The Rest Is History - 604. Greek Myths: Sex, Drugs & Tragedy (Part 3)
Episode Date: September 28, 2025Who was Dionysus, the son of Zeus, and Greek god of ecstasy, revelry and madness? Why was he so central to the ancient Greeks? What is the story of the Bacchae, the play in which a young man is ripped... apart by the handmaidens of the goddess Artemis? What did it mean to be a Bacchae, one of the followers of Dionysus, and what shocking acts did it entail? Why were female cults like this believed to be integral to the survival of Athens? How did Dionysus’ cult subvert all the conventions of Ancient Greek society? What hedonistic revels occurred at his festivals every year? And, what hidden secrets about his historical origins have been unlocked by subsequent archaeological discoveries…? Join Tom and Dominic as they discuss one of the most exotic and erotic of the Greek gods: Dionysus, and the origins of The Bacchae, the tragedy that immortalised his story, but also transformed Greek drama, and thereby the world, forever… Try Adobe Express for free now at https://www.adobe.com/uk/express/spotlight/designwithexpress?sdid=HM85WZZV&mv=display&mv2=ctv or by searching in the app store. Learn more at https://www.uber.com/onourway Join The Rest Is History Club: Unlock the full experience of the show – with exclusive bonus episodes, ad-free listening, early access to every series and live show tickets, a members-only newsletter, discounted books from the show, and access to our private Discord chatroom. Sign up directly at therestishistory.com For more Goalhanger Podcasts, head to www.goalhanger.com _______ Twitter: @TheRestHistory @holland_tom @dcsandbrook Producer: Theo Young-Smith Assistant Producer: Tabby Syrett + Aaliyah Akude Video Producer: Bruno Di Castri + Jack Meek Social Producer: Harry Balden Executive Producers: Jack Davenport + Tony Pastor Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
Transcript
Discussion (0)
Thank you for listening to The Rest is History.
For weekly bonus episodes, add free listening, early access to series and membership of our much-loved chat community, go to the rest is history.com and join the club.
That is the rest is history.com.
This episode is presented by Adobe Express, the quick and easy create-anything app.
What does that mean?
Well, say you need to make a presentation or a video or a social media post or a flyer to some, certainly to me, that sounds intimidating.
But Tom, with Adobe Express's intuitive features like templates, generative AI and real-time collaboration, it has never been easier.
Adobe Express. Try it for free. Search Adobe Express in the App Store.
This episode is brought to you by SAP.
With investors, customers, and workers demanding more from your business, it's time to try SAP.
Its AI-powered capabilities can help you streamline costs, connect with new suppliers, and manage payroll even when your business is being pulled in different directions.
To deliver a quality product at a fair price, while paying your people what they're worth, too, so your business can stay unfazed.
Learn more at SAP.com slash uncertainty.
Agave was foaming at the mouth.
Her rolling eyes were wild.
She was not in her right mind, but possessed by Bacchus, and she paid no heed to Pentheus.
She grasped his left arm between wrist and elbow, set her foot against his ribs, and tore his arm off by the shoulder.
It was no strength of hers did it, but the God filled her and made it easy.
On the other side, Inoe was at him, tearing at his flesh, and now Outinaway joined them,
and the whole maniacal horde. A single and continuous yell arose. Pentheus shrieking as long
as life was left in him, the women howling in triumph. One of them carried off an arm, another
a foot, the boots still laced on it. The ribs were stripped, clawed clean, and women's hands.
thick red with blood were tossing, catching like a plaything, Pentheus's flesh.
So that is the devastating climax of the most shocking, the most blood-soaked and notorious
of all Greek tragedies, the Bacchai by the great Athenian dramatist Euripides.
It's a terrible scene.
Pentheus is being ripped into pieces by these women possessed with the spirit of Bacchus
as he describes it, and the little bits of his flesh are.
are left scattered under rocks and over trees.
Tom, you chose this lovely reading.
Yeah, I did.
In the episode.
Why?
It's unbelievably dramatic.
And it, I mean, it reads like, you know, a kind of description from the walking dead or
28 days later.
It has a kind of real zombie vibe.
And the scene where this is happening is Mount Kitheron, which is the very same mountain range
south of Thebes.
in central Greece, where the infant Oedipus in Sophocles' play, which we talked about in the previous
episode, was taken from his parents' palace. So generally it's not, it's a place where terrible
things happen. But the action in this play, in the back eye, with this poor man being torn to
pieces, is set four generations before the time of Oedipus. So Pentheus, the guy who's being
torn to pieces, he was the grandfather of Jakasta, who was Edipus's mother, stroke
wife. And he ruled as Oedipus was going to rule in due course as the king of Thebes. And we
highlighted in the previous episode how the Theban royal family is the most dysfunctional dynasty
in the whole of Greek myth. And this episode absolutely sets the seal on this reputation. Because
Agave, who you described ripping off Penthes' left arm, is Penthes' mother. Oh my God.
And I know and Otonoway, who are joining in the fun, are his aunts.
So it's, you know, as family rendezvous go, picnics up on the mountain, this is a very, very bad one.
And what's going on here is not that they are, you know, you used the Walking Dead parallel.
They're not zombies.
No.
Although in a kind of way they are, they have become possessed, haven't they become ravers, I see in your notes.
So what's that?
Mynads.
Mayanad, yes. So they've become what the Greeks called mineads, literally ravers. And they have been gripped by a frenzy that in Greek was called a bacchaya. And when you join a bacchia, if you're a minad, you dress up in the skins of thorns or leopards, and you roam the uplands, you leave the kind of the plains, centres of civilization and go up into the hills. And up there, you either you suckle wild animals. So you put them to your breast. Or,
you tear them to pieces with your bare hands.
And this is a right of kind of ecstatic dismemberment called Sparagmos in Greek.
And if you are a minad who is particularly off her face, then you might go one step further and
tear the flesh off your victim and eat it raw, which again the Greeks called omophagia.
And the excitement of it is that you are subverted.
every norm that governs conventional society in Greece.
So you are abandoning your city for the uplands, for the wilds, you're human, but you're
turning into a wild beast.
And if you're a woman, then you are casting off all the kind of the rules, the assumptions,
the decorum that is supposedly govern your behavior.
And in the back eye, Euripides describes the mine ads turning men to flight.
So men are playing the role of women.
So subverting gender norms, as critics would say now.
We love doing that on the rest of history.
And this is what the Bekehya is all about.
But having said that, it's not just Minads who are doing it.
You also get men who are called satires,
and the satire has a hint of the goat.
David Lloyd George.
Yes.
Yes.
Well, like Lord George, it's this kind of the exciting sense that you're casting off the norms
and you can do whatever you like.
Yeah.
And mynads satires, both are following the same god. And one of the names that this god has is Bacchus, for obvious reasons. He's the god of the Bacchia. He's also known as Omestes, the eater of raw flesh. He has a whole host of other names. But his original name, the name by which the Greeks generally refer to him, is Dionysus.
Right. So Dionysus. Of all the Greek gods, Tom, I have to say, I've always found.
him the most mysterious and obviously he's the most unsettling because of the rights
that are associated with him and we talked previous episodes about how people generally
encounter the Greek myths when they're children as children's stories but Dionysus doesn't
really fit in them at all when people think of the Olympians he's not one of the names that
first comes up but as we'll see as I know you're going to talk about scholars have become
more and more interested in Dionysus yeah in over the last century or so and he's moved
from the periphery, really to sort of
center stage in historians
understandings of the Greeks and their
and I was about to say their religion, I know you'll question
the word religion, and their experience
of the supernatural. Yes, exactly.
Yes. Yeah, so Dionysus tends not to feature
in children's books.
And also, he has always been
a challenge
to
those who have an idea of ancient Greece
as, you know, a world
of serenity and
kind of harmony and light and rationalism and all of that. And this was a stereotype of ancient
Greece that was very popular, particularly in Germany in the 18th and 19th centuries. So enthusiasts
for ancient Greece were always kind of mooning over the noble simplicity and quiet grandeur,
as one of them put it, of Greek civilization. But there was a kind of reaction against that
bubbling under in 19th century
Germany. And
the classicist who
most famously reacts against
it is the great philosopher
Friedrich Nietzsche
who
oddly ends up talking to a horse
in a quite kind of Dionyssen
manner. But very
early on in his career, long before that,
he published a book
called The Birth of Tragedy and he was only 28
when he did it. He was already a professor
of Greek. And essentially,
in that book, he is doing for Dionysus, what Freud would do for Oedipus a couple of decades later,
kind of make him into, I guess you'd call him a meme now, something, an expression of something
that seems simultaneously very ancient, but kind of thrillingly modern, thrillingly 19th century.
And what Nietzsche is doing in the birth of tragedy is to contrast Dionysus with Apollo,
who, for the Greeks, is the god of light, of beauty.
And Nietzsche insists that you can't really understand Greek civilization if you just emphasize the light and the beauty.
You also have to recognize the deeply Dionysian qualities that Greek civilization had as well.
And, you know, I mean, Nietzsche is more than familiar with the Bacchai.
The Bacchai plays a key role in the birth of the tragedy.
And he, you know, all this kind of tearing people to pieces and things.
He says he recognizes the darkness.
He said an effusive transgression of the sexual order
whose wave swept away all family life and its venerable principles
an abominable mixture of sensuality and cruelty.
So he's saying that's a bad thing.
Right. Not in favour of that.
But then he is also saying that it has, you know,
there's a brilliant size to it.
Essentially, it's fun, whereas he puts it,
the blissful rapture which rises up from the innermost depths of men.
I mean, that is German for fun, basically.
Right, yeah.
I'm sure that he expressed that in one word.
I'm a large huge German word
The essence of the Dionysin, Nietzsche says
Basically, it's like getting drunk
It's like getting pissed, it's intoxication
And Dionysus for the Greeks is the god who invents wine
So famously Dionysus is the god of getting drunk
But he's also the god
Who is there when humans experience
The thrill of nature that has not been tamed by humans
So the thrill of the wild
And also, and I think very germainly, and this is part of what Nietzsche found so fascinating about it,
and it's certainly what people have found fascinating about it in the 20th century,
the sense of ecstasy that you get when you dissolve your own individual sense of yourself into a crowd.
A huge theme of 20th century writing and 26th century criticism, right?
So, I mean, I know you're going to make a comparison with the 1960s.
You know, having read loads of sort of countercultural stuff in the 1960s,
people were always going on about this, about the joy of Dionysian revels, and that was what
the 60s represented, and, you know, that was the spirit, and we were, you know, sort of absolutely
reveling in the idea of sort of, that there being something, it is quite a kind of Freudian idea,
that there's something deep down buried that needs to be let out, and by drinking or by taking
drugs, and by forgetting your individuality and becoming one with your friends, you will
express some deeper, more authentic
truth. And that's a
as you say a massive thing in the 60s, but going into
rave culture, I mean, a man ad is literally
a raver. Yeah. And the idea
of going off to a field in Hampshire and taking
ease and whiz, this is, you know,
you could dignify it by saying
this is Dionysin. But there is also
kind of a much darker side to Dionysin,
the notion of the Dionysen
in the 20th century. So
there was a seminal study
of the Backeye, written by a
guy with a splendid name of R. P. Winnington Ingram, which came out in 1947, so immediately
after the Second World War called Euripides and Dionysus, Winnington Ingram had witnessed the
Nuremberg rallies. And in the introduction to his book, he wrote, we have lived through events
which have demonstrated tragically the dangers of group emotion. He doesn't specify what it is,
but in 1947, everyone knows what he's referring to. And so you can see why the idea of the
Dionysen, I mean, it's a very powerful one, because if it can embrace both, you know, the
counterculture of the 60s and the Nuremberg rallies, you know, you're covering a lot of
bases there. And I think that although today classicists do not accept the kind of the precise
details of the technical arguments that Nietzsche goes into in the birth of tragedy, what they do
accept is his broader case, which is that Dionysus has a really central role in Greek civilization,
in Greek culture and more generally the irrational.
Right.
You know, there's a famous book by E.R. Dodds, the Greeks and the irrational.
I mean, even Apollo, I mean, Apollo is counterpointed to Dionysus by Nietzsche.
But Apollo is an absolute bastard as well.
I mean, you know, he's killing everyone left, right and center, too.
So the sense of the dark and the strange and the weird and the ecstatic is crucially a part
of Greek mythology.
But a Greek myth, but not of the legends, right?
So here's the thing.
A lot of people, when they saw we were doing a series about Greek myth,
would have been like, oh, they're going to do Heracles, they're going to do Perseus,
they're going to, oh, Dionysus, that's a slightly niche one to choose.
And is that because Dionysus, he doesn't really feature in a lot of the kind of canonical stories?
Now, why is that?
Why is he, is he even mentioned in the Iliad at all?
There are very fleeting references to him by Homer, by Hesiod,
and he's not a central figure in any way, as you say.
And that is crucially important, because as we've said already,
the Greek understanding of the gods is mediated by poets, not by priests.
or prophets.
What about temples?
Are the temples to him?
Not many temples either.
And in fact, as happens in the plot of the Backeye, Dionysus seems much keener on kind of
pulling temples down than having them erected to him.
And I think a further reason why Dionysus seems slightly at the margins of the kind
of conventional understanding of Greek myth is that he is conventionally portrayed as a
very young god, kind of very youthful.
and he is also described as coming from beyond Greece
and particularly from the East.
So in the Backeye, for instance,
Dionysus describes himself as arriving in Thebes from Asia,
the fields of Lydia and Fridia, fertile in gold.
And Winnington Ingram in that book, which published in 1947,
he completely takes for granted that Dionysus is a very recent import,
that he's only just come to Greece.
And this is why he's not really mentioned by Homer or by Hesiod.
but actually our understanding of who Dionysus is has been completely transformed since the 1940s
because in the 1950s tablets from the Mycenaean citadles in Greece and from Crete were cracked
and these kind of very ancient tablets and it revealed that actually Dionysus is one of the
oldest Olympians and he has a temple on one of the islands in the Aegean that has been dated
as far back as the 15th century BC so he is
actually, you know, I mean, he's, he, he's been part of the Greek imagination for a very, very
long time. And although he's kind of hazy, perhaps in the public imagining as a figure of
myth, and although his cult does seem weird and strange when compared to the, the cults of
other gods, he is no less Greek than Apollo. And that's basically what, you know, what Nietzsche
had kind of intuited. And so his strangeness is not, you know, it's not a bug. It's an absolute
feature. It's there at the heart of Greek culture right from the very beginning.
Well, let's try to tell his story a little bit. So obviously, the fact that he's not
covered by these great poets, or he's not really covered in the same detail, means that
it's harder to piece together, to create a canonical story for him, as we did for, you know,
you told the story of Zeus, for example. You could do it with Hermes or Apollo or whoever.
Now, there are lots of different rival traditions, aren't there? So one of them is that the Titans
tore him apart and then they et him
and then they put him back together
which strikes me
it's kind of drawing on the rituals
that he's associated with
and then the other is that he's the son of Zeus
and Persephone who's the queen of the underworld
which one of those do you go for or do you go for neither
okay for all of them
and bear in mind that
Persephone was
Zeus's daughter
yeah okay yeah
by his sister
so there's a whole load of incest
going on there. There's a lot going on there. And there's also, there were traditions that there were
actually two gods called Dionysus. So essentially, I think what you have is that the stories
told of Dionysus are like, you know, haze of smoke. It's impossible to get a finger on them. They're
always kind of drifting away. But having said that, in Thebes, there is a very distinctive
tradition. And it, it derives from the one significance reference to Dionysus that we do get
in Hesiod. So we talked about him in the first episode. He wrote a, um, uh, uh,
a poem called the theogony that discusses where the gods came from. And to the extent that there
is a kind of canonical account of the origins of the gods, Hesiod provides it. And so what Hesiod has
to say about Dionysus, even though it's very fleeting, has a lot of weight. So what Hesiod said,
Cadmus's daughter, Semile, Bord's use, a resplendent son in shared intimacy, Mary Dionysus,
immortal son of mortal mother. And Cadmus, who we talked about in the previous episode,
Sowing dragon's teeth.
Sowing dragon's teeth.
The Phoenician prince, who had gone to look for his sister, Europa, never finds her, comes to Thebes and founds Thebes.
He is the father of Agave, the mother of Pentheus, who tears him to pieces.
And that means that Pentheus, the son of Agave, is the cousin of Dionysus.
So very much a family affair.
Very much a family affair.
And this is the story that Euripides, who is in Athens, you know, just down the road from Thieves, is drawing on for the opening of the Bacai.
So the play opens with Dionysus himself.
He's standing on the stage, and he announces to the watching audience who he is.
I am Dionysus, son of Zeus, my mother, with Semele, Cadmus' daughter, from her womb, the fire of a lightning flash delivered me.
And as so often in tragedy, we don't get the full story because the playwright is assuming that the audience already knows it.
And the reason that Euripides can assume that people know this is because another famous playwright,
called Eeschylus had actually written a celebrated play about exactly this drama. And so as far as we
can tell, the story that is told in Thebes and then recycled by the Athenian tragedians about the
birth of Dionysus in Thebes goes as follows. So Zemile is a priestess of Zeus in Thebes and
she's very beautiful. And so inevitably she attracts the attention of Zeus, who transforms himself into an eagle
and repeatedly descends on her
and very rapidly gets her pregnant with Dionysus
and it's evident from the beginning that Dionysus is something special
because you only have to touch Semelais's pregnant belly
and you were driven into a kind of ecstatic madness.
Hera, the wife of Zeus, relentlessly jealous,
understandably because of Zeus's record of philandering.
She finds out about this
and it's a slightly kind of snow white in the Disney film vibe.
She transforms herself into an old crone and she visits Semelais and she says,
you know, you think that this eagle coming every night is Zeus, but I mean, how do you know?
Are you sure about this?
And Semelay starts to worry about this and says, well, how can I find out?
And Hera says, the only way that you can know it is Zeus is if you ask him to reveal himself in the full
refulgent glory of his divine splendor.
And Semley says, okay, well, that's, I'll do that.
And so she's, she's in bed with Zeus.
I don't know whether he's turned into her.
Yeah, Zeus or whether he's still an eagle.
I mean, stroking his feathers or whatever.
And she says, darling, promise me something.
And Zeus says, I promise you whatever.
And Semley says, absolutely swear it solemnly.
You cannot break it.
And Zeus says, fine.
And then somebody says, I want you, if you are Zeus, to show me.
your full glory and Zeus desperately tries to back out of it you know trying to say please don't
make me do this but Semelay insists and so Zeus has no choice and he reveals himself this kind
of scorching blaze it's like looking into the heart of um I don't know an atom bomb going off or something
it completely shrivels and destroys Semelay and she's left as kind of charred smoldering ash and
Zeus picks up the unborn baby who's been left undamaged by this.
manifestation, and he sows the fetus into his thigh, and then a few weeks later, Dionysus is
born. So a very implausible story your father would probably describe it as. He would. But this is
what the Thebans absolutely thought had happened. This is the story that is being invoked at the start
of Euripides' play, because Dionysus describes in it how his mother's house smolders with the still
living flame of Zeus's fire. And Dionysus notes approvingly that Cadmus, who is still alive,
so the very, by this point, aged founder of Thebes, has consecrated the House of Semmelay as
as holy, as sacred to the gods. And Dionysus himself boasts of having decked it round with
sprays of young vine leaves. So the vine, of course, is holy to Dionysus. Yeah. So that's Thebes,
but there are Athenian traditions as well, aren't there? They're kind of rivaled traditions,
because the Athenians say, okay, fine, you know, he was born in Thebes, but he came to Athens,
and they have a festival celebrates it, don't they?
The Antheistaria, which is held in the spring.
It is, as is the way with Dionysus, it's simultaneously ecstatically joyous and deeply, deeply unsettling.
So the fun side first, essentially the Antheistaria is a kind of great communal celebration,
and all of Dionysus' festivals are communal.
It's all about the ecstasy.
of becoming part of a huge crowd, and it marks the opening and the drinking of the previous
years vintage. And everybody in Athens chairs in this. So slaves share in it, and women who
normally are discouraged from drinking wine, they also are, they can have a tipple. And it's great
fun. There's a huge procession. Dionysus is escorted into Athens from Piraeus, the port, and a cart,
and this cart has been made up to look like a ship
as the cart is led into Athens
it's surrounded by huge fallacies
and the whole celebration is inspired by a famous poem
that describes Dionysus' victory over pirates
the pirates are taking Dionysus as a passenger
they try to kidnap him and murder him
and Dionysus turns into a lion
and as he does so
vines start to grow out from the mast
and to wrap the tendrils wrap around the rigging and then the oars and everything
and all the pirates are turned into dolphins.
Just on the festival, this is a very boring and banal question, sorry, but you said
Dionysus is escorted into the city in a cart, decorated sort of like a ship.
When you say Dionysus, do you mean a statue, is that an effigy of doing someone playing the
part?
We will come to exactly who Dionysus is in this celebration in a minute.
I mean, you're absolutely right to fix on that, because the thing that is representing
Dianysus is incredibly interesting and then ties into the second festival that we'll be talking about.
Exciting. But just sticking to the Anfesteria at the moment, this idea of a great festival of Dionysus arriving in a city is clearly something that Euripides is echoing in the back eye. And the other thing that he is echoing in the back eye is the absolutely central role in this festival that is played by women. So there is a band of women who are called the venerable ones. So presumably they're kind of more elderly. They are appointed.
to make a nighttime sacrifice to Dionysus in one of the few temples that have been erected to him.
But it's telling that this temple is not in the city, it's out in the marshes.
And it is only ever opened during this festival.
And they all go out there.
And one of them who has been appointed queen of the venerable ones, then we are told, has sex with Dionysus.
And what exactly that means, I mean, we will never know.
We have no idea what that actually means.
but there are illustrations on vases made in Athens
that shows the venerable ones at this shrine out in the marshes
and they're drinking and they're dancing
and they're making sacrifice before the idol of Dionysus
and this idol Dominic, this is what you were asking about,
it's very primitive, it's not the kind of, you know,
the glowing sculpture that you would get in the museum today.
It's not what you kind of imagine as a Greek statue.
It's essentially a pole with a mask
hanging from it.
How would you have carnal relations with a mask?
Well, it's a mask hanging from a pole.
So who knows what's on the pole?
Yeah, the pole.
But I mean, the mask, what part of that?
Anyway, I'm overthinking it.
I'm not overthinking it.
You're not overthinking it because it is an intriguing question.
And if you've got a festival with huge fallacies, I mean, we don't know.
And I think lots of Greeks didn't know.
I mean, that was part of the fascination of what were these women getting up to in their temple.
I mean, and so you can see that it would.
would, as with us, kind of inspire all kinds of male fantasies and questions that is then
part of the context for what Euripides is doing. And that mask, from the evidence of Athenian pottery,
which is really the only evidence that we have, does seem from very ancient times to have been
specifically associated with Dionysus. And the mask plays a key role in the other great
festival that is celebrated in Athens. And in this festival, the huge mass,
of the city's male citizens
assemble in a theatre
on the slopes below the Acropolis
to watch the staging of myths
by actors who are wearing masks
and this is a festival called
the Great Dionysia
and it was staged in late spring
and unlike the Anthisteria
it's of relatively recent origin
so the late 6th century BC
Anthropesiria origins
reach back centuries and centuries
this festival is inaugurated
while Athens is still under the rule
of tyrants
but the tyrants get expelled, the democracy is founded.
And this festival, and particularly the acting out of stories by people wearing masks,
becomes a key part of the culture of democratic Athens.
It has at its heart this amazing cultural innovation that the Athenians call drama.
Right.
So that obviously includes tragedy, but it also includes comedy,
and it includes things called satire plays
and these are plays that have satires
so the male followers of Dionysus
as a chorus.
That's its own genre.
Satire play.
How any of them survived?
Yeah.
We have fragments of it.
Tony Harrison kind of wrote one
that gives you people a sense
of what it might have been like.
Right.
Was it good?
Yeah.
I mean, if you like a satire play.
Yeah.
Actually, I mean, I don't like it.
I don't know anything.
about satire plays, so I don't know if I'd like it to give it a go. Open-minded.
Yeah, I'm very open-minded. You know me. So you've got your satire plays. They're clearly
Dionysin. But actually, the tragedies and comedies, even though they don't always, I mean, most of the
surviving ones don't have Dionysus at its centre. Nevertheless, it's clear, I think, that the whole
festival is very, very Dionysin. So to quote Richard Seaford, who wrote a excellent book on Dionysus,
The drama festival was performed in a sanctuary of Dionysus, along with rituals for Dionysus, during a festival of Dionysus.
And on top of that, Dionysus is viewed as one of the key sources for poetic inspiration.
I think we can conclude from that that Dionysus definitely had a part to play in drama.
He absolutely does.
And also think about the communal nature of it.
Right.
Oh, yeah.
The crowd.
The audience.
Huge, huge numbers of people gathering.
Do women attend?
We're never told that they don't.
but probably not, there's probably not room for them.
I mean, maybe a priestess or two there, but probably this is a, you know, it's the mass of the
male citizens who are there.
And they're sitting down to watch stories that may not feature Dionysus himself, but these
stories tend to have themes that echo stories that are told about Dionysus.
So, royal dynasties tearing themselves to pieces.
So you get that in Oedipus, for instance.
Yeah.
Dramatic moments of revelation, dramatic moments where fortunes are
upended and reversed, and the downfall of someone who thinks to defy the gods while a chorus watches
on. So all of that you get in Oedipus. But what you get in the back eye is Dionysus himself. So he is
there nakedly, you know, for the Greeks, it's the equivalent of drinking wine unmixed with water.
Yeah. If you think about a conventional tragedy, Dionysus isn't present. That's the watered down
wine. If you have Dionysus at the center of the tragedy, that is like drinking neat wine. And
The Greeks tended not to do that because they knew that it was incredibly dangerous.
Oh, it's exciting.
So we've got to the neat wine.
It is powerful.
It's intoxicating.
It's dangerous.
And that is the back eye.
And we're going to be asking the second half, why and when was it staged when it was?
What did people think of it?
What on earth was the point of it?
What did people think of it when they first saw it?
And how does it point towards an excitingly radical interpretation of myth, Tom?
I'm just reading from your notes here.
Yeah.
You're doing it brilliantly.
Yeah.
One that continues to influence how we tend to conceptualize the world to this day.
I don't think we've ever had a more exciting cliffhanger.
So come back in a minute.
Dole it, can I just say, I mean, you could give it more welly, because it really is exciting.
What is happening in Athens at this point, and the back eye is channeling it, is something
that is going to profoundly affect the way that the Greeks understand the world,
but also continues to influence the way that we understand the world to this.
day. So after the break, probably the most important half hour of your lives, like a half
hour of Tom Holland chat that will change the way you see the world, you see the Greeks that
you understand the meaning of your own life and your purpose on this earth. Come back after the
ads, or if you remember the rest of history club, plunge in right away to this intoxicating
bath of undiluted wine and blood.
This episode is brought.
to you by Uber. Now, do you know that feeling when someone shows up for you when you need it
most? We all need that sometimes, and Uber knows it. Uber isn't just a ride or a meal delivered. It's
showing up no matter what. Like for your long distance friends, bringing soup when they're sick,
sending flowers when they're down. When it really matters, whatever it is, you show up. Where
there's a will, we're on our way. Uber.
on our way. Download the app today.
Welcome back to the rest is history. I can only imagine the excitement and the tension as
people look forward to this, the most thrilling 25 minutes of content we will ever produce.
25 minutes that will probably change all our lives because Tom really wanted to give this
some wellie because he thinks it's so important. It's the back eye. It's you rip.
Eurpedes's play, it was first staged in 405 BC, and even then, did people know how important
this would be all these years later for listeners to the rest of history? I don't know. Maybe they did.
No, I don't think that was uppermost in their minds. No. Because in 405 BC, they think about other things.
They absolutely are thinking about other things. So it is a posthumously produced play.
Euripides had died the previous year, according to tradition, in Macedon. And one year later, so in the spring of
404 BC. Athens is going to surrender to Sparta. So we talked in the previous episode, there's been
this great war that's been raging since 431 BC. Athens is on the brink of defeat and when the
defeat comes, it is absolutely total. So everybody who is taking a seat to watch the back eye when
it is premiered knows what they're staring down the barrel on. They're staring down the barrel,
not just of defeat, but of potential annihilation. Their city could be
flattened to the ground by the Spartans. And so I think that that raises two obvious questions.
And the first is, what exactly were they watching that spring morning of 405 BC?
And then secondly, how did it impact them, bearing in mind what the horrible political context was?
OK, let's start with the plot. So what are they watching? What's the story?
So we've described how Dionysus arrives and tells the audience who he is.
He has come from across the sea, but his own family have rejected him.
And part of the reason for that is that although he has revealed himself as divine to the audience,
he hasn't done so to other people in Thebes.
He's kind of in disguise.
And already, the punishment that he's visiting on his family for refusing to acknowledge him is kicking in.
So we're told that Dionysus' answer, that's Agave, I know.
Ortonoway have been driven mad.
They've gone out onto the uplands.
They put on their kind of, you know, their dainty fawn outfits, and they are roaming the mountains.
Pentheus is, he's an absolute square.
He's not into this.
He doesn't find it groovy at all.
And he is shocked in all kinds of ways.
So women running free, that's bad.
His grandfather, Cadmus, and Terracius, you remember our old friend, Terracius?
Yeah. I had a little stint of as a woman.
Yes, and then become a man.
But now he's got back into dressing up as a woman
because he and Cadmus have both dressed up as my nads.
They're very elderly.
You know, they look ridiculous.
So again, Pentia is not approving of that.
And the claims of Dionysus followers that he's a god,
Penthes also thinks this is utterly blasphemous and shocking.
And so he orders that Dionysus should be captured,
brought into his presence, and then stoned into death.
And he also orders that a squad of a crack squad of elite pig men should go up into the mountains and capture the
mainads and stop them getting up to their shenanigans.
However, obviously, it doesn't work out.
Dionysus is captured, but it doesn't take him long to reveal to Pentheus, to the Thebans, to the audience,
his terrifying divine power.
So Pentheus thinks that Dionysus is being tied up, but in fact, it's a bull that's being tied up. Pentheus can no longer distinguish between this bull in the stable and Dionysus. Dionysus then makes Pentheus's palace shake, collapse, and then the rubble of the palace is consumed by a great blaze of fire. And Pentheus emerges back onto the stage, completely bewildered by this, stabbing at the air. You know, he's starting to lose it.
At this point, a herdsman arrives.
He's come down from the heights of Mount Ketheron,
and he reports what he's seen there.
And basically, he's seen the mine ads,
and they are picking up snakes,
twining them into their hair.
They are putting Penthes' elite squad of crack pick men to flight,
and the women are doing this armed only with staves tipped with pine cones.
So, again, kind of very, very unsettling.
And they are going around,
and every time they find a cow or,
of bull, they tear it to pieces. And so the herdsman reports, you'd see some ribs or a cleft
hoof tossed high and low and rags of flesh hung from pine branches, dripping blood. Now, by this
point, it's as though, you know, the ease and whiz are kicking in for Pentheus. He's getting
increasingly spaced out. And he essentially is putty now in Dionysus's hands. He does whatever
Dionysus tells him to do. And Dionysus persuades Pentheus that what he should really do is
go up into the heights and spy on the Maynads and that the best thing, the best way to do that
would be for Pentheus to dress up as a woman, to dress up as a minad.
I feel like nothing good is going to, well, I know that nothing good is going to happen to
Pentheus. He's making it some bad choices. He is making some, but, you know, then again,
he's kind of off his face. And so Pentheus says, yeah, that's a brilliant idea. And by now he's
really tripping. So he says, I seem to see two sons, a double Thebes. He looks at Dionysus,
and he sees a pair of horns sprouting from his head,
and he is starting to recognize the God for what he is.
So he puts on his fawn skin dress,
and then Dionysus leads him off stage,
and they're going up to the mountain.
And it doesn't take long for a messenger to appear on the stage
and to report what happened next.
And we're told that Pentheus had reached the heights of Mount Kitheron,
and he wants a good view of the mainads who are, you know, rampaging around, having their
rave, all of that.
And so Dionysus pulls down a pine tree and he puts Pentheus on the top of the pine tree
and then he twang, you know, he lets the pine snap back up.
So that Pentheus is then at the top of the tree looking down at the Maynads.
And then Dionysus, the rotter, yells over to the mainads and says, hey, look at this.
There's a spy pointing up at the hapless Pentheus who's on the top of the
the tree. And the main house go absolutely mad and they start shaking the tree. And then the herdsman
says, from his high perch plunging, crashing to the earth, Pentheus fell with one incessant scream
as he understood what end was near. And that passage that you read at the beginning of this show,
that is what happens. He is torn to pieces. And shortly afterwards, on stage, Agave appears and she's
cradling her son's head. And effectively, you know, what the actor must have been holding is the mask of
of Pentheus. And presumably Agave is played by the same actor who'd been playing Pentheus.
So Agave thinks that what she's holding is the head of a lion. She thinks that's what she's
torn to pieces. And it's only gradually in obedience to the promptings of Cadmus, her father,
that she kind of comes out of her ecstatic state and realizes what it is she's holding and what
it is that she's done. She's devastated. She and her sisters are sent into exile.
And Cadmus and his wife are turned into snakes. So,
bad day for the royal family of Thebes, and the moral of the story is summed up by
Casmus at the very end of the play. If any man derides the unseen world, let him ponder the
death of Pentheus and believe in the gods. So a blood-soaked d'enumal, an absolutely
devastating play. And the obvious question is, what does it mean? What's the point? Because
is the, you know, are we to see Pentheus as the villain, as it were, who's being punished?
for not embracing the spirit of Dionysus?
Or are we, you know, is Pentheus a martyr, a victim?
And should we feel sorry for him?
And is Dionysus actually a terrible person or terrible God?
Yeah.
And I guess that's the point about the green myths, isn't it?
That it's impossible to fix a simplistic meaning
on something that seems so slippery and so nuanced,
but also, frankly, so strange and so terrifying.
Absolutely.
There are critics who see Pentheus as the villains,
see him as, or Dionysus is the villain. You can stage it, I mean, you could stage it as being
about the coming of the Nazis. You could cast Dionysus as, you know, as Hitler. Or you could
stage it with, you know, Pentheus as some boring square who is refusing to drop out and join
the hippies. Yeah. And as you say, that is a kind of the measure of the richness of this,
of Greek myth and of tragedy, is that two and a half thousand years on, it's still has this
kind of richness. It can be interpreted and adapted. But I'm guessing that that's a very modern
way of viewing it, right? The Athenians, when they saw it as part of a communal experience,
that is a central part of their city's calendar, and you know how important their civic culture
is to them. They would not have said, oh, this has multiple meanings, and it's very slippery
and nuanced. They would have said, it has one meaning, and the meaning is this. So what is
it? Well, I think the context is key. The fact that they are staring down the barrel of total
ruin and they're sitting there watching the dramatic portrayal of a city being utterly destroyed.
So Euripides is very precise about this in the back eye, that the ruin that's visited on
Pentheus is also a ruin that is visited on Thieves.
So to quote Euripides, the city, streets tremble and guilt, as every Theban repents too late,
his blindness and his blasphemy.
And I think it's impossible to believe that Athenians wouldn't have felt those lies.
as incredibly chilling
and thought about how
the ruin that's going to be visited on thieves
might well be the ruin that's visited on them.
Right. Yeah.
And what's more, it's the men who are sitting there thinking about it
and they're watching Pentheus, the king,
who has responsibility for the day-to-day affairs of his city.
In a democracy, it's the mass of the male citizens
who have that responsibility.
So they're watching Pentheus lead thieves to disaster
and they must have been reflecting, well, you know, Pentheus is us.
We, we, the citizen body, who have responsibility for the day-to-day running of this city,
whether it goes to war, how we conduct that war, we likewise have led our city to ruin.
I mean, I think it must have been devastating.
But their mistakes, if they are mistakes, have been political, military, diplomatic ones.
Pentheus' mistake is that he doesn't fully embrace what you would call Tom to do a Tom Hollandism, the dimension of the supernatural.
Is Euripides arguing that that is also the Athenians mistake?
Is he a sort of, is there a slightly Savonarola aspects, Savonarola and Florence aspects of this?
Basically, you haven't, this is an opportunity for you to revive your gravely voice, Tom, Severnorola's voice.
is he but is
European is saying the mistakes
you know the political mistakes
are merely a symptom of a deeper kind of moral
spiritual malaise
well as in the back eye
so in the dying days of the great war with Sparta
the Athenians would take for granted
that the gods are actors
in the drama
of what is happening
and normally for the Athenians
the readiness of the gods
to intervene in the affairs of their city is seen as a positive. So to quote Greg Anderson,
who I've already cited in this series in his book, The Realness of Things Past, for the Athenians,
the gods of Attica were not some group of faceless superhuman hired contractors. They were something
closer to benevolent governors or caring parents, beings who perpetually monitored and managed
the shared local environment, taking a personal interest in the life and well-being of their
chosen people. And the chosen people is the demos. That is what the democracy is. It's the
rule of the chosen people of Attica, the chosen people of Athena. And this notion of the Athenians
as a chosen people of Athena and of other gods as well, worshipped by the Athenians, this embraces
women as well as men. And in fact, it is women far more than men who are entrusted with the rituals
that exist to please the gods and thereby to keep the demos secure. So that's why these women
are going off to the temple of Dionysus in the swamp.
They're the ones who preside over the sacred rituals,
but there are other rituals as well.
So from childhood they've been doing it.
So at the age of 10, we're told the girls of Athens go out to a shrine of Artemis,
the goddess of the hunt on the shores of Attica,
and there they turn into bears and they run with Artemis.
Or they tend the sacred snake on the Acropolis,
or they weave robes for Athena,
which are carried up onto the Acropolis.
are used to adorn her statues. And Euripides himself is, you know, he is fully conscious of this role
that women are mandated to play in securing the health of the Demos and of Athens, because
we have a fragment from an otherwise lost play in which he states this explicitly. So to quote
this fragment, as regards relations with the gods, matters which I judge to be more important than
anything. It is we women who have the leading role to play. So he's ventriloquizing a woman in this
fragment for there are many rights which cannot legitimately be performed by men but which flourish when
women conduct them the order which prevails in the engagements of mortals with the gods is then
it can be said a female one and so that being so again imagine how terrifying it must have been
to sit there knowing that your city is on the brink of total ruin watching women running amok
worshipping Dionysus in a way that causes ruin for the state.
In the Bacchai, women are embroiled in the collapse of Thebes just as much as men are.
And again, I think that the relevance of this for the first audience of the Bacchai would have been stupefying.
They must have thought that, I mean, what's the lesson of the Bacchai?
That men can adopt policies that are disastrous, but also that
women who are mandated to keep the gods on side can run completely amok and be
complicit in the destruction of the city as well. So I think that that is a theme that must have
been overwhelming for the audience, the sense that men and women alike are embroiled in the
disaster that the Athenians like the Thebans are facing. And what is the argument that
Euripides is making then? What is the argument that he's, you know, how does this story illustrate
the deeper failings, you know, is it that they've, that they haven't honoured the gods,
that they've lived in an ungodly way, that they have...
Yes, I think that's absolutely, I think Euripides is saying that, well, I mean, it's a drama.
He's not saying it, but it's a possibility that is haunting the contours of the drama.
He's saying that men, like Pentheus, in the day-to-day running, they can, they can disrespect
the gods, they can lead their city into disastrous policies, but also that it's possible for
women who are mandated to honor the gods and to keep the gods on side, that they can also fail
in that responsibility. And that if men and women both fail, then the consequences for a city
is disastrous. Now, that, of course, is to assume that the gods are real. And there is another
possibility, one that is not countenanced in the back eye, where the God, you know, Dionysus is on
the stage. The last messages believe in the gods. But Euripides was.
notorious for having explored the possibility that the gods did not exist in other plays.
So, again, another fragment that hasn't survived in total from a play called Belerophon.
And Belerophon was a hero who fights the chimera.
Fights the chimera and rides around on Pegasus, the magical flying horse.
And in it, Belerophon describes murderous leaders.
So, you know, leaders of cities that come to disaster.
and he says he describes these murderous leaders
people who deprive citizens of their property
and break their oaths to sack cities
and despite this they prosper more than those
who live piously in peace every day
I know two of small cities that revere the gods
which are subject to larger more impious ones
overcome as they are by a more numerous army
so that has a real resonance in the
the terrible war between Athens and Spartan
all these kind of things have happened
and in it Balerophon argues therefore there can be no gods
because if there were gods,
and they wouldn't permit crimes like this to happen.
Exactly.
And of course, I suppose you could say Belorferon is just a character.
Euripides doesn't believe this himself.
But for Euripides to imagine a character who thinks like that
suggests that there must be people who think like that.
He's not going to imagine the unimaginable.
So Euripides is countenancing the possibility at least
that there is an argument to be had about whether the gods are real.
Yeah, well, we don't know what Euripides himself thought.
And it's worth, I mean,
emphasizing that Belerophon does have a magical flying horse.
And in the play, he uses, he flies on Pegasus up to Mount Olympus to see whether the gods
are real or not and is, they are.
They are because he gets, yes.
So in the play, his doubt is answered in a kind of tragic way.
But it is a staple of the comedies which are being staged in the Dionysa as well as the
tragedies.
Euripides appears in comedies by Aristophanes, the most famous of all.
all the great Athenian comic writers.
And for Aristophanes, it's a kind of standing joke that Euripides is an atheist, to quote
Aristophanes, he's always persuading men that there aren't any gods.
And for Aristophanes, Euripides is the spokesman for a kind of a real, a sinister, elitist
trend.
Metropolitan atheists.
Metropolitan liberal trend.
Right.
And this trend essentially is to believe that the stories that are told by Homer and by Hesiod and by the other ancient poets are inadequate to explain and characterise the true character of the divine.
And this is a trend that is more than a century old by the time that Euripides is writing the Bacchi.
And it originates on the opposite side of the Aegean.
to Athens, so in what's now Turkey, Anatolia, in the mid-6th century BC. And in time, so just a few
decades after the death of Euripides, this kind of intellectual trend will come to be called
Philosophia, the love of wisdom. So philosophy, which is probably the most, well, I mean, not probably,
I mean, it is the most radical and influential of all the intellectual achievements of ancient
Greece. And it originates as a reaction against the stories that were told by the poets, very
specifically. And so it's kind of manifests itself in all kinds of ways. So it's critique of the
kind of homeric anthropomorphic gods, the gods who look like humans. It's completely devastating.
So there's a guy called Xenophonies who writes, if cattle and horses and lions had hands or could
paint with their hands and create work such as men do. Horses like horses and cattle like cattle
also would depict the gods shapes and make their bodies of such a sort as the form they themselves
have. In other words, we only think that their gods look human because we're human. If we were horses,
we'd think they look like horses. As it often, he goes on to say that black people
worship black gods and that redhead people worship redhead gods. The redhead gods, I'm not
aware of any redhead gods. The Thracians, Dominic, apparently the Thracians had red hair and they
worship redhead gods.
Okay, well, there you go.
I stand corrected.
Other philosophers insist that Zeus doesn't hurl thunderbolts, that the sun isn't a fiery chariot,
that the universe instead is formed out of air or moisture or fire out of kind of universal
eternal substances.
And the very word mythos, which in Homer, signifies a story that is infused with authority,
with truth
that actually
it means the opposite
that a mythos
a myth is a fable
a fantasy
and the philosophers
oppose this
to another word
logos
which means
recent argument
so you have
you have myth
fantasy
and you have
logos
recent argument
so in a sense
this answers
the question I asked
in the very first
episode of the series
which is
did the Greeks
genuinely believe
this
did they believe
there were people
with heads
with the head of a ball or people on flying horses and all this kind of stuff.
And the answer is clearly, no, a lot of the, a lot of Greeks or some Greeks, not a lot,
maybe a, will come to how many, did not and said, come on, this is rubbish.
This is a, it's interesting, they are, the philosophy is born in opposition to story, right?
That's basically your, what you're suggesting.
It absolutely is.
And the most famous philosopher of all, who was, you know, a young man in his 20,
when the back i was staged and then when when athens fell the following year he goes so far as to
argue that in an ideal state the poets homer hesiod and so on should be banned and that man of course
is plato and plato in in the republic his attempt to um describe the the ideal form that a city
should take wrote poetry feeds and waters the passions instead of drying them up she lets them rule
although they ought to be controlled if mankind is ever to become happier and better.
And so, therefore, he says, you know, Hesia shouldn't be allowed in all this stuff
about Kronos cutting off the testicles.
I mean, it's just unacceptable.
Controvenes all kinds of health and safety regulations.
Well, I don't think that's the prime objective.
But, I mean, essentially what he says is that this is an invitation to insurrection.
Yeah.
You know, I mean, before you know it, all kinds of people will be having their testicles cut off,
and we can't have that.
And he also thinks that a hero seducing Zeus and, you know, all this, that it's just blasphemous.
And he doesn't want any of it.
So he still very much believes, I mean, if he thinks is blasphemous, he believes there is a supernatural element that needs to be treated with respect.
But he thinks these are basically silly children's stories that introduce the gods and actually demean them.
Yes.
And so, therefore, Homer should be banned.
Right.
And so, you know, you said lots of people believe this.
So the question then is, does this mean the end for the end for the?
the myths. With the emergence of philosophy, with Plato and so on, is myth going to die? And it doesn't
and for two reasons. And the first of these is that the stories that are told of the gods of the
heroes and so on are so intimately interwoven into the fabric of Greek life, you know, all the
cults, the festivals and so on, but also just the mental headspace. I mean, these stories are
so powerful, they're so strong. They can't just be banished. And the Sandbrook perspective on this
surely would be. Most people don't think about this at all. They're doing tilling their fields.
Exactly. Exactly. They're not intellectuals. They're not worrying about philosophy or whatever.
So myth remains part of, you know, it's just the kind of the air that they're breathing in.
Exactly. That would make total sense. They don't actually, if you said to somebody,
are you interested in the stories of Eucing Kronos or whatever? They'd say, sure, everyone knows
these stories. Do you believe them? They'd say,
I don't really think about them that much, to be honest with you.
I mean, we observe the rituals, of course, but I've got better things to think about.
So if we look at Plato, he sets up this school outside Athens called the Academy.
And it's so influential that in the long run, you know, it gives us the word academic.
But it's worth emphasizing it stands outside Athens.
It's not in the city.
And it is named after the tomb of a hero, Academus.
So the presence of myth is there right.
in the heart of Plato's school.
And it, you know, the Academy cannot remotely compare for kind of splendor and cost and
prestige with the temples that continue to stand in Athens.
No one is going to say, the Academy is more important than the Parthenon.
Right.
So it's the equivalent of a, I don't know, a liberal arts college in upstate New York
where they're coming up with all kinds of wacky theories and whatnot on, and they're living
outside capitalism.
But actually in New York City, no one cares and they're just, you know, kind of
of. Yes. I suppose kind of. But the other thing to emphasize is that philosophy doesn't
banish myth. It just creates a new one. So Xenophonies, even as he's saying, you know, cows would
worship cows. What he's really disputing is the fact that the gods look like humans. He absolutely
believes in a god. Yeah. I mean, and it sounds very much, you know, it will sound familiar to monotheists
today. Zonophonis, right, there is one god, greatest among gods and men, similar to mortals,
neither in shape nor in thought.
And those who are arguing that, you know,
the cosmos is made of air or fire or moisture or whatever,
the assumption is that these elements are themselves divine.
So in that sense, the whole cosmos is divine.
And Plato is himself the greatest of all myth makers.
And what he does with momentous consequences
for the way that we continue to think today
is that he makes the real unreal and the unreal,
real, because what he's arguing is that beyond the world as we perceive it, there is another
world which is perfect, immortal, unchangeable. And the way that this is always summed up is that
there are, you know, you have tables, all kinds of tables, but these are merely reflections of
the perfect table that kind of exists as in an ideal state. So what Plato is doing, he's banishing
the Homeric gods, but he's enshrining new gods. And these are kind of
of essentially abstract nouns, you know, kind of the just, the beautiful, the good, whatever.
And rather than a Bacaea, so going out and celebrating on the mountain, what Plato is offering
his followers is an assent, the idea that the individual has an ideal form, namely, you know,
in the form of a soul or whatever you want to call it, and that the soul can ascend from
the dimension of the material to, as Plato puts it, the best of everything which can be
comprehended by thought and which is eternal. And this in effect is God. And this concept is going to
be a massive influence on Christianity. On Islam. On Islam. So to quote Walter Burkart in his great book
on Greek religion, since Plato, there has been no theology which has not stood in his shadow. So there's
a sense in which the Greek reaction against myth that Plato exemplifies, but you also have Aristotle
and other philosophers too.
This is part of the Great River
which will feed into the emergence of Christianity
and Islam
and therefore is of titanic
significance, I think.
So now with Plato and with his ideas
we are heading towards
we're not quite there yet but we're heading towards
the Hellenistic era, the age
associate with Alexander the Great and his
successes. And I guess the obvious question
is after Plato
and after the, you know, the massive
of political disruption of the emergence of Macedon and Alexander and his empire.
What does this mean for Greek mythology and the Greek stories of the gods?
And how does Alexander in particular, how does he come to it?
Because he assumes such massive existential significance.
How does he change the way that Greeks think about the relation between mortal and the immortal?
And Tom, this takes us to one of my favorite Greek myths,
which is the story of Jason and the Argonauts, the quest for the golden fleece.
And this is what we'll be doing next time, isn't it?
And the exciting thing is, so we actually have our own crew.
We have our own Argonauts, and they can listen to that episode right away.
Is there any way that somebody who's not on the Argo right now could join the Argo?
Do you know of any such way?
They absolutely could.
They could sign up to the Argo by going to The Rest Is History.com and joining the merry crew there
and going to win the Golden Fleece.
And if you think this last half hour of this show,
was absolutely mind-blowing and life-changing.
Let me tell you, that episode on Jason and the Argonauts
will knock everything that's gone before
and the rest is history into a cockt hat.
So don't delay.
Join the Argo.
Sign up at the rest is history
and listen to it right away.
Goodbye.
Bye-bye.
Hey, it's Anthony Scaramucci, and I want to tell you about my podcast Open Book, which just joined the Goalhanger Network, which we're all very proud of. In my latest episode, I interviewed Goalhanger's very own James Holland. We spoke about World War II and what World War II teaches us about today. Here's a clip.
Prime Minister Winston Churchill. Well, I think he was a great man. I think he was a man of vision. He was a man of enormous geopolitical.
understanding. And he was a man who offered possibilities. When you're in a life and death
struggle, you need people that can persuade you. You need people that combined you. You need
men of vision of charisma. That's the problem with the moment since we haven't got those guys.
I mean, you know, he's flawed, of course. All the great men are. But thank goodness for the
developed world and the democratic world that he was political leader of Great Britain in 1940 and
throughout the whole of World War II. He literally, in so many different ways, man of the century,
I think because Roosevelt was a charmer. Roosevelt was a great strategist. He pulled the Americans through
the Depression and helped him manage the war. But without Churchill holding ground in May and June of
1940, it would have been a much darker, much worse world. It would have been not a lot that
the Americans could have done without Churchill's steadfastness and his inspiration to his fellow citizens.
If you want to hear the full episode, just search open book wherever you get your podcast.
You are not luminous, Watson, but you are a conductor of light.
Here they are.
Dr. Mortimer, I presume.
Yes, hi.
John. Dr. John Watson.
Who is your client?
He was my client.
Sir Charles Baskerville.
Keep reading.
A local shepherd noted, I...
saw first that of the maid, Hugo Baskerville passed me thence on his black mare, and there
behind him, running mute upon his track, such a hound of hell that God forbid should ever be at my heels.
I wish I felt better in my mind about it. It's an ugly business once, an ugly, dangerous business.
And the more I see of it, the less I like it, I shall be very glad to have you back safe from me.
found in Baker Street Passport
Hello
Goldhanger
Presents
You're not Sherlock Holmes
I'm Henry Baskerville
From one of the biggest audio dramas of all time
Is it bother you? Like in a creepy
kind of way? Like in
there's an evil giant hound that likes
The taste of Baskerville's kind of way
The seminal gothic novel by
Arthur Conan Doyle
They're watching
Who? Who are watching?
It's not safe.
I could just make out its pitch black form.
Welcome to deepest.
Everything a hellish void.
Darkest.
For this piercing yellow glow of eyes.
Dark mark.
What do you want?
Of giant facts.
No.
Sherlock and Cole.
The Hound of the Baskervilles.
Listen now.
Five stars, says the eye paper.
Hugely popular, says The Guardian.
A successful reinvention of homes for a younger generation, says the times.
Search Sherlock and Co. wherever you get your podcasts.