The Prof G Pod with Scott Galloway - China Decode: Why China is Sorting Kids into “Genius Camps”

Episode Date: February 10, 2026

In this episode of China Decode, Alice Han and James Kynge dig into China’s so-called “genius camps” — the small, brutally selective talent pipeline behind many of the country’s biggest tech and AI breakthroughs. Then they turn to rising nuclear tensions after the U.S. accuses China of having conducted a secret nuclear test in 2020, just as the last major U.S.-Russia arms control treaty expires. How credible are the claims, and what does this mean for global nuclear negotiations? Plus, China’s underground club scene is roaring back after years of pandemic closures, as global music crosses borders in new ways — including Bad Bunny topping the charts in China. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Support for the show comes from David Protein. Who doesn't enjoy a protein bar after a good workout? Here's a tip, David Protein bars. All David Protein bars are designed to maximize protein while minimizing calories, and they say that their bars deliver the highest protein per calorie ratio of any leading bar on the market. Their David Gold Bar, for instance, delivers 75% calories from protein, and the David Bronze Bar delivers 53% calories in protein. Head to Davidprotein.com slash PropG,

where they're offering a special deal for our listeners by 4%. four cartons and get your fifth free. You can also use their store locator to find David in stores at a retailer near you. Does the winter weather have you feeling tired, antisocial, sad? You may want to take a cue from our friends in Norway. Really, they tend to orient towards the things that they like about the season instead of just sort of seeing it as a time of year to endure. How to embrace the winter.

That's on the next, explain it to me. New episodes every Sunday, wherever you get your podcasts. Megan Rapino here. This week on a touch more. Gotham F.C.'s Rose Lavelle joins us to talk about FIFA's very first Champions Cup, her incredible year of wins, and some of her greatest pranks of all time. Unfortunately, on yours truly. Plus, with the WMBA's CBA negotiation still stalled,

I got to ask the question. Is it time to worry? Check out the latest episode of the touch. more wherever you get your podcast and on YouTube. I believe China may be more meritocratic today than America is. Given this system, given the way in which education and scholastic intelligence are lionized, I would say that China today is probably more meritocratic than the U.S. Welcome to China Decode.

I'm Alice Han. And I'm James King. In today's episode of China Decode, we're discussing digging inside China. China's genius pipeline, Trump accusing China of secret nuclear testing, plus the revival of China's underground club scene and bad bunny topping the charts in China. That's all coming up, but first, let's do a quick check-in with how the Chinese markets are starting the week. On Monday, the Shanghai A-Share Index and the Hangsang-H-Share Index closed up 1.4% and 1.8% respectively, as investors shipped back to risk-on mode after last week's sell-off.

Potmar, the company behind the Labibu, rallied about 6% on news of strong growth expectations and expansion overseas, and tech giants, Alibaba and Tencent both closed up over 2%. How are you feeling, James? I know it sucks to be sick. Kind of getting there. Sorry about this, and my voice is not great. Well, you still got the voice for radio. All right, let's get right into it. There's been a voice. viral narrative floating around about China running some shadowy, all-powerful genius factory. But the reality is both less conspiratorial and way more interesting.

China isn't mass-producing prodigies. It's running a small, brutally selective pipeline that spots extreme talent early and pushes it fast. And a surprising number of the people behind China's biggest tech and AI companies and breakthroughs came through these genius programs. James, you've lived in China for many years. I'm sure you've met people who have been in these genius camps that can tell us a little bit about what it was like on the ground. Yeah, I have actually, Alice. I've known some kids who are in these genius camps. You know, this is one of these stories that people who've lived in China know very well.

And people outside China find really fascinating for very good reasons, I think. You know, this is so different from what people might imagine happens in a country that is governed by a party that calls itself. communist, but is in fact anything but egalitarian. This is, as you said, Alice, this is brutally competitive. It is the very antithesis of egalitarianism. What happens in this process is that the authorities skim off the very brightest kids, and then they put them in a class with other super bright kids, and then they skim that cohort again until at the end of this process, you end up with a few classes in the very best universities full of truly genius-level talent. And these genius-level talent, as you've said, Alice, they all, well, most of them anyway,

go on to lead some of China's extraordinary technological advances. And I think this programme says a lot about what China is all about. It says a lot about what China prioritizes, what drives its people, what society's all about, and it reveals a crucial motivator of China's extraordinary success. When I lived in Beijing, we had a family friend, and she lived in what's called the Houtong area of Beijing. Those are the old alleyways that sort of cluster around the forbidden city in the center of Beijing. And families live kind of cheek by jowel. It's not a wealthy area.

These were not wealthy people. but the son of our family friend, he was a truly clever boy. And at the age of 11, he was skimmed off to go into one of these genius classes. And what I remember so particularly is the fact that everybody on his street, I'm talking, hundreds and hundreds of people knew this news. And every time he walked down the street to go home and have his tea, you know, dressed up with his little red tie around his neck, he would get applauded and mothers would pop out of their homes and give him a little dumpling

or some other little bit of food to eat because everybody in China admires a clever kid. But Alice, what do you think about this system of skimming off clever kids? Well, I love the way that you've described that story. And to some extent, I think a lot of Western countries could benefit from that. It seems like we're facing a culture of anti-intellectualism. I don't think that kind of kid would be given a dumpling in some. say America. I personally didn't grow up in China and my cousins, none of them, got into these genius classes, but I know friends of friends who did. And what's interesting to me is that it's

not just isolated to STEM students. So humanity students can also get into these genius programs. And the reason why I think this is so interesting is because if you look at the founders of the big tech companies, a vast majority of them came from these genius schools. You know, I was just looking at back of the envelope, the founder of Baidan's Zhang Yi Ming, the founders and leaders of Taubo and Pinduodor, China's biggest e-commerce platforms, the founder of Maituan, the Chinese chipmaker Canberacon, its founders also both went to genius schools and engineers behind Deepseek and Alibaba's Kwen AI models. I read a great think piece over the weekend in the FT where you formerly work, James, and the author who wrote this piece ends up revealing towards the end of the article that

She also went to one of these genius schools. But she describes how even humanities students worked more recently in AI companies like Deepseek to help with their models. Because a lot of what these models have to deal with is real human intelligence. And that's just not isolated to STEM. It goes to humanities and history and literature. But it was fascinating to me doing research on this because I hadn't lived it personally, but I can see how it's having a real impact on generating talents at the top levels of of China's tech companies, of China's corporates.

And it's something that I think has really floated under the radar, and it's been around for decades. That's the other thing. It's not an overnight thing. It's been around for decades, I believe, since the 80s. So this has been a concerted effort by the government to try to find talented individuals across all of the provinces in China. And it reminds me a little bit of the imperial Chinese system,

which is very much to try to find these scholar gentlemen in all the different far-flung provinces, bring them back to Beijing so that they could become basically ministers within the court of the Chinese emperor. But in this case, in the modern day scenario, these highly talented individuals then go out and proliferate and make companies and lead major tech firms.

One last thing that I will say is there apparently is a special class known as a Yol class. Andrew Yow is the sole Chinese winner of the Turing Award, which is basically the equivalent of the Nobel Prize in CS. And he, a couple of decades ago, moved from the States back to China, where he originally was from. And he's really become the champion intellect

and professor of AI in China. So apparently there is a class named after him at Cinco, the Yo class, where the chief AI scientist at Tencent was one of his students, the founder of Moonshot, which is produced Kimi, and the founder of Pony AI,

as well as a range of these Chinese tech, founders. So again, I think the story is so fascinating because it shows both the government having a hand and plucking out these highly talented individuals, but also then these individuals going out from the bottom up and making their own companies, which are really driving China's innovation. Yes, absolutely. Alice, you mentioned, I think, that there's about 100,000 of these students that are selected every year to go into this genius class streams. And those students sort of find themselves somewhere in the system later on. One of the things that I hadn't realized about this

until I read the article in the Financial Times that you mentioned by Zijingwu was that if you get selected, you get to skip the Chinese high school exam called Gao Kau, and there is no more dreaded a word, I think, in the Chinese language than Gao Kau, because it is this absolute solid year of stress for any student who wants to graduate from high school.

The competition is so intense that every year you hear about students having nervous breakdowns. You know, families that have kids that are about to do gao cow cow are in major, major sort of protective mode. But it's interesting to think about the dynamics of this because if you get to skip doing the gao cow cow cow,

then you can focus more on the subjects that you're interested in. You don't have to do the gao cow cow cow syllabus, So you can just focus on, let's say, if math is your thing or computer science is your thing, you can specialize in that area. And that allows you to make greater progress towards the genius stream and to, you know, come up with the breakthroughs that you've just been mentioning, Alice. The other thing I think is instructive is that we're talking 100,000 students that are selected for these genius streams. there are every year nearly 13.5 million Chinese students that take Gao Kau. So you can already see what a tiny proportion of students are being skimmed to go into these genius streams.

That really is a tiny, tiny proportion of the very brightest kids in the country. And the last thing I'd say, Alice, is that, yes, this resonated with me so much, having read quite a lot of Chinese classical literature, the way in which Chinese culture lionizes bright kids, especially poor bright kids, is truly amazing. There are so many stories that go back thousands of years, in fact, to, you know, like a particular boy whose parents were so poor, who would read by the moonlight that was reflected off the snow,

again, because his family couldn't afford candles. So there is this incredible, ancient culture of studying despite adversity and getting ahead, using the education ladder, to correct for society's injustices, and somehow to rise to the top, even despite your fate as belonging to an impoverished family. So there's a real big amount of mythology around all of this stuff that makes this such a poignant story for me. I would even hazard a... a statement which is that I believe China may be more meritocratic today than America is. Given this system, given the way in which education and scholastic intelligence are lionized,

I would say that China today is probably more meritocratic than the US. And one last point about the goal call, which you rightly mentioned, James, is that it's a system that's predicated on your score during the exam. It's unlike any other, I think, exam in the world. certainly unlike the Australian exam system I went through or even the American system I went through as well, where in those models you have a hybridized scoring of your exam scores, your essays, your extracurricular activities. In the Chinese scenario, it really comes down to what score you get on the day of the exams. And it's also true, I think, Alice, that every Chinese person knows their Gao Kau score and remembers it forevermore.

I mean, even 20 years after the event, if you're... You asked them, what was your Gao Cowan score? They can tell you immediately. Yeah, it's emblazoned on their memory, either as a badge or as a scar. Yeah. All right, we'll be back with more after a quick break. Stay with us. When it comes to the new Melania movie, here are some important numbers to remember.

40 million. That's how much Amazon paid Melania Trump's production studio for the rights to the film. It's the highest price ever paid for a documentary. 35 million. That's about how much Amazon spent marketing the film. 28 million. How much went to the First Lady? And 7 million.

That's how much the Melania movie made on opening weekend, which is honestly pretty good, and certainly more of the many box office insiders projected. So, how did this movie get made? Who's it for? And if this is finally Melania Trump's side of the story, what does she have to say? That's coming up on Today Explain from Vox.

Listen weekday afternoons, wherever you get your podcast. Support for the show comes from boot.dev. So you want to learn code? The good news is that there are endless tutorials and classes that'll teach you. The bad news is that a lot of them can be pretty boring. And when you're bored, chances are you're not going to retain the information being thrown at you. Boot.comtev teaches you to code through gameplay. Quite literally, it's an actual game, and Boots is a bear wizard

and your personal AI tutor who guides you through the training ground. a place where you can practice your coding skills and complete challenges before you forge ahead in your coursework. Boot.Dev is free to read and watch, and if you decide to upgrade to a paid plan, you'll unlock interactive features, including hands-on coding, AI assistance,

progress tracking, and game mechanics. Learn XP, levels, achievements, complete quests, and fight bosses while learning to code Python, SQL, and go. Go to boot.dev and use my code, the Prop G, to get 25% off your entire first year on the annual plan. That's boot.dev and use code the prop G to get 25% off your entire first year on the annual plan.

This week on Net Worthin Chill, I'm talking about what happens after you've mastered the basics. How to build wealth that actually lasts for generations. With the top 1% holding nearly a third of the nation's wealth and 98% of them being men, breaking into generational wealth isn't just about getting rich. It's about changing who gets to stay rich. Plus, I'm explaining the great wealth transfer, $124 trillion, about to change hands over the next. 25 years and what it means for you. I'm answering your questions about calculating your net worth, whether you should rent or buy to build wealth, and how to pass your retirement accounts to your

kids without losing them to probate court. Whether you're just getting started or already maxing out your 401k, this episode will show you how to think bigger than just making money today. Listen wherever you get your podcasts or watch on YouTube.com slash you're rich BFF. Welcome back. Big news on the nuclear front. The U.S. is accusing China of secretly testing a nuclear weapon back in 2020. The accusation comes just as the last remaining U.S. Russia arms control treaty is expiring. With Trump pushing for a broader deal that would include both China and Russia, the global nuclear landscape is suddenly shifting very, very quickly.

James, how credible are these claims that China has been secretly testing nuclear weapons? Apparently, according to the Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty Organization, they haven't found or detected any such nuclear weapons tests. But according to the U.S. administration, they've been doing this. So what's your take on it? Well, I mean, it's really tough for somebody like me to know. But I would say, I mean, look at the nature of the official that has made this announcement. Thomas DeNano, he is U.S. Undersecretary of State for Arms, Control, and International Security. He made these assertions at the United Nations disarmament. conference in Geneva. So the first thing to say is that this is the right person in the U.S.

administration to be making these comments, and he made them at a very serious forum. And it was in the nature of an announcement. He said, I can reveal that the U.S. government is aware that China has conducted nuclear explosive tests, including preparing for tests with designated yields in the hundreds of tons. He added that the China's military sought to conceal the testing by obfuscating the nuclear explosions because it recognized that these tests violate test-banned commitment. So, you know, the plain truth is that I have no idea, but it does seem to me that we've got a very serious US official saying this and also saying that China has tried to obfuscate it, maybe muffle the shockwaves that come out from a test like this. So to me, it would probably be

likely that some kind of a test by China has taken place. But I also think there's an interesting question here as to whether or not China did anything wrong, because we need to look carefully at what treaties China has signed up to. It has signed the Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty, but it has not ratified it, which means that, you know, it didn't break any of the precepts of that treaty because it hasn't ratified that treaty. If you look at the nuclear non-proliferation treaty,

which China has signed and ratified, then that treaty actually does not prohibit tests. It discourages them, but it doesn't prohibit them. So I think there's an interesting question here. My guess would be, that this US official is speaking from a position of having some evidence. We all know that the US monitors Chinese territory very, very carefully with all kinds of spy satellites that cover probably every inch of the testing area. But the second point is that China hasn't actually done anything

wrong according to the treaties that it has signed. At least that's my take on it, Alice. What are you seeing? Yeah, I completely agree with you, James. I think the real issue for the U.S. administration is that they have no leverage against China on this issue. As you rightly point out, China hasn't signed any document that prohibits them from this kind of testing. And certainly there isn't a bilateral agreement like we've had in recent years between Russia and the U.S. that also curtails China from doing these nuclear tests. The timing couldn't be more interesting because obviously on February 6th, we had the expiration of the last major nuclear arms control treaty between the U.S. and Russia. And a lot of, if you go back to the Cold War, the relationship between Moscow and Washington was built around strategic arms controls. So the question that is then begged is, you know, we've got two months until the April potential meeting between Trump and she, will both sides make a big deal about this? Certainly it seems like the Americans are very concerned, but could there be some kind of a framework? I'm a bit of a bit of a bit of.

of skeptical. But this, I think, is going to be one of the, I would say, difficult issues between Beijing and Washington to discuss this year. Add that to the list of other things that China is unhappy about. The Panama deal, for instance, so Japan, which we haven't mentioned, where Takayichi has had a landslide victory that could have massive implications for U.S.-China relations as well. So I see a lot of rocky obstacles to this April meeting. I don't think it's going to be smooth sailing between now and when Trump and Xi are supposed to meet in China and Beijing. And one last thing that I'll end on is it's interesting to note that China is still very, very much behind on its nuclear weapons arsenal. Russia has the most, which a lot of people actually don't know.

It's got 5,500 nuclear weapons, followed by the US at 5,300. And China only has 600. Now, the Pentagon says they predict that that arsenal will grow beyond a thousand operational warheads by 2030. But from China's point of view, they want to continue to build its nuclear stoppile because they're quite a bit behind. And if we think about the timeline to a Taiwan showdown, having a nuclear war chest is going to be critical.

Completely agree, Alice. I think, you know, the idea that China's going to sign up now to a regime which is led by the US and which would restrict China from building new warheads and testing the warheads it needs to test in order to make sure that its nuclear arsenal is operational is for the birds. I really don't think China is in any mood to do that. China is, as we often discuss on here, on course to become the leading superpower. That is its aim. It wants to present an extraordinary level of military prowess so that it can achieve its strong. strategic aims such as eventually take back Taiwan or take back the first island chain. This is what

Xi Jinping's program is all about. It's a security first vision for China's place in the world. And therefore, I don't think that the US really has much hope of invagling China into some kind of a negotiating situation ahead of the April meeting between Trump and C. I just don't see that happening. I would say that China would be highly resistant to this type of nuclear arms control in the foreseeable future. I would agree with that. And what is different from the Soviet-American experience during the Cold War is that China is still a great degree behind the Russians and the American. So it has an incentive to massively build up its nuclear arsenal. Whereas if you look back to even as late as the 80s during the time of Reagan and Gorbachev, there was an incentive given that both

were neck and neck and then nuclear stockpiling for both of them to say, hey, we need to take a step back from the brink and try to limit our nuclear capabilities. China is not in that position. And as you rightly say, James, it has an incentive from a strategic standpoint to keep building it because it gives it more coverage and capabilities if there is a Taiwan showdown. So again, I think that this story is another example in which, you know, U.S. and China, beyond the dovish signs that we're seeing between Trump and Xi in recent months, has a lot of thorny and tractable issues that they need to deal with. And it's unclear to my mind that this will actually be dealt with.

I think China's strategic priority will be to get Trump to focus on trade, maybe on currency, but really to steer clear from some of these strategic issues like Taiwan, like the nuclear rollout and testing. And on that note, I do wonder how Japan fits into this. We haven't talked about it yet, but this week, Takaichi has had a landslide victory in the lower House. I think that's going to have implications for China's policy in the region. Well, I mean, I think, first of all, that Sanaai Takayichi's victory was really quite stunning. And I think it can be seen, to some extent at least, as powered by China.

China's uncompromising stance towards Japan over what Takaiichi said about disputed territories between China and Japan has definitely, I think, propelled some. of the voters to vote for her. It's created this sense of unity among the Japanese. And of course, Japanese culture and society is famed for its sense of unity. And it seems to me that that is partly what's happened in the very, very strong vote that she has received. How that now plays out is another question. I would say this bolsters Takeichi's stance of effectively remaining unmoved by Chinese pressure. But we don't know how deep the Chinese pressure will get. We don't know whether China will deploy all kinds of other economic tools against Japan. And if that was to happen,

then the pressure could build to a level at which Takaichi just simply couldn't resist it anymore. Yeah, I'm quite worried. Now, if you look at Japan's constitution, they can't become a nuclear power. She would need a supermajority in both the lower and the upper house to change that. So, It's unlikely that we see a nuclearized power in Japan. But what could be an issue, I think, in the coming year or two, is seeing whether or not she issues verbal and even military support to Taiwan. Now, there's speculation that the US is going to do more arms sales to Taiwan this year. If Japan's part of that mix,

I worry that there's going to be more diplomatic and coercive pressures in the form of export restrictions from China to both Japan and the US. so I think we shouldn't continue to watch that. That is a real concern to my mind. Okay, let's take one last quick break. Stay with us. Over the last several years, AI companies of all shapes and sizes

have been desperately trying to get their hands on every bit of available data to make their models better. This week on the Vergecast, we have the story of how Anthropic destroyed hundreds of thousands, maybe millions of books, and fed them all to Claude.

Plus, we have information on who in tech is in the Epstein files, what's going on with Netflix, whether it's woke, whether it's going to buy Warner Brothers, and whether Peloton is going to successfully sell you a treadmill ever again. All that on the Vergecast, wherever you get podcasts. Welcome back. After years of pandemic closures, China's underground club scene is roaring back to life.

From Shanghai to Chengdu, DJs, photographers, and die-hard clubbers are reclaiming the dance floor, reviving the energy and communities that make the nights unforgettable. And it's not happening in a vacuum. At the same time, global music is crossing borders in new ways, whether it's Bad Bunny, topping charts in China after his historic Grammy win and Super Bowl halftime show, or international sounds finding new audiences in China. There's a sense that nightlife culture is reconnecting China to the world again. James, I'm going to ask you straight out, have you ever been to a Chinese

undergrad club? Well, I have, but certainly not in the era of Bad Bunny. Oh, that surprised me. But yeah, I mean, I have actually. I've been to quite a few Chinese underground music clubs back in the day. They kind of pop up in hidden makeshift venues like abandoned air raid shelters or industrial spaces. Even way back in the 80s, actually, there was a very famous Chinese rock singer called Sui Jian. He's known as the father of Chinese rock. He used to work in the Beijing Philharmonic Orchestra, but then he picked a

up his electric guitar, he had a kind of Springsteen-esque, kind of raspy voice. And he used to sing about how people had nothing. I mean, his most famous song was called Nothing to My Name. And I remember he sang it in Tiananmen Square to the protesting students in 1989. And it's all about a young guy saying to his girlfriend, will you go with me? And she laughs at him because he knows he's got nothing to offer. And then at the crescendo of the song, he notices that her hands are trembling. And he says to her, could it be that you're telling me that you love me, even though I have nothing to my name?

So that was the first sort of subculture that I remember in China. But it's evolved a lot since then. And we're now in the era of Bad Bunny. So Alice, tell us all about Bad Bunny. and China and what the scene is like these days? Well, James, I'm normally a boomer in terms of my music interests. It's normally jazz and classical music with a bit of alternative rock. But I do have to say that I like Bad Bunny a lot.

And I thought his Super Bowl performance, if you haven't seen it, was just an absolute wonder to behold. It was artistically, creatively beautiful to watch. And at a time like this in the political environment in the US, I think so needed. So I highly recommend watching this afterwards. But fun fact, I was looking this up, that Bad Bunny's name in Chinese is Huai Pitou, which if you know Chinese means literally bad, naughty bunny. I think that's actually quite interesting.

And I've seen more memes in China of Bad Bunny, Huay Pitou. His album has reached number one on the Apple Music chart in China. So it's definitely gaining traction in China at a time where in the last year or two, we've seen a lot of big foreign musicians, whether it's Kanye or Katie Perry, going to China and doing live concerts. I believe Katie Perry recently was there in Hangzhou. I saw a lot of videos of her performing too. And we talked about it previously, James. I think part of this push is really consumer-led.

The government really wants to boost the consumption related to music tourism. According to China Association of Performing Arts for every single Yuan spent. on concert tickets. It generates around 5 yuan and surrounding consumption for the local city. So that's a 5x return. And at a time where China really wants to boost consumption throughout the nation, I think this can be seen as one of the pillars in which it wants to achieve this. But it's been a big reversal because if you recall, really from 2020, I would say to 2024, there was a real slowdown and even clamp down on Chinese music concerts and the underground music scene. I'll give you an example. I see Michael Pettis, who is a well-known China economist and

expert quite regularly in China. I remember just after COVID, I think around 2023 seeing him in his Beijing Hortong, and he said that unfortunately the underground scene, which he's really involved in the music scene, has pretty much died. He said prior to that, you know, Beijing was one of the most dynamic underground rock scenes around the world, which is part of why he funds underground rock artists and he's got his own label, I believe, still in China. So he's a very, very cool bloke. But last year when I saw him, he was saying that a club that he's involved with is just started up again and that even though they're not going back to the heydays of Beijing Rock, things are starting to improve and come back to life again. But this is a good representation

of how we're starting to see this new generation approach music. There's a Chinese expression for these underground raves. Effectively, it's called Yeddi, which means wild dances. And these Chinese youngsters who get involved in this, they are told where these events are very last minute and in cryptic ways, so as not to attract the attention of local authorities and they advertise it online to would-be listeners and fans. So it's an interesting way in which Chinese youths are trying to go about it to avoid too much attention from authorities, because remember drugs are illegal, the Chinese authorities heavily frowned down on profanities

and a lot of the culture attendant to underground music scene or rap culture, you know, tattoos, drugs, for instance. But we're starting to see things trickle back and that's been interesting to see in tandem with government support of music, tourism and music concerts. There's more talk I've seen recently about trying to create super concerts, kind of like Coachella in China. There's a couple already that are happening, but expanding that so that China becomes a big music festival scene.

I would have been surprised if you told me this a couple years ago, but here we are. All right, James, you know what time it is. It's prediction time. As you peer into your crystal ball, what is your prediction for the week? Right. Okay, this week I'm looking again at humanoid robots. Last year, humanoid robots sales in China are estimated to have totaled about 13,000. So that means 13,000 humanoid robots sold over the entire year. Now, we should remember that last year was the first year of mass production for humanoid robots in China, or for that matter, anywhere else in the world. So my prediction is this year, there will be around 30,000 humanoid robots sold in China.

That is obviously a significant increase. and then by a year like 2030, that number is going to go up to about 400,000 units. We're headed towards a very sharp trajectory in annual sales increases for humanoid robots. It's going to become a robot nation by 2030, I think. What about you, Alice? What kind of prediction of you got? Well, it's related to the Japan story that we've been tracking. I expect China will test out a lot of its export controls with greater frequency and degree on Japan in the coming months.

I think Takehii has been emboldened in her hawkish stance on China. The Chinese don't like it. And in a way, they will use Japan and the sanctions they put on Japan as a warning to Washington. So I could foresee further ramp up in restrictions on some of the critical minerals, some industrial goods and intermediate inputs on the grounds at their dual-use technologies. and that will be a warning shot, I think, both for other countries in the region, but in particular for the US, at a time where we've got that critical April summit that could happen between Xi and Trump in China. All right, that's all for this episode. Thank you for listening to China Decode. This is a production of Prof G Media. Our producers are David Toledo, Eric Janikis, and Ness Smith Savido. Our research associate is Dan Shalan. Our engineer is

is William Flynn. Our social producer is Jesse Milwood. Our technical director is Drew Burrows. And our executive producer is Catherine Dillon. Make sure to follow us wherever you get your podcast so you don't miss an episode and talk to you again next week.