major halts in trade quite yet, but that's definitely on the horizon column four, vaccine vaccination effects.

They're, they're already getting exposed heavily and rfk junior just became the hhs secretary So, you know, we got check studies showing kovacs fax women are 66 less likely to give birth Senior or a senator subpoenas hhs for covid vac safety records and fauci emails You can bet rfk juniors department will comply with that subpoena. And on the disease creation exposed front goes hand in hand with everything to do with covid and the vaccine. USAID. We learned this because of Doge

basically locking down USAID and bringing out facts and figures for all to know USAID bundled 53 million to support Chinese gain-of-function research that likely led to the creation of COVID-19 Okay, so you know I must you know just putting it out there and X say you know This is criminal and evil what they found in USAID so Three grade one happening now, dangerous indicators. So maybe a little bit of a cognitive dissonance for our audience there.

We start off the show talking about all the positive direction of Trump, just absolutely taking it to the swamp. Meanwhile, yeah, here we go. Some black on red, you know. vaccine effects being exposed, gold rising and foreign black ops being suspected or exposed. Some people can say that's good. But enough of those types of things that are seemingly good, maybe even if you own gold,

very good. If they start to rack up and destabilize society, they're not good. So that's why they're black on red tonight. There's a heat map dashboard. Then want to jump into the article about the Fed, the Federal Reserve dude that the Department of Justice, the brand new Trump Department of Justice is jumping into go ahead and hit foreign black ops suspected We gotta go to the archive Okay, and hit the top article

Right there I see yeah, and it's the one on the 31st then one yep Yeah, I tried to post it again, so sure up on the headline tonight, but actually happened. Oh first and Yeah, John Harold Rogers 63 of Vienna, Virginia Is going to the big house spying for China on the Federal Reserve. What do you think? He's arrested on charges that he conspired Hopefully they could find others that associated with him now that they've got him arrested Kind of how they used USAID and all these others to find others that associated with him now that they've got him arrested kind of how they

used USAID and all these others they're unraveling with these little these whiz kids and using AI computers unraveling the worms the ball of worms but here's one a Bankster worm arrested senior advisor for the Federal Reserve Board of Governors, which is the DC branch, the 13th branch for all intents and purposes, conspired to steal Federal Reserve trade secrets for the benefit of the PRC.

That in my opinion, you can't even consider that may not even be the real reason or what that guy was really doing. It could be. We'll find out. It's got to be in court. Well, it could be more like he's enacting Chinese policy on behalf of China as well, not just stealing from America, but also polluting America with Chinese. I agree. The trade secrets of the Federal Reserve is pretty vague, isn't it? This one could explode into other people, other countries with influence inside the Federal Reserve. This could turn the Federal Reserve on its head. And as I quoted earlier,

executive powers vested in the President of the United States. And the Federal Reserve has has always been executive power. Surely, surely. And we've already... Trump's leaving that fight for later on it seems. And I'm actually... even Ben the Breaker of Banksters is fine with that because I have full faith in what he's operating at right now in terms of the order that he's taking these fools out. So anyway, anything else you want to cover on this article? I mean,

we'll keep close eyes on this. And it's definitely folks want to look deeper into it. We have all the links up here on futuredanger.com. You can go through and find them. But did yeah, he was did yelling get a pardon? No, she did not as far as I'm aware not like Fauci for example might be wishing she did I know right so by the way this has to do with uh and I would know this I've spoken about this a lot before I went to Purdue University and a good portion of in my master's program a good portion of kids there are corrupt in certain ways and unfortunately yeah Chinese University here this guy this Federal Reserve

senior advisor was paid four hundred fifty thousand dollars a part-time professor at a Chinese University so we send our quote-unquote experts there they send them here same with the students in particular. So trust me, hey, a lot of the kids I met, and we were like 22, 23, 24 years old. Hopefully they're good, but I'm sure a couple work for the PRC in trying to destroy America.

So hopefully I can counterbalance that here in the West, but this guy is part of that, making the money and selling us out. I'm not going to be able to balance that here in the west, but this guy is part of that making the money and selling us out. If the PRC tells a subject of China to the to the PRC that it demands that person spy for it or work for it,

right? That's what you do or or you never hear from your mother or father again, right? So, uh, I think this is the tip of the iceberg next week. It's already being telegraphed that, uh, the department of education is going to be targeted. I think the timing of the, uh, nominations and the, uh, confirmations is such that cash Patel at the FBI probably has or can bring in or or can find some agents that will not be on the list of 5,000 that could be fired that

will start to bring charges against some espionage in every one of our departments. I think that the Biden regime let the Chinese intelligence operation go full bore against us. And this is only tip of the iceberg. The fact that the first victims of this was out of the Federal Reserve I thought was notable. Yeah, we're going to have to keep track. John Hald Rogers will put that in the transcript, that was notable. Yeah, we're gonna have to keep track. John

Held Rogers will put that in the transcript. Follow up on that in the coming months. Hopefully, we'll take years to prosecute him and investigate but they're after it. I like it. I like to see that. couple other articles. future Dan wanna

get into. Yeah, let's jump into the true federal government financial liabilities being estimated at 158 trillion. Alright, let's do that. Let's do that. Welcome to the new listeners and viewers. Welcome to the Patriot Power Hour. Just had a couple dozen people join up for live every Wednesday across YouTube X and

rumble. Part of Prepper Broadcasting Network. Today, we're going through the way that Trump is eviscerating the enemy and why it is legal, lawful and freaking awesome. But before we get further down that road, we are covering a couple items of news and kind of going through the economics and financials first, featured Dan, we've harped on this a lot, man. We've been doing radio for more than seven years together and I've done lots of podcasts with others and by myself as well, saying that it's not just

the national debt, it's all the unfunded liabilities. Well, that's coming to the forefront. I think people are ready to hear that again and maybe do something about it. And yeah, these numbers here on this article are pretty crazy, but they're absolutely real. And do you think though we could maybe grow out of this and if not prevent a bankruptcy of the country,

have a softer landing? Seems more reasonable to me too. Nowadays, not with the current Congress split so evenly, if the situation got bad enough and the fiscal hawks became super majority in a one or both houses, then yeah, all of this is fixable. Oh, it'd be tremendous austerity. But what it takes and what the New Deal and the Great Society gave us is,

are we willing to go to the point where social security goes unpaid? Medicare and Medicaid, right? So social security going unpaid is a, you know, an indicator on future danger never been activated. No, you know, and that's certainly not what Trump wants. But major restructuring of the social security program is inevitable if to avoid, you know, a federal government default. I mean, that's just it just is. They got to raise the age limit, and they're gonna have to raise the age limit and they're gonna have to reduce the, the

benefit or it's gonna fall or it's gonna tank us just financially. There's no way, no way around it mathematically, certainly. And I do agree that even a lot of pretty hardcore MAGA will change their tune if they realize their 401k was gonna get cut in half and their social security would be cut in half, potentially like stuff like that.

Now some would be understanding that's maybe the price need to pay so everything doesn't collapse and that we all gotta kind of bear some of this burden as we try to overthrow the banksters and restart America 2.0, right? But it's not gonna be just all easy and everyone's just gonna live

in the land of milk and honey without any issues because we've been fricking burning a debt. I call it the black hole of debt. We've been burning that for 50 years. I mean, and really, really bad in the last 10 years. You can't just that really, really, really, really bad in the last four years. Pretty much COVID autos is crazy. Yeah. Question is, is it in fact, a black hole? Like that cannot cannot be asked of that horizon

where it's literally impossible for light to get out. I have said on this show that it is in US dollar terms but that doesn't mean and we've talked a little bit about this. That doesn't mean we can't reset because we have so

many natural resources, not just intelligent people which is number one but all types of natural resources in the ground, the land in America and just worldwide that, you know, shucking off the corrupted evil and guaranteed to mathematically die financial system is actually okay. We actually need to do it sooner than later. You might call me accelerationist in that regard but uh yeah it we can't you know this we're looking at this article 158 trillion not the you know 34 trillion 35 40 50 that's a lot that's what everyone will talks about and projects out for the next five years ten years but you got a triple or quadruple that when you're talking about Medicare Social Security and then think about the state level so yeah it's uh

here's the thing with austerity if it could really cause some problems too I think we could grow through it with technology and getting rid of all this corruption. That'll help a lot, but with the austerity, people will have to kind of downshift potentially in their standard of living for a few years. And unfortunately, I think a lot of Americans are too freaking spoiled to do that willingly. So to do that willingly. So you can outgrow anything. Is there a way to outgrow it? Is there a way to free the economy to outgrow it? That's the question. It's not going to come through tariffs. Tariffs are not going to pay for this. When Trump talks about tariffs and all the revenue from tariffs, I can't tell if it's a fundamental misunderstanding that this debt is absolutely this big or It's one of his you know

Non-sequiturs that captures the attention keeps people occupied makes his opponents epileptic exposes them Like like just last night suggesting probably by the best that I could tell zero consultation with Anybody else on the planet Trump suggested the United States is going to take over the Gaza Strip and redevelop it Right. So is that you know a legitimate on its face? Proposal or So is that, you know, a legitimate on its face proposal or is it more about just being such shocking off such an outrageous proposal that all the other players in the Middle East

and in the world, you know, come to the realization it's time to do something different in a constructive way Because if we don't just like we got to do something to stop Trump and thus Accomplishing what Trump wanted to have done right? Right with the death, you know, just stabilizing it flattening it out, you know slightly reducing You know the the federal debt, you know would be a massive accomplishment. And because we are the strongest economic, the reserve currency, right, and probably going to exceed China again by the time Trump's done, become the number one world economy, and there aren't any other currencies for which to become reserve currencies.

There's no competitors. Don't talk to me about the bricks. That's not real. All those countries in the bricks are hyper corrupt anyways. Right? Just just leveling this off could for, you that we've been divided for you this time last year and keep on prepping. Keep on prepping all the time for sure. Even just for a regional disaster like a hurricane, earthquake, flood. But a couple things, I'll try to make it quick. The debt, I believe it was Musk. Either he either posted on X

or he reposted someone else on X that said this. Essentially they need to turn the $2 trillion he either posted on X or he reposted someone else on X that said this, essentially they want it, they need to turn the $2 trillion or more per year deficit. So $2 trillion per year of extra debt piling up every year compounding really bad. If we could turn that from 2 trillion to 1 trillion, he said, that would be a low enough. So still adding 1 trillion a year,

but instead of two, it's now one. At that level, we could outgrow it. So they need to cut the deficit in half and their plan is pretty much all through cuts of spending rather than additional taxes, which is definitely something I'm very happy about and think is the right way. But with tariffs super quick, we went through like a, the quickest trade war of all time

in the last week. Uh, like everyone capitulated to Trump super quickly and it wasn't even close. It wasn't even close. I even was watching, um, gosh, I think his last name's Ford. I know his freaking first name, but his last name's Ford is the premier of Canada, like Trudeau's kind of counterpart, Rob Ford. And Aaron Burnett on CNN, I almost never watch this crap, but I decided to just turn it on for a few minutes. And he was on there, the premier of Canada. Aaron Burnett was trying to get a rise out of him

and all this right after Canada said, we'll do whatever you say, just don't tear us. And Ford was just like such a puppy dog saying how he just wants to work with Trump and work with America and we just all need to be friends and CNN's try to like get him to talk trash about America, rile up a trade war and just verbal war and hatred amongst each other. And he's like, Nope, Nope. That just means Canada needs so much. Trump use that leverage perfectly. Same with Mexico and those, you know, that trade

war was over before it started. Trump got what he wanted. That was impressive to me. So I keep that type of stuff up. Yeah. Let's talk about Mexico a little bit right here on what's going on there. But I shot you a link a moment ago. Can you bring up the Laffer curve? It's the first time I'm pictured power hour. We could visualize some line graph that we were actually talking about. Okay. Let me see if I can search this up. I see it. I also don't have signal or anything else. But let's see here.

I see. I just search it. Yeah, just Google it and look at images and you'll find a curve that is the lapper curve. This is Reagan era stuff, you know, Art Laffer came up with this in the early 70s and he basically pitched it to to Reagan. Yeah, go ahead go ahead there good one. Yeah, so basically what it's saying is You know by reducing taxes you can increase tax revenue because it is good growth and on the far left of the graph when Tax rates are at zero You can have zero revenue. That's obvious. It's logical But on the other end where it touches it's a hundred percent tax rate, which will also bring you zero revenue because if there's no incentive to produce right the government just confiscates it all and

For those of us that watch the end of the Soviet Union. That's exactly what it was Right. Nobody owned anything and nobody was was working so on that curve somewhere on that curve there's an optimal point for tax revenue but it's obvious that if you go at a tax rate towards x too high you're actually lowering revenue and so the laffer curve he never won a you know a Nobel prize for this, you know, absolutely rejected by mainstream economists, but it's self-evident on its face, right? The shape of the curve you can argue about, right?

But the two starting points, zero revenue with a hundred percent and zero revenue with 0% is obvious. So there is some kind of curve there. Trump knows this very well. Trump was a young man, you know, when Reagan basically brought it back from the lap or curve and study history a little bit, the, the, the JFK tax cuts in the early sixties, same thing, right? Same thing. He cut taxes and raised revenue by doing so. So do the Democrats have enough power in Congress to block significant cuts or in other words, bring it back on the curve? Because you know, we're clearly towards the X right now on the Laffer curve right now. Can they bring it

back to see the optimal point for revenue? We'll see. We'll see. But, you know, just just, you know, something else I heard Trump has mandated is for every federal agency that adds a federal regulation, they must rescind 10 other regulations, which means nothing's getting added. And he might go ahead and just rescind many of the worst economically repressive Biden regulations. They're going to be moving from X to Z quickly. Watch the growth figures. We don't trust all the figures from the federal government, but I would hazard that they are

far more trustworthy this year than they have been for the last four years. And without beating a dead horse, but I think it's super relevant. Tax fraud will go down, meaning more revenue. Also, all these NGOs and nonprofit 501c3, whatever the heck, all these other ones that are, you know, Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation donate to them well that's a tax shelter so that won't be available anymore that doesn't mean all that revenue go directly to the US but my point is yes we can get more taxes but what I like what I really happy about is the other end of the equation, the spending, all the cuts and corruption and just largesse and sloth and waste, let alone the corruption. So hitting it on both ends, I like it.

Well, let's get into the legality of exactly what you were talking about there by bringing up the first of two articles that we want to talk about. Now these articles don't make it to Future Danger because they're, you know, intellectual discussions on these issues are not events right they're not news events. First yes by Andrea Whitberg. If I could real quick just shout out Jay Ferg what's happening Jay Ferg better late than never. Oh yeah I agree welcome to the show thanks as always for coming through. We're getting into the good stuff, Jay Ferg. So, uh, welcome. Yeah, this is a, this is a new article two days ago, Andrea Wittberg, Trump's attack on the deep state is spectacular and almost certainly legal.

So, um, first she goes and speaks about, you know, how, uh, Kennedy founded USAID by executive order. All you gotta know is because that's true, Congress did not establish USAID, it means Trump can eliminate it and he has, right? It's now absorbed by the Department of State. That organization is done. If scroll slowly please, let's get into this discussion of what impoundment is Pretty funny name right here. Yeah, Twilight of the leftist bureaucrats. They all are walking out of their agency in tears this week Image by Grock by the way as AI has kind of

Funny I guess stock photos will not have anyone that was a stock photo Actor actress model no more jobs for you. Yeah. No, it's not a real picture, but it's probably not too far away from real pictures. Not at all. Probably way uglier people to be honest, but yeah. So keep, keep going down. We, you know, this, this starts off with, you know, immediately addressing the us IV Issue that was you know the the leading news 48 hours ago when this article was was actually a

Released let's keep on scrolling. Let's get to impoundment and the conversation about impoundment. All right. Yeah So very worthwhile article recommend reading from the top all right, so since Yeah. So very worthwhile article. Recommend reading from the top. All right. So since 1881 with Thomas Jefferson, she writes 1801, 1801. Yeah. Presidents had the power of impoundment. All right. Long story short, from 1801 through 1974, this was pretty much true. during Nixon's era fallout from Watergate right the Congress enacted the Congressional Budget and Empowerment Control Act so we've

been under this law for 50 years and it basically forced the president to spend the money that Congress had authorized with no power. But that's not executive power. That's not what Article 2, Section 1, first sentence of the Constitution says. So the author goes through a lot of case law about this, about how the Supreme Court held several times at Congress as, you know, actually we scrolled a little bit too far. We're talking about firing officials now.

Back to impoundment though. You know, what she writes is given the history of impoundment, the ratifying generation approved of it, it's highly unlikely that 74 Act is constitutional. Now, what's happened is, you know, Ford, Carter, Reagan, first Bush, Clinton, second Bush, Obama, even even Trump, especially not by no one's ever challenged it. No one's ever gone against it. What Trump's going to do and you're going to hear this

next week, I expect when you know, the real attack on the department, education is launched, is that the money is just not going to be authorized. That's why Musk was sent to the Treasury first to look at the actual Treasury payment system, right? Trump's gonna impound funds, he's gonna stop spending money where he doesn't approve of it and Congress is gonna sue everybody's gonna sue and this is gonna end up in court and striking down the 74 Congressional Budget and Empowerment Control Act is I think a major objective of Trump and if he succeeds, it's pretty likely they will,

given the arguments in this article. This was status quo. This is the way it was done. It was understood that the president had this power until 1974 that the Constitution is going to hold. This is executive power choosing not to spend money is executive power and that's going to make a dent on that deficit that you're very concerned about that. I don't

want to go too deep into it because we can have well first I've only got a few minutes left but we can go a little over time. I think today. What is the check and balance against the president for not executing, you know, what Congress has agreed to? Is that just impeachment? Is that what it is? If they really didn't like it, they would impeach him or just get him out of office the next go around elections. So in theory, a president could not spend anything for four years straight. If he was self-destructive in such a way and it's not unconstitutional. Right. I mean, that, you know, and if he was elected on that vow and did it and was reelected on that vow, it's constitutional.

What's unconstitutional in all likelihood is a congressional budget and empowerment control act of 1974. Right. So Trump's going after 50 year old jurisprudence here. But if we scroll a little bit further, the ability to fire employees. Now there's been more case law here. The debate, as the article says, has led the Supreme court to hold several times that Congress has no direct role in firing officials.

The question is, can Congress pass laws that prevent the president from firing? Right? So, highly recommend this article. Not going to read it to the audience, but essentially, this is not going to be as clear cut as going directly after a 50 year old law and knocking it out. But it's pretty logical if the executive power belongs to the president of the United States, the firing of employees does. And when that gets settled, if it's settled favorably, any future president can cut back in a bloated bureaucracy at will. And there's gonna be firings in the FBI for certain that are gonna bring about these cases. And I think it's all well understood.

I think Trump is listening to constitutional scholars. They're in his circle. They have a plan. And that would make sense that some of the stuff we're seeing right off the bat is designed so that these cases go before the Supreme Court while Trump is president. He's not doing this at the, you know, the third out of the fourth year of his term. He's doing it now.

Great stuff. Anything else on this article? You want to wrap it up with that last one? It does talk about from the 1930s this idea that you know Congress can create agencies that are outside of the purview of the President. And again that doesn't necessarily square with executive power being vested in the President of the United States. So FCC, FEC, Federal Reserve, many, many, many other independent quote unquote independent agencies.

That concept's going away. And when that concept goes away, big, big parts of the deep state are big parts of the deep state are are are finished. They don't exist. Right. And USAID when they that was very nebulous. Now he's like, nope. It's an outer department of state. We'll maybe continue some of these programs if we see fit as we see fit.

Oh, it has no longer independent. It's to exist. Right. It gets over there. It's already done. It was done in like 72 hours or less, right? Now he can't Trump can't do that to these Agencies established by law, right? You can't just will them into non-existence

He could because USAID was you know created the same way by a president Kennedy with executive order These other agencies they're going to be you know not they're gonna knuckle under the president it's gonna be you know it's gonna be called a constitutional crisis by people for for this whole four years three four years of constitutional crisis to MSNBC and CNBC and they're gonna get used to this idea that you know this is not the same. This is Radical historical change what Trump's after? Certainly is we're living it week by week here on Patriot power hour with y'all

All right ready to get into the grand finale yeah, you want to go a little after hours get into a What I found to be a absolutely fascinating article about COVID. For sure. We definitely here on Patriot Power Hour, we aim to go for one hour every Wednesday, 7 p.m. Eastern, but occasionally we'll go an hour and a half even longer. Tonight's going to be one of those nights. So stick with us over time. Yeah yeah let's take it up to the picture it's important you can start with the picture alright so the author went ahead and grabbed this picture of of of Athens and the metaphor the parable that that this author scroll scroll down a bit to our title. Yeah, the Joe Murray, the bio defense oligarchy and its demographic

defeat. So the parallel they draws is with Athens and the invasion of Sicily. And what Murphy writes about is how 30,000 warriors for Athens were lost in that fight. And it really brought about the downfall of Athens as a major city state from its peak. And yeah, just go ahead and scroll through and let's talk about some of what Mr. Murphy's getting into. He's a former naval officer So he's drawn he's writing one of these things that draws, you know the the Lines between you know, the 30-year Peloponnesian war thousands of years ago and what happened to us during kovat, right?

The important point he's making about Athens is after the defeat in Sicily, the losing but powerful factions in Athens just dug in. They just calcified and said that they justified what had happened. But in reality, the loss in that manpower, Athens never recovered from it. And the parallel is bringing to COVID is the damage of the vaccines. Something that you said originally, I had always said, you know, this, this COVID, the virus, it's a bio weapon. And you pointed out that, you know,'s a two-stage bio weapon because the Vaccine is going to be just as dangerous if not more dangerous than the actual virus and this article explores that

And it gets a little frightening I got to admit it gets a little frightening this is written by a former naval officer who questions the This is written by a former naval officer who questions the healthiness of our military aged population, the men in our country that in the event of a real world crisis, if we had to, you know, really bring up our forces, what is the condition of the hearts of, of, you know, today's 12 year old and a decade from now's 22 year old who would have to serve in that military

has the vaccine actually laid a real demographic damage to the population that took those shots. Very scary stuff. He's talking about the parallels between the bio defense, we call the bio defense oligarchy now and the Athenian oligarchy that both dug in and justified their bad decisions. And reading into what he means by the bio defense oligarchy,

if you are an adherent to what I would say is highly simplistic point of view, that there is one secret new world order cabal, the globalists, right? You know, that's an Alex Jones mantra. It's easy to understand, but it's not, um, fine. It's not fine enough for me. It's not it doesn't tell me enough. It's a shortcut, right? It's a useful shortcut. It's a rhetorical shortcut. But when you get into what the bio defense oligarchy is the powerful message out of Murphy's article here is that somewhere on the order of 20 or so years ago, the Department of Defense really stepped out of bio defense. It was beneath them, right? We had bio weapons

programs when the Soviet Union existed, and that was deemed as certain point to be beneath what honorable military leaders do, right? We signed treaties. We don't do it anymore. We don't research it. We're out of it. All that did was transfer it to civilians, the Fauci's, and made possible the gain of function research at NIH that That you know was clearly via USA USA ID a known CIA front You know organization by the way to start sending the money or send or send in the you know, the capability to China to engineer a bat virus which which Clearly they did so Now, you know, we're talking about pots of money,

right? You know, DHS, DOD, NIH, universities, like all the research, lots of them. I'm telling you, university is a ball of worms that really needs to come out to. Yeah. So the, the bio defense oligarchy is defined and well, well understood here. and you know the criticism that you know as is the top sentence that you've scrolled to wait go back a little bit. Yeah is unclear if the warriors the combat armsmen and the unrestricted line officers

are involved in the assessment since they ceased to be involved years ago in an act of false piety To which the origin of coven fiasco can be traced. So what he's saying is Because the military stepped aside Scum like Fauci could rise up and make this happen So this is very full-throated argument for bringing certain functions back into the D.O.D. And it goes on to, you know, and the IC intelligence community. So intelligence community, right? Highly tied into this. Is that what that's saying?

What they say is that the commercial, you know, the commercial entities that produce the vaccines, they can go to the IC, they can go to the DHS, they can go to the ic they can go to the dhs They can go to the od In in much less degree, but they can go to the national institutes of health There's so many pots of money to keep it going, right? So this article is extremely timely, right? It's it's it's happening simultaneous to doge going in and tearing apart These organizations and looking at where the money's spent and it's putting it out there that this bio defense

Oligarchy is it's it's it's it's called a subset of the New World Order Certainly globalist in nature the multinational corporations creating the vaccines the ones that are getting you know Hammered on Wall Street as RFK jr. Comes into power. You know, they're they're part of it, right? But it's it's more than that, right and Yeah, excellent. Excellent article from Joe Murphy at the brownstone is to put the last paragraphs probably you know The worth worth having to read Then if you can get to the bottom and again all the way to the bottom. All right, there is a lot paragraphs probably, you know, the worth worth having to read,

then if you can get to the bottom and again, the bottom Alright, there is a lot. So it's totally I mean, it's worth reading this whole thing, guys, if you got time, but let's go summarize a lot of it. But you know, I'll read this as the bird is so is the newfound energy in the land, the demos, the people right is in rebound, it dismantles illicit oligarchy. It returns accountability and vigor to the state. Let it not be spoiled by discounting the physical loss of an errant expedition. Let it not be further spoiled by ignoring the moral injury accrued from that failure. A great republic learns from the past. And what he's talking about here is,

failure. A great republic learns from the past. And what he's talking about here is, you know, being spoiled by discounting the physical loss, that's the cost of COVID, the fatalities, and also the vaccine and long term costs. But more about the moral injury coming forward and admitting as a country, we had a biode bio defense oligarchy. It was run by very nefarious actors they were essentially treasonous with with our you know, a announced adversary People's Republic of China Bring this to light having you know Rand Paul and his crew in the Senate really get access to the paperwork and that's coming his crew in the Senate really get access to the paperwork and that's coming. RK juniors in right? That's coming.

Bringing it forward, admitting that this is what happened. We let you know, elites that were outside of the military have control of a basically a military function. We're going to live with the cost for that for a long, long time. It's basically an argument to reconcile our country to what happened to COVID to not brush it all under to, you know, the rug to all pretend like it never happened because the long-term effects of those vaccines are going to be dealt with for a very, very long time.

It's going to fester. It's going to bring about a lot of social resentment. And we remain weak, right? It's in this article. We didn't spot it. But the very idea of what is our capacity to recruit for a military right now? How many people can actually serve who are healthy, who are very young and got those vaccines? It's an open question right now. And what Murphy's advocating for is we got to deal with this openly Transparently, we got to admit that that happened before we could do anything about improving from it awesome article awesome analysis on a subject that we've talked about so much on patient power hour and I'm just glad that this type of stuff is coming out. Not only some of the

articles we talked about earlier about, and I wanted to touch on one or two of them, super quick while we're at it on overtime here on Patriot Power Hour, welcome to the show. If you're new here on Rumble, X or YouTube, but this article hand in hand, this is out of the Czech Republic, but I've seen more and more of these studies coming out all around the world and they can't put a lid on them all. And here we go. Women who are COVID vaccinated are 66% less likely to give birth. Musk has been all over the lack of replacement birth rate in most Western countries and in places like South Korea as well, Japan. So he said that's a huge, huge problem. That was before COVID. Most of those numbers he's looked at and talked about. If there is a statistically significant, and I would say 66% is extremely, extremely, extremely statistically significant. Even 6% less likely to give birth would be massive.

66%, just unbelievable. So this information's coming out and like you said, RFK is at the helm, but worldwide, this is huge. I'm hoping others in the world get some inspiration of America trying to break out of the chains of all this crap and expose it. Well, hopefully that'll happen worldwide.

So studies like this out of Czech Republic doesn't seem like a very free place necessarily, but hey, they got this studies coming out. I like it. You know, all right. For, for all of Trump's, you know, public facing, you know, you know, self congratulating, uh, you know, you know, what, what his opponents consider, you know, an arrogant, you know, you know, ability to just talk openly about his successes. What happened with COVID in the first, his first term,

how will he deal with that? Will he ever have to, you know, actually get into the Oval Office on TV and have kind of like Reagan did with Iran Contra sit down and say I Thought I was doing the right thing but in reality That was not what was happening and we made mistakes If he could ever do that he could rise in my opinion To the same level as Raul in terms of the greatness as a president And he has that chance and it could be easily something after the midterms So can't be used against in the party could be right in the middle of the second two years

So it doesn't necessarily all of the admission of that would would not transfer to the next Republican nominee You know, we assume it will be Vance, right? Will he go so far when it allowed RFK Jr. To be the messenger of what this article from the Brownstone Institute, Joe Murphy is speaking about. This was a horrendous mistake to ever let this self-reinforcing, self-funding, espcing, self-funding, espionage-ridden, bio-defense apparatus get us to that point?

Can RFK Jr. be the one that becomes the hero for exposing it? And Trump graciously admits that that was a mistake that happened and quickly turned to how we're gonna reform so it never ever ever happens again. I'm looking for that this term. I am too that one small misstep that he's had so far was uh when he had what who was it? Uh I don't think he knew any better. He was he was pretty naive at first. No, that was a huge misstep. That was I'm talking about this go around, but he was naive.

I'll give him that. When they were talking about the mRNA vaccines with regard to artificial intelligence with Sam Altman and frickin' Larry Ellison, that's who he was. I don't like that, because they're talking about how they can create better mRNA, so they may just say well

There might be some bad effects of kovat vaccine, but it was just you know version 1.0 So we can improve it. I don't want them to go that route. That'd be a cop-out. So we'll see Yeah, I agree. I agree How many more years before these articles like out of the Czech Republic? Now we have a Secretary of Health and Human Services and control over a payment system that would allow research to be done. Government studies, the CDC to be directed to study this issue. Right. And then and And when that happens and the effects are known, the outrage is going to be real. It's like riding a tiger

for the Republicans in Washington, D.C., right? You fall off that tiger, it might eat you. But if you can ride that tiger through midterms in the next presidential election, it can carry a long, long way for a long time. That's kind of just, you know, my take on why they've picked USAID and the treasury payment system first, Department of Education is next. They're going to give RFK some time. And then HHS is on the block. It's going to get, you know, discovered what the the Wednesday, 7 PM Eastern. Future Dan, I'm uh I think we're gonna have a a great 2025 here. At the pace we're going, I don't think we're gonna be talking about any of the topics we talked about tonight. Seven nights, seven nights from now. What what's coming now is gonna you know

be all new about what we see in DC. So we're here to break it down in the audience. We are grateful you are here. Thank you for listening.