The Prepper Broadcasting Network - Patriot Power Hour #356 - The Fall of Fauci; RED HOT DASHBOARD To End July 2026

Episode Date: July 31, 2026

Each week on Patriot Power Hour, Ben ‘The Breaker of Banksters’ and Future Dan explore the latest Liberty, Security, Economic & Natural news, providing the situational awareness needed to execute your preparedness plans. Questions, Feedback, News Tips, or want to be a Guest? Reach out!Ben “The Breaker of Banksters” @BanksterBreaker on XFuture Dan@FutureDanger6 on XBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/prepper-broadcasting-network--3295097/support.Support PBN and become a MEMBER of the PBN FAMILY! Free courses, Members only videos, reviews, and podcast! The Prepper's Medical Handbook Build Your Medical Cache – Welcome PBN FamilyJoin the Prepper Broadcasting Network for expert insights on #Survival, #Prepping, #SelfReliance, #OffGridLiving, #Homesteading, #Homestead building, #SelfSufficiency, #Permaculture, #OffGrid solutions, and #SHTF preparedness. With diverse hosts and shows, get practical tips to thrive independently – subscribe now!Newsletter – Welcome PBN FamilyGet Your Free Copy of 50 MUST READ BOOKS TO SURVIVE DOOMSDAYSupport PBN with a Donation 

You are now listening to the Patriot Power Hour, the newest show of the Prepper Broadcasting Network. This live episode features the situational awareness you need to practice self-reliance and independence. Introducing your hosts, Ben, the Breaker of Banksters, and Future Dan, the editor of future danger.com. July 30th, 2026, Patriot Power Hour is back. episode 356 live 7.7 p.m. Eastern. I'm Ben, the breaker banksters here with Future Dan. We have a heavy news night again this summer of 2026. Loaded heat map dashboard, but I want to cover some preliminary topics. What he got on the agenda, Ben? I actually spent a lot of time this week, caping off some research projects that I've been

working on the last several months, even longer than that with some of them, mainly focused on the debt of our country, focused on gold, silver, Bitcoin, and oil, and focused on vaccine research, but more importantly, kind of the after effects and the news of what's come out with regard to COVID, COVID vaccine, and not even as much about the vaccine safety and efficacy, which is important, but a lot more focused on censorship of narratives and just overall overstepping of the government. It's just really looking back, you know, a little bit scary how quickly everyone went into lockstep, but I think a lot's coming out right now, future Dan, where, you know,

hopefully those who are awake are more fortified than ever, not to let something like that happen again. Yeah, I think the lockstep is the other direction this week. What did you think of the former National Institute of whatever diseases, ultimate downfall in front of the Senate? Yeah, Fouchy got dragged out in front of the cameras in front of the, I forgot if it was the senator or the House, but regardless, it was the Senate. It was joint, but it was definitely at least a senator.

It was Rand Paul's committee. Exactly. So I don't know if it was joint, so to speak. But to Senator Rand Paul and, well, he pled the fifth, I think more than a hundred times. 1111. 111. I pled the fifth now. Something I've been waiting for this show to ask you, future Dan, as I've been seeing and reading and hearing that if you receive a part in,

not allowed to plead the fifth. Is that true or is that some sort of internet hearsay? Obviously not true. He did it 111 times. Folks are saying included some of the folks talking to him. You're not allowed to do that. And we're going to follow up with that. Who won't allow that?

Who won't allow you? Pretty much you're in contempt of the committee for doing that. This is just what I'm hearing. I'm no constitutional expert. I'm asking. Well, yeah, but it doesn't mean you can't do it. It doesn't mean it's not legally sound. Apparently, because he has a pardon from Biden. That's why he's not allowed to, allegedly. I don't know if that's true or not. We don't compel people to testify against themselves. That's Nazi shit. That's what I was thought. It was a little weird. I was like, I don't know. He's allowed to do this probably.

Anyone who says otherwise, just trying to score political points. That was what my gut said, but I'm like, I don't know. You didn't get a parted. I don't know. He could be in contempt to Congress at the same time, too. That could also be true. Right. Okay. Right.

So getting steered into a lose-lose situation for Fauci is just some more of the justice that comes his way. So, you know, what heartens me is, think of what most people you knew thought of Anthony Fauci up on stage was Trump standing behind. him in March, April of 2020 when it was the bend the curve. Like the attention he had and the mainstream media just falling in right behind him. Because they could see that. He was helping lead Trump to defeat in that election that year. Think of what everybody you knew thought of him back then, setting aside your esteemed colleagues in this network who, you know,

maybe knew better. Should go back and listen. But I remember when I first saw Pouchy, I mean, I didn't, I didn't think anything was untoward at the beginning, right? And, and look where he ended up. And I'm heartened by that because any of these fucking liars can end up the same way. It just might take four years, but I can wait four years for this to be exposed.

Any of them can come to this. Well, more importantly, we hit on this big time a couple weeks ago is, go forward people better have their eyes open not let this happen again and hopefully justice will be served for those have done it things like this so what i what i've done is i've spent a lot of tokens right researching not only uh just vaccines and COVID generally, but specifically the transcripts from the Senate yesterday and what are known as the Fauci diary, okay, like 11 hundred pages talk, you know, pretty much documenting this entire situation. I've read a lot of it, but definitely not 1100 pages worth, but I put this all into one of my research projects going here. And I had to compare to a bunch of the really transcripts

a Patriot Power Hour over the last six years and asked it to compare, hey, where was Patriot Power Hour ahead of the game? Where did we miss? And these revelations, this new information, what does that tell you? And I told it to be skeptical. And we know, I believe at least, that all these AI systems, even Grock are pretty biased and woke. And they would absolutely try to find something to take a part in my argument with regard to COVID and it didn't do a very good job of that so that makes me feel pretty happy with my analysis you want to hear what uh its analysis was and i do the patriot power hour i do but i want to also say that a moment ago when i said maybe maybe maybe we should go and take a look that was not availed like you know i'm not playing a stick here i literally didn't know that you had

done this when I said that. So now I am even more excited to see what you came up. All right. There we go. Most important Patriot Power Hour takeaways as ChatGPT model 5.6 sole high thinking analyzed for me. Number one, the Lab League theory was a legitimate possibility and was prematurely stigmatized by media and government. And it talks about how Patriot Power Hour was the entire time flagging this as one of, if not the main reason. And it's pretty much fact evidence. Now, that did a blably theory,

including Fauci. They thought it probably was back in 2020. So that's come out. And we were on top of that. We were as ahead of that as everybody else. But, you know, while that transcript was after Zero Hedge got, you know, de-platform for reporting on it. It wasn't that hard to see if you're looking at the right sources.

100%. We have the American funding connection to Wuhan is established. There was money, and it confirms approximately $8 million by way of three NIH awards to EcoHealth Alliance, which folks who have been researching this might remember that name, EcoHealth Alliance, $8 million of that $8 million. $1.8 was a sub award, including the Wuhan Institute of Virologies. So they've tracked the receipts.

That's not that much money to the grand scheme of things, but where there's smoke, there's fire, $1.8 million documented to go from taxpayer money at the National Institute of Health to the Wuhan Institute of Virology, future, Dan. Yeah, I don't know what the period of that money being spent was. Let's say, for example, that was maybe, I don't know, four years, right?

So at $2 million a year, the level of effort, you know, considering the purchasing power of that money in China would have paid for, I don't know, sticks to 10, pretty smart scientists to be working full time on that. We have Fauci's gain of function denials depending on a very narrow definition that he did not clearly disclose. Again, this is Chat GPT's opinion

that it was essentially semantics. He was able to play some games with Rand Paul. Geez, when was that? A few years ago, a couple years ago. And essentially, he was maybe correct, but definitely

not in the spirit of disclosure. And that's pretty much a straight fact right now. Yeah, totally. Caught cold. Vaccine effectiveness was real, but narrower and less durable than advertised. I think that's a pretty milk toast way to say that he lied and they all lied when I've seen multiple clips. I'm not going to roll any right now. He can go find him where he says 90 plus percent effective at stock.

stopping transmission and 95 plus percent effective at reducing the amount, you know, how severe the disease is if you did get it. Multiple clips of that. There's other numbers that maybe not as extravagant as that like, hey, it works really well. It's not perfect. But let's just say they were sandbagging at best, lying at worst. And the overall summary, yes, vaccine effectiveness was real, but narrower and less

durable than advertised. Yeah, if you're going to run a White House with a deep state, you better have people that know how to detect liars next time. Vaccine risk and natural immunity required individual analysis that all these mandates ignored. That's come out. And that's, you know, for chat GP to actually output that, there must be a lot of evidence in my opinion. Vaccine risk, natural immunity need an individualized person by person, health analysis. that oh sweeping mandates got to mention lockdowns ignore that is a very important patriot power hour takeaway that might be you know that was the eighth and last one here on this list but that's like

right up there with the censoring and just overall manipulation of media and the people is yeah uh what what happened to individual uh medical decisions and you know vaccine paper please, that seems like that violates HIPAA future Dane. Yeah, none of it made sense. And that's why I personally never played along because it was theater. It was the president's adversaries in a great big fucking theater trying to make, make, find a reason to get him to fall in the election. It's all it ever was.

My question is, how long before we find the links? of Fauci and Chinese intelligence. That's what we're, that's what I hope that they have, and they're just not releasing that publicly for whatever reason so they can continue the investigation, so they can work clandestinely to stop that. Could he have been that big of a useful idiot,

have done all of that out of sheer personal greed and for whatever nefarious reasons? And to play right into an intelligence agency's hands without ever having been contacted by him. I kind of think that $8 million ECHO alliance money was sort of like the Chinese saying, look, you got to lay down a paper trail so that you got skin in the game, right?

You can't get half into this and flip it on us, right? Now, I have to, it's poking amount of money. Chinese could have funded this. It probably did. fund this long before by themselves. I always saw people that said, oh, look at this. We funded the Chinese research. We were being a bit naive.

Like, if it can scientifically be done, that state is running all kinds of genius-level scientists with the best tech they can get their hands on to do it with or without us. And spending billions a year, at least, you know, hundreds of millions a year, not 1.8 million. And I did look, the funding, the $1.8 million was between 2014 and 2019, so started in Obama and continued up through 2019, of course. Yeah. And I think that better crystallize some thoughts I was having, having what you said there about this is such a small amount of money. Why would it be there?

And it's a little bit to burn you or have skid into game and kind of lay a trail to kind of have that almost. like the mafia, I keep thinking of like you get them on the income tax, you don't get them on actual crime. One kind of follow-up, I guess, I feel like. Russia is probably compromise. Russia is called it compromise. Yeah, the Soviet Russia is call it compromise. Compromising material.

Having compromise on others, leverage on it, right? Which is of such a magnitude where you'll go down for it, but it's not so big that it raises huge red flags right away, maybe, right? Because Chinese intelligence is probably smart enough to see the day when Fauci would be in front of U.S. Congress, bleeding the fifth 111 times. And if they had done like $80 million of funding like they probably would have wanted to, then that would have been floated to the top a lot sooner. And it would be less of a conspiracy theory type of thing.

So that makes a lot of sense. It's one other thing. It's set the money. This isn't biological warfare. operations. You're into a very serious weapons of mass destruction warfare terms. Money doesn't matter anymore at that level. It's what knowledge we transfer to them. 1.8, 85, whatever, right? You're going to talk to us later about the black old debt that the United States is steering towards. We're talking about you know, tears in the ocean amounts of money, right? So, you know, it's,

What in fact you really help the Chinese do? That I wonder, because I'm not going to give their military research and development outfits, credit for some of the sophisticated gene splicing that happened, you know, putting HIV, you know, hooks and ladders and stuff to attach onto, you know, bat flu, right, and making it more lethal. I'm not so certain they could do that without, you know, intellectual contributions, not just be out money. And going back to Fauci, I don't think he cares about that money either,

even though he's become wealthy off of all this. It's as much or more is he wanted to be the kind of that savior complex or just kind of wanted to be a celebrity. Like you see him with his little shit eating grin up there. He tries to eat that up. Even today, he got someone left some flowers on his doorstep. I saw this. someone said he sent flowers to himself for a photoop to make him look like he was being loved

but anyway of course there's a certain segment of the population out there that feels so bad for Fauci think he's being bullied think he's a medical hero think it's not all his fault uh i think that's a bunch of BS but in of itself he just seems to have that sort of personality where he would almost do this for free because he wanted to just be in the spotlight and be kind of you know, the magic's doctor or scientist behind the COVID response and vaccine. And so, who knows? He's top 10 pathetic American villain quality right now, right? Like Benedict Arnold's on the list, probably number one in my book.

And there's, there's been others. Bullets, pursuit and Lincoln, like that kind of scum. Bouchy's in the running for top. 10, no doubt. You're talking all time, too. Wow, I was thinking of like modern time. I'm like, yeah, top 10 for sure. And then you're talking all time.

I'm like, well, it's really hard to name. If half of what I think he's perpetrated is true, which I feel like it's that or more, it's really hard to argue against you there. No, even before the founding, I'm talking about, you go back to Jamestown and start counting all-time American losers. He's on that list. He's known for it. This is just the day new month of that legacy for Anthony Fauci this week in Congress.

And credit to Rand Paul for holding him to account. 100% didn't give in at all. They tried to, you know, they gave Rand Paul hell and stuck with it. Well, you want to hit the dashboard? Want me to go ahead and hit the dashboard? Because we've got a lot of other stuff to talk about. Well, blitz it, Ben, because we got like significant. movement this week. We got columns and indicators hot that weren't for a long time,

especially in economic. It's a very different picture this week. All right, let's roll. Senator unloads devastating safety data showing COVID-vax logged nearly 7,000 death reports per year while the FDA pushed it. Three-way collision, how genetic predisposition plus mold, plus vaccines can all combine to lead to autism and other neurological issues. So other vaccine effects exposed on the dashboard today. But let's move on in the health and natural news section. Abortion drug proven detectable in American tap water. So enjoy that tap water with abortion drug in it.

Catastrophic flooding in West Virginia, two dead. we have a little bit more volcano activity. Saka Rojima, volcano bat blast glowing lava. So Pacific ring of fire we've been seen in the last few months picking up. Nevada wildfire still burning out of control near area 51. We have a girl discovered to have died in March 2025, just seven days after a world first clinical gene editing trial.

So at a Chinese university, by the way. So world first gene editing trial. The girl dies a week later. AI reveals hidden movements beneath San Andreas fault. 7.1 magnitude Japanese earthquake kills 13 and potentially higher death told them that even. the other aspect of the Pacific Rim of Fire, not just volcanoes, but earthquakes. Also higher than average activity and the 7.1 magnitude is fairly large. 1,000 deaths official from the Ebola outbreak.

And really, they're thinking the number could come in above 1,500 when all is tallied. Seems the death rate itself has slowed down, but. the calculation takes a little while to catch up. Economically, we have pretty large jumps in interest rates. Treasury yields 19-year high, 14 basis point jump on the 30-year. That just means mortgages, credit cards, corporate debt, and government debt, all going to be more expensive. Fed.

holds rates unchanged this week. 17 states placed under power emergency. The Secretary of Energy orders this to be done. Commerce Department quietly announces seven new equity stakes in private companies. This is a topical news item, but under the indicator economy federally seized. We'll explore that a little bit. Record homelessness in some of the cities that. said yes to drugs those type of cities that enabled addictive drug use are well they're seeing

more and more homelessness and drug use market stock market that is has been taking a taking a bit of a whackin nothing too crazy but down 2.2 percent and one of the largest single day drops in the past year, the worst in the last year. But still, the market is quite robust at this point, or at least the number on the stock tickers are pretty high still, all considered. We'll keep watching that as we head into the fall. Let's go on to security, domestic, and international. Proof-of-life photo of Kentucky Senators released Trying to stave off Constitutional officer going missing

Heavy Russian attacks reached the far west of Ukraine And a missile even slams into Poland 60 miles into Poland by the way And that missile could in theory Or not in theory in practicality Hold a nuke It didn't have one of course But you almost have to assume

that they are. Nuk carrying nukes. If you're doing the game theory, Navy carrier strike group, patrolling tension-filled South China Sea. China's going to arm Iran with hundreds of manpads despite Trump's warning.

So the Chinese equivalent of Stinger missiles to shoot down helicopters, low-flying aircraft, etc. Shoulder launched. Your purchases at Amazon and Walmart are funding Chinese manpads to shoot

down American Blackhawks. X-N-I-A-D director refuses to testify in Congress. More refusing to testify. And this one is, of course, under false flag exposed. And, well, pleading the fifth. U.S. Saudi attack leaves, excuse me, I had a little glitch there on the tech. U.S. Saudi attack kills IRGC fighters in Iraq. Saudis form Sunni military lines to protect the Red Sea shipping lanes.

Saudi Arabia preparing even a land offensive against the Houthis. The Red Sea is really the only way Saudi Arabia can get its exports out. So with Hormuz closed down and also if the Red Sea goes down, Saudi's in big trouble. So you're seeing them move. and the U.S. is definitely helping Saudi Arabia with that. Epstein friends mysteriously

dying. I mean, everybody's got to die sometime, but it seems to be dying at a quicker clip. We'll look into that a bit. And one more column. Let's go for it. Liberty. The Bill of Rights column, as I call it.

War unconstitutionally waged. The War Powers Act was fairly close to being passed, but has not been done, but war has not been passed either or declared that is. But we certainly look to be

darn near in a war. President threatens to hit Iran hard following missile attack. There's a two-week plan to escalate strikes in Iran sent com. A lot of activity going over to the Middle East and there already has been so much buildup over the last

six months. So, keeping quite an eye on that. this is a ShtF level indicator trending on feature danger.com. Under elections are stolen, over 148,000 mail ballots rejected in California primary election. Again, 148,000 mail ballots rejected in the primary election, or how many got through. They were fraudulent. New Jersey rejects Department of Justice requests for records on alien voter registration. error. So New Jersey putting up barriers for any investigation into a legal alien voter registration

or just alien in general. U.S. Intel chiefs back. Trump claimed that China interfered in the American elections just two weeks ago. Trump went on air about 9 p.m. Eastern on a Thursday just after Patriot Power Hour came out with all that information. now Intel chiefs are backing that China did interfere in American elections. Also, well, let me finish strong here instead of Pontificate because we're almost there. We'll bring future Dan back on. Fourth Amendment being liquidated by subscription. What does that even mean?

We'll look at it. Radar like 6G networks to track you without cameras, phones, or consent. They can just track you through. the signals in the air. We're really in Star Trek now. Car owners take extreme measures to avoid surveillance, technology, microphones, cameras, and other types of tracking.

And finally, well, we did talk about this some last week, but they've gone on to double down Democratic Socialists of America, want to abolish the Supreme Court and the presidency. Future Dan, that looks to be the dash. for July 30th, 2026. They want to abolish

the prisons that they belong in, too. What was that? They want to abolish the prisons. That big share of them probably will find themselves in someday. Or they want to put people like me and you in those prisons

and work camps from what I've seen in 20th century history. They like that. Well, it's exactly how they'll find themselves in the prisons. Well, on lobby. There you go. Where do you want to hit? That was quite a deep dashboard for end of July, really.

There is. It's very hot, very dangerous column one. But last week we talked about how many basis points would have to move in a treasury rate before you suspected things were breaking under the service. Your answer last week was 10 basis points when there was a four basis point. point move. And then I think yesterday or today we had a 14 basis point. So it took your standard, added what happened next week to that. And that has to meet the definition of the financial system breaking underneath the service, don't you think? A couple things. I would say my 10 basis point would be like in a day or two. So it has happened practically in a day. Definitely in the

week, so might as well be close to that sort of pace. Also, this is just everyone capitulating that the Fed cannot lower interest rates. And so any and all gas and hope in people's, you know, trading portfolio that maybe they can squeak out a 25 basis point cut. It's not happening. So at 14 basis points, a good portion of it. I don't know how much. I haven't done a sensitivity analysis on it. but a good portion of that is traders just giving in the Fed can't cut rates inflation is already

too high they can't do anything about it so that's some of it now the question is is it going to stop here or is next week it's going to be another 5 10 15 basis points and continue to roll up and you and your new personal hero hero Kevin Warsh isn't doing forward guidance anymore right he ended that, you know, yelling, pal, probably back when Bernacki was in there of prognosticating about what to expect next time, or we're going to cut three more times than the rest of the year. That bullshit's, worst never believed in it. He's not doing it now. And I think this is a tantrum in reaction to that. Some of that might be.

You know, I have two ways to look at it. I think I've said this many times, but probably the best thing to do right now is just not touch the interest rates. So at this rate, keep doing what you're doing worse. Just step away. Don't mess with the machine. I really think you can only make it worse, whether you raise or lower rates, it would make it worse. That's my personal opinion. But, but yeah, I think they're too worried about lower and a lot of that is because of the inflation pressure out of,

the Middle East. Here's the message coming over Bankster Radio tonight, though. It really revolves around Trump chaos, you know, geopolitically, financially, tariffs, just unpredictability. Trump chaos, they're really riding that in combination with, wars can't possibly go on without, you know, without giving Ford. guidance because the absence of his voice will create a vacuum that'll, you know, they'll get filled by the worst among the financial world and, you know, it's going to crash

everything. Sounds to me like early messaging for hoovering Trump, Ben. Well, they would certainly have that as an arrow in their quiver to blame. Like, oh, they totally mismanaged the Fed. They got rid of the right data. I've heard that as a Democrat talking point. Oh, the government data, the budget data, the federal reserve is including, but I'm also talking about the Treasury and other agencies.

Their data either has been restricted or cut off or blah, blah, blah. And that could make us blind and make us susceptible to a big crash, which is essentially what you're saying with a Hooverism. Yeah, or the Trump Waterloo, right? He finally goes down and defeat once or for all. And it's going to be the financial world that causes it or does it because it was his chaos. It'll be his great stock market crash. It'll be his great dollar collapse.

It'll be his great depression, right? All just run around his neck. I'm hearing the beginning this week of the messaging that if it can be done. If there's some cartel or some strong enough power center in the international banking world to defeat the U.S. president that stood up against the, quote, false song of globalism. I think I'm starting to hear the messages come out now. Well, I really still think that from an economic standpoint, and we've talked about how power and deterrence through. strength on the geopolitical and warfare point of view can be worth more than just money or it's really hard to calculate how valuable not having a massive war nuclear war would be but i've done

some calculations and looking at really everything here uh i have it country by country but the u.s overall is losing according to my calculations two to three hundred million dollars per day from the Strait of Hormuz direct increases and shortages. That's small from a GDP point of view. But that plus also, I mean, that doesn't take into account increased government spending for the military, which is upwards of $500 million per day. So we're talking $500, $700, $800 million a day. Because of that, all added on top of debt.

That's why they can't lower rates. And with it, you know, they're simply put, uh, they're hamstrung there. They should raise rates. Probably the math would say raise rates, but man, talk about everyone just piling on Trump going into midterms. If he raised rates, you know, it's, it's politically difficult to raise rates. Let's just say that. Yeah.

So I don't like that indicator sitting out there. that whole economic calm could get worse fast. It's billions and billions of dollars per year. Additional interest being charged just compared to this time last week. So 14 basis points, you know, that's equal to 0.14%. That sounds like nothing. But when you aggregate that across all auto loans, all mortgages, all student loans, all corporate debt,

two plus trillion dollars in government debt every single year that we add to the national debt. I mean, that ends up being a lot. You know, pennies on trillions of dollars becomes billions and billions. And in fact, even more than a trillion dollars per year of interest paid just by the government. So we're going to see the Kessel Run graphic you showed me before the show? I think you're talking about it right now. It's not ready for public facing yet because there's some errors and inconsistencies. but the way I've constructed

what I call the Kessel Run black hole of debt. Anyone that's a Star Wars nerd knows about the Millennium Falcon making the Kessel Run. What the Kessel Run is essentially is a smuggling route that goes really close

to a bunch of black holes. You can pretty much have to weave through a bunch of black holes. Very dangerous. Hans Solo did it in the Falcon. I assume Chewy was with him. And I've come up with four different black holes that if we run into any of them from a national economy point of view, it's a black hole of debt where you, if we get too much debt, you can't grow out of it,

barring some sort of miracle, but not really mathematically possible. So anyway, let's just say that my model says that at the start of this year, we were at a six and a half out of 10 severity rate. now we're out of eight out of ten my model says conditions have deteriorated materially in the last seven months we're not on the verge of a total economic or debt spiral collapse yet but we have almost no buffer to absorb some other shock so if some other COVID comes around or some other 9-11 sort of terrorist attack or some 9.1 magnitude earthquake in San Francisco like goes really bad. That might push us over.

We don't have the buffer. We don't have that, you know, the reserve fuel tank at the least. I take your point. I look forward to when that graphics a little bit more trustworthy on the numbers for the audience. It looks cool, but I'll leave it to you to debut

when you feel confident in it. Yep. And still tweaking some of the numbers. it's hard to really know what the numbers mean. They're kind of like scales of 1 to 10 or percentages. So anyway, I'm going to refine it more. Let's just say the debt situation has gotten worse in the last year. And your household, if you're an American, your American household is definitely closer than ever to foreclosure.

Let's just say that. Right, but sovereign debt. So that's kind of where that equation doesn't. doesn't equal right two sides right my my house and what i owe and what the united states of america owes not really the same thing it there are certainly differences to the borrowing capacity uh really in the end they can monetize all their dead and just pass the inflation to us which which is what they do so that's what you would expect exactly what else is striking your interest on this heat map dashboard.

All right. Let's see if I can get this article. I actually put out a statement that the editorship of future danger, I think it has an error now that I thought about where one of those headlines went. Which one? Go ahead. The one about the gene editing in Chinese University and the young girl died. we're just learning about that. The indicator I put it under,

I'm not sure it belongs there. It should be under human experimentation exposed. Because that's exactly what they were doing. They were taking, you know, a disabled child, a birth defect, a neurological defect. Basically, you know, some, you know, an underdeveloped child. Delayed development, call it what you will.

They're just experimenting on her. Try to try and see if they could switch off the gene that caused the condition, but it killed her. So that's super grotesque and inhumane. And based on the article here, the condition usually doesn't impact life expectancy. So it's not like she was going to die in the next six weeks no matter what. And it was the last second attempt.

That regime will throw away life and sanction it. And when they get caught at it, the university will be fined, right? The university got fined in a communist country, right? So that's China. And the parents and relatives were asked to contribute $860,000 equivalent. So very wealthy Chinese. And someone, I remember specifically when I was a little more rambunctious in my breaking the bankster days, talking more trash on social media.

media before it was cool. It never was cool. But anyway, I was talking trash about China and someone corrected me and appropriately by saying, you keep talking about them as commies, but actually they're hyper-capitalists psychopaths. So they take the worst of communism and kind of a capitalist slash monetizing everything without really monetizing human life. It's like everything has a value except human life practically. And, you know, they put it pretty elegantly, you know, actually.

I'm butchering it. But they're pretty much like, hey, man, they're not just communist. Actually, they're super hyper, almost fascists in a way. And I'm like, yeah, I guess it doesn't matter what label they are. You know, they're horrible. How about that? Yeah, except for there's giant streams of that society that if the entire regime just yank back into Lenis Marxist

doctrine you know Maoist cultural revolution could take it could snap back to what it once was which you know right there with the Russians as one of the most hideous pure communist regimes we've ever

seen they can become that again oh absolutely and there might be more dangerous the way they are now though because they could actually accumulate a lot of resources, a lot of wealth, and have more influence than when they're, you know, maybe they, you know, the average Chinese person might have a better

life now than they did in 1965. I'm pretty sure that's true. But China's also way more dangerous in the world stage because they've accumulated trillions and trillions of dollars of resources and industry, et cetera. And jumping over to a different article that's talking about the same regime. You know, for reports to be coming out that they're going to just ship the man pads, you know, that is defiant. And who knows if it's a real report, right? Somebody in our government could be saying that just to, you know, stoke the flames of war. But if they could do it and they thought they were given hardware that would help the Chinese or the Iranians continue to fight, I mean, they're. And they're obviously going to do it.

they fed they fed plenty of soviet equipment right into Vietnam to bring about that outcome I guess you got to assume every government will attempt as much of this as they can that they think they can get away with without risk in nuclear war is that kind of the only like that's all they seem to care about they'll almost it really this includes

the US and NATO against Russia like hey we'll provide the ISR will provide the missiles you know still ukraine has to hit the button did launch it most of the time but everything else besides pushing the button is almost all funded and supported by nato at large apparently that's not enough to trigger nuclear war which i'm happy about so i guess also china i mean china given four hundred man pads is nothing compared to that so china can do that easily is that true i don't know if they'll get them to them but they're going to try right probably overland you know harder to strike in the interior of Asia, but China and Iran obviously don't share a border, so I'm not

entirely sure that's possible. And let's talk about Poland, getting hit by the Russian missile, right? I'm not sure if that struck and killed civilians that we wouldn't be in a real crisis right now. So the Russians have been receiving very sophisticated drone swarm strikes that they can't defend against, right? And waves upon waves into Moscow. So they're just going to use ballistic missiles and pound Western Ukraine, try to go after probably, you know, the obvious place to put all the manufacturing and all the staging, all the logistics. is further away from the front, so it's all in western Ukraine. It's right on the border with NATO,

and that's getting hammered now. So that whole theater is, you know, no better off towards peace. And then you have, like, countries with, you know, you know, the triad of nuclear weapons. We can all strike each other. We can all counter strike each other.

We can all seriously, risk the continuing existence of each other's governments, right? You know, thermonuclear total war, right? War games, right? That war games, like, don't play, you can't win kind of thinking. That's clearly in effect with us and Russia and China, and all the country is under our nuclear umbrella. So how far can any of this conventional warfare go before we're into a,

you know, something is serious again as, let's say, the Cuban Missile? crisis was. It's generally considered the closest we ever got to, you know, nuclear war. We're going to get close to one of those sometime soon. I feel, I felt the last four years that what's gone on in Ukraine, at least at the peak of it, had to get us pretty damn close to that. Maybe, maybe not Cuba level, but it was, it was pretty nasty. Maybe it's a little more tepid now or a little bit more of a, you know, NATO and Russia are on the triggers right now as much. But then again, things are escalating and things. And like you said, if that had landed on an apartment and killed 30 people, that missile,

might be different. Might be different. I had a question. Maybe this goes hand in hand. Maybe it's a dumb question. but maybe not. 400 of those man pads. If the U.S. knew that they were being shipped in to Iran,

you know, do you think we should take out that shipment before it could happen, even if that resulted in Chinese military casualties? Or is that too far to go? Like there's so much cat and mouse at some point, you've got to smack them down. But is that too far? Like, you've got to be a lot more subtle about this.

You know, I would not be good clandestine guy, I don't think. How many Americans get killed that way before we'd have to be at war? Well, kind of incident. How many? You don't think you're about. Okay. Yeah. Right.

Yeah. So, no. No, but, you know, that's what the intelligence services are for, right? Stop it without having something that either public must be aware of. In that case, the body count, got to be pretty high, uh, considering Ukraine and Iran at this point, not even looking at China or Taiwan stuff. A lot of that's got to be going on, just interdicting weapons shipments and just it's got like pretty, pretty crazy, really.

But then there's proxies, right? Like, what if Israelis struck a train deep in the middle of Asia that had them on there, right? Then China, what are you going to do, what are you going to do Israel? You're not going to do anything to them. So that's where all the. proxy warfare comes in, right? Getting with the Saudis to go after, you know, after, you know, the remnants of Iranian proxies, like proxy warfare replaces that.

And it always did, right? You know, instead of having World War III, we fought it out in Korea. We fought it out in Vietnam. We fought it out in lots of places with surrogates. All right. We've been on air upwards of an hour, not quite yet. We got a few more minutes. A lot of articles we haven't touched on.

Anything you really, really got a hit on? Yeah, I did a little analysis of how new cars are being, you know, avoided or changed or, you know, otherwise just, you know, circumvented by owners. Love that article. How we recommend that. We don't have to get into detail, but, you know, does touch upon how to, you know, alter alarm systems, alter surveillance systems, cameras, etc. that are, you know, even the lighting and vehicles, like they expose you, right? Like, you know, your car now just leaves you just exposed if you don't know how to change it. But I love that article.

Highly recommended for preppers. What else, Ben? Economics. I have other news that's concerning, but maybe not debt related that we can get into. Well, that was one I wanted to hit on and the other two headlines under. that same indicator to the SHTF highest threat level, unreasonable search and seizure, normalize. You have all that surveillance tech, but, hey, maybe ways to turn it off or circumvent it, like you said, go check it out.

But also, we have radar-like 6G networks to track you without cameras, phones, or consent. Essentially, future Dan, it's these waves that would be on the street, right? Just like everyone's talking about 5G being bad. Well, it's everywhere now. Well, imagine 6G and beyond where it's much better tech. And it can, for all intents and purposes, see everything going on in your house by way of the waves. They already have a lot of research where Wi-Fi can map out your house or your apartment where rooms are, where people are sleeping at the time, even like how tall people are.

they can distinguish that person's like the three-year-old child, and that's the adult male. And also not to mention to listen to your voices all throughout, like your Xbox and your Samsung TV. So anyway, throwing that all together, now there's going to be public 6G networks that you can't control that will be able to track you, get different information off of you.

And who knows, you know, really, this is all been expected, but now it's actually here. You know, they can track you by your voice, track you by your gate, track you by, well, the phone in your pocket and the car you drive future Dan. It's a whole network. And some share of us are, you know, just be honest, that radiation is going to kill them. It's going to put tumors in your body.

So maybe that's the savior from this when, you know, RFK Jr. or somebody else in the future, brings down the hammer and shows like we now know about COVID and the vaccine, we've got to have that, you know, revolution and thought on wireless technologies, probably very unhealthy besides setting up 1984 everywhere. Absolutely. There has really been a lot of research about being near 5G,

being bad for your health. Just like years ago, it was proven time and again. that living very close to interstate highways bad for your health. Sure, there's a socioeconomic aspect to that. Poor people are less healthy and poorer people usually live next to, you know, high traffic, dense areas, but that's only part of it. A lot of it is the sound and the air pollution and the bright lights on the margin is bad for you.

And I would dare say the radiation aspect of your phone, Wi-Fi, 5G, 6G, blah, blah, blah. It's like an order of magnitude worse. And the wealthier you are, the wealthier area you live in, the more soaked you are in that radiation because it costs money to push signal. So it's kind of the opposite of that, you know, sounds like something meathead on Archie Bunker would argue about living near highways. But, you know, 6G is not going to the poor neighborhoods first. Yes and no.

I would say the urban Corps is downtown. Yeah, those are very expensive, but a lot of wealthy people spend a lot of time out in the country and far away, or at least they have bugout places out there.

But I agree, this is something that cuts through no matter how wealthy you are. If you're standing on the street in Manhattan, you're going to be getting a shit ton of radiation. Yeah, it already are too. Yeah, that's bad. one more bad thing to pay attention to on the heat map dashboard.

Try not to be doom scrolled here, but got to talk about these things. You know, educate, open people's eyes up. Go read these articles yourself and make your own judgments, right? A lot of these articles are topical because it's not happening now, but if you think about it, that's the position of Patriot Power Hour. All of this is worth conversation. How about to end this? We're talking about the flock cameras and really the whole take down of flock.

I like to see this. But on the other hand, this is only scratching the surface, number one. Number two, I want to point out that we have never caused any physical destruction or called for that future, Dan, but we did have a couple exercises and potential exercises. and potential exercises on the books where we were looking to identify surveillance cameras on certain routes. Let's just say, for example, if you needed to bug out from your place of work to your home, you knew a route or two identifying where some cameras were, not to destroy them, but just to avoid or at least know where they are so you could, you know, change the way you walk or the way you look, etc.

You were talking about that years and years ago before flock, and now this is even more reason future. Dan. Yeah, the thing about that I don't understand about flock, and I think I asked this before, maybe at some point I'll be motivated enough to answer it myself, but I invite others to do it

if they are equally as interested is, are these brands of cameras with something special about it? I keep you at people like, I saw a flock camera, saw a flock camera, and maybe there's a camera company out there that has standardized on a model that's affordable,

highly, highly reliable for what it's designed to do. Like, okay, maybe, but who cares if there's software collecting all the cameras that are already out there that don't have brand name block on them and integrating them into one common operating picture? Damn right, that software's been out there forever. And the police agencies that buy it want it better and better and better. This has all been out there. you know, trade shows, you know, police trade shows,

you know, military, you know, kind of conferences and industrial events. So who cares if it's a flock camera? They've already been integrating every feed that they can get. All the resolutions, all the angles, pan, tilt, zoom, or not. Getting hung up on, hey, I've heard about these new flock cameras, so it's all suddenly here and against me, seems to have missed the point. Pretty well said.

And so the background of flock is it started out in 2017 as pretty much what you said there, like a neighborhood watch or residential or small company. You know, you could have a few of those for your parking lot or your lobby or whatever. But what really put flock over the edge is they had a lot of public, private partnerships and contracts where police departments, you know, paid them for that access and, in fact, even installed some of their own cameras, official, quote unquote, official city or county type that flock cameras. So that public private partnership and all that money flowing in, you know, that was just the start. And then the overall integration, how that's all pulled together

from the ring camera from Amazon and there's several other camera companies. I think the main reason people caught on the flock first or more than the others is because it was police, you know, contracts with police departments. So it wasn't just the cops could subpoena your footage. It was actually live monitored and shared nationwide, license plate information,

what bumper stickers and photos of your car and, you know, through your windshield and stuff like that. Yeah, okay. But it kind of resembles to me, like, you know, what's the basic difference between Apple computers and phones and, and, and, and, you know, Microsoft, right? You know, Microsoft is open, right? You can make an app and put it on Microsoft. Apple's closed. Like, it's got to be the Apple way, right? I don't know, flock is like the iPhones of cameras, but my bigger concern, you know, because, you know, Apple's, you know, is still a minority product, right? It's the bigger, you know, video integration, right? So every office building in a zone just to get permission to be built probably has to

allow authorities to feed its security cameras, for example. So I think the software integration in the back is a much bigger issue than, you know, maybe one company got its brand of proprietary cameras, cameras. sold enough to, you know, get people's attention. The surveillance problem's been bigger, worked on much harder, and is much more widespread and, you know, cross-platform than everybody that's hyped on flock right now, you know, you know, tends to talk about.

I've seen these same articles on, you know, doing future danger about, I don't know, what, five, six years ago when ring cameras became about, that was the big panic then. I think the analogy is flock isn't even ahead of the hydra. It's not even a tentacle. It's just one sucker on one tentacle of the beast of the surveillance system.

But it is a sucker that people got sick of and destroyed a whole bunch and, you know, not explicitly endorsing that here, but it wasn't sad to see. Hey, real quick, looking at these, the founders, from 2017. I'm like, yep, they look almost exactly my age. They are, you know, the face of happy millennial hipster types, right? I'll try to help everybody. Guaranteed in 2017, if I had

seen this article, I would have been like, oh yeah, they're definitely part of the, you know, evil surveillance state. Everyone would have called me a tin full of hat wearing conspiracy theories, but I hear about nine or ten years later, there's a lot less people call me conspiracy. theories future day there's no conspiracies here the same technology that could be used to persecute you can be put up and catch carjackers and murderers and rapists in the act and dramatically lower crime both are true at the same time hey not to go on a total tangent but they say the age of the serial killer is pretty much over and that the golden age of serial killer crime everyone you know all these people, not me, but a lot of people love these crime stories and serial killers of the

70s and 80s are all famous, right? That's because they had just enough forensics to piece it together. It was the same person or person's killing, but not enough to really catch them early. Now serial killers get caught up within the first couple, few killings, it seems like, because of surveillance, because of DNA. Not to say there's not going to be serial killers that get away with stuff, but I thought that was interesting. That's a positive externality about the surveillance state, you know, serial killers get caught sooner, hopefully. It's just one more of those driving issues that forks us, right? It has a yin and a yang.

It has two sides of the coin. One of them is very positive for society, and then you can flip it. It could be horrendous for society, right? We'd like to talk about these things in a balanced way, but if police departments are funded by governments that are fairly elected, they spend their money to have cameras that are on property where they're recognized,

then what I would say is perfectly legitimate about how to rid yourself of those in a grid down scenario, excessive rule of loss scenario, knowing how to avoid them and take them out. That should be like basic prepper skill. But in the meantime,

maybe the neighborhood you live in is safer too. right? I hope so. I hope so. Future Dan, it's been a great show. I don't have any more articles of topics to hit on. I think it's one of our better shows of the year. We've had some great shows very busy to round out July. We'll be here in August as well. No dog days of summer so far. I got a historical fact I wanted to throw out there that I saw today. Ben, did you know little trivia here, that the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs oversees certain burial locations of American veterans, right? And let's see if you could take a guess. Guess how many of those, you know, basically government maintained war cemeteries, how many American revolutionary vets are in them? they're getting honored this week.

It's not a high number. It's not a high number. You got to do the math, right? You know, the Revolutionary War ended. And how long did some of those guys live? And where were we at in the 1800s where war seminatories were starting to get, you know, identified and recognized and later, you know,

cared for by the VA. Man, this is like very difficult. I'm going to just say like, Or how many cemeteries or how many people? How many revolutionary war vets? How many of those veterans are buried in cemeteries that we have that are tracked that are, you know, maintained, funded, looked over by the VA. Not a big number. Take you guys.

800. 49. 49. That is really low number. And they know. And they know those burial plots. They know they're veterans of the American Revolution, and they're getting honored this week.

So a little shout out for those boys on Patriot Power Hour. Talk about thank you for your service right there. Absolutely. Were there any particular states or cemeteries or more of them more than others? Or that should be maybe some homework for listeners and myself, go look up a few of these places where they are and a few stories about these people and stuff like that. I bet just only a handful of the original 13 colonies that have these. Yeah.

There you go. What a way to round out. Patriot Power Hour, Episode 356, July 30, 2026. Be back next week, Future Dan. I will be mobile on the road. I'm 90% sure we'll be able to make a show work. We just might not be able to share screen as well as we normally do. And you know what?

Future Dan, we got. A fair amount of people live watching right now on Rumble, on X, on Facebook. So those who have been joining us more and more for our live broadcast where we can share the screen. Appreciate it. Next week, probably won't be able to share the screen, but I am expecting our podcast to go off. Same time as usual. Same place, 7 p.m. Eastern or thereabouts on Thursday, right? That's right.

Thank you to our audience. You all know, we're not just watching the news on the night that we broadcast. watching it all the time we're talking about it in the back channel all the time so if all hell breaks loose anytime between now and next week we'll be here but if not i'll catch you next week then catch you next week everybody