The Prepper Broadcasting Network - The Strange Truth- Nuclear War Soon - A deep analysis of the escalating situation.

Episode Date: March 16, 2024

https://linktr.ee/PBNLinks?utm_source=qr_code

The The The The The Well, welcome to another episode of Strange Truth. I'm your host, Carl B., and I really hope that everyone has had a pretty good week. We're going to talk about some some pretty heavy heavy stuff here today. The possibility of nuclear war. We're going to look at that. You know just just how much of a threat it is.

So we're going to talk about that today. I think that this is the elephant in the room that we have to address. And we've got to start giving some serious thought to, you know, in light of a lot of the things that's been happening in the world at large. So we're going to come back and we're going to discuss and we're going to talk about and kind of like examine, you know, just how big a threat is the nuclear war at this moment. So we're going to talk about that first. how big a threat is the nuclear war at this moment. So we're going to talk about that first. However, let's go to our sponsors. Let's give a shout out to our sponsors. Are you prepared to be the family doctor in a disaster or emergency? This is the Intrepid Commander, and I'm holding The Prepper's Medical Handbook by William W. Forgy, M.D.

In this great book, you'll learn how to prepare for medical care off the grid. You'll learn about assessment and stabilization. You'll even deal with things like bioterrorism response, radiation, and how to build the off-grid medical kit at home. Look, 2020 taught us a lot about the limitations of our medical infrastructure in America. Get the Prepper's Medical Handbook today at Amazon.com. Again, that's the Prepper's Medical Handbook by William W. Forgy. What if I told you you could own land for $200 down and highly affordable monthly payments.

Yourcheapland.com is your answer to bug out land, hunting, recreation, and whatever else your prep or mind can dream up. Yourcheapland.com has properties in Texas, New Mexico, Colorado, Oklahoma, Arizona, Utah. Go to yourcheapland.com, check out the properties, use the promo code PBN, and get $100 off your purchase. Let's hope that that is a sound that we don't ever have to wake up to. But, you know, just perusing the news over the last two weeks, I figured, you know what, this is something that I am going to have to discuss in a podcast because I think it's a real issue. The rhetoric has changed, especially since it's not going the way NATO and the United States want it to go in Russia. So we're going to take a look at, you know, is there a possibility that we could get into a nuclear conflict with a major power this year?

We'll examine the Russia issue. We'll examine what's going on with China as well. But most of the show will be concentrated on the Russian issue because I really think at this point that is the most serious but so the first thing that I am going to start with is I just want to let's look at China okay and this is from an article over there at themostimportantnews.com and I'm sure it was written by Michael Snyder but let's just take a look at what's going on with China here. It says, at a time when their economy is really struggling, the Chinese are increasing military spending and ramping up preparations for war. But who is China preparing to fight a war with? Needless to say, the answer to that question is obvious. Yes, the border dispute between India and China could erupt into something significant, but that is not likely.

The only other opponent that the Chinese would be fighting a major war with would be the United States. And right now, Chinese shipyards are churning out military vessels at a pace that the U.S. simply cannot match. The U.S. cannot match the pace of building in the shipyards of Shanghai, The U.S. cannot match the pace of building in the shipyards of Shanghai, which have already turned out two new aircraft carriers with a third expected to begin sea trials soon. The latest vessel, the Fujian, features catapults to launch heavy fixed-wing aircraft with immense bomb payloads. These shipyards are also building a new type of amphibious assault vehicle and many roll-on, roll-off ferries which could have dual purpose transporting cars in peacetime and armored assault vehicles in event of attack that the Chinese have been constructing. We are being told that this network of tunnels makes the Hamas tunnels on the Gaza look like holes scooped by children in a sandpit. While the West has been scaling back its military spending in favor of welfare and health care, China has been building artificial islands as naval bases and airfields.

islands as naval bases and airfields. Less obvious but more ominous, it has also been digging a vast network of tunnels and bunkers that make the Hamas warrens in Gaza look like holes scooped by children in a sandpit. The Chinese tunnels stretch for hundreds of miles and their plans are so closely guarded that Western intelligence agencies have little idea what's down there. Domestic spies in the pay of the West who have attempted to smuggle out information have been caught and executed. No one knows why China has been putting so much effort into these tunnels. Are they anticipating that vast numbers of Chinese will need to shelter underground during an apocalyptic conflict with the United States. In recent years, the Chinese have been fervently upgrading and expanding their strategic nuclear arsenal. Most alarming of all is the buildup of nuclear missiles. Throughout the

Cold War, though China has been a nuclear power from the mid-1960s, its atomic arsenal was limited. By the fall of the Berlin Wall in 1989, the People's Liberation Army had only 30 or 40 long-range nuclear missiles. Because that elite was more than enough. As President Deng Zoping chillingly taunted American journalists, how many Los Angeles can you afford to lose? That policy has changed. More than 100 nuclear missiles with multiple warheads have already been built and armed, with production expected to exceed 500 by the end of this decade, if not sooner. The moment that Chinese invade Taiwan, they know it will mean war with the

United States. If that war is limited to conventional weaponry, the Chinese will win a war in Taiwan, and every war game that our leaders have conducted in recent years has shown this. The U.S. could try to threaten China with nukes, but if China now possesses enough missiles to wipe out dozens of U.S. cities, our leaders may not want to risk a nuclear confrontation. The Chinese know that most battles are won before they ever fought, so they're trying to position themselves for a positive outcome before the very first missile is fired at Taiwan. at Taiwan. Okay. Now, you know, and of course, the amount of Chinese immigrants that are coming across the border, right? Last year, U.S. Customs Border Protection reported 37,000 Chinese citizens were apprehended crossing illegally from Mexico into the United States. That's 50 times more than two years earlier. In many cases, groups of military age Chinese men all decked out in similar equipment are being encountered. There's a lot going on that we're not being told about. There's a lot

going on, you know, with the whole border issue that we're not being told about. You know, the smart money would be on, you know, we've let in so many of these people at this point that we must have let in some very dangerous people who mean to harm us. And at some point, something very significant will occur here in the United States. Please brace for that, prep for that. You know, from this article, you can see that the Chinese have been making extensive, extensive arrangements to fight a nuclear war with the United States. You know, all these tunnels for hundreds of miles that they're building. And, you know, actually, like, and the constant manufacturing of nuclear warheads is something

that, of course, we have to be concerned about. So, and the axis of evil between them and the Russians and Iran, right? And of course, you know, the Chinese and the Russians have missiles aimed at the United States. And I think if we go to war with one of those countries, the other one is going to help the other country to retaliate because they don't, they're not going to want us standing, folks. Okay. So, you know, how prepared are you is the question uh you know um if you wake up tomorrow and there is no internet there is no electricity because uh you know they've been nuclear strikes across the country how prepared are you to function in in that world is a very serious uh question that we must all consider at this point.

So I just kind of wanted to bring in that stuff with China because that sets the tone for what's going on with Russia. Let's see. One of the things I want to preface this with, okay, and, you know, I think that when independent journalists, when independent media, you know, alternate media, when they don't tow the party line, so to speak, when they don't tow the, you know, the party line of, we're winning the war in Ukraine, and, you know, Russia will be defeated, blah, blah, blah, blah. And not really report on, you know, not really give it hard analysis and not just parrot in or cut and paste in, you know, articles that has been recycled pretty much by the intelligence communities in the West. by the intelligence communities in the West,

you know, independent media is branded as, you know, Russian apologists, right? Or, you know, spreading Russian disinformation. But if we are going to wake up one day and a lot of people are dead because of a nuclear blast, or we find ourselves without electricity, which will result, you know, for months, which will result in millions of people dead, then I think that we need to look at everything that's out there and prepare accordingly. That's what smart people do. And, you know, and for the folks who are glued to their phones and glued to the mainstream media and glued to the propaganda that's being floated out there, you know, I wish them well.

I wish them well. I cannot afford to live in that world. Right. None of us really can. We have to really take these things seriously. of us really can we have to really take these things seriously so i am going to look at a few articles here really quickly and and and just kind of give some analysis on these articles the first one is taken from the gateway pundit and said could germany start world war three leaked audio unveils military bombshell and this is my neighbor uh naomi selbit right say a bit uh and it says

here a shocking revelation about Germany's military plans is shaking the geopolitical landscape. A leaked audio recording exposes a chilling conversation among top-ranking military officials regarding a potential operation to bomb the Crimean bridge in Russia with Taurus missiles. Worse yet, the recorded voices, one of whom is Lieutenant General Ingo Gerhardt, the commander of the National Air Force himself, stressed that Germany's involvement in the attack must be concealed from the public. The recording, initially dismissed by some as mere propaganda, has been confirmed as authentic by the highest echelons of the German government. Russian officials demand swift answers from Berlin,

labeling the leaked conversation as evidence of direct German complicity in acts of aggression against Russia. Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov scorns NATO, suggesting a glaring betrayal of trust, while former Russian President Dmitry Mendeyev condemns Germany as a resurfaced adversary. He released a brutal statement on Telegram saying, after all, our eternal opponents, the Germans, have again turned into sworn enemies. And again, the call from the times of the Great Patriotic War becomes relevant. And it says here, one can only hope that Putin keeps his cool. He tends to

rule with a very firm grip on the situation without resorting to disastrous measures out of pure impulsivity. Nevertheless, the gravity of the situation cannot be overstated. At stake are not only diplomatic relations, but the delicate balance of power in Eastern Europe. The Crimean Bridge, a symbol of strategic importance linking Crimea to mainland Russia, emerges as a focal point of contention. This occurred just after Putin delivered his State of the National Address, wherein he sent a stern warning to the West. Aggressors against Russia will face much harsher consequences. Russia is prepared to fight with technologically advanced weapons and a highly efficient economy. Thus, the Western mass media immediately escalated the fear-mongering and claimed that Putin was

threatening the West with nuclear war. However, it is crucial to note that Putin clearly stated that any form of attack would only be a defensive measure in response to Western attacks. There is no reason for an escalation of tensions. Russia is always available for dialogue and seeking common solutions. Plus, he emphasized that the nuclear war would be an extremely serious scenario, which he would never take as lightly as the Western media does to incite panic. Everything they're inventing now, spooking the world with the threat of a nuclear conflict involving nuclear weapons, which potentially means the end of civilization. Don't they realize this? The problem is that these people who have never faced profound adversity, they have no conception of the horrors of war.

I think that was Putin speaking. But now that Germany has put the cards on the table, Putin's word of warning takes on a new dimension. Suddenly, there is an explicit reason for Putin to suspect that Germany is willing to attack with exceptionally destructive weaponry. So, you know, and then we have this article from Zero Hedge. So that's the leak audio coming out of Germany saying that the Germans were, you know, looking to attack the Crimean Bridge with terrorist missiles, right? So that's Germany, that the Germans were, you know, looking to attack the Crimean bridge with terrorist missiles, right? So that's Germany. That's one country. Now listen to this. Macron doubles down on NATO sending troops to Ukraine remarks. This is from Zero Hedge by Tyler Durden.

It says, authored by Dave DeCamp, French President Emmanuel Macron on Thursday stood behind his comments about NATO not ruling out sending troops to Ukraine despite the uproar it caused and the warning it drew from Russia. These are sufficiently serious issues. Every one of the words that I say on this issue is weighed, thought, and measured, Macron told reporters. Following a meeting of European leaders on the Ukrainian proxy war on Monday, Macron said, there is no consensus today to send in official endorsed mannered troops on the ground. But in terms of dynamics, nothing can be ruled out. His comments appear to confirm a warning from Slovakia's Prime Minister Robert Fico, an opponent of NATO support for Ukraine, who said earlier that some NATO members were

considering sending troops to Ukraine on a bilateral basis. Macron's comments caused many NATO members to refute the idea that they're considering sending combat troops to NATO, although it is an open secret that there are a small number of NATO special operation forces already in the country. One NATO country that backed up Macron is Lithuania, the Baltic nation that borders Kaliningrad and has an active duty military that consists of only about 15,000 troops. Lithuanian Foreign Minister Gabriela Landbergis welcomed Macron's comments, saying no option can be rejected out of hand. The country's defense minister, Aridas Anufkas, said troops could potentially be sent to Ukraine for training, not for combat.

You believe that one, right? The Kremlin has warned that the deployment of Western troops to Ukraine would make a direct Russia-NATO war inevitable. Russian President Vladimir Putin warned on Thursday that Russia's nuclear arsenal is on full combat alert. Okay. So you have that idiot Macron, you know, like floating this whole thing about, you know, sending troops to, you know, into Ukraine. And then we have this other article about Moscow reacting to Macron proposing European boots on the ground. And it says, let's see, let's read a little bit of this.

President Macron, Emmanuel Macron, is now openly discussing the possibility of sending European troops to Ukraine to fight the Russians, which would without doubt trigger World War III between major nuclear powers. His jingoistic words came just at the end of a summit held in Paris in support of Ukraine, which involved 20 mainly European leaders. He said of efforts to arm the Ukrainians with more advanced weapons, European leaders. He said of efforts to arm the Ukrainians with more advanced weapons, people used to say, give them just sleeping bags and helmets. But he emphasized that now nothing should be ruled out. He admitted there is as yet no consensus on sending Western troops

to Ukraine, but he laid out that we will do anything we can to prevent Russia from winning this war. Macron warned in his remarks, there is a change in Russia's stance. It is striving to take on further territory and it has eyes not just on Ukraine, but on many other countries as well. So Russia is presenting a greater danger. We are at a critical moment in this conflict that requires us to take the initiative, Macron said, while also unveiling a new European coalition, which is to provide Kiev with medium-range and long-range missiles. President Putin and top Kremlin officials have repeatedly rejected the charge that Russia is seeking to wage an expansionist war in Europe and in other former

Soviet satellite states. According to CNN, Macron told reporters at a news conference that while he and 21 European leaders did not agree on deploying military personnel, the prospect was discussed openly. However, Germany, the UK, Poland and others have rejected the possibility of deploying troops with German Chancellor Olaf Scholz, who was among those present, later emphasizing that participants were unanimous in being set against it. The statement out of the UK Prime Minister's office was interesting, given it admits the small number of personnel already on the ground in Ukraine.

Britain is not planning a large-scale deployment of troops in Ukraine, Prime Minister Sunak's press secretary said, other than a small number of personnel who are in the country supporting the Korean Armed Forces, we have no plans for large-scale deployment, he was quoted as saying by right uh reuters um so all of these guys are talking about this and it's just a matter of time

um before i think this gets to a point of no return uh you know we're slowly just, you know, by millimeters, you know, just inching our way to a nuclear conflict. And it's just insane to watch this happen in real time. There is another article here that was published on, I believe this one was published in Zero Hedge. I'm just going to read a part of it. But it's just showing just the really reckless deployment of troops and the ideas that these really desperate NATO world leaders are contemplating. And it says, well, Exhibit 1 is French President Emmanuel Macron's proposed plan to station military personnel from NATO members within Ukraine to serve as a tripwire, arrayed as a cordon around Kharkov, Odessa, and Kiev. They are meant to

deter advancing Russian forces from moving on those cities for fear of killing Western soldiers, thereby risking a direct confrontation with the alliance. It is a highly dubious idea that defies logic and experience while tempting fate. France long has deployed members of its armed forces in Ukraine where they programmed and operated sophisticated equipment, in particular the Scalp cruise missiles. Scores were killed by a uh retaliatory strike a few months ago that destroyed their residents paris cried holy murder for moscow's uh unsporting conduct in shooting back at those attacking them it was retaliation for the french participation

in the deadly bombing of the russian city ofogord. Why then should we expect that the Kremlin would abandon a costly campaign involving what they see as vital national interests if uninformed Western troops were deployed in a picket line around cities? Would they be intimidated into passivity by spiffy uniforms assembled under the outside banners inscribed with the slogans, don't mess with NATO. Moreover, there are already thousands of Westerners bolstering the Ukrainian armed forces. Roughly four to five thousand Americans have been performing critical operation functions from the outset. The presence of a majority predates by

several years the onset of hostilities two years ago. That contingent was augmented by a supplementary group of 1,700 last summer, which was as a core of logistic experts advertised, mandated to seek out and eradicate corruption in the black marketing of pilfered supplies. The Pentagon people are sewn throughout the Ukrainian military from headquarters, planning units, to advisors in the field, to technicians and special forces. It is widely understood that Americans have operated the sophisticated HIMARS long-range artillery and the Patriot air defense batteries. This last means that members of the U.S. military

have been aiming and perhaps pulling the trigger on weapons that kill Russians. In addition, the CIA has established a massive multipurpose system able to conduct a wide range of intelligence and operational activities independently, as well as in conjunction with the Ukrainian FSB. That includes tactical intelligence on a day-by-day basis. We don't know whether they had a role in the campaign of targeted assassinations inside of Russia. A critical role also has been played by Britain. Their specialized personnel have been

operating the Storm Shadow missiles counterpart to the French Scout employed against Crimea and elsewhere. Two, MI6 has taken a lead role in designating multiple attacks on the Kursh Bridge and other critical infrastructure. The principal lesson to be drawn from this overview is that the positioning of European troops at key sites as human hostages is not wholly original. Their presence has not deterred Russia from attacking them in the field or, as in the French case, hunting them down in their residences. Okay?

So, you know, NATO have been killing Russians, right? I mean, it's already happening. And the Russians have been killing NATO members. So it's already happening. And the Russians have been killing NATO members. So it's already happening. You know, as Dave Jones so succinctly put it the other day, right, you know, we're in a state of undeclared war, right? Third World War is going on. It's just undeclared at the moment. is going on is just undeclared at the moment. And I think that this is a really, really serious issue that can any minute spiral out of control. And, you know, just based on human experience, I think that that's almost nailed on to happen at some point.

That at some point, NATO is going to attack Russia in a way that it just, that crosses some kind of red line and the Russians are going to be going to retaliate. And all the bluster of NATO then goes out the window. And while Russia is going to take a massive, massive body blow. Right there. You know, I mean, what do they think is going to happen to Europe? OK, Paris is going to be gone paris is going to be gone london is going to be gone right um you know the major european cities are going to be gone millions are going to be dead and that's why i don't understand this crazy crazy thing that's going on

in the british media no one seems to be asking their government really what is the truth here. You know, what is really the truth about Russia? Because everybody is expecting or they were expecting earlier on that Putin was either going to keel over because you remember when they were saying that he had cancer, he was sick or something like that, or that he was going to be overthrown, right? They were treating him like a kind of like a third world dictator, right? Not as a nuclear first world dictator, which he is, okay? One that has a vast war economy and a vast economic system and a vast array of plans that are laid out to actually fight a nuclear war.

Right now in the United States, we don't have the means to really fight a nuclear war. We'll shoot missiles, but what happens when we get hit? What happens about surviving the nuclear war? We don't really have those plans in vast amount of Americans, right? that are really taking any of this stuff seriously and everybody else, not so much. Not so much. And I think that it just sets itself up for a really bad show here. And at some point, we're going to have to deal with it. I'll read one last article. And it says,

what is Russia's policy on tactical nuclear weapons okay um and uh actually let's look at this one read the fine print russia's nuclear weapon use policy uh you know i'm just going to switch uh this is from uh thebulletin.org because i think this is actually a you know we know that they have tactical nukes and we know that you you know, if they're threatened or whatever, we know that, you know, their policy is that they'll use those tactical nukes. But let's take a look at what is their nuclear policy here, because most people aren't really clear on what, you know, what would trigger them, what would cause them to use nuclear weapons. So let's just deal with that. The risk of nuclear war cast a dark shadow over the already tragic events in Ukraine. On February 19th, Vladimir Putin launched an exercise involving Russian strategic forces.

On February 24th, the day Putin invaded Ukraine, he warned that Russia would respond immediately to those who stood in his way. And this was written in in 2022 so it's an older article but it deals with you know the russians um uh you know nuclear policy which i think that we really need to take a look at and it says here um on february 24th the day putin invaded Ukraine, he warned that Russia would respond immediately to those who stood in its way, with consequences that will be such as you have never seen in your entire history. On February 27th, he publicly ordered his Minister of Defense and Chief of the General Staff to transfer Russia's deterrence forces to special combat readiness. Putin's aim was to evidently to deter outside intervention and to signal Russia's determination to achieve its goal. But another more troubling aspect to Putin's recent comments has received little or no attention. It has to do with the circumstances

under which Russia might use nuclear weapons. In June 2020, Putin signed a decree, the basic principles of the Russian Federation state policy in the domain of nuclear deterrence, that specifies two conditions under which Russia would use nuclear weapons. The first is unsurprising. The Russian Federation retains the right to use nuclear weapons in response to the use of nuclear weapons and other types of weapons of mass destruction against it and or its allies. But that sentence ends with an unusual statement. And also in the case of aggression against the Russian Federation with the use of conventional weapons when the very existence of the state is put under threat. Emphasis added. And I'll read that again. At the end of that statement, here's something that is

interesting. And it says, right, you know, when they would use nuclear weapons, right interesting and it says right you know when they would use nuclear weapons right and it says the statement ends with an unusual statement and it says and also in the case of aggression against the russian federation with the use of conventional weapons when the very existence of the state is put under threat so r Russia's policy is not just, okay, you have to use nuclear weapons for us to use nuclear weapons against you. This is saying basically, okay, if you attack us, even with conventional weapons, and we figure that we're in an, you know, our nation faces some kind of existential crisis here, you know, for our existence, then we are going to

use, we have it, we have a policy that we can use nuclear weapons. That, my friends, is scary. And it says here, in his February 2024 speech, Putin echoed that unusual language to describe his Ukraine invasion. The United States, he claimed, was created a hostile anti-Russia next to Russia and in Russia's historical land. For the United States and its allies, it is a policy of containing Russia with obvious geopolitical dividends, he said. For our country, it is a matter of life and death, a matter of our historical future as a nation. This is not an exaggeration. This is a fact. It is not only a very real threat to our interests, but to the very existence of our state and to its sovereignty.

Emphasis added, Putin has defined the current situation as one in which, in line with the principles of his deterrence policy, Russia retains the right to use nuclear weapons. This does not mean that Russia will use such weapons, and deterrence at the strategic level appears to be robust. At the tactical level, however, the situation is different. The 2018 U.S. Nuclear Posture Review ascribed to Russia the view that the threat of nuclear escalation or even first use of nuclear weapons would serve to de-escalate a conflict in terms favorable to Russia. I'll read that again. At the tactical level, however, the situation is different. The 2018 U.S. Nuclear Postal Review ascribed to Russia the view that the threat of nuclear escalation or even first use of nuclear weapons would serve to de-escalate a conflict on terms favorable to Russia.

Russian military theorists have certainly discussed this idea of escalating to de-escalate, though whether it is part of the Russian doctrine is disputed. whether it is part of the Russian doctrine is disputed. So it says here, in a local war with a non-nuclear adversary, however, the small-scale tactical use of nuclear weapons might be a serious temptation, especially if the war were not going according to plan. In short, the impulse to escalate in a tight corner could be strong. This is nothing new. It's always been known that the Russians have a first strike policy,

something that the West, I think, most people in the West don't really realize. Here in the West, we kind of think of, you know, okay, if somebody fires at us, then we'll fire at them. You know, we've been told, although, of course, in secret, this could be very different, that we will not be the aggressors in a nuclear war. That basically, you know, what would trigger us is if we are attacked or a NATO ally is attacked. One of our allies is attacked with nuclear weapons. That would trigger us to react, but not so with Russia. Russia, in their doctrine, they reserve the right to strike first.

And I think that in a conflict, they would definitely go there, especially depending on leadership in our country. Please understand, if the Russians or the Chinese really believe that we have weak leadership, okay, in the White House, right, and in our government, then I think that there is a distinct possibility that in order to get us off the table, right, if they nuke two cities here in the United States, okay, and not only would that cause a nationwide disaster, right, because you're dealing with the fallout, you're dealing with the EMP issues, Because you're dealing with the fallout. You're dealing with the EMP issues, which would knock out electricity for probably, I would say, a great portions of the country.

And the loss of life and everything else. Not only dealing with that national tragedy, but would we then have the guts to retaliate? Now, most people here in the United States and most people listening to this, you know, would say, yes, we would. We would cowboy up and we will retaliate. But is that really true? That really does depend on the leadership here in the country. If we have a person in the White House that, you know, you know, that lacks the will to be able to retaliate, then, you know, that's us off the table. And I think that they would try to play that game. Okay, we nuke one of your cities, you know, what are you willing to withstand? Well, how many losses are you willing to take here? How many losses are you willing to take here?

Okay. So, okay, we nuke New York. Okay, you nuke one of ours. We nuke, we'll nuke another one of yours. You know, how much are we willing to trade here? Okay. Would it be like, okay, you know, like, you know, in the old way of looking at nuclear war. Right. You know, when you watch like the day after or any of those scenarios. Right. You see all these ballistic missiles coming over from Russia, like hundreds of them. And we're shooting hundreds of nuclear missiles towards Russia.

I don't necessarily think that that would be the way it would go. I think it'd be very strategic. I think that the Russians would probably shoot one missile at us, which would probably succeed because it would be completely unexpected. And I don't necessarily trust, you know, the guardians, the people guarding the gate, so to speak. I really think that a lot of the folks guarding our nation are not necessarily as competent as they used to be in the past. So I think that I would not be surprised if, you know, they could nuke, say, New York, right, with missiles. And we would be shocked because they did it.

You know, it's just incredible to me. When you see our reaction just dealing with balloons and how paralyzed we are just dealing with balloons. I think that it sends a real signal as to what our reaction would be in, you know, in case of a drastic attack on our nation. So based on our reaction to balloons, based on, for example, in my last podcast, I talked about how the CDC reacted to the Chinese biolab that was in California and just them you know clean up the scene to this point i really don't know if the scene you know if this bio lab has been completely completely like shut down um they they they didn't test for example they didn't test uh all the vials that they found in the lab they only they only uh they only basically destroyed, the ones that were labeled. The other vials, you know, which they must have been a huge quantity of vials, right?

Basically, they didn't really want anything to do with. And it just goes to show here we have a national agency that is supposed to be on the forefront of dealing with, say, biological issues, right? Biological threats to our nation, you know, pathogens, that kind of thing. And they had a biolab that basically that was discovered. And the way they dealt with it caused a lot of concern. It was very inept, very inept. And, you know, to this day, a lot of people are still asking, you know, like, how well was that cleanup dealt with? You know, is it completely cleaned up? What, you know, what's going on with this biolab, you know, in California? And just based on, you know, just how the government agencies reacted, based on how we reacted to COVID, I don't think that we would handle this really well.

Just think of it, okay? You know, two nukes, you know, yeah, we live in middle America. You know, you guys who live in middle America, right? You know, we'll be thinking, okay, they're just going to, you know, the nukes are going to be concentrated on the east and west coast. And probably, you know, Washington, yeah, is a target, right? The nukes are going to be concentrated on the east and west coast. And probably, you know, Washington, yeah, is a target, right? And we, in the middle of the country like in in in in California or Texas that would knock out our our electric grid across the country. The EMP issues would be vast.

And then we would be dealing with right. Not having electricity for months and dealing with the fallout and everything else around those cities and around those zones and the millions who would have lost lives and everything else, we would have a massive national emergency. How well would we be react, you know, how could we react to that? You know, how well would we be reacting to that? Those are all things that, you know, a lot of folks have not gamed out and our government really hasn't really gamed out. And I think that we're kind of living in this world. We lived in this world, in this country for a long time, that the worst case scenario will never happen. That everything will just work out for the best. And that got blown up with COVID. The worst case scenario. Well, in that case, you know, COVID wasn't as deadly as some of the pathogens that are out there. But it showed that we did not have a plan in place to deal with something on that level. Much less, you know, a nuclear attack. And I know, for example, I know that Davis said,

hey, you know, because he's gamed it out, and that, yeah, you know, we would be able to survive and everything else. But, you know, just waking up, right, the day after, with no electricity and no internet, after with no electricity and no internet and most likely not really knowing what's going on across the country and with most people running out of water and running out of food. Because when you think with no electricity, there's not going to be any water. Most people won't have running water. And everything that's going to trigger, you know, in terms of problems with hospitals and all those patients are in those hospitals and, you know, all the, you know, the old people, right, that are living in assisted living and, and, and them,

it would be horrific, horrific. So this is something that, um, I don't think that we've really necessarily taken a really good look at. I really do think here on PBN, you know, we need to probably convene a panel and really get into the nitty gritty of all of this and discuss this in detail, you know, and try to game this out

a little bit. You know, I would highly recommend that on PBN, we, you know, we probably have a really serious preppers live or something like that to really game this out. But folks, this is a serious issue. And whether it be, you know, an issue over Taiwan, or whether it be a vast miscalculation in Europe, the fact that we could seriously be involved in some kind of nuclear issue, whether here in the United States or in Europe, is something

I think that there is a distinct possibility that this could be the case sometime in the very near future. And we, as you know, our countries are not prepared to deal with this. The English aren't. The French surely aren't. Okay?

You know, do the French people know where their bunkers are? Do they, are they prepping in those countries? You know, do they understand how to survive nuclear fallout and how to deal with a country that has no electricity or running water or any real basic supplies? You know, do they have pantries that they have extra food stacked across Europe? I would say that most Europeans, this to them is all extremist talk. This to them is all, you know, all those crazy conspiracy theorists out there. This to them, you know, and, you know, I just say COVID.

Okay? And I just say COVID But they have not learned that the world is unstable And this is something that most of us hear That listen to PBN That are part of the preparation The preparedness movement, right? These are all things that we've been thinking about and gaming out. Here's what I say, right? Look at your own plans, folks. Do you have some kind of plan in place just in case this occurs, okay?

Because if you don't, then you need to make a plan. How is your food supply, your storage foods, your extra foods in your home? Okay? If you're living in a city, where would you go if your city was bombed? If you're living in an apartment, where would you go to try and survive? If you did survive, you know, and you're in a city, you know, especially, you know, like, if you're in parts of New York, if you're, you know, Philly, or, you know, Houston, or one of the really big cities, right, San Diego, If you're in a place that got attacked,

a heavily, a densely populated area, what is your plan? Would you leave? Would you stay? What's the plan? Do you have extra water someplace? Do you have access to clean water? You know, do you have access to clean water? Do you have access to specific drugs that can help you to deal with nuclear fallout?

Okay. So if you're living in a more rural area, someplace where, okay, might not be in the direct danger zone of being attacked in a nuclear war, right? What's your plan? You know, same questions. Do you have extra food? Do you have, you know, do you have a plan in place that, okay, you wake up or you're at work or something occurs, all electricity goes out, you've got to get home, you've got to get your kids from school, you've got to coordinate all of that, you've got to try and get home safely and deal with this national emergency. Just driving is going to be a nightmare with no electricity, right? Because all them traffic lights ain't going to work. nightmare with no electricity, right? Because all them traffic lights ain't going to work.

You know, you're going to have to navigate streets and possibly highways and possibly really busy streets, right? Where you might not be able to drive your car because guess what? Those lights aren't going to be working and there might be multiple vehicular crashes that's going Lock up the road. So what's your plan? Okay. My analysis is that the recklessness of our leaders and because just the ineptitude of the folks that we have in places of leadership all across the globe, yeah, there is a very high possibility that we could be in some kind of global conflict here in the next couple of months. Here in this country, the other high area of issues is going to be the election.

Here in the United States, you have to be prepared to deal with a lot of the fallout. I think that since it's going to be the election. Here in the United States, you know, you have to be prepared to deal with a lot of the fallout. I think that, you know, since it's going to be Mr. Trump versus Mr. Biden, there's going to be a lot of really aggressive, you know, demonstrations and people in the streets and rioting and different things happening, you know, and I really think that that can really seriously cause some problems. We have to be ready to deal with those scenarios. The two big scenarios this year for this country, I believe, right,

apart from the economy, will be dealing with the issues, right, with the fallout from the elections. And, you know, I don't know, you know, if all of this is really going to be good for our country. Because even if Mr. Trump gets elected, how is he going to govern with all these people against him? Who is going to be working for him? Because they go after everybody that works for him and destroy those people. So will he even be able to govern? I don't even know. It's just one of them things that you throw out there, right?

You got to just kind of think about that kind of stuff. And just the fallout from all of that, you know, just the craziness that's going to result from the left with all of that you know they're just the craziness that's going to result from the left with all of that because they like to think that the craziness is only going to come from the right but there's going to be serious craziness from the left as well i think that they're going to be the ones in the street burning stuff and you know demonstrating and and and and causing all kinds of national chaos if mr trump wins based on what happened last time around. Okay, because I think they're going to lose their minds. So there is that.

And then looming over all of this is the possibility of a nuclear conflict, a nuclear war. Okay, so that's my take on the issue. I think that the threat is real. I think that you should prep for it. I think that, you know, you just got to, you got to game it out and say, okay, what if I wake up tomorrow and nothing is working? Okay. Am I ready to navigate that world? Okay, folks, these are serious times and serious times require serious people. So this is where I'm going to end it for now. Keep listening to PBN. Okay, I know that this was a bit heavy. This was, you know, this was a pretty gloomy subject, but we have to look at these things. We have to look at the facts.

We cannot imbibe the nonsense that the mainstream media and Western propaganda, that's not the way the world is going here. that's not the way the world is going here. It's not the way the world is going. Right? You know, we have to look at, okay, you know, while we don't know the full truth of the situation, we can look at the facts as we can glean them. And as it stands, right, we're in a really serious situation. Okay, we're in a really serious situation, especially, you know, the Russians seemingly

they're going to win this war in Ukraine. And of course, NATO is never going to stand for that. And I think that that's going to be the problem. The problem is they're never going to be able to admit defeat after lying to the population, lying to their people about what's going on in Russia. And therein lies the rub. Therein lies the rub. Okay. All right. Well, let's just hope for the best, folks. Let's just hope for the best.

Okay. So, you know, there's going to be there is a lot of stuff on PBN this week. Please listen. If you like what you hear or if you think somebody could benefit from from what you've heard, please pass us around. Let people know about this resource, folks. You know, we offer a very unique, you know, thing here on PBN. You know, we offer a very unique, you know, thing here on PBN. Just let people know what was, you know, what we're all about. And please pass these podcasts around and share us, share us, share us with everyone. Okay. You know, if you want to read something really interesting about a family surviving an economic collapse, you can go over to Amazon and you can get my book,

The Prepper Part One, The Collapse by Carl A.D. Brown. That's The Prepper Part One, The Collapse by Carl A.D. Brown. It's about a family surviving an economic collapse. And that's the whole U.S. after they're being attacked by nuclear weapons and the economy just folds up. And this family, they're pretty much on their own and they've got to survive a post-economic collapse world. It's a crazy novel, but it's a scary novel. I always say it's the small scary book that every prepper must read.

Okay, so that's the prepper part one, The Collapse by Carly D. Brown over there at Amazon.com. And there is, you know, you can also listen to it too, which if you prefer, you can also go with that option as well. So you can check that out.

Okay, so until next week, folks. Okay, you know, keep looking at the news. You know, right now is the time for you to escalate your preps, I think. Make sure that everything is in order because I think that we're, you know, things are just so uncertain now that you just cannot be caught unawares. You just cannot allow yourself to be caught unawares. All right. So you all have a great weekend.

And until next time, folks, take care and good night. On the brink of blackouts again, as power demand reached an all-time record high overnight, slivers of the Golden State plunged into darkness. ComSays expects to continue with Stage 6, running blackouts for the rest of the week. A scheduled outage on Thursday, but the one that happened Sunday, it wasn't scheduled, it was unexpected, and it lasted longer than a day. Point Zero Energy has given me the American-tested, American-assembled, reliable solar backup

that I've been looking for. Their Titan solar generator is American ingenuity at its finest, with a removable, expandable lithium-ion battery, 2,000 watt-hour, 3,000 watt high-efficiency inverter. So what does all that mean to you?

It means the Titan can charge your smartphone for 88 hours, your laptop for 35 hours, a CPAP for 108 hours, your refrigerator for 26.8 hours. Get to pointzeroenergy.com today for the all-American solution to backup power. The second largest producer of agricultural products, the Netherlands,

is being forced to shut down 3,000 of its farms in 2023. This is to meet the strict emission goals of the European Union. 2023 will be a year of food shortage and increased food costs across the world. That's why your backup food supply and survival food are more important than ever. I want you to create your own stockpile or build upon what you already have

with the best-selling 4 Patriots 3-Month Survival Food Kit. 20 mouth-watering recipes for breakfast, lunch, and dinner. Right now, go to 4patriots.com and use the code PBN on this or anything in the store to get 10 off your first purchase start building your own stockpile today go to fourpatriots.com and use the code pbn Teksting av Nicolai Winther សូវាប់បានប់បានប់បានប់បានប់បានប់បានប់បានប់បានប់បានប់បានប់បានប់បានប់បានប់បានប់បានប់បានប់បានប់បានប់បានប់បានប់បានប់បានប់បានប់បានប់បានប់បានប់បានប់បានប់បានប់បានប់បានប់បានប់បានប់បានប់បានប់បានប់បានប់បានប់បាាប់ពីប្រាប់ពីប្រាប់ពីប្រាប់ពីប្រាប់ពីប្រាប់ពីប្រាប់ពីប្រាប់ពីប្រាប់ពីប្រាប់ពីប្រាប់ពីប្រាប់ពីប្រាប់ពីប្រាប់ពីប្រាប់ពីប្រាប់ពីប្រាប់ពីប្រាប់ពីប្រាប់ពីប្រាប់ពីប្រាប់ពីប្រាប់ពីប្រាប់ពីប្រាប់ពីប្រាប� Teksting av Nicolai Winther Thank you.