The Rest Is Classified - 177. Who Blew Up the Nord Stream Pipeline? (Ep 1)

Episode Date: July 19, 2026

Why did an undersea pipeline that sent Russian gas to Germany explode in 2022? And could a group of Ukrainian operatives really have been behind it? David and Gordon are joined by Bojan Pancevski, Chief European Political Correspondent of the Wall Street Journal and author of the newly released book, The Nord Stream Conspiracy, to discuss who was really responsible for the explosion of the Nord Stream pipeline in 2022. ------------------- THE REST IS CLASSIFIED LIVE 2026 at The Rest Is Fest: Buy your tickets ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ to see David and Gordon live on stage at London’s Southbank Centre on 4 September: ⁠⁠⁠⁠https://www.southbankcentre.co.uk/whats-on/the-rest-is-classified-live/⁠⁠⁠⁠ ------------------- Sign-up for our free newsletter where producer Becki takes you behind the scenes of the show: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://mailchi.mp/goalhanger.com/tric-free-newsletter-sign⁠-up⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ ------------------- Join the Declassified Club to go deeper into the world of espionage with exclusive Q&As, interviews with top intelligence insiders, regular livestreams, ad-free listening, early access to episodes and live show tickets, and weekly deep dives into original spy stories. Members also get curated reading lists, special book discounts, prize draws, and access to our private chat community. Just go to ⁠⁠therestisclassified.com⁠ or join on Apple Podcasts. ------------------- Get a 10% discount on business PCs, printers and accessories using the code TRIC10. Visit ⁠⁠⁠⁠https://HP.com/CLASSIFIED⁠⁠⁠⁠ for more information. T&C's apply. ------------------- EXCLUSIVE NordVPN Deal ➼ https://nordvpn.com/restisclassified Upgrade your online protection with an all-in-one security app! It’s risk free with NordVPN’s 30-day money-back guarantee ------------------- Email: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠[e-mail]⁠⁠⁠ Instagram: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠@restisclassified⁠ Video Editor: Joe Pettit Social Producer: Emma Jackson Assistant Producer: Alfie Rowe Producer: Becki Hills Head of History: Dom Johnson Exec Producer: Tony Pastor Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

For exclusive interviews, bonus episodes, ad-free listening, early access to series, first look at live show tickets, a weekly newsletter, and discounted books. Join the declassified club at the rest is classified.com. Why did an undersea pipeline that sent Russian gas to Germany explode in 2022? And could a group of Ukrainian operatives really have been behind it? Well, welcome to The Rest Is Classified. I'm Gordon Carrera. And I'm David McCloskey.

And David, four years ago, just after Russia invaded Ukraine, scientists detected what looked like an enormous undersea earthquake in the Baltic Sea. But if that's what it was, we wouldn't be talking about it on our show, because the reality was it was an explosion, an act of unprecedented sabotage. Someone had blown up the $20 billion Nord Stream pipeline, which carried cheap Russian gas to Europe. But who could have orchestrated such a wild and dangerous operation? an operation that took place 80 to 100 meters underwater on the floor of the Baltic Sea. And what were the motivations of the group that did this? For many in the immediate aftermath, the prime suspect was Russia. But over time, the finger would gradually point somewhere else.

And it's really spawned, I think, an information war around this entire event that has become interested. all on its own, causing some very difficult and tense conversations between countries that are supposedly allies. So to get to the bottom of this wild and crazy stories of spies, sea divers, political cover-ups, all the kinds of things that we love on the rest is classified. We are very fortunate to be joined by Boyan Panchevsky, who is the chief European political correspondent of the Wall Street Journal, and author of the newly released book, The Wonderful Norfolk,

stream conspiracy. Welcome, Boyan. Thanks for being with us. Hey, guys. Thank you so much for having me. It's a real pleasure. This episode is brought to you by HP. In intelligence work, it's rarely the obvious problem that causes failure.

It's the overlooked detail or the flaw nobody quite solved. The kind of vulnerability, intelligence services, look for. And running a business is the same, especially when you're building or growing a team. It's the risks you can't see or don't understand. HP designs technology so devices, collaboration tools and security work together as a single system, helping teams keep everything running smoothly at home in the office and out in the field. The protection is built in, hardware-level security working quietly in the background, helping reduce risk without creating more work.

With a team of business advisors, HP helps businesses of all sizes, find technology that fits their needs and budget. To see how HP helps businesses work securely and productively, visit HP.com forward slash classified. The rest is classified listeners also benefit from 10% off HP business technology with code T-R-I-C-10. The Hulu original series Furious is coming to Disney Plus, starring Emmy Rossum. Furious follows FBI agent Alice Black on the hunt for a mysterious and calculating serial killer. Both walk their own paths towards. justice. And as their lives start to intertwine, the line between right and wrong begins to blur.

Don't miss the three-episode premiere of the Hulu original series Furious on July 27th, only on Hulu on Disney Plus. If you want a $3,000 a month payday for life, what would you feel free to do? Maybe take a long weekend, every weekend, or try a bunch of new hobbies. Would you feel free to upgrade and listen ad-free? Don't worry, we get it. dollar ticket can win you $3,000 a month for life and supports life-saving cancer research at the Princess Margaret. Feel free to buy your payday for life ticket today. Raffle number 155-2194. Please play responsibly. Boy, and you've done a decades, two decades of reporting across Europe, covering lots of different stories, financial crises, and of course the war in Ukraine.

and I guess this must be one of the craziest stories you've ever done. Is that fair to say? Yeah, it's entirely fair to say. It's an extraordinary story largely also because of the people involved. And that's how I decided to write a book about it. I had been covering Nord Stream before it exploded because it was always this kind of large geopolitical sort of topic and generating tension between Germany, America, Germany, Britain,

Germany, its Eastern European neighbors, etc. But after the explosions, it became that much bigger, the story. And when I actually finally met the characters behind the attack, but also the detectives who are hunting them, I realize these are extraordinary people, and you can only do justice to their saga by writing it. a pretty thick book as I did in the end. It's really a fascinating subject.

It's probably one of the, if not the most fascinating story I've ever worked on, but certainly right up there in the top. More interesting than doing Brexit on some of the other stories, you did. Yeah, that's a past life. I can hardly remember that. I think we've all blocked it out. Yeah. Exactly.

Well, maybe we should start, I guess, with the crime, the explosion. as it were. Maybe could you set the scene for us on what happened on that fateful day in September of 2022? Because I mean, we're seven months into Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine, the Nord Stream 2 pipeline. We'll talk about how there's a couple pipelines that are that are on the seafloor there had been completed a year earlier. No gas is flowing through it. It's September of 2022, what happens on that day? It was the 26th of September, and somewhere around midday, there was a report that the pressure had dropped in the North Stream 2 pipeline, which at the time was not in use, but it was

fully functional and filled with gas for technical reason. Both pipelines were pressurized and full of gas. The reports were public. It didn't really mean much to me at that stage. I realized something was going on, and I thought they might have, you know, the Russians had stopped the flow in Nord Stream 1. As you said, there are two pipelines. North Stream 1 is a little bit older.

Nordstrom 2 is more recent, and both of them kind of run almost parallel to each other connecting Russia and Germany beneath the Baltic Sea. It was the biggest offshore pipeline system in the world, and it was one of these mega infrastructure projects, one of the kind of critical infrastructure projects in Europe. I read about the pressure drop, you know, didn't think much of it. I thought it was kind of brinkmanship from the Russians because they had shut down the flow of gas almost a month earlier

through the existing and operating pipeline, Nord Stream 1. And then the next day, the footage now iconic emerged, the Danish Navy sent out a jet fighters and helicopters, and then the Swedes did the same. And there was this kind of photographs and footage of this gigantic kind of vortexes in the middle of the ocean. And then it became clear that this was an enormous story because from the onset, it was obvious that someone had sabotaged the pipelines,

someone had blown them up. Just to talk about the scale of the thing, of the event itself, It was the largest ever recording man-made or human-made release of greenhouse gases into the atmosphere. It was absolutely ginormous. And the explosion was so powerful that in the first seconds, the kinetic energy released was equal to the terminal output of a large nuclear reactor. Wow. Wow. These gaziers at the top of, at the surface of the Baltic Sea went on for about a week.

There was so much gas in the pipeline that it took a week, a whole week for it to kind of empty out into the atmosphere. There were many scientific studies in leading journals following the event, and they found that around 14% of the Baltic Sea was saturated with gas, because the gas then became kind of fluid as it was spreading. and there was satellite footage from space, kind of observing this. It was a pretty large and very noticeable event. So it was quite an extraordinary event. When the first tremor occurred, Europe's early warning system for earthquakes spotted or kind of was triggered all the way up to the polar circles, almost 1,000 miles to the north in the polar circle of Sweden in the middle of the night.

And, you know, the initial assessment was that this was an earthquake with an epicenter on the bed of the Baltic Sea. Soon after seismologists realized this wasn't an earthquake, but it was probably a set of explosions because seismologists have experience in kind of distinguishing between the two. And that's how basically experts arrived at the conclusion that this was a sabotage very early on. I mean, in the first kind of hours of the event, a sabotage, but who did it? And that, I think, is what's remarkable about your book, because it's a stunning piece of investigative journalism, telling us a lot about how sabotage really works and about also investigations and how they try to unpick who was behind it. And it involves lots of fascinating characters, spies from different countries, including theories about who might have been behind it. Even the CIA, David, I think at one point was. I mean, you know, who'd have thought that they could be responsible. We would never destroy critical infrastructure, Gordon. Right? Completely out of character. Completely out of character.

Stuxnet, Nicaragua in the 80s. I mean, these are Cuba, Operation Mungus. We have no. No precedent. No track record on that. But it was described as the greatest act of sabotage on civilian infrastructure in history. So, you know, you'd think some of these intelligence agencies might be competing to see who could carry that out rather than denying it. But maybe we should go back and explain what it was because that is.

the crucial part of this story to understand it, isn't it? Is where did it come from? Why was Nord Stream being built? And to some extent, it was very controversial, wasn't it? And this is a lot to do, Boyan, with Germany, isn't it? And Germany's relationship with Russia. Absolutely. Germany and Western Europe, though.

So North Stream was conceived in 2004, 2005, during the reign of the then-Chancellor, who was a very close friend, with Vladimir Putin, the Russian president, who at the time was seen in Germany, certainly, elsewhere in Western Europe as well as a reformist leader, a man with whom you can do deals, you can cooperate in the energy sector in particular. Russia is the second biggest exporter of oil, one of the biggest exporters of natural gas, and Germany was extremely hungry for cheap energy.

It is the industrial locomotive of Europe. So North Stream 1 was conceived in the months before Schroeder was forced to call an early election and got booted out of office. So it was his brainchild, but he didn't actually get to build it at all. North Stream 1 and then Nord Stream 2 were built entirely during the time of Angela Merkel, the German chancellor who ruled Germany for around 16 years. So the idea behind Nord Stream was pretty simple. it was to circumvent Eastern Europe, the pesky little nations between Russia and Germany, because Russia always had a beef with these countries.

Ukraine is a point in question, but also obviously Poland, etc. These were the former satellites of the Soviet Union, the former satellites of the Kremlin. A lot of them had a pretty tense relationship with Moscow, and there were old pipelines, and there still are running through that region who always needed fixing because they were going to be. going back to Soviet times, and then obviously there were these geopolitical tensions between Russia and the transit countries. So the Germans decided to build a pipeline that would circumvent all that trouble and channeled

the gas straight from Russia, from the Siberian gas fields, through continental Russia, right into Germany. Now it's important to note North Stream 1 was a pan-European project. It's often now forgotten it. The Germans get blamed for everything eventually in Europe, you know, including at the World Cup. But it was a- We should say, we are recording this.

We're recording this the day after- Germany got knocked out in the world. Knocked out by Paraguay. It was the worst day for the Axis Powers since 1945. Both Germany and Japan go down on the same day in the World Cup. It was a day of morning in Germany and day of national shame. First they lost to Ecuador and then they lost to Paraguay. It was too much to handle.

But nonetheless, Northuanian War was a pan-European project. And if you look at the footage from the festive opening of the pipeline, you will see the French Prime Minister of the time, François Appillon. You will see Mark Routé, who is a familiar face. He was then the Prime Minister of the Nation of the Netherlands. And he was quite eager to expand the economic relationship with Vladimir Putin. Nowadays, he is the head of NATO and he has reinvented himself as a Russia hawk and hardliner.

And a Trump whisperer, but that's another story. And a Trump whisperer indeed. Yeah, he shows up in the Oval Office calls Trump Daddy and shows him very simple, very straightforward, kind of flip charts to convince him of his loyalty and the loyalty of Europe. So it was all smiles at that festive opening. I think it was 2011, if I'm not mistaken. and the pipeline was constructed as means of providing cheap energy to the industrial heartland of the old continent. In return, Putin got cash.

And right from the beginning, even before construction started, North Stream became extremely controversial. Every single American administration, starting from George W. Bush's all the way to the president administration, basically opposed North. more stream. Consecutive British governments were also quite negative. They were not as outspoken as some American presidents were, but the British politicians were always very, very cautious about what was going on because the sense was this is no simple commercial relationship that is being built, but rather it's a geopolitical bond in the making that will eventually make Western Europe reliant on Russian energy export.

On the other side, Chancellor Angela Merkel and pretty much everyone else in Germany and a lot of people in the Netherlands, France, etc., were actually quite keen. They rejected these arguments. They saw Vladimir Putin as a normal leader of a country that needs money, of a country that actually based its budget. At the time, I think a third of the revenues of the state budget of Russia came from the sale of hydrocarbons. So in their mind, it was a simple equation. We get the gas. He gets the money. We both need each other.

Why would there be a problem? And for Germany, this philosophy ran much deeper. There is a concept that became at some point known as change through trade, vandel do a handel. I was going to ask Gordon to pronounce it. Yeah. Because I understand that you speak German. and Russia, I believe.

But we frequently have attempted to speak German on this program with mixed results. Could you just say that again? What's the phrase? And I'll try it. Vandel do a handle. Vandel do handle. Okay, got it.

That's pretty good. That's pretty good, Gordon. It's pretty good. You've been working on your Germans. I've been working on it. But that basically means change Russia through trade, doesn't it? That's kind of, or bind it in. At the time, it means change

the Eastern Bloc because Germany in any war game Western war game and then later after the fall of the Iron Curtain we found out that the Soviet war games were exactly the same. In any scenario, Germany becomes the stage of a nuclear confrontation

in the Cold War when the NATO and the Warsaw Pact were aiming missiles at each other. So basically you want to avoid war by binding them close? Well, you want to avoid any kind of confrontation because within up to two weeks, Germany, up to Bonn, which was then the capital of Germany, becomes kind of scorched earth, radioactive pile of ash.

And so it's a little known that the first post-war chancellor of Germany, Conrad Adenauer, who took charge of the democratic rebirth of Germany from the ruins of Nazism, he joined NATO, I think it was 1955. And in the same year, within a very short space of time, he traveled to Moscow to the Kremlin, to sign a trade pact of sorts because it was a balancing act. You know, in one hand, they wanted to be embedded in the Western Alliance. On the other hand, they wanted to balance the kind of potential of conflict because they were the stage of that conflict.

So as much as Germany was faithful to the Western Alliance, and it was always, you know, harboring Western British troops, American troops to this very day. there are almost 50,000 American troops, not only troops, the personnel around the troops, logistics, et cetera, but it's almost 50,000 people that are tied to the American armed forces in Germany to this very day, including bases like Ramstein and so on. So Germany always had to kind of tiptoe that line because they were terrified of war with the Eastern Bloc.

So the concept of change to trade was meant to change that situation of tension and being kind of tiptoeing on the brink of nuclear holocaust and change your potential opponent into becoming slightly more flexible, slightly more amicable, slightly more democratic even. So that's the need for the pipeline. But it's interesting, isn't it? In terms of who was involved in it, I mean, it should have raised some suspicions, you'd have thought, because on the one hand, you've got Putin, an ex-KGB guy,

you know, who's running it from Moscow, but also the person involved in running Nord Stream was an ex-spy and ex-Sazzi agent, weren't they? I mean, so spies were all over this from the start. It was about more than just trade. Maybe you want to explain a little bit who was involved on the German side. Absolutely. I mean, you know, Putin is an operative in the Kremlin. He was KGB and then FSB and every single person that wields any kind of power in Russia,

pretty much every single person is someone he knows from back in the days in the KGB, right? Or their children, for that matter. I mean, his spokesperson, Dmitri Peskov, is the son of a KGB agent who served as a station chief in Turkey. And therefore, he speaks fluent Turkish because he went to school there. So that's the kind of personnel that Putin has at the core of the Kremlin power apparatus. And it was, interestingly enough, not different with North Stream. He deployed his best friend, possibly his best friend in the West, a man called Matthias Vannig. Matthias Vannig is a banker-turned energy executive.

This is his kind of post-Cold War career. His pre-Cold War career was that of a senior operative with the Stasi and also with the Foreign Intelligence Service of the Eastern German Republic. He was kind of a senior officer with both agents. And as soon as the wall came down, he used the old connections, his kind of linguistic skills to set up a business relationship with Russia that emerged from the Soviet Union. And that's how he met Vladimir Putin. Vladimir Putin was a deputy mayor at the time in San Petersburg. And the two men met, this is the official story, that there is a theory that they had met even before when they were both spooks. We don't know if that's true or not, but what is documented is that they met when Putin

was a senior official in San Petersburg. And Putin's wife needed medical aid because of a car crash, and Matthias Vani kind of pulled some strings and had her flown over to Germany where she was treated very successfully, and that kind of sealed the bond between the two men, and they became the best of friends. and it must have been an awkward moment for Chancellor Angela Merkel at the opening of the North Stream 1 festive opening of the pipeline because Matthias Varanig showed up there as the chief executive and it's interesting to, you know, she hails from Eastern Germany

and she has often spoken about how the Stasi, how she hated the Stasi and how the Stasi was omnipresent and so on. And so do have this former officer of the Stasi directly kind of working with her administration must have been must have been quite interesting you know varnig also is a very capable individual it must be said he's he's highly regarded in the energy sector as a very clever executive as a very inventive kind of businessman he was rubbing shoulders with the good and the grade for decades he maintains a winter residence on a spanish island in the mediterranean and he there owns a yacht called katherine the great which i i find quite quite a

using to know. Boyan, I do want to ask just to kind of set up a few of the facts around the pipeline. So Nord Stream 1 becomes or kind of becomes functional in 2012, I believe. What is the ownership structure of the pipeline? Because I think it's just important when we talk about, as we will soon, the actual sabotage, who actually owns the thing? What is the, what's the construct for the ownership of the pipeline? Well, it's a little bit different for both pipelines. So the earlier, which was slightly less controversial pipeline, North Stream 1, is a joint venture between Gazprom, the energy giant,

the state-controlled energy giant of Russia, and a string of big European companies, including Gasunier from the Netherlands, Inge from France, which is also state-controlled, and some German companies. So that's Nord Stream 1. North Stream 2 is a little bit different because that project was extremely controversial and it was conceived and built after Putin originally attacked Ukraine in 2014, after he annexed

the Crimean Peninsula. So despite all these transgressions, Merkel sort of went ahead and built a whole new pipeline. The ownership structure was similar in the beginning, but then President Trump then in his first term imposed very serious sanctions on the pipeline during the final stage of this construction and the Western companies were forced to kind of pull back from the management and reduced their exposure. So it then became fully controlled by Gazprom. So what's so significant about Nord Stream 2 is, as you said, it's being built even after 2014 when Putin has made his first invasion of Ukraine annex Crimea. The Germans are still going ahead with it. As we've heard, allies, including

the US, are against it and fear that it's going to create a dependency. And then we get to this point, the construction of Nord Stream 2, the actual construction is completed by September 2021, just before Angela Merkel is going to leave office, actually. But before it actually starts pumping any gas, something's going to happen, which is going to change everything. And that is Russia is going to invade Ukraine in February 2020, and that is going to lead to the dramatic events that will come to in terms of the sabotage. So let's maybe take a break there, and then when we come back, we'll start looking at who actually carried out this act of unprecedented sabotage and why.

Hey, this is Michael and Hannah from Gollhangers, The Rest is Science. This episode is brought to you by Cancer Research UK. What if your immune system could learn to recognize cancer cells? That's immunotherapy. One type is car T-cell therapy. T-cells are your body's watchmen, and doctors can now extract these and reprogram them to spot cancer. Car-T cells, they've started showing this real promise in treating cancers of the blood like leukemia, because unlike most cancers, blood cancer cells, they float around separately, and that makes it easier for car-t cells to seek them out and destroy them. And now, Cancer Research UK-funded scientists are designing car-tie cells that can tackle solid. tumors too, making them tougher so they can survive a more crowded and hostile cancer environment. Now, these approaches are experimental, but they do start to show where treatment might go next.

And over the past 50 years, Cancer Research UK's pioneering work has helped to double cancer survival in the UK. I mean, this shows you how far research can take us. For more information about Cancer Research UK, their research, breakthroughs and how you can support them, visit cancerresearchukuk.org forward slash rest is science. Right now, for a limited time, everyone's part of the Buick team, even you. Buick's Employee Pricing for You event is on now. Get a purchase credit of up to $3,168 on a 2026 Buick Envision. Surround yourself with signature Buick refinement from an available massaging driver's seat

to an expansive panoramic moonroof and a stunning ultra-wide 30-inch diagonal screen. Don't miss Buick's employee pricing for you event. Visit buick.com for more details. When West Jet first took flight in 1996, the vibes were a bit different. People thought denim on denim was peak fashion, inline skates were everywhere, and two out of three women rocked, the Rachel. While those things stayed in the 90s, one thing that hasn't is that fuzzy feeling you get when WestJet welcomes you on board. Here's to Westjetting since 96.

Travel back in time with us and actually travel with us at westjet.com slash 30 years. Well, welcome back. Left off with the completed Nord Stream 2 pipeline. ready to carry Russian gas. And it is September of 2022. That pipeline, as we talked about earlier, is about to explode. And boy, here I think, I mean, we come to the part of this story that, I mean, really does truthfully read very much like a spy thriller. And you bring us into the world of this this very interesting Ukrainian team that is going to wind up leading the sabotage effort. I'm wondering if you could, in particular, give us a sketch of two of the key people behind this.

And you call them the colonel and the general in the book. Don't use their real names. We should say none of the operatives are given their real names in the book. But who are the colonel and the general? And what role do they play in the sabotage operation? So the colonel was the absolute mastermind of the operation. He's a veteran of the special services of Ukraine. He was born during the time of the Soviet Union.

He was trained by Soviet-slash-Russian experts in espionage, counter-espionage, sabotage, special operations, etc. And then as years went by, he essentially turned against Russia. after 2014 and became one of the fiercest defenders of Ukrainian independence in the war against Russia. That's the colonel. The general is a friend of his and an ally. The general similarly was born in the Soviet Union. He was trained in the Soviet spirit of intelligence gathering, counterintelligence,

special operations, etc. And then he equally was in very senior roles across the several. intelligence services in Ukraine. So in an interesting twist, these people are now probably the world's most dangerous opponents of Russia. And they were in a way created by Vladimir Putin. They were once perhaps even pro-Russian.

When not pro-Russian, they were certainly ambivalent. They are fluent Russian speakers. They had no beef with Russia. They had lived with Russia. They had lived in the Russian information space. They were trained by Russian or Soviet experts. And then it was the Russian aggression that turned them into what they are now, you know, the most dangerous enemies. Yeah.

I always find that fascinating, because I've met quite a few Ukrainian spies, and they understand the Russians, I think, in the way a lot of Western spies and, you know, Western journalists and others might not. Because, you know, they fought alongside them, they trained with them, they understood them. But also that makes it feel particularly brutal because the antagonism is quite deep on both sides, you know, especially as we see what happens. What I find fascinating is the culture of what we're going to see of how this operation to target Nord Stream develops. Because it's kind of, it's not necessarily top down, is it? You have groups of people and groups of Ukrainian officers and spies who have, I mean, you put it as almost like a startup mentality. And you call them the startup because they're coming up with ideas, particularly as we get closer to the invasion in 2022, about what they could do to take the fight to the Russians. It's a different model, isn't it, of intelligence operations to some extent.

Oh, absolutely. It would be entirely alien to a British or American civil service. or intelligence official or army officer, you know, it's very fragmented, is very atomized, it's very self-driven, self-motivated. To this very day, I mean, in the early days of the full-scale invasion, there was kind of a period of chaos where it was basically every man for himself or every unit for themselves for a short while, for at least a month or two. But even now, you know, you got these now famous drone units.

and the best drone units in Ukraine, and consequently, I think the best in the world, perhaps, were all set up by private entrepreneurs who brought in private funding. So it wasn't even, I mean, officially they are part of the armed forces, but a lot of the tech was developed by kind of kids who got a bunch of money from oligarchs or business people or crowdfunding and then came up with these technologies that are now like at the forefront of innovation in warfare. And, you know, overarchingly, the army is sort of commanding them. But, you know, when you look at the day-to-day activity, quite often they decide what to do.

So that, you know, beyond the financial, I mean, that is partly because Ukraine is very poor and relies on external funding for running the war, partly because of the corruption, which is quite endemic and rampant. And partly because that kind of the political fragmentation, you know, There are a lot of tiny little fragments of a deep state-like structure, and they are loyal to different politicians or different oligars, et cetera, and it's not necessarily, you know, the state doesn't really work like the United States or Great Britain, let me put it that way. But I have to say, while researching for my book and while reporting from Ukraine since 2014,

I've noticed that that has served to their advantage. It makes them incredibly nimble. It makes them incredibly innovative. It makes them incredibly resilient. Like there is a, you know, you have an elite military unit. They don't expect the armed forces to take care of them. I mean, they're very angry with them. They don't get their weapons or ammunition or even like, you know, flag jackets or whatever. But then they kind of find a way to get them anyway.

You know, they crowd fund or they get it, they tap an oligarch, or, you know, they organize a campaign or they kind of reach out of funds from somewhere. So that's how it works. Incredible resilience and adaptivity, you know. And Boyan, you call this particular, I guess, I don't know if we could call it a clan, but this particular clan that is going to plot the destruction of Nordstream, the startup. Is that your codename for them, or do they actually call themselves the startup? That is what I came up with because when they started explaining who they are, how many, there's around 20 men involved. There are mainly officers above the rank of colonel.

Some of them are slightly more junior, but it's mainly colonels. There are a couple of generals. And they're also kind of state officials, businessmen. They're very prominent businessman inside there. There are kind of people who own various other businesses, lawyers, et cetera. So it's not just army or intelligence people. It's a whole ecosystem. So it's over two dozens of people. and they call themselves, or they describe themselves as a little deep state because they have been watching the news from the United States and all these kind of cultural wars around the deep state.

And they said, we were kind of a little deep state, you know. And then after I got acquainted with a lot of them and with the way they operate, they were initially loyal to the previous president. They were attached to some people from the business community who were providing funding, and they shifted from the special services to the armed forces. After this full-scale invasion,

they became embedded in an elite unit of the armed forces of Ukraine, and some of them are still there now. So they said, you know, we are this little deep state, and I told them, look, what are you telling me? That sounds more like a start-up. You're like, maybe you don't want to brand yourself that way. It's not going to resonate. It's not going to resonate as well.

Yeah, exactly. Exactly. And it's also much more order. the deep state than what you're doing. Like I say, this is a very much of different spirit, you know, a different mentality. And there are not unusual. There are groups like that, you know, there are groups like that across the spectrum in politics, in the economy, you know, it cuts across all walks of life.

You know, they have a couple of senior lawyers who take care of their legal challenges. They have a couple of senior minigarchs or even oligars who finance their endeavors when it's necessary or at least partly financed. their endeavours. So it's a kind of a nexus between the private sector and the military sort of industrial security complex. I mean, it is fascinating because it is basically a deep step. I mean, David, I can't imagine. Could you imagine in the UK if you suddenly had a kind of bunch of colonels and generals who are going like, let's just start up our own little club and, you know, backed maybe by some businessmen. And we're going to do our own sabotage operations, you know,

I mean, without any real, well, we'll come to it, the issue of political oversight. I mean, it's kind of wild and very, very different. That's why it's so hard, I think, for a lot of Western observers. I mean, including myself, I'm coming out of a very, you know, structured, bureaucratized organization. And I'm thinking about how covert action, for example, is authorized and planned and, you know, sort of thought through. And it's just, you know, this is not how it's done. There's not a few random people, you know, who were connected to different parts of the agency bureaucracy who decide because they get funding from a, you know, a tech billionaire to go out and blow something up. You know, it just- Don't give anyone any ideas, David. Despite the, despite the, I guess, conspiracy theories around the agency, that just doesn't, that just doesn't happen. But obviously, it does in the, in the Ukrainian services. I mean, Boyette, how do they, how do they focus? How do they come to focus on Nord Stream?

I mean, we've obviously set it up in the first half of this episode as a relatively juicy target for the Ukrainians because it's a Russian cash cow. But like, how do they think about the target set and get focused on Nord Stream? Well, this is the chronology. So at the onset of the full-scale invasion, 24th of February, 2022, they immediately form their own unit in the defense of Kiev. The early days of the defense of Kiev were quite chaotic because President Vladimir Zelensky was reluctant to believe the warnings that were coming out of Washington and London about imminent invasion. And I think days or weeks, a couple

of weeks before the full-scale invasion started, he received a visit by William Burns, the then head of the CIA in a last ditch attempt to convince him to start preparing for this invasion. You know, he didn't believe what Burns had told him. All the Burns kind of laid out the details of what is going to happen and how it is going to happen. And I think it really actually happened that way. And on the other side, the military leadership was receiving the same warnings partially from the CIA, but also from the armed forces of Britain and the United States. General Millie was the then counterpart of General Valerese-Zelluzni, who was the head of the Armed Forces of Ukraine. And he was telling him, look, you need to dig trenches around Kiev. You need to

do this and do that. You need to secure that small airport where the Russians are planning to send paratroopers and set up a command base, etc. And that wasn't done. And largely, I think Zaluzni did believe the warnings, but Zelensky kind of refused. And so when the invasion started, Kiev was basically defended in a very chaotic manner and these people just went to the armory of the military intelligence service with their private cars. They put on their uniforms, their official uniforms, they took out weapons, official weapons on the back of them being officers and then they just self-organized, which is very interesting. Of course, they were operating under the auspices of their service, but commands were not coming

from above. They were just self-motivated. And this includes the colonel in the general, yeah? is the, you took. Yes, absolutely. A four-star general was kind of firing rounds into into Russian tanks, which is also unheard of. I've never heard of that happening in any kind of Western system. It's hard to imagine that, you know, an American general will go to Afghanistan and kind of shoot at insurgents or whatever. So, but that happened. And, and after the war, after the Battle of Kiev was won, partly due to their efforts, they regrouped

in a private office because they stopped using their official headquarters for fears that the Russians had the blueprints of all the facilities and they thought they might kind of drone them or send missiles or whatever. So they felt they were safer to meet in covert headquarters. And they set up a list of high-value targets in what they called hybrid warfare against Russia. the priority was to hit, as they told them to hit the Russians where it hurts, to hit their revenues from the hydrocarbons. And this is something they were specialized in, you know, asymmetric warfare, hybrid warfare, economic warfare, assassinations behind enemy lines. So they dropped to the

list of almost a dozen targets, very high value targets. One of them was the Kerch Bridge that connects mainland Russia with occupied Crimea, which at the time was extremely strategic. And two other targets were North Stream, the pipeline, and we discussed, and, and, and, uh, Turkstream, which is the kind of North Stream equivalent in the South. It connects Turkey with Russia and then pumps gas up through the Balkans into the European Union. So they devised this plan to strike both pipelines, North Stream and Turkstream simultaneously. And they decided to, well, maybe I don't know how you want to handle the role of Western agencies and advice they received or not received.

Yeah, I think we'll come to that. Maybe one question just at this point is they're coming up with this plan, pretty ambitious plans striking these pipelines, including Nord Stream. Who's signing off on it? And maybe this is a difficult question to know all the answers to. But how far is it just the startup and how far is this someone else who's involved? So, like I said, the startup is at all time embedded in official service. Initially, it was first they started off as members of the SBU, which is the largest intelligence

service of Ukraine. It's perhaps comparable to the CIA, but not quite because it's an enormous machine. It has now, I think, around 55,000 employees. They are a kind of intelligence service, counterintelligence service. They have their own kind of anti-corruption unit. They have their own prisons. They have their own sort of prosecution in a way. They tap the phones and telecommunications of pretty much everyone in Ukraine at all times.

And then they segue it into the military intelligence service, which is much smaller, but also quite ferocious. It's called the H-U-R-H-R-H-R. It's, again, equivalent of the Russian and previously Soviet military intelligence agency called GUR in Russia. And then they became embedded in the armed forces. So when they were planning the attacks behind enemy lines on critical infrastructure that served Russian interests, they were doing that as part of this elite military unit, which was commanded by a very senior general, who then answered directly to Valeris Aluzni, the chief commander at the time of the armed forces of Ukraine. And currently, Ambassador to London, we should say.

Exactly. Ambassador at the Court of St. James, he was effectively fired by Zelensky because there was great tension between the two men. Rivalry. Yeah, a lot of people's things, Zillusione could end up president. Exactly, Zaluzni said to have presidential ambitions. He was extremely, extremely popular figure in Ukraine during the time he was in command. Ukraine was winning pretty much. And then when he got shafted, they, you know, their luck turned. So he remains quite popular, I think. He's not been necessarily tainted, but some of the more challenging things that had happened to the armed forces

in the last almost five years now. And Zalusinio also, interestingly, was very, I think, upset with Zelensky who refused to allow him to prepare for the invasion. This is something that is felt, this is a very strong emotional subject within the Secret Services

or parts of the secret services and part of the armed forces where people who are not that keen on Zelensky and his clique are very upset that he did not prepare for the full-scale invasion, right? So Zillusioni, I think, belongs to that camp, and he was literally not allowed. In secret, he performed some preparations, but he wasn't allowed to dig trenches

and throw divisions around and do all that sort of stuff. And that's the kind of origin of that animosity. But anyways, the illusioning green lighted the operation at the time, and he even asked them whether they had told the president's advisors about it, and they informed them that they hadn't. So he was quite happy because he did not believe that the presidential administration is reliable. He felt that if you tell them about something like this, they might leak it, and the Russians might even find out about it. Such was the animosity between the two camps that they didn't trust each other, even with basic stuff like that. Well, Boyan, I think maybe there with the operation Greenlit and the startup beginning its plans to target Nord Stream.

Let's end this episode. We come back next time. We're going to dig deeper into how our good friends at the CIA become involved in this dramatic plan to conduct the greatest act of sabotage on civilian infrastructure. and history and how dogged German investigators get at the truth behind who planted the bombs, which is a team of professional, not just professional spies, I guess, but also civilians. And it includes a glamour model among the diving team. But of course, Gordon, no need to wait for that episode.

You can get it right now, early access by join the declassified club. Go to the rest is classified.com. and sign up. We'll see you next time. See you next time. Hey y'all, it's Kelly Clarkson with Wayfair. Ever order furniture online and wonder, what if? Like, what if it doesn't hold up?

That sofa was four days old. You should have ordered from Wayfair. With Wayfair, there's no what if. Just style you love and quality you can trust. Visit Wayfair.ca. Wayfair, every style, every home.