The Rich Roll Podcast - Dr. Ted Schaeffer: All Things Prostate Cancer, Urology, & Men’s Health

Episode Date: August 8, 2024

Dr. Edward Schaeffer is a world-renowned urologist, pioneering robotic surgeon, and Chair of Urology at Northwestern University. This conversation explores the complexities of prostate health and cancer care. We discuss the latest advancements in early detection and treatment and the importance of proactive health management for men. Dr. Schaeffer shares insights on interpreting PSA tests, the role of genetics in prostate cancer risk, and the revolutionary impact of robotic surgery. Along the way, we debunk common myths about prostate health, address the controversies surrounding mass screening, and examine the interplay between lifestyle choices and cancer risk. Dr. Schaeffer is a pioneer in his field. The conversation is enlightening and potentially life-saving. Enjoy! Show notes + MORE Watch on YouTube Newsletter Sign-Up Today’s Sponsors:  AG1: Get a FREE 1-year supply of Vitamin D3+K2 AND 5 free AG1 Travel Packs  👉drinkAG1.com/richroll Peak Design: 20% OFF sleek carry solutions 👉PeakDesign.com/RICHROLL Squarespace: Save 10% off your first purchase of a website or domain 👉 Squarespace.com/RichRoll  On: Enter RichRoll10 at the checkout to get 10% OFF your first order 👉on.com/richroll Meal Planner: For customized plant-based recipes 👉meals.richroll.com Check out all of the amazing discounts from our Sponsors 👉 richroll.com/sponsors Find out more about Voicing Change Media at voicingchange.media and follow us @voicingchange

Hey, I'm a 50 year old guy. Should I be thinking about screening for prostate cancer? These days around 35,000 people a year die from prostate cancer, which is a low number, but it's still the second leading cause of cancer death. Men's relationship with healthcare is very different than women and they really only engage later in life when a problem becomes apparent. I mean, cancers don't read rule books. They get this diagnosis and it's not on their 2024 agenda. We can screen guys and pick up cancers early and curable. We can do this more modern surgery and we can actually improve the outcomes for men with prostate cancer. It's not a sign of weakness. It's a sign of strength when you can talk about these things publicly. You just want to understand your individual risk and understand how close you need to be followed. Hey everybody, welcome to the

podcast. Today features an important and very comprehensive conversation about an all too under-discussed, under-appreciated, and often misunderstood topic, prostate cancer, a disease that afflicts one out of every seven men and is second only to lung cancer in cancer death lethality. My guest for this discussion is Dr. Ted Schaefer, one of the world's leading experts in the diagnosis and treatment of prostate cancer. Dr. Schaefer is the chair of urology at Northwestern University's Feinberg School of

Medicine. He has over 430 peer-reviewed publications to his name and is a pioneer in robotic prostatectomy, the most advanced surgical procedure available for the treatment of prostate cancer. Today, we demystify all things prostate and all things prostate cancer. We discuss risk factors, including TRT therapy, and the importance of early detection. We go into detail on everything you need to know about testing, including PSA screening, MRIs, and biopsies. And we discuss the various treatments for prostate cancer, as well as many other important topics related to urological health. It's all coming up quick, but first. We're brought to you today by On.

Being a gearhead, I'm all about testing the latest sports tech. But you know what often gets overlooked? Apparel. Apparel is crucial to performance, and that's why I was blown away by the folks at ON's Swiss Labs. Their cutting-edge approach from sustainability to precision testing for performance enhancement is next level. It is truly Swiss innovation at its best. Visit on.com slash richroll and use code RICHROLL10 at checkout to get 10% off your first purchase.

Traveling is one of my favorite things. I love it. I do a ton of it. But packing, well, not so much. But this is a dread that I have successfully cured thanks to Peak Design and their line of superb, totally dialed essentials that streamline and compartmentalize everything, making it all portable and easy

to immediately access anything and everything I need without the hassle and inconvenience that has historically plagued me. First, they make these genius, super lightweight, compressible packing cubes, as well as shoe pouches, toiletry kits, so I can separate and organize everything in that very specific OCD way that I prefer. Separating the soiled from the fresh, the shirts from the pants, the workout gear from the workwear,

with all my cords and my chargers and my batteries and card readers all neatly tucked in their design pouch, all of which fits perfectly, along with easy accessibility, in the expandable Peak Design 45L Travel Backpack. Here's the bottom line. Point blank. Peak Design just makes Travel Backpack. Here's the bottom line. Point blank.

Peak Design just makes the best design stuff. Details matter. They get it. And all their stuff is a solid cut above everything else on the market. Crafted to meet your needs. And right now, Peak Design is offering an exclusive 20% discount for all my listeners. And if you know these products, you know they pretty much never go on sale. To access the deal and check out some of my favorite Peak Design gear,

go to peakdesign.com slash richroll. That's P-E-A-K design.com slash richroll. role. Okay, not only is Ted just the absolute man when it comes to this field, he is a genuinely good human. And I'm just beyond grateful for him to take the time to share his wisdom and expertise with me and with all of you today, which I consider to be a masterclass and a true public service announcement. So without further ado, enjoy. Ted, thank you so much for doing this. I guess the first question I have for you though, to just kick this off is,

when you decided to go into urology, was it always your plan to end up on the Howard Stern show? You know, my path to urology was kind of multidimensional. My father's a urologist who happens to be a prominent academic urologist. And when I was in high school, my dad's dad died. And there was this whole journey where every single weekend we would go see him over years.

And I saw this individual age and slowly decline, and I didn't know what he died of at the time. But he ended up, it turns out, he died of prostate cancer. And so during my medical training, I kind of came to the realization and understanding of what he died from. And that really solidified my interest in doing urology, a different kind of urology than my father and what he did, but a urology that was very hyper-focused on helping others in the future kind of diagnose their cancers early and treat their cancers early

in a way that we could extend meaningful life for those men. Yeah, yeah. That's a great little kind of context for what we're gonna talk about today. The joke around Howard Stern being that Ben Stiller was your patient and you treated him and he made this decision to be public about it as a real public service really to raise awareness

around this issue, which is often kind of unspoken or perhaps not as widely understood as it should be. And it's part of why I wanted to have you here today, because I wanna sort of cast a spotlight on something that a lot of men don't talk about or is kind of talked about off to the side, right? Not in a public forum like this. And I think it's the more that I looked into the work

that you do and trying to better understand prostate health. Like I'm embarrassed to say that I've never been screened. Like I'm immediately going to go get screened after this experience. Yeah, I think men's relationship with health, their health and healthcare is very different than women and their relationship with their health. And I think it has to just do with, as a generalization,

women have doctors that they kind of grow up with as they go through puberty and then into young adulthood and so forth. And men don't have that. They kind of, as a boy, they'll see their pediatrician and there's this large gap. And they really only engage traditionally healthcare providers later in life

when a problem becomes apparent. So I will just throw it back at you and say that, the work that you're doing and kind of, and our good friend, Peter Atiyah, what they do in terms of bringing to the forefront, this idea that men can engage in their overall health and their wellness in a very proactive way versus being reactive, I think is just a huge benefit too.

And so I'm honored to kind of be able to be here to talk about it, because it is a great thing. And Ben really did lead the way and really bring it to the forefront where it's not an embarrassment, it's not a sign of weakness, it's a sign of strength

when you can talk about these things publicly. I wanna dig deeper into the PSA testing and talk about the nuances there, but let's put that aside for a moment and start with some real basics. What is the prostate? What does it do? Why is it important?

Prostate, the prostate- This is as basic as it gets. Let's do it, yeah. No, the prostate is this very small, about the size of a golf ball, sexual gland. And so it sits just below the bladder in men and it produces semen. Okay. So its job is to basically produce a fluid that keeps sperm alive while that sperm is

trying to go find an egg and basically fertilize an egg. That's the job of the prostate. trying to go find an egg and basically fertilize an egg. That's the job of the prostate. And without a prostate, you really can't effectively reproduce by natural kind of techniques. Now, it sits just below the bladder. So, and the tube that men urinate out of, the urethra,

that's where urine comes out of when you empty your bladder every three or four hours. And that's where semen comes out of when you have an orgasm, when you ejaculate. So that tube actually runs right through the middle of the prostate. So the bladder's above it, you pee through the tube and the first part of the tube is the prostate

or the prostatic urethra. So the most common issue that the prostate has for men is just it enlarges the channel that you urinate through kind of gets compressed and you have urinary symptoms, weak stream, you don't empty all the way. These are common. 75% of men over the age of 50 actually have urinary bother because their prostate gets larger

and kind of compresses off their ability to urinate normally. So although prostate cancer is very common, actually the prostate itself causes lots of issues for men, mostly because it gets bigger and it causes obstruction. Most- Which is not necessarily cancer. Yeah, most of the time that urinary bother

and those urinary symptoms are not from a cancer. They're just because of natural or normal kind of aging out kind of phenomenon. So prostate sits at the very bottom of your pelvis. It sits just below your bladder. It's there for sexual reproduction and that's its function. But it causes a lot of issues for guys. Yeah, so it's gonna naturally grow no matter what,

as we age, that's gonna cause some problems. It's not necessarily indicia of anything terribly wrong other than just aging up. During your time at Johns Hopkins, you had the privilege of working underneath what I gather to be the godfather of how we understand the prostate, prostate cancer and how to treat it, this guy, Pat Walsh.

Can you talk a little bit about him and why he is such a legend and what you learned from him and how you picked up the baton and kind of ran with it in the wake of what he kind of represents? Yeah, Pat Walsh is one of the icons in my specialty in our field. And there were many of those icons at Hopkins, which is what made it such a special place.

He had a passion for really doing deep dives into understanding how to diagnose and then subsequently treat the disease in a better, safer way with improved outcomes for men. And so he was really a pioneer in developing the surgical techniques to, at that time, allow people to have an operation and actually survive because the death rates from the surgery itself were quite high at that time. And then refine the techniques so that there's improvements in overall function of individuals after their prostate cancer surgery. So he did

that and that by itself, developing the technique and then really disseminating it. So he wasn't someone who developed a technique and then kind of kept it to himself. He published videos, he published books, he published and invited people to his OR to help them disseminate like, this is how you can do it better. And he did that with a surgical technique that was with what was an open approach where there's a bigger incision below the belly button to kind of get access to the prostate. And then when I was training surgical robotics,

minimally invasive surgery really came online. And so I wasn't the first individual to do it with a minimally invasive approach, but I would consider myself to be an early adopter with that approach. And then I was really able to take and translate all these special observations and surgical techniques that Pat Walsh, my mentor, developed

and deploy them with kind of a minimally invasive approach. And so it was a great time to come up and train under him and then a great time to kind of be in practice. And I was honored to be his first and only partner through his career. Did the robotic procedure, what's it called robotic? Well, the company is called Intuitive and it's called the DaVinci is the machine

that we use to kind of do the technique. So it's a very sophisticated tool set, but you can't just, you know, you don't just need a sophisticated tool set to do a great job. You have to understand the anatomy and understand the implications of each move that you make when you're doing the operation

to be able to kind of result in excellent result, you know, excellent outcomes for the patients. Pre-robotics and pre-Pat Walsh, paint the picture of what could be expected for somebody who had contracted metastasized prostate cancer. It wasn't a very pretty picture in general. Yeah, so in pre 1990, effectively 40 to 50% of men who came into an office office when they were diagnosed with

prostate cancer was metastatic, as you said, which is spread throughout the body. And there is no cure for that. You can suppress the growth of metastatic prostate cancer by blocking the production of testosterone. And there's a variety of ways to do that. But effectively that's a very, you know, difficult process to, you know, survive because you feel very bad, you know, testosterone is the kind of predominant male hormone. It makes you who you are and makes me who I am. And so you take your normal testosterone

and you make it zero. It's basically like immediately inducing kind of menopause in a man. You have a lot of side effects from the medication. And then if you have metastatic cancer, you often have side effects from the cancer itself. So it's this kind of double-edged sword of like, you have a medicine that can make you suppress the cancer

from growing, because you feel bad from the cancer, but the medicine makes you feel bad too. So that was kind of pre-Walsh era was this idea that 50% of guys ballpark, 40% of guys came in with incurable disease. And those guys that presented with curable cancer, there was really no effective treatment. Radiation was very kind of broad. It wasn't focused. And there was a lot of side effects, burning of the skin, burning of the rectum, burning of the bladder when you tried to treat prostate cancer with radiation. And when you did surgery,

bleeding would be very high. It was a high risk of just dying when you were on the operating table. And then the side effects from the treatment, total incontinence, total impotence, erectile dysfunction after the surgery, in many ways, the cure was worse than the disease. And so Walsh really took those observations

and said, let me try to develop a technique to make the outcomes from the surgery better. And then a variety of people, there was a urologist at Stanford, Tom Stamey, who made this observation that you can use this blood, there's a thing in the blood called PSA and you can actually measure that. And he made this observation that you can use this blood. There's a thing in the blood called PSA and you can actually measure that. And he made the observation, you can measure that and gauge how well controlled your cancer is. And there's a guy named Bill Catalona, who's one of my partners

in Chicago who made the observation that, hey, we can use this PSA blood test to actually check men and pick up prostate cancers while they're in their infancy, while they're much more curable. And so the two things that really revolutionized the field was Pat Walsh's development of better surgery and kind of this deployment with Bill Catalona of like, hey, we can screen guys and pick up cancers early and curable.

We can do this more modern surgery and we can actually improve the outcomes for men with prostate cancer. So if you fast forward today to today, only about four or 5% of men are diagnosed with metastatic prostate cancer at their initial kind of diagnostic screen. And what is the difference in lethality

between then and 2020? Well, yeah, so these days around 35,000 people a year die from prostate cancer, which is a low number, but it's still the second leading cause of cancer death. I think something like 250,000 people are diagnosed every year. Yes, so the numbers are going up in terms of diagnosis, but that's just a side effect of the idea

that the baby boomer is aging up. And also perhaps early detection because there's more testing. When the PSA blood test was approved by the FDA for screening for prostate cancer in the 1990s, a number of cases just went through the roof. That's because you just started screening a huge population of men.

And so we picked up the most prostate cancers then. Once you kind of screen out the population where you're not just screening everybody who's over 50, but you're just screening men that go from age 49 to 50, then the numbers came down and then they were steady. The total numbers right now are very high because of the boomers. But if you look at the incidents per 100,000,

the rates are pretty steady. So we're able to kind of identify cancers now early. A lot of times we don't actually have to treat them right away, we can just map them out and follow them. But when we do pick up a cancer that needs to be treated, that's aggressive enough to require treatment, we have a lot of really sophisticated technologies and approaches to do that.

When do we be concerned? Like when do we know that something is off and we need to go see a urologist or get proactive about some interventions or some testing? Yeah, so most of the time, you know, urinary symptoms in men are not from a cancer, but they are symptoms that can affect their overall quality of life.

They can have profound impacts on their sleep habits. And so one of the common things that people will have, men and women, but men as they age out, nighttime urinary frequency. And so if you're having those issues and those symptoms, you should definitely see and engage with the urologist because there's medications that are very straightforward. They're safe to take that will make you feel better.

In terms of when should men engage with urologists in terms of thinking about the C word or cancer, we generally would say if you don't have a family history of cancer, if you're an average US citizen, so to speak, we would suggest that you engage with and start getting checked at age 50. It doesn't have to be with the urologist,

it can be with your primary care physician. But again, I think men should start engaging with and developing a relationship with the primary care physician starting around age 40. That's when things like blood pressure, cholesterol, you really have to kind of start thinking about those. And you can also start thinking about cancer screening. That includes prostate cancer screening

and in individuals also colon cancer screening. Are there lifestyle choices that we can or should be making to care for the prostate? Yes, the short answer is yes. But the problem is in part that the lifestyle choices that many men will say, I wanna do these things to improve my urinary function or reduce my cancer risk. Those are things that you had to really engage with early on in life.

So the life of a prostate really begins around puberty. So let's start, let's say age 15-ish ballpark, right? And so it's what happens to your prostate over those decades, 15 to 25, 25 to 35, et cetera, that have major implications for your overall prostate health and your prostate over those decades, 15 to 25, 25 to 35, et cetera, that have major implications for your overall prostate health and your prostate cancer risk later in life. So it's hard to say at age 50, I'm gonna make radical changes in my life or my lifestyle that will significantly impact

the subsequent 10 years of their life. And in my mind, it's really what you do early on in your prostate's life. When you're kind of post-pubescent, that really has a big impact on your future risk for cancers. Why do I say that? If you look at kind of retrospective data

from different countries, individuals who traditionally were from Asia, not new modern kind of China with all the Westernized diet and all that. But if you look at more traditional East Asian cultures, their risk for developing prostate cancer is very, very low, much, much lower than any Westernized country, US or European.

So if you say, well, what's different about those cultures? It's what they ate, right? They didn't eat a lot of meat. They had a lot of just vegetable-based, plant-based stuff, food. And then the volume of food they ate, which was substantially less because it was effectively a peasant lifestyle. And so those things I think we've shown just historically can really lower your overall risk for developing cancer. But you really have to think about deploying those early on in life, I think, to have the biggest bang for your buck.

It doesn't mean that you can't change later and have a profound impact on your overall lifespan or health span, because you can, but do it early if you really wanna focus on enhancing your, you're reducing your prostate cancer risk. And there's nothing specific about the prostate. I mean, that's counsel you would give anybody to sidestep

your, or at least ameliorate some risk of cancer generally and other lifestyle illnesses. Yeah, yeah. And you know, there's a lot of similarities between prostate and colon in terms of like the foods you eat and the impact on the foods that you eat vis-a-vis your colon cancer risk and your prostate cancer risk.

So processed meat, charred meats, meats in general, those things are gonna have a, they're associated over a long, long period of time, decades, they're associated with higher risks for developing those cancers. Yeah, well, let's talk about prostate cancer. I mean, prostate cancer is the second leading cause of cancer death behind lung cancer.

It's the number one cancer diagnosis in men, correct? Yep. One in seven men will get this diagnosis. We mentioned earlier about 250,000 diagnoses per year. Why is this particular type of cancer so prevalent and so devastating? We don't really know why it's so prevalent. It varies a little bit based on genomic ancestry. So where your ancestors came

from, but in general, the risk for prostate cancer is quite high and is directly associated with how long you live. So the longer you live, the higher your risk for developing prostate cancer, which is kind of unique among cancers where there's much earlier onset for other kind of aggressive cancers like breast cancer women. So we don't exactly know. It's what we would consider to be polygenetic, meaning there's many little individual genes that if you sum them up will increase your risk for developing prostate cancer. At this point, there's probably over 250 different little individual markers that you can actually attribute to an increased or decreased risk for developing prostate cancer. And there are tests that you can actually obtain, blood tests, that will kind of calculate your polygenetic

risk and they'll give you a score and they'll say, well, okay, Ted, you have a low score, your overall risk for developing prostate cancer in your lifetime is low. Or no, Rich, your score is high and your overall risk for developing cancer is elevated. So you can kind of obtain those tests. It doesn't tell you individually, you know, that you're going to get a cancer or not, but it gives you a relative risk. Beyond that, there are very rare specific genetic mutations. So there are these genes that are associated with breast cancer, BRCA1 and BRCA2. They actually are associated with ovarian, breast,

and prostate cancer. So if you have a family history of breast cancer in your family, a strong family history of breast, ovarian, prostate, family history of breast ovarian prostate, you may wanna consider getting checked for those. They're very rare, less than 1% of the population harbor those. But if you have them,

you definitely are at a specifically increased risk for getting prostate cancer. And it's genetically related versus let's say environmental or other factors. Is prostate cancer unique in its relationship to age versus other cancers? It is. This idea that you do get it older

and there is that kind of common trope of, if you live long enough, you're gonna get a prostate cancer diagnosis at some point. Like what is it about this particular type of cancer that connects it with age? Yeah, I think it's just the kind of, it's the longstanding environmental exposures that just happen over time.

And so we know, for example, that like smoke inhalation is a strong inducer for lung cancer. So if you stop that exposure, then you reduce that risk. And then for prostate, there aren't, as I mentioned, known and kind of dietary-based exposures that are traditional in Western diets

that will increase your risk for developing cancer. So it's this kind of daily, small little ping that I think over time is a cumulative risk for developing a cancer. So it's true, if you're young and you get prostate cancer, it's a real bummer, right? But the older you get, the cancers you develop are almost always more aggressive.

And that's because you develop them after all these little cumulative hits on your prostate genome, so to speak. The other interesting thing here is that symptomology only occurs in, I think you said 5% of people that have it. So it's not something that you would necessarily intuitively know that you have

unless you're proactively testing. Yeah, so here's the uniqueness of prostate. So we said 250,000 approximate new diagnoses this year, 34,000 deaths. If you look at pancreatic cancer, it's like 30,000 new diagnoses, 29,000 deaths or something like that, right? So there's a very tight correlation

between diagnosis and death. And the reason is because we don't have an early test to pick up pancreatic cancer while it's still curable. Every time you're diagnosed with pancreatic cancer, you will almost certainly die from it. So one of the big differentiators in prostate is that we have this test, the PSA blood test, we'll get into that in a sec.

That PSA blood test is a way we can screen for early cancers. Not every single prostate cancer is lethal. Many men will die with and not from their prostate cancer. So one of our jobs as urologists is to identify those individuals who have a prostate cancer that if left alone, it will become a problem for those men. But almost everybody we screen now has no symptoms of their cancer. Whereas if you have lung cancer, you're often, you know, you're coughing up blood.

If you have pancreatic cancer, there are specific symptoms of it. We don't, we screen for men early. Those men don't have any symptoms related to their prostate cancer on average over 95% of the time. And so we're really just picking them up early. Then our job really, our important job as urologist is to say, you know, person A needs treatment, person B can be followed.

And, you know, and that strategy is definitely something that we do a lot of these days. That's a pretty strong argument for getting tested. Yeah, because we, you just want to understand your individual risk and understand how closely you need to be followed. So to take it back for the audience, how do you screen for prostate cancer? It's a blood test. That's simple. The test is basically looking at this molecule called PSA

or prostate specific antigen. That's something that's produced by the prostate and is normally in the semen. So that's part of the semen that keeps sperm alive and helps it impregnate or infertilize an egg. That particular fluid, that particular molecule can leak into the bloodstream. So it's supposed to be in the prostate normally.

And it's in the prostate in levels that are like 100,000 nanograms per milliliter, super high levels. It leaks a little bit into the bloodstream and we screen for very low levels. PSAs in the bloodstream are often one or two or four or eight or 10. So the relative amount that we see in the blood versus in the organ where it's supposed to be is very, very low. But we look at that low number and we basically can follow that low number over time. That's why it's good to engage with a doctor

because you really want to track trends and look at that number over time to kind of understand your risk at the time you get your first blood test and understand your risk over subsequent five or 10 or 15 years based on how that number is changing or if it's stable. Another argument to get tested early

because you're getting a baseline basically. And then it's really about how are you, how are the levels varying from that baseline? Totally, I always like to tell patients, it's like, I wanna take not just a single photograph, I wanna take a bunch of photographs and make a movie. Cause then if you have a sense for what's changing over time,

you can identify the bad actors from the good actors. Because even if it's low and comes off as a low risk situation, if there's a sudden extreme jump. That's right. And even if that jump is still within a reasonable range, that would be alarming. Over 70% of people in the US

when they get their blood test checked will have a PSA below three. And that's a very safe kind of range for most men. If you're younger, when you get your first baseline PSA, so for a guy who's between 45 and 50, which is a good age to start getting a baseline PSA, as you said, your number should be below one for sure. And on average, it's below 0.6.

So the median PSA for a 40 to 45 year old is around 0.5 or 0.6. A median PSA for a 50 year old is one. So for half of the male audience watching right now, that's really good news. If you're 50 and you get your PSA checked and it's below one, you don't have to worry. You should still follow it, but you should not be anxious at all or worried at all. If your PSA is over one at a young age, if it's over one at age 50, it doesn't mean you have cancer. It doesn't mean you need to do anything at the time except for closely follow it over the years. And if it ever kind of reaches

an inflection point, as you mentioned, where it goes up a lot over a year's time, or if it creeps up to a number where we're not comfortable, 2.5 or 4 are good kind of general cutoffs, then you want to engage more with your urologist and on my podcast, talks about green lights, seeking them out and following their lead. One green light I greet first thing every morning comes in the form of a green powder called AG1, a morning routine non-negotiable that gives my body the green light to tackle the day. AG1 is a foundational nutrition supplement that delivers daily nutrients and gut health support. What's unique is that the entire formula, not just the ingredients, is backed by rigorous research, the safety and efficacy of which has been validated by third-party, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies, the gold standard in research, with results impressive. After 30 days, 97% of participants

felt more energized. At 60 days, 91% needed less coffee. And by 90 days, 97% had improved digestion and fewer cravings. I have experienced similar benefits in energy and focus and digestion. If there's one product I trust for whole body health, it's AG1. That's why I've partnered with them for so long. So start your AG1 journey today. Get a free one-year supply of vitamin D3K2 and five free AG1 travel packs with your first purchase at drinkag1.com slash richroll. That's drinkag1.com slash richroll.

Check it out. This podcast is brought to you by Squarespace. In today's digital age, having a strong online presence is just crucial. Whether you're an aspiring entrepreneur, a creative professional, or someone with a groundbreaking idea, Squarespace is the ultimate platform for building that standout digital identity. Their latest innovation is called Squarespace Blueprint, and it's really revolutionizing web design. It's like having a personal design expert guiding you every step of the way.

Plus, their SEO tools are cutting edge, helping you climb those search rankings and reach a wider audience. Squarespace's flexibility is also impressive. For example, if you need to process payments, it's just effortless, supporting everything from credit cards to PayPal and Apple Pay.

They've even incorporated buy now, pay later options, catering to modern shopping habits. But what's really exciting is Squarespace AI. Need help with product descriptions or engaging blog content? This feature creates custom content that aligns perfectly with your brand voice. Ready to bring your vision to life?

Head to squarespace.com for a free trial. And when you're set to launch, check out squarespace.com slash richroll to save 10% on your first purchase of a website or domain. When you talked about PSA leaking into the circulatory system and the bloodstream, this is the difference between what you would call free PSA versus bound PSA, correct? Well, so PSA will leak into the bloodstream and how the PSA appears in the bloodstream,

free or bound, varies if it's leaking into the bloodstream from a benign prostate cell or from a cancerous prostate cell, okay? So there's less free PSA around in the bloodstream if the cell that's making the PSA is a cancer cell. If the cell that's making the PSA is just a benign cell, as we've talked about, the prostate gets bigger as we get older, then there's more bound PSA,

there's more unbound PSA, so the percent free is high. Right, so as we age and the prostate gets larger, there's gonna be more PSA in the blood. There's more PSA in the blood, but there's also a higher percent free PSA in the blood. If you get, as you get older, if your PSA goes up, but your percent free PSA is low or goes down, that's the canary in the coal mine to tell you,

you have a problem. And that problem still isn't necessarily cancer. Could it be attributed to something else? It can be other things. It just warrants further investigation. So ballpark, I think PSA screening at age 45 is good. Understand your baseline. There's very few men at age 45 that have prostate cancer. So for the audience out there that's scared, don't be scared. Just get it as part of your annual routine to get a PSA test and just chart it. Don't rely on

your doctor to chart it. Just do it yourself. Get it every single year. If your PSA rises, as you mentioned, more than half a point a year, that may be cause for concern. Or if it crests over the 2.5 or four threshold, those are causes for concern. So what do you do then? Then you can get this percent-free PSA.

It's a free test and you can look. If your percent free PSA is high, that means that you shouldn't have to worry too much because it just means you're probably, your prostate's getting bigger as you're kind of getting older. If your PSA goes up and your percent free is low and the number you wanna think about is 16.

So if it's below 16, you should be a little worried. If it's over 16, you're probably okay. Still follow it though. If you have any worrisome signs, what do we do? We don't just start poking you and doing biopsies. We do other tests. And the test that we like to deploy is an MRI. And I always explain it to patients like, you know, these days you never go anywhere without checking Google map, right? And this is just a high resolution Google map of your prostate. It gives us an amazing topography of the prostate and it will identify suspicious areas.

If there's a suspicious area, that's when you wanna go and you can do an MRI guided biopsy of that suspicious area to figure out what's going on. And again, if you have an MRI abnormality, it's not a guarantee that you have prostate cancer and it's definitely not a death sentence. Rather, these tests allow us to identify things,

rule out cancers in many guys, but pick up cancers while they're early and curable in many other men. But the MRI only comes into play once there is a PSA value that is concerning enough to inquire more deeply. Yes, in my mind, you can get MRIs and there's a lot of interest in whole body MRIs at this point. It's very much on trend. In general,

I don't think a whole body MRI makes any sense or a prostate specific MRI without a baseline blood test number. Because that test, the PSA test is so powerful at effectively your pre-test probability of having something that unless your pre-test probability is high, I wouldn't deploy the test, which is the MRI. And in the context of the MRI, it's also important to have a qualified technician and diagnostician who knows how to take the right image

and interpret that image, right? Because somebody who isn't necessarily as steeped in urology as yourself might miss something or might not have the right frame in the right place to properly interpret the result that you're trying to understand. Yeah, and it's a team based approach, right? So urologists are really the captains of the team,

but we have to rely on like super talented radiologists and other folks. They're the folks that really tell us, hey, is this MRI suspicious or not? We put it into the clinical context, but they give us their initial assessment. Okay, it's an A or a B or a C. We then put that in the context

and help our patients make a decision about a next step. Before the PSA though, we all have the experience with the reach around, right? So the reach around precedes the PSA typically with your general practitioner when you go in for your annual checkup or whatever. What is that all about? It's called a DRE.

Yeah. What do we, is that still about? It's called a DRE. Yeah. What do we, you know, is that still an effective, you know, indicator of anything? Or is that something we can just sidestep, just get your PSA? I mean, I do rectal exams on everybody, but almost everybody I see already has a cancer diagnosis.

So for me, I'm doing it to get a sense of their extent of their disease. The benefit of doing a rectal exam in individuals who you're screening is very limited relative to the power of the PSA test. So I'm not saying that your doctor is a bad doctor for doing it. Is it essential? It's not essential. And frankly, if you can get a primary care doc who will It's not essential. And frankly, if you can get a primary care doc who will map and chart out your PSA annually over time, frankly, that's, and they're hesitant to do the exam, that's fine too.

One of the things I'll have is many primary docs will just say, I'm not comfortable. I don't do enough reps to do it. Can you just see this person? And I will do it for them, but it's not essential. So if that's what guys are afraid of going to the doctor for, then go to the doctor, get the test, and you're 98% of the way there.

The other ripple has to do with hair loss medication. If a patient is taking Propecia finasteride, that is going to artificially reduce that PSA value, correct? So these tests, these products will A, help with hair loss prevention, but they lower the PSA test by about two to 2.5. And it depends on the time that you start taking the medication. So if you start taking Propecia and you're a young man, then your PSA will be very, very low. It should be less than one for sure, less than 0.5

when you start the medication, if you're taking it in your twenties or thirties, and it will remain very low over your whole lifetime. It should never, ever move. So the point is when you start the medication, your PSA will drop and it drops between 1 3rd and 50% on average, you have to just chart that out. And that's really the patient's job to do that. You set that new baseline and it should

never go above that baseline. The new baseline PSA, when you start these medications is where you are and you should never move up. If it moves up, that means that you have a four or five fold increased risk for actually having a cancer at that time. So the medication is very powerful at lowering the PSA and suppressing the PSA. If you ever have a bump up, you got an issue. And the problem I see is that there's a lot of online resources for these hair loss medications

and men may not inform their family physician, their primary care doc, hey, I'm taking Propecia for hair loss medications. And men may not inform their family physician, their primary care doc, hey, I'm taking Propecia for hair loss. And they'll be, I see it in my practice. It's not a theoretical thing. I'll see it where a guy comes in, he's 55, his PSA went from 0.5 to one to four to six. And it's too late before the primary care doc realizes

it's not actually six, it's 12 or 14, because you have to double or 2.5 exits. So that's when the real problem happens. So a general practitioner may not know to ask that question, but any urologist is gonna know. We ask, but the question is, who's doing the primary screening? So there's a really well done study

done out of Southern California where they looked at individuals in the VA and they looked at men and they said, is it safe to put people on finasteride or Propecia? And the answer was that there was a much higher risk of death from prostate cancer in people on Propecia or finasteride than those that were not. And the reason is because of what we just talked about, the primary doctors who are doing the screening, they're just not aware of the situation. And so the number starts rising and they missed the early detection.

Another nuance to this is understanding PSA density. So if somebody has an elevated or a concerning PSA value, then you have to look at the density of that. And from what I gather, and please correct me, I could be totally wrong, this then becomes somewhat of a predictor of the aggressiveness of that cancer. Yeah, it's a difficult concept,

but it's a very important concept. So as we said, the prostate, as we age, it gets bigger and more PSA leaks into the bloodstream As we said, the prostate, as we age, it gets bigger. And more PSA leaks into the bloodstream just from a regular, just increasing size over time. And so if you think about the average size of a prostate for a man who's 50, it's around 25 grams. And if you look at a safe PSA for a man at around 50, it's less than 2.5. So if you do that calculation, 2.5 over 25, that PSA density for that individual is 0.1. And that's kind of a safe PSA density for most guys.

As you get older, your prostate gets bigger. So an average prostate size for a man who's 60, maybe 40 grams. So if your PSA is four and you have a 40 gram prostate, then actually that PSA density, again, is fine, it's 0.1. The problem lies in if your PSA is five and your prostate's still 25 grams, that means that there's a lot more PSA

being leaked into the bloodstream relative to the size of that prostate. And that is a very strong predictor that there's some kind of cancer going on in that guy's prostate versus the other guy whose PSA is five, but his prostate's 50 grams. That's just probably PSA being leaked

into the bloodstream on average because their prostate's just bigger and it's just crawling with time. Right, understood. So it's hard to, you don't know your PSA density unless you've gotten an MRI or had an ultrasound. So usually the algorithm is we're tracking PSA over time. We're looking for the velocity change. How much is it increasing over time or is it remaining flat? And if it's increasing or we, if it's increasing, we do something like the percent free PSA check and it's low and concerning, we get an MRI. I look at the MRI, say, okay, number one,

what's the volume of the prostate? And I calculate the PSA density. And then number two, do our radiology colleagues see something suspicious in the prostate and they'll rank order like how suspicious it looks. Those are the factors that I take with me to suggest, okay, we should do a biopsy or no, we should think about, we can just follow you. This is a pretty bulletproof case that you're making for testing early detection. But there is a very persistent second trope in your world,

which is, and I've heard this many times, like, oh, don't get tested. You know, if you get tested, they're gonna find something and you're gonna end up with an unnecessary surgical procedure because, you know, there's financial incentives for surgeons and hospitals to, you know, cut and also, you know also sort of litigation oriented

incentives to make sure that you're doing everything you can, can you speak to that controversy a little bit? I don't even know if it's a controversy, it's just a kind of- Yeah, I mean, it's certainly, so look, most people don't have prostate cancer. And so getting a space line PSA test will provide significant reassurance for those men.

It's 90% of men at age 50 don't have an elevated PSA. They're in the clear, there's no problem. So it's just a select group of people that have an elevated elevation in their PSA. It's not everybody. It's a very, very narrow focus of individuals who have an issue and then require additional testing and may need to have surgery.

In terms of the idea that urologists are making money doing surgery, well, the way our profession works on average is that we're paid for the work that we do. That's true for attorneys. That's true for hedge fund managers. Everybody's paid in general for the work that they do. So I myself, I'm not, I'm on a flat salary, but in general, that's the way that it works. However, I would argue that urologists spend a lot of the insurance company's money doing these sophisticated tests to really reduce the number

of biopsies we do. MRIs are very expensive. They're five or $6,000. We deploy MRIs all the time to not lean us to do a biopsy, but actually to steer us away from doing a biopsy. So if you look backwards in the old days before MRI, everybody with an elevated PSA got a biopsy. Now with MRI testing, about two thirds of men who get an MRI, actually we find out they don't need a biopsy. Then of the one third that get a biopsy, and let's just say we pick up a cancer,

about 40 to 50% of cancers that we pick up today, we don't recommend treatment for. So we're actually monitor people over time, following their cancers rather than just cutting on them. And, and, and as the story goes, making a buck or two. So I think that in general, urologists are very good citizens. They're very cognizant of, of what they do. Why? Because unlike a lot of other surgical specialties, we follow our patients for life. So when I have a patient who has prostate cancer, they have access to my cell phone number for the rest of my life and their life.

So we follow them longitudinally. So we're very engaged in kind of survivorship with them. And so in that way, I feel like we, you know, we have a reasonable conscience to say, hey, we want what's best for our patient because they can track us down over time if we do something to them that, you know, they don't, you know, they have side effects

from the treatment or something like that. Right. You did say something that was quite alarming though, which is no PSA number, no matter how low, guarantees that you don't have cancer. So even if you go through the rigorous testing that we just spoke about, there's still a percentage chance

that you nonetheless have prostate cancer. Well, I mean, cancers don't read rule books. That's why I always tell my patients, when we get a great pathology report after surgery, everyone's happy. I just say, we're still gonna follow this. They don't read the rule books. So yes, there are no absolutes in medicine.

Prostate cancer falls under that same general edict. There are no absolutes. And so you have to be a thoughtful, good doctor. And there are several prominent folks out there right now who are really battling publicly and they're true champions. They're prostate cancers that don't always show up with high PSAs. But on average, this approach is safe for men

to engage with their physicians. And it generally speaking allows for those rare individuals who have a cancer that needs treatment to get their treatment early and be cured. And for the vast majority of men out there, they can be screened and they can feel rest assured that there's nothing going on. Hence the much lower lethality rate in comparison to diagnoses. That's right. So if you say there's 34,000 deaths a year, that means that there's 170,000 men who are surviving their cancer.

And many of those men never got treatment for just monitoring them. Okay, so reach around PSA, MRI, all of these things are telling you that we need to know more. So the next step is the biopsy. And performing a biopsy on the prostate is not a small thing from what I understand.

But we just finished a study where we use carefully tracked in the modern era nowadays, how people do after prostate biopsy, how much does it bother them? And what are the results of the testing that we do? So a modern prostate biopsy, how much does it bother them? And what are the results of the testing that we do? So a modern prostate biopsy at our shop is with a kind of percutaneous approach. That means that we put the needle through the skin

into the prostate. We do have an ultrasound probe in your rectum and that's actually the most uncomfortable thing. The thing that guys don't like is the, with the exam is the fact that there's a finger going in their rectum and that's actually the most uncomfortable thing. The thing that guys don't like with the exam is the fact that there's a finger going in their rectum. We still put an ultrasound probe in the rectum. It looks directly up at the prostate and visualizes it. And then we can use software to kind of overlay the MRI onto the ultrasound image and then deploy a needle from the skin into the prostate just above the rectum and actually sample the suspicious areas within the prostate.

What does that mean for men? It's about an eight minute procedure at Northwestern. We know on a one to 10 pain scale that they report it's about a 3.6 out of 10. So it's uncomfortable for about eight minutes. It's not painful. We deploy as much lidocaine as possible. We really max out the dose per kilogram of lidocaine and numb the area up. And with that, we can get the results of the biopsy. If you think about it, like, are we really doing this because we're incentivized to do biopsies? I would say the answer is no. are we really doing this because we're incentivized to do biopsies? I would say the answer is no. About 50 to 60% of the men we biopsy, they needed the biopsy. We pick up a cancer that is something that we wanted to know about. So we're not overly biopsying people just for fun or for money. We're

doing it when the clinical indications are appropriate. The procedure's done awake in the office. It takes eight minutes. They leave the office on their own. The pain that they had at the time of the biopsy is gone within 10 minutes. And that's gonna definitively tell you whether a cancer is present or not, of course. It tells us if there's a cancer that is significant enough for us to worry about

on average, yeah. And so from that, what is the decision tree around surgery? The decision tree is very complicated, but it's quite simple to be honest with you. It's what's the age and the health of the patient and how aggressive and how bulky is the cancer. It's those two things that really kind of

way we put into the equation as to whether or not the person needs treatment for their cancer. And if they need treatment, what's the best treatment for them? So about 40% of the cancers we pick up today are low grade and they're small and we monitor those. And historically, those individuals would have had surgery. When I was training, those men automatically had surgery. We've now learned that those cancers are indolent. They don't, they're not aggressive. They don't grow very quickly

and they can be followed safely for five to 10 years sometimes before an intervention is necessary. So those men we follow, we call that active surveillance. And is indolent the opposite of metastatic? Indolent is the opposite of like fast growing and aggressive. I see. So it just kind of sitsastatic? Indolent is the opposite of like fast growing and aggressive.

I see. So it just kind of sits around. It may change slowly. Indolent low-grade cancers at five years, about 40% of them flip and they start growing. At 10 years around 60% kind of have flipped and start growing. And you'd say, well, that's not very good odds.

And I would argue, well, if 10 years after a diagnosis of cancer, that 40% of men don't need anything, I'd say that's a huge win. When historically, everybody who had that got treatment. So that's 40% of guys who we do biopsies on have a cancer that we can follow. They don't need any treatment.

What does that mean for the guy? It means that they can live their regular healthy life and not have to worry about it, except for once a year when they come in for their biopsy. So there's no pharma intervention or any other kind of treatment protocol. Yeah. Other than just consistent screening.

A heart healthy lifestyle is the best thing for those guys. Of the men who have a cancer that needs to be treated, those men can choose to have surgery or they can choose to have radiation-based approaches. Again, in the whole spectrum, only about four or 5% of men that we diagnose have metastatic prostate cancer, prostate cancer that's spread to other parts of the body. So if you're getting a biopsy, 40% of the time, it's something that can be followed. What's the math? 55% of the time, it's something that we should

probably treat and treatment will prolong your life. And 5% of the time you get treatment, but it's intensified other kinds of treatment, not surgery and not radiation to really extend those individual's lifespans. But radiation would be the preferred treatment protocol for a metastatic version that has spread to other areas of the body, obviously,

because surgery is not going to. Yeah, so when it's metastatic, we use two things. We use systemic therapy by medications that will aggressively block your testosterone levels to zero. Testosterone is the fuel for prostate cancer to grow. So you can suppress and really halt its growth significantly. And in many cases in those scenarios, we will also use radiation to kind of spot weld any little areas that we see the cancer in.

That's very effective for men with metastatic. For men with clinically localized cancer that needs treatment, then they can either have surgery or they can have radiation. In general, both are effective treatments. We usually will direct young individuals, individuals with a 15 to 20 plus year life expectancy towards a surgical approach versus a primary radiation-based approach because surgery in general is more durable. It lasts longer than a radiation-based approach. So for young guys, we will usually deploy surgery. In general, for older guys, we will usually deploy radiation, but there's a lot of nuance and it's a very individualized decision process that we usually will work through with our patients to allow them to make the best decision for themselves. And is that because surgical intervention

in an older person becomes a higher risk scenario? So you're really kind of measuring and trying to gauge and balance out the life expectancy of the patient and then the efficacy of the treatment. life expectancy of the patient and then the efficacy of the treatment. So in general, radiation doesn't have as many potential profound side effects as does surgery, particularly in older men. So the main side effects with treatment are impacts on urinary function and impacts on sexual function. The impacts and then cancer control. So in an older individual who maybe has less robust muscle mass and less resiliency in their tissue, surgery may result in higher rates

of urinary incontinence, for example, with surgery. Whereas with radiation, there are really effectively minimal or no rates of urinary incontinence. And if the radiation can effectively control the cancer for what we anticipate is the patient's life expectancy, then we'll go with radiation. There are a lot of nuances to it and variations

in terms of what we select for individual patients. And so I will often really encourage patients to go see a radiation oncologist and learn more about the disease from their perspective before we make a decision about what's best for them. Understood. So for the patient who is a good candidate for surgical intervention,

the surgery is called robotic prostatectomy. Yes. And I'm envisioning, I don't know what this looks like. You mentioned the DaVinci machine, but I'm imagininging, I don't know what this looks like. You mentioned the DaVinci machine, but I'm imagining a large computer-based sort of thing where you have a high precision joystick and somehow you're operating an arm, or there's a program that goes in

that can do the cutting and the incisions in a very specific and targeted way. Is that a fair argument? You claim you're a lay person, but you're a budding urologist, you need to know it. Yeah, so that's basically, the best way to think about the robot from the, the utilizers perspective is like,

it's like playing an organ in many ways. You have foot controls. So when I operate, I use my two feet and my two hands. So you control things, individual hand movements with each hand, and then you have foot pedals to also augment your ability to move things. The actual, the technology that really was the edge for Intuitive in terms of doing this was two things.

One, their technology allows for something like the size of your pen. That's the size of the instrument that we put inside the human body. It's fully wristed and allows for seven degrees of motion. So exactly what my arm can do, the instrument that I put inside the body can do. It's just totally miniaturized.

That was a huge, huge advance that Intuitive developed and came up with and patented. The other was that they came up with this idea that you could create a laparoscope. That's how we see things on the inside of the human body that had two eyes. So previously, all the laparoscopes had a single lens or a single eye, and all you would be able to do is see two-dimensionally. Their technology allows for processing of images from a right eye or a single eye, and all you would be able to do is see two dimensionally. Their technology allows for processing of images from a right eye and a left eye. They're adjacent to each other. They're very close, but they can actually triangulate

an image and they provide three-dimensional views. So basically- You can understand depth. When you put your head into their console, which is like basically the size of this table, when you enter that space, you are entering the inside of the human body in three dimensions. I mean, it is just like spectacular, spectacular stuff. So with that, you can see things that you could just never see with open surgery. When you're doing open surgery, it's your regular eyes. Even if you

wear magnifying glasses, you can't see things. There's much less bleeding when you do it with the laparoscopic robotic approach. So there's no kind of blood hiding the surgical field. So the view and the ability to do things, you just cannot do them with traditional instrumentation. And that is part of the skill of what makes a great,

you know, prostate surgeon. And the other one is just understanding the nuances of the human body and how the anatomy varies. And it's just like, it's that old 10,000 hour adage, right? If you do a lots of, because you can't, there's no automated program to just take a prostate out because your prostate is different than my prostate and everyone else's out there.

So that idea of understanding the anatomy, I learned that from Pat Walsh. And that guy saw stuff that I only saw when I started doing robotic. I mean, he just understood the anatomy spectacularly. So it's the robot and that as a very sophisticated, very expensive set of tools. And then understanding the disease and really understanding the disease in the sense of skating where the puck's going to go and really anticipating what you're going to see in that particular case that really make for, I think, a great prostate surgeon. How long did it take for you to master this machine? You know, there's ways to kind of gauge that performance. And so

how you do in your first 50, 100, 200, 250 cases. So when we looked, I was good out of the box. Yeah. But you get better every time. You got those surgeon hands. I'm not sure what it is, but I did okay out of the box, but I always, we have this very sophisticated software that allows us to actually, we record every single case we do.

So I look at my cases and I look at how patients do and I can actually help just like professional sports teams do. And my mentor did the same thing. He used VHS tapes. We have everything digitized. And by the end of the day, my cases are downloaded to my virtual inbox and my surgeries

and I can pull those cases and look at them, which is pretty awesome. Game tape. Game tape, takes a lot of time, but it's pretty amazing when you go back and look and you kind of analyze and say, where could I have done better in this case? Or what was it about this case that was a challenge?

And that's kind of the fun part of doing it, right? You can just kind of continually try to perfect your technique. I think some of Pat Walsh's procedures are on YouTube. He has them. You can actually watch. Yeah, that was one of his gifts back was to say, like he really was the master and he owned the space,

but he really shared that space. And so we have a YouTube channel at Northwestern. I put up many, many of my techniques and I'm always developing new techniques that I think will result in better outcomes. And I put them out there so that other surgeons can, you know, all of our trainees, they're ultra talented. I train our residents, physicians, how to do my techniques, teach them the tools to learn them and to deploy them in their own practice. And I put my videos out there so people can see them. It's not proprietary. It's so that

everybody can be better. Right. I'm super proud to announce my next venture, Voicing Change Media, this beautiful consortium of thinkers, storytellers, artists, and visionaries all committed to fostering meaningful exchanges and sharing thought-provoking content. Voicing Change Media will feature shows like Soul Boom with Rainn Wilson, Mentor Buffet with Alexi Pappas, Feel Better Live More with Dr. Rangan Chatterjee, and The Proof with Simon Hill. You can explore this network and all its offerings at voicingchange.media. If you are truly desiring of mastering your plate, but you feel like you lack the skill in the kitchen or the time or the culinary acumen you believe you require,

I can't stress enough how much our Plant Power Meal Planner can help you out. It truly is an extraordinary product. I'm so proud of. We worked very hard on to solve a very basic problem, making nutritious eating convenient and delicious. When you sign up at meals.richroll.com, you will get access immediately to

literally thousands of delicious and easy to prepare plant-based recipes, thoroughly customized based on a battery of personal preferences that you input when you sign up. You also get unlimited grocery lists, grocery delivery in most metropolitan areas, and a team of craft nutrition coaches at the ready to guide you. And you get all of this for just $1.90 a week. So to learn more and to sign up, go to meals.richroll.com or click on meal planner on the top menu on my website.

How many of these DaVinci machines exist? Nowadays, it's hard to say. I think we have at our hospital 10 and then deployed, we have 11 hospital system out throughout Chicago. We probably have 25 different machines. They were the market share leader. They had the patents on everything up until this, just this past year.

So they really had the ability to kind of be very proactive and develop really nice tools for us to kind of use very proactive and develop really nice tools for us to kind of use for our patients. But is it the case that every major hospital has one of these machines in their urology department? Well, they're used now for almost all kinds of surgery. You can use the robot to kind of advance things. It was originally developed for cardiac surgeons

because that's very precise suturing and you need magnification. And it just wasn't adopted in cardiac surgery. Urology is a specialty that's very kind of innovative. We're always kind of progressive and trying to do things better with new tools and new technologic advances. And so we saw this tool, deployed it in our space. We just started doing it on prostatectomy. And now for almost every major surgical procedure we do, it's done with the laparoscopic robotic approach. Every surgery requires an intense level of precision, but but from what I understand, the prostate is particularly sensitive because of the density of the kind of vascular system there.

Is that what creates the complications and the risks? It's the size of a golf ball. Everything surrounding it is like high price real estate. So you have to be very precise about dissecting the prostate off all the structures around it. And there's something that those structures exist to do. There's no redundancy when it comes to where the prostate is located.

So you have to be very precise about separating it off of something on all the different sides that it's kind of a budding. And then you have to reconstruct it. So you're disassembling things, you're putting them back together. And so yes, the robot enables more surgeons to remove prostates, but you also have to be skilled in how you remove it and put the pieces back together effectively. And that's a big differentiator from a good surgeon to like an exceptional surgeon. And does prostate cancer show up as a singular mass,

like a lump, or is it something that's sort of diffused across the prostate? Like when you go on to take it out, is it removing one thing or lots of little things and trying to find where it's hiding? Yeah, it's a great question. And I like to explain to patients, it's a weed with roots

and those roots can kind of disseminate and infiltrate throughout the prostate. So even if you can see a spot on MRI, that may be the weed above the surface, the depth and the extent that the roots disseminate throughout the prostate is variable. And so you can't just go carve out and pull out the spot that you see on the MRI

because the roots of that spot kind of do disseminate, not everywhere in the prostate, but they may go from the right side across to the left side or in fact grow outside of the prostate. And when you have roots of the weed growing outside of the prostate, that's where part of the surgery becomes technically more difficult because there's no, everything around the prostate is really important. So you have to kind of gauge, okay, is the tumor have roots outside?

If the prostate cancer has roots outside, am I clearing all those roots out when I'm doing the operation, et cetera. And so that's where it becomes technically very difficult and you're kind of processing this. The procedure takes around three hours. So you're in this machine, you can take a break and give your eyes a rest, but you are hyper-focused for three hours where you're really just focused on and doing this one particular craft. If you do that several times a day, it becomes like training, it becomes hardcore training to be able to do it for 10 or 12 hours in a day. In terms of risk factors,

you mentioned sexual dysfunction, urinary tract dysfunction, are there other risk factors and what is the incidence level of these risks showing up? Yeah, so those are the main ones. So it's really, we focus on cancer control and how often are you removing the cancer at the time of surgery?

Theoretically, it should be 100% of the time. A really excellent surgeon is removing the cancer 95% of the time when it's contained within the prostate. And that's kind of how I track my numbers and we're able to track your performance. And then rates of urinary leakage should be very low. And it's hard for me to say what other folks are doing. For me, 95% of my patients are dry by three months after surgery. About 55% are that way immediately after

surgery, like no leakage at all. And about 2% of guys, there's something else wrong in terms of their urinary function that requires them to have a small secondary procedure to be totally dry and comfortable. So overall, with an experienced surgeon, you should be looking at rates that are in the 1, 2, 5% range. Erectile dysfunction is not quite as good. And that depends on a lot of factors.

So why is it that men have erectile dysfunction after prostate surgery? So when you wanna have an erection, you get a signal from your brain. It goes all the way down your spinal cord. It goes through the nervous system into the penis. And those nerves run right adjacent to the prostate. These nerves are microscopic. You cannot visualize them. We know where they are, but you can't actually see them.

And we have to kind of peel them off of the prostate. In doing that, they often will be damaged. And so they have to kind of recover from that damage. And that recovery rate is variable. It depends on, well, what's the function of the patient before the surgery? What's the age of the patient? So the younger you are, the more resilient your nerve tissue is. And then what's the extent of their cancer? Because one of the first places that cancers grow

is just adjacent to the prostate. And that happens to be where the nerve tissue is. So there's lots of variables that affect your ability to recover or erectile function after surgery. So it's hard to kind of just say, okay, if you have surgery with Schaefer, 95% should be dry at three months. It's hard to give that equal number

for recovering erectile function. And that's where really we're much more kind of individualized and kind of giving that patient's probability of recovering. Urology and what you do is somewhat unique in the world of oncology because cancer doctors are constantly contending with death and they're combating a disease that, you know,

eludes our ability to figure out how to cure at least so far. And so there's a lot of sort of tragedy, right, around it. But you're in this situation where you're performing this life-saving procedure that is taking lethality off the table. So you have this rare opportunity and experience of treating patients and being with patients

on the other side of this surgery, like literally saving their lives, preventing this lethal cancer from robbing them of their lives too soon. I'm curious around what that experience is like for you when you go and visit the patient after the procedure, or you have the opportunity to look them in the eye and spend time with them afterwards.

Yeah, it's a good question. They have this new lease on life. They have this opportunity all of a sudden. Yeah, I think that being an oncologist or a cancer doctor has a lot of high highs and a lot of low lows. For me, it's a gift that I was given, this is my talent. So I feel grateful and I have a tremendous amount of gratitude that I can help with my gift to help other people. And I'm always,

you know, I try to be as empathetic as possible. These are people who, as you, we talked about earlier, they have no symptoms. They're living their regular normal life. And then they get this diagnosis and it's not on their 2024 agenda. And so although we can cure them, it's still a process for them to think about and to kind of work through. And last week I took care of a 44 year old man who has a four year old kid. So although I know that he's gonna survive, it's still, if you just pause and think about that stuff, you have a family. It's remarkable and it's scary and very powerful. So I feel honored that I can participate

in these individual patients' journeys with them. I feel that there's a lot of, you have a burden that you really have to be a cheerleader for them. You have to be a psychiatrist for them. You have to really try to be, you know, in this one moment in time, you know, a lot of things for them.

And so for me, that heavy burden is fed forward and I get a payback from, for my patients. And you know, several of my patients and the relationships that I've developed with them over time is really, it gives me kind of the energy that I need in individually to kind of get back to the next 10 men who we help in their journey in life. Yeah, I mean, one patient that I know of yours,

you know, said basically like, suddenly you think your life is getting stripped away, your life is returned to you. And this question comes up of, well, what are you gonna do with this? And I would imagine having done this for as long as you have and performed as many of these procedures

that you've seen people take stock and inventory of their lives and make changes as a result. Like to not to say that there's a, there's that this is like a, like a gift, but there is an opportunity in there. And I'm curious around like what you've seen people do with that opportunity. Yeah, I, you know, Yeah, you're absolutely right.

And it's the silver lining of the diagnosis is when you can see an individual really take that accounting of their life and perhaps how they've given back in whatever capacity they have and really making what they perceive as a negative into a positive. I know for me personally,

I've done that. I've taken stock of my own, the gifts and accounted for what I've done. And it's made me, I think, a much better person, a much better husband and a much better dad. So that when I do spend time with my kids,

I think about, okay, this is really, in this moment in time, what, how can we make it better? And so I, it's helped me, but it's also really nice to see patients. They've done just many, many things. It doesn't have to be that they start fundraisers for prostate cancer. I don't want a million people doing that. I want people to kind of, again, re-engage with their talents and, and, and, and, you know and deploy those talents to make the world a better place. It sounds super cheesy,

but it's actually people do that and it's very, very powerful. Another trope that you see in movies and television is the surgeon with the terrible bedside manner, right? That's just all about like the cutting and getting on with it. The emotionally stunted, kind of overly materialistic character.

You're certainly not that, you strike me as a deeply empathetic person who's very aware of the role that you're playing, but within that, how do you manage, like from a psychological perspective, the toll of, and the heaviness of it all? Like, do you have to have certain kinds of psychological boundaries?

So you're not like this porous membrane where all of this, you know, angst and fear and pain is seeping in. Like, you know, how do you comport yourself over the long term so you can continue to do this and take care of yourself? Well, one, I bike ride a lot. So that helps me personally, just in terms of if I can get my blood,

my heart rate over 150, that helps me a lot. Peter got you on a program. Do you have the indoor bike? You're not riding in Chicago in the winter, are you? I rode in February this year. Did you? Because it was 70, right? But in general, I'm indoors in the winter

and I try to get out and bike commute in the summer best I can. But I would say that it's definitely something I've thought about it. And to be honest, I will tell the patients to their face how I'm feeling. And I will try to be as empathetic and say, listen, I know this is hard for you and I feel for you.

And I'll just tell them to give me a hug. And that idea of having fewer barriers at that moment with the patient, I've actually found helps me a lot and actually helps those patients tremendously. And it's tough. I mean, after doing surgery for 12 hours in a day and I probably lose five or six pounds in water weight

just because the OR doesn't have humidified air and it's just an intense process. It's hard sometimes to go and see these people, but you have to think about, I just try to think about how they're scared and how I do this thing every day. They do this once in their life. And so I try to remind myself of that.

And then I have my wife to remind me of that too. So she keeps track of me and make sure that I'm good to my patients. Yeah. Have you ever had any moments where you felt like you needed to step back because it was all too much or you're able to navigate it

and kind of find a way to balance all of that? I think, you know, it would be too much, I'd be too macho to say you don't have those. And, you know, you have them when you have, you have, you know, you have, you're doing the surgery and you have a side effect, you have a complication and it's super duper hard to process and develop a game plan when you do have a complication. And the greatest surgeons in the world have complications. And then that's when you need to rely on your friends, your colleagues who are usually I think in your specialty,

in your line of work to just decompress. So I try not to decompress professionally with my family because I just don't want to be that guy, which is why I'll spend time on the phone on my drive home with colleagues and just say, I had a tough case or I had a hard day and it was, or I had a patient who they're young or they're this or that. So I try to do that with my colleagues and I try to proactively reach out to them because I know that they go through that same thing. It's very much in the forefront of medicine,

this idea of physician burnout and processing all these different outside stressors in your individual life and then your professional life and just working to kind of balance them. And it's definitely something that's a work in progress for me, but I think outlet through friends and then outlet through family

and then outlet through high heart rate. Yeah, I mean, the conventional idea that you would have would be, you're modeling something different. Like there's this idea like, listen, I'm performing thousands of these procedures. Like, do you want me to do a good job? If you want me to do a good job, If you want me to do a good job,

like I got to mute out all the emotional stuff because all that does is take up mind share that should be deployed in the process of performing the best surgery that I can. So let me just do that, right? To instead say, I'm gonna give this guy a hug and I'm gonna understand that they're in pain and there's a lot of fear here.

And to have that, you know, gentler approach and to have that work for you is interesting. I'm sure it's powerful for the younger doctors that are working underneath you. And, you know, knowing some of your patients, like it's appreciated. Like these people are, you know, well, I just can't say enough amazing things about you.

I try, I can always do better, you know, but I always try to be the best guy I can be for that. And it's easy when you put yourself in these people's shoes, it's like not, it's not hard to understand what somebody needs, you know, in their particular situation when they're confronted with a health event in their life. Speaking of cycling, every time I get on my bike

and I'm out for a couple hours, I'm thinking, what is this doing to my prostate? And nothing, don't worry about it. Okay, good. We cleared that up. Yes, no issues. Cycling good, not, yeah, like, cause there's a lot of, sometimes like if my fit isn't right

I get a little numbness, you know, down there. Yep, I mean, you know, as you know, fit fitment is key. Speed comes from a good fitting bike, right? So yeah, there are special seats. You know, there are nerves that it's not the prostate, but there are nerves around the prostate that actually you can get compression, you know,

injury to and have numbness. So there are different seats that can kind of relieve that pressure in the area where the prostate lives. And they can be significant game changers for some of those folks. Yeah, I found that the saddles that have the cutout in the middle and kind of an elevated rear that's like right on the sit bones.

Yeah, way more anatomic, 100%. The saddles have gotten a lot better. They have. And the tri bikes are often like the worst because the old tri bike, you're just really, you're really in it. You're leaning forward. You're right on, yeah, exactly.

You're not on the sit bones at all. Exactly. So those ones where, that's where the seat is the biggest kind of factor. Cause if you're on a tri bike for a long, long time, which I imagine you've been, your prostate's not an issue, but you can actually have problems with the urethra,

the tube that you pee through, because you can just compress it and cause issues with the blood vessels too. So fitment is key. What is the relationship between prostate health, prostate cancer and TRT, like testosterone therapy. Yeah, I actually think there's no increased risk for developing prostate cancer

and testosterone replacement therapy. So that's a very broad and maybe provocative statement, but there's a lot of good recent studies that have shown that that's not a major player. Peter and I are gonna do a very deep dive on that coming up. So we'll have a really nice, super nuanced and detailed podcast about a big picture. A couple of recent trials came out.

They gave men testosterone replacement. These were men had low T. They brought them on replacement to like just below low T. So not very good replacement. So the quality of life for those guys wasn't super great. But with mild testosterone replacement, there was no increased risk for developing prostate cancer. In general, I think testosterone replacement

to relatively reasonable levels is not gonna induce any cancer issues. It can cause your prostate to grow and cause more urinary symptoms over the long haul, but over a shorter term period of time, it's probably not a problem either. Does it have any impact on PSA results? Is it something that the neurologist needs to know about? Good question. It can bump the PSA, but in general, it's in the tenths of a point. So not major changes in PSA with testosterone supplementation. Again, normal ranges for testosterone, a low is considered below 300 and high ranges are

eight to 900. So if you're low and you go on replacement, you may have a subtle bump, maybe half a point, 0.4 of a PSA value rise, and then it should be stable. If you go in the thousands, you may have more of a rise initially, but then beyond that, actually, it shouldn't go up substantially. If on TRT, your PSA is rising, just like in every other space, if your PSA is rising, that's when you need to get an investigation with the urologist and get the workup we talked about earlier. Are there any other kind of pharma

that would have an impact on PSA values or be something that's contributing or creating a greater risk for prostate cancer? So there is some correlation with some of these very strong immune modulators that people take for autoimmune disease. So Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis, which can be very catastrophic diseases of the colon, there are some very effective medications that can make those symptoms go away. And remember Crohn's and ulcerative colitis are really profoundly catastrophic if untreated in individuals. The medications that you use to suppress those can raise your risk of developing prostate cancer.

So again, if you have Crohn's or ulcerative colitis on any TNF alpha blocking medication, so those of your audience that are on it, they'll know what I'm talking about. Just follow your PSA very carefully. Again, screening the way we do it in America is pretty aggressive. And so it works, if you deploy it, it will work for most everybody to pick up something early. I would definitely not advocate

for not taking those medications because you're taking them for a real disease. Just have to be careful in terms of following. So those medications for autoimmune disease can do it. Testosterone, Clomid, which raises testosterone can do it. And then the finasteride, dutasteride, Propecia that protect your hair loss in general or your prostate from growing in older men.

It can alter your numbers. And so you have to be cognizant of that too. What is happening in terms of new and developing science in terms of better understanding prostate cancer? And where are we in terms of the possibility around a cure? Yeah, good question. So a lot of the cancers that we diagnosed, we diagnosed them and we gauge how aggressive they are

based on how they look under a microscope. And in the last decade, there's been a huge shift in terms of looking at the genomics, what drives those individual cells to look the way they do under the microscope. And when you start looking at genomics, you can understand the fundamental kind of recipe for an aggressive or a non-aggressive cancer. And if you understand the recipe for an aggressive or a non-aggressive cancer. And if you understand the recipe for an aggressive or non-aggressive cancer on a genomic level, you can then deploy more customized, more precise therapies for those individuals.

So how has that impacted individuals who have a localized cancer? We're now learning that you can use genomics and probably will be able to kind of help titrate and tailor some of the types of radiation treatment you get. There's trials that are ongoing that will answer that. In terms of more advanced prostate cancers, for those men that are unfortunate enough to have an advanced prostate cancer, genomics has really transformed how we treat the disease. So we've identified vulnerabilities, developed and deployed medications

to attack those vulnerabilities. So we're getting there. And there's been tremendous progress over the last 15 or 20 years to like do newer, more customized, more precise and powerful medications. So less overall side effects, more toxicity to the cancer cells. They're not creating cures yet,

but we're getting closer kind of every year, to be honest with you. From a lay person's perspective, why is cancer, just cancer generally, such a challenge in terms of trying to figure out a cure? So many brilliant minds have devoted their lives to trying to solve this and getting closer and closer and closer,

but there's something missing that's preventing that from happening. Yeah, it's a good question. I think about it like, we know the best example of medicine about where we probably would wanna be with cancer is how we treat HIV. So we don't have a cure for HIV,

but we have a very powerful cocktail of medications that can suppress the growth of HIV virus and allow a person to live out a full healthy life and die with, not from their HIV. In prostate cancer, we have a portfolio of super powerful medications. And our goal is to enable people short-term to not die from, but die with their prostate cancer. And so I would argue that, yeah,

it is very, very difficult to find that cure. And there are cancers we can cure, testis cancer in men, for example, is curable. Other cancers are just way more elusive because they're always changing over time. So we find something to attack them and then they evolve and they develop resistance and they change.

But I think if we get enough of those different new medications that we can kind of continually suppress and think about deploying them in cocktail formats like we do for HIV, you could actually suppress the disease and enable them to live out a full healthy life. So for example, if a man's diagnosed with metastatic prostate cancer today, he can live on average eight to 10 years, median survival, eight to 10 years.

That means that some people are living 15 or 20 years with metastatic prostate cancer. And there are some side effects from the meds, but in general, they're able to live out a nice full, healthy life. So we're not there yet in terms of cure, but we're there, we're getting closer. And in the meantime, we can live, people can live substantially longer with limited kind of side effects. What kind of advances can you reasonably anticipate

in your lifetime? I think further ways to target like testosterone is the main kind of driver for prostate cancer progression. So further more sophisticated methods to suppress testosterone in individual cancer cells will be key. And then further deploying like immune-based therapy. So, you know, immunotherapy has really changed a lot of other cancers, melanoma, kidney cancer, bladder cancer,

and enabling people to live longer. And I think we haven't yet cracked the nut as to how to kind of deploy immunotherapy within the prostate cancer space. So that's, I think, super exciting and on the horizon. And then in the localized space for most guys, just refining, hey, who really needs aggressive treatment? And if you need aggressive treatment,

should it be surgery? Should it be radiation? How do we fine tune and tailor that? Those are the kind of exciting things in the next five to 10 years that we'll have. Yeah, as groundbreaking as the PSA test is, and as revolutionary as this DaVinci machine is, we're seeing such rapid technological advancement right now

in robotics and diagnostics and like screening and with the advent of AI, like applying like, you know, hyper intelligence to massive data sets. It feels, again, from a very lay person's perspective that we're on the precipice of being able to make some pretty astronomical breakthroughs in medicine. Yeah, they're happening. So AI is deployed in medicine already.

We just don't, it's for example, if you get a CAT scan, you lie on that machine. You don't know if you've ever had a CAT scan, you lie on the machine and it weighs you. And it figures out, it's just deploying very basic AI machine learning, how much radiation you should get based on your weight and your body composition. Now we have AI that can read x-rays

for people that come through the ER so that the doctor who's reading them is not overtired. And we're reading them is not overtired and it's for reading them and screening them and identifying things that are much more precision than a regular physician. They're doing that in mammography, so for breast cancer screening. So we have a project looking at AI to read MRIs better

perhaps, and try to find the needle in the haystacks that maybe we were missing before. So again, lots of deployment in that space. And then also in terms of that kind of physician life balance, we talked about like, how can we use AI to actually give physicians a break to allow them to not feel like the weight of the world is always there on their shoulders

because their patients are accessing them all the time with information. So using AI to actually improve wellness and decrease burnout, that stuff is very much what I think we would benefit from tremendously. So not just better medicine, but actually better care of the physicians

who are delivering that better medicine. I'm gonna get practical here. So look, it's pretty common as you get older that sleep becomes a little more elusive and you might have to get up in the middle of the night to take a pee, generally happens to me sometime between 2 and 3 a.m. Pretty regularly, not multiple times,

but generally one time during the night. A, should I be alarmed? And B, what can I do to ameliorate this or make it less likely that I have to get up and go to the bathroom in the middle of the night? Yeah. Should I be worried? You shouldn't be alarmed.

Most people get up, most people over 50 get up, men and women get up one time at night to go to the bathroom. Usually that's not too disruptive for an individual person's sleep. When you get on to two to three times, that becomes incredibly disruptive and it's not effective

in terms of your overall sleep habits and so forth. How can you mitigate it? You can do basic things like time, when you stop drinking fluids. And so for you, that's like, are you working out later in the day and then having to rehydrate and excess fluid is coming off overnight, et cetera.

And for the general listener, it would be the warning signs that you wanna think about if you have nighttime urinary issues are, what other things besides your prostate could this be a sign of? The key thing is actually sleep apnea. It affects one third, 50% of individuals, not just men. Sleep apnea is when you stop breathing at night.

I mean, you just stop breathing and you go apneic. That's like, it's scary to think about. And sleep apnea has a profound effect on so many different organs in our body. But one of the things that is a blessing is that it can actually cause you to urinate more at nighttime. And so if you're getting up a lot at night to urinate,

you have a, you know, even if you're, you know, it's typical, the way to think about sleep apnea is like, oh, you're, you have a thick neck, you have a, even if you're, it's typical the way to think about sleep apnea is like, oh, you have a thick neck, you have a floppy neck. Risk factors for sleep apnea are male sex and men over 50. So it doesn't mean if you're thin and you're fit that you may not actually have sleep apnea as a problem. So sleep apnea is a key thing to just think about and be screened for if you start having

increased nighttime urinary frequency. There's other cardiovascular things that you can have. I don't, you don't have, you individually don't have them, but a listener would wanna think about. And so yes, more than once at night is good to bring up with not just your urologist, but your primary care doc, because there may be other factors that precipitate that nighttime frequency.

What is the relationship though, between sleep apnea and the urge to pee? Well, sleep apnea increases your urine production at nighttime. So some people have increased urine production at nighttime and therefore they have to get up to go pee. Other individuals just have an urgency to go to the bathroom at nighttime,

but it's actually not related to a tremendously increased amount of urine. It's just something that they're awoken and they get up and they'll do small volume urination. So that's something that is more in the urology space. But if you're urinating 20 or 30% of your total 24 hour urine volume at night, then there's a couple of factors

that you may wanna look in, you can look into to see not just prostate specific, but hormonal and or sleep apnea and or heart related. What about compression socks? I heard that if you have this issue, wearing compression socks might be helpful. Not that I really want to put on compression socks. I have mine on right now. Once a cyclist, always a cyclist. I mean, once you just adapt to them, yes. It keeps the- Sleeping in your Normatec boots. It keeps the interstitial fluid. It just diminishes the amount of interstitial fluid

you develop in your legs over the course of a day. Why does that matter? Interstitial fluid in your legs, i.e. you can push your skin in and around your ankle and it's kind of mushy. If you eliminate that, when you lie flat at night, that interstitial fluid leaves your ankles and your legs and it goes into your bloodstream

and your kidneys produce urine. So by wearing compression socks, then you mitigate the amount of fluid that you have leaking out of your blood vessels in your legs, and then you'll have less urine production at night. So basic stuff, yeah. The timing of when you stop drinking fluids,

eliminating caffeine from anything in the afternoon or evening, and then all day long compression socks, except for like if you're going to the beach, or something like that, that's what I would say. So on weekends, if it's the summer and I'm biking a lot, I don't wear them, but otherwise I wear them. What should men understand or know when it comes to erectile dysfunction?

You're not alone. So a lot of guys think that they're the only guy around and you shouldn't be embarrassed and bring it up with your primary or for sure your urologist, because there's great medications that can help augment it. About 2% of men annually over 50 develop erectile dysfunction. So that's, you know, 20% of guys who are age 60 have it at least, right? That's

reported. So it's probably higher than that. So you're not alone. There's great medications that you can use to, you know, augment whatever performance you have. And I always tell my patients, urologists can get guys, we can get you to wherever you wanna be. But we start with simple medications, over the counter stuff. In what case is it incident of erectile dysfunction, an alarm bell, or sort of a canary in the coal mine

regarding a larger circulatory or cardiovascular issue. Because if somebody comes in with that and you're just, they give a pill and it's like problem goes away, you're dealing with symptom, you're not actually getting at the root cause of what's that really needs for drugs. Yeah, that's definitely one of the concerns

or considerations for these kinds of online shops that offer it is are you really thinking about the whole patient? So erectile, the concordant, you know, meta issues that you can have medically that could be reflected in ED would be diabetes. So diabetes, high blood sugars can have an impact on direct nerve function. And that's often first manifest in erections because the nerve for the erections are so small and they're so sensitive. The other is high blood pressure.

So the small nerves have small blood vessels that go supply them with their nutrients. And so high blood pressure can cause erectile dysfunction and uncontrolled blood sugars, i.e diabetes can do the same. So those are the two things that you wanna think about when you have a patient who has new onset erectile dysfunction is, are there other factors that can contribute to that

that we need to address also to help that person, overall medically. Sure, I mean, your body's trying to tell you something. Yeah, exactly. Is off, right? So if you just deal with that, take the Viagra or whatever, you're blind, you're gonna have a problem,

a much bigger problem later. 100%. If somebody is gonna go into their urology, they've listened to this, they're like, "'Wow, I just learned a lot. I better go to my GP and then perhaps my urologist." What are some guidelines that you could share around the questions that somebody should ask, like the

smart questions to know whether they're with the right person and they're going to get the right kind of care? Well, I view modern medicine should not be paternalistic. It should be a relationship that the individual patient has with their doctor. So I try to be empathetic and I try to be there for my patients. I understand that there's some percent that just, you know, they don't care for me. So you have to have a good open relationship with your patient. And I think the patient should view it the same way. They should be able to have an open relationship. And then I think, yeah, just having a frank conversation. Hey, I'm a 50 year old guy. Should I be thinking about screening for prostate cancer?

I quit smoking five years ago. Do I have to worry about bladder cancer? You know, my erections are good now. Is there something I need to do in the future? Just having an open discussion. But I think the main things that urologists wanna see patients for early is their cancer screening.

And then certainly part of our specialty is to enable men to live out a full healthy life. And that for some people would include refinement in their urinary function. So they get up a lot at night, they have trouble urinating. We can fix that. And then also their sexual function. What would be an alarm bell that maybe you're not

with the right practitioner? Is there something common that would come up that could let the patient know like, maybe this isn't the right person for me to be seeing about this? Yeah, I think just brushing off questions and shrugging off concerns or considerations is always a bad thing.

Like, oh, you don't need to get a test or something like that, being cavalier. Yeah, if they say that, you have to say, well, why don't you think I need a test? And I sometimes tell people that, but that's because they're 97 years old and they don't need to get screened for a cancer that may be lethal for them in 15 or 20 years.

So it's a little bit about context. And certainly I try to appease and really develop a good relationship with every patient, but there are some that you just can't because there's just a personality conflict. So I think making sure that they're kind of available and trying to find people who are as empathetic as possible is always helpful.

And then there's lots of online reviews that you can go to on the web to figure out, okay, what's this doctor really about? And those are quite powerful. And we now at Northwestern really fully respect and understand that medicine is not transactional. It's really like a lifetime journey that we try to establish with our patients

and really kind of be there for them throughout these different intervals of care. And so thinking about it that way is something that we've been pretty progressive about, but frankly, our patients are our consumers and they're gonna be very, they're gonna shop around and be critical.

They want the best. And I think, you know, individuals are pretty savvy these days about refining and finding out, you know, the best portfolio of doctors for them. In terms of male contraception, what should men understand about vasectomies? Well, vasectomies are done to help prevent you

from having subsequent children with vaginal intercourse, but they're not. Thank you for that, public service. But sometimes I say it like that because some people confuse having a vasectomy as being an effective way to mitigate sexually transmitted diseases. And it's not that, right?

So yes, you can have a vasectomy, it's safe to do, and it will really effectively eliminate your ability to impregnate an individual with intercourse. But not at all impede your ability to pass on an STD. Or acquire an STD. So, depending on the preferences of the individual patient, we will have discussions about PrEP, which is a medication you can take to prevent

acquisition of HIV if you're in a high risk kind of population. So try to be proactive about engaging our patients and saying, hey, how can we serve you? What things are on your mind? And then trying to be safe for them as well. And the procedure from what I understand is safe. to them as well. And the procedure from what I understand is safe. Vasectomy is totally safe. Yeah, yeah. And this is the era of the vasectomy. Everybody says on during March madness,

every guy will get their vasectomy on Wednesday, right before the opening weekend starts. So that's, it's like the highest rate of vasectomy. Is that true? Yeah, yeah, yeah. But in general, it's totally safe. And most people usually get them on a Thursday or Friday, then they have the weekend,

then they go back to work and they have no issue. So not anything to be concerned about. It's highly effective in terms of a contraceptive approach, 100%. Is there anything that we haven't covered that you feel you want men to understand about, not just the prostate, but reproductive health? I think men are afraid to talk to their doctors

about their feelings on their health and how they're doing. And they should take a note from the playbook that women use. Women are very proactive in my opinion about engaging with their physicians and telling them how they feel and telling them what their kind of concerns are. Think about all these spectacular breast cancer survivors,

they're champions, right? And as you mentioned, when we let off this piece, you said men are so afraid to talk publicly about their prostate cancer. And it's this very strange dichotomy where women are champions and men perceive themselves as failures if they talk about their vulnerabilities. And one of their vulnerabilities they feel like

is really their men's health function, their sexual function, their urinary function, and their history potentially of cancer. So I would tell them to just try to be open with their physicians. And if we understand where they're coming from, function in their history potentially of cancer. So I would tell them to just try to be open with their physicians. And if we understand where they're coming from, that helps us kind of just break down those barriers. And it's part of what we try to do. I have a team that I work with. I have a great nurse practitioner who is, she's a great icebreaker with our patients. And so

in that way, just being out there as a provider is helpful, but the patients need to understand that they should also feel free to bring it up too. Yeah, get tested, get your PSA test, yeah? Yes. I'm telling myself. Get your test and send it to me, I'll help you interpret it. Yeah, thank you.

Is there anything, I mean, we covered a lot. There's certainly more that we could cover, but as we wind this down, is there anything that I mean, we covered a lot. There's certainly more that we could cover, but as we wind this down, is there anything that I've left off the table that we haven't covered that any misunderstandings, further misunderstandings or, you know, tropes that you'd like to correct? I think we did a great job.

I mean, thank you so much for having me come on the show. I'm honored to be able to be here and talk a little bit about what I do for a living. Yeah, I mean, thank you so much for having me come on the show. I'm honored to be able to be here and talk a little bit about what I do for a living. Yeah, I mean, you perform in an unbelievable public service and you're also an exceptional communicator of what you do and the importance of it, which is an added talent on top of your surgical hands and your ability to operate the DaVinci.

And I really, I appreciate it. Like I really wanted to, you know, make this whole episode, you know, a public service announcement basically for men to also give them permission to do what you just said, which is talk about it and raise their hand. And, you know, I'm gonna take your advice as well. So thank you for that. Awesome.

If people wanna learn more about you, where should they go? Where would you direct them? They can find me on the Northwest. I mean, I'm everywhere, but Northwestern Medicine's webpage and or tedchafermd.com will direct you to Northwestern to contact me if you wanna reach out and have a question.

And we can go to that YouTube page and watch your procedures. Yeah, our YouTube channel is NM for Northwestern Medicine underscore urology. So nm underscore urology. And there's tons of my videos. And then we have a whole portfolio of different educational,

urologically based videos that are put up there by our team of experts. Excellent. Thank you. Appreciate it. Thanks for having me. Next time, let's go on a ride. Let's do it. All right, cool. of experts. Excellent. Thank you. Appreciate it. Thanks for having me. Next time, let's go on a ride. Let's do it.

All right, cool. Thank you, Ted. Thank you. Plants. This episode was brought to you by ag1 try ag1 and get a free one-year supply of vitamin d3 plus k2 and five free ag1 travel packs with your first subscription at drinkag1.com slash rich roll that's drinkag1.com slash Rich Roll. That's it for today. Thank you for listening. I truly hope you enjoyed the conversation. To learn more about today's guest, including links

and resources related to everything discussed today, visit the episode page at richroll.com, where you can find the entire podcast archive, as well as podcast merch, my books, Finding Ultra, Voicing Change in the Plant Power Way, as well as the Plant Power Meal Planner at meals.richroll.com. the easiest and most impactful thing you can do is to subscribe to the show on Apple Podcasts, on Spotify, and on YouTube, and leave a review and or comment. Supporting the sponsors who support the show is also important and appreciated. And sharing the show or your favorite episode with friends or on social media is, of course, awesome and very helpful. And finally, for podcast updates, special offers on books, the meal planner, and other subjects, please subscribe to our newsletter, which you can find on the footer of any page at richroll.com. Today's show was produced and engineered by Jason Camiolo with additional audio engineering by Cale Curtis. The video edition of the podcast Thank you.

Thank you, Georgia Whaley, for copywriting and website management. And of course, our theme music was created by Tyler Pyatt, Trapper Pyatt, and Harry Mathis. Appreciate the love, love the support. See you back here soon. Peace. Plants. Namaste. Thank you.