The Texan Podcast - Daily Rundown - June 27, 2025
Episode Date: June 27, 2025Want to support The Texan and help us continue providing the Lone Star State with news you can trust? Subscribe today: https://thetexan.news/subscribe/The Texan’s Daily Rundown brings you a quick re...cap of the latest stories in Texas politics so you can stay informed with news you can trust.Want more resources? Be sure to visit The Texan and subscribe for complete access to our in-depth articles, subscriber-exclusive newsletters, videos, podcasts, and more.Enjoy what you hear? Be sure to subscribe and leave a review!
Transcript
Discussion (0)
Howdy folks, today is Friday, June 27th and you're listening to the Texans Daily Rundown.
I'm the Texans Assistant Editor Rob Lauschus and here is the rundown of today's news in
Texas politics.
First up, in a historic 6-3 opinion, the Supreme Court of the United States placed constraint
on the power of the judiciary to issue broad nationwide injunctions, with Justice Amy Coney
Barrett writing that even when the executive branch unlawfully exceeds its
powers, the judiciary is not justified in doing the same in response. The decision
represents a partial win for the Trump administration's Department of Justice,
which raised the question while defending Trump's executive order ending automatic birth
rights citizenship for the children of non-citizens who were not legally
present in the US at the time of the birth. The question was prompted when
Trump's order was blocked by multiple nationwide injunctions by federal
district courts. With the administration being on the losing end of an
unprecedented number of nationwide injunctions,
the DOJ's defense included a challenge
to the very authority of the courts
to issue such sweeping relief, a strategy which paid off.
Barrett explained that to this day,
the federal courts derived their powers
to issue injunctions, which is called equity powers,
from the Judiciary Act of 1789, but that in
passing the act, Congress did not give quote, freewheeling power to the courts.
Next, the Supreme Court of the United States has upheld a Texas law requiring websites
that intentionally publish quote, sexual material harmful to minors, end quote, to verify the
user's age. The six to three decision in free speech coalition versus Paxton was delivered by
Justice Clarence Thomas writing that quote, the power to require age
verification is within a state's authority to prevent children from
accessing sexually explicit content. The case originated in 2023 after the Texas
legislature passed House Bill 1181 by Representative Matt Shaheen. The case originated in 2023 after the Texas legislature passed House Bill 1181
by Representative Matt Shaheen. The law requires a website that intentionally publishes sexual
material harmful to minors to verify the user's age through digital identification, or a third-party
verification system that uses government-issued identification, or a quote, commercially reasonable method that relies on public
or private transactional data to verify the age of an
individual, the free speech coalition and adult
entertainment advocacy group challenged the age verification
law on the basis that it is overbroad and fails strict
scrutiny and asked the courts to deem it unconstitutional
and unenforceable. In other news, some Texas lawmakers strict scrutiny and asked the courts to deem it unconstitutional and
unenforceable. In other news, some Texas lawmakers and conservative
organizations are urging Governor Greg Abbott to add a previously
unsuccessful bill, quote, in response to the alarming threat of
abortion pills, end quote, to his special session call for July 21st.
In a letter authored by Texas right to life president Dr. John Segoe sent to governor Greg Abbott on June 24th signed
by a total of eight senators, 29 house representatives, 15 members of the
state Republican executive committee, 30 organizations or other individuals,
and lieutenant governor Dan Patrick Abbott prompted to, quote, stop these deadly drugs
and take swift, decisive action.
Senate Bill 2880, also known as the Woman and Child Protection Act, sought to curb the
distribution of chemical abortion pills in Texas through a private right of action, additional
powers granted to the Texas Attorney General, and liability extended for wrongful death
of a preborn child.
As a national pressure campaign rose during the end of the 89th regular legislative session
due to the bill's extended time in the House State Affairs Committee, Chairman Ken King
voted it out on May 23rd.
However, the bill never saw the light of day as the committee report was never sent to
the calendars committee so that it could be brought up on the house floor.
Last but not least, another blow has been struck against the completion of a high speed
rail project proposed to run between Dallas and Houston as Renfe, the Spanish owned company
that was contracted as the project's early operator, has liquidated its US subsidiary.
According to reports from Spain, Renfe has put its American
subsidiary company, Renfe of America, into liquidation,
recognizing losses of over $5 million and recording
a 100% impairment on investments made
over the past five years.
Jennifer Stevens, spokesperson to reroute the route,
a group that opposes the high-speed
rail project from Dallas to Houston, said of the latest development, quote, Texas Central
has continued to refuse to be transparent with any stakeholders, public or private involved
in this project.
Thanks for listening.
To support the Texan, please be sure to visit thetexan.news and subscribe to get full access to all
of our articles, newsletters,
and podcasts.