The Science of Everything Podcast - Episode 89: The Atmosphere
Episode Date: November 23, 2017An overview of the composition and layers of the Earth's atmosphere, including a discussion of the exosphere, thermosphere, mesosphere, stratosphere, and troposphere. I also discuss the ozone layer an...d ozone depletion, the Karman line which marks the boundary of space, and the ionosphere. Recommended pre-listening is Episode 42: Gases and Gas Laws.
Transcript
Discussion (0)
You're listening to The Science of Everything podcast, episode 89, The Atmosphere.
I'm your host, James Fodor.
In this episode, we're going to talk about Earth's atmosphere, particularly focusing on the composition,
we'll look at the different atmospheric layers, and we'll also talk a bit about the Karmann line,
the ozone layer, and the ionosphere.
So to give you a general overview of the Earth's atmosphere and some of its major properties.
No specific recommended pre-listening for this episode, although this is part of a series.
series of connected episodes, which is leading up to talking about the science of climate change.
So the previous two episodes, cartography and earth seasons and geography of planet Earth may be relevant.
Also, a few points from episode 42 gases and gas laws may be pertinent as well, but mostly this is
standalone.
The atmosphere refers to the envelope of gases that surrounds the planet Earth.
And the composition of Earth's atmosphere consists mostly of nitrogen.
78%. Now, that's contrary to what most people, I think, naively think, which is that oxygen is the
main component of Earth's atmosphere. Oxygen is actually only the second largest component,
21%, this is by volume. And the third largest component is argon, which is an inert gas that
doesn't really react with anything. It's a noble gas, so we don't hear about it very often.
The fourth most common component by volume of the Earth's atmosphere is carbon dioxide, and it's been
increasing in concentration in recent years, which we'll talk about when we get to discussing
the science of climate change. Now, I should also say that these figures, 70% nitrogen, 21%
oxygen, 1% argon, and trace other gases, are for dry air because the atmosphere, varying at different
levels of altitude in the atmosphere, but it contains significant portions of water vapor.
So water vapor accounts for about one quarter of 1% of the atmosphere by mass, and by volume it can comprise quite variable portions depending on temperature and altitude and region of the Earth's surface, depending on the climate and so on.
So in cold and dry regions where there isn't going to be much water vapor in the air, it can be negligible, very little water vapor, up to about 5% of the water.
by volume in hot, humid regions. So because of this variability, we typically give the composition
of dry air rather than the actual composition, because that's going to vary too much,
depending on how much water vapor there is. So for dry air, 78% nitrogen, 21% oxygen, 1% argon,
and then trace elements of other gases, the largest which is carbon dioxide. There are also
traces of neon, helium, methane, and other gases as well.
Now, if all of this atmosphere was uniformly distributed with a uniform density from sea level up,
it would terminate abruptly at an altitude of about 8.5 kilometers above sea level.
Of course, the atmosphere doesn't work like that.
Oh, 8.5 kilometers, by the way, is just a little bit below Mount Everest.
So if the atmosphere worked like that, Mount Everest would actually peak just a bit above the top of the top of the atmosphere.
But, of course, it doesn't work like that.
the density of the gases in the atmosphere decreases exponentially with altitude.
So it drops by a factor of half, roughly every 5.6 kilometers.
So that means the atmosphere keeps getting thinner and thinner as you go up.
Which also means that there's no real definition as to where the atmosphere ends.
Theoretically, it just sort of keeps going, getting forever and ever sparser.
So about half of the mass of the atmosphere lies below.
an altitude of 5.6 kilometers, so the other half is above that. About 90% is below 16 kilometers
in height, and essentially all of it is below 100 kilometers in height. This is the so-called
Karmand line, which by convention marks the beginning of space. So usually it's understood
that the atmosphere extends up to somewhere around 100 kilometers in height, and beyond that
is space. But that's kind of arbitrary. There's some reason to choose that as a demarcation,
as we'll talk about it a bit later,
but also when studying the atmosphere
from an earth science perspective,
we talk about it, it's extending beyond that as well,
because there are gases above that altitude.
It's just you have to pick some demarcation point
for things like defining what space travel is,
and 100 kilometres at around the Karaman line
is what is used for that purpose.
Now, most of the atmosphere,
and certainly all of the parts of the,
atmosphere that we regularly interact with, specifically the troposphere, stratosphere and mesosphere,
which we'll talk about in a minute, but those are the three lowest layers. These are part of
what's called the homosphere. These are regions of the atmosphere where the chemical composition is
more or less constant with altitude, so that it doesn't vary depending on how high you go.
This is important because some people have this idea that gases will, in the atmosphere,
will settle depending on their weight or density or something like that.
But that's not true.
That sort of thing only becomes an issue at the very highest levels of the atmosphere,
which are part of what's called the heterosphere,
where the composition does vary with altitude.
But in the homosphere, the most parts we're familiar with,
the atmosphere is sufficiently dense such that it behaves like an ideal gas,
and that we talked about in the episode 42 on gases and gas laws.
Effectively, in an ideal gas, really what matters is the density of particles,
and their temperature and the rate at which they collide with each other,
each particle, say whether it's a nitrogen molecule or an oxygen molecule,
behaves in essentially the same way.
And also there is sufficient density in an ideal gas
so that they will mix together,
and the composition will be uniform throughout.
So you don't have nitrogen bunching up in one part of the atmosphere
and oxygen bunching up in the other part or something like that.
There are a few exceptions like the ozone layer, which we'll talk about in a bit,
but basically the parts of the atmosphere that we know and love, so to speak,
troposphere, stratosphere and the mesosphere, most familiar parts,
the composition is fairly uniform.
Okay, so now let's move to talk about the atmospheric layers,
and we'll work from the outside in,
so from generally the less to the more familiar layers of the atmosphere,
and the sort of less to the more relevant from our perspective as human beings, at least.
The first thing to understand about atmospheric layers is that,
in general air pressure and density decrease with altitude.
So I've sort of already alluded to this, but the basic idea is that air pressure is caused by the weight of the air above that region.
So pressure is force divided by area.
So pressure refers to sort of the force per unit area.
But that force comes from the weight, so the gravitational attractive force essentially,
of all of the air molecules sitting above a.
particular region on the Earth's surface. So as you move higher in altitude, as you move
away from the surface of the Earth, there is less, in terms of total mass, less air molecules
sitting over that particular region, and therefore the air pressure at that altitude decreases.
And so as you move further and further up, there's less than less air pressure.
Now that has consequences, for example. We use, we need air pressure in order to be able to breathe
and to extract oxygen from the air we breathe. So if you climb up to Mount Everest,
the air pressure is a lot lower at that high altitude, and it's therefore hard to breathe.
Then at the highest altitude, there's not enough what's called partial pressure of oxygen.
Effectively, that is the contribution of the total pressure by oxygen.
There's not enough of that in order to get enough oxygen out of the air to breathe,
and therefore if you're not going to die, you need artificial oxygen.
So air pressure decreases with the altitude and density decreases with altitude as well.
The reason density decreases
is effectively the same reason
as air pressure decreases,
that the lower regions are compressed
in less space by the force of the air sitting on top of them,
whereas higher layers have less air sitting on top of them
and therefore not as compressed.
Now, as I said before,
that doesn't mean that the heavier gases sink to the bottom
because the Earth's atmosphere, at least,
at the lower layers, is well mixed
and is sufficiently dense
that there is a mixing of the gases,
and you don't have this sort of sinking to the bottom.
the bottom. So it's not like temperature, however, is very different to air pressure and density.
Air pressure and density pretty consistently decreases altitude. Temperature, however, varies depending
on the altitude. So in some regions of the atmosphere decreases altitude and other regions
it actually increases. And that might be very counterintuitive because typically we think as you go
high up in mountains or in aircraft, it gets very cold. And that's because pretty much all of the
parts of the atmosphere that we are familiar with, like in aircraft, high mountains and so on, and
those are part of what's called the troposphere,
which we'll talk about in a minute,
but that's the lowest level of the atmosphere,
and in the troposphere, temperature decreases with altitude,
but in high levels of the atmosphere, that's not true.
And so you can think of the temperature,
if you were to plot,
think of a graph with the altitude on the y-axis,
so going higher up on the y-axis,
and temperature on the x-axis.
So effectively, I won't try and describe the exact shape,
but it's sort of a zigzaggy line.
It goes back and forward.
And what that means is that in some parts of the atmosphere,
temperature decreases with altitude,
and in some parts it increases.
And in other parts, it's fairly steady,
so it's sort of a vertical line.
And so according to the sort of kinks in this zigzag,
so essentially when the line changes direction,
and when instead of increasing the altitude,
it starts decreasing with altitude or stops changing much,
at these kink points, we can mark changes in boundaries.
we can effectively classify regions
according to where these kickpoints are.
So that's how the classification
of the layers of the atmosphere
is generally done by these temperature levels.
There are other ways you can do it as well.
The homosphere, heterosphere that I talked about before
is by composition.
That's a different way of breaking up the atmosphere
and there are other ways of doing as well.
But this method by temperature changes
is, I think, a very useful one.
And remember, the classification is not based on the level
of the temperature, but it's based on
whether the temperature is increasing with altitude,
or decreasing with altitude primarily within this region.
So that's important to bear in mind.
That's what these levels are based on.
This is called atmospheric stratification.
There are five main layers here.
The exosphere, the thermosphere, the mesosphere, the stratosphere, and the troposphere.
That's going from out to in.
And we'll talk about each of these in turn.
So first we'll start with the exosphere.
The exosphere extends from roughly 10,000 kilometers to 700,000.
some sources say 500
it seems to vary exactly how they define
it but several hundred it's
in the most point is several hundred kilometres
above the earth's surface now you'll notice that
all of these distances are well above the Karmann line
so in some sense
they're considered to be part of space
so most people think of the atmosphere
as part of the earth in space as being beyond
the atmosphere but that
sort of simple demarcation doesn't really work
the Earth's atmosphere continues
into space
by 700 kilometres if you were
If you were up there, it would look like you're in space.
Now, to give you some comparison, you've probably seen some photos taken from the International Space Station,
photos of the Earth or photos sort of outward, sideways, parallel to the Earth's orbit.
So if you haven't, just look up those photos.
Most people would say these are photos from space.
We think of the Space Station as being in space.
I mean, it's called the Space Station, right?
We don't think of it as being in the Earth's atmosphere.
However, the orbital altitude of the International Space Station is around 400 kilometers.
Now that means that it's actually within, it's not even in the exosphere, it's in the thermosphere, the next layer of the atmosphere.
So not only is the International Space Station and all of the other satellites, pretty much all of the other satellites,
some of them are much further out, but most of them are within the Earth's atmosphere,
but they're not even in the furthest, in the outermost layer of the Earth's atmosphere.
So the point is if you were in the exosphere, it would look like you're in space.
In fact, if you're in many parts of the thermosphere, it looks like you're in space.
So, for that reason, the exosphere is often sort of excluded from the atmosphere, being kind of beyond it.
But in other sense, it's the outermost layer.
Now, in the exosphere, the density of gas is extremely low.
So the composition, this is not part of the homosphere, this is in the heterosphere,
the composition is not the same with altitude.
And it's also, its composition is quite different to the percentages I gave before.
those are mostly for the homosphere.
Well, those are for the homosphere.
The exosphere is composed
mostly of very low density hydrogen and helium
with some other heavier molecules as well.
The atoms are so far apart
that they can travel hundreds of kilometres
without colliding with each other.
So it's an extremely diffuse gas.
And because of this, it's far too far away
from the earth for any meteorological
phenomena to be possible, so there's certainly no clouds
or weather up there. However,
the Aurora, Aurora Borialis and Aurora Australis,
you know, those southern and northern lights that you see at very high latitudes,
they sometimes occur in the lower parts of the exosphere,
they also overlap with the thermosphere, the next layer down.
So there are phenomena that we can see that occur in the exosphere,
and effectively these southern northern lights occur because of charged particles
that are traveling through the very highest regions of the atmosphere,
the exosphere or the upper thermosphere,
and so they're interacting with the other particles,
the diffuse particles that are up there,
and that gives off light.
Apart from that, there's not too much to say about the exosphere.
Let's then move on to the next layer down, which is the thermosphere.
The thermosphere extends from roughly 80 kilometers up to,
well, wherever you think the exosphere starts.
Again, I've seen different figures from that, 500, 700 kilometers up.
Now, the height of the thermosphere varies because of changes in solar activity,
and that's true for most of the levels that I'm going to talk about.
The exact demarcation point is not really possible to define
because it varies depending on factors,
like weather and climate, latitude, solar activity and so on.
But it's going to be more or less, this is the same,
but there is variability.
Now, the defining characteristic of the thermosphere
that distinguishes it from the levels above and below
is that its temperature gradually increases with altitude.
So, in other words, it gets hotter as you move up higher
in the thermosphere.
Now, that's a bit of a misleading way of saying it,
because although temperature increases,
it doesn't get hotter in a sense that we would recognize.
The temperature in the thermosphere can actually get quite high.
It can rise near the top part, it's up to as 1,500 degrees Celsius,
which sounds extremely hot,
and you might wonder how do our satellites,
some of which are in this layer and some of which are higher,
and say astronauts, as they pass through the satellite, they not melt.
Well, the answer is that although the temperature is very high,
the actual latent energy contained in the kinetic energy
of the molecules in this layer is very low.
That's because the gas molecules are so far apart
that they don't interact very often
and the density is so low,
they just aren't very many of them.
So at this point, there's often several kilometers
of average distance between molecules,
so that is they'll travel a kilometer or two
between collisions with the new air molecules.
That's a lot less than in the exosphere
where it's hundreds of kilometers,
but that's still a long way.
The air is still very rarefied.
Again, if you're in the thermosphere,
it would still look like you were in space.
closer to the Earth than the exosphere, but it's still basically space.
And therefore, although the temperature is high, the actual heat content is very low, so it wouldn't
feel hot. It's just temperature is defined as average kinetic energy of the particles.
So if their average kinetic energy is high, the temperature is high, even if there are hardly
any particles to actually produce heat. If you're a bit confused about that, go back to the episode
42 on gases and gas laws, where I talk about that sort of thing in more detail.
The reason, by the way, that the temperature is so high and is increasing with altitude here
in the thermosphere effectively is because of the very low density.
The particles at the very highest regions of the thermosphere
have such low density that they just travel very fast
and don't have much impeding their motion,
whereas those further down have more impeding their motion,
the density is higher, and therefore they're slowed down a bit,
and therefore that's manifested in temperature.
There's no water vapor in the thermosphere,
there's not enough density to hold it there,
and so there are no clouds in the thermosphere, and so no weather that we normally think of.
But as noted before, the aurora sometimes occur in upper regions of the thermosphere.
And as I also said, the International Space Station orbits in the thermosphere around 400 kilometers in altitude.
Okay, so we've covered the two atomostalais, the exosphere and the thermosphere.
Pretty diffuse, not really that much happening as far as sort of weather phenomena is concerned.
Now we move into the homosphere, which is the...
the bottom three layers, which are more interesting and more like what we would think of as the
atmosphere. This is where the compositions that I talked about before, the nitrogen and oxygen,
so forth, this is where those compositions more or less hold, and this is where it's obviously
the interesting weather stuff starts happening. So the middle layer of the atmosphere is called
the mesosphere. That's the third layer in, and it extends roughly from 50 to 80 kilometers.
So it's just below the thermosphere and just above the stratosphere. In the mesosphere, temperatures
drop with increasing altitude, so that's sort of as we would expect. The top of the mesosphere
is actually the coldest place on Earth. It has an average temperature of around minus 85 degrees Celsius,
extremely cold up there. Just below the mesopause, so the mesopause is the altitude at the top
of the mesosphere, where temperatures then start to increase again because the densities get so low,
the particle densities get so low. Just below the mesopause, the air is so cold that any water vapor
there will sublimate and perform what is called noctilucent clouds, which are very, well, very high
altitude clouds that you can sometimes see if the light reflects on them near, near sunlight or sunset.
The mesosphere is mostly accessed by rockets and rocket-powered aircraft. You'll also see meteors as they
pass through the mesosphere and start to burn up when the atmosphere gets thick enough for that to happen.
The mesosphere is middled in a number of ways. It's sort of where you would start to recognize
as an atmosphere as being.
You're certainly not in space anymore.
It's too low for, say, satellites to orbit in,
or for the space station to be that altitude.
There's too much drag.
But it's also too high for us to access with any aircraft.
And therefore, the only real way we can access it is through sounding rockets.
Essentially, rockets on ballistic trajectories.
They don't go into orbit, but they go up into very high altitudes.
And as I said, there's no real weather phenomenon here,
apart from the neutral-elucent clouds and meteors
and a few other interesting phenomena,
but most of what we think of as weather happens at lower altitudes than that.
And as I mentioned, temperature decreases the altitude.
That's important.
Okay, now let's move on to the stratosphere.
Probably you've heard of the stratosphere.
For some reason, stratosphere seems to be a word
that people know more than troposphere.
Although maybe that's just me.
I don't know.
Let me know if that's different to you.
But stratosphere is actually not the lowest level of the atmosphere.
Troposphere is.
So stratosphere is the second lowest layer, which is just below the mesosphere.
The stratosphere extends roughly from 10 to 50 kilometers up, or 12 to 50 kilometers up,
but varies a bit again.
In the stratosphere, the characteristic feature is that temperatures actually increase,
roughly constant or increased with altitude.
Now, as I mentioned before, that's countertitude.
If we think of high altitudes as being cold,
that's because commercial jets and all of the highest mountains are all located in the troposphere.
that's the next layer down the lowest level of the atmosphere.
In the troposphere, temperature does decrease with altitude.
So if you were to go up a bit higher than pretty much anything that we tend to experience
into the stratosphere, temperatures actually begin to increase with altitude.
Now, the big reason for this is because, clearly, of the ozone layer.
The ozone layer exists in the stratosphere.
I'll talk a bit more about the ozone layer later.
But the basic idea is that in the stratosphere,
there is a greater relative abundance of particular types of molecules that absorb ultraviolet radiation from the sun.
And because of all of the energy that's being absorbed in these layers that aren't absorbed nearly as much in other layers,
temperature increases with altitude here.
So the stratosphere is, particularly the top is much warmer than the top of the troposphere,
the top of the stratosphere, which has the highest temperatures of the stratosphere,
because it's increasing over the course of the stratosphere.
Temperatures get to around zero Celsius, which might not sound like a lot.
but when you compare that to the top of the mesosphere, which is minus 85, and the top of the troposphere, which I think is like around minus 60, it's actually quite warm.
Now, because of this increase in temperature with altitude, the stratosphere is quite different in terms of its meteorological conditions compared to the troposphere.
One of the main drivers of weather conditions and also climactic conditions in the troposphere, the lowest level of the atmosphere, is a conveyorerological condition.
is a convection cells of air.
And I would have talked a bit about this, I think, in gases and gas laws
or possibly a different episode.
But a convection cell is essentially a current of air,
or fluid, but in this case we're talking about air specifically,
that transfers heat from hot regions to cold regions.
And in the case of the troposphere,
it is a method in which energy is moved from the surface of the earth,
where a lot of it is absorbed from the sun, so it gets hot.
it transfers that energy through convection cells, essentially through the flow of hot air,
up away from the surface of the earth to higher regions of the atmosphere, where it gradually gets colder.
So these are convection cells.
Now, convection cells are dependent on temperature gradients, so you're only going to get convection
from one way or one way or another if there's a temperature difference,
specifically if you have hot-to-cold gradient, which does exist in the troposphere, usually.
However, it doesn't exist in the stratosphere precisely because of this increasing temperature with altitude.
So basically, clouds and other phenomena that form weather in the troposphere generally don't exist.
They don't continue up into the stratosphere because there's effectively a ceiling, a cap enforced by this temperature inversion.
This can occur in the troposphere sometimes as well, which can lead to small getting trapped over cities if there's a temperature inversion.
But it happens on a grosser scale with the transition from the troposphere to the stratosphere.
And so for this reason, the stratosphere is generally quite stable atmosphericly.
You don't have large cloud formation or air turbulences that you get in the troposphere
because you can't get these same convection currents.
In the troposphere, you've got really hot, dense air from the lower atmosphere,
which then can convect upwards to the cooler temperatures of the upper troposphere
and therefore drive these big energy flows, which give rise to weather.
But in the stratosphere, it's reversed.
The hottest regions at the top of the stratosphere,
you're also the least dense, and so you just can't have the same big convection cell energy flows.
So that's why you have the big difference,
and effectively why the stratosphere is quite distinctive from the troposphere below it
and the mesosphere above it, both of which have decreasing temperature with altitude.
There are some types of clouds like polar stratospheric clouds
that can occasionally be seen in the lower parts of the stratosphere,
and I think that occurs largely over polar regions
where you just get the sublimation of the whatever residual air,
vapor is there. But for the most part, you don't see much weather phenomenon in the stratosphere.
The stratosphere is mostly accessed by weather balloons and also by some types of jet aircraft,
particularly military aircraft. Commercial aircraft generally fly near the top of the troposphere.
So aircraft can fly in the stratosphere, but they have to be specially designed to do so,
and you need generally relatively advanced jet aircraft to be able to fly comfortably in the
stratosphere. Propeller-driven aircraft are
relegated to the troposphere,
to which we now turn.
Now the troposphere is the lowest
part of the Earth atmosphere. It extends
from sea level up to around 12 kilometres.
Although this altitude
varies, as I mentioned before, by several kilometres
actually varies by quite a bit.
It's more like 9 kilometres at the poles
and 17 kilometres at the equator.
That's partly due to the bulging
at the Earth's surface due to centrifugal
effects of the Earth's rotation.
And there's also variations due to weather.
The troposphere is bounded at the top by the tropos pores.
That's where the temperature inversion occurs that I talked about.
So that's when you have the decreasing temperature with altitude stop,
and the temperature then begins, well, first it sort of levels out
and then begins to increase with altitude.
So there's a tropopause at the top of the troposphere where that happens.
There's also a mesopause at the top of the mesosphere where that happens.
So generally, temperature declines with increasing altitude in the troposphere
due to the effects that I talk about,
energy transfer away from the surface of the earth,
where lots of energy is absorbed.
As you get further away from that, the energy is diffused,
and therefore the temperature gradually reduces with altitude.
That is until, of course, you get to the tropopause and the stratosphere,
where you've got that UV absorption that changes things up.
Again, because of the density and temperature profiles that I just talked about,
this promotes vertical mixing in the troposphere, those big convection cells that I mentioned.
This gives rise to most of our weather phenomenon,
and also some climactic phenomena, too, which we'll talk about in few.
future episodes. The troposphere contains about 80% of the mass of the Earth's atmosphere, so
really most of the atmosphere is in the troposphere, and essentially all of its weather
phenomenon. So when people talk about the atmosphere, implicitly they're talking mostly about
the troposphere, although technically it's only the very lowest level of the atmosphere.
Pretty much all of the clouds that you know and love, or maybe not love so much, I don't know,
depending on your attitudes to such things, exist exclusively in the troposphere.
the very tall cumulonimbus clouds can penetrate the tropopause sometimes and extend in the lower part of the stratosphere,
and there are a few unusual types of clouds that can exist in the stratosphere, even the mesosphere.
But for the most part, weather phenomenon clouds and everything's all in the troposphere.
And pretty much all conventional aviation, aside for some military applications occur in the troposphere as well.
So that concludes our discussion of the layers of the atmosphere.
Hopefully you have a bit of a better understanding about how those work,
in connection with each other. I'll just give a quick sort of recap of that so that you've
got the picture. And this time we'll work in the opposite direction. We'll start at sea level
and move upwards. So starting at sea level, we have the troposphere, which is the densest
layer of the atmosphere, and extends up for roughly 10 kilometres, 10, 12 kilometers,
depending on exactly what your latitude is. Remember, latitude is how close you are to the
poles or equator. Altitude is how far away you are from ocean level. So in the troposphere,
temperature decreases with altitude.
Effectively, that's because the Earth's surface is heated
by absorbing a lot of sunlight and then emitting that again,
and as you move further away from that,
or as the air moves further away from that,
the energy is diffused, and therefore temperature decreases.
So that's sort of the effect you would expect naively.
That's what occurs in the troposphere.
That's also what occurs in the mesosphere at the third level.
The stratosphere, roughly between 10 and 50 kilometers,
let's say, that lies in between the troposphere and the mesosphere is different. Temperature
increases in the stratosphere. This is largely because of the ozone layer, higher concentrations
of ozone, which is a particular compound that is good at absorbing ultraviolet radiation
from the sun. Because of this extra heat that it absorbed, temperature actually increases
with altitude here. Most of the weather occurs in the troposphere, a few weather phenomena
in the stratosphere. Most aviation occurs in the troposphere, some aviation in the stratosphere.
The mesosphere is beyond pretty much all weather and pretty much all flight.
We can only access to through sounding rockets and some very high altitude weather balloons.
The next layer of the altitude, the fourth region, is called the thermosphere.
It extends roughly from 80, 80, or so, up to 5, 6, 700 kilometers above the Earth surface.
If you were to be in the thermosphere, it would look like you're in space.
Many satellites exist in the thermosphere and the space station orbits here.
temperature increases with the thermosphere, largely owing to the fact that particles are so diffuse
that the higher altitude ones are even more diffuse and therefore have more freedom to move about
with high kinetic energies. But that doesn't really translate to hotness in the way. We would
understand it because the particles are so diffuse. But nevertheless, temperatures do we increase
with altitude in the thermosphere. Anything above this 5-6-700 line is called the exosphere.
where some of the higher altitude satellites orbit
and effectively is indistinguishable
from most ordinary perspectives are from space.
The Karaman line, which demarcates officially,
as far as such things go, the boundary of space
exists in the, or occurs in the lower thermosphere.
So most certainly the exosphere is effectively space
and gradually fades into the background space.
There's no clean cutoff.
the way the atmosphere really ends exactly.
Okay, so that's a discussion of the stratification of the atmosphere
and the main layers and their properties.
Now, I'll just talk about a few phenomena that I've mentioned,
but I want to go into a bit more detail into,
the Karmann Line, the ozone layer, and the ionosphere.
So the Karmann Line is, well, it's an imaginary line at altitude of about 100 kilometers
that it conventionally marks out the boundary between the atmosphere,
well, between space and not space, I suppose,
although technically the atmosphere is on either side.
of it. So parts of the atmosphere are in space and parts of the atmosphere and not in space, I suppose.
But this sort of arbitrary demarcation occurs at the Karaman line of 100 kilometres. So if you go above
that, you're an astronaut and you're considered to have been in space. Below that,
now what's the significance of the Karaman line? It's not just that someone thought that 100
kilometers sounded nice, although it kind of does. There's actually a reason for specifying this.
It's named after the guy came up with it, obviously. Effectively, the Karmine line marks out the
outer limit to which aviation is even theoretically possible. I'm not aware of any aircraft that
have got up to this level, the altitude before, but it is at least theoretically possible to
build aircraft that are able to stay aloft using the force of lift up to the altitude of
100 kilometers. Above that, it's theoretically impossible. So the Karaman line marks out the maximum
possible altitude that you could have an aircraft that kept itself aloft through the force of
lift. Above that, you can sort of stay aloft in a sense, but only by either being in a very high
archbolicistic trajectory or by orbiting the Earth, not through the force of lift that keeps
aircraft in the air. Now, I haven't really done an episode on how aircraft work. It's actually
quite interesting. But from the simple perspective we need at the moment, the basic idea is that
aircraft keep themselves aloft by traveling fast enough through the air. So, that the simple perspective,
that they can generate sufficient lift force to keep them up.
And that lift force occurs essentially by pushing air down.
So aircraft travel forward in doing so.
They push some air backwards as well, but they push some air downwards,
which generates a lift force keeping them up.
This is very highly simplified, but it's good enough for our purposes here.
The faster they can travel forwards, the more air they can push down,
and the greater lift force they can generate.
Now, lift force is affected, as I mentioned, by air speed,
speed relative to the air. However, it also depends on the density of the air. So the density
air is the easier it is to generate a lift force. That's the same phenomenon as the fact that it's
easy to float in salty water than it is to float in freshwater because the salt content increases
the density of the water and helps you stay afloat. It's more or less the same idea. So that means lift
decreases with altitude because the air density decreases with altitude. So it's harder to stay
aloft at higher or higher altitudes. That's why aircraft design gets trickier.
Well, there's one reason why aircraft design gets trickier as you want the airplanes to reach higher and higher altitudes,
because it's harder to generate that enough lift force to keep the weight of the plane aloft.
So, therefore, all other factors remaining equal,
air speed must increase to compensate for the lower air density as you get to higher and higher altitudes.
At the point of the Kahnman line, an aircraft would have to be traveling at orbital velocity
in order to generate enough lift force to keep itself aloft.
orbit of velocity essentially is the velocity at which you are orbiting the Earth, effectively.
It's the velocity at which the rate at which the Earth's surface is curving away from you
is the same as the rate at which you're falling down to the Earth's surface.
I think I might have talked about this in episode 1, explaining gravity.
So when an object is in orbit about the Earth, effectively what's happening is it's in free fall,
meaning it's constantly falling to the Earth's surface because of the force of gravity.
The reason that it doesn't actually hit the Earth's surface
is because basically it's moving an object in orbit
is moving so fast relative to the surface of the Earth,
parallel to the surface of the Earth,
it's moving so fast in that direction
that the rate at which the Earth curves away from it
is the same as the rate at which the object falls
towards the surface of the Earth,
and so it's effectively sort of, it's constantly falling,
but it never gets there.
For more details, I'll see the episode on gravity.
But the point is, that's a very different,
distinctive mechanism from generating lift to stay afloat like an air, to stay aloft like an aircraft does.
So the point is that if the velocity you have to be traveling out to generate enough lift to stay aloft is in fact
orbiter velocity, then you're not really flying anymore. You're orbiting. So the Kharuman line marks out
the point where flight, aeronautical flight becomes impossible essentially and you become an orbiting object.
So it's, because of this, obviously being a relevant distinction between aircraft and spacecraft,
it seems a logical point to mark the boundary between sort of the atmosphere and space.
The common line is not exactly at 100 kilometres.
The exact point at which flight becomes impossible is a complicated function of exactly what the temperature
and pressure of the gases and so on is, but it occurs at around 100 kilometres,
so that's sort of defined as the altitude that's convenient.
it. Okay, so that's the Kahneman line that I mentioned that demarcates the line
where space begins sort of by convention. Next, I'm going to talk about the ozone layer.
The ozone layer or ozone shield is a region in the Earth's stratosphere that absorbs most
of the sun's ultraviolet radiation. It contains high concentrations of ozone, which is
three atoms of oxygen or bonded into one molecule. So remember, oxygen and air is comprised
of O2 molecules, two oxygen atoms in a molecule.
is three oxygen atoms combined in a molecule. All of the atmosphere or the lower regions at least
have some ozone in them, but the ozone layer in the stratosphere has much larger concentrations.
It contains around 10 parts per million of ozone compared to about 0.3 parts per million
in the rest of the atmosphere, so something like 30 times the concentration of ozone.
It's found mostly the ozone layer is mostly in the lower portion of the stratosphere,
sphere about 20 to 30 kilometers above the surface of the Earth, although its thickness varies
geographically and also seasonally, as we'll talk about in a moment.
The ozone layer absorbs something like 98% of the sun's medium frequency ultraviolet light.
So that's of wavelengths sort of just below the visible spectrum.
These wavelengths of light would otherwise be very dangerous to expose life forms on the
surface, effectively because they have sufficiently high energies that they're able to disrupt
proteins and nucleic acid and other biomolecules that we need to survive.
That's why exposure to too much ultraviolet radiation can cause cancer effectively
because of these disruptions to the bonds of the molecules.
It's got the right energies to be able to do that.
So ultraviolet radiation is harmful,
and the fact that the ozone layer is able to absorb nearly all of it
is very useful for our purposes so that we can survive on the surface of the Earth.
Unfortunately, for us, the ozone layer can be depleted by certain chemicals,
particularly free radical catalysts.
Now, a free radical is a type of molecule that has an unpaired electron.
An unpaired electron meaning that electrons like to exist in atomic orbitals in pairs,
one spin up and one spin down.
Don't worry if you don't know exactly what that means.
I've talked about it in previous episodes on this sort of thing,
but the point is that they are in a lower energy state when the electrons are paired.
And if there's one that's left by its lonesome,
the molecule is in a higher energy state, and therefore it tends to be very reactive.
So some of these types of molecules, nitric oxide, nitrous oxide, hydroxyl, chlorine, bromine, and some others are very reactive,
and we'll tend to react with ozone converting it into its O2 form or other forms.
Now, chlorofluorocarbons and also bromofluorocarbons are compounds that have significant concentrations of halogenes
in them, so particularly bromine and chlorine, which are reactive radicals.
Chlorofluorocarbons and bromofluorocarbons are generally highly stable, so they can survive
rising up high in the stratosphere. This differs from a lot of other compounds that will be broken
down or react before they get up into the stratosphere. But these carbons, the CFCs and BFCs,
can get up to the stratosphere level where the ozone is. There, they will survive for a long time,
But eventually, the chlorine and bromine radicals are liberated by the action of a ultraviolet light.
So, effectively, they break free.
And then these radicals are free to initiate and catalyze a chain reaction of breaking down tens of thousands of ozone molecules.
A catalyst, remember, is there something that's not used up in the reaction?
It's not changed.
So the chlorine and bromine can react with molecules of ozone, convert them into, say, O2 molecules,
and then themselves remain unchanged and then go into to break down further ozone molecules,
and they can stay up in the atmosphere for a very long time.
So these molecules, particularly the chlorofluorocarbons and bromofluorocarbons,
when released into the atmosphere, can have devastating effects on the ozone layer.
Reducing the concentration of ozone in the ozone layer reduces the absorption of ultrafarlet radiation
and therefore creating what are called holes in the ozone layer,
or at least a thinning of the ozone layer.
layer, it varies. The extent of the thinning or of holes varies seasonally by complicated
effects. It also depends on the region of the Earth's surface. These holes were originally discovered,
I think in the late 1970s. Oh, no, sorry, first reported in 1985, reductions of up to 70% of the
mass of the ozone column observed in the, were first observed in the southern hemisphere over
Antarctica in 1985. So these can be very substantial reductions. The degree of the
reduction varies from year to year, but up to 70% in the worst years is very substantial.
Other years, it's less, but it's still significant. So these compounds, chlorofluorocarbons,
bromopluorocarbons, and others are, I don't think I said, but predominantly man-made.
So they're released into the atmosphere. They're able to, they're stable, so they travel
high up into the stratosphere where the ozone is, and then gradually radicals are released,
which are able to catalyze many rounds of breaking down of ozone molecules. And this is what
has caused these holes and also thinning of the ozone layer since roughly the late 1970s.
Now this is a big problem as I mentioned because ozone is important for keeping out ultraviolet radiation.
And thinning and holes in the ozone layer have been attributed to some proportion.
I don't know exactly how much, but some proportion of rises in skin cancer and other illnesses like that in particular reasons of the world.
The reason, by the way, that the holes in the ozone layer are most pronounced over the Arctic and the end.
Antarctic, even though obviously hardly any pollutants are actually produced in those areas,
so it's a bit counter-adjuitive at first, is effectively because the temperature matters a lot.
So reactions typically take place most effectively in polar stratospheric clouds.
I actually mentioned those previously, particularly cold clouds that occur in the stratosphere,
particularly over the Antarctic and the Arctic.
The reactions occur most effectively there, and so that's where the ozone depletion is worst.
The pollutants are not produced over the polar regions, but they're able to travel there,
because as I mentioned before, the lower regions the atmosphere mix very effectively.
There's two aspects of ozone depletion.
One is a gradual thinning of the average ozone layer over the whole of the Earth by about 4% since the late 70s.
That has effects as well, because every bit of the diminution of the effectiveness of the ozone layer
has an effect on skin cancer and other conditions.
So that's bad.
but particularly bad are the whopping, you know, 20, 30, 50, 70% reductions in the ozone column
observed in the polar regions in some years. It varies from year to year and by the season,
so it's quite variable. There aren't permanent holes in the ozone layer that exists over the Antarctic,
but seasonally the holes open up and then sort of close to varying degrees.
Thankfully, however, there has been relatively swift action since the original discovery of concerns about ozone depletion
So in 1987, the Montreal Protocol was signed, which phased out the production of many types of chlorofluorocarbons and bromofluorocarbons,
which had a wide variety of industrial uses as refrigerants, solvents, fire retardants, and other things like that.
But in most cases, alternatives were found.
There were a few exceptions where exemptions were granted.
But this was actually an international treaty.
It was ratified by essentially all countries and has been extremely successful in,
dramatically reducing the emissions of all of these ozone-depleting compounds,
which are now well below the levels that they were in the 80s,
and continuing to decrease.
The hole in the ozone, or the holes in the ozone layer,
have stabilized in the past roughly 10-ish years, I think,
and they're predicted to ozone thickness is predicted to return to pre-1980s levels
sometime around mid-century.
So it's going to take a while to recover,
recalling that the catalysts that are already up there in the atmosphere
are still causing ozone depletion.
It's just that we're no longer adding to them at the same right.
Gradually they'll be broken down over time,
but that's going to take several decades.
But the problem is not getting any worse,
and it's gradually getting better.
So there's good news on that front,
unlike the global warming case,
where action has been much more difficult to bring about.
The final thing that I wanted to just briefly mention
is the ionosphere.
This is the ionized part of the Earth's upper atmosphere,
which extends from about 60 kilometers up to 1,000 kilometers in altitude.
So that includes the upper parts of the mesosphere and the thermosphere and also parts of the exosphere.
So the ionosphere is, well, it's ionized, as I mentioned.
It's ionized by solar radiation.
So remember, ionization is the process of becoming electrically charged.
So the atoms in the particles in these regions lose some of their electrons or potentially gain electrons
and therefore become electrically charged.
So effectively you can think of the ionosphere as a shell of electrons and charged.
atoms that surrounds the Earth at this high altitude and exists as a result of
ultraviolet radiation which is able to ionize these molecules. Now because ionization
depends on the activity of the Sun, the extent of ionization varies with the
amount of radiation that's received. So it depends very seasonally and with solar
activity and other factors like that. Now the interesting thing about the ionosphere is
that because it effectively represents a layer of electrons around the Earth, a charged layer,
and electrons, particularly sort of a free C of electrons, react with electromagnetic radiation,
just like, say, metals reflect light. It's effectively the same phenomenon. The ionosphere
is actually able to reflect certain types of electromagnetic radiation. Now, we're not
talking about the ultraviolet radiation that is absorbed to create the ionosphere in the first place.
that's much higher energy, and that's not reflection anyway, that's absorption and ionizing the atom by freeing the electron.
Here we're talking about a larger scale phenomenon where longer length, wavelength, is reflected as a result of its interaction with the charged sea of electrons.
Again, it's effectively the same as what happens when light is reflected off the surface of a mirror, say, or other metals, which have that sea of electrons which is able to interact with the electromagnetic radiation and reflect light quite well.
The wavelengths that are reflected by the ionosphere are certain bandwidths in the high-frequency radio waves.
And so the ionosphere is actually able to reflect these types of radio waves back towards the surface of the Earth,
where they are able to actually bounce off the Earth and then back off the ionosphere and so on a number of times.
So this actually ables people to communicate with short-wave radios even over the horizon of the Earth.
So when they can't directly see each other, when you can't shoot waves,
directly from one observer to the emitter to the observer because the curve of the earth is in the way.
You can actually bounce them off the ionosphere and they'll bounce back off the Earth and back off
the ionosphere a couple of times and eventually reach their intended destination.
So this is called skipping or skywave propagation. It's been used since the 1920s to communicate internationally.
The process is a bit tricky because there's some, obviously, lost at each stage of the bouncing.
So often the signal quality is not so great, and that's going to depend on, you know, the solar activity and how thick the ionosphere is.
and atmospheric effects and a bunch of other things.
So it's not really used much anymore
because we have satellite communications
and underwater internet cables
and other things that are much more effective
for sending signals generally.
But it still can be done,
and radio hobbyists still do it.
It's pretty cool phenomenon, though,
not something that you would initially expect to be possible,
but it's a result of the ionosphere
and the charged particles that exist up there
as a result of UV radiation.
causing ionization.
Okay, so that concludes what I wanted to discuss in this episode,
the layers of the atmosphere and the ozone layer,
cardamine line, and the ionosphere.
Hopefully that's given a bit of a richer picture of the atmosphere for you
and a bit of a better understanding,
which will then put to use in the next couple of episodes
when we get around to talking about climates and weather effects.
So, if you enjoyed this episode,
please give the podcast a favorable review
on the aggregator of your choice.
You can also like our Facebook page.
If you just go to Facebook and type in the Science of Everything podcast, give our Facebook page a like.
That also helps to promote the show.
If you have any questions or suggestions for future episodes or any other feedback, you can send me an email.
My address is Fods12 at gmail.com.
That's F-O-D-S-1-2 at gmail.com.
Thank you very much for listening, and I'll talk to you next time.
