The Prof G Pod with Scott Galloway - What Actually Motivates People, and Is America Losing Its Edge?

Episode Date: January 5, 2026

In today’s Office Hours, Scott answers listener questions on how motivation develops in young people, whether social safety nets dampen ambition, and what the rise of private members-only clubs says about inequality and community.  Want to be featured in a future episode? Send a voice recording to [e-mail], or drop your question in the r/ScottGalloway subreddit. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

If you get mad every time you pick up your phone and start scrolling, it's not just you. Rage bait is kind of the currency or the power that's behind a lot of the content we might see. This week on Explain It to Me from Vox, why the internet is pissing you off on purpose. New episodes, Sundays, wherever you get your podcasts. Welcome to Office Hours with Prop G. This is a part of the show where we answer your questions about business, big tech entrepreneurship, and whatever else is on your mind. If you'd like to submit a question for next time, you can send a voice recording to

Office Hours of Propggmedia.com. Again, that's Office Hours of Propggemedia.com or post your question on the Scott Galloway subreddit, and we just might feature it in our next episode. Question number one, I have not seen these questions. Our first question comes from Reddit. Jackie on Hudson says, Hi, Prof. G. I'm writing to you about the subject of motivation. As a mom of two boys myself, I find that they are surrounded by lots of distractions. Do you think that desire is hardwired or can be learned?

I know not growing up with a lot of money has been a huge motivator for you. Is there a common ground that you see in many of your young hires? Thank you for your time and congratulations on your book. That's a nice question. Jackie, so let me be clear. I'm not one of these productivity hackers that does an ice plunge. I go to bed around two years. 30 and I wake up around 9.30 or 10 in the mornings. I basically futs around. That's the thing about living in London. Everyone, you know, basically no one's awake till noon. And I usually work till about 8 or 9 p.m. But I'm not one of these productivity peoples that has a list every day. So what I will say is, just as it relates to your own sons, I don't mean to abdicate responsibility or rationalize them being lazy, but I didn't get my shit together until I was 25 and I had a health scare in my family. Basically, my mom got sick and was very motivating for me.

And what do you know? Science says that the prefrontal cortex, the gass on or the CEO of the brain for a man doesn't catch up to a woman's until the age of 25. What did help me was guardrails. And I'll talk about three guardrails. One, I had things that forced me to get out of the house. So in college, I could have easily just smoked pot and listen to R.E.M. and Lloyd Cole in the commotions and the English beat. which are awesome, which are awesome, and stayed in my fraternity room

or just occasionally gone on campus, but I joined crew, and having to get up at 4.45 in the morning and having to push myself that hard and having the guardrails of a varsity sport was really helpful for me. Getting a job, and more specifically a job

where I had to go into an office at Morgan Stanley, I had to put on a tie. I had to think, well, do I really want to have a third drink? I mean, when I got to get up tomorrow at O Dark 100 and commute down, downtown with a tie-on and also having a boss and having that intense environment. I think you want to put yourself in intense, challenging environments as a young man, and they have to make that decision. You can prod them, but that was really helpful. And then

going out with friends being social and having a romantic relationship was really important for me. It not only was hugely beneficial for me to have someone who just liked me a lot. I didn't have that confidence until I had, I think, I don't know, I had some of it for my mom, but it was just very nice to have a girlfriend. And also, she put guardrails in place from me, you know, stop smoking so much pot, or I'm going to stop having sex with you, which was very motivating. So you can't, what can I tell you, routine, get them out of the house, ask them to limit their screen time, get them involved, or ask them to get involved in as many things

that gets them out of the house. I don't care if it's a church group, a nonprofit, volunteering, for God's sakes a job, got to make some money. If you're living at home, you've got to pay some rent. I don't care if it's being a task rabbiter or ride hailing. You've got to make some money. And I also find trying to emphasize fitness for mental health. And also, I mean, the reason why women are attracted to men with muscles and are in shape

is not that they're attracted to big pecks. It's just they're attracted to competence in people who clearly can commit to something and show some discipline. So I don't know what the, it's all situational. I don't know if you have any leverage over your boys. If they're living with you and they're cashing your checks, you have some leverage. You have to pay rent. You need to get a job.

But I think structure for a young man is super important, specifically guardrails. And also their success is going to be inversely correlated to the amount of time they spend indoors, trying to encourage them to be out as much with friends as much, meeting people. So what were for me, sports, a job in office. I think remote work is a fucking disaster. for young men, friends, relationships, and also just incorporating exercise into my life. These are stories a bit of privilege because I think people sometimes from low-income homes don't have that kind of access, but I grew up not on a low-income home. I'd call like, I was affectionately saying me and my mom were upper, lower, middle class. But I think trying to

prod them or help them across those dimensions can be helpful. Anyways, two boys. What a blessing. Question number two. Hi Scott, Ned. I'm Betty from Edmonton, Canada. At the Toronto pivot live event, Scott said that innovation basically stops the Canadian border. My daughter, who now lives in the U.S., argues that Canada's stronger social safety net kills ambition and makes people less hungry to innovate. My question is, how would you strengthen the U.S. social safety net without dampening the country's innovation engine or ambitious culture? And Second, do you think the U.S. could adopt any parts of Canada's safety net without losing what makes its economy dynamic in the first place? Thanks. I'd love to hear both of your takes.

It's a really thoughtful question. Okay, so just some data. The U.S. and Canada spend about the same share of their economies and social programs, but they do it. They spend it very differently. Canada mostly uses public benefits. The U.S. liens heavily on private ones like employer health insurance and pensions. On average, a family gets about $21,000 a year in support from Canadian provinces compared with about $12,000 a year from U.S. state programs. When it comes to startups, the U.S. massively outperforms Canada in scale. Canada needs about 55% more investment to produce a single big startup success. And over the last decade, U.S. venture capital exits total $2.6 trillion compared to just get this, $56 billion. So about 40 or 50 times.

the outcomes of startups in the U.S. And the U.S. produced more than 4,000 exits over 10 million. Canada had fewer than 200. So the tradeoff is in security versus upside. Canada offers a stronger safety net that isn't tied to having a job. In the U.S., health care and benefits are often tied to work, so losing a job or a startup can be losing coverage too. And some, America has more upside, and Canada delivers more protection

and some were more of winners and losers here. My father used to stay affectionately that America is a terrible place to be stupid. The safety net here is basically a cement ground with spikes on it, but your upside is kind of unlimited. There's some other things to play. I think I mean, this is a multi-dimensional issue. So think about who came to the U.S. There were people trying to escape religious persecution and they kept heading west and, you know, might have to eat their niece or nephew along the way and that they got bogged down on the Rockies. And then what do you know the most innovative companies and the biggest exits in history are all on the West Coast. And so we have just a risk-taking DNA where people start crazy shit that sometimes ends up

being crazy genius. And because of the outcomes here, it creates a virtuous upward spiral, but there's just a tremendous amount of risk capital that's drawn to the U.S. In the U.S., there's $5 million for every startup, and in Europe there's one million. So there's just more capital here. People are more willing to take risk, which goes to your kind of societal dynamic. And that is, for example, in Germany, biggest economy in Europe, not that innovative, at least on the startup scene. Specifically, you can come out, you can start getting some vocational training in your senior year in high school in Germany and go to work for a middle stop, whatever's called, mid-sized company and manufacturing, make 60 to 80,000 euros, maybe your partner as a nurse, make 120,000 euros, 140, and you can go to a beer garden that also has a trampoline park and get a reasonable. priced apartment and have a nice life. So the downside, you can have a reasonably nice in life, middle class life on not a lot of money in Germany. At least it was that way a few years

ago. I don't know if they've been impacted by the same rampant inflation we have around education and housing. But what that does is it creates a bit of a disincentive around taking big risks. So there's definitely a downside to a social safety net and a lifestyle where you don't need to take these risks. Whereas in the U.S., everybody thinks, okay, if I start the next big company, I might in fact be on a boat with hot models and be speaking to Andrew Ross Orkin at the deal book conference and be doing ketamine with, you know, the wealthiest man in the world, whatever it is. The upside here is just so huge that people and the downside is so fucking ugly.

And every day, 210 times a day you're notified by you get someone vomiting their faux wealth on your phone. So it creates a lot of motivation. I also think it creates a great deal of anxiety. I'm not sure we should have the same social safety net as Europe or the U.S. where people are somewhat doing tradeoffs around, should I work, should I not work? Universal child care, in my opinion, should be also a national program because you can do it at scale, deliver it more efficiently, more effectively,

and also draw more women into the workforce or more domestic partners, or both the husband and the wife, or the husband and the husband, there's my land acknowledgment, into the workforce, because Americans work. I think that's one of the reasons why we're so successful as work is kind of central to our brand, even though only 160 million of 350 million Americans actually work. That was a lot. So how do we relieve some of the anxiety while not removing the incentives? But I don't want this to be a Hallmark Channel. We do believe in winners and losers here. And I'm actually a fan of not having the same level of social safety net that disincentivizers work

as they have sometimes in Europe and in Canada. At the same time, though, I don't think a cancer diagnosis should mean that you're about to go bankrupt. Thanks so much for the question. We'll be right back after a quick break. Support for today's show comes from Zoom. Work isn't just meetings.

It's calls, chats, docs, emails, calendar invites, events, and more. And Zoom brings it all together on one platform. everything close together so that you can finally focus on what matters with zoom ideas happen faster projects move forward and your workday finally works for you zoom is more than meetings it's a unified platform powering how people get work done learn more at zoom dot com slash podcast and zoom ahead support for the show comes from net suite AI brings with it a world of possibilities for business possibilities that your competitors are already taking advantage of well No more sitting on the sidelines with NetSuite by Oracle, you can put AI to work today.

NetSuite is the top AI Cloud ERP trusted by over 43,000 businesses. It's a unified suite that brings your financials, inventory, commerce, HR, and CRM into a single source of truth. All that connected data is what makes your AI smarter. So it doesn't just guess, it knows. It can intelligently automate routine tasks, deliver actionable insights, and help make fast AI-powered decisions with confidence. Now with NetSuite AI Connector, you can use the AI of your choice to connect your actual business data and ask every question you ever had. Whether your company earns millions or even hundreds of millions, NetSuite helps you stay ahead of the pack. Right now, get the free business guide, demystifying AI at NetSuite.com slash Profchee.

The guide is free to you at netsuite.com slash prop G. That's netsuite.com slash prop G. Welcome back. Our final question is from Clay Davis on Reddit. They say, What do you think about the effects of private clubs and the long-tail effects of a community having gathering places for people of different economic means? Well, that's a good question. Private member, okay, so just some data here. Demand for private clubs is rising. About 60% of clubs say they grew membership in 2022 and 2023. For example, Soho House with over 180,000 members across 40-plus locations. They've stopped admitting, members in L.A., New York, and London because they're simply too crowded. And now they're going

private in a $2.7 billion deal after going public in 2021, which is interesting because the hard part about this business model is it's based on not scaling. It's based on keeping it smud. Membership clubs should not go public because implicit in going public is the notion that you're going to continue to grow. Now, they could argue they're going to grow geographically. But the whole point of a members club is that you want to get into clubs that you shouldn't get into and that everyone there is more interesting,

richer, or hotter than you. That's the whole point of a member's club. Even so, the money is real, the private club market hit about $32 billion in 2024 and is on track to reach $59 billion in 233,

roughly 7% annual growth outpacing most of the hospitality industry. So let's just do a review. I'm absolutely, I love this conversation because I'm obsessed with these things because I'm a, what's the term, douchebag. I like to go somewhere where I know I can get a reservation, where I can get in, where the crowd is curated. If that sounds obnoxious, yeah, but fuck it, I've worked really hard.

What does it mean? Look, it's capitalism, and as people heard or they want to divide into little tribes, they want to find their people. It starts in high school, then it goes on a college. Basically, you know, life is just high school with like different apparel in different price points. So this is going to happen. It started in the UK, these members close. It's moved to the U.S. Look, they're going to happen, so to say you don't like it, well, you don't like capitalism. I do, there is a part of it that bothers me in the sense that I worry, where do young people who aren't working for a hedge fund or Google, where do they go to meet

when the most, quote, unquote, attractive or fortunate or people with rich parents get to go to these super cool places, and then the other 90% just don't have access. And when I was in New York for the first time, when I was a younger man, I remember going down to like the shark club with our friends. We'd like plan a strategy for how we were going to walk up and what we were wearing because it was face control, which is obnoxious. But you could potentially get in, even if you weren't, they didn't have members clubs. It was just you tried to get into these clubs or you waited in line, try to catch eye contact with a dormant. And there's a certain amount of skill and a certain amount of, and by the way, a lot of times I wouldn't get in, you know, have you seen me?

Anyways. But in a way that was a little bit even more egalitarian, even the face control, there's always going to be. a selection set. There's always going to be a velvet rope around the hottest places, whether it's through pricing, membership, or some sort of face control outside. That's just the species. We're competitive. We always want to upgrade. And so creating a natural barrier to signal exclusivity, creates aspirational value and scarcity. It's just a good business model. But I do worry there aren't enough. If I were going to start a, I've been approached about starting members clubs. I'm not just going to starting a members club. I would consider starting a bar. I would consider starting a bar.

that was relatively inexpensive where people could just go and have a good time and have good music, and it was reasonably priced, because I think we need more third places for people. And I was actually thinking of investing in a company called Putschak that also has these, I think they're called Wave Gardens, because I think we need more third places for people to go with their families or friends that are outside of the home. A third place is technically a place you don't work or you don't sleep. So, yeah, the fact that everything's being sequestered behind a velvet rope and young people have even fewer places to meet if they're not killing it or don't have wealthy parents,

it bothers me. So what could we do about it? I don't know, maybe tax credit for third places that aren't, they're open to everybody. So I think this is a problem. And it trickles all the way down to our social life, specifically these clubs. So what do I think we should do? Quite frankly, I think there should be a new classification of, I don't know what you call it, or like a new douchebag tax, that if you're at, you know, if you're a membership at Shea Margo, you fly a private plane, you're in private school, you pay a VAT tax and that money gets reinvested in education and third places for the bottom 99 in that community. And that's a progressive tax. I just wouldn't have a problem with that. And I think you could figure out the

type of establishment that qualifies for that tax. And then on the other side, give tax credits or exemptions to public schools to third places that don't have any sort of exclusionary element to them. So what's the answer here? Let's tax the super rich and the places they go at a progressive rate. And then let's reinvest in our public infrastructure such that it's so fucking good that more and more of us have the same experience and we're all invested in this experiment called America. That's all for this episode. If you'd like to submit a question, please email a voice recording to office hours of propertymedia.com. Again, that's office hours to ProptoMe.com, or if you prefer to ask on Reddit, just post your question on Scott Galloway

subreddit, and we just might feature it in an upcoming episode.