The Prepper Broadcasting Network - Patriot Power Hour #359
Episode Date: August 28, 2026Each week on Patriot Power Hour, Ben ‘The Breaker of Banksters’ and Future Dan explore the latest Liberty, Security, Economic & Natural news, providing the situational awareness needed to exec...ute your preparedness plans. Questions, Feedback, News Tips, or want to be a Guest? Reach out!Ben “The Breaker of Banksters” @BanksterBreaker on XFuture Dan@FutureDanger6 on XBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/prepper-broadcasting-network--3295097/support.Support PBN and become a MEMBER of the PBN FAMILY! Free courses, Members only videos, reviews, and podcast! The Prepper's Medical Handbook Build Your Medical Cache – Welcome PBN FamilyJoin the Prepper Broadcasting Network for expert insights on #Survival, #Prepping, #SelfReliance, #OffGridLiving, #Homesteading, #Homestead building, #SelfSufficiency, #Permaculture, #OffGrid solutions, and #SHTF preparedness. With diverse hosts and shows, get practical tips to thrive independently – subscribe now!Newsletter – Welcome PBN FamilyGet Your Free Copy of 50 MUST READ BOOKS TO SURVIVE DOOMSDAYSupport PBN with a Donation
Transcript
Discussion (0)
What do you want?
Statement of purpose.
Should I email you?
Should I put this on your action item list?
You decide your own level of involvement.
We are the Prepper Broadcasting Network.
You are now listening to the Patriot Power Hour,
the newest show of the Prepper Broadcasting Network.
This live episode features the situational awareness you need
to practice self-reliance and independence.
Introducing your hosts, Ben, the Breaker of Banksters,
and Future Dan, the editor of Future Danger.com.
Patriot Power Hour live once more.
August 27th, 2026, episode 359.
Ben the breaker, Banksters here with Future Dan.
What's going on, Future Dan?
We're almost at the end of the summer.
hottest months of the year behind us.
It does look like with the temperatures,
some of the news we've seen in recent weeks
is cooling off a bit,
especially in economics.
We're getting, you know,
toward the crisis for the past couple of weeks
with the bond market,
but that seems to have subsided.
Or maybe not.
Are you seeing things under the surface
that aren't making it to the news radar?
We've got a heck of a dashboard.
We'll jump right into,
but speaking of economics
and whether a financial crisis is in the offing,
the banksters,
meaning the Treasury Secretary,
in this case. They've kicked the can down the road successfully here with doubling the purchases,
the buyback that's going to start in September of debt. That's going to help support the overall
financial system, make sure interest rates don't explode crazy out of control. But they're also
looking at tapping a trillion dollar additional account for more bond.
buybacks that'll go longer term as well as probably more per month.
So yeah, I don't think crisis has been averted or solved at the basic level, right?
But it has been successfully kicked, I guess.
We'll find out.
I don't think we can say what's really going on until after Labor Day, right?
It's still August.
People are back, but still light trading right now.
Yeah.
What else you've seen?
What else has been happening that is drawing your attention, Ben?
The CIA director going to Russia, Ratcliffe.
That's making you nervous?
Moscow. That makes you nervous?
No, it's actually the other way around.
I'm like, oh, maybe they're like meeting and trying to prevent total breakdown of communication and, you know, resulting in escalation.
That's what I'm hoping for if it's the other way around.
and they're like really fighting it out in person, I guess.
But I'm more like hopefully they're trying to come up with a way to not blow each other up on accident.
I can't remember before the Trump presidency, any CIA director travels that were public.
He uses CIA director that way and comes straight out and says it was semi-routine to do it.
But on the other hand, you know, would you expect to see something like that weeks before World War III?
I do recall there were some visits by, gosh, maybe you recall, but right before February 2022, when Russia went into Ukraine, there were some high-level dignitaries that had just visited Ukraine right before it happened.
Yeah, maybe Obama or Biden also sent CIA directors publicly.
that's that's true it's barely recent to have you think back during the cold war that was never a thing right
they very well went and did stuff like that it was just always like anything they did was secret right now we're getting to see it
sure and there's a lot of reasons for that and uh we won't get too much into the cloak and dagger but i'll tell you one good reason
go for it so they can escalate to rubio next
and then if they needed to, they could escalate to Vance, right?
So they got, you know, constitutionally a bigger gun, right?
Higher up the chain of, you know, succession, really.
If you wanted to, like, say, all right, no, you really can't be doing this.
And Rubio would go to Lavrov, right?
And I don't know.
Vance would probably want to speak to Putin and probably get Medved.
at least they're engaging in that diplomatic dance instead of just totally shut off is how I look at it.
But maybe that's gracious for me to give the CIA director.
I don't care what administration.
I'm not hard for me to be like too supportive of them.
So another way that governments do this, which is almost always clandestine, at least when it happens, is, you know, it's a French diplomatic term called democracy.
mars, you know, issuing a demarch. And, and militaries do that, right? An example that's now,
you know, public knowledge is when Saddam Hussein invaded Kuwait, he got a demarch through, I think,
you know, probably the Swiss, some intermediary delivered it. And it was like, from our military to
you, if you go into Saudi Arabia, you're getting nuked, right? The, the, the, the, the, the, the, the, the, the, the, the, the,
We got the insoluc in Turkey where there's bunkers.
They bring the nukes out.
They put them on the F whatever's they had at the time.
And you're at risk of that.
So the question in my mind is, did Ratcliffe issue one of those?
Well, I guess what would you, if he did, what would you see in practicality?
And are you seeing that right now in future danger?
What would you be seeing in the coming weeks if something like that did happen and didn't
positively. Well, the European media, especially the British, and possibly, you know, I'd accuse
Germans of, you know, really pounded on this story that Putin's going to attack a NATO
country, probably a Baltic state, Romania, Poland, or one of the Baltic states
in the coming weeks. And the fact that Ratcliffe went there sort of substantiates that, at a
minimum our European allies think that is going to happen.
And it's Overton window stuff then, you're right?
That the Russians would try to set a precedent, you know, a precedent that was not met with,
you know, lethal force.
And I would not be surprised to learn later that Trump sent Ratcliffe there to say,
this will be war if you do that.
And well, I guess we'll keep reporting here on Patriot Power Hour.
which what we really see happening do you have any any further opinion i can just say demarses
are serious things they are when militaries say to other militaries there's the line we're not
going to accept it being crossed right and what's the line so what prompted this then russia's
starting to kick ukraine sticks over the drones problem i german germans are saying that there's
drones in Germany with explosives
that are linked to the
German military intelligence
right, the GRU
and Ratcliffe was sitting across
the table from
two senior
you know, the senior
civilian intelligence and the senior
military intelligence representatives
of Russia. So he's talking
he's talking to the people that if they're up to
that stuff are
ultimately responsible for it and
other
you know, we've reported on future danger
other, you know, other, you know, drone incursions.
So the Europeans are very worried that they're going to try to set a new precedent and
cross that line.
I'm not sure how legit that ultimately is because that's, you know, Article 5 stuff, right?
If Lapia gets struck, they're a NATO member.
They invoke Article 5.
What else can the alliance do?
Well, I think, you know, that was the CIA
CIA director getting sent there to remind them.
Once you start down that path,
they're, you know, global thermonuclear warfare is the end state.
We don't know of a way to start fighting like that
and not end up there if you strike allied territory.
So where's that leave Russia?
Because they're getting bombed in Moscow and interior, you know,
from the interior, they're just going to take it on the chin.
They're kind of being power played like that or because, you know, they're getting
getting kicked right there.
Yeah, there's a whole bunch of territory, a whole bunch of governments.
They're all in an alliance.
And they're under the American nuclear umbrella, French and British in a minor way, too.
And not going to strike us.
And you invaded Ukraine.
So it seems like your problem.
You know, interestingly enough, as part of the 15-year anniversary of the 13th
thrown the banksters. I had a news site that was, I'm like, it wasn't similar to future danger,
but it did repost and list several articles a week that I thought were interesting, including
the maiden revolution in 2014 and moving into Crimea and all the stuff that 10, well, I guess
eight years later turned into the invasion. So it's kind of, I went back down memory, down a memory hole.
I guess, looking at old articles 10, 15 years ago over this last week since our last broadcast.
That was one of them.
And seeing this acceleration and potential escalation, having the CIA director show up there like that, definitely hope.
Cooler heads prevail, but it does not seem like Ukraine ceasefire is going to happen.
That's actually one of our Patriot Power Hour predictions for the year that there would be a sustained ceasefire.
It's kind of an evaluation where you have to make the judgment call,
but we have not been able to make that call yet.
It doesn't look like it's going to happen either.
Fire simply in the ballistic missile and the cruise missiles,
the drone munitions,
just a ceasefire in that air war would be a significant achievement this year.
Right.
Yeah, let alone.
localized fighting on the ground.
That prank isn't going to stop.
I mean, that was going at a low level since like 2014.
But then, of course, blew up big time in 2022 and beyond.
Well, we'll go through the news because we have a couple more articles about Ukraine
and just generally national security and economics.
But before we do the dashboard, any other major topics you want to hit on or anything,
just generally on your mind, even if it's not a news item?
a little preview of the heat map dashboard.
Last week I talked about how, you know,
after a period of occasionally using artificial intelligence
to find news articles according to the 492
indicators of future danger,
it's now become a regular practice to seek news in this manner.
And a lot of the returns that I've got,
are, we're definitely on the trivial side, not making it onto the board.
And that is a big sign that news is cooling off.
It would have found serious stuff easily.
So that's how I say, you know, this last episode of Patriot Power Hour this summer of
26, schooled off a little bit.
but still very significant things heating up in other directions.
It's just a little less intense than we've seen in the last couple weeks,
and that's obviously good.
Right.
And we were saying that, like, especially last week as the example,
it was possibly the most intense August news splits of all time,
except for maybe 2020 is what my guess would be.
So, but just because it's cool off since last week, my point is this is still pretty heavy.
And I know maybe a couple of these articles were found by AI that otherwise would not have,
but I think they're all very legit.
And there's a lot of fairly high rated, you know, high grade.
So it's not just all topical.
So how about I just run through it and we'll judge it one at a time.
Yeah, let's see what we get.
All right.
Economics, Bitcoin, above 80,000 gold.
silver back off their lows in the past month, but definitely not at their all-time highs, any of those
assets. What is at the all-time high, of course, is the debt. You know what also is all-time high.
Diesel up 20% near the all-time high, not at the all-time high, but super close, up 20% or excuse me,
20 cents since last week. Goldheads for his best month since 1999 has the dollar
wobbles.
Wheat futures surge to three-year high.
Mentioned this early on.
The Treasury Secretary could trap nearly a
tap nearly a trillion-dollar Treasury general account
to fund bond buybacks.
Under grid goes down.
There's residents in Indiana, and during the 11th day
without power, storms toppled power lines still don't have it back.
And AI supercharging the hacks of everyday utility.
we're on prepper broadcasting network and everyone should be prepped to go at least a week without power
honestly a whole month minimum that is worth being a prepper just no power for a month
trade severely declines economic outcast China is threatening the U.S. with retaliation
over Iranian sanctions more trade war I mean we've got trade war in Canada we got a
trade war with many countries.
Let's move on to national security and domestic security.
We already talked a lot about Russia and Ukraine, but let's just run through it real fast.
CIA director delivers secret message in Russia.
First known trip by Ratcliffe.
CIA chief personally warns Russia do not attack a NATO member.
and the U.S., the U.K. and Norwegian forces are deploying to a strategic island for a NATO exercise called Arctic Century.
Keeping an eye on that.
50,000 ice arrests in July.
Pretty large number, almost the NFL stadium worth.
The most concerning, although Russia is concerning, certainly,
I've always found this indicator to be very, you know, probably the most concerning in this column.
foreign black ops.
Here's several important articles about that.
U.S. universities were found tied to Chinese defense research labs in an Air Force study.
So the Chinese research labs using U.S. universities in different ways tied to them.
Chinese hackers breached Justice Department, NASA, the Fed.
Yes, the Federal Reserve and the Senate.
So our universities, our defense research, DOJ, NASA, financial institutions, Senate, Senate, just the Senate alone.
FBI disables tools used by firm servicing Chinese intelligence agency and military.
DHS, CISA, SISA, over 100 internet exposed water systems targeted in July cyber attacks.
Yep, 100 internet exposed water systems targeted in July, wastewater systems and water systems generally.
That's the security column. Let's move on to Liberty.
Supreme Court backs the presidential order on mail-in ballots.
U.S. Special Forces conduct operations inside Ecuador.
charges are dropped against a person who clapped at a city data center meeting.
It charges brought up against them, but then dropped.
9 million facial recognition images leaked and a major breach at reverse image search
and identity verification service.
I don't know about you, but I've used a couple apps, including like Customs Border Patrol.
Got to take a picture.
facial recognition images, right?
Reverse image search and identity verification services.
Let's go to the fourth and final column,
Health and Natural News,
new record high of average global sea surface temperatures.
Reletless heat dome, Texas,
to California.
Heat, heat, heat.
Did that heat cause
a glacier to fracture, this avalanche.
Flash floods 160 plus dead.
It's going to probably be a lot more than that in Nepal and China,
including a few dozen Americans, at least it looked like.
Lab-made DNA stores memory just like Flash Drive.
So this is actually the highest rated article of the night,
S-H-T-F level, because it's actually happening now.
The future is now for better and worse.
Lab-made DNA stores memories like a flash drive.
Nature re-engineered, organic computing, etc.
6.9 magnitude solar flare with an earth-directed CME,
a G2 geomagnetic storm watch was issued.
Again, power outages from natural or man-made.
Solar flare, not really a way to prep for that
if that hits us a big enough ones.
So just get ready to have no power for a little while.
That's my backstop, what I'm trying to prep.
measles death or multiple deaths in pennsylvania the first u.s. deaths of measles in
2006 rena nevada has what's known as the hawk fire thousands had to evacuate more evacuations in
texas up near dallas there were fires there's a lot of fires all throughout the west of course
the summer but 80,000 acres for the ross
in Texas, blood red moon over the U.S.
And another kind of artificial life,
lab-grown brain type of article to finish the night.
Oldest lab-grown human brains reach seven years old.
And they may have recorded the passage of time.
So they have a concept of time.
This lab-grown human brain material that is seven years
old living and may have actually recorded the passage of time future dan artificial life is spawned
and it's living what do you say getting towards it aren't we definitely ain't in kansas any
more any articles or topics you really want to jump into tonight yeah yeah correction uh or potential
correction because r fk junior says that the measles deaths in pennsylvania might be false
reports. I saw that earlier today.
Okay.
So that could be some government statistics being falsified
rather than actual pestilence of that nature.
Well, I wanted to get to this one for sure.
I tried not to jump into it during the newsblitz.
So now that we've broached the topic.
First, two deaths out of the entire population of America.
That's nothing.
I don't mean, each individual.
is a tragedy, but it's totally statistically insignificant.
There could be two deaths per day of measles, and they wouldn't even move the needle for me.
But you're missing the point.
That disease was essentially eradicated.
So, you know, when we had MMR vaccines that weren't controversial and almost everybody agreed you should have one and they work, right?
So two threads.
Yes, people don't trust those vaccines anymore.
Number two, how many illegals have entered the country in the last five years that are spreading measles?
My real question.
Or Americans that said, I'm not doing any of that because my brother's children are artistic and they got loaded with 30-something shots the first year of life.
I add that all up, and it definitely, that is statistically significant.
So a lot less people are getting vaccines for sure.
potentially it's a good reason.
Well, it is a risk, and you could potentially die from it.
But as you said, this could be a miss, kind of going back to your original point, is this real statistic?
Is it propaganda?
Is it whatever?
RFK, I'll dig deeper into what he said.
I haven't heard his rebuttal or do you have a little more info on that or I'll try to follow up on that soon.
I didn't read what he said.
So that's pending, but pretty clear his political enemies are just, would be
overjoyed to see a, you know, a deadly measles outbreak ravaged the United States.
It's almost like Democrats cheer for it.
Well, that's certainly true.
They cheer for that and they cheer for mass shootings at schools, for example, too.
Not good.
Well, I'm almost taking this that, yes, it's true.
Even if it was true, you know, okay.
There's two of them.
That's really nothing in a country of 350 million plus.
but it could be totally false.
And most stats,
I'm one of the last people to trust government stats.
Let me tell you.
So we'll see.
We'll run this down.
I want to see what RFK says and if they can actually track it down.
And if there's more coming up towards the end of the year.
But we're already in towards the end of August and there haven't been any up until these two here.
That's pretty amazing, really.
It's a amount of time that passed when there was none, many, many decades.
that that's the perspective most people have.
And I just had to say, yeah, most people just have an unrealistic expectation of statistics.
But I have very, you know, maybe my way of looking at things is not always agreed upon or, you know, whatever.
And you're right, though.
It had been, you know, the worst year in measles since 1991.
And, uh, it did three decades of nine.
No, I mean, that's true.
That's pretty crazy.
It went three full decades and now.
There's been a couple.
If it does end up being a couple per week going forward,
then that, you know, would be a concern.
And it's not like measles became a super bug resistant to its own vaccinations, right?
Like that's still a disease that could be eradicated.
So to me, it's like our civilization peaking and now you see in one small dimension
and falling off of what we once achieved.
That's a good way to put it too.
And this is not the only example of that, probably.
All right.
Let's move on.
Let's see.
How about, let's stay in this column.
I want to hit the Lab-made DNA.
Lab-made DNA can store memory like a flash drive.
Synthetic DNA.
This is different than the brain that lived seven years,
the neuron tissue, which we'll look at later too.
but this uses synthetic DNA and a semiconductor.
So it's merging carbon and silicon, it sounds like.
Cyborg, right?
Memory resistor, a memorister.
It calls, holy cow.
This is just good old pop science.
I used to read pop science, pop mechanics, popular mechanics when I was a kid.
And now what I was reading back then,
Pells is to comparison to,
artificial DNA,
semiconductors,
lab-made DNA.
How about this?
This is,
this seems too much.
I don't know if this is true.
It must be, though.
It says one gram of DNA,
which I don't even know
if we have a gram of DNA in our body
because it's so small.
But a single gram of DNA
has 215 million gigabytes of data.
Like the most,
you want to know
what the best data drive is your body.
It's your own cells have way more data than any computer.
That's pretty crazy.
I know that's true, but I think like the 215 million gigabytes,
I don't know how much,
I don't know if we got how much DNA we have in our body.
I'm going to have to actually ask AI that right now.
Yeah, while you do, yeah, what we're headed for is data centers that have significant
they're going to be biohazards.
They're going to be loaded full of organic human material processing,
being the model for the machines and also storing the information.
They're going to, if people are against data centers,
if there's a reason to be against data centers,
I haven't heard a good one until I just kind of realize that.
Wow.
bio-hybrid system they call it yeah i haven't read this have you read about this because i just
kind of put two and two together right now and the future come came to me just on the two articles
you're talking about patriot power our epiphany
future dan i'm sure others have written about it long ago and there's sci-fi movies anyways right
but just a you know just your sterile local data center that's you know it's a big
box with power grid lots all around it to keep it powered.
You know,
pretty soon those are going to be,
you know,
biological hazard sites like,
big,
big plates of brains in there.
Oh, man.
It's definitely sounds like an 80s cartoon type of thing, too.
I don't know.
Like the evil robot,
hive mind as part brain,
part machine.
It all,
checked out here, man.
I did independent research and
per gram of DNA that is 215 million
gigabytes.
And holy cow, everybody knows
how big a gigabyte is. Like, that's a
pretty detailed, lengthy
movie, right?
Quarter billion million.
And so you're doing 215 million
of those per gram. And the human
body has 25 to
50 grams.
Oh, you were you're a bit off on that estimate.
Wow.
But this just seemed like unbelievably ridiculous amount of data.
Like I thought, I don't know.
That's crazy how much.
First off, I didn't know we had that much DNA.
That's like an entire ounce, one ounce of your body about is DNA, just by itself.
Yeah.
Could this be for the best or is this going to bring about dystopia?
I'm not trying to fearmonger here.
But these articles are on the heat map dashboard for a reason, right?
Artificial life being spawned, nature being completely re-engineered.
Doesn't take much of an imagination to know that that could go horribly wrong.
I think if I had to really jump into it, I'd say developing computer chips that have DNA in it,
I don't have too much of a problem with it because what's the difference between that
and raising factory animals that live in exactly in the same spot their entire lives and then are slaughtered.
There's been that and some neurons that were created.
However, it really crosses.
They're human neurons.
That's the difference.
But are we sure they're all human neurons?
Because maybe we can use other type of animal neurons that aren't human and still get some of the good.
But if human experimentation in this dimension isn't banned,
and of all the animals on the earth, why would you go and use chicken brains when you can use fake human brain?
That's a great point.
Well, that's definitely probably,
could debate it for hours and hours.
I think I like science and technology.
I don't think I like human experimentation or using human brain matter kind of in a scientific way against us.
It's who's also using it too.
I will not trust those who are doing the experiments either.
That's a big part of it.
You know, modeling the structure so that we have silicon-based memory that has that capacity
because it's designed like the human genome or,
you know
silicon-based
CPUs
that are modeled after the brain
and are therefore
far more effective
right? I mean that's kind of inevitable
you kind of expect that
but it's when you actually have
flesh
tissue
organic material of humans
in the machines
you know
you wonder where's that stop right
there's going to be a whole class of people that are genetically modified that, you know,
have absolutely dominant intelligences and other physical attributes, right?
Blade Runner's shit.
Well, it's like you said, a lot of sci-fi around it.
I don't know, very complex.
I'm mostly am against it, but I'm also, there is a little bit of inevitability to it,
just like with AI.
I'm using AI right now, even if it could be used for better or worse.
You can't avoid it.
But yeah, I don't know.
Human brains plugged into SkyNet is not what I'm looking to support by any means.
All right.
So have we thoroughly covered the nature, science, technological dimension of our show?
Anything else in that column that's worrying it?
I'm actually looking into the other article,
didn't have it up on screen.
These are,
you know,
the human brains are just like very,
very tiny.
The size of a peppercorn,
some of them peppercorns that you grind up.
But again,
this is just the beginning.
Other articles,
I mean,
the wildfires could be huge,
depending if you,
where you live.
So another great,
great reason to be a prepper
if in your region,
in flash floods or hurricanes.
We saw Hawaii hit by a hurricane in the last month,
last few weeks.
We've seen earthquakes all around the world.
If I was on the west coast of the United States
or even up in Canada, Vancouver and all that,
on the Pacific Rim and up in Alaska,
I would be on tsunami and earthquakes, super alert
because that's the one part of the Pacific Rim
that's not been hit hard.
But we're not seeing any after.
multiple weeks in a row of a lot of earthquake
and volcanic activity, not really seeing
any right now.
So that's something I just wanted to point out.
Yeah.
What about
what we talked about in security?
Anything surprising in the
column two security, foreign or domestic?
The U.S. universities.
Let's go see if my alma mater is
in there because Purdue University has
done a lot of work with
Chinese nationals and
Chinese students.
Right. A lot of the big, a lot of the big universities have been involved in now.
Let's see who's named here. I hope it's not Purdue.
So they're right there in the heading.
Well, it has a, I'm looking at the exact universities. It's got.
It's the biggest word on the line you're showing.
Oh, no, it's right there. You're right.
You made that up. You saw that already.
You didn't come into this article and actually stumble into that, did you?
yeah i did wow yeah you're right though i guess you're really right about perdu oh man yeah i mean
one third of my business master's class was from china or taiwan and a lot were from india and a
couple from the middle east just for whatever it's worth so no i had a feeling they would be on here but i did
not see you're right it literally is one of the subheadlines peru and be hung
built joint research labs.
Well, Purdue's heavily involved in aeronautics and computer science and military stuff.
They even have a nuclear reactor on campus.
So nuclear engineering, they're big on.
And let's just say one of my family members, like, let's just say, was very involved with nuclear research in this country.
and he was working with Chinese guys who I thought were the good guys.
Hopefully a lot of them are the good guys that came to America and working on our side,
but easy to have spies or, you know, double Asians, whatever.
So this was back in 2011, which is right around the time I was in grad school.
Funny enough, 2011, just after I got out of there for the second time,
the joint laboratory on energy systems and low emissions combustion.
So I actually did come into this naked, not knowing that.
That would be one of the biggest ones,
but I also did know that Purdue was going to be implicated in this for sure.
But I definitely expected to see the likes of Harvard, MIT and others, Berkeley, Duke, Penn State.
But, oh, man, not where I wanted to see Purdue, not on top of this list.
Boilermakers.
Yep.
sold out to China
China
um
I yeah yeah well let me just say
Michigan sold out to China too
so Northwestern did as well
everybody the university systems
sold out top to bottom
um
yeah so that's not good
my mom's been telling me this for a while too
it's like produce sold out to China
I tell you, when the history books are written, I'm wondering what part of that regime did they absolutely institutionalize what we would call in the United States think tanks to sit down and just thoroughly look at the ways to absolutely exploit every angle of the freedom of our country to serve the communist regime.
because this is clearly planned.
That's all they do is centrally planned from Beijing.
And I'm just wondering, when did they really just say,
all right, we'll do a little bit there, a little bit there,
and we'll try this here and we'll kind of haphazardly
perform espionage against us and turned it into a complete enterprise level.
It's got to be 2008, Obama, from Obama on.
Sure. It was gangbusters, maybe even before, but I mean, once Obama got in and after the Beijing Olympics, that was the coming out party planned, kind of esoteric planned by them, the capital T, them, who run a lot of the weird stuff with the Olympics.
They're like, now it's China's turn and we're handing it over, the Manchurian candidate Obama on behalf of China. There you go.
I think that's the implementation.
I think the
Clinton's terms
would have been where
looking at the Clinton presidency,
even without any
you know, treasonous
cooperation, they might just
look, all right, if that country's going to elect
people like that, then
we're going to just exploit
every single angle of it.
They'll let us.
He was a Vietnam protester,
right? It's a big, you know,
a big warning sign that he might be lenient on what we plan to do.
It is a red flag, as they call it.
All right.
Enough looking at the Purdue one.
But there's more than that under the foreign black ops that I wanted to hit on that.
That's the not just universities, but DOJ, NASA, Federal Reserve and Senate.
There's some memes, which I don't think are particularly funny, but it may be at one point in my life.
I thought they'd be funnier about China hacking the Fed and what they found inside the Federal Reserve and blah, blah, blah.
But I don't really find that too funny anymore.
I'm kind of jaded in that regard.
But let's get into the article of the Justice Department and FBIC's three domains Wednesday.
Shut down some hacking platforms used against American government networks and infrastructure, NASA, the Fed Energy Department.
Justice Department, Health and Human Services, NIH, National Institute of Health.
And again, the Senate, kind of important there.
All types of exploits and vulnerabilities were exploited there.
And really, I mean, I don't know how much actual damage was done.
in my profession, I'm always like, okay, good to know what actual damage was done.
What kind of exposure is that?
I don't know.
I don't know how much damage was done.
But here's the thing.
We may never know the damage is done or who's sitting lurking in weight that gained access
and are now just waiting to be activated years down the road or just passively monitoring.
I mean, you know, I don't know.
The analogy that comes to mind is,
A submarine analogy different than the one we've used before, or metaphor, I guess.
But sometimes a submarine isn't just to shoot torpedoes and they're not just to launch intercontinental ballistic missiles.
They're also meant to just sit there silently and observe and report, right?
So that's a lot of cyber attacks are just burrowing deep and just staying there to be.
activated later and or reporting back
passively some info, you know what I mean?
I do.
Stiber is a warfighting domain.
I think it's greatly overhyped.
But to me,
black ops suspected comes in many forms
and cyber is a black op.
They want it to be clandestine.
They don't want to be found out about this, right?
because it doesn't work if you find out.
FBI found out and disabled everything, right?
But, you know, if a country is willing to aggressively perform espionage on you,
it's because they're preparing to fight you.
That, you know, it's a chain of events.
It's the dangerous part.
This in and of itself isn't going to collapse the United States.
You hacked.
Well, they definitely don't want to get caught.
I guess the question is for everyone that gets caught.
How many are out there?
Is it just a few?
Is it hundreds?
is the thousands. We'll never know, of course.
And again, what actual damage and what actual data can they get access to?
There's a lot of people that get paid a lot.
And you know what? Funny enough, the cybersecurity and infrastructure security agency,
CISA, had an article about that.
And this was more focused, though, on water systems that were targeted.
Future Dan, no one died because their water was turned.
off, right? But there were attacks. There was some damages. Happened in 12 states.
And even the article admits, yeah, not that much significant disruption, but did raise concerns.
So, I don't know. I guess I'm more worried about the data and privacy aspect of hacks than like blowing things up by way of a cyber attack.
but I don't know.
We haven't seen a full-on cyber war
or at least it's not
published to the public. Maybe it's
going on right now under the undercurrent
though. Oh, it's
constant, but
to what effect, right? 40% of my
life, there was no internet, right?
I can remember when there was no internet.
To me, it's like,
all right, well, if there's no internet tomorrow,
you know, life will
go on. I saw it.
There's been electricity in my whole
life, but it wasn't for my grandparents.
So, you know, life will go on.
Now, to what degree are there people that can't cope without electricity and Internet?
And obviously, if you live somewhere where food transportation is going to break down,
now you're in a starving situation, that's real.
But life will go on without those technologies.
It was before.
you'll kill a lot of people
a lot of civil unrest
a lot of people won't
mentally handle it
but I think smaller communities
you know
will be able to cope
I think the mental part
yeah I think the mental part is a huge part
that's why I do some fasting
and I definitely try to
live a fairly clean life
and exercise and do this and that
so that you know
if stuff hits the fan
I'm not going through sugar withdrawals
or alcohol withdraws or just, you know, there's part of it just you got to be tough when stuff
gets tough.
But on the other hand, if you live a decadent lifestyle for years and years, it's going to be
a little harder to shift into that.
So I think part of being a prepper is, you know, kind of working on that, especially food.
I feel like within a couple days, if you're not getting the food that you're used to,
and we did this with some of our prior challenges last year in particular, eating MREs
and having calorie deficit.
Like if you haven't done that before,
I would just say, do it.
So you're not totally surprised.
Not too many firsts,
as MPC guy says.
But in terms of no internet,
here's what I would say,
yes, 100% world would go on.
But from an economic standpoint,
it would obviously bring everything down really bad.
I mean,
maybe that would be a blessing in disguise,
but it would be in great depression mode,
if not worse,
if the internet was off for more.
than a month.
At this point,
if we just have a GDP
that goes down by
1 or 2%, we would be
massive panic and crashing.
But if we had a GDP minus
10% for a month because there was
no electricity or
minimal electricity,
yeah, all this debt and Ponzi scheme
would unravel very fast.
The Fed couldn't even print out of it potentially.
Yeah, that's true. I just don't
feel fierce cyber attack that way.
the cyber attacks that have to be dependent against
are, you know, are
war fighting battle command systems, right?
Like, I don't really care if Wall Street
can't function for a week.
Can the nuclear arsenal function?
That's kind of level that I look at.
Like, that kind of cyber attack, I don't,
I don't think that is possible.
I don't think they can knock out Wall Street,
right now. Maybe muck around with some websites is apparently what this is.
All considered we have not in almost 25 years, almost exactly right, to 9-11.
If they had some sort of all-encompassing cyber attack that would have knocked out power to 10% of
America or more, it would have been launched by now, I think.
I'm not. I'm sure the NSA has done it to people. I'm sure they've done it to every
adversary as I'm sure Russians have
received what you just described
the Chinese have received what you just
described I
don't see any reason why our technology
and capability to go
offensive cyber
wouldn't lead the world
while at the same time
building the defenses we would need ourselves
and just not having some of this
stuff internet exposed as they say
that's one thing they're doing is
rethinking their architecture
like do we really need all these different
part so internet enabled and smart and all that crap maybe not just other new avenues for entry
you know so that's that's a little part of it too the the internet attack surface may be smart
about it yeah what else is interesting you on the heat map dashboard last show of august
2006 it is hmm scotis backing the president a mail-in ballot
executive order to stop voter fraud.
Backed by the Supreme Court, 10-page order,
reversed to lower court, stay on the executive order.
So lower court had said, stay, like you say to a dog,
that's how I remember, like stay.
Does not proceed.
Doesn't count yet, kind of like a pause.
Well, Supreme Court has the authority to reverse that stay
and have it now take into effect.
This is the ensuring citizenship verification
and integrity in federal elections,
but the fight is not over.
They're reporting here on the new American,
but this is a good, you know, victory.
And, you know, at this point,
anything like this that comes out of the Supreme Court
is certainly positive.
We'll take it.
This was from March 31st
and another order in March 25th.
so here we are five months later it's being supported by the Supreme court you definitely talked
over the last several years about how things got to work their way through the court and how in fact
it'll set positive precedent right so it might take a little while but when it actually happens
that can be bare fruit for a while right all right future day we're going to move on
month since $99
$4,600 on Friday.
Remember, gold touched $5,000 earlier this year,
but $4,600.
There you are, future, Dan.
We moved on to gold.
I just want to jump back to the immigration thing real quick.
So that whole Supreme Court decision
hinges on this concept of ripeness.
Do you know what I mean by ripeness
when it comes to, you know,
different actions in court?
courts?
No, go ahead and expand on that.
To make it real easy,
it's like the decision from the Supreme Court is
the lower judge couldn't stay in order
that actually hadn't been given yet
because the Trump administration did an executive order
ordering the post office
to establish new standards
for verifying mail-in ballots.
But the post office hadn't done it yet.
so the injunction wasn't ripe.
There was no harm done because what Trump had ordered the post office to do, the post office hadn't done yet.
Okay.
And then immediately, so it wasn't ripe.
There was no decision to be made that the lower judges, you know, lower judges can't just stop things that haven't happened yet.
Was the logic of that.
And then as soon as that decision came down, the Trump administration through the post office,
did establish the orders,
which have immediately been sued again.
Right.
So now it's right.
Ripeness, okay.
But the,
but the, you know,
the president's opponents,
you know,
the Democrats that want, you know,
carte blanche with bail in ballots again,
might actually find out
that by the time,
the next cases,
make it to that Supreme Court level, it'll be now too late. So the opposite of right, it'll be
passed, it'll be passed, it's expired. So it looks like the White House is using the timeline
to actually maneuver this in a way where no lower court can stop it from taking effect. And
my God, it has Democrats that are smart enough to know how this works, really, really upset.
Because it does seem like it's going to work.
Love to see it.
Love to see it.
We talk about bar codes.
We're having bar codes on the envelopes of the mail-in ballots so they can actually be tracked, right?
Like something very obvious and fair that they're trying to, but they have to actually maneuver the legal system to prevent thousands upon thousands of lower court federal judges from stopping.
them. Right. Well, I mean, it seems
dishonest to try to have a stay when the rule isn't even
final. They've said it wasn't even proposed, let alone final.
But of course, they don't care about wasting taxpayer resources in court
time, et cetera. You know, those attorney fees are, you know how much
of cost to bring that motion up that was just political warfare? I mean,
I won't even go anything further than that. But that's just how this stuff works out, but at
least seemingly the Trump administration's playing the game the right way might be able to
maneuver it with the ripeness. I get that now. That makes sense. It's working between when,
well, in the insurance world, when does the claim actually start and when is the statute
of limitations expired? Like you said, expired. Similar thing. Like, when does the actual law or
policy go into place? And it had not happened yet. And the people bringing that up knew that. It was
very on its face. But there, you know, that's the political jurisdiction, you know,
jurisprudence warfare, which is very important in all this. I'm,
I'm no attorney, but, you know, it's very important. I know that. And when the vote,
vote theft of 2020 was underway before, during the very, you know, the days of the actual election in
2020 and all the way through the period until the electoral college completed its actions and
Congress certified it in, you know, J6, 2021. In that whole timeframe, the same logic, this isn't ripe yet.
Everything that Trump said and his lawyers were saying is going to happen to steal the vote.
Every court refused to recognize it because it hadn't happened yet. And then shortly thereafter said it was
a fate accompli
and there's nothing to be done
because what's happened has happened.
So
what comes around goes around.
For sure.
Looking at this article, I did notice
there's a thumbnail I wanted to click on.
We're not going to play this right now. But you said it to me.
I listened to it yesterday.
Worth listening to this.
The Psychology of Tyranny.
Why psychopathic authoritarian's
keep rising to
power. I did search our transcripts. I got about a third of our transcripts. This is episode
359. So I got about 150 maybe 125, 150 transcripts. I searched to see if we ever used the phrase
psychopathic authoritarianism. It did not find that, but I swear I must have said it at some point.
But anyway, the point is, this sounds like Ben the Breaker of Banksters from 10 or 15 years ago.
but this is a doctor in hypnosis.
He's talking about society.
Psychiatry.
Well, okay.
But he practices hypnosis.
How about that?
It's a specialty,
but he's a legitimate psychiatric doctor.
Joseph Sansone putting a book out next month.
And this hour long or half hour long interview with him by New American,
I want to read that book.
I think I want to get my hands on it.
He talks all about what a psychopathic authoritarian is and about hypnosis,
about how mass media hypnosis, whether it's January.
He didn't even mention January 6th, I don't think, but that's hypnosis.
That's a great example.
COVID, of course, 9-11, but he focuses big time on COVID and COVID shots and lockdowns and
all that. So definitely, definitely worth us. And yeah, okay, there's not a such thing as a doctor
in hypnosis. That's true. But he talks about clinical psychology, history, philosophy, sociology,
and what's the dark tetrad? I've heard it before. It's all about sadism, narcissism, and
Machiavellianism, psychopathy, how all these traits are actually
they manifest in the public because of the leaders.
And he puts out examples of like the people trying to get you arrested for not wearing a mask at a supermarket, right?
They feel so empowered and they often lean on the state.
Imagine what it must be in like North Korea and China.
Like you are in such like locked out in your own mind, such Stockholm syndrome and your own sadism comes out.
and you're like, yeah, me and the state, we're going to work together.
And I don't know, like that whole psychopathy, the leaders manifest that, but they definitely, like,
they're doing it on purpose.
They know what they're doing.
Some kind of like dark magic almost.
Yeah.
Yeah.
It's the topics that are at hand.
It's definitely worth of listening to.
And I'm going to get the book.
I'll tell you what.
That, that, not many half hour interviews by authors.
have me say, I got to get that book and read it.
But he's brought together a lot of things you've heard for a very long time on alternative media in, you know, an actual construct of someone who's a doctorate in psychiatry.
So I want to read it.
I like it.
I like it.
And then actually when this, we're running low on time for the show.
But after that, another interview came out about gun control.
and someone pretty much gun owners of American.
I'm like, all right, the New American.
I've been on New American quite a lot,
but got to make sure I go check that out more often,
definitely hitting things out of the park.
So future Dan, we got a few minutes left.
Are there any big articles you really wanted to hit on
or any topics to kind of bookend this episode,
final August 26 episode?
I want to ask you, is your Uber chari,
on America's debt, death spiral, that infographic ready for the public.
Let's do it.
I almost forgot.
How could I?
This one.
Can you see it?
Yeah, totally.
Busy.
All right.
We're going to run through it in a very high level way.
Wish me to look.
It is busy, but it's all about the debt going back 15 years and
going forward 15 years. So last week, 15 year anniversary of the banksters, my original blog
talking about the banksters and all their schemes and their psychopathic authoritarianism,
etc. Well, since then, here we go. Debt went from just under 15 trillion to 40 trillion in the last 15
years now in 15 years from now the official CBO congressional budget office
James Walton was talking about the CBO last week like well how can we have a budget office if we
have a trillion dollar deficit what is that like almost like a side of film meme or something
what are we talking about uh yeah well they even think that we're going to go from 40 trillion
to 83 trillion by 15 years
from now. But that, in my opinion, is massive sandbagging. Is that real or inflation adjusted?
What's your inflation assumption? Or is that just nominal?
That is nominal only. So that's a great question. Now, okay. Look on this right hand side,
this green box. This actually kind of translate the last 15 years was 173.
percent nominal increase.
But if you took it into an inflation, it was like an 85% increase in real terms.
So if we just said like the nominal increase, like cut that in half would be the real increase.
That's still literally $20 plus trillion of today money.
So that makes sense.
They're looking at like, okay, over the next 15 years, one to $1.5 trillion of today money deficit.
That's like what we are now.
No improvement, but no, you know, nothing getting worse is what they're kind of expecting.
But that is, I just want to show why it's just a small change in that, which I think is necessary,
can blow that number out.
So, again, in current dollars, not inflation, nominal, they think we're going to go from 40,
the official numbers, from 40 trillion to 83 trillion in the next 15 years.
Okay.
but if we actually grow at the rate of debt that we have for the past 15 years we're not going to make like if we just maintain what we've did on average the last 15 years we're not going to end up at 83 trillion we're going to end up at 110 trillion so I'm just saying if we did the exact same regression line if we did the same kind of moving average over the next 15 years that we just did for the last 15 years that we just did for the last 15
years. We're actually going to land at 110. So just that is the baseline, because I don't
think anything is going to be improving in the next 15 years.
But my question is, in 2041, is the yellow or the red or the blue final number in today's
dollars or in what we expect after inflation money to be worth in 2041?
That'll be in today's numbers.
So in reality, they're going to be sick higher numbers.
It'll be, it'll have less purchasing power, which means the debt is worth less to.
But it's still going to be a heck of a lot.
I mean, let's say instead of, you know, here, here's another way to look at it, actually,
is what's the percent of GDP that it represents?
It's almost a real basis.
It's almost the best way to look at it.
Right.
So in that regard, what I would say is it's going to keep rising as a percent of GDP,
which if that happens, it's going to be big time problems.
Not only would interest rates be going up, but it could potentially lead to just that great reset.
I mean, based on the math here, pretty high chance that will be some.
some sort of reset of the financial system of 15 years.
Best case scenario, it's like 2008, 2009, 2010,
where some people go bust,
but it doesn't collapse everything,
and there's some bailouts,
and it goes another decade.
I don't know.
I think that it can't do that for another 15 years,
maybe another five or 10.
So this doesn't take into account World War III or a COVID-2.0 either, by the way.
So this is just the baseline,
let alone a shock of value where several trillion dollars needed to be printed like in a year, right?
So just keep it out in mind too.
And I do think it's a Marxist frame to, if some calamity like that happened to say that it was inevitable because the capitalist system was falling apart.
First of all, this is not due to capitalism.
This is clearly due to statism for over 100 years, or 14 or 15.
years to be precise. So, you know, I'm not going to accept any arguments ever that, you know,
this was inevitable or it was caused by capitalism or they're, you know, the economics,
or the situation where there had to be a war. I can agree with that because the basis is not
capitalism for sure. Yeah, the problem was not capitalism. They'll try to blame it. A lot of them
say, oh, this is late stage capitalism. That's one of their buzzwords for sure.
yeah i'm not buying it that's a marxist frame nemo Marxist frame a categorically reject it
and speak against it weekly on patriot power hour
the only way to be able to get this far as if the government is complicit and
in the fraud which it is so there you go like in a free market everything would clear out
collapse and rebuild and regrow naturally uh the only way this fraud can be perpetrated
this far this long is with the government helping to support it,
the lender of last resort,
the buyer of last resort, right?
Like the government will be there to buy.
I mean, they already have done subsidies for corn and soy
for decades and decades, for example.
But anyway, the insurer of last result.
If all the insurance companies and pensions and actuaries and all that go tits up,
then there'll be some sort of check.
coming from Uncle Sam, but what can you actually buy with it?
It will be a question.
I got a feeling.
Yep.
So, pretty busy, infographic.
You got to post that for us to spend a little more time on our own looking at?
Yep, I'm going to get that out on X.
In fact, I think I posted it last night.
Let me double check.
I had a beta version of this last week, but I cleaned it up.
I specifically told the AI reformulate this with no.
Marxist, socialist, you know, Occupy Wall Street type of iconography.
It was actually this other one that was worse.
If you remember, I had this to throw in the banks just 15 year.
And it had like the fist rising.
It was like red colors.
I mean, this is still kind of the red in Soviet style.
But it looks a lot better.
I do like the color, actually.
But anyway, long story short, yeah.
I am posting on X and I'm expecting and hoping to make some more assets.
Maybe not as busy as this one.
But I'm going to be posting them throughout the year.
I'd be interested in seeing ones on, you know,
what kind of peaceful, non-reset, fundamental changes
to start to flatten the curve.
Because flattening the curve relative to all the rest of the debt.
of the rest of the world
would set America up
and, you know,
exactly where we want to be.
The best we could hope for.
What kind of productivity gains
what do we have to see?
What kind of breakthrough scientific discoveries
that can be brought, you know,
perhaps out of
clandestine military affairs
and, you know,
brought to the civilian economy?
What could AI do?
What could,
blockchain do? What can, you know, energy breakthroughs do to flatten that curve?
I like to you de-thrown the banksters version of that.
I love it. The first one that pops out is definitely energy and definitely, especially electricity,
nuclear plants, et cetera, et cetera. But I've always been drill, drill, drill. I'm really,
everyone's pretty damn glad we did fracking and drilling in the last decade with what's going on
nowadays. Let's just say that. I was always for that drill baby drill. But other, you know,
energy, energy, energy. And then food, food, food, you know, improving the food supply, the cost,
but also the quality. If you improve the quality of the food supply, that'll have a lot of great
externalities on the health side of things. It's really, health care is such a big expense and just
growing and growing. So that has to be handled in a lot of different ways.
Medicaid, Medicare, running, you know, $3 billion a day each, right?
Stuff like that.
It's ugly.
And I have, I'm not going to call this inside information, but because it's probably publicly available.
I haven't done my due diligence, but I'm not, you know, running a public company right now.
Health insurance premiums should be going up 15 to 25% in the next 12 to 18 months.
So I hear that first year.
expect, you know, if your health care premiums have gone up, expect them to continue going up
double digits minimum for the next several years based on what I'm hearing in the insurance
and insurance brokerage field.
So that's more, more inflation.
Everything's going up in health care leading the charge, really.
I hope it breaks that whole system and we get back to, you just paying, getting cash discount
for paying for medical services that are.
entirely outside of the insurance system.
Something tells me that's so much corruption and regulation, regulatory capture,
insurance and health care, you know, juggernaut, you know, HMOs.
Something's not functioning according to market principles there.
And that's probably what it takes to break that, is, you know, drive that to on affordability.
The market will adjust.
Yes and no
Part of it's who's going to be in charge
Will they try to socialize it if it breaks
If the freaking
You know
Social America in charge
I sure is heck hope not
That's gonna happen
If they completely socialized medicine
You know what they would immediately create
As a proverbial black market
For medical care
And people pay cash
Because they wouldn't be able to get any other way
Right
My doctor only accepts gold, silver,
Bitcoin
and water purified
But that's a way I'll find that doctor, but yeah.
Sort of joking, sort of not.
I mean, in fact, I did not do this, but during COVID, there were certain people that
would try to, you know, work outside the medical system and only certain doctors would
see people that were unvaccinated and stuff that hopefully maybe some doctor-patient
relationships were built that could be outside of the system.
Maybe I need to go prepping to do for me.
go find a doctor that I could actually trust outside of the system.
I have not done that.
It would be pretty hard,
but it's probably really necessary.
Right,
but if premiums skyrocket like that,
they're going to be alternatives out there.
There's going to be people banding together for smaller insurance pools.
There's going to be clinics that'll come up and take cash payment.
Right.
As soon as it's like,
there's no value there.
You're paying insurance premiums and the doctors aren't getting paid.
People are paying too much that those middlemen, you know, they can't drive that up forever without breaking it and people going direct and cutting out the middleman.
Well, nothing can cut out the middleman quicker and better than AI.
So there's your efficiencies.
Cut out the middleman.
Get all the paperwork to happen 10 times faster, 10 times more accurate for one-tenth the cost.
cost by way of AI. There you go. And, you know, faster, more accurate diagnoses.
For sure. For sure. So you ain't pissing away all these diagnostic tests that are unnecessary
or on the other hand, you're treating something right away when it's $10,000 instead of six
months later when it's $80,000. Exactly. All right. I love these infographics. They help me learn.
Love to see one dedicated on what I really thinks is, you know, who cares about it.
how much debt you got if you have an income that exceeds it. If gross domestic product is
really healthy in leading the world, is that curve flatten? So perfect. Here's the,
how about the final number of all the busyness, the real number? I'd say the real number is
the 110 plus trillion. That is scary. That's important. But it's the, what is the compounded
annual growth rate? So compounding interest, annual growth rate. So compounding interest, annual growth rate.
the last 15 years, the debt is grown by 6.9% every year compounding upon itself on average.
So 6.9%. We would have to grow 6.9% per year at that rate, which is possible, but it's hard.
I've not seen it 6.9% GDP print. Maybe that one quarter after COVID lockdowns were lifted or something.
It's not possible, though, but we would need that to match even.
Is that right, though?
Because, you know, growth and its effects on the federal government's revenues and taxes,
I'm not sure that if it's that linear, right?
If we were running at 6.9% growth,
but the tax base wouldn't just be six, you know,
it's not a 6.9% increase in tax revenue.
Multiple factors of that, wouldn't it?
It's a great question.
They call that like the inflator or the multiplier.
What is that in a one year period?
But then looking at what is that in a five year period?
Because, you know, let's say you get your paycheck, well, you're going to spend a certain amount pretty quickly.
And then that person or business will spend theirs and they'll be paying sales tax and income tax withholding on all the transaction that, like you said, spawn out.
So I don't actually know what the kind of.
study show.
But it's a great point, though.
It's not one for one for sure.
Taking this to a new challenge level.
Maybe we'll get to see it in September.
I like it.
This is some good homework.
This is something I should just like put this transcripts.
Just I'm going to save this transcript and get going with.
I've been using transcripts a lot.
They're helpful.
But nothing like the human brain that sits on our shoulders, not in some lab future.
Dan, another great show in the books.
We'll be back next.
week on Patriot Power episode
360
and uh
wrapping up the
summer season in the middle of September
a couple more weeks after that
like always though
all hell breaks loose will be on any night
on the prepper broadcasting network
good show Ben
another great show talk to you soon man
