The Prof G Pod with Scott Galloway - The Story Behind Raging Moderates + Why Jeff Bezos Is Wrong About Taxes

Episode Date: June 10, 2026

Scott Galloway explains why Jeff Bezos' proposal to cut taxes for lower earners is a deflection from the real issue, shares the origin story behind Raging Moderates and how he met Jessica Tarlov, and breaks down how to tell the difference between a toxic workplace and one that just isn't the right fit. Want to be featured in a future episode? Send a voice recording to [e-mail], or drop your question in the r/ScottGalloway subreddit. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Support for the show comes from Cohere. As AI advances, one thing matters more than ever, staying in control. Most AI comes with strings attached, like sharing your data and infrastructure or compromising your independence. With Cohere, you don't have to give up control to gain capability. You can have both. From frontier models to out-of-the-box tools, Co-Hare gives you everything you need to build and deploy secure, scalable AI that drives growth and delivers results. Your data, decisions, and competitive edge stay yours. You control your AI on your terms. To see how AI can empower your organization without compromising what matters most, visit cohere.com slash Vox. When it comes to home improvement, even the most experienced DIYer has a limit.

I'm not going to come in here with the blow torch and get it hot and solder and put the copper pipes to come. I'm not doing it. I call it very nice man to handle it. When to call the experts and when to do it yourself. That's this week on Explain It to Me. Find new episodes, Sundays, wherever you get your podcasts. I don't think I want to raise girls who are nice. Girls who are nice are pliable and do what other people tell them so that they can be liked.

This week on Project Swagger, the incredible Shonda Rimes. I felt really overwhelmed after Grace was a giant hit. And then I thought, like, well, how am I supposed to do this again? We talk about motherhood, confidence, knowing your worst, and adding tax. If you go in already thinking to yourself, I have to take a deal, I have to make this deal, you've already lost.

Listen now at Project Swagger. Welcome to Office Hours of Prop G. This is the part of the show where we answer your questions about business, big tech, entrepreneurship, and whatever else is on your mind. If you'd like to submit a question for next time, you can send a voice recording

to Office Hours of Propggymedia.com. Again, that's Office Hours of Propaggymedia.com, or post your question on the Scott Galloway subreddit and we just might feature it in our next episode. question number one. Our first question comes from KGL on substack. They ask, what do you think about Bezos' statement on taxes? Okay, well, let's listen to what he said.

So people talk about making the tax system more progressive. How about we start by having the nurse and queens not pay taxes? At all. Why is a nurse in Queens who makes $75,000 a year paying more than $1,000 a month in taxes? that's $1,000 a month that could help with rent or groceries or anything. And by the way, do you know what that all adds up to? The bottom half of income earners in this country pay only 3% of the taxes. It's only 3%.

We can find 3%. So we don't have, it's a small amount of money for the government, you know that. And really, the more I thought about it, to me, it's kind of a, assert that we're doing this. You know, we shouldn't be asking this nurse in Queens to send money to Washington. They should be sending her an apology. Yeah, so I'm friends with Andrew Yang, and I thought that he, I think UBI was, I don't think UBI is a good, I hate the universal and basic income. And, well, let me back up. I think Bezos talking about cutting taxes for people into the income of 75,000. is a bit of a deflection.

And ultimately, I think what Amazon would probably do is lower their wages, such that they ended up with the same take-home pay, because I think Amazon is optimized for the supplied demand of labor, not for what is social consciousness, as in many of their drivers have to, you know, pee in bottles because they don't want to take bathroom breaks

to try and meet their productivity quotas. So I'm a little bit, I think it's a little bit cynical for a guy who pieced out to Florida to spend more time with his father about the time he was about to sell his Amazon Zay. In other words, in some, Mr. Bezos, sit the fuck down. I think you talking about cutting the taxes of people making less than $75,000,

like, how do I figure out an Amazon-size eye roll? And the fact that this guy is also saying, in the same breath with the same interview at CNBC, that there's no way that raising his taxes would help that same nurse Now, actually it would, would. Even if we don't create additional programs, it would at least reduce the deficit. There's just no getting around it. State taxes, exemption, capital gains, lower tax rates, being able to piece out from the state of Washington to Florida about the time you decide to sell your stock, despite the fact that you aggregate in $120 billion in wealth using the great infrastructure and ecosystem of Washington. You know, you just, you just, you just, you should and lectures, I think this is, quite frankly, a deflection and a misdirect. And I don't think he's genuine about his own view on taxation. Having said that, I do think that if Andrew

wanted to be successful in framing this, I think the way you frame trying to get money to people to level them up is not by saying universal basic income, that sounds socialist. I would have framed it as a negative income tax. And that way you'd get Republicans on board. Republicans like the idea of cutting taxes. So say we're going to cut taxes and make a negative income tax. And so, for example, and by the way, there would be a big argument over whether it's universal child care or services, because the problem when you give people services and just not straight cash is you create a government bureaucracy that never goes away. And there's a lot of NGOs in Europe that give a lot of money to, you know, needy people in Africa. But what they found is they're

better off just giving the money to people in Africa as opposed to creating these large infrastructures of people, of administrators who get paid who are overeducated to think big thoughts and host lunches and talk about famine in Africa, you're better off just giving money to people in Africa and say, go buy your own food and figure out what to do. And they also, and this is sexist, but I'll say,

give money to the women, because you give money to the dudes and the prostitutes and the bars thrive. You give money to the women and the kids get taller and fatter. Anyways, I don't, I think that, negative income tax is a really good idea. Whether you give it to people in the form of services, universal child care, you know, healthcare subsidies,

I don't know. I'd want to see studies on that. But yeah, you know, I agree. We need to figure out a way to put more money in the pockets or help lower and middle class people keep more of their money. I'm down with that, but we've got to pay for it, Mr. Bezos. And the fact that you've aggregated $120 billion in wealth

you know, people say, people demonize billionaires like Bezos, and I don't agree with the far left either, that he didn't earn his money. He was born to a single mother when she was 17. He's a genius. He deserves to have earned $120 billion in wealth. What is wrong is that we have failed to elect people who maintain a progressive tax structure, similar to the tax structure we had in the 60, 70s, and 80s, where people who made $120 billion, the equivalent of that were taxed at 60, 70, or 80s. You might think, you know, that's going to discourage innovation and innovators and they're more productive with capital than the rest of us. Well, there's a kernel of truth in that, except the downside of letting people aggregate so much power is they weaponize government and they decide who gets elected. And generally speaking, we don't look back on history and say, wow, I wish the most powerful people had had more power. So taxation to a certain extent is what protects us from the aggregation of power. And so I believe we need a progressive tax structure. Now, what do you want? You want taxes that are the least taxing.

What do I mean by that? If you were to tax people for every time, 100% tax for every dollar they spent on food or health care or education, you would decrease the amount of education, health, right, and longevity. That's a bad tax. A good tax is one where you create revenue for the system, whether it's paying down deficits, the Navy, our parks, that doesn't really hurt people's emotional or physical well-being. I believe getting rid of the estate tax exemption, if the Bezos errors inherit $20 billion instead of 30, I don't think they're going to be any less happy.

I think if you had an alternative minimum tax of, say, 50% on people making more than a million dollars or, and by the way, some people already pay 50%, but the owners don't, the people who buy and sell stocks or businesses, I don't think that anything above a million or two million bucks a year makes you any happier. And there's research. I'm basically when I say on Daniel Kahneman's research that there is a correlation between money

and happiness, but it tops out. So above a certain amount, if you get no incremental happiness, but people under a certain amount of money get a lot of happiness, in other words, if someone pays a billion dollars more in taxes, because they made $10 billion in a year selling shares in the upcoming space ex-IPO, and there's going to be a lot of people who make at least $10 billion, they're no less happy. But if you take a million houses and give them each

$10,000 in cash or services, they'd say have an income of less than $60,000, you create a great deal of happiness, or more specifically, you relieve anxiety. The happiest countries in the world are the ones in Northern Europe. And it's not because they have more stuff. It's because they have an absence of fear of things being taken away from them. They have an absence of fear about having their dignity robbed because they might be one of the 40% of U.S. households that have medical or dental debt. So nearly half of American households have medical or dental debt because they just couldn't afford to pay for their daughter's Roo Canal. So in some, you know, I think it's nice to saying that. I think it's a misdirect from the fact that he should be paying

more taxes. I do believe we should at some point have something resembling a negative income tax. and make sure that people at least have enough money for housing and health care. But yeah, Bezos, again, sit down. Question number two comes from Goosneck-07 on Reddit. They say, I would love the Jessica Tarlov-Provji origin story. Why did you decide to bring her on and start a separate podcast with her?

Did you have to do any persuading since she is a mom and has a current full-time job on TV? Love the Raging Moderates podcast, thanks. Oh, I love this question. So during COVID, I heard from this lovely woman named Susan Bennett and said, would I be interested in going on Bill Maher? And I just freaked out because I get more nervous going on Bill Maher than anything I do. And the reason why is because my dad, when he was alive, only watched two things on TV. Watch Maple Leafs hockey, go Leafs, or Bill Maher.

And so when I'm on Bill Maher, I feel like my dad is watching me and I desperately want to impress my dad. I get very nervous on Bill Maher. Also, I have a lot of respect for him. I think he's fearless and a moderate. I just think the world of him and his producers are these incredibly impressive people, Dean and Sheila. Anyways, so I went on Bill Maher.

Notice how I turned this back to me. And there was this woman on named Jess Tarloff, who I guess hosted a show called The Five. And I do well, or I have done well on Bill Maher. And I'm a narcissist and an egomaniac, and so immediately after the show goes, I go to the YouTube comments. I love hearing like, oh, Scott's so good. I like that. I'm like anybody else. I like affirmation. And when I went on, when I was on with Jess, every comment was, she's a genius. More Jess Tarloff. And my first reaction was one of jealousy. And then I thought I should reach out to her and see if she's interested in starting a podcast about politics because I wanted to try and take the politics out of pivot.

out of Prop G stuff and put it in its own area. Because people get upset listening to business takes and takes on this show that are political because that's not why they came here. And I thought she would be a great co-host. I reached out to her and said, would you be interested in starting a podcast? She said yes. And simply put, she is a lovely person and is a joy to work with. I would say, of all the external people we work with and we work with a lot of talented, good

people. The team here is an enormous, you know, a fan of Jess Tarloff. She shows up. She's a professional. She's nice. She's very good at what she does. And she's just a great team player. But anyways, I found Jess and she found me on Bill Maher. And it's been a great relationship. I think we're going on our second or third year with Jess. And she just brings a really nice dynamic to the show. Anyways, thanks for the question. We'll be right back after a quick break. Hey, what's up guys? It's Andrew Ray, aka Babish, and I'm so excited to be hosting a new podcast with Vox Media

called In The Booth with Babish. In Every episode, I'll be sitting down with celebrities, chefs, and other fascinating folks to make a meal out of conversation. New episodes of In the Booth with Babish drop every other Tuesday, and you can watch on YouTube or listen wherever you get your podcasts. Cheers. Support for the show comes from Odu. Running a business is hard enough,

and you don't need to make it harder with a dozen different apps that don't speak to each other. One for sales, another for inventory, a separate one for accounting. Before you know it, you find yourself drowning in software and processes instead of focusing on what matters, growing your business. That's where Odu comes in. It's the only business software you'll ever need. Odo is an all-in-one fully integrated platform that handles everything.

That means CRM accounting, inventory, e-commerce, HR, and more. No more app overload, no more juggling logins, just one seamless system that makes work easier. And the best part is O-Doo replaces multiple expenses, of platforms for a fraction of the cost. It's built to grow with your business, whether you're just starting out or you're already scaling up. Plus, it's easy to use, customizable and designed to streamline every process.

It's time to put the clutter aside and focus on what really matters, running your business. Thousands of businesses have made the switch, so why not you? Try Odo for free at Odo.com. That's O-D-O-O-O-O-D-O-com. Big news this week for all my Gordon Geckos, my Robin Hooders, my Claude Squad Anthropic, which is newly the most valuable AI company in SeWorld announced it would be going public. That news follows reporting that OpenAI plans to go public

as soon as September, and that that news follows reporting that SpaceX, which also considers itself an AI company, will be going public in maybe just a few weeks from now. Welcome to the era of the Omega IPO. We are about to see millionaires, billionaires, and yes, probably even the world's first trillion. created overnight. And yes, it's that guy.

This is the chainsaw for bureaucracy. Change saw. But all the tech bros who are going to make all the money, they need our money way more than we need their products. And we're going to remind you why on today, Explain from Vox. Welcome back. Question number three comes from R to the Helm on Instagram. Have you ever had to navigate a toxic work environment? If so, any tips on how to do so well. So I may have worked in a lot of toxic work environments, but they've been my toxicity, simply because since the age of 25, every company I've worked at, I've been the CEO of,

so I kind of set the tone. The most toxic work environment I worked out, and I learned a lot from it, was I worked at Morgan Stanley right out of UCLA, and it was, you know, abusive, probably. I had a chair thrown out me once, and it was sort of like a fraternity hazing, but even more. I was in a fraternity, and the hazing there was somewhat good-natured. This was not good-natured hazing.

It was, oh, he's, it was sort of the Steve Jobs mentality before Steve Jobs, and that is, if you were a managing director of Morgan Stanley and you would yell at people and meant you were a genius, where if you were just a nice, pleasant person, it meant you were talented. So you got a reputation and a population, in a positive way for occasionally yelling at people

or being just a total dick. And it just wasn't very healthy. And there was a, so when I was in a Morgan's saying, you weren't allowed, you had to be there before anyone's senior to you and you couldn't leave until everyone's senior to you had already left. So I worked, and I didn't mind that. I'd meet it a swift kick in the ass. I was 22, I'd been sleepwalking through life.

So some of that discipline, it almost felt a little bit kind of militarish, if you will, was good for me. And I actually look back on my experience as being, positive, but it was pretty toxic. And also, I was, it was more, it was easier for me because I was a straight white male, and it was all straight white dudes, or at least, you know, they thought they were straight. So I think it was especially hard for women, for non-whites. And I think things have gotten a lot better. It's not a longer as abusive. But I got to be honest, I look back on it, and I think some of that was probably good for me. Doing needs,

that kind of abusive behavior in the workplace? Absolutely not. I learned a lot from it. I learned about what I didn't want to do in terms of how to treat employees. But I also have some of that still in me. One of my favorite quotes is from Don Draper of Madman.

When people complain, I say, well, that's what the money's for. You know, it's just, so, okay, how do you navigate a toxic work environment? I think you have to decide if the environment is, one, what is your role in that, you know, are you, you know, are you facilitating that? Well, that's probably unfair. Shit, I don't know. A couple of things. One, is it a work environment or is it your little pod? Do you just need

to get out and away from these people you're working with and for whatever reason is just a stew that creates toxicity? Or is it an environment and a culture of toxicity? What I have found oftentimes is people conflate toxicity with a culture that doesn't match there as well. What do I mean by that? So a place like Goldman Sachs or McKinsey or even, I would say, tech firms in the early days, and some of my firms, quite frankly, the agreement is the following. We own your ass. You're going to have no life. Your relationships, your health, your mental well-being are all going to suffer.

And in exchange for owning your ass and you basically devoting your entire life to this organization, we will by the time you're 30 give you more opportunity and more economic security. and more income than your parents had at 50. And guess what? Millions of young people raise their hand and say, I will absolutely sign up for that. And oftentimes, people decide, I don't want that environment. And so they call it toxic. When no, it's not necessarily toxic. It's just not the right culture for you. And the most successful organizations in the world usually have that compact with their employees. You're going to work your ass off. It's not going to be fun. You're not going to have a lot of balance, and you're going to make an extraordinary amount of money. And a lot of people willingly embrace that. So one, is it toxicity, or is it just a culture

that doesn't foot with what you want in terms of the work-life balance or the culture you want? I worked at Levi-Strauss and Company. Well, I didn't work there. They were my biggest client. And it was a very maternal organization. What do I mean by that? Friday's off. Very politically correct, sensitivity training. I found that toxic. I found that so fucking obnoxious and that it fostered such a culture of mediocrity that it was difficult to get anything done and very frustrating. Now, that's a politically correct form of toxicity. What I would suggest is the following. If you're being abused, go to your HR manager and ask to be switched out or say, you know, find a boss or, you know, find a boss, someone who you can confide in and say this is what's going on what's my role in this how do i

improve what do you think to decide if it's real toxicity or if it's just you need a change in culture and also three it's a free market if you really believe you're in a toxic work environment maybe you don't even need to examine what the problems are just try and find another job and find something that is more suitable i find the word toxic is overused and a lot of time People use it to wallpaper over their own disappointment that they aren't doing better in that culture. Anyways, I would need to know more to make more of an accurate assessment. Appreciate the question. That's all for this episode.

If you'd like to submit a question, please email a voice recording to Office Hours of Proptoadmedia.com. Again, that's Office Hours of Proptoimedia.com. Or if you prefer to ask on Reddit, just post your question on the Scott Galloway subreddit, and we might feature it in an upcoming episode. This episode was produced by Jennifer Sanchez and Laura Janair. Camryka is our social producer, Brad Williams is our editor. And Drew Burroughs is our technical director. Thank you for listening to the PropGPod from PropG Media.

Formula One, so hot right now. It's like if traders in succession had a baby on wheels. Teams lying. Drivers beefing. Celebrities everywhere. And scandals. Lots of scandals. So we made a show about it.

the Red Flags podcast where we recap races and break down all the latest F1 headlines. But no nerdy tech talk. We only cover the stuff you want to hear about. Yeah, and the only thing hotter than the drivers are our takes. And now we're doing it on Vox. Oh, we're so legit now. We're basically thought leaders. TED Talk incoming. And we do a podcast with Gunter Steiner called Venka Hours. I still can't believe that's true.

Well, believe it. there is so much for the beautiful Vox Media audience to enjoy. So come check out the Redflax podcast every Monday on YouTube or wherever you get your podcasts.