The Prof G Pod with Scott Galloway - How to Fix the Tax Code + the Problem With Corporate Jargon

Episode Date: June 8, 2026

Scott Galloway explains why a national sales tax sounds fair but always hits the wrong people, makes the case for saying less and listening more as a manager, and advises a 25-year-old in London on whether to cut his contract short for love. Want to be featured in a future episode? Send a voice recording to [e-mail], or drop your question in the r/ScottGalloway subreddit. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Support for this show comes from Odu. Running a business is hard enough, so why make it harder with a dozen different apps that don't talk to each other? Introducing Odu, it's the only business software you'll ever need. It's an all-in-one fully integrated platform that makes your work easier, CRM, accounting, inventory, e-commerce, and more. And the best part, O-DU replaces multiple expensive platforms for a fraction of the cost. That's why over thousands of businesses have been,

made the switch. So why not you? Try O-D-O-4-3 at O-D-O-O-O-com. That's O-D-O-O-O-O-com. When it comes to home improvement, even the most experienced DIYer has a limit. I'm not going to come in here with the blowtorch and get it hot and solder and put the copper pipes to come. I'm not doing it. I call it very nice man to handle it. When to call the experts and when to do it yourself. That's this week on Explain It to Me. Find new episodes, Sundays, wherever you get your podcasts. Lyme disease is one of the fastest growing threats to human health around the world. It's often difficult to diagnose.

It may be difficult to treat. And now we have a vaccine that is safe and effective in preventing it. That is, we had a vaccine back in the early 2000s. But then, the Lyme vaccine became a cautionary tale. That's this week on Unexplanable, wherever you get your podcasts. Welcome to Office Hours with Prop G. This is the part of the show where we answer your questions about business, big tech, entrepreneurship, and whatever else is on your mind.

Anyway, if you'd like to submit a question for next time, you can send a voice recording to Office Hours of PropgMedia.com. Again, that's Office Hours of Profgimedia.com. Or post your question on the Scott Galloway subreddit, and we just might feature it in our next episode. I have not seen or heard these questions. Our first question comes from David, who emailed us. Scott, I'm writing to get your thoughts on the concept of a national sales tax, specifically.

What do you think about a tax that would apply to everything other than unprocessed food, with an additional luxury tax included. I would be interested to hear your perspective on this idea. I think we have that. I think it's called federal taxes or a VAT, a value-out-out-tax, which is big across Europe. So the lowest income quintile spends $35,000 a year, exceeding their reported income, while the highest quintile spends $150,000 a year. a flat sales tax effectively hits the bottom group at nearly 100% of disposable income.

So I don't like sales taxes because I feel like they're regressive. There's something I just don't see. I'm just not down with pretty much any tax at this point that taxes, any household making, say, less than $60,000 or $80,000 a year. I just think they've gotten so, yeah, hit so hard from inflation, from outpacing wage growth, you know, oil price spikes, 22% of their, costs related to energy. So it feels like we've outsourced so much pain to lower middle class households recently that I don't think any sort of national tax, I don't like it is the bottom line because I think it just disproportionate. I wouldn't feel it. And that's not where we need to tax. We need people who are wealthy to feel it and pay a disproportionate amount of it.

In sum, the rich pay proportionally far less. Lower income households spend 16% of their budget on food versus 10% of the highest earners. So the unprocessed food exemption helps, but housing, transportation and utilities, all taxable, still dominate long-income budgets. The existing national sales tax proposal, the Fair Tax Act, sets a 30% rate in attempts to offset regressivity with a monthly prebate. But analysts note, it still hits retirees, large families, and students the hardest, the tax foundation. So what do we need? I don't like a national sales tax. What do we need? We need to remove the exemption on a state tax. The best tax is the tax that is the least taxing. So if you were to tax all food, that's a really bad tax because it taxes, everybody's got to eat. And if all of a sudden,

the percentage low-income households spend on groceries goes from 30% to 40%, that's not helping anybody. And it doesn't affect upper-income households at all. So you want to tax it as the least taxing. So what are the least taxing taxes? Lower the estate tax exemption from 30 million to 1 million. We're going to have something like $120 trillion passed down over the next 30 or 40 years. We don't need dynasties in the United States. One of the key points of distinction between the U.S. and Europe is meritocracy, meaning that we don't build dynasties. We like people to make their own money. And if the Bezos kids inherit 30 billion instead of 40, we're all going to, they're going to be just fine, and so are we.

So only, I think, 8% even qualify for that exemption. So only 1 and 12 households would be hit by additional tax. I wouldn't even call an additional tax would not have that tax loophole. And I don't think the kids would be any worse off. I know a lot of rich kids. And the difference between them inheriting 10 million or 12 million just doesn't make any difference to their lives. They're equally fucked up and trying to please daddy with their range rover they didn't earn. Little angry, little angry.

I hate rich kids. Let me just come out and say it. And every time I meet a rich kid that works really hard, I'm really impressed because if I was a rich kid, I would have a cocaine habit and a rangeover and not much else. I don't know where kids get their fire if their parents are rich, and that's something I think about a lot. But that's another talk show. Anyway, lower the tax exemption on estates from $30 million to $1 million. An alternative minimum tax. The tax code has gone from 400 pages to $4,000, and those incremental 3,600 pages are there to fuck the middle class. 12-02, first 10 million on a town on a company sold, tax-free. Well, who starts companies, typically people, the kind of company that gets sold, typically someone who has the capital to start a company, or the venture capitalists who invest in it, raise capital gains to the same rate as income tax. Go back to Reagan, one tax rate. Why is the money that money makes more noble than the money that SWAT makes? If there's any tax rate or lower tax rate, it should be how people actually show up and do the fucking work to service. as opposed to the people who sit behind a computer and trade their stocks on Robin Hood or hedge fund managers. And that might sound like class warfare, but it's not. It's Reagan. It's income is income.

And then an alternative minimum tax of at least 40% on anyone making over one million a year or any corporation saying making over 50 or 100 million a year. And I think we can mostly have the tax burden solved. So I do not like any universal tax because it ultimately is a regressive tax. Appreciate the question. Question number two. Another listener email. I've been working as an engineer in the manufacturing facility for four years. One thing that struck me is the difference in how manufacturing and HQ personnel communicate. Put plainly, HQ personnel seem to lean more into corporate-speak, schick, which I think creates more confusion than clarity.

My question is, what do you make of this phenomenon and why is it so widespread in corporate America? Thank you for all you do. Huh. I think it's probably because mental management comes more from business schools and consulting firms and uses term like synergy and operational leverage and benchmore. you know, just all this sort of consultant speak. And I think some of it is fine, whereas I think people on the factory floor are just trying to get shit done.

So I don't think it's either good nor bad. But I think it's, I do think occasionally, I think more than syntax or semantics, it's about everybody in the organization, even managers, have to do a certain amount of actual work. They're producing something, not just managing others, which I think is important, but they actually produce work because that way they stay in touch with the work, that way they earn their respect to their colleagues and their better managers, if you will. So everyone at Prop G, we have 27 people now. Everyone has work they work on. Everyone is attached to revenue, even if they, you know, have to manage people and people report to them. And I think that's a

healthy thing. But I think the corporate speak, I don't have a silver bullet for it, but I don't, you know, it's not corporate speak you need to be careful of. It's trying to avoid what I did the first 20 years in my career. And that is, most of the time when I was saying something, I wasn't saying something to add value. I wasn't saying something to try and learn. I was saying something that I thought would make me look smart. And I do think that trying to just ask good questions, be thoughtful, add value or say something when you think it's going to add value. You know, that takes a certain amount of discipline, but I think really good leaders, Tim Cook just stepped down and he was known for not saying anything in questions.

I think typically you have a bad culture or a fucked up culture or a culture that can be improved. Let's do that. And this was most of the cultures, I think, am I being unfair with myself? I was just, a mistake I made is a lot of the meetings I was in where I was running the company. I spoke more than most people.

And that's just not good. I used to think that was leadership. I have now come to believe that good leadership is asking people a lot of questions, giving them an opportunity, to speak and listening and trying to get to the right answer as opposed to impress everybody and convince yourself and them why you're the top guy or gal. So if I had it to do again, I don't think it's corporate speak. I think it's less speak is what you want to aim for and ask a lot of questions as a manager

and then participate. Don't be afraid to talk. Don't be afraid to use. Try and replace your corporate speak with data. and that is here are the numbers, here's the evidence. I think this might be telling us X. I found some interesting data. How I interpreted is the following.

I mentioned the group's response. But I think people sort of begin to wince a little bit when someone just uses a ton of BCG speak, if you will. So listen more, if you can, especially as a manager. Don't be afraid to speak up, but make sure you're adding value or asking good questions. That's one thing junior people don't do a lot of is ask questions. I think that's important when you don't understand something to say, well, what about this or what do you mean by that? And then trying to replace the corporate speak with data, if you will.

Anyways, appreciate the question. We'll be right back after a quick break. Support for the show comes from Vanguard. To all the financial advisors listening, let's talk bonds for a minute. Capturing value in fixed income is not easy. Bond markets are massive, murky, and let's be real, lots of firms through a couple of flashy funds your way and call it a day. But not Vanguard. Vanguard bonds are institutional quality. Institutional quality isn't a tagline, it's a commitment to your clients. It means top-grade products across the board. The lineup includes over 80 bond funds. They're actively managed by a 200-person global squad of sector specialists, analysts, and traders. Lots of firms love to highlight their star portfolio managers,

like it's all about that one brilliant mind making the magic happen. Vanguard's philosophy is a little different. They believe the best active strategy shouldn't be locked away with one person. They should shared across the team. That way, every client benefits from the collective brainpower, not just one individual's take. So if you're looking to give your client's consistent results year in and year out, go see the record for yourself at vanguard.com slash audio. That's vanguard.com slash audio. All investing is subject to risk, Vanguard Marketing Corporation distributor. Support for the show comes from LinkedIn. It's a shame when the best B2B marketing gets wasted on the wrong audience. Like, imagine running an ad for cataracts or

on Saturday morning cartoons or running a promo for this show on a video about Roblox or something. No offense to our Gen Alpha listeners, but that would be a waste of anyone's ad budget. So when you want to reach the right professionals, you can use LinkedIn ads. LinkedIn has grown to a network of over 1 billion professionals and 130 million decision makers according to their data. That's where it stands apart from other ad buys. You can target buyers by job title, industry, company role seniority, skills, company revenue, all suit can stop wasting budget on the wrong audience.

That's why LinkedIn ads boast one of the highest B2B return on ad spend of all online ad networks. Seriously, all of them. Spend $250 on your first campaign on LinkedIn ads and get a free $250 credit for the next one. Just go to LinkedIn.com slash Scott. That's LinkedIn.com slash Scott. Terms and conditions apply. This spring, denim gets a softer, lighter update. Introducing Old Navy's drapey denim wide leg, a new fit that moves with you.

It's everything you want denim to feel like for summer. Easy, breathable, and effortlessly cool. With a fit that creates natural movement and a wide leg that feels modern, not overwhelming. Plus, that signature, wait, for this price, moment. Old Navy's drapey denim wide leg. Welcome back. Question number three comes from a listener who emailed us. Scott, I'm a 25-year-old male early in my career who took a two-year contract in London last September.

It's been professionally transformative, but personally. brutal at times. My partner stayed in the states and the distance is straining. I'm debating cutting the contract short at the end of 2026 to be with her in New York. I feel genuinely alive here, but I can't share with the people who matter most, which hollows it out. You preach optionality and doing hard things while you still can, but you also say don't over-optimized her status at the expense of relationships. So which is it? Finish what I started or go home to her. Love your work, thanks. So this is a good problem. You're in London with a good job. sounds like, and you love somebody or you're into somebody, and you want and miss each other.

So, boss, I don't know if you're 21 months away from your 24 month or three months, but my advice would be to stick it out and figure out a way to get home more often or get back to New York more often or figure out a way to get her here more often, because time goes really fast. So, and if the relationship is really weak, long distance is hard, but if the relationship is really weak, and you move back thinking you're going to save the relationship, and then the relationship doesn't work out, you're shit out of luck with no relationship and no job. So I hated investment banking. I knew that from day one. It was a 24-month analyst program, and I knew right away in the first week, I'm like, I'm not good at this, and I hate it here. And, but I'm like, it's two years,

and it'll be good for me to stick it out. So I'm kind of, I'm just not a Hallmark Channel here, you know, go with your heart, go with love. No, spend two years. finish out your program in London, work really hard, take advantage of the isolation, if you will, to just really dive into work, try and demonstrate excellence, and then look for another job back in New York. And if you're really good at what you do, and it's a multinational, they'll maybe try and figure out something for you, such of the two of you can be together. But, you know, if the relationship is strong, I'm going to assume that you're halfway through, so you got another year, 12 months goes fast.

It may not feel like it goes fast at your age because the reference point, not having been on this planet for very long, seems long, but it's not, it'll go fast. And I think you're going to look back, and quite frankly, if the relationship doesn't survive it, it probably wasn't going to survive, although I realize long distance is stressful.

You know, tricks do a lot of face time, plan trips together, but I wouldn't give up a job at this point for love. This isn't like you're away from your wife. wife and three kids and miserable. This is you're away from young love, which is awesome and fun. But I don't know, 24 months, I say, boss, put your head down before you know it, that 24 months is going to be over. And as a means of giving yourself something to look forward to start thinking about opportunities and ways to get, for the two of you to get to the same city and start

planning that together about what jobs each of you are going to try and get such that you can ultimately be together in whatever it is three, six or 12 months. But Like, we live in a capitalist society, and economic and professional trajectory is really important, not only for your own, your own sake, but for the sake of the relationship. Relationships are just easier when you're economically secure, and part of that economic security comes from sacrifice when you're your age. So it's probably not what you wanted to hear. I find with advice like this, people have already made up their minds and are just looking for validation, but my advice to you would be to most likely without knowing more information to stick it out

and start planning how you both figure out a way to be in the same city at some point. But it doesn't sound like it's that far away. But anyways, like I said, good problem. You're in London, the second greatest city in the world. New York is number one by a long shot. But number two is pretty good. And you have someone that sounds like you're crazy about. So your worst days are better than most people's best days.

Thanks for the question. That's all for this episode. If you'd like to submit a question, please email a voice recording to office hours ofprofugemedia.com. That's office hours ofproptuMedia.com. Or if you prefer to ask on Reddit, just post your question on the Scott Callaway subreddit. And we might feature it in an upcoming episode. This episode was produced by Jennifer Sanchez and Laura Jinnar. Cameric is our social producer. Brad Williams is our editor. And Drew Burroughs is our technical director. Thank you for listening to the Propgey Pop from Propheum Media. Hey, y'all. It's Kelly Clarkson with Wayfair. Ever order for you. furniture online and wonder what if? Like, what if it doesn't hold up? That sofa was four days old.

You should have ordered from Wayfair. With Wayfair, there's no what if. Just style you love and quality you can trust. Visit Wayfair.ca. Wayfair, every style, every home.