The Tim Ferriss Show - #335: The Life Lessons and Success Habits of Four Presidents — Doris Kearns Goodwin
Episode Date: September 7, 2018Doris Kearns Goodwin (@DorisKGoodwin) is a biographer, historian, and political commentator who found her curiosity about leadership sparked more than half century ago as a professor at Harva...rd. Her experiences working for LBJ in the White House and later assisting him on his memoirs led to her first book, Lyndon Johnson and the American Dream. She followed up with the Pulitzer Prize-winning No Ordinary Time: Franklin and Eleanor Roosevelt: The Home Front in World War II. She earned the Lincoln Prize for the runaway bestseller Team of Rivals, the basis for Steven Spielberg's award-winning film Lincoln, and the Carnegie Medal for The Bully Pulpit, the chronicle of the friendship between Theodore Roosevelt and William Howard Taft.Her newest book, Leadership: In Turbulent Times, examines how the four presidents she's studied most closely — Lincoln, Theodore Roosevelt, FDR, and LBJ — found their footing. It goes all the way back to when they first entered public life and takes a look at the daily habits, tricks, and tools they used to navigate confusion, uncertainty, fear, and hope to establish themselves as leaders.Enjoy!This podcast is brought to you by Audible. I have used Audible for years, and I love audiobooks. I have a few to recommend:Ready Player One by Ernest ClineThe Tao of Seneca by SenecaThe Graveyard Book by Neil GaimanAll you need to do to get your free 30-day Audible trial is visit Audible.com/Tim. Choose one of the above books, or choose any of the endless options they offer. That could be a book, a newspaper, a magazine, or even a class. It's that easy. Go to Audible.com/Tim or text TIM to 500500 to get started today.This episode is also brought to you by Inktel. Ever since I wrote The 4-Hour Workweek, I've been frequently asked about how I choose to delegate tasks. At the root of many of my decisions is a simple question: "How can I invest money to improve my quality of life?" Or, "how can I spend moderate money to save significant time?"Inktel is one of those investments. It is a turnkey solution for all of your customer care needs. Its team answers more than one million customer service requests each year. It can also interact with your customers across all platforms, including email, phone, social media, text, and chat.Inktel removes the logistics and headache of customer communication, allowing you to grow your business by focusing on your strengths. And as a listener of this podcast, you can get up to $10,000 off your start-up fees and costs waived by visiting inktel.com/tim.***If you enjoy the podcast, would you please consider leaving a short review on Apple Podcasts/iTunes? It takes less than 60 seconds, and it really makes a difference in helping to convince hard-to-get guests. I also love reading the reviews!For show notes and past guests, please visit tim.blog/podcast.Sign up for Tim’s email newsletter (“5-Bullet Friday”) at tim.blog/friday.For transcripts of episodes, go to tim.blog/transcripts.Interested in sponsoring the podcast? Visit tim.blog/sponsor and fill out the form.Discover Tim’s books: tim.blog/books.Follow Tim:Twitter: twitter.com/tferriss Instagram: instagram.com/timferrissFacebook: facebook.com/timferriss YouTube: youtube.com/timferrissPast guests on The Tim Ferriss Show include Jerry Seinfeld, Hugh Jackman, Dr. Jane Goodall, LeBron James, Kevin Hart, Doris Kearns Goodwin, Jamie Foxx, Matthew McConaughey, Esther Perel, Elizabeth Gilbert, Terry Crews, Sia, Yuval Noah Harari, Malcolm Gladwell, Madeleine Albright, Cheryl Strayed, Jim Collins, Mary Karr, Maria Popova, Sam Harris, Michael Phelps, Bob Iger, Edward Norton, Arnold Schwarzenegger, Neil Strauss, Ken Burns, Maria Sharapova, Marc Andreessen, Neil Gaiman, Neil de Grasse Tyson, Jocko Willink, Daniel Ek, Kelly Slater, Dr. Peter Attia, Seth Godin, Howard Marks, Dr. Brené Brown, Eric Schmidt, Michael Lewis, Joe Gebbia, Michael Pollan, Dr. Jordan Peterson, Vince Vaughn, Brian Koppelman, Ramit Sethi, Dax Shepard, Tony Robbins, Jim Dethmer, Dan Harris, Ray Dalio, Naval Ravikant, Vitalik Buterin, Elizabeth Lesser, Amanda Palmer, Katie Haun, Sir Richard Branson, Chuck Palahniuk, Arianna Huffington, Reid Hoffman, Bill Burr, Whitney Cummings, Rick Rubin, Dr. Vivek Murthy, Darren Aronofsky, and many more.See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
Transcript
Discussion (0)
At this altitude, I can run flat out for a half mile before my hands start shaking.
Can I ask you a personal question?
Now would seem an appropriate time.
What if I did the opposite?
I'm a cybernetic organism, living tissue over a metal endoskeleton.
The Tim Ferriss Show.
This episode is brought to you by Audible, which has the largest selection of audiobooks on the planet.
I've used Audible for many years, and I have several audiobooks to recommend right off the bat if you're looking for a new one.
Ready Player One by Ernest Cline. You may have heard of it.
The Tao of Seneca by Seneca, if you want to hear my favorite collection of letters of all time, as well as the Graveyard Book by Neil Gaiman,
which is a fiction book I use to reintroduce nonfiction purists to the beauty and truth
and enjoyment of fiction. Graveyard Book. It is incredible. And I like the version that
Neil reads himself, but the entire ensemble cast is also fun. Audible members get a credit every
month, good for any audiobook in
the store, regardless of price, and unused credits roll over to the next month. So if you didn't like
your audiobook, no problem. You can exchange it, no questions asked. Plus, your books are yours to
keep. With Audible, you can go back and re-listen anytime, even if you cancel your membership.
And for some books, again, Graveyard Book by Neil Gaiman, I've listened many, many
times. You may even just start over as soon as you finish it the first time. Audible also helps
you to listen to more books by letting you switch seamlessly between devices, picking up exactly
where you left off, whether it's on your phone, through your car, from a tablet, or at home on
Amazon Echo, whatever. You can get through tons of books, hands and eyes free, while doing almost
anything. So that is part of the beauty of audio.
It is a secondary activity when you're walking the dog, cooking, whatever it might be.
Audible content includes an unmatched selection of audiobooks, original audio shows, news, comedy,
and much more from leading audiobook publishers, broadcasters, entertainers, magazine and newspaper publishers,
and business information providers.
Maybe that's what I am, a business information provider.
And right now, Audible is offering listeners of this podcast a free audiobook with a 30-day
trial membership.
So check it out.
Go to audible.com forward slash Tim and browse the unmatched selection of audio programs.
Download a title free and start listening.
It is super simple.
Go to audible.com forward slash Tim or text Tim to 500-500
on your telephone to get started today. Check it out.
This episode is brought to you by Inktel. And I've used them personally. Ever since I wrote
the 4-Hour Workweek, I've been asked over and over again how I choose to delegate tasks, how I do 80-20 analysis, and so on.
At the root of many of those decisions is a simple question, actually two questions. Number one,
how can I invest money to improve my quality of life? I use that in investing as well.
The second, how can I spend a little money or moderate money to save significant time?
Inktel is one of those investments. They're a turnkey solution for
all of your imaginable customer care needs. I used Inktel during the launch of the 4-Hour Body,
which was very, very involved. And they provided 24-7 customer service for my land rush campaign
because it was critical for me to take care of every person who purchased my books and
participated. This allowed me to focus on the things that I am better at, my strengths, like the marketing plan that we'd worked on for six
months, implementing that. Intel trains their experienced customer service reps to know your
business and your products inside and out and make your customers raving fans. They answer more than
a million customer service requests every year, and they can do so across
all platforms, including email, phone, social media, text, even chat. Leaving your customers
with poor service or just mediocre service, which by the way, in a competitive pool is a huge
liability, long wait times or unanswered messages carries a massive cost and risk to your business.
Intel removes the logistics and headaches
of this type of communication, allowing you to focus on your strengths and grow your business.
It can be a real competitive advantage. And I see many, many e-commerce companies
and tech companies thinking of customer service as a good enough checkbox or an afterthought. And just like Airbnb, you design in innovative ways
to be a competitor and to win, you can do the same thing with customer service.
So as a listener of this podcast, you can get up to $10,000 off. That's a big discount. $10,000
off your startup fees and costs by visiting Inktel.com forward slash Tim. So check it out. For more info,
go to Inktel.com, I-N-K-T-E-L.com forward slash Tim.
Hello, boys and girls. This is Tim Ferriss, and welcome to another episode of The Tim Ferriss
Show, where it is my job to deconstruct world-class performers to tease out the habits,
routines, et cetera, that you can use in
your life. And this episode is a four or five for the price of one, which is free, but four or five
for the price of one because my guest is none other than Doris Kearns Goodwin, who could be
found at Doris Kearns Goodwin. That's K-E-A-R-N-S, DorisKearnsGoodwin.com, also on Facebook and on Twitter
at Doris K. Goodwin. Who's Doris? Well, let me begin with some background. Doris's interest
in leadership began more than a half century ago as a professor at Harvard. Her experiences
working for LBJ in the White House and later assisting him on his memoirs led to Lyndon
Johnson and the American Dream. She followed that up with the Pulitzer Prize winning No Ordinary Time, subtitle Franklin
and Eleanor and the Homefront in World War II. She then earned the Lincoln Prize for the runaway
bestseller Team of Rivals. And for those of you who don't recognize that book title, you might
recognize it as the basis for Steven Spielberg's award-winning film, Lincoln.
And she then won the Carnegie Medal for The Bully Pulpit,
the chronicle of the friendship between Theodore Roosevelt and William Howard Taft. Her newest book is Leadership in Turbulent Times.
And I love this book because it goes all the way back to the very beginning
and looks at how the four presidents she studied most closely,
Abraham Lincoln, Theodore Roosevelt, FDR, and LBJ,
how they found their footing.
It goes all the way back to their first entries into public life,
and we encounter them at a time when their paths were filled with confusion,
uncertainty, fear, and hope.
How did they establish themselves as leaders?
What did other people recognize in them?
But also, how did they manage their lives day to day?
How did they get to sleep?
Were there any tricks that they used, any social conventions or rituals that they used
to maintain composure in the hardest of times. We dig into all of that. And as such, we get all sorts of
tidbits and life lessons from not just Doris, we do talk about her life as well, but these
presidents she has studied so in depth. And with that, I had a blast with this episode. And let's
just get right to it. Without further ado, please enjoy this wide-ranging conversation with Doris Kearns Goodwin.
Doris, welcome to the show.
Glad to be with you, Tim.
I have been looking forward to this conversation and also very intimidated by this conversation
in my prep and in doing all of my homework.
So I'm going to apologize in advance to you and my listeners if I embarrass myself with very intimidated by this conversation in my prep and in doing all of my homework.
So I'm going to apologize in advance to you and my listeners if I embarrass myself with my lack of domain expertise as we get into many different things.
But I thought we could start with something that does not intimidate me, and that is
some of your very early childhood experiences. I had read in the course of doing preparation for
this conversation that your father was an optimist and his optimism was perhaps the greatest or one
of the greatest gifts that he gave you. Could you perhaps just set the set the scene and explain
some of the circumstances and then also what that meant to instill optimism in you.
No, I do indeed feel like it was the greatest gift he could have given me.
He had a very difficult life, which I learned about, of course, when I was a little girl,
but never having met his parents or grandparents. Grandparents had come over from Ireland. And then
my father was orphaned when he was 10 years old. His little brother was hit by a trolley car when my father was 10.
The little boy was six.
His mother was pregnant.
He had a two-year-old sister.
And the little boy died finally from the trolley accident.
His mother had a child, died, another child.
And his sister and he were then put out to other people.
After his mother died in childbirth, his father committed suicide.
I only learned this all later.
So here's this man, Michael Francis Aloysius Kearns, 10 years old, goes to work very early,
eventually becomes a bank examiner in New York State, was great with numbers, something
that he did not give me as a gift.
But most importantly, he somehow, if you saw that man, you would never know
that sadness that he had in his childhood. He had a twinkle in his eye. He loved life. He gave me
that optimistic spirit telling me if you like people, people will like you in turn. And it's
been the way my life has been led since then. And it's hard to imagine what better gift. There's
confidence that I think you get from your family. And I think I got that too. But the ability to just get through adversities with
resilience and to have that hopeful feeling that things are going to turn out all right,
even though sometimes they don't, you think they will again, it's sustained me through my whole
life. Are there any particular examples that you can think of or just approaches that you
remember your father taking to coach you through difficult times or difficult experiences? I mean,
when you were perhaps not at the peak of confidence, when you were suffering hardships,
what approach would he have taken or did he take? Well, I think, you know, in small and large ways.
I remember once I was in a concert at school,
and we were singing Old Man River.
And by mistake, instead of singing Old Man River,
instead of saying,
he's tired of living and scared of dying,
I said, he's tired of dying and scared of living. And I was so embarrassed.
And after I came out, he said, that was much deeper what you said. He's tired of living and
scared of dying. Isn't that incredible? And I felt great. And we went and had some ice cream.
And then, of course, because I was such a huge baseball fan, I had to get through the failure
of the Dodgers year after year after year, the Brooklyn Dodgers. And again, he just said, it will happen some year. And he made me feel that wait till next
year will happen. But probably more importantly, my mother had had rheumatic fever as a child,
so she had a damaged heart and really was an invalid for most of my childhood.
And so he saw what I had to go through and what he had to go through where she was not well, she had several small heart attacks. And again, he just got her through it, got me through it. And it all sounds so sad what I'm saying, but my childhood I'm so interested in you as a person, is that you are such a keen observer, and that's reflected in your writing, certainly reflected in your speaking as well.
And I'm interested in the formation of your character and strengths and so on.
Baseball.
You mentioned baseball.
I don't know much about your background with baseball, but is it true, and I can't believe everything I read on the internet, so I certainly stand to be fact-correct at any time, that you were the first woman to be invited into the Red Sox locker room? Is that true?
It is absolutely. I don't know about the first woman to be invited in, but I was the first journalist to be invited.
First journalist. First journalist. I happened to be at spring training on the day that the order came down from the court saying that women journalists had to be allowed into the locker room to be able to do their job.
So the owners of the Red Sox said, go in.
So it happened that I was the first person to go in.
And it actually is a trivial pursuit question in a New England trivial pursuit game.
So it's a great pride to have done it.
It wasn't that exciting, to be honest. I didn't see lots of guys in matters of undress, but I was there,
and I didn't even have to interview them. I just had to say, I was there. I'm okay.
Have you always been, as long as you can remember, an aficionado of baseball? How did that develop?
I think in so many ways, my love of history came
from my love of baseball. My father had grown up in Brooklyn and then moved to Long Island just
before I was born, but still loved the Brooklyn Dodgers. So when I was only five, six years old,
he taught me that mysterious art of keeping score while listening to baseball games
so that I could record for him like on a summer afternoon, the history of that afternoon's Brooklyn Dodger game. And then he would come
home from work on the Long Island train at night, and I would recount for him with all my miniaturized
symbols, the K for strikeout, getting the guy around the bases. I could tell him every play
of every inning of the game that had taken place, and he made me feel I was telling him a fabulous
story.
So it makes you think, even as a little girl, there's something magic about history to keep your father's attention for so long. In fact, I'm convinced I learned the narrative art from
those nightly sessions with my dad, because at first, I'd be so excited. Before I went to this
huge rendition, I would say, the Dodgers won or the Dodgers lost, which took the drama of this
two-hour telling away. So I finally learned you had to tell a story from beginning to middle to end.
He made it even more special for me when I was six. He never told me then that all of this was
actually described in great detail in the sports pages of the newspapers the next day. So I thought
without me, he wouldn't even know what happened to the Brooklyn Dodgers. So it really did, I think,
teach me the importance of telling a story.
In fact, much later, I read an essay by my heroine, Barbara Tuchman. And she said,
even if you're writing about a war as a narrative historian, you have to imagine to yourself,
you do not know how that war ended. So you can carry a reader with you every step along the way
from beginning to middle and not being an all knowing person that says, oh, they won this war.
What's the drama if you already know that? So I learned that just trying to keep my father's attention
and telling him the story step by step of what happened to the Dodgers that day.
For those who don't know, who is Barbara Tuchman?
Barbara Tuchman is a female historian, and I only mentioned female historian because she was a very
important early female Pulitzer Prize-winning historian. And I read a female historian because she was a very important early female Pulitzer Prize winning historian.
And I read a book that she wrote, Guns of August, when I was in college.
And it was so beautifully written.
But more importantly for me, she was writing about battles and military stuff and things that you don't imagine that sometimes a woman might be so adept at.
But more importantly, she was just a beautiful storyteller and writer.
So I met her later, but she became a mentor in my imagination, I think, when I was in college.
Now, the point at which history enters the scene as such, labeled as such, even if baseball and your experiences with your father perhaps introduced you to crafting this narrative arc. Did that start
in high school? I had read, I don't know if that's true or not, but I had read that you had a fantastic
history teacher in high school, who I think won an award for best history teacher in New York State
or something along those lines. Was that a very influential period for you when you were
specifically in that class? Or did history
somehow enter the picture prior to that? Well, I think beyond baseball, the other
experience that led me to love stories from the past is because my mother had had rheumatic fever
and had this damaged heart, I loved to listen to her tell stories. I kept saying to her,
tell me stories about you when you were a young girl like me.
I somehow thought if I could keep her mind talking about days when she was young before her illness set in,
that her mind would control her body and this premature aging process we were witnessing would be stopped in its tracks.
So I was constantly saying, Mom, tell me a story about you when you were my age,
not realizing how peculiar that was until my own three sons never once said to me, Mom, tell us a story about you when you were my age, not realizing how peculiar that was until my own three sons never once said to me, mom, tell us a story about you when you were our age. But I think
again, it instilled in me the idea that stories from the past can bring people who are different
alive when they were younger. And then of course, when I ended up studying dead residents, trying
to bring them to life. So these two roots, I think, of my father's love of baseball and my wish that my mother could be younger and I could imagine her running up the steps two at a
time led to my interest in the past. But then I think when I got to high school, a wonderful high
school in Long Island, Southside Senior High School, this teacher, Miss Austin, who was the
head of the social studies department, she made you feel when she was telling, I remember,
about FDR's death, as if she were experiencing it, you know, her eyes filled up. And she did
indeed win an award as the best history teacher in New York State. So all of us benefited by having
that chance to see history come alive. I love history so much now. And I just wish that every
kid in school would have a teacher with that kind of passion. Because whenever I hear kids say, oh, it's boring, it's just a bunch of facts.
And I keep thinking, no, it's about people who lived before they had drama in their lives,
they, they went through tough times, our country went through tough times. And the more you can
learn from that perspective, just like learning from your parents or grandparents, you're learning
from generations ago. And if I could just have a
Miss Austin in every school in America, that would be my dream. When did you decide that you wanted
to explore biography as, I suppose, one of your many explorations of literature and as a writer?
When did that first come onto your radar or did you first think of it?
No, I think where biography came from was Lyndon Johnson. When I was in graduate school and in
college, I was really interested in the Supreme Court and thought I might actually go to law
school rather than graduate school. But I did end up going to graduate school. And I had a great
teacher at Harvard Graduate
School who taught the history of the Supreme Court. So my PhD thesis was on Supreme Court.
So I might have been studying these guys in their robes rather than my dead presidents,
were it not for the fact that I got a White House fellowship and a wonderful program that still
exists today, which takes people from 23 to 48 or 50, perhaps, and brings
them to Washington for a year, hoping that you'll get a sense of the government and then go back to
your private life, having been enriched by that experience. And I was at the young end. I was only
24 when I was chosen and ended up in a peculiar way working for Lyndon Johnson and then helping
him on his memoirs the last years of his life and then writing my first working for Lyndon Johnson, and then helping him on his memoirs the last
years of his life, and then writing my first book on Lyndon Johnson. So that's what set me
into presidential history. That's what set me into biography, that random experience. I mean,
chance plays a role in so much of our lives, I think.
I, in the course of prepping for this, read that you had some doubts about whether you would remain
in the White House. And I'm paraphrasing here, I'm pulling from memory, which isn't always my
strong suit, because you had written an anti-war piece. And that, I guess at the time, the president decided to keep you around
and that if he couldn't convert you, nobody could.
And I'm just wondering, A, if you could flesh that out a little bit,
and B, why he would make that type of decision.
Yes, what happened is when we were chosen as White House fellows,
there was a big dance at the White House. And he did dance with me that night. Not that peculiar. There were only three women out of the 16 White House fellows. But as he twirled me active in the anti-Vietnam War movement and had written an article with a friend of mine that we had sent to
the New Republic weeks before and had not heard anything back on the need for a third party
candidate to challenge Lyndon Johnson. So it came out with the title two days after the dance in the
White House, how to remove Lyndon Johnson from power. Oh, my God, I was certain
he would kick me out of the program, or even worse, he might destroy the entire program.
But instead, surprisingly, he said, Oh, bring her down here for a year. And if I can't win her over,
no one can. So I was not assigned directly to him in the White House, though. I think I was
too incendiary for that. So I was assigned to the labor department under Willard Wurtz, who was a wonderful mentor. And then Johnson withdrew from the race in March of 1968. And right after he
withdrew from the race, he called me to the White House and he said, well, you said I should be
removed from office. I've now removed myself. Now you have to work for me the rest of the time.
And so I did. I went to the White House. And then, as I say, he asked me when the White House
Fellowship and the year working for him came to an end to help accompany him part time to his ranch
to help him on his memoirs. He wanted me to come full time. But I knew enough about Lyndon Johnson
then that if you were completely in his sway, it was really hard to keep your own sense of balance.
So I asked him if I could just go part time and go back to Harvard to start teaching,
which is what I wanted to do. And at first he said, no, all or nothing, all or nothing.
So then the last day when he was in the White House and he was going to leave the next day,
he called me back and just said, okay, it's all right. Come part-time. And then he just got to me.
He said, you know, it's not so easy when you're not in power in the same way to get what you want.
I won't forget that you're doing this, but just don't let those Harvards poison your feeling about me. So that was the extraordinary
experience. I stayed at the ranch much of the time I was there, got to know Lady Bird, got to know him
very well, and felt a great deal of empathy for him, even though he never changed my mind about
the war. I did see extraordinary success that he had had in the Great Society and in civil rights.
And I saw him struggle with how he would be remembered in those last days and last years
of his life. So it was a very emotional experience, led to my first book, Lyndon Johnson.
And then from there, I became a presidential historian somehow. It wasn't that I set out to
become one. What an incredible opportunity.
I wonder, and I'll just ask you, if in an alternate universe I were able to ask him directly why he asked you to help him, what do you think he would say?
I mean, he could have reached out to any number of people.
What did he see in you?
Or how would he answer that question, do you think?
Well, you know, he had a number of other people that were working on the memoirs with him.
But I think to some extent, because I was young and he knew that the audience he wanted to reach were those young people because he felt that they hadn't understood him, even though he liked to believe he had done so much for them, which he had, except for this huge thing, the Vietnam War.
I was a woman, so maybe it was easier to be able to talk to me as a woman. And he knew that I loved listening to stories. And he was a great
storyteller. I mean, fabulous, colorful, anecdotal stories. There was a problem with these stories.
I later discovered that half of them weren't true, but I loved listening nonetheless. So I think part
of my attraction for him was that I loved listening to his tall tales. There was also a moment when I worried that part
of the reason he had me there was because I was a young woman. But everything was perfect. I kept
talking to him about steady boyfriends, even when I had no boyfriends at all. Until one day he
decided to have a discussion, he said, about our relationship, which sounded ominous when he
took me nearby to the lake, conveniently called Lake Lyndon Baines Johnson. There's wine and cheese
and a red check tablecloth, all the romantic trappings. And he starts out, Doris, more than
any other woman I have ever known, and my heart sank. And then he said, you remind me of my mother.
It was pretty impressive, even what was going on in my mind. But nonetheless, I was there. You know,
we used to walk
on the ranch. I talk about this actually in the epilogue of my new book because I tried to bring
all four of my guys, Lincoln, Teddy, Franklin, and LBJ, to the whole question of how they wanted
to be remembered over time. So I describe a lot of the scenes of walking with him every day where
his mind was just going back over the happier parts of his life. And also the sadness of knowing that the Vietnam War had cut his legacy
in two, but hoping that what he did on civil rights would receive some sort of bounty in the
time to come. And it certainly did, and it has, but he died before knowing that for sure. When you mentioned earlier, and I'm paraphrasing here, but referring to your
decision or your priority of working with him part-time, you said something along the lines of
when you're fully in his sway, it was hard to maintain balance. So I decided to, or asked for part time.
What does that mean? If you could elaborate on that?
You know, I think what it means is that he was so powerful, that you had a feeling sometimes,
that you couldn't get away from him. He wanted me to be there every moment. I mean,
even when he took a nap, he would want me to be sitting in a chair right outside the closet, just in case something happened to him or just not wanting to
be alone. And this was a man who needed company. And, you know, I felt in some ways like at 24
years old, am I going to be able to, you know, to say, no, I want to go to the movies tonight,
or I want to, I just need some time, or I want to read,
even though it was an extraordinary thing to be in his presence.
I remember one time in particular, it just sparked this memory which I haven't thought about,
when he would have visitors to the ranch, he would take them in his car and show them the jumping antelope, the blue bonnets, he'd narrate the whole beauty of the ranch to them.
And when I was first working down there, I'd be in the front of the car with him.
It could be an important person in the back, like Dean Rusk or something.
And he'd say to me, look, Doris, look at the jumping antelopes.
But then I remember one weekend I didn't go to visit him at the ranch.
And I think he was mad that I hadn't gone because I'd stayed at Harvard.
So the next time I was down, I was in the back of the car.
And he's saying to whoever's in the front of the car, look, look at the jumping antelopes. I felt like I was in Siberia. I don't even want to be in this car. I've seen these jumping antelopes a thousand times. That was one of the times I think I knew that a small thing could be transferred into an arc of power. And at least I had enough sense to think, as long as I've got myself back at Harvard,
and I can come on weekends, I can come vacations, it really was perfect. And I also wanted to be
back teaching. That's what I'd been preparing for. I got my PhD, and I couldn't wait to teach.
So it was a balance, I think, between the two, but it worked out really well.
Why couldn't you wait to teach?
I think I always talked ever since I was a little person telling
stories. And I knew that if I could teach now the kids at Harvard, it was later than getting them in
high school or elementary school. But at least then, if I could make them love history, just as
I had, that I would be doing something meaningful, because I thought in passing on that passion,
and there could be one or two or three or five kids in the class that might end up really loving
history, even if they didn't go into it, maybe for the rest of their lives, they'd be reading history
as their avocation, not their vocation, that I would do something that mattered to me. So,
and I really loved teaching. I mean, I only stopped teaching when I got married and had my
kids and couldn't teach and write and be with the kids at the same time. And it was scary. I mean,
to think of myself as suddenly becoming a writer when I was much more sure of my ability to teach.
So I left Harvard. I had two kids immediately after I was married. My husband had already had
a son from his first marriage. His first wife had died. So all of a sudden, I have three boys. And I was finding myself hardly able to get through the day, much less
get anything done. So I had to make a choice. Will I continue teaching or will I try and be a writer?
And so I had luckily by that time finished the first book on Lyndon Johnson and was going to
be working on my next book and had a contract. But even then, it took me 10 years to finish the next book. And I remember being at a cocktail party
in Cambridge at one point where somebody said, whatever happened to Doris Kearns anyway? Did
she die? I wanted to hit the person and say, I have three boys. That's what's happened to me.
But I was able to balance, I think, being a writer better with having the kids than I could
if I were teaching and writing and having the kids. But every now and then when I think, being a writer better with having the kids than I could have if I were
teaching and writing and having the kids. But every now and then when I lecture, and it's a
45-minute lecture or a 50-minute lecture, I think, yes, this is what it used to be like.
45 minutes is a nice self-encapsulated beginning, middle, and end, compared to perhaps 10 years. Were there times when you
didn't see the light at the end of the tunnel or weren't sure if you were going to finish?
Did you have any moments of self-doubt over that 10-year span? I mean, that's a long period of
time.
Well, in fact, each of my books have taken such a long period of time that there are certainly
moments where you just think, what am I doing? I mean, the book about Franklin and Eleanor and World War II took longer to write than it took
the war to be fought, which is really embarrassing. And the book on Teddy and Taft took seven years.
And the book on Lincoln took nearly 10 years. The reason it's not as scary as it might sound
is that I always sort of have an outline of knowing what I want to do before I start.
It's sort of the laypersons. I don't know that much about the person. So I want to know what
do people want to know about them? I'm not that much of an expert on the person when I start.
And then I start building the book, usually chronologically, if not from their childhood,
wherever I'm starting. So chapters get done. So it's not like I spend
five years researching and then start writing. Again, Barbara Tuckman, my heroine said,
you've got to start writing as soon as you can, because otherwise, you'll really feel this mass
of material is unable to be worked on. So yes, sure, there were times. But on the other hand,
it meant that I could have my own hours. My husband was a writer and we both wrote at home. I didn't have to travel anywhere to go and do what I was doing. I didn't have faculty meetings at night. I could be with the kids. I could go to the Little League games. And I really appreciated that I was now in a profession that allowed me to balance as much as I could, even if it meant I wouldn't produce 40 books. I sometimes think, what if I,
you know, had been a man living in another time, and I wasn't involved with the kids? I mean,
it's a sad thing to think about. Maybe I would have produced more books, but I would never trade
it. Oh, I think you're doing spectacularly. I have, as I was mentioning earlier, such an incredible level of respect for the work you've done.
It's very intimidating on some level.
It's just fat.
I'm not sure it's intimidating, but it's fat.
Somebody was teasing me who read The Bully Pulpit, which was a very long book, actually, 900 pages pages that she was reading it at night in bed and
she fell asleep and it broke her nose luckily my new book is shorter than any of those
nose is going to be broken well let's let's talk about some of your guys and uh perhaps we could
we're going to bounce around quite a bit and we can take this in just about any direction. But I'd love to perhaps start with a question about Lincoln. And I've read that you've said, what's perhaps most striking about Lincoln was his emotional intelligence and temperament. Can you explain what you mean by that?
Absolutely. I mean, I think when we look at the quality of empathy, which I think is a critical quality for any leader, I think for some people it's inborn, others can develop it over time.
But for Lincoln, even as a child, when his friends would be putting hot coals on turtles to watch
them wriggle, he would stop them and say, this isn't right.
We can't do this.
Or there are times when he found somebody drunk in a pithole
and everybody was walking by the person
and he ended up going back and picking that person up
and bringing him, carrying him to a home.
And you can see that in him as a child,
but it's more than that.
I felt living in his presence that I could become a better person. I don't always think that I have great respect for the people that I've written about. But there was something about Lincoln's and even forgetting how it made him a great leader, which it did. He just refused to let resentments fester. He refused to let himself get jealous of people i mean it wasn't that he didn't
have the normal human emotions of jealousy or envy or anger but he said if you allow those to fester
they'll poison you so there would be times when you know i might be jealous of something or envious
of something and i just remember i'd say link it would tell me this isn't doing you any good you
have to stop i mean there's this extraordinary extraordinary story of Stanton who becomes his war secretary. And they had met when they were in the law practice
together in the 1850s. Stanton lived in Cincinnati. Lincoln, of course, is in Springfield, Illinois.
But Stanton had a very national reputation, had a big case to be tried in Chicago. So they thought
they needed someone of counsel in Illinois.
His partner came and looked at Lincoln, thought he'd be fine. Lincoln was so excited at the thought of working with this extraordinary lawyer, Stanton. But at the last minute, the case got transferred
from Illinois to Cincinnati. So they didn't need Lincoln anymore, but they forgot to tell him. So
he kept working on his brief. He went to Cincinnati all on his own. He met up with Stanton and
Stanton's partner on the street corner.
And he said in his typically gregarious way, let's go up to the courthouse together in a gang.
Stanton took one look at Lincoln.
He had a huge stain on his shirt.
His hair was disheveled.
His arm sleeves were too short for his long arms and legs.
And he turned to his partner.
And the partner said this later and said, we have to lose this long-armed ape. He will hurt his face. It's awful, right? And Lincoln was humiliated and they didn't open the brief. He had painstakingly prepared. But the amazing thing is he stayed and watched the entire trial for a week because he could see that there was some brilliance in Stanton and he wanted to learn from him. And he went back to Springfield, Illinois, and he said, I still have to learn how to
become a better lawyer.
So he would stay up later at night.
He'd get up earlier in the morning.
He taught himself Euclid when he was on the circuit in Illinois.
But much more amazingly, so after his first secretary of war has had to resign, everybody
comes to him and said, the only person that can mobilize the North and mobilize the war
department is Edwin Stanton.
He's tough.
He can be a bully at times.
He can be insensitive.
But he's your guy.
And somehow Lincoln was able to put that past hurt behind him and give Stanton that most incredibly important job.
And Stanton came out eventually loving Lincoln more than anyone outside his family.
Now, that's a story that just tells everything you want to know about him. He said, I don't care if somebody disliked me or liked me in the past, if somebody's
been guilty of ill treatment or abuse of me, if they're right at this time in this place,
they're the right person for the time, I trust that I'll be able to bring out the best in them.
And he did. It's really incredible to hear these types of stories. And I think that
it's worth digging into perhaps some more examples. And I'd love to get your definition
or how you think about temperament. Because I've read you describing temperament as the greatest
separator in presidential leadership.
And maybe we could scratch presidential from that phrase.
I don't know.
But I and I think it was let me get this right.
Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr., who said about FDR, right?
He has a second class intellect, but a first class temperament.
What does that what does that mean to you?
I think what temper means really is your basic stance toward people, toward the world.
If you have the kind of temperament that's got a certain base of confidence in it so that you can surround yourself with people who can argue with you and question your assumptions,
do you have a temperament that allows you to share credit when something goes well, to take the blame when something goes badly? Do you bring out the best in other people? Do you make them want to work because you have a
common sense of mission? All of these are the basic way you treat other people. I mean, I suppose it
is encompassed in emotional intelligence, but I think you're born with a certain temperament,
but you also can develop a certain temperament over time. And I do think Oliver Wendell Holmes was right.
I don't think he was right that FDR had a second-rate intellect.
I think that's defining intellect by academic excellence.
And he was a mediocre student at Harvard, a mediocre student at Columbia Law School.
But he had an incredible problem-solving mind.
And he had the ability to bring people around him, experts in all the
academic fields, and he'd start out these evenings, these brain trust evenings, where they just relax
and tell funny stories and have a couple drinks. And then he would start questioning them. And he
was an incredible questioner. And he could bring out, it was almost as if he was excavating their
brain. And whatever he heard by verbal thing, he could remember. People remember in very different
ways. I mean, Lincoln remembered when he read, he had an extraordinary memory that if he read
something over and over again, it would stick in his brain like a poem or a piece of Shakespeare's
drama. FDR learned by listening to other people. And once he had the story in his own mind,
he could then tell it to somebody else. So that's intelligence is of a different
sort, I think, than just doing well on a series of exams when you're in school.
And if we're looking at, say, attributes versus skills that are developed, or the nature versus
nurture aspect of some of these abilities, or the temperament, as you mentioned. If we look at,
say, and I think I'm getting this right, the Lincoln quote, your opponents today,
maybe your allies tomorrow, was he always that way? Or is that something that he
developed over time and became better at?
No, I think he did develop it over time. In fact, I think most
of these, there are attributes that may be inborn that are perhaps like intelligence or maybe even
people skills, empathy, as I say, may be inborn, but the ability to communicate in some ways,
but you can develop all of these as time goes on. And I think that's the important thing for leaders to understand. But in his case, I think, when he was younger, he had an extraordinary sense
of humor, and he could really take down an opponent by making fun of him. And he did that
on a couple occasions. There was one time when the audience loved what he was doing and making
fun of the opponent. And then he saw the opponent leaving the audience and with tears in his eyes. And he just said to himself, this isn't worth it.
This is not the way you do it. So he learned from the experience of feeling guilt at taking down an
opponent that way, that if it were possible to bring him on your side eventually, I mean,
obviously when he's in the middle of the war, the Confederates are his
opponents. But even there, when you look at that second inaugural, what is he doing in that second
inaugural weeks before he dies, but saying, both sides, you know, both sides read the same Bible,
both prayed to the same God, neither's prayers were fully answered, where he's acknowledging
that the North had had problems with slavery just as the South had, and then with malice toward none and charity for all, let us bind up the nation's
wounds. That's the words that say it. But what really says it was that night when he's elected
president in 1860, he knows he's had at least much less experience than any of his three rivals.
They were more celebrated, more educated ones, but they'd been governors, they'd been senators, Seward, Chase, and Bates. And he realizes, I need their help. The country
is in peril. These are the strongest and most able men in the country. I need them by my side.
He brings them into the top three positions in his cabinet. Some of his friends say,
why are you doing this? You're going to look like a figurehead having these strong people around you.
And he said, I need them and I'll be fine.
And at the beginning, some of them thought they were more important than he was.
Seward, in particular, his secretary of state, thought he was running the show and that Lincoln would be like a figurehead.
But then at a certain point, Lincoln saw what Seward was doing.
He knew he needed him, but he put him in his place.
He said, I am the president and I will do this.
And they, too, became great friends.
And Seward ended up,
you know, admiring him more than anybody else. So I think he had an internal confidence that he
could bring these opponents into his midst. But it wasn't easy. It meant holding hands with a lot of
them. It meant having to chew them out when they started bringing their anger toward each other
out in public. And he had to keep going at it. It's much harder than if you
have the same people around you who are all in the same direction. You may not have as many
arguments and as many troubles, but he was able to contain those factions within his cabinet.
And then he was containing it in the country at large because they each represented a certain
segment of the population, whether it's radical, moderate, or conservative. So it's an extraordinary
way to do it. But the
interesting thing is, you know, when I've talked to business leaders, a lot of them said they were
able to, maybe not in that extreme way, having those kind of rivals with you, but to understand
the importance of bringing people near you who really can argue and question your assumptions.
There's a moment, the same thing with FDR. He's in a room with a bunch
of generals early, before the war had even started, the Second World War. And he's describing some pet
project that he loved. And all of them are shaking their heads as if, well, that's wonderful. And he
looks over at George Marshall, who eventually, of course, becomes the chief of staff. And he says,
George, you're not shaking your head. What do you think? And he said,
well, Mr. President, I don't agree with you at all. And the room came to a silence and everybody
left and they thought, well, that's it for George Marshall. And then he appointed him not long after
bringing him up like 14 names on the list or more to be the head because he wanted that kind of
person around him. So it's that strength, I think, that inner confidence that allows you to do that. That's a critical question in all leadership capacities.
Do you have any people you surround yourself with who you know will speak truth to you or
who have wildly divergent opinions or political perspectives? Is that something that you have proactively built into
your life? Or did you just have people already surrounding you who offer those opportunities to
hear dissenting opinions? You know, it's a really important question. I mean, I think in my work,
so I've had a woman who's been my research assistant for the last 35 years, and she's still working for me.
Beth, who's my manager, my best friend, my partner in a lot of things that we do together, lives in California, has worked with me for the last 18 years.
And I trust her, I think, more than almost anybody to tell me when something I've done is not up to par, when something I've written is not as good as it should
be. And when, when maybe I'm moving in some different direction. And then my husband and I
have a best friend named Michael Rothschild, who is a writer and a sculptor and lives in Maine.
And he has worked with both my husband and me, and we've worked with him on everything we write
together, everything we do together. And he's absolutely honest about this sentence isn't any good or this, you're not making this
clear. So that's built in, in a certain sense. I'm not sure that I did it on the purpose,
but they are the kind of people, Beth and Michael, and my husband, of course. My husband read every
single thing I've written and not only edited them, but would tell me when I was going off in a direction that really wasn't right.
I remember when I was working on the book on the Kennedys, and I'd always been interested in medical history because my sisters were both nurses and my brother-in-law was a doctor because of my mother's medical history.
So John Fitzgerald, Rose Kennedy's father had gone to Harvard Medical
School for a year. And I thought, oh, this is great. I can write a whole chapter on the state
of medicine in the 1880s. You know, and then my husband looks at it and he says, but he dropped
out of medical school and he became a politician. Why are you doing this? And oh, I hated to make
that chapter go down to two pages, but he was just dead right. But the other thing that happens that builds in
dissent is that we live in Concord, Massachusetts. And ever since the kids have been grown, and the
kids are now joining us because they live back in the town, which I can talk about later. But
anyway, we go out every night to eat in a bar, one of these two or three bars in Concord that
the whole gang of us goes to one one night, one the other night, and the next one the next night.
And in that group of people, there are Trump supporters, there are radical people, there are moderate people, and we argue and talk about politics.
And I think it's really important for me to be able to listen to those other sides when I'm going to be talking on television or thinking about today, as opposed to thinking about the past. Let's say you're having one of those group conversations,
you're at a restaurant slash bar, so there may or may not be alcohol involved.
Maybe. If things get heated, how do you or other people in the group, are there any particular
phrases you use or interjections you use to cool things a little bit if they start getting too ad hominem or too heated?
And I guess what I'm stretching for here is if there are any tools or phrases, approaches that people might use to create environments where a group like that can actually communicate and hear each other's
opinions without it devolving into a verbal fistfight. Yeah, and obviously, you know,
all over the country right now, it's a difficult situation where some places you go in bars,
and they won't even put the news on because they're afraid it will rile the people and make
them unhappy. So it's not been easy discussions, not only this time, but we've had a tribal feeling
about Democrats and Republicans for some time now through Obama, through Clinton, through Bush.
And I guess the best thing is, as long as you can just ask the people, why do you feel that way?
What makes you, what parts of him do you like? Or do you like this part of what he's saying or not
that? And you can sort of parse it out or they can ask us, you know, why did you like Hillary or why did you think she'd be OK?
You know, even though they might have thought she was a terrible candidate.
And as long as you can acknowledge, you know, that, yes, parts of her candidacy didn't work, but this is what I thought she was prepared for. Or on the other hand, they could say he touched a chord, Trump did,
and people who felt they were being left out and people who felt that they weren't being listened
to. And then sometimes it does. Sometimes if it gets too hard, then we just say, okay, let's have
another drink and change the subject and talk about the Red Sox. And that's what does it.
And there may be some Yankee fans in the group, but usually it's not. So not up here. So the Red Sox are a very calming device. Even though we're mad at them, too, because they, but not is fine. Civil discussion, civil discourse about
some of these potentially polarizing topics. That is a skill that can be developed. You have
to practice, but it can be developed. And I'd love to look back at some of your guys
and to look at perhaps some of the mistakes, failures, or roadblocks,
which I know you discuss very directly in the new book, to maybe give an illustration
of something they perhaps weren't very good at that then later became good at? Just to show us, give us some
historical examples of those early mistakes slash weaknesses slash roadblocks and how they dealt
with them. Well, I mean, taking both Teddy Roosevelt and Franklin Roosevelt, for example,
both of them had grown up in an extraordinary privileged background, and both had a certain
kind of snobbishness,
I think, about people who are not in their class. When Teddy Roosevelt went to Harvard,
he looked up the names of potential friends to see if they were on the social register
so that he would know they'd be safe for him to be friendly with. But then interestingly,
he always was interested in the outdoors, in fact, in part because he was suffering from
terrible asthma as a child. So he had to build the body that would allow him to become a man and to live on. So in
the summers, he would go to Maine with these guides, and they were kind of backwoodsmen guys.
And he just loved being with them. And he loved asking them about their lives. He had always been
interested and curious in other lives through literature. But now he was seeing them, they knew the woods, they knew things he didn't know. And all of a sudden, the fact that he read
more books than they did seemed less important. But even so, when he first got into the state
legislature, he was a fiery kind of character. And he went after a judge who he thought was corrupt,
and he pounded his desk, and he said terrible things about him. And he got a swelled head when the judge was
undone by the newspapers. And then he realized that he'd become so self-important that he thought
the Democrats on the other side were terrible people. He wasn't dealing with them, that only
he knew what was right. And as he said, I rose like a rocket and then I fell to the ground.
And he finally decided that you had to compromise and collaborate and be with other
people and learn from them. So, and FDR, similarly, when he first got into the state legislature,
he did very well at the beginning. He was organizing a group of people and he thought that
the Tammany bosses were all bad people. And then he began to see, my God, they may be doing some
corrupt things, but they also are helping people in the cities.
The people who vote for them do it because they come to their funerals.
They get them food.
They get them fuel.
And he moderated his kind of approach to politics.
But that's the thing that, you know, what Teddy said at one point was the great thing about being a politician, more than if he had chosen another field.
And I'm not so sure it's true today, but it was then. He said, a man who takes an active part in the political life of a great
city is going to be meeting all sorts of people as a result. And that's what he called fellow
feeling, which he said was essential for any democracy. He said that by going to places that
he normally wouldn't go, he went to tenements, He was a police commissioner, and he roamed the slums at night.
He was a civil service commissioner, so he understood what it was like to take an exam and want to have a job for that kind of clerkship.
He was in the army.
He had fellow soldiers that he was leading, and he lived with them in the same kind of tent.
All of that broadened his experience that he would not have had as a child. And by the time he reached the presidency, he had what he called that sense of civic life being marked by understanding other people's points of view.
It's the very thing that's missing in our country today.
He said a large part of the rancor of political and social strife arises from misunderstanding by one section of one class.
They're so cut off from each other that they don't appreciate each other's passions and prejudices. And because he had spent time in
the West where he went after his wife and his mother died on the same day in the same house
to escape his depression, he saw cowboys. He was a cowboy. And it's that breadth of experience that
I think all leaders need to, it can come through curiosity, it can come possibly through reading,
but it comes through meeting people of different sections and different places. And that's what politics in the best sense can do. But today, I think they're much more narrowed down to the people who agree with them, and they do know that there are a number of senators who subscribe to the podcast, and various, that they could, in the current day, somehow incorporate to develop these types of attributes that we're talking about?
I do believe there are.
I mean, think about it.
Lincoln used to have ordinary people come into his office in the morning and just talk
to him about what they wanted. They wanted a job. This is the days before civil service.
And he'd listen to their family discussions. He'd listen to why that clerkship or that
post-ministership would matter to them. And after a while, his secretaries, Nicolay and Hayes,
said to him, Mr. President, you don't have time for these ordinary people. He said, you're wrong.
I must never forget the popular assemblage from which I have come.
So Teddy Roosevelt took whistle-stop tours on a train six weeks in the spring and in the fall,
and he went to places where he'd been defeated as well as places where he had won,
and then he would stop the train at the local station and listen to newspaper editors,
you know, who would be criticizing something he was doing. He'd be talking to ordinary people. You have to get out of the office. I mean, FDR was not able because
of his paralysis to go around the country as much as Teddy Roosevelt was. But he sent Eleanor,
his wife, 200 days a year, she would be going from one New Deal project to the other,
seeing which ones were working, which ones wasn't, bringing him back stories of people who were hurting during the Depression,
the stories that he needed to really work. And LBJ, if you look at the way he dealt with the
Congress, why was he so brilliant in getting the two sides of the aisle together? Because in the
first six months of his presidency, after JFK died, he had every single congressman over in
groups of 30 to the White House.
They would then start with drinks together. And then Lady Bird would take the spouses in those
days on a tour of the mansion. And then they would sit and talk. And then he would call them up at
six in the morning. He'd call them at noon. He'd call even a senator at 2 a.m. He said,
I hope I didn't wake you up, but I just need your advice. And then the senator says,
oh, no, I was just lying here looking at the ceiling, hoping my president would call.
But nothing beats spending time with different people and not letting your day get filled up
just with the colleagues and the people in the government itself. I mean, FDR said when he was
putting over the papers to the FDR library, the first presidential library, he said, there's millions of papers here of government talk to one another, but the ones
I value the most are the letters from the people who are telling me their stories and their opinions
of me and what I should do differently. And those are the ones that I hope people will read as time
goes by. So maintaining that connection, whether it's a leader and their company and their shareholders,
or whether it's a president and their constituencies, and keeping that sense of
understanding and connection directly. That's why FDR was so terrific on the radio, because
he made people feel when he was communicating with them, that he was talking to them individually.
You know, people would be sitting in their living room or in their kitchen looking at the radio, but they felt somehow he was just talking to them.
There's a story about a construction worker going home one night and his partner said,
where are you going so early? He said, well, my president, he's coming to speak to me in my
living room tonight. It's only right I be there to greet him when he comes. It's that sense of
keeping that connection. The higher up you go, the more likely it is to narrow the
numbers of people that you see. And all of these people reached out across those barriers to keep
fresh. Even when Eleanor Roosevelt came back from her stories, what the people were feeling in the
country, they would always have dinner the first night. So the story would be fresh, not repeated
over time. You mentioned Eleanor.
You also mentioned Lady Bridgjonson.
Are there any First Lady stories or attributes that you think don't get enough airtime or
that perhaps are lesser known that should be better known?
Well, I think the important thing is that the importance of a first lady, and so far we have had just first ladies, no first men, the importance of a first lady to the president goes well beyond
whether they contribute in the partnership way that Eleanor did. I mean, she was extraordinary.
She's the first lady to ever have a radio program,
the first lady to speak at a national convention, the first to hold weekly press conferences where she had a rule that only female reporters could come to her press conferences, so that all over
the country, stuffy publishers had to hire their first female reporter to go to Eleanor's press
conferences. But they all can't be as active in politics as Eleanor was. In fact, when Bess
Truman came in, Eleanor said,
I'll introduce you to the ladies of the press. And Bess Truman said, why in the world would I
want to do that? I'm not going to be talking to the ladies of the press. What you need to know
is the same thing you need to know about any partnership, is what are they contributing to
one another? Teddy Roosevelt's wife, Edith, had no interest in being a public figure. She said
the only time a
woman's name should be in the press is when she is born and when she dies. But she gave him the
stability of a raucous family home. The kids were part of his life. He'd come home and play with
the kids. He knew that they had a family that was strong and stable and could withstand any of the
pressures of public life. So I think we need to look at the way in which the wives of first ladies have contributed to their husbands that may be
very different from political. It could be a balance, as Lady Bird was an extraordinary balance
to Lyndon Johnson. There were times even when I was at the ranch where I could see him get so
angry about something, and controlling anger is such an important part of leadership. And somehow, as he was yelling at somebody, she could just put her hand on his knee and say,
now, Lyndon, Lyndon, you don't really mean that. You're going to feel bad about this later on.
And somehow it just calmed him down. So I think sometimes it's somebody who's calm
against the manic person. Sometimes it's somebody like Eleanor who could actually argue with him.
He said she was like a welcome thorn in his side. She was Eleanor who could actually argue with him. I mean, he said she
was like a welcome thorn in his side. She was the person who could tell him the truth whenever he
needed to hear it. Are there any other presidents? There could be someone you have written about,
could be someone else you've studied, doesn't even have to be a president, a leader, let's just say,
who strikes you as particularly underrated or overlooked?
And it doesn't have to be one, could be more than one.
Well, you know, there's leaders that I don't know about that. I mean, that's what's amazing,
even though I taught a course on the presidency for years at Harvard,
I don't really know a lot of our presidents. In fact, right now, I'm involved in
possibility of a miniseries on George Washington.
And I can't tell you how little I know about George Washington, which is really embarrassing.
But I'm so excited because now I'll be able to live with him. I'll wake up with him in the morning
and think about him. I'm not writing about him. It won't be quite as intense as it would be,
but helping as a consultant on this documentary. So I don't think he's underrated, though. I think
people know about him.
But I'm sure if I were to go into somebody like Cleveland, maybe, Grover Cleveland, if I went into
James Polk, which everybody who knows him says now he's a really interesting guy, you'd find more
about it. That's the thing. When you study somebody, you get interested in them. And the fact
that they reach the presidency usually means that there's
some ambition there. There's some desire, hopefully, to do something for the country.
There's some resilience because they've all been through something. So they become human beings.
And then you realize that maybe they're underrated as a person because of their judgment in history.
The way presidential historians judge people can often be difficult. I remember I happened to be at a dinner at the White House in 1997. So it was before Monica
Lewinsky happened to Clinton. But there'd been a presidential historian's poll that came out that
day that ranked him sort of in the middle. And he was so angry through the dinner. He just kept
talking about it. I unfortunately was sitting next to him as a presidential historian. So I was trying to make him feel better. That very day,
the owners of the Brooklyn Dodgers, now the Los Angeles Dodgers, had announced that they were
selling the team. And there was some thought that maybe they'd come back to Brooklyn. So I said to
President Clinton, I'd make you a corrupt bargain. If you bring the Dodgers back to Brooklyn,
I will put you up a notch on the next presidential poll. He didn't even really laugh. I didn't think he thought it
was funny, but I thought it was funny. Anyway, you know, just mentioning that business, though,
of Lyndon Johnson and having anger, controlling anger is such an important part of leadership.
And both some of my guys were so much better at it than others. I mean,
Abraham Lincoln had this wonderful ritual that I think you can develop, where when he got angry
with somebody, he would write what he called a hot letter to the person releasing all his anger.
And then he put the letter aside, hoping he would cool down psychologically and never need to send
it. The famous case of that is when General Meade failed to follow up with General Lee's army after the victory at Gettysburg, despite telegrams saying you can't let Lee's army escape. He did
let Lee's armies escape. And Lincoln was so upset about it that he wrote a long letter saying,
I'm immeasurably distressed. You didn't do what we asked you to do. Had you done so,
the war would have come to an earlier end. But then he realized, oh my God, he's still in the
field. This will paralyze him. He puts the letter aside and it's never even seen until the 20th century
when his papers are opened and a raft of these kinds of letters exist, never sent and never
signed. So after the book Team of Rivals came out, a CEO wrote me and he said, thank God for
Lincoln's hot letters. He had written an email to a subordinate thinking that
the subordinate had done something wrong. And then he decided, I think I'll just put this in draft
instead of sending it. And he found out the next day that he'd been wrong about the information.
So that's one way to get through with anger. FDR had his own way. He would write drafts of
speeches, say his fireside chats would go through five or six drafts before they would
be done. And if he was angry at a congressman over a particular incident, he would call out the person
by name in the first draft, you know, call him a traitor to his class, a terrible guy. A new young
speechwriter came along and said, I can't believe he's going to do this. This will look terrible.
The older speechwriter said, just wait till the second draft. By the second draft, the congressman's
name was gone. By the third, the negative adjectives second draft. By the second draft, the congressman's name was gone.
By the third, the negative adjectives were gone.
By the final draft, all was sweetness in life.
But he'd gotten it all out of his system by doing that.
So figuring out ways to get that anger out in a way that's not going to hurt the person
directly and hurt your own leadership is something that my guys were able to do.
Lyndon Johnson, less able to.
When he'd be angry, he would go, for example, to somebody's desk. And if the desk was clean, he'd think,
oh my God, the guy's not working hard. If it was messy, he'd think he's disorganized.
And then when he got angry, he would just start yelling at the person right there. And then he'd
feel bad. And he might send, you know, a present to them the next day. But so much better if you can release that anger
in a different way. Stanton, Lincoln's war secretary, came by one day and he was furious
at a general. And so Lincoln said to him, well, why don't you write to the general and tell him
what you're feeling? And so Stanton comes back a few days later and he reads him the thing and
he says, now, Stanton, what are you going to do about it? And he said, well, I'm going to send
it, of course. And Lincoln said, no, you're not. Just throw it in the waste paper basket.
And he said, but it took me two days to write. And he said, I know. And it did you ever so much
good. You feel better now. That's all that's necessary. Just throw it away. And so after a
little more grumbling, Stanton did just that. And the interesting thing is when I interviewed
President Obama for a Vanity Fair exit interview, I was talking to him about Lincoln's hot letters, and he had read Team of Rivals, but we went over it again.
And I said, do you ever do that?
And he said, what do you mean?
Of course I do all the time.
I said, what do you mean?
He said, I write dozens of letters and crumble them up and put them in the wastebasket.
So that's a lesson one could learn. Pulling from that Vanity Fair piece, I wanted to ask you about this because at one point, and I think I have this right, you wrote at the beginning, preparing for this conversation today, I realized that it was nine years ago that you first called me on my cell phone, quote, Hello, this is Barack Obama. I've just read Team of Rivals, and we have to talk that convention. So I had
never met him. But I'd heard him give that speech because I'd been there covering it for television.
But no, I can picture the room I was in in my house, when I just answered the cell phone. And
he said, This is Barack Obama. And I thought at first, is it really but indeed it was. And what
had happened is that he wanted to talk to me about the book,
not because he was thinking of creating a team of rivals. He was so far behind Hillary at that point. He just was fascinated by Lincoln's emotional intelligence, you know, how he could
forgive these people in the past, how he could control his anger, how he could share credit,
all those things. So I went to his Senate office building and talked to him about Lincoln.
And then the interesting thing that happened is that when he then appointed Hillary Secretary of State, his chief rival, after he had
won the nomination, actually, somebody asked him, a journalist said to him, would you really be
willing to put one of your chief rivals into your cabinet, even if he or she had a spouse who could
be a pain in the neck? Of course, it was meaning Hillary and Bill Clinton.
And he then quoted Lincoln.
And he said, you know, the times are in peril.
You know, these are the strongest of people.
If she's the strongest, yes, I'll put her in.
So then when he did, it sort of became a term, team of rivals.
So when I went to the inauguration, covering it for television, and there was a party the
night before where Hillary Clinton was.
And teasingly, she came up to me and said, you're responsible for my being Secretary of State.
Of course, not me, but Abraham Lincoln. But yes, I think leaders do learn from each other.
One of the great things about Harry Truman was that even though he was not college educated,
he loved reading history and biography. And he learned from the leaders in the past.
I mean, each one of them, I think, learns from each other.
I mean, when I think about it,
the book that I've written about Lincoln and Teddy
and Franklin and LBJ, it's almost like a family tree
because LBJ's hero was Franklin Roosevelt,
who he called his political daddy.
Franklin Roosevelt's hero was Teddy Roosevelt.
In fact, he modeled his whole career on him.
When Franklin was 28 years old and a law clerk,
as I say, not having been a great student or even a great law clerk, he and the law clerks are
sitting around and talking about what might happen to them in the future. He said, I'm not going to
be practicing law forever. I think what I'd like to do is to be a state legislator. And then I think
I'd love to be assistant secretary of the Navy. He loved ships and he loved maps. He loved the Navy.
And then maybe from that, I could be governor. And then who knows, maybe I could be president. Exactly the path that Teddy Roosevelt had taken. And Teddy was his hero. They were distantly related. But of course, Eleanor Roosevelt was Teddy Roosevelt's younger brother's daughter. And her father had died of alcoholism young. So Teddy became a really important uncle to her. So from the time that Franklin was young, meeting the family early
on, and then from knowing Teddy Roosevelt, the young man, that was his hero. Teddy Roosevelt's
hero was Abraham Lincoln. And he used to read, he read one summer when he was in the middle of this
terrible crisis of the coal strike, he read the volumes, eight volumes by Nicolay and Hay on
Lincoln. And it just helped him, he said, to learn that Lincoln had been through rough times before, that Lincoln had had to face radicals on the one side,
conservatives on the other, and figure out a moderate point of view. And in the middle of
this coal strike, he's reading this book, and it gives him solace. And then, of course,
Lincoln's heroes were the founding fathers and George Washington. So it shows how short the
history of our country is, that you can encompass these four or five leaders in the whole history of the country
who form a family tree.
It is remarkable.
It really is incredible.
I mean, I think about, say, traveling overseas,
and you find these buildings that are by not a small margin
so much older than the entire history of our country.
It's really remarkable.
And I'd love to come back to some of these habits,
one of which we discussed, the hot letters, say, that Lincoln would write.
Are there any other routines or habits could be for anything,
for forgiveness, sharing or giving credit or anything at all that have stuck with you that
you find particularly interesting or unusual from any of the figures you've studied?
Well, I think, you know, one of the things that Teddy Roosevelt would argue was that
procrastination was a mortal sin.
So that if he knew he had to give a speech months away, he would start writing it that day just so that he wouldn't have to think about when am I going to start it?
When am I going to start it?
Even when he was leaving the presidency, he was supposed to give a speech in the Sorbonne after his year in Africa on the hunt that he went on.
But he had already finished the speech before he went even on the hunt that he went on, but he had already finished the speech before he
went even on the hunt to Africa. And so there's so many times, even for myself, if I have something
I really don't want to do, I at least start it so that I won't have to think, when am I going to
start that thing? So that's a habit that I think he developed in his other people in the cabinet.
Whenever they had to give a speech or go somewhere, they would all be preparing ahead of time
and sharing drafts with one another,
which they wouldn't have done
if it had waited till the last moment.
I think the most important thing, however,
that they all figured out how to do
was how to relax and replenish their energy,
to find time to think and relax.
You know, I think about it in our 24-7 world,
so many leaders or even regular people working in an organization feel, I can't take a vacation
or I have to take my email with me wherever I go.
I can't find time to do anything else other than work.
But think of these guys that I'm studying.
They certainly had difficult situations.
You had Lincoln having to deal with the Civil War.
You have Teddy dealing with the Industrial Revolution and the huge gap between rich and poor that arises during that time and big labor strife. You have obviously
FDR with the Depression and World War II and Lyndon Johnson with the civil rights struggle.
And here they go. Lincoln goes to the theater more than 100 times during the Civil War.
And people criticized him for it. They said, how can you go to the theater in the midst of all this?
And he said, I've got to get out of politics and out of the war.
And for a few hours when I'm watching Henry IV, I can imagine myself back at the War of the Roses.
And I must have some relief from this terrible anxiety.
It will kill me.
And the theater is it.
Or for Lincoln, when he told funny stories, he was a great storyteller.
And he could tell stories to people who were around him.
And they'd laugh. And when he would laugh, somehow he could tell stories to people who were around him, and they'd laugh.
And when he would laugh, somehow he was whistling off his sadness.
So humor, in a certain sense, was his way of dealing with anxiety.
Teddy Roosevelt, every afternoon, found time, two hours every afternoon, for either a raucous tennis match or a strenuous hike in the wooded cliffs of Rock Creek Park or being thrown around
by two Japanese wrestlers or a boxing match. He loved playing this game of single stock. He would
often injure himself in these various games he played. And then there was one time when he was
in the middle of the coal strike where he was deprived of these zany exertions because he had
an infected leg. So he writes to the Librarian of Congress, and he said,
I need some escape from all this. I want you to send me something on Mediterranean history,
or something on the history of Poland. And so in the middle of this coal strike at night, he says, and he writes back to the Librarian of Congress, and he said, it's been such a delight to drop
everything useful, everything relating to my duty, particularly the coal strike,
and spend an afternoon reading about the relations between Assyria and Egypt, which could not possibly do me any good, but in which
I reveled accordingly. Franklin is the best. I think in some ways he's the best. So first of all,
he loves having movies at the White House. He loves crossword puzzles. He loves his stamps.
He loves looking at maps. He loved playing poker. He really,
really knew how to relax. But the best thing he did was when he was in World War II,
he had a cocktail hour every night. And the rule was that you couldn't talk about the war.
You could talk about books you'd read. You could talk about movies you'd seen, gossip about people,
as long as the war wasn't mentioned. So for a few precious hours, he, like Lincoln,
when Lincoln was at the theater, could relax totally.
And after a while, this cocktail hour was so important to him
that he wanted his closest friends and associates
to be living on the second floor of the White House
to be ready for the cocktail hour.
So the White House became the most exclusive residential hotel
you could possibly imagine.
Harry Hopkins, his foreign policy advisor,
came for dinner one night, slept over,
didn't leave until the war came to an end. His secretary, Missy LeHann, lived with the family
in the White House. Lorena Hickok, who had an emotional relationship with Eleanor, had a bedroom
next to Eleanor. And the princess from Norway in exile in America during the war lived with the
family on the weekends. And the great Winston Churchill came and spent weeks at a time in a
room diagonally across from Roosevelt's. So when I was writing the book, I just imagined all these people in their bathrobes at night on
the corridor of the second floor of the White House, waiting for the cocktail hour, or having
come from the cocktail hour and then being ready for bed. And wishing that when I've been up there
with Lyndon Johnson, when I was 24, I'd asked, where did Roosevelt sleep? Where was Eleanor?
Where was Churchill? But I wasn't thinking in those terms then.
So I happened to mention this on a radio program in Washington when No Ordinary Time came out.
And it happened Hillary Clinton then in the White House was listening.
So she promptly called me up at the radio station, invited me to sleep overnight in
the White House so I could wander the corridor together with her and her husband and figure
out where everyone had slept 50 years earlier.
That's amazing.
She invited me and my husband to sleep overnight, and we were given Winston Churchill's room,
which meant there was no way I could sleep. I certainly was sitting in the corner drinking
his brandy and smoking his cigar. But with my map, we figured out, yes, Chelsea Clinton is
sleeping where Harry Hopkins was, and the Clintons are sleeping where FDR was, and of course,
we were with Winston Churchill. So it was pretty exciting.
That is amazing.
Are there any particular routines, tools, anything that you use to rejuvenate or decompress yourself?
You have an incredibly busy schedule.
Just based on the amount of work you put out, it would seem that
you are certainly able to go, go, go. So what have you built into your schedule to help recharge the
batteries? Well, the most important thing I think is that once it's time for dinner, I don't work
late into the nights. I get up early in the morning. I can wake up at 5 or 5.30. I love getting
up before everybody else is around. And I don't look at email until 7 or 7.30. If it's winter,
I come downstairs and I have a fire that I can turn on, a fireplace. If it's summer and it's
air conditioned, I put a blanket on myself. And the rest of the household hasn't awakened yet.
So those are really precious hours to just read over what I'd written the day before,
not look at email,
not think of everything else I have to do that day.
And similarly, by 6.30 or so at night,
that's the end of work.
We go out to dinner every night, as I was saying,
and when I get to that bar with my friends,
it has nothing to do with what I was doing that day.
We're talking about the game of
the Red Sox, or we're talking about politics. And it's totally taking me away to another channel of
thought. And then because we've had season tickets for the Red Sox for the last 30 years, when I
walk into the baseball game, I obviously became a Red Sox fan after the Brooklyn Dodgers abandoned
me and went to Los Angeles. And I moved to Harvard and became a Red Sox fan, equally as crazy as I was as a Brooklyn Dodger fan. But once I walk into that ballpark
and I keep score still when I can there, I feel like I'm in another place and I don't think and
worry about what I'm doing. And then when I get home at night, I don't read history at night. I
read mysteries. Somehow that's what I need to do before going to sleep is to read some mystery. I don't know why, trying to put the pieces of the puzzle together, but just relaxing with a fishing trip at one point, 10-day fishing trip in the middle of the crisis of Britain before we were in the war.
And he came up with the whole idea of Lend-Lease on that fishing trip because he was away from the turmoil of Washington where the bureaucratic structure couldn't figure out how to lend money or lend supplies to England because of neutrality.
So he comes up with Lend-Lease.
Can you explain what that is? I'm going to admit my ignorance. I don't know what that is.
No, absolutely. So what happens is that when Britain is already being bombed by Germany,
and it's 1940, so we're not in the war yet. He knows that Churchill has run out of supplies.
Dunkirk had happened, so their destroyers were killed.
We need to somehow get our supplies and our weapons to England. But England has no money to buy them anymore. And Neutrality Act say we can't just give them to them. So he comes up with
the idea that we will lend you our weapons. And then after the war is over, you will get them
back to us as if a neighbor's house is on fire and you're
going to lend them your hose to save that neighbor's house, but also save your house too.
And then in return for giving the weapons, we got a lease on British bases all around the world.
It was really a good deal, a good Yankee bargain. But anyway, it eventually gave us money for
Russia. It gave us money for all of our allies, not just money, but supplies that were given to our allies all over the world because of leasing them rather than letting them buy it.
So on this 10-day fishing trip, he comes up with the idea that he can just lend the weapons and then get them back at the end.
And it's really leasing them rather than selling them or having them buy it.
So it was a simple thing, but nobody could figure that out in Washington. But the thing that
really struck me was that on evenings when FDR couldn't fall asleep, when there was unusual
tension and the poker game didn't do it or the cocktail hour didn't do it, he had this ritual
that helped him to fall asleep. He would close his eyes and imagine himself as a boy again at Hyde Park,
standing with his sled atop the steep hill behind his house. And he would go down the hill until he
reached the bottom and then slowly come back up again to the top. And then he'd do again,
go over and over again. It was his method of counting sheep. But the amazing thing is he's
also liberating himself from the paralysis by this imagining. And in that way,
he falls asleep. So and what Teddy Roosevelt would do when he was anxious about an election,
and this I've thought about a lot, actually, he would write letters to his friends and his family
saying, don't worry, if I don't win this election, I've had the best life so far, I've had a first
rate run. And it would be selfish of me to think
that if I don't win this one, everything is lost. And I've thought about that a lot. Actually,
I've thought about the fact that if I knew I were dying, and maybe this is a dramatic way of putting
it because he was just worrying about losing an election, but that I hope that it would give me
solace to think I've really had a good life and I felt like it was
what I wanted it to be. And I can't control that it won't go on any longer, but I can look back on
that just like Teddy looked back on his life. And I thought about it so much in these last months,
because my husband got cancer this last year and he was incredible during the whole time. I mean,
he's, he's still, even though he couldn't enjoy food anymore because of
the radiation that he went through, couldn't have his trademark cigars anymore, he went out every
night with us to our regular bar dinners, even though he was being fed by a feeding tube during
the day so that he would get the nourishment he needed. And I actually learned how to do the
feeding tube. I couldn't believe that I learned that. I was so afraid of my technical abilities and I had to face that fear and somehow do it. But in the days before he died,
all of our friends came to visit him because he was in hospice at home. And somehow magically,
he woke up when people would come and he had something to say to them, something funny or
something serious. And then he would go back to sleep and then wake up again. But in so many days
before that, he would say, he didn't necessarily know he was dying right then, but he knew that
he had cancer and that the radiation hadn't worked. And there was no sense of talking about
death. He was still working on a book that he hoped to finish. But he kept saying, I love this
town. I love what's happened to our life. Our kids are great. How lucky we are. And I just hope I can say that at the same way he did.
It made me less nervous about dying to watch the peacefulness of the way he handled it.
And there was an extraordinary moment.
I can't believe I'm really talking about all this right now, but I've somehow gotten into it, where the last thing he said to me, he just looked at me.
And he had this incredible light in his eyes.
Everybody said it was almost like magic. And he just said to me, you are a wonder. I mean,
I will take that those words with me the rest of my life. So I just hope I can be
as peaceful and loving as he was as he faced his own death.
Thank you so much for sharing that.
I don't know how I got into all that. But it has something to do with anxiety.
How you go to sleep at night. Yeah. I mean, the gratitude and appreciation that you're describing on so many different levels.
First and foremost, I'm sorry for your loss. I can't even imagine what that would be like.
But I thank you for sharing that.
No, you're welcome. He was great. 42 years of marriage and an extraordinary
life that he had. I mean, he was involved in so many things that people knew when the obituaries
came out, the breadth of it, people had known part of it. I mean, we knew he wrote for Lyndon
Johnson, the great We Shall Overcome speech. He wrote Bobby Kennedy's South Africa speech,
The Ripples of Hope. He worked with JFK when he was only in his 20s and worked
on some of his famous South American speeches, Al Gore's concession speech. But more important
than any of that, he was just involved in policy and in the great society and civil rights.
And then he was in the quiz show investigation. And that was made into a movie because he was
the young guy who discovered that those quiz shows, when you weren't even born,
those quiz shows were corrupted.
And then he wrote a play about Galileo and Pope Urban VIII
that was put on in London and in Boston.
It was such a wonderfully broad life
and he was a great guy
and a great husband and father to our kids.
Our kids adored him.
I feel like I'm unsure of where to go next with this that was such a beautiful
story uh and you're such a you're a gifted storyteller and it seems to go back a long way
you've honed that certainly over time and uh you have some of the most incredible, speaking of storytelling, some of the most incredible book blurbs and quotes from admirers of your work for this new book, Leadership in Turbulent Times.
You have Warren Buffett.
You have an incredible collection of fans who have provided you with words for this book. Why did you write this book? I mean,
you have such a keen sense of the finite amount of time that we're all given on this planet,
given your study of history, certainly mortality, your firsthand exposure to it.
Why put the time and energy into writing this book?
Well, you know, in some ways, I mean, I started it five years ago, so the times were not as
turbulent as they are now. But there was a sense that Washington was broken even then,
and that we weren't the kind of leadership on the two sides of the aisle that could get anything
done. And having lived through the 60s, having been there when the civil rights bill passed and the voting rights bill passed and
aid to education, Medicare, it was such a thrilling time to be young, to see our country
moving together in those directions. I'd written about these four guys before,
but I hadn't really looked at them as leaders and what it was that made them able to not just bring two sides of
the aisle together, but lead the country through such difficult times. And I realized that each of
the times in which they led were far worse than the time we're living in now. So that if we think
this is the worst of times, history will tell you, no, we've had more turbulent times before.
And we got through them when you had the right leader fitted for the right time. I mean, they
all had different leadership styles. They wouldn't have been fitted leader fitted for the right time. I mean, they all had different
leadership styles. They wouldn't have been fitted to be in the other time, but possibly so. It's not
just a matter of the constellation of traits you have. It's whether or not those behavioral patterns
fit the challenges of the moment of the time. But I think what I really wanted to do was just to
understand how they became leaders. I mean, we see them as iconic figures now. They're Mount
Rushmore. There's monuments. And I was giving a talk to a group of college students, you know,
four or five years ago, and one of them raised their hands and said, but how can we, I was talking
about leadership lessons from the White House, but how can I ever become one of them? It's too far
removed. So the way I start the book is when each one of them is running for office the first time. So they're not formed yet, and they're not going to necessarily succeed. Lincoln, in fact,
loses his first election when he's 23 years old. But incredibly, he says, if I lose, I've been
already too familiar with disappointment to be very chagrined. But I do promise I'll come back
five or six times and try again until it's too humiliating
and then I'll give up. That's incredible, that kind of resilience. Teddy Rose, they all suffered
adversity and I guess I was interested in that too, maybe because of my personal history of
my mother dying when I was 15, my father dying when I was in my 20s, so that I had encountered
death at an early age, but all of these people went through terrible adversity.
Lincoln had a near suicidal depression when his word was no longer his bond. He had broken his
engagement to Mary, and he was humiliating her by doing so. He had failed in bringing
infrastructure projects to Illinois, which he had promised to do, and he really was almost ready,
he said, to die, but when he was told by his best friend, you have to rally or you will die, they'd taken
all knives and scissors and razors from his room.
He said, I would just as soon die now, but I've not yet accomplished anything to make
any human being remember that I have lived.
So that was his lodestar.
That carried him through everything, all the losses that he had.
He tried for the Senate twice.
He lost.
He finally wins the presidency, and then he has the Civil War in front of him. So resilience and coming through adversity was
a key that I wanted to understand. It happened to all of them. Teddy Roosevelt lost his wife
and his mother on the same day in the same house in New York. His wife was pregnant, having a child.
The mother, only 49, had come to take care of her. The mother got typhoid fever and died,
and the wife died in childbirth on the same day in that house and he was so depressed he left the
state legislature he went to the badlands he said he had to be on his horse 15 hours a day he could
outride black care depression but more importantly he found solace in nature he found solace in the
west and became a different kind of leader because he understood the West as well as the East.
And he came back and then went on to this extraordinary political career. But it taught
him, he said, that you don't build your resume little by little. He had always thought before
he had a pattern worked out and no longer did that pattern seem. So he said, I'm just going to take
whatever job comes that seems really interesting to me because it may be my last job because he
now had a fatalism about life. So his friends say, why are you becoming civil service commissioner? Why are you police
commissioner? This is below you. He said, no, I want to do these things. And if it's my last job,
so be it. And then of course, most importantly, FDR. I mean, what he went through when he
contracted polio and was paralyzed from the waist down, it allowed him to emerge more warmhearted,
more connected to other people to whom fate had
dealt an unkind hand than he would have been before that. You know, he said, if you spend,
you learn humility through something like the polio and the paralysis. He said, if you spent
two years trying to move your big toe, which is frozen, and you finally move it and you celebrate
it, then the pressures of the presidency are not going to get to you. What he did at Warm Springs by bringing his fellow polios, as he called them, to enjoy
life again, not just to rehab themselves in the Warm Springs pool, but he would have wheelchair
dancers. They'd play games in the soccer games or badminton games in the pool. He made them learn
to live life again, even with the affliction of having been paralyzed.
And he emerged a different person.
I mean, it's extraordinary what he did.
And I just, on a human level, I found these stories so important to understand, much less because it made them great leaders.
I mean, when he first made an appearance after his polio, two years afterwards, he hadn't been in public life,
he was asked to give a nominating speech for Al Smith for president in 1924 at the Democratic
Convention. And he was very worried about how he could get from the seat with his braces locked in
place, he could make appear to be walking if he held on to the arm of somebody, his son, strong
arm, get to the podium. But he practiced and practiced
that distance in his own library time after time. And he was sweating and he got up to the podium
and he made it. And he would practice even when he couldn't walk at all, he would practice crawling
up the stairs, one stair at a time. And each stair, when he got higher, they'd have a celebration.
When you go through that adversity, you're a different person at the other end. And Lyndon Johnson, what happened to him was that he had a loss in a Senate race in 1941. And he then just accumulated wealth and power and was not as interested as he had once been
in making lives better for other people.
Then he had a near fatal heart attack in 1955.
And as you often read about with other people, it changed his attitude toward his life.
And he decided, I need something more than power.
I need to make that power put to a purpose.
And when he did finally
get into the presidency through the death of JFK, and he decided that the first thing he would go
for would be the Civil Rights Act and segregation in the South. Everybody said, it's too risky. You
can't do that. You'll never get through the filibuster and your presidency will be a failure
and you're not going to be able to win the next election. And he said, well, every now and then,
if you're playing poker, you got to throw in all your chips. So he had learned that through adversity. So I think what I wanted to do
was even though I knew them as family men, I knew their colleagues, I'd studied the times,
I'd studied the substance of their leadership. I wanted to understand how they became leaders,
how they got through adversity, how they developed, how they learned from their mistakes.
And then finally, the last part of the book are case studies, their pivotal moments in their histories, which are Lincoln's Emancipation
Proclamation, which is actually coming out in a Harvard Business Review, you know, in days,
actually. The Emancipation Proclamation as an example of transformative leadership.
And then with Teddy, it's crisis management leadership of the coal strike. And with FDR, it's turnaround leadership with the 100 days. And with, it's surprisingly, visionary leadership for LBJ on civil rights, though obviously there's a coda about the war in Vietnam where his leadership utterly failed and it was an epic failure of leadership. in graduate school, we used to talk about big things like ambition. Where does ambition come from? Where do you get a sense of purpose? How do you have meaning in your life? These are the
things you'd stay up with late at night to talk about. And I realized that that was what I wanted
to come back to. Probably, you know, this is in some ways a culmination of 50 years of studying
presidents, but it's at a different level. It's a more personal, emotional level about my guys,
as I call them. And I've really, it's really stretched me in a way because it meant drama and history and literature and not just biography, but other things to try and understand psychology, to understand how they led and how they became leaders. conversation. I've had so much fun. And I am completely certain that this book is going to be
so incredibly compelling and valuable to readers. Because as you said, it's taking such a personal
lens to the stories and lessons learned vis-a-vis these leaders that it transcends politics
and really touches upon so many layers of the human experience.
I really appreciate you taking the time to chat with me today and to share all this.
I enjoyed it so much.
Really, this is so weird to just be looking at
this little picture of your face and I feel like we're really talking to each other. It was
terrific. I thank you so much. Oh, it's entirely my pleasure. And I really encourage everybody to
take a look at your new book, Leadership, subtitled In Turbulent Times, couldn't be more timely and timeless at the same time.
And I will link to the book, of course, to other pieces of your writing in the show notes.
Everything we've discussed for people listening will be in the show notes, so you can find links there at tim.blog forward slash podcast. And Doris, I have to ask you one more question
before we wrap up, which is speaking myself as someone who occasionally has trouble sleeping.
Mysteries. Do you have any mysteries that you might recommend or types of mysteries?
Absolutely. In fact, I just go on reading one mystery writer, you know, it's sort of a binge
reading. So just recently, it's sort of a binge reading. So just
recently, it's been John Grisham. And the great thing was that I was already into John Grisham,
when a few months ago, he came up to Boston with four of his friends from old Mississippi,
including one who was 80 years old and had a bucket list of things he wanted to do and places
he wanted to see. And they were all on a bus together. And then they would come to these various places. They went to New York. Anyway,
when they came to the Kennedy Library, part of the bucket list of the older guy was for me to
talk to them for a couple hours. So Grisham was there. So it was so exciting. I mean, for me,
just having come into reading all of his works, to be actually meeting him and hearing him talk about how he creates a story and what
sparks his desire to write about a particular law firm or a particular medical problem that
happens. So yeah, there's something about mysteries that just allow me to transport
myself somewhere else. So I think Grisham's a great book. I've read Bill Clinton's new book,
and I'm reading Jake Tapper's book
right now, Hellfire Club, which is really good also. So I have several of them because when I'm
on a trip, I have to take a paperback because my suitcase is too heavy. So if I'm reading a
hardback, I have to have another one going at the same time, but I somehow get to sleep.
Well, no one will ever accuse you of being an underachiever, you are so gifted at telling stories that are worth
telling and also doing such an incredible depth of research to piece it together in a narrative
and a story arc that is easily digested. I really appreciate you doing the work that you do.
And once again, thank you so much for the time today.
I thank you for yours. Wow.
And to everybody listening, like I said, links to everything are in the show notes,
Tim.blog.com forward slash podcast. And until next time, thank you for listening.
Hey guys, this is Tim again. Just a few more things before you take off. Number one,
this is five bullet Friday. Do you want to get
a short email from me? Would you enjoy getting a short email from me every Friday that provides a
little morsel of fun for the weekend? And Five Bullet Friday is a very short email where I share
the coolest things I've found or that I've been pondering over the week. That could include
favorite new albums that I've discovered. It could include gizmos and gadgets and all sorts of weird shit that I've somehow dug up in the
world of the esoteric as I do. It could include favorite articles that I've read and that I've
shared with my close friends, for instance. And it's very short. It's just a little tiny bite
of goodness before you head off for the weekend.
So if you want to receive that, check it out. Just go to 4hourworkweek.com. That's
4hourworkweek.com all spelled out and just drop in your email and you will get the very next one.
And if you sign up, I hope you enjoy it. This episode is brought to you by Inktel.
I use them personally. Ever since I wrote the 4-hour workweek, I've been asked over and over again how I choose to delegate tasks,
how I do 80-20 analysis, and so on. At the root of many of those decisions is a simple question,
actually two questions. Number one, how can I invest money to improve my quality of life?
I use that in investing as well. The second, how can I spend a little money or moderate money
to save significant time? Inktel is one of those investments. They're a turnkey solution for all
of your imaginable customer care needs. I used Inktel during the launch of the 4-Hour Body,
which was very, very involved. And they provided 24-7 customer service for my land rush campaign
because it was critical for me to take care of
every person who purchased my books and participated. This allowed me to focus on
the things that I am better at, my strengths, like the marketing plan that we'd worked on for
six months, implementing that. Inktel trains their experienced customer service reps to know your
business and your products inside and out and make your customers raving fans. They answer more than a million customer service requests every
year, and they can do so across all platforms, including email, phone, social media, text,
even chat. Leaving your customers with poor service or just mediocre service, which by the
way, in a competitive pool is a huge liability. Long wait times or
unanswered messages carries a massive cost and risk to your business. Intel removes the logistics
and headaches of this type of communication, allowing you to focus on your strengths and
grow your business. It can be a real competitive advantage. And I see many, many e-commerce
companies and tech companies thinking of customer service as a good enough checkbox or an afterthought. And just like Airbnb, you design in innovative ways to be a competitor and to win, you can do the to $10,000 off your startup fees and costs by visiting
Inktel.com forward slash Tim. So check it out. For more info, go to Inktel.com, I-N-K-T-E-L.com
forward slash Tim. This episode is brought to you by Audible, which has the largest selection
of audiobooks on the planet. I've used Audible for many years, and I have several audiobooks to recommend right off the bat if you're looking
for a new one. Ready Player One by Ernest Cline, you may have heard of it. The Tao of Seneca by
Seneca, if you want to hear my favorite collection of letters of all time, as well as The Graveyard
Book by Neil Gaiman, which is a fiction book I use to reintroduce nonfiction purists to the beauty and truth
and enjoyment of fiction. Graveyard book. It is incredible. And I like the version that
Neil reads himself, but the entire ensemble cast is also fun. Audible members get a credit every
month, good for any audiobook in the store, regardless of price, and unused credits roll
over to the next month. So if you didn't like your audiobook, no problem. You can exchange it, no questions asked.
Plus, your books are yours to keep. With Audible, you can go back and re-listen anytime,
even if you cancel your membership. And for some books, again, Graveyard Book by Neil Gaiman,
I've listened many, many times. You may even just start over as soon as you finish it the first time.
Audible also helps you to listen to more books by letting you switch seamlessly between devices, picking up exactly
where you left off. Whether it's on your phone, through your car, from the tablet, or at home,
on Amazon Echo, whatever, you can get through tons of books, hands and eyes free, while doing
almost anything. So that is part of the beauty of audio. It is a secondary activity when you're
walking the dog, cooking, whatever it might be. Audible content includes an unmatched selection of audiobooks, original audio shows, news, comedy,
and much more from leading audiobook publishers, broadcasters, entertainers, magazine and newspaper
publishers, and business information providers. Maybe that's what I am, a business information
provider. And right now, Audible is offering listeners of this podcast a free audiobook with a 30-day trial membership.
So check it out.
Go to audible.com forward slash Tim and browse the unmatched selection of audio programs.
Download a title free and start listening.
It's super simple.
Go to audible.com forward slash Tim or text Tim to 500-500 on your telephone to get started today.
Check it out.