The Rest Is Entertainment - Mushroom Murders: True Crime Wars

Episode Date: July 14, 2025

Why are mushrooms on the lips of every true crime podcaster? Has Google's new AI video software put the final nail in the TV and Film industry's coffin? Australia has been gripped by the case of Erin Pattinson, the recently convicted "Mushroom Killer". What does our obsession with murder and crime say about us as consumers? Richard and Marina discuss the true-crime-industrial complex and how that impacts the subjects of these often traumatising cases. The latest, and most impressive, AI filmaking tool 'Flow' by Google has taken the tech world by storm. Richard sets out his vision for a new media utopia, fuelled by the revolutionary app. Recommendations: Marina - K Pop Demon Hunters (Netflix) Richard - 24 Hours In Police Custody (Channel 4) / Can't Sell Must Sell (Channel 4) / Last Stop Larrimah (HBO) Both - Trainwreck: Poop Cruise (Netflix) The Rest Is Entertainment AAA Club: Become a member for exclusive bonus content, early access to our Q&A episodes, ad-free listening, access to our exclusive newsletter archive, discount book prices on selected titles with our partners at Coles, early ticket access to future live events, and our members’ chatroom on Discord. Just head to therestisentertainment.com to sign up, or start a free trial today on Apple Podcasts: apple.co/therestisentertainment. The Rest Is Entertainment is proudly presented by Sky. Sky is home to award-winning shows such as The White Lotus, Gangs of London and The Last of Us. Visit Sky.com to find out more. Requires relevant Sky TV and third party subscription(s). Broadband recommended min speed: 30 mbps. 18+. UK, CI, IoM only. For more Goalhanger Podcasts, head to www.goalhanger.com Assistant Producer: Aaliyah Akude Video Editor: Kieron Leslie, Charlie Rodwell, Adam Thornton, Harry Swan Producer: Joey McCarthy Senior Producer: Neil Fearn Head of Content: Tom Whiter Exec Producers: Tony Pastor + Jack Davenport Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

This episode is brought to you by our good friends at Sky who've made something rather nice. It's called Sky Glass Air, a 4k TV, sleek, sharp and from just £6 a month, which let's be honest, is less than most people spend each morning chasing the perfect oat milk latte. It's the kind of picture that makes your living room feel like it's had a tasteful upgrade. Every shadow, every sword fight, every suspicious glance exactly as the director intended. It also uses Dolby Audio and automatically adjusts picture and sound based on what and where you're watching. No tinkering, no faff, just clever telly that adapts to you. And it's got Sky built in plus all your favourite apps in one place, ready when you are, which

means less time hunting, more time watching. Skyglass Air brings the cinema to you, only this time you decide when the show starts. To find out more or to get yours from just £6 a month, head to Sky.com. No Frills delivers. Get groceries delivered to your door from No Frills with PC Express. Shop online and get $15 in PC Optimum Points on your first five orders. Shop now at NoFrails.ca. 5 orders. Shop now at NoFrills.ca. Listen closely. That's not just paint rolling on a wall. It's artistry.

A master painter carefully applying Benjamin Moore Regal Select Egg Shell with deathly executed strokes. The roller lightly cradled in his hands, applying just the right amount of paint. It's like hearing poetry in motion. Benjamin Moore, See the Love. Hello and welcome to this episode of The Rest Is Entertainment with me, Marina Hyde. And me, Richard Osmond. Hello. This one's Hello Marina. Hello Richard, how are you? Yeah, I'm all right it's still too hot. Yeah. Come on man. It's not built for this. I like it. Yeah. It's not city weather. Yeah, is this entertainment news? I don't know. But it is, it is hot. What are we talking about this week? I have some thoughts on Google Veo, Google Flow, this new AI filmmaking tool. We've obviously moved from the era of the AI image to AI video.

And I'd like you to tell you what that means. I will say just as a headline, I will say this, the revolution has already happened. I will say that we're going to talk it through. I've come to a number of conclusions and I'd love your take on them. And I'd love, I would love our listeners take on them as well. It's a brave new world. It is. We'll have to be brave about it. We are also going to talk about documentaries and podcasts and all the sort of stuff that comes out of true crime off the back of the mushroom poisoner case, which sort of set the world on fire.

There's the sort of rush for content. Anytime there's a, there's a whack of the Christie or a mushroom poisoner, the kind of 15 different people all within pitch projects at the same time. Yeah. Should we start with Google V O, which as you say, it's you remember when chat GPT sort of came out of the blocks 18 months ago and everyone went, Oh, this changes sort of writing forever. Well, that's happened. I think this week, that has happened with video for a long time. Now people have shown me all sorts of short film videos that they've used for sort of pitch documents and things like that. And it's always been sort of great, but has limitations.

I could see how it's used this week. Somebody showed me something that he put together in a matter of hours. It's like a three minute animation, perfectly synced, beautifully acted, looked amazing, looked consistent. And it was absolutely extraordinary. And the reason he's able to do it this week is because Google VO issued an update. And this sounds nerdy, but stay with me because this is where the revolution begins. You can do eight seconds at a time on these video things.

But it now has an update where you can take a screen grab of the end of what you are doing and that can go straight into your next thing. So you can now sync sound, you can sync dialogue across clips and you can also make your characters look and sound completely consistent, which was always the biggest issue with these things. So you can now build and build and build. So you've got a big strong narrative. So I saw this thing and I thought, well, okay, that is the end of part of entertainment history and the beginning of part of entertainment history. Can I talk you through some of the conclusions I've come to and we can discuss them because I'm still not entirely sure what I think about it. We should say that the video tool is called Flow, which is this thing built on top.

Yes, that's sort of it. Yeah, like an official name for it. And at the moment, it costs you 200 quid a month to use it. Is that more or less expensive than making television in a traditional fashion, Richard? These days, it's about the same 200 pound a month. So what do we think is going to happen? Well, firstly, in the short term, short term content, you know, TikTok ads, trailers, anything like that, I will say would be majority AI assisted by 2027. I mean, really almost immediately. There is absolutely nothing standing in the way now of any ad agency, anyone making it a little 10 second, eight second clip.

They've just completely taken over. I've, I've seen lots of, because I was sort of looking for them. Cause I knew we were going to talk about them. I've seen so many fake videos created with this that have got honestly in 24 hours, like 150 million hits. They're absolutely massive. There's a lot. I did actually notice there was one genre, which is fat grandmas. Fat grandma collapses a glass bridge. I don't know what that says about our culture. I don't think it's great. But there was a whole sort of trend of those things, but there were so many of them. The proliferation is extraordinary.

Yes, it's the ease with which you can now do this. You can literally sit in your bedroom at home and do it. And of course it means that the first thing we're gonna see is an awful lot of slop. And the first reaction is gonna be, oh my God, AI is taking over and AI just does all the work. And my positive spin on that would be firstly, there will be a huge amount of AI slop, which is just fed into a machine. But secondly,

anything that's not AI made immediately now has a premium. I mean, that's it, you know, you go, Oh, this is actually made by human beings. So that suddenly means something. But secondly, the people I know who are the most excited about VO and all of these different, by the way, this will be superseded so quickly by other video creation AI software. The people who are most excited are creatives, are people who sit down with a blank piece of paper and a pen. And the key thing about any creative is you want the least path of resistance between you having an idea and

people seeing that idea. That's the thing you want to wake up in the morning, have a great idea and you get excited. You go, I want everyone to see this. Now you can do that in a matter of minutes. And I think it's going to unlock an incredible wave of creativity, incredible democratization of creativity. You know, when I remember when I was 22, 23 and you were your creativity was I'm going to think of a TV idea and then we're going to go in and pitch it and then we're going to sell it and 18 months later, it's going to be on, you know, now I just going to do it, I'm going to do it this morning at home. That is genuine creative ideas driven people thinking I now have No gatekeeper between me and the public I can have an idea this morning and the public can see it that afternoon And it's going to create some unbelievably great content and it's going to create some stars of you know Writing and acting and all those types of things So I think that around about 2027 you're going to start seeing huge stars emerge from this who would not have had a way of emerging without it because they're not able to

go into a studio, they're not able to afford a traditional way of making media. So they can write a script. If you're an actor, you and four friends can sit around, you can act a script, and it can be out in front of the public that afternoon. What if you bother having humans? But that's, I think, is going to be the premium. It is going to create opportunities for very funny, very smart people to spread things very, very quickly is what I think. Okay. Would you disagree with that?

No, I wouldn't disagree with that, but I think it's interesting that you think that there would even be the idea that they would even feel the need to use actual humans. I mean, some of the stuff I've been seeing is, I mean, actually they're incredibly weird, you know, they've kind of created all these standup comics who are talking about, you know, the, the, the, the humans. I mean, some of the stuff I've been seeing is, I mean, actually they're incredibly weird. You know, they've kind of created all these standup comics who are talking about, um, being prompts of

just being the subject of prompts. I saw, um, quite anguished scenes of people, not real people at all, begging for you not to write the prompt for the next awful thing that's going to happen to them, you know, in horror. So you could, you, you, this, they could, you can easily see, you could easily come up with a sort of, um, 90 minute horror movie and it can happen to unreal people or even though they, they seemed completely ready. There was no longer that kind of uncanny

thing. If the script was good, I would never notice. Which by the way is the key. If the prompts are good and the script is good, that's the key. Maybe some writers will still work. That's the, see, and that's the problem. So all the way, is the key. If the prompts are good and the script is good, that's the key. Maybe some writers will still work. That's the problem. So all the way through I'm going to try and balance the fact we will get to job losses and where it leaves people. So point two I would say is it does, it invents a whole new industry for creative people, which is writers first you can get their work seen much more quickly than they could have

done previously. I mean, much more quickly. There will be huge jobs and it sounds like an awful job, but actually when you start looking at these things for prompt creators, this is why I try and look at it as a TV producer. I think what was it that I was doing all of that time? And by and large it was prompt creating. That's what I was doing. I think that's right. It's just a different word for it. You were asking the right questions. Exactly that. What happens next? What would happen if? How would it look like if, right? That's what you're doing all the way through. The only difference being I then wait, wait 18 months. Whereas now you go, Oh, I'll see what happens if. So

that's if I was 22, I think there are an awful lot of jobs out there for prompt creators, because AI is nothing. AI isn't anything. AI is like a camera, right? A camera isn't anything until you put a camera operator or a photographer behind it. A camera is not anything. It's a piece of technology. AI is not anything. This clip I saw this week created by a friend of mine. It was created by a series of very, very, very funny smart prompts. Funny smart prompts that would not have been on television for a year if it hadn't been for this technology. So that is a huge thing. AI used by brilliant people is going to create brilliant

things. So put aside the slop, we will deal with all of that nonsense, but there will be amazing works of art created with this that would not have been created without it. If you take other jobs, so take the job of an editor. And you know And people are saying this can be hard to be an editor in the world of AI. But there's two bits to being an editor. And one bit of being an editor is you do an assembly, which you take every single bit of footage that's been filmed in a TV studio

or a movie or something like that. And your job is to go through it painstakingly and assemble it together in the correct order and find particular shots and put them where they're supposed to be. Now that is a job that can be done by AI, right? That job can be done by AI in the same way that when I started out, editors were cutting bits of tape with, you know, razor blades and, you know, suddenly a computer was able to do that bit for them.

Which is why you suddenly got so many montages. Yes, exactly. Doing a montage at the end of one of them or something used to be like the most painstaking job and then it was like, oh, let's have three a day. Yeah. That's so easy montages. Yes, exactly. Doing a montage at the end of one of them or something used to be like the most painstaking job. And then it was like, Oh, let's have three a day. Yeah, so easy. Yeah, get out the elbow CD. We will sort this out. But the real job of an editor is anyone who works in the industry knows is to have an eye and have heart, right? Because anyone can assemble those things in the right order if they're

told to. But an editor is somebody if you've got a great editor, you'll walk in and they will all the way through, they'll be thinking, yeah, but what is the audience thinking at this moment? And if this shot was a second longer, would they be thinking differently? And actually, if I had that reaction shot, would it change the story? And so editors, editing is an enormously, a large part of it is grunt work, which is the stuff that can be done by AI. But the great bit about being a great editor or a great grader or anyone in post-production is the heart and the eye. And that is something that AI is never, ever, ever going to have. It doesn't matter how great AI gets, it's never going to have it.

You'll always need that humanity to it. And most of the, I've spoke to a few AI production houses, that's a thing now. And they're all employing editors now, all of them, because they understand that AI will's a thing now. And they're all they're all employing editors now. All of them because they understand that AI will do a certain thing but you first you need a great producer or writer to prompt it and then you need great post production to make it amazing. So there are jobs that are new jobs that are going to be made within this world and there's not an edit suite now that's not incorporating AI into what it is that that they do.

So new jobs are going to be created. Old jobs are going to be lost. We know that. I would say one piece of good news, they're probably not going to be lost in the next five years because there are enough people who are over 45 in our country to keep a fairly healthy television industry. But I would say below that, any entry level people, you better get on board with what AI does in the same way that you know, you you better get on board with what AI does in the same way that

you know, you had to get on board with with digital media, you know, 25 30 years ago, you just packed it, you can't you can't be a holdout anymore. It can't be done. But you know, I do think the traditional media industry has got a while left in it. And one of the reasons, by the way, I think this slightly extends the traditional media industry is there will be a huge cohort. There'll be people listening now who are like, I do not want anything to do with AI. I want human-made things. And that, I suspect, adds a good five, 10 years onto our traditional media industry, just the backlash against what is going, what we're about to see. Sure. I do think we're in a situation at the moment, in the entertainment industry, particularly. I've been feeling this more and more where you haven't really got, particularly in somewhere

like Hollywood, you don't really have like a middle class as an industry middle class anymore. You've got lots and lots of people at the bottom who are kind of badly paid and actually are struggling to find work and suddenly struggling to find work with anything like the consistency that they did before. And then you've got the people at the top who are still to some extent like that, the Cartian characters run over the cliff, but it's still earning a huge amount of money. Yes, agreed.

And then obviously in societies where the middle class gets completely screwed over, they tend to have like revolutions. I'm not sure that's the case with industries and I don't think having thought of, you know, I'm afraid people just become sort of obsolete. Looking at this stuff, it's completely different and honestly stuff that you could have laughed at two months ago, three months ago. You suddenly are like, this is ridiculous. A project I'm working on, a project I'm developing is, it's a comedy and there isn't much money for comedy, but the trouble is the location of this comedy is very very specific and you can't really do it anywhere else

To some extent people have always cheated things like that And of course you build sets and they shot carry on follow that camel in Canberra sands But there's a degree to which you can't funny enough I've been out went on a walk with my friend Stephen Frears He was you know in his 80s has made lots of brilliant films is continuing to make amazing films And I said what can I do about this? Is there a way of like using original footage from this location? And he said, Oh, no, you've just got to find someone who's brilliant at matching and people used to do that. And even John Ford used to do it in West. It's just

about where you make the cut and how you do all of that. Or for that complicated sort of very, very expensive location stuff. I mean, I was watching people, I don't know where it was, it looked like a war zone, banging down a door, shooting, a sort of SWAT team going in. None of this was real, but it was so completely real that it wasn't like, honestly, three months ago, I would have said, yeah, I mean, I've just got this weird vibe that it's not real.

I didn't, I'm afraid to say, you'd have to convince me that it wasn't. It is now real, and that's the horns of the dilemma right there, and that one decision you've got to make, that it was. It is now real and that's the horns of the dilemma right there and that one decision you've got to make because if you're 22 you know what you do, which is of course, you know, not even going to question it. I just fake the location. Well, I want my thing to be made and you can't make it without the location.

So am I going to, you know, that already I feel. Yeah, but I imagine you will push back a little and we'll see if we can get it made. Because this stuff is still going to get made and premium stuff is still going to get made and human stuff is still going to get made. But if I could say one thing about all of us, it is going to start to be a struggle to win that argument. Now it already is. Look what they're spending on comedies now compared to what they were before. And you know, you're having very, very different, by the way, brilliant pieces,

but they are of a type because they're small and they're not expensive. It's creatively limiting. It's not sometimes an excessive is the mother of invention, as we've discussed many times in that particular genre, which is almost people love to watch, but it's almost dying. Um, and everything is becoming so much cheaper in that to the point where lots of things just couldn't be made.

Yeah. And lots of things are about to be able to be made. Well, exactly. And that's where we are. Listen, I feel very, very uncomfortable talking about it. So do I. Because it takes the heart out of an industry that I love and I've worked in for my whole life. And on one side, I absolutely get the exciting creative side of it, but on the other side, you do think what does this mean for

an industry? Here's a concrete example. It's another of my points that very, very soon, see the first deal has been done now, actors are going to start licensing themselves and writers are going to start licensing their products in a way that makes things not the Wild West. Take Severance, rightance right now severance are not doing this but imagine you create a severance now and you've just had this big hit and it's sort of all set in a fairly you know white environment and you've got a small cast of actors say every single one of those actors has signed a contract that allows an ai use of their image within the world of severance not outside of that but within the world of severance, not outside of that, but within the world of Severance.

And say you say to the writers, we'd love you to write on it, the showrunner has signed this thing, and he needs all the work of Severance to be inside this gated wall of Severance AI. Now, if you have all of those things, and that's a fairly easy thing to do, for the rest of time,

Severance fans can create their own episodes of severance. Okay. They've got Adam Scott's likeness. They've got his voice. They have all the scripts. They have every single set that they could want. They can write scripts that will within six hours can create a five minute piece of severance content, which can then go straight back to the severance people, which can be shown to severance fandoms, which if it's monetizable,

severance can make money out of, but it allows people to constantly remix their favorite television programs and allows those programs to keep some of the money from that. In the same way that video games have these incredible mods that kind of change the games, that I think will definitely happen. And in the same way that we've said, Delebs, that dead celebrities have allowed their lives to use, but when I saw that just a couple of weeks ago, my beloved Vin Diesel was announcing the final Fast film, and it's gonna be back in Los Angeles,

and it's gonna have Paul Walker in it. So then how do you think they're doing that? And it's definitely not with like, they obviously have permission from the family and all that, but they're not going to be using bits of found footage from the other things and passing them together. He's going to be in it in some way. Well, that's it.

If you're Doctor Who or something like that, and Doctor Who is slightly harder because so many people are still on residuals and things like that, but there are groups of people who aren't. If you're Doctor Who and you can get a core cast of people, all of whom would agree to be in the new Doctor Who AI universe, then Doctor Who can run forever with, you know, we get fan fiction now all the time, which is hugely popular. Now you get fan videos, you get fan episodes, you know, that is definitely, definitely coming. If you have something that's already a big piece of IP, if you have something that's

already got a big fandom, then that will now live forever through various people remixing what it is that you have done. I think that definitively is something that is going to happen. And as a site adjunct to that, I think we're going to find ourselves in a world where everything that was created before the last couple of weeks suddenly has a premium, because people know that it was created without AI. So, if you've got any movie, any music, any TV program that was from pre-AI era, that is going to be a holy relic like Beethoven or Mozart or something like that. that is going to be a holy relic like Beethoven or Mozart or something like that that is going to be the canon and those are the things that will constantly return to time

And time and time again and do our own new versions of it And there'll be versions of friends in 200 years time that someone you know has Remixed and it's on some streaming service somewhere in the same way that we would go to the Royal Albert Hall to watch You know Mozart being played in a slightly different way by slightly different people. It's going to be a huge boom time if you are already a famous actor. That is for sure. Yeah.

Because, you know, you will not have to leave your house if you choose to get on board with this. And you can choose to get on board with it in two ways, of course, which is someone offers you a load of money or some great director or some young buck who's 23 who sends you a video and you just go, well, that's incredible, says, I need your likeness. And you go, in the same way I might take a chance with an indie filmmaker 20 years ago. Okay, kid, let's see what you can do with that. And that is going to grow and grow and grow, I think. And what will you do all day? If you're the actor, will you just be like Mark Wahlberg and like pray and work out and have showers?

Yeah, yeah, you go to the gym. But also they can really, you know, like Mark Wahlberg and let himself go. He can finally go, do you know what? I put so much work into making myself look like that for like a two month period and now I can be like that forever and ever and ever. People will go nuts in the age of authenticity if that happens and they see some paparazzi pictures of Mark Wahlberg being sort of beached in Hawaii somewhere, and then they're like, what? I'm so sorry, I've just paid for him to be in daddy's home for, and I just don't accept that he looks

like this, or Mel Gibson. But you know, it's, films are weird. The stuff in films doesn't really happen, you know, those actors are not, I mean, they're just human beings pretending to be someone. You know, it's the whole thing is an artifice. It has been for the whole, you know, those actors are not, I mean, they're just human beings pretending to be someone, you know, it's the whole thing is, is an artifice. It has been for the whole, you know, the whole point about the craft of movies and TV is to make you believe something that isn't real is real. That's the, that's always been the job to one settling for people. No, I think it'll be unsettling for people for about two years and then it won't be.

And then it will become used to it. Well, cause it, and also it will just, it just won't look any different. So the whole TV schedule just be AI stuff. I think TV shows it is different because TV show all this is that's something that I will get onto, which is this premium of human made content. I don't think we can stop the slop. Okay. I don't think in the world of advertising, I don't think in the world of tick tock, we, I think the landslide is already coming down the hill. We just, you know, you have to get out of the way. In TV, I think there is still a way to, and this is what we have to do to

harness this premium on, on, on human made stuff. And if you're the BBC or ITV or channel four, it's beholden on them. I think, I think they have to use AI in interesting ways. They do. There's no point having a blanket bound on it. You know, they've talked about having kind of tutors that stay with kids from the kind of birth through to 18 that kind of learn how they learn and, you know, and that's, that's a useful use of AI, something that would be

unimaginably expensive to do in a, in a, in a human way. But I do think they, they probably have to put an awful lot in place about programs being human made. If you're going to fake a drone shot on a daytime show that you would not be able to afford otherwise, maybe you can do that. Stop the drone shots. You know my feed about them anyway. Yeah, I do.

Just stop the drone shots. Yeah, stop every single American documentary starting with a water tower with the name of the town on it. I think that there has to be sort of a gold standard of human made programming. And I think that the big channels have something to do with that. I also think if you're on Netflix or Amazon, it's beholden on you to do that as well, because I know that you're purely commercial organizations, but you got big by backing creators and you got big by backing camera operators and lighting people and sound people.

You know, that's how you made all of your money and you've got to give some of that back now. You have got to say there is a premium here. Everyone's going to experiment, everyone's going to do interesting things, but you have to support the industry, you know, because the industry supported you and without it, there's none of your money. So I think that everyone has to get together

and find a way of keeping as many people in jobs as possible. One of the things about all of these AI things is, you know, they say, oh, it's amazing you can do all these different camera shots and this, that, or the other. Very specifically about camera operators. I think about someone who I work with called Nigel Saunders, right? So Nigel has worked in the BBC for ever and ever and ever, right? And a lot of the shots you see on TV, he's one of the first people ever to do them, right? They're problem solvers. Again, camera operating is not a non-creative job. It is not pointing a camera.

It is absolutely fixing problems, working at different ways to shoot things. Uh, and if I was an AI company, those are the people that I would be looking to employ right now as consultants, people who've been there, done it all. He worked with the worst technology with the best technology. I tell you now that Nigel in his head will have 50 shots that he thinks, imagine the technology where I could do that. You know, any camera operator, any sound guy, anyone, they're all thinking about new technology all the time. And what does that mean that I can do? So if I was an AI company, you think, great, Nigel, come in and talk to us about the ways that you could use a camera if there

were absolutely no physical restrictions, right? And that's a guy who'd be able to tell you and there's loads of people in the TV industry. You've got all that experience. And if I worked in AI, I'd be bringing them in on a fat wage as consultants to tell me exactly how to light something, exactly how something should sound and just all the ideas these people have for a bit you would, then you wouldn't need them anymore. Yeah. But if somebody get paid an absolute load, then, you know, and also that creates a new job, which is, you know, AI camera operator, which is a that's the thing. I'm really trying to be hopeful that I'm trying to find ways

through it where we protect as many jobs as possible, and we protect as much creativity as possible. So I think it's beholden on the on all of our broadcasters to say that there's a premium on human-made product. That is why it's very, very important that traditional broadcast media has some sort of system where we keep studios open, we keep people employed, we keep a premium on human-made products, because it's not like how do we fight back? The fight has already been had. It's how do we regrow? how do we fight back? It's the fight has already been had.

It's how do we regrow? How do we retrench? But certainly if I was Lisa and Andy listening to this and I'd worry slightly less about some of the smaller things that you're worrying about and just go this is an entire industry that needs looking after and that there are ways that we can legislate

to make this happen. Well, we know the BBC are thinking about this enormously and they are comparing the sort of tens of billions that's being put in by the US companies into this. And if the government's talking about tiny, tiny amounts, a billion or less to put into developing a kind of AIs that they might be able to regulate and that they might be able to use the powers for good, then they're just not even in the same universe as any of this. And I'm sorry this has been unfocused and I hope people take it in the spirit in which

it's intended, which is, you know, I do, I think we all have to come to terms with it very quickly and I'd be fascinated. I know so many people who listen to this work in lots of different areas of the industry, but some of which we wouldn't have even thought about in this. So anything you do have any, any, any notes you do have or ideas you do have, it'd be absolutely lovely to hear them. But I definitively from this week, I think the game has changed. We're in an entirely new era of content creation. I do think some of that is going to be amazing, but we do need to protect as much of what we've got as we possibly can. I completely agree with you. It's changed so much.

I mean, I remember when Sora first came out, everyone's like, Oh, look at this. I mean, that looks just like something anti-delivian now. It's ridiculous. And you look at these things and you think, I just can't tell that that's not real. Yeah. And again, I think my absolute key is if I was 22, this would be the thing that I'd be using and I would be insane not to, and we have to come to terms with that. It also means of course, live experiences will be a huge, I mean, that's, they've

been growing and growing and growing, but the kind of stuff that you can't fake, you know, going to see Oasis live is a much bigger deal than Oasis releasing a new album. I mean, much, much, much bigger and you know, experiential things and you know, the growth of podcasts and all this stuff, stuff that is so obviously human, it cannot be faked. You know, that, that is a huge growth area. Well, I've said to you before, I think podcasts are massively vulnerable to AI.

And anyone listening at home, do, if you have an insight into your particular side of the industry and things where it might be useful that we haven't thought of and particularly areas where it is definitively not going to be useful that we haven't thought of as well, it'd be fascinating to start that conversation. Yes. The email is therestofentertainmentat at goalhanger.com and we always look forward to hearing from you. Yeah, and a real human being will read your emails. And that's what we've got five years left of that, maybe. Yeah. Shall we now go to a break? Oh, yeah. I'm shattered. This episode is brought to you by Sky Cinema, the ultimate destination for the latest blockbusters.

Speaking of blockbusters, let's talk about something that defied gravity, bewitched critics and fans alike, and has now landed on Sky Cinema. What could it be? Fast and Furious? No, of course we are talking about Wicked. Wicked is here, the beloved Broadway musical reimagined for big screen in all its glittering green-tinged glory. It's the untold story of Elphaba and Glinda long before Dorothy dropped in uninvited and started flattening the locals. A tale of power, perception and pointy hats starring Cynthia Erivo and Ariana Grande. With breathtaking visuals, iconic songs and a surprisingly sharp take on identity and friendship, it is part spectacle, part social commentary, but fully spellbinding.

Two Oscars, a Golden Globe critically adored and wardrobe choices that earn their place in cinema history. If you want to relive the magic, now's your chance to get swept back to Oz from the comfort of your sofa. Upgrade to Sky Cinema today to enjoy Wicked, more of the latest blockbusters than anywhere else, and Paramount Plus included at no extra cost. So, search Sky Cinema to find out more. It won't take long to tell you Neutral's ingredients. Vodka, soda, natural flavours. So, what should we talk about? No sugar added? Neutral. Refreshingly simple. Hello listeners of The Rest Is Entertainment. It's John Robbins here, and if you enjoy

the way Marina and Richard peel back the layers of TV, music and pop culture, then I think you'll love my podcast, How Do You Cope? Each week I speak to brilliant people, actors, writers, musicians, about the challenges they've faced, from grief and trauma to public humiliation, which I believe Marina and Richard just call Wednesday. I've spoken to the likes of comedian Sophie Willan, musician Justin Hawkins and political powerhouse Alistair Campbell and in one of the most affecting episodes we've recorded so far I spoke to Amanda Knox who spent four years in jail before she was exonerated. So if you're after something that pairs perfectly with your cultural deep dives

give How Do You Cope a listen for honest conversations with humour and heart. Search and follow How Do You Cope wherever you listen to podcasts. Welcome back, everyone. Should we spread a bit of joy with the tale of poison mushrooms? Well, yes. I mean, the mushroom poisoner, Erin Patterson, who was found guilty in Australia for poisoning various members of her extended family. And to me, it's very interesting because it was, I don't know if you know about this, but it was held in a sort of tiny courtroom in rural Australia, and yet it grabbed everybody's attention. In Australia, the podcast Top Ten had three network back podcasts in it all about the mushroom poisonings. I think even The Guardian did one as well. So there were basically four. There was

Mushroom Case Daily, that was the ABC one. There was the Mushroom Murder Trial, there was the Mushroom Cook. Already, there's been a documentary that they've already had ready to go channel nine in Australia murder by mushroom They've announced a scripted drama but for the ABC the Australian Broadcasting Corporation Toxic and by the way, we haven't even got on to Netflix Which as we know is the global TV channel and people will be watching this in many, many iterations on Netflix. And to go back and unpick it, lots of aspects of this and how it sort of blew up were very interesting to me because obviously it is a sort of, obviously it's a sensational story. Give us the bare bones of the story.

Right. Erin Patterson, who I have to say was a true crime obsessive herself, she invited family members, well, extended family members, members of her husband's family, really, who's estranged from including him, to a meal at her house in rural Victoria in 2023. And she served a beef Wellington, which was laced with death cap mushrooms. She had a different colour plate to everyone else. And despite turning up at the hospital saying, oh, I'm feeling really bad, they found nothing wrong with it. Well, it was a cover story. Yeah. I do know what my work that out. My copper's nose. Yeah, you're nothing as far as a police officer. But she felt really bad as well. So there's

no way she did it. Yeah. She is a three of three of the relatives died. One only barely survived. And so she has been now found guilty of murdering her parents in law, Don and Gail Patterson, Gail's sister, Heather Wilkinson, and attempting to murder Gail, Heather's husband, who was in Wilkinson. And only, as I say, her husband only managed to survive, I think, because he decided not to attend the meal.

And it just sort of, it's one of those things that sort of caught fire. And I suppose the story is fascinating and you can't quite believe it all. I think what's interesting is how you see news organizations have all pivoted to this. So while things like this are happening, what we used to call a newspaper, a news outlet, whatever,

is already doing ongoing podcasts about this in the same way that they might've done about the Lucy Lettby trial in the UK or whatever. And then they are, so they're kind of constantly repackaging essentially the same stuff. Their journalists are already being picked up as talking heads for future documentaries. But what's interesting to me is you're getting much, much closer to the actual event in terms of, in the old days days it would take a long, you know, it would have been years before someone did a documentary about this. You've just seen the

court case that would have been regarded as enough. Yeah, and 10 years later you might go, would you remember that mushroom thing? Yeah, and someone would do a deep dive in it all. It would have been really interesting. Okay. Now that courtroom at the end, there were so many people from podcasts, from, you know, television, effectively streaming executives, working, there were going to be so many competing documentaries about this. The first time people really realized this was happening, um, was in, with the Fyre Festival ones. Now remember the Fyre Festival, it was like going to be this kind of gorgeous influencer party in a, on a tropical island. Anyway, it all went wrong. They had to be in sort of disaster tents and they had really bad food and polystyrene things and there weren't any influences there and it was a disaster.

Anyway, by 2019, which is quite incredibly long compared to what we'd expect now, that's ancient, both Netflix and Hulu had one. It's quite interesting already in that we can start to see some of the things we're thinking, they each had ethical issues with each other. One of them said, well, you've paid Billy McFarlane, he's obviously a criminal, he was the guy who sort of was essentially the figurehead of it. You've paid him and he's obviously a criminal or whatever. Another one, sorry, the, you know, swearing alert, the festival's original marketing firm were called Fuck Jerry. Yeah, that was their name. And they'd taken a lot of footage, you know, to run art, to do the adverts for it, stuff that they could put all over Instagram.

So they had all that footage. So that'd be all AI these days. Yeah, exactly. So they, they thought we want to get access to this, which they partnered with them and therefore consequently in that documentary, I can't remember which of the two it was, they got an easier ride. So what's quite interesting is that already people are becoming media, much more media literate and they start thinking about the whole process of documentary making

as opposed to just like sitting back and allowing it all to wash over you. So people are starting to think of like choices, methodology and things like that. I again, I've said this before, but in the wake of the Waggatha Christie court case, Rebecca Vardy and Colleen Rooney, four people, four different production companies asked me if I would write a sort of, you know, I guess a comedy drama script about it. That's just fiction. There were obviously lots of documentaries. There's such a race to get this stuff out here. So news, so news has become IP. News has become IP and it's become IP really quickly. And here's what I think has now happened.

You know, like I just said to you, fire festival was supposed to be in 2017 and they got the stuff out in 2019. Okay. It's reduced so dramatically in recent years. This is roughly where I would put it now podcast daily during the trial, whatever it is, the news event, TV special docudrama, a week or a month afterwards, that's called sort of docu journalism, that's a new whole strand, the streaming series, the proper, you know, the sort of big Netflix,

say one that, I don't know, that, that, that murder guy in, in the US or whoever it is, one of those cases, three months, 12 months is now the outside, isn't it? You would be, I mean, how long do you think it's going to take Netflix to get their mushroom went out? Not as long as 12 months. Season two as well of, you know, what happens when it becomes a media sensation. So Monster Family, so that's the series too.

Well, scripted drama is one to three years, I would say. I mean, so what you're doing is in order to make these things, you've got to, you may got to make it during the trial. You're just in that way that we talked about a little bit earlier about how easy it is to do montages and things like that. Now in the trial on people's downtime, you're

interviewing journalists as talking heads, you're building the framework for either verdict. If she'd got off, which I suppose she could have, you're building the case, then it becomes something like, I can't believe she got away with it, or you're building the framework for, tell me what happened. Now there's lots of different things about this. First of all, I do wonder, and I was thinking about this, sorry,

when we were talking just earlier, what are we actually learning from any of this? We're stuck in this weird thing where we're essentially just rehashing things that happened 10 minutes ago. I don't think we're learning anything at all. I don't think we're going in any more depth. You couldn't go into any more depth than you did during the trial really. Um, and I think that dystopian fictions, they're always set sort of 10 minutes into the future. A lot of our culture is set 10 minutes into the past now.

There's so many things that we're just sort of, we can't move on in some weird way. We are sort of continually rehashing the very, very recent present. And I don't think really learning anything. Well, it's like when you're a kid at school, which is, you know, if you've got maths after lunch, you're talking about, do you remember the thing that's a hamlet at lunch? Do you remember when you said that to me? Do you remember what I said that? Is that, isn't it just non-stop? It is. It's completely odd. And we're not really, and you're just sort of revisiting the incredibly recent past. Okay. But what I really want to talk about as well is the whole ethical issues, which I think

have come into much sharper focus about this purely because there are so many of these and they're so splashy. When that mushroom thing comes out, believe me, it's going to be in the Netflix top 10, even though we've just been through it. And there's a woman, her name is Margie Ratliff. She is a participant in the documentary, The Staircase. Her mother, and she had two step siblings, was found dead at the bottom of the staircase in North Carolina.

And her father, her stepfather in fact, but the other children's father, was charged with murder. Now, he invited, this is ages ago, he invited a French documentary crew, thinking of the more people who see this, you know, and the subsequent documentary was shown in those kind of previous like real documentary spaces, you know, like Canal Plus, BBC Four, but it was a sort of cult thing because it was fascinating and these children who'd just been through this awful tragedy were filmed all the time. Anyway, but a lot of people thought that changed documentary making, particularly documentary making around

crime. I mean this is before things like serial and all of those things which were podcasts but they thought that was really interesting, you could really delve deep in anywhere and they had all this footage. Now Netflix bought that in 2018 now of course that becomes a whole, it becomes a huge thing. And then by that point, he was almost getting out. And so they then added two extra episodes. It's resold again, it's streamed in 200 countries. HBO made a dramatized version with Colin Firth and she was played by Sophie Turner. I mean, I should say she's never had a penny for any of this, but she feels her life has been completely commodified, completely. So she's actually started something called the

Documentary Participants Empowerment Alliance because she wrote this incredible article, which I strongly recommend you read in Time magazine saying, I was sitting on a plane and I, you know, just because I was in the mood to chat, I talked to the person next to me and said, you know, what are you going to watch? She was on a long haul flight or whatever. And this woman said to Margie, oh yeah, no, I love true crime. Her hackles are already up because she's thinking so many people come up to her in the street already

and say, so do you think your father did it? I mean, it's horrific. And she says, I love that one about staircase, you know, about that man who got away with murder, the person sitting next to her on the plane. And she's sitting there thinking, this is so, she does say, I feel very sorry for the children involved in all of this, this woman just doesn't recognise, I feel sorry for all the children about that and she said, yeah no, I didn't really think about that and it's so interesting

because so many people, people just like us, people who listen to podcasts, whoever, think very carefully I think these days about, you know, their fashion choices and the ethics of their food choices, but the ethics of sort of content choices are something we don't really think about hardly at all in lots of ways. And anyway, she teamed up some people in a documentary maker, including one who used to work at the FT and thought, this is so weird because, you know, in a traditional news media setting, you've got your relationship with your sources. And if they're part and even if they're participants in the story you know there's a whole way of dealing with it you've got an editor whereas documentaries are sort of the wild west and

anyone can do anything and it depends who's brought up who and people can say sort of what they like about you especially in the US. Well that's just to give people an idea of the process if people are making these sorts of documentaries, there's a number of ways of doing it. So ITN, for example, has a very, very fast turnaround documentary unit now and it does amazing things. But their job anyway is to take all footage of everything. So they've got a lot of footage that they're taking in their daily life, and they've got all sorts of interviews with people, exclusive things, and they can put that together and put it out as a documentary.

Or you can, as you say, you can be in the courts and say the mushroom case, well, there are relatives who you could say, can we buy your story? And you can tell the story via that person. Or there might be the police officer who was involved and maybe he's retired and you say, can we buy your story? And you can tell the story via the police officer. So, so long as you've got your angle in, which is I already have all the footage anyway, or I bought the story and the rights to someone who has some footage no one's ever seen before, or the police officer who has a view on it that we've

never heard before, you can do that, or you can do a very, very super cheap. Here are some talking heads. Here are some shots we just got from the news media, put them together. do you remember and then she said this and then she did that which has no insight But you can do all four of those things and people do do all four of those things and yeah that the first thing They're thinking is not how do I be respectful to the people in here by the way lots of these documentary makers are Some aren't but they are thinking what's my angle do I have the footage? Do I have the participants that I can turn this around in two weeks and set it?

Absolutely. And the other thing that's changed, obviously, in a digital era is that lots of times people would make documentaries that I suppose you might have originally categorized as true crime. But I think how hard it was to find those things. Now, everything's just clicking away and the algorithm will continue to serve you long ago library stuff as long as you like.

So you can never really escape this and it's interesting. So Margu participated in this documentary, which I recommend watching as well. It's called Subject. And there's a really quite compelling moment where she sits in front of the camera and she says, I know what I am signing up for by being in this documentary and says what is, yeah, it's a lot what you're signing up for. And people obviously have no idea. And some of the people who've been subject to these documentaries, there's another one in this particular documentary. It was the siblings who were sort of kept captive for 14 years and the so-called wolf pack. And one of those

children who is now an adult who, I mean, again, whose life has been completely modified in this way and will be completely thrown up by the algorithm to anyone who's interested in this sort of stuff forever, you can never really escape it, also participates and says the same thing. And I do think that the ease with it is being able to be done, the sheer scale of it and the sheer number of it, the proliferation and the way in which they constantly get served back to people, that you have to push for much better ethical frameworks for these things now, because Erin Paterson has two children and they won't necessarily understand what they're signing up for and it's not at all

clear. Well, there's that there's an absolute blurring of the lines between and you can see how all these things come about. You know, we have drama, then we have documentary, then we have drama documentary, then we have things like the Kardashians, which are documentary, but clearly bits of it are scripted. So you start to think that anyone involved in any sort of area of the public eye and a criminal trial is an area of the public eye, are fair game or are part of, you know, just some chess pieces that can be moved around.

And no one's thinking that consciously, by the way, but subconsciously, I think we're thinking that we're very used to seeing everyone's private lives on screen and you forget that if you're a Kardashian you choose to be in that story. If you are the daughter of a murderer it is not a story you chose to be part of. No, and you own, you know, you're the Kardashians, you own everything, you control everything, you have final edits, say you have all of this stuff, which you don't, if you're one of those people, and just the thought of people just coming up to her for her whole life in the street saying, so did your father do it? It's sort of unimaginable. And yet it will be visited upon participants in this case, and survivors and all of these things and it is a real Wild West area of programming at the moment because there is just so

much of it. There's so much of it, you've got Paramount, there's series after series of cold case things, some with reconstructions, some you're talking to the victims or families of victims and there's so much, my favourite is American Detective with Joe Tender. Um, because that's it is possible to do these things in a, um, respectful way. And it's possible to do these things with the involvement of families. And it's possible to tell interesting stories that tell us about our world and, and teach us something about our world. That are ethically produced.

That are ethically produced. about our world. That are ethically produced. That are ethically produced, but it is easier and probably cheaper to do it in a different way. And by the way, when you see cases like that, case of Nicola Burley who went into the river and just they had to literally put a cordon around the town because so many citizen journalists of some type or another came and were making content. And as you say, none of those people are thinking of the ethical issues at all. All they're thinking is I'm cleverer than everyone else. Yeah. And there is no framework whatsoever and victims, survivors, people who are just

tangentially related are constantly being sort of falling victim to this wild west. And there has never been more of this stuff. It is such a, like it's just the tiger economy, true crime of everything in broadcast. People can't watch enough of it. And I really think that there would have to be much, much more stringent sort of, I'd love to see that we will stringent frameworks around it. Cause you could see with this, that this tiny town, which is already tiny, as you can see, it couldn't support the structures, couldn't support the massive

interest and they certainly won't be any sort of off after event care for any of the people involved in that. Yeah. If I can listen again, it seems a very weird place to be recommending things, but we spoken before about last stop Laramie, the story of an Australian murder. It's possible to make great art with great humanity about tragic stories. It really, really is. And Last Stop Laramie is certainly that. Yeah, it's very, very difficult. And it's the ease of, again, it's the ease of which

these things can be made that in the old days was completely different. It was really hard to make documentaries and also they were pushed into, as I say, no disrespect to BBC4, which I love, or Canal Plus or whatever, but it's really different for being number one on the global Netflix chart for a week. I love Canal Plus. There, I've said it. But it is obviously different and I think that something, it's becoming more and more obvious. And as I said earlier, people are becoming more literate to the choices that are made by these documentaries and whilst people may sort of carry on now not

really thinking about the ethics of where their content is coming from sometime there will be a reckoning at some point and it could be a horrid one yeah that said I did enjoy train wreck poop cruise on on Netflix about the about the cruise where the toilets stop working and it suddenly becomes Lord of the Flies very, very quickly. Well, everyone in that is so enjoying talking about it. Everyone in that is loving it. That's standing around a little cocktail table going, and then there's three girls. Then you never guess what happened. Oh my God, they loved it. And then they opened the

bar. Yeah. There was quite low stakes to some extent. I would not have liked to have been involved in that, but it's not really the same. No one died on the poop cruise. When they came up with the title of poop cruise, they must have gone, okay, I think we've got a hot one here. I think that's us about done for the day. Do you have any recommendations before we go?

I most certainly do. I finally cave to my children and I watched K-pop Demon Hunters, which is really good. I don't know if you've seen this, it's really torn up the charts, the film charts on Netflix. I've seen the title many times and been intrigued. Okay, but actually, yeah, me too. Like, oh my God. I watched it. It's really funny.

The music's really cool. It's very, very knowing. It reminds me so much. It's made by Sony actually. And it's, it reminds me so much of those, uh, Spider-verse, the Spider-verse trilogy of things. It's really good. Uh, I, I recommend K-pop Demon with, with, with kids or just, or yeah, it's good, but you don't, you don't have to watch it with kids. It's, but it's. It's completely geared towards, you know, tween and teenager kids. But it's very knowing and it is funny and it's very well done. And the story is good.

I'm going to combine our two stories this week and give another shout out for human endeavor in television. Just 24 hours in police custody is back on channel four. And it only comes up very rarely because we've spoken before about you have to wait for the end of trials before they can have these, the two that have currently come out one of the one of the I mean, listen, is very trigger warning. But, you know, take a look at what it is. But it's so brilliantly made, made by humans and made with humanity. And it is just you know, it's been going for so many years now, 20,000 police custody, but every time you kind of think, well, surely they haven't come

up with another story. And there's one about a lodger who lives with an older woman that you just think, God, every time you watch this, there's like a different aspect of humanity is shown. So anyway, it's brilliantly made. But I'm also on channel four. Stuart and Scarlett Douglas have done Can't Sell Must Sell, which is just which is a house renovation show people who literally can't sell their house, you know, it's been on the market for ages and they do it up and I you know, I love a home makeover show. Those are the types of shows that are not going to die. They're really, really not. There's got there's such a market for those things for the next 1020 years. There's such a market for that mid-level stuff

So we must support it must keep watching those things because it's it's just you know, it's a industry I'm incredibly proud of and there's something about human shows made by humans that will never ever ever die Thank you. I really need to watch that now Now we have a bonus, speaking of shows that were all made by humans, we have a bonus episode this week about sitcoms. Yes, we are going to, with you, the listeners, work out the greatest British sitcom of all time. We're doing it in decades. This week we are talking about the sitcoms from the 70s, 80s, 90s and noughties, giving you the runners and riders for you to vote on. Just little behind the scenes stories

about the greatest British sitcoms of all time. There's some gripping polling for more in common I must say as well. So that, if you want to join the club, it's therestisentertainment.com. Otherwise we will see you as always for our questions and answers edition on Thursday. On Thursday, see you everyone.

Bye. This episode was brought to you by our good friends at Sky. Sky is home to the shows everyone is talking about and plenty you haven't discovered yet. But what really sets it apart is how it makes your whole entertainment setup feel smarter, slicker, better. With the new Skyglass TV you don't even need the remote. Just say the name of a show, genre or actor and Sky finds it instantly across all your apps and channels, no scrolling or forgetting where you saw it last. Even from across the room, voice control works. So, whether you're making tea, loading the dishwasher or the remote's vanished again, just say,

hello Sky, play poker face or whatever you fancy and it's already on by the time you sit down. Or add it to your playlist. Maybe succession for power plays and poisonous one-liners or the white lotus for something sun soaked, sharp and unsettling. Either way, it'll be there, ready when you are. Skyglass doesn't just make things easier, it makes finding your next entertainment favourite feel effortless. Visit sky.com today. Hello listeners of The Rest Is Entertainment. It's John Robbins here, and if you enjoy the way Marina and Richard peel back the layers of TV, music and pop culture, then I think

you'll love my podcast, How Do You Cope? Each week I speak to brilliant people, actors, writers, musicians about the challenges they've faced, from grief and trauma to public humiliation, which I believe Marina and Richard just call Wednesday. I've spoken to the likes of comedian Sophie Willan, musician Justin Hawkins and political powerhouse Alistair Campbell, and in one of the most affecting episodes we've recorded so far I spoke to Amanda Knox, who spent four years in jail before she was exonerated. So, if you're after something that pairs perfectly with your cultural deep dives, give How Do You Cope a listen for honest conversations with humour and heart.

Search and follow How Do You Cope wherever you listen to podcasts.