The Rich Roll Podcast - Arthur Brooks: Cracking The Code To Happiness
Episode Date: May 30, 2022Author of the instant #1 NYT bestseller entitled From Strength to Strength—today Arthur C. Brooks shares the ​​roadmap for finding success, happiness, and deep purpose in our later years. A pr...ofessional French horn player turned social scientist, Arthur served as president of the American Enterprise Institute think tank in DC for a decade—and is currently a professor of public leadership at the Harvard Kennedy School and professor of Management Practice at the Harvard Business School. In addition, he writes the popular How to Build a Life column at The Atlantic, which is also home to his podcast, The Art of Happiness. Needless to say, this guy and his work are featured in every prominent media outlet there is. Today’s episode is also viewable on YouTube: bit.ly/arturbrooks683 More about Arthur + show notes: https://bit.ly/richroll683 Arthur is as charismatic as he is whip smart. This one is packed with priceless wisdom and actionable takeaways for everyone regardless of age. I hope you learn as much from Arthur as I did. Peace + Plants, Rich
Transcript
Discussion (0)
Love is a decision and not a feeling.
It's a measure of who you are as a person,
as your decision to love in a world full of hate.
How do you reestablish a relationship with your spouse and kids
when that has become cordial at best?
How do you kick a success addiction
that is deeply rooted in the neuromodulator?
It's reestablishing love relationships
and replacing the substitutes for love that will never truly satisfy you.
Meaning and purpose for you are simply intertwined with the suffering that you've had with substance abuse, for example, with the relationships that suffered as a result of that.
And that's the cosmic truth of meaning.
When you avoid pain, you're avoiding meaning.
truth of meaning. When you avoid pain, you're avoiding meaning. When you're avoiding learning what your purpose is through resiliency, what you're capable of and the lessons you're supposed
to learn to avoid your unhappiness is to avoid your happiness, which is that we need pain.
The secret to being more satisfied is not having more, it's wanting less. That's the secret. The Rich Roll Podcast.
Hey, everybody, welcome to the podcast.
So last week, we dove deep on the value
of wisdom accrued with age,
what it means to be a modern elder
and how to adapt as we grow older. And we did that with Chip Conley. Well,
today we extend that conversation, how to make the second half of life better than the first.
And we're going to do it with the esteemed Arthur C. Brooks on the occasion of his latest book,
his 12th and an instant number one New York Times bestseller entitled From Strength to Strength,
which is this really powerful roadmap for finding success, happiness, and deep purpose in our later years.
Arthur is a professional French horn player turned social scientist.
He was the president of the American Enterprise Institute think tank in D.C. for a decade,
and he's currently the professor of public leadership
at the Harvard Kennedy School,
as well as professor of management practice
at the Harvard Business School.
In addition, he writes the popular
How to Build a Life column at The Atlantic,
which is also home to his podcast, The Art of Happiness.
And if you Google him,
you'll quickly realize that this guy and his work
is prominently plastered
on essentially every prominent media outlet there is.
I enthusiastically dubbed this conversation
Overflowing with Wonderful,
and it's coming right up, but first.
We're brought to you today by recovery.com.
I've been in recovery for a long time.
It's not hyperbolic to say that I owe everything good in my life to sobriety.
And it all began with treatment and experience that I had that quite literally saved my life. And in the many years since, I've in turn helped many
suffering addicts and their loved ones find treatment. And with that, I know all too well
just how confusing and how overwhelming and how challenging it can be to find the right place and
the right level of care, especially because unfortunately, not all treatment resources
adhere to ethical practices. It's a real problem. A problem I'm now happy and proud
to share has been solved by the people at recovery.com who created an online support portal
designed to guide, to support, and empower you to find the ideal level of care tailored to your
personal needs. They've partnered with the best global behavioral health providers
to cover the full spectrum
of behavioral health disorders,
including substance use disorders,
depression, anxiety, eating disorders,
gambling addictions, and more.
Navigating their site is simple.
Search by insurance coverage,
location, treatment type, you name it.
Plus, you can read reviews
from former patients to help you decide.
Whether you're a busy exec, a parent of a struggling teen, or battling addiction yourself,
I feel you. I empathize with you. I really do. And they have treatment options for you.
Life in recovery is wonderful, and recovery.com is your partner in starting that journey. When you or a
loved one need help, go to recovery.com and take the first step towards recovery. To find the best
treatment option for you or a loved one, again, go to recovery.com. We're brought to you today by
recovery.com. I've been in recovery for a long time.
It's not hyperbolic to say that I owe everything good in my life to sobriety.
And it all began with treatment and experience that I had that quite literally saved my life.
And in the many years since, I've in turn helped many suffering addicts and their loved ones find treatment. And with that, I know all too
well just how confusing and how overwhelming and how challenging it can be to find the right place
and the right level of care, especially because unfortunately, not all treatment resources adhere
to ethical practices. It's a real problem. A problem I'm now happy and proud to share has
been solved by the people at recovery.com who created an online support portal designed to guide, to support, and empower you to find the ideal level of behavioral health disorders, including substance use disorders, depression, anxiety,
eating disorders, gambling addictions, and more.
Navigating their site is simple.
Search by insurance coverage, location, treatment type, you name it.
Plus, you can read reviews from former patients to help you decide.
Whether you're a busy exec, a parent of a struggling teen,
or battling addiction yourself, I feel you. I empathize with you. I really do. And they have treatment options for you.
Life in recovery is wonderful, and recovery.com is your partner in starting that journey.
When you or a loved one need help, go to recovery.com and take the first step towards recovery
to find the best treatment option for you or a loved one again go to recovery.com
okay arthur brooks i'm sorry arthur c brooks can't forget that. So we cover a lot in this one, how to define happiness
and strategies to improve it. We talk about the role that negative emotions play in living a
meaningful life. We discuss the crisis of meaning that visits people as they age. Also the striver's
curse or what happens when we prioritize specialness over happiness.
We talk about the difference between fluid and crystallized intelligence,
how to confront your inevitable decline.
We talk about the increasingly important role that friendship, family, faith, and service play
in finding happiness as we age and many other topics.
play in finding happiness as we age, and many other topics. As I mentioned, this episode is very much of a piece with my conversation with Chip Conley. It's sort of an extension or bookend
to that conversation, if you will. So if you enjoy Chip, you're going to love Arthur. He's
very charismatic. We got on like a house on fire. This one is packed with priceless wisdom and
actionable takeaways for everyone.
It's also just super fun.
And I think you're gonna dig it.
So let's do the thing.
This is me and Arthur Brooks.
Arthur C. Brooks.
Do you still go to India every year?
Well, I can't during the coronavirus epidemic
because it's been closed.
But I have, you know, I did until coronavirus
once or twice a year.
It's super important to me.
It's just, it's, you've been there, of course.
I haven't.
You haven't been there yet?
Julie's actually only been once.
I mean, she went to Arunachala.
Yeah, so I'd go to every year,
I would do three things.
I would do business stuff in either Mumbai or Delhi,
you know, meeting with government officials
and, you know, random capitalists.
And because they're so interesting.
The billionaires in India are so interesting, right?
And every year I'd go to Dharamsala,
see His Holiness, the Dalai Lama.
And then in the South,
I would actually study with somebody.
In Palakad or someplace like that,
I would actually find a guru
who was willing to spend a day with me.
It's so interesting that you square that with being,
this, I don't know if you would call it devout,
but it seems like you're a pretty devout Catholic.
Yeah, it's the most important thing in my life.
How does that line up?
I love all religions,
but I'm in love with the Catholic church.
And I learn as much about who I am as a Catholic
by talking to people who are not.
It's really, really important to talk to people
who are not you.
Because there's too much uniformity
and spiritual compatibility does not expose you
to enough complementarity.
Complementarity in life is actually how you learn things.
You learn things from people who are different than you
in a lot of ways.
And you can stress test your-
Stress test and also just they give you the better technique.
I mean, studying with the Tibetan Buddhist monks
in Dharamsala is how I learned to pray my rosary.
Wow.
Yeah, I learned how to pray the rosary
with my breath and heart
by studying with the Tibetan Buddhist monks.
Yeah, that's interesting.
Yeah.
And how many times have you visited with the Dalai Lama?
10, 11, something like that.
Anytime I'm there and he's there.
The problem is that he's completely sequestered still.
He's 86 or 87 now in July.
It'll be 87 in July,
but he's been in the States many times with me too.
So when he would come here,
we've been in different parts of the States
and I would interview him,
but we've written together too, which is interesting.
What would you say is the primary thing
that you've kind of extracted from being in his presence?
The understanding that love is a decision
and not a feeling.
Elaborate.
It's that, well, St. Thomas Aquinas said that to love
is to will the good of the other.
It's nothing about feelings.
And this is an ancient medieval teaching
that actually comes from Aristotle,
that love, philia, is a positive decision
on the basis of who we are as people.
And the Dalai Lama lives that every single day.
He says, you must decide to love.
You must decide to love.
You might not like.
To like, as Martin Luther King said,
to like someone is a sentimental something,
but to love somebody is a positive decision.
It's hard.
It takes work.
It's a measure of who you are as a person,
is your decision to love in a world full of hate.
And the Dalai Lama is a living embodiment of that.
He's as wonderful as he seems.
I suspect that's true.
Yeah.
And it's interesting to hear love contextualize
as this action verb that you have control over.
It gives you a sense of agency.
Absolutely.
And I think our Western notion of it is backwards
in the sense that we're looking to receive love,
but we're not really adequately focused
on how we're giving it or exuding it.
Absolutely, we're a feeling based society.
And this is actually one of our great,
I mean, you think,
so one of your sort of preternatural gifts
is how you've engineered your life
on the basis of what you wanted it to be.
You know, this is one of the reasons
that I listened to your show and many people do
is because they want agency.
They wanna be fully alive and to be managed by themselves
as opposed to be managed by their urges,
their impulses, their appetites, and their feelings.
That's a phenomenon that we call metacognition.
And you're the walking example of metacognition.
You made decisions on how you're going to live
and you live that way.
And that is not a, just a Western brainy idea.
On the contrary, you know, the Dalai Lama shows that
in by understanding ourselves at a certain remove,
we can make these decisions for ourselves,
including how we're going to treat others,
the love that we're gonna show to the rest of the world.
I'm trying to take that in.
I'm trying to get better at like receiving,
but when I hear you say that,
all I'm thinking is, oh, you have no idea.
Like, I'm gonna wait till I get to the part
where I get to tell you about, you know,
how much your latest book like spoke to me
and how many things it's given me to think about
how imperfectly I've kind of made this transition
and live it on a daily basis.
And, you know, I look at it as a series of light posts
or kind of, you know, aspirational behavior patterns,
but I suspect, and I'm interested in your thoughts on this,
like this is not a linear thing.
Like this is a one step forward,
two steps back at times kind of thing
that, you know, requires a level of mastery
that we'll all take to our grave.
For sure, and the reason I wrote it
is because precisely I'm on the same journey.
And I wrote it as my own exercise in metacognition,
which says, I can be managed by my feelings
or I can manage them.
And the only way to manage your feelings,
I mean, the greatest way, Western way at least,
to manage your feelings is to journal. Right. It's my journal. This book is my journal. Yeah. Is the journal of actually the,
what I actually founded my research and how I wanted to apply it to my life. And the only way
that I can do that is to make it something I can share with you the way that I can share it with
other people. I know, I'm sure that you, the, the road to being the man that you are includes
helping people to be their best selves as well.
I'm sure that this show is a form of therapy for you.
Oh, 100%.
I mean, I invite people on who can help me figure out
how to take that next step on my growth arc
or who can talk me through
whatever it is I'm going through now.
So it is very self-serving in that regard,
but the greater mission of course,
or the guiding light is this effort to be of service.
And in that of course is the meaning and the purpose,
which is at the heart of this book that you've written.
And a side benefit is it's a vocation
that can support my family.
But there's an ego piece to it.
And there's a sense of like, how special can I be?
That plays into all of that.
And I wanna unpack all of that, but let's just,
we should probably kind of like set the stage
and contextualize what it is
that we're actually talking about.
We just had Chip Conley in here the other day.
I love Chip.
Who's the best.
He's a very special person.
And so we had a different version
of what we're gonna talk about today.
But all of this kind of subject matter
is swimming around in my mind like a soup.
So maybe the best place to start
is with how you conceived of this book to begin with,
because it kind of starts with this incident
that occurred on an airplane.
Yeah, right now I write, speak, and teach
about human happiness, but 10 years ago,
I was the president of a think tank,
a Washington-based research organization.
You grew up in DC and you know what these things
are all about.
But a lot of the people are watching
and listening to us right now.
This is like a university without students,
which many professors would say
is the best kind of university.
It's a bunch of smart people sitting around,
coming up with ideas, trying to impress each other.
Trying to influence public policy.
It's a very DC thing.
And it was a great organization. It's been around DC thing. And it was a great organization. It's
been around since 1938. And I was feeling like a proper big shot being the president of this
organization. And it was great as far as it went. But I was having a little bit of a crisis trying
to understand what the future was going to hold. I wasn't especially happy. I was working more than
I wanted to. I was away from my family more than I should have been. And there was no end game.
I wanted to. I was away from my family more than I should have been. And there was no end game.
I mean, work, work, work, work, croak, go to the wheels, come off. It wasn't exactly clear.
And furthermore, the whole idea is be as successful as you possibly can. And finally, you'll find satisfaction. That didn't seem right. And I'm a social scientist. So this is more than
idle curiosity to me. It's a research question for me. And I didn't quite know how to get my
mind around it.
And as I was going through this period of reflection,
I guess I had this experience where I was on an airplane
and I overheard a conversation.
Now my laboratory as a social scientist
is overheard conversations on an airplane.
So if I overhear you talking to your wife,
it might become a book.
Right, as this did.
Yeah, exactly right.
Careful.
Check your seats before you.
Make sure you're not sitting behind Arthur Brooks.
Fortunately, I'm getting, you know, my hearing
is not as great as it used to be.
So, but anyway, so the guy behind me,
I could tell he was an elderly gentleman
and he was talking to somebody I assumed to be his wife,
who sounded like an elderly lady.
And he was as near as I could tell explaining to her
that he might as well be dead.
And his wife was trying to console
this obviously disconsolate man saying,
it's not true, you'd be better off if you were dead.
He's kind of mumbling.
It's going on for 20 minutes that nobody respects him.
Nobody remembers him.
Nobody thinks about him.
And I'm thinking this is a guy
who's probably disappointed with his life.
He didn't actually live up to his own expectations
or get the education he wished he had.
And he's disappointed because it's over.
He's probably 85, I don't know.
The end of the flight, it was from coming from here in LA
out to Washington Dulles and it was a nighttime flight.
So I couldn't really see, it was dark.
And when we landed, you know, the lights go on,
everybody stands up and I'm curious.
Now I'm not trying, it's not prurient interest,
but you know, humans, it's my gig.
So I just flip around to see,
and it's one of the most famous men in the world.
This is somebody who's done 10 times
as much with his life as I ever will or hope to.
He's rich, he's famous, he's a hero.
He's somebody who's not controversial.
He's not Senator, he's not a entertainer.
He's somebody who has done amazing things with his life
a long time ago and is still rich and famous
as a result of it, still dining out on it.
And I get this glimpse of this mistaken view
of satisfaction and happiness.
Like the world tells us,
do a lot with what you've been given,
succeed, work hard, strive, achieve, bank it, die happy.
That's what the world tells you to do.
That's what the world says that that's the secret
to your happiness is money, power, pleasure, fame,
on the basis of your achievements,
do it as early as possible.
There's even a name for it based on a,
it's called the Holderlin strategy,
is get rich, famous, successful, powerful early,
and then dine out on it for the rest of your life
because you can achieve that permanent satisfaction. You kind of know that's not right, but I heard this guy, if anybody should be happy
with his life and proud of what he had done, it should be this guy. And I thought, so is he an
outlier or is the whole model wrong? And I started looking into that. And furthermore, I thought to myself, you're on the wrong track to me. The way I'm going 30 years from now, I'm going to be explaining to
my wife on a plane that I might as well be dead because I'm not very happy. And I'm not going to
suddenly get happy. Let's be honest with ourselves. I'm on a treadmill here and I gotta find some way to get off
because that's where it ends and I'm not happy now.
So come on.
And furthermore, looking at the data as a social scientist,
I know perfectly that the people who tend to be most unhappy
at the end of their lives
are the people who achieve the most early in their lives.
It's exactly the opposite of what the world tells us
because if you achieve a lot early on,
you can never ever live up to your impossibly
high expectations.
And furthermore, when the party's over, you know it.
You know, what goes up must come down.
Well, we see this played out in all kinds of ways.
I mean, it's the high school quarterback
whose glory days are behind him at 18
and never leaves the small town
or the professional athlete who had a couple of good years
and has to retire at, I don't know, 32
and then is faced with the prospect
of trying to find something as exciting and as meaningful,
which is almost a fool's errand at that point.
And it's a setup, right?
Because you think, well, how could my life already be over?
And this idea that that sense of satisfaction that you get
with setting out and then achieving these goals
has any kind of lasting emotional impact
that would give you some kind of sustainable sustenance
later in life doesn't make any sense at all.
It doesn't make sense on reflection.
And yet you're the limbic system of your brain,
your primordial processing center for appetites,
the things that make you drink too much,
the things that make you reactive when you're angry,
they tell you it's gonna work, man, it's gonna work.
Just stay on that treadmill.
Mother nature wants you to be,
have a lot of fitness in your capacity
to pass on your genes.
She does not care if you're happy.
She will trick you until the end of your life.
The neurochemistry is both interesting and powerful here.
Like my lens for this type of thing
is always through recovery and addiction
as somebody who's been in recovery for a long time.
So it's clear, like when you lay it out, it's like,
oh, well this is an addictive relationship
with something that is steering you astray.
But the neurochemistry of the constant dopamine hit,
and then the need for the bigger dopamine hit
is a powerful means by which we can all dilute ourselves
into thinking, well, yeah, but this next thing
or this next thing is gonna satisfy you.
Yeah, no, no, if I, you know,
I'm finally gonna drink so much
I don't need to drink anymore.
Nobody has ever said those words.
But there's an actually added layer of tyranny to this,
which is that when you were in the worst parts
of alcohol abuse, nobody said,
"'Hey, Rich, good job.
"'That's a lot of alcohol.
"'I'm really impressed.'"
But if you're-
The social reward system is inverse. But if you're- The social reward system is inverse.
But if you're a hopeless success addict,
and you work the 14th hour
instead of the first hour with your children,
you get patted on the back.
Are you kidding me?
Because you're just, you're a hard worker
and you're successful and you're,
they congratulate you.
They admire you.
Nobody admires somebody for doing five grams of cocaine
on a Saturday night.
But people- I know a few people who might.
You're gifted.
But this is the key, but it presses the same levers,
you know, hit the lever, get the cookie,
which is how dopamine works.
I mean, we understand this better and better.
The anticipation of the reward is so powerful
in creating the craving,
whether it's a behavioral or chemical addiction, it all works the same way.
And by the way, you notice that people
who are really successful, who are success addicts,
they tend to abuse alcohol more than people who are not.
You know, the people, the high socioeconomic status,
people who work really, really long hours,
according to the OECD, you know,
data across virtually every country, especially for men,
they tend toward alcoholism.
They turn toward drug abuse.
They, these are-
Well, maintaining that level of intensity,
you need some kind of escape valve.
Yeah, and there's also cross addiction.
Dopamine is dopamine.
And these are, there's comorbidities between dopamine.
It's one of the reasons that if you go to the doctor
and if you have abused alcohol, the first thing that,
and you say, I can't sleep,
the doctor should not prescribe you Ambien
because you could get addicted to Ambien much more easily
than somebody who's never engraved
these dopaminergic pathways into the brain.
Like, you know, Rich loves Susie on a tree
that you're mortified to see for the rest of your life,
even though the tree continued to grow.
So explain this existential crisis
that so many people face,
like you kind of set the stage,
but the experience of trying to reckon with this reality
is something I think a lot of people can relate to.
If they're not in it, they're inching towards it.
Yeah, and this is especially true for strivers,
the people who wanna make a lot of their lives,
the people who are trying to be their absolute best selves,
that they measure it in worldly terms,
money, power, honor, which is admiration,
or even the envy of other people.
These are natural yardsticks that they use.
But there's a couple of things that go wrong with that.
Number one is the satisfaction paradox.
You actually can't find satisfaction
by getting enough of those things.
You will reset.
There's a process that the brain,
in any biological process in the human body,
is called homeostasis,
that takes you back to equilibrium.
Because if you stay out of equilibrium, you will die.
You have to be ready for the next set of circumstances,
whether it's physical or emotional, to be sure.
But the bigger problem on this
is that you will outrun your ability
even to do the things that you did well,
which is the thrust of what I was writing about,
what I've been writing about in my research.
I mean, the strategic plan for the rest of my life.
You find that what people who are really good early on,
what they have in common is they face the puzzle
of the fact that things weirdly
that they were really good at and getting better at
start getting harder in their 40s. So, and nobody else notices because if you're a real
striver, whether you're in financial industry or you're a doctor or a lawyer or an electrician or
a bus driver, and you're just good at what you do and you take pride in it, nobody's going to notice
when things that used to be easier, a little bit harder that you're just, and you're not making
progress anymore, but you notice the The thing is that what happens typically
is in one's mid forties, after working really hard
and just seeing things get easier and being congratulated
because you do a good job,
that you're like, I don't, I'm kind of burning out.
I'm kind of feeling bored by this.
That's a signal that actually things have gotten harder.
So your dentist at 45 starts taking Fridays off.
Why are you taking, I thought you loved being a,
I used to love being a dentist,
but you know, everybody gets bored.
They're not bored.
They're actually on the wrong side
of their fluid intelligence curve.
Fluid intelligence is your ability to innovate,
your ability to focus,
your ability to get better and better.
You're a ninja at your job.
And your 20s and 30s is when it's like blue ocean, man.
I mean, you're just like, you're getting,
and then your late 30s, you peak
because fluid intelligence peaks
in your late 30s, early 40s,
and you start to decline.
And people who try to stay on that curve,
who try to keep their groove,
who wanna be special in that particular way,
woe be unto them
because they're gonna ride that curve
all the way down into the basement.
They're gonna wind up like the man on the plane behind me.
Yeah, a couple observations. First of all, down into the basement. They're going to wind up like the man on the plane behind me. Yeah. A couple observations.
First of all, baked into the DNA of the striver is going to be a denial of that declining
fluid intelligence.
They're going to fight it all the way to the death and just try to outrun it, basically.
Do harder and harder and harder work because it always worked in the past.
Yeah.
And what was somewhat dispiriting,
there's a silver lining to it,
but somewhat dispiriting is not only the inevitability of the decline of this fluid intelligence,
but how early it comes a calling.
Yeah, absolutely.
And you can keep doing the thing that you're doing.
I mean, I was perfectly fine doing what I was doing.
I was running a company and I was super energetic
doing all the things that I was doing,
but I was noticing it was getting less satisfying
and I didn't have the focus that I had before.
And I couldn't quite understand why.
And I thought maybe it was because I was just less interested
or I was out of steam or something.
And what it was, was I was on the wrong,
I was on the downward part of my fluid intelligence curve.
And I did not know that I was making a big mistake,
which was the failure to recognize
that that was not my only success curve,
that there was another one behind it.
Well, before we get to that though, so you're 58, right?
I'm turning 58 and yeah, May 21st.
Almost 58.
Nobody would accuse you of having lost half a step though.
Right?
Like it's a self, it would have to be a self-diagnosed thing
which would require like a level of like self-awareness
and you know, enough inside work
to be able to call yourself out.
Truly, I mean, but this is the Stryver standard
is you versus you.
That what all Stryvers know is they got better
than they were before. The Stryvers, you know, seen a quantumvers know is they got better than they were before.
The strivers, you know,
seen a quantum of excellence
as I was better than yesterday.
I mean, you're like a super athlete.
And if you're losing a step
in what you're actually doing athletically,
that's bumming you out despite the fact that you're like,
you're eating everybody's lunch for people who are your age.
That means nothing to you.
No, my visit to the pool today was, you know,
it was a reckoning of, a reckoning with my own mortality.
Yeah, but if you were swimming compared to me,
it'd be like- Yeah, but that doesn't count.
Exactly right, exactly right.
So when you're losing a step compared to you yesterday,
that's what's really, really painful.
And so you know the solution,
the striver's solution is to work harder, work longer.
And this gets into this deeply, deeply
dysfunctional addictive behavior.
Like when you're chasing the high,
what do you get?
How do you chase the high?
More of the drug, more of the drug.
And when you're getting less of the high back
because homeostasis and drug addiction and drug abuse
means that you take more and get less
and you simply
have to do more and more and more. You're chasing the elusive high that actually comes from that.
And that's what it's like to be on the wrong side of the fluid intelligence curve, mostly in your
forties, but at your fifties. But I know people in their sixties that are trying to keep up with
the young guys. They were the star litigator. You were a lawyer before and they come in,
they can crack any case. They're gifted. And the guys in their 60s and 70s or 50s even,
who are trying to keep up with the lawyers
in their 20s and 30s, that's the wrong path.
You wanna be Cincinnati's.
You don't wanna be the nattering old guy,
wandering down the hallway, knocking on people's doors.
Right?
It's true, but it's crazy.
When I first finished my doctorate
and I was writing these papers
that were so mathematically sophisticated
that today I can't understand them.
And I wrote them when I was in my mid thirties
and I can't understand them.
And at first I thought,
when I was starting to lose my edge
in this really pretty hardcore research
that I thought that I needed to work harder.
I needed to go back over my textbooks to
relearn my math to do that until I realized that this is the structure of the prefrontal cortex of
my brain. And there was another path. There was a better path. Weirdly, this is not what we talk
about. This is not the common knowledge because the success trajectory that's handed to us by our
culture is get better, get better, get better, get 10,000 hours. You'll never get worse.
You can be a star for the rest of your life.
Croak, done.
And that was the perdition of the guy
behind me on the plane.
And by the way, when you look at the biographies
of some of the greatest women and men through history,
you find that they died bitterly unhappy
because they were on the wrong side of their fluid.
So talk about,
there's a couple of really interesting examples.
Like you talk about Darwin and Pasteur and you know,
these guys that we, you know,
if you don't really know their story,
you would never imagine that they, you know, suffered this,
you know, kind of their version of this.
Yeah, the biographers don't care about if you were unhappy,
they care that you were great
because that's what goes down in history.
You know, this is a ritual, you know,
all these millions of listeners to his podcast.
They don't talk about the fact that, you know,
something might not have been going right
in your emotional life.
Yeah.
That's because that's not interesting
as far as the history of the strivers is concerned.
Charles Darwin is a perfect example of this.
Charles Darwin was the, he was the king of the Mambo
when he was 27 years old.
I mean, he came back from his voyage around the world
where he visited the Galapagos Islands.
It was the five-year voyage of the Beagle
that terminated from when he was 27.
And he came back and dropped this atomic intellectual bomb,
which later was known as his theory of natural selection.
He was introducing the concept of evolution
by his mid to late 20s.
And he was almost overnight,
the most famous celebrated
scientist in all of Europe. He was rich. He was famous. He was the guy on the plane early in life,
quite frankly, or any striver that we can imagine. He's killing it and he earned it. I mean, he was
no slouch. And he developed that in the next couple of decades. And then he hit a wall in his
early 50s. He actually couldn't keep up mathematically with his own field because it was developing more and more and more. He needed the knowledge that today is what
we call genetics, the field of genetics, which is just beyond his capacity. And so his forward
progress stopped and he was not able to update. Back in the old days, he would have been able to
learn this new knowledge, but for some reason he couldn't do it. And his creative work never made any more advances.
He wrote like 11 more books after that,
but it was all straw in his mouth.
And he went to his death regretting bitterly
the disappointment that was the back half of his life.
And it was Gregor Mendel who picked up the football
and took it across the goal line.
Yeah, interesting. For Gregor Mendel.
I feel like he deserves more recognition.
Well, Gregor Mendel is an interesting case, for sure.
I mean, a Czech monk who wrote his papers in German
and who invented the field of genetics
didn't actually get super famous for it
until after his own death,
because after he invented the field of genetics,
he was promoted by his local bishop
to be the abbot of his monastery.
And he spent the rest of his life in management,
doing human resource issues among the monks.
And he died in relative humility
serving his religious community.
So it's a kind of a different model,
but in a way it's a better model.
Do it.
Better than Darwin, for sure.
Oh, for sure.
Yeah, but the other thing is that he moved on
from his fluid intelligence curve
and then went on to serving other people.
He went on to becoming a,
he went from being a player to becoming a coach
in his own way, which is interesting.
Right, which is similar to the trajectory of Bach
that you talk about in the book.
Yeah, yeah.
I mean, these biographies are interesting.
As a social scientist,
I have a tendency to be like, study, show.
But it turns out that somebody's life shows
can be more evocative and winds up helping me a lot more too.
Bach is my favorite composer.
I was a musician for many years
and Bach was my favorite composer.
He was unbelievably prolific.
He lived 65 years,
published more than a thousand pieces of music
for every instrumentation of his time and had 20 kids.
This is prolific, right?
10 lived to adulthood.
How many wives?
How many women? Two, two.
I mean, his first beloved wife, Barbara,
died after seven kids.
And then his second wife, who is his copyist,
had 13, his last 13 kids.
And he was a total family man, absolute family man.
But what happened was the same thing that happened to Darwin
which is his forward progress stopped
when he was about 50 years old.
He was the most celebrated composer of the high Baroque,
which is this, the music that we think of as Bach today
was the rage.
I mean, princes were seeking him out for commissions
and he was super famous in all over Europe,
as famous as you could be before social media,
before that, he didn't have a podcast,
but he was pretty good, you know, in the Bach cast.
He was very famous and about age 50,
he was supplanted because his own son,
Carl Philip Emanuel Bach was developing a new musical style that took Europe by storm
and left the high Baroque in the dust
and Bach couldn't write in the new style. He just dust. And Bach couldn't write in the new style.
He just couldn't figure out how to write in the new style.
He was too far down in his fluid intelligence curve.
So he retooled his whole life
and he did it right by accident.
He became the most celebrated beloved teacher of his time.
He said, I'm gonna teach all different kinds of music,
especially the high Baroque.
I'm gonna teach chorus.
I'm gonna teach organ. I'm gonna teach all different kinds of music, especially the high Baroque. I'm gonna teach chorus, I'm gonna teach organ,
I'm gonna write textbooks.
He was literally had his pen in his hand,
writing a textbook called the Kunst der Fuge,
the Art of Fugue, when he croaked.
It was half a measure was written
and his own son who had supplanted him wrote in the margins.
At this point, the composer put down his pen and died.
He was like strong finish.
And he was surrounded in his ultimate,
his last days helping others, writing a textbook.
The textbook by the way is played as music in concerts today.
Imagine writing a textbook so incredible
that it's read as literature.
That's what this is today.
But at the time it was like, I don't know,
he's like an expert in disco, beats me.
That's what we would think of as anachronistic at the time.
And when he died, he died happy
because he was known as the greatest teacher of his time.
And he felt like he was serving other people.
He was on his second curve,
which is what the man on the plane missed,
which is what Charles Darwin missed,
which is what Linus Pauling missed,
which is what so many strivers,
what you and I are in danger of missing.
Unless we can understand what that second curve is.
So the second curve involves this reckoning
with your declining fluid intelligence.
In 12 step, they would say,
it's a moment of clarity that must
visit upon you where you realize that you have a problem. Uh, and then the first step towards,
you know, embarking on this second curve is a recognition and a cultivation of crystallized
intelligence. So let's explain that a little bit. There's a social psychologist in the middle of
the 20th century named Raymond Cattell, who noticed that there was kind of two kinds of geniuses.
And what he meant was people who have exceptional ability
and an accomplishment.
One blooms super early and they have innovative capacity,
the ability to focus, solve problems,
and they're kind of sole proprietors, big early stars.
And you would see them in law, in science,
in almost every field.
There's a second kind of genius that blooms really late,
like 50s and 60s.
These are the ones who are more historians.
They assemble other facts that actually exist.
They use a vast intellectual library.
They're better at working with people and forming teams.
They're much better teachers.
So applied mathematicians, for example,
they use the theories that have been developed
by other people in new and creative ways,
but assembling them, they bloom really late.
Theoretical mathematicians bloom really, really early.
And so he called the first fluid intelligence,
which is what Darwin had and which he declined.
The second he called crystallized intelligence,
which is wisdom,
the ability to recognize patterns, take information from other people and put it into coherent stories
and teach it. That's what it comes down to. That's what Bach did, it turns out. And there's these two
different intelligence curves. Now, later on, research showed very clearly that everybody gets
both. We all get both. Now, not everybody recognizes both.
Darwin didn't recognize both.
And a lot of people,
they stumble a lot early in their lives
until they don't actually realize
their own form of genius
until they are much later
because they have a misspent youth, for example.
Those are the people who only recognize
the crystallized intelligence,
but properly understood,
we both get both.
And the mistake that we make
is not walking from one to the other,
but trying to stay on the first.
Or just holding onto the former until, you know,
that ship is so capsized that making the transition
into the ladder becomes much more complicated.
For sure, and bitter.
And through bitterness, you can live in the past.
Right, so crystallized intelligence
is more about synthesizing information,
pattern recognition,
also leveraging a lifetime of experience
to have some kind of wisdom to share.
And then really it's about channeling it in service.
I mean, we explored this with Chip.
He calls it being a modern elder, right?
But whether you're a teacher or a mentor
or an advisor or what have you,
it's really just a giving back
of what you have accumulated over the years, right?
Which for a striver also, it's sort of like,
yeah, but it's about me getting, right?
Like, what do you mean I'm giving this away?
Totally, totally.
I mean, it's the hubris that comes from the first curve
is so hard to kick. curve is so hard to kick.
It's so hard to kick.
And part of this, because the accolades that you get
as the sole proprietor is the super ninja.
Well, you have to be a bit of the man in the shadows.
You're the guy behind the guy.
A lot, yeah.
And so this is the interesting thing.
So you find that you can find it in almost any profession.
So you go from researcher to teaching professor.
You go from, in your former line of work,
the star litigator to the managing partner,
or in entrepreneurship, you'd go from the innovator,
the startup entrepreneur to the venture capitalist.
Because the venture capitalists,
the most successful ones are pure crystallized intelligence.
And you don't find venture capitalists who are 25
or very successful because they don't actually have
the perspective and the pattern recognition built up through the school of hard knocks. You actually need to be a problem. Most
need to be a really good entrepreneur. And with that just incredible focus that comes from the
crystallized intelligence curve, and then walk onto the second curve where you can pick out the,
the ninjas, right? Right. Right. Right. In your case, when you became a professor at Harvard,
was that a conscious decision of embracing crystallized,
you know, this crystallized intelligence,
or was it a happenstance sort of thing
where it just seemed interesting?
It was on purpose.
It was on purpose.
I mean, I got to eat my own cooking.
And I had done this research to find out
how I was in the middle of an executive career
that I understood it looked like it had a dead end for me.
And I did the research and find out that sure enough,
I was probably five years late
on my fluid intelligence curve.
And I said, okay, what is my crystallized intelligence?
I'm an academic, I'm an idea guy.
I'm a social scientist.
Right. Right speak and teach.
Right speak and teach.
So I'm gonna stick it to you a little bit here
because what I see is a guy who has a lot of self-awareness,
who understood that his life in the think tank world
inside the beltway and all of that
had kind of run its course
and was sort of providing diminishing returns
to your wellbeing, et cetera.
You make this pivot, you become a professor
as a social scientist,
you got interested in this particular subject matter, you write this pivot, you become a professor as a social scientist, you got interested
in this particular subject matter, you write this book,
but the book's an instant number one
New York Times bestseller.
It seems like, and I'm sure this wasn't
your lived experience, but it seems like you went
from public intellectual to happiness guru almost overnight.
And ever since, have you not been on some version
of the hedonic treadmill going from speaking engagement
to speaking engagement to podcast
to you were just in Half Moon Bay,
it was the Atlantic Happiness Conference
that you were hosting
and you're publishing all these articles on the Atlantic
and you're on the news and you're on all the shows
and all that kind of stuff.
Like, are you not rushing around
chasing some kind of validation
in this like second or third act of your life?
And no judgment.
Like, listen, I'm like, I mean, we'll get to that.
But like, I'm just interested in how,
even if you were to disagree with me,
how do you know the difference?
Yeah, I know.
Obviously you've been talking to my wife.
Just pure observation.
No, it's ironic.
You know, it's ironic that I talk about
the success addiction and how to break it
such that you can get on your second curve,
which requires clarity and humility.
And just by dint of talking about that a lot,
you've fallen back into it.
For sure, for sure.
I mean, it's like those experiments in the 1950s
of primates where they could self administer cocaine
and within six hours they were sitting in front of the lever
hitting it until they died.
I mean, I'm a cocaine monkey.
I mean, I'm hungry to talk about this,
to spread these ideas to be sure,
but I gotta be careful because I can actually turn this
right back into something else.
Now, it's a different kind of work.
It's not a fluid intelligence work because writing,
speaking and teaching is synthesizing ideas.
And it is a, you are mentoring the world by passing on
this very valuable message to people,
but it's about your ego's relationship.
For sure, absolutely.
I mean, it's absolutely astute observation,
a fair one of that.
I mean, it's when you have,
when you strike while the iron is hot
and I'm doing something that is associated
with the excellence of the fluid intelligence curve
in a younger man, for sure.
And so I have to ask myself, where does this lead?
Does this lead to ever bigger and greater?
Does this lead to something?
And as soon as I start thinking that,
at least have the presence of mind to say,
no, this is a temporary phenomenon.
You're spreading these particular ideas,
but this is not forever.
And-
Keep telling yourself that.
Well, I'm lashing myself to the mast.
I'm on this popular podcast telling you.
But I have to be careful because I am a dopamine guy.
I really am.
Aren't we all?
I mean, we were built for this.
I mean, a hundred percent, I am. Yeah, yeah. And it's like, we were built for this. This is- I mean, 100% I am.
Yeah, yeah.
And it's like, we're two guys in our mid to late 50s
who on some level, you know,
one thing we share is that we're both hitting
a certain kind of stride, right, in our lives.
And I came to this very late and I feel like
I finally found this thing that like I'm good at,
that people seem to enjoy and I wanna make hay while I can.
And so I'm gonna sit in that denial mode
of I don't need to recognize
my declining fluid intelligence,
but part of what I get to do here
is synthesize information and share other people's wisdom
and pass that along.
So there is a kind of teaching,
kind of advisory mentorship piece to all of it,
but there's also a big ego piece.
Like how many people are watching and listening?
And like, how big can I make this?
And will this lead to something else?
And all of that kind of stuff, which is really,
it's dangerous and it's intoxicating.
And when you told the story in the book
about woman, the Wall Street executive,
who was very unhappy, very successful and said,
yeah, but maybe I just wanna be,
maybe I'd rather be special than happy.
And I was like, that was like a gut punch
because I've entertained that.
Like I'm a pretty happy guy,
but I go through periods of being exhausted
and burned out and stressed and somewhat unhappy and thinking,
yeah, but like I get to do this thing
and I feel really special doing it.
Totally, totally.
And that hits the same circuits that let you up.
Like I haven't had a drink in 19 years.
This is like having a drink.
It hits the same circuits.
Yeah, it's the same chemistry.
Sure, this is, I mean, cross addictions
exist all over the place.
And there's a reason that you have to be,
especially if you have monkeyed up your dopamine
with substances or behaviors
at a previous point in your life,
you have to be especially adroit.
You have to be awake to these types of behaviors.
And it led very least to be metacognitive about them,
to understand exactly what's going on.
For at least, look, Rich,
you just told me you're doing it. You didn't, you're not accidentally doing it. at least to be metacognitive about them, to understand exactly what's going on. For at least look, Rich,
you just told me you're doing it.
You didn't, you're not accidentally doing it.
No, somebody is discovering this.
You have the self-awareness to do this
because you have recovered from, you know,
something being in the grips of that.
You're not-
But as they would say in 12 step,
self-awareness will avail you nothing.
Self-aware-
I can call myself out,
but if I don't alter my behavior.
Correct, correct.
And my guess is that you do alter your behavior,
but the question is whether or not,
you know, you're working in a liquor store.
Yeah.
And so there is constant temptation
and there is a little bit of backsliding,
but we have to take care of ourselves.
There's a balance.
I want to serve people.
I want to lift people up.
My mission with my crystallized intelligence
is I am going for the rest of my life
to lift people up and bring them together
in bonds of happiness and love using my ideas.
That's what I'm going to do.
And when there's a ton of attention on that,
it's risky.
It really is risky, but I can't.
And you can't.
But the valence of that message,
like the depth and the resonance of that message
is directly correlated to the extent
to which you are walking that talk.
So the minute that you're out of balance with it,
that message is not gonna land.
It's weakened, absolutely.
And so I have to be very careful with that.
I have to have an exit strategy from this particular point.
This doesn't lead to lead to something else,
to something else.
And then suddenly, you know what?
Then I'll be happy.
Then I'll be happy.
I have to make sure I'm not fooling myself.
The new thing, you know,
that's always right around the corner.
Exactly right.
That's gonna satisfy that thing.
Well, you sat at the foot of a guru in India
who declared that your wife was your guru.
So does your wife keep you in check with this?
Yeah, for sure.
Or she's got the clarity to say,
hey man, time to come home.
Absolutely, I mean, maybe she's-
Sure Miami was great.
Yeah, that was Rich's podcast.
I talked to her before we started.
She says, well, enjoy that.
Enjoy that, but come home.
And that's really important because left unmediated,
it can be a really dangerous thing.
You can, and it's really, I mean, somebody,
and you're not the first person to recognize the irony
that I'm talking about, be careful with your ambition
because it's as addictive as any drug.
And then being very ambitious about the message
of talking about tempering your ambitions.
This is the kind of the nested structure
of actually how these things work.
Yeah, the lattice work of that
is kind of so beautifully constructed, right?
That if you're out of synchronicity with it,
it'll just fracture.
Wheels inside wheels, man.
And so, yeah, so my wife Esther is truly my guru
and it's time for me to come home.
And we have a time limit.
By the middle of June, this era will have passed, this epic will have passed.
Yeah, all right.
Well, I'm gonna put it in my calendar
and call you on that day.
All right, so one of the things that I appreciate
about the work that you do is that it's rooted in science,
you're a social scientist,
but as you have sort of written about repeatedly,
social science is very good
at kind of pointing out these problems,
but not always so great at the practical kind of off ramp
or on ramp to altering your behavior patterns.
So we can say, look,
you gotta get off the hedonic treadmill,
you've gotta let go of your attachment
to your fluid intelligence, all of these things,
but those are very ephemeral notions.
So let's root this in practicalities
with maybe first some thoughts on like,
what would make somebody happy?
What is happiness?
How do we make this transition gracefully
so that we can actually follow that curve
of being even happier.
Like that arc continues to go upward, right?
Through our 60s and our 70s,
if we can keep our health intact
to continually get more happier as we age.
Right, and the way to understand that is to begin with,
what's the hole in our souls that we're trying to fill
with the success that we're pursuing
in our fluid intelligence curve?
It virtually always has to do with love.
And why?
Because we can get more validation,
we can get more satisfaction early on
by sacrificing the non-special love relationships
and by being successful.
I mean, that's how people behave.
And so what do we need?
If we're fearful of what it would mean
to not be successful,
we have to remedy that fear by surrounding it in love.
Fear and love are opposites.
They're cognitive and philosophical opposites.
Love and hatred are not opposites.
Hatred is downstream from fear.
When we're fearful of being unsuccessful,
the remedy to that is more love.
And love only comes from human beings.
So what you find is that the happiness 401k plan,
that what you need to invest in all along the way,
which as the great thing about it is a 401k plan
and money means you have to sacrifice now.
You don't have to sacrifice now.
You actually enjoy now and into the future
is in the categories of faith, family, friendship,
and work that serves other people.
The more that we invest in those particular things,
the more that we can actually step away
from these hyper validating,
but ultimately unsatisfactory accomplishments
on the fluid intelligence curve.
And so one of the things that I talk about
is how do you start in your spiritual walk
when you're 45 years old and you're a declared agnostic
and think it's all woo-woo and nonsense.
How do you reestablish a relationship
with your spouse and kids
when that has become cordial at best?
How do you kick a success addiction
that is deeply rooted in the neuromodulator
that's just keeping you chained to that sense of success?
How do you break those shackles?
And so these are the things that we actually talk about.
That's what I talk about in the book.
It's reestablishing love relationships
and replacing the substitutes for love
that will never truly satisfy you.
Yeah, it's beautifully put.
The dilemma, of course, being for the striver
who has not been there for their kids
and really hasn't been super present for their partner,
has shunned any relationship with faith
and has lost touch with most of his or her friends
because of that allegiance to the career track
becomes a sticky wicket to undo.
And you go through kind of a series of,
the common things that come up,
like I don't even know how to do that.
Or I would feel it would be embarrassing
for me to call this friend
that I haven't spoken to in 20 years.
And I've been going through a version of this.
Like I noticed that I'm raising kids,
I'm working really hard.
It's like, I don't have time for much else.
And I miss my friends.
And I realized like, that's work.
And that takes like an intentionality and carving time out.
And I'm trying, and I don't always do such a great job,
but I really started to recognize in the last couple of years, like I miss my friends. And not only do I want them, you know, and I don't always do such a great job, but I really started to recognize
in the last couple of years,
like I miss my friends
and not only do I want them in my life,
like I need them.
And if I don't sort of water that garden,
it's gonna be really difficult.
It just gets harder and harder.
Yeah, yeah, there's a movement.
I mean, given the fact that traditionally
the loneliest people in America are 60 year old men,
60 year old men.
It's like the not 60 year old women, it turns out that 60 year old men, 60 year old men. It's like the not 60 year old women.
It turns out that 60 year old women tend to be pretty good because-
Women are much better at this.
At friendship. They're better at friendship because they put the time in on friendship.
You know, and they, that's why women, for example, they recover six months after being widowed,
typically to their old level of happiness where men never do. I told my wife that and she's like,
huh? Noted. Good to know. their old level of happiness where men never do. I told my wife that and she's like, huh.
Noted, good to know. The widow Brooks, you know,
it's like, I guess it'll be okay.
But it's so, and so what do they do?
There's in a couple of countries,
there's this thing called the men's sheds movement.
And what it is is that men who retire,
65 or 70 years old, they retire
and their wives drop them off to in these like sheds
where they do woodworking in parallel with other guys.
You talk about like it's the parallel play date
that your little kids do.
It's so infantile, it's hilarious.
Because they don't look at each other.
So the guys aren't looking at each other.
They don't know how to talk to each other.
They're making a birdhouse together or something.
It's sad.
You don't wanna be dropped off in a shed
to make a birdhouse with a stranger
because you don't know how to make friends.
It's like you're completely-
Or you're too afraid to call your friend
that you haven't seen in a long time.
Yeah, and so the key is, is actually you,
so one of the things that I recommend is that
the four are faith, family, friends, and work,
but strivers over-index on work
and under-index on the other three.
So the key is to right now start making a proper investment
in the first three.
So everybody should be reading.
I don't mean a traditional religious faith necessarily.
I mean, you need to read some wisdom literature
and engage in something that is transcendent
every single day.
Right, as a practice.
Yeah, everything, that means 15 to 30 minutes
of reading something, the stoic philosophers,
or literally studying the theory
of the work of Johann Sebastian Bach, or walking in meditation with a walking meditation in the
forest, whatever that is, or rediscovering the faith of your youth, whatever it happened,
or at least looking at that. The second is family and friends. You should be sending,
we all should be sending a text or email in each one of those categories every single day.
How are you?
How did that thing turn out?
You know, I was just thinking about you today,
whatever it happens to be, just to touch,
just touch, touch, touch, and then start,
you can grow it from there.
But when these relationships are fallow,
they're very difficult to, especially when it's like,
hey, I just retired, wanna be friends again?
It doesn't work that way.
We need to-
And family is insufficient on its own
or just turning to your spouse.
Your immediate family, for sure.
Yeah, I mean, one of the things that you find
is that 60-year-old men often will,
they'll, the strivers in particular,
they'll retire and they've got enough money, for example,
and they'll just want to hang out
with their spouse all day long.
The spouse is like, I got a life, man.
I got a life.
And they don't want that. And that's intensely lonely because they actually don't have that
closer relationship with their spouse, but it's the friend at hand. And if you don't actually
create these roots, it's interesting because the metaphor that I like to think of is the
aspen tree, which looks stately and solid and solitary. It's the striver. It's like,
yeah, sometimes I'm lonely,
but you can count on me.
You can take shade under me.
And the aspen tree is actually a great metaphor
for the way that we should be living
because it's one single root system.
All aspen trees in a particular grove are one plant.
The largest living organism in the world is called pando.
It's a 106 acre aspen stand in Utah. That's a 6 million
kilograms of wood. And that's really who we are. If you're thinking about the height of your tree
and the gloriousness of your leaves, you're getting it wrong. The health of your tree is
actually the health of the next tree. You need to be cultivating your root system because your life is that next tree.
And you need to see yourself in your children, to see yourself in your friends. The Buddhists say
that individuality is an illusion. That is literally an illusion that Rich and Arthur are
different guys. That's how the Buddhists see it. That's a very sophisticated philosophy,
but it's easy to understand somewhat conceptually. And that's what we need to attain. Yeah, and that really underscores the difference
between East and West.
I mean, the idea that, you know,
there is no such thing as separateness
versus the rugged individualism of the West
that breeds the striver to build these peons to his ego
and to, you know, hearken to the world
that he is the self-made man. Like it's difficult for to, you know, hearken to the world that he is the self-made man.
Like it's difficult for that, you know,
identity construct to then say, yes, I'm a root system,
you know, tied to everything else.
You have to deprogram all of that
to get back to that essential truth.
For sure.
And it's interesting, you know, I have,
since doing this work, I've cultivated friendships.
I have a very close friend in Atlanta,
somebody that we talk about things that matter.
We text each other about things that matter.
What's that?
No sheds, no birdhouses.
I have a friend here in San Francisco, here in California,
that I talk to two times a week on the telephone.
I mean, he's 80, I'm 58.
I learn a lot from him.
I love him.
I love him.
I mean, he's just such an interesting person,
but we have a real friendship.
This is the key to remember is when you're thinking
about the people around you, ask yourself,
put them in a category.
I make my students do this at Harvard,
you know, because my students are MBA students.
They're big achievers, big strivers.
I make them take all of,
take your 20 closest friends
and put them on a piece of paper
and put a line on the piece of paper
and put in one column real and the other column deal.
And put your friends in one of those two groups.
And it was your kid that came up with that idea, right?
It was my kid, yeah.
Real friends or deal friends.
Yeah, I was talking to a guy on the phone
and I was actually delaying a fishing trip
because I was talking to a guy on the phone.
And a long time, a long conversation about a deal.
We were doing a deal.
And afterward, he said, who's that dad?
He's 11.
And he said, who's that dad?
I said, it was a friend.
He said, really?
Is it a real friend or a deal friend?
Right.
Clever boy.
Yeah, that's gold.
That's a good one.
It's a good one.
Now that boy now is a sniper in the US Marine Corps.
Oh, wow.
Six foot five, 4.3% body fat.
Fluid intelligence intact. Yeah, yeah, yeah.
It's fluid intelligence, tattoos,
large explosions and love for America.
Wow, okay.
Obviously the driving principle here
is to extend your happiness later in life.
But like, explain to me how you think about happiness.
Like what is that concept?
What is happiness?
How do you define happiness?
Yeah.
Because there's so many different ideas
around how to think about this.
Yeah, so saying happiness gets people's attention
because they know they want it.
But then when they think about it,
they don't know what it is.
And so I ask my students on the first day of class,
and that look, it's a hard class to get into.
There's a lot of competition to get into the class.
So I say, look, you're in this class, you bid your points, because this is a point
system for getting electives at Harvard Business School. It's a market. And I say, so you must know
what it is, right? What is it? And they'll go around and say, it's the feeling I get when I
remember. Wrong. Happiness is not a feeling any more than the smell of the turkey is your
Thanksgiving dinner. That's turkey is your Thanksgiving dinner.
That's evidence of your Thanksgiving dinner. Your feeling is evidence of it. If we look at the
happiest people and the unhappiest people, the happiest people have in common three macronutrients.
Like you and I are interested in this stuff. If I say, what is the Thanksgiving dinner? You're
going to say, because you're a guy who does this stuff, it's protein, carbohydrates, and fat.
That's what your Thanksgiving dinner, literally does this stuff is protein, carbohydrates, and fat. That's what your
Thanksgiving dinner, literally your Thanksgiving dinner is proteins, carbohydrates, and fats.
You're making your macros or not if you're going to be healthy. Happiness has three macronutrients,
enjoyment, satisfaction, and purpose, which you need in balance and abundance. And if you don't
have all those three, you're not going to be a happy person. So when I talk to somebody who says,
I'm just, and you know, when you're a happiness specialist,
people talk to you like you're a psychiatrist.
And so I'll talk to very powerful people say,
frankly, I'm just not happy.
I will look at their macronutrient profile
in the same way that if you said,
ah, my digestion's all goofed up.
Well, probably you're not eating,
you're not getting the right macros.
And ordinarily what I'll find with strivers
is that they're very high in stoic work ethic
to get a whole lot of long-term meaning.
And they're very low in enjoyment,
very low in enjoyment what I find.
If I'm talking to undergraduate students,
they're very high in enjoyment
on the basis of a high dose of pleasure.
They're sort of epicurean in their outlook
and they're very low in meaning.
They're not getting a whole lot of meaning
or if they're real success junkies,
they're trying to get as much satisfaction as they can.
And it's elusive because they're on the treadmill.
You know, it's like work hard, get the hit, you know,
okay, well that was good for a week.
The new car smell lasts for like a week, right?
You know, the people always say, you know,
the California phenomenon.
There's a lot of research on this
about how long you'll be satisfied
if you move to California.
And the answer is the sunshine
will give you satisfaction for six months,
but the taxes are forever.
You know, careful with, I mean,
sorry, I'm not trying to hurt you, Rich.
I've made my peace with that, but go ahead.
It is a nice place.
So the point is that the balance that you need
in the macronutrient profile of happiness
is really the best way to diagnostically understand
how happy you are.
That's where I actually start.
That's the definition, satisfaction, enjoyment,
plus meaning and purpose.
And they all have a big science behind them.
Right, so enjoyment is sort of pleasure
with this elevated sensibility.
Plus elevation.
Yeah, plus it's basically pleasure enjoyed in communion.
So you get pleasure from eating the turkey
at Thanksgiving dinner.
You get enjoyment from eating it
and making a memory of doing it with people
that you actually love,
such that you can actually get happiness from it
for a long time afterward.
Right, satisfaction, that's kind of a striver thing, right?
Like we get that sense of satisfaction
in the pursuit of something ambitious.
Right, that's a goal met, the joy of a reward,
but which is very elusive as Mick Jagger reminds us
that you can't get no satisfaction, but you can hack it.
You can actually hack it if you understand and go against.
You can get enduring or at least lasting satisfaction
if you go against your nature,
which is a really interesting body of literature
because it reminds us again
that mother nature doesn't care if we're happy.
Mother nature wants to fool us again and again
and again and again to hit the lever
because it makes us more genetically fit.
It helps us to pass on our genes by having more money, more power, more honor than the troglodyte in the next cave who has fewer
animal skins. But we think that that car will bring us lasting satisfaction. You have to hack
that matrix and you can get lasting satisfaction. Right. The purpose piece is a little bit more
complicated and elusive though. Yeah. Purpose piece is in a way the most beautiful
and one that I know you're well aware of.
You know, I listened to this podcast
and you learn a lot very quickly.
It takes about five episodes
before you put together your biography,
which is one of struggle and pain and sacrifice
because of a lot of things that happened to you in your life.
But who you are as a man
has everything to do with what you've suffered.
It's part of who you are as a person.
Not being a mental health professional,
but being a listener to the show
and a specialist in this area,
I would say that meaning and purpose for you
are simply intertwined with the suffering that you've had
with substance abuse, for example,
with the relationships that suffered as a result
of that. And that's the cosmic truth of meaning. And one that's really elusive for all the young
people today who are psychological hedonists, they're spending all their energy and time
trying to avoid unhappiness. What that does is that when you avoid pain, you're avoiding meaning.
When you're avoiding learning what your purpose is through resiliency, what you're capable of
and the lessons you're supposed to learn.
And you're avoiding, to avoid your unhappiness
is to avoid your happiness,
which is that we need pain.
We need sacrifice.
Yeah, it's so true and so convoluted to understand,
but it's absolutely essential.
And I think that's a very accurate notion
of how I think about this
because my satisfaction and my purpose
have been sort of gilded out of unhappiness
and suffering and toil,
but a search for meaning within that,
and then an act of service in trying to return
what I've learned along the way.
And so it's not an Epicurean happiness. I mean, it's fun
to talk to you and we'll have a couple of laughs and all of that, but it's really more of a meaning
driven thing. And so I think of happiness as being a by-product of pursuing meaning of being of
service, of trying to align my actions with my values, because happiness isn't something that you can grab. It's only the result of these other endeavors
and it's fleeting at best.
So it's best not to really even think about happiness
or be in its pursuit because I feel like it's a trap.
Well, the pursuit is of its macronutrients
to make sure that you are doing,
you have a proper hygiene, that you have the right habits.
Think about the habits as opposed to the happiness itself.
So the best way for people to get happier immediately
is to think in sort of three steps.
The first is do the work.
And to do the work, you need self-knowledge,
you need understanding.
And maybe that comes from your religious practice.
Maybe that comes from reading a happiness book
about the science of happiness.
Maybe that comes from sitting at your grandmother's knee
and writing down everything she says for a week.
Whatever it is, do the work.
If you said, hey man, I wish I knew more calculus,
I'd say, buy a book.
I would say, do the work.
Don't wish you knew more math, do the work.
The second is to practice it in your life.
People, if you can't just read a book about golf
and become a better golfer, you actually have to golf.
You have to learn and then you have to golf.
And happiness is a hands-on business
by practicing the habits of happiness,
faith, family, friends, and work,
loving other people intensively, purposively.
And then the last is really the most important,
which is you gotta share it.
You have to teach others.
You know, what I'm trying to do
is I'm trying to create a happiness movement
of a nation of happiness professors.
I want us to hold each other accountable for this.
I mean, it's so valuable to me
that you notice the irony of what I'm actually doing,
which is not good for my happiness hygiene
and talking about happiness.
That's what brothers are supposed to do for each other.
Right.
I mean, and when we hold each other accountable,
we give each other suggestions,
when we actually teach this,
this is the ultimate act of metacognition,
where you're not being managed by anything.
You're managing it by making it fully human, by observing it, ultimate act of metacognition, where you're not being managed by anything.
You're managing it by making it fully human,
by observing it,
by putting it into the prefrontal cortex
of your big, wonderful human brain.
One, two, three, understand, practice, share.
That's the secret.
Yeah.
The sharing piece is so powerful.
I mean, I just, as you're explaining that,
I'm just thinking of Chip, you know,
down in Baja with his modern wisdom,
modern elder academy,
where he's teaching, you know, this elder wisdom
and the experience that he had at Airbnb,
where he got to, you know,
practice that crystallized intelligence to be of service
to these young founders.
And it's confusing.
I said to him, I said,
why isn't that experience that you had at Airbnb
a case study, Harvard Business School case study
that should be taught?
Like why doesn't every company have their version of that
that business school students are studying
and understanding the value of.
Yeah, no, for sure.
And one of the things that Chip Conley is,
I mean, I think very highly of Chip Conley.
He has magnificently transformed his own career
into one that actually is with crystallized intelligence,
passing on these ideas to other people
and lifting them up.
In such a beautiful way.
And I feel like he isn't on the hedonic treadmill
and his ego is exactly where it's meant to be right now.
He has such a healthy relationship with what he does.
And he's so generous of heart and spirit in that.
I mean, you feel it in his presence.
Yeah, absolutely.
And one of the things that he's, as a practical matter,
that he points out to all of us, and one of the things that I'm at the Harvard Business School that I'm promoting
as much as I possibly can, is trying to, see, one of the problems in America, in our business
climate today, is it's too heavily loaded on fluid intelligence. How is it that social media and the
tech industry have gone from the pinnacle of respect in capitalism to near the bottom in 15 years,
where people are worried that social media
is creating a harmful product or has a harmful culture
or is anti-competitive or whatever it happens to be.
It has everything to do with the fact
that there's unforced errors across these business models
in the way that these things are working.
Like I have tons of respect for these people.
These are my friends, they're your friends too.
But the truth is there's not enough old people
in this process.
There's too much fluid intelligence.
There's not enough crystallized intelligence.
My view is that, and Chip gave me this idea, quite frankly,
that every product marketing and team and C-suite
of every company in America needs more people over 70.
You know, I was saying, I'm gonna tell this story
when I was lecturing, I was giving a talk at a tech company in the Valley.
And they were talking about,
they asked, somebody asked me about diversity,
which is, you know, people of color and women
who are coding and doing engineering work.
And it's a diversity problem for sure.
And I talked about that.
But then I said, speaking of diversity,
how many old people work here?
Like, I mean, over 30?
Right.
That's the problem.
Yeah. I pointed this over 30? Right. That's the problem. Yeah.
I pointed this out to Chip though,
and I'm interested in your thoughts on this.
This is certainly true in startup culture,
but if you're at a Fortune 500 company
or some giant legacy conglomerate,
DuPont or Coca-Cola or something like that,
I would suspect that the C-suites are filled
with septuagenarians who are well past
their fluid intelligence curve,
who are sticking around too long.
And in that case, you need the younger person
to hold those people accountable
because that's equally broken.
We need diversity.
I mean, that's why diversity is really important.
But the kind of diversity that we really lack
in America today is age diversity.
We need, and it's weird because we have this system
for your kids are going through grades in school
where they stay with the same age
over and over and over again.
And that lack of diversity,
that lack of intergenerational diversity,
but even among students who are four or five
and six years apart who can teach each other,
that's a real debility.
That's a big weakness that we have in our society today.
And so we have a tendency to hang out with people
more or less our age,
hang out with a couple who's more or less your age.
And I made a conscious effort to not do that.
I have friends who are younger than me
and I have friends who are a couple of decades
or 30 years younger than me.
And I have friends who are 30 years older than me
because it's way more interesting and fun
among other things,
but also I learned more.
Yeah.
When you're teaching this class at Harvard Business School,
well, there's, let me say this.
So in recovery, you know, there's this understanding,
like you can't will somebody else to get sober.
Like they have to have their own, you know,
intrinsic willingness or receptivity and everybody,
it's a timing thing. Like you have to be ready to do the work to get sober.
Not everybody is.
When you're kind of espousing the virtues
of this way of thinking and approaching your life
to these young strivers, what is the receptivity level?
Like, does it land for them?
Or what is your sense of how it's being processed
by people who are at the very beginning
of venturing out into the world
and in their attempt to conquer it?
Yeah, well, one of the things that I tell them
is it's useful to them to have a crystal ball.
And if I can tell you what's gonna happen to you right now,
they're very interested in it.
I say, you're here, in 20 years, you're gonna see this.
I want you to remember
this. That's interesting to people. This is a thing that's going to happen to you. Write it
down. Write it down. Commit it to memory. And you're going to see this thing. When it happens
to you, you're not going to be surprised. And as a result of it, you're not going to make the
following mistake. They're intensely interested in what that's all about. The second is they're
extremely interested in their parents. So my students have parents that are my age.
I mean, my kids are in their 20s.
And when I talk to people who are in their 20s,
I'm the age of their parents.
I'm talking to them about people like you and me.
And a lot of their dads and moms are intensely unhappy
and they understand for the first time why it is.
And they care about their parents.
And so a lot of them, what they wind up doing is that,
I've noticed that there'll be a Zoom link for my classes,
for people who have coronavirus or something,
they can't go to class.
And there'll be parents on the Zoom link.
Unofficially auditing, like what is this about?
I know, and then a bunch of times I'll see,
I'll be in this, I mean, my students are,
I have sections of 90, I have two sections of 90.
And as the semester goes on,
I notice that there's like people my age
in the back of the class.
Uh-huh, that's very funny.
And afterward I'll say, it's my dad.
That's pretty good.
Well, that's a good indicator, you're onto something.
One of the techniques for this,
you mentioned stoic philosophy, et cetera,
but you talk in the book about,
I can't remember what sort of faith denomination it was.
I think these ascetic monks
who would do this version of exposure therapy
where they would walk amongst rotting corpses
to like have this,
to inject yourself with a sense of impermanence
and a connectivity to your own mortality.
Yeah, exposure therapy to the source of your fear.
Most people that I talk to,
only 20% of Americans are morbidly afraid of death.
That's called thanatophobia.
And it's in the DSM-5 manual, but only 20%. I mean, none of us
is like, oh, hooray, death. But we're not really afraid. You and I are not afraid of death. But we
almost all have our own death fear. So if you're afraid of failure, that's your death fear. If
you're afraid of irrelevance or being forgotten, that's your death fear. And one of the things that
I ask my students or anybody to do is to figure out what your death fear is.
What is your concept of your life
that you're afraid to lose?
That's your death.
Anybody who says, by the way, my work is my life,
professional failure is your death fear.
And then the way to cope with that,
because you can't break through,
you can't get to the second curve,
you can't actually find your bliss
until you conquer your fear, because that stands in the way of your love. That stands in the way of the real
life in your life. So the way that I do this has been very helpful to me. And now I do it with my
students, particularly with fear of failure, because my MBA students at Harvard are ultra
achievers with very little experience of failure. And they're self objectifiers, a lot of them,
because they consider themselves to be success monsters,
success machines, homo economicus.
Like, of course I always get A's.
Of course I get into the best schools.
Of course, because I'm the special one.
And some of that comes from their parents,
but a lot of it is internally generated.
So the way that the meditation on death works
that can be adapted to our own particular death fear
is called the Maranasati meditation
of the Theravada Buddhist monks.
If you go to a monastery in Thailand or Vietnam,
you'll notice that in a lot of monasteries,
they'll have photographs of corpses
in various states of decay.
And the monks will stand in front of them and say,
"'That is me,' and they'll walk to the next one
and say, "'That is me.'"
And it's just like horrible
until you realize it's exposure therapy.
You can't be fully alive
when you're afraid of not being alive.
It just doesn't make sense.
And yet the nature of our brain
is to block out this cognitive dissonance.
You know, the mortality paradox
is that we know we're gonna die,
but we can't conceive of non-existence.
And that intense discomfort makes us terrified.
So this, it turns out that that meditation,
that nine part meditation,
if people Google it, the Mara Nasati meditation will come up.
And if you do that, you will be free.
But if you do that in the case of your fear,
you will be free as well.
So I have a nine part fear of failure meditation
that I ask my students to contemplate.
It's one of the exercises.
Every lecture ends with an exercise,
much of it based in theological or philosophical tradition.
And it's like, I'm not doing well in class.
It starts easy, right?
And then it gets a little bit harder.
My friends from college seem to be doing better than me
and getting better jobs than me. And then a little bit later, it's like, I think my parents feel sorry for me.
And sometimes the students will weep at this point because the concept, confronting that
terror of what is effectively their own death, but they will be free when they do that because it can't hurt them anymore
when it becomes ordinary.
The phantasm, when it's exposed to light, evaporates.
And then the ultimate being sort of,
yes, you're gonna die,
and this attachment to relevance
or being remembered in a certain way has to go, right?
So nobody's gonna remember you, nobody's gonna care.
Like the more that you can just kind of acclimate
to that notion and be comfortable with it,
there is a freedom.
Like in the example of the gentleman sitting behind you
on the plane, like if he had just embraced the fact
that his time was up and this is the nature
of the way life is, he could have found some peace
and comfort with that.
Yeah, I mean, your great-grandchildren
will not know your name. They won't know your name. I mean, if you can Yeah, I mean, your great-grandchildren will not know your name.
They won't know your name.
I mean, if you can say how many, I mean, you have eight.
And that's nothing.
Yeah, you have eight great-grandparents.
How many can you name?
Oh my God, I don't know, two?
Yeah, it's crazy.
It's crazy, so there's six that are gone, poof.
And it's funny because you get evidence of this
as you get older.
It's one of the consolations of age is actually experiencing
this actually having this exposure.
I ran this important think tank in DC for almost 11 years.
I've been gone for three years.
I go back, people don't slice that who I am.
Poof.
That's very DC.
And are you able to gracefully kind of like laugh
and smile to yourself as you, yeah.
Yeah, I mean, it helps that I've got a new thing
and I got a new bag, right? But yeah, I mean, it helps that I've got a new thing and I got a new bag, right?
But yeah, I mean, it's part of that is the exposure
that comes from actually having done this work.
This was work I did and then published.
I mean, I actually did the work on this such that,
and I'm much more comfortable with my weaknesses.
I'm much more comfortable with my professional
and prestige mortality than I was in the past.
I can laugh at things that scared me before.
Yeah.
Yeah, I mean, it's not perfect.
I mean, I wake up in the middle of the night sometimes,
but it's better.
I mean, I'm happier.
Here's the, I mean, the acid test is basically this.
When I stepped down from that job in the middle of 2019,
my happiness on a one to seven scale self-evaluated,
which is the best kind of way to do it,
where one is the unhappiest person you've ever met,
and seven is the happiest person you've ever met.
That number was three, and now it's 4.8.
And- Wow, that's very specific.
Yeah, well, I'm a conist, you know,
I'm a quantitative guy.
But for me, that's really meaningful.
I keep very careful data
on not just the macronutrients of my happiness,
but the micronutrients
that feed into it as well.
All of the elements that I need to track,
I'm tracking very carefully all the time,
such that I can make a strategic plan for my life.
And it's all been going up.
It's all been going up.
And do you do that specifically with respect
to the numerator denominator math that you talk about,
where needs and wants have to be correlated
in a healthy ratio?
Yeah, haves and wants.
So this is how you hack the satisfaction rate matrix.
So the problem is not that you can't get no satisfaction
as Mick Jagger sings.
The problem is you can't keep no satisfaction.
The real problem is you get it and then it goes.
So you get the high from cocaine or alcohol, for example,
but it's gone immediately and you chase it.
That if you never got it in the first place,
it wouldn't be a problem.
If you literally got no satisfaction,
there would be no problem,
but that you can't keep no satisfaction,
that's the real problem.
The way to think about it is,
if you have a concept of your satisfaction
in terms of what you have, you're in trouble. But if you understand a more accurate model where your satisfaction is what you have a concept of your satisfaction in terms of what you have, you're in trouble. But if you understand a more accurate model
where your satisfaction is what you have
divided by what you want,
haves divided by wants,
then you need a haves management strategy,
but more importantly, a wants management strategy.
The secret to being more satisfied is not having more,
it's wanting less.
That's the secret.
Right.
And I feel like culturally,
that's not unrelated to the rise of minimalism
and so many young people who are interested
in living their lives differently
than the way that we were brought up.
Like I think that there is,
and I'm sure you see this in your stoop,
maybe not because it's Harvard Business School,
but so many young people are approaching their career tracks
from a perspective of, you know,
how is this gonna be meaningful to me?
Or what is the impact going to be of my involvement in this
rather than what's my starting salary,
what's the raise gonna be, et cetera.
Yeah, no, I do see that, although I still see,
we're all human.
I mean, we all are chasing the Thomistic,
you know, St. Thomas Aquinas says four idols,
the four substitutes for God
are money, power, pleasure, and fame.
And you don't have to be theological even to understand that.
What he's basically saying is these are the things
that distract you from your happiness
because they're instrumental to good things.
There's nothing wrong with money.
It's when you make it intrinsic
that it'll be what you chase
and you never find your satisfaction, you wind up unhappy.
So what you find is that there's a natural human tendency
based on our evolutionary biology
to chase these extrinsic goals, these instrumentalities,
as if they were the secret to our own happiness
and then we can't quite figure it out.
So hacking the matrix means wanting less of that.
It's okay if we get it.
I mean, I play a game with my students
called what's your idol. And the way that what's your idol works is I say, okay, it's a very
comprehensive taxonomy of your idols, which is money, power, pleasure, and honor, which is
usually admiration or prestige. Sometimes it's fame. Some people actually want to be famous.
Okay. Don't tell me what your idol is.
Tell me what is not.
So let's play.
You wanna play?
Sure.
Okay, tell me of these four,
money, power, pleasure, and fame,
which is the one that you care about the least
and would kick away in two seconds?
Money, power, pleasure, fame.
Is that what it is?
Yeah.
Probably pleasure.
You'd kick it away?
Yeah. But you chased it for is? Yeah. Probably pleasure. You'd kick it away. Yeah.
But you chased it for years.
Yeah, but that was more of a running away.
Yeah, it was actually escape, not pleasure.
It was the, yeah, it wasn't, you weren't looking,
you weren't running to pleasure,
you were running away from pain.
Yeah. Yeah.
So pleasure, okay, good, good.
And tell me what's next.
Money, power.
You got money and power and fame.
Power can go.
Power, you don't care.
I don't know.
No power over people.
You probably, and part of the reason is because you don't-
Power might even be the first thing.
Yeah, because you don't want anybody to have power over you.
No.
That drives you crazy.
I don't seek, I'm not like motivated by power.
Yeah, okay, you got two left.
So it's money-
And fame. And fame. Fame, okay, you got two left. So it's money- And fame. And fame.
Fame would go.
I got your idol.
So the money's my idol.
Well, and again, you might be pretty good.
But it's weird because I don't like,
like this podcast makes money,
but I didn't get into it for that.
Like it's a byproduct of doing something meaningful to me.
But I think maybe I'm thinking of it in that way
because I've got four kids and I'm worried
about making sure that they're taken care of
and I've gone through financial hardship
and I know what that feels like
and I don't wanna go back there.
Totally, yeah, totally.
And again, there's nothing that's disreputable
about that at all.
This is absolutely human.
The key thing is knowing yourself
such that you're not making decisions
that militate against your happiness on the basis of chasing your idol.
That that's how you can self-manage is understanding that that will wind up being your weak point.
Now, ordinarily, it's because there's a little bit of fear having to do with your past.
And you can never be quite secure enough when the people that you love are involved.
The second is that money is a trophy for entrepreneurs.
Money is a trophy.
In other words, money is good because it represents the value
the rest of the world places on you.
So even if you don't care about boats and planes,
you can still have that as an idol
under these circumstances.
And you gotta watch that is what it comes down to.
For me, I don't care about power.
I mean, running a think tank was hard
because I don't want anybody to have power over me.
And I hate having power over others.
I actually dislike power.
I'm pretty libertarian in this way.
It's like, don't tread on me, kind of, right?
Second is money.
Money for me, money.
You know, it didn't have that much growing up,
but it doesn't have any allure for me particularly.
Now things get a little bit uncomfortable.
I like pleasure.
I like it, right?
But okay, I'll give it up.
I just found my idol.
I wanna be admired.
I want admiration.
I want the admiration of strangers.
I mean, how stupid is that
to want the admiration of strangers?
What could be less satisfying and more idiotic than that?
And yet, and yet.
But that brain neurochemistry gets lit up
when Anderson Cooper calls and says,
we need Dr. Brooks on tonight.
Yes, sir.
Two thumbs up. I am available.
Yeah, and it's funny because, you know,
we understand how the neurobiology of that
would be wired, right?
And yet, you know, the whole idea that the reward
would have been multiple mates
and lots of offspring.
I don't want that.
I don't want that.
No, I don't want that.
I don't want a secret second family.
I want, you know-
So what do you do with that self-understanding?
You make sure that you're not making decisions
on that basis.
So I will interrogate my decisions.
So my decision to go on Anderson's show,
I'll say, why?
And I'll interrogate myself.
Now, fortunately, I have a partner, my beloved wife, who will interrogate me with great acuity.
She'll say, why do you want to do that? Why do you actually want to do that? Why did I want to do your show? Because I love your show and I'd never been on it before I always wanted to.
That's actually meritorious. It's interesting to me. It's not because it's gonna bring me this,
the cosmic admiration that I seek.
It actually gives me the intellectual enjoyment
that is part of how I'm trying to live a good
and happy life.
I would actually take the time,
even if we weren't airing this.
But that's kind of how I interrogate it,
expose it to empirical scrutiny
and make a decision properly.
I don't always make the proper decision,
but at least I know my weakness.
Yeah.
That's power.
Yeah, that's cool.
Let's talk about the faith piece.
We kind of kicked this off.
You were sharing about your trips to India
and your Catholic faith,
but this is a big piece here and it gets tricky.
People don't like to talk about this stuff.
It makes them uncomfortable.
But if you look at the blue zones
and where people live the longest and live the happiest,
faith is big, big piece here.
And a lot of people have very unhealthy relationships
with how they were reared in a certain faith
and whether it was traumatic
or just they're not interested anymore.
And then they live this secular life
where they're in pursuit of the very things
that we were just talking about.
And now are faced with the prospect of being told,
like, you gotta figure this out.
Yeah. It's tough, right?
Yeah. But as the statistics,
interestingly bear out,
and you talk about this in the book,
like there is this receptivity
to a more transcendent way of approaching your life
that kind of begins to bloom and blossom as we get older.
Yeah, it's a real mystery.
And it was for the longest time
because the belief was with the enlightenment
that faith and reason were naturally antagonistic
and that science was gonna crowd out faith entirely
because faith was nothing more
than a bunch of superstitious theories
that helped us understand the world.
Now that's been overtaken by the observation
that there's no antagonism
between a Picasso painting and Picasso.
There's no antagonism between the two.
And it's worth understanding both, the man and the painting.
And that is the painter and the painting
is the better metaphor as opposed to,
you know, when the Soviets in the 1970s
sent a rocket, a telescope into orbit
and pointed out into space and announced to the world
that there was no evidence of God.
Well, that sort of sounds idiotic because it is.
It's like looking in the Picasso painting
for evidence of Picasso.
That's not actually where you find it.
These are different lines of inquiry
that are actually complimentary.
And people start figuring that out
ordinarily in their 40s.
You find that people tend to walk away
from faith or spirituality in their 20s.
And the reason is because the world is messy.
And you say, how can there be a benevolent creator
with so much pain in the world, et cetera.
And I understand that this is troubling to a lot of people.
But when you're our age, you're like,
yeah, everything's messy, nothing's consistent.
I can accept a whole lot of cognitive dissonance now
that I was unable to accept when I was 28 or 32 years old.
Just couldn't do it.
And so the result of that is that
whereas superstitions tend to fall away,
I don't believe in the tooth fairy, the Easter Bunny,
I'm more willing to be childlike
in understandings of the supernatural.
Now for some people, it doesn't work that way,
but here's the deal when it comes to happiness.
If you're left to your devices,
your ordinary quotidian devices,
your life is gonna be like a continuous tape loop
of one episode of Better Call Saul.
Like it was okay the first time,
and then it's the same and the same
and you'll go mad with tedium, with boredom.
It's just really my job, my car, my money, my friends,
my time, my show, my me, me, me.
Just give me a break.
The Dalai Lama always says, every time I see him,
he says, remember, you are one in 7 billion,
by which he does not mean that I'm an ant,
that I'm insignificant, by which he does not mean that I'm an ant, that I'm insignificant, by which
he means don't forget the adventure of looking at things from a distance. Don't forget the adventure
of seeing life in its spectrum, its majesty, its scale. At 40,000 feet, looking at the whole world
where you're part of it gives you perspective and it gives you peace. You need that. Everybody has
a transcendental Walk.
Now it comes, maybe it comes from the incredible.
I mean, it's like I hang out with a guy named Ryan Holiday.
Yeah, I just talked to him like two hours ago.
I talk to Ryan all the time.
He's fantastic.
He's fantastic.
And he's cut his teeth by introducing Marcus Aurelius
to a generation of Gen Zers like,
wow, Ryan Holiday discovered Seneca, it's awesome.
But it's so smart and so good.
He's such a, Ryan's a visionary guy.
And you can study this, the philosophers,
or as I mentioned before, the works of Bach
or understanding nature in a very metaphysical way
or a traditional or non-traditional faith
or spiritual practice or a meditation practice.
There's lots of ways to do this,
but we must have a transcendental walk
because life is simply too intense and exhausting
and boring if we don't do that.
So how does one embark upon that
if this is a new alien concept?
Yeah, I've asked the Dalai Lama that very thing.
It's like asking for a friend kind of,
but in, and I have a,
my more traditional religious life
actually proceeds from this because I realized,
I mean, there are times when I was more religious
and times when I was less religious,
but in my thirties,
I recognized that this was a big hole in my soul
and I didn't need to go across state lines
to go to a different supermarket.
What precipitated that?
A need, I recognized a need that I needed,
I needed better, more peace and better perspective.
And I just have a sense that this is right.
Now, what part is right, I don't know.
I don't actually know, but I need a physics of spirituality.
And just as I would not try to create
my own mathematical structures and, you know,
to create my own alternative system of mathematics,
I don't feel like I have to do so in a religious way. Other people feel differently
about it. But the Dalai Lama talks about kind of a pyramid where the basis of the pyramid is moral
living. Figure, and this is a Jungian perspective too. Carl Jung said that happiness comes from
defining your values and living according to them. If you know what your values are and you don't
live according to them, or you don't know what your values are, you won't be happy.
Defining your values and your morals
and living according to them with impeccable integrity.
That means, you know, when they say make your bed,
I mean, that's just a boring example
of living according to what you think is right.
And even when nobody's watching, living according to it.
What I recommend is that people don't lie ever,
just don't lie.
Now, when the murderer is at the door and says,
where's the victim?
Fine, but that's not what we're talking about.
That's a different podcast.
That's a different podcast.
That's a Wondery podcast.
Or a Sam Harris podcast, maybe.
So figure out, write down what your moral values are
and make a plan to live according to them.
That's step one.
Step two is build a meditative practice,
build a practice of contemplation.
Maybe that's formal meditation,
maybe that's walking in the woods,
but you need a practice without devices
where you can be at peace.
And finally, you need to read wisdom.
You need to expose yourself to people
who have had deeper thoughts
and more profound thoughts than you.
So number one, act according to your values,
learn your values, act according to your values,
practice your values, write it down, journal it.
Number two is get your contemplative practice in order
and make sure you start with at least 15 minutes a day.
And number three is actually read the wisdom literature
in whatever tradition you want
and do that daily for at least 15 minutes.
Starting there, your life will change.
It will, your world will rock.
What does the science say about the service piece,
the giving back piece?
Cause I just know for me,
like when I have those moments of bliss,
they come in the most unlikely packages.
They generally come when I'm not self-seeking,
but I'm able to get outside of my own self
and my own egocentric, you know, looping
and avail myself for the betterment of somebody else.
Like it's just, if you are going through something difficult,
if you're having a hard time,
if you're meeting a roadblock to just like pick up the phone
and like see how someone else is doing
and not in a complicated way necessarily,
but to kind of reflexively develop that skill
is such a relief and such an amplifier
of that thing that we're seeking,
which is a sense of connection
and fulfillment and purpose, et cetera.
And I suspect the older we get
and the more our crystallized intelligence
becomes more important and paramount
as we're searching for outlets
or ways to kind of engender more meaning in our lives,
that this is such a beautiful and obvious thing
for people to channel their energy into.
No, you're absolutely right.
Crystallized intelligence in this expression
requires serving others, requires serving others.
You can't teach without students. There's no reason for you to have pattern recognition
and pass on the knowledge if there's nobody to pass it on to. It's not just a question of you
creating value on the basis of your clever ideas. It's collecting clever ideas in service of other
people who need to learn from you. The professor requires students,
and that is an act of love at its best.
All of the evidence, all of the empirical evidence,
all the social science shows that you will be happier,
healthier, richer, and even better looking if you give more.
Better looking? Yeah.
How do they evaluate that?
I know, there's this great study,
it's a British study where the social psychologists, they bring couples into the lab, married couples in the lab.
And there's a guy in a white lab coat.
And he says to the married couple,
some have been married for a long time,
some just for a couple of years.
And he says to the couple,
"'Okay, here's how the experiment works.
"'I'm gonna give you this pocket full of change
"'to the gentleman.'"
He takes the coins and puts it in the man's pocket.
"'You two need to walk down a little path
"'over to that building over there outside.
He says, and I have a colleague who's gonna wait
and he's gonna interview you for five minutes
and you get to keep the money and go home.
Simple experiment.
Cool.
Okay, now it turns out
when they're walking down a little path,
there's another pathway that comes from between the buildings
from which a hobo comes walking out,
a homeless guy comes walking out,
a panhandles the husband, right?
He's a Confederate to the experiment, right?
He's a collaborator.
You got some change?
He does.
They put the change in his pocket.
He has to make a decision.
Am I gonna give to the homeless guy or am I not?
He makes a decision.
They go on walking to the next building
where the other scientist is waiting to interview them.
He says first,
"'Sir, did you give to the homeless man and how much?
Writes it down, says to the wife,
how attractive do you find him right now?
It turns out the more-
It's sort of rigged though.
I mean, it's like, yeah.
The whole point is that she likes him
if he was just more generous,
which is why if you're in the market,
when you were in the market back in the old days,
when you were dating your wife,
you were extra nice to puppies and babies around her because you wanted her to see that you were a the market, when you were in the market, back in the old days, when you were dating your wife,
you were extra nice to puppies and babies around her,
because you wanted her to see that you were a giving person,
you were a loving person,
that it brings out the best in you,
because you actually became more attractive
on the basis of your love for your fellow men and dogs.
Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah.
You actually get better looking.
Women find men better looking if they are more loving
and philanthropic and serving others.
So if you take away no other idea from this podcast.
News you can use, man.
That's right.
We were talking a few minutes ago
about reducing your wants.
Like if you can really curtail that,
that's a good recipe for putting you
on like a happiness trajectory, right?
But like, how do you do that?
How do you reduce your wants?
You want what you want, right?
Yeah, no, except that there's all kinds
of interesting ways to do that.
So there's an image that I really like,
it's really helpful, that a guy,
a philosopher of art in China taught me.
And I was actually touring
the National Palace Museum in Taipei.
And we were looking at this sculpture
of this chipped piece of jade,
and it was sculptured to a Chinese village. And I said, look, even if you didn't tell me it was
Chinese, I would know it was Chinese. How do I know just by looking at it that it's Chinese?
If it didn't have a pagoda in it, but it looks Chinese. He says, why? He says, because it's a
different concept of what art is. He said, you think of art as starting with an empty canvas
and being filled up with brushstrokes.
We think of art as already existing inside the block of jade
which we have to chip away until we find the work of art.
He said, this is also how you see success in the West,
as starting from nothing and building up.
And then after a while, it's so full
that you actually can't get any more satisfaction
because it's just more brushstrokes.
You know, if you've got a completely full canvas,
effectively, metaphorically,
and you're like, I don't know, I'm not satisfied.
Maybe I'll get a boat.
It's not gonna work because the canvas is already full.
To find real satisfaction in the second half of life,
this is a second curve phenomenon.
This is one of the things
that all happy older people have in common.
They've stopped adding and they start taking away.
They start chipping away.
And each year I throw away more stuff until I can find me,
which is intensely satisfying.
So the key thing is, what are you gonna throw away this year?
Don't have a bucket list.
Have a reverse bucket list.
The reverse bucket list is a list of your attachments
and your strategic plan for,
look, if I get it, I get it.
But I no longer am going to consider myself a loser
if I don't ride in a hot air balloon
or have lunch with the president.
I am detaching myself officially.
And that metacognitive exercise really, really works.
And I do that.
One year I gave away two thirds of my clothes.
Simply by making a decision to do it?
Making a decision to be detached and then act accordingly.
I gave away two thirds of my clothes.
Last year, the year before on my birthday,
I gave away half of my political opinions.
I wrote down all my political opinions.
I detached myself from half of them.
That's so interesting.
Well, for two things, first of all.
It's hardcore, right?
You're kind of a clothes horse, right?
Like you're a sartorial maven.
So giving away your clothes is probably,
there might've been a little pinch there.
I might've not given away the best ones.
Yeah, okay.
All right, fair enough.
And it is interesting because you were once known
and have written many books about politics.
But if you kind of go online and research everything
you've been talking about, there's none of that.
Like you've really kind of put that aside and said,
I'm focused on this now.
That is, and it was pursuant to the decision
in my reverse bucket list birthday exercise
to detach myself more consciously
from something that had been quite important to me,
quite frankly, but was holding me back.
It was holding me back from bonds of love
with people who are different than me.
Are you happier?
Yeah.
You're not part of that conversation?
I really am.
Yeah. I really am.
And again, I've got nothing against the conversation.
I want a responsible country that has good public policy
and better politics,
but I actually don't think I have an oracle on truth.
I know I'm wrong, I just don't know on what.
And actually getting away from intense opinions
and big arguments has been a kind of detachment
that has truly set me free.
It's set me free to-
Do you have to just stay off Twitter?
Well, I mean, I could say-
I mean, that's gotta be provocative
when you see a bunch of craziness.
Yeah, yeah, but it's actually-
You have this urge to jump in.
Well, since I made the detachment decision
about political opinions, I get a lot more,
I get more laughs.
I get more laughs from people, you know,
who are saying outlandish things, I have to say. I mean, look, people, you know, who are saying outlandish things
I have to say. I mean, look, I'm alarmed at what's happening in this country. And I believe we need
to love our enemies politically a lot more than we do. That's super important for us to do. And
I'm just better able to do it and to model that, to build alliances with people who would ordinarily
be very, very different than me politically when I'm not attached. I mean, look, I got these
opinions, but I can take them or leave them is the whole point.
It's interesting and Thich Nhat Hanh,
the great Vietnamese Buddhist master,
he said the greatest attachments that many have
is to their opinions.
That had a big effect on me
because we never think of that, right?
It's like, yeah, it's my material possessions and-
Well, there's an identity construct in that.
For sure, absolutely, for sure.
And by the way, give away parts of your identity.
Give away your concept of who you are.
Detach yourself from these things
about who you actually are.
And that's been really helpful to me too, I have to say.
That's very liberating.
Hugely.
It's actually one of the greatest secrets
that I've ever been able to come across
is the reverse bucket list
around ideology, identity, and opinions.
Yeah, it's a PhD in minimalism
because it's really a mindful practice.
It's not about, I mean, cleaning out your closet
is an activity, but it's not really about
getting rid of your possessions.
It's about clarity of purpose and thought
and removing the clutter of your conscious experience and the traps of your identity
that are getting in the way of you
being a more fulfilled human.
Yeah, and when you make a commitment to it
and somebody says something you would have snapped at before,
you're more likely to go, huh.
Right. Huh.
Tell me more about that. Come sit next to me.
Yeah.
So when you go back to the think tank and walk the halls,
can you, like, it must be, you know, like, did they,
like your old colleagues, are they confused?
I don't know.
You don't know.
I don't really know.
You've transcended that.
Well, I mean, I've gone back a couple of times
and like, I love these people
and I think they're doing absolutely outstanding work.
I just love the work they do. I'm so proud to have been part of times. And like, I love these people and I think they're doing absolutely outstanding work. I just love the work they do. I'm so proud to have been part of that. But I also recognize that I did
go poof and it's okay. It's absolutely okay. And they'll talk to people and they'll kind of be like,
what happened to you, man? It's interesting. Cause I used to be, I was a musician for so many years.
Yeah. We didn't even talk about that.
Yeah. And I was a classical musician, but I also toured for two years
with a jazz guitar player, Charlie Bird.
Oh, you did? Yeah, yeah.
And I was on tour with Charlie Bird all over the place.
And years ago, probably six or seven years ago,
I was doing this, I was hosting this big event
in Washington, DC.
You know, 2,000 people black-tied
the National Building Museum.
You know, we had this big event
and Benjamin Netanyahu
was this guest speaker and it was a huge thing.
The press corps was all there
and we had protesters outside.
It was a great night.
It was a fantastic, fun night.
And we hired a band.
And the band was playing and they were pretty good.
In the end, we're kind of cleaning up
and I was the president of the organization.
I'd give them the remarks and one of the keynote addresses
and afterward, my bow tie is untied and it's 11 o'clock at night and pretty satisfied. And I
noticed the drummer is coming down from the bandstand. He's walking over to me and this
is either places clearing out. He says, are you Arthur Brooks, the French horn player?
Because that's what I did for a living. And I recognized him. He was the drummer for Charlie
Bird. And I'd made two records with him 20 years earlier,
25 years earlier.
And he's looking at me and he says,
he says, are you the boss of all this now?
I said, yeah, yeah, I am.
He says, what happened to you, man?
It's the same thing, right?
It's a crazy story to be this French horn prodigy
and to have this whole career throughout your 20s
and be playing in these orchestras
and really being in pursuit of this career
of mastery of music.
And then to discover in your 20s
that you just couldn't play as well as you once could
and the struggle to try to figure out how to solve it
until ultimately you have to give it up.
Yeah, yeah, give it up.
And then it bursts this whole other career.
It reminds me of, do you know Maya Shankar?
Yeah.
It's a similar, very similar story.
Yeah, yeah, yeah, the violinist.
Yes.
Yeah, yeah.
It's, playing a classical instrument is hugely coordination
and strength endeavor, strength-oriented endeavor.
It's like being an athlete, but with fine motor skills
as opposed to gross motor skills.
And there's a lot of things that can go wrong.
And there's a lot of things that we don't understand
that can actually go wrong.
There can be repetitive stress injuries,
there can be nerve damage,
there can be actually muscle tears at the finest level.
You can be a French horn player like I am
and tear a tiny muscle in your upper lip and you're cooked.
I mean, you'll go into decline, you'll be able to play,
but you'll be able to go into decline.
And who knows why, but in my 20s, I was getting better.
Man, I was getting better.
I was on this upward trajectory.
And I frankly wanted to be the greatest French horn player in the world.
It's like, what a great country.
You can have an ambition like so crazy.
And things looked good.
But when I was 21 or 22 years old, I started to get worse.
And I couldn't quite figure it out.
And then I played for a bunch of seasons
in the Barcelona Symphony and I was getting worse.
I mean, no matter what, it's nothing worked.
And I went to the greatest teachers
and it was like this master class in understanding Klein,
which is very helpful to me, I have to say,
because the Kleins that came later
because of fluid intelligence,
not because of a small muscle tear in my lip
or whatever happened.
I was actually able to experience what decline meant,
but I had to retool my career and leave.
And I went in, I just reluctantly and sorrowfully
and ashamedly left music and got my PhD
and went into the family business, which is academia.
Because my dad and my father and my grandfather,
they were both academics.
And most people would be like, awesome,
what's your problem, man?
It's because this was my dream.
This was my dream.
It was like I wanted to be a major league pitcher
and I just kind of got to the three games in AAA
or something like that and had to give it up
and thought about it.
And I thought it was gonna be sad about it
for the rest of my life, quite frankly, I have to say.
Do you play today just for joy?
Never, because there's no joy.
There's actually no joy.
There's just, I love music.
Now I actually love music for the first time.
I didn't love music when I played.
And it's interesting.
There's all this literature about humor.
I've done a lot of research on humor.
There's two, sense of humor means two things.
It means enjoying jokes and making jokes.
Happiness is only associated with enjoying jokes.
It's not associated with making jokes.
It turns out that if you're a funny person,
that does not improve your happiness, quite the contrary.
But if you enjoy funny things and you have the humility
to laugh at other people who are funny,
you get the benefits.
The same thing is true with a lot of enjoying music
and making music.
Now, some people get a lot of joy from it,
but for me, it was like being a standup comic.
It was just this pathos and drive and ambition.
And I wasn't happy and I'm much happier than I was then.
It's interesting because then that becomes
almost a test case for what you focus on later in life.
Like you had this experience where you had to weather
a career transition at a very early age
and you understood disappointment and loss
and all of that and how to rebuild.
Right.
So you did it at a period of time
where you had a lot of fluid intelligence
and when you're younger, maybe the stakes are lower
and you have all this upside
because you have so many more years to do other things.
But it's almost like that,
maybe that like, you know, planted something.
Yeah, and I've taken my career down to the studs four times.
I mean, did 10, 12 years
as a professional French horn player,
10 years in academia, 10 years running a think tank.
And now this happiness operation,
whatever this is.
Happiness startup.
This is like, make America happy.
Well, there's a cabal of like happiness experts
and out there like there's Gretchen.
We're all trying to get happy.
You don't study what you have.
You study what you want.
Well, let's like round this out
with maybe a little bit more practical advice.
Like, as I think about this in relationship to myself
and my own career path, I'm thinking, okay, I'm 55.
Like, I wanna keep doing this.
How long can I keep doing this?
I don't know.
I'm trying to make it as sustainable as possible
so I can continue to have a joyful relationship with it
and maintain that level of enthusiasm
and kind of like
connection to it so that it can maintain that level of quality. But how long am I going to be
able to do it? I don't know. I do know that at some point I'm going to be like, I don't want
to talk into a microphone anymore, or I'm not able to do it at the quality level that I want to. So
what can I do now? Well, as I mentioned earlier, I wanna develop my friendships a little bit better.
My kids are getting older.
I wanna make sure that those relationships are intact,
that there is a bond there that, you know,
will transcend my career path without doing it
in an unhealthy way where I'm creating expectations
for what our relationship,
cause they need to go and be in the world.
Like I don't wanna be, you know,
like I think some parents make the mistake
of like putting all this pressure on their kids
to now be their friends
because they're in that weird space.
Big mistake.
But, you know, what else should one be doing
or should I be thinking about
or even you be thinking about as we, you know,
walk this path?
You need, we need to be purposive.
We need to be thinking in a very specific way
about the engineering of this,
and that requires discernment.
See, discernment is hard.
We think that the world is gonna tell us what we want
through the experiences.
That doesn't work.
It doesn't work that way.
My students will say,
I thought when I went to college,
I'd figure out what my passion is,
and I got out of college and I still didn't have it.
So I went to business school and I thought that I would find it there. And I got out of college and I still didn't have it. So I went to business school
and I thought that I would find it there.
And then I went to McKinsey or I went to
the Boston Consulting Group or Goldman Sachs
and I thought I would find it there.
And I'm 31 years old still looking,
still waiting for my passion.
But we do sort of the same thing too.
I like this thing and what the next thing that should be
will present itself to me.
But that's actually not the way it works.
We need to be highly purposive about our discernment.
And discernment is an ancient tradition.
You know, discernment sunesis for the ancient Greeks,
panna for the Buddhists in Pali or Sanskrit.
And there's this Ignatian spiritual discernment for Catholics.
And so every spiritual tradition has discernment
and it requires work.
You know, when I was thinking about this,
when I stepped down as the president of this think tank,
I went for a walk.
I walked the Camino de Santiago.
I walked and walked and walked and asked for help
and thought about this.
And what am I supposed to do next?
And I've done it since then too.
And I'm gonna do it regularly
because I need to this constant process of discernment,
which exposes me to the most boring thing ever,
which is the exposure therapy
to something that's not exciting,
that is actually excruciatingly boring and painful.
And during which time I can actually contemplate
actually what the next next thing probably should be.
But we need to get out of our routine
and do the work of this.
What I recommend is that you're 55 years old,
say what's 60 year old Rich, what's he doing?
You know, what does this actually mean?
Now, what is your happy version of you look like?
Okay, so here's the exercise.
Six to five years from now, you imagine yourself,
you are happy, you know what that means
because you know how that feels.
And you've got some of the data on this too,
with your enjoyment, satisfaction,
your purpose, et cetera, et cetera.
Now, list the five things that are most responsible
for you being happy in order, okay?
The podcast is not number one.
Your marriage and your relationship with your children and your friendships are probably number one,
two, and three.
And probably number four is your religious enlightenment.
And maybe number five is what you're doing
professionally all day long.
Maybe, I'm just guessing.
Yeah.
Put them in order and then ask yourself,
what am I managing to?
I bet you're managing right now to number five.
Switch the order.
Switch the management imperative. Switch the how you need to more intensively manage one, two, three, and four
than number five. My students do this all the time. And part of the reason is because it's easier to
manage the things that are more professional. It's easier to manage your career than it is to manage
your friendships. But you can manage your friendships. And that means starting to do that every single day.
Maybe in five years, you'll be doing the podcast.
Maybe you won't.
But in five years, you should have closer friendships,
a better marriage,
a better concept of your relationship with your children
and a much deeper spiritual walk.
And if you do the work right now,
then the job will take care of itself
and your priorities will be in order.
That's super sound advice.
I feel like I am doing all of those things on some level,
but just to kind of label it in that way,
and then to inject it with like a higher degree
of intentionality and structure, I think.
For sure, and we can all do that.
I mean, this is the wonderful blessing
of having a big free prefrontal cortex
is that you don't have to take life as it's given.
You can actually be the manager of you Inc.
Which is your ultimate enterprise of importance.
And what you kind of didn't say explicitly,
but is implicit is when you're in this mode,
in this practice, you are making space for the mystery, right?
Like there is the, like if you walk this path
and you're taking care of these things
and you're aligning your actions with your values,
and you're exercising that level of discernment,
there is a faith and a trust
that like the next step will be revealed.
And that's like, that's an embrace of, you know,
the mystical nature of what it means to be
in the beautiful mystical nature of being human.
You're willing to walk off that edge.
You know, it's one of the, I talk about this, you know,
for my little girl, she returned 19 last week.
She your youngest?
Yeah, and she was 18 a year ago, obviously.
And for her 18th birthday, she wanted one thing,
one thing, one thing.
She wanted to jump out of an airplane with me.
She wanted to go skydiving, right?
Okay, so, and my wife's like, forget about it.
And I have a son, as I mentioned,
the Marine Corps, he's done it a million times.
And my older son is like, that's stupid.
She said, no, no, daddy, I wanna do it with you.
So we-
But how sweet is that?
And the awareness, like those calls don't come around
all the time. No, no, no. She's the best. She truly understands me. She's rock solid. And so
we did that and it's not scary. It's just the most unnatural thing ever. I mean, my heart didn't even
elevate, but I was intensely aware of how unnatural it was. And this unnatural thing,
and it could have been scary for some people find it very frightening, but for whatever reason, it didn't frighten me exactly. And, but the guy's like
jump. And he was telling me to do something that was, that seemed literally impossible. And I did
it. This is it. If you're actually doing the work, you're doing the work of having your spiritual
and moral and values, your life in order, then it will still feel unnatural to make these jumps,
but you can do it. You can actually just, because all you do is you fall out of the plane. You just
literally fall out of the plane and you can do that. And that's an incredible gift to be able
to do it, but you can't do that if you don't actually have somebody
who's that you trust and a parachute strapped to you
and a guy strapped to you,
and you can't do all that stuff.
And that's what this work really is,
is actually making it so that with complete confidence,
you can do the least natural thing possible.
But there is a level of like self-connection,
interconnect, like a self-awareness
and a commitment to that inside work
so that your intuition can be somewhat trustworthy, right?
I think for a lot of strivers,
that's not really part of their mental, emotional,
or spiritual equation.
So there has to be some cultivation to that.
So I guess that's, you know, when you talk about, you know,
faith or pursuing something transcendent in your life,
like that's a big component
of whatever that modality is gonna look like.
Yeah, no, if you've only developed your exterior self,
it's a problem.
If you've developed yourself as a full person,
a lot of strivers, when you talk to them deep down,
they think they don't really exist.
They think of themselves as a hologram
because they've been working on it.
They think of themselves as a 2D person on Zoom
to themselves.
It's the weirdest thing.
And in my worst days, it's been like that too.
You know, I'm a guy, I'm a guy that I've invented.
I've invented this guy.
Yeah, the avatar.
Yeah, I'm an avatar of a real person.
And that's what a lot of strivers do.
And you have to actually do the work
so that you come to life in 3D to yourself.
Cool.
Super inspiring to talk to you.
I'm so glad we were able to do this.
It's really nice to meet you.
It's nice to meet you in person too.
I love all the writing that you're doing.
I love the book.
It's fantastic.
So everybody should pick it up.
Strength.
Strength.
And come back
and talk to me again sometime.
Thank you.
Thank you for what you're doing.
You're lifting a lot of people up
and you're bringing a lot of us together
around these values that matter.
I appreciate that, man.
Cool.
Peace.
You too.
Peace.
That's it for today.
Thank you for listening. I truly hope you enjoyed the conversation to learn more about today's guests including links and resources related to everything
discussed today visit the episode page at richroll.com where you can find the entire
podcast archive as well as podcast merch, my books, Finding Ultra,
Voicing Change in the Plant Power Way,
as well as the Plant Power Meal Planner
at meals.richroll.com.
If you'd like to support the podcast,
the easiest and most impactful thing you can do
is to subscribe to the show on Apple Podcasts,
on Spotify, and on YouTube, and leave a review and or comment.
Supporting the sponsors who support the show
is also important and appreciated.
And sharing the show or your favorite episode
with friends or on social media
is of course awesome and very helpful.
And finally, for podcast updates,
special offers on books, the meal planner
and other subjects, please subscribe to our newsletter, which you on books, the meal planner, and other subjects,
please subscribe to our newsletter,
which you can find on the footer of any page at richroll.com.
Today's show was produced and engineered by Jason Camiolo
with additional audio engineering by Cale Curtis.
The video edition of the podcast was created by Blake Curtis
with assistance by our creative director, Dan Drake.
Portraits by Davey Greenberg and Grayson Wilder.
Graphic and social media assets
courtesy of Jessica Miranda, Daniel Solis, Dan Drake,
and AJ Akpodiete.
Thank you, Georgia Whaley,
for copywriting and website management.
And of course, our theme music was created
by Tyler Pyatt, Trapper Pyatt, and Harry Mathis.
Appreciate the love, love the support.
See you back here soon.
Peace.
Plants.
Namaste. Thank you.