The Prof G Pod with Scott Galloway - Is Energy the Next Big Trade? + How to Actually Tax Billionaires

Episode Date: June 3, 2026

Scott Galloway breaks down why energy is already the defining investing story of the AI era, why Democrats keep losing on progressive taxation because they'd rather demonize billionaires than do their jobs, and shares his honest guide to winding down with edibles. Want to be featured in a future episode? Send a voice recording to [e-mail], or drop your question in the r/ScottGalloway subreddit. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Support for the show comes from David Protein. We're all trying to get more protein, but who wants to be stuck drinking chicken milkshakes? Try David Protein instead. Their gold line of protein bars has the best macros, 28 grams of protein, 150 calories, and zero grams of sugar. That's 75% of the calories coming from protein. Our co-host, Ed, Ed, Ed, what do you think? I love my David Protein bars. I'm trying to bulk out, build some muscles, so I love to have my protein bar right after a workout.

And it's been great so far. Head to Davidprotein.com slash provg where they're offering a special deal for our listeners when they buy four cartons. They get their fifth free. You can also use their store locator to find David in stores at a retailer near you. Support for the show comes from Northwest Registered Agent. Your business identity is everything that makes your business legitimate and professional. With Northwest Registered Agent, you don't just form a business.

You start a complete foundation bill for privacy, credibility, and growth. That includes registered agent service, a business address, operating. agreement, domain, website, professional email, phone number, and built-in privacy. In other words, your home address, personal email, and phone number stay private. Don't pay hundreds or thousands of dollars for what you can get from Northwest for free. Visit Northwest Registeredagent.com slash ProfG Free and start using free resources to build something amazing. Get more with Northwest Registered Agent at Northwest Registeredagent.com slash profgifree. Support for this show comes from Norwegian Cruise Line. A cruise with Norwegian

is a vacation you'll never forget, with an onboard experience that makes it easy for the whole family to settle into their own version of vacation. Because on a cruise with Norwegian, choice comes naturally for the whole family, and destinations feel just as effortless. Wander beautiful cities and take in stunning

natural scenery. Norwegian Cruise Line. It's different out here. Visit NCL.com, call your travel advisor, or 1-888-NCL Cruise. Norwegian Cruise Line, Chips Registry, the Bahamas and USA. Welcome to Office Hours with PropG.

This is the part of the show where we answer your questions about business, pick tech entrepreneurship and whatever else is on your mind. Anyway, if you'd like to submit a question for next time, you can send a voice recording to Office Hours atprofugemedia.com. Again, that's Office Hours of Proptoe Media.com. Or post your question on the Scott Galloway subreddit, and we just might feature it in our next episode. Our first question comes from Reddit user, the Green Lawn,

who says, Scott, energy is arguably the defining capital story of the next decade. AIS turbocharging electricity demand and critical mineral support. supply chains are reshaping geopolitics. Yet, as an industry insider, I feel that the overall topic rarely gets the same narrative treatment as tech or finance. Do you see energy is the next great investing story? Thanks. And I disagree. I think it's getting a ton of attention, whether it's sort of adjacent to data centers or nuclear powers rejuvenation. or it's just there's a ton.

I think the best performing stock of the last three or four years might be bloom energy. And so people are sort of going down the stack, if you will, of the supply chain, and everything sort of leads to energy. So I think it's getting a lot of attention. Why? Because the scale of the AI buildup, AI's CAPEX boom is the second largest is a share of use GDP in history, bigger than the railroad second only to the, I think, the Louisiana purchase, as not as big as, I think the railroads at one time,

there was two railroad moons. And I think at one point it was like 8% of GDP or even greater. And then there's the buildout of the electrical grid, the highway system, the Apollo program, although that wasn't very big. And then the internet and sort of the telco infrastructure. What's interesting is typically kind of two or three years post any buildout or infrastructure build out that takes more than two or three percent of GDP,

there's a crash because you can't justify. the build out economically. And so, unlike past tech booms, Facebook, Instagram, DoorDash, it's fundamentally a supply-side story about making chips, building data centers, empowering them. It's money creating demand for energy, not the reverse.

So what does that mean for electricity? The IEA reports that data center electricity demand grew 17% in 2025 against just 3% growth and overall global electricity demand and projects it will double by 2030 with AI-focused centers. tripling. To put the investment scale in context, the five biggest tech company spent more on

Cappex in 2025 than the entire global oil and gas industry invested in production. So then why is your electricity bill going up? You might ask. Prices are rising your data center hubs, but the real culprit is an AI stealing electrons from consumers. It's the cost of transmission infrastructure, transformers, wires, hit by tariffs, post-COVID labor costs, and decades of deferred investment. Isn't that interesting? It's maintenance, the supplies to build this shit, as opposed to the actual energy itself. I guess you could say it's the cost to build the infrastructure

for the energy, not the electricity itself. Hmm. Tomato tomato. There's also a geopolitical problem nobody is talking about. China controls roughly 80% of battery-grade graphite and rare earth elements, and in 2025 began weaponizing that dominance through a series of escalating export controls on materials critical to chips. EVs and defense systems.

The Council on Foreign Relations called it a dangerous inflection point for the U.S. economy. U.S. policy has made all of this more difficult. The one big, beautiful bill, signed July 4th of last year, terminated most IRA clean energy credits years ahead of schedule. Analyst now projected will reduce new clean energy additions to the grid by 50 to 70% by 2035. I think in the last year, China's added more solar capacity than we've added in the last 10 or 25 inches. it's insane how they're going long on energy, and we're just assuming that the CAPEX

from the small players will catch up. However, economics, despite the collapse and the support of renewables by this administration, economics might win, and renewables keep getting built because they're simply the cheapest and fastest way to add grid capacity. I remember being in South by Southwest,

and my pivot co-host's ex-wife, Megan, a really smart woman, came up to me and showed me there's a site in Texas showing where all the electricity is coming at that time. And in the middle of the day, literally they were getting 60% of their energy from wind and 22% or 17% from solar. So the bottom line is the economics are beginning to pay off. And as China goes deeper and deeper into solar panel production and batteries, the scale they get cheaper and cheaper. And in some, renewables become competitive.

And I would imagine the biggest epipenjole to the heart for renewables, happened with the spike in oil prices. All of a sudden, renewables are going to be just have an increased focus in investment in the private sector. Now, does that mean we shouldn't be massively as a nation investing in renewables? Yeah, I think we should. I think we should also be investing in chips. I think the war, if you will, it's not going to be fought over energy as much as it's going to be fought over who controls rare earths, which is China's dominance and leverage,

and who controls chips, which is the U.S. and Taiwan's kind of leverage her advantage. The power argument, I think that possibly, possibly, that while it appears everyone is moving towards that the kink in the hose, the foot on the carotid artery of AI is inability to keep up with power demands. I typically find when everyone's worried about something, that's not what you need to be worried about. And I also would hypothesize that possibly different technology around quantum different technologies around the advances in chips are not going to increase or not only will increase compute and inference, but will massively decrease the amount of power needed. So I wonder if the innovation is going to not be as much around improving the quality

of the supply as it will be around decreasing the demand for power consumption, if you will. But the word is out. Power stocks, Constellation Energy, which I believe is the largest owner of nuclear power plants. I mean, these things, even utilities have skyrocketed. So I think it's gotten a lot of attention. And I wonder if the trade is if it's already too late for that trade. But I think it's getting a lot of attention. And the only insight I would offer is that because we're so worried about it, I wonder if people are fast at work at reducing the demand of all of the chips in LLMs and data centers or figuring out technologies that aren't as energy thirsty, if you will. I appreciate the question. Question number two is an email submitted by a listener. Scott, you recently pushed back against what you called AOC's demonization of billionaires. I've always believed policy should focus more on raising the social floor than attacking wealth

itself. But today's extreme concentration of wealth and power increasingly distorts democratic representation rights and influence. At the same time, rhetoric rooted in anger and division seems to resonate more than a feels to hope. Doesn't AOC's more confrontational tone reflect a political reality that now aligns more closely with our society's dynamics? Cheers. So just for context, I put out a video that went semi-viral. I basically said that I was in favor of Mom Donnie's tax on Pietitaires. If you're wealthy enough to own a second home in Manhattan that's worth more than $5 million,

you're wealthy. And I think it's fair to say that in the last 30 years, there's been an enormous transfer of wealth from labor and consumers to shareholders. And put another way, the wealthy. And the top 1% by any metric have just outperformed every other part of the lower 99. So nobody likes taxes, but if you're going to increase taxes, I think it makes sense to restore a progressive tax structure. And in some, I'm now believing that as somebody who has been totally focused on money their whole lives, once you get to a certain point, you go no incremental happiness, which says to me the following, a progressive, a very progressive tax structure is the most, is the best place to increase taxes or the least taxing place to increase

taxes. The great economic boom in the great society and productivity and an embrace of democracy and young people feeling good about their country having more, what they perceived as greater potential was when we had marginal tax rates of 60, 70, and even 90% at one point on the super wealthy. I'm not suggesting to go back to 90%, but I'm suggesting that billionaire should never lower tax rate than, you know, middle-class Americans. And people will respond, well, the top 1% pay 48% of taxes in New York. I get it, but the super-rich are figuring out ways to avoid real wealth because owners, essentially, their ownership, the asset they own, compounds tax-deferred, if you will,

whereas earners lose 10, 20, 40% of their money every year. The people who get most screwed in our tax system are actually what I call the super earners, and that is, mom's a baller at a law firm, dad owns a chiropractic clinic, they make $1.5 million combined, but they don't own anything. They just make everything through current income, and that gets taxed in New York, New Jersey, or California at 52, 53 percentage points. So I believe that a piettaire tax that goes after the asset is not going to reduce anyone's quality of life. I will lose $100 grand a year. I own a home. I've done the calculation, but it's worth it, and quite frankly, I can afford it, as I believe most people who own Pietitaires in New York can. So there's that. What caused the pushback or what

you're talking about is I went on to say the Mamdani personalizing the attack and doxing Ken Griffin and going to his condominium building and demonizing him, I think is how we elect J.D. Vance's president. Why? In America, distinct of a very loud minority of voices, there are a lot, maybe even the majority of Americans all aspire to be millionaires themselves. And so they don't, for the most part, shitposts millionaires. Now, are there billionaires that behave poorly? Is there an Epstein class that deserves to be called out or imprisoned? Absolutely. But the majority of Americans themselves aspire to be wealthy. And one of the great things about America is that we do, in fact, celebrate success and we want to create a lot of millionaires. Should we have someone worth

$650 billion? I don't think so. And I'm increasingly believing that power corrupts, absolute power absolutely corrupts, and the only Kevlar we have throughout history against this type of absolute corruption that comes from a sequestering of all power to a small number of people is progressive taxation. 1945, to call it, 1995, was an anomaly in history where the world's greatest innovation, the American middle class emerged. It was an accident. Middle classes typically don't happen. And typically a small group of very talented, very lucky people aggregate a lot of power and wealth and use that power and wealth to aggregate even more at the cost of the bottom 99.9. And because we came together as a nation and said we weren't going to let that happen, we had what I think was the most productive society in the world.

And we seem to be reverting to the laws of the jungle and going back to a small number of people controlling everything. Having said that, I'm all for progressive tax policy, but how do we get there? How do Democrats actually be effective versus just being right? How do we redistribute income instead of redistributing virtue? We do this by talking about sensible tax policy, an alternative minimum tax on anyone making over a million dollars of 40 percent. On an alternative minimum tax of any company making over 50 million in profits of, say, 45 percent, you don't need to show up to people's homes and start demonizing them. And by the way, that's just really fucking stupid. He's going to, you don't think he's going to take that $6.5 billion project that he's working on in New York and figure out a way to do it in Texas or Miami? You don't think the, I think it's a quarter of a billion dollars in donations he's given to New York-based charities.

He's going to start giving elsewhere. It's just stupid. And that's what we do as Democrats, is we'd rather be virtuous and get cheap applause at a fucking gathering of far lefties than actually figure out a way to get control. of government or have influence in government so they can do their fucking job. It drives me crazy when senators Warren and Sanders talk about billionaires paying their fair share. Well, bitch, do your job. And when I say, bitch, I use it androgynously as someone who I'm sick of complaining, both Sanders and Warren. You've been in, Democrats have controlled all three branches of government for years at a time. They've been in the Senate for fucking ever. And yet, as they have been there,

taxes on the wealthy have gone down. are you either ineffective or lying about your sincerity to create a progressive tax structure? So if you as, or if we as Democrats want to continue to demonize young men, look at every podcast, every liberal podcast. It's essentially an eye role about how irredeemable, incompetent, or generally predatory all young men are. It talks about how essentially the majority of white people are subconsciously or unconsciously racist and that all billionaires are bad. AOC has said no billionaire has earned their money. So Beyoncé and Oprah didn't earn it.

Jeff Bezos, he earned it. He was born to a single mother who was 17. Now, should he pay 50, 60, 80 percent tax rates? I believe he should. And this is how we're effective, not just right. We don't demonize people. we don't play identity politics, we make a sober, thoughtful, competent argument around why we need to restore a progressive tax structure. And you're never going to get there if you lose 60% of the

voting population, which is white, if you lose billionaires, many of whom are Democrats, and would like to see a more progressive tax structure and support these ideas. Or we lose the election like we did the last one because we demonize and don't see the problem. the young men face. So let's do this for a change as Democrats. Instead of wanting to virtue signal, let's do our fucking jobs and get elected and restore a progressive tax structure.

Am I in favor of increased taxation across the wealthiest Americans, alternative minimum tax, lowering the tax exemption on estates from $30 million to $1 million, triggering a tax event when you borrow against stock, which is the common practice of the very wealthy? Yes.

How do we get there? Not by playing identity politics and demonizing people you see as born wrong. That was a rant. Thanks for the question. We'll be right back after a quick break. Support for the show comes from LinkedIn. It's a shame when the best B2B marketing gets wasted on the wrong audience. Like, imagine running an ad for cataract surgery on Saturday morning cartoons

or running a promo for this show on a video about Roblox or something. No offense to our Gen Alpha listeners, but that would be a waste of anyone's ad budget. So, when you want to reach the right professionals, you can use LinkedIn ads. LinkedIn has grown to a network of over 1 billion professionals and 130 million decision makers according to their data. That's where it stands apart from other ad buys. You can target buyers by job title, industry, company role seniority, skills, company revenue, all so you can stop wasting budget on the wrong audience.

That's why LinkedIn ads boast one of the highest B2B return on ad spend of all online ad networks. Seriously, all of them. Spend $250 on your first campaign on LinkedIn ads and get a free $250 credit for the next one. Just go to LinkedIn.com slash Scott. That's LinkedIn.com slash Scott. Terms and conditions apply. In the span of a decade, Ben Shapiro built the daily wire into a conservative media empire. He produced hit podcasts that bit at liberal excesses and documentaries and lectures about the founders, the genders, the gospels. He peddled polos, hats, candles, provided a home for deep platformed conservative stars like Matt Walsh and minted stars like Candice Owens. Let's put a pin in that. The Daily Wire even has kids programming, a judgmental

puppet named Zoodles. Zoodle! Who shares Shapiro's load-bearing eyebrows. This year, though, the Empire showed signs of collapse. The Daily Wire's YouTube videos are down from millions of views to the low-five figures. Web traffic is plummeting. And recently, Shapiro laid off 13% of his employees. Asked by the Washington Post, what had happened? Shapiro accused other conservatives of click whoring by embracing radical Islam, theorizing about the evils of Winston Churchill and mocking the widow of Charlie Kirk. The kids still got it. On today explained, the fall of Ben Shapiro. Today Explain drops every weekday afternoon. Welcome back. Question number three. Hey, Prof. G, you often talk about taking edibles at night. As a 44-year-old dad, I'm trying to

navigate some new ways to take the edge off a little bit at night. I'm wondering about your routine. Do you do indica, setivia, how many milligrams? I'm new to this world of edibles, so I'm interested to hear what you have to say. What should I expect? What does it do for you? How should I start this process? Any recommendations, et cetera. Would love any advice. Thanks for everything you do. Thanks. So I'm somewhat remiss to encourage anyone to start using alcohol or cannabis or anything else. So I'll just tell you what I do, and I'm not endorsing this. I'll just, well, I guess I'm sort of endorsing it because I'm telling you what I use. So look, I smoked a decent amount of pot in college. I don't think more or less than most fraternity jar heads of UCLA, but I really

enjoyed it. It was bonding. I had trouble keeping on weight, and then one of the things I used to probably get high two or three times a week with my friends, and we would just eat a lot, which was good for me. And it was a lot of laughs, a lot of bonding laughs. And there's some evidence that, for those of you young people out there, that you need to be very careful with THC as your brain and prefrontal cortex are still evolving. And maybe that's why I'm so fucked up. But anyways, so I think it's a different ballgame for young people where there's evidence, especially if you have any history of schizophrenia or psychosis in your family. And also just generally if you have, and this is true of alcohol and anything else, if you have any history of

addiction. So enough of the land acknowledgments. What do I do? I didn't smoke after college. I decided to get very serious about work for a good 20 odd years, and I didn't actually drink that much or smoke. I just focused on work, which in some way is sort of an addiction. And then as I got older, I decided I wanted to get more into or more social. I started drinking more. I started smoking more. I don't smoke and go out, and I don't usually do edibles when I go out. because the thing about THC for me is occasionally it makes me anxious and paranoid, and that is not a good time when you're out. I like to be at home.

So I would say once or twice a week, I take an edible. Now, everyone's different. I take a brand called Wild Time, and I get them at a dispensary in Aspen, and I use pear gummies, and I really like them. I use a hybrid. They're 10 milligrams, so I only take half a gummy. I only start with 5 milligrams. and it's one-to-one THC and CBG.

And the CBG compound is intended to make the experience feel clear and more functional than a heavy indig edible. I don't like being really high. The reason I don't smoke leaf is I have trouble calibrating it. The thing about edibles is you're in it for a longer ride. It's kind of a couple hours, whereas the nice thing about leaf, for me at least, is that if I don't like when I'm feeling, I just kind of take a walk or eat and then I'm fine.

but I have trouble dosing with leaf. So once or twice a week, if I've had a long day and I feel a little bit stressed, and I think I'm going to have trouble sleeping, which I increasingly encounter as I get older. Once everyone's in bed, I just hang out with the dogs, and I will take half or five-millground gummy-again, this I like wild-time pair.

I've also tried peach. I don't like that as much. I like it to come in a container because I want to know exactly what I'm getting. and it just quite frankly, I just sort of melt into the couch. I find I'm exceptionally unproductive. I've tried to do work on edibles, and it doesn't work for me. I write a lot at night.

This is going to sound awful, but I actually think, especially when I'm writing about personal stuff, that actually alcohol helps. And I'm more emotional and more unguarded with my feelings, and I find that that actually helps my writing or my writing resonates with people at the same time. I don't want to be a bad version of Ernest Hemingway and that it's not have the skills of an Ernest Hemingway, but have the addiction. So I try not to do that too much.

But once or twice a week when you're looking to wind down, I think it's also fun to do with a partner and watch streaming media. But everybody has to pick their poison or not. But if I, again, I'm not endorsing this, I would start very light, very small. It's much better to be not high enough than too high. Do it in a controlled environment. Do it with products that you know are sealed that come from a legitimate dispensable. But for me, I just enjoy nighttime is kind of my time. I keep very strange hours. I go to bed around two or three in the morning and I wake up around 10. And I find that it quiets my mind, is the way I would

say it. A lot of times when I get in bed, I have trouble turning my mind off and this helps a lot. I don't do these outdoors. I don't travel with them. But I find it's a nice way to kind of wind down. So where I started, I'm not suggesting this is where you start. Very small, two or three milligrams, see how you feel, see if you like it. I think it's fun to do with a partner and just watch a good movie or listen to music, but I have found it's a really nice way to wind down. And on a regular basis,

I take one, two, four weeks off because not only do I not want to become dependent on something, that's not a big rest for me. I do not have an addictive personality, but I think the effectiveness starts to wear off. So I don't do anything more than two or three times a week other than see above hang with the dogs. Anyways, hope this helps.

And good luck on your journey. That's all for this episode. If you'd like to submit a question, please email a voice recording to OfficeHours of Propteamedia.com. That's OfficeHours of ProptuMedia.com. Or if you prefer to ask on Reddit, just post a question on the Scott Galloway subreddit, and we might feature it in an upcoming episode. This episode was produced by Jennifer Sanchez and Laura Jenaer. Cameric is our social producer.

Brad Williams is our editor. And Drew Burroughs is our technical director. Thank you for listening to the Proctiore. from privacy media.