The Prof G Pod with Scott Galloway - China Decode: Can China Challenge Nvidia’s Dominance?

Episode Date: June 2, 2026

Alice Han and James Kynge break down Huawei’s bold new strategy to challenge Nvidia and the future of AI chips. They explore the rise of Huawei’s influential "chip queen" He Tingbo, the company’s attempt to move beyond Moore’s Law, and what it could mean for the global semiconductor race. Then, tensions between China and Europe are heating up. With record trade deficits, growing concerns over Chinese imports, and new efforts to protect European industries, Alice and James examine whether a full-scale China-EU trade war is beginning to take shape. Finally, Hong Kong has officially overtaken Switzerland as the world’s largest offshore wealth hub. They discuss what’s driving the surge in cross-border wealth flowing through Hong Kong, why China’s ultra-rich are increasingly keeping assets closer to home, and the risks that come with tying so much wealth to the fortunes of mainland China. Subscribe to China Decode on Substack for weekly analysis, livestreams, and deep dives into the biggest story shaping the global economy: chinadecode.profgmedia.com Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Support for the show comes from Northwest Registered Agent. Your business identity is everything that makes your business legitimate and professional. With Northwest Registered Agent, you don't just form a business. You start a complete foundation bill for privacy, credibility, and growth. That includes registered agent service, a business address, operating agreement, domain, website, professional email, phone number, and built-in privacy. In other words, your home address, personal email, and phone number stay private. Don't pay hundreds or thousands of dollars to what you can get from Northwest for free. Visit Northwest Registeredagent.com slash profgifree and start using free resources to build something amazing.

Get more with Northwest Registered Agent at northwestregisteredagent.com slash profgifree. Support for this show comes from Norwegian Cruise Line. A cruise with Norwegian is a vacation you'll never forget, with an onboard experience that makes it easy for the whole family to settle into their own version of vacation. Because on a cruise with Norwegian, choice comes naturally for the whole family and destinations feel just as effortless. Wander beautiful cities and take in stunning natural scenery. Norwegian Cruise Line.

It's different out here. Visit NCL.com, call your travel advisor, or 1-888-NCL Cruise. Norwegian Cruise Line ships registry, the Bahamas and USA. Support for this show comes from Odu. Running a business is hard enough, so why make it harder with a dozen different apps that don't talk to each other? Introducing Odu, it's the only business software. you'll ever need. It's an all-in-one fully integrated platform that makes your work easier,

CRM, accounting, inventory, e-commerce, and more. And the best part, O-DU replaces multiple expensive platforms for a fraction of the cost. That's why over thousands of businesses have made the switch. So why not you? Try O-D-O-4-Free at O-D-O-O-O-com. That's O-D-O-O-O-O-O-com. It really couldn't be a bigger story already. Jensen Huang, the CEO of NVIDIA, has said that his company has largely conceded, those are his words, largely conceded China's AI chip market to Huawei. In 26, so far, Huawei has captured around 50% of the Chinese market for AI chips. What this really means is that chip companies in the future might stop obsessing so much as they do right now

about how small the transistors in the semiconductor should be, and they might focus more instead on how fast the data moves through a semiconductors. Welcome to China Decode. I'm Alice Han. And I'm James King. In today's episode of China Decode, we're discussing the latest sign that China's chip industry might overtake, NVIDIA, a growing trade war with the European Union, how Hong Kong has become more popular than Switzerland for the mega-rich. That's all coming up, but first, let's do a quick check-in with how the Chinese markets are starting the week. On Monday, markets were down today,

as investors turned cautious over renewed China-EU trade tensions. The Shanghai Composite Index dropped 0.73%, while the Xinjiang Composite Index fell 1.81%. Overall in May, the Shanghai composite lost 1.06% while the Shinjin component was up 3.1%. All right, let's get right into it. There are more signs coming to light of the Chinese chip industry's ability to potentially take down U.S. competitors in a not-so-distant future. Huawei, thanks in large part to its head of chip development, Hurtig-Bor, has announced an antidote to Moore's law.

That's the long-in-practice mechanism by which semiconductors continue to improve and and gets smaller over time. But increasingly, it appears that we've hit the Moore's law limit. Instead, Huawei is beginning to operate under a different kind of scaling law, and the innovative approach might just catapult Huawei into serious competition with U.S. chipmakers, the leading of which is Nvidia. I love the fact that she's now called the Chip Queen, and she's somebody who's generally shied away from the spotlight. But she's been responsible for running this internal semiconductor unit since 2003. So nigh on two decades, with an annual budget of about $400 million.

And she's now become a viral sensation in China, and I think rightly so. Can you tell us a little bit about what you think about this new tower scaling law that Huawei's just launched? And whether or not this is a serious threat, everyone's going to ask this multi-trillion dollar question. Is this a serious threat for Jensen Huang? I think, first of all, as you've described it, this story is partly about Herting Boar, the chip queen, as you put it, and it's also partly about the business of the world's biggest company, that's Nvidia, in China, the world's biggest emerging market for semiconductor chips. So it really couldn't be a bigger story. And I think it's really key,

because already Jensen Huang, the CEO of Nvidia, has said that his company has largely conceded, those are his words, largely conceded China's AI chip market to Huawei. And he may well say that because in 26 so far, Huawei has captured around 50% of the Chinese market for AI chips. And just to give you a number here, the size, of the AI chip market in China is supposed to be about $21 billion US dollars this year, but by 2030, according to Morgan Stanley, it could be worth about $67 billion. So we're talking really big dimensions as usual. And now, what Herting Boar has said is that we're moving to a new type of way of assessing

semiconductor performance. And she's called it the tau or the scaling law. What this really means is that chip companies in the future might stop obsessing so much as they do right now about how small

the transistors in the semiconductor should be, and they might focus more instead on how fast the data moves through a semiconductor. So that puts the focus away from the little transistors that go into a semiconductor

and more into the clever way that you can arrange semiconductors on a chip and the wires that you use and the memory systems that you use so that you get greater efficiency on that chip. At the moment, as I'm sure you're aware, these transistors that go into CPUs or GPUs, those are the chips within AI systems, right?

they're so small that you can literally get hundreds of billions of them onto a chip. Now, that means that these transistors are invisible to the human eye. So we're reaching the physical limits of miniaturization. And that's why, as you said in the opening, Moore's Law, which used to say that a transistor that would go into a chip would endlessly shrink. so you could get more and more of these transistors onto a chip. And that, of course, boosts the compute power of that chip. That's why this has always been an aim.

But we're now reaching the physical limits of Moore's Law. We simply cannot expect physics to allow chips to get smaller and smaller and smaller now that they've already reached the size, effectively, of a human virus. So that's the key background to what Hurtingbor is saying here. She's saying we're moving to a new way of assessing the compute power of a chip. And that way is not to miniaturize the chip because we're already reaching the limits of physics. It is to cluster the chips, to stack the chips in a clever way and focus on the other parts of the chip, such as the wires and the arrangement, design, all of those things,

to increase the compute power of the chip. So I do think it's an interesting development. I have no way of assessing whether or not this is going to be something that really has traction. I have no way of assessing whether the tau or this tau scaling law is really going to be the way that we assess chips in the future. What do you think, Alice? Yeah, it's so complicated. And so far as I understand it, you know, Moore's law is predicated on the doubling of

the number of transistors on a chip. And to your point, it's ever getting miniaturized, smaller and smaller, in terms of the components on the chip. Now, apparently, TSM is understanding that it's hitting the upper limit of Moore's Law and is now going into 3D stacking, which is not to dissimilar, I think, from this TOW philosophy in terms of increasing efficiency on a chip. But if TSM is going in that direction, because it recognizes it's hit, it's hit, the upper limit. My question is, you know, can Huawei and other players, you know, Hua Hong and

Smick, who are Peel play foundries as well in the space, can they reach the aggregate amount needed to meet Chinese demand? I thought it was interesting. And again, here I'm citing the Council in foreign relations, so we've got to take it with a grain of salt. But insofar as they understand it through their own research, you know, the best US AI chips is still five times more powerful and compute than what Huawei can currently do, and apparently, according to them, the gap is a widening. And according to their calculations, only around, you know, in the most bullish scenario, Huawei can only produce about 4% of the aggregate AI compute that Nvidia can produce. That is a huge, I think, takeaway, because even if they are getting more efficient,

in the short term, the big question, a trillion, multi-tillion dollar question is, can Huawei produce enough to meet domestic Chinese demand, which is only going to increase, as we've previously talked about, you know, because of the massive public and private sector investment in data centers and AI across the stack. I'm a little bit worried there, but I don't bet against the Chinese in terms of finding ingenious ways to work around existing technological constraints. But in the short time, I'm a little bit worried about whether or not they can meet the demand currently. One last data point I thought was super interesting. I'm still bullish. Maybe this is out of consensus, Jensen Huang in China. Jensen Huang just got announced that he is on the board to

Chinghua University's School of Economics and Management on which the Apple CEO, Tim Cook, is also a member. Maybe this is a signal that things are heading in a more positive direction that some of the floodgates may be opened softly. But my number one question is, can China meet the demand that is only rising for AI compute with the existing domestic competition? Well, that's the $64 million question, or probably $64 billion question. I have no way of knowing, but my sense of this is that the running is going in China's favor.

And I think that this statement by Herting-Bor, Huawei's chip queen, gives a sense of confidence. It gives a sense that China's got an alternative method, an alternative route towards creating the types of compute power that it needs. And in this regard, this is this scaling technique that she is describing. So I think that actually, although I believe China would probably like to get its hands on the latest Nvidia chips, the Blackwell chips, which are considerably more powerful chip for chip than anything that China's got or anything that Huawei is even close to producing, I think that even if China doesn't get its hands on these Blackwell, it can stack these chips and scale these chips, the Huawei, indigenous ships in such a way that it can probably have a useful workaround.

And then if you add into the equation things that we've spoken about on China decode before, the fact that electricity is so much cheaper in certain parts of China and that, you know, you can run data centers close to the Gobi Desert using solar power that provide incredibly cheap electricity and thereby overcome the fact that you're having to spend, use more power to power the chips to run your large language models. I think overall, China is in a pretty good spot. But I'm also interested, you mentioned Hirting Boar at the beginning. This is a great human story as well, isn't it, Alice?

I mean, as I understand it, she was put in charge of Huawei's chip development way back in 2003 when Huawei was really nowhere when it came to making. chips. They were really nowhere. But she had a 400 million US dollar budget annually. And she's become one of the company's most important executives. And Huawei has to rank as China's most important tech company, if not China's most important company, full stop. And now Herting Bo is on the Huawei board. She's one of only two women to be on the board. It's really incredible story, isn't it, Alice? It really is. And I've been reflecting a lot on Huawei's evolution, that Huawei was late to the game to what Samsung had long been doing, because Huawei obviously started off doing telecommunications and then is expanded now across, you know, phone sets to now chip production.

And Samsung did this fairly early on, but I think increasingly, you know, my te hard take on this, and maybe you think this is right or wrong, is that Huawei is increasingly becoming the Samsung of China, which is this global. technological leader in the broader ecosystem, but that has a complete supply chain or hopefully resilience in that it's touching many, many different sectors in the technology stack. What's your take on that? Yes, I would definitely agree with that. And I would say the other thing about Huawei is that it's the symbol of China's resistance to American pressure under the export control regime. I mean, Huawei has been the main target of American sanctions. It has been unable to get hold of a lot of crucial American technology, and yet it seems to have prevailed. And so the development of various different semiconductor chips, hurting boars, confidence in coming up with this new law,

the scaling law, I think is just another indication. that Huawei is prevailing against, you know, American sanctions and American pressure. So it's a geopolitical story as well. And I have to say that I'm happy about my prediction that semiconductor stocks would rally. I was just looking at year-to-date performance on one of the ETFs, and it's up at least 40% year-to-date. It's done outpaced the AI stocks and the Shanghai and Hong Kong composite indices clearly assigned both of confidence, growing confidence in the domestic chip industry, but also, you know,

foreign investors, I think, are looking into it as a play, as a more picks and shovel play for AI as Nvidia has been in the US context. It's interesting that we'll have CXMT, which is a big memory, DRAM supplier coming online probably this year. And then I just heard the announcement that Minimax, which is a big AI model company, is looking to list additionally, in addition to Hong Kong, also in mainland China on the Shanghai Starboard, rather. So we're seeing a lot of a momentum, I think, in this AI hardware story, and the chips definitely are a beneficiary of that. Okay, we'll be back with more.

After a quick break, stay with us. Support for the show comes from Vanta. What's spreading through business even faster than AI? AI risk. Every new tool your team adopts, every vendor enabling AI features, every fresh integration can introduce new vulnerabilities for your company. And most security programs weren't designed to keep up with AI speed. That's where Vanta comes in.

Vanta is the leading agentic trust platform trusted by more than 16,000 fast-moving companies, including Ramp, Cursor, and Harvey, to stay audit-ready at all times. And now Vanta is helping companies, including yours, monitor the risks that emerge between audits, across vendors, AI tools, and your entire environment. The Vanta agent acts like a 20-20. 24-7 GRC engineer running quietly in the background, servicing issues, preparing fixes for your team, and reducing vendor assessment time by up to 50%. Whether you're a fast-growing startup or a global enterprise, VANTA is here to help you automate your security and compliance and earn improved

trust. Get started today at vana.com slash prop G. That's va-a-n-ta.com slash prop-G. Support for the show comes from LinkedIn. It's a shame when the best B-2-2 marketing gets wasted on the wrong audience. Like, imagine running an ad for cataract surgery on Saturday morning cartoons or running a promo for this show on a video about Roblox or something. No offense to our Gen Alpha listeners, but that would be a waste of anyone's ad budget. So, when you want to reach the right professionals, you can use LinkedIn ads. LinkedIn has grown to a network of over one billion professionals and 130 million

decision makers according to their data. That's where it stands apart from other ad buys. You can target your buyers by job title industry company role seniority skills, company revenue, all suit can stop wasting budget on the wrong audience. That's why LinkedIn ads boast one of the highest B2B return on ad spend of all online ad networks. Seriously, all of them. Spend $250 on your first campaign on LinkedIn ads and get a free $250 credit for the next one. Just go to LinkedIn.com slash Scott.

That's LinkedIn.com slash Scott. Terms and conditions apply. Support for the show comes from fora. For most, traveling is a luxury. Getting to explore can change your perspective of the world. But what about turning that exploration into a business? Fora bridges the gap between travel and business by giving you access to the technology, partnerships, and training. You need to start operating a successful travel business immediately. Fora is a modern travel agency built for people who love to plan travel and help others travel well.

As a fora advisor, you get best-in-class training, powerful booking tech, and a vibrant global community of experts and fellow advisors who should are real insider knowledge to help you launch and grow your own travel business. That's right. With Fora, you can turn your passion for travel into a real business. And with a network of over 7,000 preferred travel partners, Forra gives you the ability to offer clients VIP perks, including upgrades, resort credits, and late checkout, helping you deliver standout experiences and build a business people come back to. Become a foraadvisor today at forat travel.com slash prop G.

That's F-O-R-A travel.com slash prof-G. And make sure you tell them we sent you. Forwardravel.com slash prof-G. Welcome back. In another evolution, following the increased sanctions between the U.S. and China, there are now apparently growing worries in the European Union as to their economic dependence on China, which means a new trade war is just about to brew.

James, as the resident European, I have to get your hard take on this. This has been a long time coming. because China for years has been running increasing trade surpluses with Europe. It just apparently hit about over $400 billion last year, the highest level on history and probably will increase again in 2026. But, I mean, the Europeans should have foreseen this, that China would increasingly become Germany in the global supply chain and that it's replacing it in the areas in which German and European manufacturing

have traditionally been strong, that is cars and chemicals in particular. I found it interesting that the majority of the trade surplus is in cars and machinery right now, but China's making a lot of inroads in the chemicals industry as well. So it wouldn't be surprising to me if we have this conversation in five, ten years, that it is the global dominating supplier

in the chemicals industry. But as a European, I have to ask you, where did we go wrong? Where did the Europeans miss the train? Yeah, this is, those are great questions, Alice. I would say some of the biggest things to change recently was a statement by French President Emmanuel Macron.

He called on the EU to take inspiration from the United States on trade measures aimed at protecting strategic industries in Europe. And then he had this quote, and this really sums up the realization that is dawning not only on Emmanuel Macron, of course, but on many policymakers in Europe. He said, quote, China is literally killing a large part of European industry. And I must say, he couldn't be more correct. We've all heard about floods of Chinese electric vehicles coming into Europe and really dealing body blows to European carmakers. But that is by no means the only sector in Europe that is getting hit. And you mentioned the issue of whether or not Europe should

have woken up to this a long time ago. And, you know, it's so clear that they should. I have been so exasperated looking at Brussels, you know, the center of EU power and looking at the national governments that are members of the European Union and looking at the government here in the UK and wondering why is it that they are failing to heed so many warnings and so many research papers written by think tanks all over Europe talking about the rise of China's tech challenge and the way that this is going to impact one industry after another across Europe and, you know, until people like Macron a couple of months ago started to talk in the way that I've just mentioned, we really didn't get hardly anyone sounding the alarm. But now we have,

and I guess that's why this is topical at the moment. We've got a French-led coalition of five EU countries, that is France, Italy, Spain, the Netherlands, and Lithuania. And they are urging Brussels to rapidly deploy stronger cross-sector tariffs and defensive trade tools to protect European industries from this surge of Chinese state subsidized imports. And the trade deficit that Europe has with China is enormous. It looks like there are forces in Europe, let's put it that way, that are limbering up for a trade war. They want to have a trade war with China. They want to restrict Chinese imports with tariffs and other defensive trade tools.

There is going to be a G7 summit. That's the summit of leaders of the G7 countries. And that will be held in France on June the 15th. And I think that's partly why we're seeing Emmanuel Macron, the French president, start talking about this, because I believe that this, G7 summit may talk a lot about reducing economic reliance on China and talking about the hit that many industries in countries across the G7 are getting from cheap Chinese imports. And we have officials from the European Commission's Directorate General for Trade saying

that they are drawing up, quote, more assertive and effective trade defense policy tools with Beijing. So we've got quite a lot of things going on. Personally, I think that what we may see is some new trade tools being used by Europe to protect their domestic industries against Chinese competition, but I very much doubt whether these will work. And the reason I see, say that is primarily because many of Germany's biggest companies have China as their biggest market in the world. And those big German companies are lobbying the German government to ensure that a trade war or trade friction between the EU and China doesn't get too nasty, because they fear that the Chinese government could turn against their interests in China.

this is a convoluted web. It's hard to know how it's going to evolve. But what are you seeing on this topic, Alice? Okay. I've got to be a bit of a Debbie down on James. I go to so many conferences. I was just in Poland where the standard fair is Europeans complaining about the G2, US China dominating the world, and they're stuck in the middle. And meanwhile, you know, very little the druggy report has been adhered to. There's a lot of talk about export restrictions in tariffs from China. And yes, you know, over a year ago, they did put restrictions and EVs

with tariff measures. But we still continue to see record Chinese exports of EVs into Europe. I thought it was interesting. The Rodium report just had recent data suggesting that while there was a downward cycle in Chinese FDI, both M&A and Greenfield since 2018,

over the last two years, there's been an uptick. So last year, FDI grew 57% year-on-year. And a lot of that is actually driven by both M&A activity, so buying up European companies and greenfield investment into places like Hungary traditionally, but also increasingly France and Germany in the automotive and green tech sector. So automotives and batteries were the highest share of that greenfield FDI investment breakdown.

So my big cynical take and question of sorts is, at the end of the day, do these barriers matter if China is just going to put up shop and factory in Europe, do the kind of reverse tech transfers that part of Brussels actually wants, and bring jobs, manufacturing jobs to Europe in the way that Japan did in the 80s. Remember when Reagan put on voluntary export restrictions, basically tariffs on Japanese goods, in particular, automotives, and then Toyota and other conglomerates responded by setting up factories in middle America.

Maybe that is the future. and all this tariff stuff is just a nothing beggar, but maybe I'm overly cynical. So you're saying, Alice, that it won't save European industry anyway because Chinese investors will move into production sites within the European Union, like Hungary and whatever. Correct. And those guys are going to go out of business anyway. I mean, the Germans and the French, yeah.

Yeah. Yeah. When I was in China, you know, prior to this recent trip in late November, I had a friend of mine who was advising. BMW in China and it's just dire straits and Audi too in terms of just their outlook in China. So then the other question is how much of a lobbying power can they have if their share of the domestic market is ever winnowing? And maybe, you know, we end up in an equilibrium, a Nash equilibrium where the Chinese create jobs in Europe in green tech. And then the Europeans

feel as though they don't need to put on these tariff barriers because the industry is moving to Europe via Chinese firms like BYD and Cherry and CATL. My personal fear is that what we get here is an ill-advised set of trade barriers erected by Europe to keep out Chinese competition, thereby protecting many of the ailments that have got Europe into this state in the first place. In other words, huge inefficiencies across the board. high energy costs, high labor costs, highly restrictive labor laws, restrictive investment laws, very low productivity in almost all countries. So I fear that we could end up with the worst of both worlds.

That is, restrictive policies towards China and that protect inefficiencies in Europe. And then a kind of trade war that eventually China wins. so Europe doesn't reform itself urgently, such as it clearly needs to, and it ends up losing the trade war against China. I fear that that could be the outcome. And I think the next blow, you know, China's counterpunch is going to be, you know, to fight back on European ag. So I'd be worried if I'm a French cognac maker or a Spanish, you know, pig farmer because that's what the Chinese will do. And in agriculture, as you know, is a big lobbying group in Europe, right?

Yep, and of course, China has other tools that it can use as well, such as exports of critical minerals and rare earths, which many European countries need. So if you're going to get into a trade war in China these days, my advice would be prepare well. China has many weapons that it can use, and it has shown that it will use. So if you're in Brussels right now,

you've really got to be cognizant of the forces that you're taking. on. Yeah, the rare earth question is a really important one because obviously they've shown that they're willing to weaponize it. They did it last year twice. And I don't think the Europeans have a good response to that. I haven't yet seen major investment announcements about unshoring rare earth's critical minerals production. They're not as geographically blessed as the North Americans or the Australians in terms of having their own geographic supply domestically. So yeah, that's a really good point. And I wouldn't be surprised if this escalates that China is willing to use that mechanism again.

Okay, let's take one last quick break and stay with us. Hey, y'all, it's Kelly Clarkson with Wayfair. Ever order furniture online and wonder what if? Like, what if it doesn't hold up? That sofa was four days old. You should have ordered from Wayfair. With Wayfair, there's no what if. Just style you love and quality you can trust.

Visit wayfair.ca. Wayfair, every style, every home. In the span of a decade, Ben Shapiro built the Daily Wire into a conservative media empire. He produced hit podcasts that bit at liberal excesses and documentaries and lectures about the founders, the genders, the gospels. He peddled polos, hats, candles,

provided a home for de-platformed conservative stars like Matt Walsh and minted stars like Candice Owens. Let's put a pin in that. The Daily Wire even has kids programming, a judgmental puppet named Zoodles. Zoodles. Zoodoo!

Who shares Shapiro's load-bearing eyebrows. This year, though, the Empire showed signs of collapse. The Daily Wire's YouTube videos are down from millions of views to the low-five figures. Web traffic is plummeting. And recently, Shapiro laid off 13% of his employees. Asked by the Washington Post, what had happened? Shapiro accused other conservatives of click-horing by embracing radical Islam, theorizing about the evils of Winston Churchill and mocking the widow of Charlie Kirk.

The kids still got it. On today explained, the fall of Ben Shapiro. Today Explain drops every weekday afternoon. Buy Now Pay Later is everywhere. And honestly, we need to talk about it. 60% of Coachella goers put their tickets on Buy Now Pay Later this year. You can even pay off your DoorDash order in installments now, like your sushi. So this week on Net Worth and Chill, I'm breaking down exactly how these companies are making money off of you,

why missing one payment can flip your interest rate from zero to nearly 36% of, overnight and the uncomfortable truth about what it really means when you need to split a $200 purchase into four payments. Plus, I'm answering your questions, including what to do if you're already in over your head. Listen wherever you get your podcasts or watch on YouTube.com slash your rich BFF. Welcome back. On a somewhat lighter economic note, some of the world's wealthiest individuals have a new favorite safe haven called Hong Kong. It's overtaken Switzerland as the leading offshore wealth hub in the world, according to a report from the Boston Consulting Group. That is measured by total cross-border assets under management, with Hong Kong ending 2025 at

$2.95 trillion. James, in a way, I wasn't surprised that Switzerland seemed to have peaked and that Hong Kong, relatively speaking, is on the ascendant, you know, having been there multiple times in the last 18 months. I've noticed just more up-died sentiment. Now, this is not economic-driven analysis. It's really based on the vibes, but people in Hong Kong, you know, coming out of COVID were a little bit despondent about the future in the last 18 months. I think they have really turned the corner and they feel that Hong Kong can finally breathe as a cross-border financial hub and a cross-border hub for talent because Beijing wants to use and leverage Hong Kong's international standing to allow both mainland money to flow through and find investments

overseas and foreign investors to find investment opportunities on the mainland as well. And I think that this story is way more than about the stock connects, which we've talked about previously, you know, finding investors to invest onshore in the equities market and vice versa. And it's so increasingly about the wealth connect. So, you know, the rise, for instance, and I just heard this in my last trip in Hong Kong, the rise in mainland bank accounts in Hong Kong with the Hong Kong bank's HSBC or Standard Charter is a reflection on on how mainland people want to diversify their risk in portfolio and Hong Kong is increasingly seen as an attractive proposition.

I think this is what is driving it. This comes at a time where a lot of the fixed term deposits now, it's not clear the size, but I would guess at least in the $2 to $5 trillion range of mainland fixed term deposits that have been five year or so. yielding around 5% has about to expire this year. Current yields for a term deposit is 2%, which is extremely low,

but unlikely to change given that rates are probably going to keep being low or maybe even trend downwards. So then the big question for a lot of mainland investors is where else am I going to park my money with higher returns? Real estate is still declining in terms of value in certain parts of the country. And the equity market is super volatile.

So maybe you park it in these, you know, asset managers, mutual funds, pension funds, not just in the mainland, but in Hong Kong. So I see Hong Kong is really playing an important role in this new evolution in China's capital markets, which is, you know, we started from phase one of getting rich and building wealth. And phase two is really creating a capital market system that helps to maintain and expand family wealth. But that's a long round. I want to get your take on how you see this as well. Actually, I completely agree with everything you've just said.

According to the Boston Consulting Group, Hong Kong ended 2025 with $2.95 trillion US dollars in cross-border assets under management, when this is basically mostly money that's come from mainland China into Hong Kong. And that amount of money represents a 10.7% increase year on year, and it's slightly larger the overall amount of money than Switzerland had in cross-border assets. So that's how we come to the conclusion that Hong Kong has pipped Switzerland as the sort of wealth hub haven.

Boston Consulting Group goes on to say that they project this trend will continue and that by 2030, the gap between Hong Kong and Switzerland will widen to near. nearly 600 billion US dollars. So Hong Kong will be managing more than 600 billion in excess to what Switzerland manages at that time. So they see this as a long-run trend, just as you do, Alice. I personally think that this is largely due to the dynamics of money in the mainland of China and in Hong Kong. If you're a mainland person living in Hong Kong, one of the great boons is that you can change your money from Remminbi into Hong Kong dollars. And the Hong Kong dollar, unlike the Remembe, is a freely convertible currency. You can convert it to any other currency in the world.

You can invest it all over the world. The Remminbi, or the Chinese Yuan, is not a freely convertible currency, especially on the capital account, in other words, for investments. And so that's a big draw for Hong Kong. That's why so much mainland money. flows into Hong Kong because from Hong Kong it can go to the world. Whereas if you're stuck in mainland China, it's much more difficult to get your money out of the country, change it into foreign currency and invest in whatever trend takes your fancy on capital markets around the world. So I think that's the key difference. The other thing I'd say is that I was in Hong Kong during the time of the Hong Kong national security law. That was a sweeping piece of legislation.

that was enacted by Beijing in 2020 to crack down on the demonstrations that had rocked Hong Kong in 2019. And a lot of people at that time, including in the financial industry, were saying quietly, you know, over coffee or dinner, oh, Hong Kong's finished. You know, Hong Kong is no longer going to be the wealth haven, the haven for safe money in this part of the world. but of course that has proven to be completely erroneous. The flow of mainland money into Hong Kong has not only continued, it has accelerated. And now we see Hong Kong as the city in the world with the second largest number of billionaires anywhere. There are 71 billionaires in Hong Kong, and that is second only to New York.

So a lot of billionaires, a lot of tech tycoons in China who've made it, moved to Hong Kong. And actually, I mean, I've seen where a lot of them live. It's a beautiful stretch of land overlooking the coast, where the old UK tycoons used to live. The old guys from Jardine Matterson and Swires from yesteryear, they used to live on this strip of land. And it's now mainland Chinese tycoons. mostly in the tech area. And I understand the richest person in Hong Kong is Robin Zung. He's the chairperson of CATL, which is, of course, the battery maker that we talk a lot about on China Decode. So, yeah, I mean, this is an interesting topic. It just shows that Hong Kong's got legs when it

comes to managing wealthy people's money. I'm somewhat related to this, because Singapore often gets put into the same category in terms of... of this cross-border financial hub in the heart of the Asia-Pacific. And I remember during COVID, a lot of stories of people leaving Hong Kong to go to Singapore, hence, you know, huge influx of Chinese people in Singapore, house prices went up. But since then, I've heard through a couple of friends that people have been moving back to Hong Kong. You know, they find Singapore, quote-unquote, boring.

I'm not necessarily endorsing that point of view. But I'm certainly getting a sense that there has been, you know, a return of a lot of people in that region, Singapore, back to Hong Kong. So my broader question, I haven't gone to answer to this, maybe you do, James, is can Hong Kong out-compete Singapore in terms of taking the crown as the main cross-border hub in the Asia-Pacific? Because I buy this theory that, you know, if I'm looking to the future, it's increasingly not Europe,

which you've just discussed, and Switzerland really is a gateway for European wealth. It's increasingly the Asia-Pacific, where you've got demographics on your side, You've got all the companies and countries that are part of the picks and shovel for AI. So they're doing all the hardware and the electronics part of the AI CAPEX that is really being fueled and financed by American money. So I look at Asia Pacific and I'm pretty bullish. But my general question is, can Hong Kong be more competitive than Singapore, do you think,

having lived in the region? This is a question that I always fear answering. I think they do different things. My sense is that Hong Kong is still more freewheeling, more buccaneering than Singapore. And I remember Li Kuan Yew, the former Prime Minister of Singapore, the former senior minister of Singapore, when he used to come to Hong Kong back in the day, he's now deceased, of course, he would say the same thing. He would say, how come I can get a suit made in Hong Kong in 24 hours, whereas back in Singapore takes me however long. it was. And I just feel that Hong Kong still has that energy. It's got, there's a feeling that Hong Kong is all about the art of the possible, whereas Singapore tends to be more highly regulated,

more conservative. But that's just a personal view. I could well be wrong about that. I'm a huge fan of Hong Kong. I agree with that. There's a kind of preserved wildness about Hong Kong. It's not really clinical or manicured in a way that some other major cosmopolitan cities are, and I find that very refreshing. But one last question for you is, you know, Beijing's relationship with Hong Kong, right? And I think the number one reason I heard that people were leaving Hong Kong was after the protests. They felt as though, and this is not just journalists, there is also people in banking and finance and services. They felt as though Hong Kong had just become the mainland. And I push against that any time I have this conversation with people, because when you go there,

you don't necessarily feel that. Yes, there is more political, I would say, interference in Hong Kong's affairs and the management of Hong Kong. But when I go to Hong Kong, I don't yet feel, you know, this argument that people have that it's increasingly just mainland China. But maybe I haven't been there long enough. Do you have a take on that, James? I do, actually. From the time I was there when the national security law came in, a lot of people, most of them, I would say, probably foreigners, but significant numbers of Hong Kongers as well were saying, okay, this is the end of Hong Kong. Our freedoms, our civil liberties are now ending, and Hong Kong will never be the same. And I'm not blowing my own trumpet, but at the time I said, look, what's happening here is that

your political freedoms are being circumscribed, but your economic freedoms are clearly being safeguarded because China doesn't want to kill the golden goose. And Hong Kong still is a golden goose for China. Look at the number of tech companies, as you were saying earlier on in this podcast, that are listing in Hong Kong. So, you know, I think I remember several rather uncomfortable conversations in which people were telling me I was dead wrong and, you know, this was the end of Hong Kong. But actually, Hong Kong's economic future has continued. to thrive, even though nobody can argue that political rights have not been circumscribed. They absolutely have been circumscribed, and a lot of people find that objectionable,

but that's the situation. It's politically tighter, but economically just as I was, well, maybe not just as freewheeling, but economically still liberal. Yeah, that's an interesting distinction. Thanks for that, James. All right, you know what time it is? It's prediction time. as you look into the future this week, what do you see?

Well, I'm going back to the question of whether or not Europe will have a full-blown trade war with China. This is the buzz at the moment in Brussels and several other European capitals. And I'm going to say that Europe will not have a full-blown trade war with China. There may be some skirmishes, but ultimately the interests of Germany's big multinational. that are in China and doing business will prevail. These companies will lobby their parliament back home, their government back home to resist a trade war. And I think that the German government's view will ultimately prevail in Brussels. And we won't have a full-blown trade war. We might have the skirmish, but there won't be a full-blown trade war. I think I agree with that,

given that Mercer's language vis-a-vis China's changed, I would have expected a more hawkish mertz given his profile but I've been actually quite surprised and then the next question is this year who come who replaces Macron because all that really matters is that French-German access in terms of what they think about trade and China policy so mine is not too differentiated it's in the realm of currencies and trade so OECD just came out with a report it's pretty shocking 60% of Chinese market gains are driven by some subsidies. This is based on their own calculation. And what's interesting is in the last couple months year to date, CNY has been up 3.4% against the dollar. It's also been up against

most other trade-weighted currencies in its basket. I don't think that that is durable in a time where we might see real shock to China's export engine if demand destruction holds globally because of what's happening in Iran on the oil supply shock front. So I think that we'll start to see a gradual walking back, a pairing back of some of the appreciating gains of CNY against the dollar. You know, we're currently at 6.7. I think it might dip a little bit more before it starts to rebound in the second half of the year and move closer towards the seven region. That's my take, primarily because I think it's not going to be advantageous or supportive for exports if we continue to see and appreciate. All right, that's all for this episode. Thank you for listening to China Decode. This is a

production of Prof G Media. Make sure to follow us wherever you get your podcast so you don't miss an episode and we'll talk to you again next week.