The Prof G Pod with Scott Galloway - Office Hours: Peloton’s Acquirers, Working Abroad, and Moving into Management
Episode Date: July 12, 2021Scott answers a question about whether Nike should acquire Peloton. He also shares his thoughts on risking it all to move abroad, and offers career advice to someone with an offer to take on a managem...ent role. Music: https://www.davidcuttermusic.com / @dcuttermusic Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
Transcript
Discussion (0)
Join Capital Group CEO Mike Gitlin on the Capital Ideas Podcast.
In unscripted conversations with investment professionals, you'll hear real stories about
successes and lessons learned, informed by decades of experience.
It's your look inside one of the world's most experienced active investment managers.
Invest 30 minutes in an episode today.
Subscribe wherever you get your podcasts.
Published by Capital Client Group, Inc.
Support for PropG comes from NerdWallet.
Starting your credit card search with NerdWallet?
Smart.
Using their tools to finally find the card that works for you?
Even smarter.
You can filter for the features you care about.
Access the latest deals and add your top cards to a
comparison table to make smarter decisions. And it's all powered by the Nerd's expert reviews of
over 400 credit cards. Head over to nerdwallet.com forward slash learn more to find smarter credit
cards, savings accounts, mortgage rates, and more. NerdWallet, finance smarter.
NerdWallet Compare Incorporated. NMLS 1617539.
Welcome to the PropG Pod's Office Hours. This is the part of the show where we answer your
questions about business, big tech, entrepreneurship, and whatever else is on your mind.
Share with the dog.
Share with the dog.
Don't share too much, but share.
If you'd like to submit a question, please email a voice recording to officehoursproptgmedia.com.
Again, that's officehours at propgmedia.com.
First question.
Hey, Scott.
This is Justin from Atlanta.
You've talked quite a bit about how you think Peloton is a really good acquisition target for Apple. And I agree with that. But I would love your thoughts
on the possibility of Peloton being acquired by Nike. Peloton's market cap at the time of this
recording is around $32 billion. Nike's around $200 billion. I think synergistically, they could
really take each other to the next level, just the strengths that each has. I think synergistically, they could really take each other to the next level,
just the strengths that each has. Would love your thoughts on this. Lastly, your book,
The Algebra of Happiness, has been just a staple in my life and has really, really meant a lot to
me. I've recommended the book to so many people. So thank you so much for that. Love those best practices. Keep on keeping on. Thanks, man. Justin from Atlanta. Thanks for the comments,
or thanks for the nice words on the algebra of happiness. I actually don't select these
questions. My producer does, who I think, in general thinking, I think, you know, likes me,
but doesn't love me. But express some love by choosing your question because that made me feel very good. So thank you for that. Okay. So let's bring this back to me,
my favorite topic. My, when I joined NYU, they said, you know, we match your, whatever it is,
contribution to some retirement fund. And so I picked two stocks. I picked Oracle. I have no
idea why I picked Oracle. And I picked Nike and And Nike has been a great performer. And it's a great company. I've done work with Nike, Adidas, and Under Armour. And they're all great companies. But I think I have a special affinity for Nike. I've just always, I don't know, but I like the European elegance of Adidas and I like soccer. But Nike, you didn't win silver. You didn't win silver, you lost gold. I love Nike too. Anyway, I don't know
where I was going with that. So Nike acquiring Peloton, I don't think it happens. So you have
Peloton at 38 billion, meaning you'd have to show up with a check for 50 billion to take Peloton out.
And they have almost about a million digital subscribers, which is really powerful. But I
think that comes down to a million, about $38,000 or $50,000 of the premium you have to pay per subscriber. So the question is,
how do you justify paying $50,000 per subscriber? You can't if you're Nike,
because Nike is in the business of selling stuff and they could potentially move into
connected fitness, but that would, would they be able to justify it?
Then they'd have to, if they could get a big enough portion of their revenues to say,
we're no longer just athletic apparel, we're subscriptions, similar to what kind of what
Lululemon is trying to do with their acquisition of Mirror. I think that would be just a pretty
big bet. That'd be about a 20% dilution to existing shareholders. In other words,
I think Nike acquiring Peloton for $15
billion makes all the sense in the world. I think at $50 billion, I think the board's got to get
out their pencils and go, I don't know. I think this probably destroys shareholder value unless
we just execute perfectly against this and become known as a connected fitness recurring revenue
company. Who it does make sense for, quite frankly, is Apple. Why? Because an additional three to five hours a week in front of an operating system for Nike doesn't mean anything. For iOS or Apple, an additional three to five hours of our gross attention in front of iOS is worth a lot, especially the people who are on iOS, because then they can sell them more apps, get 30% commission on all their apps,
and start saying iOS slowly but surely not only has whatever it is, a 46% share in the US,
it has a 70% or 80% share of the time in front of a screen of the wealthiest Americans with the
most disposable income, as evidenced by the fact that I think about 80% to 90% of the revenue from
the app economy flows through iOS. In sum, it makes sense theoretically, but what you have to think about when you talk
about acquisitions is, is it accretive or dilutive? Or simply put, when you buy this company, the
amount of money you pay for it, at some point, no acquisition makes sense. And at some point,
every acquisition makes sense, depending upon the price you'd have to pay. And the reality is,
I just don't think Nike could monetize Peloton
to justify a $50 billion acquisition
because they don't get any credit
for the additional time in front of the operating system
that Apple would get.
But a very thoughtful question.
I do think Nike's similar to Lululemon
is gonna go vertical,
but I wonder if they start buying these apps.
Like I've been doing that app with a guy, Thor, Chris Hemsworth, is that his name? Just so I can feel bad about
myself. Jesus Christ, is that guy a tall drink of lemonade? Oh my God. Oh my God. I can't believe
they actually make humans like that. That is just so discouraging. We should tax that shit. You look
that good, you get the shit taxed out of it. Alternative minimum hunk tax. Anyways, where was I going with that? The apps, I think fitness apps, we're going to see a resurgence in them. There was a mini blip. Under Armour bought one that made no sense. They overpaid for it. But I think there will be. I think these guys got to go vertical and start maintaining a relationship with the consumer. Nike is probably the one to do it. They have the greatest marketing capitalization.
They have the currency. They also have the brainpower. One of my early co-founders at L2,
a woman named Maureen Mullen, is a senior exec in their direct-to-consumer department. And that
woman has got it going on. That's like some serious fucking fire in between those years. So
I would not want to be Adidas or Under Armour with Maureen
Mullin figuring out how to sell more shit online with a swoosh on it. Anyways, great question.
Thank you, Justin. And thank you for the nice comments about the algebra of happiness. And
again, do as I say, not as I do. I struggle. I'm pissed off and angry all the fucking time.
But I have made some observations around how to not be me. Don't be the dog. Next question.
Hey, Prof G.
First off, I've been a huge fan of yours ever since I picked up a copy of The Four years ago.
My name is Marcus.
I'm in my late 20s from Vancouver, Canada.
I currently work for a medium-sized publicly traded tech company.
And like you always say, it's a solid platform for really growing my career.
So what my question is, should I be willing to quote unquote risk it all and scratch my itch
of living and working in another country?
I'm thinking perhaps Singapore, Shanghai, Shenzhen
or somewhere in Asia where there's a booming tech industry.
What I would be giving up here is my family
and my loved ones and my solid social network here in Vancouver, my job stability, and obviously my comfort.
What I think I would be getting in return is massive personal growth from putting myself in truly uncomfortable situations, both professionally and personally.
I guess being a Canadian-born local who has never really lived anywhere else long-term, I've grown bored of my home city and all the comforts it provides.
And I really admire those who've taken the jump to do truly challenging things in their lives.
I can't imagine myself growing old and losing that chance to work in another country.
I'd love to hear your thoughts.
Thanks, Prof. G.
Marcus from Vancouver.
Thanks for the question.
So, 100%, get out of Vancouver.
And by the way, I would argue Vancouver is probably one of the nicest cities in the world.
You don't want to, you're not going to do better, but what the opportunity to go explore different cultures,
meet different people, eat different food, try and establish the skill set around being a globally empathetic business person. It's just, I grew up in LA, went to graduate school in the Bay Area,
lived in San Francisco for about a decade, moved to New York, then moved to Miami, and I'm likely
going to move to London in a year or two years, just because
I feel as if you have the opportunity, if you're blessed with the opportunity to move,
and that's a function of not only your resources, but hopefully you don't have.
Having family in Vancouver is a reason to stay, but it's not the reason to stay. The reason I
think you stay in a city is if you have very aging parents or someone you need to take care of. But for God's sakes, by all means, get
the fuck out of Dodge. And when I say Dodge, I mean that crystal clear sky, Vancouver and climate
and beautiful, beautiful city that it is. But yeah, absolutely get out of there. The only wrinkle
I would add though, boss, is I would try and find the job first. And also, if you work for a tech company,
see if they'll transfer you. Because where you want to be in Singapore or Hong Kong or London
is you want to be an expat. Specifically, you want a department at a company trying to figure
out all the brain damage and cost of moving you to another world-class city. Because the thing
about world-class cities is they've figured out the world class and they're really fucking
expensive. And so the best way, the best way to move abroad
is under the auspices of a sponsorship from a company.
So by all means, get to another city.
Get to another city.
It's just, oh my God, no brainer, do it.
But get a job first.
I would say try going there without a job. I think it creates a certain
amount of X factor because you might find the job you get in Hong Kong. But if you just take
off for Singapore, I think that limits your options and likely you end up with fewer options
and a less better job, if you will. And also just the anxiety of moving somewhere and then a month
goes by and two months goes by and you don't have a job. So yeah, by all means, get the hell out of Dodge, but get the job first and then go where the job takes you. We'll be right back.
The Capital Ideas Podcast now features a series hosted by Capital Group CEO,
Mike Gitlin. Through the words and experiences of investment professionals, you'll discover
what differentiates their investment approach, what learnings have shifted their career trajectories,
and how do they find their next great idea? Invest 30 minutes in an episode today.
Subscribe wherever you get your podcasts. Published by Capital Client Group, Inc. Support for this show comes from Constant Contact.
You know what's not easy?
Marketing.
And when you're starting your small business,
while you're so focused on the day-to-day,
the personnel, and the finances,
marketing is the last thing on your mind.
But if customers don't know about you,
the rest of it doesn't really matter.
Luckily, there's Constant Contact.
Constant Contact's award-winning marketing platform can help your businesses stand out,
stay top of mind, and see big results.
Sell more, raise more, and build more genuine relationships with your audience
through a suite of digital marketing tools made to fast-track your growth.
With Constant Contact, you can
get email marketing that helps you create and send the perfect email to every customer and create,
promote, and manage your events with ease all in one place. Get all the automation, integration,
and reporting tools that get your marketing running seamlessly, all backed by Constant Contact's expert live
customer support. Ready, set, grow. Go to ConstantContact.ca and start your free trial today.
Go to ConstantContact.ca for your free trial. ConstantContact.ca.
Welcome back. Next question. We're an account-based company with an entrepreneurial culture that values bringing in and retaining clients.
This year, however, I've been asked to take on an operations role, manager of one of the company's largest offices.
My time is now equally divided between managing a team of 20-plus people as well as account work.
So my question is, do I lean into an operations role?
Is there value to growing into this side of the business, knowing that account work is what drives my company's growth? Is this a valuable professional
growth opportunity, or is this just going to sidetrack me? Thanks a lot.
Wow, it's good to be you, Lauren. This can definitely be categorized as a good problem.
So I thought you were going to ask if you should get out of consulting. I've started two
consulting firms. My first firm, Profit, I started in my second year of business school. I started a brand strategy firm at the
age of 26, which is me trying to impress you, right? Fucking Pierre Palo Barbieri starting a
fintech company at 30. I started a consulting firm at 26. Anyways, services firm, strategy firm,
great in terms of skills, makes you a great athlete, fantastic training, doesn't
take capital, but you never get really rich, or what I found is you don't make the big, big bucks,
and it's also very taxing on relationships. Not what you asked. You asked if you should get into
an operations role, understanding that the people who make all the money at Goldman are generally
the ones kind of ringing the register and then manage or on the front lines creating revenue, getting investment banking
clients trading.
I would argue, I think there's very little downside to establishing credibility as someone
who knows how to run the firm.
And while the people who run the firm oftentimes aren't the highest paid or the operations
people, their income is what I'd call less volatile.
And also, it's not a death sentence.
You can decide after two or three years of running an office that you could go back to more of the client work or the client engagements, but at the same time, understanding how to run that business puts you in a position to transfer your skills if and when you want out
of consulting. I think everyone should be out of consulting by the age of 40 unless they just
fucking love it because I think it's very hard in relationships. I just got sick of being someone
else's bitch all the time. I got sick of the CMO of Samsung calling me and saying, hey, can you be
in San Francisco to meet with our CEO and me having to say yes all the time? Or I feel as if I was
constantly renting my brain to older people. I just found it fucking exhausting, relationship
driven, playing golf with people I didn't really like. Not that I didn't like them, but I didn't
really like them and I don't like golf. Anyway, anyway, I think
that if you have the opportunity, if they see you as someone who has the ability to take on an
operational role, oh my gosh, by all means, by all means, why wouldn't you? I think this is a
fantastic opportunity. According to a 2020 McKinsey report, women hold just 38% of management level
roles in corporate America.
As someone who sits on a lot of public company boards, we are, I don't want to say desperate for women, but much more, being much more thoughtful about ensuring that the board looks,
smells, and feels like our customer base or at a minimum our company. And that usually means
bringing on more women and more people of color. So it sounds to me like you're setting yourself
up well for things like board roles or taking on a senior level operational role on the client side. You are
going to want to get to the client side. Not that I don't know you, which I don't, but I think
consulting is a fantastic training. And then you want to jump to the client side and have a more
balanced life, a more balanced life, a little balance, son balanceo, of which there is none.
There are only trade-offs. Anyways, congrats
on the rocket ship that
is your career. Move to Vancouver!
That's all for this episode.
Again, if you'd like to submit a question,
please email a voice recording to officehours
at profgmedia.com.
Our producers are Caroline Chagrin and Drew Burrows. Thank you. What software do you use at work? The answer to that question is probably more complicated than you want it to be. The average US company deploys more than 100 apps, and ideas about the work we do can be
radically changed by the tools we use to do it.
So what is enterprise software anyway?
What is productivity software?
How will AI affect both?
And how are these tools changing the way we use our computers to make stuff, communicate, and plan for the future? In this three-part special series, Decoder is
surveying the IT landscape presented by AWS. Check it out wherever you get your podcasts.
Hey, it's Scott Galloway, and on our podcast, Pivot, we are bringing you a special series
about the basics of artificial intelligence. We answering all your questions what should you use it for what tools are right for you and
what privacy issues should you ultimately watch out for and to help us out we are joined by kylie
robison the senior ai reporter for the verge to give you a primer on how to integrate ai into
your life so tune into ai basics how and when to use ai special series from Pivot sponsored by AWS, wherever you get your podcasts.