The Prof G Pod with Scott Galloway - China Decode: The Global AI Race

Episode Date: September 23, 2025

In this episode of China Decode, Alice Han and James Kynge discuss China’s decision to block Nvidia’s newest AI chips—what’s behind the move, and what it could mean for the global AI race. They also break down the long-running TikTok saga, now moving toward a new U.S. ownership structure—who will really control the app and its algorithm? Finally, they explore a social media trend capturing Chinese Gen Z’s nostalgia for the “boom years,” revealing what today’s young people are longing for and why. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Rinse takes your laundry and hand delivers it to your door, expertly cleaned and folded. So you could take the time once spent folding and sorting and waiting to finally pursue a whole new version of you. Like T-time U. Or this T-time U. Or even this T-time U. Said you hear about Dave? Or even T-time, T-time, T-time, T-time U. So update on Dave.

It's up to you. We'll take the laundry. Rinse. It's time to be great. Did you lock the front door? Check. Close the garage door? Yep. Installed window sensors, smoke sensors, and HD cameras with night vision?

No. And you set up credit card transaction alerts, a secure VPN for a private connection and continuous monitoring for our personal info on the dark web? Uh, I'm looking into it. Stress less about security. Choose security solutions from TELUS for peace of mind at home and online. Visit TELUS.com slash Total Security to learn more. Conditions apply.

Certainly, I think a lot of U.S. investors are salivating when they look at TikTok because they see the eyeballs, the potential, the growth, the different income streams that could arise from a stake in TikTok. Welcome to China Decode. I'm Alice Han. And I'm James King. In today's episode of China Decode, we're discussing China pulling the plug on Navidia's AI chips. the latest on the U.S.-China TikTok deal and how China's Gen Z is looking back and dreaming of the boom years. So let's get right into it. We're still following the news that Navidia's AI chips just got the cold shoulder in China. The country's top internet regulator has reportedly told major tech firms like Alibaba and BytD

that they should stop buying and testing Navidia's newest chip, the R2X Pro 6,000D. This is a chip Navidia designed specifically. for the Chinese market in compliance with U.S. export controls. And this is a big deal, apart from it being a very cumbersome and difficult name, which a lot of these chips are, this really matters because the people that I speak to I rate really highly in the chip world basically have equated chips to the oil of the digital economy. And Chinese companies have been stockpiling on these chips over the last few years.

In fact, they've ordered thousands of these chips since July, and now they've been told to pull the plug. Navidia CEO, Jensen Huang, said he's quote-unquote. disappointed, noting that the company can only serve markets that actually want its products. And right now, Beijing is signaling that it just doesn't want Navidia's chips. I do hope that the United States and the Chinese government work out their perspective on what's the best way to share technology and share markets. And I have every confidence that's going to get worked out.

This move comes amid China's accusations that Navidia is violating antitrust rules and claims on the part of China that its own homegrown chips and now as competitive as Navidia's offerings. James, I know this topic can seem very niche and very arcane, but can you describe to us in plainest language why these chips matter and how big this is a deal for Navidia? A great quote there, Alice, you know, the oil of the digital economy, that really sums it up. These chips make everything work in the digital economy. And for Nvidia, it really is huge. I mean, I think we first of all have to realize how big NVIDIA is as a company. It's capitalized on the stock market at $4.3 trillion U.S. dollars.

That means that this one company, this one American company, is worth more than a trillion dollars more than the entire UK economy. So really, whatever news is coming out with regard to China and NVIDIA, it could be measured in the hundreds of billions of U.S. dollars in stock market value. And the news that came out, as you said, from China this week was huge, that they don't want this Nvidia chip that you mentioned. And, you know, we don't know how much further this is going to go. We don't know if the Chinese government is going to get tougher on all kinds of invidia chips. Now, the Chinese market accounts for about 13% of Nvidia's global revenues.

And actually, it's pretty well understood that that's a big underestimate because there's huge smuggling of invidia chips into China through places like Singapore. So if Nvidia loses the Chinese market, and we don't know if that's going to happen yet, but if it does, then it will have a significant impact on the stock market, price or Nvidia and also on the company's revenues. This news was greeted by a 3% sell-off in Nvidia shares, but I think we can be clear that this is just a fairly modest decline because most of the market participants, the investors, they don't think this is curtains for Nvidia in China. They think that what's underway is more of a shadow play between America's

biggest company and the Chinese authorities, and eventually some kind of deal will be done. And we've just heard the news that Trump and Xi Jinping are going to meet in November in South Korea and then again next year for a summit meeting. So I think what's happening is that the market thinks that this will all be patched up and Nvidia will be able to sell some chips we don't know which to China as it has done in the past. That's my reading. I don't know about you, Alice. James, I was going to add, given that I was just in China two weeks ago, a lot of the discussion that I had with some of these entrepreneurs and some of them were in the semiconductor space was that Jensen Huang lobbied hard because he was very worried that the CUDA architecture, basically what was described to me as the operating system for chips and the video users would basically be jockeyed out of the country if Trump didn't relax some of these export restrictions, including on age 20s, which are not the leading edge chips that previously during the Biden administration adhered to the export controls for China. That seems quite plausible to me that he is in a desperate situation

where he's seeing competitors like Huawei and Smic who almost every other day, and including today, are announcing that they have Ascend chips, they have cutting-edge AI chips that they can completely manufacture in-house and design in-house. My sort of question that I'm grappling with, and I struggle with this because I see arguments on both sides, is to what extent are the Chinese puffing themselves up when it comes to these semiconductor

capabilities? Because on the one side, you definitely have the bulls who say, well, Huawei can generate all these, you know, even close to three nanometer chips, but they can do these clusters that can perform just as well as potentially Navidia. On the other side, you hear people in the bear side who say, even if they're, you know, producing more, they're not going to have the same compute capabilities as Navidia's cutting-edge chips. But where do you sit on this debate, James. I'm curious. Well, I mean, that's a huge question. And I think there's a lot of debate about that. I had an opportunity this week in London actually to meet with a delegation of senior Chinese officials. And we spoke a little bit about this. And their point was that

China's self-sufficiency in advanced chips must happen. They were absolutely clear that this is a priority of the Chinese government. And actually, this goes back quite some time. I remember, I remember reporting from China 20 years ago. I remember the president of the time, Jiang Zemin, saying that if China remained dependent on the West for semiconductors, he said, then the West will always have us by the throat. And he was the same president of China that had his son start one of the very first big semiconductor ventures in China. So I'm not surprised to hear this mantra of China must achieve self-sufficiency in chips. But the question is, are they actually going to do it? We can look at some of the resources that China's put into this. About 150 billion U.S. dollars in grants since 2014. That puts the U.S. Chips Act funding into the shade. It's about three times as much as the funding from the Chips Act. But the really big question now resides with these companies that you've mentioned, Huawei, Alibaba, and some other big Chinese tech companies, Huawei's chips,

especially the Ascend series, are supposed to be getting close to some of the best performers that NVIDIA can put out. And particularly, if you cluster several hundred, several thousands of these Huawei chips together, you can get what's called superclusters. And these Huawei superclusters are apparently really catching up with Invidio superclusters in terms of their efficacy in AI, in artificial intelligence. So it's rather involved. I don't think anyone has a clear answer to the question. But as far as I can see, and as far as my research is concerned, China is definitely catching up. Yeah, I go back again to why this matters. I think a couple years ago when China seemed to be behind the curve on chip development, and everyone was saying, you know, these export

controls from Trump and then Biden are really canny. They're going to be a choke point for China. They're not going to be able to catch up. I sensed that this was going to have material impacts for the AI rollout or even the discussion about AGI, which we'll get to in just a bit. But when I was there three years ago, the general feeling was from the people I spoke to in China, yes, we're screwed when it comes to semiconductors, but we'll have to. good enough workarounds through, and they didn't say illegal smuggling, but it does happen through smuggling and increasing stockpiles through potentially illegal means, but also through some of the domestic options like SMIC, SMIC, which is a fab based in China. They felt as though

they had the workarounds to support EVs, AVs, the IOT industry. But when it came to AI inference and training, which requires strong compute and memory, there was a realization and I think even an admission from the people I spoke to in China that this would seriously hold them back. That, I think rhetoric has shifted when I was in China two weeks ago. There was this feeling, to your point, James, is that now China is getting better at AI chip design. They have some fabs that maybe not on the level of TSMC, but they're getting there. And certainly, I think what is important that I don't think gets covered enough is that

you still have TSM producing Chinese design chips. So even if Huawei and Alibaba are saying that they're designing all their chips in-house, they still need fabs, and some of these fabs are outside of China. So I think it's kind of erroneous or potentially overly simplistic to say that these are all completely made in China. There's still a huge ecosystem that supports Taiwanese and Chinese innovation on the semiconductor side. But to again wrap this argument back around to AI, I think this is going to have to

have serious implications when the West considers China's AI rollout. Because a couple years ago, as I mentioned, people were very skeptical about AI because they saw the chip, the hardware constraint, and they said, well, this is going to really screw them when it comes to training. Absolutely. And I think, you know, particularly this is all about what's called AGI, that's artificial general intelligence. And it's difficult to sort of define what this but it's seen in the industry as the kind of Eldorado of the artificial intelligence industry. It's the point where machines become so clever that they can start learning for themselves.

And therefore, their learning process can happen at warp speed. And really, I was told by a US analyst close to the Pentagon this week, that really what's happening now between China and the US is that their competition in these AI chips is being driven by this race to achieve AGI artificial general intelligence quicker than the other competitor. We don't know who's going to win that race. But if China wins, according to the analysts that I spoke to, then it will mean that its military development in all kinds of technologies will get a leg up. And that's what's really scaring the US. And similarly, it's scaring China too from the other perspective. So we're in this kind of extraordinary, I won't call it

an arms race, but it's clearly a chip race or a chip war, which is part of what people talk about when they talk about the new Cold War between the U.S. and China. And it has echoes to me of the old Cold War. It's this sense we must win, and therefore we're going to throw everything at this. money, our most brilliant people, our best scientists to come up with the best chips so that we can win this race to AGI. So it's really, I mean, I don't know, maybe it's being overplayed, but it seems at this point to be high stakes. Yeah, I want to take this back to what is China's strategy here? Because the statement that came out a couple months ago in which Chinese media and the government were casting aspersions as to the safety or security of using Navidia chips.

It begs the question, are they doing this because, A, they want to support domestic competitors, so it's a form of national protectionism, or are they doing this because they actually are concerned about the security risks? I was reading an article by a colleague in mind, Chris Miller, who also wrote Chip War. It's funny that you make that analogy. So he basically says that the U.S. is looking into geotracking, the semiconductors that it's exporting. because it's aware that there's a huge degree of smuggling via Southeast Asia, mainly. I looked at it a couple of months ago. There was a huge potential smuggling through Malaysia, for instance.

So they're looking into that, I think that he calls it telemetry. And the Chinese may be concerned that that could be used to geolocate or geotrack chips as they get into China. So I struggle with this, and I'm curious if you have a view, what is China's end goal? because it's not like China can overnight rival Navidio or even TSMC. It still needs other countries and companies, be it, you know, the Dutch's ASML for lithography or TSM for fabrication. It can't produce everything domestically. So I'm struggling to figure out what its strategy is here by saying no to Navidio chips, basically.

You're struggling, Alice. I think everybody is struggling. It's really an opaque situation. I mean, if you ask me my guess, I think that what China's doing is coming up with a negotiating ploy so that when Chinese, well, when Xi Jinping meets President Trump and all their officials get together to prepare those meetings, the Chinese have got more leverage with America. I think that's number one. The second point is, can China really go it alone without Nvidia chips?

My guess is no, not for quite a few years yet. So ultimately, I think the Chinese are angling to get hold of the best Nvidia chips. So not the ones that we've been talking about so far, but the Blackwell series, which is the latest series of Nvidia chips coming out, hugely powerful, much more powerful than anything that China's got. And I think that the ban on Nvidia today is a negotiating ploy to get the Americans to allow invidia to export the black world chips to China so that China can use those in its AI model so that China can race faster towards this goal of AGI than I mentioned. I'm glad you mentioned that because it reminded me of a conversation I had with a P investor in China recently, in which he said basically

the same thing, is that it's rather negotiating ploy or a gambit to again, as you mentioned, get higher grade chips that could potentially be compliant with some of the US export controls. But I completely buy that in as an argument, and I think that that's extremely convincing. And it seems like, just to use a pun, all chips are on the table when it comes to the negotiation between Trump and she. And as you referenced, James, they had a productive call this Friday. And it seems like they've agreed on a number of issues. But it also paves the way for a TikTok deal, which is the next subject of discussion. Do you have TikTok, James? I do. What's on your feed? Because my feed is all food in fashion, so the algorithm knows me.

I've got quite a few food things. I've got quite a few sports. I got a lot related to China, actually, because obviously that's my interest. But really, it's spooky how quickly the algorithm learns your preferences. I mean, and I guess this is why TikTok is so popular around the world with 170 million users in America alone. It's quite extraordinary.

Right. We'll take a break now. Stay with us, and we'll come back for more on TikTok. The Twisted Tale of Amanda Knox is an eight-episode Hulu Original Limited series that blends gripping pacing with emotional complexity, offering a dramatized look as it revisits the wrongful conviction of Amanda Knox for the tragic murder of Meredith Kircher and the relentless media storm that followed. The Twisted Tale of Amanda Knox is now streaming only on Disney Plus.

Welcome back. As of this taping, the year-long fight over TikTok may finally be moving forward towards a resolution. President Donald Trump announced that he had a quote-unquote productive call with Chinese President Xi Jinping on Friday and that they've effectively approved a framework deal for a group of U.S. investors to take control of TikTok U.S.'s operations. There's tremendous value with TikTok. And I'm a little prejudiced because I frankly did so well on And so we were able to work out a deal with China. And it's a very good deal for us. I hope it's a good deal for that.

I just, I want to say I want to thank President Xi because he was a gentleman. And we've just had a good relationship. The agreement would spin off a new U.S. entity with 80% owned by a consortium consisting of Oracle, venture firm Andrewson Horowitz, and private equity firm Silver Lake, alongside some existing bite dance backers. and bite dancer's total stake would fall below 20% meeting the requirements of the U.S. legislation passed last year. Trump said that he and she signed off on the deal during the phone call on Friday, and that they also discussed other topics including trade, fentanyl, Russia's war on Ukraine,

and she, for his part, framed it as a commercial solution while stressing that China should retain authority over TikTok's core technology. I want to read actually a statement that I just saw from the Chinese foreign ministry, in which they basically seemed to be happy with this deal. They said they were happy to see productive commercial negotiations in keeping with market rules, leading to a solution that complies with China's laws and regulations and takes into account the interests of both sides. So it seems like TikTok has finally,

after almost a year of torture, have seen a pleasant ending for it in terms of its app being still used within the US, where you've got 170 million US users who can still use the app as of right now. So now that the deal seems to be done, the big question remains what happens to the algorithm? Because insofar as I understand,

the Chinese semantic is that we are licensing this algorithm out to our U.S. operations, but that algorithms are still owned by Bight Dance, which is, after all, a Chinese company. Whereas this, I think, is a bit of a murky territory because at least according to the U.S. legislation, the algorithm cannot be owned at all by a Chinese entity. So we may be in a period of strategic ambiguity in which both sides

agreed to disagree, but certainly I think TikTok has evaded the worst. What do you think, James? Yes, I mean, this is a remarkable deal. It appears to pave the way for TikTok to operate in the United States. But as you rightly point out, Alice, what we really don't have a clear sense of yet is what's going to happen to the algorithm. The old algorithm, or we should say the existing algorithm, it's changed, means that American user's data is accessible to China. And China's national intelligence law of 2017 creates a legal obligation for all Chinese firms to turn over data collected abroad and send it back to China if China requests that. So it isn't absolutely clear to me at this stage as to whether this new deal will mean that American data,

stays in America or whether there'll be a backdoor for that data to come back to China if TikTok so desires. That's just absolutely not clear, I don't think. Have you picked up anything on that? Well, I think we have to understand this TikTok deal within the context and framework of the broader U.S.-China relationship. And what's become apparent to me is that a Trump cares a lot personally about TikTok for his branding, for his appeal to the base. And that's not of you that's shared, I think, by a lot of these colleagues and peers, potentially, who take a more hawkish posture. You look at some of the senators and congressmen like Tom Cotton, for instance, who I think are going to be tough on this issue. And B, the Chinese, I think, understand that

Trump sees this as part of a grand deal, a grand bargain, and are employing the art of the deal in potentially offering him something that looks like it's ticking some of the boxes. And so I think it's a big magic act where Trump basically says that it complies with the U.S. legislation even though it doesn't fully. And meanwhile, other companies may decide not to sue the administration or bite dance because they don't want to fall a foul with Trump. So I think Trump ends up with TikTok. And on the same time, the Chinese end up potentially with a better deal on trade and technology because they see this as an area in which it's been an easy concession for Trump. So I think that that's how I kind of approach it.

And the real minutia in a way doesn't matter because ultimately it's a political game in which the Chinese are swapping TikTok potentially for maybe relaxation on chips. Yeah. And I mean, in the meantime, TikTok remains incredibly popular, especially with American teens. So about 57% of American teens use TikTok every day

and they use it for an average of 1.5 hours a day. So, you know, this really does matter, isn't it? I mean, this is by far China's biggest cultural export, I guess. And so whatever the fate of TikTok finally is, it really does make a big difference, not only to TikTok and bite dance is parent company, but also normal Americans and normal British and other Europeans. And just to again talk about the financial side of things, I read recently that bite dance, the parent company of TikTok, is on track to make more than $180 billion this year

and trades at a valuation of about $330 billion. And again, to sort of peel back the layers of the onion, Trump's friends, many of them who are in on the deal, if you look at Susquehanna Capital, Jeff Yass there, or you look at Oracle and Dresen Horowitz, they could be investing in TikTok at a lower price per share multiple than Procter and Gables. So there's obviously other agenda at play

beyond just TikTok itself. And certainly I think a lot of U.S. investors are salivating when they look at TikTok because they see the eyeballs, the potential, the growth, the different income streams that could arise from a stake in TikTok. Absolutely. I think what strikes me as being interesting in the U.S. context is the way in which we've seen some of the hawkish members of the establishment really treat bite dance like an arm of the CCP. I remember when the CEO of BightDance, he was being interviewed by senators in the Senate Commission, and they were asked him if he ever had any affiliations with the CCP. And it went viral because a lot of people were seeing that and watching it with a degree of incredulity. But it speaks volumes about the fact that, you know, Bight Dense has internally that tension

of being seen as a Chinese company, potentially an arm of the Chinese government, whilst trying to be global. In 2023, a former Biden's employee alleged that the CCP spied on pro-democracy protesters in Hong Kong in 2018 by using quote-unquote backdoor access to TikTok to identify and monitor the activist locations and communications. My own view on this is that any platform, whether it's X or Instagram or even Telegram, any platform really is ripe for misinformation, disinformation, for any kind of government-led espionage. So I don't think TikTok in this instance is unique, but certainly I think it has been a lightning rod politically for a lot of American policymakers when they look at the company because they're very worried about the longer term impacts of having a Chinese platform that is disseminating information to millions of daily users in America. And I guess related to that is TikTok seen as a Chinese company outside of the U.S. Because in the U.S., it's very much been politicized in the sense that, you know, they see this as a Chinese company that poses a threat. But I'm not sure if the rest of the world really feels that way about TikTok. I think, you know, in the U.K., I think most people don't really see TikTok even as a foreign company.

They just see it as an app that gives them pretty inoffensive and quite amusing short videos on their phones. I, of course, you know, a certain number of people will know that TikTok is Chinese and a certain number of people will know that data can be exfiltrated by these apps back to China. But I think the sort of baseline attitude here in the UK is, well, if I'm looking at a lot of cat videos, then why does that matter? You know, how important is this information to China anyway? I'm not any kind of an agent. I'm just a normal person looking at my moment.

phone. So to be honest with you, Alice, I think the popular sentiment towards TikTok is pretty good. But then the security services in the UK and other European countries are very much vigilant towards TikTok because I suppose in addition to sending data back to China, these apps allow these Chinese companies to learn quite a lot about the way cyberspace works in European countries. So maybe that's it. But generally, I think the public view on this is that it's pretty inoffensive. And one last thought that I had on this issue was that decoupling in reality is tough to do. Even though politicians want to basically ban TikTok, I think this story leading to a happy conclusion potentially for TikTok proves the point, which is to say that

as long as there are vested business interests in the US that are pro TikTok, it would have been very hard to ban it. And the reason I say that is, you know, Biden's over the last few years has been teaming up with Oracle more, but Oracle serving basically data centers for TikTok in the U.S. and overseas. When I was in China,

they were talking about potentially adding more data centers through Brazil to service the whole Latin America and North America region. So I think this story, in a way, beyond it being Trump scoring a victory for his communications to the base, is also a story of how, you know, the Andrew St. Horowitz's and the oracles of the world have actually won a big deal by getting

an increased stake in this very valuable social media company. Absolutely. That's it. All right. Just before we head off to another break, we're going to talk about another social media trend that is all the rage in China. So we're going to take a quick break and stay with us. During the Volvo Fall Experience event, discover exceptional offers and thoughtful design. that leaves plenty of room for autumn adventures. And see for yourself how Volvo's legendary safety

brings peace of mind to every crisp morning commute. This September, leased a 2026 X-E-90 plug-in hybrid from $599 bi-weekly at 3.99% during the Volvo Fall Experience event. Condition supply, visit your local Volvo retailer or go to explorevolvo.com. Welcome back. We're diving into a trends.

social media in China, something people are calling the beauty of the boom years. Platforms like China's Red Note and Dooying are fuller posts that take users back to the 2000s and early 2010s. Think bold fashion, catchy pop songs and vintage TV ads that wants to find the era. Nostolic hashtags like hashtag millennium, hashtag Chinese dream call, and hashtag beauty of the boom years have racked up over 10 billion views. But what exactly are people in China reminiscing about? Many say these posts reflect a time when China felt full of possibility, optimism, growth, and prosperity before economic slowdown, stagnation and social pressures hit. Remember when life was simple. No pressure, no hustle. Just dreams, sunshine, and 3G phones. Back when Chinese dramas made you cry and success felt possible. Today, millions in China are posting. I miss the golden era. I miss who I used to be.

If you feel that too, like this video and comment. Wei San Quaitu. I want to go back to. Let's bring the feeling back together. At the same time, this wave of nostalgia comes with a bittersweet undertone. Young people, especially Gen Z, are increasingly sharing content that seems to mourn what's been lost or lament the pressures they face today. Everything from rapidly growing housing costs to career uncertainty.

It's a vivid window into a generation caught between the world. the optimism of the past and the challenges of the present. James, I really, really want to get your thoughts, because you actually lived in China during these quote-unquote boom years. I only ever went there once a year over the summer to see my grandparents, but you really lived there as a journalist at the FT. So tell me a little bit about what that period was like. It was a great period, really, honestly. When you look back at that time, it seemed just much more simple. There seemed to be much more possibilities. And I have one friend who bought an apartment of 90 square meters in Beijing back in 2003 or four,

and she paid 80,000 US dollars for it. That apartment today costs more than a million US dollars. So you can just see that, you know, back in the day, you could buy things for not a huge amount of money. And these days, young people would not be able to afford a million dollar apartment. not in a month of Sundays, not in a very long time. In addition to that, life is stressful, people work long hours, the traffic is clogged, commuting times are very long, the cost of schooling is high, and mostly, you know, China is just a very competitive and stressful place to live. And, you know, this came out recently in a survey done by Doyin, which is China's version of TikTok.

they found that 88% of young people in China are feeling stressed in their daily lives. And 60% said that they buy things to alleviate that stress. And so this has led to what I consider to be a really fascinating trend in the economy, which is this big consumer theme of emotional consumption. So that's people buying things that are nostalgic or, or help with their self-care, or things that bring joy, or they're kind of cute, a bit like the Labuboos that we mentioned last week. I was going to say, yeah.

So, you know, this is a really, really interesting theme, I think, this emotional consumption idea. I don't know. You must have come across this quite a bit. Yeah, for sure. It chimes with, at the macro level, what I'm hearing from P. investors who are saying, yes, there has been a trend line of high savings ratio in households. but Gen Z, the next generation, they're going to be earning less, potentially, than their parents, but they're going to be spending more. So their marginal propensity to spend will go up, and they're already starting to see the initial changes in their consumption patterns relative to their parents and forebears. So I think at the macro level, that's definitely being borne out.

But to go back to what you were saying, as I was reflecting on this, I was thinking how it's so interesting that in the U.S., you know, Trump is trying to revive the 80s in the power suits and the Reagan years in which you had financial liberalization and men and women in power suits and he had a full head of hair. And in the Chinese context, they're also nostalgic about a period

in time in which they had relative prosperity and freedom, but in the 2000s and one other sort of thought I had related to this was how last year I think it was the most watched TV show was a TV show called Fan Hua, which means blossoms, and directed by the Great Wang

Kauai, who also did in the mood for love and Chongqing Express, who is a great Chinese director-auter. But that is about Shanghai, China in the 90s, where it's starting to experience liberalization, where the China dream, which is a, I think, a counterpoint to the American dream is possible. Social mobility is relatively strong if you work hard. I think we're seeing the mirror image of that right now, where people, to your point, James, they feel stifled, They feel unmotivated. There's a term that started off in sociology in China that's gone into economics.

It's called Neidren, which is involution, basically. This kind of feeling that there's no point in trying because it's too competitive and too tough out there. And that's really feeding into, as you say, this generation of people who will spend more, won't work as hard, and don't feel the need potentially to live in bustling Tier 1 cities. you also see in China a trend of young people going out into the country or into the forest

living in nature or living in lower tier cities, you know, getting a thousand, I mean be a month, but being happy because they can afford to live in the lower tier cities. So I think this is an important sociological trend. And I'm glad that we're discussing this because we in the West tend to look a lot at how AI and the economy are screwing over Gen Z. But there's a similar, I think, dynamic and debate taking place in China. you're so right alice this is a really important topic and and it's so palpable when you go to china you meet people who talk about as you said you know kind of going to the countryside living a simple

life you know i think you're also really right to to invoke the comparison of americans looking back to the regan years you know there's a sort of sepia tinted kind of aspect to this whole thing and i was just looking recently into the phenomenon of the white rabbit candies uh I love those. I grew up on those. You know, they're from Shanghai originally. I didn't know that. I was hoping you were going to say that. These are extraordinary. I remember them so well from when I was a student in China. They're cute little candies. The wrappers are sort of blue and red, and you open them, and there's a little bit of rice paper and the candy inside or the sweet inside of your British.

It's kind of milk-based. And actually, it turns out that these candies have got a bit of a history in China because a Chinese leader called Joe Enlai in the 1970s, he was premier at the time. He loved them so much that when Nixon went to China in 1972 to open relations between the U.S. and China after a deep freeze, Joe and Lai gave him a box of these candies, but I couldn't find anywhere online whether Nixon liked the white rabbits as well. But anyway, the point is to update this story is that these white rabbit candies

are becoming the nostalgia candy. of China now. And the sales are just wild. There's all kinds of follow-on products like you can buy white rabbit cuddly toys and you can buy, you know, little baby suits and all kinds of other white rabbit stuff. So it's just an example of how people are hankering for the past, which, as you rightly say, Alex, is so counterintuitive, I think, to the way the rest of the world looks at China. We always think of China as charging ahead and steaming into foreign markets and relentless growth and everyone kind of gung-ho. But actually, when you get there and when you know Chinese people, there's a lot of people who find this blistering pace just kind of

unbearable. Yeah. It reminds me of what we were talking about earlier in the week. You said to me that Maltai vintages, the older they are, getting more and more expensive. There's a whole market for them, right? Absolutely. I happen to meet, you know, an executive from the company that makes Mao Tai, which is this fiery white spirit in China. It's very expensive. And I was asking him about how much they cost. And he was talking unbelievable numbers, you know, a bottle of Mao Tai going back to the 1950s, costing hundreds of thousands of US dollars, and even some more recent than that as well. So there is this ticket to nostalgia that increasing numbers of Chinese consumers are jumping on, because it reminds them of a time in the past where things were simpler, life was simpler.

And as I said at the top, you know, this seems to be a balm for Chinese consumers. They seem to feel less stressed. They seem to feel happier about their lives when they're buying stuff that makes them feel joy like that, I suppose. I love that story. And even though I'm not a big fan of Motai, I'm still very much in the camp of a good Japanese sake. I do love the fact that we're starting to see an economy that a problem. appreciates older vintages. You're starting to see that in wine as well. There's some domestic offerings as well. I was just recently in Shanghai, and there's this place, House of Roosevelt,

where they have domestic Tewa bottles of wine from different periods as well, as early as the early 2000s. So maybe nostalgic for them. But yeah, it's definitely, I think, happening at a pretty societal level, which I think is worth keeping in mind. Do you know why it's called the House of Roosevelt? Well, it's related to Teddy Roosevelt. So there's pictures of Teddy Roosevelt all over the place. Wow. Amazing. Okay. All right, James, it's prediction time. So why don't you go first and then I'll share my predictions. Okay, Alice, great. Yeah, I'm going to predict something about the emotional consumption craze that I was just referencing. I'm going to say that this emotional consumption, which basically is led by Gen Z, and includes Chinese spending on things that make

them feel happy or make them feel less stress, make them feel nostalgic, for better days in the past, is going to expand by more than 12% this year, and just put that number into perspective. That is three times faster than the general pace of consumer spending growth in China at the moment. So it's obviously a really big theme. So I'm going to predict 12% growth for emotional consumption in 2025. How about you, Alice? What kind of prediction have you got for us? So I think that we're going to get more news about Chinese semiconductor capabilities. Now, whether or not at a technical level, this actually is significant, remains to be seen back to, you know, what we said earlier. But I do think that A, will get more stories about Chinese companies doing in-house chip production and design.

And B, we're going to get potential relaxation on some of these chip controls, especially if the talks and meetings go well in late October, early November. And I think that that will give more upside for chip stocks, Chinese chipstock. So I think we're probably going to see more upside for Chinese chip makers domestically. There are a couple that I saw in Hangzhou that are also looking to get listed soon and probably in Hong Kong. So I would watch that space. I need to do the fundamentals analysis to see how they're priced. But my knee-jerk reaction, having seen some of the news today, is that I think Chinese chip stocks might be a win. Well, Alice, I'm paying extra attention to your prediction this week because

you smashed it last week. You said that Xi Jinping and Trump were going to schedule a meeting. And lo and behold, a week later, Xi Jinping and Trump have scheduled not one meeting but two meetings. So well done. Well, thanks, James. So we're going to have to enjoy a bottle of whiskey. What's your favorite? Well, I owe you a bottle of whiskey, it seems to me, from our bet last week. But I'm thinking, can I give you a miniature? I mean, do I have to give you a full bottle? No, a miniature's great. Thanks, James. All right. that's all for this episode. Thank you for listening to China Decode. This is a production of Prof G Media. Our producer is David Toledo. Our associate producer is Eric Janikis. Our research

associate is Dan Shalan. Our technical director is Drew Burroughs. Our engineer is William Flynn and our executive producer is Catherine Dillon. Make sure to follow us wherever you get your podcast so you don't miss an episode. Talk to you again next week. I don't know.