The Prof G Pod with Scott Galloway - Dopamine Nation and the Age of Digital Drugs — with Dr. Anna Lembke

Episode Date: March 6, 2025

Dr. Anna Lembke, Professor of Psychiatry at Stanford University and author of the bestselling book, Dopamine Nation: Finding Balance in the Age of Indulgence, joins Scott to discuss the rise of addiction in the digital age – from drugs to social media – and why our brains are wired to crave more. Plus, Dr. Lembke shares practical solutions to help build a healthier relationship with pleasure. Algebra of Happiness: no is the key to success. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

On this week's episode of Net Worth and Chill, I'm chatting with internet sensation and everyone's favorite Philly influencer, Bran Flakes. He's a social media maverick and content creator turning viral moments into cold hard cash. Listen wherever you get your podcasts or watch on the YourHBFF YouTube channel. It might be enticing to try and sleep through the next four years, but if you're wondering how to survive a second Trump term while staying fully conscious, Pod Save America is here to help you process what's happening now and what comes next. Every Tuesday, Wednesday and Friday, John Lovett, Tommy Vieter, John Favreau and Dan Pfeiffer wade hip deep into the week's political news and fish out some political analysis you can trust. Yes, Tommy's shoes get ruined. Yes, he'll do it again

tomorrow because the endeavor is worth it, and so is your sanity. Tune into Pod Save America wherever you get your podcasts and on YouTube. Support for ProfG comes from Nutri-Full. We all deserve to love our hair, but sometimes that's hard to do when you have less of it than you used to. According to Nutri-Full, a lot of factors that can contribute to your hair issues are actually a reflection of what's happening on the inside, including stress and hormones. Well, now you can target the root cause of thinning hair with the help of Nutri-Full. Nutri-Full is the number one dermatologist recommended hair growth supplement brand trusted by over one and a half million people.

That's because Nutri-Full supports healthy hair growth from within by targeting key root causes of thinning, stress, hormones, aging, nutrition, lifestyle, and metabolism through whole body health. Start your hair growth journey with NutriFull. For a limited time, NutriFull is offering our listeners $10 off your first month subscription and free shipping when you go to NutriFull.com and enter the promo code PROPG. Find out why over 4,500 healthcare professionals and stylists recommend NutriFull for healthier hair. NutriFull.com, spelled N-U-T-R-A-F-O-L.com promo code prop G. That's Nutriful.com promo code

prop G. Episode 339. 339 is the area code serving the Boston, Massachusetts area. 1939, the Wizard of Oz premiere. True story, whenever I climax with a woman, I scream out, surrender Dorothy! Or I'm melting. I'm melting!

Go, go, go! ["Dog on Fire"] Welcome to the 339th episode of the Prop G Pop. What's happening? The dog is howling. He's busy. He's like one of those Belgian malinois dogs. It is not happening unless it's working all the time, like roaming property or defending someone.

I, except I'm not like that, but I basically have the tasks of a Belgian, of a Belgian malinois. And that is, I have so much shit going on today. I flew in last night from Barcelona, got in late, came here, took an edible, crashed for like five hours. Now I'm up, I'm at the Fauna Hotel, which I love. Even though it's not really my design aesthetic, it's like a very handsome, wealthy,

metrosexual Buenos Aires exploded into a hotel, which I think is pretty much the owner of this hotel. And then I got to do this and I'm going to this conference, this 0100 conference to host a lunch and I got a bomb up to Palm Beach where I'm doing a speaking gig. Then I'm on a plane in New York and you know, wash, rinse and repeat.

But anyways, I'm in Miami. It's absolutely beautiful. Isn't it good to know what I'm up to? Thank God I know where he is. Thank God I know what's going on here. Anyways, what are we going on? Today's episode we speak with Dr. Anna Lemke, professor of psychiatry at Stanford University and author of the bestselling book, Dopamine Nation, Finding Balance in the Age of Indulgence. We discuss with Dr. Lemke the rise of addiction in the digital age from drugs to social media and why our brains are wired to create more. Plus Dr. Lemke shares practical solutions to help build a healthier relationship with pleasure. I really enjoyed this conversation. You occasionally interview somebody, especially it's so rewarding when you interview

someone in the sciences or the public health field. And you get the sense they genuinely care, that they want to figure this stuff out, they want to help people. And she highlighted something, we did this interview, I think about a week ago about a lot of young men are just a lot, not just a lot of men are have addictions to porn.

And there's a lack of peer reviewed research on it because very few academics want to be known as the porn professor. And just literally after she highlighted what an issue it has become for many of her patients, I have had no joke, three men come up to me and start talking to me and we start talking about addiction and they look around and in the very self-conscious, they say, well, I have an addiction problem. And I am, we start talking and I'm, I'm pretty straightforward. I say, what's your addiction

problem? And all three times it's been porn. And I want to learn more about it because it's something that I don't think we talk a lot about. And there's very little peer-reviewed research. And as we think about men, especially young men, and the access to this type of porn, I've often said that the nicest thing in my life is getting to raise children with a competent partner. If you can figure that out, if you can find someone who you share values with, that you're aligned with around money, and that quite frankly you want to have sex with, and you are blessed with healthy children, that quite frankly you want to have sex with and you are blessed with healthy children. That's kind of the whole shooting match or at least that's what

I decided is the whole shooting match. Everything else for me was just like a means to an ends and I was never sated. I always wanted more and more money, more experiences, more relevance and I'm still on this fucking hamster wheel and is the reason why I'm here speaking to you right now. Is that fair? Is that fair? Anyways, lets me stay at the fine, you know. But if I had been a young man and had access to porn, I'm not sure any of that would have happened. And why is that?

No joke, part of the reason I used to go on campus and probably the only reason I got a 2.27 GPA from UCLA and not a 1.87 at which point I wouldn't have graduated. I wouldn't have gotten a job at Morgan Stanley. I wouldn't have gotten into a high school of business, wouldn't have met my co-founder of Profit, wouldn't have started businesses and, you know, 30 years later, 35, be at the fineena.

And that is because I would go on campus and go to class because I was hoping deep down or something in the back of my mind was that I was going to meet a strange woman, establish a rapport with her, and at some point have sex with her. That was very motivating for me. And that sounds crass, but I don't think there's anything wrong with wanting to mate. And what I tell young men is the following. I tell them, look, I consume porn, but I've tried to, for the last 10 or 15 years when kind of porn came on the scene, and I think it's really good advice, especially for young men, try and modulate your use. Because some of that desire, some of that

wanting to meet people such that you can make your own bad porn is key. You don't want to extinguish those flames of desire because those flames of desire can actually result in good things. They make you want to be more successful. They make you want to be in better shape. They make you want to develop a rap. They make you want to figure out a way to make someone else laugh. They make you want to have a plan such that you're more attractive,

such that you might in fact be able to get out there and establish your own romantic relationships. Anyways, what's the bottom line and the advice I would give to anybody, but especially young men? Look, most people consume porn. Is that true? Most men I think consume porn. I get it. But try and modulate your use and try and figure out

a way to develop the mojo, the desire, and the skills that you can get out there and start making your own bad porn. So with that, here's our conversation with Dr. Anna Lemke. Dr. Lemke, what does this podcast find you? I am physically sitting in my office here at Stanford University.

This is where I treat patients and do my work. Sounds good. So let's first write into it. In your bestselling book, Dopamine Nation, published back in 2021, you argued that constant access to stimulation is rewiring our brains four years later. Has anything changed

or any additional observations between then and now? I would say that the four years that have elapsed have really unfortunately just seen an acceleration in this problem. I guess the good news is that people are talking about it more, more aware of it. I think the groundswell really started with parents concerned about their kids, but I think in general,

the average person is now, you know, more aware of and concerned about their consumption of digital media. Something that I'm especially concerned about is the father of a 14 and 17 year old, especially with a 14 year old. And my colleague, Jonathan, I talked a lot about this, is that the rewiring is especially,

or I guess the more appropriate term would be the wiring of the brain is children are going through puberty, that that can be especially damaging. Are we about to flush into the economy or society millions of essentially dopa addicts that if they don't find it on their screen, they're going to find it elsewhere? Yeah, it's a great question.

I think it's important to emphasize that we are constantly rewiring our brains, wiring just really being a metaphor for neurons and the plasticity of neurons and the way that we're constantly making new connections between neurons. Every single experience that we have rewires our brain in some way. So, you know, the fact that we're spending enormous amounts of time online by the latest report, I think it was Pew surveys came out and said that 50, about 50% of teenagers now report being continuously online during the waking hours. Of course that is rewiring our brain. The question is

to what end, right? Because we have to adapt to any environment. We're always rewiring our brains, but are we now rewiring our brains in a way that is ultimately not good for us as individuals, not good for societies, not good for humanity. And I mean, I would say, I think I'm a little bit more measured than Jonathan Hyde about this, although I totally respect him and his work. I would say, yes, there is a lot to be concerned about here,

but that I'm ultimately optimistic that we will both self and other regulate. What do I mean by that? I'm already seeing people who are beginning to say, you know what, this isn't good for me or this isn't good for my family. Even teenagers themselves forming these groups and saying, let's get off social media together. Let's try to do things that we can do in real life with each other. Other regulate because it can't just be left up to the individual. This is far too powerful a transformation to just say, well, you know, it's up to you to figure out how to moderate your consumption of digital media. We have to get smartphones out of schools,

bell to bell. We have to hold the companies accountable. We have to legislate particularly to protect kids. Talk about the different types. We have to legislate particularly to protect kids. Talk about the different types of addiction. There's obviously addiction to screen and there's drugs, there's alcohol, there's pornography, there's gaming. What, is there any way to sort of stack rank these addictions? And I was always told, I'm pretty open on my podcast. I love marijuana.

I loved it in college. I took kind of a 20 year break because I was working my ass off and I've started using it again and I enjoy it. And I actually think it's additive to my life. And, but I remember people was telling me that it was a gateway drug to more serious addictions. If you were to sort of stack rank different types of addictions in terms of what is the most dangerous or what perhaps is a gateway to other things. Any thoughts about sort of the hierarchy or the waterfall of different types of addiction? Great question. I have become pretty much convinced over the course of my career that it depends on the person and their unique wiring and their drug of choice. For one given individual, traditional

drugs like alcohol, cannabis, opioids, nicotine may not hold much appeal, but social media may indeed be the drug that overpowers them and leads to a very serious and devastating addiction. Furthermore, there are people are variably vulnerable to addiction period. Some people are much more vulnerable than others and can get addicted to a lot of different substances and behaviors. Other people getting addicted is something that probably won't happen to them to a significant degree.

And again, the uniqueness of the wiring, although I have argued that we're all more vulnerable to addiction now than before because of the drugification of our environment. I think we also have to take into consideration that when we're thinking broadly about danger, it's not just the addictiveness of the drug, like nicotine is very addictive for many people, but also the lethality of the drug. So opioids is something that can kill when, even when the dose is just a little bit beyond what the dose is for the desired effect. That's not true in the short term for nicotine or cannabis, right?

Which can do significant harm in people who are addicted and use heavily, but it usually takes a long time, many, many years of exposure. In your case, somebody who loves marijuana, who gave it up for a period of time is now using it and just basically finds it enjoyable, you know, great. It's nice if that can be an enjoyable part of a person's life. Intoxicants in various forms have been around since the beginning of time. The one thing that I would caution about always is just that we're not always the best self-observers around whether or not our enjoyment is really leading us to, our short-term enjoyment is really leading to long our short term enjoyment is really leading to long term enjoyment or is interfering in ways that we can't see just because these drugs tend to interfere with our

insight in terms of what they're doing to us. And often they can be causing harm or we can be getting addicted and really not see it. I've observed something and I'd love you to get, or I'd love to get your thoughts on it. I go to a lot of conferences where there's a lot of young, successful people, whether it's South by Southwest, or I go to this event called Summit. And I've noticed over the last, going to these events for the last 20 years, that young people are not drinking. And, but it's not as if they've gone healthy or healthier. They, the aspirational set likes to think

they've discovered a new technology and that they're innovators. And now they're all doing ketamine, not all. A lot of them have substituted or traded out alcohol for ketamine, ecstasy slash molly, 2C, which I guess is a mix of ketamine and molly, even to the point where they would roam around these conferences with their own concoction

using eye droppers and different means of, I mean, it just staggering to me. I was on, I went to this thing called Summit at Sea and it was on a cruise ship and I went up and ordered a drink and the bartender said, "'Jesus, someone's actually ordering a drink.'" And this is amongst a crew doctor of wealthy young people who would generally there'd be a line at the bar

and there are, oh, and the one I missed was mushroom chocolates. And I imagine there's a lot of edibles in there too. I've just seen an enormous, and if you look at, it's having such weird knock-on effects in London, 40% of nightclubs have closed since pre-pandemic because kids aren't drinking. And some of that is they don't have the money anymore, but they're swapped out. They're under the impression that it's, uh, healthier or less bad for you.

And they'd rather do mushroom chocolates and have one drink or Mali. And they see alcohol as old technology. I'm curious if you see, if you know, this is just anecdotal evidence, or if you see real evidence of this and what your thoughts are around addiction and what it means for society when we're no longer two martini lunches, we're maybe doing a little bit of ketamine and trying to get on with our day. What do you see going on here?

Yeah, well, I mean, you know, I'm really torn because on one level as an addiction psychiatrist, I'm thrilled that people are taking more seriously the harms of alcohol, which we've known for many thousands of years. Of course, again, alcohol, um, which we've known for, you know, many thousands of years, of course, again, alcohol in moderation, the healthiest people being those who drink no more than one to two

standard drinks per week and the threshold per week, right. Per week. So if we're taking the healthiest people on the planet. I was almost entirely sure you were going to say for Dan, but okay, maybe. I know, I know.

I know. But let me qualify that. Let me qualify that. Okay. So that's a J-shaped curve that shows that people who drink one to two standard drinks per week are the healthiest, but it's probably because there are confounds there.

Like those are people who do a lot of things in moderation. They eat in moderation. They exercise in moderation. They're even healthier than people who don't drink at all, but that's not because alcohol itself is good for us. It's because in that non-drinking cohort, you get people who are what we call sick quitters who used to drink heavily and now are on the liver transplant list. But what we do know is that beyond two drinks per week, and again, these are large epidemiologic catchment studies. One given individual is going to have their own trajectory,

but beyond two drinks a week, you get to a threshold in women where more than seven drinks per week and men, men more than 14 drinks per week, where you start to see a significant increase in all cause, morbidity and mortality, whether it's risk of cancer, risk of accidental death or trauma, risk of pancreatitis, liver disease, dementia, what have you. So that's why we generally recommend that men have no more than 14 standard drinks per week and no more than four on a given occasion, women no more than seven per week and no more than four on a given occasion, women no more than seven per week and no more than three on a given occasion. But in general, through most of my career, it's been an uphill battle trying to convince people that alcohol is not good for them when consumed

in excess, excess being as I just defined it with the Fortune of Four. There's been a huge sea change in the last five years where all of a sudden people seem much more aware of the dangers of alcohol, much less inclined to consume it recreationally because they're concerned with the dangers. This maps perfectly with what we know about perceived dangers in use. When people perceive that a substance is dangerous, they're less likely to use it, less likely to use it in excess, less likely to get addicted. The huge shift along with that I think is twofold.

One, what you've already identified, the incredible surgence of designer drugs in all their various forms including plant medicines, hallucinogens, psychedelics, where people really misperceive the dangers, think they're much safer than they actually are, and also have become equated with having some kind of actualization experience or spiritual growth experience. So you've got the combination of people thinking they're not dangerous. Why? Because they've been heavily promoted as not dangerous, including the studies that promote their use, for example, the use of psilocybin as a treatment for depression. Those studies systematically ignore harms,

don't document harms. So, and the lay press has picked that up, that has legs, and now people think, oh, you know, hallucinogens, psychedelics, they're not addictive, they're not harmful, and I might have a spiritual awakening. So that's what's happening there. I think the other piece of it too,

that can't be ignored is that we are narcotizing ourselves with digital media. So where we might go drink and get together with others, which in some sense, at least it was more social. You know, now, you know, I can speak for myself. I'm like in my bedroom watching one YouTube video after another and it feels very pleasant. And yet I know it's not good for me.

We'll be right back. Suppose in the future there's an artificial intelligence. I've been asking some very smart people a question that's been on a lot of our minds. Should we be worried about artificial intelligence? But the answers I got from the greatest minds in AI surprised me. One guy told a parable of an AI that could cause an apocalypse.

Let's give this superintelligent AI a simple goal. Produce paper clips. Via paper clip? Another woman cast AI as an octopus. We posit this octopus to be mischievous as well. And yet another story sounded like it was out of the Bible. She seems likely to drown. What should you do?

Imagining AI as a savior. Like a god. And all of these fantastical tales from the greatest minds in AI made me wonder, maybe even these people don't know what to think. I'm Julia Longoria, Good Robot, a series about AI coming March 12th on Unexplainable, wherever you get podcasts. Support for the show comes from Betterment.

When investing your money starts to feel like a second job, Betterment steps in with a little work-life balance. They're an automated investing and savings app, which means they do the work. While they build and manage your portfolio, you build and manage your weekend plans. While they make it easy to invest for what matters, you just get to enjoy what matters. Their automated tools simplify the complex and put your money to work, optimizing day after day and again and again.

So go ahead, take your time to rest and recharge because while your money doesn't need a work-life balance, you do. Make your money hustle with Betterment. Get started at betterment.com. That's B-E-T-T-E-R-M-E-N-T dot com. Investing involves risk, performance not guaranteed. Support for Prop G comes from LinkedIn.

One of the hardest parts about B2B marketing is reaching the right audience. And sometimes it feels like the only solution is posting everywhere, paying exorbitant amounts of money just to get one company to notice you. It's time for a new strategy so your ads don't get lost in the noise. LinkedIn ads can help by ensuring your message makes it to the right audience. LinkedIn has grown to a network of over 1 billion professionals making it stand apart from other ad buys. You can target your buyers by job title, industry, company role, seniority skills, and company revenue. LinkedIn has all the professionals you need to reach in one

place. So stop wasting budget on the wrong audience and start targeting the right professionals only on LinkedIn ads. LinkedIn will even give you a hundred dollar credit on your next campaign so you can try it yourself. Just go to linkedin.com slash Scott. That's linkedin.com slash Scott. Terms and conditions apply only on LinkedIn ads. So, and I don't know if the producer warned you, but basically I use these podcasts and the guests as a vehicle to talk about me. You know what?

Go for it. I love it. It's always more interesting for me because I get to like, you know, see a real human being and I have one of the top domain experts in the world. So I wanna talk- On yourself or on something? I'm teasing you. On addictions, and I'm fascinated with addictions. And I wanna talk about a couple of addictions

I think I have, and you talk about whether they're actually clinically diagnosed addictions and what to do about them. And then I wanna talk about the advice I give to young men and what I'm getting right and wrong. Cause what I realize is I have a series of principles that I want to talk about the advice I give to young men and what I'm getting right and wrong. Cause I, what I realized is I have a series of principles that I lecture young men about. And I don't know, I think I'm right, but I

want to know what I don't know. So the first is I believe that everyone has a certain amount of addictions. So that's not true. Some more than others, but I think almost everybody has some level of something they do that is probably, if they did less, it would probably be better for them across their life, whether it's addictions to shopping, the affirmation, whatever it might be.

And I am addicted to the affirmation of strangers. I care too much about what other people who I don't know will never know, think. And sometimes it gets in the way of my relationships with people who I do, I should care about. Someone will say something mean about me or insult my work on a social media platform and it inhibits my ability to be close to my loved ones that weekend. I see that as an addiction, an addiction to the affirmation of others and strangers.

And I think that might be something that plagues quite frankly a lot of successful people or insecure people. And then I would also argue I have an addiction to money that I'm very blessed and I got kind of enough money to live well or be economically secure. And I still, almost every waking hour spent a decent amount of that time thinking about how to get more money, even when I should probably, and I talk myself into believing it's for me and my family, but it's really just an addiction.

I've spent so long trying to dig out of economic insecurity that I've become addicted to more, specifically more money. So addiction to the affirmation of others, addiction to money. Are those clinically diagnosed addictions and how should I be thinking about them? Wow, those are really good ones

that I don't get asked about very often. So thank you for your honest self-disclosure. Let me go back a little bit to your first comment, this idea that everybody has something that they do more of than they wish they did. And that's been true since the beginning of time. We know going all the way back to what Aristotle called wide-eyed incontinence. Incontinence is actually something that we use in medicine to talk about when people can't hold their bladder. But this kind of where Aristotle talked about wide-eyed incontinence, I see the thing that I am doing. I have wide eyes when I'm seeing it. I want to stop doing as much of it as I'm doing and yet I am unable to. And so I agree with you that that is true for all of us in varying degrees.

And it's because of the way we are wired over, you know, many, many, many thousands of years of evolution to reflexively approach pleasure and avoid pain, because that is what ensured our survival in a world of scarcity and ever-present danger which is the world that we lived in for most of human existence. As civilization has progressed, we have managed to use our big brains to apply technology and site right. Now we've drugified everything. We've made it more potently rewarding, more easily accessible, more abundant, more novel. And so now we're all struggling with this problem of compulsive over consumption, which is really making us unhappy. This idea of the affirmation of strangers,

so it's very clear that we are also wired over evolution to want to connect with people. You know, being in a tribe is what ensures that we will find mates, steward scarce resources, protect ourselves against predators, and that wiring works through our dopamine reward pathway. We know that oxytocin, a love hormone, binds to dopamine releasing neurons in the reward circuitry to release dopamine, which is our pleasure reward neurotransmitter. The more that dopamine is released and the faster that it's released, the better it feels. And this is healthy and normal and wonderful until you have drugified human connection, which is exactly what the internet and social media and digital media has

done. So you're somebody who's relational, you care about what other people think of you. We all do, by the way, to varying degrees, but most of us, if not all of us, care what other people think that's so deeply ingrained. But now you live in a world where you can have instant affirmation or its opposite at scale, hundreds to thousands to millions of people, right, quantified with likes and shares and on and on. And now you really have a very potent drug, which when it's going well is incredibly reinforcing, much more so than some nice compliment my husband might give me. Like that's not as exciting as my book is number one on Amazon, right? With a whole bunch of reviews and people telling me

that I'm great. And it's very easy to get caught up in that. So yes, I think we can get addicted to the affirmation of strangers. I think that the internet and social media has become the drugification of social affirmation, making us all more vulnerable to that problem. And my intervention for that problem would be the same as for people addicted to drugs and alcohol, which would be to abstain from social affirmation venues, especially when you're dealing with them at scale. So try to avoid those types of situations where you would be exposed to like all of the love because ultimately what happens with that huge surge of dopamine is that our brain compensates

by down regulating dopamine transmission, not just to tonic baseline levels, but actually below baseline, we go into a dopamine deficit state, that is the addicted brain. Now we need more of our drug in more potent forms, not to get high and feel good, but just to sort of level our balance, go back to baseline and feel normal. And we're in a constant state of craving.

Plus, we're experiencing the universal symptoms of withdrawal from any addictive substance, which are anxiety, irritability, insomnia, dysphoria, and craving. Getting more of our drug temporarily relieves that but it doesn't last very long and actually makes the problem worse. And in terms of money, I mean there's so much evidence that monetary gain lights up the same reward pathway as drugs and alcohol. It's why we're seeing a huge, huge increase in online pathological gambling. Sports betting has been made legal in many states in the nation. And with it, like a 300 to 500% increase in calls to hotline pathological gambling centers

because people are losing everything in the face of their parlays having to do with whether or not the referee is going to touch his hat five times, you know, during the game. So yeah, I mean, this is sort of human nature, like writ large, because we live in an ecosystem that has taken all of these things that are in some fundamental way, healthy and good for us and something that our brains need to be doing and turned it into a drug. Yeah. It's part of thought.

I believe that one of, I'm constantly saying something as a crisis, I overuse the word crisis, but I do think we have a crisis of loneliness. Do you think you can be addicted to loneliness or that we just fill in the dope that we used to get from being social to, as you referenced, getting that hit with a low cost, low entry, low risk activity like YouTube or what have you. Can you get it? I have to force myself. It takes me almost as much discipline to get out and be around other people as it is to drink less. I have become, as I've gotten older, addicted to being alone. And I just find it easier comforting whatever happens.

And I know it's bad for me. Could you say a certain level of deciding to be alone, maybe more than it's healthy, could that be classified as an addiction? Drugs in all their forms are the great human replacement. Addiction is a disease of loneliness. Even if we have a lot of great people in our lives, if we get addicted, we will isolate and we will use our drug to replace that human connection. And I say that because we sometimes talk about loneliness as the cause of addiction, but more often than not what I see is that the addiction causes the loneliness. That because we're able to use this drug or this device or this behavior

to meet our physical, emotional, sexual needs, we are no longer seeking out other people. And it's an enormous problem because not only are more people in the United States actually physically living alone than ever before, but more people than ever before are endorsing loneliness. So this is a huge problem. And again, the antidote is to do the thing that's painful and difficult in the short term because in the long term, it will make us feel better

and it will make our lives better. How have you seen the patients and the research you see come through your office and across your desk, which addictions or types of addictions have you seen increase and decrease? So are the, in terms of our patient population, the most common addictions for years have been the usual suspects, alcohol, nicotine, cannabis, and then starting the early 2000s, opioids, prescription opioids, segueing to heroin and illicit fentanyl. Starting in the early 2000s, we saw the very first signal of typically middle

age men coming in with sex, pornography, and compulsive masturbation addiction and almost universally endorsing that it was the advent of the internet and then explicitly the mobile devices, the smartphones that led them from moderate, manageable pornography use to immoderate, unmanageable addictive use and destroying lives, like losing their families, their jobs, engaging in illegal activity. Since that time, we've just seen an increase in escalation in people presenting with digital media addictions, video games, social media, online gambling, online shopping, the internet more broadly, a kind of diffuse addiction to the internet.

So that's what we're really seeing increasing. You know, we're here in Northern California, so cannabis is huge. We're also seeing a lot of, as we talked about, sort of designer drugs, psychedelics, hallucinogens. Like nobody uses, they used to call, they used to like, let's say, 25, 30 years ago, they had this term white glove alcoholics. These were folks who like, they were just addicted to alcohol and not anything else. We never see that anymore. Everybody's using a whole bunch of stuff. It's a real sort of polypharmacy festival.

I coach and work with a lot of young people, specifically, I think a lot about young men. And the addiction I see emerging that I don't think is getting enough attention that just feels like a ticking time bomb to me is online gambling. And the reason I think of it as being so dangerous is my mother was a docent at the Bellagio in Vegas. And so she used to come home with all these facts about gambling addiction. And she told me, and you can confirm or deny this, that it has the highest suicide rate because you can get in so deep. If, if I develop an addiction to meth or alcohol, it generally becomes pretty

visible to the people around me and they intervene and try to do something. becomes pretty visible to the people around me and they intervene and try to do something. I can get so deep with gambling and nobody knows. And then I get in so deep, I spent my kids college fund, mortgage the house, my spouse doesn't know what I've done. I see no way out. I decide to end it. And I see, I've just seen these stats that 50% of college males bet on the Superbowl. And I see occasionally I'm in a scenario where I'm with a bunch of young men and they're all on their phones and I think, oh, that's natural people. I know kids are on the phones. They're all gambling on the game they're watching and they're not gambled.

They're not doing a hundred bucks Liverpool will beat Arsenal. They're gambling every seven minutes. It's the, the, the, the ball's going to turn over. What you were saying about the ref and I, and these, I know these companies and the people architecting these algorithms, they will figure out who's going to lose their money and encourage them to bet more. And the ones who actually know what they're doing, they will block out of the platform, so it's a guaranteed loss of income.

So if, and I like to gamble. I think it's fun. I go to Vegas, I gamble, but I assume it's consumption. I assume I'm going to lose it all. It strikes me that we might, and tell me if I'm being just, you know, hyperbolic or inflammatory or I don't know, exaggerating or, or, or just, you know, worrying too much here that we're going to have hundreds of thousands of young men. And my sense is young men, and again, I'd like you to validate

and nullify this, are much more prone to gambling addiction than women who enter the world with massive financial hangovers and shame because of the constant presence of gambling apps. Your thoughts. Yeah, so it's funny that you, I thought for sure you were gonna say online pornography because I would probably put, in terms of risks to men living in the world today,

I would probably put that above online gambling, but I would make online gambling a close second. And it's very hard to get actual data on this, but this is sort of based on my clinical impression and what I'm seeing. Of course, I've seen treatment seekers, but yeah, this is an enormous problem. I always like to start by emphasizing the vast majority of people who gamble will not get addicted to gambling. And that's true for any drug, right? So most people will be able to moderate their use. But as with drugs and alcohol, about 20, well, 10 to 20% of folks who consume will develop an addiction. An addiction is a brain disease, a very serious and potentially life-threatening one.

And until you've either experienced it yourself or seen it in somebody you care about deeply, it's really hard to imagine how people could get to a place where they would sacrifice everything in pursuit of their drug, but that's exactly what happens. And so what is the vulnerability there? What is the difference? And the risks I usually classify into nature, nurture, and neighborhood. So nature, some people are inherently more vulnerable than others, but as we've talked about, drug of choice matters.

If you meet your drug of choice and it's gambling, you may never get addicted to alcohol, but gambling may just be the end of you. Co-occurring psychiatric disorders put people at risk because of a kind of a self-medication myth and cycle. We know that trauma contributes to the risk of addiction. That's the nurture part of it. But also neighborhood is really key. And this is again, the ecosystem that we live in.

The easier it is to get your drug of choice, the more of it you'll use, the more you'll change your brain and the more likely you will be to develop a very serious addiction. So yeah, I mean gambling is everywhere. There's enough data to verify your impression that it's more men than women, although women also struggle with it. The same is true for online pornography, more men than women develop an addiction to that, although women do develop pornography and sex addictions. There are some addictions where women are more vulnerable than men like online shopping There are some addictions where women are more vulnerable than men like online shopping and social media. But in terms of gambling and pornography, definitely men are more vulnerable. And I absolutely agree with you that this is a huge and largely unseen problem, complicated

as you say by the shame issue where for gambling addiction, there's still so much in our culture about being a man who becomes wealthy and successful as sort of our modern day hero. That if you're somebody who's not done that or, God forbid, gotten into financial trouble, very, very hard to come forward and ask for help. And frankly, the same is true with sex and pornography addiction. We have this prevailing cultural, I believe false notion, that all men are sexual predators. And so to come forward, you can only imagine the shame of somebody having to come forward and say,

like, I'm addicted to sex or I'm addicted to pornography or I watch, you know watch these types of pornographic images and they're stimulating for me. Very shameful, very hard. I've had patients come in and like on their, you know, come in and say they had a problem with like some drug, which wasn't even their problem. It was pornography and it took them four visits to be able to admit it. Huge, huge problem here. And again, access, ease of access, quantity, it's all at the touch of our fingertips, which just makes it very, very difficult for us as humans who are reflexively wired to approach pleasure

and avoid pain to withstand the lure of these incredibly potent drugs. There are professors and academics such yourself looking at gaming. I found it really difficult to find anybody with deep domain expertise or peer-reviewed research around porn. And my assumption is that professors don't want to be known as Professor Porn. That there's actually shame in the academic community. You don't want to be that guy or gal.

It's like, well, why did you decide to do that professor? It's just, there's, it's the second largest category, I think on the internet. And relative to the size of it, there's ridiculous scant amount or dearth of research around it. I had thought that, or some of the stuff I'd read is that it's a small population consuming a disproportionate amount of porn that most men, young men and young women are able to modulate it. My fear around it has always been that it just being very transparent. One of the reasons I went on campus every day at UCLA was one, cause I knew I was

supposed to go to class, but two, the prospect that I might meet someone who over the medium or long-term would decide to have sex with me. Yeah. You sound like my son. Well, I think I sound like, I'm gonna say, I sound like most sons in their head, and I think I just articulate it.

And if I'd had porn available at home, I'm pretty certain I wouldn't have been on campus five days a week, I might've gone to four or three or two, because it just might've been. I mean, the reality is I wanted sex so badly and my hormones were raging so much that I was willing to take social risk and go out and try and meet people. And by the way, I think that's really healthy to think I want to take these risks, I want to meet people in hopes that I can have a coffee, invite to a party, establish a relationship,

and at some point along the way, maybe have those types of physical encounters. I think that is really, really healthy. And I worry that, and curious to get your take, that it's not the hardcore addicts that are screwing up America around this stuff. It's that it just decreases across an enormous population of young men, their willingness

to establish connections with others. That we're evolving, we're maturing a new species of asexual, asocial males that never get categorized or clinically diagnosed as addicts, but are just alone their whole lives and never developed these skills. Is there a low level form of, I don't even call it addiction, but avoidance or replacement theory that could be even more damaging than

what we think of as traditionally diagnosed addiction? Absolutely. And there are data to support this. So young people are having, for all our liberated support this. So young people are having, for all our liberated sexual moors, young people are having less sex today than ever before. And many young men will report that they feel like the social landscape out there when it comes to dating and having sex is so uncertain and such a landmine that they just end up staying home watching pornography and masturbating.

And for folks who are vulnerable to that as their drug of choice, it can evolve to the point where they literally cannot stop. Like with any drug, they need more potent forms over time. So pornography becomes chat rooms, chat rooms become meeting in person, prostitutes, child pornography. I mean, this is a huge issue right now. And by the way, I think your point here about it being so widespread that we can hardly even call it, it's like an endemic disease. It's not even like a rare disease. I have had in the last little bit of like the last month, two mothers call me who are in desperation because their sons have been identified as viewers of child pornography.

Now these are teenage boys who are watching teenage girls and who now are facing potential felony. So I just think that the whole system is not set up for the degree to which this behavior has become so widespread, so normative. We can't be convicting all of these young men of felonies. I'm not by any means endorsing child pornography or teen pornography. My personal opinion is that none of it's good for so many reasons. None of it's good for so many reasons.

But the issue is we have a court system who is now looking to convict an 18-year-old boy for viewing pornography of a 17-year-old girl and facing like being a lifetime sex man. Like our legal system has clearly not caught up with what is happening. And the corporations that make and profit from these media are not remotely being held responsible for what's going on. I mean, this is really endemic proportion problems. And yeah, in terms of creating, you know, it's kind of a, I mean,

I talk about the smartphone as our masturbation machines and I mean that like in every sense of the word. That's what they are. We're using the internet and these devices to meet all of these needs that used to require other people. And part of what connects people together is our interdependency, our mutual need. If we didn't need other people, we wouldn't bother to do the work to go interact with them because it's a heck of a lot of work and it's complicated and it's, you know, it's ambiguous and it's painful, you know, because of all the ways in which we're all so complicated. So yeah, this is a huge problem.

We were like, we're like, we're, we're creating a generation of mole people as in mole the animals who, who never go out and never leave their little hidey holes. Super scary. We'll be right back. We're taking Vox Media Podcasts on the road and heading back to Austin for the South by Southwest

Festival, March 8th through the 10th. What a thrill, chicken fajitas, queso, strawberry margarita, extra shot of tequila. There you'll be able to see special live episodes of hit shows including our show Pivot, Where Should We Begin with Esther Perel, A Touch More with Sue Bird and Megan Rapinoe, Not Just Football with Cam Hayward,

and more presented by Smartsheet. The Vox Media Podcast stage at South by Southwest is open to all South by Southwest badge holders. We hope to see you at the Austin Convention Center soon. I'm not joking, I love South by Southwest. The people are a ton of fun. It's a great time. If you do come, come up and say hi.

Visit voxmedia.com slash SXSW to learn more. That's voxmedia.com slash S-X-S-W to learn more. That's voxmedia.com slash S-X-S-W. Support for Prop G comes from 1-800-Flowers. Roses are a classic way to say, I love you. And since Valentine's Day is coming up, you might want to start thinking about how you're going to celebrate it. You can gift a beautiful bouquet to a special person this year with the help of 1-800-Flowers.com. They offer stunning, high quality bouquets and each one is crafted with roses picked at their peak and cared for every step of

the way. They're shipped fresh to ensure lasting beauty and right now 1-800 Flowers has a special offer. When you buy one dozen, they'll double your bouquet to two dozen roses so you can get double the roses for free. Our own producer, Claire, ordered from 1-800-Flowers and she thought, Claire, bomb in here. What did you think? What did you think of those flowers? They're the best roses I've ever received.

They're beautiful. So happy to get them. There you go. Their bouquets are selling fast and you can lock in your order today. Win their heart this Valentine's Day at 1800flowers.com. To claim your double your roses offer, go to 1800flowers.com slash ProfG. That's 1800flowers.com slash ProfG.

We're taking Box Media Podcasts on the road and heading back to Austin for the South by Southwest Festival, March 8th to the 10th. What a thrill! We'll be doing special live episodes of hit shows including Pivot. That's right, the dogs going to the great state of Texas. Where should we begin? With Esther Perel, A Touch More with Sue Bird and Megan Rapinoe, Not Just Football with Cam Heyward, and more, presented by Smartsheet. The Vox Media Podcast stage at South by Southwest is open to all South by Southwest badge holders. We hope to see you at the Austin Convention Center soon. Visit voxmedia.com slash S-X-S-W to learn more.

That's voxmedia.com slash S-X-S-W. We're back with more from Dr. Anna Lemke. I want to move to solutions, and I'm sure you get calls from government officials in D.C. and Sacramento who ask for your advice on this stuff. I think most of this, if I could think of one thing to try and set a context that would reduce addiction, it would be third spaces. And that is trying to get as many young people as often as possible in the company of other young people

and in the company of potential mentors, friends, and mates. I was in Israel after October 7th at the Nova music festival site or Memorial. And I met with an idea battalion of IDF soldiers. And there were these, these young, extraordinary fit. 120 kids, 19 to 21 outdoors in the company of each other. Many of them go on to start businesses together, lifelong friends, a lot of them meet their spouses, outdoors, serving in the agency of something bigger than themselves.

And I thought, I just don't think nearly as many of these young adults are going to end up addicts. And I thought, how can we, how can we do this a million times in different ways, whether it's continuing education, softball league, church, nonprofit, like third spaces. If I could do one thing, it would be third spaces. What is the one thing, your thoughts on that and what is the one or two things you would want to do to set up a context of success and addiction avoidance?

Because we are creatures innately designed to approach pleasure and avoid pain, we need to create spaces where we have access to healthy sources of pleasure and a sufficient challenge to make that interesting enough for us that we creatures who need a certain degree of friction find it interesting and also spaces that limit our access to unhealthy sources of pleasure, unhealthy dopamine as in the instant pleasures of the various intoxicants we've been talking about. So I love the idea of third spaces, but it sounds a little rarefied like it would be for the elite and the wealthy. We have the potential to create those third spaces in the public school system,

where kids spend the vast majority of their lived hours. So after school programs. Not even after school, during school. How can we do that? Get smartphones out of schools, bell to bell. Create, give hands on, bring back, what happened to, I mean, I didn't like, you know, Auto Shop, but at least we had it, you know?

I mean, let's have more art, more hands-on stuff. Let's have writing classes where they're not allowed to use ChatGTP and they get real, you know, not to say that we should never use those tools, but everything has gone online in the schools. It's all digitized. We're learning everything by watching somebody else do something. Kids need to do. And schools are the place, the default place to make that happen, which means getting the digital drugs out of their hands during school time hours. I'm also a huge believer in age verification. We have to recognize that digital media is a drug for the vulnerable.

The vulnerable include a kid with a developing brain. We cannot have five-year-olds on iPads for eight hours a day. What do you think that number is? Is it 16? Is it 12? What is it? I think it's at minimum, at minimum 13. And, and even then I think there has to be a lot more in terms of guard rails. So we really need real age verification, like the real deal, you know, where you

have like a third party site you're at. And I know there's a lot of problems with that in terms of people's privacy, but I'm sorry, we make a lot of sacrifices to protect the vulnerable few as we should do in our society. And we already don't let kids drive cars, buy firearms, go into casinos and gamble, buy cigarettes, buy alcohol, buy drugs. We already- Join the military. Yeah. We educate a lot of things. Yeah, like we recognize that kids have vulnerable grains

and that their frontal lobe isn't fully connected and that if we just let them run amok, we would have many fewer kids on the planet and we got to protect our kids. So that's what I think. Do you have kids, doctor? I do, yeah. And what advice would you have?

I find it difficult sometimes to discern between normal adolescent behavior, which is abnormal as far as I can tell. And when I should be worried, when I should think, okay, he takes his phone into the bathroom to watch TikTok and pretends he's in the bathroom for 10, 20 minutes. Okay. Is this 14 year old behavior or should I be worried? And as someone who's been a parent and

what pieces of advice, I don't know how old your children are, but as it relates to addiction, I don't know how old your children are, but as it relates to addiction, are there any sort of unlocks or critical success factors or red flags in your child's behavior where you can help discern the difference between what you'll call, not necessarily behavior we shouldn't correct, you know, get out of the bathroom enough already, but where you probably think, okay, this is getting serious and

might require professional intervention. Yeah, so there's no blood test or brain scan and diagnose addiction. We base it on phenomenology on what's called the DSM, the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, which briefly summarized is the four C's, control, compulsions, cravings, and consequences, especially continued use despite consequences.

The problem is that a lot of kids use substances, engage in addictive behaviors, and don't have obvious consequences. So it's very hard to tell at that age because they're young, they're resilient, and they're good at hiding it. So although you won't find these criteria in the DSM, I think a warning sign to look for, unless there are obvious signs of unraveling, but if you've got a kid who, you know, isn't obviously unraveling but you're kind of wondering, is look for lying and other anti-social behavior. Again, you won't find that in any psychiatric diagnostic manual, but I think those are very important soft signs of something going wrong with the kid or in the family. Now all people lie, the average adult tells one to two lies per day. These tend to be small little lies about hiding our own selfishness and foibles, and teenagers

definitely lie. But if you get a kind of a more significant systematic lying about where I've been, who I was with, what I was doing, or even just kind of anti-social behavior, rudeness, hostility, rage, these are the things that I think, you know, we should look for as potential warning signs for something going wrong with our kid. Last question, Dr. And you've been very generous with your time. Very curious to get your thoughts and take on GLP-1 drugs. GLP-1 drugs are super exciting. I'm really glad they're here. They don't work for everyone all

the time because we're all unique and we have these unique brains. But the more tools we have to stop the kind of addiction chatter that happens for some people, the better. As you know, GLP-1 agonists are FDA approved to treat diabetes and obesity. They modulate stomach emptying, slow down the gastric flow, and make people feel more full. But they also work on the brain's reward pathway. They modulate dopamine release, our reward neurotransmitter, and there is very active research now looking at their use broadly in addictions, foremost alcohol addiction, but also there's some preliminary evidence for benefit with

nicotine addiction with opioid use disorder, which is really interesting, as well as behavioral addictions like gambling and sex. We are using them off label occasionally in our clinic for treatment refractory alcohol use disorder. This is folks who have tried everything for their alcohol addiction, and we're getting some good traction in a few of our folks. Other folks try it and don't find it that helpful. So, you know, nothing is going to be like the miracle drug.

I don't think GLP-1s will either, but they're exciting new development and they can be very effective for food addiction and potentially other addictions as well. Dr. Anna Lemke is a professor of psychiatry at Stanford University School of Medicine. She's also the author of the bestselling book, Dopamine Nation, Finding Balance in the Age of Indulgence.

I really enjoyed this conversation and you're doing such important work and you have such a nice vibe about you. You just reek of credibility and I can see why you're having such an impact as I find myself just hanging on every word because I get the sense that you are really, I don't know, a good actor trying to just call balls and strikes. Really appreciate your good work and enjoy the conversation, Doctor. How do you feel about the future of happiness? Outro of happiness.

I am starting, I had a bit of a gap, but I'm starting to coach young men again. And actually had a kid come up to me last night, this guy in his early 30s, super impressive in the ad tech market, making real good money. And kind of stalking me and asking me to be his mentor. And finally I just said, dude, you don't need my help. And who I'm trying to focus on are quite frankly, young men who are struggling. And I've actually taken on a couple men my age who are trying to reinvent themselves who are struggling, but I'm doing this exercise and it's having real,

it's yielding real benefits, especially with young men. And that is, I was just struck by the stat I read that over half of men, ages 18 to 24 have never asked a woman out in person. They'll swipe right, right? They'll email somebody or whatever it might be, or they'll, who knows, like go on Craigslist and get whatever. But there's very, the majority of men, 18 to 24 have not asked a woman out in person. And that just rattled me and made me so upset and sad. When I think about 18 to 24 for me,

it was putting myself in an environment where I'd have a greater likelihood of being able to ask a woman out. And I show me someone who can ask a woman out or handle the rejection or be successful. I'm going to show you someone. Anyone who's good in a bar is good in a boardroom. I think it's a key skill for young men. And so the exercise I've been doing, and I talk a lot about this is one, we're going to get fit two, we're going to start making a little bit of money.

No matter what it is, lift driver,, TaskRabbit. Three, we're gonna put ourselves in a context, in an environment with strangers regularly, in the context of something bigger than you, whether it's a church group, softball league, nonprofit, whatever it might be. And, and this is what we're gonna do. And this is what I recommend if you're a young man right now.

I need you to approach a stranger and express interest in friendship or exploring a romantic relationship. And those are weird words. You would never say that, Hey, are you, you know, what are you doing this weekend? You want to get together, go to a bar, watch the game. Hi, would you, you know, lay on your wrap or develop your app or lack thereof? Would you mention grabbing coffee or grabbing a drink, what have you. And that's not the win.

That's not the exercise. The win is I need you to get to know. And unfortunately that happens a lot. Right. And that is, I want you to go up to someone, do your best, try, say hi, and shoot, would you like to have coffee? And then call me the next day. And this is what's going to happen.

Most of the time, the answer will have been a no. It's usually a polite no, but it's usually a no. And that, and then I'm going to say, how are you? And this is what you're going to tell me. You're going to say, well, I'm upset, I'm bummed, but yeah, on the whole I'm fine. That's the victory. That's the payoff. Because here's the thing.

No is the way to success. Specifically, your willingness to put yourself in a room where you get nos. If you're not getting nos, it means you're in the wrong room and you miss all the shots you don't take. The number of nos, nos are your path to yes and success. So here's the victory.

You express an interest in friendship. You express an interest in romantic relationship and you get to the no. And that's the victory. Cause you find out, you find out you're fine, they're fine. And it hurts a little less the next time you get to a no, whether it's inquiring about a job you're not qualified for, whether it's expressing interest in lunch with someone who might be able to mentor you or help you, whether it's expressing interest in lunch with someone who might be able to mentor you or help you, whether it's expressing interest in someone that you are physically and romantically attracted to. The reason I'm staying, I get to live the life I lead and I get to partner with someone who is

much higher character and much hotter than me was no. Specifically my willingness to get to a shit ton of no's and then mourn and move on and get through them. What is the key to success? No. This episode was produced by Jennifer Sanchez. Our intern is Dan Shalon. Drew Burrows is our technical director. Thank you for listening to the Proffes G Pod from the Vox Media Podcast Network. We will catch you on Saturday for No Mercy No Malice as read by George Hahn and please follow our ProfGMarkets pod wherever you get your pods for new episodes every Monday and Thursday.