The Rest Is History - 558. The Rolling Stones: Sex, Drugs and Rock ‘n’ Roll (Part 1)

Episode Date: April 20, 2025

What are the origins of Britain’s original bad boys, The Rolling Stones? Where did they all come from and how did they meet? What was it about the 1960s, with its air of sexual liberation, newly elected Labour government, and rising youth culture that allowed them to burst onto the musical scene? Who was Brian Jones, the band's troubled founder? And, what made the Rolling Stones, even from the earliest stages, so much more controversial than The Beatles? Join Dominic and Tom as they discuss the rise of one of history’s greatest, sexiest, and most suavely devilish bands, and the glaring light they shed upon the tumultuous 1960s. _______ Twitter: @TheRestHistory @holland_tom @dcsandbrook Producer: Theo Young-Smith Assistant Producer: Tabby Syrett + Aaliyah Akude Executive Producers: Jack Davenport + Tony Pastor Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Thank you for listening to the rest is history for weekly bonus episodes, add free listening, early access to series and membership of our much loved chat community. Go to the rest is history.com and join the club that is the rest is history.com Listeners to the rest is history will know that we do love a good sequel on the show. So 100 Years War, sequel. French Revolution, sequel. Captain Cook and Nelson haven't had the sequel yet, but I promise they're on their way. And I'll tell you what else is on its way. Our second Sunday Times bestselling book, The Restless History Returns, is out in paperback in May. And in in its pages what we do is to take you, the beloved reader, through an alphabetical miscellany of history's best and most bizarre moments from Cortez

to Chaucer, from fashion to Freemasons, from Mitford's to monkeys. And on top of that, there's a pub quiz and there's a whole host of puzzles to test your historical mettle. So if you enjoy a sequel as much as we do, why not send your future self a little treat and pre-order your paperback of The Rest is History Returns now. Parents do not like the Rolling Stones. They do not want their sons to grow up like them. They do not want their daughters to marry them. Never have the middle class virtues of neatness, obedience and punctuality been so conspicuously lacking as they are in the Rolling Stones. The Rolling Stones are not the people you build empires with.

They're not the people who always remember to wash their hands before lunch. Parents feel cheated. Just when the Beatles had taught them that pop music was respectable, just when they were beginning to understand what happens. Their children develop a passion beyond the comprehension of anybody for these five young men. So that was Maureen Cleave writing in the London Evening Standard on the 14th of April, 1964. Maureen Cleave, very groovy, kind of Anna Wintour haircut, probably the most influential pop writer of the day, first national newspaper journalist to champion the Beatles. She would go on to do the infamous interview with John Lennon in which he boasted that

the Beatles were bigger than Jesus. But Dominic, we're not here to talk about the Beatles, are we? We are here to talk about the Rolling Stones. And what was the headline to that particular article that I just quoted? Because it's quite a good headline, isn't it? Yes. Hello everybody. The headline on that article was, But would you let your daughter marry one?

And that was inspired by an article that had run a few weeks earlier in Melody Maker. Would you let your sister go with a rolling stone? And I think that captures Tom, the stone's enduring image. So even today, I mean, they're in their eighties, aren't they? Mick Jagger and Keith Richards. I mean, amazing. Keith Richards is still around in his eighties. I know, amazing. But to people like our producer Theo, who loves the rolling stones, they're

still symbols of kind of defiance of authority, of rebelliousness, sort of sexual excess. Everything that Theo embodies. Everything that we like our producers and the rest of this history to embody. Exactly. Now some people, I guess, may be thinking the Rolling Stones and a history podcast, really, but I think there are two dimensions in which they're really important. The first is obviously pop cultural.

So I think it's the Stones, more than any other band since the 1960s, who came to define the look and the sound and the style of rock music. And I say rock music deliberately. Obviously, the Beatles are enormously influential in all kinds of different areas. But in terms of pure rock music, I think the look of the Stones in particular and their, as it were, dare I say their vibe, Tom? Tom McHenry The vibe, yeah. Tom McHenry The vibe. It's the Stones who established, as it were, the vibe. Tom McHenry You wouldn't say that from the kind of the 70s onwards though, basically they're

doing it as a kind of self-parody. Tom McHenry Yes, of course. Tom McHenry I mean, they're becoming completely predictable. They have a logo. Tom McHenry Yeah. Yeah. They became the first tribute act. Tom McHenry To themselves. Tom McHenry Yeah. in rock music history to themselves. But they're also, I mean, you mentioned the logo, they're huge commercial pioneers. And in the second episode, we'll talk about their later tours of the United States,

where they charge higher ticket prices than anyone had ever charged. They recognize the business potential of this. I mean, of course, famously, they become tax exiles. Yeah, they go to the south of France, don't they? Exactly. So there's that. If you're interested in pop culture, the stones are obviously really important, but also in a more conventional historical dimension. The Rolling Stones become emblematic in Britain in particular of the 1960s. And I think their story, their rise and rise, normally we do Rise and Fall and

History podcast, but this is Rise and Rise. Their story becomes a brilliant window, I think, into the world of 60s Britain. So we can explore all kinds of things like social class, economic and social change, attitudes towards drugs and whatnot. And we'll do this over two episodes. So in today's episode, we look at where they came from, what they represent, why they're so controversial, which I think is a really interesting question, and how they end up being cast as

the sort of the yin to the Beatles yang. You know, that sort of Beatles versus Stones thing, which is obviously massively contrived, but which runs all the way through the 1960s and becomes a big cultural signifier, I would say. And today we'll be looking particularly at the man who founded the band, who I think is often a little bit forgotten today and that's Brian Jones. Originally it's not Mick Jagger's band, it's not Keith Richards' band, it's Brian Jones' band.

So we'll talk about him. But first, Tom, would you like a little bit of historical context? I'd love a bit of historical context. Of course you would. You know, I love to embed popular music in historical context. Brilliant. I'm so pleased. This is why you're the perfect person to do this podcast.

I know. I'm so excited. I do. Well, you know I do. You know that's why I love your books. That's not the only reason I love your books, but it's definitely one of them. So the Rolling Stones first become famous in 1964,

and that's the end of 13 years of conservatism in Britain. The premierships of Winston Churchill, Sir Anthony Eden, Harold Macmillan, and finally, Alec Douglas-Hulme. Do you know Dominic, I hope that when this goes out as a video, maybe they could put in some video image of Alec Douglas-Hulme looking tweedy on a grouse estate, and then footage of the stones. Right. That's the classic kind of move, isn't it?

It is. It's the juxtaposition. So in that period, the British Empire has largely disintegrated. Everyday life in Britain has been transformed by full employment, by massively rising wages, by free mass education. In other words, this is the absolute high point of what people call at the time the affluent society. And the people who benefit arguably more than anybody are young people.

So there are about five and a half million teenagers in Britain by the early 60s, and they are defined economically. In other words, they are an economic group really for the first time, who are spending more than 800 million pounds a year, and they are supporting a huge infrastructure of cinemas and dance halls and music magazines and record shops. And the magazines, the magazines are kind of driven by girls, right? And girls have a kind of outside influence on this teenage culture that's emerging. Yes, absolutely.

Girls spend the most money. Girls are the most important. If you are a record promoter or you run a dance hall or you are a magazine editor, it's girls that you think about far more than boys. And it's girls who dominate, who are really important in the record market. So teenagers make up half the market for records and record players,

and they buy singles, not albums. So in 1955, there had been 4 million singles sold. In 1963, 61 million. This is big, big money. And for the first time, I think you have a genuine national youth culture through television, so a really good example of that in August 1963, the BBC launched a program called Ready, Steady, Go, which is a kind of national pop program.

And it means that basically if you live in Scotland, if you live in Aberystwyth, if you live in Cornwall, wherever, you're watching the same thing, the same fashions, listen to the same music. It is a genuine nationwide phenomenon in a way that was unimaginable in the 1890s or something. And it's unimaginable now, I guess. Exactly. It is a much more national homogenous kind of story. Basically, to separate these young people from their money, record promoters on both sides of the Atlantic have come up with a succession of musical crazes. So the famous one in the mid fifties rock and roll, Bill Haley and his comets, Elvis Presley and so on.

But that doesn't last forever. By the turn of the sixties, that's over and record company executives are looking for something new and actually it's really funny if you look at the first years of the 60s, the mad things that they think might take over. So calypso or cha-cha or yodelling. Or kind of comedy songs, which a producer called George Martin is experimenting with. Right. Comedy songs done by people in bowler hats, you know, aca-bilk kind of thing, whatever.

Yeah. Digging holes in roads. Exactly. Window cleaners. And actually, as everybody listening to this podcast surely knows, even if they don't think they know it, they know that the big winners are actually the Beatles, Beat Music. And they rise incredibly quickly. So in October 1962, their first single, Love Me Do, didn't even get into the top 10. But a year on from that they Totally dominate the charts in a way that is unimaginable Really before or since I would say so nobody has ever had the hegemony

Since that the Beatles had in 1963 64 maybe Taylor Swift is the only person who comes close But now the market is so fragmented. It's no comparison really. Now why this happens, I would say some people may disagree. This is not because of the Beatles unique genius. It is because the conditions have been established. So in 1963, the economy is roaring on all cylinders because Harold McMillan and his chancellor Reginald Mordling have unleashed a pre-election dash for growth. So there's tons of money around and more teenagers are spending more money on records than ever.

So in other words, if the Beatles had not existed, or if, you know, Brian Epstein hadn't discovered them or George Martin hadn't taken them over or whatever, I think it's reasonable to assume that some other band would have played that part because the market is sitting there waiting. Will you say band? Yeah. I mean, I'm not sure that part because the market is sitting there waiting. Well, you say band. Yeah. I mean, I'm not sure that's necessarily the case. It could have been a solo singer or something.

So, I mean, famously, Dick Rowe, according to Epstein, at any way, the Beatles manager says that guitar groups are on the way out, right? Yes. Guitar groups have finished. You know, and so that's why he doesn't sign the Beatles. And then a year later, it's Dick Rowe who signs the Rolling Stones on the recommendation of George Harrison, a member of the Beatles. And so the sense that it's the Beatles who blaze the path for the kind of guitar groups

that the Stones will be and the Who and the Kinks and everybody else. But it might not, you know, if it had been a solo singer, if it had been a Cliff Richard or somebody like that, then it would have gone on a different course. And it might not have been Britain. It might have been British. First of all, it almost was a solo singer. Frank Eyfield, who becomes the first person, I think, to sell a million records and has the first person of three number ones in a row. In other words, the potential for hegemony, for dominance of the charts, is greater in 1963 than at any point before. But I think the fact that it's groups that come through and the groups that then dominate for the next 10 years.

British groups. Suggests that there's something elated potential in the group because you can market four or five people more successfully and more appealingly to more people than you can market one. I would argue anyway, we could get massively bogged down in this. One other point about this. I think, I think it's really important to remember. Is very clear at this point that the appeal of pop music is not just and perhaps not even primarily about the music.

It is also i think especially about the attitude and about the atmosphere the critic mcdonald's wrote a brilliant book about the beatles is really good about this. The Beatles is really good about this, that it's actually about what we would now call, as it were, the vibe. Because a lot of people don't really listen to the lyrics, they're using the music only to dance to. Or famously just go and scream. Exactly right. And not hear any of the music at all. Now there are two other elements of this boom that I think are really important for the

Stone story. For the first time in the early 1960s, you have a cult of amateurishness. So in the 1950s, there was an expectation that a group or even a singer would have been picked and groomed and manicured by their management. And the songs would be written for them by professionals. But by 1963, there's an expectation that a young performer will write their own material it's meant to come from the heart. That does reflect the influence of the Beatles, doesn't it?

Yeah. The Beatles are obviously really important in that. The Beatles are the heart. That does reflect the influence of the Beatles doesn't it? Yeah the Beatles are obviously really important in that. The Beatles are the model and secondly the other thing that is very unusual in 1963 is the overwhelmingly and unusually positive coverage of the Beatles. So rock and roll had always been treated with great anxiety. Famously the Daily Mail in 1956 had called it the Negro's Revenge African Tom Tom and Voodoo dance music. It called it even Cliff Richard. You mentioned Cliff Richard.

So for non-British listeners, he's the kind of Christian mainstream, you know, the housewives favorite. He is now regarded by people in Britain as the sort of the acme of the sort of diluted, what would, how would you put it, Tom, the sort of safe, boring, bland. White bread. Yeah, white bread pop star. But at the time, the NME, the great kind of music Bible, condemned his indecent vulgarity, his violent hip swinging, hardly the performance any parent could wish her children to see. So this kind of sexual anxiety in particular is always there,

but not there with the Beatles. Brian Epstein has packaged them to appeal to the widest audience possible. So by the autumn of 63, when they're approaching their peak, the newspapers are constantly saying, isn't it amazing? We have this band and they're really funny and likable. And the evening standard, October 63, they've won over the class snob, the intellectual snob, the music snob, the grown ups and the evening standard October 63 they've won over the class snob the intellectual snob the music snob the grown-ups and the husbands i.e. the two groups you know who are least likely to approve of any pop musician that their daughters are listening to and then an

amazing editorial i love this the daily mirror in November 1963 hair will be a big feature of today's episode by the way. The Mirror said, the fact is that beetle people are everywhere from whopping to Windsor, age 7 to 70. And it says it's plain to see why. The beetles are very cheerful, they're very high spirited. Quote, they wear their hair like a mop, but it's washed in capital letters. It's super clean.

So is their fresh young act. They don't have to rely on off-colour jokes about homos for their fun. So what are they thinking of there? Exactly. This is the mystery. What are they thinking of there? I've often thought of like writing some essay about what lies behind that. It's a mystery. It is a great mystery. Let's get back to the Stones themselves. So we'll kick off with the real founder of the group. And this is a person who I think is a bit overlooked today. And this is Brian Jones. So Brian Jones is born into a very middle-class family in Cheltenham in 1942.

His father works at the local aeronautical engineering factory. He's got a very suburban background, very respectable. He is, like so many people in the story of 60s music, very clever. He passed his 11 plus which for overseas listeners is the test that you have to do at the age of 11 to decide which kind of school you will go to in your teens. Will you go to a grammar school for the bright kids, aspirational kids, or will you go to a secondary modern where the government basically dump everybody else? He passes.

He does very well at school. He passes lots of exams and does well. But he is badly behaved. He is, depending on your viewpoint, either extraordinarily reckless or extraordinarily selfish. In 1958, he gets a 14-year-old girl pregnant. In 1960, he gets a married woman from Guildford pregnant. In 1961, he gets another girl pregnant.

By the time he's 22 and the stones are becoming famous, he is already the father of five different children. The weird thing is, I mentioned Maureen Cleves and a Wintour Bob. He looks a bit like a kind of male Maureen Cleves a little bit. Well, that's his hair, isn't it? That's a strange sort of bowl haircut. Yeah, it's his hair. Cause there was a weird thing. So his girlfriend, Anita Pallenberg, didn't she say that he wanted to be Francoisardy or some kind of French Chanteuse and he would get her to kind of, you know, put on makeup and

Well, in the next episode, we will discuss the Pallonberg Jones relationship, which I think the safe to say is tangled. Tom. Yeah. The theme of androgyny in the stones is obviously quite important. I mean, say with Mick Jagger as well. It is indeed. So initially he gets into Cheltenham art college, but then after news of his poor

conduct emerges, he's kicked out and he ends up taking a succession of odd jobs. Because Brian Jones, he'll dominate these two episodes. It's worth pausing for a moment on his personality. He's a very bright boy, he's sensitive, he's very needy and he's very, very difficult. Bill Wyman and his book, Stone Alone, which is well worth reading actually. It's really, really interesting book. Bill Wyman said he was a preening peacock gregarious, artistic, desperately seeking assurance from his peers.

Mick Jagger said of the Brian Jones, I've been practicing. I can't really do it. It's so hard to do. No, it's impossible. He was an extremely difficult person. There's something very, very disturbed about him. He was very unhappy with life, very frustrated, but he was talented, but he was very paranoid personality, not suited for show business, Keith Richards. This is the most principal thing I could find.

His former friend and bandmate. He was a bastard. Harold Godfrey said unwilling the conqueror. Yeah. Now I think the thing about Brian Jones is clearly a very nasty man. He's got a very nasty streak. He has something in common with John Lennon. He enjoys beating up women.

He beats up women a lot. John Lennon did not enjoy beating up women and he repented it. But he does beat up women. He does it multiple times. He did, but you know, the great drama of his life is his struggle with that instinct. The struggle. Oh, poor him.

What a victim. What a victim. We'll do a thing on John Lennon at some point. God forbid. Let's not get bogged down into an argument about John Lennon. God forbid. So in Cheltenham, there was a little Bohemian set as there is in so many towns in Britain in the early sixties.

Art college, coffee bars, people who are students, who are members of the campaign for nuclear disarmament. Dufflecoats. Yeah, who are aspiring musicians. They will meet up and they will listen generally to jazz music or to folk. And Brian Jones plays the clarinet, doesn't he? He played clarinet in the school orchestra. So yeah, he's ready with his clarinet.

Oh, and he's got a saxophone, I think. He's a talented musician. Now through listening to jazz and folk, people are starting to get into blues music. So blues music for people who are not massively familiar with music, the music of the rural Mississippi Delta in the late 19th century, and it spreads to the cities of the American South in the 1920s or so, Atlanta and so on. And then through the great migration to Chicago in the 1940s, you get people like Muddy Waters and Howlin' Wolf.

How do you pronounce Howlin' Wolf? Howlin' Wolf. Howlin'? Howlin' Wolf, that's his name. That's an important part of the story, isn't it? You drop the G if you're a blues player. Exactly. And this is a sort of the Chicago blues, which is the kind that becomes very popular in Britain, is the electric guitar. There's a harmonica.

It's a kind of more urban sound. In the late 1940s, the American magazine Billboard started calling it rhythm and blues, as in R and B. And that became a sort of vague euphemism for black music generally. And obviously this music was very influential on people like Elvis Presley in the United States, but it doesn't go through into the white American mainstream because record company executives believe that white audiences will never take black music. So in other words, when people like the Stones take it to the United States or the Animals or whoever, a lot of white audiences have not heard it before, which is an important thing in their success.

But Britain is different. In Britain, white jazz and folk enthusiasts are not hidebound by the same racial inhibitions as in the United States. So they start listening to blues as well. And a good example of this is the best known jazz band leader of the day who's called Chris Barber. He went to St. Paul's, Tom.

So many of these people, yeah. So many of these people are the grammar school boys or public school boys. It's really strange and interesting phenomenon. Chris Barber played a lot of blues with his touring band. And in October, 1961, they go to Cheltenham where Brian Jones lives and they play at the town hall. And he's 19 years old Jones and he goes to see them and he is absolutely transfixed by it. And afterwards he goes to one of these clubs, the Waikiki Club, to talk to Chris Barber's

guitarist who's a man called Alexis Corner, who's a very influential person in the small British blues scene. Yes Tom. You see, I was amazed to learn this because I knew Alexis corner as a DJ when I first started listening to radio one. Right. He had an incredibly gravelly voice. Yeah. Very gravelly voice. And he did an amazing series on guitar greats, which was kind of an education. Yeah. In all that. And so to find him hanging out with Brian Jones in Cheltenham, who knew who knew? So Brian Jones plays his guitar for Alexis

Cornish says, I'll show you what I can do. Alexis Cornish says, Oh, brilliant. You know, you can come to London anytime and stay with me. So let's move on a bit to 1962. Harold McMillan's last full year as Prime Minister in March 1962. Just giving people a bit of political context. Never had it so good, Dominic. Yeah. In March 1962, Alexis Cornish starts the first regular blues night at the Ealing

Jazz Club with his own band, which is called Blues Incorporated. And other clubs start to copy that. They're in places that are sort of on the suburban fringe of London. So Guildford, Andover, Richmond, Twickenham, quite affluent little sort of places, towns that have been absorbed into the great sprawl of Greater London. And I think what's basically happening is that the art school, Bohemian arty people who would previously have listened to jazz or folk music

three or four years earlier, they're now listening to blues and among them, at least three future Rolling Stones who we will come to. And actually what distinguishes blues from its predecessor, jazz is hotly debated by these people, there are furious arguments and Brian Jones himself writes a letter to jazz news in October, 1962 to explain what he thinks the difference is. And he says, I think it's actually a pretty good definition. He says, jazz is the music of the intellect, but blues can only be emotional. Yeah, that's good.

Isn't that there's something earthier. That's the difference. He says jazz is the music of the intellect, but blues can only be emotional. Yeah, that's good, isn't it? But there's something earthier. That's the difference. It's in the kind of the atmosphere and the sound, I guess. And is he wearing a duffle coat at this point? Almost certainly he is. The fact that he writes that letter speaks volumes about his obsession. He is more into the blues than any future Rolling Stone will be by a huge degree.

So by this point, spring 62, he's in London. He's working as a client salesman. He's sometimes playing with Alexis Corners Band, Blues Incorporated, but he's desperate to set up his own blues group. So on the 2nd of May, 1962, he puts a classified advert in the Jazz News. He says, I want to form an R&B band.

I'm a guitarist. I'm looking for harmonica or sax. I'm looking for piano, bass, drums, etc, etc. He gets the first recruit is a chap called Ian Stewart, who's a Scottish jazz pianist. Got an absolutely enormous jaw, hasn't he? He does, he does, which actually dooms him, I think it's fair to say, like a Habsburg. Looks like Desperate Dan. And then in June, he picks up three more recruits from the kind of Blues Incorporated milieu. And these are two teenage friends from Dartford in Kent and they are Mick Jagger, Keith Richards

and a guy called Dick Taylor. So now we come to Mick Jagger. He's Michael Jagger, isn't he? Really? He's Michael Jagger, but he has by this point renamed himself Mick. Jagger was born a year later than Brian Jones. He's born in 1943. His father was a gymnast and a PE lecturer. Oh, like that sinister bloke in the Czech Republic.

I knew that comparison was coming. Yeah, Conrad Henlein. I mean, they're very different people. I just want to put that on record against Mick as listening. His mother was a hairdresser and a very keen conservative activist, I read. Mick like Brian Jones is very middle class. He sings in the church choir. He does very well at school. I think this is really important. He passes the 11 plus and goes to grammar school and then continues to do really well

and wins a place at the London School of Economics. And people often sort of pass that off. That's amazing, isn't it? That's an interesting little detail. Actually it's more than an interesting little detail. Actually, it's more than an interesting little detail. It says that Mick Jagger is both very bright and must be extremely dedicated and hardworking because to get into the LSE, which is one of those prestigious places in Britain at a time when nine out of 10 people

don't even go to university at all. And especially where he's come from, right? Dartford and Kent. That's an impressive achievement. He always comes across as very, very smart. Yeah, he's very smart. He'll be very smart throughout these two episodes. Now, Dartford Grammar School, he'd become friends with a plumber's son, another very

bright boy to be at Grammar School at all, called Dick Taylor. And they're massively into their jazz and their blues, the Howlin' Wolf, Muddy Waters, the Chicago stuff, all this. They form their own teenage band, basically playing in their bedroom. jazz and their blues, the Howlin' Wolf, Muddy Waters, the Chicago stuff, all this. They form their own teenage band basically playing in their bedroom. And it's at this point that Mike Jagger, he affects this accent. I mean, even now his accent is so variable. Yeah.

You know, sometimes it's quite, he's very well spoken and sometimes it's just the kind of the weird strangulated estuary voice that he does and he obviously starts calling himself Mick, doesn't he? I mean, not Mike, causeuary voice that he does. And he obviously starts calling himself Mick, doesn't he? I mean, not Mike, because he thinks Mick is cool. Well, he's not wrong. Is he not wrong really? I mean, in the context of the early sixties in Dartford. I think he should have called himself Mickey.

Well, thank God you weren't the Rolling Stones producer. Yeah, right. Exactly. The Andrew Lou Goldham of podcasting. Yeah. So, very famously in October, 1961, Mick has, you know, calls himself is on his way to the LSE and he's standing at platform two and Dartford station when he notices a boy from primary school.

You know, who remembers from a long time ago. And this is Keith Richards. Keith Richards is from a much more working class family. His father worked in a light bulb factory. His mother worked in a baker's shop and he has grown up on a council estate. He is not a good boy. He did not go to grammar school, he played truant from school, he was expelled from Dartford Tech and he ends up at Sidcup Art College and he's also very into the blues. So they're standing there and Jagger notices him and comes over and sees that he's got these records that Keith is carrying these

records and we know this because Keith wrote a letter to his aunt Pat right afterwards and described I was holding one of Chuck Berry's records when a guy I knew at primary school came up to me. He's got every record Chuck Berry ever made and all his mates have too. They're all Rhythm and Blues fans etc etc. So they have this little chat and Mick says to Keith, Oh, do you know Dick Taylor? He does know Dick Taylor. What are the chances?

Brilliant. Why don't you come and play with us? We can have our own little band and they set up their own little band called little boy blue and the blue boys. It's a terrible time. It is a terrible time. They wouldn't conquer the world with that. They would not.

Little boy blue. It's like potpast. It is potpast it is pop us So they're like playing in their bedroom and whatnot their mums kind of shaking their heads wearily and then in May 1962 They see Brian Jones is advert, you know, and they what are they now? 1819 and they answered the advert and the band is born. They played they met up They'd pay their first gig together at the marquee jazz club then in a basement in Oxford Street on the 12th of July, 1962. They decide to call themselves after a muddy water song and they call themselves the Rollin' Stones. Right. So no G, no G.

And they are unambiguously basically a Chicago blues tribute band. So when they sort of announced themselves to the world, the jazz news asks them about their name and Mick Jagger says to jazz news, I hope people don't think we were a rock and roll outfits. Right. So it's only R and B, but I like it. Exactly. It's only R and B, but I like it. And you know what?

They're not very successful. No one likes them. They are too loud, they're too raucous, they're too sort of raw, they play in church halls and in sports clubs and nobody cares. So at the end of 1962 Dick Taylor goes off to art college. Jagger and Richards are basically, you know, they're like, well, this is quite good fun. We'll keep doing it. And they move in with Brian Jones in this flat in Chelsea. It's the coldest winter in modern British history.

The third coldest in all British history, the big freeze, all that water pipes freeze, they've got no money. Keith Richards' mom has to send them food parcels. And they are all very close to their moms, aren't they? They are very close. Yeah, absolutely. It's very sweet. So they're absolutely freezing and really miserable and nobody likes their music.

But somehow over the winter, they acquire two new members. One of them, they get a bassist. He's called Bill Wyman. He's also a grammar school boy, but he's a fair bit older. This is really important actually in the Stones internal dynamics. Bill Wyman was six years older. Well, he likes hanging out with people who are younger than him. He does indeed. He likes enjoys the company of young people.

I think that's a thing. He'd done his national service in Germany. So he's been in the army. He was married. He had a baby son and he has a steady job. He lives in Penj, but he's happy. He likes the music and he thinks, yeah, fair enough. Although that said, he is always more conservative than they are. He lives in Penj, but he's happy. He likes the music and he thinks, yeah, fair enough.

Although that said, he is always more conservative than they are. And he's always suspicious of what he sees as their bohemian arty side, which he doesn't trust. So he's the Dominic Sandbrook of the stones. Well, is he, or is the next person Charlie Watts? So Charlie Watts is a lorry driver's son. Yeah. Maybe you're more Charlie Watts. And also the Bill Wyman comparison is one I want to encourage.

Charlie Watts is a lorry driver's son from Wembley. He's a trained graphic artist. His passion is jazz. He's a brilliant jazz drummer. He does not like rock and roll and he doesn't even like R&B. That's the amazing thing about Charlie Watts. I know. They have to persuade him to join the band and he only does it because he can see that blues is becoming more popular than

jazz and actually throughout the whole career of the Rolling Stones, Charlie Watts is basically playing music he doesn't really like. Just bonkers. And he's again, a very different character. He was married to his wife, Shirley for 57 years. He's not interested in the groupies. He doesn't go out going on tour. He collects model soldiers and memorabilia from the American

Civil War. And cricket memorabilia as well. Yeah, he's a great memorabilia man generally. He loves cricket, as actually Mick Jagger does. Mick Jagger's a big cricket fan, isn't he? And also Charlie Watts, very well dressed man, loves his tailoring. He is very well dressed. I think actually the Stones generally are very well dressed.

Yeah, they are. I think they're very well turned out. So 1963 comes and they get their big break on the 24th of February when Brian Jones, who's basically spends all his time writing to, you know, blues promoters and jazz people and stuff like this. He gets them a gig at the Station Hotel in Richmond, so near the railway station in Richmond. On Sunday nights, they have a club night called the Craw Daddy run by an emigre from Georgia in the Caucasus called Giorgio Gomelski.

The Stones come on and they play in this station hotel. And there's a rival promoter called Vic Jones who was there who said of that night, I honestly didn't know whether to laugh at the Stones or call for an animal trainer. I had never seen anything like them because they're just so sort of loud. That's a lot of shouting. Obviously Mick Jagger's style is very, he's kind of Leonine, isn't it? Yeah.

Leonine later on Andrew Lugo old and compared him with a Puma. Actually. Yeah. Puma Puma is better, but he has this kind of main, I guess. Yes, exactly. And Kamelsky, the promoter who's doing this, he thinks they're very loud and raucous and disorganized, but, you know, they've got something. And his adverts for this night, which is every Sunday, start to play on the fact that Stones will be there and their reputation. And he writes this incredible kind of bullion copy, the inexhaustible purveyors of spontaneous combustion, the unmitigating ebullient perturbing rolling stones,

or warning R&B sound barrier to be broken by rolling stones. Do you think this is why the Sex Pistols hated the stone so much? That they kind of looked at the stones and thought, that might be what we end up becoming. Yeah, I think so. I think that's the similarity, isn't it, that the Sex Pistols find alarming? Yeah, there's a real strong similarity.

So by the spring of 1963, they're getting a reputation among blues fans in West London. And that's not a big group. All sex of them. Yeah, exactly. Well, I mean, we get the first press cutting ever about the Rolling Stones in April 1963 in the Richmond and Twickenham Times. And this newspaper says there's a thing going on at this station hotel 300 people they're getting now every Sunday with long hair, suede jackets, gaucho trousers and Chelsea boots.

I don't actually know what gaucho trousers are. No, but you've been to Argentina, surely you're not sporting a pair of gaucho trousers as you strutted. I actually went horse riding in Argentina. Did you? But I don't remember any special trousers. There might have been some chaps or something like that, but um. God, I don't want to imagine you in chaps.

Brilliant. The other thing is that this point, the first appearance in the press is also the first point where people comment on their appearance. Their hair worn Piltdown style brushed forward from the crown like the Beatles pop group. And Piltdown style. Piltdown man. Yeah, Piltdown man. Friend of the show. Do you want to and Piltdown style. Piltdown man. Yeah. Piltdown man friend of the show.

Do you want to explain Piltdown man very quickly, Tom, to people who didn't hear that episode. Yeah. Fake prehistoric man. The missing link discovered in Sussex. Exactly. So the comparison with Stone Age man, which you hear a lot in the sixties, but also obviously the comparison with the Beatles.

So right from the beginning, they're being held to that standard. And as it happens, the very next day, who should come to see them play? But the Beatles, the Beatles have been filming for TV nearby in Teddington, and they've heard that there's this band and they come to see them at this hotel to sign actually of how relatively unfamous the Beatles are at this point. They're famous enough to be filming for TV, but not so famous that they can't go to a hotel to watch a you know a little local band and they go there and the Stones are very excited that the Beatles who are what a year or so older maybe max you know little more than that roughly the same age but far more famous. The Stones are very excited they

actually try to impress the Beatles afterwards by saying listen to this and they'll play random blues numbers that the Beatles have never heard of and are not interested in. So the Stones are desperately trying to sort of suck up to them but the Beatles are very nice to them. The Beatles say look we're playing at the Royal Albert Hall in a couple of weeks would you like free tickets? The Stones don't find that condescending they're delighted they're very excited. I mean but it is a brilliant thing to play at the upper hall, isn't it, Dominic? It is. We should do that to other history podcasts. Actually, we don't want to because I don't want to set up a Rolling Stones to our Beatles. That would be terrible.

Bill Wyman in his memoir says, Jagger and Richards idolized the Beatles and were starstruck by them. And I think this, you can argue this is a key moment for them, because this is a point when they, for the first time, meet people who have had the success of which they dream. And it's a point at which they glimpse, perhaps for the first time, what it would be like to become stars. And then just two weeks later comes the moment and the meeting that really changes their lives. So if the Richmond Station Hotel is the Rolling Stones' cavern, who will be their Brian Epstein? Find out after the break.

I'd never seen anything like it. They came on to me. The music reached out and went inside me. Totally. It satisfied me. I was in love. I heard what I'd always wanted to hear. I wanted it. It already belonged to me. Everything I'd done up until now was a preparation for this moment. I saw and heard what my life thus far had been for." So that was Andrew Lug Oldham, the Rolling Stones' first real manager, Dominic, remembering the moment on the 28th of April, 1963, when he heard them play for the first time. The kind of equivalent in the Stone story of Brian Epstein walking down into the cavern,

seeing the Beatles for the first time. And the amazing thing about him, he's Dutch. Well, was that what that was? Yeah, it was kind of my approximation to a Dutch. I'd never seen anything. How does a Dutch person with this, says for sure a lot. And does that sort of strange, they do that, don't they? That's what I was trying to convey. Maybe it didn't work. Well, he was the son of a Dutch American air officer. He didn't actually talk with a Dutch accent. He went to private school. He definitely didn't come out of a British private school speaking like a Dutchman. That would have been beaten out of him. He'd been beaten with his own clogs, surely.

So Andrew Lou Goldham, who's their first manager, he goes to see them play on the 28th of April, 1963. He is a tremendously amusing character. His autobiography, like Bill Wyman's is a cracking read. He's a very wily man. He's very driven and ruthless. His own autobiography approvingly quotes one of his critics calling him calculatedly vicious and nasty, but as pretty as a stoat. Is a stoat that the look that you strive for?

I don't know. Maybe it is. If it's a hot stoat is the look that you strive for. I don't know. Maybe it's a hot stote. Yeah. So after private school, he'd left early. He'd worked as an odd job boy for Mary Quant, the fashion designer. We talked about in our 60s fashion episodes, and then he'd worked as a sort of gopher for various pop promoters. People who are promoting Bob Dylan, working for people

who are promoting the Beatles. He really wants to be Phil Spector. That's a prison. He was where a weird wig. Look, I mean, I'm not approving of it. I'm just saying that's what it, you know, that's where he was at. I'm just reporting. That was his dream.

I'm just reporting history, Tom. That's how it is. People make bad choices. What can I say? He wants his own band to rival the Beatles. He's heard from a new sort of music industry insider. Go down to the station hotel in Richmond. And Dominic, I think there's a real kind of sliding doors moment there, isn't there?

Because this club, he goes there because it's on the same line as Frognell where he lived. Yeah. So it's easy to get to. Exactly. So if that hadn't been on the same line, he goes there because it's on the same line as, um, Frognell where he lived. Yeah. So it's easy to get to exactly. So if that hadn't been on the same line, he wouldn't have gone and history would have been different. History would have been different. Never heard of Mick Jagger. What would he be doing now? Who knows? He'd be an English teacher, wouldn't he? He'd be a PE teacher, maybe like his, uh, like his father, not at the LSC though. You wouldn't go to the LSC in it. No, he'd be teaching economics. Yeah, he would. He'd be a top economist. He goes down to this hotel on, he would. He'd be a top economist.

He goes down to this hotel. On the way in, he bumps into a young man who's having an argument with his girlfriend. He describes the young man. He was thin, waistless, giving him the human form of a puma with the gender of its own. That is a brilliant sentence. And this is Mick Jagger, you see. And it's a very good description of Mick Jagger. You're really right. If you read that sentence, someone said, who's this? That's clearly Mick Jagger. Anyway, he goes in, half an hour later, the band start playing.

Now, Andrew Lou Goldham knows nothing at all about music. He's only interested in this as a vehicle to make money. I like that in the music promoter. Yeah. I mean, he's got his eyes on the prize. And he goes in and then he says, oh, this is absolutely amazing. That quotation that you read in your lovely Dutch accent. He persuades them to sign a three year contract. Now I should say he's only 19 years old.

Yeah. I mean, it's bonkers that they've signed a three year contract with this man who knows nothing about anything, but he talks the talk and he finds a partner, an old school partner called Eric Easton, who's from Lancashire like our own beloved executive producer, Tony Pasta. So he knows all the nuts and bolts of the music industry. He's the kind of person that all bands had, but that doesn't fit into the sort of, oh, the 60s was an age of revolution account. So he's not groovy?

No, but he's, you know, he's the kind of person who says, Hey, and by the way, you know, I know how this works. You sign this deal, you do this, you know, that's what you need. Tom, do we not have that with the rest of history? We absolutely do. So Eric Easton, Andrew Lou Goldham arranged a meeting with Dick Rowe at Decker. And you mentioned him in the first half. He's the man who turned down the Beatles.

And Dick Rowe is looking for groups. He wants as many groups as he can get. And as it happens, Dick Rowe has recently been judging a talent show in Liverpool with George Harrison. And George Harrison had said to him, I went to see this band at the station hotel in Richmond the other day. They were quite good, the Rolling Stones. And so when the Rolling Stones come to him, he says, great, right, brilliant.

You know, what's not to like? And he signs them. Now at this point, Andrew Lou Golder makes two changes. First of all, he says, the name is rubbish. The Rolling Stones. Yeah, you see, he's worrying about that as well. Yeah, like you. Yeah. How well he said worrying about that as well. Yeah. Like you. Yeah.

How would he said, and I quote, how can you expect people to take you seriously when you can't even spell your name properly? I mean, he's not wrong. So the second thing is it said that it didn't become the rolling stones. Now, the next thing is that, um, he says six people in the band is far too many. Like someone's got to go. And he says, uh, Ian Stewart, like you, Tom, again, very similar people, you and Angela Goldham.

He says, um, in Stuart, he's ugly. He's too ugly and he's got to go. Get rid. I don't think he's ugly. I mean, I think if you like massive square jaws, he'd chew on a girder or something like that and have no problem with that, but I mean, I can see it doesn't blend in with the kind of androgynous look of the stones. Exactly. Now they say to Stuart, oh, I'm so sorry, you've got to go. And he says, well, fine, I'll stay on and I'll drive you about and I'll be your road manager, which is so sweet.

He's such a noble guy, isn't he? He does end up in a band, I think, with Charlie Watts, doesn't he? And Alexis corner. Yeah, they did indeed. So that's good. Yeah. And he drove around and did stuff for them and helped look after them for 20 years. I have to say Brian Jones promised him that he would get a sixth of everything. And did he? No, he didn't. That's bad. Anyway, we've now got to about May 1963. Now this is the point where Beatlemania is taking off in Britain. And obviously Andrew Lou Goldham does the obvious thing. He decides to make them just like the Beatles. So he takes them to Carnaby street.

He gets them velvet sort of jackets and little ties and Cuban heels. And they absolutely hate it. Matching uniforms. He gets Keith Richards to change his surname to Keith Richard. So he will sound more like Cliff Richard. I mean, that's mad, isn't it? It has a more pop sound. They're often confused.

He starts placing articles in the music press. So a very good example, Record Mirror, May 1963, their style, it says is quote, the new jungle music, they sing and play in a way that one would have expected more from a colored US group than a bunch of wild, exciting white boys. And this is actually important. I said we would explain why the Stones are so controversial. I think this is actually really important that people say from the very beginning, they are playing, you know, black music. This is unprecedented.

Well, that's the great quote in the Rock and Rolls fendle about Mick Jagger. Exactly. Unquotable, I think, on this podcast, Tom. Very much unquotable, yes. But it's a very slow start. They spend the summer of 63. the Rock and Rolls fendle about Mick Jagger. Exactly. Unquotable, I think, on this podcast, Tom. Very much unquotable, yes. But it's a very slow start. They spend the summer of 63. They're doing this long provincial tour.

And this is how rock worked in those days. They're supporting people like the Everly Brothers touring Britain, and they are playing the maddest, tiniest venues. So my favorite one, I always love this story. They played the co-op ballroom, none eaten, and they were playing, they were booked to play at an afternoon tea for the town's bribery school children. And when they came on stage and they start playing this music, these children who are literally eight years old, all threw cream cakes at them.

Oh dear. It's only rock and roll. Bill Wyman mentions this in his, he mentions this in his memoir. He said, you know, it was terrible. I hate it. Pastries raining down from those eight year olds. Yeah. People go on about Altamont, but this non-eating is the real, the real dark moment.

Anyway, this actually works because this is how you build a national reputation. So their very first single, which was come on a Chuck Berry cover had only peaked at number 21 in June, but by December, their second single, which is I want to be your man, which was given them by Paul McCartney gets to number 12 and people are starting to notice them at this point. So the Daily Sketch National newspaper January 1964 says to its readers, watch out for this new band with heads like hairy pudding basins. Got to say the standard of music journalism in the 60s was superb. Well, brilliant. There's more of it I think and it's more...

It's wittier. Yeah, it's fun because it's all new you see. It's all new. It's more of it, I think, and it's more. It's wittier. Yeah, it's fun because it's all new. You see, it's all new. It's gear. Yeah. Now, there's one really big development at this point hugely important for the Rolling Stones, which is the rise of Mick Jagger and the decline of Brian Jones. So Mick Jagger has all this time been at the LSE.

He's been a registered student at the LSE and he doesn't drop out until the end of September 1963 when he writes a letter to his tutors. I've been offered, I can't do his voice, I've been offered a really excellent opportunity in the entertainment world, he says. Now, up to this point, they had very obviously been Brian Jones's band, a blues band. Jones had put them together. Jones had booked the gigs. Jones had collected the money and doled it out, keeping the lion share, I have to say for himself.

But at exactly this point, he starts to lose his position. He starts to be pushed out a little bit, basically because he's a complete flake. He doesn't have the temperament or the stamina to tour and play full time. He keeps collapsing with nervous exhaustion. The other stones say he's a hypochondriac. They're always making jokes about, oh, has he got a doctor's letter? Is he going to let it from his mom to let himself off rehearsing or whatever? But crucially, Andrew Lou Goldham says to them, playing old blues classics will not

cut it. We're in a new age and a new audience expects people to write their own songs as the Beatles do. So, you know, Jagger and Richards say, oh, brilliant. We'd love to try writing our own songs. And Brian Jones doesn't want to do that. In fact, Mick Jagger slightly ungallantly, I think it's fair to say, said later, Brian couldn't do that.

To be honest, Brian had no talent for writing songs, said Mrs. Mick. None. I've never known a guy with less talent for writing songs said Mrs. Mick. None. I've never known a guy with less talent for songwriting, which is harsh. Right. About a man. Well, and now can't answer back. Anyway, anyway, Jack and Richard's move into a flat with Andrew Lou Goldham. Brian Jones has left on his own.

So he's even more marginalized. And as Bill Wyman says in his autobiography, Brian would try to ingratiate himself by crawling first to Mick and then to Andrew, which didn't do any good, he should simply have been strong in himself. So you find this, there's such a bunch of bullies. Well, Brian Jones, see, I think Brian Jones is terrible and they behave remarkably patient given his poor behavior.

But anyway, there you go. Yeah. Well, now from the start, I said, we'd get into why they're so controversial. They had been controversial from the moment they stepped onto the national stage. So they'd made their television debut at the very bottom of the bill on a kind of variety show called thank your lucky stars in July, 1963. They were still in their matching outfits. They were in checked jackets and slacks like lecturers at a Midwestern university, history lecturers at an American university, nice chinos or something, ironed with creases down the

middle. And even though they were wearing these outfits, ATV who made the show were deluged with letters, people saying absolute disgrace. And I quote, it is disgusting that long haired louts such as these should be allowed to appear on television. Their appearance was absolutely disgusting. The whole lot of you should be given a good bath and all that hair should be cut off. Your filthy appearance is likely to corrupt teenagers all over the country. Do you know the sense that Britain was a much more fun place? No, I know. The weird thing is when you watch the, if you look at them, the hair really isn't that

long. Very slightly long hair. But everyone wins, don't they? Because outraged people can be outraged. Yeah. The stones get to be dangerous. Yeah. And they're not really.

And everyone's a winner. No, absolutely, Tom. Everyone's They're not really, and everyone's a winner. No, absolutely. Tom, everyone's having a great time. I think they're also, they've got so much money, I think by comparison with what they had before. So they're all, you know, they're all excited. Now this is of course the summer of the Beatles. And I think the context of this really matters, but the Beatles are mainstream.

The Beatles, thanks to Brian Epstein's marketing, their huge popularity and then of course especially when they do things like the Royal Variety Performance or when they go to America and conquer the American charts, they become kind of national heroes. You were laughing earlier about Sir Alec Douglas Hume. Sir Alec Douglas Hume goes out of his way to praise the Beatles. He says if anyone asks why the Beatles are successful I can tell you it is because they are a band of very natural, very funny young men. That thing about them being funny, by the way, that is one massive difference in the Beatles and the Stones. The Stones are never, they're unintentionally funny, but they're never really funny, are they, in the same way the Beatles are?

Yeah. I mean, they are funny, I guess, in private. Yeah. But in their interviews, they're not kind of bantering and joshing and all that kind of ring going away. How did you find America turned left at Greenland? Hilarious. Oh, amazing banter. So I think what's happened is because the Beatles have occupied the center ground,

there is clearly a gap in the market for a group that is more unsettling, more rebellious. And this is where the hair comes in. Almost every single article about the stones in their first 18 months or so mentioned the hair. In mid-century Britain, I think in large part as a legacy of the Second World War and the mass conscription involved in national service in the 1950s, Long hair is viewed as dissident, dirty, licentious, subversive, Bohemian, all of these kinds of things. What's not to like? And people really are offended by the stones here. So in spring 1964, this is an amazing

the National Federation of Hairdressers held its annual conference and the president of the national federation of hairdressers devoted his speech to an assault on the Rolling Stones slovenly dirty and downright ragged appearance. Theo's very keen that we make the joke that basically the story of this episode is the Stones versus big hair. So it's basically big hair versus big hair. They kind of big or big hairdressing, I should say. Anyway, the puzzle actually is that the Beatles also have long hair, but that's clean.

It's fun. Yes. It's clean and wacky and fun. Here's, I think the difference. The Beatles, because they present themselves as funny and cuddly and child-friendly, their long hair is eccentric and quirky and entertaining, whereas the Stones' long hair is dangerous and threatening. But I think it's also because of the nature of the music. The Beatles music is already familiar. It's a

familiar style. It's not an alarming style of music because it's the beat music that has been around for a couple of years. The Stones music is rhythm and blues which has no chart history before 1964 and when people do talk about it they say what is it? Oh it's the music of poor black Americans and so people talk about it as kind of scruffy music, rebellious music and so I think even before the Stones have conquered the charts, before they've actually done anything wrong, the press are talking about them as bad boys, rebellious outlaws and so on. And for me, Andrew Lou Goldin's genius as a manager is having started out thinking I

will make them like the Beatles. He ditches that quite quickly and realizes we cannot possibly compete with them because they have such a massive head start. The gap in the market is for the anti-Beatles. It's for a group teenagers can have for themselves that will shock their parents. In his memoir, he says at the end of 1963, he consciously decided to turn the stones into quote, the group parents love to hate, dangerous, dirty, and degenerate. And he said to them, be as nasty as you can be in

your interviews and your public performances. And he is the guy who's kind of spoon feeds titles like you know would you let your daughter go up with the Rolling Stone things like that to the press so it's very very calculated isn't it? Exactly and that's the interesting thing right people always at the time and afterwards have said well the Beatles were very commercialized they were manicured. The stones are more authentic because they're more rebellious. Actually that is totally wrong.

The stones is rebelliousness is completely contrived and manufactured. Can I just read you something that I, cause I didn't have time to dust down all my rolling stones books. So I turned to Bob Stanley's, yeah, yeah, yeah. Yeah. The kind of Plutarch's lives of popular music. Brilliant pen portraits of all the acts, including the Stones. He said, The youthful authority the Stones perceptively had, which even the Beatles lacked, resulted not

from their knowledge of muddy waters, beach sides, but from their complete control of their image, sound and media angle from the start. Olden produced the records and designed the sleeves, while Jagger and Richards made sure there would be no pantos, no synchronized head shaking on stage, nothing predictable. Yeah. So it's the lack of predictability that enables their rise to become predictable. The contrivance, the manufacture is the lack of contrivance. If you know what I mean, there's a story, Oldham gets a guy called

Gerard Mankiewicz, very well-known photographer to photograph them. And he says, you know, snarl more, make it more or pilt down, more pilt down, more moody, you know, look more angry and difficult. Whereas in fact, actually they're not especially angry and difficult off stage, but the media love this. Everyone's happy. It works for everybody. So by an early 1964, the media are playing along the daily Daily Express February 64. They look like boys

whom any self-respecting mum would lock in the bathroom but the Rolling Stones five tough young London-based music makers with doorstep mouths, pallid cheeks and unkempt hair are not worried what mums think. So Mick must be thrilled at being called a tough young Londoner. Right but a weird thing is of course as we will see they do worry about what mums think, meaning their own mothers, because they're very filial. And the contrast of the Beatles becomes so explicit it becomes a cliché. Here's the news of the world, November 1964. The Beatles bubble with laughter, they make jokes, they wear neat clothes, they get along with royalty, but it's different with the Stones.

They leer rather than smile, they don't wear natty clothes. And at the end of the piece, the journalist notes correctly, the extraordinary thing is that more and more youngsters are turning towards the stones. The Beatles have become too respectable. And it's that very respectability that the Beatles clearly do have in 1963, 64, that gives the stones their opportunity to cast themselves as the antithesis of it. Had the Beatles been less respectable actually, there would have been much less room, I think, for the Rolling Stones to make a name for themselves.

And of course the irony is, is the Beatles are authentically working class, and their apprenticeship had involved any number of pills and, you know, hanging out with prostitutes and brothels and all kinds of stuff. But all that has been buried. That has been buried, as has the Stones kinds of stuff. But all that has been buried. That has been buried as has the stones. Respectability. The LSE and all that. The Mick Jagger going to the LSE. The fact that Bill Wyman and Charlie Watts had held steady, serious jobs.

The fact that Bill Wyman was married with a child. The fact that when journalists interview them, they say offstage, they are quiet and modest and Mick Jagger, their leader, Brian Jones would not have been happy with that. Mick Jagger, their leader, Brian Jones would not have been happy with that. Mick Jagger, their leader is unusually friendly and intelligent. That's from a book called the Teenage Revolution by Peter Lorry, 1965. Their parents, their family are really surprised at the criticism of them. Charlie Watts, his mother, he's always been a good boy.

We've never had police knocking on the door. He's always been terribly kind to old people, which is good preparation for going on tour with the road. Bill Wyman's mom says, what's going on here? And Bill, she asked about his hair. And Bill Wyman says, I love this quote because it expresses, it basically expresses my worldview. Like how I approach everything. Bill says to his to his mom, it's only for about three years off his hair and I'll get a nice car and a nice house fully furnished out of it. You've put fully furnished in italics. Well, I think the fully furnished, it's like there's the banal practicality. Euterish quality.

Exactly. Keith Richards always kept in touch with his mom when he went on tour and used to send her presents from the countries that he visited. Charlie Watts arranged to have his mum receive her favourite chocolate cake every Friday night. Isn't that nice? Yeah. John Lennon never behaved like that, Tom. He bought Aunt Mimi a house in Bournemouth.

He did. That's true. He did. The media, of course, aren't interested in any of that. Doesn't fit the personas and Oldham downplays it. And all that happens is their rebellious image becomes greater and greater. Every little incident, and of course there are bound to be lots of incidents because these are young men surrounded by adoring girls that drink, they're having fun.

Later on of course there'll be drugs. So it's not like there aren't any incidents, it's not that there isn't any bad behavior, but it's massively magnified. And it's a strategy that works. In April 64, their album The Rolling Stones knocks with the Beatles off the top of the album charts. In July, it's all over now, becomes their first British hit single. In December 64, Little Red Rooster becomes the only blues song ever to top the British

singles charts. But Dominic, just to say that in turn then gets knocked off the top by, I feel fine by the Beatles, which has that kind of amazing feedback at its start, which is no one's ever done before. So the idea that the Beatles are conventional and the Stones are rebellious in musical terms, it's the Beatles who are, I mean, way, way ahead. I would agree with that. That said, there's just not the musical journey of the Beatles, but in the next

18 months or so, they do have a pretty amazing run of singles, Heart of Stone, Play With Fire, Satisfaction, Get Off My Cloud, 19th Nervous Breakdown, Paint It Black and so on and so forth. But these are all their own, I mean, they're kind of their own songs, right? Yeah. And so that is taking them away from Brian Jones's vision. Exactly. Brian Jones is more and more unhappy with this because actually what they're no

longer doing is playing Chicago blues. They are evolving into a rock band, into something new, something that hasn't actually really existed before. I mean, imagine being unhappy that you've released Satisfaction as a single. So Satisfaction was their first US number one in 1965. Then they have their first US number one album out of our heads. A month later in October, 1965, when they released in America, December's

children, everybody's, which was their next album, the US title, it was advertised by a huge David Bailey poster in Times Square. So this is two years after they had been on that stage in non-eaten. Having kids. Having bums. By eight year olds. By eight year olds. I mean, that is bonkers.

Because we now take their rise and that of the Beatles and groups like them for granted, we underestimate, I think, what an extraordinary thing that was. Not least because stuff like this had never happened before and certainly never happened to a British group. It might happen now all the time. So we're used to the trajectory and there's a sort of formula. But at the time people like the Rodding Stones had never even been to America on holiday. So to go and have your poster in Times Square at the age of what?

22, 23? I mean it's a mind boggling experience for them. And the interesting thing is when the Beatles did this, the Beatles came home and they were national champions, patriotic heroes, hurrah, you know, banner headlines, but the Stones never enjoy that reputation because they appear more cynical, more confrontational. What they've done is they've established something that I think is new, which is the image of the rock group as insolent,

as representing aggression, sensuality, confrontation, generational discord. Well, that's the key thing, isn't it? And this is an occurring theme right the way up to the present, is that if you're a rebellious teenager, you don't want your parents digging what you're into. Yeah. But nobody had had that conversation before this point. No. So they invent that they effectively invent that they, I mean, the generation

gap, I think is massively inflated in the sixties, but there clearly is a market for a group that will annoy your dad. And the stones fill that gap perfectly. And actually at the point when they're conquering America, something happens in Britain that I think if you'd ask most adults in Britain in 1965, what's the one thing you know about the Rolling Stones? It is this story. So we'll end with this. Does this involve a micturation?

It does. Micturation. Oh, that's, that's what they pay you the big bucks for. Isn't it Tom? That kind of wordplay, witty wordplay. Yeah. Yeah. So in March 1965, they'd been giving a concert at the Romford Odeon. That's the other great thing about, about the sixties, right? Yeah. One minute. Times Square, you're in the Romford Odeon. That one minute you're doing something brilliant. And the next thing you're in that Boerum in the Newton again. And they've, they're Daimler, their chauffeur driven Daimler is bringing them back from Romford

and they late at night and they stop at a service station, a garage, a gas station, as our overseas listeners would call it in Stratford, East London. And the garage manager, whose name was Charles Keighley, just later told a court that a shaggy haired monster got out of the car and asked quote in disgusting language if he could use the toilet and Keighley said no this person was Bill Wyman by the way married with a child living in Penj and then the other members of the band got out of the car too and started to argue with Charles Keighley and said come on you, can you let him use the toilets? We piss anywhere, man.

Yeah, Jagger comes out with this terrible line. We piss anywhere, man. But still they're trying, they're not insisting, they're bargaining with the petrol station staff and Charles Keely lost his temper and shouted, get off my forecourt. At which Brian Jones started dancing around the forecourt stations, shouting and shouted, get off my forecourt. At which Brian Jones started dancing around this forecourt stash stations, shouting and singing, get off my foreskin at the station, ma'am. Not get off my cloud. No, not get off my cloud.

Anyway, this episode in glorious as it may sound ended with Bill Wyman, Mick Jagger and Brian Jones urinating on the wall of the forecourt and then driving off in triumph in their Daimler. Charles Keighley brought a private prosecution against them. They were dragged into an East London courtroom and convicted of insulting behaviour liable to cause a breach of the peace and handed a very small fine. And was this all arranged by Oldham? Well, this is a brilliant, this is an amazingly trivial and pathetic story, but it was like

front page headlines, stones, shame, but massive for their reputation, a massive, massive, their reputation. So a magistrate and a Scottish magistrate in a totally unrelated trial, about a week later, went off on a massive rant about the stones. Some incidents happened in Scotland. He said it's basically all the fault of people like the stones. He said they are quote, complete morons who wear their hair down to their shoulders, wear filthy clothes and act like clowns.

And the news of the world came out with a wonderful verdict. They wallow in a swill tub of their own repulsiveness. Does that make you nostalgic for the good old days when you were writing for the Daily Mail? It does. Coin phrases like that. Yeah, that's exactly the kind of stuff I would come out with. Right. That's not the end of the story with the news of the world and the Rolling Stones, though, Tom.

Because next time we will be moving forward to the end of the 60s. We will talk about the great scandal of their arrest at Redlands, Keith Richards' house and their trial on drugs offenses. We'll talk about the fate of Brian Jones, who's been pushed out of his own band. And we'll come to the moment that for many people marks the very end of the sixties, the death and darkness at the Altamont Raceway. Brilliant stuff, Dominic. Thanks so much.

Members of the Restless History Club can hear that right away. And if you are not a member and you would like to be and get to hear all about breaking butterflies on wheels, swimming pools and Hells Angels, then head to the restishistory.com and sign up there. We will be back on Thursday. Goodbye. Bye bye.