The Rich Roll Podcast - Become An Idea Machine With James Altucher: Create, Experiment & Adapt
Episode Date: June 1, 2020The dystopia is here. Chaos, confusion, fear and anger. Horrific racism. Generations of pain fueling rioting and violence. Death and illness. Faltering systems and leadership failures. Market crashes ...and jobs lost. Communities are divided. Home lives are disrupted. Meanwhile, cities all across America are literally on fire. How we can right the ship? Deal with these cataclysmic shifts? And move forward productively? We can crash and burn. Or we can adapt -- a remaking of society that begins with personal reinvention. James Altucher is a virtuoso of this process. A prodigious intellect and abundantly talented polymath, James is a comic, chess master, entrepreneur, investor and prolific writer with over twenty books to his name, including the Wall Street Journal bestseller Choose Yourself. He's also a fellow podcaster and an unconventional thinker with an idiosyncratic lens on pretty much everything from creativity to finances. James and his writing have appeared in major media outlets including The Wall Street Journal, The New York Times, The New York Observer, Techcrunch, and The Financial Times. His blog, JamesAltucher.com, has attracted more than 20 million readers since its launch in 2010. And The James Altucher Show regularly appears in the top 100 podcasts on iTunes. On the subject of self-experimentation, James' latest unconventional move was releasing his latest self-published book, Think Like a Billionaire, on Scribd. Most compelling is James' relentless devotion to constant reinvention. Making his fourth appearance on the podcast, today we explore the importance of this trait and the habits that enable you to adapt and thrive in rapidly changing times — more critical now than ever. Recorded pre-pandemic in mid-February, this conversation is the last in my stash of episodes banked before quarantine. Nonetheless, I suspect you will find our discourse highly applicable to our current moment -- packed with tactics and strategies you can deploy to better acclimate to the rapidly changing circumstances that face us all. It's about how to make better decisions. And ultimately, how to create opportunity out of calamity. The visually inclined can watch it all go down on YouTube. And as always, the audio version streams wild and free on Apple Podcasts and Spotify. James is one of my most favorite people. He’s a natural and gifted conversationalist, his ideas are easily deciphered, and packed with the perfect amount of humor and data-backed insight. To some degree, we are all being called to reinvent ourselves right now. May this conversation help serve that process. Peace + Plants, Rich
Transcript
Discussion (0)
vulnerability like the kind you experience in AA or one should experience in in writing and maybe
all forms of art vulnerability sort of buys freedom like when you're vulnerable when you
are able to admit to what can go wrong what has gone wrong with you in the past the mistakes
you've made now you're free like if I'm writing something I don't publish it unless I'm afraid of what people
are going to think of me. I just ask myself at the end, right before I hit publish, am I really
saying something new and unique here? Because I don't want to say something that everyone else
has said. Or am I saying something where I'm really afraid? Oh no, what are X, Y, and Z going
to think of me? What are these people going to think of me? What are my friends going to think
of me? What are my readers going to think of me? So I always have to double check myself because
if you're not afraid of what you're creating, there's a chance then that, okay, everybody else
has done it because they weren't afraid either. And so there's got to be some resistance somehow
that you get over. And yeah, I'm just being authentic and that allows me to be as creative
as I want in this area. I'm creative even about my mistakes.
That's James Altucher.
And this is The Rich Roll Podcast.
The Rich Roll Podcast.
Hey, everybody.
How you guys doing?
So right now, as I record this,
it's Sunday afternoon, May 31st,
and I'm once again coming to you with a heavy heart
because I'm bearing witness to riots and protests
here in Los Angeles and all across America,
growing in numbers, growing in intensity,
cities literally burning, and it's as if the
country is descending into this dystopian chaos. So, in an effort to collect my thoughts on our
current state of affairs, I wrote a piece that I just shared on Instagram a few moments ago, which I think I'd
like to just loosely riff on here because it's difficult to know what the right thing to say
is. And I know for myself, I feel somewhat paralyzed when it comes to publicly sharing
a perspective on what's going on right now, I really, really don't wanna get it wrong.
This is a time in which I think it's much more important
for somebody like me to listen
than to just pontificate for the sake of pontificating.
But there's a tension
because I also feel a responsibility
as somebody with a platform and an audience
to somehow participate in the
process of provoking positive change. And the thing is, the truth that I really need to own
is that I am in so many ways a beneficiary of systemic racism. I'm a white man. My life is
the direct result and product of tremendous privilege.
I can walk down any street without unease.
I can run anywhere without any apprehension.
And pretty much everywhere I go, doors swing open.
And because of this, it doesn't really feel comfortable or right to weigh in on this historic moment of cataclysm.
And yet, what is the point of this privilege if it isn't used to help empower the voices that too long have gone unheard?
in so many ways because we, as both individuals and as members of a collective society,
have time and again failed to truly redress
the toxic racial divide that is woven
into the very fabric of this country,
a nation that was birthed out of a violence
not entirely dissimilar from what we are seeing today.
This pot has been brought to its current dystopian boil by galling failures in leadership, countless infuriating miscarriages
of justice, foundering efforts at true social reform, the rise of brash authoritarianism buttressed by an increasingly militarized
police state that perpetuates violence completely unchecked. We see the weaponization of media
and broken economic and political systems that aggrandize power and accelerate the rapidly
growing divide between the very few haves and the countless and invisible have-nots.
This moment really should come as no surprise because disenfranchisement cannot be decoupled
from the anger, the confusion, the fear, and the chaos that it creates. And the silenced
must be heard. Now look, I don't condone violence. My heart grows heavier and heavier
with each new report from the rioting front lines.
But I really think humanity is facing a choice.
Are we gonna crash or are we gonna rise?
Personally, I choose rise.
My hope is that this burn is not for naught,
that the ashes of this devastating upheaval will ultimately unite
us to finally reimagine and recreate a society that values true equality and opportunity for all.
So that's the post. And one aspect of what I was trying to get at is that social change begins with personal
change. We can't shift systems without shifting ourselves, without an honest, uncompromising,
objective appraisal of ourselves and inventory of our behaviors. So, in an admittedly very clumsy
effort to now segue to today's conversation, which I think it's important to point out was recorded way back in mid-February and therefore free of coronavirus or social unrest discussion,
of being teachable, adapting to changing times, and committed to constant growth and self-reinvention,
which I think is more important now than ever. My cipher for this exploration is my friend James Altucher, who I consider in many ways a virtuoso when it comes to reinvention. Returning for his fourth appearance on the show, James is, well, James is many things.
He's a prodigious intellect. He's an abundantly talented polymath. He's a comic. He's a chess
master, an entrepreneur, a prolific writer. I think he's written over 20 books, including
the Wall Street Journal bestseller, Choose Yourself, which is my favorite.
He's a fellow podcaster and a fairly unconventional thinker with an idiosyncratic lens on pretty much everything from creativity to finances.
finances. James and his writing have appeared in major media outlets, including the Wall Street Journal, the New York Times, the New York Observer, TechCrunch, and the Financial Times.
His blog, jamesaltucher.com, has attracted more than 20 million readers since its launch in 2010.
And his podcast, The James Altucher Show, regularly appears in the Top 100 podcasts on iTunes.
to her show regularly appears in the Top 100 podcast on iTunes. What's most compelling to me about James is this drive that he has to constantly reinvent himself. So today, we're going to explore
the importance of that trait and the ability and the habits that allow one to adapt and thrive
in rapidly changing times, something that I think is more critical now
than ever. But first...
We're brought to you today by recovery.com. I've been in recovery for a long time. It's not
hyperbolic to say that I owe everything good in my life to sobriety.
And it all began with treatment, an experience that I had that quite literally saved my life.
And in the many years since, I've in turn helped many suffering addicts and their loved ones find treatment.
And with that, I know all too well just how confusing and how overwhelming and how challenging it can be to find the right place and the right level of care, especially because, unfortunately, not all treatment resources adhere
to ethical practices. It's a real problem. A problem I'm now happy and proud to share has
been solved by the people at recovery.com, who created an online support portal designed to guide, to support, and empower you to find the ideal level of care tailored to your personal needs.
They've partnered with the best global behavioral health providers to cover the full spectrum of behavioral health disorders,
including substance use disorders, depression, anxiety, eating disorders, gambling addictions, and more.
depression, anxiety, eating disorders, gambling addictions, and more.
Navigating their site is simple.
Search by insurance coverage, location, treatment type, you name it.
Plus, you can read reviews from former patients to help you decide.
Whether you're a busy exec, a parent of a struggling teen, or battling addiction yourself,
I feel you.
I empathize with you.
I really do.
And they have treatment options for you. Life in recovery is wonderful, and recovery.com is your partner in starting that journey.
When you or a loved one need help, go to recovery.com and take the first step towards recovery.
To find the best treatment option for you or a loved one, again, go to
recovery.com. Okay, James, thinking differently, learning how to fluidly adapt to change and
reinvention. These are the things that we're going to talk about today.
This conversation was recorded back in February. It's the very last in what used to be a pretty large stash of episodes banked before we went into quarantine. However, I think you're going
to find that much of what is discussed today is highly applicable and can be deployed to help you navigate our current circumstances,
this moment in which we are all being required to adapt and to varying degrees reinvent ourselves.
This is about how to make decisions, how to find and create opportunity in uncertainty,
how to find and create opportunity in uncertainty,
how to cultivate creativity, and also it's about how to create financial stability.
James is one of my very favorite people.
He's a natural and gifted conversationalist.
His ideas are easily deciphered
and they're packed with the perfect amount of humor
and data-backed insight.
So here we go.
This is me and James Altucher.
It's nice to have interesting people come to your house. And I think that they,
my theory is that they infuse this place with their energy. And there's a certain like kind
of permanence to that, that I feel like with every guest that comes, like this place becomes better.
I like that.
And also I think just having people in your home,
it makes them relax a little bit.
I think it makes them relax.
And I think it makes them see, view you as,
it makes it easier for this to be a conversation
because I'm in your home.
I'm not just sitting back waiting for you
to interview me like a reporter.
Exactly.
This is your home. How long have you lived back waiting for you to interview me like a reporter. Exactly. This is your home.
How long have you lived here?
Since we built the house, 2003.
So 2003, so you were still doing the lawyering.
Yeah, yeah, I mean, I lawyered,
I mean, I was slowly kind of weaning myself off of the law
up until 2012.
The last couple of years, I wasn't doing very much of it,
but yeah, I was a lawyer here for the first several years.
And you'd commute all the way into LA?
No, I mean, at that point,
I had opted out of the big corporate law firm life.
And then I had a variety of different iterations.
Like I was a solo practitioner
and then I had a couple of partners for a while.
And then I had a different partner.
I had an office in Beverly Hills for a while. I had an office in Santa Monica. And then I just worked out of partners for a while. And then I had a different partner. I had an office in Beverly Hills for a while.
I had an office in Santa Monica.
And then I just worked out of the house on and off as well.
So, but also, you know, in those iterations, like I didn't really have a boss.
So I had more flexibility.
So it wasn't like the nine to five type of commute.
But there are people that live around here that commute downtown every day.
Like, I don't know how they do that.
Cause we live pretty far out there. How far away is downtown from here? commute downtown every day. Like, I don't know how they do that because we live pretty far out there.
How far away is downtown from here?
We, it depends.
It's all about traffic, as you know.
It can be two hours or it can be 45 minutes, depending.
But our eldest daughter, she's a sophomore in high school.
She goes to a high school that's east of downtown now.
And the commute is just too onerous.
So we have an apartment that we rent in downtown and
my wife and I split the week staying down there with her and we're homeschooling the other one.
Good for you. I think that's the way to go.
Both of them have been homeschooled on and off. And I know you have lots of ideas and thoughts
about education, specifically college and all that. I think we've talked about that before.
Yeah. Although I'm just curious as a side,
like probably the main question you're asked about this
is the socialization.
Because obviously homeschooling,
she's gonna learn more from you
than in some crappy high school.
But in terms of friends and socialization,
does she get that?
Yeah, I mean, that's something that comes up all the time.
And that's something I worry about the least
because our house is like, it's like a functioning studio. There's just people here all the time, like all's something I worry about the least because our house is like,
it's like a functioning studio. There's just people here all the time, like all different kinds of interesting people. So in terms of like social stimulus, like that's the least of my
worries. I do get concerned occasionally about, you know, basically pure academics.
Oh no, I want to get worried about that. How much do you remember from high school?
I know. It's basically just the programming of my upbringing that kicks off and
creates resistance around it. I always ask people, okay, I've even asked this to people
who majored in college in European history. And I say, okay, when was Charlemagne born?
And this is the guy who united europe or whatever is the first
great king of europe and probably 95 and by the way we've studied it it's been in textbooks every
year since like sixth grade and if you majored in european history you should definitely know it
but 95 most i would say almost 100 don't get it right within 500 years. Right. I definitely could not answer that.
I don't even really remember right now.
And I've asked, I've even written about it
and I've asked it a million times,
but I think it was around 754, give or take.
But people will say 1400, 1300, they won't know.
Yeah.
And I'm like, okay, well, what else have we learned
in school every single year?
There's nothing else.
I took French for five years.
I can't say anything other than bonjour.
And I can't even count. I can't even count to 10. And I took it for five years. I can't say anything other than bonjour. And I can't even count.
I can't even count to 10.
And I took it for five years, including in college.
Right.
What we do need to do though,
is reconfigure the priorities of education
around learning how to learn
and learning how to make decisions
and learning how to interact with people.
Like life skills that transcend pure memorization.
I mean, you were looking at Shane Parrish's book
here sitting on the table.
He was in here the other day
and his whole thing about mental models was grown,
was born out of this realization
that nobody had ever taught him
about the methodology of making good decisions.
Like it's just, there's no course in business school
or in college or in high school about that. And yet that's something that all of us need to do a zillion
times every single day. Yeah. Not, not only make decisions, but avoid the biases that are like
almost biologically built into our brains to prevent us from making good decisions.
You know, and, and from an evolutionary point of view, there was a reason for it.
Like if you heard, if you were walking by a bush
and you hear this rustling, you would start running
because for good reason.
Maybe there's only a 1% chance it's a lion
and a 99.999% chance it's, you know,
just wind through the bushes,
but you can't take the chance.
So you just run.
But we end up making,
but we're staring at a screen all day now
and we're getting those same instincts.
And so we're making decisions based on those same,
there's no lion in the computer,
but like if a stock goes down a little bit
and you're looking at the stock market
or if someone sends you an email you don't like,
you get that same thing.
Like I'm gonna just kill somebody or run.
And you don't know that these are just biases
that have been there for
a million years. Yeah. Yeah. I mean, it's certainly true. And I've been victim to that
many times. We all are. It can't help it. Like something in your body or mind is reacting to
something in a visceral way. And so if you lean into that, there usually is some creative output that you could produce.
So I remember one time, this is a crazy little experiment I did.
I wanted to play around with what are formats to write an article.
So everybody just writes and posts it on LinkedIn or their blog, and they write a little, you know, 10 reasons to do this or whatever.
And so I wanted to come up with, I've been playing around for 20 years,
different formats of writing.
So I said, I want to do something I never did before.
And Donald Trump had just tweeted, I'm going to buy Greenland.
And I'm thinking to myself, that's really weird.
Like I didn't even know you could buy a country.
And so I figured, okay, let's, something about this feels weird, of course.
And then, and then the president of Denmark, or I don't know, the prime minister of Denmark,
he tweets back, it's not for sale. And this is like the weirdest auction I've ever seen on the
planet. Like the president of the United States, like wants to buy this massive piece of land.
And I didn't even know Denmark owned Greenland.
And he's like, it's not for sale.
So that also is a weird comment.
Followed by the ultimate troll when Trump tweeted that picture of one of his hotels.
Like, did you see that?
Oh, no, I didn't.
He basically tweeted like, I definitely won't do this.
And it was a picture of like a Trump tower, like on a barren, like Greenland landscape.
That's so funny that he did that.
And so I'm thinking, but I didn't even see that, which would have definitely set me off,
but just these two world leaders, like bantering in this way like this about, you know, people
live there, you know, it's this huge piece of land. There's all these natural resources
where, what, how did Denmark end up owning Greenland? Is it from like Eric the Red a thousand years ago?
Like, what is going on here? And so I started to research it and I thought, okay, there's
some weird things going on with Greenland that I didn't know about. So I learned a lot about
Greenland. And then instead of just writing an article, I had never done a Kickstarter before.
So I decided to do a Kickstarter, which, so I said, okay, I'm going to raise a hundred million
dollars so I could buy Greenland. And I wrote all, and instead of writing an article, I wrote just
all the reasons why I want to buy Greenland, why people should let me buy it as opposed to
Trump or some other country. And, and then I had, you know, with Kickstarter, you have to put all
the rewards. Like, so I said, okay, $50, you could be a citizen, a hundred dollars, I'll make you an
Earl, a thousand dollars, you could be a Duke and carving out, I'll make you an Earl. $1,000, you could be a Duke.
And carving out all this like acreage for people.
And I was able to list though,
all the reasons why I thought this was interesting.
Like there's all these rare earth minerals
and there's a company called Greenland Natural Resources,
which is actually 100% owned by China.
Yeah, it's China.
So this is all, again, another weird,
China now is entering the picture.
And so there's all these weird things I didn't know.
I didn't know Kickstarter.
And so this article, quote unquote, that I had now published on Kickstarter versus a normal place was starting to get shared everywhere.
And so that was interesting for me.
And then Kickstarter shut it down.
And so they shut it down because I'm obviously not, people started donating money.
Right.
And Kickstarter and then GoFundMe, the same experience.
They shut me down because I'm obviously not going to raise a hundred million.
So they, and they're on, they have to pay all the chargebacks to the credit card company.
So it could be a big money loser for them.
So they just shut it down.
But then I had a second story, which is I was just shut down by Kickstarter and GoFundMe.
And so the whole thing is here's a little experiment. I had a second story, which is I was just shut down by Kickstarter and GoFundMe.
And so the whole thing is here's a little experiment.
And I gained a huge amount from it without any cost to me.
So I learned all this stuff about Greenland.
I learned about Kickstarter. I had never done a Kickstarter before.
So suddenly now I knew how to do a Kickstarter.
I spent some time studying best crowdfunding practices.
And I learned about Kickstarter.
And then I learned this new
format I could write articles in, which was weird. And then I had a second story on top of it,
which is that they censored me and here's what happened. So just that small impulse
allowed me to experiment in ways that I wouldn't have been able to otherwise and learn a whole
bunch of things that now I can do a Kickstarter or now I can speak intelligently about buying
Greenland or whatever.
And it's super funny.
Yeah, and it's funny.
It's like, wait, what?
Like, first of all, you know,
can a country buy another country?
Yes or no.
Can an individual buy a country?
And what's interesting is that you got shut down,
not on the merits of what you were attempting to do,
but on kind of a side technicality,
which was probably motivated just by extreme discomfort
at what was going on.
And them trying to figure out like,
we gotta find a way somehow to shut this down.
Yeah, people were like sending money in,
like they were like wiring money in.
And so-
And the sheer audacity of the whole thing.
Yeah.
It's not dissimilar from,
and I know you've talked about this as well,
Richard Branson saying,
go into Boeing and saying, give me an airplane.
Yeah, no, that's a great example.
It's so ridiculous that they would do that.
But there's something about where naivete meets audacity,
an audacious dream, and then some steps are taken,
that that's how anything amazing is created.
Well, there's so many layers of you can't do this involved in any creative act. Because
if people weren't telling, if people weren't saying, Rich, you can't do this, then thousands
of other people probably would have done it by now. So it's kind of finding where people are
saying, you can't do this. But when you ask
yourself why, there's no real reason, might as well try it. So like with this, there's no reason
why I couldn't start a Kickstarter to raise $100 million to buy Greenland. And I learned something.
And all the times people say, oh, well, you can't start a podcast. Have you ever done
interviews before or a radio show? Like,
leave it to the professionals. No, I think I can do it. Like, why can't I do it? And,
you know, I'll tell you another just quick experiment. It's not as interesting as Richard Branson. Richard Branson is really an interesting example because this is a 27-year-old guy who was
a magazine publisher and had no experience with anything relating to airlines.
British Airways had a monopoly in England on airlines.
Heathrow only dealt with British Airways.
And Richard Branson didn't have money.
And he simply calls up Boeing and asks to borrow a plane.
They give it to him.
I mean, the details, I'm skipping over the details.
They just lend him a plane for a year.
He throws like, yeah, you could use this one landing strip.
We don't really use that much.
Same with JFK.
And suddenly he has a plane going back and forth.
Like, you know, I'm sure at every step of the way, people were saying to him, are you insane?
But what does it hurt to ask?
And then, of course, there's subtleties.
There's skills to asking.
And how did to ask? And then of course, there's subtleties, there's skills to asking and how did he ask and all these things that he used skills learned
from being a music magazine publisher,
but still it's this combination of skills with audacity,
with, you know, like, why can't I?
And allows you to go forward
on so many different things.
Right.
I think both those examples, Greenland
and the Richard Branson example
are illustrative of both of these books.
Well, the book that you have out now,
I think like a billionaire in the book
that you have coming out next year called Skip the Line.
Like there are lessons in both of those examples
that could be pulled from both or either of those books.
Oh yeah, absolutely.
Because let's say, well, let me ask you,
when you were starting to run in marathons
and then ultra marathons and Ironman things,
and you were in your mid forties,
I bet you there were a lot of people saying to you,
Rich, maybe you should just stick with a 6K or whatever.
Yeah, plenty of that, plenty of that.
But I look at it as sort of the frog in the warm water
that's coming to a boil slowly.
Like there is an incremental like sort of compounding path
that you can take towards like an athletic goal
that's different from,
I mean, I guess I did skip the line
in that I didn't do all that little stuff
and I went right to like ultra distance
and didn't pay my dues or didn't take that traditional route in that regard.
Let's not forget, you didn't start with 5Ks, then 10Ks.
But I was an athlete. I mean, look, I can minimize it. But yeah, I guess for somebody
not steeped in this world, it does sound like a little insane and ridiculous.
It was insane, Rich.
Like you weren't an athlete then, right?
No, I had a past as an athlete.
Right, in high school.
But logically, yeah, like rationally on paper,
like it didn't make sense.
And yet, look what happens.
You ran, I don't know the exact, the ultra iron, whatever,
on every island of Hawaii, one day at a time. You did these incredible feats that I'm sure many people every step of the way
kept telling you you can't, but that's what puts you on the other side where you suddenly, if you
go past enough of you can't do this, then suddenly you're the only one doing it. And so you were the
only one in the world who had the kind of resources and set of experiences and set of talents that you had,
where you were running in all these races,
but you were also going towards this vegan lifestyle.
You had the experience of being a lawyer,
so you were able to, you had a better capability
of writing about all these experiences
than most people would.
So you were able to combine them all
into being the only rich role out there
doing these events, books, podcasts.
There's no one who can compete. Yeah. Well, I think it's an example of
having all of these skills in a variety of disciplines that I tried over the years that
weren't necessarily matched up with my ultimate talents and certainly not my, my passion or, or a sense of purpose that when they
finally found the right outlet at all, like congealed to create, you know, an amazing result
in the same way that, you know, if somebody was to say to you, like, you don't have the credentials
to be a podcast host, but many years ago you did your 3am show. You learned how to talk to people.
You learned how to create something that's entertaining.
You are doing standup comedy. Like you've done, you've been writing, you've all of these other
areas, like all contribute to your ability to sit behind a microphone and be engaging and be
entertaining and be curious. All these skills that you've developed over the course of a lifetime.
I mean, I would say similarly, I took a million depositions as a lawyer. I learned how to ask questions.
And I think that my true skillset as a podcaster was developed through sitting in thousands and
thousands of AA meetings, listening to people tell their stories and learning how to tell
my own story. That was my training ground for being a public speaker and being a podcast host. You learn how to be empathetic.
You learn how to listen.
You develop this great capacity for compassion
for the human condition that I think lends itself
towards creating a safe and interesting environment
to explore those very themes
with another person sitting across from you.
Yeah, I think that's so interesting
because I think that does come across, like your compassion for your guests comes across so much in your podcast,
I think because of your experiences. And I always wonder about this idea that
vulnerability, like the kind you experience in AA, the kind you experience or one should
experience in writing and maybe all forms of art, vulnerability sort of buys freedom.
Like when you're vulnerable, when you are able to admit to what can go wrong, what has gone wrong
with you in the past, the mistakes you've made, now you're free. Like nobody can say, well,
you can't say this, you've done this. And yeah, I said that. I'm an idiot a lot of the time.
And I, yeah, I said that I'm an idiot a lot of the time.
Bring it on and you're free.
You don't have to deal with people saying,
well, Rich, you can't talk about health.
You had this and this happened to you when you're 20s.
All right, yeah, read my book, it's in it.
I already told you about that.
So you're free from all that stuff.
And the more vulnerable, like how can people attack that? They can't say, well, now you're free from all that stuff. And the more vulnerable, like how can people, you know,
attack that? Like can't say, well, now you're not allowed to write about this because you experienced this. No, there's no rules. And yeah, I'm just being authentic. And that allows me to
be as creative as I want in this area. I'm creative even about my mistakes.
Well, your specific strain of authentic vulnerability was really a tipping point in your creative career.
Like when you finally made this decision
that you were gonna be honest and write about it,
write about your life and your experiences
in a very transparent way,
I'm sure there was a lot of fear that preceded that,
but when you mustered up the courage to do that,
that's really when things changed for you.
Oh yeah, completely.
And to the point that now I don't even,
like if I'm writing something,
I don't publish it unless I'm afraid
of what people are going to think of me.
And I don't try to say something that's gonna,
I just ask myself at the end, right before I hit publish,
is this, am I really saying something new and unique here?
Because I don't want to say something
that everyone else has said.
Or am I saying something where I'm really afraid? Oh no, what are X, Y, and Z going
to think of me? What are these people going to think of me? What are my friends going to think
of me? What are my readers going to think of me? So I always have to double check myself because
if you're not afraid of what you're creating, there's a chance then that, okay, everybody else
has done it because they weren't afraid either. And so there's got to be some resistance somehow that you get over. Like even
something I wrote recently, I was legitimately afraid, well, is this going to shed a new light
on everything I've written for the past 10 years because I'm admitting to this other thing? And
I was nervous and correctly so, but that's okay.
That's how you learn is getting over that every time.
Yeah, when I wrote,
I think I probably told you this previously, but when I wrote Finding Ultra,
like I really had to get into the mindset
of writing in my private journal
that no one was ever gonna read.
Like I had to get comfortable communicating things
about my life that I'm ashamed of and that I'm embarrassed
about. And I remember when I sent the manuscript to my editor at the publisher, I looked at my
wife and I just, I said, I hope I'm making the right decision. Like this could be the worst
decision I've ever made. But I knew intuitively that the value of the book would be directly correlated to the extent
to which I was willing to be vulnerable
because why do it otherwise?
And I think, my book,
finding ultra is it's an addiction recovery memoir.
It's also like this sports story
and it's also kind of like a health and wellness primer,
but ultimately it could be categorized as a sports
memoir. And like, I hate sports memoirs because they're usually written by athletes in the
twilight of their career and they're intended to kind of create a halo effect and perhaps buy them
a couple of years in the spotlight. And that's why they're not good because they're inherently
less than honest.
And I've never won a race.
It's not like I went to the Olympics or anything like that.
Like, why should anyone care what I have to say about this?
The only reason that this, the only way that this is going to be compelling is if I, you know, take my specific experiences and try to connect with something more universal about the human condition. And that can only come through, you know, a profound level of honesty.
Yeah, and that happened.
You created something very unique,
which was this sort of combination
of kind of a sobriety memoir, health and wellness,
athletic memoir, plus a reinvention memoir.
So you were in your forties,
a time when people think, well,
my knees are starting to hurt.
Maybe I shouldn't run marathons anymore.
There's a lot of people are thinking like this of slowing down and you were literally speeding up
at that point.
And I think you gave permission
for people who were reading it to say,
oh yeah, he stopped being a lawyer to do this.
He stopped, he became sober
and then this started happening.
He went vegan, this started happening.
He's in his forties and he's doing all these athletic competitions. It's sort of like you gave permission, not only for other people to be equally vulnerable. And I'm sure you got lots of
messages like, man, I was in the same situation as you and so on. And, but you also gave people
permission to, Hey, I could, if he could do it, I could run a marathon or do something incredible
when I'm 45 that I never thought I could do before.
And I think that's something, like I'm curious now, like when you're thinking, that was a very pivotal story for you, right?
And it's an iconic story.
Like you were saying essentially I was down and out, then this happened, and then I became a superhero.
So it's like this iconic story.
Do you ever feel like tied to that story?
Like you have to keep repeating it or find a new story? Do you ever grapple with the hold that
story now has over you versus what the hold you originally had on that story?
Yeah, 100%. And I've worked really hard to kind of transcend that a little bit. Certainly,
I think when the book came out,
it was sort of characterized as a book about running,
which it isn't.
It's not about becoming an ultra marathoner.
It's very much a choose yourself story.
You know, it's about- Absolutely.
It's about the inherent power
that we all have within ourselves
to basically shift the trajectory of our life,
even if we find ourself in our 40s or in our later years,
that that inherent capacity lives within all of us to tap into a deeper reservoir of human potential
in whatever way feels right to you. And I think it took a long time for that message to kind of
percolate out of what was considered to be a running book.
But then, yeah, I felt, I wouldn't say trapped.
I think that's too strong of a word,
but this sense of being like,
oh, you're the vegan ultra athlete.
Like, yeah, that's something that I did,
but it's only one aspect of who I am.
And the podcast very much is about,
it's not about me, it's about my guests.
It's about the next chapter, if the book was gonna have an epilogue, like, okay, now what?
Like, I leveraged some tools to grow and manifested this thing that I talk about in this book, but that growth continues.
That's not the end of the story.
I wanna continue to grow.
If I could make these changes,
what other areas in my life am I currently blind to?
So let's go on a journey to explore that
with the smartest, most interesting people that I can find.
And that has nothing to do with my story
and everything about the wisdom
that's available in the world.
And so now you've interviewed hundreds
of really amazing guests,
a lot of them kind of athletic, but not all of them. You know, a lot of this is about wellness,
but again, not all of it. It's all people who have captivated you or interested you for various
reasons. And let me ask you this. So I'm debating this. So I've also interviewed hundreds and
hundreds of my heroes and, you know, authors who are, you know, passing through the city. So I've also interviewed hundreds and hundreds of my heroes and authors who are passing through the city.
So I get to interview them and so on.
And I've interviewed many people I've just always looked up to.
And I'm starting to wonder, okay, after 500 of those, maybe sometimes I want to just say what I think about things rather than just always interview people.
And so I'm kind of going forth on that of mixing that up a little.
Not completely, but just mixing it up.
So it's not, you know, there's 2 million interview podcasts out there now.
And we were just talking about this earlier.
When we were in 2014, there was like 100 interview podcasts.
And now there's literally 2 million.
I'm not even exaggerating it.
And we've also interviewed everybody.
And so now we haven't interviewed the whole planet,
but we've interviewed a lot of people.
So people start repeating things or saying similar things.
And then, but I'm sure your audience,
they're listening to you for a reason.
And maybe they want to start hearing more
of what you have to say about a topic.
And I wonder if you've ever debated
doing kind of more solo stuff.
Yeah, I mean, a couple thoughts. First of all, both of us have been doing this for a topic. And I wonder if you've ever debated doing kind of more solo stuff. Yeah, I mean, a couple of thoughts.
First of all, both of us have been doing this for a while.
I started mine in late 2012.
You've done more episodes than me,
but I started a little bit ahead of you.
There's been a lot of overlap in our guests.
We've been on similar journeys.
Indeed, when we started,
it was not a competitive environment.
Both our shows went right to the top
and kind of stayed there.
And in the intervening years,
this medium has been adopted
in a very mainstream way.
So the ecosystem has matured
tremendously around us.
We were both lucky enough
to grab a little piece of real estate
and hold onto it.
But I certainly wouldn't wanna be
somebody starting an interview-based podcast now.
I think it would be very, very difficult to do that.
So I'm extremely grateful to be in the position that I'm in,
and I'm sure you feel the same way.
But, you know, here we are,
and I'm interested in your thoughts too.
I'm gonna throw this back to you.
What is the state of union with this medium?
And as somebody who thinks about things
in a counterintuitive way and with a different lens,
like, what is the future of this?
And I'll continue to answer your question
and allow you to answer that when I'm done.
I think that, I had Kamal Ravikant over here yesterday,
your good friend, and we were talking
and we were talking about your show.
And I said to Kamal, I go, I tune into James.
Like James has lots of interesting people on his show,
but I wanna hear James.
Like I'm fascinated by your lens,
your perspective on the world.
And you're the reason that I tune in.
So I think that that is a smart and appropriate pivot
for you to start to have more standalone episodes
with just your reflections and your thoughts.
In my own case, I have thought about that.
The hardest part of this whole podcast thing for me
is doing the introductions.
Like when I'm alone talking into a microphone,
I'm so up in my head and it feels so unnatural.
So the idea that I would sit down
and just deliver a monologue spontaneously
from whole cloth, even if I had an outline, that scares me. And I feel like that is a skill that
I haven't yet honed. And perhaps that's a reason to attempt it or try it.
Or there's a way to experiment in the sense that, let's say you have just someone sitting here who's listening and occasionally maybe instead of,
like in an interview, it's let's say 50-50.
But let's say in this case-
You need a foil.
Yeah, a foil.
You need someone who you're just gonna throw things against.
And if something doesn't quite stick,
they'll inform you of it.
Yeah, more than like a co-host,
but somebody who can match your wits and push you to deliver a monologue here and there.
Yeah, like let's say there's...
I mean, go ahead.
Well, let's say there's an issue that, you know, triggered that emotional impulse for you this week.
So something happened that bothered you and you just wanted to, and you wanted to talk about it, but not necessarily the issue, but even more globally, like what does this mean for either the world or people or what did I learn from this or the economy or whatever?
And you just start ranting on it.
Yeah.
I do have a little bit of an insecurity around it, I think.
Here's an example.
So last year we did our first like live podcast event.
We booked this big theater and we sold it out. It was like 1200 seats.
That's great.
And the idea was to do a live podcast and, but also produce a show that was very, you know,
that kind of transcended this podcast format to create an entertaining experience for people.
I had my sons play music and then in queue perform some live poetry.
And then I did a live podcast with Paul Hawken,
who's like this legendary environmentalist.
And I conducted that podcast
very much as if he was sitting across from me right now.
Like I kind of maintained that format.
And after the show was over,
I basically went out into the hallway
and just talked to people
for as long as they wanted to talk to me.
And I was there for hours and hours and hours.
And I realized in retrospect,
oh, these people,
like I think they're coming to see Paul Hawken, you know?
And I realized like, oh, they are coming to see me,
which makes me uncomfortable.
Like I doesn't feel like,
cause I have profound imposter syndrome. Like I can't imagine why anyone would want to come to see me, which makes me uncomfortable. Like I doesn't feel like, cause I have profound imposter syndrome.
Like I can't imagine why anyone would want to come and see me.
But so the growth for me is in owning that
and living up to that on some level that, you know,
I have had certain life experiences that have value
and that there is something interesting
about sharing, you about sharing my perspective.
Yeah, or what if you even went on Twitter beforehand
and you said, listen,
I'm gonna try this solo episode thing,
but give me some fuel, ask me a bunch of questions.
And then you pick the four or five that you like the best
and you can even just do a 20 minute episode
or attach a story from your life to each question
along with the answer or your answer., that's an episode. Right. Yeah. I think I'll probably try that.
I think I'm, I'm, uh, I wouldn't say I'm in a rut, but I ha we have like a routine now and
I know how it goes and it's working. Um, and, and you're somebody who's coming in as, you know,
like this disruptive force. Who's like always, you know, got the waiter pads and you're writing down the 10 ideas every day
and you're trying to buy Greenland
and you're doing all this crazy stuff.
And what I love and appreciate about it
isn't just the kind of courage to do it,
it's your relationship with the outcome,
I feel is very healthy.
It's not about whether it works or not,
you're just doing it. Right. Because here's what I always think is that something's going to work.
Some outcome will exist that I like, but it doesn't have to be the outcome of whatever it is
I'm doing that day. So I'm doing something, let's say today or tomorrow or the next day,
I'm doing something to try something new today or tomorrow or the next day, I'm doing something to try
something new or try an experiment or write something, eventually the outcome might be
bad.
Like, for instance, this Greenland Kickstarter thing, and again, this is a silly example,
but that was essentially a failure.
I didn't raise $100 million to buy Greenland.
Kickstarter shut me down, and it was fast enough.
It didn't really get as widely spread as a successful outcome would have been. But it was interesting. I learned something.
I learned a whole bunch of things. And then you move on because you have this amazing story. Yeah,
I have amazing story. And now I have knowledge. Okay. Here's how to do a Kickstarter if I want
to try something else. And so now I can do the next thing, which might be just as crazy or not. And the outcome may be good, maybe bad.
Eventually, some outcomes will be better than others.
But whether the outcome is bad or good, I'm learning from each thing.
Right.
You've canonized this as the 10,000 experiments rule.
We all talk about the 10,000 hour rule.
You're like, that's nonsense.
Let's focus on 10,000 experiments instead.
Yeah, so the 10,000 hour rule,
which was developed by great guy, Professor Anders Ericsson,
he basically determined if you devote yourself
to 10,000 hours
of what he calls deliberate practice at any field,
you'll be among the best in the world at that field.
And this was written about by Malcolm Gladwell
in the book, Outliers,
and it kind of became a popular phrase after that.
I just couldn't wrap my head around it though,
because I feel like I've gotten good
at a bunch of different things,
and I don't think I've spent 10,000 hours at them.
And for some things, I couldn't figure out what does he mean by 10,000 hours.
Like I understand with, let's say you're doing a golf putt.
I can understand practicing that for 10,000 hours and you'll get better at golf putting.
But for something like writing, what does it mean to spend 10,000 hours and you'll get better at golf putting. But for something like writing,
what does it mean to spend 10,000 hours writing?
Like there's so many nuances in a creative field
and it's not like repetitive.
It's not like I can get a coach,
after I write a sentence, I can get a coach
and say, well, that sentence could have been better.
So I didn't really, and I would write to him
and he's always very smart
and he was always very friendly to respond.
And I've read all these different theories,
like, can I borrow hours from this other activity?
So I was trying to get good at standup comedy.
I started this, it's a random thing.
I got passionate about it about five years ago,
started going up on stage and I was trying to figure out,
can I borrow from my 10,000 hours public speaking
and some hours from my writing
and some hours from just, I don't know, being funny?
Or how does it work?
And so I would-
The transferability of these skills
in a variety of disciplines.
Can you aggregate them to come up with your 10,000 hours?
Yeah, or at least give me some headstart.
And he kept writing about,
well, what's the metric you're judging yourself with?
And there's really no metric.
Like, how do you determine if something, for instance, is good writing or not?
Is it book sales?
No.
Is it if your favorite professor likes it?
No.
It's hard for creative efforts.
It's hard to have a metric of success.
For many, for sales ability, for business ability, there's so many other factors like luck, environment, the people you're dealing with.
so many like other factors like luck, environment, the people you're dealing with, that there's,
it's, it's hard to, to measure your success with these 10,000 hours. And, and it was confusing talking to him. So then I figured, well, maybe there are, and then the other thing that concerned
me was, well, what if you take training methods now and go back to the 1920s? So for instance,
if someone took people who, coaches who train for marathons and took those same techniques back to the 1920s. So for instance, if someone took people who,
coaches who trained for marathons
and took those same techniques back to the 1920s
when coaching techniques were not as advanced,
would it be then 100 hours to be the best in the world?
You know, the hours changed
depending on how advanced the field is.
So more things kept coming up
that I didn't really understand.
And that's when I started thinking
of another model completely
to measure my own success
and then to accelerate
my own learning in different fields.
And so I was very excited about that
because it basically took me
two or three years
to be a good, solid, professional investor.
It took me two years to achieve a level I wanted
in, let's say, a game like chess,
which is normally a hard skill,
or computer programming, which is a hard skill.
And then with stand-up comedy also.
I was 48 years old at the time.
I'm 52 now.
I didn't want to go 10,000 hours or 20 years
to get good at something.
I don't want to be on stage when I'm 68 years old, trying to make a bunch of strangers laugh. Like it feels silly to
me. I just wanted to get good at it. Now I wanted to literally skip the line. Everybody kept telling
me, don't think you can skip the line. Like we've all worked hard. Especially in standup comedy.
Like they're very, you know, respect your elders and that's very much a, you know, you got to grind
and pay your dues. Yeah. that's what people tell me.
Every stand up comedian will be like,
you got to go up there and bomb a thousand times, you know,
and just keep doing it and keep doing it and keep doing it.
And in 10 years, you'll be good.
Yeah, 10 best case is what they would say.
And here you are, like you start basically telling jokes
on the subway, right?
Yeah, so I saw-
And now you're headlining.
What is the time period?
It's basically about five years,
but like four years since I started taking it super seriously
where I would go up two or three times a week
and more recently, you know, up to 10 times a week.
So, but yeah, I had to construct,
I had to really be very analytical about it
and I would deconstruct every comedian's act so I would understand what they were doing.
And then I would explain it back to them.
And they were like, huh, I never thought of it like that, which is fine.
Like they have their process.
But then I started constructing experiments I can do to basically accelerate my learning.
And I found every experiment really changed the way I would do comedy.
So I would start really, people would see me from one month to the next and they're like, boy, when did you start doing X, Y, or Z?
And I'm like, after this experiment I did where I saw these other things weren't working.
And sometimes the experiments are very simple.
Like between jokes, what if you just lean back against the wall and look up at the ceiling for three seconds or for a half a second?
So just even an experiment like that because there's this feeling on stage that you have to spit everything out as quickly as possible.
Or you mentioned one experiment I did.
I wanted to tighten up my one-liner, so I went on the subway and did stand-up comedy on a crowded subway cars where nobody wants to hear you tell
jokes nobody likes you nobody is is in in the best case i can't even bar towards getting a laugh is
very high right they're not they didn't just pay a cover charge to see a comedian they just want to
get home like you're bothering them at that point and they they're not drinking. So they want to drink.
Some of them might be.
Some of them might be.
And most of them want to drink.
And then this person just gets out of the car and starts telling jokes straight at them.
And it's very difficult.
But that.
Did you get some laughs though?
I did.
Yeah.
Oddly, I would get on and I would say like, the one thing that got the most laughs is like,
I was, I, is this, was this the six and a half stop?
Like, is this, is this the train to Hogwarts?
And so kids would laugh at that.
And then I did another one.
Hey, I ordered an Uber pool,
but they sent me the subway car.
So that got some laughs.
Those were like the main two things that got laughs.
You have to be so comfortable with your vulnerability though.
But I wasn't.
It's like.
I was with a friend of mine and this person brought on a video camera just so I could
study it later.
And I got on and I looked around, I'm like, forget it.
We just wasted our time.
Like you could just put the camera away.
And I was like, and then I said, on second thought, just turn it on and let's just wait
a second. So my friend turned on the video camera and then I said, on second thought, just turn it on and let's just wait a second.
So my friend turned on the video camera and then I just went off.
So it just, I wasn't, I just went without thinking.
And, you know, sometimes people will laugh and sometimes people were like, you know, boo, like get out of here.
So, but that happens.
You got to be okay with either one, right?
Yeah, you got to be okay with either one, right? Yeah, you gotta be okay with either one. I mean, that's the difference between true vulnerability
and what I see a lot of now,
which is, I call it performative vulnerability.
It's sort of like,
now it's cool to be vulnerable all of a sudden.
And you see a lot of people using it in a very,
I feel like disingenuous way.
Like, oh, like when you're vulnerable online, that's how you get people interested in what you're doing.
So I'm going to do this.
And it's like this weird, like fake vulnerability.
Yeah.
And I see that it's almost like you can't, if you pick up a recent self-help book, almost any recent self-help book, and I'm not going to throw the whole industry under the bus, but a lot of recent self-help books, you can't even – the author always starts off like, well, I was in my darkest moment.
And then XYZ happened, and I started writing in my gratitude journal and whatever.
And then everything became better.
And it's like that's like a bad – and then even in Silicon Valley, it's like a badge of honor.
Like, yeah, I failed at my first startup and blah, blah, blah.
And then now I'm ready. Like, yeah, I failed at my first startup and blah, blah, blah. And then now I'm ready.
And yeah, I agree.
I think it's a way to kind of almost buy.
It's almost too transactional, the vulnerability.
Right.
Yeah, transactional, I think, is a good word.
And hand in hand with that, I get, I'm sure you do too, like I get all the galleys in the mail now when you host a podcast.
Like suddenly books just arrive at your house all the time. Like I get like six bookseys in the mail now when you host a podcast, like suddenly books just arrive at your house all the time.
Like I get like six books a week in the mail
and generally they'll be, you know,
the upcoming self-help books, right?
So I have so many self-help books being delivered
on the regular here that it's made me very cynical
about all of it.
You know, I just look at this and I'm like,
they're all, they all,
and I can't possibly read all of them,
but maybe you can,
but I just kind of page through them
and I'm like, they just feel like
different flavors of the same thing.
And it's made me like less interested in all of that.
Yeah, that's why I think we'll look at,
you know, for instance, Binding Ultra
or in my upcoming Skip the Line,
I think about this.
Forget about all self-help.
What are my real stories for better or for worse?
And what did I learn from them?
And what can I extrapolate?
The extrapolation is what gives it
the self-help categorization.
Like, okay, I did this, this, and this.
So that's a formula.
But I always say I'm not giving advice. This is okay, I did this, this, and this. So that's a formula. But I always say,
I'm not giving advice. This is what worked for me specifically, but maybe it's broad enough.
It could work for others. And I always want to make sure it's, it's just not like there's a,
not only is there a self-help genre, but they all kind of recommend the same thing. And, and you get the sense they're recommending it without real experience or they're recommending it so they can start getting speaking gigs,
talking about it,
because you can make a lot of money
motivating companies.
And so I always try to make sure
I'm saying something really unique.
Like this 10,000, thinking about learning
and the 10,000 hour rule and how I could succeed.
Like you went through this in your mid forties,
you left a profession and kind
of started where you did start new professions. And that's a lot of people are going through that,
but they always think, well, I'm already 45. How am I going to learn to be the best or the top 1%
of some field? So people, so I can make a living at this. Cause you need to be in the top 1%
roughly to, to make a living and to feed your family.
And we're going through it just personally
and as an economy.
And so really grappling with that
and how I challenged myself to learn different things
and how I failed at many things along the way,
I had to think, well, what's happening?
And that's where I went from the 10,000 hour rule
to can I borrow hours or is there
like shortcuts or cheat sheets or what's actually happening?
And you have to really think inside what happened to me that I can bring out as a story.
And I feel like you did that too with, with finding ultra was your unique path to saying,
Hey, at 45, you could still be a top, you know, world-class athlete and do these things
and get over these issues and change careers
and on and on and on.
Yeah, but I think my book was really just a story,
whereas you look at these things
that have happened in your life
and you look at other successful people
and you're trying to extrapolate the themes and the lessons
and then figure out a way to
communicate a path forward through a lens or a path that perhaps has never really been fully
articulated, like the skip the line book that you have coming up. I haven't read it yet, but you've
told me a little bit about it. And I think it's interesting because it's about this very thing of like, look, we're
in a rapidly changing world where we're going to be compelled to have to reinvent ourselves.
We're living longer, et cetera. And you don't want to just have to switch gears and figure out
a new career later in life and start at the bottom. You're somebody who has had success in a
variety of disciplines without really having
to do that, without putting in 10,000 hours and somehow found your way into that like top tier,
that top 1% of these disciplines. So what was it, what was the differentiator here and what can be
learned from that experience that could be helpful to other people? Yeah. And I think, and look,
there's other things too that I've massively failed at.
So you sort of learn along the way, I better restrict my failure so I don't lose everything
on this failure.
So you have to also construct ways to get better at something where you're not risking
your entire life.
And like you even said earlier, the transition from lawyer to everything else you're doing now, it took a while.
People kind of think, oh, well, I'm going to quit being a lawyer and start being a podcaster,
and the money's just going to roll in. It doesn't really work like that for anybody in the world.
You know, it's a process, and it's a process of trying lots of different things. It's a process of transition.
It's a process of finding more and more things that you enjoy and that you love doing and that
your passions maybe lie. And maybe when you find something you're passionate about, you're able to
double down on it enough so that, again, you're not risking too much, but you double down and
you see how it works and how it feels. And it's a process. Yeah.
So you've got this book about billionaires.
Think like a billionaire.
Yeah.
I feel like culturally we're in a moment
where we're fetishizing these people.
And on both sides.
Yeah.
Both sides meaning what?
Like some people, you know, you'll see politically,
people will say, well, banish all billionaires
or like somebody in politics said, and this is not, I'm very apolitical, but someone in politics said,
billionaires have not earned the money, they took the money.
So there's a very kind of almost violent revolutionary backlash against these people who have accumulated this one particular number or more. And on the flip side, you can say, well, these are people perhaps who
have accumulated certain habits that maybe you'd want to emulate if you wanted success,
even if it wasn't success about money. And then you can also say, okay, well, are there benefits
to this class of people who have accumulated so much wealth? Are they giving to charity? Are they
solving world problems? Are they creating impact more than if the money was being used in other ways?
And I shouldn't even say being used because often money is created. That's something that
a lot of people don't understand about the economy. There could be more money next year
than there is this year because people who are innovative use their innovations to, to create money seemingly out of thin air.
But you know,
if Elon Musk sells more Teslas and he raises money by having an IPO and this
Tesla goes public and whatever money is basically created and put some,
to some extent put into his pocket.
So it's not like they took,
they've created it out of their innovations,
but sometimes they're bad guys and sometimes they're good guys like anyone else.
I mean, there is a sense, I think, that you don't get to that level of wealth and accumulation
without stepping on a lot of people and having to do some dastardly things.
Yeah. I think that's kind of the sense. And it's easy to have that sense because let's say there's
a few thousand billionaires and there's 300 million other people in the U.S. So we're all allowed to trash this.
They're certainly not a minority, just because even though there's just a few thousand of
them, they're people who are very privileged and benefit, and they have every advantage
in society.
And by the way, some of them are really bad people, but some of them are enormously charitable.
You look at efforts like Bill Gates.
And again, I don't know whether you like
Microsoft Windows or not, but you look at Bill Gates,
he has spent hundreds of millions or billions
to try to eradicate malaria in Africa.
And you ask yourself, well, if the money had gone
to a government instead of Bill Gates,
would that government have been able
to solve malaria as well? I don't know. I'm not an expert, but it seems like Gates has made a
dent on it and nobody else historically has made a dent on it. And I heard one interesting story
where Bill Gates gave like $100 million to a government, just like the US might give $100
million to the government. Here's aid, solve malaria. And then that particular government
was corrupt. The leaders left and the money was just gone, not spent, disappeared, probably into
some Swiss account. The leaders moved away and whatever. So the next leader got in and Bill Gates
said, okay, I'm going to give you a hundred million again, but now I'm going to have more
control over it and see how you spend it and see where it's put. And he made a dent in eradicating
malaria in this particular country. So you have to look at instances too and see what's happening.
What are these people doing with the money? Right. But isn't Bill Gates more of an outlier
in that regard? Like there's a lot of, you know, there's a lot of guys with, you know,
lots of yachts and things like that.
Yeah. I would say he is an outlier. But there's also thousands of billionaires. So let's even
say there's a few hundred outliers who are trying to do charitable things. And by the way, I'm not
trying to... Really, the purpose of that book was to say, okay, I've been so bad and such a failure
at dealing with money. Maybe I could learn what did they do that I don't do
that I could learn from.
So it really had nothing to do
with whether they were good or bad.
And so I always feel like I'm apologizing a little.
It's also not about making money.
It's about habits and a perspective on life
and how they kind of live their day on the daily
that lead them in that direction.
Right, like not a single thing in that book is about,
well, this is the kind of investing they did,
and this is the kind of companies they would start,
and here's how they would boss people around.
But just on the Bill Gates thing,
yes, he's probably an outlier,
but you do see lots of examples of charitable things,
or even let's say not charitable,
like Ken Langone, multi-billionaire,
started Home Depot.
He saw a problem, which is that many people didn't have access to the full range of home
improvement tools that they would probably want.
He created Home Depot.
It became big.
Hundreds and hundreds of thousands of jobs were created, maybe millions of jobs over
the 30 years Home Depot has been around.
And over 100,000 people got very wealthy by being employees of Home Depot. So he
created real wealth in society, solved lots of problems. Now, Ken Langone, almost every hospital
in New York is named after him because he gives so much to charity. And I don't really know him,
so I can't say good or bad. But again, I ask myself, well, okay, it seems like both from the capitalist side, he created
lots of jobs and he solved a big problem.
He was also charitable.
Then I ask, what habits did he have that maybe are worth emulating?
And if somebody else has a different opinion of him, that's fine.
But then I can say, well, I like these habits and I'll emulate them.
Having a strong family, for instance, or having, you know,
a strong ability to execute on ideas, which is something I didn't always have.
Right. I mean, you kind of break it down. You've got like obsession and, you know,
overcoming resistance, persuasion, empathy, problem solving, and this idea of skill versus
habit, which I thought was super interesting. Yeah, like it's not, like these people have,
a lot of these people have real skills
as opposed to just, oh, they're waking up at 6 a.m. every day
or they're going to the gym every day.
These are all good habits and healthy habits to have.
But how did Richard Branson persuade someone at Boeing
to lend this 27-year-old nobody an entire plane,
like $150 million plane.
I can't call up Boeing and just ask for a plane.
Like, they'll hang up on me.
What do you mean?
You tried to buy Greenland.
Why not?
Oh, yeah, it's true.
But I failed at it.
I mean, his ace in the hole was that
there was an anti-competitive climate at the time.
Well, was that his ace in the hole,
or did he find that in the hole?
Like, he was the one who brought that up to them.
Like, they basically would said no that up to them. Like he,
they basically would said no. And he's like, well, listen, how else are you going to compete and get competitive pricing with British Airways? So he put this in their heads and convinced them.
And so it's interesting to see the little nuances of how these people achieve things because it is nuanced. Each skill they had, you know, their skills at
persuasion or sales or execution or having creative ideas or even the way they would do things. Like,
so, you know, Damon John's an interesting example. He was a waiter at Red Lobster and on the weekends
he would sew these hats on his corner and they had like hip hop logos on it.
And then suddenly Macy's makes this $100,000 order
and he can't make $100,000 worth of hats.
He works full-time as a waiter at Red Lobster.
So what did he do?
He said, of course, I will give you 100, give me a week.
I'll get you $100,000 worth of these hats.
He had no reason to say yes. And, and, and then he goes to his mom and he's like, mom, I need to mortgage your house. And so he mortgages his mom's house,
gets, you know, the money out, hires a bunch of seamstresses and they work, you know, 24 hours a
day in, in his mom's now mortgaged house. And then a few days later, he delivers the goods to Macy's.
They give him the $100,000 check.
He pays off the bank, gets the mortgage back.
And now he has FUBU, which goes on for $6 billion in sales.
So what is the skill in that?
That skill is what I call ready, fire, aim.
So this kind of instinct to get all ready,
like he knew he sold hats,
$100,000 worth of hats to Macy's.
He hadn't yet aimed.
He had no idea how he was going to do it,
but he fired.
He said, yes, I'll do it.
And why is that a skill?
Because he knew there would be some way
he can connect the dots.
And he probably already had thought it out,
but he knew no matter what, there would be some way he could connect the dots. And he probably already had thought it out, but he knew no matter what,
there would be some way he could connect the dots.
And a lot of people would say,
oh, I can't sell you $100,000 worth yet,
but maybe I can sell you $1,000.
We could do a test or whatever.
He just went right for it.
And so Sarah Blakely, who, you know,
she's the founder of Spanx.
She had a similar thing.
Jesse Itzler's wife.
Jesse Itzler's wife.
Jesse, I'm sure, has been on this podcast. He's been on mine a bunch of times. And she was selling fax machines
door to door. She had this idea for Spanx. She goes to sell them. She only has her one example
Spanx. The woman tried it on and said, yeah, I'll buy $300,000 worth of it. And Sarah Blakely's like,
done. I'll get it to you.
She had no manufacturer.
She didn't know how to manufacture clothes at all.
And it's not easy to convince some factory
to manufacture all of these clothes for you.
Are you gonna pay?
Who are you?
You're not a real company.
And yet she found a manufacturer.
She delivered the clothes
and then Spanx was in business.
So that was, again,
this ready, fire, aim ability. But ready, fire, aim has to be underpinned by a profound sense of
belief in oneself, right? Believe in oneself.
You're not going to move forward on ready, fire, aim unless you have some level of deep conviction about what you're doing. Yeah. And Sarah Blakely and Damon John, in this case,
had had enough experience with, let's say, clothing
and clothing design to roughly know
how they were going to connect the dots.
Maybe they fully know, but more likely,
they roughly knew how they could do this,
how they could scale what they were already doing
to something a hundred or a thousand times more.
And so you needed this confidence,
but you needed knowledge too.
So another example is Byron Allen. He recently, a few years ago, he bought the Weather Channel for $300 million. So he started out, he was a standup comedian, actually. He was the
youngest guy ever on the Johnny Carson show. And then he had all sorts of weird experiences in
comedy. And he said, you know what? I don't want to be in front of the camera. I want to be behind
it. I want to be the business guy. That's where the power seems to be. So he started pitching
these shows, late night shows to television networks. And they're like, ah, no, this sounds
kind of weak. And he said, don't worry about it. You don't have to buy the show. Let's just do a
50-50 split on the ads. And then he found the advertisers and it cost the stations nothing. If he didn't come up
with the money, they would never have aired a show. But he kept finding the advertisers. And
it's like 25 years later, these shows are still running and he's accumulated so much money from
them that he bought the Weather Channel for 300 billion. He's bought other networks.
It's such a crazy story because if you don't know that story, he's just the weird guy at 3 a.m.
Because that show is still on, I think.
You turn it on, like his interview show.
And you're like, who, that guy's still doing that?
And it's kind of like-
It's not really a quality show.
It's not a good show.
And you're like, this show's been on for like 20 years.
Like, how is this possible?
Well, it's because he owns everything.
Yeah, and he sold all the ads.
And, you know, at that time, a lot of networks
and still do, they just have infomercials for a half hour. So they basically say to him, if you,
we're running the infomercial, unless you show up with like one penny more, we're running the
infomercial. So he just went out there, got the advertisers and got syndicated all over the United
States, created, you know, ES Networks, I think is the name of his company. And yeah, he was like a
Created, you know, ES Networks,
I think is the name of his company.
And yeah, he was like a fair to middling standup comic who was part of that whole like comedy store,
you know, ecosystem.
And I'm sure everybody told him he was insane
for why, you know, why nobody would even think to do that.
Yeah, and it's scary too.
In all these instances,
there's a little bit of a fear factor,
like, oh gosh, what if I don't raise the money?
But he limits his risk. It's like, he doesn't have to put together the show either, really. First off, like, oh gosh, what if I don't raise the money? But he limits his risk.
It's like, he doesn't have to put together the show either, really. First off, you see those
shows, they're really cheaply done. It's just, they're like a podcast on TV. But he went out
and sold the advertising. And again, that's ready, fire, aim, but there's also skills in sales,
creativity, persuasion, and knowing what doors to knock on.
And if that didn't work,
I'm sure he would have found some other thing.
We think that's like their one idea.
And if they didn't do that, they would have been a failure.
No, my guess is all three of these people,
Damon, John, Sarah Blakely, Byron Allen,
they probably would have succeeded at some other idea
if that one hadn't worked.
Right.
Well, on this theme of experimentation,
you decide to publish this book on Scribd.
Yeah.
That's so bizarre. Why would you do that?
So I've published mainstream quite a bit, and then I've self-published quite a bit. So Choose Yourself was self-published and actually is my best-selling book.
Yeah, that's the smartest thing you ever did.
my best-selling book.
And then I self-published.
That's the smartest thing you ever did.
Yeah, that was basically,
I'm so glad I self-published that one.
And I did what I called professionally self-published Choose Yourself.
Like I hired a real cover designer.
I hired real editors.
I hired a real marketing company.
And I really did it as if I was a publishing company,
even better than what I thought
a publishing company would do.
And it worked really well.
But for this one, I felt like,
you know, I've already done one route.
I've done another route.
I want to experiment a little bit.
And Scribd is like this Netflix for books.
You sign up and whatever, there's millions.
Yeah, you can read every book
that's been published ever or close to it.
And they just started doing
kind of like what Netflix did with shows.
They started creating their own original books,
Scribd originals.
And so they approached me. I was telling the CEO about this book and he said, well, how about we publish it
as a Scribd Original? And I said, okay. And so it's an experiment and it's kind of six months
exclusive there and it's great. So I really enjoyed the experience I've done. Part of the
experiment was, what are the benefits? Well, they have a million plus subscribers that get their emails. Oh, so my name will be on an email
to a million people. So just more, you know, this is not the last book I'm ever doing, or it's not
the first book, but it's nice to have exposure to an additional million size audience and to build
a relationship with this Netflix of books, depending on, you know, they seem to be continue growing.
And so, yeah, it's just another experiment.
And are you happy with how it's working out there?
Like, is there a sense that this was the right move
versus just putting it up on Amazon
as a self-published work?
Yeah, because on Amazon, again,
I'm like every other book out there.
And it's not like I'm against Amazon.
I love publishing there and I love self-publishing there.
But here's a case where I'm one of the only books in this category of
script originals in a website that, you know, maybe up to 2 million people go to all the time.
So I figured, let's see if this is a real advantage. And you always want to go to the room
least crowded. So when we were doing, when we started doing podcasting, particularly when you
started doing it, this was the room least crowded in media.
Now it's very crowded, but like you said earlier, it's a good thing we got here when it wasn't crowded so we could carve out our space.
And here I'm on Scribd.
That's in publishing, I don't know, something like 5 million books a year published now on Amazon.
A lot of them self-published.
Okay, here's a place where there's only four books
published in this way.
Right.
You know, all the mainstream published books
are on Scribd.
The upside opportunity is much higher.
Yeah.
For having something break out in a meaningful way.
And if the book failed completely,
okay, it'll be like 18 of my other 22 books
that failed completely.
Right.
So it's no big deal.
Uh-huh. 22 bucks that bailed completely. So there's no big deal.
One of the things that I think we share in common is an aversion to setting long-term goals.
Like, I don't know about you,
but people ask me all the time, like, what's your vision?
Like, where do you see yourself in five years?
Or what's your life like in 10 years?
And I honestly, like, I always feel guilty
or perhaps even ashamed,
because I don't even think about that.
Like I can't, half the time I find myself
like making something up to answer the question.
And I've realized more recently,
like I'm just gonna be honest.
Like I don't, I have no idea.
And I don't really
expend mental energy in that way. That's funny. I didn't know that about you because I do think
a lot of people talk in terms of, well, I want to be here in three years and then six years and
then 10 years. And then, well, in order to be here in 10 years, I've got to do this today and like
next month and whatever. And I think it makes no sense to have goals. It sort of implies that my knowledge
now is so much greater than it might even be in 10 years from now, that my 10 year from now
version of myself better listen to me now, because I'm smarter now in terms of where I should be in
10 years. I don't know if this is all adding up all the numbers, but basically you're learning
more every day. So tomorrow or next month,
I might know something about myself
and my interests and my passions or about the world
that changes where I wanna be in a month
or two months or in a year.
So you can't, I don't understand like
how people can even figure out,
how will they even know what they wanna be
in one year or five years?
Well, I think that goals have their place.
Like if you say, you know, if you say like,
this is something I want to manifest in the next year, then there are certain steps you're going
to have to undertake to realize that. Like if I'm, if I want to do a crazy race, for example,
or complete a book, like there are, you can set up benchmarks to lead you in that direction. And
I think that's completely appropriate, but I think forecasting a vision for your life,
I guess it works for some people.
For me, it doesn't. Like everything that has been successful in my life has been, I wouldn't call it
happenstance, but it didn't result from me, you know, putting it on a vision board.
Yeah. Like, like, you know, I think that's a good difference between goals and what was the word you just used?
Stepping stones.
No.
Benchmarks.
No, but like that.
Aspirations.
You know, there's a difference between having something that you're moving towards today.
So like, let's say you want to get a faster running time for a marathon.
Okay, you could adjust things a little bit in how you're running. And today
you're going to try this and see if you're running as faster. But what if two months from now,
and all of this could be because a year from now, you want to enter in this marathon and
do it faster than a certain time. But what if two months from now, I don't know,
Disney calls you up and says, Rich Roll, we want you to play Iron Man's father
in the next Iron Man movie.
And you're like, well, I was gonna do this marathon
and that's my goal.
So like, call me back in a year.
You wouldn't do that.
You would just change.
Now that's an extreme example, but yeah.
So today you could say,
well, I really wanna benchmark myself
against how I'm doing a race and I'm gonna improve.
Otherwise you would just, there's no reason to do anything.
But things change and the things you love doing change.
What if suddenly you decide, oh man, I really love writing cookbooks.
And you decide two months into the year, I really just want to spend this year,
all my creativity writing cookbooks and your goals change.
So the year I started more passionately doing standup comedy,
my goal, so to speak, for the year
was I was going to write a novel.
That was where I was going to put my creativity.
But then I just started going up
more than once a week on a stage.
And then I got heckled once.
And I'm like, you know what?
I'm going to just next week,
I'm going to come back three times
and I'm going to figure out why I was heckled. And I'm going to talk to people and think about this. And it just never stopped. I
never got back to writing that novel. Things change. But ultimately the fidelity is to your
curiosity, right? And I think when you double down on your curiosity and you have the willingness
and the tenacity to follow that, like to continue to pull on that thread, it creates a compounding interest that in a real world context shows up in opportunities that you
couldn't have predicted or imagined. Yeah. Like let's say, for instance, Greenland suddenly-
James, now we're interested.
Yeah. Suddenly, or let's say suddenly somebody says, you know, this is a great idea.
How about we write a movie about somebody who buys Greenland and what happens?
Right.
And okay.
What if it actually works?
Yeah.
Like, well, I would say yes to any of the possibilities instead of going back to a stand-up stage.
You know, it just, because you sort of fall in love with different things and you experiment enough with enough things that, figure out, oh, yeah, this is pulling me a little bit more, so I'm going to double down on it.
And then everyone will say, well, what?
Wait a second.
You were just doubling down on this other thing.
No, no, no.
Now I really feel more passionate about this.
So, again, as long as you don't say, no, I'm not going to take care of my kids anymore.
I'm going to backpack around the world.
There are certain responsibilities that you have to do. But again, given our creativity
is very free, we could spend it in most cases how we want, and you should try lots of things and
see where your heart is kind of compelling you to go further. Whether you're failing or succeeding
at that point doesn't matter. It's like where you want to get better at this.
This is fun when I'm doing it
and it's not fun when I'm doing other things.
Right.
In thinking about this podcasting space,
I think there's, how many podcasts are there now?
Like-
I think 2 million.
2 million.
2 million podcasts.
Like how many hours of people talking spontaneously
about whatever's going on in their mind.
And I thought the other day, I thought,
what if podcasting existed in like 1780?
You know, what would podcasting look like in 18?
Like if we could go back and just listen to people
talking about the times in that time,
what an incredible historical record that would be,
that would shape and change how we think about history and how we consume history and how we synthesize world events.
And now we're creating that now, like 100 years from now, this will all still be available to people to look back on and try to better, this moment in time. Yeah, I mean, you know, imagine back in the 1780s,
like just Benjamin Franklin and John Adams
would be having like, you know.
What if Marcus Aurelius, instead of like, you know,
writing his meditations was doing a podcast about it?
Yeah, a podcast about Stoicism.
Like Seneca, can you please come on my podcast?
I'll promote your notes of Seneca.
We'll talk about it everywhere.
And yeah, and you, and I wonder about now with 2 million,
how do you separate out the good from the bad?
And I don't like to call any of them bad,
like everyone's trying.
But again, it's like we were talking about earlier.
I'm trying to just always understand formats
and how much, how can I change the format just slightly even from my usual one.
And you've been doing a lot of great stuff with YouTube and videos.
Like you've been combining kind of your podcast voice with kind of more
conceptual video about what you're talking about.
Yeah, we just started doing that and I want to do more of that,
but that's an experiment.
Yeah, it's totally an experiment.
How long will you do it? Maybe you do 10 of them, five of them, 50 of them. And people will say,
well, no, you've got to be consistent and focused. That could be true. Maybe you need to do a
thousand of them and then it just suddenly you have millions of views per video, but you might
get tired of doing them after 20. And you say, no, let's focus on TikTok instead or whatever
you focus on next. And so, yeah, it's just a matter of, I'm always, it's interesting now too, because another
thing that's happened in the media world that's changed, which is that I think followers don't
matter anymore.
So people have, you know, X number of Twitter followers, YouTube subscribers, Instagram
followers, Facebook followers.
I don't think that matters anymore, because I think algorithms have basically ruled Facebook followers. I don't think that matters anymore because I think algorithms have
basically ruled over followers. So the algorithm will decide who sees your video or who sees your
photo, not so much your followers. Because if you have, let's say you have 100,000 followers or even
10,000 followers, and let's say a lot of them have hundreds of followers and they're on Instagram for
three minutes, the algorithm's got to pick which one of their followers are going to be rewarded with their eyesight. So I think it's very hard in today's world to come up with good, appealing content that rises to the top. In a good way, it's much more equalitarian. Everyone's got an equal footing because followers don't matter as much. On the second hand, it's harder to curate, I think.
Well, it makes it rife for trying to manipulate.
It becomes about manipulating the algorithm.
Yeah.
I think that leads to substandard content in order to game the system.
But I think it is true.
Like the follower count thing, I mean, there was a day, you know, in 2009, if somebody with a million followers
like retweeted your tweet,
you would get, like in five minutes,
you would get 30,000 new people following you.
Like now, every once in a while,
somebody of that stature will share something
that I've done, zero impact on anything.
You know, it's like that ship has sailed
and I don't have a huge Facebook following.
I think it's like 130,000 or something like that.
It's substantial, but I'll post the podcast on Facebook and it'll get like two shares.
Yeah.
And it'll show you how many people it sees it and it'll be like 400 people.
It's like unless you pay to boost this stuff or create ad campaigns around it, they just choke it.
So I try that too.
I pay ad campaigns sometimes around the podcast. Useless. They just choke it. So I try that too. I pay ad campaigns sometimes
around the podcast. Useless. It doesn't work. So I'll have 50,000 people view it magically. I don't
know who these 50,000 people are. But it doesn't matter. Yeah, still five people clicked on it.
Right. So it's not even, it has nothing to do with the content. I don't know what it has to do with.
And I'm pretty sure I'm structuring these ads right. But I don't know, all of that,
it's always important to still have as high quality as possible. But other things are sort
of rising to the top of importance and they're harder to figure out. And I don't like the idea,
it's even hard to game the algorithm, but I don't even like thinking in that way somehow.
I never think about it. Ultimately, I think people will say, oh, you should do this
and you should, here's the strategy
and here's how you should lay out your Instagram.
And I just can't, I can't wrap my head around any of that.
And I just believe to this day,
even if it's hard, that ultimately, you know,
the highest quality content will rise to the surface
and it will find its audience.
And that means that you have to be in it for the long run
and you have to be patient and you can't be upset if it's not getting the, you know, the, the level
of attention that somebody else who's, who's specifically crafted content to create some
level of virality is going to get. Yeah. And so, so what's interesting there is you have a specific point of view also.
So you're not just hoping that the quality is going to get a lot of people.
You have a point of view that people, if they want your point of view, they have to listen to you.
And so it could be you get, let's say, 100,000 super loyal people listening to your podcast.
And you say to yourself, well, why does this other person have a million people?
Well, they're just talking about,
I don't know, the election every day.
And then those people are going to disappear.
They're not saying anything unique.
It's just again, giving the latest news or whatever.
And, you know, so I think sometimes
even measuring the number is the wrong metric,
but we're used to it in this social media world.
How many followers?
How many subscribers?
How many downloads?
And you have to get back to like,
well, if only a thousand people liked me,
but they really love it.
I mean-
I think that's more valuable.
Like I honestly, yeah,
that my ego always wants something to be bigger
and to be growing at a certain trajectory.
But ultimately what's meaningful about this work
that you do and that I do is the capacity to impact people.
And to the extent that you can improve the quality
of the work to exacerbate that impact in a positive sense
so that they're left with something substantial
that really can move the needle
in how they live their lives,
that's the opportunity there.
And so I try my best to like remain focused on that.
Yeah, and so let me ask you this.
Has anyone ever walked up to you and said,
oh my God, Rich Roll, your Instagram changed my life.
Like has anyone ever said that to you?
No.
Right, but they'll come up to you.
I bet you they have come up to you and said,
oh, Rich Roll, your podcast changed my life.
Yeah, that happens a lot.
Yeah, and so- It sure happens to you. Yeah, and again, no one you and said, oh, Rich Will, your podcast changed my life. Yeah, that happens a lot. Yeah.
And so it happens to you.
Yeah.
And again, no one's ever said to me, oh man, your Instagram, I love it.
I check it out every day.
Like no one said that.
And I have just as much followers there maybe as any place else.
And you start to realize, okay, well, why am I pursuing that?
Is it just for the numbers or like really where, where I know where people
are being impacted because they tell me. And so why am I trying to get TikTok followers or
whatever? I know you joined TikTok, right? Yeah. I joined TikTok. And by the way,
that's a very creative media. I'm not knocking TikTok.
My daughters would, they, they specifically prohibited me from joining TikTok.
Now do they use it and they don't want you on it?
Yeah, they use it.
They use it.
My younger one more than my older one,
but she was just more,
because I was joking with her the other day.
I was like, I'm going to join TikTok.
I got to check this out.
You're not half joking.
Like that's kind of where I draw the generational line.
You know, it's like- But TikTok is really creative actually.
I love those videos.
So I was like, I was kind of playing around with it.
And my youngest daughter was just appalled. She's like, please was kind of playing around with it. And, and, and, and my youngest daughter was
just appalled. She's like, please don't, please don't. Yeah. I mean, I was playing around with it
and then I put, I didn't have any followers and I put up one video, I put up a couple of videos
and one video got something like 200,000 views. And so I thought that was interesting that, okay,
they're, they're treating the algorithm differently than other places. Well, it's,
it's Twitter in 2007.
Like the opportunity to grow rapidly is available on that platform because it's a new platform.
Right.
But then I looked at the video that did get me the 200,000 views and I thought,
man, that is the stupidest video I've ever done.
And so it's just meaningless.
Right, right.
So I'd rather just do the podcast and not get-
Were you like dancing or something?
What were you doing?
Well, that one people begged me to take down and I did.
Like that, I decided, okay,
this is beyond being afraid of what people will think of me.
I'm making a fool of myself.
So I took that one down.
You could test out your material though.
I could, I've seen people do that.
And kind of comedians, it's interesting
because I saw kind of what I would
say were regular club comedians in New York City go on TikTok and suddenly get millions of views
and 250,000 followers and that actually was an indicator to me that this person was funny and
appealing to a certain audience and that that was a data point for me when sort of seeing because I
own a comedy club too so that was a data point for me when sort of seeing, because I own a comedy club too. So that was a data point for me in seeing,
oh, should this person perform more here or not or whatever.
But for me, I just put up some articles,
like an article I wrote in 2011.
I took it and just basically said it
in a TikTok kind of fashion, and it got 200,000 views.
And another one that was against college
got like 100,000 views or 80,000 views.
So I thought, okay, it's interesting a little bit, but not enough,
but it would took a lot of time even doing a 15 second video. So I figured, okay, it's not,
this is not worth really doubling down on. It's an experiment.
Right. I appreciate the experimentation. And I also think it speaks to something that like
Gary Vee talks about all the time, which is not being romantic about the platforms. Like whatever's working, move in that direction. Like you, you do lots of
things, but fundamentally I think of you as a writer, right? And this is, you know, you really
develop your audience through your blogging on your website. But then kind of blogging, you know,
really it's not like a thing anymore, right? You pivoted to podcasting. And that's the problem with writing is that-
But like writing should never go out of style.
And yet nobody's a blogger anymore.
Yeah, there's no destination blogs.
Like it used to be the case.
There's no destination websites.
Trying to get people to go to your website is futile.
You have to go where everyone already is.
Yeah, and so I think, I mean, then for a while,
like places like LinkedIn and Medium worked,
but I don't really see that as much now. So I don't know. Again, it's like when people podcasting is going and perhaps, you know,
being an early adopter of whatever the evolution of that is.
I think it's always hard to predict. Like, if you look at what's happening now, I mean, so we were doing the interview format and a lot of people do that. And look, the best,
the most popular podcast in the world, the Joe Rogan Show, is the interview format.
So that's kind of staying, but-
Two people talking, I can't imagine
it's ever gonna go out of style
if it's a substantive, interesting,
entertaining conversation.
Yeah, and then what's interesting
is that storytelling is hitting the top 10
or the top 50 or the top 100.
So like true crime stories.
So it's like back to 1920s dime novels about crime.
That's what's shooting up the fastest right now
in podcasting.
And then I would say also podcasts,
and I look at Joe Rogan as an example,
podcasts with a bunch of comedians talking is interesting.
And again, Joe Rogan's got the most popular podcast
in the world and he is a standup comedian. Often he has his comedian friends on that's his, who he's
interviewing. And so I wonder if that's because it's a safe place to, to have extreme opinions,
but not be accused of being polarized in one way or the other. So like Joe and other people like
that will say whatever they want. Like, it's just insane what they'll say.
And if they were like a big, you know, intellectual or whatever, people would say, you can't say that.
It's this.
You can't say that about climate change.
It's this about climate change.
You can't say this about the Republicans or the Democrats.
It's the other way.
But Joe, you can't ever figure out what he's talking about.
His genius is that, you know, he's the first,
he'll just say like, well, I'm a dummy comedian.
Like, why are you believing anything I have to say?
That's always his refrain.
Jon Stewart said the same thing throughout the entire,
even though everybody admitted they got all of their news
from The Daily Show, Jon Stewart would always say,
oh, I'm not a news guy, I'm just a comedian.
But he knew we all got our news from The Daily Show.
Right.
Well, in the way that the porn industry
drove technological innovation on the internet,
comedians really are responsible
for the birth of podcasting.
Like they were the early adopters.
They were the Canaries of the coal mine.
Those are the guys, yeah.
And like the early days of podcasting,
it was almost entirely comedians. And you're correct correct in that now what's capturing people's attention beginning with
serial are these longer, highly produced stories. You know, our friend Neil Strauss did to live and
die in LA did tremendously well. And those are the ones that are kind of rising to the top.
So does that leave you thinking like, maybe I'll do something in that space? Like the amount of
work that goes into crafting that,
like even if you took one interview
and you like chopped it up
and then you put voiceover of you contextualizing it,
kind of like some of how the Gimlet shows do it.
Like I've thought about that and I thought,
that's just gonna take up too much time.
Like this is already taking up too much of my time.
Oh, I'm sorry about that, Rich.
Well, yeah, and you've gone to,
you're going to four times a week with your show now.
But because two of those episodes,
and maybe even three,
is just going to be me bothered by something
and talking about it, perhaps with a foil,
perhaps someone's in there to tell me I'm wrong,
but it's not gonna be the standard,
okay, gosh, I've got to read 12 books this week
to prepare for my
interview subjects.
It's exhausting.
Yeah, it's exhausting.
So I kind of wanted to say, it's like what you were saying about somebody said, why were
people listening to you?
They weren't listening to see what you were asking the other person.
They really wanted to hear you.
And so I figured, okay, let me just try this.
I'm going to say what I think is important to me this week and why and how I'm being
impacted and kind of storytelling about me a little bit.
Or a big need people have is, like, say when Iran happened.
So January 3rd, you know, we attack this guy, we kill this guy.
And my kids were saying to me, are we getting drafted?
Is World War III about to happen?
So there was this real fear among everybody.
And I see it even in my kids.
And so I called up a big military expert.
And I said, just, I don't know anything.
And there's just a bunch of what I call spectators out there arguing all day long on Twitter
and Facebook like they know something.
Just let me ask you a bunch of questions, answer them, and now I'll know some more. And so that's
what I did. And I think calming people down is a good role for podcasters with an audience. If you
can get those guests and not have a traditional guest, but like, this is really scaring me right
now. Let's break down what's happening. I think that's an easier format to prepare for because
I know what I'm scared of. And I'm gonna try doing that a little bit more as well.
Yeah, I think that with that,
then you have to embrace the idea
of doing this contemporaneous with current events.
Like I'm trying to do interviews
that withstand the test of time
and have an evergreen nature to them.
And I've banked a bunch of interviews
and sometimes there's a long waiting period
between they go, and then I feel bad about it
because the person is like, wait,
are you ever gonna put that thing up that we did?
And trying to find a way to be more facile with it.
So from time to time, like I can make,
you know, I can do a more current event oriented
kind of show.
So I've done, I think I'm at 543 right now.
It's all been evergreen,
but I'm trying every now and then
to be a little current event
just because sometimes people are scared
and there's no one,
the media isn't properly addressing their fears
because everybody's one side or the other side
and they're not just looking at facts.
And also the media has incentive
to kind of exaggerate certain facts or change certain facts. I'm not blaming the media,
it's everybody. And so sometimes I just want to know, should I be afraid or not afraid?
So for instance, you know, there's a lot of discussion lately about, well, is AI and
technology going to wipe out 30 million jobs in the U.S., like all these people are saying?
And so I've been in the computer science industry a long time ago,
but I called up current experts in AI and automation
just to see where things were at,
and I found out and got less afraid and was able to communicate that.
So that's not going to be evergreen,
but it's good to answer this question for the next six months to a year that people have it.
Right.
And so sometimes now I'm just, again, playing to see maybe I need to be a little bit more current just to calm people down on really super important issues.
Of all these ideas that you've put out in the world, what idea stands out as the one that people went the most crazy about?
Is it like you shouldn't go to college?
Okay, no, the most controversial,
well, the college one has gotten me death threats.
Really, death threats?
Death threats.
So this is crazy.
This guy wrote me like, you know,
he said all these things, I'm gonna kill you.
And his IP address or whatever was on the email.
Somehow I was able to figure out his IP address.
Turned out to be Brown University.
So he was writing from Brown University and he put his name.
So I called up.
So my whole thing was, is that I don't think kids in today's day and age,
not necessarily 30 years ago or 40 years ago,
but in today's day and age, kids shouldn't go to college
because it's reinforcing the system of higher and higher tuitions. An entire generation of 30 million kids are going
more and more in debt, which is going to increase income inequality, and more and more bad things
will happen. And you could learn these skills now from all these online sites, but there's a
societal pressure. Anyway, that's my whole thing in college. And this guy wrote me a death threat.
And so I called Brown University Police.
They put me in charge of the chief of police.
And I should say, allegedly Brown.
I don't know if Brown will get upset at me.
So, and I read the email and I said the name of the guy and the chief of police says, yeah, that's pretty bad.
And oh, by the way, yeah, we know that guy. He did a similar thing with the school librarian.
And I'm like, well, shouldn't you do something about this? And he's like, come on, it's March.
Do you really want, he's in his senior year, just let him graduate. And I'm like, well,
he's going to graduate maybe. Yeah, that's the situation where two years from now,
he does something really bad and nobody did anything.
Right.
But there was nothing I can do, really.
But the thing that's gotten people the most antagonistic of all was home ownership.
So I would write, there's a lot of financial reasons why you shouldn't own a home.
There's a lot of reasons why it's a really bad idea.
And people got really upset about that. I did it on Yahoo Finance. It got over 10,000 comments. It
got millions of views and shares. And I've written it as an article. I've done it as a podcast.
Because that's the biggest financial decision you make in your life, there's all this-
It's also a source of tremendous pride for a lot of people. So you're basically
challenging people's sense of themselves. Yeah. And if you also spend that
kind of money, your brain's not going to let you think the day afterwards. You're too invested.
Yeah. Yeah. You have an investment bias. It's a mental model. And so your brain's not gonna let
you think you made a stupid decision. So people will bite that to the bone. Like I've lost friends
over that. I've lost friends over the college bone. Like I've lost friends over that. I've lost
friends over the college thing. I lost the most friends over though, an article I wrote on,
no war is ever really justified. And I said, I don't know anything. I'm not a historian,
but clearly like you go back and it has four or five wars. They're ridiculous.
And I'll even go as far as to say, why did we do the Revolutionary War?
Like clearly Canada didn't suffer because they didn't have a Revolutionary War.
And somebody would start writing, well, what about the Peloponnesian War?
I'm like, I don't even know what that is.
So clearly it doesn't matter to me.
But then I did lose friends.
Like somebody called me up.
I realized I hadn't heard from a friend in a while. And I called him like, what's wrong? And he's like, you're obviously
pro-slavery. And I'm like, what are you talking about? How can I be pro-slavery? And he said,
you said no war can be justified. So that means the civil war can't be justified. Well, slavery
justifies it. And I said, you could have just called me and asked me if I think minorities
should be slaves. Like, clearly I don't. And I said, well, look at the, you know, England got
rid of slavery in 1831. Maybe if we hadn't done the Revolutionary War, there wouldn't be slavery
because we would have been part of England. And I said, I don't know history. I just feel like when
20% of the country has died shooting each other
and it's all 17 year old kids,
it's probably not the best idea.
There maybe would have been another way to do it.
But I said, I don't know.
I just think kids shooting kids is a bad idea.
Well, two things.
I mean, first of all,
these friends that you've lost
couldn't have been great friends.
That one was like a 20 year friendship.
I was really surprised.
But he was of Indian descent and, you know, took kind of personal. I understand. And, and I'm
Jewish. I said, look, I don't think World War II should have happened. Right. But this is like,
to know you is to know that, that you're very much a provocateur in this sense. Like when I see,
like, here's another crazy idea that James has been thinking about,
you know,
it's like you put it out there and I think there's a,
you know,
perhaps slightly unconscious,
like glee that you get from like,
let's see what happens with this.
Yeah.
A little bit,
but I don't try,
I don't say things for instance,
I don't,
you know,
I don't blindly disbelieve.
Like, you know, there's enough research to basically connect the dots.
Like, the theory is, first, it's probably not a good idea to send 18-year-olds to kill other 18-year-olds because bad things will happen.
And then you have to look at, there's all sorts of ways to look at every war.
But I also know history is written by
not just the winners, but a very tiny percentage of the winners write history and they kind of
make the facts fit what happened. Now, all of these situations, obviously everything was horrible.
Who knows what the right solution was? War turned out to be the solution to some big catastrophic
problems. But it's just a thought experiment. What if there was never a war?
What would it be like?
Less people would die.
So it's leveraging a couple of the mental models
that Shane Parrish talks about.
It's thought experiment,
but it's also first order thinking.
Like here's something we accept
that's just kind of locked in our awareness
as being true or just the way it should have been
or should be or is, right?
And you're saying, well, let's forget about that
and look at it completely differently.
Yeah.
And then taking kind of a counterintuitive position on it.
Yeah, just a slight thing.
We dropped the atomic bomb twice
because the theory was that,
oh, and this is how history has been written,
a million American lives would
have been lost if we did a full-scale land invasion of Japan. I don't know if that's true.
No one's ever told me how those numbers add up to a million. And also, there was a lot of people
arguing back then that maybe we should just contain Japan until they give up. They were
already kind of almost giving up. And so it's very unclear what
would happen. Or why drop two bombs? Yeah, why drop two bombs? They were literally about to
capitulate. You can argue, nah, they're going to hold out, but we didn't need to invade them at
that point. A million lives wouldn't have been lost. So who knows? You always have to question,
you know, why are people doing things in a certain way? There's got to be a backstory
and a backstory to that
and a flip story and all this stuff we have no clue about.
Right, all right.
Well, we gotta round this down,
but let's talk a little bit before we end
about your perspective on the biggest ways
in which people get in their own way.
Yeah, that's a good question.
Let me ask you, what do you think is the biggest way you get in your own way? You've mentioned's a good question. Let me ask you, like, what do you, you know,
what do you think is the biggest way
you get in your own way?
You've mentioned a couple, you feel how imposter syndrome.
Yeah, imposter syndrome, I'm insecure.
I'm, you know, sitting here looking at you,
but I'm thinking like, do I sound like a dummy?
Like, you know, like what's the next question?
Can I keep the momentum of this gut?
You know, like I get up in my own head
and I'm my own worst enemy.
By the way, it's really hard being a podcaster, right?
You have to kind of always think of questions ahead.
That's when I said, wow, you're doing four of these a week.
Like I've done Saturday, Tuesday, Wednesday.
This is the fourth one that I've done in five or six days.
It's hard.
And I'm like tired, you know?
And I'm like, okay, but James is coming,
gotta be on my game. So I'm like tired, you know, and I'm like, okay, but James is coming, got to be on
my game. So I can't imagine doing four every week. So that's why the stamina endurance contest in its
own right. But in terms of how I get in my own way, like I think, yeah, I'm profoundly insecure.
You know, like I have tools to keep those things at bay and I'm very self-aware
of a lot of these limitations, but they still infect my ability to, you know, kind of optimize
my, what I'm trying to accomplish. I think, I think, but I think you nailed it though with being
self-aware and not necessarily, you know, it's, it's, everybody could say, oh, you need to be
more self-aware, self-aware, self-aware. And it's hard to do. You have to really be honest with what are my weaknesses?
What are my strengths? So I know I have like huge weaknesses and psychological issues around,
let's say money. I've gone broke so many times. I'm like literally afraid to look at my bank
account. But you have this ability to, to create money as well. Yeah. I've done it many times, I'm like literally afraid to look at my bank account. But you have this ability to
create money as well. Yeah. You've done it many times. It must be complicated. Because I lose it
too. If you lose it all, like you're like, yeah, but I figured this out so many times. It's always
a disaster every time though. So I'm knocking a lot on wood right now. But also I think knowing,
being aware of what you're interested in doing. So at one point, this is about a year ago, I was pitching a TV show and a network picked it up.
And I thought to myself,
huh, this TV show idea is good,
but do I really want to do it?
Is this going to take thousands of hours of time?
I don't think I want to do it.
And so knowing when your heart wants to do something,
when your heart doesn't want to do something,
I think is really important part of that self-awareness.
Is that like a narrative show?
No, it was like a kind of social experiment reality show.
I'll tell you the idea since I'm totally not doing it.
But I was going to take six random people off the street.
And the premise of the show was,
if they followed my advice exactly,
I would make them a millionaire within six months.
But some would bail, some would succeed, some would beat me up or whatever, typical reality show stuff.
But I thought to myself, they won't.
Network's not really going to know if this is good until it's over, until I've done it.
And what if it doesn't work?
It's just going to take a huge amount of time
flying all around the country.
They wanted people in every city
and they wanted more than six.
It's just, they picked the best six.
So it'd be so much work.
And I felt myself like afraid of doing that much work.
So ultimately it didn't happen.
But I think also being aware of like
what you're willing to do,
what you're not willing to do.
So the self-awareness piece in that is,
is the understanding like,
this isn't really what I want to do.
And then following that up with pulling the plug on it,
even though it could be this huge, amazing opportunity.
Yeah. Yeah.
Because look, if there's a lot of ways to go for making money,
making a TV show or doing a podcast or going into stand-up comedy or not or even being a writer
those are not ways to make a lot of money you don't go into those thinking man I'm gonna make
billions now forget being a plumber now I'm gonna be a podcaster that's just gonna start rolling in
that just doesn't happen so so I think a lot of it is about just being aware of what your
capabilities are what you really want to do versus what you don't want to do, understanding what skills you don't know. So somebody could say,
I want to be an entrepreneur. Well, what's entrepreneurship? There's no skill called
entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship is this bag of other skills like sales, ideas, execution,
marketing, motivation, leadership. there's all these other skills.
And added together, it equals this, you could call it this one meta skill entrepreneurship,
but that's not really a skill. So understanding what, if you want to do something, what micro
skills you need to learn, you have to avoid, you know, in whatever you're doing, you have to avoid
smoking your own crack. Like you could think, well, I'm doing this, so it must be great.
you're doing, you have to avoid smoking your own crack. Like you could think, well, I'm doing this,
so it must be great. And I see that all the time among entrepreneurs or even podcasters. I'm doing this idea. It must be the best idea in the world. Why aren't people coming to it? I'm going to have
to advertise now. You should try to always ask if you're smoking crack on your ideas,
because I think that's a real easy bias also. That's a mental model as well.
Right, right, right.
What do you think is your greatest strength?
Like what is the secret James Altucher sauce
that has propelled you to this place?
I'm not sure because I'm not so sure I've done,
I'm not so sure I've been propelled anywhere.
But I think I have a lot of fun coming up with ideas. So that's
the thing I've written about the most is like, I write down 10 ideas a day and it just, I realized
kind of shortly after I started doing this, that just writing 10 ideas a day, and it could be about
anything. It could be about just, oh, 10 ideas for Valentine's day gifts tomorrow, or 10 ideas that
Google could do to be better.
And they could all be bad ideas,
but if you just kind of exercise this idea muscle,
it really will get better.
And if you don't exercise the idea muscle,
it will atrophy.
So the times when I was like losing all my money,
I was letting my idea muscle atrophy
instead of no matter what,
no matter how bad things seemed,
I started always exercising this idea.
I was writing 10 ideas a day down.
Like I wrote ideas the other day for,
I wanted to make this card game.
Again, it's an experiment.
And I just wrote the rules.
And that was my 10 ideas of the day.
And so-
And of those ideas, how many of them do you take action on?
One out of a thousand. So people will say like, how do you keep track of those ideas, how many of them do you take action on? One out of a thousand.
So people say like, how do you keep track of the ideas
and how do you know which ones are gonna be good?
You never take action on them
because it's really just like,
if you exercise by lifting weights,
it's not like you think the next day,
well, I don't have to lift today
because I lifted really good weights yesterday.
Yeah, it's just practice.
And you'll know the good ones
because the next day you'll figure out 10 more ideas that are about that.
It might be 10 execution ideas about one of the ideas from the day before or a week before or a month before.
One of the ones I heard you talking about recently was trying to pay for stuff with North Korean currency.
Oh, yeah.
And Iranian currency.
Yeah.
Iranian currency?
Yeah.
So on a fluke, I wandered into this random auction house that had currency.
And this guy had this bag of money. It was like this old, dusty store.
You could picture it with all these garbage bags, all this stuff.
And I started finding North Korean currency, Saddam Hussein currency, Idi Amin currency.
So there was all this like weird dictator money.
And so I bought a bunch of it and I started,
I figured it'd be a fun idea to videotape me
trying to pay for things.
Like, hey, I'm going to buy a cup of coffee.
Hey, I'm out of money, but I have this,
you know, Kim Jong-il currency.
It's valid in North Korea.
And nobody ever has taken the money.
They won't even touch it, right?
Yeah, some people, it's weird.
Some just, I think maybe they're afraid
it's infected with something or there's some poison.
I have no idea.
I think, well, if it's gnarly dictator money,
it almost feels like you're complicit in that regime
if you touch it.
Yeah, or maybe-
And I think with a vendor, they think if they touch it,
then that constitutes an agreement.
Or maybe also because there's like sanctions,
like we have sanctions against North Korea.
Maybe if you are holding onto a bill from North Korea
that's against the law.
Yeah, but I don't think anyone thinks about that.
It is a weird, it is an interesting thing though.
Yeah, because I always ask people,
why did you not, here, touch it?
And they're like, no, they specifically
don't want to touch the line.
But they probably don't have a good answer for why.
Yeah, they don't, nobody has given me an answer.
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
They just don't want to.
It like creeps them out.
What's the next crazy experiment?
And then we'll finish this thing.
Well, there's a lot really. There's this
skip the line book that's coming up. You're doing that with a traditional publisher.
Yeah. So almost an experiment to go mainstream.
What a crazy experiment. James is actually going to go the traditional route.
Well, I really wanted to see how things have changed in that world. And I think they have a
little bit, but they,
and everything I thought initially was that they rely on your marketing ability as well is true.
So, but now they just, everybody sort of knows the story. Like that's the, they know you have to do that and you know, you have to do it. And, and yeah, a lot of things I'm experimenting with,
like I've been playing around with doing this card game and now I know how to do a Kickstarter
because of Greenland. So I'm going to do a Kickstarter for this card game once I print up the first version of it. And that's just a fun
thing. The key with an experiment is it shouldn't take up too much time or money. Another thing I've
been doing is I've been putting what I call anti-ads on the backs of cabs in New York City.
You ever go to New York City and you see on the back, there's a little TV show and there's ads and the ads will be for real products. So I've been creating these ads
that don't advertise anything. So there's just like, it's just like a picture of me saying hi.
And they called me up and they said, you have to put a URL or don't you want to put a URL or a
Twitter handle or something? And like, no, that's the whole point. No URL, no.
But that's like, that's, that's like performance art.
Yeah. It's a little like that.
And I kind of want to see what happens though. Like, does it,
and I've had at least one instance,
cause I did this for a couple of months or I'm doing this for a couple of
months. And one guy now did come up to me last week and he's like, you're that,
you're that taxi TV guy.
My nine-year-old loves you.
And he took a selfie with me.
He didn't know my name.
He didn't know anything other than you said hi and a little sticker.
Yeah.
And, and there's no, and the taxi TV people said, we can't run this because originally it didn't even have hi on it.
And they said, we can't run this.
Just a picture of your face.
Yeah.
It was just a picture of my, and by the way, it was really like, it was, I was wearing
a white t-shirt and I was standing next to a white background. So
it was the worst possible way to structure a photo. And the Taxi TV people said, we have to
have a certain bar. We have professional advertisers advertising on this. We can't run this.
So they made me put, and they had a good idea, which so I can't say they made me, but they said,
make it a little bit of a story.
So I put hi on the first one and like hi again on the second one.
And I forget what we put on the third one, like a math puzzle or something.
So that's an experiment.
And I have like 20 of these.
So those are up in New York right now cruising around?
Yeah.
Oh, my God.
And I have like 20 of these experiments going on, these different types of things like this that all seem small.
And, you know, I'm also working on another TV show,
which means much less work
and experimenting with the format of the podcast.
And it's just things I do all the time to figure out,
okay, if it doesn't take time or that much money,
I can do it.
And so I do it.
I love it.
And I love you.
You're fantastic.
I love the work that you do.
And you know what?
Let me just say this. You look great and you seem really happy. And that makes me happy to see.
Thank you, Rich. I wish I could say how I've been living your healthy lifestyle, but you're always
I know you've taken stabs at it.
Yeah, I've taken stabs. I remember one time you visited me and you were talking and my daughter,
my red-haired daughter was about
to turn full vegan and i think you actually listening to you actually put her over the edge
like she was just like listening sitting there like wrapped while you were talking and now she's
been like literally a vegan ever since it's almost four years later i love it so so at least she's
living that lifestyle but yeah i try to be healthy well we're working this is this is this is perhaps
a new experiment for you yeah it could be it could be all right I try to be healthy. Well, we're working on it. This is perhaps a new experiment for you. Yeah, it could be. It could be. All right, man. Well, to be continued. Yeah,
definitely. Thank you, Rich, as always. And I look forward to our next get together on the air.
Sooner rather than later. Yeah. Cool. Peace.
Always, always a super good time with James. Hope you guys enjoyed that.
Some good gems in there for sure.
And I hope you find it useful as well as entertaining.
Do me a favor, let James know
what you thought of today's conversation.
For more on him, check the show notes
on the episode page on my website.
You can go to his website, jamesaltucher.com
and you can follow him at Altucher on Instagram
and at J Altature on Twitter.
If you'd like to support the work we do here on the show, subscribe, rate, and comment on it on Apple Podcasts, on Spotify, and on YouTube.
Share the show or your favorite episodes with friends or on social media.
And you can support us on Patreon at richroll.com forward slash donate.
Thanks to everybody who helped put on today's show.
Jason Camiolo for audio engineering,
production, show notes, and interstitial music.
Blake Curtis and Margo Lubin for videoing the podcast.
Jessica Miranda for graphics.
Allie Rogers for portraits.
Georgia Whaley for copywriting.
And DK for advertiser relationships.
As always, the theme music is by my boys,
Tyler Pyatt, Trapper Pyatt, and Hari Mathis.
Side note, I've got Tyler working on some new music
for the pod, so stay tuned for that.
And with that all being said,
thank you for the love, you guys.
I will see you back here in a couple of days
with who knows what, when, where, and why.
Like I said, I've gone through my stash
of episodes recorded prior to the pandemic.
So I gotta figure out what's next, but I can promise you this.
It's going to be good.
So until then, peace, plants, namaste, reinvention. Thank you.