The Prof G Pod with Scott Galloway - Office Hours: China’s Real Estate Crisis, Career Transitions After the Military, and How to Teach Your Kids the Value of Money
Episode Date: April 3, 2024Scott gives his thoughts on Beijing’s recent $78 billion fraud accusation against China real estate giant Evergrande. He then advises a listener who is making a career change after serving in the mi...litary. He wraps up with recommendations on how to teach your kids about money and investing in an engaging way. Music: https://www.davidcuttermusic.com / @dcuttermusic Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
Transcript
Discussion (0)
Support for this show comes from Constant Contact.
If you struggle just to get your customers to notice you,
Constant Contact has what you need to grab their attention.
Constant Contact's award-winning marketing platform
offers all the automation, integration, and reporting tools
that get your marketing running seamlessly,
all backed by their expert live customer support.
It's time to get going and growing with Constant Contact today.
Ready, set, grow.
Go to ConstantContact.ca and start your free trial today.
Go to ConstantContact.ca for your free trial.
ConstantContact.ca
Support for PropG comes from NerdWallet. Starting your slash learn more to over 400 credit cards.
Head over to nerdwallet.com forward slash learn more to find smarter credit cards, savings accounts, mortgage rates, and more.
NerdWallet. Finance smarter.
NerdWallet Compare Incorporated.
NMLS 1617539. Welcome to the Prof G Pod's Office Hours. This is the part of the show where we answer your
questions about business, big tech, entrepreneurship, and whatever else is on your mind.
If you'd like to submit a question, please email a voice recording to
officehoursofprofgmedia.com. Again, that's officehoursofprofgmedia.com. First question.
Hi, Prof G. Brandon Kay here from Toronto. What do you think the global economic fallout's going to
be, if any, from the recent announcement about Chinese developer Evergrande accused of a historic
$78 billion fraud? Do you think it's going to have an impact on our domestic market?
Thanks a lot for your insights.
Hi, Brandon from Toronto. It's interesting. I was asked at a conference, I think it's really
interesting to talk about what are the most unimportant things being talked about every
day in the media and what are the most important things not being talked about. Some analysts have
said that every publicly traded real estate
company in China is effectively bankrupt when you look at the assets and the liability. So,
some context here. Beijing has accused the real estate giant Evergrande of inflating revenue by
$78 billion in 2019 and 2020. That means they're going to kill some people. And when I say kill,
I mean execute after they've had a quote-unquote trial. You don't
lose $78 billion in, I mean, I would not want to be the, and I don't know what's happened, but I
would not want to be a senior manager at Evergrande right now. Evergrande reportedly issued, is it
Evergrande or Evergrande? Is it Latino? Is it Muy Grande? Is it a big ever? I don't know. But
anyways, EG reportedly issued bonds based on these falsified financial
results. They should run for president. Anyways, the China Securities Regulatory Commission,
better known as CSRC, fined He Kaiyan, Evergrande's founder, 47 million yuan,
or about six and a half million bucks, and imposed a lifetime ban on him from the securities market.
The CSRC also fined Hengda Real Estate, Evergrande's main onshore unit, 4.2 billion yuan, 580 million,
and other former executives face penalties and market bans. So the firm was once China's largest
real estate developer, but is now in liquidation due to a prolonged debt crisis. And now they're
accused of committing a massive fraud. It's the most indebted real estate developer owing over
$300 billion.
According to analysts, this crackdown indicates Beijing's strict stance against malpractice
among developers.
Yeah, doesn't appear.
Maybe a little allowance of prevention would have helped here and serves as a warning for
cooperation and debt restructuring.
What impact will this have?
No, nothing's ever as good or as bad as it seems, but this feels bad to me.
According to the New York Times, China's leading officials are currently working to reduce the $18 trillion economy's reliance on construction.
Supposedly, real estate was a huge part of their GDP growth, but how much of that GDP growth was real?
This sector previously drove a third of China's growth and provided jobs for many of its people. According to the Wall Street Journal, the property crisis in China is expected to get worse as new home sales drop and developers burdened by debt struggle
to secure financing for project completion. So what impact does this have? To give you a sense
of the severity of the problem, I've heard analysts quote that about Chinese real estate
has three and a half times the leverage as our real estate industry had when we went into the
Great Financial Recession, which was inspired by the subprime crisis, that their problem, their crisis has three and a half
times the undetonated or ticking time bombs known as the debt on this property. And you see these
videos of these entire cities that are just empty. We're not talking about, oh, that's buildings
underwater and 50% of it is not leased. We're talking about entire cities which have been financed with debt that obviously are generating absolutely no cash flow. So what could happen here? I guess the question is, who owns the debt? And is China willing to step in and provide some sort of stimulus or backstop, which probably isn't a good idea because that creates moral hazard. A lot of people say this could get really bad because China doesn't have a lot of experience in debt restructuring.
Who are the bondholders here? What happens to them? Does this create a total crisis of confidence?
Do they let these firms crash, as you would in most capitalist economies, such that some people
lose, some people win, people can come in and buy some of the debt for pennies on the dollar. But my sense is, if I were to predict what this means, it means that a ton of debt is going to have to be restructured. There's going to be a lot of firms that are going to go out of business. This is a real test for the market economy in China. I don't see it infecting, at least not yet. I would need to know what percentage of that debt is held by Western institutional investors. But a lot of capital has been leaving China for a while now.
It's been out of vogue.
And I imagine a lot of those bondholders divested.
But beyond that, I don't really feel as if I have the domain expertise to predict what's
going to happen here.
But again, see above three and a half times the leverage as what was placed on the residential
real estate market before we
went into the great financial recession. I appreciate the question. It's going to be
interesting. Question number two. Hi, Scott. I'm an army officer in the niche field of marketing
and economics and work with a group of high caliber army officers and civil servants on
stewarding the army's employer brand. I'm six to 10 years from retirement. And while I will have a
pension when I retire, I'm saving at a rate that I'll have just under $2 million saved for retirement at the
time. I have an MBA from a top 25 school and will have 10 plus years in business development and
brand management when I leave the military. I am having trouble deciding what I want to do
following my career in the military, whether I should go to work for a startup or pre-IPO company,
look into military leader transition programs at some large
companies like JPMorgan Chase, or go back to school and work towards my PhD. What advice would
you have for someone making a dramatic career change in their early 40s? And before you thank
me for my service, I lived a chocolate and peanut butter life, jumping out of planes and blowing
shit up for 10 years. I'm sorry, brother. I'm going to thank you for your service. I think there are a lot of people out there
that would like to take our Nespresso and Netflix away
or perhaps kill us.
And I think a lot of Americans,
because we've had such peace and prosperity,
largely because of our innovation and that we have
the finest train, the highest character,
the deepest culture of warriors in the world,
like yourself,
that we get to enjoy our
Nespresso and Netflix and not worry. And unfortunately, I think a lot of people don't
appreciate that if we don't defend our shores, there are a lot of people that'll come for us
and come for our shit. I'm exposed to a lot of people in the service for a variety of reasons,
but I think it's a great training. And I think it's wonderful that you're on the back end of
that. And also, I might add that you're saving, and it looks like you're setting yourself up well for retirement, which means you're smart, and you understand numbers, and you have real discipline, which isn't a surprise coming out of the armed services.
Anyways, let's go in reverse order.
Getting your PhD.
Do you love school?
Most of the PhDs I know are really good at school.
They teach.
They like the campus environment. They love the ideas I know are really good at school. They teach. They like the campus
environment. They love the idea of teaching and doing research. Now, a tenure-track person,
which is usually why you get a PhD, I don't have a PhD. People oftentimes call me doctor,
and I say, I'm not a doctor. I'm just an MBA. I'm what's called a clinical professor. But typically,
PhDs pursuing a life in academia do a lot of peer-reviewed research. You find a domain. You
go very deep. You become sort of an expert in a niche, you write these very wonky papers
on a specific topic, other academics provide feedback, and you get as many citations as
possible. So hopefully you get tenure, which means they can't fire you, and then you become
very unproductive and a weight on students in the form of student debt. A little much,
that's probably a little too much. Anyways, that's your PhD if you want to go back and do that. I will say that being a professor
at a university is, I think, one of the most underrated careers in the world. I just think
it's an incredible way to make a living, flexibility. Generally speaking, I make fun
of my colleagues or I talk about higher ed in a disparaging light
sometimes. There's a really low asshole factor, at least at NYU. And I bet that's true of most
universities. They're generally like nice people, pretty gentle people, and a total flexible
schedule. No one cares if you're there or not. They just want you to do good work. It's inspiring
to be around young people all the time that are kind of fresh face and you feel like you're adding value. Also, I think that it's probably a nice transition from the armed services
because I would bet you're around a lot of young people and understand how to communicate
and teach. And it's also where I've seen, not seen, where I've read a lot of people who come
out of the service have trouble is they lose a sense of purpose. They're working for a private
company, doesn't have the same sense of camaraderie and purpose. And I do think you get some of that
in academia. Okay. So that's a PhD. I would probably not go to a startup or pre-IPO company
unless it's a great fit. I mean, pre-IPO companies, first off, we only hear about the
ones that go public or that get bought for a ton of money. So economically, the variance is enormous.
You can obviously do really well, but it's over.
I think it's romanticized because we don't talk about the six of the seven small companies that go out of business.
Also, I'm not sure the culture of the armed services suits itself well to a startup.
I think it's kind of a command and control, hierarchical, brute force mentality in
the armed services. And I'm sure there are special units that are much more entrepreneurial, and I'm
sure battle is the ultimate of being kind of entrepreneurial or on your feet thinking. But I
would do a sober analysis of the kind of environments you excel in, and I would imagine
it's probably not suited to a pre-IPO or startup, in my view. Also, it sounds like you're
in your 40s. That means you've probably collected a spouse and kids. And a startup and a pre-IPO
company, it's really a young man's game. You got to go in 110% of my view. My number one pick,
if I had to stack rank them based on the fact that I know about 2% of your full story here would be going to
work for a big company, which is vastly underrated. The American corporation is still the best entity
ever invented to create wealth and at a fairly low stress level. Now there's some bullshit. You'll
get a memo from someone you don't even know who wrote it. It won't be signed saying we're closing
down this office or certain people get promoted and you can't figure out why and others.
But generally speaking, the platform is so powerful.
So a company like JPMorgan Chase,
they attract world-class talent.
They have world-class leadership.
It's similar to the armed services
where I think you're being reviewed a lot
and they take human capital very seriously.
My last choice would be a pre-IPO or startup company.
I think they're romanticized.
And my gut, my gut is that the culture you're coming from doesn't foot well to a small company.
Sorry for the word salad.
And again, thanks for protecting the homeland.
We have one quick break before our final question.
Stay with us.
Welcome back. Question number three.
Hey, Prof G. Long time, first time.
Wanted to tell you I appreciate your unique perspective on life and your unique combination of skill set and knowledge base in many areas.
Wanted to see if we could combine a couple of those, your financial knowledge and your understanding of family dynamics. I've got two boys, 14 and 16 years old, and I've tried to instill in them a connection,
a visceral connection to understanding the value of time in investing and the value of committing
to an investment plan. So we started with the three jars, 20% to charity, 40% to save, and 40% to spend.
They loved spending it, had no trouble saving it.
And we did donate to charity, and I feel good about that, that they have learned the feeling of that and how fulfilling that can be.
But they do have probably a couple hundred bucks sitting in a jar on their desk that they never did anything with in terms of saving. So my question to you is, what exercise would you recommend to young boys, young kids, to really give them a visceral
connection to the feeling of a committed investment plan with a long time horizon?
That's my question. I appreciate your thoughts. Have a good one.
Anonymous. Thanks for the thoughtful question.
The first thing is just trying to be as transparent. When I get these questions about parenting, I have massive imposter syndrome. I think I manicure my image to portray myself on
Instagram and in this podcast as being just an outstanding father. I'm not. I think I'm struggling.
Struggling is the wrong word. It's not. I think I'm struggling. Struggling is the
wrong word. It's not the hardest thing I've ever done because most of it is a lot of fun and
rewarding, but I don't fucking know what to do with Snap. My kid, before he goes to bed,
wants to talk to his friends. I'm a total pushover, but I know he shouldn't be on social
media before he goes to sleep. That's exactly the wrong thing to help him calm down and go to sleep. He's rude to his mother. And I don't know how to weigh in
and like, stop that. I don't, I mean, anyways, I do a lot of virtue signaling around parenting
and being a dad. And the bottom line is I'm, I am trying to figure this shit out. So I think I've
this, my book, Algebra of Wealth coming out out, 25-year-olds can't imagine they're
ever going to be 65. They literally can't imagine it. It's a flaw in the species because
for the majority of the time on this planet, the majority of us didn't live past 35 or 38.
Our brain cannot wrap itself around the fact that, okay, if you're 40, you're probably going
to be here another 60 years. I just don't think a 14 or 16-year-old is going to be up for, okay, if you're 40, you're probably going to be here another 60 years. I just don't think a 14
or 16-year-old is going to be up for, okay, put $100 away and trust me, when you're 60,
it's going to be 8,000. I don't think that's a solid argument for them. What I think you can do,
though, is two things. One, what a wonderful man did for me at the age of 13 and something I do with my
boys. One, my mom's boyfriend, Terry, gave me $200 and said, go buy some stocks at one of those
fancy brokerages downtown in Westwood Village. And I went and I met this guy named Cy Saro at
Dean Witter. And I would call him every day. We bought, I think it was 16 shares of Columbia
Pictures at 12 and a half bucks.
And every day I would call him from the phone booth and we'd talk about the stock price movement.
And we'd try and connect it to the news.
You know, Casey's Shadow is a bomb.
Remember that movie?
You're probably not old enough.
Or Close Encounters of the Third Kind is a hit.
Or the Japanese might buy Columbia Pictures.
Well, what does that mean?
Well, if they buy it, they have to pay a premium so the stock would go up. And every day, or was it every day? Maybe three or four times a
week, he'd give me a small lesson in the markets. And so what I'm suggesting is maybe take some of
that money and say, I want you guys to pick some companies that you like. You know, you got to give
them attachment to it. Telling them to buy SPY or index funds, yeah, we know that's the right thing.
That's not going to be a lot of fun for them.
I don't think they're going to learn a lot there.
Say, what companies do you think are really good companies?
Because we're going to buy some stock.
And they might come back and go, oh, I think, you know, NVIDIA or Epic Games or whatever.
They come back with Epic.
It's actually private.
And then you say, okay, now let's talk about how expensive they are.
Because it's not just buying the best company.
It's buying the best company or good companies at a good price, right? You can see the lesson
start to unfold here. Buy the stocks and then watch them. And quite frankly, they go up,
they go down, and them going down is a really important life lesson. I think one of my sons
bought DojaCoin and it went down 80% in like the month, and I'm like, that's a great life lesson.
But it's really exciting when you see that light bulb turn on, when they connect effort and risk with money, connecting that kind
of time thing. I don't think that happens. I don't think you can do it at this age. Word salad way of
saying, I think there's easier and more enjoyable things that will solidify the bond between father
and son around connecting specific companies to specific stocks, risk capital,
the volatility of the market, lessons in the market. Thanks so much for the question. And 14 and 16-year-old boys, what a blessing. That's all for this episode. If you'd like to submit a
question, please email a voice recording to officehoursatpropertymedia.com. Again,
that's officehoursatproiteerMedia.com.
This episode was produced by Caroline Shagrin.
Jennifer Sanchez is our associate producer, and Drew Burrows is our technical director.
Thank you for listening to the ProfiteerPod and the Vox Media Podcast Network.
We will catch you on Saturday for No Mercy, No Malice, as read by George Hahn, and on Monday with our weekly market show.