The Prof G Pod with Scott Galloway - Office Hours: American Teacher’s Shortage, Why You Shouldn’t Have a Side Hustle, and What to Do if Your Employer Wants to Defer Your Pay
Episode Date: January 10, 2024Scott gives his thoughts on why he thinks there are teacher shortages in the U.S. and provides solutions to address the issue. He then discusses side hustles, specifically why they’re not a good ide...a. He wraps up with advice to a listener whose employer is asking them to defer their pay. Music: https://www.davidcuttermusic.com / @dcuttermusic Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
Transcript
Discussion (0)
Support for this show comes from Constant Contact.
If you struggle just to get your customers to notice you,
Constant Contact has what you need to grab their attention.
Constant Contact's award-winning marketing platform
offers all the automation, integration, and reporting tools
that get your marketing running seamlessly,
all backed by their expert live customer support.
It's time to get going and growing with Constant Contact today.
Ready, set, grow.
Go to ConstantContact.ca and start your free trial today.
Go to ConstantContact.ca for your free trial.
ConstantContact.ca
Support for PropG comes from NerdWallet. Starting your slash learn more to over 400 credit cards.
Head over to nerdwallet.com forward slash learn more to find smarter credit cards, savings accounts, mortgage rates, and more.
NerdWallet. Finance smarter.
NerdWallet Compare Incorporated.
NMLS 1617539. Welcome to the PropG Pod's Office Hours. This is the part of the show where we answer your
questions about business, big tech, entrepreneurship, and whatever else is on your mind.
If you'd like to submit a question, please email a voice recording to officehours at
propgmedia.com. First question. Thanks for taking my question. I'm a new listener, and I love this podcast. I'm a school administrator
from Southern Illinois, and I know very little when you discuss business and entrepreneurship,
but I love your social and political perspectives. Here's my question. We are facing a K-12 teacher
shortage in many states. In Illinois, we've passed a minimum salary for teachers and loosened up some
barriers to getting a teaching license. We're not seeing any effects from those things just yet, but
what do you think will get people wanting to teach in public schools or even go into the public
sector in general? Thanks again. Thanks, Anonymous from Southern Illinois, and thanks for your good
work. So teacher shortages are getting
worse, and there are more underqualified teachers in classrooms than in previous years. According
to research by educators at Kansas State, there are at least 55,000 vacant positions and 270,000
underqualified positions in the U.S. According to Title II data, enrollment in teacher preparation
programs is now 30 percent
lower than it was a decade ago. And a September survey conducted by the National Center for
Education Statistics revealed that two-thirds of public schools say their biggest challenge in
hiring was teachers or a lack of qualified candidates to be teachers. Evidence suggests
that more teachers are leaving the profession. Teacher turnover rose to an all-time high of 14
percent last year, so one in seven teachers leaves. The education news outlet Chalkbeat that more teachers are leaving the profession. Teacher turnover rose to an all-time high of 14%
last year, so one in seven teachers leaves. The education news outlet Chalkbeat found that in
eight states, turnover rates reached their highest level in five years. What's being done?
Some states are now sending people to college for free to fight against teacher shortages. In
addition, nine states this year have increased teacher pay to attract and retain more teachers. So look, the honest answer
is I'm not entirely sure. I can speculate. I think it's a few things. One, I think that the
wealthiest people in America are increasingly sending their kids to private school. And also,
the second thing is parental engagement. That's supposedly the key to a school is parental
engagement. And unfortunately, when you lose the wealthiest households, you lose households that have the spare time and the resources to be engaged in
the school. So I think a lot of times these public schools have a lot of kids from single-parent
homes where the parent can't be engaged. They're dealing with things they weren't paid to deal
with. They're dealing with mental health problems. They're dealing with hunger problems.
They're dealing with kids who are homeless. You're basically asking someone in their 20s who's making just a
marginal salary to become a mental health counselor, you know, an adolescent psychologist
dealing with problems at home. Some of these teachers have to come out of pocket. So
I think a lot of it just basically comes down to resources. And a lot of people will say, well, actually, some of the most well-resourced school districts, that doesn't solve the problem. I don that the primary school system in America is highly
biased against boys. And there's evidence around this. A boy who is called into the principal's
office is twice as likely to be suspended for the same behavior as a girl. A black boy,
five times as likely. Why? Men are not going into these professions. Now, why do we care?
I think boys need male role models from a very early stage. And with more single-parent households, meaning there is no male role model
at home, I think more boys need to see more men at school and relate to them. Also, it creates a
bias towards girls. Think about the outcome. Think about what elementary, junior high school,
and high school want kids to behave.
What is the behavior they want them to model?
Sit still.
Be a pleaser.
Raise your hand.
Be organized.
Color code.
Put out the study guide.
When I describe that person, who is it?
Nine times out of ten, that's a little girl.
Also, if you're a teacher, who are you going to take a personal interest in?
You're going to take a personal interest in yourself.
In other words, you're going to find that little boy or little girl that reminds you
of you, that you can relate to.
And that's who you're going to champion.
And the reality is we have more girls who more teachers relate to.
In the next five years, we're going to have twice as many female college graduates as
male college graduates.
And this has all sorts of knock-on effects.
So what do we need to do?
Well, OK, it's pretty obvious.
We need to increase compensation and resources allocated to these universities.
I also think we need more male teachers.
And we also need to think of ways to think of ways that say we value young men and boys and also make accommodations for the different types of behaviors that we see in boys. And also,
the simplest, most elegant solution, in my view, to make teaching easier and better for everybody
would be to start boys a year later. The development of their prefrontal cortex is 18
months behind girls. But in sum, in sum, we need to start valuing teachers more. And everybody
talks about this, but I see very little funds being allocated to it.
I went back to my old high school,
the University High School,
last year for my show on CNN Plus,
and I met the head of the LAUSD school district.
And he was saying, we just don't have the resources.
They pitched me on giving them,
I think they needed $300,000
to host their afterschool programs,
things like Drumline and Drill Team.
They just don't have
the funding for these things after school. And for a lot of these kids, that's really their only
outlet to socialize. That's their only outlet to meet other kids. That's kind of their only
fun. And then the question is, where do you take resources from? I think we need to raise taxes.
I think we need, or even at a minimum, to close loopholes and provide more resources to our great public schools.
I also think we should tax anyone, a per head tax for anyone who takes their kid out of the public school system and sends them to private school.
Because what you're losing is not only a student, you're losing parental involvement from folks who have the most resources to help out teachers and get involved in the school.
I can't imagine how difficult it is to teach at a public school right now. Anyways, thanks for the question. And if it
sounds like I don't have a silver bullet solution, trust your instincts. And I want to finish where
I started. Thanks for your good work. Next question. Hey, Scott, Ryan from Philadelphia
here. Love the podcast. Spotify told me I was in the top 2% of your listeners. So objectively,
I'm one of your biggest fans. Here's the question.
I've been working at a large consulting firm in cybersecurity for the past 10 plus years,
while also leading and running multiple tech startups, some of them more successful than
others, but obviously they're still a side hustle. As I apply to new roles within my organization
and even outside, I'm torn whether I highlight those experiences in startups or not. Will it hurt me or will it make my chances stronger?
Thanks.
Ryan from Philadelphia.
Two percent, bitch.
Commit.
Why are you in the top one percent?
To resist this feudal.
Give in to the dog.
That's right.
Be a one percenter.
That's a scary thought.
Anyways, thanks for your listenership.
Let's talk a little bit about Philadelphia. I had never really spent any time in Philadelphia, and then I went on the board of
Urban Outfitters, a very interesting... Two of the top brands, according to millennials,
are Urban Outfitters and Free People, both owned by Urban Outfitters. Think about that. One company
owns two of the townhouse brands among millennials. Also, they have the coolest HQ of any company I've ever been to. They took over the Navy Yard, or they have their HQ at the Navy
Yard in Philadelphia. So you'll be in a conference room talking about quarterly financials, and
you'll see this old aircraft carrier bobbing up and down. Anyway, smart people really enjoyed my
four years there. I would not describe Philadelphia as kind of the old Navy of cities,
sort of 60 or 80% of New York for 40 to 60% of the price. Seemed like a good quality of life
at a lower cost of living. Anyways, Philadelphia, there you go. Okay. What was your question? Oh,
whether or not you, when applying for internal roles, talk about your side hustles.
This is situational. I can only tell you how I would respond. And that is, as your boss,
I don't think I'd respond well. And I'd be like, Ryan, if you want a promotion, here's an idea.
Focus on this fucking job, boss. So I can tell you that I get having side hustles.
Actually, I don't get having side hustles. Let me cut to the chase, Ryan.
I think your side hustle needs to be your main hustle. I think you need to have one hustle. So do the hustle, but do one fucking hustle. And that is, if you want economic security, find something that secure, probably the primary reason I'm economically secure is I was born in the right place at the right time.
But in terms of my economic security coming from my professional success, it was focus.
And that is I went all in, Ryan.
I went all in.
I was in the office on weekends, returning emails immediately. If you're at a small organization or a place where
people are looking to develop economic security, the way you develop economic security is by
garnering an unfair share of that market and getting more economic currency than your peer
group, right? I mean, the average wage globally is, I think, about $18,000 a year. So if you want
more than that, you got to be in an economy and you got to bring more productivity. And part of
that is just pure elbow grease and focus. So I've never understood the idea of a side hustle.
I get it if you're at a big company and they're paying you well and you want to stay there. But
OK, if you're going to have a side hustle, have it for a while and then it either takes off and
you go all in on it or give it up and go all in on your company. Because my guess is the fastest
blue line path to economic security, your current job would be to be great at it or
specifically great-er, as in focus more on it. So my advice to anybody who has a side hustle is if
let's put a time limit on it. And if the side hustle begins to grow, then quit your current
job and go all in on your side hustle. But the way to economic security, the way to success,
the way to professional currency,
in my view,
is 110% focus on one thing.
Thanks for the question.
We have one quick break
before our final question.
Stay with us.
Welcome back.
Question number three.
This next question comes from a listener who would like to remain anonymous. Hey, Scott, Welcome back, question number three. more, but they're a little tight on cash. They've been a small mom and pop operation for a few years
now, and they have not had many corporate team members on payroll, and I'm one of the first ones.
They're trying to work with their cash flow to manage it as they're continuing to build other
properties, and what they've asked me to do is be able to kind of defer some of my salary until the
second half of the year. Wanted to see if this is something that's pretty common
when it comes to young companies or companies who are just getting started and especially in real
estate. Just wanted to get your thoughts on that to see if you think that's appropriate for an
employer to be delaying some of your salary or payroll to a later date to try to accommodate
the current company's needs. All right. Thanks.
Hello, Anonymous. So, look, a company that has, you know, more promise than cash flow is not unusual. But what is not cool about this is them asking you to take all the risk without rewarding
you for that risk. And that is, it sounds like your job, the market compensation for your job
is X, and they want to pay you 0.7 X and give you,
you know, 0.3 of it later in the year. Well, that's fine. If you can afford to do that
and you're willing to do it, okay, but you should be compensated for it in the form of
some additional upside or equity ownership in the project. And I would talk to a real estate
attorney or someone senior in the company saying, effectively, what
they're asking you to do is they're asking you to invest in the company. Because even if they give
you all that money back, one, you're taking risks. There's a chance that this company goes out of
business or they just don't have the money or they come up with new reasons to defer more and you
never get that money. So you're taking some risk. You are putting your capital at risk. In addition,
even if you get it back, you're losing the time value of money.
With inflation, you know, a dollar today is worth more than a dollar in six months. So, okay, fine.
If you're willing to do it, I would say to them, look, I am willing to do this. I'm willing to
forego or defer some salary. But I would expect, as is entirely reasonable, some additional
compensation or upside. And that can be additional capital,
or it can be a success fee or some sort of equity participation in the projects you're working on.
In other words, it's a personal decision. Do you have the money to invest in this company,
which is effectively what they're asking you to do? And if the answer is yes,
then they need to treat you like an investor and offer you upside beyond just paying you back.
You're not a bank. You're not a bank, for God's sakes. And quite frankly, if they don't see the
merit in that and they just want to defer your salary and they kind of wave off the conversation,
I would start looking for another job because what you're talking about is a company that is
not financially strong, nor do they really appreciate that you, like them,
are taking risks with your own capital.
Thanks for the question.
That's all for this episode.
If you'd like to submit a question,
please email a voice recording to officehoursatproptimedia.com.
Again, that's officehoursatproptimedia.com. This episode is produced by Caroline Shagrin. Jennifer Sanchez is our associate
producer and Drew Burrows is our technical director. Thank you for listening to the
property pod from the Vox Media Podcast Network. We will catch you on Saturday for No Mercy,
No Malice as read by George Hahn and on Monday with our weekly market show.