The Reel Rejects - NOBODY 2 (2025) RETURNS WITH BONE CRUNCHING ACTION!! MOVIE REVIEW!!!
Episode Date: September 13, 2025HARDCORE FIGHT SCENES RETURN!! Nobody 2 Full Movie Reaction Watch Along: / thereelrejects Start your online business with a $1 per-month trial when you visit https://www.shopify.com/rejec...ts! The Naked Gun (2025) Reaction • THE NAKED GUN (2025) IS GUT BUSTINGLY HILA... Nobody (2021) Movie Reaction • NOBODY MOVIE REACTION!! First Time Watchin... Nobody 2 Reaction, Commentary, Analysis, Recap, Breakdown & Spoiler Review! Bob Odenkirk is back as Hutch Mansell in Nobody 2 (2025), directed by Timo Tjahjanto with a screenplay by Derek Kolstad & Aaron Rabin. After burning the Russian mob’s money in the first movie, Hutch still owes debts, and just when he tries to go on a peaceful vacation with his wife Becca (Connie Nielsen – Gladiator, Wonder Woman), son Brady (Gage Munroe – The Shack), and daughter Sammy (Paisley Cadorath), he’s pulled back into a storm of violence. Returning are Hutch’s father David (Christopher Lloyd – Back to the Future), and brother Harry (RZA – The Man with the Iron Fists). New faces include Colin Hanks (Fargo) as corrupt sheriff Abel, John Ortiz (American Gangster) as Wyatt Martin, and Sharon Stone (Casino, Basic Instinct) as ruthless crime boss Lendina. Key sequences include Hutch losing his pinky, the warehouse blaze, brutal lodge fight, and the explosive theme park showdown where Becca herself steps up to protect the family. Nobody 2 mixes intense fight choreography, pitch-black humor, and family drama in classic action style. We’ll dive into how Hutch’s story evolves, whether it tops the first film, and how the sequel expands the world of this surprise action franchise. Follow Aaron On Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/therealaaronalexander/?hl=en Intense Suspense by Audionautix is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 license. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... Support The Channel By Getting Some REEL REJECTS Apparel! https://www.rejectnationshop.com/ Follow Us On Socials: Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/reelrejects/ Tik-Tok: https://www.tiktok.com/@reelrejects?lang=en Twitter: https://x.com/reelrejects Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/TheReelRejects/ Music Used In Ad: Hat the Jazz by Twin Musicom is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 license. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Happy Alley by Kevin MacLeod is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 license. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... POWERED BY @GFUEL Visit https://gfuel.ly/3wD5Ygo and use code REJECTNATION for 20% off select tubs!! Head Editor: https://www.instagram.com/praperhq/?hl=en Co-Editor: Greg Alba Co-Editor: John Humphrey Music In Video: Airport Lounge - Disco Ultralounge by Kevin MacLeod is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 license. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Ask Us A QUESTION On CAMEO: https://www.cameo.com/thereelrejects Follow TheReelRejects On FACEBOOK, TWITTER, & INSTAGRAM: FB: https://www.facebook.com/TheReelRejects/ INSTAGRAM: https://www.instagram.com/reelrejects/ TWITTER: https://twitter.com/thereelrejects Follow GREG ON INSTAGRAM & TWITTER: INSTAGRAM: https://www.instagram.com/thegregalba/ TWITTER: https://twitter.com/thegregalba Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Transcript
Discussion (0)
When you're with Amex Platinum,
you get access to exclusive dining experiences and an annual travel credit.
So the best tapas in town might be in a new town altogether.
That's the powerful backing of Amex.
Terms and conditions apply.
Learn more at Amex.ca.
This.c.com.
This episode is brought to you by Defender.
With a towing capacity of 3,500 kilograms
and a weighting depth of 900 millimeters,
the Defender 110 pushes what's possible.
Learn more at landrover.ca.
One and sip, and two, and sip,
and three and sip.
Oh, hey, I'm just sipping Tim's all-new protein ice latte.
Starting at 17 grams per medium latte, Tim's new protein lattes.
Protein without all the work at participating restaurants in Canada.
Thank you to Shopify for sponsoring this video.
More on them in just a bit.
All right, gang, without further ado, let's get some bone crunching going on.
All right, gang, that was nobody too.
if you've made it to this point in the video
thank you first of all if you'd be
so kind as to leave a like
subscribe and hit the notification bell so you can be notified
anytime one of these movies comes your
way also big thank you to the folks
over at prepper chopping these
highlights down shooting them up
putting them together so that you guys can see them
here on the YouTube's and if you happen to be
listening to this in podcast format on any
podcast platform of your choosing if you could leave
us a rating that would be mucho
helpful
before we hop in to our lovely
patron Q&A guiding the review here let's collect a couple of basic thoughts g how'd you feel uh it was a fun
movie it was fun i i definitely like the first half significantly more than the last half
like there's the merit in the second half for sure um but the first half i thought had like some
really great set up i didn't really care if the beats were similar um it like it seemed like a solid
continuation of where we left off getting more heart a little bit more personal and more intimate
with the family bob oenkirk the i like the idea of how he was like you know he's he should be
really in his own element now but now he's doing what he actually wants to do he's now missing out
on the thing he's doing it for which is his family and all those setups i thought were great
the comedy and the action was solid throughout um but yeah i think the last half of the movie
particularly was Sharon when Sharon Stone i feel like they didn't need Sharon Stone's character
I think they could have just kind of kept um whoever the dad is a villain and then you know like
just keep it the small town if they just kind of kept it focused on that yeah and then
you magnify it and Colin Hanks
Yeah I think it would have been
Stronger and then it starts feeling like a different movie
And it started feeling weirdly rushed
And like we were just going through requisite repeats
So suddenly stakes weren't felt
Emotional beats weren't really being felt to me
And I think that's what makes the nobody movie strong
Is like the surprising amount of connection in heart
um while having like awesome impactful action you know and whereas i i think the the last half
kind of drops the ball a little bit in that department like sure action's cool but then the action
doesn't weigh as much when i'm suddenly not finding the movie as engaging itself on the story
and everything but it's not to say that the last half doesn't have like moments um and i'd still be
down for like numeral stress but yeah there's just there's just
my general. I think nobody one's definitely a stronger
film. But I was actually
like expecting myself to say this is stronger
but then we got to
the Sharon Stone character which
I feel like she was taking the
direction she was given and doing the
writing she was given. I wouldn't blame it on her
I think it's more on the
just the idea that where they felt
like they needed a bigger villain to justify
going through the water park stuff and I'm like I don't know
I thought it was better when it was just like the Rambo
plot. You know?
Yeah. Yeah. Yeah.
guy stuff because everything I thought was being justified well so yeah that's it a little bit of a
mixed bag for me but overall I'd still recommend it that's fair our run how do you feel I thought it was
really fun I really enjoyed the ways in which it was comparing or what's mirroring the first movie
in the sense that the first movie was about him coming into himself and then the second movie
started off about being him I guess more embracing his family
and kind of being, trying to be more present for them
and which is why they wanted vacation in the first place.
And all the action was really, really good.
You know, I think it was a lot stronger than the first one,
even though the first one's already great in the itself.
These plots are fairly simple.
I just wish the second half had, I don't know, maybe more consistency
as far as how it was put together.
Because I felt like the stuff with the Rizzo was cool,
but it felt kind of like a side beat.
They're like, oh, he wasn't in the last one,
so we've got to have him in this one.
And kind of the same thing with Christopher Lloyd's character.
I'd say I don't enjoy their presence,
but I just didn't feel them wholly necessary in this one.
But yeah, kind of similar sentiments I feel with the Greg had about Sharon Stone.
I just didn't find a very menacing, very threatening.
But, you know, all the action stuff was cool,
and I felt like they found a fun sort of set piece for the finale.
But ultimately, I can say I generally had a good time.
I would also recommend it to people who were just fun of fans of good action.
But yeah, I think the first one is better.
But still a fun time.
I felt kind of strange that they started off the plot with him having a bunch of debt
and then you just don't address it again.
At the end, I guess we're going to address that in the third one?
I felt like they sliced together two different.
it felt like it became a different and more generic movie in the last half and then they just
like especially with risa and then throwing in like risa and stuff in there was like yeah i think
the movie's like missing the themes suddenly of like there's no catharsis at the end or no i didn't
even feel like the resolution of the family that that feeling that the movie is supposed to give you
like oh we had our trip we had maybe it wasn't the adventure we expected but in some weird way we came
together you know and it doesn't even have that payoff even though the movie's telling me they do so
yeah i would agree with both of you guys it's that thing where in the first half you're like oh
this is really fun this is moving uh at a pace that is snappy but it's not overlooking the character
beats it's doing things to endear you and charm you and to you know create that sort of sense of
irony with the walk of life that he's currently in and then once you get to the
the second half. It's just like, there's no more time
for character stuff. We just have to move through all these
action set pieces and we have to, you know,
add a new villain and it really feels like
this is a tight 90. This feels like a movie
that could have been an hour and 45
minutes and then we could have gotten back
some of the family
journey in the second half of the movie
because once the violence starts,
there's kind of nothing else for them to do, there's nothing
else for them to learn and you have them
hold up in the lodge and the sun's looking
after their sister and you're like, okay, maybe this will be
some opportunity for him to rise to an occasion.
but not really and Riz is there he's cool but it's only for like one set piece that takes care of a problem that was supposed to bring peril to the plot you know it's nice to see Christopher Lloyd and with Sharon Stone I feel like they just didn't do her any favors by not including any character meat on that bone and just simply showing only moments where she's like hamming it up and like being crazy and yeah it just feels like all of a sudden there's this other movie happening and I feel like
feel like, you're right, you could have done, you could have still maintained a lot of the dynamics had the dad ultimately become sympathetic, have him up against this, you know, number two of his, in Colin Hanks, who's clearly itching to, you know, gain greater respect and status. It's just, it's one of those, yeah, it's, it's, I would love to see what the script looked like, because like, the first half is so strong that I was like, yeah, I could see this surpassing the first easily and being like really charming and even more, you know, rich in the family stuff.
And it's just sad to watch them kind of stop doing that after a while.
Yeah, there's like so much in the first half that they set up that doesn't feel like it's rewarded.
He said we're going to talk about this later to his son.
And we don't.
We don't.
They set up the son and father, like there's like this father's son dynamic thing they had going on.
And, you know, sometimes I would be here being like, I get it.
People just want the action and that's all that matters.
But no, I think that's why nobody won.
struck a chord with people.
It was more than the action.
The people connected with it for,
and that's the secret sauce.
And this movie was like making it more nutritious.
And then suddenly it was like,
now we got just a plain burger.
And really slick looking action can fall flatter
when the stuff around it.
I know you said you preferred the action in this movie.
I think as an action movie experience,
the first movie's action feels strong.
longer in my mind because it's way more consistently bolstered by stakes and emotions.
Yeah.
Once you get to the carnival, it should be the, you know, big crescendo, you know,
centerpiece of everything.
It's kind of like you're just sort of waiting for them to tick these boxes off.
Yep.
It's like it's cool, but it's, yeah, it doesn't really weigh anything.
And it's a sad kind of waste of a really cool environment to do these things in.
But it's still very fun.
A second note, I went to the Nobody to Influencer event, and I'm heavily criticizing.
the movie. Oh, my God.
You're not a shell. It's possible.
You're not a shell.
Ah, well, we had a character arc.
You can still, you can still
do that. That's crazy.
Hey, you still contributed
to the box office ticket sales.
Your job is completed.
It's a lot of them. We still bought the movie.
Yeah, that's it. Yeah, you're
off the hook now. You paid them.
Also, one last thing,
we can get into the other thing. I didn't feel like the
resolution for
them not being able to see eye to I or be there for each other in the beginning
where he was working too much was resolved in a way that was satisfying by the end
where they're kissing in the pool and she's like I was like what that when you go back
off a vacation you're still going to have the same problem this doesn't change anything
yeah so I don't know nope right there with you and also you know where'd you learn to
shoot how'd your kid choke that guy out like you guys are clearly taking notes I can head can
but it would have been nice to have some kind of like cheeky ah the family that slays together kind of thing
but anyway let's throw it over to you guys appreciate y'all for chiming in with your questions each and
every week day vidya etc like we said at the top if you join up over the patreon you get a little
peek at our shooting schedule and you get to guide these reviews and without further ad do
Rejection. This shirt, you can find it at Rejectnationshop.com, along with many of our other apparel.
And I'll tell you, when we first launched that merch shop, we weren't then, and we're still not now, website developers.
We just knew we wanted a place where fans of ours could grab shirts, hoodies, mugs, and support the channel.
And for the longest time, we didn't do it because the idea of, like, building and running a shop sounded daunting.
And then we were recommended by a friend Shopify.
Shopify is the commerce platform behind millions of businesses around the world,
including ours and 10% of all e-commerce in the U.S.
What made the difference for us is how user-friendly it is.
They have ready-to-go templates, and we were able to build a great-looking store
without having to touch a single line of code.
It also gives us powerful tools to grow.
They have AI that writes product descriptions, built-in email, and social marketing,
and expert support with things like inventory and shipping.
It's like having a whole team behind you.
you have a business in mind or do have a business already that you want to expand.
If you're ready to sell, you're ready for Shopify.
Turn your big business idea into Shopify on your side.
Sign up for $1 per month trial and start selling today at Shopify.com slash rejects.
That's Shopify.com slash rejects.
Thank you so much, Shopify, for helping be an extension of real rejects.
Thank you.
Jaden Rhodes, I'm curious if y'all had the same issue I did, which was the movie follows
too many of the same beats
of the original movie
comes a little too much
like your older sibling
had an assignment years ago
and now you have the same assignment
but you decided to copy their work
beat for beat.
Aaron will start with you?
Do you agree with that assessment?
I don't think it's the copying the structure
that is the issue.
I think it's the fact
that you don't utilize
the elevation of heart
that the first act of the movie
establishes
because it rationalizes
the fact that this is going to be
a parallel experience to the first
movie. But with the problem now
being that in the first movie,
he's walking through life and kind of
not paying attention to his family. And this one,
he's not paying attention to his family because he's working too
much. And I felt like if they were found
a way to create a care of that heart
and those themes in the end of the movie, even though
it's structurally similar,
it would have been a strong
companion piece
to the first one. But because it lacks
some of that heart and some of that intentionality
in the second half, it doesn't
feel fulfilling, which makes it feel like
a kind of copy and paste
without as much meat to it.
Gee. Yeah, I agree with Aaron.
I thought the mirroring was like purposeful,
and then it does just become,
now let's just hit the beats.
So, yeah.
It's weird. I wouldn't necessarily say that it's like,
I was sorry, Dick.
I don't need to repeat anything.
Anyone else said? I'm done.
I'm just making sure.
Yeah, it's interesting.
I didn't feel like, I thought the beats that they repeated made sense because they're tropes of this particular franchise they're trying to build.
And I think the only beats of the original that held this down were more just tropes of the genre in general.
It felt like halfway through someone went, wait, shit, we need some big eccentric, high-powered crime lord in here because that's these movies and these are like the same creative team or a lot of the similar creative team as John Wick.
and that movie has that
and I could kind of feel that
those tropes weighing on this
when they already had such a good setup.
This reminded me of, oddly enough,
very different movie.
This reminded me of watching
the karate kid legends.
Like the first half, you're like,
this is great.
And then the second half,
you're like, this is moving so fast
and it's forgetting about all the character beats.
And we now have this villain
who I don't really care about,
but I guess we have to have a villain
and we have to have a big violent showdown.
So, yeah, I don't think this was suffering.
from recycling the first movie.
I think it was just suffering from not trusting itself
as much as it felt like it needed to play the tropes.
Resonance Zed.
Loved the movie, but I feel like there was too much family drama,
especially between Hutch and Becca.
Wow.
Shouldn't they all be on the same page by now?
Speaking of, how do you feel about the new antagonists?
Mainly the antagonist played by Colin Hanks and Sharon Stone.
Gee, throw it to you first.
I don't agree with this at all.
I think that's what it would be kind of boring if there was no drama
I think that was making it interesting was the drama between them
of you think you get what you think you're getting your happily ever after
and then that's kind of how life is you know
and you're going he's committed to his work he's committed to his life
but then now would the thing that should be the solution
like there's always going to be problems that interfere
I don't think like it would be 100% more on the same
page by now. Now, I think they could have used more of it. And then I thought the resolution of
it was weird because they didn't do a great job. I mean, I imagine if the second half was
stronger, I wonder if you would feel this way, residency. Antagonist, we've expressed her
Sharon Stone sentiments. I don't mind calling Hank's. I think there was something a little bit
interesting. They could have mined from him, you know. He had that like classic sheriff in my small
town vibe but i like the idea that he was like an insecure person who really wanted respect and
you know you know these guys will lose and i like seeing colin hanks actually play a character that's
different than the nice guy you know yeah i enjoy i enjoy push over i enjoy calling hanks um i i don't
mind there's a lot of like shunning nepo actor babies going around these days i would definitely
to call on Hanks in that category.
He's forced them to cast him in this movie
and every other movie.
He's a good actor there. I don't mind him.
I thought it was good.
Aaron, how you feel?
You agree with the resonance?
I also do have to disagree.
I thought the first movie was about, you know,
returning to a self or returning to
addiction or a dormant part of his self.
And this one was about
the story, at the beginning,
it wanted to be about what happens
when that addiction, that revival of self, comes in conflict with your family and, you know,
the return to family, but then I kind of forgot about that in the second half.
So, I don't know.
Had it played through those things, it would have been stronger, in my opinion.
But as far as the villains go, I thought Colin Hanks was cool.
He was all right.
It seemed like he had some personal grudge against Bob Odenkirk's character of Hutch, but there was really nothing there.
and I'd make no damn sense why he survived that blast.
I was like, he was literally in there.
He was all the way in there like swimwear.
And Sharon Stone, I felt like that she could have had one scene with Hutch,
and maybe that would have made things a little bit better,
but because they didn't meet into the water park.
It was like, oh, okay, it's just a guy he has no personal connection with.
But she was like, she was hamming it up,
and not all of her line delivery's word for me.
But, you know, it was serviceable.
It was fun enough.
Yeah, I feel like they, what I'm going to,
tread into treacherous territory and say what i would have done or liked to have seen was
would have been them basically taking the second half to get the family on the same page
becca knows or has some understanding of who clint is um not clint hutch mansell clint mansell
uh beck has an understanding of who this guy is the kids maybe not so much and i feel like
you could have used the second half to instead of putting them all away from the big firefight
and have Becca show up at random to save the day partway through
and to cap Sharon Stone.
Cool moment, sort of, but I felt like if you really caught them up
in the dangers of this and acknowledged that,
but also then showed the fierce, you know, love and protection
that Bob Odenkirk is, you know, putting on display for his family
and, you know, obviously to survive,
I thought they could have really tied this together in a nice bow
and had all the fun and, you know, continued on with,
the added, you know, emphasis on the familial perspective and whatnot.
And, yeah, I think Sharon Stone, again, fun to watch.
I would have saved her for, like, the very end, have a mystery around all the McGuffins and the chemicals and the weapons.
Who is all this for?
There's something bigger going on, but really what we're dealing with is Colin Hanks, you know, trying to usurp this guy
who clearly doesn't want to be in charge of this criminal organization, doesn't want this for his kid.
Colin Hanks clearly is about this life.
take that character one level further
in terms of, I don't know,
have something in those mid
of the movie exchanges between him and Hutch
lead to him taking a even more villainous turn
going off the deep end.
I like the subversion of him talking tough
and giving the speech and then them basically
rolling up and just taking them out.
But yeah, I just thought that they could have used
all these pieces in the second half a lot better
and again brought them to the same page
in a really satisfying and kind of lucid way throughout,
and I feel like they missed that opportunity.
Kev B.
Thank you for chiming in.
Question first, and then we'll nod to...
How about this?
We'll do the trivia, and then we'll jump into your question.
Trivia.
Bob Odenkirk trained harder after the first nobody movie,
coming back in even better shape for nobody, too.
Shows.
He continued working...
Is it what?
Oh, it shows.
He continued working closely with stunt trainer.
Daniel Bernhardt, who playfully doubles as multiple characters,
all of whom keep dying and returning in their action movie universe.
Sharon Stone joined the cast after Odenkirk passed her a note at an award show
inviting her to play, quote, a James Bond type batty.
That is a fun bit of behind-the-scenes intel,
although it does feel like that is about as much thought as went into having her in the movie.
To your question, though, Kev B, did you find yourself rooting for Hutch?
Even more of this time around?
I love both of these movies, by the way.
Aaron, did you?
I was rooting for him, and I thought, you know, his,
the scene where he goes back and beats up the people at the arcade
just way overboard was probably the most interesting
he became in the movie.
Because I feel like that's when you're like,
okay, his violence and his tendencies have a problem
and can affect the way his family operates.
And they're literally,
literally all in jail because of that.
So I still found myself
a rooting for him, but I wish that
that darkness would have become
more part of the plot. But
Bob Ardenkirk is still very
likable in the role, and yeah,
I think that he was great.
Gee?
I wouldn't say I rooted
more for him. I was definitely
rooting for him, and I
feel like I could probably relate
more with this version of him, of
where I'm at in my life,
than I would
in the prior version of the movie
which is still very relatable
but in terms of a character
I wouldn't say I rooted more for him
like really felt like he had this shit handled
like it was not
especially when the last half has like zero stakes
I'm not really rooting for him
I'm kind of just going all right
let's watch stuff
yeah I'm rooting I'm actively rooting for him
for about as long as the emotional stakes
are tangible and then after
while. I'm just kind of watching him and hoping
he doesn't die, because I bet he probably
won't. Yeah.
Jay Rushden,
last question of the day.
Okay. Should there be a sequel
for this film here?
Yeah.
Aaron? Sequel? I'd say yeah.
This time, when you pull out at the end,
it's not just him and his wife and the dog, but it's
the whole family, because all the family's
involved, and it's all six of them.
Grandpa and Riza and the two kids
and the dog and the cat
well they all did it they're all horse and a bird yeah but yeah i'm not for seagull yeah there's like
so many loose threads that yeah i feel like they could i hope this movie's doing well on video
on demand because i know it didn't do well at the box office um so i'm hoping the vod experience or
streaming or something gives it some second life because i totally think they could get a third one
and if they did a third one i think they could make it way stronger i i prefer it to get a third
one so that way it could
deliberate like the potential
the first half showed you could do
a sequel and then I think they sacrificed
a lot to hit a runtime
and I think they could
they could definitely learn the lesson
because I imagine what we're saying there's got to be
a lot of people who feel the same way we show
there has to be
I like I would be curious check out the Ron and Tomato
score critics and
audience wise compared to
yeah well Andrew's pulling that up
John sequel yeah
No, definitely not.
I think they should have stopped
at one, J.K.
Of course.
I mean, yeah, Bob Odenkirk
is just such a joy to watch.
I mean, this is a nice ensemble,
and I like the, you know,
when this came out,
everyone was like,
oh, this is just going to be
another John Wick?
And yeah, like, there are similarities,
but it's also got its own personality.
And I would be thrilled
to watch Bob Oden Kirk
do these movies for as long
as he's willing to throw down on him.
Because they're more comedy.
Yeah, more comedic.
Yeah, absolutely.
And there's like a quirk.
It's perfect for him
because you can bring the quirk
of his comedic chops, but also
the physical prowess that he has worked
so hard to show on screen. Especially after
I know, I think it was after the first one, at some point he had like a
heart issue. Yeah, this movie saved. Working on
this movie saved. I'm a huge Bob Odenkirk, man. Yeah, this is working on, nobody
once saved his life. Yeah. It's amazing. It's got him
in like great health and stuff. Yeah.
He almost had a heart attack on the set of Better Call Saul.
Oh, snap. I feel like, yeah, just for the longevity of Bob
Odinkirk, we should have one of the... For the longevity
of Jesse Eisenberg, we need a now you see.
me every couple years. And for the longevity of Bob Odenkirk, we need a nobody every couple
years. That's what I say. Definitely down. All right, tomato meter before we head out of here.
So I'll get the score for both of them. Maybe I'll just tell you guys the first one.
Yeah, I just tell us. All right. So the first one, critics, it was 84. And then 94 for audiences.
That's hugely high. And for the second one.
Just tells. All right. 78 for critics. Not bad. And 89 for audiences.
So it's not that big of a dip.
That's actually a little higher critically.
That's way higher than I thought of you.
I thought it was going to be like a 60 or something.
Yeah, that's way higher than I thought of you.
Wow.
Yeah.
Well, all right.
Maybe the three of us are the weird ones.
We're the nitpurs.
Yeah.
Well, gang, do you agree with the critics?
Are we wrong?
Do we need less family drama in these movies?
Leave us your thoughts down below.
Thank you for joining us if you joined us.
And we'll catch you for some more bone crunch and action on the next.
one. Be well, people.
