The Rich Roll Podcast - Fasting Compilation: Leading Experts On Water-Only Fasts, Fasting Mimicking Diets & The Optimal Fasting Window For Longevity

Episode Date: November 20, 2025

This Fasting Compilation features Dr. Alan Goldhamer, Dr. Valter Longo, and Dr. Michael Greger to discuss the science of strategic deprivation. We explore why visceral fat behaves like a tumor secreting inflammatory molecules that drive chronic disease. How many health conditions stem from dietary patterns rather than requiring medication alone. The evolutionary mechanism of insulin resistance and the reality that when you eat can matter as much as what you eat, with the same calories producing opposite metabolic outcomes depending on meal timing. I also share my own challenges. Knowing the science doesn't make implementation easy. Listen. Learn. And discuss with your healthcare provider what makes sense for you. Enjoy! CRITICAL SAFETY NOTE: Under no circumstances should anyone undertake a water fast of any length without medical supervision. Do not attempt this at home. Show notes + MORE Watch on YouTube Newsletter Sign-Up Today’s Sponsors: Roka: Unlock 20% OFF your order with code RICHROLL👉🏼https://www.ROKA.com/RICHROLL On: High-performance shoes & apparel crafted for comfort and style👉🏼https://www.on.com/richroll  AG1: Get a FREE bottle of D3K2, Welcome Kit, and 5 travel packs with your first order👉🏼https://www.drinkAG1.com/richroll Go Brewing: Use the code Rich Roll for 15% OFF👉🏼https://www.gobrewing.com Rivian: Electric vehicles that keep the world adventurous forever👉🏼https://www.rivian.com  Calm: Get 40% off a Calm Premium subscription👉🏼https://www.calm.com/richroll  Squarespace: Use code RichRoll to save 10% off your first order of a website or domain👉🏼http://www.squarespace.com/RichRoll        Check out all of the amazing discounts from our Sponsors👉🏼https://www.richroll.com/sponsors  Find out more about Voicing Change Media at https://www.voicingchange.media and follow us @voicingchange

Eat for 11 hours or 12 and fast for 13 hours or 12. The fact is it can be done safely. It can be done effectively. And when it's needed, there's nothing else that does exactly what water-only fasting does. Some studies show it's great for you. Other studies show it's terrible for you. Has all these negative metabolic consequences. People are oftentimes medicated for their diet.

And then after we're done, most of the time there's no need for medication. Intermittent fasting, water-only fasting. Water-only fasting, you know, 5-2, 25-5, time-restricted feeding. What is going on here? Fasting has become quite the popular thing lately, but what is fasting? It can mean many different things. There's intermittent fasting. There is time-restricted eating.

There is alternate day fasting, twice-weekly fasting. There's the fasting-minicking diet, minimally supplemented fasting. So what is fasting? What are we talking about when we're discussing this topic? We're going to get right into it in a sec, but first. Today's episode is brought to you by Broca. You know, it's funny? We don't often think of eyewear as performance gear until it starts to get in the way.

And if you're like me, somebody who has contended with eyesight impairment my entire life, it's a very real thing without a real solution for athletes. I cannot tell you how many times I've been mid-run, constantly shoving my glasses back up my nose, tripping on roots and rocks because I couldn't see them, or my glasses had fogged up, or what about out on the bike where the treachery is obviously far more intense? Well, this is why Roka has been a godsend for me. approaching prescription eyewear from a performance perspective first, but not at the cost of fashion, I should say,

helping not only people like me, but all kinds of athletes, including Tour de France cyclists and Ironman champions with everyday frames disimperable. Their secret is their proprietary gecko technology, patented nose and temple pads that grip even more securely when you sweat. No slipping, no distractions, and they're insanely lightweight. Most frames weigh less than,

a pencil, super light, even with prescription lenses. Beyond the function, the craftsmanship is next level. Razor sharp optics, durable construction, and a design that actually is beautiful and keeps up with you. So put them on, feel the difference, and wear without limits. Unlock 20% off your order with the code rich roll at roca.com. That's roka.com. I got news for you. The holidays are coming. And with them, all these questions kind of start swirling in our minds about what we're going to give people that we care about. And honestly, it's really hard because most gifts just end up forgotten somewhere. But the gifts that actually do get used are the ones that make someone want to use

them. And On does exactly that with their incredible line of high quality running and hiking gear. Shoes like the Cloud Ultra for trails, the Cloud Runner 2 for roads, the club hoodie for recovery days, hiking stuff for exploring nature in the mountains, and even accessories like performance socks, caps, hydration packs, backpacks, and travel bags that work as amazing stocking stuffers. So here's the thing. The real gift isn't the gear. It's what becomes possible when the gear gets out of the way. Those early morning runs where your mind just clears that trail, you've been meaning to hike, that runner's high, or that silence at the summit when everything just clicks. Movement changes things. And sometimes all someone needs,

is the right gear to make movement more fun, more stylish, and more accessible. So move yourself on over to on.com slash rich roll to explore my picks for holiday gifts. For over four decades, Dr. Goldhammer has been at the forefront of using fasting as a powerful tool for healing and longevity. And our conversation dove deep into the science behind fasting and its potential to revolutionize. our approach to chronic disease. Well, the type of fasting that we do is the complete abstinence of all substances except water in an environment of complete rest. So it's therapeutic, medically supervised, water-only fasting.

There's a lot of fasting-mimicking programs out there, and they all have potential benefits and uses. Some of them have many advantages over the prolonged water-only fasting, and that they don't require the level of supervision. They don't require aggressive withdrawal of medications. They don't have the risk profile that medically supervised water only fasting could have if it's not done properly. So particularly Volta Longo has popularized a program where it's, you know, limited nutrition intake. It can be done by most people at home. It can be very helpful to the degree that it's used. But it's not long-term water-only fasting. And as beneficial as

these intermittent fasting programs can be in helping with weight loss and helping people make behavioral changes. They're not necessarily the same thing you'll see in patients, for example, that have specific illnesses and need to reverse those diseases that you would see with long-term water-only fasting. So is that a way of saying that in your experience,

prolonged water-only fasting is a superior protocol when it comes to helping people with acute or chronic lifestyle diseases? Like, why is it that you've chosen to focus on this rather than these other protocols that are seeming to be much more a part of the mainstream discourse around fasting? Well, I think that when you can accomplish your goals

with intermittent fasting or these other programs, that has advantages. As I said, safer profile, simple, doesn't require going to a place and requiring medical supervision. But many conditions won't respond to those protocols. And when they don't respond, that's oftentimes when we see people. When they've done their best, they've made diet and lifestyle changes,

they've done what they can do to resolve the problem, but the blood pressure still persists. I know my colleague John McDougal calls us the punishment, that if he has a patient, for example, that doesn't resolve their hypertension, which most do. But for those that don't, he'll, you know. You get the hard cases. He'll send us over with apologies.

Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah. Because what we do is a more intense problem. It's not something that, you know, you'd necessarily look forward to if you're ill. But the fact is it can be done safely. It can be done effectively. And when it's needed, there's nothing else that does exactly what water-only fasting does. Right. So at True North, the typical hard case that finds his or her way to your doorstep is somebody

that you're going to supervise over a period of how long as they undergo this protocol. Fasting ranges from 5 to 40 days on water only, and there's a period of half the length of the fast recovery in a supervised setting. So a typical patient might fast for two or three weeks, they might be with us a month. And those patients will oftentimes come in with specific complaints, high blood pressure, type 2 diabetes, autoimmune diseases, or some forms of cancer, particularly things like lymphoma. Right. And how do you decide then how long this fasting protocol is going to be on a case-by-case basis? Like who are the people that you recommend a 40-day fast versus, you know, just a handful of days? Right. So you don't know with certainty before the fast exactly how the fast is going to go.

And so what we do is we try to estimate long and then, you know, if we can get it done quicker, that's great. I've had enough experience and fasted enough people. I can usually, by looking at their medical history, reviewing their lab, get a pretty good idea of what that range is likely to be. But there are patients that we expect to go a long time, but they get well really quickly. And so we just don't need to do it. Other people we're hoping are going to be a shorter fast, but it ends up being it takes longer to get the job done.

In some cases, it's pretty simple in the sense that, like, for example, if you have high blood pressure, we want to fast you until you have normal blood pressure so that when you eat well, you don't have to be dealing with medications and the risk profile. And we know based on how high your blood pressure is, what your medical history is in terms of kidney disease and other things, how long that's likely to take. Right. We can do the same thing

with type 2 diabetics. We can look at your hemoglobin A1C, get an idea of how much insulin resistance there is. And a big factor is how much extra weight and extra visceral fat do you have? Because it's the obesity, the extra weight and the visceral fat that's responsible producing the inflammation

that causes these problems. And so we want to bring people as close as possible down to their optimum weight. Now, in some cases, is people are not overweight, but they're over fat. And so those individuals, you know, you have to stay within the reserves. Other people might have plenty of fat reserves, but they may not have electrolyte reserves.

They may have other issues that become a limiting factor. And that's why we're carefully monitoring patients, examining them twice a day, monitoring their lab, their urinalysis, the variables that we can monitor so that we can get a good indication. And we know we do that safely because we've published a safety study where we have actually shown

that if you follow this protocol, you know, everybody that walks in gets to walk out. Right. What do we know and not know about the causal or highly correlative relationship between visceral fat and the cascade of chronic lifestyle diseases that seem to proliferate across the world these days? You know, everybody's worried about obesity and being fat and they think of it often as a cosmetic issue, and it's far from just a cosmetic issue. On your body, there's a type of fat called visceral fat,

it particularly accumulates around the abdomen and the organs, that has hypermetabolic effects. It produces inflammatory products, IOS-6, T&L-Alpha, acute-phase reactive proteins. And these inflammatory components are thought to be responsible for the heart disease, the diabetes, the autoimmune disease, and some forms of cancer. So getting rid of, you can think of visceral fat like a tumor.

So if you had a multi-pound tumor in your body, you would be appropriately alarmed because of its effects and we go to inordinate effects to get rid of those types of tumors. And interestingly enough, let's say you went on a fast and lost 10% of your body well, you might think, well, I lose 10% of my visceral fat, but that's not the case. You may be losing subcutaneous fat or muscle mass. You would lose all those things.

You'd lose muscle, fiber, glycogen, water and fat when you fast. And when you come off the fast, you regain water, fiber, glycogen, and protein, but not fat. When you follow a whole plant food, SOS-free protocol, you'll continue to lose fat. And what's interesting is you don't just lose equal amounts of fat and visceral fat. You will lose disproportionate preferential mobilization of visceral fat. For example, we used a dexas scanner to do some studies. Typical male fast for two weeks loses 20% of their total fat, but 55% of their visceral fat. So the visceral fat is being mobilized, much like tumors are. In other words, if you lose 10% of your body weight, you don't lose 10% of your breast tumor.

You might lose 50% or all of the breast tumor. So how does the body know that it wants to get rid of the breast tumor versus anything else? Because there is mechanisms in the body that preferentially mobilize materials in inverse proportion to their need. And visceral fat shouldn't be there. And as a consequence, the body appears to go in and deal with that first, which is really great, because it's one of the great benefits of fasting, is the preferential mobilization of visceral fat. So people going in might think, I'm here to lose my subcutaneous fat, but the sort of good news and bad news is, maybe not more of the visceral fat,

but that's actually in your best interest. And I suppose there are people who are relatively lean, who nonetheless and unsuspecting to themselves, also have high stores of visceral fat. Is a dexas scan the only or the best way to figure out whether visceral fat is a problem for you if you're not kind of overtly obese? Well, a Dexas scan with specific software that's designed to measure body fat, which is what we used in our studies, we'll do that.

I don't know that it's necessary for people to do that because what's great is if you adopt a whole plant food, SOS-free diet, engage in exercise, get enough sleep, your body's going to take you down to optimum weight. And even if you're at optimum weight, it's going to start the conversion process of mobilizing fat and replacing it with muscle. Next, we have Dr. Walter Longo. Volter is an expert in gerontology and biological science, as well as the author of an extraordinary book called The Longevity Diet, that he then combines with this periodic fasting protocol that he calls the fasting mimicking diet. Yeah, so I would say that, at least in my opinion now,

the more clear evidence for fasting. is in the time rest of the eating domain, you know, so the daily fasting. And I think we discussed it before, but I stick with the 12 hours of fasting and 12 hours of feeding per day. And there's new data indicating that, in fact, maybe the problem of skipping breakfast and doing 16 hours of fasting and skipping breakfast may not be about skipping breakfast, but maybe about the 16 hours, right? So we don't know.

But certainly that's a possibility. And so I think 12 hours is a much safer way to go. And that is effective. Of course, it's 16 hours of fasting every day, but still effective. And so I think Sachin Panda and I will agree on the same 11 to 12 hours daily, time-restitated medium. So, you know, eat for 11 hours or 12 and fast for 13 hours or 12. My understanding, correct me if I'm wrong, is that we still, need more research to really drill down on, you know, the efficacy of these specific windows.

But as of right now, like, it's sort of a safe bet. Like this 12 on, 12 off seems to be the one that kind of works for all purposes, whereas others may have benefits or deleterious impacts that we're still trying to better understand. But as of right now, like, this is, this seems to be the window that is the safest and most predictable in terms of outcomes. Yeah, the easiest, safest, no physician will ever argue that that's a bad idea and really not a single paper saying that this is not safe or that is not effective or at least partially effective in preventing and treating a number of diseases. So yeah, so I think it's a good compromise and I think it's something that everybody should do. And it's also consistent not just with the

epidemiological data, the clinical trials also consistent with what centenarians have been doing for a hundred years or more. So, yeah, so I think that the 12 virus is one. And then I've always argued against the alternate day fasting, the five, two, and not because they're not effective, but again, they're very demanding, right? So not eating every other day. It's going to be something that very few people will ever be able to do. And then you get into the, again, the territory of are their side effects caused by not eating every other day or not eating for two days a week.

So I would say in general, I just don't see a big future, at least not for the general population, right? Maybe some people can do it. We'll see about the efficacy and the safety. But I think that in general, I will say that at least I'm not enthusiastic about either alternative day fasting or. about two days a week of fasting. Then, of course, I'm enthusiastic about the fasting-making diet. So in addition to the time we're still eating daily, then the cycles of the fasting-making diet.

And so this is a plant-based, you know, low-calorie, low-sugar, low-protein, high plant-based fats. The program that we've been testing, we and many universities have asked to test it, have been using it for all kinds of diseases, from diabetes, pre-diabetes, cancer, Alzheimer's, autoimmunities, et cetera, et cetera. For people that didn't listen to our previous episode, the fasting-mimicking diet is essentially a way of eating a calorie-restricted diet

with a very specific, you know, kind of menu, that physiologically mimics what the body would experience had it been just fasting. Correct. Does that, do I say that accurately? Yeah, that's accurate. So then there was first developed in mice, and so we used certain markers to make sure that there is a fasting response equivalent to that of water-only fasting. And then the same was done in people.

And again, we're looking for certain factors in the blood that would show that, in fact, that person has responded as it would if it was not eating at all. Before we move on from time-restricted eating in this 12-hour window, you know, To restrict your eating to a 12-hour period isn't really fasting at all. It's sort of like if you get up at 8 in the morning and you go to bed at 9 or 10 at night, like there's literally only an hour or two in which you're not meant to be eating. Right. Yeah. And this is very important, right? Because if you look at Europe, 60% of people are overweight or obese and the United States is 75%. So we're in a world, I think, and this is not just Europe and the U.S.

It's the whole world with a few exceptions. So it's a very undisciplined world. And so that's very important to also say not just what would be most effective, but will be easiest for people, realistic for people. And so I think that 12 hours, a lot of people say, that's not fasting at all. Well, it is fasting because now on average, and this is work by Panda, people were eating for about 15 hours a day. So, yeah, so people all over the world like to eat for long periods every day. Yeah, so then somebody may start at 6 a.m. and then 11.30 p.m. right and so that you know the three four five hour restriction can make a big difference

and can make a big difference not just in reducing calories because you have less opportunities but also in metabolic switches they may make energy expenditure higher let's say right and and also help people sleep so those are some of the things that that are emerging in mouse and human starts. If people are eating on average 15 hours a day, is there evidence or is anybody kind of looking at the co-founding factor of the impingement on sleep that would be impacting deleterious health outcomes? Because if you're eating for that many hours, you're probably staying up late and not getting, you know, this, the eight hours that you should be getting or seven hours. Yeah, so Sachin Panda published on that and showed that in fact when they reduce the eating

window from 14 hours and above, if I remember correctly, to less than 11 hours, there was an improvement in sleeping quality. So, yes. So that seems to be the case. And I've always been also preaching, not eating for the last three hours before you go to sleep. So that's consistent. That's still the hardest thing for me. It's really difficult for me to go to sleep when I don't have a full stomach or I'm feeling hungry at night. It's just a mountain I still have not mastered. Yeah. And I think it's important, you know, the foundation clinics, we, everybody's got a different method, right? So, so I think it's important. So for example, it's better to eat a light dinner, but I have a very big dinner, right? So because I would be unhappy having a big lunch

and a small dinner. So, so to me it works. For me, it works. And so I think it's okay. I sleep well or pretty well, unless I'm traveling like I just did. But yeah, if you eat late and that's a big deal to someone, but that doesn't really affect you negatively. I don't think there is too much data suggesting that you're going to live 10 years shorter because of that, right? So if you're sleeping well, that's probably okay and okay, compromise. I do notice, though, if I overdo it in terms of volume and hour of the evening, I'll generally wake up around two or three in the morning. And when I was wearing a CGM, I would notice, you know, these spikes and these drops that would occur, you know, over the course of the evening that don't happen when I eat earlier or, like, reduce the volume.

Right. And as you get older, they might get worse, right? So, yeah, so then, yes, the recommendation stays, eat earlier and eat within 12 hours. And then, you know, as somebody is not affected by eating later, it's probably okay. until that becomes a problem, right? So I think that's a good way to look at it. And of course you have to know that it's a problem, but not sleeping well.

Most people will know even without a bracelet. You'll know, yeah, you don't need any kind of like data feedback to know whether you're sleeping more or not, honestly. Who's next? My friend Dr. Michael Greger is next. That's who. Dr. Greger, for those that don't know, he's the man behind the nutrition factor

website, which is an incredibly robust resource for searching for the latest, most up-to-date information on a vast spectrum of medical, nutritional, and lifestyle topics. He is an incredible communicator of nutritional information. I love him to death. So here is a clip between me and Dr. Michael Greger. In the morning, your body has to make glycogen stores for the rest of the day. And instead of just using the energy, if you take the little chains of sugars and starches and make them the glycogen in your muscles and liver, that's an energy intensive process. And then you break it back down to be used later on.

And so the fact that you're using energy to basically get the energy right back is kind of energy intensive process. That's one of the small reasons why eating in the morning when your body's, you know, knows it's got a whole day ahead of it, where you have that glycogen building signal earlier in the day. But, you know, a lot of the chronobiology stuff, we just don't know in terms of what exactly is going on. But everything from body temperature to, you know, testosterone to cortisol levels, everything, you know, goes on this wild daily stock.

And there's seasonal cycles. Weight loss, you know, it's the weight you put on in the kind of winter months for the holidays may have a role. Depends upon how far the earth is from the sun. It's crazy, right, the rotation. So that was, I mean, that, yeah, that just blew me away. So you can put people on 2,000 calories, exact same to 2,000 calories. There's one meal at breakfast or one meal at supper. The Army did this.

And one, and the evening group, same calories, gains weight and the breakfasts, loses weight. That's such a true. It's crazy. Um, and so then that really opened my eye. Okay, well, now anything's possible. And so then really kind of dug deep and, you know, came up just, you know, what are the criteria for, uh, for optimum weight loss like? What would a, what would the optimum weight loss diet look like from kind of from the ground up just because, um, originally how not to diet. It was going to be a chapter on each of the latest diet trends. Um, and just, you know, going through what's the science behind each. But I realized the book is going to be out of date before it even comes out.

I'm part of the U.S. News and World Report, you know, diet panel, you know, and so we get dozens of new diets I've never heard about every year that we have to go through. And I just realized, well, wait a second, that's not the, right, it's like whack-a-mole. So instead, let's just, here's the criteria against which you can look at any future diet and see kind of where it would fall among this range. And then the second half of the book is, regardless of what you eat, there are, you know, kind of tips and tricks. that can, and tweaks that can get you to accelerate loss. Right, like the water thing and focusing on nutritional density and caloric dilution, things

like that. So, yeah, nutritional density, that's really the first part. I mean, that's part of a good weight loss diet. It's a weight loss techniques. But like the water, right, water preloading. So if you drink two cups of water before eating a whopper, you'll gain less weight. I mean, so it's regardless of what you eat. That's the whole second half.

And the hope is people won't just kind of jump to the second half. You know, they'll actually do a safe, sustainable, nutritious, healthy diet. it. In terms of the foods to eat, though, I mean, it harkens back to the previous book, and it kind of orientes around the daily dozen. It ended up. I mean, it ended up that way based on those criteria. Like, we want to be fiber-rich and, you know, low-and-ed sugars and low-ed-ed-fed and, you know, water-rich and all they say, and the same, you know, vegetables and kind of on down the list. And that was the criticism we got from the daily does an app that we released. It's, you know, I had a million downloads.

And there's two camps of criticism. One is, oh, my God, it's too much food. I can't eat at all. And which gets, I'm like, look, too much. Oh, my God, I can't go through all this stuff. You got to make sure you get all of that. Well, I mean, but look, it's aspirational. Like, you know, it's just, and you can, you know, make it a game and see how many you can get.

And if, you know, do good one day, you can try better the next day. And that was actually this, I mean, I'm hoping to, you know, after you checked off those boxes, there's only so much room for pepperoni pizza at the end of the day. I mean, it's this kind of, it's this kind of eat more approach, but it's really hoping to kind of push out some of the less healthy options. But the other group of criticisms came in, it says, not enough calories. It's like, look, I'm training. There's no way I'm getting enough calories eating this kind of stuff. I was like, well, look, this is the minimum. You can eat more food.

I'm not saying this is all you can eat. This is, I just want people to hit this. But then I realized, well, wait a second, oh, too much food, too few calories. That sounds like a good weight loss. And the fact that these are some of the healthiest foods on the planet is a good bonus as well. Right. Did you come across some interesting research on intermittent fasting? Because that seems to be the thing that a lot of people are talking about and thinking about and practicing right now.

And I've had a couple people on the podcast speak to it. That's the biggest chapter is the fasting chapter. So much information out. I remember looking to fasting because there's been a, a, you know, common interest for years, people asked me about it. And any time, I only want to say, I don't know once ever, even if it's the most esoteric question in the world, I want to, the next time someone asks me that, I'm going to know an answer to it.

And so people can ask me about fasting, and there just was no data. And so that's why, if there's, if there's a condition or food that you can't find a NutritionFacts.org, the number one reason is probably because there's just no good data out there. I mean, it's not like, you know, I'm trying to ignore it. It's just like we don't know. And so, but just in the last few years have been an explosion of research into intermittent fasting, water only fasting, you know, 5-2, 25-5, time-restricted feeding, all these. And so, tremendous literature.

And what's interesting about the intermittent fasting literature? Well, so in terms of intermittent fasting, no benefit in terms of compliance or lean mass conservation or weight loss compared to continuous chloric restriction. and the longest, largest studies today shows increasing cholesterol for people that have the same caloric restriction doing alternate day modified fasting. And so I would encourage people not to do it or at least get their cholesterol checked. But the time-restricted feeding,

where you try to narrow your eating window to 12 hours or less, and so you're fasting at least half the day, this was one of the research areas where there was diametrically opposed. Some studies show it's great for you. Other studies show it's terrible for you. It has all these negative metabolic consequences. And so it was my job to like, what is going on here?

And it turns out it's timing. Early versus late. So when you break the fast. So your window. Right. So if your window is late, you get the negative biological consequences of eating at night and shifting your calories, towards later in the day.

And so people that skip breakfast had these negative metabolic effects of time-restricted feeding, whereas people that did early time-restrictive feeding not only got the chronological benefits of shifting their calories towards the beginning of the day, they also got the time-restricted feeding benefits. And so that is really the, that's one of the things in the book that actually changed the way my family aids. Yeah, you just rocked me with that, because I do it where I eat at night. And I don't eat during the day.

If you miss any meal, it should be, it should be supper and not breakfast. Right. Breakfast is called break fast for a reason. Yeah. I mean, and that actually may be one of the reason that the seven-day adventists vegetarians live, the longest living population in the world, right? Okinawa Japanese was the number two, and they're done. Now they're eating KFC.

There's really only one blue zone that continues to this day. It's in Loma Linda, California, the seven-day Adventist of Vegetarians, longest living formerly studied population in the world. But one of the reasons may be because they practice this early time restricted feeding, often skipping supper. The teachings of the church are like two meals a day and make lunch, the biggest meal a day. It hasn't been put to the test, but given all this short-term data,

that's super interesting. That may be, I don't know. That'll be the next book, How Not to Age. I'll look deep into that. Good Lord, the holiday season. I can't believe it, but once again, it's here a time of year that I tend to find overwhelming because I'm a creature of routines and I don't like my routines being disrupted. But that's just the deal with holidays, all the travel, the family gatherings, eating patterns that go sideways.

I think it's okay to admit that it can all be a little bit too much at times. To combat the chaos, I try to double. down on portable routines that work and don't demand that much time. And at the top of that list is AG1 NextGen, who's sponsoring this episode. It is a daily health drink that combines your multivitamin, pre-and-probiotics, superfoods, and antioxidants into one simple green scoop that's clinically shown to support gut health and fill in common nutrient gaps. In order to stick, routines need to be simple. So I keep it that way. Just cold water, a scoop of AG1, done, one solid health decision just locked in before the day gets away from me. The next gen formula has

five probiotic strains working with prebiotics to support digestion, which matters when your eating routine gets thrown out the window. And with more people getting sick this time of year, having that broad spectrum of vitamins, minerals, and antioxidants feels like the smart play. Plus, Now there are four flavor options, including original, citrus, berry, and tropical. So there's something for everyone. Head to drinkag1.com slash richroll to claim your free welcome kit. You'll get a sample pack of all four flavors, a bottle of vitamin D3K2, and a shaker bottle. That's drinkag1.com slash rich roll to give AG1 a try today.

We are brought to you today by the wonderful folks. at Go Brewing. A few years ago, there was this guy, his name's Joe Chura, and he called me up out of the blue and asked if I would speak at this event that he was hosting in Illinois called Go, which turned out to be this incredibly memorable weekend for me and for all of the attendees because it was all about how to take inspired action. Joe and I connected, but, you know, life moved on. That was many years ago.

Then a couple years back when I was at Jesse Isler's Running Man event in Georgia, I'm walking the grounds when I see Joe. I was surprised to see him again, of course, sort of different context, but also surprised because he had actually taken inspired action. I shouldn't have been surprised knowing Joe, but I guess I was in the moment. What he did was he took this idea of go and he turned it into the hottest new brand in non-alcoholic beer called, of course, go brewing. What sets go brewing apart is their refusal to cut corners. Everything is handcrafted from scratch and small batches. This commitment to quality has propelled go brewing into one of America's fastest growing breweries, now in over 5,000 locations across 20 states. Their salty AF chelotta claimed the untapped, number one non-alcoholic logger spot in America.

They're constantly dropping all these bold new flavors, double-up. IPAs, incredible sours, all without added sugars or any artificial nonsense. A non-alcoholic revolution isn't coming. It's here, people. And I'm really honored to be championing it with Joe. So get on board by getting with Go, by going to gobrewing.com. We're going to use the code Richroll for 15% off your first purchase. That's gobrewing.com code richroll.

You probably know that Rivian makes all-electric trucks and SUVs, make that the best all-electric trucks and SUVs. But did you know that Rivians actually improve over time through software updates? Through regular over-the-air updates, the technology keeps evolving. New features, improved performance, additional safety features. So your vehicle actually becomes more capable the longer you own it. And knowing RJ, Rivian CEO, I can tell you firsthand that this is a guy who is not into tech for tech's sake. Every feature is designed for actual real-world situations, like pet comfort, maintaining cabin temperature so your dog stays comfortable if you need to step away briefly, adaptive lighting that responds to the environment, plus warning systems and highway assist that monitor the road alongside you, making the driving experience safer. and more enjoyable. I'm so proud to partner with Rivian. They're just the best, everything you want

out of a vehicle, of course, but also because of their ethos, which is making the world a better place, providing what you need to make the most of life's adventures and using technology to do it. So you're prepared for whatever comes next and have everything you need for every adventure you can imagine. Okay, once again, here's me and Alan Goldhammer. If somebody has anorexia nervosa or if somebody is, you know, on the other side of chemotherapy where they're maintaining their weight is an issue, I would suspect that that's probably not a great candidate.

What about somebody who's coming in and they're on a battery of medications? You would have to wean them off of that, I would presume, on some level, before they could undergo this. Yeah, you know, there's most medications, you do not water fast while you're taking medications, those have to be weaned down beforehand. But we have physicians that are experts at helping people unwind the consequences

of their medical treatment. And most medications, interestingly enough, the day you change the diet, you have to begin changing the medication profile. Right. Because the medications are treating the diet. Most people are being treated that is medicated for their diet

when you change their diet, the need for medication dramatically response. You have to reduce the blood pressure medication. You start crashing these patients because they're not going to be hypertensive once you eliminate the reasons why they're hypertensive. And they're not going to be needing the same level of medication once you normalize their dietary intake as far as their diabetes or getting them off their pain medication. Once they don't have the pain, they don't need to be on all that oxy

because now the pain is being reduced because the inflammation is reduced because of the dietary change and then ultimately the fasting. So that's one of the reasons why fasting does need to be done in a controlled medically supervised setting. It's not the kind of thing that you do long-term fasting at home. At home, right. So you do that in a controlled setting where there's been a proper history, exam, lab, and daily monitoring. So we're seeing each of these patients twice a day, and that's how we're able to ensure that this is a safe and effective experience. So they may withdraw their medication with careful feeding, initiate the fasting, normalize the condition.

And then after we're done, most of the time there's no need for medication. because they've gone from 220 over 120 cap that on five meds to being 120 over 70 off medication. And so there's no reason for anybody to want to put them back on drugs that cause chronic cough, fatigue, impotence and premature death if the condition's actually normalized. Now, the side problem is you have to keep on the healthy diet and lifestyle. Yeah.

Because you're not curing anything. You're just managing it. But you've rebooted this operating system and wiped the slate clean so you can build a new foundation. It's very much like treating a, you know, when your computer becomes corrupted and you don't know exactly what's wrong, but you turn the thing off, you turn it on,

you can't explain, but now it's working. Right. And it seems to be that way. And we're trying to figure out exactly what those changes are that's occurring in fasting. I know the pharmaceutical interview is very interested in what's happening because they want to come up with a word of called fasting mimicking drugs.

They want drugs that'll do just what fasting does to you, but without that nasty fasting, that's something that they can sell in a pill. Yeah. So a lot of the research, of interest is trying to figure out what exactly is it that's happening and fasting that's allowing the body to get well

so that we can try to reproduce that without having to go through the process. Right, I mean, that's my next series of questions. Like, does it have to be water only? What is it about that deprivation protocol that is so special, you know, physiologically that is causing this cascade of positive impacts? Like, what would happen if you were eating a little bit?

I mean, I know Longo, has his fasting mimicking protocol where he is allowing people to eat something like, I don't know, 600 calories a day, and he's able to reap some of the benefits of what you're experiencing without having to go on a complete water fast, but what is happening to the body

when you're depriving it of food in such a, you know, comprehensive way? Yeah, the intermittent fasting protocols are just that fasting mimicking diets or fasting-making programs, trying to reproduce some of the changes that we know occur, with fasting without the risk profile

or the complications of long-term water-only fasting. And I think they can be very effective as they've demonstrated. However, long-term water-only fasting has a much more profound impact on these mechanisms that are associated with fasting. For example, just the most obvious is weight loss. You know, when you're water fasting,

you're gonna lose an average of a pound a day. Now, some people say, well, you lose weight but then you gain it back afterwards. Now, interesting, we've done a study, We have now recently acquired a Hologics Dexas scanner with the new software that allows you to do a whole body detail composition. It looks not just a percent body fat,

but how much visceral fat there is. And we have a paper that'll be coming out that looks at the fact that, yes, you lose a bunch of weight fasting and you regain some weight after fasting, but it turns out the weight you regain after fasting when you're eating a whole plant food diet is exclusively water, fiber, glycogen, and protein.

There is no fat. In fact, the fat profile continues to drop during refeating. even though the scale weight obviously goes up as you rehydrate, put some fiber back into the gut. Right, as long as you adopt the whole plant food healthy, you know, dietary style. But the point that the old wives tale was, well, you lose fat and you just gain the fat right back.

Well, that might be true if you go back to eating greasy, fatty, slimy, dead decaying, flesh processed foods, but that's not what's happening in these patients that we're re-feeding appropriately. And so weight goes up, but the weight that goes up is re-alimenting your glycogen stores and muscle stores, which is really exciting. So preferentially, not just do you lose fat,

but you preferentially lose visceral fat, that the ratio of visceral fat to adipose tissue loss is 3.0. In other words, there's a significant preferential mobilization of this very type of fat that we think is most compromising to health, the fat, the abdominal fat, the fat that stores are in the organs. So now we have what may turn out to be an effective strategy of specifically mobilizing visceral fat. Now, we've done some preliminary work.

We're actually enrolling patients in a study starting in August, looking specifically at body composition changes long term with follow-up. So, you know, we'll be able to speak more definitively about it by the end of the year. There's also a process that happens in water fasting that you don't see as profoundly influenced in juice diets or modified diets. And that's naturesis. There's a selective mobilization, elimination of excess sodium from the body and water fasting. It happens right away.

It's very powerful, more powerful than, say, taking hydrochlorthiazide or a diet and it's responsible for the big dump in fluids that happens initially on fasting that drops blood pressure so dramatically, gets rid of the congestive heart failure symptoms that eliminates some of the arthritic symptoms and joint swelling and the non-healing wounds and this body is selectively getting rid of this excess sodium that's accumulated that the body's having to deal with because of the dietary choices. The traditional justification for fasting was the idea of detoxification. This idea that there's toxins in the body and now we need.

No, that's true. That's controversial. Well, it's actually not controversial in the sense that you can take a fat bopsie of a human and break it down. And you'll find there's hundreds of different chemicals there at various concentrations, PCB, dioxin, pesticide residues, mercury.

And the only thing that's controversial is say, oh, well, it doesn't matter. Well, it turns out it does matter. It just matters at different thresholds to different people. And so this idea of rapidly mobilizing toxins during fasting has been so well accepted by some that they say that's the reason not to fast. The body would rapidly mobilize these fat-soluble nutrients too quickly,

and your body wouldn't know what it's doing, and it would overload your system. Unless you take their proprietary products, then apparently it's okay. But what our experience has been that there is a rapid detoxification. We know that there's some studies looking at, they've even done total body load measurements

before and after fasting and showed that PCB levels would drop. Clinically. So you're not taking any chemicals into your body and you're allowing the liver and the kidneys to just do what they do, right? But it's more than just what you would calculate through burning 2,000 calories of internal fluids.

There's a selective and rapid mobilization. For example, with tumors, let's say you have a breast tumor and you lose 10% of your body weight. You would assume that you'd probably lose 10% of your tumor weight. But what happens in the, for example, in lymphoma, you lose 100% of the tumor. So the body's preferentially mobilizing some nutrient stores versus others, and it seems to be able to do that

in inverse proportion of the value of those tissues to the body. So it's getting the visceral fat, which we think isn't probably healthful fat, before it's mobilizing adipose fat or certainly before it's getting to critical nerve tissues and other things that are preserved. The body has an intelligence where it's unwinding itself. And what we're suggesting is it appears

that both endogenous and exogenous toxins are preferentially mobilized in water-only fasting at a much more powerful rate than the Arcea when you're going on a health. diet and lifestyle. And that may be a way, a justification for trying to facilitate and speed this process. There's also the effect on enzymatic induction. Think about athletes.

One of the things of being a trained athlete is you induce, for example, glyconealytic enzyme systems, you get better at mobilizing glycogen stores. And, you know, this whole business of carb loading and trying to increase glycogen storage so you have more to pull on so that you don't hit the wall so quickly when you're running that marathon or whatever, you get through that process. that is induced with persistent exercise. The same enzymatic production for glycogen, for politic enzymes, for protein,

for gluconeogenesis enzyme systems is induced during fasting because you have to mobilize all your glycogen stores. You're emptying the chamber, you're taking that battery and draining it all the way down. And it suggested that not only do you induce improved efficiency of enzyme systems, but they persist after fasting, which is just like you get better and better at exercising

every time you do it, you get better and better at fasting every time you do it, which is perhaps one of the justifications for intermittent fasting. If you fast 16 hours every day and you limit your feeding window to an eight-hour window, you may be inducing some changes in that, even that limited fast, that 16-hour fast, day after, day after week after month, cumulatively that may have a very profound effect on body physiology. And that's one of the suggestions that's being made by those advocating intermittent fasting or short periods of fasting that cumulatively may be. Well, when you do a long-term fast, this is a very important.

a huge impact. And now this is some of the stuff we're working with people like Luigi Fontana from Washington University where they're looking at changes in microbiome, changes in whole body composition, changes in these various exotic biomarkers. And what happens in short-term and long-term fasting, nobody knows yet because we're really the only people

doing and monitoring long-term water only fasting in its physiological effects. So this is all virgin data and very exciting. Once again, this is me. and Dr. Volter Longo. With this understanding the kind of basic tenets of what comprises a diet that promotes longevity based on this research, where does fasting come in?

Like, what is the relationship between these dietary pillars and these protocols around fasting or fasting mimicking? So I think there are two, I always look look first at the safety factor, right? So what is it that we don't know if it's safe or not? And then I just exclude them until we have many decades, I think, of evidence. But if you look at safety and efficacy both,

I think you come up with 12 hours every day as being very solid. I always say I've never seen a study showing that if you do 12 hours of fasting a day, you're gonna have a problem. When you get to 16, and as we, I think already discussed before, you get to 16 hours,

get to skip, breakfast keeping, I see meta-analysis, not just studies, but studies of all studies showing increased mortality, reduce lifespan. Now, what is the reason for it? We don't know. Probably there are double-edged swords, right? So for example, ketone bodies,

maybe fatty acids, ketone bodies are going both ways, right? They're helping you on one side and they're hurting you on the other side. But so 12 hours, very solid. And they work by Sachin Panda and everything else is supportive of it. And then I would say probably people, we eat all the time. And so in the thousands of years ago, as humans evolved, we evolved probably insulin resistance as a way to survive the winters, right? So you eat as much as you can during the summer or whenever

food is available, you become diabetic, essentially, pre-diabetic or diabetic. You put everything away and then the winter comes or some period where there is no food and then you become insulin sensitive again. So I think what happens now is everybody is insulin resistant all the time or somewhat insulin resistant all the time because the winter never comes. And that's where this prolonged, not just 16 hours of fasting, but say five days, that's what we've been working and that's where they come in. There seems to be pretty clear. Now we have three more clinical trial that we are about to publish, very clear that they switch you into an insulin sensitive mode. So, and also they switch you into a long-term anti-aging mode. So for example,

Leptin, and now this is about four clinical trials that we've done, Leptin stays low for a long time after you return to normal diet. IGF1, the central growth factor pro-aging, it stays down for months. So we, in the first trial, we showed that after three months from the end, IGF1 was still lowered. Yeah. So then I think that there is on one side insulin sensitization. So the system now goes into a fat utilization mode versus building. And the system also goes into a maintenance mode. So now I'm just going to protect myself as much as possible, ages slowly as possible, waiting for the next wave of lots of food where maybe I can focus on reproducing.

Right. So with this understanding that there is no winter, the winter is not coming, and everybody's kind of hurtling towards some degree of being pre-diabetic because of the Western way of eating, how malleable is that? Like if somebody has been in that pre-diabetic state or in a,

situation where they lack insulin sensitivity for a prolonged period of time, what is your sense of how one can repair that? Like if, obviously, if you're, if you've just arrived in that situation, it's probably gonna be easier for you through fasting and these other protocols to bounce back and create some insulin sensitivity,

but if you've been in that state for a decade, does it become more difficult or can you still repair it? You can still repair it. We just finished a trial on diabetes in Holland, 100 patients. And I mean, I cannot tell you the results, but I can tell you that even if you're diabetic, you're obese, you got, you've been taking medicine for years and years and years, no problem.

We can bring it back. We cannot bring it back in everybody, but I would say the great majority of people, you have the team, the physician, the dietitian, and you have to have the method. So, and in that trial, it was just fasting mimicking diet, no longevity diet.

Yeah. In the clinic, we do both, right? But again, we don't push you to 1,500 calories if you had 2,500 calories. We push you to keep the calories maybe just a little bit lower. You maybe go from 2,500 to 2,300, and then we work on the NutriTech, what I call Nutri Technology. We work on making it easier for you to lose weight rather than starving you for a year, hoping that you stay like that for the rest of your life, which you're never going to do. So in the four years since we sat down, there's been quite an explosion of interest in fasting. It's gone from this kind of curious endeavor into something that has truly gotten mainstream attention. A lot of discussion about different ways of fasting and many different, as you mentioned, different types of thinking about fasting, intermittent fasting,

alternate day fasting, time restricted eating, fasting, mimicking. Maybe it would be worth kind of just talking about fasting in general and the validity of these various protocols and why you feel so strongly that the fasting, mimicking approach is optimal. Yes, so alternate day fasting, it's an extension of the 16 hours, let's say, right?

So there is no doubt that if you do 16 hours of fasting every day or you don't eat every other day, you're gonna get a lot of metabolic effects. The problem and the question is now that we have meta-analysis showing that if you skip breakfast, you live shorter and you have more cardiovascular disease and probably more cancer, et cetera, et cetera, is there some issue with these ketone bodies, with this fatty acids, etc., etc. So no arguing with the metabolic effects short term, but a big problem with long-term, right? So I would say, don't do it, right? Certainly don't skip breakfast. what we're starting a trial is now what happens potentially if you skip lunch. So keep the 12 hours and then skip lunch. That's what I've been doing for 20 years.

But now we're gonna finally get to test it. We don't know, but let's see. And so that's alternate day fasting or let's say 16.8. Then you have, let's say fight two, right? That's another popular one. Well, what happens if you do two days a week of, fasting or semi-fasting. Well, we don't know, right?

Because there is not very many studies, there's a few, it looks promising. The problem I see with that is most people have a difficult time, I say, going from four coffees a day or three coffees a day to two coffees a day. Half of the people that used to smoke are still smoking, even though we know that it kills you and it says that on the package.

So is that gonna really be? more than a small, small percentage of the population. So even if we show that it was effective, who's going to do that, right? I mean, I don't know. Personally, I don't know anybody that would go two days a week without, you know, eating anything, right? I don't know, a single person. But that doesn't mean it could not be effective,

and that doesn't mean there are not people that could do it long term. So I'm not arguing that, you know, with the effectiveness, and I'm not arguing that some people could do it. I will say the great majority of the people are not going to do it. And then I would say, we even don't know what will happen long term. So we got to go with things that are more realistic, less invasive. And that's where the fasting making diet comes in. And this is, again, 30 years of work since the world for years, right?

So it's not an idea that I say, oh, I see a few patients in my clinic. They're doing so well with these five days. I'm just going to do that, as it happened for many very popular diets in the past. So this was 30 years of building, building, building, from all these pillars, right? And then you get to a point where you say, this looks very promising. Like, what if we made people do this three times a year for five days, four times maybe? And if you have diabetes, in the diabetes trial, we did one cycle a month for 12 months. But most people did not do 12 cycles.

Some people did two, some people did six, some people did eight, and some people did 12. So now we're going to analyze the data and we'll be able to tell, you know, know, who is doing well. But overall, they all did well. So, so I think that three, two to four times a year, say some people may even last, somebody like you probably, you know, a couple times a year, it'd be more than sufficient. But for most people, I say three to four times a year, that seems to be very realistic. It's clearly showing this long-term efficacy. It doesn't, it allows for FDA-like, it doesn't have to be. FTA, but FTA-A-like procedures where you can say, hey, this was tested. That's exactly the way

you should test it, and everybody can test it. Everybody can grab it. So now we have 30 clinical trials running. Some of them, you know, we help them with. Some of them people just get it and they do their own trial. So that's the way it should be. Allow everybody to test it. And let's see, right? Eventually, we're going to see these are millions of people and we're going to see the reports from it. And I really think that that's slow. moving in the toolkit of physicians on one side for lots of diseases, but it's also moving in the toolkit of the people that are paying attention and that they want something there is being clinically tested.

And just because we haven't defined it, essentially what you're saying is this is a five-day protocol where we provide you through pro-lon this meal delivery meal kit situation. and when you eat this way, you're mimicking your biological response to fasting without being overly calorically deprived. Yeah, I cannot talk about products, you know, because I'm prohibited from doing it. So in the FMD, you know, for example, for cancer,

it's four days. It's very different from the one for normal people, which is five days, as you just mentioned. And we have one for autoimmunities is seven days. We have one for Alzheimer. We're testing now in Italy, which is five days, but then it has a daily supplement for the in-between.

So it's really about nutrient technology, but yes, the fasting immune diet, let's say it goes from four to seven days in most cases, plus or minus what could be supplements. For example, in the Alzheimer, we were worried about people losing weight, and some people did lose weight. And so that's why we give them a supplement

between the 25 days between one cycle and the next of the fasting immune diet. We also, because they're so old, let's say 75, 80, 85 years old, we give them a higher calorie fasting immune diet, right? So yeah, so we adjust based on the age, on the disease, and eventually, I think there might be adjustments also. For example, now we're developing a non-inflammatory one.

Lots of people with inflammatory bowel disease, is a colitis, gastrointestinal problems. We're developing something that is non-allergenic, non-inflammatory, which I think it's going to be very important for, and we, I mean the university. I don't mean, I'm not talking about company. So, yeah, I think that's certainly, I'll be very surprised if this doesn't move into more of a mainstream

and start competing with the drugs, right? I mean, that's what we're trying to say. like, let's start thinking about repairing systems, you know, based on all the things that we discuss and not just putting a band-aid on it. You have diabetes, drug number one, then you escalate the drug number two. Then you get cardiovascular disease. You have two more drugs there. And this is what happens. It's really criminal. I think, you know, in the United States, in Europe, all over the world, as, you know, I call it unconspirate conspiracy, right? So everybody is going along with the system

and you have a lot of bad food and a lot of drugs that people take and the whole system is profiting from it, but people, the average 45 year old now, it's got two chronic conditions in the United States. And so by the time you get to 55, 60, you probably have about three chronic conditions taking lots of drugs, right?

So you were saying, what is the system, not to just block that, but to bring you back to a healthy status. And it used to be ideas. Now we see in the clinical trials, but we also see it in the foundation clinics where we follow lots of people. So we're very confident that this can work,

but it's not gonna work unless you have the team that I was discussing earlier, the doctor, the dietitian, and the knowledge, and probably also the molecular biologists, right? When you get to complex, So we get people at the clinic all the time, and they have very complicated problems, right? And so you have a very busy physician, even our own, right?

And you have a very busy dietitian. And I think that the molecular biologist specialized in whatever field could be the key person, right? So the strategist, like I am, right? So this person comes in, works with the physician and works with the dietitian to strategize. How do I solve the problem? This person has got three chronic conditions.

Where do they come from? And how do I solve them without creating another problem, right? I don't know about you, but I have this tendency to wake up overwhelmed before the day even begins, berating myself with all the things that I should have done better and should be doing now. But when the shoulds pile up, calm is the tool I reach for to release stress and find space to breathe, even on the busiest days. What keeps me coming back is the variety. Some days, it's a meditation to clear my head. Other days, it's expert-led talks. And I really love the sleep

stories. They've become this essential for winding down. But basically, every program on Calm is this reset to ground me in the moment, remind me of what's most important. And let's face it, absolve me of the shoulds. Calm is the number one. for sleep and meditation, and it's here to help you feel better, guided meditations to boost focus, sleep meditations to drift off naturally, grounding exercises to reset, and expert-led talks to help with relationships and more. Calm has an exclusive offer just for listeners of our show. Get 40% off a Calm premium subscription at Calm.com slash Richroll. Go to C-A-L-M-com slash Richroll for 40% off unlimited access to calm's entire library com.com slash rich roll this podcast is brought to you by

square space when it comes to the infinite scroll of our digital world there's an important distinction i like to draw which is that there is a difference between consuming content mindlessly and on the other hand, using our computers with creativity and intention as a tool to build something meaningful, whether that's a coaching practice, for example, a store or a portfolio for your photography. What you need and deserve is a high quality, highly designed platform that reflects your personality without compromising functionality. And now Squarespace is even more powerful courtesy of something they call Blueprint AI, which asks you to answer a few questions about your goals and your style. And then it generates this completely custom website that looks

professionally crafted without any tech skills on your part even nominally required. Their analytics show you what's actually working, where your audience comes from, what content resonates, real data instead of guessing. So head on over to Squarespace.com slash richroll save 10% off your first purchase of a website or domain using the code ritual. Rounding out our incredible lineup is Dr. Allen Goldhammer, a true pioneer in the field of medically supervised water-only fasting. Walter Longo has 10,000 offices making prolon available. Many of those doctors might be supportive. then once a doctor has one patient and they have success, all of a sudden, we're seeing all

kinds of their patients. Now, again, some people are better candidates for inpatient care. Some people are fine for outpatient care. And one of the benefits of the free consult that I do with people is to help them, are they a candidate for fasting? Are they a candidate for home fasting? If so, that we can hook them up with a doctor that provides those services, if they really need to do it inpatient, they can come to the center, they can go to the other places that

do this kind of thing. Or maybe what they need to do is just a doctor. the diet and lifestyle principle long enough to where then they become a good candidate, you know, for those changes. So we're trying to make sure that whoever does it, does it intelligently and does it safely. Not everybody's going to follow our advice, but at least we can feel good that we've done our best to make the educational services available to everybody, to make the services available to people at home that are good candidates for that. And we have a facility for people that are better candidates to come

inpatient. Who isn't a good candidate for inpatient? So a person that's on medications that you can't safely withdraw. For example, if you've had a recent pulmonary embolism, cardiac arrest, you have atrial fibrillation and you're on an anticoagulant therapy medication, you don't just stop those drugs because it can induce a stroke. So it's very careful protocol to withdraw those meds and you don't fast on those medications because they can become, like many medications, greatly potentiated during fasting. They will work differently in the physiology of fasting than they are in the physiology of feeding. And so fasting medications don't go together. There are a few exceptions. Sometimes we'll allow some hormone replacement therapies like thyroid replacement

therapy. You still have to modify the dose and monitor it. But it's not an absolute barrier. But we discuss that in detail and can fasting save your life. We talk about who's a candidate, who's not a candidate, you know, what has to happen in terms of medication. But it's basically you have to get people stable off meds. You have to have people that have a condition that we believe are likely to respond

to fasting. We don't want to be doing experiments on people, particularly remotely, unless we kind of know what their condition is and what symptoms they're likely to experience so we can educate them about that. You need to have a person that's willing to try to eat healthfully after fasting. It's no good to do a fast and then go on some crap diet and get terrible symptoms and then blame fasting. I don't know interested in that. We're trying to actually get a good net long-term result. And that means we have to limit working with people that are, you know, willing to try to do these things. Not everybody's going to be perfect. A lot of people are going to struggle.

But if they aren't going to make a good faith effort, it's probably not the best thing to do. They should be doing some other kind of program that isn't, you know, going to put them at risk. How do you make that determination during the intake process to gauge willingness? Well, first of all, they filled out a detailed medical questionnaire. So I have their medical history that I've reviewed before I've talked to them. And we asked those questions in the questionnaire to gauge where they are. And also, I've interviewed tens of thousands of people. I mean, essentially, that's what I do is I talk to people on the phone about their specific issues

and try to direct them in the right place. And I've been doing it for 40 years. I've got a pretty good idea who's likely to behave and who's not going to behave and who's a good candidate and who's not. And, you know, witness that everybody that's walked into the center, are 25,000 people now for fasting, probably close to 40,000 people overall. Everybody that's walked in is walked out. So we're pretty good at making sure we don't bring in people that are not good candidates. Not everybody has an uneventful stay.

There are patients that have serious side effects that we have to deal with. Occasionally we'll have to hospitalize a patient. If they get into an issue, we'll have to get diagnostics done, whatever. But as the safety studies show, this is a comparative. safe process when it's done according to protocol. What is your personal fasting practice? I fast every day. And it's-

So you never eat. I fast every day for 16 hours. Or as close to 16 hours as I can manage. You're on a 65-year fast. I fast every year. So you do a 16, 16-hour fast every day. Every day. So you eat between the hours of what and what?

Well, I usually have, depending on which morning it is, because I play basketball in the mornings. So depending how long the basketball goes, I'm eating between 8 and 9 in the morning. I'm not eating after 5, 5.30, you know, at night. So I have a window in there of feeding. And then I don't have anything before or, you know, after dinner. So I do that every day. I fast once a year. I fast for a week.

If I'm doing okay, no symptoms, then I'll stop it. If I have symptoms, I'll go however long it takes to resolve the symptoms. I don't like fasting. You have to rest when you fast. You can't play basketball. It's really annoying. My wife, Dr. Morano, is really strict about it because I fast. She's my supervisor when I fast and she won't let me on my computer.

That's the hardest part of all. I let the patients have their computer. What do you do all day? Oh, I just lay around and meditate and rest and it's awful. But, you know, I don't have symptoms, which is interesting because I've done this. I mean, I've, you know, I never smoked, never had a drink. I never, you know, I've been a vegetarian since I'm 16 years old. So I've not had the exposure.

So there's not a lot, I don't use medications, I don't use drugs. So the fast itself is boring. Nothing happens in terms of untoward symptoms, but you still have to arrest. And for me, that's the big challenge, is slowing down. And I do, I find it some of the most beneficial intervention I do is fasting, but it's not pleasurable. Sure. And your blood work is, yeah, it's going to be. Your blood work's good.

My blood work's great, my blood pressure is great. You know, but again, I started as a kid, so you'd expect it to be. You've been doing this a long time. It's so interesting. It seems so severe and radical to undergo these things, but so many people, thousands and thousands of people, have benefited from what you're doing.

You practice it yourself. What is radical, though? Radical is radicus. It means root or cause. That's the fundamental. thing we're doing is we're actually getting to the reason people have these problems. We spend all of our time and money treating the leading causes of death, heart disease, cancer, stroke, diabetes, instead of the leading cause of death, we don't deal with the actual causes

of death, which is smoking, drinking, eating animal foods and highly processed refined carbohydrates. If we put our time and energy treating the actual causes of death instead of the leading causes of death, we'd probably be a lot better off. The reason isn't going away. We talked about the statistics earlier. They're quite dire, but I don't see an eradication of highly palatable ultra-processed foods disappearing from our food environment anytime soon. If anything, it just continues to metastasize and people are getting more and more sick and

fatter and fatter. It doesn't appear to be headed in a great direction, which demands these types of intervention. to save people's lives and get them on a different track. What is your prescription for the world? Like, how are we going to, as a collective, conquer this challenge that we have in terms of our food system to create something better? I mean, honestly, for the sake of humanity.

Yeah, you know, to me, if I look at humanity as a whole, it would be very stressful and I don't like stress. So what I do is instead, I look at the fact that I'm going to do everything I can do, to influence the one or one and a half or two percent of the population that are hungry for information willing to make these changes and hope that if we can get those people optimizing their health, that they'll set a good example and the 100th monkey effect will kick in and maybe it'll have some downstream effect, maybe not in this generation, but in future generations.

So I'm not going to try to take on the world as a whole. I only want to work with the highly motivated people that are willing to do what it takes to actually get and stay healthy and prove that this is an approach that can help them, you know, spend the last 20 years of their life healthy and happy. And to kind of end this, maybe, you know, look to camera and say, what is the message that you want the person who's listening to this are watching to understand? Maybe that person has their own health challenges. They're trying to figure out what to do about it. They're a little bit scared or intimidated by what you shared and aren't really, you know, sure-footed about how to take that first step or where to begin.

Well, health results from healthful living. So if you want to be healthy, you've got to pay the price and live healthfully. That means diet. Our particular version is a whole plant food, SOS, free diet. Other people have different opinions, but a healthy diet, hopefully, regular exercise within your capacity. Abundant sleep, so developing the ability to get to sleep in a cool, dark, and quiet place, and maintain good sleep hygiene. Fast every day for 12 to 16 hours.

Fast occasionally as appropriate. and try to figure out strategies to minimize stress, perhaps by only focusing on the things you can do something about and not worrying about the things that you have no potential to control. There you have it. I really hope you enjoyed these highlights. And in closing, I just want to say that I'm genuinely grateful for all the guests who share their wisdom. And also for you, our listeners, our viewers, without whom this show just wouldn't be possible. So thank you. you. If any of these snippets piqued your interest, I encourage you to watch the full episodes, links to which you can find in the show notes on the episode page of richwall.com, as well as

in the YouTube description. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you.