The Tim Ferriss Show - #148: Josh Waitzkin, The Prodigy Returns

Episode Date: March 22, 2016

Ever since episode #2 of the podcast, you’ve been asking for more Josh Waitzkin, so here it is! This is an in-depth jam session, and you can definitely listen to this one independently. Josh Waitzkin was the basis for the book and movie Searching for Bobby Fischer. Considered a chess prodigy, he has perfected learning strategies that can be applied to anything, including his other loves of Brazilian jiu-jitsu (he’s a black belt under phenom Marcelo Garcia) and Tai Chi push hands (he’s a world champion). These days, he spends his time coaching the world’s top performers, whether Mark Messier, Cal Ripken Jr., or high-profile investors. I initially met Josh through his incredible book, The Art of Learning, which I loved so much that I helped produce the audiobook (download here at Audible). If you're interested in implementing programs designed by Josh in your classroom, go to theartoflearningproject.org and find out if the program is a good fit for you. This episode is DEEP, in the best way possible. Just like last time, Josh will blow your mind. Enjoy! Show notes and links for this episode can be found at www.fourhourworkweek.com/podcast. This podcast is brought to you by MeUndies. Have you ever wanted to be as powerful as a mullet-wearing ninja from the 1980’s, or as sleek as a black panther in the Amazon? Of course you have, and that’s where MeUndies comes in. I’ve spent the last 2-3 weeks wearing underwear from these guys 24/7, and they are the most comfortable and colorful underwear I’ve ever owned. Their materials are 2x softer than cotton, as evaluated using the Kawabata method. Check out MeUndies.com/Tim to see my current faves (some are awesomely ridiculous) and, while you’re at it, don’t miss lots of hot ladies wearing MeUndies. This podcast is also brought to you by Wealthfront. Wealthfront is a massively disruptive (in a good way) set-it-and-forget-it investing service, led by technologists from places like Apple. It has exploded in popularity in the last two years and now has more than $2.5B under management. Why? Because you can get services previously limited to the ultra-wealthy and only pay pennies on the dollar for them, and it’s all through smarter software instead of retail locations and bloated sales teams. Check out wealthfront.com/tim, take their risk assessment quiz, which only takes 2-5 minutes, and they’ll show you—for free–exactly the portfolio they’d put you in. If you want to just take their advice and do it yourself, you can. Well worth a few minutes to explore: wealthfront.com/tim.***If you enjoy the podcast, would you please consider leaving a short review on Apple Podcasts/iTunes? It takes less than 60 seconds, and it really makes a difference in helping to convince hard-to-get guests. I also love reading the reviews!For show notes and past guests, please visit tim.blog/podcast.Sign up for Tim’s email newsletter (“5-Bullet Friday”) at tim.blog/friday.For transcripts of episodes, go to tim.blog/transcripts.Interested in sponsoring the podcast? Visit tim.blog/sponsor and fill out the form.Discover Tim’s books: tim.blog/books.Follow Tim:Twitter: twitter.com/tferriss Instagram: instagram.com/timferrissFacebook: facebook.com/timferriss YouTube: youtube.com/timferrissPast guests on The Tim Ferriss Show include Jerry Seinfeld, Hugh Jackman, Dr. Jane Goodall, LeBron James, Kevin Hart, Doris Kearns Goodwin, Jamie Foxx, Matthew McConaughey, Esther Perel, Elizabeth Gilbert, Terry Crews, Sia, Yuval Noah Harari, Malcolm Gladwell, Madeleine Albright, Cheryl Strayed, Jim Collins, Mary Karr, Maria Popova, Sam Harris, Michael Phelps, Bob Iger, Edward Norton, Arnold Schwarzenegger, Neil Strauss, Ken Burns, Maria Sharapova, Marc Andreessen, Neil Gaiman, Neil de Grasse Tyson, Jocko Willink, Daniel Ek, Kelly Slater, Dr. Peter Attia, Seth Godin, Howard Marks, Dr. Brené Brown, Eric Schmidt, Michael Lewis, Joe Gebbia, Michael Pollan, Dr. Jordan Peterson, Vince Vaughn, Brian Koppelman, Ramit Sethi, Dax Shepard, Tony Robbins, Jim Dethmer, Dan Harris, Ray Dalio, Naval Ravikant, Vitalik Buterin, Elizabeth Lesser, Amanda Palmer, Katie Haun, Sir Richard Branson, Chuck Palahniuk, Arianna Huffington, Reid Hoffman, Bill Burr, Whitney Cummings, Rick Rubin, Dr. Vivek Murthy, Darren Aronofsky, and many more.See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

optimal minimal at this altitude i can run flat out for a half mile before my hands start shaking can i answer your personal question now what is this episode is brought to you by ag1, the daily foundational nutritional supplement that supports whole body health. I do get asked a lot what I would take if I could only take one supplement, and the true answer is invariably AG1. It simply covers a ton of bases. I usually drink it in the mornings and frequently take their travel packs with me on the road. So what is AG1? AG1 is a science-driven formulation of vitamins, probiotics, and whole food sourced nutrients. In a single scoop,

AG1 gives you support for the brain, gut, and immune system. So take ownership of your health and try AG1 today. You will get a free one-year supply of vitamin D and five free AG1 travel packs with your first subscription purchase. So learn more, check it out. Go to drinkag1.com slash Tim. That's drinkag1, the number one, drinkag1.com slash Tim. Last time, drinkag1.com slash Tim. Check it out. This episode is brought to you by Five Bullet Friday, my very own email newsletter. It's become one of the most popular email newsletters in the world with millions of subscribers. And it's super, super simple. It does not clog up your inbox. Every Friday, I send out five bullet points, super short, of the coolest things I've found that week,

which sometimes includes apps, books, documentaries, supplements, gadgets, new self-experiments, hacks, tricks, and all sorts of weird stuff that I dig up from around the world. You guys, podcast listeners and book readers, have asked me for something short and action-packed for a very long time. Because after all, the podcast, the books, they can be quite long. And that's why I created Five Bullet Friday. It's become one of my favorite things I do every week. It's free. It's always going to be free. And you can learn more at Tim.blog forward slash Friday. That's Tim.blog forward slash Friday. I get asked a lot how I meet guests for the podcast,

some of the most amazing people I've ever interacted with. And little known fact, I've met probably 25% of them because they first subscribed to Five Bullet Friday. So you'll be in good company. It's a lot of fun. Five Bullet Friday is only available if you subscribe via email. I do not publish the content on the blog or anywhere else. Also, if I'm doing small in-person meetups, offering early access to startups, beta testing, special deals, or anything else that's very limited, I share it first with Five Bullet Friday subscribers. So check it out, tim.blog forward slash Friday. If you listen to this podcast, it's very likely

that you'd dig it a lot and you can, of course, easily subscribe any time. So easy peasy. Again, that's tim.blog forward slash Friday. And thanks for checking it out. If the spirit moves you. Fascip noyes, my cute little darlings. This is Tim Ferriss and welcome to another episode of The Tim Ferriss Show, where each episode it is my job to deconstruct world-class performers from many different worlds, whether they come from military, entertainment, sports, or otherwise, to dissect and collect the patterns for you that you can use to tease out the routines, habits, thought processes, et cetera, that you can apply immediately and test in your own life. And this episode is a really fun one. Ever since episode two of the podcast,

we're probably around 140 or 150. Now you've been asking for a round to a follow-up with Josh Waitzkin. And this is it. Josh Waitzkin was the basis for the book and movie searching for Bobby Fisher. He is considered a chess prodigy, although we'll discuss why that term doesn't necessarily apply to him because he has perfected learning strategies that can be applied to anything, including his loves of Brazilian jujitsu. He's a black belt under the phenom nine-time world champion, Marcelo Garcia, or Tai Chi push hands. He's a world champion. These days he spends his time coaching the world's top performers, whether Mark Messier, Cal Ripken Jr. or investors whose names

you'd recognize or whose assets under management would blow your mind. And as context, I initially met Josh through his incredible book, The Art of Learning, which I love so much that I helped produce the audio book. You can find that as part of my book club, audible.com forward slash Tim's books. And this episode is deep. Josh is always deep and he walks the talk in the best way possible. I hope it will blow your mind. We talk about flow, achieving flow states, near-death experiences, use of slackline, training elite performers, cultivating sensitivity. And I don't mean that in the most woo-woo way imaginable, rather the most practical way imaginable, using heart rate

variability training, high intensity interval training, breath awareness, et cetera, uh, intuition and its applications to investing. And it just goes on and on and on. So please enjoy my conversation with Josh Waitzkin. Joshua. Yes. Timbo. Welcome back, buddy. I'm so happy to be here. I'm thrilled you're here, man. Hanging with you. And I thought we could maybe start just with a complete non sequitur, which is a book you just mentioned to me that I know nothing about, which is Dreaming Yourself Awake. Can you talk about this? Oh, I didn't think we were going to begin here. It's a book that I explored a couple years ago. 20 years ago, I started studying Tibetan dream yoga and lucid dreaming. Not deeply, but exploring.

And this was during the period where I was first getting involved with my study of East Asian philosophy. And then a dear friend of mine recommended this book. It's actually funny because we kind of made a mistake together. I recommended another book that he texted back confirming that it was the name. He texted me back that name that I didn't intend, but then I picked up and read, and it was extraordinary. It's just a phenomenal discussion, very systematic discussion of the art of lucid dreaming

in this way that fuses East Asian philosophy with Western science. And you were competing then at the time? Or were you not competing? You were in the midst of competition? Two years ago, you mean? Oh, this was two years ago. I think you said 20 years ago. 20 years ago was when I started studying East Asian philosophy.

I got it. I was competing in chess then and then into the martial arts. I need a little more caffeine. Working on it. You've had a rough night. And I wanted to thank you. I'm just, this is like Tim's stream of consciousness

podcast intro. We're looking at a slack line. This is an indoor Gibbon classic slack. It's about 12, no, not even, 10 feet long maybe. We have,

it's surrounded by kettlebells, an endo board, and a triceratops, which I don't think is yours. Got the Bosu ball there. And the Bosu ball. And I want to thank you for actually getting me to bite the bullet and grab a slackline, which I set up on Long Island. Yeah, absolutely.

I've loved, I've had some fun on your slackline on Long Island, too. I love, right now I'm in the period, I kind of oscillate between these. And my son, Jack, who's four and a half, we have a great time. I'm on the Indo board I kind of oscillate between these and my son, Jack, was four and a half. We have a great time. I'm on the endo board rocking it. He's on the BOSU ball. We're having a catch back and forth while on these things.

We're always integrating these interesting kinds of physiological awareness training. Speaking of which, I feel like maybe we should throw a cautionary tale into this follow-up podcast. So we obviously trade stories and findings all the time. we should throw a cautionary tale into this follow-up podcast. So we obviously trade stories and findings all the time. Would you like to talk about your recent experience with Wim Hof and breathing training? Wow. Yeah. Well, I had an extremely scary experience. So I'm a lifetime meditator and kind of experimental subject like yourself around all

these things. You tend to have better self-preservation. I tend to, although I've had a lot of close calls in life. Well, when I heard you speak to Wim, I was extremely intrigued. Actually, when I heard someone mention Wim to you on your podcast And then we spoke about it And then you spoke to Wim I thought he sounded like a fascinating guy I started digging into his work So powerful

And I started going through his course His online course I loved it The energetic feeling The electric surging through the body I'm also a lifetime freediver Since I was 4 or 5 years old, I've been free diving. And so breath hold.

And just to put that in perspective, I mean, you spend about a month a year in the water. Used to be three months when I was younger. Now it's about, well, yeah, free diving, usually about a month of the year. But I spend a lot of time now, as we know, surfing, stand-up paddle surfing, swimming, diving. I mean, the ocean is a huge part of my life. We got to talk about our stand-up paddle adventures together, which are pretty hilarious. We'll definitely come to that.

Timbo and I have been having some fun with that. But I started playing with the Wim Hof method, and I thought it was incredibly powerful. The intensity that you're experiencing internally, it's very similar to training in Tai Chi, Tai Chi Chuan, moving meditation for 10, 15, 20 years, and then being an hour long into a session. And you have this feeling of energetic flow inside your body. With the Wim Hof,

you do a few rounds of his breath method and you're experiencing these things. And it was incredible. The gain and strength were mind-boggling. The length of the breath holds were fascinating. But then I made a big technical error. I ignored all the signs on WIM's site and that you spoke about, you know, do not do this in water, which is,

they were all over the place, but I thought, you know, freediving is a way of life for me, no problem. And the major technical error was not realizing, which is absurd after a lifetime of freediving, that it's carbon dioxide buildup that gives you the urge to breathe and not oxygen deprivation. Hugely important thing, please everyone burn that in that it's carbon dioxide buildup that gives you the urge to breathe and not oxygen deprivation. Hugely important thing. Please, everyone, burn that in. It's CO2 buildup that makes you want to breathe. And so I did the, after a long swim at the NYU pool a few months ago, I started doing my wind breathing and did a series of underwater swims. I did about eight 25-meter swims, and I think I was on my fourth 50 and I underwater and I, um, this was after a long workout and I went from this ecstatic state to unconsciousness and I was actually on the

bottom of the pool after blacking out from shallow water blackout for three minutes, um, before someone pulled me out and you know, the doctors have told me usually it's 40 seconds to a minute to, um, perhaps permanent brain damage, death. I got very lucky. My body saved my life. And they said that if it hadn't been all the training I've done for so many years, I would have been gone. And more specifically, you, correct me if I'm wrong, you didn't, and this strikes me as so odd, you didn't have the reflexive inhalation of water.

Is that right? Yeah, I didn't take any water into my lungs, which is hugely fortunate because fresh water in the lungs can be terrible. So my lungs had no water in it pretty much. After they pulled me out, I was unconscious for 25 minutes. I started breathing on my own though. And when I came to 25 minutes later, I was blue everywhere else. My body sent all the blood to my brain and my heart. Saved my life, and I'm here. And it was a life changer on a lot of levels. You know, the idea of my four-year-old boy four blocks away sitting on the rug waiting for daddy to come home, and me unconscious in the bottom of a pool, blue. Just, that's

the kind of experience that is shattering. How did that change how you think about training and these types of experiments or life in general? I know that's a very broad question. I've been... How does it change your decision-making? Yeah. Well, first of all, how it's influenced my life in general

is I've never lived with such a consistent sense of gratitude, beauty, and love in my life. It's just flowing through my body. Presence to the exquisite little ripples of beauty in everything I do. And a sense of gratitude for the little things. It sounds cliched, but it's embodied and I really feel it. And in terms of, and that's something I'm'm really grateful for it's exquisite i have a you know my little boy my wife is um pregnant with we have another another son coming in june um and it's made me rethink these questions of risk and it but on the other hand it's been very important not to oversteer i mean one of the the most important learning lessons that i've learned

for myself and training elite mental performers is the is people oversteer all the time. They over calibrate. And so I've been very careful to sit with this and try to draw the right lessons out of it and not the wrong. And not too big a lesson. And not too small a lesson. So, for example, this was a huge technical oversight I had. I didn't realize I was taking a big risk here. And there's a lot of big risks that I've taken in life.

Some with you. And I think I'm actually pretty good at navigating those, but I've been thinking about them quite a bit. And of course- Being cognizant of the level of danger or risk. Right. But of course, it's very important for me to be cognizant, like in a group risk, as we've discussed, it's important to be present to your own level and the level of everyone else around you. We can get into some of those. Yeah, we'll get into that.

But I've been really sitting with this. You know, since I was a really young boy, I started playing chess when I was six years old. And by the time I was seven, I was the top-ranked player in the country. So I had all this pressure on me. And a big part of the way that I found my therapy was flow can you explain that yeah like when i was under huge pressure external pressure for his little boy you know my style as a chess player was to create chaos i loved the game i love the battle of chess attacking chess right right attacking chess uh and and most players you know when they have a lot of pressure on them in the scholastic chess world,

for example, and it's true in many fields, they learn how to memorize their way to victory, right? They find shortcuts to getting good fast and controlling the game all the way. They think about reading points. They think about rankings. They think about winning. They have parental pressures. They have school pressures. They have sometimes publicity pressures if they're doing well. So they want to control their way. I had a different approach. I like to mix it up. I grew up playing in Washington Square Park with the hustlers who taught me to battle. It fit my personality.

And it was a core part of my competitive style to with stresses has been to put myself into a flow state. And this is an element of risk that I've been thinking about. It's different when you're 20 and 25 and 30 years old as a professional competitor or professional fighter. And then, you know, now I'm 39 years old, a dad, which is the most important thing I've ever done in my life, being a father. I'm so committed to it.

So I have to be quite cognizant of the distinction, for example, between risk competitively and risk mortally. When you're playing chess, it feels like life and death. It really does feel like life and death. When you lose a chess game, it feels like you've been shattered on the most fundamental level. And so I was quite comfortable mixing it up profoundly, creating chaos. And I'd be willing to take those risks. But actually, it isn't life and death, right? And then when you're a professional fighter, martial artist, you can break arms and legs in a second if you're not in deep focus, or you can break your neck.

But again, the stakes are, it's you out there, right? And then when you're a dad, it's a little bit different, right? And like when you're surfing, or when you're rock climbing, or whatever you're doing that's in an extreme state. So it's very important for me to be clear about the distinction between what felt like life and death as a chess player and what actually is life and death today. Metaphorical and literal. Right. And then there's the state of being someone who's found deep flow as the ultimate therapy. How do you...

There are a number of different questions I want to ask related to everything you just said. The first is, how do you initiate or facilitate a flow state? And how would you describe it? Maybe we could hit that first. Well, I've had a lot of different ways of playing this over the years. For me, I can describe it in terms of myself,

and then we can go into how, when I train people, how I'd work with them. Great. For me, love has been work with them. Great. For me, love has been a huge part of flow. You know, I fell in love with chess and I found flow in the self-expression of, through an art form that I,

that I absolutely loved. And I think this is really important with children, right? To, to find something that they feel just connected to and that they can express themselves through. They can bring out the essence of their being through some art. And then there was tremendous competitive intensity. And of course, stretching yourself to your limit is a huge part of, it's a very important precondition to flow. And I was always

playing as people who were at my level or above. And so I was always stretched, right? And then I was integrating, in my teenage years, started integrating meditation into my practice, right? So I got very good at increasing my somatic awareness, my physiological introspective sensitivity. I began to feel the subtle ripples of quality in my process. I could feel when I moved from a 9 or a 10 out of 10 back down to a 9 or an 8.

You're talking about in the meditation itself? No, I'm talking about through my meditation practice. You became more tactilely sensitive when doing push hands or some other type of practice? Chess initially. Chess initially. And then into push hands, right. Why is the tactile component important in chess? I think it's hugely important in mental disciplines so for example you know in chess and today a lot of what i do

today is is i have this laboratory of training elite mental performers largely in finance investors and um a huge part of the training is in their physiological introspective sensitivity that's that's the their somatic awareness that's the foundational training why well first of all you know we can't just separate our mind and our body totally um i mean cartesian duality right i mean this is your way of life as well but we intuitively can feel things way before we are consciously aware of them right the chess player always senses danger before he sees it just like you know the hunter will sense the shark or the jaguar before he'll see it right then he you know, the hunter will sense the shark or the

jaguar before he'll see it, right? Then he'll look for it. So the chess player's process is often to be studying a position to sense opportunity or danger, and then to start looking for it, right? Deconstruct what it is, and then find what it probably is, and then start calculating, right? But that sense comes before. Or if you're a great decision maker, if you're an investor, you can sense danger, right? You can sense opportunity. But you need to have stilled your waters internally to feel the subtle changes inside of you that would be opportunity or the crystallization of complex ideas or danger or the onset of a cognitive bias, for example, which is hugely important as a chess player or as an investor or as anything else. You know, this is one of the areas where I, we've had this ongoing dialogue and our friendship around what I call armchair professors, right?

Philosophologists. Right, philosophologists, yes. So the people, this is a, philosophologist is a term of Robert Persig, the author of Zen and the Art of Modestical Maintenance. He's one of my favorite books and thinkers. He's a friend of mine. You know, the difference between the

philosopher and the philosophologist is what Tim's referring to, or the writer and the literary critic, or the man in the arena and the armchair professor. Or Remy from Ratatouille and Anton Ego. Okay, I don't know that one. Who's the food critic? Okay, yeah, yeah, there it is. Good. Yes, there it is. And so when we think about, for example, cognitive biases, the academics who study cognitive biases,

who speak about them in mind. And just for people who have no context on cognitive biases, an example, like the sunk cost fallacy. I've spent this amount, therefore I should put good money after bad because I feel like I need to somehow try to salvage this money that I've put into a given position. I just wanted to give people some examples. We've had a number of meals with him. There's a gent, I think twice, what was the author's name again?

Do you recall? Mobison? Yeah, Michael Mobison is who you're thinking about. Mobison, there we are, for people interested. Sorry to interrupt. Yeah. And so one of the interesting things about the dialogue, the academic dialogue of cognitive biases,

is that there's the idea that the biases have to operate completely separately from the intuitive process, right? As if we have an intuitive process, and then we have to go through a checklist of cognitive biases. In my experience, really high-level thinkers have integrated cognitive biases or an awareness of cognitive biases into their intuitive process, right? So this is constant process. We discussed this a couple years ago, actually, where you're deconstructing technical awareness into something that – so this process, for example, of building a pyramid of knowledge, we have a certain technical foundation,

we have a high-level intuitive leap, we can then deconstruct the intuitive leap into something that we can understand technically and replicate technically. And then we're raising our foundation of higher and higher-level intuitive leaps. This is this pyramid of knowledge, which in my process is built upon by...

The intuitive leaps are what's guiding it. Similarly, we can learn how to take technical material and integrate it into our intuitive understanding. But we aren't going to intuit the cognitive bias. We're going to intuit the feeling. That it corresponds. That it corresponds with the bias being present. And so we think about this relative to the language, again, Robert Persig. I like the language of dynamic versus static quality, right? If you think about the timeline in a

competitive state, for example, in a chess game, there's a certain objective truth to a chess position. If you think of that as a timeline which is moving, think about Persic's term of being at the front of the freight train of reality, right? The freight train is pushing through. Dynamic quality is right at the front of that freight train, right? Think about that as a timeline. And then there's the chess player's mind studying the position when the chess player is present to the position it's continuing right you're you're just running parallel to the truth of the position to the dynamic quality of the position but if let's say something changes you make a slight mistake you move from having a slight advantage

to a slight disadvantage but you're emotionally still connected attached to having the slight advantage then what's going to happen is that you're sort of stopping. Your dynamic quality is becoming static. But the timeline of the chess position is continuing. The game is continuing. But what's going to happen then is that you're going to subtly reject positions that you should accept. And you're going to stretch for positions that you can't, for evaluations that you can't really reach. And you're going to fall into a downward spiral.

So that's the onset of a cognitive bias. In that case, the cognitive bias would relate to the emotional clinging to a past evaluation. But if you had the present state awareness, which you trained through different tools and approaches that you use with these elite performers, for instance, you would sense the feeling of that cognitive dissonance and not get caught up in sort of the slipstream of that dislocation. Exactly. And the way that you would sense that in this case is that you would feel the slip away from dynamic quality, right? And then you would deconstruct that feeling and then you would see what the bias is that's setting in. So this is really important to say, right? It's not that

we're going to intuitively develop the ability to know exactly what bias might be setting in the moment, but we're going to cultivate the ability to have presence, right? It's not that we're going to intuitively develop the ability to know exactly what bias might be setting in the moment, but we're going to cultivate the ability to have presence, right? I think about the idea of cultivating quality as a way of life, cultivating presence as a way of life in little moments and small, when we're holding our babies, when we're reading a book, when we're having a conversation with a friend, when we're meditating. How do you help people to identify that feeling, to become more sensitized to it. And just as a, as a, maybe not a counter example, but an example of not listening to intuition or instinct. So we were both in Costa Rica recently doing paddle boarding last week, last meal of the trip. Uh, we, we go out to celebrate,

we go to this seafood restaurant, food comes out, it's a Sunday. And I leaned over the plate and smelled the food and immediately knew that it was something I shouldn't eat. And despite that, you know, everybody's ordering drinks, everybody's celebrating, went into the food and about a third of the way through, I stopped and I just pushed the plate away. And then lo and behold, and behold everybody gets severe severe food poisoning except for the two people who i guess we tried to narrow it down to whether it was the garlic dip or any number of other things but yeah we were we were on the toilet each like every five minutes for for the next 12 hours minimum and the great part of it is you and i were we were were joining bedrooms. We were sharing the same toilet.

So that was a hell of a night. And we never saw each other. It was amazing. But I heard that flushing happening, taking turns. That was, that was a brutal experience. I remember watching you sniffing and you had this like expression of concern

come over you at the dinner table. And like, I saw that moment. Maybe I wasn't present enough to you and you didn't, it's a great example of you didn't fully trust your gut, but you were right on. It was amazing. Or I felt a sort of social pressure to conform and not rock the boat.

So how do you help someone say in the world of investing, just as an example, develop, not only develop the sensitivity to, to, to separate that signal from the noise, but also to actually listen to it, right? Yeah.

These are two different points, right? Right. So let's talk about developing it, and then let's talk about listening to it, right? Because they're both so hugely important. And I'd frame them both thematically in different ways, and I'd build training systems around them both that would be quite different. So when we're thinking about cultivating the awareness, I mean, I think that a lot of this relates to a return to a more natural state, right?

This isn't so much about learning as unlearning. Agreed. Getting out of our own way, releasing obstructions. I think about the training process as the movement toward unobstructed self-expression, right? Obstructedness. We have so many habits that are fundamentally blocking us, right? From the phone addictions.

People are constantly distracted. People don't have the ability to sit in empty space anymore. People are bombarded by inputs all the time. They're in a constantly reactive state. So one way that you could frame this out is cultivating a way of life which is fundamentally proactive, right? In little things and big. And you can build day architectures that are fundamentally proactive. But then getting into the weeds a little bit more, I think it's most foundational to develop a mindfulness practice to cultivate the ability to sense

the most subtle ripples of human experience. Now, I've been trying to onboard people in, specifically in the finance space, for example, into meditation for a bit over eight years now. Initially, I would just try to get guys to meditate. They'd look at me like I was crazy. Then what I realized, I had this breakthrough, which was that if I had them start doing stress and recovery interval training, then when, so oscillating heart rate between 170s and 140s, say, so let's say someone does a six or eight or 10 minute warmup and then they're on a heart rate interval doing some kind of cardio bike or whatever, moving their heart rate up and down between 170s, 140s, when they become aware of the quality of their focus on their breath during the recovery intervals,

enhancing their ability to lower their heart rate more quickly. And they start to feel their heart rate, listen to it. When that awareness would kick in, I'd start, I'd layer in meditation. And the on-ramp was just much more successful. People would just, and then what I started to refine that with is biofeedback. So now what I'll do is I'll have them do the stress and recovery interval training. Then I'll have them do some form of biofeedback, often with, for example, heart rate variability through heart math

and working with a specialist. And then when they begin to have a certain kind of consistency of their ability to observe, to enhance their emotional regulation, to observe these subtle ripples between stress and coherence, and you can see their biometric data then you layer in meditation and then the the on-ramp is even more powerful and so then they embed it layer in a meditation practice i think headspace is a wonderful tool for layering in meditation yeah and i think for a lot of people also starting with headspace before bed is another kind of gateway drug approach to then building into or leading into the morning meditation, which a lot of people have trouble with because they wake up, they feel rushed.

It's another thing to layer in on top of the brushing the teeth, the getting the kids ready, et cetera. And so sometimes the evening approach, but I agreed that headspace is really useful. And I think it's really important. I think, I think you're absolutely right there. And I think it's really important to have a core meditation practice, which is, at least in the beginning, in the conditions in your life that are most conducive to deep focus and to not being distracted. Later in life, we want to be able to tap our meditation under complete,

you know, in chaos. But we want to cultivate it initially in the most peaceful time possible. So if you have kids, waking up before the kids um are up or in the evening once they're asleep or if you don't have kids then life is much simpler yeah or during your commute i i've found a lot of people who will just like throw on headspace or some song that they meditate to and they know they have 20 minutes on the subway and it's like all right that's my 20 minutes right yeah i i enjoy meditating on the subway and it's like, all right, that's my 20 minutes. Right. Yeah. I enjoy meditating on the commute a lot personally. You've been meditating for a long time. I mean, I'm not sure how you feel about this. I find that if people can have the first two, three months of meditation practice in a quiet room, then if they start doing it in

their commute, they've sort of built the foundation of it in this really quiet space. I think that from what I can tell, it appears to depend a lot on what type of concentrator you are. And what I mean by that is, if you look at writers, for instance, there are some writers who want to be in a quiet environment in order to hear whatever the muse is whispering. And they'll go to a library. They'll go to someplace like that. I can't do that for whatever reason. I thrive in noisy environments because if I have the noise, I feel like it focuses me, it forces me to focus inward. So for me, studying languages even in a loud environment, writing in a loud environment for whatever reason is a forcing function for me.

But I can definitely see why for even perhaps a majority of people, it would be, I think it's partially due to the fact that, for instance, I'm looking at your wall right now, and the fact that that picture is tilted like five degrees to the right

is making me totally bonkers. You think we should fix it? This is training for me. Look at that. The rest of the time we're talking. But the same is true auditorily. So if I have a controlled noise like music or the chugga-chugga-chugga-chugga of the car in the subway, I can focus on that repetitive noise.

But if I'm sitting in a space that I want to be quiet and I have that controlling aspect of my personality trying to impose itself on something I can't control, and then there's somebody hitting reverse in a truck and I can hear that outside, it will drive me nuts. Long observation to a short comment, but I do think that if you can drop in in a quiet environment, the point being, as you said, I think to stack the deck in the beginning. Yeah. Like learn how to do this in a controlled, unstressful environment, and then you can ratchet up over time to when you can use it in the most stressful of environments.

Right. Because we don't ultimately want to be meditating in a flower garden. We want to be able to meditate and have a meditative state throughout our life. In a hurricane, in a thunderstorm, you know, when sharks are attacking you. Any moment. Because that's... Paddle boarding. When you're paddle boarding the last day on a first trip and josh is like you'll

be fine and then three leashes snap and all hell breaks loose that's a long story killer set comes in so that's just a little context here timbo and i have been on this great adventure um stand up paddle surfing taking it on together and we found this we got a great friend down in costa rica Rica, Eric Antonsen, who actually has the other podcast other than yours I listen to in life, the Paddle Woo podcast. Paddle Woo, yeah. Paddle Woo. Eric's awesome. He's a great dude. He runs Blue Zone Sup.

He's a brilliant teacher. Really fascinating mind, deconstructing stand-up paddle surfing on increasingly small boards for us. And we've been going out there. We've had some hilarious close calls. Our last trip a couple weeks ago we almost we we almost we had we almost destroyed each other yeah we had there's a this one like witching hour where the the juju is really weird almost everybody either got like decapitated impaled by a board or just head-on jousting collision which is what but the point that you bring up, I think, is right on about meditation.

That when you're building training programs for elite mental performers, the most important thing is to understand them so deeply and build programs that are unique to their funk, embrace their funk. That's a term my buddy Graham, who's a dear friend of ours who comes on our surf adventures with us.

He's a brilliant thought partner. Embrace the funk. Could you explain that explain that yeah we have to embrace our funk we have to figure out what you know you think about the the entanglement of genius and madness right or brilliance and eccentricity understanding that entanglement is always a precursor to working with anybody who's trying to be world-class at something because that entanglement is fundamental to their being and they have to ultimately embrace embrace their funk embrace their eccentricity embrace what makes them different um and then build on it right and so we think about self-expression it's not trying to take everyone and put them into the same mold it's trying to understand someone very deeply and build a training program a way of life um that helps them bring out the essence of their

being through their art whatever whatever their art is. And that's how I relate to the path to excellence in chess, in martial arts, in different arts, very actively in the investing space when I work in education with children through my non-profit. It's, again, the movement to unobstructed self-expression.

But the problem is the teachers don't listen. They don't know how to listen, right? They don't know how to sit, or parents, to sit in empty space and observe the nuance of their child's mind or their student's mind and then build a way of life around that. People are used to teaching the way they learned. Think about martial arts instructors. Almost all of them trained a certain way and then teach that way which alienates 65-70% of the students by definition it's very rare that you have someone who can take the time and it takes a lot of time

to know someone deeply enough to build a training program and a way of life around who they are I only work with 8 teams and I don't take on new clients very seldom do I take on new clients and I won't work with more than eight people. You also don't do a lot of PR for everybody listening.

I always get these emails and texts. They're like, hey, could you intro me to Josh? I want to have him on my show. And I'm like, he's not going to do it. Tim, you're the only person once a year or two, you're the one guy who brings me out of my hermetic cave. I live a bit of a strange life because I'm not on... It doesn't feel strange to me. It feels completely natural. But I'm not on Facebook or Twitter or Instagram or any of these things. I don't even know

the names of most of them. I have an email account, though. I do have that. That box is great. I cultivate empty space as a way of life for the creative process. So Timbo, you're the one guy who brings me out of the cave where we have a lot of fun together. So you were talking about these top performers and getting to know them on a very deep, subtle level so that you can help them express the combination of their madness and genius or at least embrace it, among other things. How do you think about parenting? Yeah, let's dig into this one. All right, and then let's remember to loop back after this to finish this discussion of,

first of all, you were talking about how to cultivate the somatic awareness, and then how to listen to it. So let's go back to how to train to listen to it. Okay, parenting, Jack. Well, Jack's the love of my life. I mean mean this kid is such an awesome dude and i parenting has um has been the most fantastic learning experience i've ever gone through so from when he was born i i tried very hard not to go in with it with a

lot of preconceived ideas and to be attuned to him, to listen to him. From when he was just days, weeks old, he was teaching me. You know, you talk about teaching presence. Our eyes would be connected. And if I would think about something else, his eyes would pull me back. If there was any distraction that set in, he would pull me back. And as he got a little older, he would just take your face and pull it back in the sweetest way. And so the depth of connection, being deeply attuned to a young spirit that hasn't become blocked, that is in that state of unobstructed self-expression, that is just this unbelievably game learner,

unblocked learner. And Jack is the gamest little person I've ever known in my life. And so, but I, of course, I've been thinking about learning and education for a lot of years. And so I had some, some thoughts. And so, for example, I think that control is, the need for control is something that inhibits people in life. The need to have external conditions be just so in order for them to be able to, right, Timbo's pointing at my grandmother's painting.

That was my grandma's painting. It's a beauty, right? That's great. Yeah, Stella, Stella Waitzkin. That's her self-portrait. Okay, we're going to leave it messed up. We're working on control. So like from a young age for me, when I started playing chess,

I would create chaos on the board like I described, and then I would play in chess shops with people blowing smoke and playing music. And I'd play chess with like loud Gyuto Monk chants bursting into my head from speakers. I would, when I play cards, I would never, playing Jin Rami, I'd always keep the melds out of order. Say that again? When I would play cards. Cards, like a game of cards. A card game, playing like Jin Rami, a card game.

I would never organize my hand. I'd always keep it. Did you say meld? Yeah, like if you have like three sevens. okay right or like all right jack queen jack queen queen of hearts or whatever i would keep everything out of order so i'd have to reorganize it in my mind i'd keep my room messy so you wouldn't gather your icy you wouldn't you wouldn't move your cards around to organized right i was creating chaos everywhere to train at being able to be at peace in chaos and organize things. That was kind of part of my way of life.

And I found it to be a huge advantage that I had competitively. And so one of the biggest mistakes that I observed in the first year of Jack's life or year or two of Jack's life that I observed with parents is that they have this language around weather, weather being good or bad. And whenever it was raining, they'd be like, it's bad weather. You'd hear, you know, moms, babysitters, dads talk about it. It's bad weather, we can't go out. Or it's good weather, we can go out. And so that means that somehow we're externally reliant on conditions being perfect in order to be able to go out and have a good time. So Jack and I never missed a

single storm. Every rainstorm, I don't think we've missed one storm other than maybe one when he was sick. But I don't think we've missed a single storm, rain or snow, going outside and romping in it. And we've developed this language around how beautiful it was. And so now whenever there's a rainy day, Jack says, look, Dad, it's such a beautiful rainy day. And we go out and we play in it. And I wanted him to have this internal locus of control, right, To not be reliant on external conditions being just so. And then that kind of has, and now he's four, he's getting older,

so we've been playing with these things. We began meditating together when he was a little over a year, just doing breath work. Initially, we started doing meditation work when he was in that kind of most pure state, so when he'd be taking a warm bath and he was lying on his back

and being completely relaxed, blissed out, we would just naturally breathe together. I wanted the habit to be formed in something that was the initial experience to be in conditions that were most conducive to just natural peace. And then we have in recent months been taking it to an interesting funky place. So he would watch me do the Wim Hof training, and I'd be putting my hands in ice buckets and doing this interesting breath work through cold water. And he would initially watch, and he'd come over and stick his finger in and put his hand in. So this is a great moment. A couple months ago, we were out romping in this huge snowstorm, and Jack, about 10 minutes into it, we'd just gone on this long search for the right

carrot to make the snowman with. We found the nose. We found it. And then Jack got, he was in this huge drift and he got his boots just loaded up with snow. And he looked at me and he said, Dada, my feet are cold. My boots are filled with snow, but that's okay. I'll just do the Wim Hof and make them warm. And we looked at him.

And then for an hour and a half, we played after that. Feet just covered with snow and he was completely fine. Never mentioned it again. And then he got increasingly interested in this internal terrain. And we would take hot baths together. We'd take a bath together every night. And then he would want to turn on the cold shower and get in it. And we'd play what we called the It's So Good game. And so we kind of reframe this thing.

You know, I have this – you know, people tend to bounce off of discomfort whether it's mental or physical and so they run up it whether if they run into internal resistance whether it's a meditation training or someone exposing a weakness or if they're training and someone might be better than them whatever whatever it is they bounce away from things that might expose them they're repelled from it right right and but you know the flip side of this is to learn the way i i you i talk about living on the other side of pain, pain being like mental or physical discomfort, right? And much of life that's so rich comes from the other side of it, the other side of challenge, internal or external challenge. And with Jack, of course, I'm not using that, but it's a little child's embodiment of it. We started to play with turning on the cold water, and he would say,

It's so good, Dada. And we'd kind of be in the hot bath and play in the cold, and he would say, It's so good. It's so good. And he began to have this gorgeous, blissful smile meditating through it. And he would say, I'm meditating through it. It's so good. And we were reframing cold.

Cold is a metaphor from something that you bounce away from to something that you can learn to sit with, to be neutral in, to find pleasure in. Just like the weather. And then we had this experience the other day where he said to me, you know, Dad, will you tickle me slowly? And I always tickle him. He laughs uproariously. But we were lying in bed and I was tickling him very slowly. And he said, I'm going to do my meditation. He would meditate.

And then the next day he said, Dad, will you tickle me slowly? And to me then the next day he said dad will you tickle me slowly and i did it and he said can you pick him a little bit faster and and i didn't suggest this to him he suggested it to me and then we played this game where we say one to ten and i would tickle him slowly and he'd start doing his meditation and we'd move it from one two and we'd go up to he'd like be doing his meditation and finally i'd be full tilt tickling him you'd normally be in hysterics and he was just sitting there meditating um and not laughing and he found this so interesting and he's now guiding the process in this in this beautiful way and now we're turning it to talking about you know question just to interject did you at any point condition him to be proactive in that way or was it just an organic now i'm in the driver's I think I encourage him to grab the wheel all the time.

I mean, a huge part of my relationship to parenting, and this is from my mom, and I watch my mom with Jack, and I think this is maybe the greatest gift that my mom gave me is having a sense of agency in the world. You know, the idea that, you know, having a sense that I can impact the world, right?

And that my compass really matters, right? So when I grew up, I wasn't seen but not heard. I was familiar when I was five and six years old, they were having adult conversations with friends and I was part of it. They wanted to hear my ideas and I felt that they mattered. And that's a big part of how I believe in, and my wife and I believe in raising Jack.

And so he plays a really active role in everything that we do. And so it was sort of a natural thing. And it was all fun and play. I wasn't pushing any of these things on him at all. This is stuff that he wanted to do. But then him naturally, I've been kind of blown away by how he's been transferring this stuff over. I mean, lateral thinking or thematic thinking, the ability to take a lesson from one thing and transfer it over to another, I think is one of the most important disciplines that any of us can cultivate or ways of being. And it's something that Jack and I have from a really young age. We began to cultivate this from when he was really small around this principle of go around. We would initially, it was like, the first thing that time it happened is that he was

trying, it was really tiny. He was trying trying to get in we were in a little cottage a single cottage in a in in um on martha's vineyard tiny little cottage in a big field and he was trying to get in one door and he couldn't but he could get in the other door and i said jack go around and he looked at me and then he went around and then go around became a language for us physically if you can't go one way you go around to another way but then it became a language for us physically. If you can't go one way, you go around to another way. But then it became a language for us in terms of solving puzzles and in terms of any way, time you're running an obstacle, go around.

And then working with the metaphor of go around opened up this way that we would just have dialogue around connecting things, right? Taking away of a principle from one thing and applying it to something else. And we've had a lot of fun with that. And so it's fascinating to see this game little dude, if you have this thematic dialogue, principle driven dialogue, and we're, we're cultivating somatic awareness, cultivating the

ability to feel these little ripples inside. I mean, Jack's telling me his dreams in this beautiful way. He tells me, you know, how his emotions feel in his body. It's a great journey. I'm learning so much from him. There's a book you've mentioned to me a number of times, or at the very least a researcher, and I'm probably going to massacre this name as well. Is it Carol Dweck? Getting that right? Mindset? Yeah. Carol Dweck. Mindset. Yeah. Yeah. Fixed or entity theories of intelligence versus incremental or growth mindset. Yeah. Carol Dweck is one of the most important foundational developmental psychologists, I think, around this distinction of a fixed perspective on how good somebody is.

Let's frame it like this. Most children, unfortunately, are educated to believe that they have a certain ingrained level of ability in things. You are smart, you are dumb, you are average. Right. And they're told, and the sad thing is that when they are, even when they're praised, they're told how smart they are, right? Or you're such a good writer, right? You're so good at math, or, and the kids will say, I'm smart at this, or I'm dumb at that, right? And so, but if you're very smart at one thing, then that means that if you fail, then you must be dumb at it. And so it becomes very static, right? And the kids are often quite

brittle when they have a fixed mindset, right? Or an entity theory of intelligence. Well, a growth mindset or a mastery-oriented mindset is one where we understand that our, our, the path to mastery involves incremental growth, right? We don't have an ingrained level of ability at something. We're going to have successes and failures. We're going to work at things. And it's work, it's practice, and it's an open-mindedness to life's experiences

that makes us succeed. How would the praise differ? You would praise a kid for the process versus the outcome. And so you would say, I'm so proud of how hard you worked at your math, not you're so smart at math, right? Or if someone has a failure, the other side of it is not to say that don't worry about it, you're just not good at math, you'd do something else. It's to say, well, how can we practice this to get better? And so we're focusing on the process and not the outcome. That's like the fundamental principle. And it's so easy to say it, but it's very hard for people to live it as parents, especially if they don't embody it themselves. What you see often with

kids and parents is that the parents are fundamentally fixed. They have an entity theory of intelligence themselves. They're fixed. They're stuck. But they've read the material of Carol Dweck or somebody else, and they want to parent their kids around a growth mindset, but the kids see what they embody, not what they say. So we have to embody it. I mean, one of the most important things that we do, I think, that we do with my foundation

and our work with schools, with programs around the world, is that when we're working with teachers, it's not just, this is the material you should teach your students. It's working with these core principles and embodying it themselves first. And then through that embodied intelligence, working with the kids and how they can embody it. We have to walk the talk.

So let's, let's go back to what you said. You should go back to at some point, which is somatic sensitivity. Those sort of dimples of light in the darkness that most people overlook. How do you train that? Well, thematically, the first thing I would say is that we need to think about cultivating an internal locus of control or an internal orientation versus an external one, right? So as an artist or performer, we have all these external pressures on us. Let's say, for example, again, let's talk about investors again. Let's say an investor is running a $1

billion investment vehicle and they have partners. They have people who invest in that, right? And they have to write investment letters. They have all the partners, say they have 30 or 40 or 50 partners who are institutions, maybe endowments, educational endowments, charities, whatever, who have put their money into this investment vehicle. And maybe that person has his own money as well or her own money in this investment vehicle. Well, for them to be successful, they have to operate from the inside out. They have to bring out the essence of who they are as a performer, like we're discussing, or as a human being, to bring that out through their art. But if they are constantly feeling pressured by what others expect from them, what others want from them, how they'll be perceived, right? Or how people are looking at their Facebook post, or how their tweet is being responded

to, right? It's tweet. That's what it is, right? That's right. See? I mean, it's so interesting for me, like watching people watch their Instagram accounts, right? I see it with buddies with all the time. It's natural. It's, it's completely human, but, but then we're, we're aware of how we're perceived, right? One of the major ways,

reasons that I stay away from these things is because I can feel how susceptible I am to this stuff, right? You publish a book and it's on Amazon. It's so hard not to go look at the Amazon numbers, right? And then a book comes out and you're tracking them. it's on amazon it's so hard not to go look at the amazon numbers right and then a book comes out and you're tracking them even if you know it's ridiculous and you shouldn't be doing it now someone like you you're such a world class um and you've so systematically trained at and cultivated the ability to market these things this is actually a very important scientific input for you it's not for most authors most authors is an addiction right so that's a completely different point, in my opinion.

You're actually gathering data and using it. Most people are just constantly feeling... Tapping the vein. Right, tapping the vein. So with investors, what this often relates to is P&L checking, profit and loss checking. Oh, sure. Right? So most investors check P&L hundreds of times a day. In fact, it's constantly because it's on their screen all the time.

And so having these little adrenal hits all the time, right? Whether it's dopamine or cortisol, whether they're making money or losing money, they're constantly bouncing off of these things. That's the ultimate external orientation, right? So if you think about internal plus proactive versus external plus reactive, this is how I would tend to frame this out. We want to build a proactive way of life that's fundamentally moved from the inside out versus a reactive way of life where we're constantly reacting to all of these inputs, which we may or may not want, and where we're constantly beleaguered by or oppressed by a sense of how we're going to be perceived, social pressures. And so when you're talking about a really high-level artist who might have a really subtle intuition about something,

and they should listen to that intuition, or they should at least deconstruct that intuition and investigate it and see if it's the right way to go. But they're aware that that intuition might not be perceived as impressive by others. The problem is that the others usually aren't world-class artists. They're the armchair professors. They're the philosophologists. And so you have the man in the arena who's compromised by a sense of self-consciousness of what the critics are going, how the critics are going to perceive him or her, which is ridiculous because it's like an A player thinking about the approval of a C player. And that's disastrous. That's external orientation.

That's like looking at, you know, I mean, thinking that we have, we're going to get food poisoning from something, that something's off, and then dismissing it because of, I mean, first of all, there's the incredibly subtle sense is how strong the intuition is, right? I mean, no one else at that table there and we had some pretty high level dudes sitting at that table had that feeling that that we were about to eat something that food poisoning right so it's very subtle you had a very subtle sense it wasn't banging you over the head right and then there's the feeling of the social pressures and

everything right it's a very interesting subtle example yeah right but it's but the subtle pressures pressures were louder in that case than than the really subtle intuition that you had. And then there's having the attitude of, I don't care about the social pressures. But that's really hard, right? Which I was able to do a third of the way through. But you did. But not before. Right.

I think you're actually really, in my observation, you're really evolved with this. I mean, you have so much external pressure and external awareness on you. I consistently find it stunning and impressive how you're able to embrace your funk, how to live a life that is attuned to your kind of inner ripples. I mean, I think it's actually rather unique. It's, I think it's a core strength of yours. It might be. Thanks,

man. I think that one element that's been very helpful in trying to mitigate the risks and dangers in that, in the sort of paradox of trying to be introspective while having a very public facing life is stoicism. And, uh, and I remember reading at one point, I want to say it was Cato who is considered by his contemporaries and his successors in a sort of stoic thought leadership to be the perfect stoic in a

lot of respects. And I'm going to get the colors wrong here, but he would deliberately wear, I think it was a blue tunic as opposed to a purple tunic to encourage people to ridicule him because he wanted to be embarrassed about only those things worth being embarrassed about. So training himself not to be overly sensitized to the critiques of the C players around him. And so I constantly, I remember, for instance, this is such a silly example, but I was just in Montana. And I went into the ski shop to get some light gloves just for walking around, not for skiing. And I looked at the whole rack and I was like, ooh, I like these. And they were like the most

ridiculous Dr. Seuss striped nonsense gloves you've ever seen. They will not match with anything, just ludicrous looking. And I asked the woman at the front desk, I'm like, what do you think of these? Or should I get a different one? She's like, nah, I think you should get the black ones. And I thought about it. I sat there and I thought about it. I was like, what do you think of these? Or should I get a different one? She's like, nah, I think you should get the black ones. And I thought about it. Like I sat there and I thought about it. I was like, nope, I'm getting the Dr. Seuss gloves. And so I got the Dr. Seuss gloves. And that expresses itself for me in a lot of different places because I will, for instance, do,

and this is not something I recommend to everybody. So caveat emptor, you can't be, you know, you're in control of your own life. So, you know, if if you do this you can face some dire consequences but i'll do uh drunk q and a's on facebook and i'll have a bunch of booze and i'll go on and i'll do a q a something will come out that will embarrass me but it's not going to be life destroying and so it's systematically create an environment in which I feel like I don't have a reputation to protect, which is another reason why I talk about the psychedelics. And I'll talk very openly about monogamy versus non-monogamy. I'm a politician and B that I don't feel like I have a fixed identity to cling

to that I need to protect because I see how disastrous that can be. Yeah. That's really, that's really powerful. And you know, the fire of competition plays that role as well. I mean, you look at people who compete, let's talk about martial artists. So, so I own a Brazilian school with Marcelo Garcia. We've discussed Marcelo a lot. Definitely. And you as Simon mentioned, creating chaos and training yourself to operate optimally in chaos compared to others. And, of course, Marcelo, who's what, 10-time? Nine-time?

Nine-time. World champion. Is the master of the scramble? Yeah, they call him the king of the scramble. The king of the scramble. I mean, he's the greatest transitional player in the history of sport maybe um he's incredible i mean his is the essence of his game is to not hold to allow people to move and to again embrace the chaos and get there first his his he just has cultivated the transition so systematically that he has 10

frames in transition where somebody else will just be moving from one position to the next. That transition itself is something which is like, that's his ocean. It's a beautiful thing to see. But if you look at the school, Marcelo runs the school so beautifully. And we've got, at this point, a lot of world-class competitors. A lot of school tends to win pretty much all the tournaments.

A lot of the guys who you've trained with... With the Tim Ferriss experiment. That was hilarious. Oh my god. That was awesome. Day one, day one i'm like okay i think i broke my rib you did great man you did great that was pretty um yeah guys you should check that out that was pretty pretty the tv show if you want to see me get my ass handed to me uh and have a great time training with guys like uh john stava who's an incredible athlete and teacher yeah john that's a tv show worth checking out but um not the truth if you look at the learning curve of the people in the school the ones who put themselves in the line as a way of life just learn much faster than the

ones who are protecting their egos right most schools what happens is someone gets good and then they have to win to protect their status as being very good or dominant. It usually happens with martial arts instructors, which is that they reach a certain level. They open a school. They get a little bit older. They get a little fatter. They have a reputation. So they stop training because they don't want to be exposed by the young students who are coming up.

And they sit in the sideline. But their egos get increasingly large but riddled with insecurity, and this brittleness tends to then splay down to the students and the whole school becomes a joke, right? Versus, you know, Marcello, the way Marcello runs our school is so magnificent. Everyone's on the mat training so hard as a way of life.

Everyone's on a world-class growth curve. And it's very interesting to observe who the top competitors pick out when they're five rounds into the sparring sessions and they're completely gassed. The ones who are in the steepest growth curve look for the hardest guy there, the one who'll beat them up, who might beat them up, while others will look for someone they can take a break on, right? And so there's that constant search for exposure. And that's kind of a parallel to what you're describing in terms of not having an ego to protect. Or a, you said not having a reputation to protect.

Yeah, a reputation to protect or a fixed identity to protect. Right. So this is a way as a competitor to constantly put yourself into the fire. Here's a question I have for you because I feel like particularly in jujitsu I could get better at this. You remember when we did that one day? we had the gi on and you're like, Timbo, your lips are purple. I thought I was going to die. I thought I was going to have a heat stroke and have to be carted off.

But do the guys, is it correlation or causation? Meaning, are the guys who on round five pick the hardest guy in the room have they already self-selected by coming to the school in a sense or have the did they start off perhaps when they walked in the door the guy who would pick the easiest person in the room at round five and have been converted into the guy who will pick the hardest person you see both you see both you see both in the latter case how do they cultivate that transition i think that marcello is a great role because i think it's a good i mean it's a fantastic metaphor for life right i mean this is you need this everywhere 100 i mean i think that you know we think about this this principle of

cultivating quality as a way of life and the big things and little things. And you, you look at the way Marcello runs that, that training environment is, is pretty exceptional. I mean, if people don't have, he puts his ass on the line all the time, his ass is on the line all the time. Um,

and he's, you know, he's getting a little bit older. He's, um, he has two kids and he's a wonderful dad. Um, his life is not just 100% Jiu Jitsu anymore.

he has all of these, 20s, at this point world-class students, who want to go at it hard with him. And he goes at it hard with them. He wants to. He doesn't mind getting exposed. He brings it. He's living it. But he's also creating an environment where people are present to quality

in little things. If someone doesn't have their gi on straight, if they haven't tied their belt, if they're sitting in a way that's sloppy, what happens? He tells them to straighten their gi. I love that. When people are doing the warm-up,

if they're cutting the corner a little bit, he tells them to run the full circle. If people are doing a certain drill in a sloppy way, he refines it. So it's the little things, right? As you watch Marcelo doing the warm-up, there's a way that he'll have his hand and just brush against the mat as he passes it. You can feel him engaging his tactile feeling for the room, right? He's someone who embodies and teaches quality as a way of life. So if you're in your fourth or fifth round and you are looking for a way out, you feel that you're fundamentally violating this principle which you've been cultivating. Right. A tenet of the school.

Right. And, you know, this is so important. We think about a core part of how I train people is around the interplay of themes or principles and habits, right? The habits are what we can actually train at. The principle is what we're trying to embody. And so we'll train it two or three or four or five habits which are the embodiment of a core principle but the idea is to burn the principle into the hundreds of manifestations that principle

become our way of life right and so in this case we're talking about marcello talking about or embodying the principle of quality in all these little ways these little ways you could say don't matter but they add up to to matter hugely oh i think the little things are the big things right because they're a reflection i mean this might sound cliched but it's like how you do anything is how you do everything right and uh it's such a it's such a beautiful and critical principle and and we don't most people think they can wait around for the big moments to turn it on but if you don't cultivate turning it on as a way of life the little moments there's and there's hundreds of times more little moments than big, then there's no chance in the big

moments. Yeah. That, okay. So if people listening, don't take anything else from this interview, I think that's so key to who you are. It's so key to why you've been good at what you've been good at. That's it right there. And, uh, there's a, I'm going to, here, let me mangle another name since that seems to be one of our themes for the show. This episode is, I think it's Archaeolocus, Archaeolocus, perhaps I'm going to get this wrong,

but it was a quote, gotta be a Roman, maybe a Greek, who knows, uh, who said, we, we do not raise the level of our hopes.

We fall to the level of our training. Yeah. And if you can't just do one every five years waiting for the, of our hopes, we fall to the level of our training. And you can't just do one every five years waiting for the big event. You're not going to have the training necessary. As a principal that I've been thinking about a lot around parenting, you see so often people with their second child

are not as present, right? Now, unfortunately, in today's world, people are often not present with their first child are not as present right now unfortunately in today's world people are often not present with their first child either i was i was taking a walk yesterday with a dear friend of mine in central park and at dusk we were just talking what other ideas we've been we've been thinking about and we walked past this woman who was had three children in in a stroller and was walking her dog, and the children were all talking to her, and she was on the cell phone having a conversation with a friend. And it wasn't like a quick, it was like a long gossipy conversation. And I was just watching

this. It was an exquisite external environment, like the embodiment of distraction. Three children and a dog, like the children like looking, trying to pull her, but she was just in this other world, right? We think about the distraction of parenting. And then you think about what often happens with parents with the first child, they're completely tapped in because this is all new, they're present. And the second child, they just, well, relatively neglect. We see that all the time, right?

I'm thinking about this a lot because we're about to have our second child. And so I'm thinking about like how important it is to not take for granted the things that you've done right and think they'll just be there. Because they're not going to be there unless you're present, equally present, right? We think about, and we see this in the martial arts, as someone who trains twice a day as a way of life for 10 years, training until they drop, and doing external training as well with strength and conditioning and stretching and everything else. And then they get to a place where they're consistently winning and then they think they can train, you know, seven times a week instead of 10. And it'll be the same. It's not the same.

Like that slip it shows. There's something incredible about going into competition knowing that there's no way that anyone else trained as hard or as good as you, as smart, right? So when I talk about training quantitatively, I think about training qualitatively, right? The confidence that comes out of knowing, whether in any discipline that you're at, that you gave it your all. When I work with someone, I say that one of my many filters is looking at someone in the eye and saying that working with me is living as if you're training qualitatively as if in a world championship training camp. Qualitatively, but I look at them in the eye and some people you see a fear. You see the fear of exposure. Other people you see a lean in, an eagerness, a gameness, a hunger for what that exposure will lead to, right? Those are two very, very different paths. Maintaining presence to that quality, right?

Even after we've assumed that we've got it nailed, right? You see this with people around presence, right? You see there's so much bullshit in the meditation world, for example. So much bullshit. Because people might have meditated wonderfully for four or five years or six years or eight years, ten years, but then they get ego involved with it. And then they put together their schools

and they're not embodying it anymore, right? And then it becomes hollow. And they kind of slip from the philosopher to the philosophologist without even knowing that it happened. They weren't even present to the question. Firewalking process. Yeah, that's important. What is the firewalking process? This is new to me too. I'm not sure I've heard you discuss this. Yeah, this is something I've been really for the last

year and a half or so developing intensely. I think it's been a core part of my process for a long time, but training people I've been, I've been on this really intense learning curve on how to work with people on this. So the core to the principle is that people tend to learn from their own experiences with much more potency than they learn from other people's experiences, right? And the firewalking process is, that's what I call, that's my term for a gateway to cultivating the ability to learn with the same physiological intensity from other people's experiences as we learn from our own. So for example, if you're a jujitsu fighter and you slightly overextend your arm and you get armbarred, and let's say in the world championships,

right? Your arm is being separated from your body, right? You feel like your shoulder is disconnecting, your arm is breaking. If you don't tap, you're going to break. So you have the combination, and often guys will fight it, right? They won't want to tap. It's the world. So they'll have the combination of huge disappointment, all the adrenal reactions to being caught and having, being wounded, and maybe torn ligaments or tendons, right? Depending on how the injury sets in, or maybe a bone. And they will burn that lesson to themselves and they will not overextend their arm that way again, right? That's been burned in on an animalistic level. But if they watch somebody fighting and they watch them overextend and get

caught in an arm, that's just like nothing. That's an intellectual knowledge that has no impact on whether or not they'll overextend. But if we can cultivate the ability to learn from other people's errors or experiences with the same intensity as we can learn from our own it's unbelievable how that can steepen the learning learning curve what would be an example of that beyond jiu-jitsu well for example a really interesting live example that i'm playing with today is that we, working actively with investors, is that we are, a brilliant investor recently used the term the Pavlovian impact or the Pavlovian influences of growing up in a bull market, right? So most investors, most relatively young investors grew up in a post-2008 world. So all of their subtle responses have come from growing up

in a bull market. So for the most part, they've experienced pleasure when they put the foot on the gas and they've experienced pain when they've taken the foot off the gas. For the most part, it's oversimplified. It's really interesting to sit down and think about all of the cognitive biases, all of the subtle associations that come with growing up in a bull market. Now, traditionally, what people will say is you have to live through certain business cycles. You have to school of hard knocks, right? We have to learn from the pain of the other side. But can you take a highly talented young investor who has grown up in a bull market and give them the wisdom.

You think about the journey from pre-consciousness to post-consciousness competitor around a certain theme. Give them the wisdom of living through many market cycles when they haven't, right? So then you can deconstruct systematically what does a bear market look like. Now, I'm not sure if we're in the beginning of a bear market now, but let's just say that we are maybe in the first or second inning of a bear market now. Maybe we're in the tail, like the eighth or ninth innings of a bull market. Maybe we're in the ninth inning of a bull market and we're going to see some huge round of intervention and we're going to go into extra innings of a bull market. No one really knows. Maybe there's some other dynamic at play. Even the great macroeconomists don't know,

but they have a sense through this deep study of either macroeconomics or valuation. But we are, at one point someday, relatively soon, we'll probably enter a bear market. So it's going to be very important, right? And so if you haven't lived through one, one thing you can do is you can deconstruct what a bear market looks like, and you can have them firewalk it. And so what that means is suddenly all of the – and a bear market doesn't just mean going down. It actually means the subtle undulation of going – it's often going down for three weeks and then a really steep two-week rally and then going down again for three weeks

and two-week rally. So people often, even bear – people who are betting, think the market will go down, get really hurt in bear markets, right? Because it's violent. There's a volatility to it. right and so the question is how can in this case an investor who's grown up in a post-2008 world um firewalk market cycles so that he can burn that wisdom into himself or herself and then the question is how you do this right right? And so a lot of the things that we discussed around physiological awareness, right? Somatic awareness, cultivating the sensitivity of what's happening inside of us,

right? What comes with that is the ability to switch state emotionally, adrenally. And so if we visualize something very painful to us, we can have the physio, if we visualize with tremendous potency, we can have a physiological response to that, right? True even of exercise training. People who say, take a 10 minute meditation visualization session in lieu of, oh, there we go. All right. That means we have to go pick up Jack from school. We have to go pick up Jack, but they get the benefits of the exercise in large part just from the

visualization over 10 minutes. But we have to go grab Jack. And to be continued. To be continued. Awesome. Okay, so we're back.

We reclaimed the boy from school, ate some Japanese food, talked about life, and now here we are for the continuation firewalking visualization we're going to talk about casts let's continue with firewalking yes you were just bringing up the um the physical dynamics that are possible with intense visualization, right? I had this formative experience I wrote about years ago

where I broke my hand seven weeks before a national championship when I was training in the Chinese martial arts push-hands. And I was in a cast for six weeks up until, I think, three days before the nationals. And the doc said I couldn't compete in everything except be atrophied. But I was committed to doing it. And it was really interesting because I was just doing all of my training one-handed and visualizing the weight work that I was doing on the one side passing over to the other. The weight work?

Weight work. Resistance training. Yeah, I was doing my martial arts training one-handed, which was fascinating on its own to just work on being able to do with one hand what you can do with two that was tremendous but i was also visualizing the resistance training i was doing on one side passing over to the other and um but really intense visualization not just like thinking it but burning it it's kind of when i made my firewalking the distinction between kind of thinking about intellectually sort of trying to to visualize it, or versus burning it in.

With every sort of sensory simulation. Yeah, like with your whole spirit burning it in deeply. And it was fascinating to see. When I took off the cast, I had basically not atrophied. And I competed the next two days, three days later and won. The doctors, I mean, they were pretty surprised by it. A lot of Western medicine is pretty surprised by it.

I mean, they're close-minded about these kinds of things. What would you do to translate that to something less obviously physical? Like we were talking about training people who've never been through a bear market to have the wisdom or the lessons learned of those who have been through. So pragmatically, how do you simulate that? Do you have them interview someone who's gone through it and then try to relive those stories through visualization? Or what would the process potentially look like?

Yeah, so cultivation of empathy to be able to do what you just described very deeply is one thing, to be able to live someone else's experience profoundly. First of all, we have to really be clear about the distinction between intellectual knowledge and somatic knowledge, right? When we've having something burned in, there's an adrenal response, right? So there's a physiology to having an experience very intensely. We have to learn how to create that physiology, right? So how to undulate, so we can do biofeedback training, um, undulating between states of physiological coherence and states of extreme stress,

so that we build up the ability to kind of move between them at will. And then when we're studying, for example, the experience of somebody getting burned extremely intensely time and again in a bull market, I mean, in a bear market, during the volatility, the ups and again in a bull market, I mean, in a bear market, during the volatility, the ups and downs of a bear market, right? You can look at it and it can feel like, you know, just like a chart. Or you can experience the anxiety that comes with it, the pain that comes with it, like the shattering of your previous conceptual scheme, right?

You can almost firewalk the experience of the Pavlovian influence of growing up in a bull market and then having that shattered. You could firewalk that shattering and then open your mind to the reality of the broader cyclicality over the long term. And there's a lot of, I mean, in terms of how you do it, well, I mean, this is, the foundation is in a lot of things we've been discussing, right? Intense meditation training, ways of becoming increasingly attuned to these subtle ripples inside your body, stilling your waters, having a lifestyle which is less reactive, less input addicted. Being really aware of how we fill space addictively in life. Whenever there's empty space, we just fill it as opposed to maintaining the emptiness. And the emptiness is where we have the clarity of mind and the perception of these little micro ripples inside of us.

Cultivating the ability to observe in us and in others the subtlest undulations of quality or of physiology. Well, you and I talk a lot about maintaining slack and trying to build slack into the system and how important that is. I was told by someone I respect a lot recently, find the silence because you have to listen from the silence. And that might sound very uh vague but i i found that if you really meditate on it it can apply to just about anything i mean if you really want to separate the signal from

the noise you need the space to do that right it's such an important principle. All right, we're going to take a break. We have baby time. Jack is up from his nap. And we're back to your regular programming, Joshua. We're talking about Slack while the Slack is expiring in the system here. Very impassioned cries from upstairs. Yeah, our aim today was to do this in the morning while Jack was in school. The fortune intervened.

Yes. Changed our plans. Yes. You know, this principle of slack um is a is is so interesting i mean for me a lot of it relates to the empty space for the learning process right like in my in my way of life i'm i mean i've built a life around having empty space for the development of my ideas for the creative process and for the cultivation of a physiological state which is receptive enough to to attune to tune in very very deeply to people right to people i work with

um and so like i can see how i could i could triple the amount of people that i work with um very easily with the systems that i have but my growth curve would get much, I mean, it would change fundamentally. And my internal physiological training would take a hit. I wouldn't have enough time for meditation, for reflection afterwards, for developments of the thematic takeaways of every session that I have. And the creative process, it's so easy to drive for efficiency and take for granted the really, you're going to have to juggle 17 chainsaws instead of two chainsaws. Right. And I'm reacting.

I'm not embodying the core principles that we're working on. And so much of, I find, really high-level training is sort of somatic transmission. You're embodying a certain state and then you're helping someone embody that state as well. Totally agreed. And I think that if you want a good example of that, just as a relatively new dog owner, as an adult, you can look at dogs or children who are fundamentally unblocked in that somatic read reading ability. And, uh,

you can see just as you said, like as a parent transmits their state of being to their child, despite what, despite or with the assistance of whatever they might say. Uh, similarly, if you're interacting adult to adult, you need to sort of return to that state to be maximally effective in what you do in

particular. Right. Right. And then when we're talking about sort of dancing on the razor's edge, right? So when you're moving up the growth curve in a certain discipline, there's a lot of things that you can do to reach the first 80th or 90th or 95th percentile of something. When you're talking about the last 0.001%, you're talking about these arenas where the greatest insight will be right next to the greatest blunder. And you have to be willing to go just right on that razor's edge. I was having this great conversation with the sports psychologist Michael Gervais couple weeks ago and he made he had talked to use this language of thrusting into big waves right the experience he had to go into like to push himself as a surfer to thrust into big waves i love that i love that expression right it's like but of course if you're thrusting into

big waves then you can easily push yourself into the wave you shouldn't take. So big wave surfers have to be able to navigate that just the most finely tuned, in the moment, just intuitive decision-making process of whether the moment is just right or whether it's a moment that will kill you. And then if you're working with people as a coach or as a trainer of people who are navigating that terrain, you have to be in a state where you can navigate that terrain, you have to be in a state where you can navigate that terrain. You have to have an embodied state there. And I think that's a mistake that a lot of people make in everything that they do. They just scale.

They scale and dilute quality. And when they dilute quality, you lose the ability to successfully navigate the razor's edge. And then by definition, you're probably more destructive than you are helpful. And so when I think about training people who are in that place, it's like 99.9% listening. And ideally you can make the most potent suggestions with the lightest touch feasible.

The notes, I took some notes beforehand here, or borrowed some notes beforehand. And one of them touches on the principle of scarcity in a habit creation, be the learning process, see the creative process. I don't know if we'll have time to all of these right now, but could you just elaborate on the principle of scarcity? So if we think about the, like the idea of subtraction or essentialism or scarcity right um i mean you you frankly are as good as it gets in my opinion at at harnessing the principle of scarcity right in your learning process learning how to deconstruct something focusing on what's

absolutely most essential right and zone in on it, right? As opposed to just throwing huge amounts of resources at things and just having a good diluted quality of approach. Most people, when they become successful, they have the opportunity to have more resources and they keep on layering more and more resources on things. And so they're not very potent in how they go about things. If you cut those resources down 99%, then you find yourself

just zoning in on what's most essential. And then if you can learn to add resources incrementally, maintaining that potency, it's incredible what you can do. But it takes a lot of discipline to maintain that principle of scarcity. So in habit creation, taking on the right amount, not too much. Not too little, but not too much. People tend to think about layering on, you know, they get excited when they realize, if I go through a diagnostic process with someone, we realize that there's 10 areas they could take on, they want to take on all of them at once, right? You can really take on one or two things at once. Ideally, one theme, you take on two or three manifestations of that theme to burn that theme on, and you keep on

layering, right? In the creative process, I on, and you keep on layering, right? In the creative process, I mean, you talk about limiting inputs, right? We've been talking about limiting inputs. Positive constraints, yeah. Right, positive constraints. I mean, you could, listen, me speaking about this principle to you, I mean, you embody this principle profoundly.

What are your thoughts on it? Well, a few things. I mean, just to maybe add a couple of anecdotes to what you just said, the first thing that came to mind was a quote, and I'm going to butcher this, but it's from Jack Ma of Alibaba who said, you know, in the beginning we had an advantage. We had no experience, no business plan and no money. So it forced us to make all of our decisions very carefully. And I do think that people tend to, and I'm also borrowing this, but overestimate what they can accomplish in a week and underestimate what they can accomplish in a year, which leads to theoretically appealing decisions, like trying to adopt 10 new behaviors at once

that are kind of hour wisewise and year-foolish, right? In the sense that they're doomed to fail from the outset in many respects. And to your point also about scaling, I have friends who call this the S word because it's romanticized, kind of worshipped notion in Silicon Valley. Scale, scale, scale. You got to be bigger, hire more people, ship more product. And if you are looking to kind of optimize your craft, your art, that may or may not be the right path to doing that. And to my mind, you can look at exemplars or you can look at examples of people who have scaled, who are still critics of scaling in the sense that Bill Gates, I believe said, you know, if you add people to an inefficient process, it just makes the

problem worse. You have to add people to an efficient process. And to that end, whether you are looking to build a, for instance, lifestyle business, like a healthy cashflow-based business that represents in some way your craft. Let's just say you make, this is a real example actually, like 20 customized rifles a year. That's all you do. And you sell to the top, like 0.001% of marksman in the United States. You never ship more than that. That's the constraint that you apply. Whether you're trying to do that or build Microsoft, that lesson can apply, right? Whether it's adding one person or adding the next thousand people. So for me, I think it's very easy to create a false dichotomy in your mind when you look at, say, a small-scale craftsman

who's perhaps making, let's just say, oil paintings in rural Alaska versus a startup in Silicon Valley with a thousand employees. And to think of them is totally different. But in fact, if you look at the top performers in either environment, they'll have a lot in common with each other. And I think one of those commonalities is applying a lot of positive constraints, even when you have an embarrassment of resources available. If we think about this in terms of the creative process, maybe one of the most important things to train

is the ability to ask the right question, to know where to look. And if you look at people in most creative fields who are extremely high level versus incrementally lower fields, it's knowing what the most critical area is for thinking. Let's pause for two minutes and then we'll continue. I kind of want Jack to say hi to everybody. What do you say?

Jack's saying hi to everybody. He's saying, we're going to get Jack playing with something and then we're going to finish up. Okay, to be continued. Okay. Siamo tornati. Here we are. We have Dinosaur Train playing for the little one.

Dinosaur Train creators, that one's on me. And Josh has a continuation yeah thinking about this principle of of scarcity um one of the the ways that i i have myself trained at this um in the creative process or harness the principle of scarcity is is and i have everyone who I work with live in this routine, is forcing yourself to end of each day think about what the most important question is and what you're working. We discussed this last time. It's really interesting because you're studying complexity all the time. And if you're a really high level thinker, you're slicing through most of it like butter, but then there's usually one or two or three areas of stuckness. And most people I find tend to live in the creative process by kind of surfacing, deciding where they want to go, putting their head down and just grinding

their way toward it and then surfacing later on. They don't surface enough to reflect on what's the most potent direction to go. You think about like the human versus the computer playing chess 10 years ago. Now the computers are getting really good at knowing where to look. But 10 years ago, now the computers are getting really good at knowing where to look. But 10 years ago, the human knew that one of these two or three directions was the right essential direction. Intuitively, we sense that, right? And we cultivate the ability to know where to look. The computer had to look at everything. If we're looking at everything, then we're just operating like really, really bad computers. But if we cultivate the ability to ask the most potent question systematically, right? So how do we do this? Well, we have a routine where we end each workday thinking, what's the most important question in what I'm doing right now?

Pose the question to the unconscious, and I'll wake up first in the morning and brainstorm on it. Do you have them pose it again? No. Actually, I think it's pretty important not to do that, because then we're kind of consciously ruminating on it. I have them, hopefully they haven't thought about it for a few hours before they go to bed.

This is something that Hemingway wrote about in his writing process really beautifully. Yeah, Hemingway would stop writing mid-sentence and provide a foothold for continuing the next day. Right, which we could also look at from the framing of that internal versus external framing, right? If you're kind of held by a sense of guilt whenever you're not working, then you're going to feel like you have to write everything you have to write. But if you're nurturing from the inside out your creative process, you're going to be comfortable stopping with a sense of direction, even when you're mid-sentence or mid-paragraph, right?

When I've talked to people who have started journaling successfully for the first time, the most consistent pattern that I see is I write less than I feel I can each day. They're never pushing to max capacity or feeling like they're pushing to max. They always write less than they feel they should write. Right. That's very interesting. That's very interesting and if we think about taking this and then and then turning it into a systematic training of the ability to be potent in the creative process if we're if we're reflecting if we're going to given project and reflecting on what's the most important question

here and we're journaling on it in the brains in the brainstorm in the morning we're doing a lot of things you know we're opening the channel systematically between the conscious and the unconscious mind we're waking up at the more in the morning and beginning our day proactively. All of these things which we discussed in the past. But then if you sit back after, say, a month, and you look back at your, say, three or four or five journals, brainstorms, Q&As on a given subject, and you think about, okay, so in the moment, this is what I thought was most potent. But now I realize this, in fact, would have been most potent. What's the gap? Deconstruct the gap between your understanding then,

your understanding now, and then design your training process around deconstructing that gap, right? And training at what that gap revealed. It's a really powerful way for individuals. What assumptions underlied that gap, right? The creation of that gap or that blind spot. That misperception about what was most important. Right.

Right? And so you're training yourself day in and day out, like water, right? To be an increasingly potent thinker. And this is manifesting scarcity in that we are forcing ourselves, no matter how many resources we have, to think about what is the most important question and what i'm working on right now do you journal every day yes when do you journal i journal um well i journal throughout so i it's like i'll wake up in the morning um meditate, take a cold, then hot, cold undulation shower, and then meditate. And then I will journal. I've had periods where I've just moved right, especially when I was working on Lucid Dream, where I'd move straight from sleep into journaling.

But that's my rhythm today. And then when I have insights throughout the day, I'll do quick journals about them. And then after I have sessions with clients, I'll do a journaling session on the most important takeaways. Do you do that in a notebook or do you do it digitally? I do it on Evernote. And then I tag everything thematically, which is hugely important for me. I have all of my journals and all of the resources that I find valuable tagged thematically and through habits in the language of my training process.

And so this is incredibly powerful for being able to give people resources, for me reviewing the ideas without having recency bias impede how I communicate. Can you say that one more time? Give. So if I have a client who I think has to work on a certain theme and I want to give them resources they can read on it, I can just click on the tag on Evernote and all of the resources, things that I've written and things that I've read circling that theme are right there. Got it.

And it's also really powerful because it's really hard to overcome recency bias. I see, without recency bias, right, meaning like the primacy and recency effect. So you're recalling what it is you read most recently, not necessarily the best resource. Right. And not necessarily the foundation of my relationship to the theme. Understood. And you want to communicate it from the, you want someone to learn from the foundation up. Right. And not necessarily the foundation of my relationship to the theme. Understood. And you want to communicate it from the,

you want someone to learn from the foundation up. So really powerful. The tagging, I mean, I find on, I'm sure Evernote isn't the, I'm not a big tech wizard

as you know, but just to put this in perspective, so we were looking for, well, we, I'm using the wrong, we,

Josh was looking for dinosaur train for like 10 minutes and then he's like, you know what? I think I'm going to search this thing. And I was like,

and you say you're not good at tech it was a good showing no i was thanks man that was a big discovery um and then jack's like there's dinosaur train amazing how this search function works uh should we talk about thematic interconnectedness? Yes, let's talk about it. I'd love to talk about it in the context of education a little bit. This is one of the, I mean, thematic interconnectedness is one of, maybe that's the essence of my relationship to the world or beyond. I think it's, I mean, you and I have, you and I have eccentric conversations all over the world on surfboards and wherever else. this has been a

big topic for us right yeah constant topic in various states um and it's been a huge part of how i've approached learning you know from my foundation and in looking at the relationships between chess and life learning about life through chess then in transferring level over from chess into the martial arts and then first chinese martial arts arts, then into Brazilian jiu-jitsu. And then when I work with people, it's really how I learn. And it's how I've found it's really powerful to help people amplify their growth curves, to teach them to be able to learn the many from the few, or from the one, right? Learn the macro from the micro. Break down the boundaries between disparate pursuits or disparate parts of

life, between the personal, the professional, the technical, and the psychological, right? And if we have an experience where we're on surfboards and we have some little thematic breakthrough and we can apply it to every other aspect of our life, it's really interesting what can happen because we're pretty well calloused over in our areas of strength, but in areas where we're less advanced, we can be more raw and we might be more conducive to breakthrough sometimes. Oh, 100%. I mean, you can see things with beginner's mind because you have no other choice. Right. You don't have to try to simulate beginner's mind because you are a beginner.

It's like the race to the bottom experience. So for those who are wondering what the hell that means, the race to the bottom is an expression that Eric of Paddle Woo, our paddle surfing instructor, uses to refer to constantly dropping in board size, often measured in liters for buoyancy purposes. And Josh and I, and everyone who is there really very quickly realized that you are to use your expression, kind of dancing the razor's edge and trying to find a balance between the race to the bottom,

but also maintaining motivation. So you're not just slipping on banana peels for five hours straight and to what extent do you focus on the board size and the race to the bottom versus which gives you more maneuverability in surfing versus actually working on say the footwork and the other technical aspects of the game on a board that you can manage and it's very interesting to think about this theme of the race to the bottom combined with this other wonderful principle that Eric, that we were all talking about with Eric, which is the swapping of boards between, so he had these camps where he had, I think, the 18 top stand-up paddle surfers in the world together with him, all riding these

ridiculously small boards that are deep underwater when you're standing on them. And, I mean, it's incredibly hard to balance in these things. So they've internalized this race to the bottom theme so deeply, which we are working on. And then they're also – they had this experience where they were all together and initially it was sort of competitive. But then it became much more collaborative and they were just sharing ideas. And then they began to swap boards, and they began to have this interesting experience where every surfboard kind of carves its own lines, right? There's the practitioner who carves his lines, but then there's also the board that has a unique rocker who finds new lines in the wave. And what these guys would find is that if they swapped boards, they could see new lines in the wave because if they listened to the board. Some guys would swap boards and try to force the

new board to carve their lines. Others would sort of be open to what this new board could do. And then they would learn from it. And then they'd go back to their board and their minds would open up. That's another way of thinking about this idea of the beginner's mind, right? The new board forced them, helped them see new lines if they were open-minded enough. So anyway, this is the kind of this is an example of thematic interconnectedness right so when i came back from that this was our last

our previous um trip where we were talking about the swapping boards theme and i came back and i was red hot on fire with how to apply this theme in the investment process with my guys right so you have these teams that are so private and that are so magnificent what they do but if you could get teams to mix to share ideas with a sense of abundance, right? Like, for example, if a world-class portfolio manager could swap analysts with another PM for a week or two or three, wouldn't it be interesting?

If they were both, like, open, if they were truly, everyone was sharing openly, you'd be doing a quick swapping board, seeing new lines, right? It's forcing a beginner's mind, but forcing a beginner's mind not only with an open-mindedness, but also tapping somebody who is truly exceptional at a very

different style of what you do right so there's an example of just having experience in surfing and applying it to something else right and converting it potentially into a simple question right like where can where can i swap boards right right would be something that is used for fodder for people listening in a journaling exercise. Wake up, have your coffee. I was going to say have your coffee, then meditate. Probably not the right order. Meditate, have your coffee, sit down, drop that question at the top, and just... Where can I swap boards?

Beautiful. Exactly. That's a magnificent journaling, like brainstorm questions or a phone. I love it. I love it. I love it. So how do you apply that to education? So this thematic interconnectedness, I mean, the way – I don't think that we can do much more important work with children than help them love learning, help them learn to bring out the essence of who they are in the learning process, right? So to express the core of who they are through learning, which obviously will help them love learning. And then help them discover thematic interconnectedness, how the world is interconnected via principles, themes.

People are really siloed right now. People think about disciplines in an increasingly data-driven… Segregated way. Segregated way and a closed-minded way. And it's kind of heartbreaking. in an increasingly data-driven, segregated way, in a closed-minded way, and it's kind of heartbreaking. And so I have this nonprofit I've been running for a lot of years, and a huge amount of what we do, so all of our work is in education. We've got hundreds of programs around the world, mostly in the U.S., but international as well.

The artoflearningproject.org is our, is our website. And the, the programs that are most exciting to me are the ones where we really are systematically working with schools to help children experience thematic interconnectedness. And so the way we'll do this, for example, is that we'll be working with five teachers in five different subject matters or four or five or six or three, whatever the

number is, in the same age group. What are you smiling at, man? What are you thinking? It was great looking at your face. I'm sorry. I'm sorry. Sorry, guys. I was just looking at the URL.

So it's theartoflearningproject.org. And I was laughing because I remembered when we were filming the TV show and we were walking up the stairs to the jujitsu, know to the marcelo garcia gym and you kept on saying towel this towel that and i thought you're saying towel t-o-w-e-l and i'm like what the fuck is towel and you're like it's my goddamn book and you got all upset i'm like oh the art of learning i'm like how did you expect me to piece that together anyway that's why i was smirking sorry right but now i know the acronym and i won't anger josh any further you didn't anger me i know i'm just fucking with you um so anyway the the um i don't remember that conversation i'm trying to

it was great towel towel towel for like five flights of stairs. I'm like, what the fuck are you talking about? Anyway, my bad. So the way that we do this is that we have, for example, five, you know, teachers in different subject matters working with my team to weave the same principle of learning into, for example, math, English, history, social studies, volleyball, soccer at the same time. And so you'll have kids who are studying their subject matter, but they're studying also the way a certain principle of learning or the creative process of performance psychology manifests in each of these disciplines at the same time. And so they're

by definition breaking down the walls between these different pursuits. And it's a really interesting systematic way of doing this, right? so they'll be studying the same principle in math and they move to the next subject and there's they're they're experiencing it through another lens and then through another lens and they're experiencing it in sport are these borrowed from the art of learning book in so much as you're talking about smaller and smaller circles or you're starting you're talking about learning the macro from the micro etc yes yeah the root of these are in are in core themes of learning creativity and performance psychology that I wrote about in my book and that I've developed since.

Yeah, absolutely. And we've spoken about a lot of them together. Um, and so it's a kind of a combination of individualized self-expression. Um, well, every,

a lot of these themes that we've been discussing today and, and, and last time. And so can people learn more about this at theartoflearningproject.org? They can. So we invite everybody, please come check out the site. We've got some really wonderful programs around the world, and it's good timing for this right now because I'd love it if any educators out there, we're on the verge of launching about

10 really high-level programs is what we want to launch, all thematically driven right now in the next, preparing them in the next months. And so anyone who is in the educational world who'd love to touch base with us about applying for this kind of program, Katie on my team can be reached at katy,

K-A-T-Y, at jwfoundation.com. JW Foundation is the name of my nonprofit that houses the Art of Learning Project. So katy at jwfoundation.com. Katie, K-A-T-Y, at JW as in Joshua Waitzkin Foundation.com. Yes. And she works with- What type of educators should check this out and email her teachers teachers or people running schools or school systems any minimum number of students or any other parameters

well the essence of these of these programs would be would be a school system that's open-minded around for example engaging like i, teachers in different disciplines working at the same time in a collaborative way so that the kids can be embodying the same principle in multiple disciplines at the same time. I mean, that's the essence of it. It's a bit of a coordinated program. We've had wonderful success doing this. And it's what really excites me when I think about education, how to build systematic training in creativity through thematic interconnectedness into the way kids learn these days, because kids get so excited when they can see connections. I mean,

this is a big part of what I'm experiencing as a dad with Jack is how red hot he gets when he can learn something and then apply it to many other things. And this is a core part of my approach to learning. I think it's been a, I mean, it's maybe my biggest strength is the ability to find hidden harmonies between disparate parts of life.

Seemingly disparate. Yeah, seemingly. Right. Well, Josh, this is always so much fun to drag you kicking and screaming out of your cage. You did it. Cage. Or cave. I like cave more.

I like cave more. I don't know why i was thinking cage i guess i guess that's just my inner primate coming out but the uh people have asked me often about education following my ted talk where at the end i close out talking about tackling different facets of education and i feel like your approach and principle-based lens through which you can not only spot but teach interconnectedness is just so incredibly valuable. Like you said, in an educational system where fields are increasingly siloed and viewed as separate and you have political turf wars between departments and whatnot, which only exacerbates that problem. And I feel like this is a massively powerful step in the right direction. So number one, thank you for that. And number two, educators

listening to this, or if you're just curious to check it out and might be able to help in some way, theartoflearningproject.org. And then if you get a taste of that and it seems compelling and you want to try to apply or jump into the fray, then kdkaty at jwfoundation.com. That org. Oh, I'm sorry. No, my bad. You're right. Theartoflearningproject.org. And I'll put this in the show notes for everybody listening.

These will be and many of the other things we mentioned will be in the show notes at 4hourworkweek.com forward slash podcast. But Josh, I would usually ask where can people find you online, but they can't find you. So I won't ask that. Is there any thing that you would like people to, besides visiting the resources we just mentioned, anything that you'd like people to take away, consider, do, any action, anything that comes to mind you'd like people to take away, consider, do, any action, anything that comes to mind you'd like people to walk away with, just as a closing comment or question? That's a big question. Yes, absolutely. It's funny, as I sit with this now, for so many years my primary identity was as a fighter, a competitor. And I've transitioned in recent years and I find my primary identity now is self-identity.

The way I experience myself is as a nurturer of people. My family, the people I work very closely with, and children as I work more broadly in education. And when I think about it through the context of nurturing people and nurturing ourselves, I think that we're living in a world of so much noise and so much distraction and of the space being constantly filled that it's rather remarkable what can happen if we cultivate a mindfulness,

a stillness of the waters as a way of life and we find the beauty in that. There's so much beauty that can come from silence. We can learn so much by feeling the inner ripples of our internal experience and as parents embodying what we want our children to embody living it, walking

the talk, putting away our phones living a life of deep presence with our children with our students, with the people we work with cultivating empathy, cultivating compassion it scares the hell out of me how powerfully I see the world moving in another direction from this. And there's so much that we can learn from the speed of what

computers can do, of where AI is headed, of what big data can reveal. It's thrilling to me, as long as we stay in touch with the essential parts of our humanity. And when I experience what happens working with people, with adults or with children, when we're just completely present and we cultivate that presence as a way of life, it's incredible what can happen between people. And when I experience the scars in children that I see everywhere, the anxiety that comes from the lack of attachment, secure attachment, the lack of the attunement of the parent, the lack of the embodiment of the parent or the teacher,

these things that are spoken about, it's heartbreaking. So maybe I'm really, really old school, but there's something about the cultivation of deep presence and qualities of way of life, which just rings all through me. And honestly, the other thing I'll say is that after having the experience I had a few months ago, coming as close as you can come to dying, as you can basically. I mean, first of all, on a tactical level, please, you know, if, if anyone's experimenting with different forms of breath, hold work like the Wim Hof method, which I think is very interesting and quite powerful. Please don't do it in any water,

even an inch of water. Cause if you go out, um, you don't want to be in water. Um, and then I should say, if you practice this stuff enough and your type a personality, you are going to go out.

It's not just a high probability, it's almost a certainty that you're going to go out. And to think otherwise is really courting disaster. So do not do it in or near water. Yeah. And when we talk about firewalking, right? About learning from other people's experiences with the same physiological intensity that you can learn from your own. There's something about when you come, like when you go over that edge, over that cliff, if I could take the experience of love, gratitude,

and beauty that I've been living with ever since I had that experience, and I could give it to my brothers and sisters, you know, holy smokes. I mean, what a beautiful thing. And so there's any way that we can just live with that deep sense of beauty. That's a rich place. To find the stillness, to cultivate, not just find,

but create that stillness and practice, like you said, the calming of the waters, I think it's underestimated because of its perceived simplicity. And just as not all things that are simple are easy, not all things that are simple are low in value right sometimes what's right in front of you within grasp that is most important to grasp onto and make use of yeah doesn't have to be extremely esoteric and it's so easy to think we've got it nailed you know like we can meditate for 15 years and think we've got presence nailed and then we stop meditating and then six months pass and we're distracted you know it's it's, it's just a, it's,

there's a constancy to it, right? Yeah. And a presence to the sense of the real sense of danger that it can slip. And speaking for me personally, it's also building it in as a habit, just like brushing your teeth for those people who brush their teeth, uh,

in so much as for me. And I'm sure, I know this is true for many of my friends, meditation doesn't really work well as a batched process. In other words, meditating 10 minutes a day for 10 days is much more valuable than meditating once in 10 days for 100 minutes. And for most people, it'd be less painful to, uh, once you get into that habit and it becomes a ingrained part of your being in your practice, you will see the value, particularly once you have a critical mass of, for me, it's typically five

to seven days. And then I'm just like, I cannot believe I wasn't doing this. I can't believe I stopped for four weeks or whatever it is. It's incredibly valuable. And Brother Josh. Thanks, Brother. This was a blast, man. Thanks, buddy. Hey, guys.

This is Tim again. Just a few more things before you take off. Number one, this is Five Bullet Friday. Do you want to get a short email from me? Would you enjoy getting a short email from me every Friday that provides a little morsel of fun before the weekend? And five bullet Friday is a very short email where I share the coolest things I've found or that I've been pondering over the week. That could include favorite new albums that I've discovered. It could include gizmos and gadgets and all sorts of weird shit that I've somehow dug up in the world of the esoteric as I do.

It could include favorite articles that I've read and that I've shared with my close friends, for instance. And it's very short. It's just a little tiny bite of goodness before you head off for the weekend. So if you want to receive that, check it out. Just go to fourhourworkweek.com. That's fourhourworkweek.com all spelled out and just drop in your email and you will get the very next one. And if you sign up, I hope you enjoy it.