The Prepper Broadcasting Network - Patriot Power Hour #351 - Season Finale & Mid-Year Prediction Recap

Episode Date: June 11, 2026

Each week on Patriot Power Hour, Ben ‘The Breaker of Banksters’ and Future Dan explore the latest Liberty, Security, Economic & Natural news, providing the situational awareness needed to execute your preparedness plans. Questions, Feedback, News Tips, or want to be a Guest? Reach out!Ben “The Breaker of Banksters” @BanksterBreaker on XFuture Dan@FutureDanger6 on XBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/prepper-broadcasting-network--3295097/support.Support PBN and become a MEMBER of the PBN FAMILY! Free courses, Members only videos, reviews, and podcast! The Prepper's Medical Handbook Build Your Medical Cache – Welcome PBN FamilyJoin the Prepper Broadcasting Network for expert insights on #Survival, #Prepping, #SelfReliance, #OffGridLiving, #Homesteading, #Homestead building, #SelfSufficiency, #Permaculture, #OffGrid solutions, and #SHTF preparedness. With diverse hosts and shows, get practical tips to thrive independently – subscribe now!Newsletter – Welcome PBN FamilyGet Your Free Copy of 50 MUST READ BOOKS TO SURVIVE DOOMSDAYSupport PBN with a Donation 

You should I put this on your action item list? You decide your own level of involvement. We are the Prepper Broadcasting Network. You are now listening to the Patriot Power Hour, the newest show of the Prepper Broadcasting Network. This live episode features the situational awareness you need to practice self-reliance and independence. Introducing your hosts, Ben, the Breaker of Banksters,

and Future Dan, the editor of Future Day. Danger.com. Episode 351 of Patriot Power. Patriot Power Hour is here. It's June 10th, 2026. I've been to Breaker of Banksters here with Future Dan. And Future Dan, this is the season finale. Which makes it a special, which is why we're showing a dashboard,

a very unique and new and experimental dashboard on our video cast. Tell us what we got, Ben. Well, long-time listeners. remember that here at the Patriot Power Hour on Prepper Broadcasting Network, we've made it a bit of a tradition, a bit of a, you know, end of year and mid-year predictions and check-ins. So our first episode in January, I believe it was episode 331 and today's 351. Let me go double check that, but about 20 episodes ago was early January, 26. We spent an entire episode, Lane, and out potential scenarios for 2026 that every prepper needs to be aware of and and you know really

tracking and our percentage chance of will it happen is it highly likely or is it very low chance hey maybe it's still prepping worth prepping for but uh you know maybe not it's maybe it's overblown long story short this is the dashboard as of today june 10th 2026 we got a lot to go through on it featured Dan, but it's really, really interesting. Maybe our most interesting dashboard of all time. Yeah, we got a lot of hits. And we did do predictions for 2026 on January 1st. The only time we've ever broadcast on the first of the year.

So look back to the archives and you'll find us on 1-1-26. And artificial intelligence to try to take the transcript of that show and make sure all the numbers of confidence levels are correct here. and maybe there's. But we banned some validations. We think we got this mostly right. So it's a good baseline to talk from

actually the prediction show on the first of the year is our actual percentages. And when we wrap up this year at the end of the all the set of a lot of

it looks great. We had a little bit of tactical difficulties You came in at the very last second I hope you rubber band in probably the network But I got most of what you said I think it looks pretty good A I'm going to make it look really shine For the end of year dashboard

But this gets what we needed And now of course A lot of people are listening on radio, podcast, live and archives So they don't see what we got displayed here But for those on Rumble Be sure to follow Pepper Bromble Prepper Broadcast Network on Rumble. You can see the screen we're sharing,

and we got 20 different indicators, featured Dan, and they're color-coded, both based on the column they're in, the category, and mid-year takeaways slash, did it happen or not? Was it a hit or is it a total miss or something in between? That's what we're looking at here. Yeah, how's my audio?

Am I coming in now? better very good all right let's take it from maybe top from the top and the left on through walk us through where we're how we're doing ben all right the first one we put down thrown down the gauntlet for 2026 prediction back in january will the u.s have a recession in 26 two straight quarters negative growth or more we said only a 12.5 percent chance of that a one in chance and I believe in where we're standing right now does not seem very likely and are you know AI large learning large language model that we run this through says that we're on you know very unlikely that we're going to miss this one it's given us a hit future Dan I don't know Q3 Q4

could be a double recession but but it doesn't think so it thinks we're going to be good Q1 and Q2 and maybe even Q3 from what I'm seeing. Yeah, if we're using the traditional measure of a recession, two negative growth figures of GDP in two consecutive quarters, and I'm taking that percentage down to less than 1% right now. That seems to be what our informal grader, the AI system, says, yeah, very low probability that the U.S. will hit a recession in 2026. And we put 12.5%, which is pretty low. In hindsight, we probably should

even put lower or we could have put big time money on this if you think it from kind of the odds, because the overall consensus was, I would expect, higher than 12.5. So we took a sort of low conservative non-hype stance and it prevailed as it seems. Yeah, let's work through this. Number two, Fed cuts below 2.5% we may have been much too high on that. And it's also because later we're going to see we did not anticipate Epic Fury. No.

And so therefore the Fed was not, the Federal Reserve, not able to cut rates below 2.5%. We put it as a little bit higher than a coin flip. 55% chance the Fed would cut rates below 2.5%. Well, they haven't been able to cut, like you said, even close to that at this point. So the grade is, well, it's an orange, which means

not likely for this to take place. We did say there's only like a coin flip or a little bit more, but as you said, with Epic Fury that put water on that for sure. Yeah, we are high on that. US debt exceeds 40 trillion.

That's yellow. I don't know the trajectory of that. Maybe the debt clock's available from your monitor. How are we doing actually on that? I should. I don't want to break anything

to get off the screen and look right at the second. But the 40 trillion, we said a 66.7, you know what? I'll try to make it happen on the other end. Hopefully I don't disconnect or anything. But, you know, we said a two out of three chance it would be greater than 40. Right now it's at

39.23 trillion. Yeah. And let's look 765 billion away. I guess how long does it take for us to rack up that much? I think, you know, we're going to hit it at that. Wow. We might. Yeah, that's going to be a close one at the end of the year.

Number four, government shut down for a grand 10 days. And so we said it was 85%, but then there's only a partial shutdown for a big stretch. So how do you, you know, how much of a government shutdown happened isn't, really addressed in what we talked about. I think we were talking about the full shutdown of the federal civilian agencies. Of course, the intelligence agency and the Department

of War never stop. Big parts of DHS never stop. But I don't think we've had that greater than 10 day. I don't think we get a hit on that yet. But I'm still sticking with 85%. That we can easily see that with

even in a lame duck Congress. You know, they could they could do things that shut stuff down. So our analysis returned an asterisk next to this one. It said partial government shutdown scoring needs better definition and to be discussed on air. It literally prompted us that, hey, it's really hard for me to score this right now. You need to define what a government shutdown is. And that's exactly what you just said.

So you could speak further about it because we're going to ingest, we're going to upload, to the transcript of this show into this chat later. So what would you like to say in that regard? It all depends on where the money's flowing and who has temporary amounts of money. But a lot of the government

is funded now. We might actually miss that one. We'll see. We'll see. We need to find these types of things better before we put them out on air, but that's okay. Amateur radio at its finest. Number five, top 10 bank failure or forced merger

instead of 25% chance. I haven't seen any news to that effect yet, but I think that's one of those things where there's always at least a 25% chance of that with modern monetary theory. 100% on that 25%. I do say so. I feel like if that occurs,

it's very likely we'll also hit on that Fed cuts below 2.5%. For example. And we talked about some of those potential interdependencies and correlation, negative correlation, all that stuff on previous episodes. Don't have to dive into it too much here, but I agree. Several of these indicators could flip literally in just a few days, but others need a bigger buildup and you can trend to them out a little easier. So precious metals, six and seven already achieved them, already happened, and in fact makes

our percentage estimates low. glow now. Man, it's been insane in the last six months. Really, I guess five full months. Wow, unbelievable, really. Silver, easily cleared $100, but it's

round-tripped back to like $65 bucks right now as we stand today. Gold, above $5,000. We hit that. We knocked both of those out of the park in the first couple of months. Gold well above $5K, but it also has pulled back to gosh, I think, like $4,300 earlier.

today or it's been they've been so volatile they've been trading like a crypto future dan we got one hit under bitcoin number nine not the kind of hit you and i so wanted as bitcoin owners but we were correct that you know at um at a 50% chance it went under 70 and yeah i see two numbers i got to go review the exact transcript it didn't translate as well on this dashboard but we got two numbers and I bet my guess is I said there's a 50% chance that goes below 70k and the other number is 85% and it makes sense maybe you said 85% chance Bitcoin goes below 70k and it's certainly under there it's 65k right now that's my guess I'll go check those facts uh we'll obviously talk about this prediction in December as well when we do the end of your cap but

I you knocked that out of the park featured Dan I was on the low side and uh I do think the Bitcoin will see it's $200,000 day, but I'd probably lower that percentage chance that happens this year the way things are sitting. Yeah, we had a 30% chance Bitcoin hit above 200K. You got to remember it was above 100 and gosh, I don't know what it was on January 1st. Should go go take a look, but it was definitely above 100K, maybe 110 even. So we said one and three chances will double this year. but I said a one and two chance it would lose 30, 40%.

You said really high chance it would do that. So in a way, what I would like to see is you already cashed it on the Bitcoin below, but then maybe we can rock it back up, 3x from here by end of the year. I'm not predicting that, but wouldn't that be funny if you hit both? I think that a major financial crisis sits between those two places. And I don't think this year is the year for it, But there's always a chance. Geopolitics.

Geopolitics is probably my forte and excited to look at where we got with some of this. Ukraine formal seats fire. We didn't have an approximate 80%. I'm wondering what that percentage pants has seemed high. If we said 80%, we were way wrong. But that war seems like there's no end in sight, but it's a lot less ground combat. a lot more missile strikes now.

So it's not the full out war that we've seen at times in that theater. Let's go right into that. Let's see. I have the exact feedback from the chat, not just this dashboard. So this is kind of our first deep dive into something, and see if we remember it correctly or evaluating the system. It may not be right. We'll see.

Here we go. This is the output from the system. The transcript reality says, There's, you said an 85% chance of a ceasefire. I said 75%. I don't think that means it's a permanent. I don't know if it means a permanent ceasefire, though. It might be just like, oh, we think the ceasefire breaks within a week.

A 50-50 chance that it would break within a week if declared. So I guess what I was going to be declared, but it would break, I guess. Did we get an Easter truce? They had a brief one, didn't they? Maybe something we got to dig deeper into. what's the exact definition, but... In the big scheme of things, though, there's no long-term ceasefire,

so geopolitically were in the same place as we were at the beginning of the year. But I believe there was, like, you know, some periods of ceasefires, but then also violations thereof in the middle, just like everything that happens since Epic Fury. We're at a, you know, a ceasefire, except parts of the Iranian military

didn't get the memo, and they're still shooting, right? Yep. That actually has even more variance or shorter ceasefire periods, it seems. So I'm going to flag this to follow up, see if there was seven consecutive days of a ceasefire, but in the end it's just a little kind of academic, I guess, because it's still ongoing conflict right now.

Still got another six plus months. See if we can see if that does happen or not. But just to reiterate, both of us said at least a one and two chance that if there is a formal ceasefire it would break within a week in less than one week. Less than one week.

Yeah, that makes sense now. Taiwan, don't see a shot. That's 7.5% if anything else went lower with the just sheer demonstration of aerospace force by the United States Air Force, Navy, and Space Force, all three.

what the missilery, what we were able to do with ISR, just the sheer demonstration of force against Iran. I don't think, you know, China's prospects of doing that were much, much better under Biden than right now. Okay. On the exact transcript analysis, you said 5%, I said 10%. That's where that 7.5% comes in. So it is a little bit of a blended score.

So Yeah, all these were Less for sure All these were the middle of where we both came in, yeah Except a couple that I think we explicitly stated We were going to have separate numbers But maybe I got to, you know, we'll go fact-checked that Well, we mostly come to a decent number of consensus

I guess Number 12 I'm not sure if I'm not sure of Epic Theory or even what Israel and Hezbollah You know, in Lebanon, I'm not sure if major war counts when there isn't, you know, major ground action. But that one, of course, devils in details. What do you call major war?

It's it says that as well. It's like active watch escalation risks, but the system doesn't judge it as a major Middle East war. I don't know. probably about as close as you could be and not be classified as such. How much from could you go about arguing? There's other constructs, though, about how to think about war. And in U.S. military doctrinal terms, there's a spectrum of war, right, from low intensity to high intensity.

And all of this is still not even halfway towards high intensity. right if you're not committing ground troops you're not fighting on the ground you are you are not anywhere near a high intensity conflict when you right now it's

really much two nation states against one US Israel versus Iran that's also kind of defying definitions of major major would be you know dozens of states on either side

in something like a world war, right? So, but, you know, it depends on your perspective. You're not, if U.S. military doctrinal definitions are not something that guide your view of the world, then this Epic Fury, you know, just in air, space, and naval, it's pretty major. But it's not the full compliment. I'm maybe biased because I was in the Army, right? You know, we don't have troops on the ground. That would be a whole other level.

the thing that stands out based off that and what we saw we had a 50% chance that there was going to be a major new Middle East War so was that way too high then or do you think 50% is appropriate now or do you think it's higher because we had 50% no because I'm pretty sure Israel is going to do this with or without us in fact I think Trump said that at the beginning right so you know there was there was going to be action and I think that country, if they hadn't had us with us, would have gone back to what they did during last summer.

They had troops on the ground in Iran. In fact, I think we do. It's just all covert right now, right? Not large numbers, and they're well protected from the air. And everything that we got going on there could become major war. If the decision is, you know, if the deciding factor is, you know, is there open ground, to occupation. Yeah, then we have a major war.

Carg Island. We can talk more like opinion or thoughts later. Let's do the facts, finish up the dashboard. Because we can talk about all these things for quite a while. Here we go. Three regimes collapsing. Four, sorry, four of them. Venezuela, Iran, Cuba, North Korea.

Take it away. So 13, that 50% is obviously too low because Maduro is not there. Now, if you want to argue whether the form of government has to change for the regime to fully collapse, well, a pretty novel approach to doing this is to keep the regime in place and decapitate it and then coerce it so that, you know, it's not even the same regime anymore. But there is not the same regime in Caracas any longer. So I think we hit that one. It asks us, the system asks us,

to also discuss and confirm whether we think this should be triggered because Maduro was removed. It pretty much literally says partial hit could be a full hit if the hosts, you and I, confirm on air that this qualifies. So are we going to say it qualifies as a hit? It's a hit in my book because not only what, like if it was just a raid in the in the, captured the leader and withdrew with him and left the regime entirely alone and in place then that's not a hit but that's not what happened

right the CIA director and the Southcom commanding general are both in there like visibly in there right like photo ops of them in there that regime is entirely you know taking its orders from Washington it's not the same regime I give it a hit, too. So let's just chalk it up.

It's a hit. We said 50-50. In high-insight, that's lower. But I bet 50% was higher than the market rate, like the polymarket equivalent. We should cross-reference that for the end of year. Now, I ran short. Yeah, go for. Iran's a different argument, right?

And it's pretty obvious that tiers of the Iranian regime at the top have been. been obliterated, not just collapse. But we're down to the third and fourth and fifth tiers and they're still resisting, right? So can the remnant of the Mula

regime survive the rest of the year? I gave it 45% or somewhere, we gave it 45% you know, before Epic Fury. That percentage chance has to be higher at the mid-year checkpoint. I can

what would you give it? I mean, it's got to be 85, 90? No, that might be too high. It might be too, no. No, it's not enough. There's no hundreds here anywhere. But, you know, from a 45,

I'd give it a solid 70 now. If, you know, the right intelligence was acquired and new strikes took us to, from the third level of the regime down to the fifth. And we don't know what's going on behind the scenes, right? Like, slowly but surely, that regime is under, you know, constant pressure to, you know, to turn on itself, to make compromises to negotiate. But still, the best I could do is probably 70% on that now. A very solid 30% chance that it's the Mosaic regime, right?

It's just, it's a theocracy, so it's a belief system in there. Can you get down to the, you started with the Ayatollah as number one. If you kill the top of 10,000, is the next 10,000 just as radical as the top 10,000? Yeah, I mean, that's the equation there. You can't just grab, you know, decapitate and have the country fold and capitulate. That's exactly what happened in Venezuela. Iran's not Venezuela. Cuba, though, this year, that 25% chance probably should be raised.

Basically what happened to Venezuela and Iran. You almost think it has to, right? So, Iran going back there, 70% is fair. Yeah, nothing's 100%. But man, if they last, I don't know.

I understand that 70s still a pretty high number, but I feel like it should be higher even because how could they possibly last until December with literally the chokehold on them? That would be, they'd have to go more than twice as long as they've already gone and still maintain grip and the economic aspect,

the bombing, the internal strife, but like you said, the mosaic. The mosaic analogy is perfect. So, okay, 70%. I'm going to go ahead and put 75%, just to be a differentiator. No, I'll stick with 70. We'll defer to you.

We'll stick with one number, 70. And Cuba was 25%. What are you saying that's going to go up to now? They're 50-50 right now in my book. 50. in just six months too especially after that indictment of raw Castro right the indictment

against Castro it's like setting it up teeing it up North Korea 7.5% obviously much lower than these other three I don't see any reason for it to be higher or lower but what about you

it depends on the health of the dictator I don't think that regime has the same kind of you know it's not it's not a theocracy it's a communist regime So, and it's a cult of personality. And it has been a cult of personality since, you know, the current dictator's grandfather. So if they had, you know, some kind of break in that chain, and it has, it's the other half of the same country in the south that could absorb and govern. So I think, I think still a very low chance that we see North Korea collapses here.

but CIA said the same thing about the Soviet Union a month before it came apart. Let's go on domestic. You ready? Let's go for. Insurrection Act. Posse Comitatis. No formal invocation at this point. We said 60% chance.

And this goes hand in hand with the next two sustained multi-city riots. We said there's a 90% chance. And for George Floyd level riot damage or greater, we said 30% chance. Now, last week on the show, we talked quite a lot about this, and even the week before, I think. So do you think those numbers maintain because we're just now entering the summer, or were they a little too high? Or what are you thinking? They're not high. They're not high. The first and the last one might be low.

We've had the mayor of New York threatening to block ice mega operation, which has been threatened during the World Cup. We got a New Jersey detention center for ice under constant riot conditions. You know, this is all solid predictions in my book. We have a major cyber or grid event, 15% chance that has not hit up or down on that. I don't believe we are under, I don't credit cyber as an area that we're at risk, really. That number's getting lower. And that's the dashboard through June 10th, 2026. Now, this dashboard is certainly different than the future danger dashboard.

And we're going to get to that dashboard shortly. But let's summarize it. We had a total of 20 predictions or kind of categories with a prediction and tagged a lawn to it. And eight hit. Let's check the math here. Ready? Eight hit. Two are trending towards a hit. So if you take what hit and what the AI believes is trending towards a very high likelihood,

that's 10 out of 20. Halfway, not bad at all. Then there's eight, which are classified as to watch or partial hit or possible hit. You know, it's hard. Each one you've got to look at individually, but call those like coin flips maybe. So let's just say three or four of those might turn out. I don't know. doesn't work like that, but it's possible.

We'll have 14, 15, 16 of these hitting. Hopefully not more than that, though, because some of these are very serious bad things. And if they, too many of these hit, you know, very big problems. So what's your overall take now, zooming out? I think

that's a good question. Are we even baselining the right way? Are we giving ourselves easy things? If we're getting 14 or higher out of 20, 70% or higher, we're getting hits. We probably were on the timid side of our predictions, but, you know, still got a happy year to go. We might not be looking so good by the end of this year. Some that, you know,

really it's going to hinge on a lot on the rioting aspect. If there are not, serious riots will have a few misses. And I want to miss. I want to find that being a problem. But if those do hit, then yeah, we will be hitting that. I don't, I don't think we sandbagged here. here we had quite a large variety and I thought we gave pretty realistic rational explanations of our predictions but still quite early but I don't know I think maybe we just have a pretty good read on things possibly future Dan which is where we want to be which is the whole point of the exercise is right you know we don't we don't want anything bad to happen right we we want all of these indicators a danger to, you know, to dissipate.

And this is kind of an abstract conversation. We're talking about how well do we predict bad news, not whether we want bad news to happen, right? Yep. But we're on the prepper broadcasting network. If you're not forecasting the future and prepping, if it's so simple-minded is, you know, a long time ago, you just gave up hope on the humanity and you're going to, you know, just stockpile and train and, endure life to the last moment of your life without any regard towards what the environment is. Well, it's a strategy.

It's a strategy. But there's other strategies. And the other strategies is be ready for the circumstances in which you live. And we're trying to get good at that. Well, I for one became a prepper and into all this stuff more than 10 years ago. And I did not think you would get all the way this far. So I'm glad. I did not quit my job and go live in the forest.

because I would be totally bankrupt right now rather than building resources to prep with. But on the other hand, you might want to have a bug out location or at least a backup plan if you get laid off, right? So prepping takes all types of forms and, hey, your information awareness. Unless you're going all in on,

I don't want any information, I'm just homesteading, prepping, cutting the world out. Like you said, that's a strategy. You either got to go all in on that or you got to have some information awareness, right? Even on that, you got to know who's on the other side of the hill from you, right? Exactly.

Yeah. So we'll do this again in December at the season finale of the fall season. This is the season finale of the spring season, halfway in. Yeah. And we got a major innovation this year. We got actual graphic representation from this awesome dashboard. So I appreciate you pulling it together. And just for the audience, just,

stand by we're going to try and make it even greater in December look forward to it yeah we put a lot of real intelligence into this but now the ability to turn it into a dashboard into a more visual and using the transcripts from our show I have a few notes taken right now but they're more big picture I'm not literally writing exactly every single point but it's really cool how that could be integrated so again we'll keep tracking this keep adding to this and we can do you year-of-year analysis. We're just building the library from top to bottom. Really cool.

Hey, I want to do a shout-out. Looks like Firewood Forge is in the chat. What's happened in Firewood Forge. Good to see you, man. This is our season finale. We plan to be off next week, but we always reserve the right to come back if anything's hitting the fan or we just feel like it. But we're planning to have next week off returning on or about the 24th or 25th of June.

Not exactly sure. Actually, you know what? Probably the 24th. I'll talk with you, Future Dan. But we may just have to lock in Wednesday. But long short, we'll be off next week. We still got a solid hour here, though, future Dan, right? This is a special review.

We are sticking around for at least 90 minutes. And we've got a major heat map dashboard on Future Danger to get through. Lots of news tonight. So let's just jump right in. If you're ready, I thought it was a good review of, you know, really good review of the dashboard predictions but to the news dashboard we go you ready i'm ready my gosh i'm going to go for wish me luck here we go those of viewing on rumble or watching the archive etc you can see it future danger dot com i'm going to be pithy i'm

going to try my hardest here we go start with economic stuff the economy indicators consumer prices rise 4.2% annually, the highest in three years. Stocks suffer the daily drop that's been the largest since April 2025. It's because they think the Fed's going to raise rates after a decent jobs report and a lot of other stuff going on. The Fed may actually raise rates, definitely not lower. Stocks drop big time. Two trillion wiped out, actually.

President looking into the U.S. taking stake in some AI companies. companies, bankruptcy filings search 7% year over year. There's, well, everyone's quite aware of the Social Security shortfall, but it's expected to accelerate even outstrip prior predictions. 2032 funds will be critical. That is six years from now. Signs appear of global trade starting to slow a little bit. A lot of mixed signals out there, I feel like, though, especially with trade.

Let's go to natural indicators, health, and the natural world. Some relatively big earthquakes. Cuba had 100 biggest in 150 years, 6.1 magnitude. Felt in Jacksonville a little bit even. There's a big time eruption in Japan, some heat advisories in the central U.S., fire weather developing across the western U.S., about that time of year. Then we got a little bit more focused on science and health. Smartphones reduce birth rate.

Studies say this under natural family falls. China engineers bird flu viruses, 560,000 times more lethal in mammals. I don't even know how they measured that. China's engineering their own bird flu viruses, of course. we have and are sure screw worm first confirmed detection we talked a little bit about that last week apparently not a threat to the food supply we'll keep an eye on it Ebola not as many headlines as last week but still a couple serious ones it rivals the 2014 outbreak maybe even outstripping it a little bit. And if you come down with this particular variant, no treatment available. Horrible.

Let's move on to security indicators. We'll go with the highest, most actualized ShtF rated. FBI and the MI5 warning against Chinese military spying. This goes hand in hand with what we talked about last week. Just moored piled on top. of spending billions to stop AI and data centers. Americans working for Beijing state media, please guilty. Spying for China. I also got Israeli spying being brought up to say the least. DIA defense intelligence agency raises threat of Israeli spied on U.S. to the highest level.

Congresswoman says Epstein had intelligence connections. Oh, do you say? This is huge. Future Dan was bringing this up in the back channels over the last week. The Truth of Butler coming out. FBI records reveal redacted emails between would-be Trump assassin, Crooks, with a deputy prior to the Butler attack. A remote device with an antenna was found in Crooks' pocket after he was killed.

A suspicious person who was reported before the shooting was never. ever found. I remember talking about that. Man with a camera bag entered building near the shooter and vanished. All this provable now. Second person at the scene based off witness descriptions. So this evidence exists. It's been out there. Red pickup driver repeatedly watched area before an attack.

Detection dog alerted below Crooks' rooftop position. Early reports mentioned. multiple operators down possible shootout crooks had pre-attack email contact with local officials we already talked about the deputy but another witness too apparently released records leave several leads near shooting site unresolved as we've gone through most of them each of these headlines I'm reading has an entire article you should go review them major portions of the FBI file remain sealed or withheld so this is what's come out what could be sealed or withheld ice future Dan talk

talked about this a bit earlier ice agents arrest riders attacking vehicles outside Newark detention facility and more recently we have New York basketball fans physically attack San Antonio supporters in New York City streets Tuesday night after game three at NBA finals antifa mob riots outside of t p u s a event in texas and race riot feared after 19 year old black teen found guilty of murdering 17 year old white teen during texas track meet but these are relatively you know low level has not triggered our dashboard as an example our prediction dashboard for massive riots countrywide by any means but we're watching watching the sparks so we're ready if it flames up.

President and New York Mayor are on a collision course about ice at the soccer World Cup. That's what Fuget Dan was really hitting on. World Cup starts, I guess, tomorrow the next day, something like that.

In U.S., Mexico, Canada. So, yeah, a lot of people coming in. New York Ice Surge is there to meet them. And let's run through super fast. Oh, actually I missed at least one here. Russian deputy foreign minister threatens nuclear attack.

Just got to throw that one in there. I got another one I might have missed. I tried to order them and I got too fancy, but I'm getting better at not missing them at least. Here's another one. Outgoing Director of National Intelligence to declassify COVID-19 documents. I would have been pissed if I miss that one. Hopefully future Dan was going to point it out.

Well, that was huge. COVID-19 documents. All right, I think I can now move on to our Liberty column. I call it the Bill of Rights column, sort of kind of. Elections are stolen indicator. Pretty hot. Feds probe multiple election fraud cases in California. Lawsuit exposes 873,000 ghost voters in California.

Questions piling up fast as candidates suddenly loses second place in L.A. mayor race multiple ballots found inside Los Angeles County Library Shananigans to say the least I know if you didn't get pissed

my call a shenanigans because it's very serious so how about just fraud and crime U.S. and Iran exchange strikes in the Gulf this after seemingly promising

ceasefire negotiations seems to break down. An Apache helicopter was shot down. Crew was rescued. U.S. strikes back. Proportional response. Necessary. I mean, you've got to do that, obviously.

Indian tanker struck by U.S. Navy off Oman. That was earlier this week. Refused to respond to orders. related to the blockade. So I believe future Dan. That was the full on dashboard. No, I skipped one. Why?

Because I hate talking about it. This one was more of a mental block. Epstein, Epstein, Epstein. Epstein assistant planning to tell all book at Palm Beach, police chief says DOJ worked to protect Epstein. So Epstein actually crosses a couple columns here. Still, future Dan. and he died 6, 7 plus years ago,

legacy continues. Or did he? Or did he? Yeah. Where do you want to go? This is a very hot heat map dashboard. And I think every time we end a season, we take a week off afterwards,

usually not this hot. So the prospect of reconveninginging the next week, we got a lot of black on red happening now, a lot of news. Where do you want to go with it? well firewood forge puts in chat he saw something about texas saying there's no screw worm there but new mexico just reported they have some uh this is rated fairly high on our dashboard so let's go with it the flesh eating screw worm but uh and i guess long story short um what i want to know

is first is this going to threaten the food supply second is this some sort of sabotage or just a natural thing. What do you think here for you Dan? What do you know about this screw worm? Well, to answer both those questions quickly, I suggest, you know, the right people in military labs get a hold of those and check to see if their genome has been edited. I certainly hope they did that many weeks ago. What else would they be there for? Yep. And we wouldn't know either way, right? You know, although if they've done it and they know, they know, that it's naturally occurring and it's just the this parasite's back you know they you know they might spend the time to explain that to those of us who care but you

know with with the ability to edit genomes artificial intelligence genetic editing I mean if trying to spend it money to get us to not build data centers why wouldn't they do that too it's not out of the realm of possibility like you said I I hope it just doesn't snowball where if they do that, we'd do something back and it just continues to escalate.

Yeah, worldwide covert genetic warfare, right? Yeah. It's scary. Half released. It's scary, isn't it? Yeah. Something you can't see, something you can't really protect yourself from.

Might not know if you already got the bug. I don't know. Can't let it freak you out, but it is freaky. The year is 2026, okay. It's definitely, not in kansas anymore um and the stuff that you know directly comes after you covid 19 that's one thing but things that interrupt food supplies right they have economic impacts you're

not going to ever die because of this parasite doesn't work that way but you know just a complete attack on our economy it's covert hybrid sixth generation really nasty form of warfare if it's true or this is just naturally occurring we got we got to eradicate it again like like we had by 1966 and this by itself doesn't seem like it'll be

a major crisis that destroys everything but add this on with dozens of other little nicks and cuts and yeah there you go some of the highest inflation and low herds low number of of herds like head of cattle

Hey this is your homework Firewood Forge put it in chat Am I not correct that Like the head count of cattle Like super low right now already I heard that I heard that Really heard it right So yeah

Molla combined Yep I heard since the 1970s Last time or I read somewhere Recently since the 70s We haven't had a cattle herd this This small You know

So if we had to I don't know Whatever they call it destroy 5% or 10% or 20% that I have some knock on effects now it would be recoverable as long as it's not too nasty of a virus or something right or but you know we saw what happened with eggs like i could go get a dozen super organic eggs for like four dollars now whereas the basic eggs were eight dollars when there was that big fear and they had to call some herds or you know flocks i suppose so there is those ebbs and flows but if there's too many if they

line up all those sign waves at once and they can just bam hit a criticality of uh yeah that's what we're looking for here the trends that might line up all those sign waves into one i think that was the biden outgoing lame duck u sda and fda that ordered the killing of those chickens last late last year sure i think it was literally like december january of 25 maybe strength of our country and the strength of our economy, it's, you're right, it bounced back, but it is, it does resemble things like what Stalin did to Ukraine in the 1930s, right? Starve your enemies. Or at least make, make your successor who defeats you in his comeback election look bad for

like two weeks in the beginning of his term. Just another distraction. What else we got in here? It's got to be more salient, pressing matters than... battle parasites. Screw worms. I understand. I would say Butler,

Butler came almost out of nowhere. When it was the last time we talked about Butler? When it was the last time Butler really showed up as more than maybe a topical on future danger? I mean, I'll look into that, but what are your thoughts off the top? This is the first major revelation. This is a Freedom of Information Act request. These are FBI redacted documents, but not completely redacted. And just for the record, all those links on Future Danger, they go to the same article from this organization that got the records.

And in the spirit of disclosing when we use AI, I threw the article into a prompt and asked it to identify any fact in the unredacted release that points to the possibility of there being, you know, more accomplices or more than one, you know, member of an attempt to assassinate Trump. And the product of that AI prompt is all these separate sub headlines. I do that once in a while to really make the point because, you know, people see headlines and they, you know, might just go no further, right? Well, you guess what? Now you don't have to go any further because all those facts are in there. And they're surprising. And the fallout from this is not even begun. No, not at all.

And I hope more comes out, too, because they say a lot is still sealed. Now, of course, not all of it will come out. And not all of this should come out. There's a lot of types of national security issue. They don't want to expose, especially like the Secret Service or anything like that. But I don't know. More truth is also good on the other hand. So I like to see this.

you think there's any one smoking gun article you want to dive deeper into him and there's like eight or ten we can go through a few if you want it's all the same article there are links all the same article but um i think if republicans hold the house in november you'll see hearings and uh redacted names will be brought for made by but if the opposite happens it could be over two years we know who the redacted names are and what else

you broke up there a little bit at the end I got most of it though but I definitely saw what you mean now that it was almost every one of these headlines links to one article there is a kind of a headline by itself but all these indented yes you're correct that's just kind of grabbing phrases that makes sense now I get I get where you're coming from

am I coming in clearly now? Coming in clearly now. Yeah, so a lot of evidence there that there was multiple shooters and someone setting them up to do it. And I think we got to know the truth someday. It's going to happen. The truth will be brought out on that one.

Hopefully the truth comes out with Tulsa Gabbard pushing declassification of COVID cover-up as well. Butler and COVID, both of those. More truth. I'd like to see it. Havana centers in there as well. Answer me this. Why would any

COVID records need to be classified if if it wasn't a man-made espionage operation? I got my own conspiracy theories, but I heard that there might be some people in the United States that helped with all this.

It's not just China doing it. And that might be bad for the look of our country. It might be worth covering up. so it's not as bad. Just thinking. No, there's a lot of... Do we want to know that they've been doing all this experimentation?

They lied, you know, Fauci lies. They've been doing all this experimentation. Chapel Hill and they, you know, they've been involved in all types of shady stuff in Wuhan and in Ukraine and everywhere else. So, like, they don't want to embarrass the deep state too much. Just like Epstein, they can't let it all out. That's what I think.

Which day are we talking about? again? They who are really in charge. Who are they? They were. Who are they? I'm not, man. Well, who's stopping,

Gabbard from declassifying all the COVID-19? Somebody is, right? I don't know. We might get it all. Isn't that what she's doing? I've just seen a lot of times where they say they declassify everything. And then 10 years later, like,

oh, yeah, here's a few more things. and those things are heavily redacted. I mean, look at the JFK assassination, for example. How many times have they had disclosure and it's still like half-assed in a lot of regards? Well, the they. The they, potentially in JFK,

took over the government, LBJ. That's not what's happening now. Were they ever dethroned, or did it actually get more entrenched and worse over the 50 years, 70 years, whatever? So the, um,

the, the, the, the, the, the, the, the, the, the, the, the, the, the, the, the, the, the, the, the, the, the, the, the, the, the, the, How you dug through the mortgage applications to catch one of the Fed governors in the liar loan, right? And that's still in litigation. Bill Pulte is replacing Gabbard. And the president publicly told him to get in there and fire the deep state. So he's clearly there as acting director because in between directors he has the full power. he's going to go in there and fire anybody that won't declassify.

This is the one best chance to clean that shit out. And I think they're serious about doing it. I think there's a they that can just really stop what's coming their way right now. I hope so. I hope so.

I want it. But I guess if I put a little more thought of to it, I would say, simply put, the U.S. has all types of clandestine bio-warfare, biodefense, whatever you want to call it. So I'm sure that, you know, some of this information might be too tangently related to that.

We got to put a quash on it for national security, either legitimately or not. That's the they. Like there's someone behind the sensor. Like, who are they? Do we trust them? Maybe they're doing the right thing. I don't want China and, like, the public, to know all of our secrets of our biodefense that might be implicated in COVID-19.

So maybe not everything. Well, I think you're operating off for these, assumption that everything was documented. So some active declassification is a binary all or none when much of this was just spoken word, right? You know, the Bilderberg meeting, go and talk about it. Don't write it down. Right. So to the extent that it can be declassified, as long as the point is clear and we never have to argue in the future with Democrats that this happened and it was evil and wrong. And the military labs long ago abdicated all of this to the civilian agencies, which is probably why it should have, you know, was able to happen. And really rotten apples in

the National Institute of Health and the CIA, you know, it's quite much better to prove it and make sure everybody knows it for history than not. I like that. That is definitely good attitude. and just like the preponderance of evidence. Hey, we don't even need to declassify the rest. You're so caught red-handed tan ways from Sunday. Like the court of public opinion at least, we know you're scumbag, Fauci. Like, I've been convinced on that.

So I get it there. It's just like, is it a technicality that they can get away on? Well, okay, whatever. But we're not going to forget. I'll tell you that. She used to believe he was on stage, and at one point Trump was standing there, nodding his head to what Fauci

was saying. That's still surreal to me. I don't know. But let's see. Let's see what happens. We also got some a release this week. I didn't

pay too close attention to it, but some financial guy was imprisoned and Trump's going to pardon him on the last day of his first term. And the Department of Justice at that point, it's actually threatened the president that if you pardon this guy, he, you know, he's, you know, we're going to come after you and they did.

So we had a, you know, federal departments that once they knew Trump was on the way out in the first term, we're actually threatening him, right? So think about that background. Like, that's a big part of what's happening right now is, is foaming through the bureaucracy and treating it of those people. I can support that. Definitely. Who's the same is a good question, though. It does take a lot of time.

Burns up a lot of energy, too. I think the deep state is as weak as it's been in several decades right now because of this. I can agree. It definitely took a punch in a nose or two from all this. I don't think they're down for the count, but they got knocked down. Maybe, maybe. And also, Trump doesn't necessarily. need Congress to clean out these people.

So that's part of the reason why, you know, maybe he doesn't care how the outcome of the election. I'm sure he does and he's got some tricks up his sleeve. There's more events geopolitical and other that are going to just unfold that are completely going to change a narrative before the election. And the Supreme Court any day now could do things about how mail-in ballots are eligible or not. And I did hear a report right before this episode.

so to Patriot Power Hour that Trump's going to order the U.S. Postal Service to not handle mail-in ballots in any state that hasn't released its voter rolls, which you know is going straight to court, but he's definitely on the attack when it comes to cleaning up the boat. I like that. That's definitely a checkmark on the right side of the column. well I I get where you doesn't need to worry about the election too much you need to just do the right things make things happen

but we also got to build momentum like I just feel like if there's a total collapse and the Democrats get back in power man they're going to do everything possible and never lose it again and obviously we'll be there to fight them ain't going to you know fair elections fair you know fair constitution that America is based on,

but I'm just saying, like, if you go all out and maybe some good things are being done long-term, but you lose that election, that might make us regret that, that's all. I don't know, just one of the House of the Congress for two years, be able to be on the attack on Trump, you know, might be quite enough for America to remember why they really don't like that political party.

Yeah, good point. Got to force them out, at least, of their hidey holes, right? All right, well, we got solid. Go ahead. We got about 25 minutes. We still got some time. Yeah, I want to talk about Israeli spying,

but maybe we should finish there. Is there any other topics that you want to hit on? Economics doesn't have me too motivated today, and that's big for the breaker of banks, just to say, the new Federal Reserve Chair speaking tomorrow. We'll see what they do with any rates. We, of course, thought they could lower rates a lot this year.

They're talking about possibly raising rates because inflation's a little hot and employment's not horrible. So maybe they got some room to raise rates. But besides that, and definitely some choppiness and downward trend in Bitcoin, silver, gold. I don't know. Not seeing a ton right now. Employment's actually, numbers have been good recently. right, which means they can't lower rates,

which means they got more room to raise rates, maybe even to stop inflation, but I don't know if they're actually going to do that. Yeah, so let's get into the... Let's get into the geopolitics. So Israel has a state, and then there's, you know, the other side of the coin. So I was kind of thinking about this. And you look at, you know, imagine the world of all the nation states.

Every nation state that is in the UN, for example, right? From perhaps even down to Lichtenstein and Andorra, some of those micro states, Monaco, Europe, something like that, Stachel Islands, something with, you know, very small, small country, very small nation state, up to all the biggest ones, right? Ourselves, China, Russia, India, Brazil, all the big ones. and you know we like metaphors on patriot power so we definitely um have used them in the past i'm going to use one tonight to round out this season finale of patriot power hour so i'm asking you imagine all the nation states of the world as coins okay you're you like finance i i didn't i didn't

necessarily do this just for you but i thought after i thought about i was like perhaps he's going to like this. So, you know, take the word nation state, right? On one side of the coin is the nation, the other side's the state. And bring it home, you know, you're a proud member of our nation and a very, very strong opponent to most of the state that governs your nation, federal, state, local, you're a libertarian.

So you want it to be as minimized in your, life is possible, right? And there's other nations and they have other states, right? And some of those nations are, you know, in favor of most of them, most of the citizens, probably in favor of the tyranny that they live under. And I just thought of this metaphor, Ben, to help explain my worldview. So I'm going to pause there, you know, just the concept of a nation state coin, two sides, integral. You got a nation, you got a state, right? And there are stateless nations, Palestinians, Roma, in Europe, right? They're stateless people. In this case, we're talking about nation states. And you can't have a nation without a state and you can't have a state without a nation. If you accept those premises, then I think we can explore with those ideas. I'm going to stop there and get your reaction to just the metaphor of the point as a nation state. I understand it, but now I'm trying to imagine like 170 coins or whatever. Is that the next step or each one's you think, I guess, to some degree, right?

Yeah, yeah. Imagine a table and you got all those coins on the table. And all the headsides are the states and all the tail sides are the nation. And what's to say nation, we're talking about the language, the ethnicity or ethnicities, the religion or religions, right? especially the language, though, and the creeds, just the people, people, and all the various dimensions that we measure. People, apolitically, right? The political side of the coin is the state, but on the nation side, it's just the demos in democracy, the people.

Imagine you saw a table, and all the coins were turned on the tail side up, the people side. What do you see if you see that? The people side? Like the actual people of the nation? What would I see if all of them were there? Yeah, just without their government in the conversation, just the peoples of the world. Hmm. Much more similar than their governments, probably, I would say.

True. Still some definitely differences across, but it would be more similar than the nations, possibly. All kinds of different kinds of nations, right? And some of those nations, majority of their people, are in favor of the rotten tyranny in their nation state. So I do hold them accountable, right? So, you know, the ultimate, you know, example in history is probably, you know, the German people supporting the Third Reich, right? And the German people vastly supported the Third Reich, and the German people paid heavily for that, right? So you got that out there.

Me, when I see all the people sides of the coin, I just want freedom for them. I want them to have the freest possible states as they can possibly have in my lifetime. I want them to live without tyranny. Right? I want them to be, they don't have to be a Jeffersonian democracy necessarily. I don't have to have a mirror copy of our Constitution. Yeah, we have our own problems. And they've been getting worse over the years. We're still, you know, on that table, the people side, we are the example to the world, the golden city on the hill, to what freedom looks like.

I want that for everybody on the people's side. well i did too for sure and there is a little bit of nuance to it of certain systems work better for certain societies maybe but i still think a lot of the principles are pretty pretty clear so maybe it's not strict jefferson you know jefftopherson uh ideals but i think a lot of it would apply to all people's it's just i don't know i guess the history culture do make a difference and but but I don't know, freedom is freedom is freedom too, though, right? Now, if you're opinion that some people have to be ruled by dictatorships, you know, that's an argument, right? The people are realist about this, you know, they look at Russia.

You know, Moscow has never supported a free government of the people, right? It's never happened in China. It's never happened in Iran, right? It's just it's not in those people that all people. you know, have the government that they deserve kind of attitude, sort of pessimistic, realist kind of point of view. That's not me. That's not me.

Because every fraction of the people on that side of the coin, they believe in freedom. Now, 250 years, vast majority of that slice of humanity has fled to the United States of America, right? It came to America to get away from that and get to the freedom, right? So, but I want that, you know, outside of any systems, the civil society, the people, when I'm looking at that side of the coins, that's what I want for them. If you flip the coins to the state side, then my attitude about the coin starts to get, you know, wildly different. So I, you know, kind of dig into my view of that. Just I want to walk you through this thought experiment.

flip all those coins to the governmental side, the state side, including the U.S. Tell me what you see on the table. Bad imagery, like lots of boots stopping on people's faces. Just different degrees of it, really. Kind of a war shark there. I feel like skull and crossbones and abuse and stealing. Even the U.S. I see, like, it's fairly pitiful.

It's way better than the rest or most of the rest, but it's still like rule by terror and fear of a gun, not out of peace and prosperity. So there you go. That's a very idealistically libertarian lens, and I respect that. That is your lens, and I respect that. Mine's different. For me, you know, now I'm looking at the types of government that are in place, and I'm looking at ones that I'm, favor and then it trends towards really disfavoring, right? Right.

Which is why if Congress held the vote to authorize Epic Fury, I'm 100% with it. Because that Mullah regime is one of the ugliest coins on the table. Beijing, Moscow, Havana, right? Go down the list. Even run it through all the monarchies. Those are repugnant to me. Even the constitutional monarchies that hang on to their monarchs, the family members attend Bilderberg. That's repugnant to me.

Even when you're in the zone of parliamentarian democracies, you're closer to home with me. If the demos, the other side of the coin, if it's ruling itself, and if the demos, the other side of the coin can change its government. which is why when I'm looking at Israeli all-time, you know, or shall we say highest alert level of spying, you know, take it with a grain of salt. It's a people with a state, and that state is looking out for its people. If that involves spying against us,

no one should be surprised. They're always trying to do that. By the way, all of our NATO allies are industrial espionage. French were a leader of that. for many decades, taking some of our secrets, especially radio communication and avionics, right? It happens. It happens. But they are not even close to what the government in China is to us. Right. So for me, it's a big sliding scale. I don't know how you describe that politically, but I consider patriotic, right? I'm a patriot. I'm a American.

compatriot. Our country is not necessarily an ethnic country. It's an ideological country. So if your ideology is American, you're an American to me. And as long our coin on that table is the biggest, the brightest, and most valuable, wherever everybody would like to be, that's safe for us. That's where we tie back to Prepper Broadcasting Network.

that that you know and from within us powers that want to you know change our coin on both sides that you know the people who are not patriots of the United States of America those that's who I oppose

that's why I'm on this show every week to talk out against them I thought that's a useful nation state coin metaphor for you but I've been giving it a lot of thought and it kind of you know it helps me you know rationalize like obviously Israel

they'll spy on us And if you look at from their point of view, wanting to know what our negotiators are doing relative to their national security, obviously they would do that. Wanting to integrate science and technology so that they can build and have the weapon systems that serve the state and the nation of Israel, obviously they're going to do that. And if every country in the world had a parliamentary system, maybe that kind of behavior towards us would start to really draw my ire. Right? There's so, so many worse. You cut out the very end there. But you're saying there's just many worse examples, right?

Totally zoned out maybe. Let me know when you get this. I'll keep it out for you. But I heard almost everything he said there. agree wholeheartedly. I feel like the people can affect the nation and the nation can affect the people.

Like if you have a totalitarian, authoritarian, shitty government for 100 years straight, that'll have negative repercussions for your people. They'll just kind of lose their inspiration. Plus, a lot of the, let's just say it,

like the type of people and bloodlines that would be patriots in Russia and Ukraine in 19, they're probably they probably all died, right? They got killed off. Doesn't mean the next generation can't be strong and fight back

and get their own freedom but literally killing off the Patriots in some of these countries I think is a literal literal issue. They can come back but on the other hand, yeah,

you could have a great fair government but if your people become corrupt, lazy, decadent, it'll be true. drag the government down too. For sure, absolutely. Well, future Dan

unfortunately hit some technical issues. I'm sure he'll be back, if possible. We've gone about an hour and 18 minutes. So it's been a great show if he gets back in. We'll knock out this last 10 minutes. If not, I might have a couple small things to hit on before we get out of here.

I'll be on the lookout, see if he's able to reconnect. But as always, big shout out. Prepper Broadcasting Network. However you're listening to this show and have been listening, make sure to go follow the other ways to listen to PBN, not only so it's more convenient for you. You can get the podcast and the video, right?

But it helps with our number of follows. It helps with the algorithm. So, really, the podcast numbers have been doing so, so well in the last few months, really. So nice to see pretty much anywhere you can find podcasts. Just search Prepper Broadcasting Network. So some of you on Rumble, go subscribe to the podcast. Vice versa. If you're listening to the podcast right now, you want to check out our dashboard that we just talked about today a lot.

Go to rumble.com. What's the exact address? Rumble.com slash, I figure it's just prepper broadcasting network, but I totally don't want to give the wrong one. Yes. Rumble.com slash user slash prepper broadcasting network. but if you just search Prepper Broadcasting Network you'll find it for sure

So this has been a really good show I think overall top to bottom bottom to top I'll stick around another 20 30 seconds See if you're able to reconnect If not all good We plan to be off next week But we do reserve the right To come back

If there's big time breaking news Or we just get the itch But yeah I think Geez from January 1st All the way through today June 10th, we had like 20 episodes, maybe. So we did not miss many. I think we only missed two or three weeks, possibly.

One, I was out of the country, one I had something else going, and then we have our pre-planned break between the spring and summer, or excuse me, the winter and the spring. So we've been grinding, we've been consistent. We show up. We appreciate all the listeners out there. I'm going to call it a show. Pepper Broadcasting Network.

We love you. This is episode 351 of the Patriot Power Hour. Sight it off. Enjoy your summer. Talk to you soon.