The Taproot Podcast - Jungian Addiction Recovery with Corey Gamberg
Episode Date: May 27, 2025Addiction Recovery Psychology: Jung, 12-Step Evolution & Depth Therapy Breakthrough with Recovery Expert 🎯 ADDICTION RECOVERY | PSYCHOLOGY | THERAPY | MENTAL HEALTH | SPIRITUALITY Discover the ...revolutionary integration of Jungian psychology and addiction recovery with Corey Gamberg, Executive Director of Rockland Recovery Treatment Centers. This groundbreaking episode reveals why traditional 12-step programs often plateau after 3-4 years and how depth psychology creates sustainable, soul-level transformation for lasting recovery. 🔥 WHAT YOU'LL DISCOVER: Addiction Treatment Revolution: Why addiction recovery methods must evolve as addiction itself changes The hidden Carl Jung connection to Alcoholics Anonymous founding How depth psychology surpasses cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) limitations Revolutionary post-recovery work for long-term sobriety challenges Jungian Psychology Applications: James Hillman's archetypal psychology in addiction treatment Moving from pathology model to soul-centered healing Understanding addiction as spiritual initiation vs. moral failure Practical depth psychology techniques for therapists and counselors Recovery Science & Spirituality: The 3-year recovery crisis point most programs ignore Why evidence-based research isn't always clinically relevant Integrating EMDR, IFS therapy, and Jungian approaches Creating "bigger containers" for continued psychological growth 📊 EPISODE BREAKDOWN: 🧠 Psychology & Mental Health (0:00-15:00): Individuation theory in addiction recovery Beyond CBT: depth psychology vs. surface-level interventions Mental health stigma and pathology reframing Depression as soul communication, not just symptoms ⚡ Addiction & Recovery Science (15:00-30:00): Opioid epidemic evolution and treatment adaptation Brain-based medicine integration (brainspotting, EMDR) Substance abuse treatment center innovations Recovery community dynamics and hierarchy issues 🔄 Spirituality & Personal Growth (30:00-45:00): Jung-AA historical connection through Roland Hazard Spiritual experience redefined through psychological lens Mythology and ritual in modern recovery practices Transcendence vs. depth-based healing approaches 🎭 Advanced Therapy Techniques (45:00-End): Archetypal psychology practical applications Post-recovery work for established sobriety Aesthetic response and environmental healing Personal ritual development vs. prescribed formulas 🎯 PERFECT FOR: Mental Health Professionals: Licensed therapists and counselors seeking advanced training Addiction specialists and substance abuse counselors Clinical psychologists interested in depth psychology Treatment center directors and program developers Recovery Community: People in long-term recovery seeking deeper meaning Family members of addicts looking for understanding Sponsors and recovery coaches wanting new perspectives Anyone questioning traditional recovery limitations Psychology Enthusiasts: Jungian psychology students and practitioners Depth psychology and archetypal therapy learners Spiritual seekers integrating psychology and meaning Personal development and self-improvement audiences 💡 EXPERT INSIGHTS: Corey Gamberg brings unique expertise combining: Executive leadership in addiction treatment centers Personal recovery experience and community involvement Advanced training in Jungian and depth psychology Innovative integration of traditional and alternative approaches 🌟 KEY TAKEAWAYS: Recovery Evolution: Addiction treatment must adapt as substance use patterns change Soul-Level Healing: Sustainable recovery requires depth beyond behavior modification Jung-AA Connection: Historical spiritual foundations inform modern psychological approaches Post-Recovery Growth: Established sobriety opens doors to deeper psychological work Integrated Treatment: Combining 12-step foundations with depth psychology creates "bigger containers" 📚 RESOURCES & REFERENCES: Books Mentioned: "The Soul's Code" by James Hillman "The Red Book" by Carl Jung Jung's collected works on individuation Hillman's "Re-Visioning Psychology" Therapeutic Approaches: Internal Family Systems (IFS) therapy Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing (EMDR) Brainspotting and somatic approaches Archetypal and depth psychology methods Organizations & Training: Rockland Recovery Treatment Centers Chicago Jungian Institute International Association for Analytical Psychology Depth psychology training programs 🔗 CONNECT & LEARN MORE: Guest Information: Website: depthrecovery.org LinkedIn: Corey Gamberg, Executive Director Rockland Recovery Group: Massachusetts-based treatment centers Related Topics to Explore: Jungian analysis and individuation process Archetypal psychology in clinical practice Addiction as spiritual emergency and initiation Integration of ancient wisdom and modern therapy 🏷️ TRENDING TOPICS: #AddictionRecovery #JungianPsychology #DepthPsychology #MentalHealthTreatment #TherapyInnovation #RecoveryScience #SpiritualPsychology #ArchetypalTherapy #TraumaHealing #AddictionTherapy #RecoveryCoaching #PsychologicalHealing #MentalHealthAwareness #TherapistTraining #ClinicalPsychology #HolisticRecovery #SoulWork #PersonalGrowth #PsychotherapyEvolution #RecoveryEvolution Episode Length: 60 minutes | Content Rating: Educational/Professional | Release Date: [Current Date] This episode contains mature themes related to addiction, mental health, and psychological healing. Intended for educational and therapeutic purposes. Not a substitute for professional mental health treatment.
Transcript
Discussion (0)
All right, welcome to the Taproot Therapy Collective podcast, Discover Heal Grow.
I am here with Corey Gamberg, who's the executive director of the Rocklin Recovery Treatment
Centers.
And we're going to talk about some ways that depth psychology and some of the more experiential
and somatic medicine overlaps with 12 step in drug alcohol recovery.
Corey, thank you so much for being with us today.
Yeah, man, thanks for having me.
So can you tell me a little bit about your role in Rockland?
I've seen your stuff on LinkedIn.
I've enjoyed some of the things that you've posted.
You're coming from a similar perspective to us at Taproot,
same stuff we talk about on our podcast.
So I'd really like to hear from you how you do that work
and what that looks like.
Yeah, thanks for responding to some of the posts.
Some of it's a little daunting to post, I think.
I don't know, I love it.
I was like, I'm off the wrong way for people sometimes but you got to get over that man
Yeah, you gotta get over that and just throw it out there and can if you build it they will come, you know
Yeah, and yeah, there's been a lot of good feedback within Rocklin, you know
So I'm the executive director of the Rocklin recovery group
So it kind of oversee multiple outpatient facilities that we have. We operate substance abuse and mental health treatment centers in Massachusetts.
And I think over the course of the last five years or so, it's been a mission of ours at
that company to try to be on the cutting edge of substance abuse treatment of kind of what's
coming next. I'm a big believer that, you know, just to jump
right into the Jungian stuff, like, as far as individuation goes, everything individuates,
you know, so as a person moves through individuation, so does phenomena. So, you
know, the experience of addiction itself individuates the experience of recovery itself
individuates. And, you know, you can kind of see that a lot of the example that I use for a lot of people is
I'm a drug addict who comes from the OxyContin era of drug addicts and that's not really
something that we see as much today as we did 15 years ago.
Heroin and Fentanyl are very different.
In my area at the very least, the increase in people using different drugs like
methamphetamine has increased and that's become something that 10 years ago you didn't see
as much. So addiction is changing and the landscape is changing. And with that, we need
to find new ways to meet that for recovery. And that's a big part of the work that we're
trying to do at Rocklin, you know, where to from here sort of thing.
Yeah. Can you say that? Because a lot of like what I wanted to do, it's interesting, like you
never really lose the bad reputation from the people who are wanting to kind of criticize you
for being forward thinking, even when research catches up with what you're doing. But when we
opened, which was not that long ago, I mean, it was five years ago, you know, people kind of acted like I was
crazy for doing brain spotting. Now brain spotting is like almost kind of ubiquitous in our area that even the EMDR
practitioners have kind of switched over. But I'm seeing kind of the eating disorder world and the treatment, resistant
trauma world and the addiction and recovery world change a lot and blow up and that doesn't necessarily mean
that 12 step is discarded or gotten rid of,
it just means that we have kind of new brain-based medicines,
new understanding of neurology,
new understanding of cultural and anthropological metaphors
that need to come into this thing to keep it alive,
to keep it relevant.
And can you say some things about what you're seeing
about where the industry was that wasn't great, where the industry is going now, and maybe what the future of that looks like as, you know, because, you know, when you're a part of a business, part of that is staying relevant and meeting the need of what's happening, you know, you can't rest on your laurels in it, and it looks like you're very forward-thinking in what you do.
you can't rest on your laurels and it looks like you're very forward thinking in what you do. Could you kind of talk about some of the
strengths weaknesses of how we do that in America and the in the in the profit motive of healthcare?
Yeah, definitely. I mean, I've I'm someone I've worked in treatment in one position or another probably since 2011 or so. And in that time as well, I've been a part of starting some nonprofits that, you know, assist family members through the experience of addiction.
So I've seen a lot.
I think my experience has always been as a person in treatment, as a person working in
treatment, has always been faced with, you know, traditional 12-step approaches,
evidence-based practice, CBT, DBT.
And that was kind of the bread and butter.
evidence-based practice, CBT, DBT, and that was kind of the bread and butter. To your point,
over years EMDR and different sorts of modalities have come into play. I think something that's really big right now is the IFS modality. I think a lot of people are taking to that.
And interestingly enough, that's just, in my opinion, depth psychology with clinical language.
So it's interesting to see as far as the question of where are know, so it's interesting to see
as far as the question of where are we going,
it's evident to me that we're going to a place
that has more depth.
We don't, we're not responding to kind of surface level,
let's polish this up and get through this and move on.
We're not responding to that anymore as a collective.
Do you think there's cognitive and behavioral implications
of like behavior is all that's relevant.
So as long as you're not doing drugs, you're good.
As long as you're going to church, you're good.
As long as you're lifting weights in the morning, you're good.
As long as you're eating your broccoli, you're good.
But not looking at how old is that part of you
that wants to use, or how old is that part of you
that doesn't feel understood?
Where does it come from? Where is it in the body? Do you feel those like earlier kind of CBT take or attempts to fuse the 12 step
with CBT is sort of avoidant for the lack of a better word avoidant of a more whole
or more threatening psychology to our system?
I probably would, you know, I probably would. I think that even now I think that and this
is a big part of the work that I'm doing
on a personal level
Recovery just has to be more than that, you know recovery just has to be more than the
the
Cessation of symptom and the change in behavior and not using you know
Because as someone in recovery for so long, obviously I've seen a lot of people who you know
Do that sort of thing like go to church to the meetings, they live that way of life, but they're still struggling with all these underlying, more deeply rooted issues that just changing behavior doesn't touch. And then to that point, I think that then immediately a relapse or some sort of behavioral regression is immediately
seen as a failure and in that mindset it just creates this very shame-based
recovery world I think. Yeah. And again just to kind of go back to that
previous question I think where we came from a place where it was it was much
like that grounded in changing your behavior,
just don't use. And now we're moving to this experience where I see people in their early
twenties and you can't really speak to them from that sort of 12-step mountaintop, you know,
this sort of idea of sit down and shut up and this is what you're going to do. This generation,
this new generation of people suffering from addiction,
it's just not responding to that because they're longing for something deeper.
And you know, this even happened within my community where I would say Jung probably was a very unknown
figure, minus his mention in the big book and some people's knowledge of him. He was the only one that responded to Bill W. I mean Bill W wrote seven people and
Freud didn't write him back. You know, Jung was the one who kind of gave...
You talk about Roland Hazard.
Sorry?
So the story with Jung and Aya, the story starts with that guy, this guy Roland Hazard,
and he writes to Freud and he writes to Adler and those guys kind of, they don't respond
to him at all.
And Young is the last.
Hey Cory.
I think the video is frozen.
I'm not sure if you can hear me.
Oh dear. Okay. Technical difficulties. We will try and reconnect and
go from there. Hey, Corey, I lost you for a minute and you froze. I lost audio. Can you
hear me? Sorry, Matt. Yeah, I can hear you. Can you hear me? I'm so sorry. Let me we'll just keep recording and then I'll fuse those together
If you want to just kind of go from the he writes Adler
Um, I think that's the last thing that I got. I apologize. Um, no, no problem, dude
So so yeah this guy rolling hazard
He writes freud he writes adler and they both you know, don't respond and young is the last one he writes Adler, and they both don't respond. And Jung is the last one he writes,
and Jung is the only one who responds, and he says, okay, man, if you can come out to Zurich,
that's cool, I'll work with you. And they worked with each other for a year. And the story goes is
as soon as he left Zurich and got on the crane, he was drunk. And he calls Jung back or he contacts
Jung, and there's this real humbling moment on Jung's part where he goes,
okay, well, I kind of misdiagnosed you. I thought you were a hard drinker, but you're what people call a real alcoholic. And the only thing that's going to help you is some sort of spiritual
experience or spiritual transformation, essentially. So go home and find that.
And is that the letter where he says spiritus ex spiritum the replace spirits
with spirit no that's so that's the letter he writes to Bill W okay and
that's like that's that's kind of that's probably ten years past this story when
that letter actually yeah that's the one I'm familiar with so I don't know the
Roland-Hazard stuff yeah Roland-Hazard is kind of the guy who really helps the AA become AA
because he comes back to the States,
he joins the Oxford group, which is kind of its precursor.
He gets sober through the Oxford group practices.
He meets Abby Thatcher, who's Bill W's best friend.
Abby Thatcher meets Bill W and the story goes.
But without Young, we really don't have this idea that, you know, spirituality
or some sort of spiritual experience is the answer or one of the solutions for addiction.
So it's just interesting that a lot of people aren't familiar with him or weren't familiar
with him in the community that I was in.
And then over the last probably seven or eight years, he's become prominent in a multitude of ways, not only in the recovery
communities, I think, but also in the collective, which really speaks to something of greater
depth as well.
So to that point of when you're forward thinking, people kind of think you're crazy, but then
eventually they catch on.
That's kind of what happened with Young.
Even when we
opened Rocklin and we started, you know, talking about Young, it wasn't something
that even clients who were coming in for treatment were really familiar with. And
it's introducing people to, you know, an entirely different perspective and way
to move about psychological life.
And, you know, to jump in some of the hard questions of AA or some of the
sticking points people have with it when you say spiritual experience I mean do
you mean that I have to see an angel do you mean that I have to go to church do
you mean I have to make contact with a deep part of myself I don't understand
what do you what do you mean there you know that spirituality is essential for
recovery could you speak to that? Yeah I mean I think it means so many different
things to so many people.
And beyond like spiritual experience, I really like what AA's text says about, you know,
the psychic change and, and taking that from a psychological point of view and breaking
it down etymologically, you know, we're looking for a soul perspective, a soul transformation.
So the way that I see the world, so to me, you know, a spiritual experience is when something happens to me that has happened so many times yet I can experience it
Perspectively and embody it in a totally different way. I don't react in my old behavior. I don't react in my own my old thinking.
I'm able to see something happening to me and respond in a completely different way that allows me to find more meaning in
that experience versus some sort of resolution to it.
And I think that's something that's really hard for people in the treatment world to
understand when they work with people is how to hold space for clients versus needing to
offer them some sort of resolution to what they're bringing up. Because a lot of times it's just about putting some voice
to the experience and getting some distance
and perspective on it that shifts the way you relate to it.
Yeah, I talk about like why a lot of the stuff
that is brain-based works.
IFS is probably the most well-known kind of repackaging
of some of those things
Yeah, but I think the trick is the metacognition that these parts of self feel like they are possession
Like they're all of us like they take over whether or not we admit that that's happening. You know that that's what's happening and then
Repressing them through a cognitive or behavioral intervention or more avoidant intervention
You just white knuckle it through life until you never,
even if you make it to the end of your life
and that thing never does flare up
and make you deal with the shadow or make you relapse,
you're still taking that energy and avoiding it
in a way that I think does damage.
And what the metacognitive parts do
is they let you experience that
without being overwhelmed by it,
without even having to identify with it directly
you can have sympathy without over identification and
and that those networks in the brain are attention they are at odds, but we we need all of them and
Yeah, what these are doing are letting us know those parts of self without them possessing us essentially. Yeah, 100%
I agree with that. Yeah, it's interesting because you know, IFS is growing like I saw that you had done some training at the Chicago Union Institute.
Yeah, which is probably where 50% of our web has come from.
Oh wow, nice.
Yeah, which is even though we're in Alabama. Yeah, that in New York is like half, you know, a couple thousand a month, but the like, people get angry with me for saying that, you know, I like IFS, but that
if you're going to do individual therapy, it may not be the best way to go to sink $15,000 into
that because what Schwartz is doing a lot of that is putting Jung and the post Jungians together with
Fritz Perls, the experiential stuff. And people will send me hate mail about that. And I'm like,
man, this is in the introduction of his book like I haven't even gotten
He's telling you you know like this is him
But I don't know
I mean I see it as like a model that takes a lot of these perennial philosophy and then trains people to do it and
Facilities quickly, you know with a with a universalized language
But without the amount of work that it takes to kind of learn a lot of these things that take, you know, 72 years to learn some of the time.
I don't know if you could speak to that when you're saying like where the industry is going
and kind of what's getting popular and why, you know.
Yeah, I mean, I think that to me, you know, working with an individual in treatment or
someone who's pursuing, you know, recovery or substance abuse treatment, it's a journey, man.
It's an unfolding.
To work with them, it can't be something quick.
We can't do a quick fix.
We have to take the time.
I'm a very psychoanalytic thinker.
Therapy is about the retelling of my story.
I think that that's the area that we need to move the industry in is bringing
people in to see that, you know, their struggle with addiction or their struggle with alcoholism
is not some sort of moral failing. It is not something that makes them different from another
person. It's a sole event. You know, addiction is this sort of Promethean rupture in the psyche, this desire to transcend and grab that fire
and also feel divine in myself, to Jung's point.
So I think that working with people one-on-one
needs for the industry to really progress and survive
and be useful in a big way.
It needs to understand that the process
is not a 30 day thing, it's not a 60 day thing
that you might expect.
But the research says that the recovery,
could you speak to people that are thinking
whatever comes after that ellipses?
Usually the clinical psychology grad school student
that has just taken their research 101 or 201 class and
sends me hate mail. Could you tell them why that research isn't maybe not relevant as somebody who
is an executive director and also in recovery? Yeah, I mean, I deal with this all the time where
we'll hire clinicians that are 26 years old who get a master's degree and then they come out and
they think everything is cookie cutter and this is how you work with someone and then you do this and then you do this and
There's it's not touching anything. You know, it's not touching anything of the real wound of why this is happening
You know to this idea that behind the behavior of addiction there is an image and the work really needs to become this would be
there is an image and the work really needs to become this would be real Hillman piece of it but the word really needs to become identifying the images
behind the behavior of addiction you know the images of descent the images
of rupture the images of longing and exile and these are the things that then
need to kind of be amplified in the individuals experience and revisioned
into their mythos.
And if they can do that, and that doesn't happen in four weeks,
doesn't happen in six weeks, you know, that's a real down and dirty process.
But when that happens, we have seen, especially at Rocklin,
lasting recovery, but also recovery that looks totally different.
You know, these are people that pursue the 12 step process, but understand it as a practice
simply of grounding and a way to kind of organize and hold their suffering for a period of time,
but not live there.
And I think that's a big piece of where recovery is going in the future, where the industry
needs to go in the future.
AA and that 12 step model is great for that grounding experience
But it's not a place to live in and I think that's been the dominant mode of thinking for a lot of people in the addiction
space
Well, and one of the things that I think is
Well, I'm trying to think of how I want to set that question up, but I'll just give you
three pieces of something and then see how you want to fit them together.
One of the things is I get a lot of calls of a certain type and I'll say, when I get
somebody who's saying that they're having a dissociative disorder that is just flaring
up all of a sudden and they don't know why and they're starting to drink alcohol more
or they're starting to have some kind of symptom more
is y'all ask like, what age are your kids?
Because so, and they're like, what?
I'm like, you know, what happened to you
when you were at that age?
Because so much of the time it's like,
if I'm a woman and I have a sexual assault or an abuse
and then at seven and then my child is right about to be
seven, especially if the child's female, your body starts to
almost give you that thing to start to understand in order to
protect your child. You know, I see that happen a lot. One of
the things that happens with with addiction, I think, is
people are like, man, everything's going good. Like
I'm going to church, I've got this nonprofit, I'm doing this,
I'm doing this, I'm doing this, but I'm like feeling this
overwhelming, whatever. And you know, it was an alcoholic
or I use, you know, IV drugs, but I've been in recovery
and that's good and whatever.
I always am like, how long have you been in?
Was it about three years?
Because it seems like that three year mark is where,
you know, all of the technique and the skill
and the cognitive parts of like how not to use drugs or how not to participate in the behavior that you're in recovery from or there and established.
But then all of a sudden, there's this, the original problem that put you there is back, but you don't really want to go back to your old solution. But all of a sudden, the problem is a problem problem and you're trying to deal with it. And that's like where the real trauma work can start where like brain spotting and the Jungian lens of the soul
is like such a helpful thing.
And so that I love getting those phone calls
because I know that person's just so ready, you know?
Yeah.
Can you say anything about that?
Definitely.
I mean, I think that that is so accurate.
It's funny.
It's so funny because I usually think that it's around
like this four to six year mark that that really starts to happen for people.
So, you know, and I talk about that and that happened in my experience, you know, like, I believe that the 12 steps are, it's a mythology.
And mythology is, can be thought of as a psychic container. You know what I mean? It holds our suffering. It gives our suffering context, it gives my suffering language, it gives
my suffering ritual, and that's what being in AA does. And so for that three
year period of being in AA, that four year period, you know, everything is able
to be held within that mythology. And then that exact thing happens where
you kind of take a step back and the formulaic aspect of what you've been
doing and the rigidity of what you've been doing, it starts to confine and
something in you is trying to grow beyond that. And we don't have places for
those people to go that don't want to return to use, but also can admit that what they've
been doing really isn't working anymore.
And a lot of times, especially in the 12 step community, it's kind of met with dismissal,
you know, like, oh, you're overthinking it, you know, maybe your ego's getting in the
way or, oh, you're heading towards a relapse.
And how frustrating is that? Because for someone who's done quote unquote, done the work
and changed behaviors and changed thought patterns
and going through all of this stuff,
they're simply saying, I can't identify
with that mythology anymore.
And so I need to find the next container.
And the work that I've been doing,
I really categorize this period of recovery as post-recovery
work.
It's not walking away from recovery, but it's changing the way we understand it, to your
point.
It's moving away from formula and rigidness, and it's moving into more of trying to deeply
understand the roots
of the problem in the first place. Now that I've had some time away and I've stabilized,
I can do that work. And a lot of I've had this experience where a lot of friends of
mine will go five, six, seven years. And you know, then all of a sudden they're out and
they're relapsing and you ask them what happened. And a lot of them said they felt this way
but they couldn't speak to it.
They didn't feel like they had someone
who was gonna be there to hold that
because it was gonna be met with some sort of aspect
of or experience of that dismissal.
And what's frustrating is a lot of those people
are not saying they want to relapse.
They're not having any kind of desire for that. And it's almost like the community pushes them that way because they need to
interpret everything as this need to use again. And so that becomes the language that they're
almost offering somebody. And I think the fusion of 12-step and the Jungian thing, it's not either or, it's, you know,
making a bigger container, you know?
And every, every epic, every cultural cycle,
we have to do that because the culture is different,
the addiction is different, the drugs are different,
the cultural factors that make up the human psyche
and the waters we're swimming in are different.
So of course, these methods have to change.
And the idea that, well, this was randomized controlled
trial, so it's a hundred percent.
If you do this, you have the best odds.
I don't really believe that that is a dynamic
of a model of research and clinical practices as we need.
Absolutely.
And it's just the same thing.
I mean, you know, I think about Hillman's book a lot.
You know, we've had a hundred years of psychotherapy
and the world is getting worse.
And, you know, I think about that in relation to AA sometimes.
I wouldn't say that it's getting worse,
but we've had 100 years of AA almost.
Where are we going now?
And is it still meeting the times?
And to your point, its language works for what it works for,
but then it starts to fall short.
And again, to your point, how many people have we lost trying to fit themselves into that container once they outgrew it?
Yeah, that's bad thing to think about yeah, and I think outgrowing it doesn't mean that you can drink or use drugs
You know
Occasionally or I mean it doesn't have to mean when a lot of the people who are scared by this kind of thing means
It means that the small continues to to mean what a lot of the people who are scared by this kind of thing means. It means that the soul continues to grow.
And a lot of times there's no plan to ever use again.
There's, it's not a good idea to ever go back
to partial recreational use of anything.
That isn't the distinction.
You know, it is that there is a bigger model
where we can continue to have containers
for people that are in further and further along.
You've written a lot about James Hillman, who was a... I guess he was a Jungian analyst,
even though he got out of Zurich with fire and later said, I'm not an analyst, I'm not
a clinical psychologist when he was being fired in Texas.
I don't know what to call him, but he was an interesting guy.
He was a good writer.
Can you talk about how Hillman's kind of imaginal archetypal psychology informs some of what you do or just his ideas?
Yeah, definitely. And real quick, I just want to say to that other point, I think part of the goal of recovery is to have that growth experience.
You know, it is to move on eventually and not stay put. So, just to end that question, you know.
Hillman, to me, is kind of like my psychological forefather. It's really wild. I just,
I stumbled upon his work for the first time probably in around 2017 or so. I picked up
The Soul's Code. I really wasn't in a place to read it, you
know, how that happens with books, you know, you psyche picks it up, but it's not really
the right time. And it wasn't until probably more closer to COVID and the 2020 timeframe
where I had downloaded the volume of his biography, the first one by Dick Russell, and I walked
around my apartment
complex every day listening to it. And the more and more I listened to it, it's just so much related
to my experience within the Recovery Collective. He kind of came into the Jungian world, and then
as he progressed through it, he kind of found the same juncture that we're speaking of. This is the
old way, and it's kind of cracking cracking and what's going to come next.
I think that Hillman opened so many doors for people in this current climate.
You know, I think he was a man ahead of his time and I think his time is coming and his
time is probably, you know, now in some fashion because again, we're hungry for new perspectives
and new ways to think and the way that he talks about returning soul to psychology
and soul as a perspective,
soul as something you can kind of embody,
not some sort of thing that you have.
It's a way of saying-
It's like the soul being different.
John Beebe would point out about Hillman too,
that they're not the same thing.
Yeah.
Maybe some overlap. Yeah. And so,
you know, for me, I think bringing some of Hillman's ideas into the addiction space
started for me. It's kind of funny, like, you know, and in revisioning psychology has this chapter
about, you know, basically this process of seeing through, seeing through something into its
archetypal roots.
And that's kind of what happened. His work led me to look deeper through the recovery experience
and beyond that kind of, again, try to conceptualize this next phase of what recovery is for people when
they outgrow that initial container. And it's helped me to sort of bring mythopoetics into the addiction
space and allow people to understand the addiction process as initiation but
also as a living myth for them. It's part of their story and you know do this
with introducing certain stories like Prometheus or Persephone and Tantalus
and again just finding these new containers for people to
conceptualize their suffering through beyond a clinical model or some sort of research you know.
Yeah. Yeah, I, Homan is an interesting figure to me and because he's one that I couldn't get away
from like I kept bumping up against. A lot of him, I think, is not quite finished.
You know, like a lot of the things that he puts out
as finished works, he was more in the process of something
than he was willing to admit.
I've talked to Dick Russell on here, his biographer.
Hopefully we're gonna talk to him again later this year
when his next book is coming out.
I've talked to David Tacey, who is an analysis and
and a assistant element.
He's an admirer of a lot of his work and also a critic of a lot of his work.
I've talked to Lawrence Hellman, who is James Hellman's son, um, and, and also working in astrology and psychology, um, and,
and uh, industrial organizational psychology too. Um,
and he was somebody who I kept seeing my own worst angels in,
like the part of myself that I was kind of afraid of.
Because I think that there was a element of Hillman that was kind of driven mad, a little madness he mastered later in life,
but by his ability to see through time beyond his own life and the inability for his whole life to contain the expansiveness.
You know, we all kind of hit that.
And that the reason that I mentioned that is not to opine on helmet a ton, but I
think a ton of recovery work that is embodying that is soulful, that is good.
Is helping people come to terms with these frustrating and impossible
limitations of life that are human.
The body, um, the temporal thing that we have to
to sit through. I'm thinking of Simone Vey, the mystic, that says, well you should approach an
addict like somebody who is trying to eat God. That this person is, you know, sort of trying to
contain all of it in a way that isn't possible and to really reconnect and know that it's not a taking
in, it's an emptying yourself of to really make room for something else.
Could you say anything about that?
I mean, that's kind of a very open statement.
Yeah.
I mean, I think I would agree that Hillman had this way of seeing through the events
in his life that made his grounded life, his literal life, a little chaotic for sure. And, uh, I think that.
In my experience, it really opened up not necessarily kind of my darker
sides of my life, but Hillman really opened me up to see how expansive my life
could be or how expansive I was as an individual and coming from such a kind
of structured recovery experience
and world, that was really freeing to me.
But I agree in the sense that it's hard to start with something like that, you know,
that someone who's looking to get sober, really coming off the streets or right off of a run, it's really hard to grasp any of this imaginal, sort of deeper
rooted material.
But I think what's really important that I do with people in the early stages with them
in relation to Hillman is really trying to kind of talk about the idea of pathology and
this idea that we psychopathologize everything.
I've listened to some of your episodes where you guys talked about evidence-based research and it's just you know, we psychopathologize everything and I had this instance with my son who you know,
One day was just kind of pulling at his ears a lot, you know, and and I was with someone and they said something and I said, well, maybe he's just going to be a musician You know, maybe there's something like peculiar about the way he's listening and and we don't know rhythm of it
Yeah, yeah
We don't need to say that there's something wrong
But we need to try and honor this thing that's happening and and I talk about that with like people's experience of depression a lot
you know if you
when you experience depression from a
You know, if you, when you experience depression from a Hillman's perspective, I would say, if you kind of work with it a little bit and embody the depression a little bit, you realize
certain things like when you're depressed, you watch different movies, you eat different
food, you listen to different music, and you might dress differently.
And through that experience with depression, you're able to gain a perspective through
that lens that you weren't able to gain a perspective through that lens
that you weren't able to gain through your ego's
perspective prior.
And in that way, the depression is actually a gift.
It's actually the soul trying to tell you something.
And if you break down that word, psycho,
sorry, psyche logo, psychopathology, or psychopathos,
that is the love of the soul.
And so, you know, a symptom like depression is the soul's way of loving
us into seeing something about our lives that we cannot see from ego consciousness.
And, and that, you know, understanding that is very freeing from this idea
that there's something wrong with me.
Yeah.
And I think that is so important for people to understand. And that's why I think Illman's time
is sort of coming because I think people are ready for something like that versus this idea
that I'm sick and I need to get on this medication and I need to do this for the rest of my life.
Yeah. And also I think seeing a static end goal
as this place that we get to
is always gonna let you down.
The other issue I have with the biomedical model
is that like you're saying,
it turns every symptom into a problem
or into a not even a problem as much as a finite thing.
And I think that you should get under it
and see it as a dynamic force that is sometimes good, sometimes bad, but
always you and a part of yourself that you can learn to hold. And that when we turn things into an objective metric, like, you
know, we can look at a white cell blood count in a hard science like biology, but we can't really do that with psychology, like a lot of the people that want to turn us into a computer or just an inevitable result
of computational genes are trying to do.
We need to be able to see these things as the soul speaking,
the soul crying out, as dimension, you know,
you don't even have to kind of do trans-dimensional forces,
but just dynamic forces that need to be understood. And ultimately can probably only be understood by, you know, the person who is, who is the one having the soul that is an analysis, you know.
There is a rhythm to suffering. And I think that's such a thing that I talk about with people
in recovery, which is this idea that you're in this process now
and you're sober and you're helping other people
and you're showing up.
It by no means means that you're not going to suffer.
Like heartbreak is going to happen,
relationships are going to end, jobs are going to end.
And it kind of follows this rhythm of Persephone.
The idea is you're always going to return to the underworld and we're all going to
return to the underworld and we need we need to learn how to move through
the underworld without grasping for the fruits and the fruits for people in recovery
or drug addicts are relief and comfort and all these things.
So we need to learn how to maneuver the
underworld in a participatory way, not in a defensive way. I think that's another thing that Hillman really brought out in me that changed my life,
which was I need to participate with my emotions, not defend myself against them.
And that really opened up a whole world for me
Yeah, I have you read all three volumes of Hillman's biography. Are you I've read I haven't read I have like psychotically. Yeah. Yeah
Dick Russell when I interviewed it wasn't out yet
He said that there was kind of a forgiveness of Jung when Hillman found the red book and that a lot of the anger
That he had he kind of let forgiveness of Jung when Hillman found the Red Book and that a lot of the anger that he had, he kind of let go of because he saw that
as this descent and return
that he was wanting psychology to have.
And he saw that Jung had done that himself
to kind of have the framework that he later built.
He just didn't think that the kind of archetypal realm
that he was descending into with the Red Book
was something everyone needed to do.
It was something he wanted to glean insights from
and then inform his writing.
But Jung had this idea of descent and return,
which, you know, Campbell takes and makes
the hero's journey for, you know, pop psychology
and screenwriters, but there's this idea of like,
you know, that you go down into this place
that is the descent into hell
or the descent into the underworld,
or ultimately the parts of yourself you don't understand,
and then you come back. but that you do that enough
that the ego kind of becomes porous
to where it's unafraid of it.
And it's not a rigid boundary that just cracks
and becomes psychotic or just needs to crack
and dissociate or crack or lose itself in addiction.
But that it becomes this porous boundary
like a cell wall that can let unconscious contents in.
But it's still a filter, it's still there.
We have to have that individual identity,
we have to have that ability to turn off a lot of ourself
because we can't just be this expansive ball
of energy of all we are.
Could you say some about maybe that reforming the process?
Because I think the biggest risk I see
when somebody is telling me that they've
Finished with addiction work or something is that they view it as a destination where they're done and they used to feel this way
And they won't feel that again and it's no on a certain level. You'll always feel that way
It's being able to go down and descend into that and then learn something from it without using
And without ultimately doing anything that is turning you off or being
Destructive, you know, yeah, and I think that's kind of what I meant with the example of depression without using and without ultimately doing anything that is turning you off or being destructive.
Yeah, and I think that's kind of what I meant
with the example of depression.
It takes a period of time before you can participate
with something like that in that manner.
And I think that's really the process
of that initial period of recovery.
It's helping the ego gain enough strength
to be able to do something like that.
And I think that's an immensely important piece of the work.
People who are jumping into the descent or archetypal or Jungian work too soon, they
risk that idea that the ego isn't strong enough to hold the contents that they meet or that
arise.
But I think to your point, that's what I meant with the idea of depression.
We have to go into it and not be afraid of it
and kind of see that the more and more I have that experience,
one of the ways I think about it metaphorically
is when I assign to depression that it's mine,
it gets sort of trapped in the body. and that's when we experience what I think collectively
we understand as depression, you know, when I, when this phenomena arises and
it comes to me for whatever reason, if I immediately trap it and I say, well, my
depression has gotten really bad.
I can't come to work today.
It actually exasperates the experience of depression.
If the phenomena comes to me and I realize this is something visiting, there's a purpose
for this happening and I work with it for a little bit and I do some writing and maybe
I like I said, watch some movies or eat different food or whatever, dress differently or listen
to different music,
and I get to some resolve of what the depression was trying to get me to see, the phenomena
I feel like leaves, you know? And then I find myself, all right, I'm okay again. I came
out of that. I've risen up again from this experience. And now the next time it comes,
I have to do the same thing because it's going to come
again. And it coming again does not mean failure, and it doesn't mean regression. And it just means,
honestly, it just means we're human. It just means we're alive, that these phenomena,
these psychic phenomena that you can't see, that you can't grasp, they come when they're ready.
And like Hillman's point,
behind every symptom there is a God almost.
So what God is coming to me right now and why.
So the question that people always direct at the Jungians
to start to put a head on some of this stuff is technique. You're talking about
a map, you're talking about a process, you're talking about throwing the baby out with the
bathwater of research and clinical psychology and the biomedical model. What do you want to do? What
does recovery look like? Because I think for most people that have your perspective, the actual 12
step model doesn't really need to change that much. It just needs to prepare for where we're not white,
knuckling it through the early stages of not using
and kind of point towards another doorway.
What does that door look like and what's on the other side
and how do we build that?
How do we do that?
How do you do that through your work?
Yeah, I mean, I think one of the big pieces about that
is like, you know, I kind of feel like Hillman would
call it the aesthetic response.
Part of it is starting to have these little moments where you try to find the beauty in
what's right in front of you and appreciate what's in front of you and see it as alive.
So you start to take more concern about the way you keep your home.
You start to take more concern about the way you keep your home. You start to take more concern about the way you decorate your office. You start to take more concern about the way you're eating and the food you're eating. And love what he says about office spaces.
If you go into your office and it's bright fluorescent lights
and there's nothing on the walls and it's all white,
there's no healing that's going to happen there.
Or even when he talks about working with a married couple,
he would say, let's not even talk about your marriage,
but tell me how you decorate the living room.
And if there's just trash everywhere
and everything is chaotic,
then that's affecting you just as much.
So I think part of what we need to do in recovery
is return to some aesthetic appreciation
of being able to see the beauty in the world
and that it's affecting us
just as much as we're affecting it.
Yeah, it's funny you mentioned the fluorescent lighting.
One of the first episodes, I talked to the architect Leon
Kreer about new urbanism, his work with urbanism.
And at the time, I didn't even know
that was going to be a podcast or that I would do one.
And I was kind of wrestling with Hillman
because there were parts of him that I really liked
and there were parts of him that kind of scared me
about myself.
And Kreer, off my, like at our conversation
at the end was like, oh yeah, you remind me of this guy
that I met in Zurich when you're talking about that.
Cause he didn't know Jung, but I probably said a Jungian
idea or something.
He was like James Hillman.
I was like, oh, and he was like, yeah, he told me
that American architecture, like European architecture
draws the eye upward.
Everything is pulling you up because it wants you
to contemplate God.
But Americans come in and they put a drop ceiling
in fluorescent lighting because capitalism needs you
to stare down into hell.
So.
That's why it's best.
I don't think Hillman ever wrote that,
or at least I don't have never seen a recording
of him saying that, but he did tell it to career in Zurich and at one point.
That's amazing. That's amazing. And I but I do think that's that's so much of it right like Hillman would say to that recovery I think Hillman would say recovery is so immensely bound in monotheism and the perspective of Christianity, and it really is from the 12-step perspective, you know?
And the idea is all about, you know, kind of transcending.
You know, I transcend resentment.
I transcend behaviors.
And I get above that.
And I don't act like that anymore.
And I reach purity.
And that's just, you know, I think to the point we were talking about earlier, that
sort of perspective or that sort of myth doesn't hold for forever. And, and we need to prepare people for for the fall of that and the ability to kind of go down and hold things soulfully and hold things from a sort of perspective of depth versus transcendence. Well and even somebody like Hillman who was just obsessed with bringing back a polytheism into psychology and wanted a return to the
Greek mystery cults and getting away from monotheism. I don't think
he saw monotheism or a singular self as a problem. He saw them as containers and
that sometimes you need this type of container at different points of the
journey and other times you need this type of container. And then there were places where that top-down
traditional hierarchy, you know, putting every,
putting, you know, God into one box
instead of lots of little boxes,
or the divine, the self into one box
instead of lots of little boxes
was not allowing for a greater ritual to happen.
You know, like if you go and you look at,
there's lots of places where I think Eddinger,
Edward Eddinger puts Jung better than Jung puts himself
because he wasn't quite settled
with what he was trying to say.
And Hillman's the same where it's like,
he kind of opened up a conversation
where there's some things where,
I don't know that he ever said them perfectly
by the end of his life, or at least not, you know, in a book.
Maybe he was saying that to somebody else.
But if you look at the through lines
and what he's calling to come back into recovery,
to come back into psychology,
I think are an animism and a sense of ritual.
An animism in that I can turn my own ego down enough
to hear the world talk to me,
to let my house be alive,
to let the sword that I'm making
be alive.
You're turning down your own identity enough
to hear the identity of the world and reinstalling that.
In a way, you're never going to get there
through an objective science that's going to say,
this is the reason why you don't light the planet on fire.
This is the reason why Black Rock and hedge funds are probably
the wrong path.
Because a spreadsheet can't do that in a way
that a re-ensulment of the world through animism can.
Yeah.
Same thing with ritual, you know.
I think that's interesting.
Like, I was only going to interrupt, but it was making me think.
Are you familiar with the work of Robert Sardello?
Yeah, I've encountered him a little bit.
So you know, that's sort of really Robert Sardllo's practices and some of his sort of contemplative work
was really the segue for me into that ability
to experience that sort of animism again.
And this idea of getting out of that top down response
from a phenomenological perspective and basis.
And it's funny that they did a lot of work together
when they were in Dallas
at the Dallas Institute for Humanities and a lot of
You know to your point about Ed and Jerry and young a lot of what sardello is doing is sort of taking Hillman and putting
It in a more kind of structured context of more
Maybe I don't know about academic but more
Refined Way almost he definitely was gonna play politics with institutions way more academic, but more refined way almost.
He definitely was going to play politics with institutions way more than
Hillman ever was going to.
Yeah.
Yeah.
I'm going to carry any water for anything that he didn't have complete respect for.
And I think, I think too, with Hillman, like the idea of what you said about
the self, you know, I don't think he was against the
self.
I think he was against the Jungian community making the self this goal to reach through
analysis.
Like you go into analysis, you individually and you reach the self and that's, you know,
Edinger sort of, you know, ego self access.
And that I think makes a lot of sense.
But again, to that experience of rhythm, I just think you come in and out
of that. You know, you experience the self and then you move around and you mess up and
then you come back and you work with the self and that sort of more spirallic way of being
in the world is much more, I feel like how Hillman honored the self versus those traditional
Jungians as sort of like this end game.
He definitely hated the literalism of the instit's that just takes over in the 80s
and
And I think probably rightly so
I mean the people that I like left the Institute to that point to pursue an experiential and a
Somatic medicine like Arnie Mendel with process therapy or Sidger and Halston with voice dialogue, which in some ways
Is a more intuitive form of IFS I think
and how sound with voice dialogue, which in some ways is a more intuitive form of IFS, I think.
Yeah. And I think that Hillman's experience, again, like we were saying at the beginning, kind of his experience in Zurich really mimics what we're saying about the recovery experience,
you know, like, and it kind of comes up against to like, you know, with Hillman,
the Pu'erh Senex work is so vast and it's such an intricate part of his thinking and that's sort of what we're up against you know like when the Cenex becomes
two-one-sided in this rigid formulaic repetitious approach to recovery you
know it breeds that poor shadow that needs to kind of just run out and jump
out the window or you know kind of jump up and scream I'm not gonna do this I'm
gonna go find something now yeah we need to honor that impulsivity as creative energy that the Cenex has kind of been
pressing down, you know, and, and that was what he was up against in that period of time when he
was sort of director of studies and trying to bring these new things to the Institute. Like,
what's that story in the first volume about playing softball? You know, like he he started bringing baseball gloves and softball and he would,
you know, say and this was so crazy, he would say that, you know, they would have better
discussions there than in any sort of lecture hall. And then I was in Chicago at a weekend
teaching with an analyst named Dennis Merritt. And one of the first things he said was, you and he would say that in that softball, Eros was there. And from that platonic standpoint,
you need Eros to teach anything.
And so how can we look at that in the 12 steps
is I would say that AA has lost its level of Eros.
There's not enough anymore.
And so the teachings start to lack.
The communities start to become hierarchical.
They start to become, well, that's that guy.
He sponsors all these people,
or this is the old timer who's been here for 20 years. Let's listen to him.
They don't have that experience of Eros anymore.
And I think that's what at his best he was trying to bring out and show people.
And you know, I think it kind of backfired on him in a couple of ways, but, um,
well when you're having an affair with a patient
You might have too much eros in your psychoanalysis, you know
Perfect guy. I mean it also the ethics was not modern
You know, there are a lot of it wasn't like he's doing that today
But yeah, there were a lot of things that are pretty wild in his biography
You know and in his life, you know, and I think he would be the first one to tell you that
Oh, definitely.
Definitely.
Yeah, I wonder, you know, we talk about animism being,
you know, the re-enchantment of the world,
but to me, ritual is where you willfully
and intentionally take parts of yourself
that you wanna change externally, you externalize them,
you know, in Western esoteric magic, that maybe is through
burying a duck egg or putting these little figures on a board.
But in art therapy, it's through art and hypnosis.
It's through, you know, or guided meditation.
It's through turning these pieces of you into an image.
Then the important part of the ritual is modifying this image externally
so that you have more power over those pieces of self and then reclaiming them.
And I think that that ritual and animism are two of the things that Hillman wanted to come back a lot of his take on
a polytheistic psychology is trying to do that. Could you say anything about
those things in your work or how they show up, how you kind of use them if you do it all?
Yeah, I mean, it's hard to say specifically. I'm trying to think if we, you know,
I mean, with animism, I think I try and work with people, especially from not necessarily an external standpoint, but as far as internal phenomena, you know, always trying to understand
what's happening to them as something that's alive, you know, so and you know, putting
a face to the experience of depression, putting an image to the experience of addiction and,
and letting it sort of amplify itself into something bigger.
I think that to your point about ritual, man, we've lost it.
And that's sort of the experience that I feel like people come up against again in the recovery space,
which is the rituals.
There's a famous quote, I forget by who, but it's the rituals remain long after the reason is remembered
or long after the reason is forgotten.
So we just keep doing these things, but they almost feel empty.
Ritual can be good and it can be bad.
And it's just a religion when it's not alive anymore.
And just like routine or tradition or, you know,
there are 12 step programs, I think that are alive,
that understand the concepts you're talking about.
I mean, sometimes I tell people who think a certain way,
I want you to go to this church on this day,
because that's where you're gonna find your people.
Whereas if you go at three o'clock, I don't's where you're gonna find your people, whereas
if you go at three o'clock, I don't know that you will.
Yeah, definitely.
Definitely.
And I think just, I think part of that is trying to push people to seek out ritual and
to understand the importance of ritual in their life and then let them create it.
I think that's part of the problem is people need to find space to develop their own rituals
and find and attach meaning to them instead of being told this is the ritual you need
to do. I think that works for a period, but really what we long for is a personal relationship
to the way we move through life. And you know, the rituals that speak to say, my daemon might
not speak to someone else's.
And so a lot of the work I think that recovery in its next evolution will be about is helping
people develop their own rituals versus putting them into old rituals, no longer working.
Yeah.
Exactly.
Yeah.
Well, that's beautiful.
Is there anything that you want to say to wrap up?
I want to be respectful of your time and not take you, you know, over your,
over your lunch break. What, what all is, uh,
anything that we don't touch on you feel like is important for, uh,
or we have enough there to go ahead and, uh,
release this on the internet and trust that people will reinstall the world
without.
Yeah. I mean, I think,
I think what's important is we kind of said it all throughout is we're not saying
anything bad about 12
steps or traditional recovery in that way.
We're just saying that inevitably it does lack and what we need to find is where people
can go in that moment or experience of lack instead of pushing back on them to do more
work or putting them in a position where they feel like they're failing because something is awakening them
and arising in them.
And I think-
It is not always the desire to use.
Even if you tell them that, they may mistake it for it.
But a lot of times it is dying of old things
and a hunger for a new thing that we can't yet see.
It's just the next, it's the next initiation.
It's the next moment in that person's development
and then in that person's becoming.
And I think that's the most important thing
to think about in the evolution of what's coming
is that how do we hold space for that experience?
Thank you, that's beautiful.
If people wanna find out more about what you do,
I can include any link in the show notes,
but what would you like them to check out?
You know an article a book your your business on LinkedIn what would be a good thing?
Yeah, they can definitely check out the LinkedIn profile and and from there, you know, they can check out
You know, my website is depth recovery org and it sort of introduces Hillman to the recovery space
young to the recovery space and has a bunch of writing and some general ideas of a different approach to this issue.
Well, thank you.
That's gorgeous.
I will link to the LinkedIn page and then from there you can check out some of Corey's
other stuff.
Thank you so much for getting on with us today.
All right.
Thanks, Joel.
Hey, guys.
This is Joel.
And I wanted to pop in to remind you that we do this podcast for free, which there
are a lot of expenses associated with one of the things that could help you and also
would help us, as if you would learn about one of our sponsors, Hardy Nutritionals.
I'm not a big fan of a lot of the BS and the wellness space.
Hardy has randomized controlled trials on all of its products that they paid to be conducted
by external researchers who found a lot of validity
in what they do.
One of the things that I like about Hardy is that
they do double blind randomized controlled trials,
which is the gold standard of research.
And they've shown that on top of a lot of health benefits,
that mental health
is improved and that especially in children with autism and ADHD, mood, anxiety, and symptoms
of irritability were reduced, which is one of the things that traditional medication
doesn't affect and often causes in order to enhance focus.
So if you'd go to gethardy.com, that's G-E-T-H-A-R-D-Y dot com and use
operacode taproot you'll get 15% off. There's also lots of information about
all the ingredients and how they work on our website gettherapybirmingham.com
and if you have any questions feel free to reach out to one of their wellness
advisors. Hardy realized that the people who try their product like myself that
weren't expecting much realized that it does make a significant difference and they
stay on it for the rest of their life most of the time so if you enter the
website you can schedule with a wellness advisor and get a customized plan made
with a professional that Hardy pays for for absolutely free. I hope it works for
you and if you have any questions reach out.