The Psychology of your 20s - 10. The Psychology of Climate Anxiety with Tenaya

Episode Date: September 4, 2021

Today we are discussing the psychology of climate anxiety especially in light of recent announcements of a code red for humanity due to climate change. I’m joined by Tenaya, our in house expert on all things sustainability, to discuss how climate anxiety manifests, the psychology of climate denial and how to take care of yourself when faced by dread about the future of the planet. References / things talked about: The IPCC report: https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg1/ Tim Hollo’s article on climate doomism being as harmful as climate denial: https://www.canberratimes.com.au/story/7385966/climate-doomism-is-the-new-climate-denial/ Fire Country by Victor Steffensen: https://www.hardiegrant.com/au/publishing/bookfinder/book/fire-country-by-victor-steffensen/9781741177268 Rob Willer on moral reframing in political conversations: https://www.ted.com/talks/robb_willer_how_to_have_better_political_conversations/See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

This is an I-Heart podcast. Guaranteed Human. 2%. That's the number of people who take the stairs when there is also an escalator available. I'm Michael Easter. And on my podcast, 2%. I break down the science of mental toughness, fitness, and building resilience in our strange modern world.

Put yourself through some hardships, and you will come out on the other side a happier, more fulfilled, healthier person. Listen to 2%. That's TWO. percent on the IHeart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts. On the Look Back at it podcast. From 1979, that was a big moment for me. 84 was big to me.

I'm Sam J. And I'm Alex English. Each episode, we pick a year, unpack what went down, and try to make sense of how we survived it. With our friends, fellow comedians, and favorite authors. Like Mark Lamont Hill on the 80s. 84 was a wild year. It was a wild year. I don't think there's a more important year for black people.

Listen to look back at it on the IHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts. Hey, what's good, y'all? You're listening to Learn the Hard Way with your favorite therapist and host Kear Games. This space is about black men's experiences, having honest conversations that it's really not safe to have anywhere, but you're having them with a licensed professional who knows what he's doing. How many men carry a suit or armor. It signals to the world that you not to be played with. And just because you have the capability that doesn't. does not mean that you need to listen to learn the hard way on the aaha radio app apple podcast or

wherever you get your podcast hello and welcome back to the psychology of your 20s the very unprofessional podcast where we talk through some of the biggest changes and transitions of our 20s and what they mean for our psychology welcome to the new maybe not very exciting episode nonetheless. This week we're going to be discussing climate anxiety, which is a huge issue for us in our 20s. I think this is the first generation to realize that our kids are not going to grow up in the same world that we live in.

So I thought we'd kind of discuss it today, and I'd bring on a guest to join me. Hi. Oh, hello. Hi. I'm Tenaia. Yeah, I'm Gemma's resident climate guide. I don't know.

Guide is a good word for it. It sounds very professional. And for all those wondering, they're recording this across the web. Across the interwebs. Across the interwebs. It took a bit of a, took a few trial runs, but we're here now. We're techie kids. We're techie kids.

I've got a pizza in front of me. I've had a few glasses of wine. How are you going this afternoon? Well, this evening. Good. Yeah, I have tea, so not as exciting, but just as good. Yeah. Sorry, there's me chewing.

Before we get into it, I feel like I want the audience to know you a little bit better. So can you tell us about how we met? What's your deal? Yeah. What are you from? Gemma and I met at college. And we bonded just exclusively over Taylor Swift. That's literally, that's how I picture you on my head.

I'm like, it's Gemma. We love Taylor. Swift. It's true. And our friendship is obviously more than that now. Yeah. No, that's, it's literally, it's just Taylor Swift. That's what you talk about. Yeah. We don't even know why we're doing this episode. Yeah. I can't think of anything else. Yeah. This has not been endorsed by Taylor Swift, so why are we doing it? But I remember the first time I was like, oh my God, me and Tena are friends was when folklore got released. And we came over and I did like a listening party at your house. Yeah. You brought so many good snacks. Yeah, and then I ate them all. Well, it was a joint effort. Yeah, we tried. I think we did

well. Yeah. So what are we talking about today? Because it isn't Taylor Swift. Yeah, it is not Taylor Swift. We are going to be talking about climate anxiety, which is sort of something that I am, get, I'm involved with, have climate anxiety because I study climate science and policy at university. and yeah, I have the things you want to know. Well, I don't have all the knowledge, but... She has a fair amount. And also, like, personal experience with this as well. And, like, so like I kind of already explained,

I think the reason I'm really interested in discussing this is because, I don't know if you agree today, but climate anxiety is, like, going to become a fucking pandemic. Yeah, no, I definitely agree. Yeah. And I really think that is just going to be overwhelmed. we are facing, let's be real, like mass extinction, natural disasters, the end of the human race. Yeah, I think, sorry.

I feel like our mental health, like, you know, sector is already overwhelmed. And then adding climate turned on to that, it's just, it's going to go downhill. Yeah, especially as like the world deteriorates even further and more people are surviving natural disasters. I really wanted to say I read this excellent quote the other day. I think it was maybe even on your Instagram to now. Classic. Classic, yeah. Follow her if you want some good climate change in for graphics

that make you feel furious and also calm at the same time. But I read this excellent quote and it was like essentially, climate change is going to be conveyed through tragic videos of natural disasters we see on our phone until one day we're the one's filming. That was pretty profound because I'm, I'm sure we'll get into it. Like we've both already had experiences with things like bushfires, floods, you know, global warming in general.

Like it's not uncommon at this stage. And it just shows how it's just going to become like increasingly more prevalent with this next generation. And like another big reason I wanted to talk about climate anxiety is because, like I said, it's on the rise. Many psychologists feel they're unequipped to handle a growing number of patients who are just despairing about the future of the planet.

because we're not like the systems and the processes we use to deal with general anxiety or depression they're just not really equipped for this kind of like existential dread which you kind of agree with that like it is very unique yeah definitely I think you know so much of like mental health response it's quite individualistic and this is like which is important and needed but this is like a massive you know worldwide problem that everyone faces and you know, everyone's going to face it in really different ways as well. That's a really good point. I hadn't actually thought about that.

Like so often the struggles that we have mentally are very individualistic. And, you know, you can go to therapy for them and maybe work through it, but this is going to be something that's just like so much bigger. And like not to be existential, but like we're not going to save our planet. Like we're going to try. But yeah. But maybe this is my climate anxiety and climate like dreads sinking in. And like, I just don't think that we're going to be able to fix it.

And that's just a huge source of dread. And how do, like, mental health professionals really adapt to this. And, like, all over the world, various psychiatric organizations and governments, they've all recognized climate change as a growing threat to mental health, not just in terms of PTSD, you're to, like, exposure to floods and bushfires and the like. It's just, like, a general common concern about the future of our planet, which I think is also really interesting. And like I just don't imagine it's going to disappear either.

And I think I was saying to you yesterday, today, when we were talking on the phone about like the Morrison government. Yeah. Yeah. I've seen the memes recently on Twitter. Oh, did you see the memes? Oh, there we go. You know it's going to hit the news when there's memes about it.

But essentially the Morrison government, ill, but whatever. Yeah. announced that they wanted more school chaplains to help children due to climate anxiety, or more specifically, alarmist climate activism that they claimed had increased mental health concerns amongst children. Yeah, I think the chaser summed it up really well. They tweeted, and they were like, after the chaplain incident, we're taking the week off. Like, there's no need for satire because the government's sort of just providing it there in the flesh. I literally love it.

I love how they're like, it's left-wing organizations, like get up and extinction rebellion. Like, they're making kids stress because of their alarming messages, which is like the truth. And it's like, maybe think that kids are actually just like stressing because it's like the end of the world. Like you think that maybe. And I said it was like, yeah, even like the mental health of children is politicized rather than, you know, actually like addressing the issue. Like instead of being like, oh yeah, climate change is actually a problem. They're like, oh, my God. the fucking get-up is poisoning them.

Yeah, it's a massive amount of blame shifting, unfortunately. Yeah, and like, it's almost satirical. Like, it's ironic. It's just, like, there's some things like this. You just can't help but almost want to laugh at. Like, just how ridiculous that, like, narrative shifting is. And we also talked about how there's been some really interesting recent discussions about whether to add climate anxiety as a disorder into the DSM.

So the DSM being like the international manual of like all clinical mental health disorders and conditions. So should climate anxiety as serious that it is be able to be classified as a mental health disorder? And this would mean more governmental funding for this type of issue, more space for research, into effective clinical approaches to minimise climate dread and existential dread concerning the planet and our climate. You know, there's not really much more funding towards actually saving the planet that can be done. but it would help in terms of addressing this from a clinical perspective. Anyhow, the reason I wanted to bring you on is you have such amazing general knowledge. Yeah, what do you start?

You have basically like a degree in environment and climate change. Yeah, my, I do politics, philosophy and economics as well, but that's a bit boring. And environment and sustainability is the degree that I really enjoy. and then I minor in climate science and policy. Yeah. And I work for an environmental charity. So she's got the whole package, guys. It's all here.

A lot of climate dread to come with that, you know? Yeah, absolutely. Also, fun facts, we're working together next year. We both got grad jobs at the same place. So this is the first of many collaborations today, I'm sure. I'm very excited. Yeah, me too. I feel like everyone knows what climate change is.

We don't need to tell you what it is. If you have not heard about it, you've been sleeping under a rock. But one thing I really want to talk about is the IPCC reports. Can you give us a little bit of an overview? Yeah. So the IPCC or like the intergovernmental panel on climate change, there is just like a lot of acronyms in like the UN climate science world. But they released their report on the physical science of climate change,

which is part of AR6. So it's like they go through cycles of reporting on the climate. And this particular report, it's just about the physical science. And the IPCC doesn't actually do the science themselves. They just assess current science. So like they looked at about 14,000 publications. There was like 234 authors and like over like 78,000 review comments. So heaps of science was assessed.

It's basically like the best sort of analysis of current. climate science in the world and they're timed to sort of tie into policy debates. So like we have COP 26 coming up, which is like in Glasgow when they'll, it's a conference basically following on from the Paris Agreement to try and keep global warming below two degrees. And this report will really help that. What are you expecting from this, from this conference? hopefully more intense climate sort of commitments to reduce emissions so Paris there was a lot of change between Paris which was in 2016 and now like we had Trump in you know who pulled out of the Paris Agreement and then Biden signed the Paris Agreement back in and then so you

have like you know one of the world's biggest polluters the US flipping from completely like climate denier to really solid pledged climate action. We had China committing to net zero by 2050. Japan committed to net zero, I think by 20. Oh, sorry, China was committing by 2060. Yeah. Yeah, so just a lot of different pledges. So it'll be interesting to see whether other countries like Australia

that haven't, we haven't changed our commitments, whether or not we'll sort of up the game or not. What's our current commitment? Our current commitment is, I think, 26 or 28% reduction in emissions. Yeah. On 2005 levels, I think. It's a really, it's a very weak political standpoint. It's not greater.

Well, who can blame us? Well, not blame us, but who's surprised? Yeah, no one is surprised. The whole Morrison, like, COVID package was like, let's just give heaps of money to, like, fossil fuel organizations and, like, it will trickle down, yes? Yeah, I know. and very much into like a gas-led recovery, which is not a recovery at all. No.

You know, it's still, gas is still a fossil fuel and it's still. Bina. Terrible. Yeah. It's like our recovery is going to be only for the next 10 years and then, well, we don't know what to do after that. Yeah, exactly. So good luck, everyone.

Bye. Bye. See you. See you in hell. But what did the report say specifically? Because it's been in the news heaps, maybe for people who haven't read it, can you give us a little bit of a sum up of, was it all doom and gloom?

Like, what's it telling us? Yeah, it was all doom and gloom. Not going to lie. And it's actually really interesting because every single government, which is part of the IPCC, which is like, you know, I think most governments across the world,

they had to go through and approve the summary for policy makers line by line. So basically the whole report was approved by every government worldwide. So you've got... Oh my God, I didn't even know that. Yeah. Yeah, it's really, so it's sort of, it actually, on some cases, it means that the IPCC and their reports underrepresent, sort of, it's like, I think the statistic is that IPCC reports are 20 times more likely to be worse than what they state, like their predictions.

It's 20 times more likely that it'll be worse than their predictions because they actually tend to underreport slightly because they have to make sure that every. Everything is very, very certain because it's all being signed off by a bunch of governments, which means that it will probably be worse than what they predict, but, you know, we'll just see. But also the prediction was already pretty bad. Yeah, so they said, you know, I think the press release line was like, this is code red for humanity. And they said, you know, we're getting like extreme heat is more intense and frequent, heavy rainfall is more frequent and intense, drought's increasing, there's more frequent fire weather, the oceans warming, acidifying and losing oxygen.

And it's just basically saying that our, you know, the Paris Agreement, like all governments worldwide, basically tried to keep committed to trying, keeping global warming under 1.5 degrees, or at least under two degrees. But where this report is saying we will 100% exceed that this century and less massively deep reductions in emissions are happening because we've already hit 1.1 degrees.

of warming. Actually, the thing that really got me when I was, I went to a seminar about this report and it said, if we want to hit net zero by 2050, which would keep us on like sort of the low, the low emissions pathways to try and like keep it under two degrees, we need to have a reduction in emissions, the equivalent of what the COVID pandemic did to us every two years. So we need to like have that massive amount of sort of economic downturn every two years. Currently, obviously there's ways that we can like decouple emissions from GDP. So like if, you know, at the moment we've, it's very tied together.

So when GDP grows, emissions grow and blah, blah. And we can change that. But yeah, at the moment, it's like we need to have a COVID pandemic level of reduction in emissions every two years. And it'll be really interesting because like I don't think COVID is going away. anytime soon, but when it does, which will be probably within the next decade. And like, that sounds like a long time for like us right now, but in terms of like climate emissions, it's not really. As soon as like COVID starts to kind of become less of the issue that everyone's worried about, vaccination increases, we don't really know what's going to happen.

But what will happen, I think, is that a lot of governments will seek to bounce back by, sorry, pizza burp. So keep, get it. A lot of governments will probably seek to bounce back by pumping heaps of money into like industries, international travel will open up again, international trade will become less regulated,

like, well, not less regulated, but more kind of open because we're not so worried about border restrictions and, you know, crossing into other territories and the spread of a deadly disease. So it's almost, like we're going to kind of slide back, perhaps even worse than we were before. And I, I know, this is like a weird conspiracy theory, but I seriously think like, mother nature, if she's out

there, COVID was definitely deliberate. Like, she was like, okay, you fucking stupid humans, time to get a grip. He's a deadly disease. Well, actually, like, it was very linked to sort of what we, like, um, science predicted and a pandemic like this. Like, there was an article that was, got quite a attraction in nature in like 2018. And it was like our expansion into areas that had previously been untouched by humans. So like just building more and expanding population meant that the likelihood of pandemics was basically 100%. And it will be 100% in the future. Like our continual expanding into like wild sort of spaces.

David Attenborough calls them wild spaces. Oh, thanks, David. Yeah, it means that this is definitely like. you know, yeah, I like to think it's the SS wants to be like, you shit hits. But though, obviously, a lot of people died and that's really horrible. So not, it's a horrific situation. I'm not saying it's not terrible. Obviously, I'm not blaming on any culprit.

I'm just saying that, like, in terms of, like, our interactions with nature. Bit of karma. And, yeah, that sounds really bad. And it's obviously a lot more nuance than that. But it shows what happens when you start to fuck with the planet in ways that, like, previously we've had control over. And I think that article, maybe I'll link it in the show notes so people can give it a read. Did it kind of basically predict COVID?

Yeah. Like, from what I remember of it, it was very much like, we are going to have a pandemic because we just keep, like, you know, pushing into natural spaces and like the likelihood of them, you know, animals in those spaces carrying diseases that we haven't been interacted with, etc., etc., yeah. Yeah. Wow. And that's essentially what happens.

So, yeah, all very doom and gloom. Sorry about the noise in the background. My housemates making pasta. He's wearing her headphones, so I don't think she realizes I'm recording. Friend of the show. But you're like all very doom and gloom. And I think this is like a huge contributor to climate anxiety. Because I think, I use in the word climate anxiety in that kind of term and of clinical

reference we've been using in recent years. It's almost not broad enough. It's not just about the climate. It's just about like the general. decline of our state of life and our capacity to like have hope for the future. It's so much more than just like, I'm worried that it's going to get warmer. It's like, we need to kind of address it more than be like, no, it's not just a worry about that.

It's about all those repercussions. I'm worried about food scarcity. I'm worried about natural disasters. I'm worried about pandemics. I'm worried about the ability for my government to provide for its citizens once its finite industries run out. Yeah, definitely. And water scarcity and rising cities.

and people in like climate refugees, which is going to become a massive problem. So the reasons really do abound. Like there's so many reasons to be stressed about this, I think. Yeah. I have definitely like sat in climate lectures and just cried. Like I remember really vividly one about talking about the bleaching of the Great Barrier Reef and how like we'll basically lose under a high impact emission scenario,

I think, which is sort of like if we. continue business as usual. There's obviously a lot more nuance to it. But, you know, our coral, there will be like no coral reefs basically across the world because they'll all be bleached and die. And I was sitting in this, like, she's just like crying. Yeah. Wow. That's kind of rough. I remember Phoebe telling me this as well, like, so many of her lectures, there's no positive spin to this stuff. Like, there really is. There's no, yeah, you can't really. been that positively. And no wonder that like, and I think I kind of mentioned this, but like,

and I love that point you made about how so many mental health issues are not stick or internal. But it's gone out. And like the nuke crisis, like in the 70s and 80s. Yeah, the Cold War.

Yeah, the Cold War. I don't even know if it was in the 70s and 80s. The Cold War. We all know what that was. Like, our psychological tools and our therapy tools and our counseling tools don't have never faced anything like just nothing comparable in the literature nothing that is able to kind of how do you sue someone who's like I'm worried that the planet's going to end and it's like well you know it's not anxiety it's like well it is like yeah it's actual reality feel okay like you just don't it's just but maybe let's talk about some ways that

we can kind of push through this because, you know, there is still stuff that we can do. What are your thoughts on that, on kind of overcoming climate anxiety as someone who has dealt with their fair amount? Yeah, personally, like obviously I, you know, have the privilege to just sort of go outside and spend a lot of time in nature, which is such a nice way to sort of experience the world and be like, okay, it might suck. and the future looks really grim, but there are, you know, a lot of, there's a beautiful sunset in front of me or something like that, you know, to sort of appreciate. But in reality, a lot of, I think you can see it in what I study and what I work for, but like my response to climate change is really to sort of take action. Like I, yeah, I was like 11 and I, and I, I,

I was in front of a glacier in Canada, which is the most privileged statement to stay, well, point out, but just a very privileged statement to say in a very privileged place to realize how much the climate is changing. But it had these signs. And it was like, this is where the glacier was in like 1902. And this is where it was in 1970. And this is where it is now. And it had retreated like two kilometers or something.

And I was just like, so I was looking at it. And I was like, this is so sad. And my brain was like, okay, well, I have to do something. thing. But yeah, that just, I think for me, like just me personally, action, like taking climate action and, yeah, can be, can just help me make, like, feel like I'm making a little bit of a difference. And if that's like, you know, divesting my money out of fossil fuels and into ethical companies or like emailing my local MP or picking companies to buy from that are sustainable, that's, you know, that's okay. But, you know, also.

having conversations like this, like doing a lot of community base, like looking how can a community help? Is there like a community food co-op or a garden or a way that I can feel connected to the people around me? Because that's, I think, the way that we're going to get through this. Yeah, and it's interesting because I think there, you know, you do make that point. Like, small actions, realistic, like it isn't going to make a huge difference. Yeah. But, no, but honestly, but this is the thing. It's like, but what you're doing. doing it for is your own mental health. So it's kind of like

you can still a medal here. Like the gold medal would obviously be to, you know, fix all that's wrong with the world, fix the climate, fix greed, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah. And like small actions, they do help. But it's also like they help you. And if the only thing you can control is how you're feeling in response to some of these,

to some of these big, you know, changes in nature and change. changes in our climate. Like that's, you really just have to go for that, don't you? Yeah, I think, you know, like, we know that a hundred companies have been the source of, like, over 70% of the world's whole emissions since, like, you know, the 20th century. And so it can feel very small and very, you know, useless. But, like, again, I think it's like, exactly like you said. it's like something that helps your mental health and like the mental health of the people

around you if you're engaging in um anything you know i think we're not going to be able to sort of tackle an issue like this yeah and it's never going to be solved either it's only ever really going to be adapted or mitigated to but like the strategies need to be based around community and like um interconnectedness so lovely um um Yeah, I think you're absolutely right. I'm on the same page with you today. Amazing. Wow.

We should set a podcast. Yeah, just us. Just us. And all we talk about is climate change in Taylor Swift. And if you're not interested, go back. Get out. Yeah. Get out.

What else is there to be interested in the world? The greatest pop star of all time and the greatest crisis of all time. We're really getting your number one. Having said that Taylor Swift's climate, like, she's not good for the environment. Like her Miss America, I don't want to hate on Taylor, but I'm just going to say her Miss American documentary, there were so many plastic water bottles. And I was like, Taylor, it's 2020 or 2019. Whenever that was filmed, you can use a reusable water bottle.

I know you can. Like, babe, you've got the money. They cost $5. Yeah, I will come and work. Taylor Swift, because you're obviously going to listen to this podcast. I have the information. I'll come and work for you and, like, sort that out. Yes.

She can be your climate consultant. Ever more folklore to her. which will be happening next year. Please. Perfect. But also the other thing is like, remember her like when you went to the 1989 world tour? And everyone had those like wristbands that like did up. Where did they all go?

Landfill. 100%. Yeah. And so much electricity to run those concerts. God, we can't have both to now. But we can't. They can be renewable. You can have a totally reusable festival system.

it's all, this is what my work does and it's possible. Yeah. Like, I mean, that's what. Yeah. Yeah, I think that with every, like, major, I don't know, I love thinking in, like, like, there's two sides of the same coin type thing. Like, as with, you know, every single massive, this is a very wicked problem, but it also means, like, a huge amount of opportunity.

Like, climate change, sort of adaptation. and mitigation, like, so changing the way we act and also changing how we respond to climate events has, like, massive opportunity in terms of improving, like, inequalities and sort of, like, so for example, like, we know that educating and empowering women, like, an actual sex education is basically one of the best ways to reduce climate emissions because it reduces population rates. And, you know, so you're educating women, which is obviously an incredible thing and you're lowering emissions or the same as like, you know, if you have like, instead of connecting to a single electricity grid, you can develop decentralized grids. So like smaller villages or towns have like renewable energy instead of connecting to a main grid. And it means that like they have sort of more secure energy and more like better access.

to energy. So it's basically, oh, and then, you know, obviously, like First Nations or Indigenous peoples across the world have massive, incredible knowledge bases about land and sustainability. And so, like, using or like amplifying their voices as well means that, like, yeah, with the problem solving opportunities is massive. And in terms of like, even like secondary, secondary order of consequences of like controlling disasters around climate change. Like, um, I'm obviously specifically thinking about bushfires, but like taking on indigenous and like knowledge is so important. Like as much as we've like developed science and like white people like created like education institutions. Like I'm sorry, we really don't know much compared to people

who've been like living with the land for many, many years. Um, yeah, that's a really good book. Oh, sorry. No, go. Please. What's this good book? There's a really good book called Byer Country that I just finished by Victor Stephenson and it's it's about like fire management in Australia and yet the possibilities if we could roll out um you know first nations led fire management across the country would just be insane like you know and the more people have like yeah and like they've lived through ice ages and you know so many climate changes that like their resilience um and learning from that is just a really incredible opportunity that we can sort of yeah combine climate action and it's like climate justice generally.

Give me that book. We can do a book swap. Okay, I will. Yeah, I'll give you something I've been reading. It's probably fiction, but still very... No, I love fiction. Yeah, oh, yeah, okay, great. I'll give you like a really good book.

Something lighthearted. I feel like you need that. I feel like with the climate anxiety, you need something to take the edge off. Okay, I can say something else that you've brought up is that climate doomism can be just as harmful as climate denial. And I know we're going to talk about climate denial later. But what do we really kind of mean by that? Climate doomism can be just as harmful as climate denial. Yeah. So this was actually

an article that a team hollow wrote who is a, he's running for the seat of the Greens and the federal the next election in the nation's capital. Yeah. And he wrote an article about this. And I read it And I was like, oh my God, basically it's just sort of saying that, yeah, we can't focus. And by climate doomism, you know, he means like, oh, like when climate change comes, which, I mean, it's here already, but okay, you know, I'm just going to go off into the mountains of New Zealand and live off the land. And that sort of very privileged thing to say that like, oh, we can just escape climate change. And I think it's totally, I mean, look, we've all had our moments, like, I have definitely, actually with friend of the show, Erin, when the election results came out

like three, you know, when Skimo won the election, we just did shots and had a cry at like two o'clock in the morning because of this and we're like, oh my God, we're going to go and just like, fuck this all, you know, and that's such a natural reaction. It has to be done sometimes, you know. Yeah, but in a bigger sense, like that sort of doom and gloom totally shuts off the possibility. of action. And it is also only, like, there's no, it's sort of, it's bullshit. Like, there's no place, even the mountains of New Zealand are going to be affected by

climate change. There's no place where we can go that sort of is like, oh, yeah, I've just, I'm just going to leave climate change behind. Like, no, we're all going to be affected. Obviously, most people, like, people will be affected very, very differently. But, yeah, we don't. Yeah, like you were saying such a privileged statement, it's like, I'm just, going to move to New Zealand. It's like, yeah, but what about all like the

Islander communities? Where are they going to go? Yeah, like Tavalu that is going underwater and, you know, it's just like, what? Like out yourself as like as being for it. Out yourself being like, I've made a individualist. Like, but I don't, I think it's like, I don't think people say it seriously. I think it is a very, very natural reaction to climate anxiety and climate doom and being like, oh, when situations become uncomfortable and put you in a situation of danger. Like, you do want to escape, you don't want to create a fantasy, and you do want to create an outcome that is because you just cannot eat perpetual. So you get what people say. I think it needs to shift. Sorry. Yeah. I think it needs to shift to like,

yeah, more, you know, the climate is something that is changing, but we can like at least try and make the outcome a little bit better like together in a in a sort of united way yeah i sound like a cult leader but you know no please and no that's the vibe that we all need you know right now we have Scott Morrison and that man is just as boring as a fish and as dumb as a scarecrow so um we do probably need something when cult leader would be better at least we could get something done but I do see this really positive point that you've kind of put in, which is that, you know, there is some optimism. You don't need to move to New Zealand, right?

You know, not right now at least. Like the world is kind of slowly moving on climate change. Like you said, most major developed countries are net zero by 2050 or like somewhere near that, promise, in terms of their target. Yeah, like the UK, EU, America, China, Japan, Russia? New Zealand. I don't know about Russia.

I'm not sure about Russia. Like, countries are committing and, you know, there's a lot. I mean, the school strike for climate and like Greta, Glendberg's Fridays for future movement, like, that was those connected sort of marches were like the biggest, I think, I'm pretty sure that were the biggest ever, like worldwide movement of protests for climate action. So, like, things are changing. And even in Australia, the government.

the government is really slacking, but like all Australian states have committed to net zero by 2050. And renewables are predicted to like outpace fossil fuels in electricity generation by the end of the decade. So yeah, it's really exciting. Sorry, we've got to Oscar's. Hi. Hi, Oscar. Hi, Oscar. He's to come back from a little walk outside.

Zoe. Sorry, guys, a little bit of a divert. We like to keep it classy and candid on this show. Oh, yeah. There we go. There's my housemate. He's fucking fabulous. He's wonderful.

I really want to talk about climate denial. And why convincing people to make it their problem can be so hard. And I've got like a bit of a story about. this. So someone that I know, someone that, yeah, you don't know how many details I want to go into. Someone who was like a close family relation of sorts. Yeah. I've already told you this. So I think maybe I have. But they're like a full-blown climate denialist. Like climate change doesn't exist. The government's just trying to control

us. The government's just trying to send us broke. The government doesn't care about small business like this is all this is all fake like the planet has changed so many times this is like nothing new it was really infuriating when I think I first recognize what what what what harm these kind of arguments do um yeah because it is I think you've said it here like it's linked to such a left and right wing divide I don't really know how that has happened surely it's like a human And surely you, like, I would always like to think that, like, this innate sense of, like, loyalty to the next generation and, like, wanting our children to inherit a better planet. Like, everyone left and right has kids, they love.

Everyone has a sense of humanity. Like, but I guess not. I guess it's still very polarized and politicized and just kind of this split between, like, conservatives and elites and regional communities and more in the city communities. that kind of stuff. Yeah, so we're like, yeah, we're second only to the US in the world in how much climate policy is like linked to political sort of lefts and rights. Like obviously not everyone is like that.

And in Australia there's, yeah, yeah. And in Australia, you know, there are people that sort of are on either side that do or don't living climate. And, you know, there's like places like the UK where climate is a really bipartisan issue. But here, I think we've, we just haven't done a very good job at like, including both sides in discussions. You know, we have like, yeah, like you said, the sort of like these activists going on road trips, which is a great way to drum up support, but also can be so isolating for regional communities or mining communities that are like, you are literally, Yeah, you're literally protesting to remove my job.

Like what the, you know, that would be so unimaginably difficult to look at. And, you know, it's so natural to respond and be like, no, fuck you. Yeah. But, yeah. And then we have these really weird contrast, too, of like, you know, the deputy PM, Michael Colmac was like, agriculture needs to be exempt from any like emissions reduction policy because at the moment, agriculture contributes about 13% of emissions. And that will continue to increase.

But then, like, the CEO of the National Farmers Federation, who you think would be his, like, sort of biggest supporter was like, no, we don't necessarily want to be exempt. We just want to be included in the transition. Yeah. And that's, like, very, yeah, we definitely just need way better dialogue around, like, just transitions and supporting a really solid transition because we have such potential for, you know, hydrogen and solar and wind.

as long as we do it right. Yeah, we definitely do. And that's a huge thing. I think two issues here that really link to kind of social psychology. And I'm sure we'll talk about this a little bit later on. But I think a massive thing that we've seen is the failure to appreciate that Australia is not one country. Australia is highly divided between regional and like metropolitan areas or like city areas. and the lives that people lead in those communities are completely different.

And there has been very little, I would say, effort to actually relate to people who are like, yeah, like people in Mackay who are like working coal mines. Like that's their livelihood. You really think that they're going to want to listen to you. Like you, you know, this person coming through telling you like, oh yeah, you need to get, you know, you need to get fired. Like you need to lose all your English. come. Fuck your kids.

Fuck the pleasures that you have in life for a bigger purpose, but also include you in the plan up for what happens afterwards. We're just going to tell you what to do now. Oscar's giving me a thumbs up. Yeah, I just think, yeah, you've given me a love. Yeah, I just think that we have done a really bad job at actually trying to be empathetic and trying to actually relate to people who don't come from the latest backgrounds. and that creates massive in-groups and out-groups.

It's huge. Like, in terms of, like, I think we were talking about this yesterday, you have this in-group, and the in-group is, like, you know, the people who are climate change is real, and, like, anyone who, like, buys non-reusible straws is going to hell and they get choked by a turtle. Fuck you. And, like, blah, blah, blah, blah. and like the thing is they create such an in-group where they're like everyone else who doesn't believe this who they must be idiots they must be stupid like oh you know these bogans which i hate that word it's like no these people are highly intelligent it's just that you have absolutely no way of appreciating the sacrifices they're going to make that you don't have to and you don't have to and when you create these in-groups and out-groups where everyone in the in-group believes they're right everyone in the out-group is this demonised minority how the hell are you meant to

you know, create collaboration on an issue that is, you know, at its core, a huge collective action problem. Sorry, I was a bit of breath. No, no, no. It's so, like, you know, we're becoming increasingly more sort of polarized and, like, we don't want to connect. I know, you know, it's so easy for me to see someone posting something slightly questionable on Facebook or or Instagram or something.

And I'm just like, oh, unfriend. And, you know, like, I know that because of social media, there's like, there's all these statistics. There's been, like, an increase in friendships that are, like, fracturing over politics. Yeah. And, you know, Facebook, like, literally actively work to polarise users in either direction. They've done all these studies on it. And it's really scary because, like, so much, like, particular, like, climate denier or climate skeptic arguments are often built around mistrust.

And we just have this. like you said, in group and outgroup where you don't trust anyone that's outside of your group. And it means that we can't sort of connect. And even I saw this like statistic that was like online comments, like something written, you can dehumanize the writer more than someone speaking in person. So we're having it's like online written things that's just like so disconnected and so sort of alienating to either side. And it really does build on these like in group outgrimed.

group kind of mechanisms that we have built into our brain in that like you're going to become more and more trusting of the group that may be feeding you misinformation from either side because you relate to them because you trust them and become you'll become more hostile to that group who's trying to change your mind perhaps by dehumanizing you because at the end of the day like we want to maintain our self-esteem and if someone's saying like oh you climb it tonight you're an idiot, you hate your kids. Well, what the fuck? Like, you don't want to then have to go on and acknowledge in the future that actually

you were a climate denial, like denialist. You're just going to sink your feet into the sand even more and just try very hard to prove them wrong. Because, you know, believing what they're saying, that you are denying something that is very real means that you have to agree with all their other arguments and all their other critiques of you as an individual. So I think that that is something that is something that. really frustrates me and I think it's probably why Australia has the most kind of, what was the

way that you put it, like the most kind of split on either side or polarization because of, firstly, huge, finite industries that contribute to climate change and also huge splits between regional, rural and then city populations as well. But, you know, every now and again, we're going to come across someone who wants to deny climate change. That's fine with them. They're within their rights. But how do we kind of connect with them? You know, I'm sure you've met people like this before.

Do you have any tips to now to convince maybe like your aunt or your like ex-boyfriend's stepdad? Yes. I have definitely, not attempted to, accidentally ruined some extended family Christmas dinners over various issues. and climate changes is one of them. Go baby, you love to see it. Yeah, but the sort of key to the whole thing

is like connecting over something other than the political issue. So like you can't, I'm like, I watched such a good TED talk on this and I literally have no clue. Like I hadn't saved it, so I don't know what it's cool. But it was just a really good TED talk saying that like just research is showing that there are like people do not change their minds unless they have an existing connection with the person that's trying to convince them of something. So I cannot walk into a room with someone that I'm not friends with.

Or actually, like I was handing out pamphlets for, it's probably obvious, the Greens at a recent election. And like a guy who was handing out pamphlets for Clive Palmer came up to me and started like being like it's rained recently climate change is another thing and I was like oh my god and I was like I'm not even going to go anywhere because you just can't like people will not change their minds unless you sort of already have a connection and so it's like you sort of need to just find a common ground first yeah which I think you would know about like psychologists like a shared reality like when you engage with a shared reality yeah it's huge it's like and creating like

mutual understanding and it's like humanizing the other person. It's really big in terms of getting therapists to trust, like therapists, use it to get people to trust them as well. And like child psychiatrists and child psychologists, it's huge. Basically, it's like we're on the same playing field. Like, we're on each other's team. You have to have something to link before you can introduce things that might be counted on what the person already believes.

It just makes so much common sense, doesn't it? Like, you don't trust? Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Reality, it's a huge concept in this. Yeah. And then, like, from then, once you have that connection, I was reading about, like, the success of something called moral reframing. So we know, like, just this is a massive generalisation, obviously, but conservative people tend to be led by values of, like, tradition, authority, purity, and loyalty.

But then you have, like, liberal. like lowercase liberal. Yeah. They sort of go for equality, fairness and preventing harm to others. And, you know, if you walk into a discussion with someone who is a climate denier and might be a conservative and, you know, you're sort of asking them to change, you know, if you go in with a classic, like, we're destroying the world, you're asking them to change, it's sort of like change their whole value set.

which is not productive and it's not going to work. But this moral reframing thing is sort of talking about, like, reframing the issue to fit their values. So, for example, like, more progressive people would potentially connect because they value, like, care and harm reduction, would connect with a statement like, we're destroying and harming our planet and we need to stop, whereas conservatives might more relate to a,

an argument like it's important to keep out air and our oceans clean and pure because that appeals to their values of purity. And so it's like both things and the same message, you know, like we need to protect the planet, but they're just like shifted to sort of realign with the values and context and history of the person that you're talking to. It's like marketing. Basically you've got to sell the same point just in different packaging. Exactly.

Yeah. Yeah. Which is so true. Do you want to talk about this next bit? About what happens if you're not in the in-group? Yeah. So like you talked about before, there's definitely these in-groups and out-groups.

But you sort of, if you can't necessarily connect, then you need to find someone who's like, what I think people refer to as like trusted messengers, like someone that is connected to with both sides. And then also like bringing in, I think just most, so many conversations, need to be like, you just need to go in, like, respecting the other person and just trying to, like, enjoy it and ask questions. And, like, you learn something from every single person.

So if you go in with a really open mind, you're going to come out with, like, okay, maybe, like, you then understand why they believe the things they believe. And then you can shift, like, the way you speak about things to sort of, like, realign with, like, the moral reframing, but realign with, you know, okay, maybe they grew up by a river and you can talk about caring for like a local river and reducing pollution in that river. You know, it can be like if you walk into a conversation, that sort of mindset. Yeah. Like you're not going to change their mind overnight, but like small little conversations over and over will hopefully like maybe shift someone's actions so that, you know, both sides can understand the other better. You're absolutely right. And

for those who kind of may be a skeptical about that, this idea of a trusted messenger, it's used so frequently think about when celebrities endorse political candidates. That's a huge part of it. Yeah, I did not think of that. Yeah, yeah, it's massive. It's a big thing that the US is trying to do in terms of vaccine hesitancy right now. Getting trusted messengers. So, for example, I love your Rodrigo.

I live your Rodrigo, but I was also thinking members of of a church. Not just the church, like, teenage girl crushes, but, like, yeah, like getting trusted members. They also got a Republican, he was like a manager of a bunch of Republican runs for president. So he's very well known amongst conservative communities, specifically specific. By the 60s and the 90s. I don't know what that was, but people born between the 60s and the 90s. And they got all these, like, what are they called?

groups together, focus groups, and they got him to present different arguments, and they found that all the arguments were just as effective because he was a trusted messenger. And a lot of people afterwards, and, you know, he was very conservative, yes, but he came into it not criticizing, just being like, let's have a discussion, giving them the facts. And he also found that when a family member talks to someone about, you know, getting vaccinated or perhaps changing to eco-friendly dish soap, whatever, small actions, people are most likely to go along with it because they trust their family member has their best intentions at heart.

So, yeah, it's a huge thing, being a trusted messenger or in the group. They actually found that if you teach kids about climate change in schools, you don't, like, it's just teaching them about climate change. So there's nothing to do with like how to talk to others or how to talk to your family about this. It's just like I think they were like maybe let's say year eight or something. It was like middle school in the US. They found that kids that learned about climate change, their parents down the track were more likely to become more sort of supportive of positive climate action than other children.

So yeah, children in particular have a massive impact, which is why like it's so important too. and it's so positive to see massive climate strikes because a lot of those kids and those kids are hopefully going to say something and, you know, sort of talk to their family about those issues. And it's like, you know, yeah, it's just absolutely so powerful. This happened with my grandma. And she had the kind of conservative views around climate change and then all their grandkids started talking to her about it.

And I think also when you're related to someone, you know what serves their values the best and what they care about the most. and for her like I grew up in Corrombin which is like this beautiful beautiful beautiful community and you know every year now there's fires one half of the year floods the other half um it's just natural like these days and it was like telling her about that and giving her grandkids to explain it to her that really kind of sunk in and i think that's like the massive message that we have today is just have conversations with your family and your friends um even if they do believe stuff you never know who they're going to meet you who doesn't.

And who they're going to talk to? Who are they going to talk to, making it a more normalized thing. And it's also just a good way to, you know, this is about climate anxiety. It's a really great way to kind of deal with that, knowing that there is a collective involved in this. It's not just you because I feel like sometimes this stuff can feel like you have the weight of the world on your hands to make ethical environmental decisions. But it is something that we're all facing together.

And that kind of gives me a bit of comfort sometimes knowing that I'm not kind of of in it alone. Yeah, 100%. No, I think like just going in and talking to, like, friends about it can be so rewarding and to just understand that you're not alone and there are people out there that really are so passionate about and there's so much change happening in so many communities. And, you know, people that might at first seem like climate, you know, deniers or whatever might just also be the people that can see and have the best amount of knowledge for, you know,

like how to really sustainably transition, you know, like there needs to be like, I think, yeah, conversations can be so enjoyable because you sort of understand where people are coming from. And, you know, yeah, like when you're talking about your grandma, my grandma, my gram, exactly the same, like, did not believe in climate change. And then the fires came in 2019 and I just persisted in talking about it at, you know, on just an occasional phone call. I'd be like, I'm learning about this.

and, you know, she believes in climate change now. So it takes, it can take years, it can take decades. But I think we, you know, it's really positive when people connect and sort of, yeah, try and tackle things. Yeah. I think that what really kind of similar was, because obviously, you know, this like me and, me and my efforts like survived the bushfires. We like escaped out of Maria during the bushfighters. And it was a really stressful time where we actually weren't sure, like, whether we were going to.

to like come out alive and like I think that's something that hasn't really sunk in for me like but looking back at that situation now I'm like oh my god people died like I could have died like we were on in the middle of a road like we could have died and I think when I told my grandma about that situation and when things were getting really serious when my family members couldn't get through to us when they weren't sure whether we decided to stay or leave like I think that was the point where she was like oh yeah this is something that my Like, you know, I could have lost a grandkid because the actions of, you know, of me and not caring about the stuff. So anyhow, kind of an emotional way to end it, isn't it, tonight?

We love the vulnerability. Yeah, we do love the vulnerability. And I want to say a huge thank you for coming on. We've been talking for like almost an hour. So if you have made it this far, I hope you are educated. Today is one of the most intelligent and just well-spoken people I know. and so I really want to thank her again for thanks for coming on.

Thank you. Thank you so much for having me. Anytime, literally. Just incredible. Yeah. Well, it was great discussion. It was a great way to end my, what day is it?

My first day. I'm here anytime. Yeah, what day is it? We're in lockdown. The day no matter anymore. Time is a construct. It really is. But climate change isn't.

Yeah, get out there. Get out there. talking. Yeah, there's a girl, in a COVID-safe way. With a mask. With a mask, yes, and gloves and also handsetting. And you're checking Canada out. Thank you.

But yes, I hope you guys enjoyed this episode. If you want to hear more about some of the things we've been talking about in recent months, feel free to subscribe. You can find me on Apple, Podcast, Spotify, Google, wherever. Follow us on Instagram. Follow Tenaia if you want. And I'll link some of the articles she mentioned in the show notes. but thanks again to Nail.

Thank you. See you guys next week. Bye. 2%. That's the number of people who take the stairs when there is also an escalator available. I'm Michael Easter. I'm on my podcast, 2%.

I break down the science of mental toughness, fitness, and building resilience in our strange modern world. Put yourself through some hardships and you will come out on the other side a happier, more fulfilled, healthier person. Listen to 2%. that's TWO percent on the IHeart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.

On the Look Back at it podcast. From 1979, that was a big moment for me. 84 was big to me. I'm Sam J. And I'm Alex English. Each episode, we pick a year, unpack what went down, and try to make sense of how we survived it. With our friends, fellow comedians, and favorite authors. Like Mark Lamont Hill on the 80s.

84 was a wild year. It was a wild year. I don't think there's a more important year for basketball. black people. Listen to look back at it on the Iheart radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts. Hey, what's good, y'all? You're listening to Learn the Hardway with your favorite therapist and host Kear Games.

This space is about black men's experiences, having honest conversations that it's really not safe to have anywhere, but you're having them with a licensed professional who knows what he's doing. How many men carry a suit or armor? It signals to the world that you're not to be played with. And just because you have the capability that does not mean that you need to. Listen and learn the hard way on the IHard radio app, Apple Podcast, or wherever you get your podcast. This is an IHart podcast. Guaranteed human.