The Rest Is History - 504. The French Revolution: War to the Death (Part 2)

Episode Date: October 16, 2024

“You have shaken off the yoke of your despots, but surely this was not to bend the knee before a foreign tyrant…” It’s January 1792, and one of the largest factions in revolutionary France, the Gironde, is calling for war against Austria. The French people’s hatred of Marie Antoinette has always fuelled suspicion of the Austrians, and at the same time, there has been constant, treacherous correspondence between the French royal family and their European cousins. And so, when one of the prominent members of the Gironde calls to arms in early 1792, little does he realise that the war he wants will haunt Europe for the next 25 years, totally redrawing its map, and costing millions of lives… Join Tom and Dominic in part two of our second season of the French Revolution, as they dive into the first of many wars to come between Revolutionary France and its European rivals. _______ Looking for all of our episodes on the French Revolution? Check out The Rest Is History’s French Revolution playlist https://open.spotify.com/playlist/37i9dQZF1DX6W9e1zgsgaG _______ LIVE SHOWS *The Rest Is History LIVE in the U.S.A.* If you live in the States, we've got some great news: Tom and Dominic will be performing throughout America in November, with shows in San Francisco, L.A., Chicago, Philadelphia, Washington D.C., Boston and New York. *The Rest Is History LIVE at the Royal Albert Hall* Tom and Dominic, accompanied by a live orchestra, take a deep dive into the lives and times of two of history’s greatest composers: Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart and Ludwig van Beethoven. Tickets on sale now at TheRestIsHistory.com _______ Twitter: @TheRestHistory @holland_tom @dcsandbrook Producer: Theo Young-Smith Assistant Producer: Anouska Lewis Editor: Ross Buchanan Executive Producers: Jack Davenport + Tony Pastor Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Thank you for listening to The Rest is History. For weekly bonus episodes, ad-free listening, early access to series and membership of our much-loved chat community, go to therestishistory.com and join the club. That is the restishistory.com. The audacious satellites of despotism, carrying fifteen centuries of pride and barbarism in their feudal souls, are now demanding in every land and from every throne the golden soldiers to reconquer the sceptre of France. You have shaken off the yoke of your despots, but surely this was not to bend the knee before a foreign tyrant. So now, led by the most sublime passions, beneath the trickler flag that you

gloriously planted on the ruins of the Bastille, follow the course of your great destiny that beckons you on to the punishment of tyrants. Union et courage. Glory awaits you. Two arms, two arms. The honor and the salvation of the nation demand it. Two arms, two arms." So that, Dominicic was exceptionally rousing rhetoric, I think brilliantly ventriloquized by me, par moi. And it was Pierre Venio who was addressing the Legislative Assembly in Paris on the 3rd of January 1792. And what he was doing there was saying, let's have a crack at the Austrians.

He was indeed. So Venio was a brilliant speaker. Well, as listeners will be able to tell from that rendition. I mean, that was very rousing, Tom. If I were a Frenchman, I'd be on my feet. Should we go and invade Vienna? Right, exactly. So he was thought of as the best orator of the entire French revolution. The Cicero of the Republic. Yeah. We haven't mentioned him before, but he was one of the leading lights in a new

faction, which will appear in today's episode. Waves of factions, aren't they? Yeah, we've got so many factions. So they were called the Girondins and they're really the party of war. And this is going to be a transformative moment in this whole story and will change the course of the revolution completely, but not merely a transformative moment for the French Revolution. This is a transformative moment in world history because this is the beginning of a war that they all think, everybody thinks will be home by Christmas. And actually it lasts for almost 25 years off and on, totally

redraws the map of Europe and costs millions of lives. It's not just Europe actually, it's a genuine world war. So this is the road to Waterloo. It is the road to Waterloo. Yes. That's how we should brand this series. The road to Waterloo. And nobody in the assembly that day listening to Vennio speak has the slightest semblance of an inkling of what is coming.

Because what people often think about the First World War, that people went to war with great enthusiasm and hurrah and let's do it, this is actually true of this, isn't it? There's great enthusiasm for it. Far more so. I mean, there's none of the foreboding that you have in the roads to the First World War. There is none of the sense of apocalyptic doom. Well, there is a sense of apocalypse, I think. A sense that good and evil will be engaged in a titanic confrontation and that the forces of good will triumph. And that is what is animating Berniou's language. I mean, he thinks of himself as a Cicero, but he is also absolutely part of that kind of apocalyptic Christian tradition.

You're not wrong, Tom. You're never wrong when you bring out the, being part of a Christian continuity. Yeah, but it's the fusion of the classical and the Christian, I think, does so much to explain what makes this revolutionary tradition so instantaneously potent. Yeah, I think you're right. Talk about it being new and it is, the sense of novelty is part of the excitement, but it's a novelty that people have been conditioned to accept. So how do we get there?

How do we get to war? Well, remember where we ended last time. We ended on the 30th of September 1791. The constitution has been agreed. The National Assembly has met for the last time and gone home. And Louis has promised to knuckle down as a constitutional monarch, a promise that as everybody listening to these podcasts will know, he fully intends to break. Meanwhile, the great revolutionary club, the Jacobin club has split into two. The moderates have all walked out and set up their Foyant club under Antoine Barnard and his friends, who appear to be the people in charge. And that has left the Jacobemin as a kind of rump club and its big star is Maximilien Robespierre. So let's pick up straight

away the new assembly voted for by sort of taxpayers, property owners meets for the first time at the beginning of October. So a 742 members and they're all new people because the old people have said they're not going to stand for the new assembly. So these people are even younger than their predecessors, even less experienced and more likely to not come from Paris but to come from small towns. Only a tiny fraction of them live in Paris. So they are outsiders. That's a bit of an obstacle when

you're in the middle of this capital seething with tension. Another big handicap for them, they've only been elected by a tiny, tiny turnout. So there were sort of strict property thresholds for who could vote and the turnout anyway was terrible. So in some areas it was only 10%, 11% in Paris it was only 14%. So actually they have not got much of a mandate, you would say, not much of a popular mandate. So in they go and straight away the factionalism, you were kind of chuckling when I said we were about to introduce the Girondins as a new faction, the factionalism starts straight away. They arrange themselves very self-consciously. The radicals on the left, the more conservative on the right. This is obviously the French Revolution

the first time this has ever happened. About four out of ten of them, historians think, are Foyon, moderates who back Barnav and Co. Another four out of five are in the middle. People call them the plain because they sit in the bottom of their assembly and they can be swayed one way or the other. That leaves about two out of ten maximum who are radicals, members of the jacquemint club. The big difference is not one of background and social class and that stuff. It's actually kind of temperament and ideology. The Foyon think basically anarchy is very dangerous. The streets are dangerous. Moderation is all.

And the Jacquemin think the common people are the incarnations of virtue. Poor people have wisdom and decency that richer people don't have. And we should embolden them and enfranchise them as much as possible. So they're populists. And this is a reversal of the traditional way of understanding things, isn't it? That it is wealth and education that brings you the expertise that enables you to run a government. And the Robespierre position, the radical Jacobin position, is that it's precisely the lack of that makes the poor more honest in a kind of Rousseauist manner.

They look into their souls and what is written on their souls is worth a million times what people have learned in salons and so on. So they've obviously got this from Rousseau and Rousseau obviously got it from a bloke in the Middle East in around about the turn of the reign of the Emperor Augustus. Didn't he, Tom? Is that correct? The last should be first and the first should be last and all that kind of business? Clearly, there are elements of that. So, there's this idealistic, I mean, they're all idealistic, by the way, in different ways. I mean, you could be a moderate or a radical, they're all pretty idealistic. But from the

moment they sit down, they're facing massive, massive challenges. I mean, France is in an absolute mess. Let's not underestimate that in the autumn of 1791. Half of the clergy are effectively in open defiance of the civil authorities because they have refused to swear this oath to the civil constitution of the clergy. Mass eruptions in the countryside, peasants refusing to pay their feudal dues to their seigneur and saying this is completely legitimate and attacking Chateau and destroying documents and things. Hard currency in France by this point has virtually disappeared and the French economy is afloat with paper money, which a lot of people find deeply suspicious and dodgy. I don't trust paper notes and they're called assignat and they are plummeting in value. So that means prices are going up. And classically traditions like that foster conspiracy theories, don't they? It's all

being manipulated by speculators, speculators and orders. So that's not helpful either. Not helpful at all. And in Paris, there was a growing sense of militancy and disorder because people can't afford to buy bread and people are angry and people have been kind of radicalised by the events of the last couple of years. And they have a sense that basically this new Legislative Assembly is meeting, but who gives a hoot about them? They don't really represent me anyway. So there's all that.

Now, on top of that, there is something else we've mentioned last time, which is that when the Legislative Assembly meets, for the first time the news has actually arrived in France that the slaves on Saint-Domingue have launched a massive uprising in the richest colony empire this is a huge challenge for France for its economy but also as you said Tom what do you do if you've committed yourself to the rights of man, but at the same time, you believe in the rights of property and the importance of order. And you also believe in preserving the French economy.

So ideals and self-interest are rubbing up against each other very violently. And the other thing now, we love a ticking time bomb on the rest of history. And this is a ticking time bomb in human form. It's Marie Antoinette and Louis XVI who were determined to overthrow the revolution at the very first opportunity. I remember when I was doing this for A-level and one of the great essay questions was always, why didn't France settle down and have a constitutional monarchy like Britain? Why did the constitutional monarchy fail? I mean, if you're giving a really simple one sentence answer, the king never wanted it to work and would never have made it work.

But just because you said in the previous episode that if he hadn't accepted this constitution, then they would have chucked him aside and they would have brought in his younger son, the Dov Fahim is about six. Why didn't they do that anyway? It would have made everything so much easier. Then that raises the problem of what do you do with him? You probably have to kill him. I suppose so. Yeah, I suppose.

I guess you have to kill him because he will probably try to escape the country and raise an army to recapture his throne. I would guess. I mean, it's an interesting question. Had they done that, what would they have done with him then? Constant house arrest. That's presumably what you'd have to do with him. But you're absolutely right, Tom. Put him in an iron mask. In an iron mask. Yeah, why not? Perfect. No, so Louis and Marie Antoinette are just buying time, hoping that either the Revolution will fall apart or that the Austrians will intervene to save them. So in the story of that autumn

is all these problems getting worse, much greater and greater rural disorder and the slave rebellion on Saint-Domingue getting further and further out of control. Thousands of people being killed, hundreds of plantations burned, the rebels are on their way to controlling almost half of the colony. And this is a massive threat to the French economy. And people start to see it in France, you know, I can't get coffee, I can't get sugar, the prices are going higher and higher and all of this kind of thing. So the moderate cause is actually, even though they appear to be the largest group, their position is eroding almost day by day and the Jacobin, the radical position is getting stronger. Now previously the radical spig star had been

Robespierre. We talked about him last time, but actually Robespierre, as soon as the National Assembly breaks up, he actually goes home. He goes back to Arras and there he's welcomed as a great hero, but he's away from Paris so he's out of the action. And so this whole business will be an absolute gift to a kind of Netflix. Cause they could use so many different actors and different character actors to come on at various points and seize the limelight. Cause now we have a new star, a really interesting character. He's a very admirable man, I think.

I said Rob Spier reminded me of you, but I mean, I think there's a lot of Tom Holland in this guy. Oh, well, thanks. I take that as a compliment. Well, we'll see whether it is a compliment. He's Jacques-Pierre Brisseau. I mean, not on the whole warmongering stuff. Yeah. So he's the son of a pastry cook from Chartres. He was a law clerk and he'd grown up in quite a lot of poverty because I think his parents had died or something like that. I can't remember.

Anyway, he'd been a law clerk and they became a hack writer, which turned out vampire novels and books on the Roman Republic. So he was writing travel books, but he also wrote a lot of pornography, like Stanley Baldwin actually. Yeah. And the Marquis de Sade of course. Yeah. So he traveled, Briceau in England and Switzerland and Belgium. He went to the US, as you'll be doing this autumn, Tom. He went to Boston. He wrote a three volume book about the new American Republic. He loved it. He said it was brilliant.

But he's also a very keen abolitionist. Massive. So this is something that he picks up in London and then I think on his travels. Yeah. Massive. He's very, very committed to the abolition of slavery. He set up a society, an international society called the Society of the Friends of the Blacks. That was what it was called. And this also, as we will see in our next episode, this also influences objection to capital punishment, which he's also against. He's a social justice activist.

I mean, that's what he is. He's a travelling writer and activist. And he threw himself into the revolution. He wasn't elected as a deputy. He was a journalist and a kind of activist behind the scenes. He has moved steadily leftward. So remember the petition from the last episode of the Chandon Massacre, it was Briceau who wrote the text of that petition. And finally, now he's been, it was Briso who wrote the text of that petition. And finally now he's been elected to the Legislative Assembly for the Department of the Sen. And he is a great star. Everybody, not everybody, but lots of people think he's brilliant. He loves a literary party, doesn't he?

He does. That kind of thing, a salon. He's very self-confident. Even his friends said if you had one flaw, he was excessively confident. Now, Tom, you and I suffer from quite low self-esteem. We do. So we wouldn't get on with him at all. Although better help has been necessary with that, fortunately. Yeah, that's great news. And in fact, a problem for him is that he's so cosmopolitan and well

traveled and self-assured that he perhaps looks down on more provincial people like Robespierre and underestimates them. And he also doesn't really have a massive common touch. So he, as you said, he loves a literary party. So the people he hangs around with at these parties are this group, the Girondins. He always likes clever, confident people. So the guy we began with, Verniot, the orator, he's one of these people. They all have come from Bordeaux, the department of the Gironde, which is why they're called the Girondins.

And they love going to this woman's literary salon twice a week. She has dinner in her apartment. She's called Manon Rolon, Madame Rolon. Her husband Rolon, Madame Roulon. Her husband Roulon, who's much older than she is, is one of their kind of cronies. So he's a factory inspector, isn't he? Yeah, he's a bit boring really. But he's devoted to her, as we will see.

I mean, he loves her literally to death. And they go to these parties and they have tremendously witty conversay. It's basically like the London review of books or the Guardian books pages or something. I was thinking it was like the rest of history, Afghanistan. Of course it is, that's what it's like. It's like the meetings of our elite club members. I can't believe I didn't see that opportunity. And these guys and Madame Roulon, they absolutely grasp I think the mood of the moment in 1791 in a way that the foil do not. Because what they

see is that political life has radically changed and that a climate of fear and suspicion has now become completely ingrained. So we mentioned the historian Timothy Tackett before. He says, basically across the political spectrum, there is now a widespread belief in a monolithic grand conspiracy, where internal conspirators, there is now a widespread belief in a monolithic grand conspiracy, where internal conspirators, external conspirators, conspirators in the court are all working together, and somebody is pulling the strings. And by and large, people think that the person pulling the strings or the people are Marie Antoinette and the Austrian emperor, and that they're controlling the whole thing. Now, that is the kind of open

goal of French politics and the foyon can't play on that. Can you play on an open goal? I'm mixing my metaphors horrendously, but they can't exploit that because they're so close to the king. They're thrown in their lot with him. But Briceau, who is really a Republican, he can play on it and he's determined to do it. And he has a very cunning strategy, doesn't he? It's a very cunning strategy. He will undermine the monarchy. He'll force the king to expose himself and he's got the perfect issue. And this is the issue of these people, the emigres. So we promised we'd talk about them. So in my imagination of this kind of HBO series,

we talk about them. So in my imagination of this kind of HBO series, this is the moment when it cuts from the kind of the pouring rain of Paris to the sun-kissed rhino. I was thinking more a salon again with very, very kind of Shinse cups of chocolate, that kind of thing. Really? Footman. Yeah, because you've got cups of chocolate, whereas in my mind, This is where I put in the gratuitous nudity. Oh really? I'd have emigre princes cavorting with Rhineland wenches. That's what I would do. Is that what they were getting up to? No, but it's you've got to allow yourself a

little bit of dramatic license, I think, for it to be a hit series. I think Jacobin radicals are engaging in free love aren't they? No, they're talking about Russo in a very pinched way. That's what I think they're doing. But in a Netflix series. I guess so, maybe. Anyway, the exiles. So the first exile really to leave was Louis's incredibly reactionary younger brother, Charles, the Count of Artois. He had gone off. Straight away, hadn't he? I mean, I think immediately after the Bastille. Immediately after the Bastille. And a few people had joined him and there'd been a

steady kind of trickle. And by 1791, he has installed himself in Koblenz, which is in the electorate of Trier in the Rhineland. So for all that people may say, gosh, the revolutionary is terrible people with their conspiracy theories, he is totally open. I'm going to run a conspiracy to overthrow the revolution. And I'm going to massacre large numbers of people. Yeah. So his aim is, and he said this, that if he gets back to Paris, he will subject Paris to the shadow of a terror.

Yeah. I mean, he's absolutely up front about it. Fair play to him. He has been joined by 1791 by his brother Louis Stanislas, Count of Provence, both Charles and Louis Stanislas, by the way, who eventually become King of France and their relative, the Proust Condé. So they're there. Also there is a guy that people may remember from the early days of season one, Charles-Alexandre de Calon. So Calon, the finance minister who was also a stockbroker and everybody hated because he'd made himself so rich. He's there and he's basically

their prime minister and he has opened talks with the European powers, you know, is there some way that we can get you to finance a big invasion of France? Well, he'd gone straight to London, hadn't he? Initially, when he goes into exile and then he kind of ends up back in the lowland. Exactly. So the question is, you know, there they all are, just over the border. Now, are they a serious threat? And the short answer is, no, they're not at all. Because actually, even though 10,000 people have left, a lot of those are women and children,

they only have an army of about 4,000 people. I mean, that is obviously pitiful. That's nowhere near what you need to launch a terror in the streets of Paris. But Dominic, one thing to bear in mind, and this is important considering what's going to come, the officer class in the army, either officers have gone to join this court in exile, or they are thinking about it. And so that suggests for people in the know about military affairs in Paris, that actually France's military resources are not all they could be.

Oh yeah, because I mean we know that people don't necessarily know this themselves, but Tom you and I know that the don't necessarily know this themselves, but Tom you and I know that the French army has descended into total chaos. People are disobeying their officers and a lot of the officers, the senior officers, as you just said, they have gone to Koblenz or they are preparing to go because they have lost all confidence in the revolutionary authorities. I mean that's going to be a massive problem if it comes to a war. So that's why I'm just wondering, I mean, you know, you're saying that they're not a threat,

but actually to have kind of 10,000 people who are very well trained, quite wealthy, have a very precise object in view up against an army that is essentially becoming a rabble. I mean, it's the odds are maybe slightly more menacing than they might otherwise seem. I think that's not necessarily unfair. And you're also right that there are other reasons slightly more menacing than they might otherwise seem. Yeah. Don't you think? Than they might seem. I think that's not necessarily unfair. And you're also right that there are other reasons why people in France, they sort of big the emigres up in their minds about what a threat they are.

So first of all, they think the emigres are responsible for the plight of the economy. They say it's the emigres whose currency speculations have destroyed the value of our paper money and is driving up inflation. That's all their fault. Right. So we talked about this, didn't we? That yeah, hyperinflation and currency money losing its value always generates these conspiracy theories. And it's the emigres who are playing the role that Jews often play in, say, Weimar Germany. Yeah, absolutely right. Next, the radical papers say these guys are going to invade our cities, rape all our women, murder our children. This is what's going to happen. And you know, there is a grain of truth in that. If they did invade France, you said yourself,

the Conte d'Atoire was absolutely open about it. You know, he can't wait to get stuck into the people of Paris. And even if you're a moderate politician, it's kind of humiliating that they're there in these tiny little German states. So there's some in Koblenz, there's some in Mainz. These little electorates are basically harbouring exile groups. There is no country in the world that would look on that with equanimity. I mean, if that was the case in Britain, if Luxembourg was harbouring British exiles, as where is it Malibu Santa Monica is currently harbouring a British exile Tom? An emigre prince.

An emigre prince. Yeah. I mean, think about the press he gets. So it's no wonder that Briso is playing the emigre card all the time. and he is brilliant at putting all this together. He says, look, it's a jigsaw and you put all the pieces together and the picture is perfectly clear. He says, there is a network. It's run by an Austrian committee. Marie Antoinette is their kind of French contact. She's using Barnav and the Foyant as her puppets. Her brother Leopold in Vienna is the other big Gs and he is using the Rhineland exiles as his puppets and it all connects and it explains everything. And this is why the pornographic traditions about Marie Antoinette

being incestuous are so resonant. The idea that she had grown up committing incest with her brothers. Of course, because they're not just brother and sister. They're a sinister couple. I mean, that lies at the center of all this. So by the autumn of 1791, Briceau, Verneau and their friends say, it's time for a massive crackdown on these people and their allies in France. And of course the genius of their plan is under the constitution, they get to pass

legislation, but then the king has to decide whether or not to veto it. They know that the king will veto what they do and that that will expose him as part of the enemy conspiracy. So in November 1791, they introduced two laws that are both designed to be impossible for Louis to accept. One is a massive crackdown on those remaining priests who have not signed up to the new regime. They will lose their pensions and indeed their right to administer the sacraments if they don't sign up and they risk being declared enemies of the homeland, of the patrie. Louis immediately vetoes this of course and

that sets off riots across France and Lyon, Marseille and Paris and so on. Legislation bit number two. They say emigres who don't return to Paris will be declared outlaws, their property will be confiscated and they will face the death penalty if we catch them. And by the way, this specifically includes the King's brothers. Of course, there's no way the King is going to agree to this. He vetoes it as everybody knows he will. And that is a PR disaster for the king. Why couldn't he have done it? If I was trying to signal, I think in his situation, I would have signed it because I'm already an absolute fibber. I'm telling lies left, right and center. I think I might as well tell another one. And I'd hope that the lie would be so obvious that it would serve as a signal to my brothers and to other Royal households that, um, you know, I'm in an

absolute hole, I'm being forced to do this. It's like kind of hostage message. Yeah, you could do, I guess. Louis is quite stubborn man. He's not crafty. He's also an idiot, isn't he? He's an idiot. You know who would have signed this?

Charles the second. He would like a, like a bullet. Charles the who would have signed this? Charles II. He would have, like a bullet. Charles II would have signed it even before they drafted it. He'd be quite relieved to get rid of James, wouldn't he? But Charles II would have absolutely, you know, political leadership and tactical skill matters. And Charles II, cynical, calculating, all of that stuff. He would have found this really tricky, but you could well

imagine him negotiating his way out of it. Louis is very fat at this point, isn't he? He's just an idiot. I mean, this is so obviously a trap. It's like, here's a large elephant trap. Oh, is it? I'll walk into it. He's hopeless. He's just blundering. He's not really on the ball. He's spending all his time eating and drinking. He's very disillusioned and depressed. He's just like, I'm not going to do this. And he's not really thinking ahead.

I think as well, the other thing, Tom, actually, he and Marion Tornette are so blinded by their own political prejudices. They still think the revolution will fall apart. So in a way he just thinks it doesn't matter. I don't think he ever quite realizes the extremity of the position. Again, well that's a failure of political imagination, isn't it? Total failure of political imagination. I couldn't agree with you more. I think his lack of political imagination is probably the single biggest defect that he has out

of many. Anyway, this is a massive vote, not just to the monarchy, but of course to the people who support the foillon, the moderates, because it looks like they're kind of part of the same conspiracy. And to cut a very long story short, what this means is as we get to December 1791, the balance of power has shifted in the new legislative assembly. Riso, social justice activist who you love, now has very much the upper hand and the momentum. And now he can press for the thing that he really wants. And that Tom is war.

Right. So let's take a break. And when we come back, it's war. I'm Marina Hyde. And I'm Richard Osman. And together we host The Rest Is Entertainment. It's your weekly fix of entertainment news, reviews, splash of showbiz gossip. And on our Q&A, we pull back the curtain on entertainment and we Hello and welcome back to The Rest Is History and Dominic, c'est la guerre. War is approaching, but why and how and wither and wherefore and whence? So Tom, you could argue, I think reasonably, that the idea for war has been implicit in

the revolution from the very beginning. So first of all, France is a state built for war. I mean, France is a state that's always fighting wars. So it's actually the only global superpower with an army and a Navy. Britain, of course, has a Navy, but it doesn't have much of an army. Austria and Prussia have armies, but no real Navy. And France has always seen itself as being in this great global competition. So France is set up to fight wars. It's what France does.

It's what France is really good at. Although that is kind of what contributed to the revolution. Of course. But I don't think anybody says, oh, therefore we should fight fewer wars. They think we should fight more wars more successfully. Yeah, of course. Now I think another element of this is the revolution is always a universalist mission. So you talked about that in your episode in season one about the ideas.

And it's quite convenient, isn't it? If you want to go and conquer foreign countries, if you feel that you're doing it on the side of right. If you're fighting on the side of Liberty against the tyrants who have enslaved you, I mean, that is the ethos of the revolution. From the very outset, there is this kind of crusading spirit. And as you said, people have been primed for this by centuries of Christian ideology. The revolution is absolutely part of that. But equally significantly, I think, again, very much plain to you, revolutionists feel themselves the heirs of Republican Rome. And they think that healthy societies are instilled with the spirit of kind of patriotic sacrifice.

Because they're now citizens in the way that the Romans were citizens and that you best manifest your sense of citizenship by standing together in war. I mean, that's the Roman understanding and it's one that is obviously very fertile in terms of where France is with the revolution at this point. Yeah, I think absolutely. It's kind of a masculinity thing as well, isn't it? My take on this is that that makes the French Revolution exceptional from the very beginning because it's obviously different from the revolution in England in the 1640s and 1650s. There was never really any expectation that that would be exported by force of arms.

Well, it kind of is, isn't it? It kind of is to Ireland. To Ireland, but not to continental Europe. There's no sense that Cromwell is going to be leading armies rampaging through central Europe. Well, Jamaica. So the Jamaican expedition against Spain, there is a kind of sense that they are up against, you know, the evils of Catholicism.

But very limited compared with what comes. The French Revolution, the French Revolution is spilling over beyond its borders from the very outset. I mean, that is why Burke and Payne, Edmund Burke and Thomas Payne are having this war of words about the meaning of the French Revolution. It's why in 1791 in the summer on Bastille Day, so we began the last episode, Bastille Day 1791, if we'd begun that episode in Birmingham, Tom, there would have been riots and an inferno as people attacked Joseph Priest's house and they attack dissenting chapels because they say because of these sort of lefty free thinkers, the French Revolution is going to erupt any minute here in the West Midlands.

Well, again, it's that association with kind of radical Protestantism. Exactly. But it anticipates, obviously, the fears of the Russian Revolution in the 1920s, that it's an international conspiracy that is poised to erupt beyond France's boundaries. And actually, the first moment that that happens, until I'd read up on this, it had never actually occurred to me. Even before war was declared, this has already happened. It happened in September 1491 in Avignon. Yeah is a Papal territory, which wasn't part of France. I had completely overlooked this until I was reading up on it. And it's very Russia in Crimea in 2014.

The revolutionaries organise a referendum in Avignon, and it is the little green men or whatever they called them in the Crimea, going around, people up. There's a lot of violence, there's a lot of intimidation. And then a month after this referendum, after the French have basically annexed Avignon, there was a load of violence erupts. People protest against the annexation. They say the Virgin Mary is weeping because she's so sad at the kind of sacrilege of the... The Pope has lost his... Yeah.... his territory. And these women, having seen the Virgin Mary weeping, they're like, well, we should do something about this.

They get this bloke who's a leading Jacobin. They beat him over the head with paving stones and they shove knitting needles in his eyes. But in retribution, the local Jacobin round up all these women and their friends. They kill 60 of them, beat them to death with iron bars and then they throw their bodies down the toilet of the palace. So it's very poor behaviour on all sides, Tom, I think it's fair to say. And the revolutionary government in Paris gives the Chacabas all a blanket pardon. They've been the real victims in this.

They're the real victims because the knitting needle action earlier on. So of course the French generally see them. I mean, this is the interesting thing. We in Britain, because of our own biases. We don't have biases, Dominic. No, you're right. Because of our objectivity. Because of our scrupulous objectivity.

We perceive the French Revolutionary Wars effectively as wars of French aggression, France exporting the gospel of revolution. Of course the French never perceive it that way. From the very beginning, they see themselves as you said, they are the victims. They think Varennes was a conspiracy, which it was, it was a betrayal. And all through France in this period, 1791, summer, autumn, there are endless rumours. I mean, there's a great one here of the Prés de Condé and the Comptte d'Artois are about to arrive with an army of men in black clothes made from the cassocks of... They'll be wearing like priests outfits from the cassocks of

non-juring clergy studded with death's heads. It's very kind of like a, you know, Marvel super villains or something poised to attack. And the person who they think of this obviously the supreme Marvel super villain is France Francis traditional enemy, the Austrian emperor, so Leopold the second. Who's actually, I mean, not at all that. No, he's a lovely man. Like his brother Joseph, who we described earlier as essentially being a very kind of enlightenment figure.

And his plans for the church have been pretty identical to those of the revolution. It's just a question of who is framing these ideas. The rest is Habsburg history. Habsburg gets such a good press from us. Unbelievable. Where is the order of the golden fleece? We're still waiting. There's plenty wrong, but they are not the kind of the monstrous tyrants remotely. No.

No. Jacobin propaganda. So Leopold is Marie Antoinette's brother. He's sitting there in Vienna and has he intervened? No. Why hasn't he intervened? Actually because his empire has got its ructions of its own because of him and his brother Joseph's enlightened absolutism and his attempts to reform the church. Also because the Austrians are too busy fighting the Turks. There's all kinds of stuff kicking off in Poland. Poland is about to get partitioned. But also Leopold knows that Marie Antoinette is a bit of a head case. He doesn't think of her as a tremendous person. He actually thinks Marie Antoinette is a bit of a feckless waster.

He obviously can't abandon her because she's his sister. So he's just kind of playing a waiting game. And actually what Leopold wants to do, he doesn't want a war, he wants to deter the French from as he sees it doing something stupid. Namely attacking him. Yeah. So in August 1791, he meets the King of Prussia, Frederick William II, at this castle, Pillnitz, in Saxony. The Count of Antoine is there as well, isn't he?

He's not invited. He's not actually invited. Is he not? No, he turns up uninvited. And he sits around outside. And they're like, oh God, that flipping loser is pitched up as well. So they issue a statement, the Kings of Austria and Prussia. And they say, look, the fate of the French King is a matter of concern

to all the sufferings of Europe. We want to see him enjoying his full libertism rights. Interesting. They're using the words, libertism rights. Right. And they say, they give a sort of hint that if it all kicks off in France and if all the monarchs of Europe agree, they would have to give serious consideration to further action or something like that.

To issuing a sternly worded dictat. It's very vague. And they think that this is like a little, just a little kind of warning to the French. Just calm down. It'll deter them, but it's clearly not a threat. They don't think that it's a threat to invade. Now the problem is that the Comte d'Artois, as you said Thomas, turned up and uninvited. He gets this statement, he has it printed from Koblenz and distributed across France with the cover letter in which

he writes, the European monarchs are poised to invade. Lock up your daughters, we're on our way or whatever. With our death heads on. With our death heads. We're priests, cossacks. And of course, everybody in France says, oh my God, yet more proof of this hideous conspiracy. So that means that when Briceau, who we talked about in the first half, pornographer, hack

writer, travel writer, Tom loves him, abolitionist, great man for a literary salon, he stands up in October 1791 in the legislative assembly, he does have Vladimir Putin. He gives like an interminable lecture in which he says, France has been the victim of enemy expansion. We have been humiliated, not in the last few years, but in the last four decades. So since the beginning of the seven years war, we allied ourselves with Austria and Austria never delivered. They've cheated us. They've conspired against us.

We have been the great victims in all world history, you know, and it's time for it to end. But Dominic, just to ask you, the focus of this is Vienna and not London. No, not London. It's really interesting. Because Britain really has been the most dangerous rival to France. But at this point, so William Pitt becomes a great hate figure in the 1790s in France, but I get the sense that it's a little bit later that all the rhetoric right now is about Austria. And I wonder how much of that is because they're seeing it all through the prism of the court of Marie Antoinette and her links to Austria. Massively, I would have thought. Yeah. Massively. That it's really remarkable reading all this stuff about it. The brilliant account of the

road to war and Timothy Tackett's book about the coming of the terror. Britain, London are barely ever mentioned. It's all Vienna and Austria. I think that is genuinely because of the understanding of Marie Antoinette as an incestuous vampire at the heart of a great web of conspiracy. But that in itself reflects the fact that Austria for a long time has been France's traditional land enemy. And that in a way the French have often thought about Britain as a subsidiary, I mean the folly and hubris of it, Tom, as a secondary player, and they will learn.

So Briceau says, look, it's very Putin-like. We need all these demands answering, he says. We seek redress, but he says they probably won't give us the redress, and that that's fine because war would be brilliant for us. First of all, he says, war will make us more united. It will restore our finances and public credit. It will put an end to terror, betrayals and anarchy. It would bring us, and I quote, domestic peace if we fight. Next he says, war will purge us of sin. Such a war is a sacred war, a war ordained from on high and like the heavens it will purify our souls. Extraordinary. War will make us more equal.

Quote, by mixing men and ranks, elevating the plebeian, bringing down the proud patrician, war alone can make all equal and regenerate souls. Fascinating. He's using Roman terms there, ple Babians and Patricians. Exactly. And he actually then points, he says, finally, history shows that all free nations are defined by war. And he points to the examples of Republican Rome and the tax evaders and the American colonies. And he says, a people which has conquered its freedom after 12 centuries of slavery needs a war to consolidate it, to test itself, to show that it is worthy

of freedom. So you see all the currents, the Republican Rome, the influence of America, the Christian mission. But again, that's what's so interesting is that he is, and this is what the French Revolution does so brilliantly, and Napoleon will as well, he fuses the idea of a civic culture, which is specific to the patrie, to France, with a sense of universalist mission. So France can go to war simultaneously, serving French interests, while also doing it on behalf of humanity. And what a brilliant fusion that is. I love all that because it's such a brilliant rhetorical sleight of hand. Briceau stands

there and he says, this is a crusade for universal liberty to free the enslaved peoples of Europe and topple all the former Bastille's. But at the same time, he says, by the way, the French are the foremost people of the universe and France is the model for the future of all mankind. So it's a brilliant trick to say nationalism is universalism. Because if we are the model, then by following our own national interest and conquering other countries, we're actually furthering the cause of liberty and isn't that lovely. So everyone loves that or do they?

Because the occasional person of principle who stands up and tells you that right? The Rob Spear fan cast. Maximilien Rob Spear has come back from Arras at the end of November 1791. Remember he's been away. He comes back and he gets an ecstatic reception at the Jacobin Club. And then he stands up in the Jacobin and he says, all this talk of war. Shocking.

I think war would be a terrible disaster. He's very prescient. I mean we said he's not a disaster. He's very prescient. I mean, we said he's not a fool. He really is prescient. He's really not wrong here because he talks about war risks the collapse of the revolution and threatens us with a Caesar, with a Cromwell. Yeah, he's absolutely right. I mean, he sees Bonaparte coming. And he also makes another very good point. He says, Briceau is saying explicitly, who loves America, is comparing this with the

American war of independence. He says, it's going to be nothing like the American war of independence. The Americans were fighting to preserve what they saw as their own liberties and their own native land. We would be fighting a war of expansion. He says it's the most extravagant idea that you can just waltz into someone's country and say, now you must adopt our laws. And I quote, nobody likes armed missionaries. You know, he'd be a brilliant guest on the

rest is politics. Wouldn't he Rob Spier? I'd love to hear him in debate with the hosts of the rest is party to discuss liberal interventionism, liberal interventionism. Then of course, Rob Spier being Rob Spier, there's a bit of a darkness there as well. He says to the Jacobin, the source of the evil is not in coblence. It is among you. It is in our midst. Let us overcome our enemies within and only then march against our foreign foes if any still exist. So in other words, it's not all kind of being shrewd. There's an element of the iron fist and the paranoid style. Rob Spier is still looking for the enemy within and saying, let's fight a war, but against our own neighbors in our own streets, not against people outside. Now, when Rob Spier does this, the Girondins are very shocked. Madame Rolland actually meets him privately

and says, come on, you should be on board with us. We're all friends, be on our side. We're all Jacobin. And she fails and she writes to him after, I saw with pain that you are persuaded that any intelligent person who thinks differently from you about the war is not a good citizen. That's the key. Well, I mean, that sums up his character, isn't it? That does sum up his character, but it also sums up the politics for the next two years in France. You can't just disagree with somebody and, you know, fine, we'll agree. What do

they say on the rest is politics? We will disagree agreeably. There's none of that in the Legislative Assembly in France 1791-2. But also, crucially, there is no equivalent to His Majesty's loyal opposition. No. So there's no equivalent to His Majesty's loyal opposition. No. So there's no room for that. There's no room whatsoever. And actually, I also think there's a personal dimension. Rob Strayer had gone away and he came back and Briso was the big star and there was not

room for both. This town ain't big enough for the both of us. You know, they're both proud men, but crucially, they both see themselves as the embodiment of virtue. And if somebody else is going around saying, actually, I'm the embodiment of virtue, then they've got to go. There's no sense, I guess, of moral or political pluralism. Well, also, I suppose what we'd recognise today as the modern party

system is in the process of being invented, but it hasn't yet reached the stage where the existence of one party led by one person doesn't serve as an automatic threat to someone else who wants to occupy that space. Yeah, I think there's no sense in which you can legitimately have more than one party or more than one faction. So the atmosphere becomes incredibly aggressive and polarized. You basically now have, we had before the Foyon and the Jacobin. What we have now is the Foyon, who are losing ground

all the time, they're kind of old moderates. I mean, they're basically on the way out. And two rival Jacobin factions, so the Girondins, but also the people who admire Robespierre. Now they sit high up in the National Assembly, so people call them the Mountain and they become known as the Montagnards. So actually, most of the time when people are talking about you, when you think about the Reign of Terror and stuff and the Jacobin, it's the Montagnard faction that people are thinking about. And don't forget there's always an element of the theatrical and the spectacle about it.

The galleries are full of members of the public who would queue up for tickets and they're there as fans, as participants. Because women can attend as well as men, can't they? And they're shouting, they're cheering, throwing abuse. People start coming armed because there are kind of virtual brawls breaking out on the floor of the Legislative Assembly. So there's a real sense of a kind of disintegration. Now this is being echoed all the time by events outside Paris. Still a lot of anger about high prices and hunger. There's what's called a war on the chateau, peasants attacking country

houses, looting them, burning orchards. There's an example in a place called Etompe outside Paris, where the mayor ends up being lynched in a food riot. He's a member of the Jacobin club. You know, he's a good revolutionary, but because he's trying to enforce the kind of liberal free market orthodoxy that many of the kind of deputies have, the people turn on him, they mutilate his body. You know, this sets off all kinds of anxieties back in Paris. And actually the Jacobin organized a festival of law in his honor to try to, you know, make some plea for stability. Now Robespierre, interestingly, Robespierre

is such a brilliant populist. He says, what? A festival of law to honor one man. That says it all about you, that you would rather honor one bigwig than care about the starving masses. His rivals must have hated him. Yeah, of course. He's a... Tried to seize the moral high ground only to find that he's got there first. Yeah. Planted his banner on the summit. He's very Kato, isn't he?

Yeah, he is. Very self-consciously, I imagine. You know what he is? He's a cross between Kato and Tony Ben. He's like a much more violent Tony Ben. The same sense of incorruptibility, moral austerity, but also the populism that infuriates his own colleagues, which Tony Ben had in the 1970s. Although, so far as I'm aware, he didn't have his penis stung by a wasp.

That's Tony Ben did. Yeah. Great fact, Tom. Great fact. I always know that whenever I mentioned Tony Ben's name, you'll bring out that, I don't know. Anyway, so by the end of 1791, 1792, I guess the more that French politics fragments, the more that people think that only a war can bring it together. So by the end of 1791, 1792, I guess the more that French politics fragments, the more that people think that only a war can bring it together.

And the interesting thing is that with the exception of Robespierre, all the different factions and players think a war will be in my personal interests. Because they all have different motivations for thinking that. Yeah. So if you're Antoine Barnard, who was the big star of the last episode, Barnard and his friends at the Foyon, they think a limited war will work in our favor because France is bound to win and the King is technically commander in chief. So everybody will give him credit.

Hooray for the King! Yeah! Vive le Roi! Vive le Roi! And that'll bring stability. That's obviously madness. Now Lafayette, we haven't had any Lafayette in this episode yet, Tom. I know you love Lafayette.

But he's a great and dashing general. Well, so he, after the massacre at the Champs-D'Amars, he had stood in elections to be the mayor of Paris and he'd been absolutely hammered. Such ungratitude. And he'd gone off in a big sulk to his country estate in the Auvergne. And he thinks, oh, a war, brilliant. I love wars. I know how to run a war. He lobbies for command and he says, great, a little war in the Rhineland is just my cup of tea. I'll fight this little war in the Rhineland.

I'll obviously win a massive victory. I'll get all the credit and I'll come back as the hero of France. So that's a lafayette for the war. The incredible thing is that Louis and Marie Antoinette want a war. Now Marie Antoinette was secretly communicating with the Austrian ambassador and she said, ah, France will get hammered in the war. The armistice will fall apart, there's no money, there's no discipline. But she thinks the war will be brilliant because if by a miracle France wins, she thinks her husband will get all the credit, which by the way, I think is bonkers.

But she thinks plausibly France will lose and then the Austrians will march into Paris and it'll be great. She'll be reinstalled in her pomp. She can laugh at all her enemies. I mean, it's bonkers. Absolutely bonkers. She's writing, by the way, to Axel von Fersen. He's still on the scene and she's sending him all those letters.

Well, he's off in Sweden though, isn't he? Yeah. And she's saying, it's going to be great. It's going to be a war. We'll lose and I'll be laughing. I think she's mad to be writing to people. Of course she is. We've been quite, I think, of the standards of historians, we were quite

sympathetic to Louis and Meryn Twinnett in the first season. I think at this point they are behaving ludicrously. Their lack of common sense is mind-boggling. I mean, nothing could be more criminal than for a king and queen to encourage war against their own people. Louis is writing letters to the emigres saying, and I quote, it is time for a congress of the principal powers of Europe to invade France. This is the only way of ensuring the evils which beset us to not spread to the other

states of Europe. I can't think of many other examples in history of a monarch inciting his enemies to attack his own country in the hope that his own people will be defeated and killed and he will... I mean, that's mad. Spoiler alert, we're going to end this series, this season with the execution of the king. And I would say he's bang to rise. I mean, he clearly has betrayed the country. Yeah.

He is guilty of treason. I mean, you're not wrong. I can't disagree with it. So we get to January 1792. There's a real sense of inevitability. The emigre princes are finally declared traitors and their lands are declared forfeit. And then all that month in January, you began this episode Tom, reading that extraordinary speech by Pierre Vianio to arms. There's loads of this stuff. I mean, Briceau is there in the Legislative Assembly. This will be a crusade for universal liberty. Every soldier will say to his enemy, brother, I am not going to cut your throat. I'm going to show you the way to happiness. I mean,

it's crazy that they're coming out with this and people are sobbing, waving their hats, embracing all of this kind of stuff. There's this scene on the 14th of January 1792 where they all raise their arms and swear an oath. I would defend to the death the French constitution against the enemies of Europe. They're basically reenacting the Tennis Court oath. But people said at the time it was an even more rousing and exciting moment than the Tennis Court oath. So they send Vienna, they agree at the end of January to send Vienna and ultimate him. Leopold must break off all his relations with the exiles. He was promised he'll never ally with the enemy of France, all of this kind of stuff. Now there's then weeks of negotiations.

The French had given the Austrians until the 1st of March, eventually. They said, we must have a reply on the 1st of March. On the 1st of March, Leopold, unfortunately, drops dead. Oh dear, that's bad timing. He is first to March on the first to March. Leopold, unfortunately drops dead. Oh dear. That's bad timing. He is very bad timing. Or maybe good timing. Well, yeah, he is succeeded by his son, Francis the second. He's very young and actually he's got younger advisors than his father.

And the advisors say, yeah, let's get it on with the French. Come on. This is a brilliant way to start your reign. The French are in an absolute shambles. Let's have a war with them. Hasn't Marie Antoinette sent the French plans? She has. She has secretly been sending the French military plans to the Austrians. I said in season one, I felt sorry for Louis and Marie Antoinette, but this is madness.

Now before all this happens, there's a dramatic development in France. We love a dramatic development in France on this podcast. Louis always had the right to have his own ministers. So he chose his ministers, not the legislative assembly. His ministers were moderates, foils. But in the middle of March 1792, the Girondins basically organized a political coup. They got hold of a load of leaked letters and they read them out that made it look like Louis' ministers were just absolute weaklings and lickspittles and soft on the Austrians and all this. And Louis therefore had to end up appointing a Girondin war ministry. Among them, the one person that people should get in their heads is the new foreign minister

because he will be a very important person. He's called Dumouriez. He's in his mid-fifties. He is a war veteran, his great friend of Lafayette. He's a kind of grizzled, serious person, a military man. And there's an irony to his war record, isn't there? Because he'd actually served in the French army that went in the next Corsica. He'd been on spying missions there and then he served two campaigns there. And this of course is what will result in Napoleon Bonaparte becoming

an officer in the French army. That's true. It's well noted, Tom. Yeah. It's a good point. Du Maurier, he came from near the Belgian border. He had been a military advisor to revolutionaries in what's now Belgium. And he, as foreign minister, he says to the legislative assembly,

Hey, a war to liberate Belgium would be an absolute cakewalk. The Belgians are gagging to be rescued from the Austrians, to no longer be the Austrian Netherlands. They will rise as soon as we cross the border. There's never been a more certain victory in human affairs than our victory against the Austrians. It'll be absolutely brilliant. The Austrians, meanwhile, who are not complete clowns as Duméryé seems to think, are sending tens of thousands of troops to the Belgian

frontier because they're looking forward to Kate Walker of their own. So on the 20th of April, the moment comes. Louis goes to the Legislative Assembly, Duméryé stands up to give this speech and Duméryé says, right, again, it's very Vladimir Putin. He says, ever since 1756, we have actually been enslaved by Austria. The House of Austria has enslaved France to its selfish ambition. We've asked for a redress and they've given us none. We will rip up our treaty with Austria and go to war and this will be an act of joyful destruction. It'll be just like the fall of the Bastille actually. It'll be brilliant. Yeah. People being torn to pieces and heads sprayed on pikes.

And one or two deputies, Tom, have some sense. So there's a moderate guy called Louis Bacquet, who says, I don't know about this, we shall be portrayed as aggressors. We will be portrayed as a disorderly country that upsets the peace of Europe in defiance of treaties and our own laws. Of course, that is how they are going to be portrayed for the next quarter of a century. And indeed, you could argue in Anglo-Saxon historiography for the next 300 years or whatever. But they all vote for this declaration of war. And then Louis is given the declaration to be read out. Now Now there's a slight problem with the declaration. The National Assembly had explicitly declared that France had renounced wars of conquest and aggression, and they would never again go to war against anybody

and free people. So the declaration says, well, actually we've been attacked, so it's fine. Kind of. Yeah. It's a defensive war. It looks like we're invading other countries, but actually it's a completely defensive war against the unjust aggression of the Austrians. We're going in to kick out Nazis. Yeah, exactly. Exactly. So Louis reads this out in this very quiet, stammering voice, because I think

even though he said he's all for it, he realises now this is a moment of maximum danger for him. And everybody cheers, there are people crying with joy. I mean, it is very unlike the previous war we did on this podcast, the Great War, where people- They're nervous, aren't they? And hesitant. Yeah, there's a sense of terrible foreboding. Exactly. There was none of that in Paris in 1792. And of course, I think there are a few moments in world history that are more replete with irony because first of all, Rob Spare was totally right. There is going to be the rise of a Caesar of a dimension that they cannot even

conceive of at this point, meaning Napoleon. But also when I finished writing the notes for this, I look back at every human being that I mentioned in the course of the episode. They all die. So Louis, Marie Antoinette, Briceau, Vergnio, Barnard, Madame Roulon, even Rob Spear, they will be on their way out. And of course, they will all perish as way out. And of course they will all perish as a result of the same identical instrument of execution, which for many people, particularly in the English speaking

world has really become the symbol of the French revolution, hasn't it? And that is the guillotine. So you will often get, I mean, we may well call our subsequent episode, the shadow of the guillotine, because that is going to be the subject of our next episode. And we'll be taking a slight break from the political narrative, just to look at how it is that the guillotine, this great symbol of the revolution and particularly of the terror, how it comes to be invented and how it comes to play the role

that it will in the subsequent political narrative that we'll be telling. How it is that all these people end up dead as a result of its slicing blade. So we have that to look forward to the coming of the guillotine. Of course, if you want to hear that episode now, you can join our very own group of... Gérardin? Yeah, our very own faction at The Rest Is History Club at therestishistory.com, but if not, we'll be back and Tom will be bringing down the guillotine. Au revoir.

Au revoir.