The Prof G Pod with Scott Galloway - China Decode: Is China Quietly Taking Control of the Iran Conflict?

Episode Date: April 7, 2026

Big news! We’ve been nominated for a Webby Award for Best News & Politics Podcast! Now it’s time to bring it home — and we need your help.  Cast your vote HERE: https://wbby.co/57448N Tensions in West Asia are escalating fast. Trump is threatening Iran, while China and Pakistan step in with a surprise peace plan that could reshape the conflict—and global energy markets. Alice Han and James Kynge break down whether it could actually de-escalate the crisis or shift the balance of power in the region. They also dig into China’s new trade investigations against the U.S. and a major FBI cyber breach, exploring what these developments mean for the upcoming Trump-Xi summit and the broader U.S.-China relationship. Finally, Alice and James look at China’s AI boom, as models like OpenClaw surge in usage, transforming cloud pricing and the global AI landscape. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

What goes up must come down, except when it comes to gas prices. The price tends to rocket up very quickly at the pump as when crude oil prices go up. But gasoline prices tend to take a little bit longer to go down in many cases. This week, Unexplained to me, why gas and everything else is so expensive these days. Find new episodes Sundays wherever you get your podcasts. Support for the show comes from Hostinger. Ever had an idea for a business or side hustle, but never actually launched it? With Hostinger, you can turn that idea into something real in minutes instead of weeks.

Hostinger is an all-in-one platform that brings everything into one place, your domain, website, email marketing, AI tools, and AI agents. He can create websites, online stores, and custom apps with simple prompts. Then, use AI agents to automate tedious tasks and grow your business. Go to hostinger.com slash the prop G20 to bring your ideas online for under $3 a month. Use promo code the Prop G20 for an extra 20% off. I don't think that either the US or Israel is going to be keen to allow China to take a leading role in a peace process in this Iran war or the war in the Gulf. It's just too important for the US and Israel. They don't want China to be playing a leading role in this regard.

Yet I do think that this peace plan by China with Pakistan sort of taking the lead, but China pulling the strings behind it is important. And I think the reason for that is that it allows China yet again to claim the diplomatic high ground from the US. Welcome to China Decode. I'm Alas Han. And I'm James King. In today's episode of China Decode, we're discussing Trump threatening Iran. as China and Pakistan propose a peace plan, China launching trade investigations into the U.S. ahead of the Trump-She summit, and how the adoption of open-claw AI in China is surging, reshaping the token economy and cloud adoption.

All right, let's get into it. Tensions in West Asia are escalating as U.S. President Donald Trump threatens to hit Iran, quote, back to the stone ages, while China and Pakistan unveil a five-point peace plan aimed at halting the conflict. The initiative calls for an immediate ceasefire, reopening the Strait of Hormuz and launching diplomatic talks, posing a potential geopolitical pivot in a war that the U.S. hoped would cripple to run. But there's another layer here. As Beijing publicly pushes for de-escalation, a new report reveals that Chinese firms are simultaneously marketing AI-powered intelligence tools that can track and expose U.S. military movements in the region. Using satellite imagery, flight data and open-source intelligence, these companies, some with ties to the Chinese military, are mapping American bases,

naval deployments, and strike activity in real time. All right, James, we're in week five. of this conflict in the Middle East. It seems that the strait hasn't been opened as of yet, although some ships are coming through destined for China. China is getting hit in terms of oil imports, but what's been interesting is that they have come in support of the Pakistanis to deliver this peace plan. Now, Trump is not taking it seriously, but what was your thinking behind this peace plan and do you think it actually has legs? Well, I think, you know, the first question is, is it a credible peace plan? My short answer to that is that it's only as credible as the other

key players, i.e. the U.S. and Israel, allow it to be. And as you've just hinted, Alice, I don't think that either the U.S. or Israel is going to be keen to allow China to take a leading role in a peace process in this Iran war or the war in the Gulf. It's just too important for the U.S. and Israel. They don't want China to be playing a leading role in this regard. Yet I do think that this peace plan by China with Pakistan sort of taking the lead, but China pulling the strings behind it is important. And I think the reason for that is that it allows China yet again to claim the diplomatic high ground from the US, presenting itself as a peacemaker, while leaving people to draw their own conclusions that the US is a warmonger.

And I also think it's important because at the margin, it could have an influence on how events in the war in the Gulf unfold. Just a couple of factual references on the plan itself. This does, I think, amount to an initiative that is more than just posturing. The reason I say that is because significant work has clearly been done. behind the scenes. There has been several hours of talks between Pakistan and Beijing, talks between the respective foreign ministers of Pakistan and Beijing, and because there are five points in the peace plan that have been mentioned. Immediate cessation of hostilities is number

one. The start of peace talks as soon as possible is another. The end of attacks on civilian and non-military infrastructure is another. The fourth is restore safe passage through the Strait of Hormuz, and the last is a comprehensive peace framework. The other interesting aspect is that there are credible reports of a four-way meeting between Pakistan, Turkey, Saudi Arabia, and Egypt. These are all Muslim countries that may be seen as more palatable by Iran as negotiations, as negotiating partners.

So there has clearly been work behind the scenes between China and Pakistan and between the four countries that I've just mentioned. That means that this is more than mere posturing by China to paint the US in a bad light and claim some of the moral high ground for China. But does this really have legs

in terms of something that is going to bring peace to the region and is going to start unrestricted shipping through the straight of hormones. I think we're far away from that so far, Alice. But what's your take on it? How are you seeing this? I completely agree with you, James. This is a diplomatic move for the Chinese and the Pakistanis to show that they have skin in the game and the stakeholders in the peace process. I think Trump's speech the other day makes it abundantly clear that he reserves the option to escalate militarily. They've got deployed, you know, thousands of troops to the region. and he is willing, I think, to commit boots on the ground,

starting in Carg Island or other aspects of the strait to really take over control of the Strait of Hormuz that obviously will have major military and political ramifications for the administration. But certainly his speech made it clear that within two to three weeks, this could escalate with a U.S. military response in the region with boots in the ground and Iran. And I'm not sure how the Chinese would respond in that scenario.

I was going to throw that question back at you, But I think as this conflict draws out, we're now in week five, we reach a point at which the Chinese country as a whole is going to suffer the energy implications. We've talked at length about how China is, in some respect, insulated, buffered for three to four months because of its strategic reserves, and the way in which it's diversified oil flows from other parts of the world like Russia. But the fact of the matter is, if you look at some of the strain that's being put on the system, you look at T-Pontor. refineries capacities, for instance, there's going to become a point in the next two months where, you know, something needs to change or else this is going to have massive energy and then, you know, cost-push inflation implications for China. So I would assume that the Chinese will try to make some kind of a deal whereby they get, you know, early access so called to the

Strait of Hormuz. Now we've seen, you know, some Chinese flagships have passed the region along with Pakistani and Indian, more recently South Korean as well. So I could see more pressure being put on by the Chinese vis-à-vis Iran to get more access to oil in the region. Because, you know, as we've known in the past, more than 50% of oil bound to China comes from the Strait of Hormuz, comes from that region. Although not as high as Trump is saying in the Financial Times,

which is 90%, about 6% of its total energy consumption, and close to 50% of seibo-born oil comes from that. region through the Strait of Hormuz. So I could see China coming at least bilaterally to try to get access to more oil from this region. But the fact of the matter is everyone is sitting on their seats, including the Iranians, to see if Trump is actually going to deliver on that threat to actually escalate militarily. But do you think, you know, if you were to put your thinking cap on from the Washington's perspective, do you think that's plausible? Yeah, I mean, I think it's plausible. But where I think China's credibility as a real peacemaker in this situation falls down,

is that China is highly unlikely, I think, to act as a security guarantor of a peace plan in this region. I think, you know, China has said that it supports mediation by Pakistan and other countries to end this war and to move to a peace process. But if mediation doesn't work, or if mediation starts to work and then falls apart because people start fighting again, then there has to be a question of who's steps in to secure the security of the region. And I don't see that being China. I don't think that China would in any sense be willing to use its military to try to keep peace on behalf of Iran. It certainly wouldn't want to get into some kind of a conflict with the U.S. and Israel.

So the idea of China is a genuine security guarantor, I think, is a non-starter. And that, to me, puts a big hole in this idea of China's five-pocket. peace plan for the region. It's just far too complicated. Mediation can only go so far. At the end, at the end of the day, you have to have somebody who will stand in to guarantee the security. And I don't think that that is China. Yeah. And just very quickly, this sort of segues nicely with future discussions about AI. But it's interesting if you've seen this, James. The Shanghai company Kourin Meets a Vision has posted real-time satellite imagery of American military movements in the run-up, actually to Operation Epic Fury that started in February 28.

So they posted some of this an X, and it wouldn't be at all a stretch of the imagination to say that the Iranians could have gotten access to this data. Now, you know, we have to ask, to what extent are the Chinese sharing this surveillance imagery with the American, sorry, and now we have to ask to what extent the Chinese are sharing this surveillance imagery

to the Iranian military. But the fact of the matter is that this data, they're publicly accessible. And so it brings into question how safe the U.S. military is in the region if a lot of the data are being leaked by these Chinese AI companies that I thought was quite interesting and may expose the U.S.-China relationship to some friction, I think. Absolutely agree with you there. I mean, we've seen one F-15 U.S. aircraft get shot down.

That's another fast-moving situation. it could create tensions that we can't yet judge between the U.S. and China. But I think you're absolutely right to point to this surveillance ability that China seems to have. This is a big setback for the U.S.'s war ambitions in Iran. Okay, we'll be back with more. After a quick break, stay with us. Support for the show comes from Vanguard. To all the financial advisors out there, the ones whose job is to help their clients keep more of what they earn,

Vanguard is here to help you out. Vanguard is slashing fees again, this time for more than 50 of its funds. That's on top of big fee cuts they already gave last year to investors in 87 of their funds. In an increasingly high-priced world, Vanguard is staying true to excellence without expense. Not only do your clients keep more of what they invest, they get sophisticated, active, and index funds at industry leading low costs. And a fixed-income team obsessed with consistent outperformance. Low fees give Vanguard's skilled bond managers more freedom to maneuver as they pursue this. that goal. And low fees help you deliver greater value as an advisor. Top performance shouldn't come at a higher cost. Go see the record for yourself at vanguard.com slash impact. That's vanguard.com

slash impact. All investing is subject to risk vanguard marketing corporation distributor. Support for the show comes from Upwork. Scaling your business isn't about executing some growth hack. It's about knowing when to delegate, even when that means hiring someone new. Upwork can help. They make it easy to bring in the right freelancer when you need them so you can stay focused on what you do best. With Upwork, you can browse profiles, review past work, and get help scoping the role so you can hire with confidence and get started quickly. Seriously, you could connect with the right freelancer in just a few hours, especially when you sign up with Business Plus. Their AI-powered short-listing pairs you with the top 1% of talent in under six hours. No

endless searching required. Upwork also cuts down operational hassle by handling things like contracts and payments in one place, so you can spend more time running your business. Thousands of growing businesses already trust Upwork to hire flexible, high-quality freelance talent for everything from one-off projects to ongoing support. Visit Upwork.com right now and post your job for free. That's Upwork.com to connect with top talent ready to help your business grow. That's UPWORK.com. Support for the show comes from LinkedIn.

It's a shame when the best B2B marketing gets wasted on the wrong audience. Like, imagine running an ad for cataract surgery on Saturday morning cartoons or running a promo for this show on a video about Roblox or something. No offense to our Gen Alpha listeners, but that would be a waste of anyone's ad budget. So, when you want to reach the right professionals, you can use LinkedIn ads. LinkedIn has grown to a network of over 1 billion professionals and 130 million decision makers according to their data. That's where it stands apart from other ad buyers. You can target your buyers by job title, industry, company role seniority, skills, company revenue, all so you can stop wasting budget on the wrong audience. That's why LinkedIn ads boast one of the highest B2B return on ad spend of all online ad networks.

Seriously, all of them. Spend $250 on your first campaign on LinkedIn ads and get a free $250 credit for the next one. Just go to LinkedIn.com slash Scott. That's LinkedIn.com slash Scott. Terms and conditions apply. Welcome back. China has launched two trade investigations. into U.S. practices retaliating against similar probes by the Trump administration just

a weeks before a planned summit between President's Trump and Xi Jinping. The investigations target U.S. policies that Beijing says disrupt global supply chains and block Chinese green tech exports, signaling political tensions as the world's two largest economies prepare for high-stakes talks. Adding another layer of complexity, the U.S. FBI recently declared a suspected China-linked hack of a U.S. surveillance system, a quote-unquote major cyber incident, suggesting sensitive data on agency networks may have been compromised. James, just really quickly looking into this, the timing couldn't be worse for Trump and Xi in a way, right, because they haven't met in Beijing. They may meet, you know, mid-May, although that hasn't been confirmed from the Chinese side. The Chinese, it

appears, a retaliate against the Section 301 probes that US put on after AEPA was struck down by SCOTUS, does this at all put a spanner in the works for a Trump-Shee summit? Should we read deeply into this as being a portender for doom? I think it's bigger than just the Trump-C summit that we now think is supposed to take place in May. I think it shows just how deep the tensions and the problems between the US and China really are. You've just been referencing in the previous segment that China is able to hack into U.S. operations in Iran. And now we're talking about a different form of a security breach that China has been able to affect inside the U.S. I think this shows just how little the security state or the deep state, as we sometimes

call it, in both countries, trust each other. And I think that goes much deeper than a summit between President Trump and Xi Jinping of China, because that summit is really, even if it takes place on time in May, is really all about mood music. It's about trying to sort of put a bottom under the relationship which has been deeply damaged in recent years. But I think this just shows that behind the attempts to put a brave face on relations and to sort of contain this slide in U.S.-China ties particularly over trade, you have the security states kind of grinding away, and there is no trust or very little trust between the security states of both countries. And so every time, you know, you try to get some kind of diplomatic progress between the U.S.

and China, you get it removed or taken away, eroded by something that happens behind the cloak of secrecy, as it were, in the real deep state relationship between the U.S. and China. Well, it reminds me of, you know, the Obama years when we had that previous hack into, you know, federal data, federal agency data, I believe is the OPM hack. And, you know, it's interesting how these things end up being quite political or they use to score political points. The fact of the matter is I'm pretty sure that, you know, some level of cyber theft, cybersecurity violations happen throughout the relationship, but oftentimes they get deployed politically to drive home message. And so my deeper underlying concern

is that the timing of this at a time where, you know, you've also got some trade investigations in both sides, where you haven't really seen real meat on the bones in the lead up by the seconds and thirds of Trump and Xi before a meeting, again, you know, even if everything points towards positive mood music, I still think that the underlying currents are quite difficult. And you add to that some of the recent stories that we just mentioned, you know, Chinese satellite imagery being potentially being used to help the Iranians, although maybe not deliberately so, that could really easily turn into Trump potentially going sour on China. Although another read of that is that maybe if he escalates or he doesn't escalate and Iran becomes a real quagmire nightmare,

he'll need to use a positive China relationship to spin his foreign policy. Both, I think, equally feasible. But what's interesting to me to frame it more generally is that the U.S. hasn't really shifted the trade relationship that much. you know, as much as Jamison Greer talks about the Board of Trade and trying to reduce the deficit with the Chinese, the fact of the matter is that even although the bilateral deficit has been reduced quite significantly, because a lot of Chinese exports aren't going directly to the U.S., they're being rerouted. So the bilateral number doesn't reflect the final destination of goods going to the U.S. maybe through third-party countries like Southeast Asia, like Mexico.

and you almost agree at USTR and Besson at State, even though they threatened last year, haven't really gone through with the rules of origin to really line by line figure out where all these goods are coming from and in that way control the trade relationship. So right now it feels very hollow all this discussion about trade investigations, reducing the deficit. You add to that the fact that actually US exports to China, which is something that the administration would like to see grow, have actually first. fallen. They fell in nominal terms, 26% in 2025. And by some estimates, trade in terms of US exports to China should have been $90 billion higher last year, but due to trade wars, that did not happen.

So when I added all together, it seems like all of these are politically motivated, and maybe they're motivated these stories, the FBI story, the trade probes, to try to get the Chinese to make concessions ahead of a Trump summit. But right now, it looks like the US is in a weaker position. mainly because of what's happening in Iran. So let's take one last quick break and stay with us. Hi, I'm Brne Brown. And I'm Adam Grant. And we're here to invite you to the Curiosity Shop.

A podcast that's a place for listening, wondering, thinking, feeling, and questioning. It's going to be fun. We rarely agree. But we almost never disagree. And we're always learning. That's true. You can subscribe to the Curiosity Shop on YouTube or find follow in your favorite podcast app to automatically receive new episodes every Thursday.

It's today explained. President Trump has not made a coherent case for his war in Iran. And last night, he said he's not ending it yet. We're going to hit them extremely hard over the next two to three weeks. We're going to bring them back to the Stone Ages where they belong. His ally, Tucker Carlson, has been making a very coherent case against the war. Because it doesn't serve American interests. in any conceivable way.

And let me just say that if it does in some way serve the interests of the United States, I'd love to hear it. I haven't heard. On Tuesday, we asked Carlson about his break with Trump and about how the Trump coalition is splintering as some young conservatives abandon the president and embrace something darker. It becomes like all of a sudden like, hey, you kids, why you listen to Elvis Presley and that rock music is bad? Like all of a sudden, Fuentes controls the conversation and becomes the cool kid. And the net effect is to make the Holocaust a joke. Today explained every weekday wherever you get your podcasts. All the way back in the year 2000, Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos had this big idea that maybe the future wasn't typing, it was talking to your computer with your voice.

Jeff Bezos didn't invent this idea, but he did push his team to invent what would become Alexa and the Amazon Echo. Two things that brought voice computing into millions of homes. around the world. This week on version history, our chat show about the best and worst and most interesting products in tech history, we're telling the whole story of the echo and how Amazon managed to get it right and still kind of missed the future. That's version history on YouTube and wherever you get podcasts. Welcome back. China's large language models are outpacing the U.S. for a fourth consecutive week fueled by the rise of AI agents like OpenClaw that dramatically increased token usage. Now, this surge is reshaping.

cloud pricing in China, enterprise adoption, and the global AI token economy, signaling a shift from simple chat models to task executing AI agents at massive scale. James, I believe you just came back from China, and apparently this was all the rage. I mean, I've been seeing it, the so-called lobster farming, that's what they call it, using open claw and rejinging it for different purposes, but this expression, Yang Lung Shia, which means lobster farming, has taken over China. you see a lot of these lobstre plushies going around. But I really want to hear your perspective, having been there on the ground.

Yeah, I spent just over a couple of weeks in China, and I was researching a lot of things such as robots and AI and other tech topics mainly. But just to kick off, for listeners who may not know exactly what OpenClaw is, it's a free and open source AI agents. So it's designed to act as a virtualist. that can actually execute tasks rather than just chat with you. So, for instance, it connects to large language models like Claude or Deepseek or Open AIs, chat GPT, and then it integrates them into messaging apps so that basically when you're using

open claw, you only have to ask it to perform tasks like booking flights or managing calendars or writing code, and it'll do that for you. So in that sense, it's different from a kind of a chat bot that will only sort of respond to your questions. As you said, everybody is talking about open claw in China. I mean, I really think, of course, I was moving in tech circles, but it was the biggest topic of conversation people would want to ask me about it. I would want to ask them about it. And the adoption in China of this is really quite amazing. So far, about 67% of Chinese industrial firms have deployed AI agents in production in China. That's compared to about 34% in the US.

So that's all agents. That's not just OpenClau, but you can see that OpenClau is now really becoming popular. The other aspect of OpenClau is that it sort of came out of left field. It was developed by Peter Steinberger, who's an Austrian programmer, And it was released in November 2025, and it quickly became one of the fastest growing open-source projects in GitHub history. But the Chinese have now taken this to heart. And maybe because it's open source, maybe that's the attraction here. But it is so convenient.

You just have to ask it to do certain tasks, and it'll get on and do them for you. But what are you seeing as the implications of this, Alice? It reminds me of a previous discussion. you and I had James where I said that China would be a fast adopter of these super agents. I called it, you know, China 10 years ago was living through super apps, mainly 10 cents, WeChat and Alibaba's AliPay. And now those super apps will give rise to an ecosystem of super agents, where these agents have access to every aspect of your life, your calendar,

your flight bookings, your children's, you know, school records, food deliveries, et cetera, et cetera. And it seems like this is already happening, which is why I'm going to call this lobster mania, you know, in a nod to Beatlemania from your country. I just think that this is perfectly natural that a country where digital adoption has been so fast, where people are willing to try new things and are less scared about privacy from a data perspective, it was perfectly natural that this would take a sweep over China. I've read, and I'd be interested to know your opinion on this, but I've read that the rise of agentic tools in China apparently is being reflected in the Chinese consumption of tokens.

The National Data Administration revealed just this week that at the end of 2025, so in December, there were 100 trillion tokens being consumed. That's a metric for AI consumption. And this month, so the month of March, rather, 140 trillion tokens were consumed. That's just to show you how in the space of three months we've grown in AI usage. And it seems that a lot of companies and people are retooling and rejigging open claw to create new application. So for instance, this one guy apparently retold it as a tool for 10 cent.

So he called it QClaw. And basically it allows him to deploy open claw and send orders via WeChat. He can interface with it via a WeChat app. But then he had this huge data issues where some of his data were erased entirely. And that brings me to my next question, which is how worried will we be that there is it going to be a government backlash because if you recall in 2021 we saw a massive tech crackdown. Now, if you had been living in China the year before that or even 2019, 2018, you would have been hard pressed to think that that was going to be the future because it was all about

internet economy, digital applications. Now we're all about AI. Certainly the five-year plan was all about it. And adoption is really high, for instance. Ninety-three percent of respondents, according to a KPMG survey last year said in China that they already use AI for work. I'm sure that's higher than the UK or the US. And apparently 69% of the Chinese believe that they see benefits outweighing the risks versus in the US it's only 35% who believe that benefits outweigh the risks in terms of using AI. I'm talking really fast because this is a really exciting topic for me personally. But my big question to you, James, is when do we hear the music stop?

because this can't be good for the everyday consumer's security and privacy. That's right. But you also mentioned the backlash, and I must say I left China with a very strong sense that some kind of correction or backlash indeed has to come. And this is simply because literally everyone I spoke to who doesn't work in the AI area seem to be concerned about employment, about the rising level of unemployed, among young people in particular. Just to give you a sense of this, I think a lot of people are now concerned in China

that AI is just taking their job. A lot of people are looking at their peers and the struggles that their peers are having to find jobs and drawing the conclusion that AI has already taken those jobs. And this only will be accelerated by the adoption of agents such as OpenClaw, which, as we've just described, moves the locus from a chat GPT type dynamic where you can ask a chatbot to do research for you

to a new locus of action where you ask the agents to perform a task for you. That's a very different thing. That is going to strip quite a lot of people of their jobs. So I left China both amazed by the speed of China's tech advance and deeply concerned that the backlash may well be coming. You're not the only one, James, because I just saw this posted a couple months ago in December

by the Cyberspace Administration of China in which they regulate the quote-unquote humanized, or another way to translate is anthropomorphic, AI interactive services. And some of the articles reflect on the moral difficulties or the moral problems with AI services given to elderly users that, quote-unquote, simulate their relatives or specific relationships. There's another article, Article 12, that talks about putting the need to put on a minor mode, meaning to protect minors underage peoples, you know, either through time blocks or time restrictions or really blocking them from certain accounts. So I think we're starting to see the wheels moving, but I think right now, I think the government's still in the mode of let it rip because

we want to compete against the US and AI and we want AI to boost productivity. I think they still have drunk the Kool-Aid on that. I agree. I think the government is still in the mode of let it rip, but I think that if you're on the ground in China talking to normal people, let it rip is not a policy that has legs. People are very, very concerned about losing their jobs to AI. All right, James, you know what time it is? It is prediction time. What's your view for the future this week? My prediction is related to what I was just talking about, this sense that the march of AI, which is truly breathtaking in China, quite on a different scale from anything I've seen, I think we can see in the West, is going to have adverse effects.

And I think that it could be bigger than what I'm about to say, but I think that when it comes to jobs of graduates, particularly those graduates that will be graduating this summer, I think we're going to see an upsurge in unemployment. And so the unemployment rate among urban 18 to 24-year-olds, I feel could exceed 20% at some point this year. This would exceed the peak of 2025 when it rose to about 18.9% in August.

And I think this is a very sensitive number in China. I don't know if the Chinese government will announce the number, but if they do, I reckon it will go above 20%, which is going to be a politically sensitive number, I reckon. So I will go back to Iran and say, I think in the next couple of months, Operation Epic Fury will have failed and will end up with Operation Tolbooth. I'm just making it up as I go along. But I think the Strait of Hormuz is going to effectively be an Iranian toll booth. And I think the Chinese will negotiate to be at the start of the line because they're going to need to have access to oil pretty soon.

That will probably be negotiated bilaterally. I just look at what's happening on the ground and Trump statements in US resolve and I'm very pessimistic about how this ends from a military perspective for the US and I think we end up with Iranians stronger and taking control of the Strait of Hormuz and the Chinese negotiating it economically

to get access pretty soon. They'll need it. China Decode is now available on Substat Subscribers get ad-free episodes, our exclusive newsletter, and a place to engage with James and me and other listeners. Find us at chinaddecode.profgemedia.com. That's all for this episode.

Thank you for listening to China Decode. Make sure to follow us wherever you get your podcast so you don't miss an episode. Talk to you again next week.