The Prof G Pod with Scott Galloway - No Mercy / No Malice: Incarcerated

Episode Date: October 15, 2022

As read by George Hahn. Follow George on Twitter, @georgehahn. https://www.profgalloway.com/incarcerated/ Sound Effect source: The Mask You Live In. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Support for this show comes from Constant Contact. If you struggle just to get your customers to notice you, Constant Contact has what you need to grab their attention. Constant Contact's award-winning marketing platform offers all the automation, integration, and reporting tools that get your marketing running seamlessly, all backed by their expert live customer support. It's time to get going and growing with Constant Contact today.

Ready, set, grow. Go to ConstantContact.ca and start your free trial today. Go to ConstantContact.ca for your free trial. ConstantContact.ca Support for PropG comes from NerdWallet. Starting your slash learn more to over 400 credit cards. Head over to nerdwallet.com forward slash learn more to find smarter credit cards, savings accounts, mortgage rates, and more. NerdWallet. Finance smarter. NerdWallet Compare Incorporated.

NMLS 1617539. I'm Scott Galloway, and this is No Mercy, No Malice. We've been speaking for a long time about failing young men. Put another way, America is failing its young men. The ways in which we do so are legion. This week, we focus on one failure. We put far too many men in prison. Incarcerated, as read by George Hahn.

Regardless of skin color, sexuality, or politics, young men are falling. They're falling behind academically, failing to attach to mates, and trading potential for addiction. Their less-evolved prefrontal cortex is especially susceptible to opportunities for quick dopa hits that have been engineered by firms whose profit incentives are in direct contrast to their economic and emotional well-being. Men make up just 40% of college enrollment and one-third of college graduates. They are twice as likely to overdose and three-and-a-half times more likely to commit suicide than women.

Women also face challenges in society, especially in the labor force. However, when we discuss the challenges facing women, we ask society to change. When young men struggle, we ask men to change. The three most destructive words that every man receives when he's a boy is when he's told to be a man. Young men in America failing should be rephrased as, America is failing its young men. We over-discipline, over-medicate, and over-expose them to drugs, pornography, and gambling, then blame them for their mistakes.

The ways we are failing young men are legion, so let's focus on one problem. We put too many in prison. Two foundational truths regarding American imprisonment. One, we are the global leader in locking up our own citizens by a wide margin. We rank ahead of El Salvador, which has the world's highest homicide rate, and Cuba, an authoritarian regime that imprisons people for pre-criminal dangerousness. There are nearly twice as many prisoners in the U.S. as there are lawyers. There are more Americans behind bars than serving in the military

or working as full-time cops and firefighters. We have fewer citizens protecting our shores and neighborhoods than neighbors we believe need to be behind bars. Second, mass imprisonment does not work. It doesn't reduce crime. Our unrivaled incarceration rate is neither the result of a high number of crimes nor the cause of a low one. Our intuition tells us that incarceration reduces crime through incapacitation. Taking criminals off the street prevents them from committing future crimes. However, the actual impact on crime rates is surprisingly small, and at 2 million Americans in prisons and jails, we are deep into the diminishing returns.

A 2014 assessment from the National Resource Council concluded that there was no reliable statistical evidence showing more than modest decreases in crime rate due to increased incapacitation. Simpler evidence? Despite imprisoning people at 10 times the rate of peer countries in Western Europe, we have a similar crime rate. There's a host of reasons for the limited impact of incapacitation. Many crimes are one-offs, violent crime in particular decreases rapidly with age, and a small minority of criminals commit most crimes. At bottom, though, incapacitation theory rests on a misconception

that criminality is a personality flaw, that there are bad apples we can remove from the barrel. But most crime flows from circumstance, from failures of socialization, reductions of opportunity, and mental health issues. Poverty and discrimination are crime volcanoes, and you don't stop the volcano by addressing the lava. Drug-related crimes are particularly resistant to reduction due to incapacitation. Drug rings have no trouble finding more disaffected young men to stand on corners. Identifying and imprisoning high-risk offenders reduces future

crime, but warehousing hundreds of thousands of low-level offenders actually increases it. Dozens of studies have shown that imprisonment does not reduce an inmate's propensity to commit crimes, and there is growing evidence that imprisonment actually encourages future crime due to decreased legal employment options for those with a record and the exposure to violence and criminality in prison itself. In sum, what is a cause of crime? Prison. We see this at scale. Once the incarceration rate exceeds 325 per 100,000 residents,

crime gets worse, not better. Reductions in state prison populations during the early 2000s were associated with reductions in crime rates. Prisoner releases due to COVID were again associated with decreases in crime rates. Prisoner releases due to COVID were again associated with decreases in crime rates. Longer prison sentences were sold to voters as a means of deterrence, scaring criminals straight. It doesn't work. Even the Department of Justice, which runs the federal prison system, has emphatically concluded that while the threat of being caught is a deterrent,

the length of the resulting prison sentence is not. In 1994, California enacted one of the toughest sentencing laws in the nation, the highly publicized Three Strikes Law, which mandated a 25-year sentence for a third felony conviction. It was sold as a deterrent, a visible public threat to criminals. Three decades later, it costs Californians over $3 billion per year, but its impact on crime in California has been measured at negligible to small and, quote, not nearly as large as early projections estimated, end quote. If it is ineffective, even counterproductive, why have we locked up

two million of our citizens? Central to the story is our 40-year war on drugs and the deployment of the heavy artillery of law enforcement against the nuanced, human-scale problems of addiction and teenage impulse control. From Nixon, who saw political advantage in criminalizing the minority communities who voted against him, through Clinton, whose own political calculations resulted in the most draconian crime bill in American history, locking up addicts is the definition of political opportunism. The population of people imprisoned on drug offenses jumped from 40,900 in 1980 to 430,926 in 2019. And the criminalization of addiction has fueled global organized crime empires while hollowing out our own communities, some more than others. Although black and white Americans use

drugs at about the same rate, black Americans are 10 times more likely to be imprisoned for drug offenses than white Americans. One out of every three black boys born today can expect to go to prison in his lifetime, as can one of every six Latino boys, compared to one of every 17 white boys. And that's just the domestic burden. Ask the people of Colombia, Bolivia, or Mexico how America's war on drugs

is going, but that's another post. Whatever you think about how we should address poverty and drugs, and who we should hold accountable for the crimes associated with them, there's another population grievously harmed by mass incarceration that no ideology should be set against, the mentally ill. Sixty years ago, we dismantled our public mental health system. It wasn't a great system, but our disastrous solution was to replace it with prison. Determining how many inmates have serious mental illness, major affective disorders, or schizophrenia is difficult. But the National Research Council credited estimates 10 to 25 percent versus 1 in 20 among all adults.

As a result, there are, quote, more than three times the number of seriously mental ill persons in prisons than in hospitals, end quote. Defendants with severe mental illness are much more likely to be sentenced to prison. Imprisonment exacerbates mental illness, and mentally ill prisoners are two to three times more likely to attempt suicide. The mentally ill remain incarcerated four to eight times longer than people without mental illnesses arrested for the same charge and cost taxpayers seven times as much. This may be exhibit number one for why American politicians have no license to invoke Jesus Christ when discussing our country. The wealthiest nation in the world incarcerates its most severely ill, its most vulnerable. Every war has its profiteers, and the explosion of incarceration in the U.S. has created an $80 billion industry. $80 billion. We spend more protecting Americans from other Americans than most nations

spend on defense, including Russia at $63 billion. That's right, the army thrusting the world to potential Armageddon spends less on its armed forces than we spend locking up our citizens. 8% of prisoners aren't in public institutions but held in private operations run under contract with the state. Many prisons, public and private, look too much like labor camps where prisoners work not only to run the prison itself, food service, laundry, cleaning, but also for various other state needs. Prisoners really do make license plates and also furniture, uniforms,

and even law enforcement equipment, for which they are paid less than $4 per day. One company alone, Corizon Health, makes $1.4 billion per year providing prison health insurance, money it needs to fight hundreds of malpractice lawsuits. The prison commissary market is a $1.6 billion annual business, and bail bondsmen generate $2 billion per year. Permitting the market to provide these services

provides jobs and increases efficiency, but it is creating an incentive structure at odds with a healthy society. When companies can make billions of dollars on a thing, they get very good at persuading us to create more of that thing. Prison industry companies spend millions of dollars on lobbying and have begun investing

in a new growth market, immigration detention. Mass incarceration has a direct and brutal impact on young men. 93% of prisoners are male, and 41% of adult prisoners are under the age of 35. How prison hampers a young man's growth is self-evident and not worth dwelling on here, because there's a second population of young men we need to discuss. Roughly half of U.S. prisoners are parents. As soon as a parent steps into prison, their children's outcomes decline significantly.

A child of an incarcerated parent is five times more likely to go to prison. Their cognitive development is stunted, leading to academic failure, and they're more likely to act aggressively in the future. The impact of having a parent in prison is more pronounced for boys than girls. Studies show that without a father, boys engage in more delinquent behavior. Meanwhile, adolescent girls' behavior is largely independent of the father's presence.

The increase in aggression due to paternal incarceration is also twice as high in boys than in girls. Boys simply have less emotional resilience than girls, and they're more vulnerable to stressful situations than girls. Boys are physically stronger, and girls are stronger. To summarize, we have 10 times the number of people in prison than a nation our size and prosperity should. Spending an extra $72 billion a year and keeping an additional 1.8 million people in prison does not make us safer. It might actually increase crime. And it poisons the well for millions of boys who become more likely to end up in prison themselves.

There have been signs of progress. President Trump signed the Bipartisan First Step Act in 2018, a small but significant set of reforms. There are many more opportunities to eliminate harsh sentencing laws, and we should invest in educational and job training programs and pass clean slate legislation to help those leaving prison re-enter society. President Biden announced that he's starting the process to effectively legalize marijuana at the federal level and will simultaneously pardon everyone with a federal conviction for simple possession. We need to send less people to prison and start letting people in, out. Diversion programs for drug offenders and the mentally ill are incredibly successful and should be more widespread.

Just one example. In Miami, a program to divert mentally ill defendants into treatment rather than into jail has cut the county jail population in half, saved taxpayers $50 million per year, and cut recidivism among diverted defendants from 75% to 20%. Breaking our national addiction to incarceration will require a decade-long massive prison release program, which in turn will require a serious investment in true rehabilitation, mental health care, addiction treatment, job training, and re-entry programs. We need fathers and mothers back in homes and to stop holding millions hostage for political

and financial gain. If we are serious about helping young men, we need to return more men to the community. The incarceration of the population of Miami, Atlanta, Cincinnati, and Memphis combined has left a void that creates a downward spiral of despair and more incarceration for the boys in that community. There will no doubt be well-publicized examples of crimes committed by people recently released, and they will skew the perception of the program's success as crimes not committed can never receive attribution and make for shitty headlines. The illusion of complexity fomented by corporations and incumbents insinuates these problems are multidimensional and intractable.

They are half right. There is a fix that will have an enormous positive impact. Simply put, boys need more men around. Life is so rich. What software do you use at work? The answer to that question is probably more complicated than you want it to be. The average US company deploys more than 100 apps, and ideas about the work we do can be radically changed by the tools we use to do it. So what is enterprise software anyway? What is productivity software? How will AI affect both? And how are these tools changing the way we use our computers to make stuff, communicate, and plan for the future?

In this three-part special series, Decoder is surveying the IT landscape presented by AWS. Check it out wherever you get your podcasts. Hey, it's Scott Galloway, and on our podcast, Pivot, we are bringing you a special series about the basics of artificial intelligence. We're answering all your questions. What should you use it for? What tools are right for you? And what privacy issues should you ultimately watch out for? And to help us out, we are joined by Kylie Robeson, the senior AI reporter for The Verge,

to give you a primer on how to integrate AI into your life. So, tune into AI Basics, How and When to Use AI, a special series from Pivot sponsored by AWS, wherever you get your podcasts.