The Prestige TV Podcast - The ‘Mad Men’ Episode(s) That Got Us Hooked
Episode Date: August 27, 2025Welcome back to Hooked! On this one, Jo and Rob play office politics and make their respective cases for why “Marriage of Figaro” and “Indian Summer” are the best places to start for those wan...ting to give ‘Mad Men’ another shot. (0:00) Intro (2:03) Why ‘Mad Men’? (8:06) Jo’s pick: “Marriage of Figaro” (10:28) Rob’s pick: “Indian Summer” (20:01) Standout scenes (22:54) Essential character dynamics (28:55) Who won the episode? (32:44) How each episode sets up the rest of the series (41:43) The pilot (50:14) **SPOILERS** Email us! prestigetv@spotify.com Subscribe to the Ringer TV YouTube channel here for full episodes of ‘The Prestige TV Podcast’ and so much more! Hosts: Joanna Robinson and Rob Mahoney Producers: Kai Grady and Donnie Beacham Jr. Additional Production Support: Justin Sayles Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
Transcript
Discussion (0)
This episode is brought to by Whole Foods Market.
Spring is here, so celebrate it with fresh, juicy, seasonal produce and some very tasty
limited time flavors.
New Whole Foods, Market Peach, Apricot, Rose, Italian soda.
Perfect for a picnic or brunch, as is their trending mango, Yuzu, chantilly cake.
But if you're on the go, new 365 strawberry pretzels make a great sweet snack.
That sounds delicious.
Get savings with yellow sale sign store.
wide and everyday low prices on 365 brand items. Enjoy the fresh flavors of spring, save at Whole Foods
Market. This episode is brought to by Bor's Head. What if we told you the taste of deep fried
turkey is now available at your local deli? Well, Boar's Head just did that. Bursting with flavor,
perfectly seasoned with that indulgent taste that usually means pointing your whole day around it,
presenting the Friars Turkey Breast only from Boar's Head. The backyard tradition now available
behind the counter. Visit your local
deli today. Discover the craftsmanship
behind every bite, Boar's Head,
committed to craft since 1905.
Hello, welcome back to the
Prestige TV podcast feed. I'm Joanna Robinson.
I'm Rob Mahoney. We're here
with another episode of
Hooked, the mini-series
that we've put together as an
excuse, the thinly veiled excuse for Rob
and yours truly to
watch some of our favorite shows,
re-watch some of our favorite shows, and talk to you about them.
But really,
What is this mini-series about?
I'm glad you asked you.
Everyone's been talking about it.
A lot of chatter about hooked,
which is our way of proposing
if you were trying to get someone in your life
to watch a show with you.
What is the one episode of that show
you would use to get them hooked?
Register a trademark.
So today, we're talking about a little show
called Mad Men.
And something that we did not intend to do
and we sort of shuffled around
which shows we would talk about in which order
is to do back-to-back AMC
shows that premiered one year apart from each other.
But that is where we have found ourselves here to talk to you about Mad Men, which happens
to be our producer Kai Grady's favorite show.
So this episode, like many, is dedicated to Kai Grady.
Of course.
I'm going to hit the spoiler warning here at the top, which I didn't do last week.
And I'm just going to do it here.
We're going to talk about three episodes of Mad Men essentially today.
We're going to touch on the pilot, which, you know, per the premise of this podcast is
not, we think, necessarily the best entry point for Mad Men.
We're going to talk about season one episode three, which is my pick for what I think is
the episode that it'll get you hooked into Mad Men.
And then we're going to talk about season one episode 11, which is Rob's pick for the episode.
So spoilers, I guess, up through episode 11 of season one of Mad Men.
I think we'll be gentle about it.
Very gentle, but just wanted to give people warning in case they were particularly squeamish
about it.
So why Mad Men, other than that it's Kai Grady's favorite show, and that is very important to us.
Mad Men ran on AMC from 2007 to 2015, seven seasons, 92 episodes.
It's set during, from March 1960 to November 1970, and it won four outstanding drama series Emmys and 16 Emmy wins total across seven seasons.
Not bad.
I mean, pretty good.
And I'm going to credit it with, actually, this is true.
I was trying to sort of figure out what it is culturally that Mad Men did
besides be an excellent TV series.
Is that not enough, Joe?
Change our lives forever.
The quote-unquote Mad Men effect changed the most popular liquor in the U.S.
From vodka to whiskey for the first time in decades.
Vodkas come back.
Tito's vodka, no free ads, cannot be stopped.
It is our preferred alcohol here in America.
But for a brief, shiny moment, it was whiskey, it was bourbon, and that is because of bad men.
I think tomorrow it could be celebrity tequila.
You know, there's growth, there's change, there's evolution here for all of us.
And I think the closer we get to, or like aviation gin, no free ads, but like, I think this is the direction we're moving in.
Listen, if any celebrity tequila wants to sponsor this podcast, you can reach us at PrestigeTV
at Spotify.com.
Sure, why not?
The Rock, if you're listening, I'm ready.
Kendall Jenner, if you're listening, I'm ready.
George Clooney, you're sold your tequila, so the window's closed on you.
Okay, so, Rob Mahoney, other than all those accolades we just mentioned and what it did
for the whiskey industry, what does Mad Men mean to you?
When did you start watching it?
What's your relationship with the show?
All-time great show.
And I think it's a perfect, hooked show as well.
because it's so hard to put your finger on exactly what it is.
It's not an easy show to easily encapsulate.
You can give them the setting.
You give them the period dressing.
You can say it's about, you know, like an ad executive and the people who work in this office around him.
That doesn't really cover, I don't know, the eighth of it.
There's just so much happening here in terms of the complexity of character that you kind of need to see it to get it.
And I know that's a problem for a lot of people, especially in the early stages of the show, is understanding what mysteries matter, which ones don't, which
character dynamics are important, which ones are going to be dropped off. You just kind of have
to stew in it for a while. And once you, once you kind of put yourself in that place, it transforms
into one of the richest television experiences we've ever had. I was checking out some of the
early reviews and some of the early, like, what were some of the negative reviews? Because
you know, overwhelmingly positive reviews, Mad Ben was deeply well received from the beginning.
That's no mystery. But I think the people who didn't click with it immediately often cite
struggling to find the tone
is this a satire? Is this
a drama? Is it a comedy? Is it a mystery
show? You know,
what exactly am I watching here? And I think
because Madman operates on
multiple levels, you've got basic
like sort of plot and character levels.
You've got literature,
you know, like college level
class level symbolism
and motif, etc., etc.
And then you've got this third level, which
is just sort of a portrait of a decade and like sort of what did this what did the 60s mean and how did
we get from 1960 to 1970 and without giving us a really boring sort of biopic-esque beat by beat
and then this historical event happened but what did that historical event how did it push us
culturally and personally totally you know throughout throughout the decade all of that under
the umbrella of moving out of the bush
era into the Obama era, which is sort of like the background of like where we were meeting the show at the time, which I think is really interesting. And I think to your point about the impossibility of defining madmen to people is not just those multiple levels that it works on, but also and this is a this is what puts a lot of people off, I think, at the beginning is the way in which the characters are drawn in many ways like ciphers. They have like deep interior lives. They're cipher characters, but they're not one dimensional. They're not.
flat. They have a lot of depth to them, but there's a lot of space
inside of these characters for us to sort of put ourselves
into the mix, and then it becomes this deeply personal show
where we get emotionally attached to these people, because we just sort of
put ourselves in the blank spaces is sort of, that was my
experience anyway, I was watching the show. I think that's a huge part of it.
You just can't tell someone how to feel about Don Draper, about Pete Campbell.
And I think, you know, we're going to get into a little later,
why the pilot isn't necessarily the best entry point for the show. I think this is one of those
reasons where in the pilot, everyone is a little bit flat, everyone is a little two-dimensional,
as is often the case with these sorts of exercises where it's like, Don is smooth and kind of only
smooth. Pete is a slime ball and kind of only a slime ball. You know, Peggy is new and naive.
And like, even characters like Joan, who become incredibly well-rounded by the end of the show,
is just kind of like a mean girl in the pilot, effectively. And so selling people on that is
difficult, selling people on the ambiguities of all that interaction between all of these characters
who are ciphers. I don't know how you can tell someone what the show is or is about without
projecting so much onto it. So I guess we're going to do that today, Joe. I guess you and I are
going to project how we feel about these characters and Mad Men. And that probably informs which
episodes we chose to. Yeah, it's almost like we should, I don't know, employ like a projector
of some kind that will take us an emotional journey. Okay. This is where we would talk about our
picks. When we did the Breaking Bad episode, we agreed on what the episode should be. In this case,
we disagreed. And that is sometimes going to happen. How do we want to talk about, do you want me to go
first as mine comes earlier chronologically, or do you want to go first? Let's do this. Why don't
you lay out, make the case for episode three, Marriage of Figaro. Okay. So, season one,
episode three, Marriage of Figaro, written by Tom Palmer, directed by Ed Bianchi, and which we discover
Don Draper is actually Dick Whitman and also the kind of guy who drunkenly runs away from his own
daughter's birthday party and tries to make everything better with a pet puppy at the end of the day.
Pretty chill.
Good parenting.
I really like this episode.
One of the tricks that the pilot does is presents to you Don Draper, Man in the City, and only at the very end, it lets you know that Don Draper has a wife and kids in Austin, and New York.
This episode is an even split between Don Draper in the city and at home, Don.
But the two sections of the episode are complete mirrors of each other.
There are things that repeat again and again in the city section and then in the upstate New York section.
And all of it centers around this opening where a guy approaches Don Draper, this character we've come to know as Don Draper on the train and says, Dick, Dick Whitman?
And everyone home goes, what?
So this idea of who is Don Draper actually?
What is he constantly running from?
What do trains have to do with it?
Many people are wondering all these things, Jill.
And sort of the ways in which he cannot fit in it all in his work life and cannot fit in
it all in his home life.
And the way in which the home life pre-packaged American Dream, which he is responsible for selling people in his job,
is a complete empty facade disappointment to him, Don Draper.
So all of that, I think, paints such an interesting, well-wounded portrait of Don Draper as a character who is still a cipher, who, you know, they say in this episode, he could be Batman for all we know.
We don't know anything about Don Draper.
It's still a cipher.
But the nature of his mystery is much more apparent inside of this episode.
So this episode, I think, is a perfect way to get you hooked into the idea of Don Draper.
However, when you told me what your episode was, I was like, I think I know what Rob's angle is, which is a really good angle as well.
So, Rob, what's your angle on your episode?
Yeah, you make a great case for selling a show of Mad Men, the Don Draper show.
I'm just not so sure Mad Men is the Don Draper show.
And in particular, even though Marriage and Figure is a great episode, I think it is exactly what you say in terms of
splitting Don's work life, and specifically like the very like Norman Rockwell home life that
is then kind of splintering apart. All that stuff executed very well. Almost no Peggy in the episode.
Yeah. And if there's no Peggy in the episode, is it Mad Men? I was like, Rob's going to show
up to this podcast, a better feminist than me to be like, but don't you care about Peggy, Joanna?
I do. Tell me. Tell me what this episode, episode 11 accomplishes. I would say the primary
pitches two things. One, not only the Peggy Don relationship, but it really hits.
It's on almost every critical relationship of the early stages of Madman.
And that's getting into all the elements of the office.
We're going to dig into those a little bit later.
I also think one of the things that Madman is most concerned with, almost obsessively,
is where ideas come from, like the germination of like how things come to be.
And so getting, you know, Indian Summer is in part about how the sausage gets made of turning
this object that no one quite knows what to do with into a product.
And so you get all of that, you get the office politics,
You get Don's double life.
You get the Peggy Don stuff.
You get Mad Men as far as I'm concerned.
And everyone in this episode is super hot and bothered.
The air is like thick with this feeling that some shit is about to happen.
And what better way to hook people?
Then here's a suicide.
Here's some people on the edge.
Here's a mysterious box.
And we don't know what's inside it.
I think you make an excellent point.
And again, once I watched, as soon as I saw which episode you picked, I was like,
my episode is no Peggy in it.
Oh, no.
So, fair enough.
However, I guess a question I will ask.
I'm not here to say you're wrong.
But a question...
Joe, you are here to say I'm wrong.
That's what we're doing.
A question we wanted to ask ourselves,
as we did this experiment, was how far into a show is too far in to name something,
a hook episode?
And so episode 11, you know, gentle spoilers for episode 11,
but we're deep inside of what's going on with Peggy in season one.
Roger is returning from an important event.
So there's just a lot of context here that I'm wondering
if people need in order to really feel like they understand what's going on in episode 11.
I think it does sell the events well enough to understand what's happening in the episode.
And it does something pretty critical for our hooked exercise,
which is it makes you wonder how those things happened.
Like what happened to Roger?
Like you're immediately kind of, your interest is piqued to understand how these things came to be the way that they are.
Why are these characters behaving the way that they are towards each other?
Like, how did this dynamic fester to the point where this is where everybody is?
I think you could walk into this episode basically cold and have that exact kind of experience where you're interested in what's happening on screen,
but more importantly, you're interested in like everything just on the edge of it.
All right, all right.
We've made our cases here.
Are we going to do a voting component?
What are we like, should we have people email us at prestige TV at Spotify.com?
Sure.
Well, yeah.
I mean, I, throughout this whole process, I want people to email us.
Yes. If they disagree with the episodes we chose, because certainly people have strong opinions about this on the internet.com.
No, of course not.
You know, if you feel like the Mad Men pilot is perfect and how dare we imply that it's not.
And something I will say, you know, that maybe helps Rob's, well, actually, I have a kid.
counter to that slightly.
But when I've tried to show mad men to people who have bumped on madmen, the thing that
they've bumped on is, and to be honest, mostly women, have bumped on, I don't want to watch
a tour of like how terrible it was to be a woman in 1960.
Like that's, the pilot is just sort of wall-to-wall horror show.
What I do like about the episode that I picked episode three, because episode 11, the one that
you picked has a like career wins.
Peggy, which is, and so key to what her character will become.
What my episode has that I find really interesting are these, like, all-female spaces.
You've got Joan and Peggy and some of the other women who work in the office talking about Lady Chatterley's Lover, right?
The D.H. Lawrence book that was, you know, there was a massive court case in 1959 about the, like, unedited edition of Lady Childly's Lover, which involved
a lot more smut than previous editions.
And so you've got the winner of the office
sort of talking about this book.
The office paperback is disintegrating.
It has been passed around so many times.
My favorite detail is that it's sort of waived
the way a book is when you read it in the bath.
I was like, that book has been everywhere.
There's ways in which the patriarchy beats women down
that is key to understanding mad men and it's what it has to say.
And then there are ways in which women are,
are directly involved in that.
So the way in which the women in Betty's orbit are ostracizing this divorcee who has
moved to town, Helen Bishop.
How dare she walk around the neighborhood, Joe?
She's just walking.
How dare she drive around in her little Volkswagen?
Come on.
How dare she wear trousers?
Like, what is she doing?
So I was really enjoying those moments where it's just like women talking to women, which
actually throughout bad men is pretty rare.
but it exists here in episode three, which I really liked.
I enjoyed it for that reason as well.
Again, I think the beauty of Mad Men is there are a lot of good entry points.
And it just depends on kind of what it is that resonates with you.
What are the scenes that are going to really hit?
And in particular, I think, the work and domestic split.
Like, are you going to be more intrigued by everyone talking shit at the kitchen,
in the kitchen at the Draper household?
Or are you going to be more intrigued by the big pitch meeting or the smoky bar
where two people are meeting to discuss whatever?
It's like there's a lot of things that can grab you.
You just have to find your madmen in that ciphery way.
Right, exactly.
In terms of like the setting or locale,
we've already discussed how mine is sort of split between office like and home life.
How would you characterize the setting location of your episode in terms of it operating as a hook episode?
I would say it's pretty much the same.
I think both of our episodes hit the big three,
which again is the office, the Draper household, and a two top at a New York restaurant.
restaurant. Like if you're in some of those settings, you are in bad men, and I think we're,
we're checking all the boxes right now. Yeah. Your home, uh, home life plot line is Betty entertaining
the, uh, the fantasy of a, yeah. Would you say like the Kmart version of Don Draper as an air
conditioning salesman coming door to door? Perhaps. Shout out to, uh, shout out to Parker from season
four of Buffy for making an appearance here. And also shout out to, you know, the real,
new friend that Betty makes, which is her washing machine.
We're all making meaningful changes in the relationships in our lives in these episodes.
Yeah, the spin cycle is really, really doing it for Betty in this episode.
I love that as soon as Parker from Buffy season four shows up, I'm like, I don't trust that guy.
Betty's like, I don't trust this guy.
And I'm like, you're right.
She didn't quite either.
But, okay, like, not to dig in too deep into like specific scenes, but that exact encounter
in which Betty is deciding whether to entertain or admit this air,
this air conditioning salesman into her house.
And from the second she decides to, and even before that,
it's like, she doesn't know what to make of this guy.
It's hard for us to read him exactly in terms of how,
is he just being slimy in the way that a salesman is being slimy?
Is he after something else here?
Is he being intrusive in a way that's deeply uncomfortable?
Yeah.
I love all of the weird gray area of that entire sequence.
And, like, again, that's the kind of stuff that Mad Men really thrives on.
And there's also what I do like about both of our episodes,
and this gets into sort of the specific scene question
that we like to entertain as we go through these episodes
is there's a fancier meta element
to both of our episodes.
You've got sort of an imagined sequence
with Betty inside of your episode.
I have this, what I think is a really,
really interesting thing that they do early on in the season
is Don is taking home video footage
of his daughter's birthday party
and capturing more than the kiddos,
he's capturing the dynamics
between different couples
inside of this fake home life,
this fake happy ever after.
And sort of, so this idea of the ad man at home,
making a movie and capturing something
and what is authentic here
and what is grimy here
and what can't be ignored
but like through the lens of the home video, you know, aspect ratio,
I just think is a really fun, creative visual flair
that Batman will get deeper and deeper into the more the show goes on.
It's also perfect for a character who, for as smooth as he may be,
just like doesn't really know how to be a human being in lots of ways
and is evasive any time he's asked to be.
And so the idea that he's kind of stalking around the party,
observing human behavior, really a perfect character note.
Snoring, gasping during sleep, feeling fatigue,
ask your doctor about Zepbound, terseptite.
The first and only FDA-approved prescription medicine
for moderate to severe obstructive sleep apnea, OSA, and adults with obesity.
Zepbound is a prescription medicine used with a reduced calorie diet
and increased physical activity to help adults with moderate to severe obstructive sleep apnea, OSA,
and obesity to improve their OSA.
Zepbound is approved as a 2.5, 5, 7.5,
10, 12.5, or 15 milligram injection.
Zepound contains terseptitide
and should not be used with other terseptide
containing products or any GLP1 receptor agonist medicines.
It is not known if Zepound is safe and effective
for use in children.
Don't share needles or pins or reuse needles.
Don't take if allergic to it,
or if you or someone in your family had medullary thyroid cancer,
or if you've had multiple endocrine neoplasia syndrome type 2.
Tell your doctor if you get a lump or swelling in your neck.
Stop Zepbound and call your doctor if you have severe stomach
pain or a serious allergic reaction.
Severe side effects may include inflamed pancreas or gallbladder problems.
Tell your doctor if you experience vision changes before scheduled procedures with anesthesia.
If you're nursing, pregnant, plan to be, or taking birth control pills.
Taking Zepbound with a sulfonel urea or insulin may cause low blood sugar.
Side effects include nausea, diarrhea, and vomiting, which can cause dehydration and worsened kidney
problems.
Talk to your doctor.
Call 1-800-545-99-79 or visit Zepbound.lily.com.
This episode is brought to you by Prime.
Obsession is in session.
And this summer, Prime originals have everything you want.
Steamy romances, irresistible love stories,
and the book to screen favorites you've already read twice.
Off campus, L, every year after, the love hypothesis,
Sterling Point, and more.
Slow burns, second chances, chemistry you can feel through the screen.
Your next obsession is waiting.
Watch only on Prime.
Focus features in Blumhouse present.
Obsession.
When I have a crush on a guy, no one knows.
Be careful.
I wish Nikki love me more than anyone in the entire world.
Who you wish for.
Obsession is 96% fresh on rotten tomatoes.
I love you so, so, so, so much.
It's blood-soaked nightmare fuel.
What kind of spoiled you put on her?
You have been warned.
Obsession, rated R.
Under 1790M without parent.
Only in theaters May 15th.
with special engagements in Dolby.
Which is the scene in your episode
that you would say
most exemplifies what Mad Men can do?
I think for me,
it's Peggy going on a bad date.
It's Elizabeth Moss's favorite scene
of season one.
She has said,
and who might have disagree with that?
I think you have,
in this scene,
Peggy is set up on a date by her mom,
goes out with this truck driver,
like a long-haul truck driver.
And she's just like constantly chafing
against the person she's supposed to be.
in this context, in any context.
It's like she wants to be assertive,
but she also needs to be polite.
She wants her date to respect what she does for a living,
but she does not respect him basically at all
from the moment that they sit down.
And so it's like it turns into,
as many things in MedMent do,
a scene about capitalism,
smuggled into a scene of like dating social moors,
smuggled into like the awkwardness
of just this like very specific exchange
between two human beings.
And so like getting those layers working,
Again, with Peggy, someone who were just getting to know over the course this season and a guy we've never seen before.
And you can just feel all the dialogue, all the dynamics clicking into place.
I think Mad Men does that about as well as anybody else.
Quick introduction of a character who comes to represent something very identifiable very quickly.
What I really love in that scene is it's so human what Peggy is doing because Madman refuses to, in both the case of Don and Peggy and and Roger and Joan and
everyone else give you a clean person that it's easy to root for or someone that it's easy
to hate, you wind up like, I wind up being very emotionally attached to Pete, who is an absolute
slime ball, et cetera, et cetera, as the show goes on.
For the record, I love Pete. Pete is a great TV character.
I love Pete.
He would be the worst person in my life, but he's a great TV character.
But like, is he going to be okay, is actually something I care about?
I want to know.
Yeah.
But Peggy at this date continually mentioning things about being in the city and cocktail she's had in this city and what it's like in her office, like that deeply insecure.
Let me remind you of all the things that I think are impressive, that I want who I want to be.
I want to present to you that I'm this sophisticated city girl, even though I feel like I'm not there yet.
but that's who I want to be.
Isn't that what Mad Men is all about?
For sure.
I'm Don Draper.
I'm not Dick Whitman or whatever the case maybe.
Or in this case,
just like going from the contrast
of being the person,
whether it's with Joan out on the town
who's being shown around to all these places
or in the office,
but having to constantly get up to speed,
it's like by contrast,
now she feels like the worldly one.
She feels like the experienced one.
And she's trying to flex that in a way
that isn't obnoxious, but it's also obnoxious.
It's a bit obnoxious,
but I feel very soft towards her.
as she's doing it.
The question we wanted to ask ourselves,
I skipped ahead to this scene thing,
but let's go back to this idea
of the character dynamics.
You mention, of course,
the Peggy Donne relationship,
which is Mad Men.
And so do you want to talk any more specifically
about how that is underlined
in the episode that you picked?
Absolutely.
I mean, it's a huge episode
for kind of the early stages
of the mentorship
that starts to take place
between the two of them.
And I think getting Peggy,
these early wins,
getting Don stepping into this role,
that up until this point, basically,
before Peggy kind of starts to move forward
in wanting to be a copywriter by sheer force of will,
we mostly see him talking down to people,
kind of shooting people down, nudging them out of the way,
and specifically Pete, just like anytime Pete tries to buddy up to him,
smacking him down,
it just absolutely despises him.
And so to see Don showing an investment in someone's future
beyond whatever it is he's doing today and tomorrow,
because that seems to be all he really cares about.
That's peeling back completely new layers of that character.
And for Peggy, like, she's getting these big wins.
She's also finding a place in the office in terms of so far she's being handed very, like,
woman-oriented products that the men just, like, don't even know what to do with.
Yeah.
They also don't really know what to do with her.
Like, they don't know how to talk around her.
They don't know how to be around her.
They don't know the, like, once she is kind of into the pitch room,
they're used to this being their space to make, like, locker room-style jokes.
And now that that space has been, like, infiltrated,
they're, like, over-explaining things to Peggy.
They're trying to over-articulate their entire dynamic and all their bits.
They're still telling those jokes.
They're still telling them.
Yeah.
But they're going to try to explain them.
By the way, his wife is not Mitch's wife, just so you know.
One of my favorite moments in that in that sequence is at the end.
Like, she does a pretty good job.
And Don has notes.
And at the end, Ken is like, good job, Peg.
Like, he just, like, doesn't know how to contract.
A little punch on the arm.
Good job, Peg.
Yeah.
Within that mentorship, you're right.
Don does have notes for her.
One of the notes he gives her is like maybe chill on the academia of like getting into the Latin etymology of the product you're trying to describe, which if you've seen Mad Men, you know, Don basically apes to great effect much later in this season.
So it's like he's a guy who's always talking out of both sides of his mouth a little bit.
But he's awfully persuasive.
And at this point in the game, he's really useful for Peggy's education on how to do this stuff.
I think because I can't claim the Peggy and Don relationship inside of this episode, which you and I both agree is a core relationship of the show.
What I can claim in my episode is Don's relationship with himself.
Yeah.
And the fact that this show starts with the back of Don Draper's head in that sort of iconic Mad Men silhouette and skip ahead.
a few seconds if you don't want to hear about the famous final shot of Mad Men or whatever,
but like ends on Don's face.
Like this is a real journey inside of the heart and soul and mind of the character of Don Draper.
That is what Mad Men is.
And why do we care about Don Draper?
In a lot of reasons, because he cares about Peggy.
So like that is part of it.
And I'm not saying she's just part of his story.
She has her own story.
But fundamentally, the show is most interested in Don Draper.
and I think his conflict with himself
and the way in which he's mirrored back
via Rachel, played by Maggie Siff,
this character that he has an affair with in season one,
echoed back by his storybook family,
and how he just doesn't see himself there.
This is who he's supposed to be,
and he just doesn't see himself there.
How he's mirrored back by all the other guys,
the other fellas in the office, and he just doesn't see himself there. And so Don in search of
a reflection that accurately bounces back to him is what the show is about in many ways. And this episode
is a big entry point inside of that that I really love about episode three. Absolutely. I also think,
to your credit, Joe, I think your episode more accurately and enticingly captures the relationship
between Don and his libido.
Like, you're getting the early flirtations of his relationship with Rachel in a way that
we will see over the course of Mad Men, spoiler alert, I guess, many times with many different
women.
Right.
And so it's just, like, portrayed and hits in a different way, you know, like the subtlety
of kind of nudging the cuff link back and forth, basically, like, things like that really,
really hit and really, really work.
And are such a huge part of that character.
And his want to not just see himself reflected in homeliorism.
life versus alternative, but in all of the alternatives that are out there, all of these women
that he meets, they're an infinite number of potential dons. And one of them is with Rachel,
and he seems to be invested and interested in exploring that version a little bit. But seeing
the early stages of it is obviously going to be a really captivating experience.
We are going to talk in a minute about the pilot and why we maybe think it isn't like the
perfect specimen of what Madman can be. But there is, you know, a quite famous speech from that
episode, The Happiness Speech, where he talks about, like, advertising is basically you're selling
happiness. And he talks about the smell of a new car. And, like, when he talks about that idea,
when he talks about the smell of a new car, I'm like, that's just dawn every time he says, like,
a new woman. Like, you know, he's just like, new car, new me, new woman, new me. Like, who can I be
in this person's eyes? Like, you know, can I feel good about who I am in their eyes? And in this
episode and episode three, it's all going swimmingly until he smooches her and then it's like,
guess what I'm married?
And she's like, what the fuck, dude?
You know, and all of a sudden he's, the shining, the night and shining armor cufflinks,
all of a sudden he's quite tarnished.
So I really love that.
Do you have an MVP of your episode?
I think for me, it's Peggy for mine.
Again, she gets like the big wins.
She gets to be such a huge part of it.
She is finding purpose and her role in the office in a way that's really unique.
And I think is unique even among the other kind of like junior executives who all seem to be sort
of swirling about trying to play the zero-sum game of office politics, wondering if like Roger
dies, does that mean one of them gets promoted because Don gets promoted? Peggy's one of the only
people in the office who has like a clear direction. Like she's getting a raise. She's getting more
responsibility. She gets to have her moment to kind of gloat in the sun. That sounds like a winner to
meet you. The fact that yours is Peggy and mine has to be Don, I think, is kind of perfect.
We're a little like match set, I think.
And I think...
I do think you could make the case for Rachel for yours, too.
I was going to say, if I had to pick anyone other than Dawn, I would pick Mase Siff as Rachel inside of this episode.
That would be my runner-up for sure.
Anything else you want to say before we get to sort of like how this episode sets up the rest of the series?
I mean, kind of a bummer that neither of us, just by pure coincidence, picked very Roger-heavy episodes.
I love Roger.
Another character, I think, is really important in understanding how Don's...
sees himself. He like wants to be a counterpart, especially at this point in the story,
to Roger so clear, like wants to be as equal, wants to be someone to bounce ideas off of.
And there's always like that tension between them where that's kind of true but kind of not.
And so having his absence in the story in my episode in particular creates a vacuum for
Don to suddenly fill. But yeah, I just love having him around.
Yeah. Your episode has a great Joan and Roger scene, Alzheimer. And I do like this.
the imagery inside of your episode of Don inside of Rogers' office and Pete inside of Don's
office and this idea of constantly striving upwards, like, who can I, whose shoes can I step
into next? I think all of that is really good. That Joan and Roger scene in particular,
again, one of these things where it's like, I can't really tell you with any kind of certainty
how some of Rogers' lines land with Joan in which they're kind of the phonish. When he says,
She's the best piece of ass he's ever had
And he doesn't care who knows it
He doesn't care who knows it
Not as romantic a line as Roger might think
But also is like the charms of it
Are Not totally lost on Joan in that process
And there's something about just the intimacy of
She is in his office to ruse him up
To make him look more lifelike after having a heart attack
Is as close as these two people have been
Sort of emotionally speaking over the course of the season so far
Yeah
And to have him deliver a line like that
Just as like as kind of
cold and crass and guys guys Roger Sterling can be.
It's like, I kind of think Joan likes it, and I kind of think she's devastated by it.
And that's the whole game right there.
And I think, you know, this reminds me of some of the conversations we had about the Breaking Bad pilot and sort of this idea of finding the characters who are going to matter as the show goes on.
The idea that John Slattery read for Don Draper, and then they pulled him in for Roger, and John wasn't sure he wanted to do it because he was like, this is a tiny character.
is a nothing character.
And then Roger just blossoms into becoming so important
and it is the career-defining role for John's lottery,
like without question.
And then similarly, like I would say,
Betty's importance comes and goes inside of Madman,
but she's a footnote in the pilot.
And then she's the second half of this episode three.
And so once again, January Jones,
just saying sort of like, I read for Peggy.
And then they cast me as the wife who had like two lines in the pilot, but like we'll go on to be more important.
I think that's really interesting.
In terms of how my episode sets up the rest of the series, something I just want to really underline about Mad Men is how successfully it hit.
It wasn't the highest rated show on television and it didn't ever get as popular as something like Breaking Bad did.
But the fact that it could hit on so many different levels of depth.
and interest, I think is really exemplified by my episode in the introduction of the Who is Dick Whitman
mystery.
Yeah.
You've activated the Reddit detectives, which I think is an underrated aspect of like the longevity
of any show.
Do I think that fan theorizing or Reddit theorizing is the most important lens through which
you could watch television?
No.
But I think it is an interesting element.
of particularly this era of television, you know, like when we get into this era, the first, you know, kicked off in many ways by the Sopranos, but definitely embodied by a TV show like Lost. And then you have people who, I was watching a panel with Matt Zollarsites who wrote, you know, two great books on Mad Men. And, and Mark Harris, great author, was on this panel and he was talking about, um, how.
I think it was him, was either him or Matt said.
Basically, any show you care about that much will become a mystery show.
Yeah.
And so who is Dick Whitman is like, at the end of the day, not the most important question that Mad Men is asking.
But it is a hooky thing that got people engaged and then brought people into a world where we could be talking about, like, symbolism and motifs.
and on Wii and like, what does, you know,
what do D.H. Lawrence and Mozart have to do with the themes of this episode,
I think is all just in the mix inside of episode three, which I really love.
We can all pretend that we're above that stuff,
but it just is so instrumental in exactly that way.
And you see it, and it shows right now, too, like White Lotus is exactly this, right?
This idea of like, oh, it's a murder mystery.
Really, it's just a super dense character study.
And Madman is that stretched out over even longer with all these other
trappings, but you need something easy for people to grab onto until the other elements will
grab them. And I think that's what the Dick Whitman stuff does as much as anything. That's what all
these, you know, the suicides and the boxes and just like all these mysterious elements, the dog,
you know, the dog tags, like all of these things are just trying to keep you on the line long enough
that you want to be on the line. Yeah, that makes a lot of sense to me. What do you want to say about
how episode 11 sets up the rest of the series? I think we covered a lot of it already because I think a lot
of it is relationship driven. It's a lot of
understanding the playing field for
all of these different people. Like we talked about
Don and Peggy. I also think the Don and Pete stuff
is so important and Eleven really
hammers home how adversarial
their relationship has become. How quickly
things have shifted from Pete
like licking Don's boots
to effectively like being
incredibly skeptical of everything that
he's doing, both in terms of the credit he
receives, in terms of who he says he is,
like how he presents to the world.
There's just this like disconnect between
Pete not understanding why his shit doesn't work on other people, but Don's does.
And that's something that can carry incredible narrative thrust for a show like this.
That's the kind of thing that isn't, it's the mechanism for some of these mysteries we're talking about,
but at the same time, you're getting at the core of who these characters are.
One last thing I will say about my episode in the, like, less spoiler way,
is to talk, just to circle back to this idea of how Mad Men incorporates historical moments into the show.
in a way that feels character-driven.
So if the bullet point in history is, in 1959,
there was a court case about Lady Chatterley's lover.
Yes.
Like, that's the boring historical footnote.
And then what does this mean to the sexual liberation of the women inside of the office is how it is entertained?
Or on the ad side of things, here's a famous ad from 1960 of Volksweb.
and the famous lemon ad.
This comes up in episode three, where they're all discussing it.
So it's sort of like, this existed is the boring bullet point, but sort of like, what does it do psychologically to these men whose job is to sell something the 1950s ideology?
And here we are in 1960, and here's something kind of weird and quirky.
Winking in a different way.
But it is the death of something.
It is the death of the 1950 Norman Rockwell into the birth of the wilder 1960s and what that will all bode for all of these people.
Not just like increasing paisley's and florals in their wardrobe, but like and the length of their sideburns and stuff like that.
But all the other things, all the other ideas that come along with it.
So I just really love the way that the show throughout can weave those things into.
natural-seeming conversations and character moments inside of the episodes.
Absolutely. I mean, it's really hard for shows to make narrative drama out of people not changing
or standing still. And I think one thing that Madman does really well is like time is marching on.
The circumstances, the world around them are changing. But like, here's this room of guys talking
about all of the supposed research saying that cigarettes cause cancer, but they're all still puffing
cigarettes. Like it never occurs to them for a moment to stop what they're doing and reconsider it.
they are just like stones against the tide
until all of a sudden that stone gets turned over.
And I think Mad Men turns that into something really exciting
and really thrilling on a really regular basis
that I frankly don't understand how it's possible,
but I want to keep watching it.
It's so funny.
When we were covering Breaking Bad last week,
I was looking at, you know, reading all the old reviews about it,
reading various essays about it,
rewatching the episodes.
And I was like, is Breaking Bad the best TV show that's ever existed?
I think we're going to do this every week, basically.
the experience of Mad Men.
I was like, is Mad Men the greatest TV show that ever existed?
And, like, if you ask me today, my answer might be.
Yeah, I just want...
It might be.
Like, the...
I guess this speaks to the very premise of this show, but each time I'm like, is it
time for a complete Mad Men rewatch?
Is that what I'm got to do now?
I don't know.
The answer is yes.
But for both of these shows, as you alluded to up top, being on AMC at the same time,
and they could not be further apart.
I mean, obviously, they have the sort of, like, problematic, anti-hero
leading men type of thing happening.
But like Breaking Bad is as plot
heavy a show as you will find.
Not to say that it doesn't come from a place of character,
have other things going for it.
I could not tell you what happens,
quote unquote, happens in season four of Mad Men,
but I can tell you two dozen things
that happened between characters
that I care about a lot more than that.
And so it just hits in a totally different register
and yet is no less effective in doing it.
I was actually thinking I had like a sort of a sideways thought,
which was that, you know,
We uncovered a similar story when investigating this pilot as we do with Breaking Bad, which is that this is a pilot that, you know, Matthew Winter really wanted to go at HBO.
He wanted this to be an HBO show.
And HBO, even though he had done all this work on The Sopranos, HBO didn't even look at it.
So then it gets picked up by AMC who wanted an HBO-like show.
And so it becomes an HBO show on AMC.
And I would argue Breaking Bad becomes an FX show on AMC.
And AMC has a few of them.
these steals and wins over the course of his existence. But it's why, even though it was a giant
for a few key years with Breaking Bad and Mad Men, it didn't endure in its stature past the ending
of the shows. It's like not a coincidence show that if you're just poaching these one-off shows
that were meant for other networks, then you zoom out. And it's like, what is AMC's broadcast identity?
What is the ethos of this network? To this day, I don't really know. Exactly. I, you know,
I still have my ASC plus subscription because I love the interview with the vampire,
but what is an AMC show is not a question they ever answered.
No.
Satisfactorily.
And so this is when you look at the pilot of this show and when you look at the pilot of Breaking Bad,
you can see even more the identity of the original networks that they were intended for.
And then just to talk about the pilot a bit more, the...
Well, before we even do the pilot, did we hit your standout scene for a marriage of
Figuero? Yeah, I would say
it's kind of a tie. It's either
Don Draper through the lens of his camera
at home, or it's
the Rachel and Don Draper scene on the roof
of the store.
A lot of good dogs up there. Really
doing the work. Some good boys up there. Are you ready
to talk about the pilot? Please.
Okay. Smoke gets in your eyes is what it's called.
Directed by the great Alan
Taylor, written by Matthew Weiner.
I think
this is a show that
doesn't quite have a firm grass of its
tone, doesn't have a firm grasp of its style, its visual style yet, but hit paid dirt with
its casting.
Yes.
And it has great writing because there's, you know, there's not only the happiness speech
that he gives, but there's the line about, you know, what you call love was embedded by guys
like me to sell nylons, which is like the thesis statement of bad men.
Absolutely.
So there's a lot to love about this pilot.
I've just heard from so many people
that they can't get into the show from watching it.
So it was sort of the perfect candidate,
my view, for this series.
What do you want to say about the pilot,
what works and what doesn't?
I think a lot of what we talked about earlier
resonates with me in terms of like,
if you just don't want to spend time
watching women get berated in the workplace
or just the general state of society
at this point in human history,
you're going to bump up against it.
And I think in the pilot in particular,
everything is so much more broad
where it's just a little too cute
about the like, isn't it funny
that doctors used to smoke in the office?
Isn't it so weird
that they used to drink this much on the job?
Like it's lingering on that stuff
in a way that makes it feel like that is the show
versus that's just sort of some of the texture of the show.
And they find that over time,
they broaden up or they kind of deepen the characters
to the point where they're not these sort of like
outlines of the people that they are in the pilot.
And in doing so,
you get into all the juicy stuff
that is enticing us back to Mad Men
over and over again.
I would say I don't even really recognize Joan
in the pilot episode.
Who might just straight up
be like the best character on Mad Men
by the end of its run.
Like one of my absolute favorite pieces of the show.
And so deliciously complicated,
but the nuance isn't,
like the shades of her are not there
in the pilot episode.
So yeah, and I think, you know,
as we discussed with Breaking Bad,
the pilot has a lot of work
it has to do in terms of like establishing the who, what, where, when, why of this world.
But it's not selling what Matt, the depth that Mad Men is capable of.
And especially, yeah, when you get scenes like all the guys in the elevator sort of leering behind Peggy, you know, like all of all of that, everything that's ever happened in an elevator in Mad Men is interesting to me.
but like that's the most cartoonish version of something that will become it's never the sexism of madden and men is never i would say subtle
not terribly no but it is more nuanced and uh shaded than what is presented in in that episode so yeah i would say so
i think that's on all fronts right it's about the way that that sexism like is articulated in the workplace
and the behaviors that it influences it's also how the characters interpret it and in particular you see peggy
who has almost like an allergic reaction
to the way that she's being leered at
in the office over the course of this season,
almost like on a molecular, like physical level
starts sort of rebelling against it.
I think there's a lot of stuff you can unpack there
in the same way as we were talking about
with the historical events where it's not about,
oh, this big thing happened,
let's talk about it or throw it on the TV.
It's about like how does that ripple out
through all the characters,
through all the plot lines, through all this stuff.
How do you give these actors who we hit home runs with
honestly, basically across the board
a lot of really juicy stuff to do.
And it is very trippy just like watching a time capsule show
where Elizabeth Moss is not a starring attraction in and of herself,
where John Hamm is not a starring attraction in and of himself.
Like they are holding the screen.
They have incredible presence.
And they certainly had both been in things.
Like, I mean, she'll always be Zoe Bartlett to me.
But it's just not the same as what you would walk into a show now that has Elizabeth
Moss in it.
And that's a headlining opportunity.
When are you going to be doing it?
your West Wing rewatch podcast,
Rahmoney.
I mean, I would love to.
Unfortunately, I've been out flanked
on the left, on the west.
I mean, Rishkei K. Sherway
basically already crushed this shit.
So, like, what am I to do?
Fair point, fair point.
This is one of the negative reviews
that I picked up of the pilot said this.
Mad Men seems to be attempting to be satire
without a plan.
The mood is serious, not campy,
and there aren't laugh-out-loud moments.
just a lot of groaners,
at which point the show simply becomes a reflection of its characters.
Depressing.
It turns out that watching moody, cruel men and unsatisfying put upon women for an hour
just isn't that much fun.
That's not how I would describe the Mad Men pilot necessarily,
but if you think about things that happen in our episodes,
like in my episode, episode three,
okay, Pete comes back from his honeymoon,
and they've put a bunch of Chinese people and chickens in his office.
That's its own level of what the fuck passes as a joke in 1960.
But then later, when Rachel and Don are leaving the offices and a chicken just walks by and Don's like, it's a junior executive.
Like, that's really funny.
They pay that shit off.
Like, I don't know what to tell you.
They really pull it together.
And the very premise of what Peggy has to navigate inside of your episode is inherently funny.
So, yeah, I think the comedy beats, which better distinguishes Mad Men's.
from the Sopranos.
Like, Mad Men
picks up right as the Sopranos ends on TV,
you know, and Matthew Winner,
like taking over as the new quote-unquote David Chase of television.
But I can't speak to the tone of Sopranos.
I know that it is definitely funny as well as being thrilling
and all the other things that it is.
But it's not the same humorous tone that Mad Men has to offer.
And I think that's something that's only grows.
over the seasons and is not as indicative in the pilot.
And there are great gags and one-liners throughout Mad Men.
It's also a show that is a constant exercise in, like,
who gets to cut down whom?
And who gets to throw the barb?
Who gets to, like, brush somebody off?
And this is something like Roger is so great at in terms of his dynamic.
And I think one thing that just, like, isn't quite there in season one,
I think maybe is a little more present in my episode than yours,
but even then, not quite there.
like you need the Burt Cooper daffiness to pop up a little bit here and there.
And you need Roger kind of coming in and smoothing things out with a joke.
And when he's not in the office, you feel that absence.
Like you feel the self-seriousness of Don's office presence, really like lording over everybody.
Like, it's a very delicate balance in terms of that workplace.
And I don't even know when the show really hits its stride in that way.
It's when the cast fills out a little bit.
There's some key characters who just haven't been introduced yet at this stage in the show.
but it's already hitting at a high enough level
that again, you just want to be along for the ride
to see what happens.
Who's the character you're most missing
in these early episodes?
I feel like it might be Stan.
It's a Stan. It's Stan.
I love Stan.
We're Stan people. That makes sense.
Stan stands, truly.
Stan stands, absolutely.
Yeah, I agree with all of that.
Anything else you want to say specifically about the pilot,
which is really fun to watch,
to your point, about watching John Hamm and Elizabeth Moss
before they are massive TV stars, which they will become.
I do want to, and I think we've given it some credit,
I want to give all appropriate credit to the pilot on having a lot of the raw materials,
like Don's scrolling ideas on a napkin,
like some of the elements from the Lucky Strike meeting,
like you're getting, you're almost getting there.
It's just that the characters themselves aren't quite there.
And it's just not finally tuned enough in the way that basically all pilots are not finally
tuned enough.
Yeah, absolutely.
All right.
else you want to say before we get to
any sort of big spoilers that you want to talk about?
I would say just the idea for my episode
that pastrami is Yankee barbecue
is something that I will be carrying with me
for a long time and I had completely forgotten
about, but is a thousand percent true.
Oh, okay, you don't find that personally offensive.
No, it's exactly what it is.
Like a low and slow meat preparation that yields
delicious products. Like, this checks out to me.
It's, you know, it's toasted, just like Lucky Strikes.
All right.
Let's go to big time spoilers if we have any that we want to talk about.
I'm going to be honest.
I don't have a ton coming off of these episodes.
And again, some of it is everything that happens in Mad Men is such a deepening of complexion
where it's not like there's a straight line from what happens in these episodes all the way through the end.
It's so curvy that I wouldn't even know how to spoil something to have a more thorough conversation about it.
I think only a couple things popped out to me as sort of almost prophecies for some of these characters.
Like, Dawn describing what Pete will become, you know, like, you know, with not much hair and nobody likes you.
Damn.
I mean, we like Pete, but.
Or Betty being so judgmental of a divorced woman when Betty herself will become a divorced woman in a few seasons.
Baby Kiernan Shipka is here.
Of course.
is really exciting to spend some time with.
And just thinking about trying to reevaluate the ending based on the beginning,
like thinking about the way in which the show ends with, again,
Don Draper not changing fundamentally, but achieving a bit more peace with who he is.
But the bar is low, Joe.
I got to be honest with you.
The bars and hell.
The bars and hell and smeared with Coca-Cola.
But, like, it's...
I just love that idea of the beginning of the show.
Dawn as, like, so dissent and disconnected.
And the end of the show,
Don with a smile in his face,
both connected to the people around him
at this, like, sort of Esselin meditation retreat.
Yes.
And using that to sell Coke.
Coca-Cola.
What else would you do with it?
What else would you do with perfect clarity into the human experience other than sell
something with it?
Sell Coca-Cola.
All right.
Anything else you want to say about Mad Men in general or this experiment specifically?
Two things.
One, just to echo what you were saying about Betty's role in the show in these episodes
and going forward, like, I think she gets a real short shrift in the way that people talk
about Mad Men, in part because, yes, there are stages of the show where she really falls
hard into the background.
But her presence at this point
in this like
Priscilla locked in the dollhouse
kind of role that she's basically
forced into playing
and the ways that she's like starting to lash out
like I forgot how much I love this dynamic of the show
and honestly how expertly it's played by January Jones
who also gets a tough rap for not being
John Hamm or Elizabeth Moss sometimes
but I think is genuinely like pretty great on the show overall.
Yeah, Betty is a character that I really had to defrost around
and then on every rewatch
I am more and more compelled by
and interested in.
Yes.
And again, it goes back
to that whole Skylar White thing
of just sort of like
the wife character
who is in the way of your...
But not really,
because Don just does whatever he wants.
No one is in this man's way.
I can assure you.
Absolutely not.
I think if you haven't rewatched Mad Men in a while
or if you haven't tried to hook a friend
or a loved one into Mad Men
with an episode other than the pilot,
I think it's a...
It's a really good time, too, and a really good idea.
I was thinking about, you know, this thing we had around our breaking bad discussion was, like, what was the most 2008 thing about this episode?
Yeah.
We didn't really do this here, but I was really sort of trying to dig into how did this reflect 2007?
How did this reflect the Bush era?
How did this reflect a country on the verge of the Obama era?
and I think that idea of us running on fumes of that immediate post-9-11
who-rah patriotism that was sort of existed in our culture
and how much that had soured for people by 2007.
And so an indelible image of Mad Men for me is the scene where the Draper family
has had a picnic and then they just like stand up
and shake out their picnic blanket
and just leave all the trash
on the beautiful lawn
where they have been picnicking
and just get in their car
and drive away.
And I'm like, that's, you know,
that's something that was on
the writers of Madman
that was on their minds
when they were just thinking
about America.
We were right on the verge
of a stock market crash
that happened while Madan was going on,
all this sort of stuff.
So if right now
you have some questions
about how you feel
about America,
and the ideas of America that you've been sold,
Mad Men's a perfect sort of reflection meditation to go through as you think about that, I think.
I actually think it is a perfectly cynical show for this moment in time,
where it interrogates everything,
but it doesn't feel overwhelming to the point you would be burdened by it or worn down by it.
So it's like you're not getting the overly saccharine that feels false,
and you're not getting the so bleak that you're enmeshed in darkness.
It's like we're just all living here in the...
middle trying to make the best of whatever circumstances we got and most of those circumstances
are bad and a lot of people are doing weird things but you know what we're just trying to sell coke
together we're just we're just accidentally inventing vibrators together hinds beans lucky strike whatever
is up for sale we want to sell it to you a car perhaps who's to say um thanks for rah mahoney
for going on this journey through madman with me thanks to jesson sales for his work on this
feed and letting us do this fun experiment where we watch great television talk about it a little bit.
And thank you to Mad Men, expert and aficionado, Kai Grady.
And we'll be back with another hooked episode soon.
And email us in the meantime, prestige TV at Spotify.com, with whatever Mad Men episode you think
is the best episode to hook people with.
I would genuinely love to hear people's ideas because, as we said, there's a wide range
of possibilities with this one.
We did consider, we should say, we did consider the wheel.
which is the finale of season one,
but that just felt even a little too far for us.
So, but that, I mean, the carousel speech is so, you know,
the carousel speech is, this is a post-credit sequence of this podcast, I guess.
The carousel speech is the Walt and Jesse dissolved Bonnie and about to, you know, what is the moment.
Yeah.
So that's definitely on our minds.
But yeah, prestige TV at Spotify.com.
Yeah.
The question we had is, does it pay off without things like Marriage of Figaro?
If you don't have the footage, if you don't see the domestic life, does it hit the way that it ultimately does?
Because, yeah, once you get there on honest terms watching through the first season, like, you are radicalized to love this show.
Join us in our love for Mad Men if you haven't already.
And we will see you soon.
Bye.
Looking for the best place to shop this Mother's Day, go with the brand that makes it easy.
to send something thoughtful to everyone on your list.
1-800flowers.com.
Right now at 1-800 flowers, order one dozen roses and get another dozen free.
More flowers mean more smiles, all backed by the quality, attention to detail,
and trusted delivery experience that make 1-800 flowers my top choice to send something beautiful
mom will love.
Make Mom's Day at 1-800flowers.com slash Spotify.
That's 1-800flowers.com slash Spotify.
Hey, Mama, thanks for making all my favorite recipes.
Hi, Ma. Thanks for your unfiltered advice.
Hi, Mom. Thanks for always being by the phone.
Hey, Mom. Happy Mother's Day.
When you ship UPS Air at the UPS Store, your items arrive on time or your money back.
Guaranteed at no extra cost, exclusively at the UPS Store UPS Store U.S. retail locations.
Visit the UPS Store.com slash air shipping for full details. Terms and conditions apply.
Send your Mother's Day gifts at the UPS Store and we'll get your gratitude there on time.
