The Prepper Broadcasting Network - The Rising Republic - Blue Equity

Episode Date: May 6, 2025

www.prepperbroadcasting.comwww.pbnfamily.com

The American people are entitled to transparency. We can't sustain a system that bleeds billions of taxpayer dollars on programs that have outlived their usefulness or exist solely because of the power of politicians, lobbyists or interest groups. They are entitled to be able to figure out where their dollars are going and they are entitled to be able to figure out where their dollars are going, and they're entitled to accountability. We are going to go through our federal budget, as I promised during the campaign, page by page, line by line, eliminating those programs we don't need and insisting that those that

we do need operate in a sensible, cost-effective way. No amount of waste is acceptable. Not when it's your money. Hello everybody, welcome to the rising republic. It's your boy L Douglas Hogan and Ryan Buford Glad to have everyone here today go back in history here to April 14th Are you familiar with the blue origin launch? Oh the old crew the rocket? Yeah. Yeah Yes, the crotch rocket whatever. What was that thing? It looked like a freaking dick missile or something like that Yeah, it was shaped is shaped was shaped like a, like a giant female toy. And it's just, I think it came from Jeff Depp Basil built it apparently.

So it sounds like they were able to, I don't know, they claimed to have gone out into space, but I highly doubt that given some of the footage. It's kind of like, was mind boggling to me was there's a lot of issues, a lot of issues. One of the comical ones was they came back talking about how they were astronauts, officially astronauts. Now I think that the the Lame Stream Media actually coined that and started talking to someone. I can't remember if it was Gayle Perry or if she had been Gayle King or she was talking to Katy Perry and said you're officially an astronaut now what's your thoughts that kind of thing. No they're not astronauts. They were passengers. They weren't flying anything. If I'm going to stretch the imagination there was no videos of them during the launch. There's no videos of them re-entering earths earth

And I'm air quoting here earth's atmosphere. Yeah. Yeah. Well, it's like I'm kind of curious Like what kind of PR stunt is this? I mean, is this just some kind of weird like I don't know I just don't I can't wrap my head around it. It's some sort of weird distraction for something else I don't know. I just don't, I can't wrap my head around it. Is it some sort of weird distraction for something else? I don't know, but it's supposed to be, what they were saying was the first all-female visit to space since like 1969. So what? I mean, when you hear these guys talk about it, you think that they're the first females, quote-unquote, in space. You know, ever. The thing with this is to me is if they were in space, they certainly didn't enter atmosphere. There's something completely wrong about the way they re they certainly didn't enter atmosphere. There's something completely wrong about the way they entered Earth's atmosphere. There was no

scorched earth, you know what I'm saying, upon reentry. Oh yeah, yeah, I mean there's a lot of weird footage coming out and you can get up in an airplane that's designed to look like that on the inside and be able to float around as if you're in space. I mean it's possible. There are certain elevations that'll kind of defy gravity. That's how they train astronauts. Well, there's supposed to be this level or this layer in our atmosphere that you're not in space technically, but gravity goes to almost zero G. So you're able to bounce around all this other stuff.

I don't know. I just know that their hair and the way they're jumping around, you know, it just, the hair to me, it looked, it didn't look real, like zero G to me. It looked like, I don't know what it looked like, it looked like something else. That's why I'm confused. Maybe it was like that the whole time,

and that's why there's no videos of them going up, right? Because first of all, astronauts train for years to be able to withstand the kind of G force that it takes to enter, just to get out of our, out of our friggin atmosphere, into where they're at, even, you know, and beyond. It actually gets easier once you get to where they're at, but just to get from Earth to where they're at, the inertia that the body goes through, it's intense.

And without proper training, you would pass out, you know? So, I don't believe this I've been known them with that training. I it's just so weird to me I just said what what is the point of it? I was gonna become a big thing because huh just yeah, what do you change? What's the launch the launch is ridiculous? It does it looks like CGI to me. Don't you look real? I'm not saying it's not I'm just saying it looks freaking bizarre. Like it don't look real at all to me It looks completely fake. It clearly looks like it's made. I'm just saying it looks freaking bizarre. Like it don't look real at all to me. It looks completely fake.

It completely looks like it's made up on some kind of, so does the landing like whenever it hit and all this, this dirt plume shot out, it all looks fake to me. And then did you see the door opening? Yeah. And then they were just kind of like, Oh yeah, hey, everything's fine. Yeah. Like that's, that's a kicker. Like no, no spacecraft spacecraft anything goes into space They're not denying the design to open from the inside What would happen if they would had a blonde moment up in space right and said oh

I'm just gonna open the store and cracked it open you see I'm saying They would all get sucked out But here it is, you know, they land and they open the door on their own And then and then one of the ladies those with I don't know who that was somebody the door on their own. And then one of the ladies that was with them, I don't know who that was, somebody in the crew, ran over the roof and said, oh no, no, no, no, no, no. And they keep the door shut. And then Bezos came over with some fake unlocking tool, right, that he acted like he was unlocking,

like he was unlocking, opening the door, which it was already open and unlocked. And then he let it go and the door bounced like it was made of styrofoam. He's boing, doink, doink, doink, doink. It's just, I thought like, what in the world? Wow. And then when the, doink, doink, doink. That's all like what in the world? Wow. And then when the videos of them supposedly in space

kind of floating around, bouncing around and stuff and their hair is all stuck out in the air. There's like a lot of space, or not a lot of space between the windows, but when you're looking at the craft after it landed, there's like huge gaps. Like it takes Jeff Bezos to walk like two steps to get from window to window

on the one that's on the ground versus when the ladies are floating around in space and they're up against that little, yeah, it's like the width of a woman. Huh. Yeah. It's kind of, I don't know, all of it just stinks to high hell of some sort of, I don't like a publicity stunt maybe or something. I do. I think it was a woke DEA stunt is all I think that it was. Yeah. And unfortunately it doesn't do anything for women. And I think if anything, it sets them back, it's like, okay, well, it's just gonna, I was going to do this and pretend like it's something cool.

But then when people realize that it's fake, it just doesn't, it takes all of anything that would have been cool about it away. It just erodes. People don't understand that when you pull the rug out and people expose these kind of lies that, hey look, this is, it just makes you look worse. Exactly, because even on the outside of the, like on the door, there's the one that went up or the one that was preparing to go up

versus the one that landed, there was different markings and everything, bolts, the hardware, everything on the outside was different, one from the other. And it's clear that they use two different ships here. I don't know if they use one for filming and they use another one for, hey, let's land in this.

I don't believe that they went up. I just don't. And that's why, and nobody does. I shouldn't say nobody. Most people don't believe, anybody with any sense because they can see all these oddities as we're discussing right now, all these strange things that people are just able to point out with a common eyeball. If we're getting to the point where people are doing this kind of stuff and they're putting

these images out there as if it's reality, as if it's fact, there's going to be a segment of the population that believe that it's true. And, you know, some people are going to believe wholeheartedly that these things are true to the point where they're sponsoring these people are doing these kinds of things. And it's just, it's just an erosion of reality. And we're getting to the point where people need to understand the difference between reality and cinema. And it just, it boggles my mind that people can't see right through this kind of stuff. And if anything, it kind of lends credence to the idea that the moon landing was staged. And I never believed that.

I never thought it was a deal, you know, until I'm starting to see some of this stuff come out about shadow configurations and, you know, how I'm starting to see some of this stuff come out about, um, shadow configurations and you know, how it all worked. And it's like, God, did we, did we even actually do that? I don't think we did. It's yeah, it's kind of, to me, I'm kind of thinking, okay, well, are we just, you know, living this weird lie as the United States, having said that we've made it to the moon so that we could beat Russia just to be able to make them quiet long enough to where they're not launching missiles on us kind of thing. That's I don't know. That's exactly your own right track because exactly what I

believe because we were in the middle of a Cold War and the United States and Russia were, were racing for everything and they were racing to go to the moon. Right. So, so why not set up some elaborate stage? Did you know, do you know if they can't even, nobody even knows to this day where that, where the moon landing is, the one thing. Yeah. Not where it was on the moon, but the one that came back, like it's gone.

Oh, it's gone. Like nobody knows where it is. And I don't know. I can't, I can't remember for life. Me, what the story is behind it. It's missing. I doubt it's on the black market somewhere. That's not something that just disappears.

If you think, and I've talked about this on one of my shows before, whenever the president was talking to, I don't think he was talking to Buzz, or maybe it was me. I came in with one of the guys he was talking to on the phone, Mr. President, it's for you, the handyman phone is one of the astronauts that was allegedly on the moon.

And the camera shots over to the president Nixon right talking I believe is Nixon talking to the astronaut and there's a picture of the earth in a frame over the shoulders desk on the wall like how did how did the picture of the earth get to him when they were landing for the first time on the moon that makes no sense to me yeah Yeah. Well, to me, it's like, okay, let's say they made it to the moon. They actually landed, they're walking around. How did they get back up to the shuttle to take them home? I could see getting around to the moon, maybe circumventing the moon, going around it and then whipping around and coming back, kind of like Apollo 13, but physically landing on the moon and then launching back up into the shuttle, essentially that's in orbit,

and docking with that shuttle, bringing the astronauts back on board and then getting them back home. I just, something doesn't sound right about that. Especially with as much effort as Elon Musk is putting into his systems and showing that, hey, look, we could potentially do this. We have to have propulsion that does it this particular way. And,

you know, he's even asking, why haven't we gone back to them? Why don't we just do it? Go go there, test it out, and then come back. You know, but it's it's kind of like, why is there all this red tape? Why haven't? Why hasn't NASA done anything of significance in that regard since this quote unquote moon landing? There's all kinds of conspiracy behind that too. People think that there's things that was there. They found things and that they found that there's,

you've seen all probably all the conspiracy where they just kill the cameras on the dark side of the moon and they go over and they find alien ships and crashed alien ships and life forms, all this other stuff. And they, then it becomes this government conspiracy that they're trying to keep us ignorant and they don't want us to anything. So that's why we're going back. They don't tell us that. Yeah. It's, I mean, I don't know, there's more to it.

There's always more to the story. And like I said, this whole thing with the female crew, all it does is shine light on the potential, the very real potential that the moon landing was staged, to me in my mind, because it's like, okay, you know, we're just basically revisiting, regurgitating that news cycle back from 1962 or three or four, whenever the first moon landing was, you know, here we are 40 years down the road,

and we're just revisiting that same thing. Yeah, 1969. It's just weird to me. Yeah, 1969. Yeah, I agree. That was, again, three years before I was even born and the technology we have now, we can still barely even get out into space. Yeah.

I remember, I saw it happen live, the space shuttle Challenger, they exploded. Remember the story with the teacher, Chrissy McAuliffe and all the crew that exploded. I was watching as a child, watched it explode. That was in the 1980s. Early 1980s when that happened, I believe. And you would think that 20 years of technological advances would have made a better ship, right, that could get out of our atmosphere. And even today, the things that we're capable that 20 years of technological advances would have made a better ship, right?

That could get out of our atmosphere. And even today, the things that we're capable to do on earth, on the land, with our computer power, our technologies, and we're still struggling to even, other countries specifically, are struggling to get their systems, their missiles, their rockets and things into the air. And then somehow, some way, some way, we landed the cameraman

first on the moon to take, just to record them, the first people on the moon landing, you know what I'm saying? Because it was their first, they go, oh wait, who recorded this? Who recorded them landing on the moon? And then who collected the footage? Because they recorded them leaving too.

You know what I'm saying? Did they have wifi back then? Did they have Bluetooth? Was it? This doesn't make sense. Yeah, and how do you get a live feed from the moon? Back then with no wires. Live video feed from the moon, yeah.

With no wires. How does that work? Yeah. There's just, there's too many things that it's like, wait a second. Nope. It just doesn't make sense. And then it's like okay well if that's not true then what about this other thing over here that I thought was true?

And it just spirals from there you know? Yeah. At least in my mind. Well yeah mine too. And I don't go too far out with it you know because there's still a lot of people that believe just because NASA lies to us they still believe that the earth is flat. You know, there's a whole group of people out there still believe that the earth is flat. And you have, you know, unless you've been in the military or you've flown from one side of the earth to the other side of the earth and you've seen the constellations in the sky change, you're not going to understand that. You know, they'll say, well, that's, you prove it.

How can I prove to you that there's different constellations in the southern hemisphere than there is in the northern hemisphere? You have to witness it for yourself. People in Illinois are not gonna see the same stars as the people who live in, say, South Africa. There's another part of Africa, I believe, that's completely opposite side of us. Yeah, and you're gonna have,

even if you've ever been able to sit on the beach and observe the curvature of the Earth from East or West Coast and actually be able to see it, you know, it's possible. So it's just kind of, but it's weird to me how people, like you say, you know, there are this kind of misinformation will drive people to believe anything. And it just, it does nothing but disservice to both women and critical thinking people. You know, just basically like, oh, these people are so dumb. They'll totally believe that, you know, we put these women up in this space and, oh, by the way, yeah, everything else that you've been told for the last 40 years is 100% true. Yeah, no, it's still having the opposite effect.

Yeah, and there's, yeah, exactly. There's a lot of people out there that believe that since NASA lies to us about a few things, they lied to us about everything. And the thing with me is like the curvature of the earth, the globe and all that, the ancients knew this, right? Oh, and they figured out what built by building obelisks, far away from each other, they lose, I don't know, there's a way to measure it at the top of the obelisk and it disappears over the horizon a certain way. And it's not because you lose sight of it in the distance,

but they measured it somehow with the sun and the shadows that are cast. That's what it was, because you measure this, you build the two obelisks far, far away from each other and you measure the shadows at the same point and you look at different measurements. That's because the earth is spinning, you know, it's oval, it's round,

and you can only get different shadows at the same time of the day if the earth is round, not if it's flat. If it's flat, there are gonna be the same length shadows just pointing in different directions. Yeah, and people, I mean, that's how we were able to even navigate, circumvent the globe, you know, it's just people, people gave up on that idea, and they were told that they were crazy. And yet here we are, you know, someone floating off into the distance doesn't fall off the edge of the earth, they wind up in a whole new continent. It's just, it's

weird to me, you know, if there's, there is reality, and then there's this other alternate form of like, community thought that people just assume that is true, like having 16 genders and they believe everything because if you if they claim, you know, I can't tell you how many people I've heard that say, for example, you know, I'm leaving the Democrat Party and here's why. And they will tell their story of how when they were in the Democrat Party, they believed

whatever they were told. And it took them an eye-opening moment to actually do some homework and to research to find out the truth. And then they leave the party. Because it's clear if you just do your homework, that there's one party who has championed its entire existence, championed civil rights. Okay, there's one party who has fought to keep the government small. There's one party that's fought to keep the government small. There's one party that's fought to keep less taxes, not raise taxes.

There's one party who has pushed tariffs, for example, like Trump is doing, and another party who would prefer to keep the tax burden on the people and not on other countries. That's why China has become so powerful is because you got places like Walmart and Amazon who is receiving all their goods, all everything from China. And they become rich. Off the back of children's child slave labor. You know, they pay these kids or these adults pennies

on the dollar in China to make a product they sell for hundreds perhaps of dollars, okay? Oh yeah. And they have huge tariffs on the United States in the 100 plus percentile, but we were only tariffing them for like, 23, 24, 25% for example, 32% I think in a recent example. When that's the kind of stuff is going on,

one country's pockets are getting bigger because they're paying their, loosely saying employees, pennies to make a product and they're receiving damn near a hundred percent. Oh yeah. If not, if not more. Yeah. I mean, yeah. And I mean, we have been fortunate to have been able to, for the last, well,

since Clinton was in office, so the nineties, the last 25, 30 years, um, to, to be able to benefit from that, to be able to have cheaper products and have things that are, the Harbor Freights of the world, so to speak, where you can go out and grab something that's disposable and move forward, move on with your life, or clothing brands that are maybe lesser quality, but cheap enough to where you can just get by and stuff like that.

And I think that that has become, people just feel entitled to that price level with that and that product being there. And the reality is that that is there because people have basically sweat and blood into it in another country. And now that people are starting to see how bad that is, and some people in our political realm are recognizing that as well. I mean, like, hey, look, this is not a good thing

to be reliant on China for these goods, for example. And we can do it ourselves here, and we can pay our own people good money and bring jobs and bolster our own economy instead of, you know, trying to go for cheap goods that are essentially marked up by the time they get here, right? Like you were saying. So I think that the comeuppance is here. I mean, we were to the point where there's no turning back, we really need to, to move away from China as our source for all of our goods. It just, you can't, you can't build a house out of straw long enough to, for it to, to take hold, you know, you have to be able to start

to turn away from that and build up instead of, you know, kind of having a, essentially a shitty foundation. And that's where we are. I mean, we're alive. We rely so heavily on this stuff. We become dependent on that cheap get it today kind of thing. Then you watch the, like the media and the media is all, you know, cause they're down Trump's throat or up his rear end about the tariffs. And of course, because it's his idea, right? And so they're, they're against it. But here, here you got a group, you know, on the left who claims to be the champions of, of anti-slavery, okay. And civil rights. And what they're not realizing, because they're not told this is when

they, when they, when they buy all these Chinese goods, that they're actually emboldening the country who still has slaves. Right, because in early America, okay, before President Lincoln, slaves were compensated. It was very, very small. They were given food, they were given water.

That's- Huh? Ruling the Lord? Yes, now yes, they were there against, you know. That's- Huh? Rue and board. Yes, now yes, they were there against their will, they were slaves. But that's no different to what we have going on in China. We got these employees who are pennies, pennies. It's not enough to make a living, but it's enough to say for the human rights organizations

to say, well, they're being compensated, and they leave them alone. Did you see, chance the interview that Stephen A. Smith had with Meg and Kelly? They're talking about DEI. Oh, I don't think I caught that one. I don't have a clip of it with me, but I watched it and it's quite interesting because they had a good conversation. You know, because he's one of those guys I told you about that he's a, he's been I think he used to be a newscast

announcer of some sort, not newscast or sportscaster. But he's gone kind of slipped over into the political arena and he has a podcast, he talks a lot of this political stuff, but he's kind of of the of the mindset that Chris Cuomo is and kind of not full blown conservative, you know, they probably never will be, but their eyes have been opened and inkling, you know, and they're seeing things that they were not able to see before. But it was a really good interview because he's having a debate of sorts with

Mick and Kelly and she was a lawyer, an attorney. So she's kind of smart anyway. But whenever he asked her the question about DEI, diversity, equity, inclusion, you know, because he was trying to kind of pin her in a gotcha kind of a thing to say that Republicans don't conservatively, civilly don't agree with DEI. And she's like, I disagree with the premise of that pretty much. She says, she says if I was to go back in time and I was in charge, I could redo everything, there would be more diversity.

There'd be more inclusion. She said, I think that mixing of cultures and melting pot that the United States is, is a beautiful thing. Me, Doug Hogan, I believe the same thing. America is beautiful like that. She says, the problem I have with this, and she gave two wonderful analogies. She said, the problem I have with this is the equity in DEI.

Diversity, Equity, Inclusion is what it stands for. The equity in this, here's the problem. She gave two great analogies. She says, I'm trying to remember both of them, but the first one she said was, it was grades. She says, so you go and study really, really hard, okay? And you get your grade A, your A plus, your 100%. And you have no student over here

who didn't study at all, okay? But because what equity means is that it's equal outcomes, everybody has an equal ending, you are now gonna be a grade C and the other student that didn't study at all is gonna be a grade C. Because they have the same right, they have a right to have the same grade

that you have kind of a thing. Yeah. And the other example that she used, the other analogy was she says it's Halloween. She's explaining this, I think, to her kid. She says it's Halloween. And she says, there's a kid over here that's not going Halloween.

Like he's not gonna go trick or treating. He's just gonna sit at his home. He's not gonna go out. He's not gonna put in all, you're gonna go out for two or three hours. You're gonna get bags of candy. You're gonna get all kinds of goodies, he's not gonna put in all, you're gonna go out for two or three hours, you're gonna get bags of candy, you're gonna get all kinds of goodies, okay? But whenever you're done, you go and give that kid

50% of all the candy that you got, because that child deserves 50% of the equity, I mean 50% of equal outcome that you got. He did nothing, you did it all. And she's not saying this to prove equity, she's doing this to prove that it's not right. She ends this by saying it's immorally wrong. It's just morally wrong. That it's not right for somebody that don't deserve to receive. You're working with one person working and one person not working. You get half your money, we're going to text you half to death and give it to this

person. Equal outcomes. That's not fair. And that applies not only to the individual, but also to the government. And I think what we're seeing now with a lot of this stuff is, you know, you and I will go out there and all our listeners are go out there and bust our asses all week long. And then we donate a portion of what we make for, a portion of what we make for, you know, obscure causes that are, you know, shrouded by NGOs and other sort of government agencies, like we talked about a couple of months or weeks ago, you know, and that's that that is equity in action. You know, equity and equality are two very different things. Yes, we don't realize that. I think you've talked about that, too, the difference between equity and equality are two very different things. People don't realize that. I think you've talked about that too. The difference between equity and equality are significant, but people have a

tendency over time to mince words and make them into something that is not what it should be. The whole Black Lives Matter thing. I mean, that is a form of word manipulation to where people believe that, okay, if you don't believe in this thing, then you are anti this or anti that. And it's kind of a, there's a term for it and I'm drawing a blank on what exactly it is, but essentially it's using words as a form of manipulation to get a desired outcome. And the whole diversity, equity, and inclusion thing is wrapped in some, what's that? Yeah, it is deception. It's, it's a thought process. It's wrapped in like a burrito form of, Hey, we want diversity and Hey, we want inclusion. And Hey, while we of, hey, we want diversity, and hey, we want inclusion,

and hey, while we're at it, we want equity as well. And as part of that, like you say, you're just kind of, it's kind of like a Trojan horse for a socialist communist sort of regime. And for it to creep in as much as it has is really kind of surprising to me. And I agree with Megyn Kelly's statements 100% because it is not right. You know, you want diversity, you want inclusion, but the equity, that's where it's different. That's where the United States, it would not be the land of opportunity that it is, if it was equity across the board. People have worked and struggled and been able to come to this country with 75 cents in their pocket,

and come out with a wealth that is beyond generation because of their own hard work and act and due diligence. And that is what makes America great. If you rip that out of the founding components of this country, then you have nothing. That it makes America no different than Nigeria. Right. So, I mean, it's just, you can't, it's a Trojan horse. And I think it's something that we need to get away

from far faster than the whole transphobia It's a Trojan horse. And I think it's something that we need to get away from far faster than the whole transphobia and all the different sexes and different bathrooms and whatever. The DEI thing is, and we've seen how it's become an issue with pilots, with drivers, with management companies and all these different things

where people are being bypassed for other races or other sexes because of that. It's like reverse racism, reverse sexism because they have to meet some sort of DEI requirements. Well, if they would just change the E from equity to equality, I think you'd have a lot more people on the right involved in participating in it because we all believe in equality. Absolutely. Yeah. and equal opportunity. Yes, that's what it boils down to. So we got equal, equality is equal opportunity and equity is equal outcome.

That's what people need to understand the difference here, that in the end, no matter how hard you work, the person who doesn't work at all is gonna end up equal to you. Yeah, so are those women who were up in that space flight equal to an astronaut? No, and again, this is Katy Perry, Gail King, Lauren Sanchez, Amanda Nguyen, and, uh, Kierian Flynn. They're not,

they're not nowhere equivalent because they didn't do the training. Right. That's a slap in the face to every female astronaut that's ever been. Yes. And that's, that's, that is not equal. That is not equal. You know what I mean? It's just, and I think people are, are having, they're just assuming that that is equality and it's not, it, it's completely different. Gail King came back down and once everybody started mocking the whole thing, you know, you know, cause everybody hates that everybody can see this and,

and they've taken a huge hit. The Katy Perry specifically, she's trying to distance herself from it. But Gail King is P owed that because she's like, we are an astronauts and you know, you need respect and basically, and she's a racist anyway, but she's like, if you don't, if, you know, if you disagree with, with this and how what happened here, then you're either racist or you're misogynistic. I'm gonna pull that card out.

I don't care if you're males or females going up in space. I honestly don't care if you're going to space. I would like to, but I don't care if somebody else is. I don't care. Just because you're a singer and you're a political personality and you're a filmmaker and there's a couple of different things on here.

You think that somehow that because you're rich and you can afford to do something that the common man can't do, that this somehow makes you, that you're the voice of the common person because you got to do this extraordinary thing that nobody else can do, if you even did it. Yeah. Yeah. Cause Katy Perry, she's here, because you got to do this extraordinary thing nobody else can do. Even if you even did it.

Yeah. Katy Perry, you see her interview. She's like, Oh, I felt, I felt love. I felt such a connection to love. And she gave this bizarre speech. And she kissed you. She was in space for 11 minutes, dude. No, I think the whole thing was 11 minutes total. She was in space for like three minutes, up and down, like 11 minutes, something along those lines. Maybe it's 13 minutes, but three minutes bounce around space. That's what it was, three minutes of space. And then she came back down, she kissed the earth. It's like, oh my God, I'm an astronaut.

I'm an astronaut. Yeah, I don't know. That is the definition of equity right there. Anyway, let's take a quick break. Welcome. Yeah. Welcome back, Earth. To the land of equity. All right. Take a quick.

On the brink of blackouts again, as power demand reached an all time record high overnight, slivers of the Golden State plunged into darkness. It says it expects to continue with stage six running blackouts for the rest of the world. A scheduled outage on Thursday, but the one that happened Sunday, it wasn't scheduled, it was unexpected, and it lasted longer than a day. Point Zero Energy has given me the American-tested, American-assembled, reliable solar backup that I've been looking for. Their Titan Solar solar generator is American

ingenuity at its finest with a removable expandable lithium-ion battery, 2,000 watt hour, 3,000 watt high efficiency inverter. So what does all that mean to you? It means the Titan can charge your smartphone for 88 hours, your laptop for 35 hours, a CPAP for 108 hours. Your refrigerator for 26.8 hours. Get to PointZeroEnergy.com today for the all-American solution to backup power. Welcome back to the Rising in Probec. Okay, I want to do this. Let's play, um, okay, you know Stephen Miller is. He's, um, he's pretty awesome. He's doing a really good job. He's got a great band too.

Huh? He's got a great band too. Wait, not the Stephen Miller band. Different Stephen. This is a different Stephen Miller. Yeah, this is a different Stephen Miller. Oh, funny. So, Stephen Miller is like the 12th United States Homeland Security Advisor and White House Deputy Chief of Staff. But he does a lot of like public speaking and stuff.

When I say public speaking, I mean like he talks to the press and this kind of thing. Check this out because they're, you know, the media is, I'm calling them the mainstream now, the mainstream media, basically legacy, legacy media. The mainstream is, they're going at it because of the whole we had two major deals right now going on we got the whole deportation issue we got the tariff issue you know orange man bad I listened to Stephen Miller because this is a I like listening to him talk besides he's got really he's got really good communication skills he always gets down to the point. Just a couple years ago there were two gentlemen they they were from Venezuela, they were members

of train de Uruguay. The Biden administration and the Border Patrol apprehended them and made the decision to provide them with extensive due process, put them onto a program known as supervised release, and put them on ankle monitors so they could go through a lengthy legal, judicial determination as to whether these legal aliens who had just set foot on US soil might want to live in the United States for the rest of their lives. What was the result of that decision? What was the result of that choice that was made?

Those two men kidnapped a young girl named Jocelyn Ungary from her family, they beat her, they sexually assaulted her, they tortured her, they stripped her, they murdered her, and they dumped her body. That is what the Biden administration's policy was. Most of your papers never covered her story when it happened. To the extent that you covered it at all, it was because President Trump forced you to cover it by highlighting it repeatedly over and over again. He had to shame you into covering it. And each and every one of you that sides over and over again with these MS-13 terrorists,

to the extent that you have the financial means to do so, you all choose to live in condos or homes or houses as far away from these kinds of gangbangers as you possibly can. If I offered any one of you a rent-free home with no taxes to pay in any of these gang neighborhoods and I said your neighbors are MS-13 terrorists or Mexican mafia or Sinaloa cartel or Tren de Aragua, I couldn't pay you to live there. But yet you with your coverage are trying to force innocent Americans to have these people as their neighbors and that one day their daughter May be abducted from their home and raped and murdered

So you're not gonna get an ounce of sympathy from this administration or President Trump for the terrorists who've invaded our homes in our country Thank you, you know how well it Yeah, and that's the things like it's it's finally coming to a head where some of these, some of these news personalities and spokespeople or whatever are getting their just desserts when it comes to actual news coverage. They did not cover this kind of stuff. They chose to go around and no, they still don't. And this stuff is happening. And, you know, they're just kind of bypassing it. And they're whoever's controlling the media right now is putting pushing that stuff onto the table. I've been in a newsroom before I've worked in those environments before.

And I can tell you, that's exactly what happens if it bleeds, it leads. But you know what, if it doesn't agree with whatever the local or the the state politicians want to have on the front page above the fold, guess what? It's getting buried or it's not even getting reported at all. And you're going to get called into the managing editor's office and browbeat when you don't, when you actually, you know, come up with a story that's worth reporting. You know, there is no more Woodward and Bernstein anymore. That doesn't exist. That's why I left the news media, because it's just garbage anymore. So I'm glad that the, that this guy is actually standing up to these people and telling them to their faces, you're doing a shitty job. And if you would have done your job, you would have known that this is

an issue. And why are you siding with these stupid terrorists? But you would have done your job, you would have known that this is an issue. And why are you siding with these stupid terrorists? But you would have thought after this last election, the results of this last election, that their eyes would have been open. Yeah. I mean, how could you not? And especially, you know what? I haven't seen any news media reporting is the the massive decline in illegal border crossings and illegal, what do you call it?

Like terrorists that are crossing the border and stuff like that, people that are getting caught. I mean, it's just the difference in the numbers alone is jaw breaking. And I'm hearing that and seeing it from social media. Well, like the only place you wanna hear is when the press secretary comes out and starts talking and asking questions

because she gets bombarded all the time from the mainstream, you know, about Big Bad Trump and how he's deporting these people wrongly and just scoop people up. Well, it sound like you know they're like there's like there's you know black buses with no windows and no no registration plates pulling up next to people on the street and scooping them up and deporting them. American citizens. That's not how this is going down but that's how they portray

it. Here's another video this one's's from CNN. Listen to, and I can't remember the name of this lady on the CNN show here, but she's second here. Make sure I got my notes right. Yeah, I can't find what show this is, but there's a Republican strategist on here by the name of Sher Michael Singleton. And so what CNN likes to do is get a bunch of, you know, they have like a roundtable discussion and they'll let all the Democrats talk and get their points out And what CNN likes to do is get a bunch of, they have like a round table discussion and they'll let all the Democrats talk and get their points out and they all agree with each other.

And then when the Republican or the conservative tries to talk, they cut them off. They try to interfere with what they're trying to say and the point they're trying to make. And oh, you're just talking points and all this and that. But this is that audio clip. I am going to move on. I'm gonna move on

because this is not a conversation about the tattoos. One of the other things that happened this week is that a California judge said that you can't just scoop people up and deport them without a warrant. And in that case, basically the judge is saying, you know, you're basically taking anybody who's in a particular area. If they don't want to talk to you, you're taking them, detaining them and assuming that they are deportable and that you can't really do that anymore. But I'm gonna pause it right there because this makes me angry that this is what they're

talking about. They're, the left doesn't seem to understand abstract thinking. And they just see, this is what's happening. They see a van pull up and a bunch of people with black uniforms and guns, and they grab these guys, they stick them in the van, they take them back, and they deport them. What they don't know is it takes weeks or months

of hard work and dedication to track these guys down. We're talking about leads, we're talking about people putting their life and limb out, going undercover to locate these individuals and communicating this information back to the group that's going to move in and take them up. There's more than an abundance of information collected and gathered before a person is apprehended and taken into custody.

The Fourth Amendment, your right to privacy, is one of the most sacred. It's just as sacred as the first and the second. Nobody in this country just gets gooped up without due process. And they're acting like this is what's going on. Like a lot of work has gone in to making sure these people are in fact illegal immigrants.

And she mentioned the tattoos at the very, very beginning. Weren't she? That's another clip altogether. But while we're talking about the tattoos, what he had on his hand, there was a skull, actually I've got a picture of it here. Because I pulled it up. There's okay, so on this guy's, this guy's hand, there's an M on his index finger and

it goes ms one three, but there's not, there's a marijuana, a leaf, right? M for marijuana. The next one is a smiley face, an S for smiley face. There's a cross on the third finger. That's a one, okay? And then the three is a skull. And you're like, why is it a skull? Because there's a dark outline around the top of the skull,

around the rim of the skull, down around the rim of the skull down around the right It would be the skulls left eye and back around under the jaw So basically there's a number three there and it's being hidden by a skull And so what this marijuana smiley face the cross and the skull is is MS 1 3 MS 13 And that's what everybody's been talking about there's all the left talks about all the time There's no way MS 13 on it because there's a Photoshop picture been talking about. All the left talks about all the time, there's no MS-13 on it, because there's a Photoshop picture going around with somebody typed the MS-13 on there

to show what the symbology is. And they believe, and there's people believing that Republicans, and I know Trump has actually fallen for this, because he's got a picture of this, he believes that the MS-13 is actually tattooed on there. No, Mr. President, I'm sure he's been corrected by now. That those tattoos are symbolic

and the MS-13 was typed on there to show the dumb people, not necessarily Mr. President, to show the dumb people who don't understand symbology or abstract thinking that these signs and symbols actually mean something. That's what's going on here. Yeah.

What the judge is saying is nothing radical. This basically comports with existing law. It comports with decades of decisions around this matter, which in pure layman's basic terms means that ICE agents cannot go after people, arrest them and detain them solely on the basis of being brown, having brown skin and being working class. And what was so interesting about this case for me is that the border patrol did not contest any of the allegations.

And they actually claimed that they changed their guidelines. Their response was just that they were going to do better training. And this issue goes, is right in line with the Mr. Abracocia case. It's a question of due process. Whatever we feel about Mr. Obregno-Garcia, it's honestly irrelevant. It's a question for the immigration judge. On Mr. Garcia, we keep saying that there's no evidence that this guy belonged to a gang. This is Sir Michael. In court filings.

That's not true. No, that is not true. That is not true. It's not true. It's not true. No, no is not true. That is true. We always have to play this game of interrupting people when they're talking. But who is the point of me being on the show if I can never finish my freaking point? This is getting really annoying, Abby.

Everyone else has made their statements. I have yet to say anything. Hold on a second, okay? I mean, Jesus. Because I want to say something and I have a point of view to make here as well. Hang on just one second. Sheriff Michael, let me ask you a question. The question is, has the government presented evidence in court that Abrego Garcia is a

member of MS-13? And my response- And the answer is no, that has not happened in court. But it doesn't mean that they have not made those claims publicly. It doesn't mean that those claims are not in police reports. It doesn't mean that they're not in police reports. They're just not statements that were made in court cases. In 2019, the immigration judge at the time believed the Prince George's County gang unit and the evidence that they presented before that judge at the time that Mr. Garcia

did indeed belong to a gang. This is not my opinion. You can, people can google this crap. They can google this. CBS reported on this. If a judge believes it in 2019, is it now all of a sudden not true? The judge granted him a withholding of removal. I acknowledge that fact. Which is a different issue. Hold on, hold on. But the point remains that a judge found the evidence to be credible that Mr. Garcia did indeed belong to a game. So now we're just not going to believe judges? The judge? We can to be credible that Mr. Garcia didn't belong to a gang. So now, all of a sudden, we're just not going to believe judges? The judge?

We can't have it both ways. I don't want to go too far down this rabbit hole, but my only point is that the government has not presented beyond the police report, they've not actually presented the evidence to prove that he belonged to this gang. So a police report's not considered evidence before a court a court of law police report is not due judges not let's let's not I I what do we say Michael what is what was it but it was the original relevant I was wrong I actually want to be absolutely is relevant to the argument from the administration which is that Mr. Garcia

well belong to a gang as one of the reasons of deporting him out of the country but you guys are saying there's no truth to it. There's no facts to it. That's not true. The Constitution is very clear. It does not say citizens. It says no person should be deprived of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness without due process.

It doesn't matter what he's done in his past. The Boston bomber... It doesn't matter. Wait a minute. Let me finish. The Boston bomber had due process. Actually, yeah, that's a very good process. He had due process. That's what this due process. Actually, yeah, he had due process. That's what this is about.

Wait, wait, wait. I gave you time. Let me finish. Yeah, excuse also American citizens. This is a president who continues to twist the Constitution to adapt to whatever his vision is to the point of the two-year-old who was deported without due process, an American citizen, his father did not want him to go. And the only access he had to his daughter was listening to his daughter cry in the background in a one-minute call. That four-year-old did not get access to a doctor, despite the fact of having stage four cancer, did not have his medication with him when

he was deported, an American citizen to Honduras. This is what this president is doing. He is twisting the definition of the Constitution, and people like you are disparaging character to try to justify the disparity. I'm not disparaging character. I'm not disparaging character to try to justify the But the idea that mr. Garcia's past doesn't matter is ludicrous Democrats want to die on the seal. I promise you, you'll regret it politically. So go right ahead. Okay. Let me let it.

Go right ahead. Dan, let me let Scott have a word. We don't want people breaking our laws, coming into our country. That is a fact. Let me let Scott have a word, and then we'll move on. It seems to me that the political analysis of this, though, is, and a lot of average people are looking at it this way, why is it that we can let 20 million people into the country just walk across whatever and there's no real process for them to do that, but then we have to individually pick

out every single person and go through years upon years upon years of paperwork and this and that and the other and all we're trying to do is send them back to where they came from because they came here illegally in the first place. Twenty million in with no process. How do you get 20 million out with years and years of people fighting every single case? You can cherry pick any case you want. But the reality is the crisis that put Donald Trump in the White House was caused over years and years and years of neglect

and letting people walk into here without any process at all and now you're trying to gum up the works to keep them here. A lot of them came in with her role. CNN polling shows 54% of Americans want Mr. Arreguar's CF back. November polling show Donald Trump won the election. That's CNN polling showing. November polling is shifting. We are a sovereign nation and you cannot just come into our country

illegally whenever the heck you want because we can't do it to any other country on the face of this earth. If you come in illegally, you have to leave. Americans are tired of that. We do not have unlimited resources. You know who was here illegally with the deportation order? Marco Rubio's grandfather. Okay.

All right. Let's... We're not talking about Marco Rubio. Now we're not? Now that's not right? Good Lord. I'm done with that argument. Bunch of children, my God. Yes, and that was a news night, a CNN news night with Abby Phillips.

That's who that was. So, I spend a fair amount of time with native Hispanic men and women who work with me or I work in a secondhand way with them to make sure that they're able to get their jobs done basically. And overwhelmingly, every single one of them that I've spoken to has been in favor of the deportations. They usually are if they came over fairly the right way. Correct. Yeah.

And these are people that, you know, their families have started here from, you know, two or three generations back, maybe more. And they've raised children here. They've sent money back home. You know, whether they came over illegally or not, they're still, you know, trying to live the life. But for the most part, the people that I know who have stable, able jobs, and they're, they're contributing to society, every single one of them, they want it to happen. Because just

like I mentioned with the female astronauts, all of a sudden you have people who feel entitled to be able to just show up. And it's a slap in the face of the people who have been here and who came across and who did the work. And then they're the ones that are getting, you know, they're getting slapped on the back. Because, you know, hey, you know, we want, we want to have all this equality and everything. No, even they're like, no, that's below. That's bullshit. You know, we work here, we do this. We went through the process. We did it the right way. You don't just get a free pass.

I don't care what your race is. But to me, it was eye opening because I was expecting the opposite. You know, I was expecting a lot more of those people to be like, oh no, they come over and we want them to be here. No, it's opposite. I mean, they don't want them here. That's the fighting sample of equity, you know? Cause here you got somebody that came over, they went through the process.

They took the test, you know, the one where you got to answer all the questions, you got to be able to answer questions about the constitution. Speak English. There's these different kinds of things that they have to qualify for, and then you got this other group who's coming over illegally, okay?

So equity is, it doesn't matter if you come in the hard way, which is the right way, or you come in, or you swim across the river, and you come over here, and you enter in illegally. At the end, in equity, you're both being American citizens. That's not fair. Equality is you both have a chance.

Correct. You both have a chance to come over here and be American citizens, but you gotta do it the right way. You have an equal opportunity. Yes. If you show up on equal terms, you can do the thing. And if you have people that are like,

no, I just come over illegally and this is my deal, then well, guess what? You get a free pass to Honduras or El Salvador or whatever it might be, but you're right here. And if you want to come back, you can do it the right way. That's there's nothing wrong with that. You know, and I just blows my mind that these people like, Oh, you know, you sent a two year old out. What the hell is that two year old doing here in the first place? How did that happen? And they're all like, well what the hell is that two year old doing here in the first place? Right. How did that happen? And they're all like, well you separated them

with the family, well if a serial killer has a child and he kills a bunch of family and he gets arrested, are you separating the family? Like the separation has been going on for years in this country. You don't arrest the child and put it in prison with the kid, you know? So yeah, you send the kid back or you do something else with the kid. You hold the

kid until you find a means to take care of it. But yes, you have to separate them because you cannot leave a child in the custody of a criminal. It doesn't work that way. Yeah. It just, it boggles my mind that the left thought process where, like you say, it's just there's zero rational thought. But it hasn't always been that way. When you go back to Bill Clinton, I mean, Bill Clinton, you used to be a strong advocate of deporting illegal immigrants.

Hillary Clinton was too when she was working for Obama as the Secretary of State. Chuck Schumer was. They were all echo chambers for whatever the Democratic president wanted to do. In fact, I didn't put up a compilation of audio, but I went through it before this show. And every single one of them was big time, when they're running their campaigns, big time deporting illegal immigrants.

But I got one thing here that I found. This was uploaded by CNN 10 years ago. Here's their savior, the Democrat savior, Barack Obama, and what he had to say with it. I continue to believe that the best way to solve this problem is by working together to pass that kind of common-sense law. But until that happens, there are actions I have the legal authority to take as president, the same kinds of actions taken by Democratic and Republican presidents before me,

that will help make our immigration system more fair and more just. Tonight I am announcing those actions. First, we'll build on our progress at the border with additional resources for our law enforcement personnel so that they can stem the flow of illegal crossings and speed the return of those who do cross over. Second, I'll make it easier and faster for high-skilled immigrants, graduates and entrepreneurs to stay and contribute to our economy, as so many business leaders

have proposed. Third, we'll take steps to deal responsibly with the millions of undocumented immigrants who already live in our country. I want to say more about this third issue because it generates the most passion and controversy. Even as we are a nation of immigrants, we're also a nation of laws. Undocumented workers broke our immigration laws, and I believe

that they must be held accountable, especially those who may be dangerous. That's why over the past six years, deportations of criminals are up 80%. And that's why we're gonna keep focusing enforcement resources on actual threats to our security. I'm gonna stop it there, but he's about halfway through the video, did he say anything that you disagree with?

No. Me neither. I actually agree with it. Yes, I do too, but check this out. So I did some digging, and you guys can find this on infographics. It's a nonpartisan statistics group Bill Clinton he deported 12 million illegal immigrants in his eight years 12 million How many indictments against bill for doing that?

0 Obama in his two terms, five million deportations. How many indictments? Zero. Zero. Biden in his four years, 2.8 million deportations. Indictments, zero. Now Trump hasn't reached 2.8 million yet,

and I don't have the statistics because he's still in office, right? But his last, his first term, two million. Under Biden's, and he has been indicted how many times? Oh, dozens. I don't even know, there's a lot. And they keep throwing them all. How come it's okay for the left to do this kind of stuff,

but it's not okay for the right to do this kind of stuff? It's because who he is. It's because the party he stands for is because of MAGA. It's sickening. Okay, so here's what I want to do because we're at an hour, but I know that we both have some stuff going on. Why don't you tell everybody what you got going on right now? Oh, yeah. So later this month, I'm going to be engaging in a live speaking event. I'll be teaching three different classes up at the Thrivalist Fair in Addie, Washington, which is kind of in the northeast corner of the state. So if you guys are interested, check it out. It's I think it's Thrivalists.org. And if you're curious about it, want more details, just shoot me a message and I'll see what I can do to send you the details. But I'm looking forward to it. It's going to be

the weekend of Memorial Day. So it's a 25th and 26th, I believe, two day camp out event. So check it out if you guys are interested. And if you want to meet me in person, that's a good opportunity to do so. And that's the rival list like like thrive. Yeah, like thrive and survive. Thrivaless like Thrive. Yeah, like Thrive and Survive, Thrivaless, like survivalist. Thrivaless, yeah.

Yeah, so do check it out. And if you're in the region, feel free to stop in and say, hey, I'm happy to meet folks. And if you're a listener, you know, feel free to hop over. Patriot Rising. Yeah. Patriot Rising, 1773 at gmo.com. Contact Ryan, just put Thrive, Thrivaless, Thrivaless, Fair, something along those lines in the subject section

to see if we can get something going for him. But it's patriotrising1773 at gmo.com. Awesome. I have a new book I'm working on and I've actually got six beta readers on it and I can't give out the name of it yet. So it's super secret sauce right now. I will tell you that it's about an EMP.

I will tell you that it's about an EMP that goes off over the Midwest. I'll also tell you that I have selected six beta readers, three male, three female, three friends, three strangers. I try to keep a balance like that so I can, you know, I don't want somebody throwing me kudos. Yeah, just because they know me, right? And they've been friends with me for a while. But all these are avid readers and book fans,

if we want to call them that, of the stuff I've written in the past. And the three strangers are not. I don't think that they've read anything of mine. But I'm a member of a 10,000 person group called the Dirty Dozen, DD12. It's on Facebook. And I'm one of 12 featured authors on there.

And so I made a post and put a post for interest. And I laid out the rules for involvement in this. And I selected six. And I had a lot of applicants, a lot of applicants, but like I said, I try to keep the number small. I don't wanna get too much, it gets sloppy when you put too many beta readers out there. There's non-disclosure agreements

and different kinds of stuff like that. So you gotta kind of keep it rolled in a little bit. But again, it is an EMP book. And here's the thing about EMPs, it's to me it's the same as martial law. We've never been hit with electromagnetic pulse, right? So what's an expert? Well, who's an EMP expert?

It's generally, it's not somebody that's lived through it, right, because we don't have any of those people. But it's somebody, and I'm not claiming to be one I don't I've never written a book solely on EMPs I just write fiction stories about EMPs and stuff but I would like at some point to have an EMP person somebody that has studied this because in my in my mind that's what makes a person expert in any any topic is somebody if you've studied this you've and you've written a book on it and you've sold a few copies,

you know, that qualifies you. Same thing. Yeah, it makes you an authority on the topic at hand. It's same thing with martial law. You know, martial laws, you guys have all heard me talk about martial law and I wrote a book called Surviving Martial Law. I've never lived under martial law.

I've written a book, I've sold a few thousand copies of it. It's happened a few times in the United States, but they were regional. They were localized, sections if you will, of Marsh Law for short periods of time. One being over Hawaii most recent that they weren't even a state yet. So they're just a territory. But yeah, it's that kind of thing. I enjoy talking about EMPs and I've only written one of the book with EMP involved. And well, there's one that's happened actually in my Tyrant series closer to maybe I think maybe in book three. And I wrote a zombie novel where EMP kind of happened early on the set off some kind

of weird stuff. Yeah. I went a little, um, little, little out there with the science fiction stuff, uh, highlighting and underscoring and bolding the word fiction because that was, there's a lot of fiction in that, in that, in that book, but it was enjoyable as a fun read. I mean, a fun ride. Nice. But that was called, um, actually just put that one out

in German actually. So that one's over there. Oh, that's that one. Yeah, they're pretty cool. It's one of my books. It's in No Light Beyond. I got a copy here, a German copy here. Kind light dahinter. I've talked about it.

I'm sure I'm pronouncing it wrong. Kindheit dahinter. No light beyond over in Germany. Good stuff. But anyway, all right, I'm just going to close things out there. I want to thank everybody for listening. I'm Al Douglas Hogan. And I'm Ryan Buford.

Thanks for joining us, Tony. Thanks.