The Prof G Pod with Scott Galloway - Office Hours: App Store Fees, Remote vs. In-Person Learning, and Spending Time with Sick Loved Ones

Episode Date: August 16, 2021

Scott answers a question in reference to Elon Musk’s comment about Apple’s App Store, and whether Amazon is also part of the problem regarding the high fees for developers. Scott also discusses wh...y he thinks in-person learning is a superior method compared to online learning in certain circumstances. He then gives a listener advice on navigating how to spend their time when a loved one is dying.   Music: https://www.davidcuttermusic.com / @dcuttermusic Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Transcript
Discussion (0)
Starting point is 00:00:00 Join Capital Group CEO Mike Gitlin on the Capital Ideas Podcast. In unscripted conversations with investment professionals, you'll hear real stories about successes and lessons learned, informed by decades of experience. It's your look inside one of the world's most experienced active investment managers. Invest 30 minutes in an episode today. Subscribe wherever you get your podcasts. Published by Capital Client Group, Inc. Support for PropG comes from NerdWallet.
Starting point is 00:00:32 Starting your credit card search with NerdWallet? Smart. Using their tools to finally find the card that works for you? Even smarter. You can filter for the features you care about. Access the latest deals and add your top cards to a comparison table to make smarter decisions. And it's all powered by the Nerd's expert reviews of over 400 credit cards. Head over to nerdwallet.com forward slash learn more to find smarter credit
Starting point is 00:00:56 cards, savings accounts, mortgage rates, and more. NerdWallet, finance smarter. NerdWallet Compare Incorporated. NMLS 1617539. Welcome to the PropGPod's Office Hours. This is the part of the show where we answer your questions about business, big tech, entrepreneurship, and whatever else is on your mind. If you'd like to submit a question, please email a voice recording to officehoursatprofgmedia.com. Again, that's officehoursatprofgmedia.com. First question, and again, I do not see, what is it? The uncut version. The, what was it called?
Starting point is 00:01:47 The Criterion uncut version where you go buy a laser disc for some reason and think it was going to be a new movie because they include a two-minute scene that justifiably was cut out of the movie. Anyway, anyway, first question. Hey, Prof G. I hope this voice note finds you well. My name is Ori. I work in tech here in Perth, Western Australia. And while I would normally have loved to ask your opinion about the relevance of the traditional big tech companies,
Starting point is 00:02:13 I thought I'd rather ask you about the recent tweet put out by Elon Musk about what's going on between Epic and the fees they pay to Apple and the App Store and whether or not Tesla is going to get involved in that debate. This got me thinking, what about Amazon and their app store? Surely there's billions of dollars worth that goes through there. Are they paying Apple that? I can't imagine Jeff Bezos is happy with that.
Starting point is 00:02:41 Or do Amazon have a separate agreement with Apple and their App Store? We'd love to hear your thoughts on this. Thanks so much. So Ori from Perth. By the way, I'm big in Australia. I'd like to be big in Japan because I love Japan, but I'll settle for – actually, that's true. I think I'd rather be big in Australia.
Starting point is 00:03:02 I have sort of a bond with Australia. They're nice, fun, mavericks, into sports. I just love, I think I'm kind of, well, my father was born in Australia. True story. Born into a wealthy family. I think it was the McVickers family. No, that's not true. He was born out of wedlock.
Starting point is 00:03:23 And his mother, my grandmama, Nana, Nana, she was a maid, house cleaner, whatever the politically correct term is now, for a very wealthy family, a shipbuilding family. I think they were called the McVickers. And she had a kid out of wedlock. And one of the women, the daughters, was getting super old for that age, like 25, and hadn't found a guy and said, I will adopt this child and I will give you and your boyfriend a bunch of money, but you have to leave Australia. They didn't want to deal with anything. You're going to go back. They were planning to go back to Scotland anyways because I guess my grandfather, Pop-Pop, never met him. Never met him.
Starting point is 00:04:03 Died of a brain tumor at 53. By the way, by the way, people always talk about how they're going to live to 110 because they have crazy genetics. I have outlived every one of my grandparents except for my grandma. Three of the four were dead by the time they were my age. The average life expectancy of my grandparents is pretty much dead. They all passed away in the early 50s. That's comforting. That's comforting. Anyways, back to Australia and the life that my father was supposed to have. And my grandma agreed. And she recognized that, I don't know what she was thinking, maybe that
Starting point is 00:04:35 her son would have this incredible life of privilege and she'd have the money to move back to Scotland. And as is often the case with mothers and sons, at the last minute, she decided no, and she panicked and went to her boyfriend and said, we need to get on a ship today for Scotland. Anyways, my dad always says that he could have been a McVicar, that he would have had a much different life. Instead, he ended up growing up in Depression-era Scotland and not having a pot to piss in, and is very dysfunctional about money. But anyways, hold me, hold me. That's my story about Australia.
Starting point is 00:05:09 Okay, bring it back, Scott. Bring it back. Perth, Perth, the most remote city in the world as identified by a city that is furthest, a city over a million people that is furthest from another city that also has a million people. I've always, I have this image of Perth. I've never been there. That it's like California in the 60s.
Starting point is 00:05:29 It would have been extraordinarily beautiful. And I always thought, maybe I'll just move to Perth and buy some crazy house on the beach for like $18,000, which is no longer true because China has turned Australia into its sort of supply chain around minerals and resources. And the Australian economy has boomed and shit is expensive now in Australia. I mean, it is really, they are dealing with massive real estate, the same price inflation, same we're dealing with. But anyways, that's not what you asked. In terms of Apple, so I think that the app store is going to be regulated. People talk about antitrust and I think Amazon, Facebook, and Google will all be broken up or will decide to spend companies prophylactically.
Starting point is 00:06:06 In the case of Google, I think they'll spend YouTube. I think Amazon at some point will spend AWS, which will be the most valuable company in the world once it's spun or a few years after it's spun. But you can't – it's difficult to break up Apple because elegant antitrust results in companies that are broken up and more competition. But it also doesn't kneecap the company. And the hard part about trying to break up Apple would be who gets domain over the core asset, which is the brand. So I think the big issue there is the App Store that is effectively acting as a toll booth for the entire Internet. Musk is right. It is kind of a global tax on the Internet because about, I think, about 80% by dollar volume goes through the iOS app store. The market share is much more balanced in terms of
Starting point is 00:06:47 Google and iOS in terms of app downloads. But given that the billion iOS users just have more money and seem to be more confident or more willing to pay for the apps on iOS, it controls, it dominates the app economy by fees. And a 30% fee results in, as an example, all the streamers, whether it's Netflix or Hulu or Peacock, pay somewhere between 3% and 12% of their total revenues to Apple because that is where a lot of people go to download these apps. So this really is a monopoly that is charging what a lot of people think is a usurious tax. Think about Spotify. Think about Spotify. Think about Spotify. They are now directly competing, or Apple Music is now directly competing with Spotify. Is that a fair fight when one company basically has a 30% advantage? And that is Apple doesn't levy on itself a 30% tax, so it can reinvest at a much more aggressive rate than Spotify.
Starting point is 00:07:45 They also see who's downloading Spotify. They can also deprioritize Spotify when people type in music search, or if they type in Spotify, Apple can basically put front and center Apple Music. So this not only goes to the usurious fees, but what it means to own the rails. Should you be competing with companies on your platform when you're the platform? And I think most antitrust would say no, at least that's what I believe. So that is coming. In the meantime, the battle that has sort of brought this to the fore is Epic wants to be able to sell products inside its app and doesn't want to be able to take, have to pay the 30%. And it's also letting other developers, said other developers, if you sell this stuff inside our ecosystem, we'll charge you 10%, not 30%. And Apple said, this is a violation of services. Any revenue that happens
Starting point is 00:08:38 has to kind of flow through us in the app and such that we can take our tax and said it's a violation of services and shut down Epic, or I think took the app off the app store, which is basically like saying, okay, we're going to essentially shut your store down. It's like being an app and not being on the app store. iOS is like having a store, but putting it on Mars. It doesn't matter how good the store is. I think you're going to see something here. And Apple tried to at least nod to this and said that they were going to reduce their fee on small businesses. And this was somewhat just purely symbolic because the amount of revenue this impacted was like maybe only 3%. Amazon introduced a small business or a similar small business accelerator program, which will reduce the commissions Amazon takes on app developer
Starting point is 00:09:24 revenues for smaller business from 30% down to 20%, similar to Apple. But look, at the end of the day, it's hard not to start to extract higher rents than our market when you have monopoly power. And that's what you do when you start believing that you're the one, that it's your genius and that you deserve that 30%. And Apple will put out all sorts of information. They probably believe it, that the investment they make, the security they provide is worth the 30%.
Starting point is 00:09:51 And I think probably a lot of their folks would agree with them. This also feeds up into something bigger. And I realize I'm droning on. I realize I'm droning on. That's what Perth does to me. But you have essentially when Tim Cook comes out and is very indignant about privacy, what he's saying is, I don't like the internet supported, or excuse me, the advertising supported
Starting point is 00:10:12 internet because I don't get fees on advertising. He doesn't get any fees, nor does Apple from this podcast. As far as I can tell, it builds momentum, it builds credibility, it builds attention on iOS by having a great podcast, being a great distributor or marketplace or podcast. But unless it's a fee for the app that doesn't do advertising, he doesn't make any money. So what do you know? He's not a fan of advertising and the privacy violation and the tracking that good advertising involves. And I think this is principled, and I'm not saying I don't agree with him, but it's awfully convenient because I think Tim Cook would like to move to a world where there is no advertising and everyone has to pay for their media, i.e. apps, and he gets 30% of it. There's some downside there, and that is there's a fear and a legitimate argument that there's a group of people, that wealthy people are the people who get to consume or have access to media that's fact-checked, that is legitimate, and that the rest of the world
Starting point is 00:11:05 has to get ads not only pelted at them, but ends up in a business model where the entire focus is on attention. So they start creating novel content, i.e. content that is not true to keep people engaged. Because the bottom line is conspiracy theories and misinformation is much more interesting than just sort of fact-checked information. You know, things are getting reasonably better. It's just not a great headline. Anyway, I think that this is not over. I think Apple is going to incur some sort of regulation and Epic is expediting that as it's basically saying,
Starting point is 00:11:38 look, this is a real problem. The App Store regulated Facebook, Amazon, and Google, I believe, are going to curse some sort of actual antitrust breakup. Ori from Perth. Ori from Perth. Thanks for the question. Next question. Hi, Prof G. Jeff here, reaching out from New Zealand. The question to you is about the future of higher education and the role of real-time interaction compared with pre-recorded lessons. I recently watched a Netflix documentary about babies that mentioned a study where they exposed nine-month-olds to a new language by having someone read to them. After something
Starting point is 00:12:08 like 12 lessons, the baby's language skills in the new language were as good as baby's native to that language. But when the lessons were provided on video, the babies didn't really absorb any of it. I'm currently a PhD student, and last year when the lockdown started, I took several online courses through edX and Coursera out of general interest and just to improve my skills. There'd be times where if I could ask a question or talk with a classmate, it would have allowed me to complete some of the assignments successfully, whereas I would find myself sometimes skipping things because I wasn't taking it for credit and I figured some learning was better than nothing. So when I heard about that study in babies, it made me wonder how my experience
Starting point is 00:12:37 in those classes would have been different if they were in person. So I'd love to hear your thoughts on this. Is a recorded version of the best calculus teacher in the world better than an average teacher who can interact in real time? Thanks so much. Wow, Jeff from New Zealand. Oceana or whatever you call this, the South Pacific. What do you call it way down there other than it's really, really nice and really fucking far? I think we'd all live in New Zealand, Australia if it wasn't so damn far.
Starting point is 00:12:59 Anyways, Jeff from New Zealand. By the way, where's everyone from? That first guy from Perth sounded like a Bond nemesis. He had one of those accents that was like, I was educated in Switzerland and my father, I don't know, was some gazillionaire in Western Australia. And now I will rule the world. Anyway, I don't, where are you from, Jeff? You're not from New Zealand. Anyway, anyway, so this is a really interesting question and it's something I struggle with. And that is, so I typically teach my brand strategy class at NYU in person.
Starting point is 00:13:32 And one, it's just much more enjoyable. There's an electricity, there's a buzz. I think it's much better for them. I think they absolutely tune in. They're more engaged. I find teaching on Zoom or this what we'll call asynchronous exhausting. And what we found in online ed, one of the things we're most proud of at Section 4 is that we have completion rates of 70%. Now, get this, the average completion rate of asynchronous higher ed is 10% because there's no buzz, there's no electricity, and there's no accountability.
Starting point is 00:14:01 When you're speaking to someone live and you look away or you look bored, they might be offended or you just wouldn't do that. Whereas if they're on video, you might just go to the refrigerator or you might just turn the video off. You just might not pay attention. So peer-to-peer feedback that's synchronous and live just has much more buzz, much more intensity. And what we try to do is make as much stuff live as possible. We have a lot of lessons that are recorded by video and we spend a ton of money trying to make them really engaging and high production value. So we recognize we're competing with the refrigerator and Netflix, but live stuff, live classes, TAs, interaction, group projects where you're meeting either in person or live on video. And then we
Starting point is 00:14:46 do live streams, which is really strange for online ed, where the professor actually does a course live or a session live. But what we found is that there's a huge difference between asynchronous, recorded and live. And I also think the next step is in person. I just don't think there's anything that replaces it. So the question you have is, would the best step is in person. I just don't think there's anything that replaces it. So the question you have is, would the best calculus teacher in the world be better on video than someone live? And I think it's just how big is the delta. But I think a good calculus teacher live
Starting point is 00:15:19 and that buzz and that interaction you get from people is probably better than the video of the best calculus teacher because people still want to go to class even though they can probably find the best astronomer in the world on doing a TED Talk. They still do opt for the in-person experience.
Starting point is 00:15:36 You're also getting all sorts of ancillary benefit, the rush, the feel of, you know, this thing called the real world. It's just totally, totally different. Another kind of observation I've made is the majority of this thing called the real world. It's just totally, totally different. Another kind of observation I've made is the majority of my current income, the majority of my income comes from investing, but the majority of my current income or short-term income or salary or cabbage, whatever you want to call it, comes from speaking. What I found is on a regular basis, I'm not a regular basis,
Starting point is 00:16:05 I'd say once every three or six months, I piss off a client. And when I say piss off, I'm part of my rap is I'm vulgar and profane and it's not an act. It's, so it's not really part of my act, part of who I am because I am a profane and vulgar person.
Starting point is 00:16:19 It's not, I'm not doing it to offend people. I'm not doing it to try and get attention. It's just the way I think. I think with expletives, I think in a profane way, I think most people do actually. And most of the time it works. Most of the time it lands. And sometimes it doesn't. And when I'm in person speaking, I can register that this is not the type of crowd and the body language I'm getting doesn't lend itself well to me talking about problems with my prostate. It's just not going to land. And then in other places,
Starting point is 00:16:50 I know it will. And you can't register. You can't get those atmospherics remote. And so there's just a lack of connection with the audience, a lack of EQ, a lack of learning, which I think can be reverse engineered to some of the things you're talking about. So in some, in some, I think it's all about the delta between the quality, but there's just no getting around it. In person, it's just, it's superior. And actually, universities have decided, especially the top or the elite schools, to be back in person. NYU has put, you know, drawn a line in the sand and we'll see what happens with like the next Delta Plus or Delta Comfort variant. If shit continues to get realer and realer again, Jesus Christ, can you believe we're here again? Anyway, they've said everyone needs to be back and they're going to do all the classes in person because they realized that in
Starting point is 00:17:40 order to charge $7,000 per class, Jesus Christ, can you believe that? They need to have the maximum experience. And they realize that the maximum high-impact experience is in person. And they need to offer that experience to justify those types of margins. Jeff from New Zealand. Jeff from New Zealand. I know a lot of very wealthy people who basically have a giant go bag called a home in New Zealand. And they're planning to move down there if there's another crash or ends up being a nuclear mushroom cloud somewhere.
Starting point is 00:18:10 That's a nice thought. That's a nice thought. Thanks, Jeff. We have one quick break before our next question. Stay with us. Support for this show comes from Constant Contact. You know what's not easy? Marketing. And when you're starting your small business, while you're so focused on the day-to-day, the personnel, and the finances, marketing is the last thing on your mind. But if customers don't know about you, the rest of it doesn't really matter. Luckily, there's Constant Contact. Constant Contact's
Starting point is 00:18:43 award-winning marketing platform can help your businesses stand out, stay top of mind, and see big results. Sell more, raise more, and build more genuine relationships with your audience through a suite of digital marketing tools made to fast track your growth. With Constant Contact, you can get email marketing that helps you create and send the perfect email to every customer. And create, promote, and manage your events with ease, all in one place. Get all the automation, integration, and reporting tools that get your marketing running seamlessly. All backed by Constant Contact's expert live customer support. Ready, set, grow.
Starting point is 00:19:25 Go to constantcontact.ca and start your free trial today. Go to constantcontact.ca for your free trial. Constantcontact.ca. Hey, it's Scott Galloway, and on our podcast, Pivot, we are bringing you a special series about the basics of artificial intelligence. We're answering all your questions. What should you use it for? What tools are right for you?
Starting point is 00:19:50 And what privacy issues should you ultimately watch out for? And to help us out, we are joined by Kylie Robeson, the senior AI reporter for The Verge, to give you a primer on how to integrate AI into your life. So, tune into AI Basics, How and When to Use AI, a special series from Pivot sponsored by AWS, wherever you get your podcasts. Welcome back. Question number three. Are we going down under again? Are we going down under? Hey, Scott, this is Jimmy from Massachusetts. I'm a day one listener of the show. And I took your advice last year when you said young people should do a Corona Corps year. Well, the dog's idea never made it into public policy. I did the next best thing and joined AmeriCorps to work with at-risk youth in my home state. I love the work that I'm doing,
Starting point is 00:20:37 and they're even paying for my master's in data analytics. So thanks for the advice. Now, while I'm normally pretty good at balancing a lot of opportunities, my sister's terminal brain cancer diagnosis last month has made it a little difficult to choose how I spend my time. So my question for you is this, how did you choose to spend your time with your mother in her last few months?
Starting point is 00:20:58 Take us back to that time. How did you decide between watching Frasier with her, taking the work call, or just taking time for yourself? And lastly, thanks for all you do. You've been a great voice guiding me through these hard times without even knowing it. So stay well.
Starting point is 00:21:14 Jimmy, I'm so sorry. There's just getting around this. This just fucking sucks. I'm very sorry for you and your sister. So taking care or caring for or making these types of decisions are deeply personal. And a lot of it comes down to your situation. I write a lot about time I spent with my mom. But my situation was I was in a position where I had some economic security and some flexibility.
Starting point is 00:21:49 And it sounds like you have some flexibility. And a lot of it comes down to who else is around. And again, these are deeply personal decisions think you want to have this terrible thing influence how you spend your time. I think you want to shape your life to try and spend more time with your sister, but I don't think you want to put your life on hold. And that is if your sister's terminal. So everything we do is terminal. Everyone here, the mortality rate is 100%. We all have a finite amount of time. It sounds like your sister's might be more finite, which means that you and the people close to her probably want to allocate more time than you would otherwise in her remaining time. And it sounds to me like you'll do that. But at the same time, I don't think your sister would want you to totally put your life on
Starting point is 00:22:53 hold. I don't think that's healthy for anybody. So that balance and that sweet spot is kind of up to you and the dynamics of the relationship and the resources. But a few things that I did that were fun was I went through music and media with my mom. I imagine you and your sister are probably a similar age. Just spending a lot of time together. Try to stay, I don't want to call it upbeat, but don't make it too strange or awkward. You're still brother and sister. You should still fight and argue.
Starting point is 00:23:28 Think about caring for the caregivers. I can't imagine how hard this must be on your parents. So giving them opportunities for breaks or being supportive for them. You will not regret spending time or a lot of time with your sister, but you should also recognize that your life is important and you should continue to make progress around your life. Does that mean you maybe put off more grad school or moving to another city? Yes. Does it mean you
Starting point is 00:23:57 stop working? Probably not. You should probably continue to do the good work you're doing. But to summarize, yeah, absolutely recognize that time with your, this loved one has become, the present value on it has become much more important. And so you're going to spend more time there, but also your life and your progress in your professional and personal life is also really important. Spend time looking after the caregivers and also treat the relationship as a brother-sister relationship, not a patient-caregiver relationship, because she just wants to be around her brother. She wants to hold on to kind of what I would imagine what her life is.
Starting point is 00:24:42 If I sound like I'm struggling here, I am struggling here. This is one of those things that's impossible to, I think, impossible to offer, like, the right advice. I don't know if there's a right way here. I think you just have to decide what your way is. Jimmy from Massachusetts, I am thinking about you and your sister. Godspeed, you both. Thanks for the question. So algebra of happiness, I think that I did an algebra of happiness a couple of weeks ago just on the importance of crying. Because it's cathartic and B, it helps you get in touch with your emotions around what's important to you.
Starting point is 00:25:24 And also what you're worried about losing. And our last question from the young man whose sister has been diagnosed with terminal brain cancer, the reason we're sad, the reason we grieve is because we have wonderful things in our life that we're worried about losing or that we are going to lose. And there's a great quote from WandaVision of all things on Disney Plus. And it goes something like this, what is grief if not love persevering? And if you shut yourself off from grief, if you haven't experienced grief, it means you've never really loved anyone intensely. Everything everywhere ends.
Starting point is 00:26:05 And it sounds like this young man is gonna lose his sister. All of us know tragedy. All of us will know someone we love who will get sick and die. And the grief itself is a function of how rich and how much love has been in your life. And so in sum, we all want love in our life. We all want relationships that matter.
Starting point is 00:26:34 But a function of that is that we're all going to have grief. And again, what is grief if not love persevering? We all want love in our life. And that disappointment is a function of the things we've achieved and the wondrous things in our life. What is grief if not love persevering? Our producers are Caroline Shagrin and Drew Burrows.
Starting point is 00:26:57 Claire Miller is our assistant producer. Claire, if you like what you heard, please follow, download, and subscribe. Thank you for listening to the Prop GPod from the Vox Media Podcast Network. We will catch you on Thursday. What software do you use at work? The answer to that question is probably more complicated than you want it to be. The average U.S. company deploys more than 100 apps,
Starting point is 00:27:19 and ideas about the work we do can be radically changed by the tools we use to do it. So what is enterprise software anyway? What is productivity software? How will AI affect both? And how are these tools changing the way we use our computers to make stuff, communicate, and plan for the future? In this three-part special series, Decoder is surveying the IT landscape presented by AWS. Check it out wherever you get your podcasts. Support for the show comes from Alex Partners. Did you know that almost 90% of executives see
Starting point is 00:27:51 potential for growth from digital disruption? With 37% seeing significant or extremely high positive impact on revenue growth. In Alex Partners 2024 digital disruption report, you can learn the best path to turning that disruption into growth for your business. With a focus on clarity, direction, and effective implementation, Alex Partners provides essential support when decisive leadership is crucial. You can discover insights like these by reading Alex Partners' latest technology industry insights, available at www.alexpartners.com slash Vox. That's www.alexpartners.com slash V-O-X. In the face of disruption, businesses trust Alex Partners to get straight to the point and deliver results when it really matters.

There aren't comments yet for this episode. Click on any sentence in the transcript to leave a comment.