The Tim Ferriss Show - #117: Dom D'Agostino on Fasting, Ketosis, and The End of Cancer
Episode Date: November 3, 2015Dr. Dominic “Dom" D’Agostino (@DominicDAgosti2) is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Molecular Pharmacology and Physiology at the University of South Florida Morsani Colleg...e of Medicine, and a Senior Research Scientist at the Institute for Human and Machine Cognition (IHMC). He has also deadlifted 500 pounds for 10 reps after a seven-day fast. He’s a beast and — no big surprise — he’s a good buddy of Dr. Peter Attia, my MD friend who drinks "jet fuel" in search of optimal athletic performance. The primary focus of Dom's laboratory is developing and testing metabolic therapies, including ketogenic diets, ketone esters and ketone supplements to induce nutritional/therapeutic ketosis. D’Agostino’s laboratory uses in vivo and in vitro techniques to understand the physiological, cellular and molecular mechanism of metabolic therapies and nutritional strategies for peak performance and resilience. His research is supported by the Office of Naval Research (ONR), Department of Defense (DoD), private organizations and foundations. Show notes and links for this episode can be found at www.fourhourworkweek.com/podcast. This podcast is brought to you by Audible. I have used Audible for years and I love audio books. I have 2 to recommend: The Graveyard Book by Niel Gaiman Vagabonding by Rolf Potts All you need to do to get your free audiobook and a free 30-day trial is go to Audible.com/tim. Choose one of the above books, or choose between more than 180,000 audio programs. That could be a book, a newspaper, a magazine or even a class. It's that easy. Go to Audible.com/Tim and get started today. Enjoy! This podcast is also brought to you by 99Designs, the world’s largest marketplace of graphic designers. I have used them for years to create some amazing designs. When your business needs a logo, website design, business card, or anything you can imagine, check out 99Designs. I used them to rapid prototype the cover for The 4-Hour Body, and I've also had them help with display advertising and illustrations. If you want a more personalized approach, I recommend their 1-on-1 service, which is non-spec. You get original designs from designers around the world. The best part? You provide your feedback, and then you end up with a product that you're happy with or your money back. Click this link and get a free $99 upgrade. Give it a test run… Enjoy!***If you enjoy the podcast, would you please consider leaving a short review on Apple Podcasts/iTunes? It takes less than 60 seconds, and it really makes a difference in helping to convince hard-to-get guests. I also love reading the reviews!For show notes and past guests, please visit tim.blog/podcast.Sign up for Tim’s email newsletter (“5-Bullet Friday”) at tim.blog/friday.For transcripts of episodes, go to tim.blog/transcripts.Interested in sponsoring the podcast? Visit tim.blog/sponsor and fill out the form.Discover Tim’s books: tim.blog/books.Follow Tim:Twitter: twitter.com/tferriss Instagram: instagram.com/timferrissFacebook: facebook.com/timferriss YouTube: youtube.com/timferrissPast guests on The Tim Ferriss Show include Jerry Seinfeld, Hugh Jackman, Dr. Jane Goodall, LeBron James, Kevin Hart, Doris Kearns Goodwin, Jamie Foxx, Matthew McConaughey, Esther Perel, Elizabeth Gilbert, Terry Crews, Sia, Yuval Noah Harari, Malcolm Gladwell, Madeleine Albright, Cheryl Strayed, Jim Collins, Mary Karr, Maria Popova, Sam Harris, Michael Phelps, Bob Iger, Edward Norton, Arnold Schwarzenegger, Neil Strauss, Ken Burns, Maria Sharapova, Marc Andreessen, Neil Gaiman, Neil de Grasse Tyson, Jocko Willink, Daniel Ek, Kelly Slater, Dr. Peter Attia, Seth Godin, Howard Marks, Dr. Brené Brown, Eric Schmidt, Michael Lewis, Joe Gebbia, Michael Pollan, Dr. Jordan Peterson, Vince Vaughn, Brian Koppelman, Ramit Sethi, Dax Shepard, Tony Robbins, Jim Dethmer, Dan Harris, Ray Dalio, Naval Ravikant, Vitalik Buterin, Elizabeth Lesser, Amanda Palmer, Katie Haun, Sir Richard Branson, Chuck Palahniuk, Arianna Huffington, Reid Hoffman, Bill Burr, Whitney Cummings, Rick Rubin, Dr. Vivek Murthy, Darren Aronofsky, and many more.See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
Transcript
Discussion (0)
Quick sound check. What did you have for breakfast this morning?
Eggs and sardines and oysters.
Eggs and sardines and oysters. Just throw that in.
And broccoli. Just a little bit of broccoli.
Just throw it in a Vitamix?
Optimal minimum.
At this altitude, I can run flat out for a half mile before my hands start shaking.
Can I ask you a personal question?
Now would have seemed an appropriate time.
What if I did the opposite?
I'm a cybernetic organism, living tissue over metal endoskeleton.
Me, Tim, Paris, show.
This episode is brought to you by AG1, the daily foundational nutritional supplement
that supports whole body health.
I do get asked
a lot what I would take if I could only take one supplement, and the true answer is invariably
AG1. It simply covers a ton of bases. I usually drink it in the mornings and frequently take
their travel packs with me on the road. So what is AG1? AG1 is a science-driven formulation of
vitamins, probiotics, and whole food sourced nutrients. In a single scoop,
AG1 gives you support for the brain, gut, and immune system. So take ownership of your health and try AG1 today. You will get a free one-year supply of vitamin D and five free AG1 travel packs
with your first subscription purchase. So learn more, check it out. Go to drinkag1.com slash Tim. That's drinkag1, the number one, drinkag1.com
slash Tim. Last time, drinkag1.com slash Tim. Check it out. This episode is brought to you by
Five Bullet Friday, my very own email newsletter. It's become one of the most popular email
newsletters in the world with millions of subscribers. And it's super, super simple.
It does not clog up your inbox.
Every Friday, I send out five bullet points, super short, of the coolest things I've found that week,
which sometimes includes apps, books, documentaries, supplements, gadgets, new self-experiments, hacks, tricks,
and all sorts of weird stuff that I dig up from around the world.
You guys, podcast listeners and book readers,
have asked me for something short and action-packed for a very long time. Because after all,
the podcast, the books, they can be quite long. And that's why I created Five Bullet Friday.
It's become one of my favorite things I do every week. It's free. It's always going to be free.
And you can learn more at Tim.blog forward slash Friday. That's Tim.blog forward slash Friday.
I get asked a lot how I meet guests for the podcast, some of the most amazing people I've
ever interacted with. And little known fact, I've met probably 25% of them because they first
subscribed to Five Bullet Friday. So you'll be in good company. It's a lot of fun. Five Bullet
Friday is only available if you subscribe via email. I do not publish the content on the blog or anywhere else. Also, if I'm doing small in-person
meetups, offering early access to startups, beta testing, special deals, or anything else
that's very limited, I share it first with Five Bullet Friday subscribers.
So check it out, tim.blog forward slash Friday. If you listen to this podcast, it's very likely that you'd
dig it a lot and you can of course easily subscribe any time. So easy peasy. Again,
that's Tim.blog forward slash Friday. And thanks for checking it out. If the spirit moves you.
Hello, boys and girls, this is Tim Ferriss and welcome to another episode of the Tim Ferriss
show where it is my job to deconstruct world-class performers.
That means that I interview people ranging from chess prodigies like Josh Waitzkin
to celebrities and governators like Arnold Schwarzenegger to everything in between,
whether those are athletes, scientists, military strategists, or otherwise.
And this episode is a very fun one. It gets into the weeds.
If you've loved the episodes with Dr. Peter Atiyah, for instance, or Pavel Tsatsoulin or
others, you will most likely love this one. My guest is Dr. Dominic D'Agostino, better known as
Dom. Most people refer to him as Dom. He is an assistant professor in the Department of Molecular
Pharmacology and Physiology at the University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine and a senior research scientist at the Institute for Human and Machine Cognition.
And when I have questions about ketosis, about fasting, or about the deadlift, I call Dom.
Why?
Well, among other things, for instance, he has fasted for seven days and then deadlifted 500 pounds for 10 reps. He is a beast, both physically and intellectually.
He has published or coauthored many different fascinating papers, research papers. And no
big surprise, he's a good buddy of Dr. Peter Tia, whom I mentioned shortly ago. Now, Pete,
of course, drinks so-called jet fuel in search of
optimal athletic performance, sometimes ends up dry heaving in the kitchen, trying not to wake
his family. And I enjoy these types of human guinea pigs, of course. The focus of Dom's
laboratory primarily is developing and testing metabolic therapies, including ketogenic diets,
ketone esters, and ketone supplements to induce nutritional and therapeutic
ketosis. There is a lot more to it. Some of his research has been funded by the Office of Naval
Research, Department of Defense, etc. He's a fascinating guy. If you are remotely interested
in, say, cancer prevention or longevity or maximal performance, then this episode will touch on many, many
cutting edge aspects, theories, and practical implementations of research that is at the
forefront right now. So please enjoy my conversation with Dom D'Agostino.
Dom, welcome to the show.
Thanks for having me, Tim. Appreciate it.
Of course. I have my notebook out.
Always when I'm on the phone with you, walking around,
I'm struggling to find paper in my pockets or record notes,
so I have all of my materials ready.
I've spoken with our dear friend, Pete Attia,
to sort of plot the arc of questions that I would ask you,
mostly out of pure self-interest. But
for those people who are unfamiliar with you, when someone asks you, what do you do?
How do you answer that question? Well, it depends on who it is, but I tell them,
I try to be brief as possible. I just say I'm a scientist and I study nutritional neuroscience,
I think is kind of how I like to phrase it as concisely as possible.
And if you're talking to a fellow scientist,
how would that answer change, if at all?
I would, I kind of go into kind of describing
how I study integrative metabolic regulation and how what we eat or certain supplements can change our metabolic physiology to treat, prevent disease, or enhance performance.
Very cool.
It kind of sums up. Yeah. And speaking of speaking of performance,
and this is a question I ask all of my guests, but what is the most you've ever deadlifted after
fasting for seven days? Wow. I imagine you get a range of responses from that.
Oh, okay. So you've talked to Peter Atiyah. He's filled you in on that. Yeah. So
I guess going back when I really got interested in fasting, I did a seven-day fast
and it just happened to conclude right before I had to give a lecture kind of on the topic.
And I went into it with my glucose in the mid, maybe 30s, low 40s, and my ketones up
there at about five millimolar or so. And then I did go to the gym. I deadlifted 500 for 10,
and I finished off with a one rep of 585 six plates. So I haven't done that since. I haven't done anything that extreme since. But I just felt like – I was inspired by George Cahill. He was a researcher at Harvard Medical School and he did a fascinating study that really – where he fasted people for 40 days, actually. And I've delved into the literature studying that. Well, I thought, well, I can do seven days, you know, if these study subjects were IRB approved.
So, yeah, I did that. And I found, you know, the first three days were a little tough,
but and then I started cruising along. But at day five and seven, you know, I was feeling
my energy level was taking a dip for sure, but I was amazingly resilient.
And I felt that had a lot to do with being in a state of fasting ketosis.
And I was firmly convinced that – and this is when I just started kind of studying this field.
So I was doing a lot of blood work on myself too to figure out what was happening.
What was the time – what was happening. What was the time?
What was the year roughly?
When was this?
This was 2010.
Got it.
I think going into, yeah, 2009 into 2010.
So I've been into this area of research for about a year or so.
In 2009, I really started getting research funding to do what I'm doing now.
It's funny to me that these subjects were able to be fasted for 40 days and everything got
approved. But if you wanted to fast animals in certain circumstances, it seems like you can't go beyond one to 30 days.
Yeah, that's good. I serve on the University Institute for Animal Care and Use Committee.
It's called the IACUC. It's like the animal IRB. And yeah, the committee usually has like a reactionary response to anything under 25% calorie restriction.
And if they lose more than 20, 25% of their weight for a fat rodent, really that's not much.
You have to – you can't do that anymore.
You got to refeed them.
So yeah, I am amazed that some of the stuff got approved.
I think the IRB was probably on vacation or something.
Yeah, IRBs are a little different now.
Can you explain what IRB is or define that for people who aren't familiar with that?
Yeah, it's the Institutional Review Board that will review kind of the ethics and the safety of a study before signing off on
it essentially and allowing it's a committee of people that have kind of a broad range of
expertise and and they review the uh the reason why the study is going to be done, the methodology, the ethics, the purpose,
and all that stuff, and approve whether or not the study can be conducted.
And it really depends on what institute you're at.
You can use an outside IRB that's outside of the institution.
And companies do that.
Industry does that.
But they can be a big hurdle.
And I've found vastly different IRBs.
There's a small college about 10, 15 minutes from here
that ran a ketogenic diet study in advanced lifters for us.
And the IRB was approved in like two weeks at university.
Which is fast.
Very fast. Yeah. Like two or three weeks. So in other IRBs, I think I did one, a pharmacokinetic
study for ketone esters, which I'll probably talk more about later. But that one, I think it's been
rejected somewhere about seven or eight times.
And I mean, it's just giving it as a single dose, kind of more or less a bioidentical molecule that our body makes. And the committee is just because it's, quote unquote, first in human, you know, it's very difficult.
And this is an outside IRB, which is less, you know, less restrictive in many cases.
So they can be a big hurdle to an
investigator.
Especially if
the 25% or more
loss is deemed cruel
and unusual punishment.
Oh, okay, for the animal study.
Yeah, in
these human studies,
there's pretty
stringent criteria on the humans and stuff.
What was the –
Yeah, the animal studies are pretty bad.
What was the study that you did on advanced lifters as it related to ketosis, and what's kind of the abstract on that?
Yeah, that's under review right now.
Got it.
Yeah, I'll give you kind of like the synopsis of it.
So we had 12 subjects and these were advanced resistance trained individuals, meaning that they could squat and deadlift and bench a certain percentage of their body weight, which kind of puts them in the range of the top 10% of lifters out there.
What was that percentage, just out of curiosity?
I got to go back.
It was some funky number.
It was like 185% or 75% of their body weight squatting for seven reps or eight reps or
something like that.
So it was pretty – it would be like me, let me see, squatting, you know, for 25 or something for a set of six or something like that.
Yeah, these are very.
It's pretty significant.
Yeah, significantly advanced trainees.
Yeah. Parallel, the control group was on a Western diet, which is pretty similar to moderate protein, higher in carbohydrates, and moderate fat.
And the ketogenic diet had roughly 75% to 80% fat, restricted carbohydrates to about 20 to 25 grams per day.
And the fat was also supplemented to some extent with MCT oil and coconut oil.
And all the subjects, it was two weeks they had to be on the diet
and had to confirm ketone levels by blood and urine.
And once they did, we only did a two-week adaptation,
which is kind of another subject we could talk about.
But they adapted for two weeks and then kind of trained the heck out of them.
And every workout was done in the lab, in a human performance laboratory.
And everything was recorded.
The volume was controlled.
All the parameters were controlled.
Blood work was done.
And the take-home on it was that strength, you know,
body composite, or I would say strength and performance were maintained and increased.
And there was muscle hypertrophy was seen with a ketogenic diet. And there was similar increases,
yeah, in power, in hypertrophy. And the big difference was kind of the overall body
composition was more favorable in the ketogenic diet group, meaning they had similar increases in lean body mass, but they lost proportionally more fat.
And that's the study that we completed.
It's under review right now.
The first journal kicked it back, so we went in for another journal and did some follow-up work with it. Now, what is your hypothesis, or maybe you already
know, but how would you explain the maintenance or even development of hypertrophy and power
in the ketogenic group when a lot of people associate, say, insulin with different growth
factors and whatnot? And I had a conversation, I want to say it was
with, uh, Steven Finney, very short conversation. And I asked him this because I'd been in a
ketotic state for two or three weeks and had experienced, uh, a non-trivial amount of muscle
growth. And I was really surprised by it. And, uh, he explained in terms that I can't recall,
but how the ketogenic might diet might have a, I guess, like a branched chain amino acid sparing effect of some type.
But is it possible to get very big and powerful on a ketogenic diet?
And if so, what's the mechanism in the sort of absence of higher spiking insulin levels?
If that is the parent anabolic hormone, and I'm not saying it is, but a lot of people view it that
way. Yeah. So, you know, there's insulin and insulin signaling, right? Certain diet, like
when you calorie restrict a rodent or even, you know, humans or any mammal, you will enhance insulin sensitivity, right?
So you will be more sensitive to a given amount of insulin.
And I think we're seeing some of that in the athletes.
I mean, exercise itself enhances insulin sensitivity.
So in guys that are advanced lifters who've been at it for like 10 years may have a different response to a ketogenic
diet than say a 15 year old kid, you know, who's trying to bulk up for football. You know, he would
probably not be a good candidate for the ketogenic diet. You know, your sensitivity to things like
IGF-1 and insulin are much higher when you're younger in your teenage years, especially.
So you could compromise a lot of your potential development and strength if you're younger in your teenage years especially so you could compromise a lot of your
potential development and strength if you're younger and doing that but if you know say guys
the older we get the less carbohydrate tolerant we get so we lose you know our ability to kind
of process carbs as we get older and our insulin sensitivity declines uh you know it's going back
to your question,
as it relates to being on a ketogenic diet,
we know that ketones are anti-catabolic.
You know, that's why we can fast for 40 days.
And the ketones have an anti-catabolic protein sparing effect.
And if our blood is flooded with ketones,
we're less likely to liberate gluconeogenic amino acids
from our skeletal muscle for fuel
because the ketones
can more or less replace glucose as the primary energy substrate to maintain your central nervous
system, which is like 3% of our body by weight but sucks up like 20 or 25% of the energy.
It's a big metabolic engine. So the ketones kind of drive a lot of that substrate energy need.
So in a situation where you're at a caloric deficit, I think that's where ketones can shine.
If you're trying to make weight, if you're trying to preserve or even increase your performance and strength, you know, and alter your body
composition.
So, I don't think the ketogenic diet is ideal if your goal is maximum a purely ketogenic
diet.
I think, you know, there's different – we have to kind of figure out what ketogenic
diet we're talking about.
But I don't think a purely ketogenic diet as it's kind of described in the literature, right? A 90 or 85% fat diet is an ideal diet
for growth and repair. The diet that we use in our study is actually a little higher in protein,
like 25% protein, which is like really almost double that used by the Johns Hopkins group that developed the classical ketogenic diet.
And it's really that protein level is important.
So growing on a classic ketogenic diet would be pretty hard.
I mean, kids do it.
Their growth rates are a little bit less, you know, with these kids that have drug-resistant seizures when they're putting on the diet. But if you simply just do what's called a modified Atkins,
and there's a lot of literature coming out now on the modified Atkins.
Eric Kossoff at Johns Hopkins, he's a colleague of mine and more in the clinical realm,
and he's done a lot of work showing that a modified Atkins,
which is about 70% fat and like 20% or 30% protein,
has the same sort of ability to metabolically manage seizures. And I think that sort of diet can be used pretty successfully in the performance world
and specifically for bodybuilders.
I think with that amount of protein, you'd be able to grow muscle for sure. And it's calories too, right? I mean, calories are the driver, your
caloric intake. If you have a surplus amount of calories, you're more likely to push insulin up
and drive anabolic processes. But a lot of times people, when they follow ketogenic diet,
because ketones have a really good appetite suppressant effect that they will
inadvertently restrict calories and may not even know it after a while and may be losing weight
without even trying. And that's, I mean, that's one of the benefits, I guess you could say,
of the ketogenic diet. You can lose weight and you can alter your body composition without
necessarily even trying just through the appetite suppressing effect.
And let's define a few terms for folks who may be outsiders to this world.
You're talking about ketosis.
Let's define ketosis.
What is ketosis?
I guess we could talk about nutritional and sort of fasting ketosis. What is ketosis? I guess we could talk about nutritional and fasting ketosis,
but what is ketosis exactly? And what are ketones?
Okay. I kind of like to start out with fasting, right? So if we're on a normal diet and we stop
eating all of a sudden, we will mobilize and use up our stored glycogen, mostly in the
liver, right?
And our central nervous system more or less demands that we have a steady fuel supply
to our brain.
And in the absence of glucose availability, it will be depleting our liver glycogen.
The insulin levels will be suppressed and we'll start mobilizing fatty acids for fuel.
The fatty acids, the long-chain fatty acids don't cross the blood-brain barrier very
efficiently.
So the liver, while you're suppressing the hormone insulin, you'll upregulate beta
oxidation of fatty acids in the liver.
And an accumulation of products from fatty acid oxidation will start
forming ketone bodies. And these ketone bodies are, they're more or less like water-soluble
fat molecules. And they're small molecules that can readily cross the blood-brain barrier and get
inside cells into the mitochondria. And as we fast, within about 24 to 48 hours, we'll start registering
ketones to the level that clinically is defined as being in ketosis, which is above 0.5 millimolar
typically. Yeah. So a person on a high carb diet would probably take about 24 to 48 hours to start even getting into mild ketosis.
But fasting is the fastest way to get into ketosis. And that's why if you have a child
with drug-resistant seizures and they're admitted into a place like Johns Hopkins,
the old protocol was to fast them. They're not exactly sure if that's
absolutely necessary with things like more with ketogenic diets have MCTs and stuff, but you can,
fasting has classically been the fastest way to get into ketosis. So the ketogenic diet has a
macronutrient ratio that's high in fat, typically 90 to 70. And by macronutrients, we're referring to protein, fat, carbohydrates.
Yeah, yeah.
And maybe ketones could be the fourth macronutrient, maybe, if you talk about exogenous ketones.
So a ketogenic diet has a macronutrient ratio that mimics the metabolic physiology that
you have when you're fasting.
So if you were to take the blood out of someone, you know, do a blood sample of someone on a strict ketogenic diet, it would look like they're fasting.
Like they've been fasting a few days.
And it's that that allows you to get some that changes your physiology incredibly.
Like your metabolic physiology changes acutely,
and then there's long-term changes that occur with that.
Epigenetic changes.
We know that beta-hydroxybutyrate, which is a ketone body,
can have interesting effects on gene expression.
What types of effects?
Well, there was a science paper showing that beta-hydroxybutyrate is an HDAC, class 1 and class 2 inhibitor,
and can activate genes that play a role in enhancing endogenous antioxidant mechanisms,
specifically superoxide dismutase and catalase. So these mechanisms, when they're upregulated, it confers
protection against the environment. It sort of enhances our cellular defense mechanisms. It
enhances the robust kind of protective mechanisms that the cell has that can preserve
the genome stability. So maybe being in a state of ketosis and maintaining that can protect your DNA from damage.
So that's the implications.
Also, anti-inflammatory.
So we published a paper.
Our colleagues actually did it at Yale.
I developed the diet for them and sent it up to them.
It was exogenous ketone. But the paper demonstrated that it activated or prevented the activation of a particular inflammasome that's
linked to age-related chronic diseases. So it inhibited a specific inflammatory pathway
that is really associated with all chronic age-related diseases.
And it was independent of the ketone's effect on metabolism.
So they teased out, they did a lot of studies to tease out the mechanism and demonstrated
that the effect of it suppressing this inflammatory pathway was completely independent of its metabolic effect.
So we understand that when I got into this, I just knew that ketones were an energy metabolite.
So now we know it's much more than a metabolite.
It's an HDAC inhibitor.
How do you spell that?
I apologize.
The HDAC?
Yeah, histone deacetylAC inhibitor. How do you spell that? I apologize. The H-DAC? Yeah, histone deacetylase inhibitor.
So H-DAC would be H-D-A-C.
Got it.
And then there's class one, two, three, I think four.
So class one and two H-DAC inhibitors are of big interest to the pharmaceutical industry.
So there are many, for example, we do a lot of cancer research.
There's a lot of pharmaceutical companies focusing on histone deacetylase inhibitors
for as targeting specific pathways for cancer therapy.
So you have an endogenous HDAC inhibitor with beta-hydroxybutyrate.
Not to interrupt, but just for people who want to keep endogenous and exogenous straight,
I've always found thinking of exoskeleton as sort of outside, as an indicator of outside.
So if you're taking exogenous, please correct me if I'm getting this, if I screw this up in any way, Dom,
but if you're taking exogenous ketones, that means you are
consuming ketones from outside of your body. And endogenous is something you're producing yourself.
Yes.
In a case, for instance, with cancer, I have a friend who recently went through chemotherapy,
and he would fast for three
days prior to his chemotherapy.
And in the same group,
almost everyone was,
uh,
aside from him,
everyone else was laid out for days after chemotherapy,
really unable to function.
And he was able to go for 10 mile runs,
for instance.
Um,
and,
uh,
it's been,
it's been,
I've been very fascinated by looking at the implications of combining fasting with, uh, for instance, you know, chemotherapy and the treatment of
cancer.
Um, does, if you were say advising someone with a family history of Alzheimer's and Parkinson's,
which I have, so I don't know if those fall into the age-related
issues that you were talking about, but are there implications for fasting or nutritional ketosis
or exogenous ketones for helping to prevent or mitigate the onset of those type of neurodegenerative
diseases? Yeah. And, you know, fasting has to be done, you know, under,
you have to know your body, right? And fasting should probably be done under pretty strict
medical supervision to some extent. Yeah. So someone would have to do a little research on it.
And it would depend on, you know, the particular person. If, so if you have a cancer patient that it's a woman with breast cancer, say, and she has
a BMI of 28, you know, and, and it's going in for chemo, I think it's a good idea for
them to fast before they go in.
BMI, body mass index.
Oh, body mass index.
So that would, and that would make her obese.
I actually don't know kind of the scale of BMI.
Yeah, that would make her kind of a little pudgy, I guess, and have some extra weight to lose.
So we know that getting chemo in a fasted state, there's a couple of reports out there showing that it could – it sensitizes. It can sensitize the tumor to the therapeutic effects of the agents.
And also, there's some evidence showing that it could prevent some of the side effects
associated with chemotherapeutic agents,
specifically things that cause cell damage.
So being in a state of fasting ketosis can sensitize the tumor to the damaging effects of the chemo
and enhance your healthy cells' resistance against the toxic effects of the chemotherapeutic agent.
And you'd want to do it.
I think the majority of patients could probably do it.
But if you have someone with severe cancer, cachexia, muscle wasting, you'd want to do it in a very cautious way.
But I definitely think this is something that should be implemented in our oncology wards.
Fasting before chemo definitely has some real benefits that we
should be utilizing.
No, it's so fascinating.
And so cachexia, man, you are a treasure trove of vocabulary.
So is that acute muscle loss as opposed to like sarcopenia, which would be the, I'm not
up to speed on my Latin, which would be sort of the muscle loss attributed to aging or what is cachexia? Yeah. So cachexia would be defined as,
um, uh, yeah, actually investigators are trying to get a clear definition of it and understanding
of it, which our lab, I have one of my students who just studies cancer, cachexia.
Cachexia is defined in cancer as you're in a physiological state where your body is releasing factors like tumor necrosis factor alpha and inflammatory cytokines, inflammatory mediators
that are catabolizing your muscle tissue your
lean body mass and just i apologize i just want it for people who are are uh unfamiliar with the
vocab so so anabolism would be building tissue in general and catabolism would be breaking down
tissue is that fair or is it exactly like anabolic steroids are building and catabolic processes are the breaking down of things.
Sorry to interrupt.
Oh, no.
That's great.
So you're in a state where you're basically wasting lean body mass.
You're wasting tissue.
And a lot of cancer patients succumb to cancer cachexia and its mortality is closely intimately related to that. So as you lose
lean body mass from being in a state, say for example, someone has advanced metastatic cancer,
that their survival will be tightly correlated with that, the ability to preserve their lean body mass and maintain their function.
And in a lot of situations, you get this situation where you have an older patient that gets cancer,
like 70-year-olds, and you have age-related sarcopenia, right? They're already losing muscle.
Compounded with cancer cachexia, which increases lean body mass loss due to the pathology,
on top of chemo-induced cachexia. So chemotherapy is a pretty powerful,
destructive agent to lean body mass on top of inactivity, so being immobilized.
So you have age-related sarcopenia, cancer cachexia, chemo-induced cachexia, On top of inactivity, so being immobilized.
So you have age-related sarcopenia, cancer cachexia, chemo-induced cachexia.
And this typically, you know, you have a patient that's bedridden, so they're not stimulating their muscle with activity. So you have four factors coming together that cause like a perfect storm for you to just kind of waste away.
And patients can go down so fast when
they're put in that situation. So I think, so we're developing protocols to nutritional,
you know, nutritional ketosis. We're looking at branched chain amino acid formulas.
And we want to do some work to define specifically what types of exercise can mitigate all these factors.
And maybe some drugs and stuff, too.
We're interested in testing.
So, yeah, I think that's not really being studied much.
There's not a whole lot of investigators out there studying this.
And I've been in touch with a lot of patients.
And I realize that this is key.
Like, I think a lot of patients would be alive
today if we had uh effective ways to mitigate because once they lose their mobility once they
get weak enough where they just can't move around i mean their whole psychology just deteriorates
i would imagine you know yeah so there's there's a lot of reasons that we should be looking into
keeping patients as strong and preserving their
muscle as much as possible. Are there any knowledgeable folks out there? I was going
to say scientists or researchers, but we both know a lot of folks who don't operate in the
more formal worlds. Are there people out there who believe that there's a role of anabolic agents,
whether steroids or otherwise in those types of circumstances with say cancer patients?
And I don't, and I'd be really interested to hear your thoughts just because we,
there are also a lot of people who are trying to say, minimize IGF-1, uh, among other things for longevity purposes, uh, or even for
anti-cancer purposes. But how do you, how do you think about that or how do other people think
about that? Well, I think it's a little outside of mainstream, uh, cancer kind of, uh, world that
I'm linked in with, but I think it should be. And I think, you know,
we want to develop a pretty solid program here in our lab to look into this. When it comes to
anabolic agents, I think, you know, you go to the literature and it shows that anabolic steroids do
not promote within certain dosing levels. They do not promote the growth and the spread of cancer
uh pretty sure the literature says that there are uh specific androgen receptor modulators out there
they're called SARMs and there's a few SARMs yeah SARMs that are out there, they basically have, they're designed to have the anabolic tissue building
potency of testosterone and other anabolic steroids without the androgenic or the hormone
effects.
And they are actually developed specifically for cancer cachexia.
Oh, really?
So there's a few out there.
Yeah, there's actually a few out there.
And I think, you know, we're kind of interested in studying them.
We're looking at branched chain amino acids right now, which we think are pretty important
too.
But if you give, so testosterone, for example, and a lot of males take testosterone to build
muscle in the gym for hormone replacement
therapy. If you administer testosterone, and the studies have been done, up to a certain point,
once you get to about 300 milligrams per week, say, you start to increase systemic IGF-1 levels.
And if you go up to about 600 milligrams a week, which would put you at a supraphysiological level about twice or three times that of a normal male at least, that causes the liver to increase IGF-1 release.
So systemic IGF-1 will go up. But a dosage of, say, 100 to 200 milligrams a week does not increase, to my
knowledge, factors, hormones, growth factors that would cause cancer to grow and spread. And I think
at that dosage, especially with a lot of male cancer patients, that would have a pretty remarkable protein sparing effect.
And we know that anabolic agents can be life-saving drugs for HIV patients, for patients with wasting diseases. the literature and you talk, you know, if you talk to the physicians and the doctors that
treat their patients that are familiar with these agents and know how to intelligently
prescribe them and administer them, they will tell you that, you know, they save lives.
So, and I think that application may be useful in cancer. So, But I think the SARMs are kind of an interesting
compound that's coming out. And I think there's definitely some potential for some drugs out
there. Now, is the advantage of a SARM over, say, a high anabolic, low androgenic steroid, like a Nandrolone or a Oxandrolone, for instance, which is very popular
with HIV patients who are trying to increase their T cell count and avoid muscle wasting.
Is the primary advantage of the SARM that it doesn't have the stigma associated with it of
anabolic steroids? Is it primarily kind of a political advantage that it doesn't carry that baggage, or are there other metabolic reasons to use it as opposed to just standard kind of –
Yeah.
You know, anabolic agents that are low androgenic.
And just so people understand, and please correct me if I'm screwing this up, but just for people to understand the context, when people talk about anabolic steroids, they're usually talking about anabolic androgenic steroids, right?
And that in so much as they have anabolic, i.e. tissue building, muscle building effects,
and then they have androgenic effects, which can accelerate the development of secondary
sex characteristics, whether that's like a square
jaw, male characteristics, or a deeper voice and development of the vocal cords, more hair,
acne, et cetera, that kind of stuff. So in the case of someone with, say, a wasting disease,
particularly if they are female instead of male, they will want to minimize the androgenic effects
because they don't want to become men or become cavemen and maximize the muscle building effects in this particular case. Is that a fair description? Feel
free to add or edit anything that I just said, but I'd be curious to hear sort of the advantage of
SARMs over preexisting low androgenic anabolic therapies.
Yeah.
Okay. So SARMs are designed with the intention in mind to minimize the androgenic component
down to nothing.
That's really the goal.
And I think they're pretty close to doing that.
The problem is, in the real world world when you read about guys taking this for
muscle building they have very kind of minimal anabolic properties compared to their uh anabolic
steroid counterparts or cousins uh but the the advantage is you know is that uh if you have a
guy with prostate cancer or all males probably get prostate cancer in time.
So high testosterone could drive the growth of your prostate and prostate cancer.
And anabolic steroids could obviously have major side effects for women.
I mean, we see this in women's bodybuilding, right?
We see the side effects are pretty real and pretty non-reversible.
So a selective angio-gen receptor modulator can have the advantage of, you know,
potentially giving the protein-sparing anabolic properties of the agents you know without uh without the side
effects so there's not there's research going on but it's it's i don't think it's moving as fast as
what we had initially anticipated as far as them being super potent uh anabolic agents that would make anabolic steroids obsolete.
Got it.
So they're not at that level yet, but there's quite a few pharmaceutical companies working on it.
And agents are, there's studies going on right now.
And I think that data will probably come out in the next couple of years.
Yeah. I want to chat with you separately about how to marshal resources to do a lot more studies because I just – it's so frustrating to see these attractive targets or hypotheses that just for lack of funding, particularly with technology and sort of the ability to do distributed studies potentially.
Anyway, you and I will love to chat more about that. But in the case, coming back to the chemotherapy, because I love looking at cancer in sort of extreme states, because I think then you can form hypotheses and test in those circumstances and then adapt findings to test in normal populations, which would, you know, I suppose I would include myself in that, although normal is kind of pushing it.
Is it possible, or to what extent is it possible, to mimic the benefits of fasting pre-chemotherapy with exogenous ketones?
Yeah, so I think we can view exogenous ketones are an energy-containing substance, right?
So you could potentially take them as a source of energy.
Right.
They're energy that your liver only produces under certain circumstances of what's considered kind of strange metabolic physiology, like a fasted state.
Right, a restisive state. So the ability, and we're interested in doing this,
the ability to elevate, to produce an artificial state of ketosis
is possible with exogenous ketones.
And it mimics many, many effects of therapeutic fasting, which would be an acute and sustained reduction in blood glucose.
And we don't really know why there's a remarkable decrease in blood glucose that's a dose dependent decrease but it seems to do seems to be related to the liver's
output of glucose so your liver is a master regulator of your blood glucose really
and uh it's uh so the the drug metformin uh in type 2 diabetics will decrease hepatic
gluconeogenesis so the liver's ability to to make glucose and put it into the bloodstream.
We think that ketones are doing this also.
And I think maybe it's kind of telling the body, hey, you're in a fasted state, so why don't you conserve the glucose that you have?
And also, a big dose of ketones could potentially cause a small release of insulin.
And that's kind of how we regulate our endogenous ketone production is that if our ketone levels get
too high, that ketone will cause a very tiny release of insulin from the pancreas and that will signal the liver to kind of turn down
or turn off, uh, hepatic ketogenesis. And it's a, you know, we have, when we're in a state of
ketosis, we lose ketones through our urine. We burn them up through peripheral tissues.
And if they get really high, we stimulate a small amount of insulin release.
What is really high on a millimolar basis as measured by like a
precision extra device from Abbott, which is what I have six feet from me, which I've been using.
What would, what would, uh, how high do your ketone levels need to get before that insulin
gets kicked out? Of course it depends on the person, but roughly speaking.
Yeah, I think it's pretty rare to see over five millimolar in kids you know with kids that have a disorder
called glucose transporter type 1 deficiency syndrome uh i'm in touch with their parents and
they routinely stay in the three to five millimolar range but typically that's rare they have to be in
a really strict ketogenic diet um but typically yeah getting above five is kind of abnormal and
sometimes you know if i'm measuring sometimes i'll just hit a peak, you know,
it's kind of like your hormones are going to, going to fluctuate throughout the day.
So if you measure and you hit seven, I wouldn't panic or anything.
I mean, cause it's probably a little peak that you're getting, uh, but yeah, or you're
doing a cycling workout.
Yeah.
Yeah.
There's that, you know, you have post-exercise ketosis
where guys that are on a high carb diet after four or five six hours of intense exercise
they're going to deplete their liver glycogen and ramp up fatty acid oxidation so high that
they're they're naturally just going to be in ketosis so their their body is used to seeing
ketones you know because of the exercise that
they do. But generally, yeah, I mean, like moderate to mild ketosis is kind of what I like
to promote for health and longevity. And that's between one and three millimolar. If you're within
that range, that's a range that you'll like pretty much never get into if you're not on a
ketogenic diet or not fasting. And I think staying in that range has some real-world benefits as far
as health benefits, longevity benefits, performance, resilience. I think there's
some real-world benefits to staying in that range. And you'd be hard-pressed to find any potential adverse effects that could be
linked to having ketones in that range. But once you get into the 5, 6 millimolar range,
that produces a mild metabolic acidosis that needs to be compensated for through your kidneys.
And, you know, so it is putting a stress, it's, it's a substrate load to your,
your system and your body's got to deal with that. So I think, you know, that,
that needs to be taken into account. How, how do you currently, well, actually, let me,
let me ask a couple of questions just because I'm in the middle of doing some ketosis experiments myself. With exogenous ketones, so I have two jugs of exogenous ketones in my fridge. Then I have some powdered beta-hydroxybutyrate, which is, I guess, the – well, most people read it as ketokana, the C-A-N-A, which I guess is
calcium potassium. Am I getting that right? Screeing that up. Calcium sodium. Jesus. Ah,
Ferris. So bad. Anyway, I try. I try hard. I'm like Avis. So I have the powdered beta-hydroxybutyrate.
If I use that when I'm trying to induce ketosis, right? So
let's, for instance, this past week, I ate a low carb, but still glucose dependent diet up until
Friday night. And then I fasted from Friday after dinner until Sunday evening. And now I'm squarely into ketosis. I'm probably at 1.1, 1.2 millimolars,
I would say, upon waking. Can I accelerate the induction of my own ketone production
through use of exogenous ketones, or am I just temporarily
spiking my readings when I'm ingesting these things? And really my body is going to get to
its sort of steady state 1.1, 1.2 in the same amount of time, regardless. Does that question
make sense? Yeah. I think there are significant advantages to speeding up the process as far as how you feel.
And I think that if you transition from a state of using glucose as your primary energy source to using ketones, that usually involves a gap in fuel flow to your brain.
You feel grumpy and shitty.
Yeah.
You have glucose withdrawal.
I mean your brain goes through glucose withdrawal.
And it uses glucose to not only for energy but to make neurotransmitters to your brain homeostasis.
Your glucose levels are basically telling your brain that it's happy.
It's in a homeostatic state.
So if you feed your body your brain ketones, it is preserving more or less that neurophysiological homeostasis, I think.
And you're not going to have maybe a stress reaction.
So if you fast in subjects that just kind of go cold turkey and fast, within the first
24 hours, it's a stress response.
Their cortisol level spikes.
Your sympathetic nervous system is activated.
Their immune system could be suppressed.
And I think that if you were to do the same thing but use exogenous ketones, you would cruise into a state of nutritional ketosis or sustained nutritional ketosis without some of the bumps along the way.
And I think that you could probably reap some of the performance
benefits. And I think it may be, and then, but then you could, you know, you may make the argument
that that stress, that physiological stress that you're giving yourself is, you know, you're
familiar with the hormetic effect, that that stress could be kicking on mechanisms that when activated can kind of,
you know,
be protective in and of itself.
Yeah.
Or beneficial in some way,
right?
That's like when,
when people were taking ibuprofen after workouts or other anti-inflammatories
and reducing subsequent hypertrophy,
right.
From inhibiting the sort of pain that was
unpleasant in the short term, but beneficial in the longer term.
Yeah. Where, you know, in the case of NSAIDs, if you're, you dose them right after your workout,
maybe those inflammatory mediators are linked to activating the signaling cascades that are
responsible for the hypertrophy effect. Right, right.
So you could be negating that effect.
But we have not shown that to be the case.
Actually, I think you could get a lot of benefit.
You could – I see it as not one or the other.
Like I think the ketogenic diet actually goes pretty well with exogenous ketones.
And one would not have to be on such a strict ketogenic diet because it is well with exogenous ketones. And one would not have to be
on such a strict ketogenic diet because it is very restrictive. And you could do like a modified
Atkins, which is kind of the way I think we should eat anyway. I mean, just eliminating all processed
carbohydrates and just protein, fat, veggies is kind of how I eat. And I pretty much always stay
in a state of ketosis just by using MCTs, like a little
bit of exogenous ketones here and there. And I think it would allow us to optimize the therapeutic
effects of the ketogenic diet and probably further augment the therapeutic efficacy if we're talking
about the clinical realm and maybe further augment the performance enhancing effects of the ketogenic diet too. And I pretty impressed and even not shocked as in the world,
but we're getting results better than I expected just by giving pure ketones. Then I thought
that you would need a level of adaptation to being in a state of nutritional ketosis to get
the benefits from exogenous ketones.
And that's not the case.
We showed that really in our first study. Now, is that true even in the presence of higher carbohydrate intake or higher protein intake?
Yeah, it is in our animal models, and we think it is in humans right now.
So we have some studies approved where we're going to be looking at is in humans right now. So we have some studies approved.
We're going to be looking at that in humans,
looking at the metabolic effects.
But the first study that we did is a rat study where we did an acute feeding.
It's kind of a gavage.
So we kind of give them a bolus dose.
And these are rats that are maintained on a high-carbohydrate standard rodent chow.
And they've never been in a state of ketosis before, you know, unless they were deprived of food or something, which they probably weren't.
So they've never really seen ketones before. And in this study that we did, we acutely gave them a ketone ester. And within about 15
minutes to 30 minutes, they achieved a level of ketosis that would take about seven days of
fasting for a human. They were in the four to five millimolar range.
And the bolus was a high dose, single?
Yeah, ketone ester. And what was the ketone ester uh it was you want the chemical name it was uh maybe i should maybe i
should take a different approach what is a for people listening what is a ketone ester okay uh
so your body makes you know primarily two ketones that it uses for fuel.
One is acetoacetate and another is beta-hydroxybutyrate.
And they're both kind of interchangeable and they're converted to one another in the body.
Beta-hydroxybutyrate actually has to break down to acetoacetate to be used for energy. But the beta-hydroxybutyrate tends to be the primary, the highest level, you know, primary ketone in our body just because it's more stable. So, but it does need to attaching it to something with an ester bond that functions
as like more or less a carrier to it. So you can esterify a ketone with a wide range of things.
You could use glycerol. We use something called 1,3-butanediol. And you can attach ketone molecules to this with a
transesterification reaction. And when it's ingested in the body, there's various enzymes.
We have hydrolytic enzymes, esterases that will break off the ketone. And when you ingest it
orally, you'll start to liberate the ketones from the molecule
that it's esterified with. And these will build up in your blood. And the idea, right, is to have
a molecule that, you know, slowly releases the ketones in a very predictable fashion where you
get a nice pharmacokinetic profile, you know, where you have, you know, you can take it orally and then within 10 to 15 minutes, you're in starvation ketosis and
then you stay in ketosis for 6, 8, 12 hours is ideal. And it depends on the molecule you're
talking about. So that's kind of what we're doing now. We're kind of screening various compounds to
figure out which ones have a favorable pharmacokinetic profile
in isolation. And then we start combining them together so we can get, you know, formulas where
we hit the ideal, you know, formula for a particular application. So a ketone ester,
yeah, is a ketone that is orally active. So you can take it and it can increase blood ketone levels.
And in the rat study that
i was describing they are quickly put into ketosis and then in that particular study we would dive
them in a hyperbaric chamber and increase the pressure and the level of oxygen within the
chamber so it would be it would simulate a navy seal diving down to 132 feet of seawater, breathing 100% oxygen on a rebreather that they use, called a Draeger rebreather.
And the purpose of that, of course, is so that they don't give away location by having bubbles come out of their system.
Yeah, so there's definitely a stealth component to a closed circuit rebreather. Um,
if you're using it and you're in the middle of a pond in the middle of the jungle and it's
perfectly quiet, like you would not know the person's under there. Whereas if you're using
standard scuba, you would see a bubble trail coming across the pond at you, you know, and you
could just, you could just sit there patiently and wait until they come out and shoot them.
So with a rebreather, there is a big advantage, a stealth component.
The disadvantage is obviously, you know, if you go down to just 50 feet of seawater, you're
at the risk of getting what's called oxygen toxicity seizures within like 15, 10 to 15 minutes.
Wow.
Just at 50 feet.
So you have to stay very shallow and which is not always hard to do during a mission.
If you have, you know, helicopters over you and they can see you in the water or you're
taking fire, you're, you gotta, you gotta dive down the plan of mine on a bridge or
a ship.
Uh, it's not always easy to do.
So we develop these things for providing resilience and safety
and performance. Now, when you say develop these things, you're talking about the exogenous ketones.
Yeah. They're developed originally with that application in mind, with sort of a defense
application in mind, a military application. And that's how my project
originally got started. And because you've had studies funded by the Department of Defense and
so on. Is that right? Yeah. The original idea for this was I got turned on to the ketogenic diet
because it was used for drug-resistant seizures. And my program officer, I ran the
idea by him and he didn't really like the idea of a diet per se. I mean, his attitude of the diet
for performance has changed over the years, but he was like, well, why don't you kind of look into
developing a ketogenic diet in a pill and see if that's even possible? So I spent, and that was
like 2008. And then that kind of
started my journey into seeing if this was possible. And when we tested it in our rat model,
I remember the first time we did it, we fed the rat and put him in there. And we typically see
a seizure in about 10 to 15 minutes. And we're standing around the chamber and we have a video
camera system and a little window port. And we're standing there and it's like 30
minutes has gone by 40 minutes and we're up to an hour and everybody's just
kind of like looking at one another.
This is unbelievable.
I wasn't getting excited.
I was like,
okay,
calm down,
calm down.
This could be like a major outlier or something.
And then every single rat we've ever done,
and we've done many rats, you know, every single rat has gone way beyond the control
to where the average is that it can resist oxygen toxicity 575%. And that sort of blows away any
anti-convulsant drug out there. So similar to the ketogenic diet, right? If you go to the
Charlie Foundation website, you know, the Charlie Foundation was set up, you know,
working with Johns Hopkins University is for kids with drug resistant seizures.
And in the studies published, the original studies by John Freeman
published showed that in kids that have failed all standard of care, all even combinations of like six anti-seizure drugs,
when they're put on the ketogenic diet,
two-thirds of those kids have seizure control,
like remarkable seizure control.
And a percentage of them, like a third of them,
have absolutely no seizures,
like 95% reduction in seizures.
So it made sense.
I was actually thinking that, well, the original study design was to feed ketone esters for a week and then dive them.
But my source was only making like a little bit at a time.
And the chemist that I got to make the product for me.
So I had little tiny vials of it.
And I was like, well, I was just kind of impatient.
I was like, instead of getting enough to feed it for a week, I was like, let's just try to give it one dose and see what happens.
And when it worked, we were just blown away.
So we did like three or four rats.
And I was like, okay, I'm convinced.
Like completely unscientific, right?
I mean, you usually got to do like in, you know, 12 and do stats and everything and do controls.
But I was complete because we dove like four rats and they all went way beyond, you know, any other rat we've ever seen.
So I was like, I have to move on this fast or someone's going to kind of take this idea or something.
I was like, we got to move on this finding as fast as possible. Well, it seems also, I mean, and just like my ridiculous potassium instead of sodium
remark earlier, definitely verbally clubbed me over the head if I do anything like that.
But it seems like when you're evaluating the statistical significance of a given study,
the sort of civilians, like non-scientists will say, oh, well, how big
was your sample size?
And it's like, oh, it was six or 10.
They're like, oh, well, that's so small, you know, kind of, and they'll say it should be
a hundred or it should be a thousand.
And they really don't know about science.
And I should probably put myself in that category too.
But if you have a huge magnitude of effect that is consistent across a smaller
subject size, it can still be statistically significant, can it not? Yeah, it depends on
your sample population, you know, what kind of statistical power you have or the likelihood to
that the study will detect an effect, you know, as a statistical power.
And that you really have to sit down with a statistician and look at, you know,
the probability of making a type 2 error or concluding that there is no effect, you know. And so this, and I know just the, you know, I took the basic stats class,
but I still consult, you know, with a statistician when we're designing you know
a study for a proposal or something like that and you kind of you need to run it by because if you
don't do it beforehand the reviewers that are reviewing your paper there's always there's always
that statistician that that's you know part of the review committee who will ding you on it and
be like nope you we're not passing it you got to go back and do two more animals for this group.
And then it's like, ah, that could set you back, you know, like a year and a half.
Sure.
Published study.
So you always want to do that up front.
Yeah.
I mean, especially I was looking at, with some mutual friends of ours, looking at a
study involving beet juice intake and endurance gains.
And they were using a small sample size
of extremely high level endurance athletes. And if you were to take the results, it was like,
you know, a 2% performance increase or whatever, and, and try to convey it. It sounds extremely
unimpressive, but the study, the entire study was underpowered, um, in some fatal ways.
But the, um, question for you, so I, I enjoy I enjoy scuba, but scuba can be dangerous,
right? Who knows? Like you get snagged on something or let's say you're, let's just
take a different scenario. So instead of using a rebreather with pure oxygen, right? So an excess
of oxygen, you risk a running out of oxygen, right? Or excessive CO2 levels. Let's
say you're a free diver and trying to break records. Would taking a sort of single large
dose, like a bolus of exogenous ketones or ketone esters before a record attempt, would that be a rational sort of insurance policy? Or would that in any way
help mitigate potential damage? Yeah, that's a really good question. And so our lab, in addition
to looking at oxygen, we also look at what's called hypercapnia, which is high CO2 levels.
Because if you're in a spaceship that's
headed to Mars or you're in a submarine, the level of CO2 that you're experiencing is about
on an order of 10 times higher. So that's something that we're looking at. But when it comes to
oxygen utilization, I guess one of the studies you could refer to is Peter Atiyah's blog,
where we look at, we've kind of set the work. Peter took a ketone salt that we had and kind
of a crude version of it. And I commend Peter for his bravery in downing this.
This is the jet fuel that made him dry heave in the kitchen? Yeah.
So, yeah, if you look at his blog there, yeah, and I think the title is Jet Fuel, and you look at the oxygen consumption for a given work output.
In his case, it was on a bike at 180 watts.
He had roughly a 5% to 8% decrease in oxygen consumption for a given work output.
So showing that your oxygen utilization, you know, was lower. And so your oxygen,
your metabolic efficiency. So that that's kind of the, the take home is that you, you can enhance
potentially enhanced metabolic efficiency. So I can tell you that when I fasted for one week, I do a lot of snorkeling and a lot of
diving and just kind of water sports.
And out of curiosity, I was swimming around in the pool at my house and I noticed I could
stay under longer.
And I told my girlfriend, now my fiancee, I want to do an experiment and measure. I knew
what my breath hold time was. And then in a fasted state, I had never checked it before.
So I was able to stay down for three and a half minutes, I think, almost four minutes, which is
well beyond double my breath hold time. And it was, it was really
remarkable. So being in a state of pretty, pretty intense ketosis allowed me to, um, to withstand
levels of hypoxia. So what was your millimolars at the time? Yeah. Or roughly. I was running between four to five and a half.
Wow, you were up there.
But I'm a good ketone user too.
So I would be – if I'm sitting at my desk, so that's what I would kind of be registering.
But if I got up and took a brisk walk around campus or around my place or something, that would drop down to like two because I think your peripheral uptake of ketones would be higher.
But you also have a lot of mass you're walking around with.
Yeah.
So and I think we build our transport and mechanisms of ketones with time. So it's called the monocarboxyl
gas transporter, sort of the protein that gets the ketones across the membrane and allow cells
to use it is upregulated over time. So the longer you're on a ketogenic diet, the more benefits you
could potentially derive from it because your body is adapting to that state of ketosis by upregulating transporter mechanisms.
And a few of my colleagues study this.
And at least in a rodent model, it takes about four weeks and you could actually double the protein level, which the actual subunits of the proteins that are part of the transporter goes up about 50% when you transition an animal to a ketogenic diet for four weeks.
So that's a pretty remarkable increase in the potential of utilizing ketones as an energy source.
And I think some of the work by Jeff Bullock, I just had an opportunity to visit him at Ohio State just last week.
And he's done some remarkable work just showing between fat-adapted athletes and carb-adapted athletes.
And they're both at elite levels.
If you look at substrate utilization between these two groups, it's like night and day. I mean, even the best
carb-adapted athletes, they're the ones that are using fat at the highest level, are using much
less fat than the fat-adapted athletes, than the guys that are on the ketogenic diet. I mean,
they're literally using about two to three times more fat during exercise. And I think that's what happens.
So I think resting and just kind of being in a calm state and letting your sympathetic
nervous system kind of chill out and having a good – diving is a lot of mental preparation
goes into diving.
But I found that if I could just kind of calm my body down,
and if I'm in the state of nutritional ketosis, fasting ketosis, I could increase my breath hold
time by like three times, like 300%. And that blows my mind. So I need to study this.
I've also replicated that myself in two different, uh, two different experiments. I mean,
it's an N of one, but, um, the, yeah, the magnitude of difference. I mean, it's kind of
like your rat swimming around for an hour instead of 25 minutes or 15 minutes rather, um, double or
triple breath hold time at, uh, even low ones like 1.3 millimolars, even on a very strict calorically restricted ketogenic diet, I very rarely get past three unless I'm ingesting stuff that facilitates it, meaning supplemental ketones, MCT oil, et cetera.
But a question for you on the adaptation.
I'm so interested in this. So for
instance, people talk about muscle memory, right? Where people regain weight faster, muscle weight
after they've gained it once before, even if they lose say 50, 60 pounds like Casey V8 or
did at one point and then regained it. And they're like, oh, well that's muscle memory.
And some people, at least based on reading I've done, attribute that to satellite cell growth and so on that happened the first time around that facilitate
this kind of regrowth. So there's a persistent benefit to that one-time event. What is the
persistence of the upregulation after four weeks of being on keto. So let's say you stay
on a strict keto diet for four to six weeks, you upregulate these proteins and therefore
sort of the uptake or transport by 50%. If you stopped that and didn't follow a ketogenic diet
again for another six months, is there a persistence of effect? Or if you had to guess,
what would you say? Yeah. Anecdotally, I would say yes. I mean, there's some memory going on here.
And yeah, if you use ketone levels as kind of an index for this like your body's ability to make ketones uh it's it's
definitely better like if you're on a ketogenic diet and you break ketosis and go eat sushi for
a couple days and come back i can get into ketosis real quick uh relative to the big learning curve
i had when i started doing this you know um so i would say. I'm not sure we've studied it to that extent I think you're
referring to, but that brings up a good question because a lot of people want to go in and out of
ketosis. Like, can I just use this intermittently? Can I eat ketogenic but just throwing carbs
during my workout? And people say, well, should I be on a ketogenic diet all the time?
Should I always be in nutritional ketosis? And I tend to be in that state because I just feel
better generally in a moderate state of ketosis. But I think it's probably good too to have
metabolic flexibility for your body to be able to use all sorts of food for energy.
So going in and out of ketosis may be optimal to get your body in and out. And I do that from
time to time depending on – I'll be traveling. I'll be in Europe the next two or three weeks,
actually. So trying different foods. I'll probably get out of ketosis. But I actually travel with ketone supplements too. So I kind of cheat along the way.
So if you go to like Italy and you're eating bread and pasta, what are the main benefits?
I'm making that assumption, but that's what I would do because I'm a glutton and love carbs
when it comes down to it. But if you went to Italy and were consuming all of that,
what is the benefit of ingesting the exogenous ketones and how would you ingest them?
Okay.
Depends on, you know, kind of the person,
what you wanted to, if you were working out or whatever.
But just for general health and energy. I would say for your personal use. So like if you could describe sort of how much you were working out or whatever, just for general health and energy.
I would say for your personal use. So if you could describe sort of how much you're working
out, just in a scenario like that, right? You're traveling with these exogenous ketones.
How do you use them and why?
Okay. Well, there's two that I kind of bring with me. One would be, um, a, uh, MCT powder
and it's basically caprylic triglyceride, like a brain octane, but a powdered form of it.
And I'm kind of, it's not on the market yet, but I just kind of have it. And, uh, and I use
the Keto Kena product that's put out by Keto Sports. Uh's kind of the first thing I take when I get up.
I drink a glass of water and then I take a small amount of ketones to bump me up to about
one millimolar.
And that's the combination of the MCT powder and the Ketokana.
It's like Gymkana, that horrible but awesome movie I saw ages ago. Ketokana, is, it's like Gym Kana, like that horrible but awesome movie
I saw ages ago.
All right, Keto Kana.
Is that how you guys say it?
Keto Kana, yeah.
So do you combine those two
when you first get up
and take it with water?
I do sometimes, not all the time.
Sometimes I'll just take
the straight MCT powder.
It just kind of depends
on my mood or whatever.
But I always take...
MCTs are so versatile
and they're so cheap and so readily available.
Traveling with MCT oil is not really that good. So the powder is something that I've been testing
and I really love it. And the powder, the huge advantage of an MCT powder, especially caprylic
triglyceride, is that with straight MCT oil, I'm running to the bathroom
on an empty stomach, or if I try to get my levels up to above one millimolar, above whatever baseline
I'm at. Whereas the MCT powder that I'm working, that's being formulated and tested, uh, is sort of spray
dried with a probiotic fiber that's healthy for your microbiome and, uh, has some interesting
properties in and of itself, but it allows you, uh, the powder increases tolerability,
at least double or triples it. And so it allows you to kind of cruise along at an extra two
millimolar and stay there. And then, you And then you could take that powder and then add some ketokina to it or some other ketone salt products that we're developing.
And basically, I mean, you're approaching the potency of a ketone ester.
The ketone esters will probably always be the most potent molecules out there.
It'll be hard to touch that. But some of the more palatable ketone salt products that are being developed and tested now, and we're working really hard to make them tolerable and palatable, will be able to approach the potency of the esters that are developed for military applications, which I think is really exciting.
Because, I mean, they're going to taste. they're actually, you'll look forward to tasting them.
They're that good.
And they can put you into that mild ketosis range, that one to three millimolar, independent
of carbohydrate restriction or fasting.
So, you will have the ability to derive a lot of the benefits, whether it be health, longevity,
performance of ketosis, of higher levels of ketosis than you could otherwise get with
any kind of MCT oil out there or anything out there.
So I will bring that with me when I travel.
And so I'll be in Budapest and Belgium and a few other places along the way.
And I will probably not be eating keto.
I'll be eating low carb, but not keto, but I'll be cruising around at, you know, probably
two to three millimolar, uh, kind of more or less off of a ketogenic diet, low carb,
but not ketogenic.
And you'll, so you'll take the, you'll, you'll take your MCT
powder in the morning with water. Then you'll have a keto breakfast. What does the breakfast look like?
Mm-hmm. Uh, this morning, um, I had, uh, eggs. I usually have four eggs and some kind of fish.
I'm a big believer. I've kind of, um, I eat beef, but I've been phasing out beef and chicken
and probably getting about two-thirds of my protein from fish.
So I had eggs and fish in the form of sardines
and a half of a can of oysters.
I've been on this oyster kick for a while.
Why is that?
Oysters, well, I mean, they're like a nutrition powerhouse, right?
So are sardines.
So I get the sardines packed in olive oil.
But they're really high in micronutrients like selenium, which are things that are maybe hard to get from other sources out there.
But I just like the taste of them, too.
So sardines are really good to travel with. They're my travel food too. So whenever my bag
is packed, I usually have about a dozen cans of sardines packed in extra virgin olive oil.
So I tend to just, I like them so much. I eat them when I'm home too. So I have, yeah,
fish and eggs and some kind of green, usually asparagus, broccoli, or spinach, or kale.
And if I make kale, I like to cook bacon, and I cook the kale in the bacon grease.
But I didn't do that this morning, but I'll probably do that tomorrow.
So that's what I had for breakfast.
But before I eat breakfast, I always kind of drink water first,
and I take branched-chain amino acids with the ketone products that I just told
you about. And that kind of gets energy to my brain like immediately. And I'm kind of like
really good to go after that. And usually, but well, before that I let my dog out and he just
kind of goes crazy. So I kind of run around and watch him chase animals off our property. So
it's always an entertaining thing. While, uh. While coffees or I got water brewing for
my coffee and I got my breakfast cooking. And so that usually goes on in the morning.
But yeah, my breakfast is always pretty much ketogenic. And if I have coffee, I do put
butter in it and I put MCT powder in it on top of the butter. So it's very ketogenic and if i have coffee i do put butter in it and i put mct powder in it
on top of the butter so it's very ketogenic and the macronutrient ratio of my breakfast is always
about about 70 to 80 fat and uh with the balance being you know protein and a little bit of carbs
from whatever green vegetables i have and um the BCAAs, what brand are you using?
Yeah, I use CIVATION.
How do you spell that?
Yeah, it's short for Science and Innovation.
So S-I-V-A-T-I-O-N, right?
Yeah, Sivation.
So Sivation has been an incredible supporter of our cancer research program. metabolic therapy research or research on diets and nutrition and just basically cancer metabolism
in general just people don't study it right uh the ceo of citations uh is a close friend of mine
and he has been for personal reasons and just kind of you know scientific reasons he has supported
our cancer research program and his branch chain
amino acid product is called extend. Uh, and it's, you know, it's probably the most popular
one out there and it's, you know, on probably the most popular on bodybuilding.com. And, uh,
it's actually the product that we're using in our cancer studies. So I, he asked me,
he contacted me and wanted me to, to study this. And I looked at the
formula and it had a high amount of glutamine in it. So I said, you know, I want to study this,
but let's remove the glutamine and just do pure branched chain amino acids. And I think he
replaced the glutamine and put some taurine in it or whatever. And we started with that.
Is that because the glutamine is glucogenic?
Or what was the reason for removing the L-glutamine?
Yeah, I should describe.
So cancer cells kind of default to a metabolic phenotype called the Warburg effect, right? So they basically derive most of their energy from glucose metabolism
and their biosynthetic processes as a tumor grows.
It's using glucose for energy, but it's also using glucose to expand the biomass of the tumor.
So it becomes the primary source of energy. And we knew this for
some time, and that's sort of underlies the basis of using what's called a PET scan for imaging the
location and the aggressiveness of a tumor in imaging, an FDG PET scan. So it basically shows
sugar metabolism or glucose metabolism. So now investigators understand that the amino
acid glutamine is also used at a fairly high concentration relative to other amino acids
i guess i would say uh by cancer cells so and we call that glutaminolysis so cancer cells can use
glucose primarily glucose but they can also use glutamine.
And this is understood now and kind of well-defined in the literature. But we know that glutamine, I mean, some formulas actually promote or hospitals will promote giving IV glutamine or oral glutamine to cancer patients. That's not necessarily proven to be a bad thing,
but I think I was erring on the side of caution by removing the glutamine
from the Xtend product, at least for our studies.
Right.
And we want to go back and do a parallel study with the glutamine actually to see.
And the IV glutamine in the hospitals is for an anti-catabolic purpose,
or is it for some type of recovery purpose? Why are they doing that in the first place?
Yeah. Because I know a lot of people take glutamine post-workout, for instance.
Yeah. If you're ingesting it, the gut pretty much, the gut and the liver, I think, probably
are pretty greedy and take their share. I'm not sure how much glutamine you're actually getting to the muscles when you do that. But glutamine,
I would say is a conditionally essential amino acid. So under periods of high stress or catabolic
physiological state, your body will use more glutamine. Glutamine is also an important amino acid for maintaining your immune system.
So it plays a – I would say if you're deficient in glutamine, it can compromise your immune system.
So you want to make sure that if your immune system is challenged, which it would be if you have cancer,
if you're getting chemotherapy, if you're a burn patient, you're a burn patient, you might want glutamine.
Although we're testing a hypothesis that we want to metabolically starve cancer cells in our experiment and preserve muscle at the same time.
So the Xtend product that's out there by Cydation is a remarkable product. I think people like it
because it tastes so good. So the people who formulate the product really know what they're
doing with taste. So it tastes like really, really good. So, and that's, if you want a
successful product, it doesn't matter if it, you know, cures cancer, enhances your performance,
you know, 10 times over. If it doesn't taste good, people are not going to take it.
So the syvation, branched chain amino acids, they taste really good, but they're also very tolerable and very palatable.
But this particular product had glutamine, so we removed it from the formula for our studies, and we ran a study with a ketogenic diet, we added the branch chain amino acid to the ketogenic diet and we looked at survival of mice with advanced metastatic cancer
and adding the branch chain amino acid to the ketogenic diet, we had like a 50% increase in
survival with the ketogenic diet alone. And when we added branched
chain amino acids to the ketogenic diet, there was trends for an increase in survival. But I think
the big thing is that we saw the animals were maintaining their weight better with the branched
chain amino acids added to it. So with branched chain amino acids, one of them is leucine. And we know leucine can
activate mTOR. And mTOR has been associated with driving, a major driver for cancer growth and
proliferation. But, you know, and there's cancer biologists out there that would say, well, if you
give leucine, you're just going to drive cancer because you're stimulating an anabolic process that can drive cancer growth and proliferation.
But I would kind of argue that that's not the case here.
We definitely don't see it in this model.
And some of the other studies out there do not show that branched-chain amino acids cause cancer to grow faster.
And some of it shows the opposite, actually.
But I think branched-chain amino acids have their effect on anabolic processes are relatively specific to skeletal muscle.
And I think that's really important to understand,
is that stimulating anabolic processes is not a global effect. It's kind of similar to
anabolic steroids, right? So there's specific receptors on the muscles. And we think that the...
Right. And that's also why if you take a sort of less selective
growth agonist, you end up looking like you're
seven months pregnant as a bodybuilder
because your intestines
are the size of your forearms.
Yeah, IGF-1
is great
for growing your skin and your
organs.
It has a pretty global systemic
anabolic effect.
Whereas, and we haven't proven this yet, but I think just based on literature,
and we're really delving into it,
we think that the branched-chain amino acids will be relatively specific for skeletal muscle.
And to look at this, we're going to feed animals the branched chain amino acids and then we take the actual tumor tissue out.
And then we do a series of metabolic analysis and assays and everything to look at the signaling and the insulin signaling, the metabolomics, the growth factors and whatnot.
So we compare it to the groups without the branched
chain amino acids. So we're really delving mechanistically into this.
Which is something I love and enjoy about your research and our conversations is that,
I mean, you have a lot of expertise in neurochemistry, neurobiology,
cancer chemistry, but you're not, would you
consider yourself a nutritionist?
You know, I, as an undergrad, I, I enthusiastically went into a nutrition science program at Rutgers
University.
Right.
And, and my, who would you call it?
I guess my guidance counselor at the time, you the time just wasn't a very interesting person.
And it was like, well, I kept going to her and I said, well, direct me to labs that are doing interesting nutrition science research.
And there wasn't a whole lot going on.
I mean I like Rutgers and everything, but there just wasn't a whole lot of stuff going on there that really interested me.
And the more people I talked to, I was kind of going the pre-med route.
And people were like, well, yeah, you should probably major in biology too.
So I double majored in nutrition, biological sciences.
But I really had a passion for nutrition.
And then when I went into a PhD program, it was neuroscience because I was really fascinated with the brain, but also did physiology.
And I studied the neural control of autonomic regulation, so how the brain controls our body, our physiology.
And then I did my postdoc in looking at physiological resilience and the oxygen toxicity thing.
And it brought me back full circle because when I started, you know, basically a pharmacologist
as a neuroscientist trying to find a drug that would mitigate oxygen toxicity seizures.
And I'm looking at all these drugs and I realized that they're not very good.
You have, they would be good if you give them at a
dose that would sedate a warfighter and basically put them into a coma and it's not very-
Not the ideal way to prevent seizures.
Ideal situation. Yeah. But then when I discovered the ketogenic diet and I wasn't really excited
when I first discovered it. I was like, ah, let me see the research on this. There's a lot of things out there. But the research on it was so like cut and dry. I mean,
there was an overwhelming amount of scientific research showing the efficacy of the ketogenic
diet for drug resistant pediatric seizures. And now in adults too. And I realized, wow,
this is like the most powerful metabolic therapy out there for seizures, like bar none. And I was like, you know, I realized this was grossly underutilized. And if I could harness the power of this and apply it to something as esoteric as, you know, CNS oxygen toxicity, that would be really cool. So I could kind of bring back my passion for nutrition, which was always there. I always, even, you know, throughout grad school and postdoc,
I was totally into working out and nutrition and understanding, you know, different diets and
trying lots of stuff on myself. It, it, it allowed me to, you know, kind of come full circle and, uh, and incorporate, you know, nutrition research into my research now.
So our entire research program is really based on the ketogenic diet. So we do ketogenic diet
studies, exogenous ketones, but we also do metabolic drugs. So we do, you know,
metformin and a few other drugs. Well, and a lot of, I mean, you mentioned metformin
as sort of a regulator of, uh, you know,
liver glycogen, hepatic glycogen. Um, and there are plenty of folks who take metformin, uh, is
it still called glucophage, the, um, or glucophage, I'm not sure the, uh, the brand name, but the
metformin prophylactically. I mean, these are otherwise what you would consider healthy people
who are taking it primarily to prevent, uh prevent cancer growth, if I'm not mistaken.
I mean, is that fair to say, or are they using it for other purposes?
Yeah, you can use it for a variety of reasons.
You could use it as kind of a metabolic prophylactin to prevent you from getting type 2 diabetes down the road. But when it comes to cancer, yeah, it definitely activates or dampens or activates signaling
pathways associated with cancer growth and proliferation.
And if you're activating AMP kinase, which it's well known to do that, and activate various
downstream signaling processes.
It mimics, in many ways, calorie restriction and fasting, the same processes that would
be activated.
It comes with some side effects, and some people have intolerance to it, GI issues with
it.
But overall, it's a really safe drug.
I mean, so many prescriptions have
been written for it. We know what it does and what it doesn't do. There's a lot of research
in cancer right now. And when you go to a cancer conference, you hear there's a lot of discussion,
a lot of buzz about metformin, but there's also a lot of debate as to how it's
working. So some people think it's toxic to the mitochondria and it's inhibiting complex
swine in the mitochondria. And other people are saying it works purely by activating amkinase.
And other people by its ability to regulate hepatic glucose output or combination in some people through other mechanisms.
So we don't know how it works.
But I think – I did a run where I took one gram of metformin for I think it was 12 weeks.
And I got blood work.
And the only thing I saw was that my testosterone was lower.
So that was – I think that's the side effect i have since got off of it and i recheck and my testosterone levels like
are back into the normal range they were did you feel that's the only thing i no i didn't and i
well i felt i don't know how to describe it, a little, maybe a little less anxious, a little bit
kind of like you're, you kind of set the governor, like my highs weren't as high and it's like,
and I would kind of dose it. I dose it twice a day. And my bigger dose would be at nighttime
before I went to bed, because that would be my bigger meal. So it kind of dosed the metformin
according to my food intake, which I think is important. But I didn't really notice any side
effects. I went up to two grams a day initially and found out, okay, that's about my tolerance
to it. So I backed down.
So to gut tolerance, meaning to disaster pants, like risk, is that, I mean?
Not the MCT effect.
Not what I'd describe as the MCT effect.
But I would, it's kind of like a dull, kind of aching feeling in the stomach.
But yeah, it was like loose stools a little bit.
And then I just kind of, the next day I backed off.
And I played around with it for probably two or three weeks.
And then I realized, OK, one gram is about what I can do, you know, safely and comfortably, I thought.
And, yeah, I did that for three months and I tried to like take nothing else at the time.
I wasn't experimenting with any other things.
And I took that and my
testosterone went down let's see but my other market like my triglycerides were the lowest ever
my hdl was like 98 it bumped up from like 80 to 98 uh and other things like my c-reactive protein
wasn't even measurable and i and i did i tried not to calorie restrict or even change my diet at all.
So some things went in a positive direction, but I really thought that it suppressed my testosterone.
And there's a couple of publications that would indicate that it does that.
Maybe if I took 500 milligrams a day, I wouldn't have that effect.
But I felt like I'd get a gram a day.
And I had like a powdered version.
So it was probably like one point, you know, one to one point five grams a day.
I was kind of measuring out with with a powdered version.
So it was at least one gram a day I was taking.
So that's that that's my experience with it, and I know a few people out there. If cancer runs in your family and you are concerned that you may be at risk or maybe had cancer in the past, I think it's a pretty safe drug to take.
One of my students is a PhD student, and his entire PhD dissertation is on metformin. So we're looking at it, you know, very deep kind of understanding of metformin as much as, you know, you can in a PhD dissertation.
So we delve over the literature.
We're running studies in individual cells in isolation and in advanced cancer models.
And, you know, we have a pretty good understanding of what it does and
what it doesn't do. And in our metastatic cancer model, we have survival times increased almost
40 to 50% increase in survival. And we have to get a pretty big dose.
Is that with some, you're talking about metformin?
Yeah. Yeah. It's just metformin to a standard diet
increases the survival times
of animals that have
metastatic cancer
we've presented this at several meetings
and we're finishing up the data now
to publish it which will be published pretty soon
and does that include
in the animal models
I'm not sure if this is in the animal
but like glioblastoma multiforme,
like the GBM, sort of the uniformly, what are considered kind of the uniformly fatal
cancers. Is that also, do you still see the 40 to 50%?
Yeah. So it's interesting. So the metastatic cancer model that we have, the primary tumor is derived from a tumor that pathologists confirmed
was a glioblastoma. What's interesting about these cancer cells are so aggressive
that we have them in culture, right? We have isolated cell cultures of these cells that are
metastatic and very aggressive. and they're transfected with a
gene that makes that that uh makes the protein uh luciferase so uh it basically makes the cells
glow in the presence of luciferin so uh not to get too complicated but if we take these cells
in culture right we harvest them and we implant them inside the flank of the animal
or underneath the skin, the cells metastasize to all the organs and even the brain. So typically,
a glioblastoma is thought not to metastasize to other organs of the body and it stays in the brain.
But I think we don't typically see people with glioblastoma with liver cancer
because they die of the glioblastoma before it metastasizes. So we've basically, and this is a
model that was generated by Thomas Seyfried from Boston College. He wrote the book Cancer as a
Metabolic Disease. It's a really, really good book. It's like required reading for all my students. But he developed this model and made
like the cover of International Journal of Cancer. And it's probably the best model out there. So,
it's why we chose the model. But it's a model of advanced metastatic cancer and the primary tumor was um had a glial blastoma kind of cell type to it
and these cells were uh kind of described as tumor associated macrophages so they can
travel on blood vessels they can metastasize to organs very aggressively and it makes it a
it makes it a uh a convenient model to use because when you implant the cells, the experiment goes real fast, right?
Because the animal succumbs to the tumor burden within about 21 days.
So we can test and we can basically test a lot of things really fast because the tumors grow so fast within 21 days, we have to put the animal down
because it'll succumb to the tumor burn. So it allows us to test various drugs and diets and
ketogenic agents. And when we tested metformin with a standard high-carbohydrate rat chow,
and we formulated it into the food so it would be equivalent to a person taking about 2.5 grams a day.
So metformin comes in like 500 milligram tablets, I think even sometimes one gram tablets.
So with the 500 milligram tablets, it would be taking like five tablets a day, would be the human equivalent to that. The animals lived about 50% longer,
about 45% to 50% longer survival time.
So instead of living 21 days, they lived almost 40 days.
That's amazing.
So what we're doing now,
so we have to tediously test all these things in isolation,
and then we have to do different dose ranges too, right?
So we got to do a variety of dose ranges and make all these dose curves and everything.
But I just want to jump right into it.
I want to do a calorie-restricted ketogenic diet with ketone supplementation and metformin and hyperbaric oxygen.
I want to jump right to it.
And we're kind of doing some of these things as pilots,
but we're testing.
I think it's really important to get a handle
on what each of these things do at different dosages.
No, definitely.
Let me, I apologize for interrupting,
but if you, and you would find this,
you would figure this out earlier, of course,
but if you found out you had relatively advanced cancer of some aggressive type, what, what are the tools that you would
throw at it that you have a decent degree of confidence would have a beneficial effect?
Like, so you mentioned a few things, right? You mentioned, uh, calorie restricted ketogenic diet.
So I'd love to hear, um, what calorie restricted means, right? Um,
you mentioned metformin, you mentioned a hyperbaric oxygen treatment. Um, you mentioned
exogenous ketones. We talked earlier about fasting, but let's just say you found out,
Oh shit. Uh, I'm in, I'm in a bad situation here. And, uh, this is a very, very aggressive cancer
putting aside the chemotherapy and some of the other therapies that you might have administered,
of the toolkits that we've been discussing, what would you do?
Okay.
Well, you know, so I'm not the kind of person, some of my colleagues are kind of very anti-standard of care, some of them for some ways.
But I think you have to – I know you told me not to talk about chemo.
But if you have something like testicular cancer or leukemia or lymphoma, there's a variety of cancers.
You'd be crazy not to do the standard of care. So when I talk about this,
one could potentially use it as a standalone therapy
or one could use it as a way to further augment
the efficacy of standard of care,
which we plan to do.
So say, you know, worst case scenario,
like glioblastoma, right?
A glioblastoma, in some ways,
it's really a good model to look at because your survival time is like one year, give or take a few months.
So it's almost, you know, you know, if we do a study with glioblastoma patients, it's almost like you have historical controls that you can refer to. So the ketogenic diet, I think, would be absolutely like your base
therapy, right? And it would be not just a macronutrient ratio, it would be the sources of
the macronutrients itself. Like you would have to, you would do a macronutrient ratio that would put
you into ketosis, but take extra care to get fish that was
from a natural source or grass-fed beef. And I think these things would probably be important
because we know the fatty acid composition changes dramatically from a corn-fed cow to
a grass-fed or a salmon that's farm-raised or wild.
So the ketogenic diet would be kind of the base.
And instead of the normal three-day or three-times-a-day eating pattern,
I would go to an intermittent fasting personally.
And I think that would be – you could further harness the power of ketosis by fasting throughout the day and then having a ketogenic meal once a day.
So your single meal would be like a dinner?
It would be dinner, yeah.
You would eat probably within a window of four hours.
And I've experimented with that, and that's possible.
I just like eating, though.
So I like sitting down and having like a
social breakfast and I don't eat during the day and then I have a nice sit down social kind of
dinner at night. So I like that. So either way, I think ideally I would probably do one meal a day
and ketone supplementation, I think. I mean, we've shown, independent of even the ketogenic diet, that ketones have an anti-cancer effect.
They not only do our ketones cannot be utilized as an energy source by aggressive cancer cells that have defective mitochondria.
So cancer cells cannot use ketones effectively as an energy source because they have defective mitochondria structurally.
They're defective mitochondria structurally they're defective if you look at the
mitochondria of uh cells of a glioblastoma patient they're the inner cristae the little
folds inside the mitochondria where atp is actually produced is completely screwed up and
they're also deficient in various ketolytic enzymes that would allow the cancer cells to make energy from ketones so ketones uh
ketones as a source of energy is a very poor energy source for for cancer so putting our state
into putting our body into a state of nutritional ketosis would be a way to marginalize you know the
fuel source to ketones and enhance the energy capacity of our healthy cells.
So exogenous ketones.
For you personally, how much would you take?
When would you take them?
Yeah, I would take a level of exogenous ketones that would put me above whatever baseline I was at,
between one to two millimolar.
So if I'm cruising along at like 1.5, you know, staying on a modified Atkins
like diet, I would further boost that to like three or three and a half, uh, with, with exogenous
ketogenic agents. I think the easiest could be medium chain triglycerides, MCT powder, which will be available soon, the Keto-Kena product.
There will be some products coming out pretty soon, ketone salt products that will taste really good and will allow you to easily achieve this.
How much would you have to take, you personally, to jack your ketone millimolar up one to two millimolars like you described?
Is it three times a day, twice a day?
What type of dosing and frequency are we looking at?
I would do twice a day.
It's probably twice a day or maybe three times a day depending.
See, the MCTs kind of allow you to maintain the levels up a little bit higher. But I think it's okay to not continuously provide an exogenous source of ketones,
but maybe just use them when you need them, if you need to boost in energy.
But if you had the glioblastoma, you would do two to three times a day?
I would do two to four times a day, probably,
because the way kind of our experiments are panning out, it just looks like the stronger you stay in ketosis from the time I wake up, keeping my ketones more or less artificially elevated.
Well, I guess it wouldn't be artificial if you're adding MCTs, which are a good carrier for the other forms of exogenous ketones, to keep it further boosted an additional one to two millimolar
minimum.
And what about other things that you might do?
The metformin.
I would titrate metformin into where it starts causing side effects and then back off from
there.
Titrate, meaning you just start low and increase the dosage.
Yep.
Even, you know, you can get it 250 milligram tablets or break the tablet in half and keep,
you know, start out one week, maybe start at 500 and then go up to 750 and then to a gram
and then bump it up to where, you know, you start to get some GI discomfort
and then back it off and then stay there.
Metformin is a pretty cheap, pretty remarkable drug in our hands. And I think it would synergize with the other things that I'm describing.
So DCA is another drug that we're looking at.
And one could simply get on Google and do a search for dichloroacetate,
DCA in cancer, and find a lot of interesting information. I think there's registered clinical
trials going on right now with glioblastoma. And we think it may synergize with some of the
things that I'm talking about, even metformin. So DCA activates a particular enzyme metabolic pathway, pyruvate dehydrogenase complex.
And for reasons we don't completely understand, it can cause cancer cells to – it kills them.
It triggers apoptosis in cancer cells by reasons we don't completely have a handle on yet.
But it's used clinically for lactic acidosis.
And lactate can drive, or in the micro environment, lactate can drive tumor growth.
So DCA can actually make your body more alkaline, right?
I mean, it's used clinically for that application.
And maybe its therapeutic effects may have to do with that, but we know that if we just
grow cancer cells in isolation, like a dissociated cell prep and put on DCA, the cancer cells
start to die at levels that are relatively non-toxic to healthy cells.
So, dichloroacetate, I don't like to give recommended, but if I was-
This is for you and theoretical, yeah.
Yeah. I would start at like 10 milligrams per kilogram, and I'm a little over 100 kilograms
or whatever. So, you could do the math on that. And so, I would start at 10 milligrams per kilogram and probably not go higher than 50 milligrams per kilogram.
Because once you get above 50 milligrams per kilogram of DCA, you start to get peripheral neuropathy.
And we see this in our animal models, they will report tingling in the fingers and the toes once they start reaching about 50 milligrams per kilogram.
I think the clinical trials use 20 milligrams per kilogram, if I'm not mistaken.
So DCA activates pyruvate dehydrogenase complex.
So that complex makes the mitochondria, it activates the mitochondria.
And if you activate the mitochondria of cancer cells, which have defective mitochondria,
it like causes the mitochondria to like explode and the cancer cells, it triggers apoptosis.
So it probably triggers the release of cytochrome C from the mitochondria, which is
part of the apoptotic pathway. Apoptosis meaning cell death.
Yeah. Program cell death. Program cell death.
Yeah. Yep. And that's kind of like a theory that I'm throwing out there, but it's based on
kind of what we know, what we see in the lab and what we know from the literature.
But it's relatively a non-toxic drug. I mean relative to the chemotherapeutic agents that are chemotherapy is – are highly carcinogenic.
So when you're giving chemotherapy, you're giving a highly carcinogenic substance.
So does it make sense to treat cancer with something that we know is a powerful carcinogen?
So it doesn't.
In some cases, it does.
Like I mentioned some of the cancers I mentioned before.
Yeah.
And there's application for it.
But I think we have to view it this in perspective.
DCA, I don't think you can patent it.
It's like a really simple molecule, dichloroacetate, right?
You can kind of visualize it if you're a chemist.
It's a pretty small, simple molecule.
And it has a pretty powerful metabolic effect.
And again, it works well by itself with a high-carbohydrate diet.
So just think about how it may synergize with the ketogenic diet, exogenous ketones, metformin, intermittent fasting.
It's working through overlapping mechanisms.
So you are further compromising sort of the energetic state of the cancer cells by adding
it to the mix.
And if you had this, you're using this portfolio of techniques, right?
So you're on a, you're in a ketogenic diet, you're intermittent fasting, you're using this portfolio of techniques, right? So you're on a, you're in a ketogenic diet,
you're intermittent fasting,
you're consuming exogenous ketones two to four times a day,
enough to jack up your sort of ceiling
by one to two millimolars.
You're perhaps taking metformin in combination with DCA.
Would fasting be additive to this or would it be redundant in your mind?
I think it has its place.
And you may not want to do, depending on your overall health.
Like my health, I can tolerate fasting pretty much every day.
Intermittent fasting would be no problem.
But I think you could derive benefits by fasting two or three times a week, even once a week, I think could be beneficial.
But I would try to do it.
Some people do every other day fasting.
But I think one meal per day.
But I think that gap in time, that 20 plus hours that you're not eating and that you have metformin in your system, you have DCA in your system, and you have exogenous ketones kind of flooding your bloodstream.
I mean, it's putting your physiology, it's putting your metabolic physiology into a state
that's compromising the tumor tissue.
And I always, you know, and I discussed this with my colleague, Tom Seyfried, he thinks
that if you don't have cancer and you do a therapeutic fast once or twice a year or maybe three times a year if it's a shorter fast, that it would purge any precancerous cells that are highly dependent for survival and growth on high levels of glucose and insulin.
By subtracting them of those growth needs, they can trigger apoptosis, autophagy, and you could potentially purge yourself of some precancerous cells.
Which pretty much everybody has by age 35, 40, right? I would imagine.
Pretty much.
Yeah.
Our immune system is kind of a surveillance mechanism that detects them and takes care of them.
You know, in our animal models, the cancer cells are kind of, they've evolved to evade the immune system.
So that's one of the hallmarks of cancer, right?
That it can metastasize, evade the immune system.
You know, now in 2011, they finally added that it has an aberrant metabolic phenotype, but they ignored the whole metabolic thing for a while.
But yeah, so the immune system, our immune system kind of becomes overwhelmed or declines in its capacity with age.
So that surveillance, that immune system surveillance over our bodies of these potential neoplastic cells can be overlooked.
And I think one way to reset our body and even stimulate our immune system is to do therapeutic fasting.
Definitely.
And I think it can build us up in ways that we're just really starting to understand now. So I'm trying to, or I'm not trying, I am fasting at least once per quarter.
And the question of duration is one I'd love to ask you about because I can go seven days
if need be.
I've done that already.
Last time I wanted to see what it would be like just from a starvation standpoint,
you know, crashing an airplane, going from high-carb intake to no food,
which I would not do again.
I would induce ketosis as quickly as possible nutritionally and then do it,
but because I had excruciating lower back pain.
I mean, I just was like in a fetal position with,
I think my uric acid levels were pain. I mean, I just was like in a fetal position with,
I think my uric acid levels were just through the roof, among other things.
So I'd like to avoid that.
That was really shitty.
But my question is, if the therapeutic fast is, say, two to three times a year,
what duration might those fasts be?
What is the sort of minimum effective dose in your colleague's mind? I'm not sure if it was a colleague or student. Yeah. If you want to do it kind of hardcore.
Yeah. It's kind of my MO.
Yeah, yeah. Okay. And this would apply to someone on a high-carbohydrate diet too.
But what I've seen, I mean, you just described it very nicely
there. The back pain, some, you know, your body goes into kind of shitty, shitty sleep,
like horrible. Like I guess that's, is that a cholinergic response? I don't know. But like
every, I was in a location where there were 40 people fasting, 50 people fasting,
some of whom had been doing it for two weeks, three weeks, four weeks or so.
But everyone reported horrible insomnia and tachycardia, like rapid heartbeat when they're
trying to sleep.
So yeah, that's an activation of your sympathetic nervous system.
It's your body saying, hey, this is a stress response.
So that's lack of fuel flow to your brain will trigger brain fog. It'll trigger
headache. It'll trigger activation of sympathetic immune system. Your insulin levels will go down
very rapidly, right? And when insulin goes down, it has a natriuretic effect, which means that you
lose sodium. So you're peeing out all your sodium. So your blood volume drops, you become hypovolemic
and your blood pressure will drop and that'll contribute to your headache and you're just
feeling crappy. And some people faint. Yeah. I've seen several women. It seems to be more
pronounced in women that try this, that they faint and they, they, um, you know, I had a couple of
them like calm me up and just and it just made them go crazy.
Like they thought they were going to die.
So if you can get past that, you can get past the feeling of, you know, and that's usually the second and third day.
I've got reports as early as the end of the first day, but I think they're kind of wimps.
But usually the second and third day you're kind of hurting if you can cruise through that and i think cruising through it would would
be a lot easier with exogenous ketones so if you're giving your body even kind of cheat through
so this is this is something that i'm kind of working on like developing like thoughtfully
developing protocols that would make this whole process easier and even enjoyable, potentially.
So, okay, like in a perfect world, if you can tolerate fasting, I would do it ideally,
yeah, like maybe once every quarter for five days. I think five days is sort of the point
where you start to level off everything. to seven days. Some of the,
that work by George Cahill at Harvard showed them kind of leveling off at about 10 days,
but they were like severely obese people starting from absolute baseline. Uh, so I would say a five
to seven day fast, two to three times a day, or maybe two to four times, not per day, per year.
I was like, wow, this is a real interstellar moment. You're like really doing some funny
stuff with time. Okay. Yeah. No, the, yeah, sorry. Yeah. No, no, no.
I think would be something to do. And you'd want to, you know, I, I would kind of say,
you know, time it so it would fit into your schedule.
But when I fasted, I did it like right in the middle of writing grants and teaching and all this other stuff.
And it didn't, I think it increased my productivity.
Because think about all the time that you spend, you know, preparing food, eating food, cleaning up, eliminating, and shopping for food.
And all these things associated with our fixation on food.
And that's kind of time that you save.
And I also realized that I was prior to doing this, and this goes back like five, six years ago, I had a preoccupation with food.
Like I was, I thought, and even going back maybe a little bit longer, I thought I had to eat like five or six meals a day and I would prepare my food, like all my food on a Sunday and
put it in bags and Tupperware and have it in there and have it labeled. And I was kind of neurotic
about it. And, you know, and that's okay if you're into that sort of thing. And I think it's good,
but it's, and it actually may be more efficient throughout the week and you know no no offense against people who do that but uh but i find that uh not doing
that makes me more more productive and i find that eating a ketogenic diet also sustains me uh
sustains my energy levels to where i just get more out of life. I'm more productive.
I'm not fixated on food because I don't have to eat as frequently,
but because my energy level is more stable.
So I can spend the time doing the things that I think are more productive.
And I'm in the process.
As we speak, this is like the week that I'm submitting everything for my tenure.
So it's been super crazy as far as 18-hour days preparing for all this and traveling and stuff on top of that.
And I can't imagine doing that, living the way I used to live, eating like five, six meals a day and having it timed and everything.
I just couldn't do it.
It is very liberating to realize that you don't have to eat on the clock three times a day
and that, in fact, you'll be fine and, in some cases, even better.
I was astonished when I went through my very unpleasant plane crash simulation starvation.
I was miserable from—well, miserable is exaggerated.
I was fatigued in day two. And then
I had the low back pain and so on, uh, day three and part of day four. And then I was fine. But
the latter part of day four, five, six, and then, uh, before breaking the fast,
I felt fantastic. I mean, I went for long walks. I felt, uh, extraordinarily, um, cognitively sharp. Have you found that you or other people,
subjects in ketosis, require less sleep? Because when I get past a certain millimolar point,
for whatever reason, and I love sleep and I tend to sleep quite a bit,
eight to 10 hours a night, but I found that I would wake up after six hours,
six and a half hours, and not have any morning fog and be able to go about my day without fatigue.
Have you observed that in other people? Or is that just a Tim thing?
Yeah, I have. I've gotten emails about that. I found a couple, you know, kind of articles on discussing
that. And I found that in myself that, uh, like last night I got to bed at 2 AM. I try to get
the bed at like midnight and I woke up at six 37. So I'm running off four and a half, maybe five
hours. And I feel totally fine. I've been pretty productive today. Um, did a lot of work in the morning. And I typically run better, best on about six hours,
as opposed to maybe seven or eight that I felt I required. And that depends on my activity level
and kind of what's going on. But generally, I feel like I need about one or two hours less sleep,
that my requirement for that is less now.
And I think there's different reasons for that.
And I think when we're in a state of nutritional ketosis,
we have better fuel flow to our brain without the fluctuations in glucose throughout the day.
And I think that our astrocytes actually kind of spare – our astrocytes –
What is an astrocyte?
Oh, I'm sorry.
There's different brain cells, neurons, and glia cells.
Right.
And among the glia would be astrocytes.
And it's thought that astrocytes are – they actually store glycogen, a form of carbohydrates, a form of glucose for the neurons.
And it's thought that that may be their function and that when we go to sleep,
the astrocytes can actually build up their glycogen levels.
So there's a couple of studies that indicate this.
And I think sleep is a restorative process, obviously, but I think we restore neurotransmitters and we restore the bioenergetics of the brain when we sleep.
And I think that process is enhanced or is augmented when you're in a state of ketosis or if you've adapted to living in a state of ketosis.
I think our brains are better able to restore homeostasis
of our brain chemistry. And I think that metabolic, so enhancing global brain metabolic
activity or preserving brain homeostasis or metabolic homeostasis in the brain is a reason why the ketogenic diet is so
effective for all these different seizure disorders independent of the etiology. So,
whether it's a glucose transporter deficiency or temporal epilepsy.
What does etiology mean?
Oh, etiology is like independent of the cause of the disease. So, for example,
glucose transporter deficiency syndrome is actually there's a defect in the transporter that gets the glucose across the blood-brain barrier for the brain to use glucose as an energy source.
So, if a child has glucose transporter deficiency, the only therapy that's offered is a ketogenic diet, and it restores fuel flow to the brain so the child can live a normal life, right?
So even in the presence of a persistent molecular pathology like the glucose transporter deficiency, and we know the cause, we've identified the gene, the protein product. So even in the presence of that persistent molecular pathology, the ketogenic diet can, but the neurotransmitter levels are restored. There's a balance of glutamate to GABA.
So the GABA levels are restored.
And I think that's what's happening too when it comes to sleep.
So we know if we do a cerebral CSF, the cerebral fluid of the brain in people that are on a ketogenic diet, it
shows that there's a higher GABA to glutamate ratio.
So glutamate is excitatory, whereas GABA is kind of like inhibitory.
It's kind of like the chilling out neurotransmitter.
So there's various things out there that you can take, like phenibut or GABA, you know, that you can take before bed.
It helps you sleep.
So the ketogenic diet elevates these things naturally.
So that may be offering some sleep-promoting potential. think that being in a state of ketosis and having ketones elevated and having them available for
your brain can enhance your restorative processes that occur when you're sleeping in the brain.
So I am looking to shift gears a little bit. I'm looking at some goodies that I'm, I'm making a cocktail with in
front of me. And I've been, I've been fasting since I got up and it's about one 30 my time.
And I can feel my brain starting to get a little grumpy, even though I'm in ketosis.
And, uh, so I inspired by our conversation. I have keto sports, keto Kena, calcium and sodium,
beta hydroxybutyrate, and the label says dietary ketone supplement for
enhanced physical and mental performance. This one is not for resale for R&D use only. So this
must be an early one. And then I have the branched chain amino acids. And then I have a Perillo MCT oil, CapTri, which is the caprylic acid. Now on the side of the calcium and sodium
beta-hydroxybutyrate, the Ketokana, they have the directions, consume 15 minutes prior to
cardio-intensive exercise, may be used with carbohydrate supplements if desired, blah,
blah, blah, do not exceed three servings per day. So I want to ask
you about the risks or toxicity of consuming exogenous ketones. And part of the reason I'm
wondering is because I think of consuming these while on a standard American diet or a high
carbohydrate diet, and it just seems like a very unnatural combination to me, but I could be totally off. So I'd love for you to just to talk about the toxicity risks or
other risks associated with exogenous ketones. Okay. So it says do not exceed three servings per day. So you will, you will, the, the GI intolerance will far exceed sort of the,
the biological intolerance that you'll get. So your body will stop you through diarrhea before
you get close to anything that'll hurt you. Is that exactly, I mean, that's the same thing with
MCT, right? You're limited by your ability to you know transport it across the gut
uh so the mineral load that you would get from the kinokina product would uh would you know cause an
osmotic you know uh issue in the gut and uh it's great you know if you want to stay regular so it's
it stimulates peristalsis in the gut um so'll you'll get that side effect probably if you exceed for me
i could probably do up to five or six servings a day and be okay but as far as toxicity and this
is where we can draw off some of the the rat studies we're doing we just finished a 15 week
study in rats and it's like equivalent to like you to a year or two years in humans, where we fed
a variety of ketone supplements from esters to the salts to combinations thereof at 25 grams per
kilogram per day. So that's really high, right? So we did that. This is part of the toxicology studies that
we are doing to get FDA approval for different things. And so they actually just required 2.5
grams per kilogram per day. Well, I was like, well, let's increase that tenfold. And we formulated it. I come at
this from the FDA, you know, may see this as a drug, but I see ketones as a fourth macronutrient,
right? You have fats, you have proteins and carbs. Ketones are an energy-containing molecule,
and they're like water-soluble fat molecules fat molecules so we formulated them into the diet
and we fed it we fed uh our rodent models this and we did clinical chemistry we were doing
metabolomics we do histology we do uh we did we we did actually some uh some anxiety studies what
is histology i'm sorry oh histology is where, at the end of the study, we harvest all the organs, right?
Like the kidneys, the liver and heart and everything.
And we weigh them out and then we take the organs and then we basically treat them in
a way where we can section them and make slices of them and look at the cells.
So we can look at the liver, for example, or the kidneys, and then we can examine at
the level of the mitochondria inside the cells.
We can examine these cells to determine whether the agent that we administered caused any
toxicity to the animal, to the organs.
Got it.
And if there was toxicity, we would be able to pick it up most likely in the clinical
chemistry, which we've done that.
And we've also, on top of clinical chemistry and the histology, we also looked at all the,
about 27 different types of cytokines.
And we didn't see anything relative to the control, whether relative to the standard
rodent chow.
There were no abnormalities to indicate liver or kidney stress.
And on top of that, we did kind of parallel to this in the same group.
And that was at 25, what was it, 25 grams per kilogram?
25 grams per kilogram? 25 grams per kilogram. So instead of delivering it like they do in drug studies with one dose, we formulated it into the diet.
So we figured out how many grams of food the animal ate.
And then we took that and we formulated it in a way that we know that if they ate this amount of grams per food a day, they would be getting this amount.
So instead of getting it at a big dose once a day, they would eat it.
They'd nibble on it throughout the day.
Got it.
And it was, you know, and that's kind of a more realistic way to give it instead of
doing like most drug studies or even food studies are done with food additives.
They just give it in a bolus.
So is the, yeah, I'm sorry.
And you didn't see anything.
So, okay.
There's no negative effects.
So you haven't observed any toxicity then? No known toxicity? There's no LD50 of,
sorry, lethal dose 50, a dose that'll kill 50% of the subjects or anything like that or produce
some nasty effect. You guys just haven't observed it? Not when administered that way. So in taking a step back, if we were to give 25 grams per kilogram as a single dose of our most potent ketone ester, that would cause ketoacidosis in the rats for sure.
Got it.
Because we, you know, got, and then they would, that would be hard to reverse actually.
But that would be such a, I don't even think that volume is possible.
I think the IACUC wouldn't even allow us to administer that dose because the volume would be so high for the stomach.
Right.
You know what I mean?
So I don't – so it effects at doses that would even approach kind of what's on the label there.
And you have to figure when these things are ingested, it's bio-identical to what our body makes anyway. If we eat an egg or a piece of – if we eat muscle from an animal that's in ketosis, we're getting ketones, exogenous ketones.
We're just not getting it at the level that would really put us into ketosis.
Although I think milk, there's some ketones in milk and different products that could kind of boost your ketone levels a little bit so we we sort of looked into that when uh we're trying to
understand for fda regulations are ketones in in our food and yes they are in our food if an animal
is in ketosis and we're eating we're drinking milk from an animal or the meat from an animal
that's in ketosis we're technically consuming exogenous ketones so So are there any unusual foods or beverages or anything that
increase ketone levels dramatically in animals or humans that you've seen? So I'll give you an
example. And this could be complete, well, it is speculation, but it could be just completely erroneous.
So I've gotten a bunch of my friends kind of hooked on using the Precision Extra device to track their millimolar levels.
And some of them have really gone kind of nuts where they're taking five to ten readings a day and so on. Uh, and one of them observed, this is Kevin Rose, uh, that artichokes
seemed to spike ketone levels. Uh, and he replicated it for himself, I think two or three
times. I've been doing some experimentation with it, but I was like, huh, interesting because,
you know, artichoke extract, I've seen it used, uh, it used as a, what is it? PDE4 inhibitor
because PDE4 breaks down cyclical AMP, as far as I understand, blah, blah, blah.
But is there any, I mean, you could talk to artichokes specifically, but I don't know if
you've ever looked at it, but are there any foodstuffs or things that
people can use to jack up ketone levels besides exogenous ketones or MCT oil, et cetera?
Yeah, that's an interesting observation. With the artichoke, artichokes, mostly fiber,
really. And I guess that could lead into the next question right soluble fiber
breaks down into short-chain fatty acids which are ketotic uh interesting so i i was actually at uh
at nasa a few weeks ago and it was brought to my attention by uh a former astronaut, Rick Linehan, who's also a vet, that cows are ketotic.
And this gets back to your sort of the thing we were talking about, about short-chain fatty
acids being formed from the breakdown of soluble fiber and short chain fatty acids can be a form of ketones,
can contribute to ketogenesis and also the generation of butyrate in the gut, which can
enhance and contribute to our gut microbiota. So, yeah, so I think that needs to be appreciated that we're
talking about foods that could enhance ketosis. And I think that one could formulate a ketogenic
diet with the intention to further enhance ketosis by adding certain types of fiber,
soluble fiber that are broken down into short-chain fatty acids, which are potentially ketogenic.
Like your friend that had the artichoke and had a big bump in ketones. That's really interesting.
I love artichokes and maybe that's why I get levels of them. I'm looking at the macronutrient profile of artichokes now and I helps slow the digestion, assimilation, and utilization of protein.
So you get less of a spike in amino acid levels, which can help.
A spike, a quick spike in amino acid levels can like shut off ketogenesis. And if you attenuate that spike, it can help promote your body
into staying in that state of ketosis longer by...
I'm sorry to interrupt. Is the spike knocking you out of ketogenesis because the liver is
using gluconeogenesis to convert those amino acids into glucose, or is it something else entirely?
Yeah, it's if you get too many amino acids getting into the liver
as a source of fuel for gluconeogenesis,
but also protein can stimulate a release of insulin,
and insulin is very anti-ketogenic.
So it's a combination of attenuating the rise in amino acids, which will attenuate the rise in glucose, which will attenuate the bump in insulin that you could potentially get from that.
So fiber is actually really useful. What would be good sources of fiber that aren't going to, that are going to have very low net carbs? Yeah. Uh, I think the staple ones that I like are actually artichoke is on that list. Uh,
spinach, kale, uh, broccoli, uh, asparagus is probably at the top of my list.
Celery a little bit.
So any kind of green leafy vegetables like salad.
I have a salad every night and with mixed greens and a lot of olive oil. And, you know, take your – always eat your vegetables with a source of fat.
I think it helps promote that you're getting the most nutrition out of vegetables.
And also, if you mix your food so you're eating your protein with, you know, obviously high fat and fiber will definitely help you stay in ketosis.
Because if you just bolus protein, a lot of people say they're on a ketogenic diet just by eating no carbs.
But a chicken breast will quickly kick you out of ketosis. But a chicken breast cut up into a green leafy salad with
a lot of olive oil and maybe some feta cheese and some bulletproof coffee or something like that
combined will not kick you out of ketosis. You can just stay cruising in ketosis.
So this is, I think needs to be appreciated. So just to fill in the blanks,
the blanks for your sort of typical day, then if your breakfast is, uh, sardines,
half a can of oysters, four eggs, and then some asparagus or some other green,
what are the rest of your meals for a typical day? Okay. Uh, I do get a lot of, uh,
MCT in the day. And, uh, so those are just tablespoons, uh, of MCT oil or the powdered MCT
oil. I have the, I have the powder in the oil sometimes. And, um, I cook in coconut oil and
I'll cook with a combination coconut oil and
butter so I'll put a pat of butter with like a spoonful of oil in a pan and cook my eggs in that
and and I will the sardines if I have sardines in the morning it's in packed in extra virgin
olive oil which I I like a lot of I was eating a lot of dairy fat and I noticed my LDL
went like really high and my LDL particle number went up. And that's kind of like a whole nother
conversation, but I was kind of doing an experiment on myself. So I haven't phased out
dairy completely, but I backed off on it a little bit and been using more coconut cream in place of
regular cream. So yeah, so in the morning, I kind of described my breakfast already, but at nighttime,
what I like to have would be, I always have a salad.
So you're skipping breakfast and having intermittent MCT oil instead. Or I'm sorry,
you're skipping lunch and having- Yeah. Yeah. And when I have my breakfast, I'll have a cup of
coffee, but I have a thermos that I bring with me to work. And in that thermos, I cut a stick
of butter in half and throw it in it. And then I put a scoop or two scoops of MCT powder and then I pour the
rest of my coffee that I make and French press in that. And I just kind of shake it up or zip it up
so it's all mixed up. And then I bring that with me to work. And that's the coffee that I sip on
throughout the day. And it's basically, I make like three cups of coffee. It's not super strong, probably less strong than like Starbucks coffee or something.
But I have like, you know, one cup in the morning and then like two equivalent cups in my thermos.
And sometimes I'll brew a cup of coffee, you know, at work.
Or I have a product that my friend makes.
It's called Utopian.
It's a really good product by DeNovo Nutrition.
I'll do that instead of coffee. What is Utopian?
Oh, Utopian. Oh, there's a company. My friend has a company called DeNovo Nutrition.
How do you spell that?
DeNovo is spelled D-E-N-O-V-O.
Oh, that's okay. Got it. Like made de novo.
So de novo nutrition makes some really interesting products.
And I'm really particular about products that I use.
And the one product that they have is called Utopian. And they also sell probably the highest quality whey protein too.
But Utopian is a product that I use sparingly.
I have it packed in my bag now because I'll be traveling in Europe.
And it's basically like a cognitive enhancement agent that also promotes sort of a well-being.
And you might call it a – it's a mild nootropic and a mild
stimulant and it's just got some standard things in it like cooperzine you might be familiar yeah
the acetylcholinesterase inhibitor right yeah yeah like it has that it's got like five ingredients
that are formulated really well that uh enhance acetylcholine transmission, enhance
dopamine. There's just enough caffeine to give like a stimuli, I think about 100 milligrams of
caffeine. And it's just, it's a good product to, that I keep on hand. And it's, it's formed,
a lot of thought went into the formulation of it. So with the ratios of things. So, uh, so I definitely,
it's,
if you're looking for a,
a,
a lift,
a boost,
a sort of a nootropic,
a utopian is definitely something that I keep at the corner of my desk and I
use it kind of sparingly,
but I'll use it a couple of times a month.
And then,
uh,
what is,
and dinner is a large salad.
What is a large salad?
What does the salad composition look like for you?
Yeah.
I usually get like mixed greens, like two or three different types of salads, like usually spinach, a mixed green, and two different types of mixed green bag salads.
And I mix them together.
And I get like a good quality extra virgin olive oil.
And I will, what else do I put in it?
Artichokes, actually.
Avocado, artichokes, olive oil, and I put MCT oil on as salad dressing too.
And so I'll make a salad and maybe a little bit of Parmesan cheese on it or feta.
And we have typically like chicken, you know, which would have the skin on it, beef or fish.
And it's usually like the fattiest versions that we can get.
And I don't go too overboard on the protein like I used to.
So pretty moderate amount of protein, maybe about 50 grams of protein.
And then some kind of – 50, 5-0.
Yeah, like 50 grams.
That would be like my bolus, like probably one of the larger protein meals.
And if I work out, if I happen to work out, which I did yesterday, I would probably eat a little bit more, maybe about 60 or like 70 or 80 grams of protein.
And that will be kind of like my larger meal of the day.
And then I'll have a salad, some kind of fatty protein.
And last night I cooked Brussels sprouts.
And I kind of cut them in half, face down, and cooked them in butter and olive oil.
No, butter and coconut oil.
So they suck it up.
And so I think of vegetables as like a fat delivery system. So the same thing with like collard greens or
asparagus, like they're usually cooked in a lot of butter, olive oil, coconut oil,
and I'll have that. So I'll have some kind of fatty protein, some kind of vegetable cooked in fat
and salad. And then I always have dessert that's kind of unique, actually.
I call it my, I don't know, keto mousse or keto ice cream.
And what it essentially is, it could be sour cream or coconut cream.
And I take sour cream.
So the easiest thing, take sour cream or coconut cream and take maybe about a cup of it or two cups, a cup and a half.
And then I put a tablespoon of dark chocolate baking powder in it, some cinnamon, a pinch of salt and stevia and stir it up until it's like a thick mousse.
And then I stick it in the freezer.
And then I go kind of do my things and shower, get ready for the day or whatever. And then I take it out of the freezer or refrigerator, and it's basically like ice cream to me.
So it's one cup sour cream, one tablespoon dark chocolate powder.
Yeah.
That's right.
A pinch of salt.
How much stevia?
Stevia, just sweeten it to whatever you like i mean i put i have the super
concentrated stevia so i just put like uh like literally a pinch of it what brand do you use do
you know offhand uh i have to go back and look at the brand but you can get it on amazon if you just
go to bulk stevia powder and it comes in like a two pound or one pound container and it's uh yeah it's kind of like
the generic i've tried like every brand of stevia and this is it's powder it's pretty good it travels
well and everything too cool uh yeah a little bit of cinnamon and it's like a fat bomb so so people
ask like where do you get all your your your fat you, there's a lot of fat to eat to get in about 300 grams of fat a day for the diet.
So, yeah, so that's like a fat bomb.
It's about 300 grams the day, I usually put in a third of a cup or even a half cup of wild blueberries, which are higher in fiber.
Not real sweet, but higher in fiber.
And I stir that into it.
And sometimes I'll do – it'll be a pretty big bowl.
I'll do two cups of coconut cream or two cups of sour cream. So I was doing a lot of, I have a whipped cream maker that I put heavy
cream in and I would put whipped cream on top of that. And I would, in my whipped cream maker,
I would put the heavy cream in and I put Stevie in. So I'd sweeten the whipped cream a little bit,
you know, shake it up and charge it with a little things that they have and make my own whipped cream. And I would put whipped cream on top of that, like a hundred gram fat bomb. And, uh,
and I was getting in extra fat throughout the day with heavy cream. And I did an experiment
because I wanted to determine what, what happens if you have surplus amount of calories in the
form of dairy fat. And if I did that for two weeks, so I got like a thousand extra calories per day, 500 to a thousand extra calories per day for two
weeks. Then I went in and got like an NMR, you know, lipidomic profile of everything.
And it really shot up some things remarkably like my LDL-P particle.
And I'm still analyzing it right now.
I'm kind of still doing experiments on myself.
But I went back and I cut out the dairy and I replaced it with coconut cream.
And all those numbers came back down.
But I still get dairy in the form of butter. and I just don't go too overboard with it because people ask me that question a lot.
Like can I have dairy?
And I do have dairy every day.
But I've switched out my nighttime snack, switched out the sour cream to either a mix of sour cream and coconut cream together.
And sour cream is really not sour, right? I mean, especially if you buy the dark chocolate
baking cocoa, the extra dark, and it's a little bit bitter. And if you add it to it,
it sort of neutralizes any remote little sourness that sour cream has. And it makes a really
delicious chocolate mousse. And it's like purely ketogenic.
And, oh, yeah, I also will take a tablespoon of coconut oil.
And especially if it has the frozen blueberries in it.
And if I drizzle it around and stir it up, the coconut oil will sort of harden and make these little crunchy chocolate things.
So it actually tastes like you have chocolate chips in there, if that makes sense.
Yeah. Coconut sense. Yeah.
Coconut oil. Yeah. So my fiance is totally not ketogenic. I mean, she has an enormous
carbohydrate tolerance and she just thinks what I do is really strange. But if I make this,
and she's a big fan of regular like Breyers or Haagen-Dazs chocolate. And if I give this to her, she thinks it's incredible.
So even someone who's not ketogenic and doesn't eat this way and has a sweet tooth
thinks this is really good. Cool. I'll try it out. So I would love to ask some rapid fire
questions. I know we're wrapping up. We could talk for many more hours, but, uh, if for people who want to dig into ketosis further,
give it a shot, what resources should they start with or books should they start with?
Yeah, I think probably the best place to go would be ketogenic diet resource. And that's a website.
Uh, Ellen Davis has that website and literally that's the name of a ketogenic diet
resource.com and uh it's like a ton of information on there pretty much every question you'd ever want
on there we even she uh put together a book for ketogenic diet and cancer one for the ketogenic
diet for type 2 diabetes it was co-authoredored by a doctor that's actually in my area that has type 1 diabetes that uses
the ketogenic diet for that.
So that's an incredible resource.
Excellent.
Ellen Davis.
Yeah, Ellen Davis, ketogenic diet resource.
Definitely one of the go-to places.
I have a website, ketonutrition.org. And I've basically,
it's like a skeleton website is compiled a lot of, um, useful links that I thought in her
websites on there, her books on there. Um, so that's ketonutrition.org.
Awesome. What, um, what is the book you've given most as a gift? Not necessarily related to ketosis, just any book that you've given often or given before as a gift.
That's a good question.
Yeah, I would have to – well, going back in the college days, I would say Anthony Robbins.
I listened to his stuff when I was my senior year in high school and uh i listened to like this 30-day tapes back one of the personal powers yeah personal back so
i bought the book too and then i liked it so much like i bought it and i gave it to all my lifting
buddies you know and and they and then you know they went off to college and everything and years
later like two of them contacted me and like like, you know that book you gave me?
It changed my life.
I did better in college.
So I would say going way back, Personal Power, Anthony Robbins' book, was kind of influential from back in the day.
And then as I got into science and became a scientist, and my advisor was funded by the NIH, and I was always told that I needed NIH funding to be a career scientist.
And then I met the NIH director, Francis Collins, at Society for Neuroscience meeting.
And I was like, well, I should understand the mind of Francis Collins and understand what is the director of basically the president of science thinking.
So I went to try to find some biographies on him.
And when I did a search, I found a book, The Language of God.
And I thought that was really – I had no idea of his sort of, uh, his spirituality or his kind of worldview
besides outside of science.
I know he spearheaded the human genome project and was pretty instrumental in finding the
gene for a cystic fibrosis.
But so the language of God, like it's, it really inspired me because I had no idea that
a scientist, uh, of his stature was, you know, couldature could have such a devout faith.
And that kind of influenced me and got me to reread some older books I read by C.S.
Lewis, Screwtape Letters.
Screwtape Letters is great.
Yeah.
Yeah.
Screwtape Letters is really good.
So I don't think I've given that to you, but I've gave the language of God to some of my friends and they really enjoyed it.
So, that would be one.
And then a required reading for my students would be Tom Seyfried's book, Cancer as a Metabolic Disease.
So, that's a really, I mean, I think it's sold pretty well on Amazon.
And it's highly, highly technical. And it's, unfortunately, it's sold pretty well on Amazon. And it's highly, highly technical.
And unfortunately, it's really expensive.
So it's about $100 to $130, I think.
Maybe you can get it cheaper.
You can get used versions for probably like $50 online.
But if you want a really good kind of description of, I guess, cancer as a metabolic disease, the science, the history.
I mean, it's really well written.
Tom did.
He's a collaborator of mine.
He worked a lot on that book, and it shows.
So that book, and oh, another book by a guy that I'm actually working on a project with him now.
His name is Travis Christofferson.
He wrote a book called Tripping Over the Truth.
I like the name, yeah.
Yeah.
And he wrote a precursor to the book.
He wrote an article that appeared on Rob Wolf's blog. And actually, I have an article written with him that's going to appear on the blog on Thursday.
It's about the history of the ketogenic diet.
And I think Rob's going to put it on the blog on Thursday, I believe.
But Travis is a brilliant, he's probably one of the most gifted writers I've ever known. So, Tripping Over the Truth is basically the story of cancer, really. I mean, it's a great history of
the story of cancer that comes at it from a different perspective from the Mukherjee book,
which is the biography of cancer that is pretty popular, New York Times bestseller.
It's been on The Emperor of All Maladies is actually the name of the book, The Biography of Cancer.
That book kind of talks from the perspective of understanding cancer as more
or less a metabolic disease and how we could develop therapies to target it from a metabolic
perspective. And I've given that book, probably bought seven or eight copies of that book over
the last year and given it away.
And everybody has come back to me and said that book was fantastic.
I mean, not only is it informative,
but Travis is like an unbelievable gifted writer.
Let me,
let me ask you one.
I have one more question and then maybe we'll do a round two.
If people demand it by popular request.
But you mentioned Rob.
So Rob and I are friends, Rob Wolf, and we've talked about Lyme disease on and off for a while now because I was out of commission for about nine months or at least operating at about 10% capacity after contracting Lyme disease on Eastern Long Island. And what appears to have made the biggest
difference for me in terms of getting back to feeling like myself and having the cognitive
function that I had pre-Lyme disease was the ketogenic diet. And I was very puzzled by this,
and I wasn't sure exactly why that would be the case.
And so I just hypothesized that perhaps either Lyme disease know the mechanism, but I had recommended to a few people with Lyme that they test ketosis.
And literally 100% of them, if they entered ketosis properly and stayed there for more than a week or two, reported the same results.
And Rob sent me an interesting research abstract, which showed how antibiotics such as doxycycline could cause mitochondrial
dysfunction or degradation, because my understanding is that mitochondria are very
similar to bacteria. And how would you explain ketosis making me and these other people feel better after Lyme disease?
And I don't know if you're familiar with Lyme disease, but how would you approach thinking about that and investigating that?
Well, I'm from New Jersey.
So Lyme is really, you know, I knew a lot of people, especially growing up in a family that, you know, was hunters and knowing most of my friends were hunting and in the woods.
I grew up in the woods.
Somehow, I didn't get Lyme's disease.
Never been tested for it, but never really had any symptoms for it.
So, Lyme's disease really produces pretty profound inflammation.
And the spirochetes can cause everything that you described, fatigue.
But I think they can cause, from a neurological perspective, they can cause encephalopathy.
And that essentially is resulting from neuroinflammation.
And ketones, the ketogenic diet and ketones in particular,
have pretty profound anti-inflammatory effects,
especially in relation to the nervous system.
Since ketones are freely permeable to the blood-brain barrier and kind of bathe our nervous system.
So I think that may have something to do with it.
Also, the spikes in blood glucose, higher insulin levels all can contribute to inflammation and inflammatory processes. So putting a dampening on that situation with a ketogenic diet
and having elevated levels of ketones could impact the primary malady
that's causing the symptoms, which would be the inflammation, the encephalopathy,
the inflammation of the white matter, I think.
There's memory, attention, cognitive, emotional states are altered in people.
And I think it can just help bring your nervous system back to a state of homeostasis, similar to what it's doing for other disorders.
But inflammation is really – did you happen to get blood work and look at – because the spirit key really – that's how it wreaks havoc in your system.
I mean by activating your immune system, but also just wreaking havoc, you know, as far as causing systemic inflammation in the body.
Yeah. I could go back. You mean looking at things like C-reactive protein or whatever?
Yeah. Or cytokines or something.
Or cytokines. I'm sure I have the blood work. I mean, the inflammation was so clear to me that
I didn't really need the blood work to confirm it. I mean, my, my knees were so swollen that I could barely get up in the morning and I was, had very slow, almost slurred
speech, um, and, uh, felt like I had early onset dementia. It was really scary as an experience.
What effect does ketosis have on mitochondria, if any yeah so uh ketones are very efficient metabolic fuel and uh and in studies
that were done in animal models and we're you know um looking at some the muscle biopsies too
shows that if you're in a state of ketosis relative to a higher carbohydrate diet, that it can
increase mitochondrial biogenesis and mitochondrial efficiency.
At the level of the cell, when we talk about efficiency, I don't want to get down into
too much specifics, but the electron transport chain is kind of how our cells, the mitochondria,
make energy.
And if there's a site between complex 1 and complex 2 and complex 3 called the semi-ubiquinone site, and if you energetic flux through the mitochondria to it's also preventing the formation of superoxide anion,
which is a oxygen-free radical or reactive oxygen species. And that's the precursor to more
reactive oxygen species like hydroxyl radical and peroxynitrate and things like that. So by kind of fundamentally, you know,
turning down the generation of superoxide anion by enhancing mitochondrial efficiency,
not only do we make more ATP through ketone metabolism,
but we're also enhancing the flux of substrate utilization and energy production from that substrate,
even glucose substrate, by enhancing mitochondrial bioenergetics.
And the ketones, we know, can do that through a variety of mechanisms that I can get into. But, uh, but basically, yeah, I mean, there, you can, you can derive
more energy, um, per oxygen molecule, uh, with, uh, with ketone metabolism.
Is it, uh, conceivable that ketosis could aid? It sounded like the answer is yes. You mentioned
biogenesis. If one had damaged their mitochondria through 8 to 12 weeks of doxycycline or even using harder antibiotics for longer periods of time, is it conceivable that the ketosis could help repair that damage?
Yeah, I think so, especially in certain tissues. We know muscle is incredibly plastic, but if you're exercising and in a state of ketosis, you can build up your mitochondria and you'll do that more efficiently if you're on a ketogenic diet.
And I think even in the central nervous system, which may have taken a big hit from doxycycline or Lyme disease, the central nervous system is running more efficiently in a state of
ketosis, I believe, especially if you can dampen some of the neuroinflammation that's associated
with the disease. And I think that would ultimately contribute to, I don't know how you would quantify that, but I'm trying to think of studies that we've done sort of in parallel.
We did some work in an Alzheimer's model, and I think that the Lyme has been associated with tau and amyloid plaques and neuroinflammation that can contribute to those plaques. And I think being in a state of ketosis, even there's some work with exogenous ketones and calorie restriction,
or even intermittent fasting type things, can limit the accumulation of some of these plaques that are associated with neuropathologies such as Alzheimer's disease, the amyloid and the tau plaques.
And this can be shown in animal that Lyme disease kind of has. not something that i study but i just come across it a lot because hyperbaric oxygen has been used
to sensitize sort of the the uh bacteria to the to the antibiotics so a lot of people ask me
questions and i have to and i have to go i've been staying up on top of the literature kind of in a
peripheral sense because it's not my kind of core of study. But everything that I read really focuses on the neuroinflammation
that's resulting from the spirochete.
Got it.
Well, Don, this is so much fun.
There's so many other things that we could talk about.
The hyperbaric oxygen treatment,
the brilliant Patrick Arnold we didn't have a chance to get into.
Yeah. And I mean, not to mention your own training and the approach that you know to
bring to that. So I want to let you get going. And if fans enjoy this, then maybe we can do a
part two sometime. But what is the best way for people to find you online in terms of websites,
social media,
if they want to say hi to you online,
what's the best way to do that?
Okay.
I think probably the best way would be the keto nutrition website.org.
And I have that and yeah,
Facebook and I probably use that more than Twitter.
What are you on Facebook?
My Facebook handle, you mean?
Yeah, your Facebook handle.
I could pull that up too.
I can put that in the show notes if you don't recall it offhand.
Yeah, I will.
Yeah, it should be obvious, right?
I think it's – oh, wait.
Here it is.
Dominic.Dagostino.1.
Got it.
All right.
So I will link to this, guys.
So Facebook is facebook.com forward slash Dominic period D-A-G-O-S-T-I-N N O period one. Uh, and I will link to all of this as well as your USF page in the show notes for
everyone listening can find links to many of the things that we talked about
in this episode and more at four hour workweek.com forward slash podcast,
all spelled out,
or just go to four hour workweek.com and click on podcast.
But Dom, I really appreciate
the time. I always love chatting. And how much do you weigh these days?
Weigh? Man, I haven't weighed myself in a while, but about two, I always stay between 220 and 230,
probably about 222.
Is that ever a challenge? I found when I – like for every additional millimeter of neck diameter that I have, the perceived IQ that people have of me drops by like five points.
Do you ever have trouble being taken seriously by people who are not sort of a nerd wrapped in a meathead body?
I don't have that problem too much now just because I have my diet under control.
But yeah, I think sometimes I face that resistance a little bit.
But generally, it was a little bit more apparent when I was a younger scientist.
But now that I'm working my way up and have a lab, I think people are starting to take some of this stuff seriously.
I am in a totally oddball area of research though, as far as being in a pharmacology department,
doing this weird high-fat diet stuff. It raises some eyebrows. So I feel like I kind of have to
prove myself still. Well, I think I would like to collaborate more in the future.
We'll talk more about that.
But this is enough for one big session.
So, Dom, I really appreciate you taking the time.
So thank you.
Thanks for having me, Tim.
Of course.
Appreciate it.
It was fun.
This is a good time.
And to everyone listening, as always, thank you for listening.
And until next time, experiment, be well, check out the ketogenic diet.
Hey guys, this is Tim again.
Just a few more things before you take off.
Number one, this is Five Bullet Friday.
Do you want to get a short email from me?
Would you enjoy getting a short email from me every Friday that provides a little morsel of fun before the weekend?
And Five Bullet Friday is a very short email where I share the coolest things I've found or that I've been pondering over the week.
That could include favorite new albums that I've discovered.
It could include gizmos and gadgets and all sorts of weird shit that I've somehow dug up in the world of the
esoteric as I do. It could include favorite articles that I've read and that I've shared
with my close friends, for instance. And it's very short. It's just a little tiny bite of goodness
before you head off for the weekend. So if you want to receive that, check it out. Just go to
fourhourworkweek.com. That to fourhourworkweek.com.
That's fourhourworkweek.com all spelled out and just drop in your email and you will get the very
next one. And if you sign up, I hope you enjoy it. This episode is brought to you by 99designs,
your one-stop shop for all things graphic design related. I've used 99designs for everything from banner ads
to book covers, including sketches and mock-ups that led to the 4-Hour Body, which later became
number one New York Times, number one Wall Street Journal. And the brainstorming, a lot of it took
place with designers from around the world. And here's how it works. Whether you need a t-shirt,
a business card, a website, an app thumbnail, whatever it might be, you submit
that project and designers from around the world will send you sketches and mock-ups and designs.
You choose your favorite and you have an original that you love or you get your money back. It's
that straightforward. And many of you who are listening have already used it and created some
amazing things that I'll be sharing in the future. But in the meantime, if you want to see some of my competitions, some of the book covers,
as well as get a free $99 upgrade, go to 99designs.com forward slash Tim. That's
99designs.com forward slash Tim. This episode is brought to you by Audible,
which I've used for years. I love audio books and I have two to recommend right off the bat.
Number one is
my favorite audio book of all time and that is The Graveyard Book by Neil Gaiman. The only audio
book I've wanted to immediately listen to a second time as soon as I finished. It's amazing. You will
thank me. The Graveyard Book. The second is Vagabonding by Rolf Potts, which had a huge
impact on my life and formed the basis for a lot
of what became the 4-Hour Workweek. So all you need to do to get your free audiobook
and a free 30-day trial is go to audible.com forward slash Tim. And you can choose one of
those two books, the graveyard book, Vagabonding, or more than 180,000 audio programs. So that could
be a book, that could be a book, that could be a magazine,
that could be a newspaper, could be a class.
It's that easy.
Go to audible.com forward slash Tim.
That's audible.com forward slash Tim and grab a book.
Enjoy.
And until next time, thank you for listening.
