The Tim Ferriss Show - #473: Naval Ravikant on Happiness, Reducing Anxiety, Crypto Stablecoins, and Crypto Strategy
Episode Date: October 15, 2020Naval Ravikant (@naval) is the co-founder and chairman of AngelList. He is an angel investor and has invested in more than 100 companies, including many mega-successes such as Twitt...er, Uber, Notion, OpenDoor, Postmates, and Wish. You can subscribe to Naval, his podcast on wealth and happiness, on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, Overcast, or wherever you get your podcasts. You can also find his blog at nav.al.For more Naval plus Tim, check out my wildly popular interview with him from 2015, which was nominated for “Podcast of the Year.”Please enjoy!This episode is brought to you by Wealthfront! Wealthfront pioneered the automated investing movement, sometimes referred to as ‘robo-advising,’ and they currently oversee $20 billion of assets for their clients. It takes about three minutes to sign up, and then Wealthfront will build you a globally diversified portfolio of ETFs based on your risk appetite and manage it for you at an incredibly low cost. Smart investing should not feel like a rollercoaster ride. Let the professionals do the work for you. Go to Wealthfront.com/Tim and open a Wealthfront account today, and you’ll get your first $5,000 managed for free, for life. Wealthfront will automate your investments for the long term. Get started today at Wealthfront.com/Tim.*This episode is also brought to you by ShipStation. Do you sell stuff online? Then you know what a pain the shipping process is. ShipStation was created to make your life easier. Whether you’re selling on eBay, Amazon, Shopify, or over 100 other popular selling channels, ShipStation lets you access all of your orders from one simple dashboard, and it works with all of the major shipping carriers, locally and globally, including FedEx, UPS, and USPS. Tim Ferriss Show listeners get to try ShipStation free for 60 days by using promo code TIM. There’s no risk, and you can start your free trial without even entering your credit card info. Just visit ShipStation.com, click on the microphone at the top of the homepage, and type in TIM!***If you enjoy the podcast, would you please consider leaving a short review on Apple Podcasts/iTunes? It takes less than 60 seconds, and it really makes a difference in helping to convince hard-to-get guests. I also love reading the reviews!For show notes and past guests, please visit tim.blog/podcast.Sign up for Tim’s email newsletter (“5-Bullet Friday”) at tim.blog/friday.For transcripts of episodes, go to tim.blog/transcripts.Discover Tim’s books: tim.blog/books.Follow Tim:Twitter: twitter.com/tferriss Instagram: instagram.com/timferrissFacebook: facebook.com/timferriss YouTube: youtube.com/timferrissPast guests on The Tim Ferriss Show include Jerry Seinfeld, Hugh Jackman, Dr. Jane Goodall, LeBron James, Kevin Hart, Doris Kearns Goodwin, Jamie Foxx, Matthew McConaughey, Esther Perel, Elizabeth Gilbert, Terry Crews, Sia, Yuval Noah Harari, Malcolm Gladwell, Madeleine Albright, Cheryl Strayed, Jim Collins, Mary Karr, Maria Popova, Sam Harris, Michael Phelps, Bob Iger, Edward Norton, Arnold Schwarzenegger, Neil Strauss, Ken Burns, Maria Sharapova, Marc Andreessen, Neil Gaiman, Neil de Grasse Tyson, Jocko Willink, Daniel Ek, Kelly Slater, Dr. Peter Attia, Seth Godin, Howard Marks, Dr. Brené Brown, Eric Schmidt, Michael Lewis, Joe Gebbia, Michael Pollan, Dr. Jordan Peterson, Vince Vaughn, Brian Koppelman, Ramit Sethi, Dax Shepard, Tony Robbins, Jim Dethmer, Dan Harris, Ray Dalio, Naval Ravikant, Vitalik Buterin, Elizabeth Lesser, Amanda Palmer, Katie Haun, Sir Richard Branson, Chuck Palahniuk, Arianna Huffington, Reid Hoffman, Bill Burr, Whitney Cummings, Rick Rubin, Dr. Vivek Murthy, Darren Aronofsky, and many more.See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
Transcript
Discussion (0)
This episode is brought to you by Tonal, T-O-N-A-L. I'm super excited about this one,
and I was skeptical of it in the beginning. Tonal, quote, Tonal is the world's most intelligent home
gym and personal trainer, end quote. That's the tagline from their website, folks, to give you
the one-sentence summary. And this device, it's really a system, is perfect for anyone looking
to take their home workouts to the next level or someone who just wants to get maximum
bang for the buck in a tiny, tiny footprint of space. Tonal is precision engineered to be the
world's most advanced strength studio and personal trainer. It uses breakthrough technology of all
different types to help get you stronger, faster. I was introduced to Tonal by three different
friends. All of them are tech savvy. One of them is a former competitive skier who's
doubled his strength in a number of movements using Tonal, even though he has a long athletic
background. And I'll paint a picture for you. By eliminating traditional metal weights,
dumbbells and barbells, Tonal can deliver 200 pounds of resistance, which doesn't sound like
a lot, but it's actually, it feels like a lot more at the high end in a device smaller than a flat screen tv and you can
perform at least 150 different exercises and these different technologies are exclusive to tonal and
you can dial weights up and down with the touch of a button in one pound increments using magnets
and electricity so the movement is extremely smooth and even though I have a home gym already in my garage, I'm still getting
a tonal installed. I've used tonal for multiple workouts now to do things I just cannot do in my
home gym, such as the chop and lift exercises from the four-hour body, all sorts of cable exercises
that would usually involve much, much bigger piece of equipment. Eccentric training. For instance, you can do, to give a
simple example, bicep curls where you are lifting, let's just say 20 pounds in each hand up, and then
Tonal will automatically increase the weight because you can lower more than you can lift
to say 25 or 30 pounds on the way down. And I do kettlebell swings. I do all sorts of deadlifts,
this, that, and the other thing. And after one workout on Tonal focusing on pulling, I was blasted for a full week. It's
really incredible what you can do with eccentrics. They also have all sorts of other really, really
cool advantages that you can apply to any of your favorite movements. Tonal learns from your
strength and provides suggested weight recommendations for every move with detailed
progress reports to help you see your strengths grow. Tonal also has a growing
library of expert-led workouts by motivating coaches from strength training to cardio. So
you can do really just about everything. Every program is personalized to your body
using artificial intelligence and other aspects of the engineering and smart features check your
form in real time, just like a personal trainer.
So check it out. Tritonal, T-O-N-A-L, the world's smartest home gym for 30 days in your home. And
if you don't love it, you can return it for a full refund. Visit www.tonal.com, T-O-N-A-L.com.
And for a limited time, get $100 off of smart accessories when you use promo code TIM21 like I'm ready for my first drink
at checkout. That's www.tonal.com, promo code TIM21, T-I-M-21. Tonal, be your strongest.
This episode is brought to you by ShipStation. The holiday season is fast approaching and we
know that people will be buying more stuff online than ever before. All of these trends
to e-commerce have been accelerated due to COVID and much more. If you're an e-commerce seller,
are you ready to meet the demands of a record-breaking online shopping season?
Be ready with ShipStation. ShipStation.com is the fastest,
easiest, and most affordable way to manage and ship your orders. In just a few clicks,
you're managing orders, printing out discounted shipping labels, and getting your products out fast. Happier holidays for you and your customers. ShipStation takes the hassle out of holiday
shipping. No matter where you're selling, on Amazon, Etsy, your website via Shopify
or other platforms, ShipStation brings all of your orders into one simple interface. And ShipStation
works with all of the major carriers, USPS, FedEx, UPS, even international. You can compare and
choose the best shipping solution every time, and you can access the same postage discounts that are
usually reserved for large Fortune 500 companies.
It's no wonder that ShipStation is the number one choice of online sellers. And right now, my listeners, that's you guys, can try ShipStation free for 60 days when you use offer code TIM.
Just go to the homepage, ShipStation.com, click on the microphone at the top of the homepage,
and type in TIM, T-I-M. That's it. Go to ShipStation.com, then enter offer code Tim.
ShipStation.com. Make ship happen. Optimal Minimal.
This episode is brought to you by AG1, the daily foundational nutritional supplement that supports
whole body health. I do get asked a lot what I would take if I could only take one supplement,
and the true answer is invariably AG1. It simply covers a ton
of bases. I usually drink it in the mornings and frequently take their travel packs with me
on the road. So what is AG1? AG1 is a science-driven formulation of vitamins, probiotics,
and whole food sourced nutrients. In a single scoop, AG1 gives you support for the brain,
gut, and immune system. So take ownership of your health and try AG1 today.
You will get a free one-year supply of vitamin D
and five free AG1 travel packs
with your first subscription purchase.
So learn more, check it out.
Go to drinkag1.com slash Tim.
That's drinkag1, the number one.
Drinkag1.com slash Tim.
Last time, drinkag1.com slash tim last time drink ag1.com slash tim check it out
at this altitude i can run flat out for a half mile before my hands start shaking
can i ask you a personal question now what is the appropriate time
i'm a cybernetic organism living tissue over metal endoskeleton. The Tim Ferriss Show.
Hello, boys and girls, ladies and germs. This is Tim Ferriss. Welcome to another episode of
The Tim Ferriss Show, where it is always my job to interview and deconstruct world-class
performers from all different fields. My guest today is a dear friend. He does very few podcasts. We're
going to get into a disclaimer around that. Naval Ravikant, you can find him at Naval,
N-A-V-A-L, on Twitter. He is the co-founder and chairman of AngelList. He's an angel investor and
has invested in more than 100 companies, including many mega successes such as Twitter, Uber,
Notion, Opendoor, Postmates, and Wish. It is a long, long list. You can subscribe
to Naval, his podcast on wealth and happiness on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or wherever you get your
podcasts. You can also find his blog at nav.al. For even more Naval, plus Tim, that's me, check
out my wildly popular interview with him from 2015, which was nominated for podcast of the year. You can find that and resources and
much more at tim.blog slash Naval. Naval, welcome back to the show.
Yeah, thanks for having me. If I recall correctly, I was crushed on podcast of the year by Jamie Foxx.
That's right. I need weaker competition this time around. If you could just tone it down
this year, please. I will do my best. Yeah. Jamie, basically, I could have been a completely non-responsive
critical care patient as long as the equipment functioned. Jamie Foxx is the consummate performer,
so he is formidable competition in podcasts, but you are a different breed.
And I understand that you get asked to do podcasts a lot. So what type of disclaimer would you like to provide?
I don't go on other people's podcasts anymore.
I had to make an exception for you
because you're the OG.
You put me on the map.
You're a good friend.
And frankly, I wouldn't even be known if it weren't for you.
So I definitely have to thank you
and honor your request to have me back.
I generally don't do podcasts anymore
or at least other people's podcasts for a couple of reasons. First is I just don't believe in sequels. I think sequels
suck, right? You look at sequels on in movies and whatnot, and they're usually pretty bad. They cost
three times as much, you know, they're long winded. The person now has an ego and a reputation to
defend. They've already said what they were going to say. So they're just repeating themselves to
some level. And, you know, maybe the first run, they took an idea they've had
for a decade or three decades, and they expounded on it, and it sounded great. And then in the sequel,
whether it's a book or a movie, they have to come up with something equally good, but they only have
two years to do it, and it's just really difficult to do. So I think sequels just make everybody look
bad, and I'm not a fan of sequels. Yet yet here we are the thing about sequels is they make money people want them uh people crave them because there's a certain
familiarity to it but hopefully we won't embarrass ourselves too much so yes i don't do sequels we'll
make an exception here and kind of see how it goes just don't have jamie foxx back on at least not at
least not this year well i am looking right now as a framework for starting this conversation at your Twitter
account. And that might seem like an odd place for me to start. People who listen to this show
a lot will know that I don't often do that. But I want to note two things. You follow zero people
on Twitter, yet you have almost a million followers. And also trending right now in
the United States is Jamie Foxx. Hilarious. He's right next to you. He's back. Cannot keep
this guy down. So let's talk about your account. I find your account fascinating. I find your use
of Twitter fascinating. And I'd like to begin with a photograph of a professor at a blackboard
that you have as your profile, I suppose, header. Who is the person in the photograph?
I think I recognize this person,
but I want to hear you describe
why you chose this photograph and who it is.
Yeah, that's Professor Richard Feynman,
who was a pioneer in the field of quantum electrodynamics.
He was part of the Manhattan Project.
He's known colloquially for his book,
Surely You're Joking, Mr. Feynman,
and a couple of related ones like
so what do you care what other people think but he's also very well regarded in the field of
physics obviously he passed away a while back but he invented a lot of quantum electrodynamics
feinman path integrals he was part of the manhattan project brilliant brilliant guy and i loved him
because feinman was one of the first characters that I encountered that did science and serious work and was accomplished in so-called real life,
but was also like a, he was a character. He was a happy person. He was deeply philosophical.
He didn't take himself nor life too seriously. He appreciated the mysteries of life. He appreciated
living life and he had a lot of fun along the way. So it was kind of,
to me, he was like a full stack intellectual hacker of life. And it was just very inspirational
to me as a kid growing up. You know, even though I read a lot of philosophy and, you know, just
kind of normal nonfiction, my hero, and even though I'm in the business world, the tech world,
my heroes are scientists because I think applied science is the engine that pulls humanity forward. It eventually becomes technology. That technology
allows us to engage in all kinds of pursuits around civilization rather than be scrapping for
just basic substance and survival. And so I think scientists are still the most unsung heroes of
human history, and Feynman was one of the greats. And he was admirable in many regards as to how he lived his life. Although I think recently they tried to cancel him, but you know,
they try to cancel everybody.
Feynman is a character, certainly he is a character, was a character, and a figure who
has fascinated me for decades. And actually, I collect very few things, but managed to buy some
of his papers and drawings at auction a handful of years ago, because it was the first time that they had been made available. So, hey, I can show you some I don't have the scientific literacy to fully
appreciate the genius that he brought to bear on physics, for instance. But I could appreciate his
cleverness and his questioning of assumptions and also his distaste for uniforms and other
accolades, most notably some of the prizes that he was awarded that he seemed to
have particular dislike for on some level. Yeah, he famously said that science is the
belief in the ignorance of experts. And it's so funny because these days, you know, so many people
are on Twitter saying, believe in science or according to science. And you have to realize
there's no such thing as science with a capital S.
Science, the foundation of science is doubt.
It is all about falsifiability.
David Deutsch, who's kind of one of my current modern living physicist heroes,
is a Popperian.
Like he subscribes to Karl Popper's philosophy. And he basically says that, you know, if it's not falsifiable, it's not scientific.
If you can't prove it false, if it's true up or down or left or right, it's not science.
It doesn't require belief.
You should be able to challenge it at all times.
It should make risky predictions that are not obvious, and those predictions should
then be tested.
And you shouldn't be able to, after the fact, move the goalposts or change how the predictions
were set up.
And so those are the hallmarks of good science, falsifiability, independent verifiability,
and making risky and narrow predictions with details that are hard to vary both before and
after the fact. And that's how you end up with good science and good explanations,
not by people on Twitter voting. That's politics. So everything has become politics now. Now science has become politics too. People politicize it and there's big science,
but I think Feynman would be very unhappy with that. He was just a generally happy character
and non-political intended not to get involved in these things. But I think he would realize
that that is not actually science, but it's masquerades as science. It's almost becoming
social science. And, you know, going to Twitter, like Nassim Taleb is one of my favorite Twitter follows,
even though he's a bit, you know.
Cantankerous.
Yeah, he's cantankerous.
Yeah, he annoys people for sure.
But, you know, you want to hear the truth, you got to be prepared to be hurt a little bit.
But he had a great tweet recently that I retweeted, which I'm sure made a lot of people mad,
where he said the opposite of education is not ignorance. The opposite of education is an education in social
science. And I thought that was hilarious. But, you know, it hurts because there's some truth to
it. If there was no truth to it, it wouldn't hurt at all. You know, if I said Tim Ferriss is fat,
that would just bounce right off of you. But if I said, you know, Tim Ferriss and Naval are fake
gurus, that might hit us, right? Because we suspect at some deep level, there's a part of that that's
true. So I think the same way, like with, you know, social science does kind of lead you down
the road to ignorance, because it's about social. And anything social is about group think and group
behavior. And, you know, individuals can search for truth, but groups search for consensus,
because if a group doesn't have consensus, it can't get along. If it can't get along,
it falls apart and there's conflict. And so the last place you're going to find truth
is in large groups. And the moment you make science about large groups and about voting
and about consensus, you're not really practicing science anymore.
Yeah. And the science with the
capital s is dangerous very dangerous no it's just as you mentioned yeah it's propaganda it's and
then it becomes like macroeconomics again another teleb line he says it's easier to macro bullshit
than it's a micro bullshit and so big science is the equivalent of macroeconomics whereas
the equivalent of microeconomics is little science which which is, you know, me in a lab or me with my computer and trying out various things. And so you can,
just like with macroeconomics, you can pick and choose whatever data you want to prove whatever
point you want. With big science, you can pick or choose whatever papers you want. So look at the
fights right now on the internet about what COVID means. You can go down that hall of mirrors and find
scientific quote-unquote substantiation for many points of view, depending on which papers you
choose to cherry pick. And so then we're reduced back to consensus. But again, science isn't done
by consensus. It should be done by experimentation, verifiability, falsifiability, rigorous testing.
And, you know, in an ideal science world, you don't go and survey
10,000 scientists, you actually pick the one smartest scientist. But that's very hard to do.
Now, no one can agree on who the smartest scientist is. So unfortunately, I think that
the nature of what science is, is being corrupted. And that started the day we let the so-called
social sciences masquerade as sciences. You know, the day we said psychology is a science
and politics can be a science and so on,
and you can apply the scientific methods to those things,
then I think that's the day we start to corrupt science,
or at least the word science.
So real science, you know, these days is relegated to a very small corner.
You know, physics, maybe like molecular biology and chemistry,
mathematics, theory of computation computation but it's a
fairly limited set yeah yeah very quantitatively uh literate friend of mine said at one point
most of the disciplines that have science at the end of them are not actually science
all the exceptions right so computer science computer science if it's hard neuroscience right be an
exception but very often if there's science appended to it it is not in fact something that
is falsifiable according to someone like carl popper right it cannot be it cannot be proven
or disproven using experiment at least that's. If there isn't some experiment that could theoretically
disprove it, then it's not science.
Yeah, it's like Honest Abe's
law firm, right? If he needs to
put honest in the title, then you have to wonder.
So the same
way if you have to put science in the word,
other than, as you said, computer science and neuroscience,
you sort of have to wonder.
Let's look at a couple of quotes from Feynman.
There are a few that I think about a lot, and these are on Goodreads. But
number one, and I think this is really applicable with respect to science in media,
particularly a term that bothers me a lot, which is studies prove or studies show, just like capital S science shows, which isn't
really a thing. The facts can get contorted quite a lot. The quote from Feynman is, I learned very
early the difference between knowing the name of something and knowing something.
This is a very deep point. And I think that a lot of times that we just define something
with another definition, or we just throw out a piece of jargon as if that means we know something. And, you know, it's a difference between memorization and understanding. Understanding is a thing that you want, you want to be able to describe it in 10 different ways in simple sentences from the ground up and rederive whatever you need. If you just memorize, you're lost. So I think this is one of the things that I get stuck on a lot, which is like, just keep going back and reading the basics over and over trying to
understand them. So don't necessarily have that tall edifice of knowledge that is very seductive
in academia. But as anyone who's operated much in the real world knows, in the real world, you get
paid for making good judgments and decisions based on the basics. For example, if you know arithmetic, statistics, probability at a high level, and you understand some basic math, you have all the math that you
need to succeed in life. You don't need calculus or even trigonometry or number theory or set theory
or any of these kinds of things unless you're going into a deeply technical field or mathematics.
Yet we spend so much of our time in school covering
pre-calc and calculus when the kids who are taking those courses aren't even that good at basic math.
So the basics are really important. That's the steel frame, the foundation for understanding
that you need to get through life. And too much of it is reduced to memorization and understanding
things as names and as definitions. i think the feynman example
is you know his dad would take him for walks and they would see birds and you know his dad would
say this bird is a such and such warbler but that doesn't tell you anything about the bird that
tells you about humans and humans gave that bird that name really the bird you know it likes to
stand on one leg at this point it It likes to pick at lice and its
feathers doing this, and it likes to eat these kinds of things. And it flies, you know, this way
for that reason, and these are its predators, and these are its prey. So, I mean, those are the kinds
of things that really give you understanding. Who cares what the bird is called? The name of the
bird is irrelevant. And you see a lot of professions in professional life, this happens a lot,
which is jargon. People try to protect their knowledge by basically saying, well, I understand this term and that term and what this term means. But the reality is most people don't actually know
what these things mean underneath. I find this very common in accounting. A lot of business people
don't know accounting. And even a lot of accountants will have fancy words for things,
but when you dig underneath, they don't really understand the principle of what's going
on below it. And if you just understand the principles, and even if you don't understand
the words, you will have an advantage in, for example, negotiating deals because you'll
understand underneath how the pieces are actually moving on the board as opposed to what they're called. And I just want to point out, developing that
foundational knowledge is akin to learning the basics of shooting foul throws in basketball.
It is not becoming Michael Jordan, right? With a very limited set of colors with which to paint,
if you spend a few weeks, maybe not even a few weeks, a few days with a decent YouTube tutorial or book
gathering the basics of accounting, you will be able to make significantly better decisions.
I just want to underscore that this is not a master's degree or a PhD or any type of commitment
like that that can separate you from the pack in terms of advantage.
Well, just run a business. Run Unlimited Stand. It'll teach you better accounting than out of a
textbook. Now, you may need to learn certain conventions because you need those to communicate
with other humans so that there's efficient communication. When you say one thing,
they understand that thing. And that's where jargon can be useful because it can be a compressed way
of communicating knowledge rather than having to, you know, try and explain it from first principles every time. But when it's not useful is when it
becomes a substitute for understanding. Understanding is a thing, you know, that's what
separates humans from the other animals. That's what separates us from the robots, that we actually
understand what's going on underneath. Like, for example, in the artificial intelligence world,
there's a new algorithm, GPT-3, which is the RAGE, which is text completion. So people are saying, hey, I can make
up like really plausible sounding writing. And so the AI is here is going to take all the jobs. Well,
no, because the AI doesn't actually know what's going on underneath. If I were to ask it a
question of, well, why did you write that? Or what does that mean? It would very quickly fall apart.
So you always want to strive for understanding, not for memorization. You should be able to re-articulate it five different ways
in every language that you know, otherwise you don't really understand it. And the good news is
you don't have to understand that many things. You know, while we're on the topic of Feynman,
one of the quotes from him is he says, like, you know, nature uses only the longest threads to weave her tapestry.
And so what he means by that is that there's only a few basic principles
that you have to understand to kind of understand
the sum total of our knowledge in physics.
There's not a lot.
And as physics becomes more and more advanced,
we're actually unifying theories.
We're collapsing them into one thing,
like we do with electricity and magnetism
or statistical mechanics and heat and thermodynamics.
You know, those turn out to be one thing.
So we're trying to do currently
with gravity and quantum mechanics.
We're trying to reconcile them in quantum loop gravity
or in string theory or what have you.
So you just kind of have to understand
a few of the basic things,
and then you'll see them recurring
over and over and over again. Like, for example example i study and read physics and computer science just for
entertainment i don't there's no practical application for me but there's this really
interesting theory i was reading about called solomonoff induction and it's basically formalizes
occam's razor which is that the shortest answer is the correct one. But it's more advanced than that. But it
basically says, like, if you want to figure out why something happened, you take all the different
reasons why it could have happened, all the different theories why it could have happened,
and then you sort of weigh each of them based on how compressed they are, how short they are,
how likely they are. And then that gives you the probability, that kind of gives you the explanation for why that theory happened. Now Feynman has a very similar and elegant thing
in a completely different field, where he basically says if you want to understand why this
particle took that path, why did this photon take that path, what you do is you look at all the
possible paths that photon could have taken, and you sort of weigh them, you sum them probabilistically
based on how likely that path was. It's actually the same observation, except one is about photons
traveling through space-time, and the other is about the causality and why an event may have
happened and what the theory is behind that. And these are two completely different fields and two
completely different characters thinking about two completely different things. And these are very, very fundamental theories in their fields. But deep down,
they're actually the same, which to me is fascinating. It just shows how much of what we
look at as complexity actually emerges from a set of very simple rules. And it's just fascinating.
So understanding is a thing to strive for, not the words.
So even though I use the fancy words like Solomon of induction
and Feynman's path integral theory,
whatever the heck it's called,
I don't even know what the actual name is.
The name is irrelevant.
It's the concept that's fascinating.
You spoke to learning accounting
through building a business.
Let's segue to business.
Your pin tweet is a tweet storm.
So it's a series of tweets, the headline of which is how to get rich. And then in parentheses,
without getting lucky, it has, as we record this 44.8 thousand retweets, 110 plus thousand
favorites. We're not going to go through this whole thing. It's quite long, but I'm curious to
know what parts of it you think
people are paying too much attention to or overemphasize and what parts of it do you wish
people would pay more attention to? Because there are many different pieces of advice in this thread.
That tweet storm is a series of principles that I kind of wrote for myself in my head when I was 13
and I was trying to figure out how to make money. And I kind of came with a framework of how to be rich, but not by accident to do it in a way that I could repeat it over and
over. And I would leave very little up to chance because I think there's kind of this, it's not
completely mythology, but there's this belief that, you know, to make money, you either have
to be born rich or you have to be privileged, or you have to be in the right circles or have to
get lucky. And I think that there are still ways to accomplish the original American dream, which is, you know, make money, but do it in a
deliberate, systematic way. And when I say money, I mean wealth. I don't mean like a law firm where
you make, you know, a couple hundred bucks an hour, but you're still tied to the clock. I mean,
like when you wake up when you want, you go to sleep when you want, you know, you live where
you want and you have freedom. So to me, the purpose of money is freedom. And for that, you live where you want and you have freedom. So to me, the purpose of money is freedom.
And for that, you need to create wealth. And can you do it ethically? Can you do it sustainably?
Can you do it reliably? Can you do it with people that you like? Can you do it doing things that you enjoy? And I think it's absolutely possible. And I like to think that I'm at least one of many
living proof points for that. You know, Warren Buffett and Charlie Munger are examples of others.
Not that I'm in their status of their league, but you know, other people have done it. So
that was the whole point of that framework. And the tweet storm, I just wrote it down one day.
And it's funny because obviously I have some experience at Twitter, so I know how to craft
things. But I think that was written back in the day when the tweet limit was 140 characters too,
so it was harder. But I just woke up one
night when I've been thinking about it, and I wrote out the whole tweet storm almost exactly
like you see it. And there are lots and lots of missing pieces. Obviously, that is just a very
high-level, very Zen-cone-like or haiku-like or even Hallmark card-like framework. It's missing
a ton of details, which I then tried to extrapolate on in my podcast series on the same topic. What do people overemphasize and what are people missing?
And actually, Naval, let me pause to just read a few of them. This is from May 31, 2018. So a few
examples, and you don't have to comment on these specific examples, but just for people who
haven't seen this, I want to give them an idea. So the second of these
various tweets in this sequence is understand that ethical wealth creation is possible. If you
secretly despise wealth, it will elude you. End of that particular tweet. And then there's another
one. You're not going to get rich renting out your time. You must own equity, a piece of a business
to gain your financial freedom. That one right there is the most important one, which is you basically, in modern life,
what happens is like the person who is the best at doing something in the world will get to do it
for the entire world through a combination of leverage and distribution, accountability,
and specific knowledge, all of which I talk about in the tweet storm. If you're the best in the
world at doing something, like if you're the best teacher in the world at math, you should be teaching the entire world math. If you're the best
podcast interviewer, you should be doing all the top interviews and their returns will accrue to
you, especially in this highly digital world where we live in, where the cost of distributing
something is very close to zero. And so what you kind of want to do is you want to productize
yourself into a business and then you want to own that business.
That is the way to make wealth.
A clear example is the Tim Ferriss podcast and the Tim Ferriss brand, right?
It's an eponymous brand.
Your name is on it.
You're leveraged through this podcast and through the books that you write and through the army of followers that you have on the various media platforms.
And you're taking on big accountability and there's specific knowledge only you know how to be tim ferris the learning machine who can then connect to other learners
and extract value out of them and share that with the audience so that's an example of you having
productized yourself but ultimately you own the tim ferris business now you can go lower levels
down from that you don't have to own the entire business you could be an investor in public
equities or private stocks you could be a partner in a private business. You could be an employee of a startup where you
have stock options. But if you don't own a piece of a business, it's going to be extremely hard
to get wealthy. It'll be nearly impossible, almost not worth that route. So I think that is the most
important foundational tweet. I think where people kind of miss the plot the most, though,
is we have pain avoidance in life. We don't want to face things where it's clear we've made bad
decisions. Because one good definition of suffering is that's the moment when you see
things that they clearly are, and you kind of don't like what you see. Like, for example,
if you and your spouse have been fighting for a long time, you know, you've kind of been sweeping under the rug and you've sort of been suffering along, but you're sweeping
under the rug and then you get divorced.
At that moment, you can no longer unsee all the damage that was in the relationship and
what all the consequences are.
They're real.
The same way if you haven't been taking care of your health, but then suddenly you find
out that you've just fallen off a cliff and something irreversibly bad has happened.
The moment of suffering arrives and you're in pain because you can no longer unsee this thing. You can no longer avoid it. So I think
the same way, the unfortunate part is that a lot of these principles are written for young people
because you can set yourself on a certain trajectory in life earlier. And so, for example,
if you went and you got a PhD in a social science, now I'm basically saying, hey, learn the code.
You're going to avoid that.
You're not going to want to see that
because you have all this sunk cost in the degree.
So I think a lot of people don't want to pick up
the new skills that are necessary,
or they don't want to, for example, physically move,
or they don't want to disappoint the people
in the relationships that they already have
to make room for new relationships.
So everybody wants to start where they are.
Nobody wants to go back down the mountain
to find the path going to the top. Everybody wants to stay on the path they're on, maybe make a few
tweaks and get to the top. Or like Charlie Munger jokes, you know, people always ask me, like, how
do I get to be rich like you except quicker? I don't want to be the old rich guy. I want to be
the young rich guy. So I think these are the hard parts. The hard parts are not the learning,
it's the unlearning. It's not the climbing up the mountain, it's the going back down to the bottom of the mountain and starting over.
It's the beginner's mind that every great artist or every great business person has,
which is you have to be willing to start from scratch. You have to be willing to hit reset
and go back to zero because you have to realize that what you already know and what you're already
doing is actually an impediment to your full potential. And most people just don't want to acknowledge that. And I'm guilty of that too.
That's just human nature. I'm not faulting anybody for it, but it's just human nature.
Just a quick thanks to one of our sponsors and we'll be right back to the show.
This episode is brought to you by Wealthfront. Did you know if you missed 10 of the best performing days after the 2008 crisis, you would have missed out on 50%, 5-0% of your returns.
Don't miss out on the best days in the market. Stay invested in a long-term automated investment
portfolio. Wealthfront pioneered the automated investing movement, sometimes referred to as
robo-advising, and they currently oversee $20 billion of assets for their
clients. Wealthfront can help you diversify your portfolio, minimize fees, and lower your taxes.
It takes about three minutes to sign up, and then Wealthfront will build you a globally diversified
portfolio of ETFs based on your risk appetite and manage it for you at an incredibly low cost.
Wealthfront's software constantly monitors your portfolio day in and day out so you don't have to.
They look for opportunities to rebalance and tax loss harvest to lower the amount of taxes you pay
on your investment gains. Their newest service is called Autopilot and it can monitor any checking
account for excess cash to move into savings or an investment account. They've really thought of a
ton. They've checked a lot of boxes. Smart investing should not feel like a roller coaster ride.
Let the professionals do
the work for you. Go to wealthfront.com slash Tim and open a Wealthfront investment account today,
and you'll get your first $5,000 managed for free for life. That's wealthfront.com slash Tim.
Wealthfront will automate your investments for the long term, and you can get started today at wealthfront.com slash Tim. And if we look at your specific case as it relates to equity,
you mentioned owning part of a business. You also mentioned in this conversation,
productizing yourself. So would you view your success in following that principle predominantly in, for instance, the equity that you own
in a company like AngelList? Or is it the identity and the brand, meaning associations
that you've built as Naval the human? Or is it slash investor, therefore being sought after as
an investor? Or is it something else? How would you think of that principle as applying most in your
own life? Because you've created wealth, not just through say your equity and angel list, but also
through many successful investments. And then I'm sure there are other ways that we could identify
wealth as coming from your path. Yeah. What I like about my path is that I've made money doing a lot
of different little things. So I've made money consistently in sort of small to medium-sized chunks.
I haven't had like one gigantic payday that set me up forever.
Although it depends on your standards, right?
I'm talking about my Silicon Valley standards.
Obviously, for most parts of the world, I've had many of those gigantic paydays.
But they've been consistent and they've been varied.
Varied in the sense of that there are completely different kinds of investments and endeavors, but consistent in that I get one every couple of years.
I just want to interject for a second, which would seem to suggest that there are principles guiding your approaches or some systematic approaches, right?
Absolutely.
Therefore, you're not relying on winning the Powerball lottery or that equivalent.
No, not at all. No, there's no lottery here to win. The lottery is for losers. Lotteries are
just attacks on people who can't do math. Get-rich-quick schemes are just other people
getting rich off of you. There are no shortcuts. So what I'm doing is I am taking my specific
knowledge, which is my ability to understand deeply technical concepts and communicate them to the rest of the world
to be an interface between great programmers and developers and designers and the capital markets and consumers.
And using that to put myself in a position where then I can identify great trends as they're emerging,
invest in those companies or help start those companies, own equity in those things,
help bring them to market,
help do the strategy on how to navigate the worlds of fundraising and exiting and recruiting and
company building and cultures and technology development and all that, and have a brand
around it. And I use that to kind of make money. And that is just one of several ways. I've also
done it by investing early on in public markets and cryptocurrencies and starting funds and all
kinds of things. But I don't, it's funny, I don't really follow my own principles anymore. Like,
for example, the whole podcast thing and the whole Twitter thing, even though I've got reasonably
good brands and followers in those, I'm not monetizing them at all. I'm not charging anybody
for anything because I'm not trying to make money anymore. To me, making money is like you become
the kind of person that makes money.
And you put yourself in long-term situations where you're always going to make money.
So I have the brand.
And I have deep relationships with a dozen people who I know and I trust that I can do
business with for the rest of my life.
And they're very high-integrity people.
They're very capable people.
And it just makes it easy to do things.
So I've set up that infrastructure.
Now the money just kind of makes itself as I go about my life. I don't want to have to work hard. I don't want to have to roll out of bed at a
certain time. I don't have to answer to somebody. So I optimize for independence and freedom. I
could have made a lot more money by raising a huge fund or joining a big VC firm early on or being
an exec at one of the massive companies in Silicon Valley early on, but I always optimize for independence. I'm lazy. I wake up at 7, 8, 9, 10 a.m.
I go to sleep at 2, 3 a.m.
I don't work a lot of days.
Some days I work morning to night,
but it's just based on whatever I'm curious about.
I never want to have to answer to a boss.
No one's ever going to tell me what to do.
I don't want to order people around.
I don't want to have someone reporting to me
and kind of asking me all the time what to do. I want peer relationships. I want to flow. I want to be able to do business while walking in a forest, talking on a cell phone or sitting in a meeting or in front of a computer, or I want to be on a beach if I can just make one good decision a year, and that makes me all the money that I need for that year, then that's perfect. And that's the way it should be because
we're living in an age of infinite leverage and your judgment just gets multiplied through this
massive force multiplier, through code, capital, community, labor, what have you. So if you're
smart and you kind of know what you're doing, you don't need to work hard. Working hard is the last
least important thing. You have to pay your dues. You have to put in all the iterations,
10,000 iterations, not 10,000 hours to figure out what to do and how to do it well. But once you
know, you don't have to put in the time anymore. It's your judgment. And the judgment comes from
clear thinking. The clear thinking comes from having time to reflect and to pursue your genuine
intellectual curiosity. And you'll see that a lot of the great investors, for example,
just sit around reading most of the time,
or Warren Buffett famously plays a lot of bridge.
Obviously, not everyone can be just an investor,
although that is becoming more and more democratized.
And I've picked something that suits my temperament and particular capabilities,
but there's lots and lots of ways to make money if you apply your mind to it.
So I don't work to make money.
I mean, if I make so much money that I'm donating hospital wings and universities and all that
stuff, I overshot. You know, I'm not trying to have some influence on the world through money.
Ironically, I have more influence of the world through podcasts like this. And so, you know,
making more money doesn't change my life. It doesn't change the world as much as I could by
doing other things. So there's not much incentive for me to make money anymore other than just practicing my craft.
Well, let's talk about a few of your missives. Missives is probably not the right word.
Yeah, I'm not telling you anything. I'm not trying to persuade anyone of anything. So
if people don't like it, some people get triggered on Twitter and they start arguing. It's like,
just leave. Just don't listen to it. The one I'm going to read would be a great one for
people to get really upset about, or I would find it comical to look at the comments of people who
are upset. But the line is this, imagine how effective you would be if you weren't anxious
all the time. Why did you put this out? And have you seen highly anxious people become people who
experience very little anxiety? Is that something you've seen? But first, why did you put this up?
What was behind it? And then have you seen anxious people become largely, I guess,
unanxious or non-anxious people? Most of my tweets are not very
deliberate or thought through. What's happening is I've been thinking about some concept for months, years, whatever.
It's been percolating.
And then all of a sudden, it'll come to me in one pithy sentence where I'm like, oh,
this is how I will remember this thing.
This is how I can distill this down into a pointer for myself so that when I need to
make decisions, I can retrieve that
whole line of reasoning.
And so where this comes from is basically like everybody after a certain age, I am taking
responsibility for my own happiness and peace and quality of life.
And one of the things you learn after you make money is that money doesn't make you
happier.
It takes care of your money problems, but it's not necessarily going to put you in a place where
you're in some kind of bliss all the time. In fact, there's nothing out there that will make
you happy forever. So you sort of have to take responsibility for guiding yourself in such a way
that your mental state ends up where you want it. And so I've been working on my mental state and I
have, you know, working is a big word. I don't, I don't even want to say I've been working on my mental state and I have, you know, working is a big word.
I don't, I don't even want to say I've been working on it, but I would say my mental state
has gotten to a place which is much better than it used to be.
And people will often say, well, I don't want to do that because it'll take away my ambition.
I want to succeed right now.
And so I've thought about that a fair bit.
And is that true or not?
Well, it's certainly for me in the last few years, since I've become calmer, my effectiveness has gone through the roof and I've been more successful.
But it's hard to disambiguate that from, well, also, maybe you're just later in your career,
you're in a better position for it. And that's a valid criticism. So one of the things I've been
trying to figure out is like, would I have been as successful? And it's hard to do the counterfactual,
obviously, if I wasn't as anxious, because anxiety is, you know, comes from fear. And it's hard to do the counterfactual, obviously, if I wasn't as anxious because anxiety comes from fear
and it's also a motivator.
It makes you get off your butt.
And one of the ways to make the anxiety go away,
at least until the next piece of anxiety comes along,
is to go do something about it.
So what is the role of anxiety?
Well, firstly, I noted that
pretty much everybody's anxious all the time.
It's a rare human being who isn't anxious.
And it makes sense.
We're alpha predators. We took over this earth and domesticated or killed all the time. It's a rare human being who isn't anxious. And it makes sense. We're alpha
predators. We took over this earth and domesticated or killed all the other animals. And we did that
by being the most paranoid, the most fearful, the most angry predators this world has ever seen.
So anxiety is built into the core of who we are. In fact, you could argue that all the mind does
all day long is fear-based scenario planning for survival and then maybe a little bit of greed for replication.
So anxiety is at the core level of who we are.
But certainly some people are more anxious than others.
There's no question.
And some people seem to be much calmer about it.
So which is more useful for effectiveness?
So assuming that your goal is your motivation is intrinsic, you're doing the thing because
you love it or because you really
want it. And you can separate that motivation from anxiety. Then I think you can take on certain
superpowers. And we kind of all intrinsically know this. Like if you look at, you know, samurai
warriors, right? Like Miyamoto Musashi is in a duel with somebody else. You know that the person
who is calmer is going to win. In all those movies, it's the one who's incredibly still, then swipes with a sword incredibly quickly,
and is then still again. That's the winner, the one who has a zen state of mind. Similarly,
in the Terminator movies, part of the reason you fear the Terminator is because he's a robot. He's
unstoppable. He's implacable. You can't argue with him. You can't communicate with him. You can't
make him slow down. And he has no remorse.
He just keeps coming.
Or in that old Clint Eastwood movie, Unforgiven, the guy who wins the gunfight is the one who
doesn't flinch.
He's just keeping his cool while he's loading his gun and shooting.
He's not all over the place running around.
So I just think we waste so much energy through anxiety that if you can be calm and still
go about your business, it's a superpower.
And I realized this myself recently where I was in a conflict situation in business. It was a high conflict situation.
It was unfortunate.
I think we've solved it.
But as I went through this high conflict situation, I'd been through one like it years before
where I was much more anxious.
And I remember that time period.
And I remember how much I was sweating it and how nervous I was
and how I went through bouts of fear and anger
and how kind of worked up I was the entire time,
intense and didn't get much sleep.
But this time I was incredibly calm
and I was almost enjoying it
because it was like practicing my craft.
Now, of course, it's easier to do now
because I have more money.
But at the same time, it just didn't bother me. It was just very mechanical. And because of that, I could be very effective about it. And I could be effective about it while doing lots and lots of other things. My mind wasn't constantly spinning in a whirlpool, taking on 10 different problems and just fear-based scenario planning all the time. Most of these things were never going to happen. So I do believe that being calm and still going
about your business is the superpower. Now, yes, if anxiety is your only motivator, then you have
a problem. But I would argue the pure motivations don't come out of anxiety. So let's talk about
attribution here. To what would you attribute the, and I know that it's difficult to isolate
variables, et cetera, But if let's just
say like you have a family. So let's just say one of your kids comes to you. It's like, dad,
I'm suffering from a lot of anxiety. What should I do? Or you observe it and you want to help your
kid out. What types of recommendations would you make or might you make? Another question,
if you prefer it, is what has helped you to go from the whirlpool
experience of anxiety in high conflict experience round one versus calm of all in high conflict
experience round two? Yeah, it's really hard to separate all the pieces out. I mean, it comes from
a combination of philosophy, yoga, meditation, getting older, having kids. Like you, I've had some psychedelic
experiences, but those are very far back in the past, just a distant memory at this point.
But I would say the number one thing that has been very, very important for me is meditation.
And it's a stupid thing to say because it's so trite. Everybody just says it now.
But when I say meditation, I don't mean sitting there and watching your breath or chanting a mantra. I mean
self-examination. And meditation is a great way to do that. It's self-therapy. It's sitting there
with your thoughts. So anxiety, this pervasive, non-specific anxiety, where you're just constantly
on edge about everything, that comes from an unexamined life you know i think
was it socrates said like an unexamined life is not worth living i forget who said that quote
something like that yeah but it's a aristotle socrates one of those yeah one of those smart
philosopher types but it's correct it's your unexamined life that is causing the problems
and you can examine it in multiple ways you can examine it through you can have some crazy
mushroom trip where it all comes out one night. You could do a lot of meditation sitting there with yourself and
letting your mind run crazy and then seeing what's actually in your mind that your mind wants to tell
you and have you listen to and have you resolve that is unresolved. It could be through therapy.
It could be through reading lots of philosophy and reflection and long walks. So there's many,
many ways to tackle it. But it's that spending that time with yourself to examine why are you having these thoughts?
Think about it this way. We spend so much time in our relationships, our relationship with our
wives, our relationship with our colleagues, our relationship with our business partners,
our relationship with our friends. The most important relationship you have is with yourself.
It's with this voice in your head that is constantly rattling every waking hour. It's this crazy roommate living inside your mind
who's always chattering, always chattering, never shuts up. And you can't control these thoughts.
They just come up out of you don't even know where. That quality of those quality of your
thoughts, those conversations you're having in your head all the time, that is your world. That
is the world you live in. That's the worldview you have. That's the lenses you see through. And that's going to determine
the quality of your life more than anything else. And if you want to see what the quality of your
life actually is, put down the drink, put down the computer, put down the smartphone, put down
the book, put down the headphones, just sit by yourself doing nothing. And then you will know
what the quality of your life actually is because that's
what you're always running away from that's why people when they try to meditate the sit down like
i hate it i can't sit still why because your mind is eating you alive your life is unexamined your
mind is running in loops over things that it has not resolved and because they're not resolved when
you run around in your normal life it's not those problems have gone away it's that they're not resolved, when you run around in your normal life, it's not those problems have gone away. It's that they're just there, but they're provoking anxiety. And what you think of
as the anxiety that's kind of consuming you and you can't identify the source, that's just the
tip of an iceberg poking out from underneath the water. And underneath is a giant pile of garbage
of decisions that were made without too much thought of situations that you're
in that you haven't resolved that you need to resolve of problems that you have or desires
that you have that have gone unmet or unmanifested or contradictions that you're living in or ways
that you which you feel trapped so proper meditation proper examination should ruin the
life that you're currently living it It should cause you to leave relationships.
It should cause you to reestablish boundaries with family members and with colleagues.
It should cause you to quit your job.
It should cause you to change your eating patterns.
It should cause you to spend more time with yourself.
It should cause you to change what books you read.
It should cause you to change who your friends are.
If it doesn't do that, it's not real examination.
If it doesn't come attached with destruction of your current life, then you can't create the new life in which you
will not have the anxiety. Or at least parts of it, not necessarily whole cloth. So let's ask,
let's dive into meditation because as you mentioned, it's a term that is used a lot
and in the minds of most, it is represented by things that you just said you do not do,
like the mantra-based meditation or following the breath.
And you and I have meditated before.
I don't know if your approach is still similar, but it is quite a, I'd hate to talk about
trite, paradigm shift in a sense, at least in the way that I experienced
it alongside you at one point, which was literally doing nothing for extended periods of time.
I don't know if that's still the case, but could you describe the practice a bit? Because it was
such a burden lifted in a sense when the pass fail is removed. And the experience that I had after,
say, a week of doing this twice a day, which is not necessarily what people do in normal life,
but it was pretty profound. So could you describe the current practice,
which may be different from what I experienced?
Yeah, I actually have two different things that I do. And I almost hate calling it meditation meditation because everyone has in their mind a preconceived notion of what meditation is let's
not even call it that i would say that there are two self-examination practices that i do
and i don't even call them practices anymore because sometimes i do them because i feel like
them and i enjoy them or because it feels right and sometimes i don't because anything done
routinely sort of becomes its own trap and is not going to get you
anywhere. It just becomes like another spiritual high, another checkbox, right?
Now, is it fair though to say that you're able to opt in and out now because you had a certain
front-loading period of doing it consistently?
Actually, I'll say there are three different things that I do and I'll go through them.
The first is I just read a lot of philosophy, especially at nighttime before I go to bed.
Which ones? Schopenhauer,auer maxims who are we talking about yeah schopenhauer western philosophy is my current favorite uh although i've definitely moved around in that one eastern
philosophy i'll read everything from osho i know he's discredited and been canceled but fantastic
that makes me like him even more um krishnamurti i don't know kapil Kapil Gupta, Rupert Spira.
I mean, it's all over the place.
Anthony DeMello, he's fantastic, actually.
I'm going to start with one book, start with Anthony DeMello's Way to Love
or his book Awareness.
They're both really good.
But there's a ton of them.
I basically read a lot of philosophers, Siddhartha, Vasistha's Yoga,
Bhagavad Gita, the Tao Te Ching.
You know, I'm always going through one of these books at any given time and usually rereading for inspiration. And I'll read these at night. Usually there'll be
one or two things I'll catch on to. I'll reflect on it before I go to sleep. So that is a form of
self-examination. And it's not done because it's a formula. It's done because I'm genuinely
interested in these things. So it's not work to me. It's fun. The second thing that I do is, which I've been doing for a long time now, is just trying
to be aware of my thoughts and not in a, you know, sit there and be like, oh, I'm going
to be aware of my thoughts kind of way.
But just realizing that a lot of these thoughts that come up are unbidden.
I don't control them.
It's not like I decided to have this thought.
I don't even know what I'm saying to you right now.
It's coming out of my mouth at the same time as I'm thinking it. So where is this coming from? Who is this person? What is this person saying? Is this true? Is it correct? Has it been correct in the past? Is he just being paranoid now? Is he being crazy? What are his underlying motivations? And after a while, when you see it, you start seeing through your own BS. You start seeing how you're mainly just justifying whatever the heck you want to believe because it's good for your survival or it's good for your replication or it's good for your money or it's going to get you laid or any of these various things.
When you're doing that reflection, is it sitting at a table, pen and paper?
Is it sitting in a half lotus with your eyes closed?
No, it's literally just walking around.
It's just walking around.
It's just life just just if you say something to me i'm always going to listen to it with a slightly critical filter because you're external to me applying that same filter to my
own thoughts gives me a level of peace and distance from them and the ability to see through my own bs
which i think makes my life better so I've just found that to be a useful
way of life. But there are lots of times where I forget to do it. I get caught up in some emotions,
some runaway train of thought. But usually these days I can catch myself and be like,
oh, okay, I'm in that mindset again. I'm having that mode of reactions again.
And when the mind sort of sees me chattering, it quiets down a bit, right? And like I said,
it's that back to that crazy roommate analogy, which I originally picked up from Michael Singer, by the way, he has a good book called The Untethered Soul.
But you know, the room, the crazy roommate analogy, like you would eventually tell your
roommate to shut up, or you would tell them to start justifying their claims. Or you would at
least at some level, you start dismissing them for just kind of rambling all the time in this fear
paranoia mode. So I think just kind of viewing your thoughts as sort
of these unbidden things that arise from within you, but aren't really necessarily the whole story
and should be viewed with the same level of skepticism that you would apply to an outside
observer. I think that framework is helpful. And if you find it to be true, then you'll find
yourself doing it more often. If you find it not to be true, if you're like, no, actually,
I choose these thoughts and I want to have them and that's who I am and this all makes sense to me, then you can stop
viewing it with a critical eye. That's up to you. But the last one is the one that I think people
think of as more traditionally meditation, which is sitting down and meditating. And on that one,
I learned from an Indian gentleman, same character you learned from, who had a very simple system and
I just found it the most compelling form of meditation i've ever tried which is you sit there for 60 minutes so unfortunately
not less than an hour at a time because it takes 30 to 40 minutes to sink in past the initial
chattering so you get to the good part or the so-called runner's high equivalent and you sit
for 60 minutes every day and you do it for at least 60 days and you do it first thing in the
morning when your mind is clear and you're alert and you've had a good night's sleep and you sit up with your back straight and
you can use cushions or you can use a chair or whatever there's no magic position and just
whatever happens happens whatever your mind wants to do you just let it do if it wants to talk you
let it talk if you want to fight you let it fight if it wants to be quiet you let it be quiet if it
wants to chant a mantra or pay attention to breathing.
You can do that, but you don't force anything.
You just kind of let it happen.
And so you don't fight it.
You don't resist it.
You don't argue with it.
You don't double down on it.
You just kind of let things happen.
And when you do that for at least 60 days, my experience has been that you kind of clear out your mental inbox and all the craziness that was going on, all the chattering will come out.
Some problems will get resolved.
You will have some epiphanies.
You will make changes to your life.
Some will be self-examination.
Some of it you just get tired of.
Some of it just needs to be heard once
and then it goes away.
And eventually you'll get to a mental state of inbox zero,
where now you're just thinking
about what happened yesterday.
You're kind of caught up
and your mind is relatively clear.
And just your anxiety level goes down. You're kind of caught up and your mind is relatively clear. And just your anxiety level goes down.
You're living more peacefully.
And I've been doing this for about two and a half years now.
And I've probably missed about a dozen days total.
But there are some days where I've done two hours a day or more.
And I will tell you that is the single most important thing that I do.
It is a sheer joy.
Much of it is highly entertaining, pleasurable.
Sometimes it's just flat.
It's nothingness.
I can't even tell you why I do it.
I can't even tell you what's going on in that state.
But I will tell you that that time spent by myself is the most important time that I have.
And thanks to that, I am now much more self-contained.
I don't feel like I need other people.
I don't need external sources of pleasure or happiness all the time.
I drink less.
I'm not attracted to trying any drugs whatsoever.
It's just life is easier.
It's more pleasant.
I don't take things as seriously.
I'm not afraid of my mortality as much anymore.
I don't fear aging.
I don't lust after things.
I don't have this constant pervasive need to find something outside of me to make my
life better.
When the best hour of my day is spent by myself,
then the world has very little to offer me. And I can still participate in it,
but it doesn't have that grip on me that it used to. I don't fear solitary confinement.
And I think that is a superpower. And I think everyone should have it. Everyone does have it.
It's easy. It requires doing nothing. It's your birthright. You can't fail at it. There's no
way to fail at it. Literally, all you have to do is just sit down and close your eyes and just
give yourself a break for an hour every day. Just take the time off from the world.
Few follow-ups. Krishnamurti, do you have any favorites of his or anything that you would
suggest someone start with if they have no familiarity with krishnamurti and i'll second anthony de mello also yeah i actually don't like starting with
krishnamurti he's a tough one but if you're going to start somewhere i started with this book called
think on these things uh there's also the book of life um he's very cerebral very intellectual
and a little confusing um but he definitely speaks truth and he walks the walk anthony de mello the way to love uh osho's
book the great challenge uh and i know people think osho is a fake guru and all that but he
had some real stuff too he's very articulate he uh he understood a lot um there's a great
clip from him on soundcloud uh that says it's called life has no goals no purpose
uh i listen to that that one a lot There's a lot of them out there.
Once you start going down this rabbit hole, you'll find them. The classics, the Bhagavad Gita,
get a good translation. Stephen Miller, I think, has a good translation. He also has a good
translation of the Tao Te Ching. Those are both really interesting. Again, only if it appeals to
you. I mean, there's ancient wisdom in Schopenhauer. Read Councils and Maxims. You know, these are
smart people self-reflecting. But overall,
the point is not to read. The point is to inspire so that you yourself can reflect.
Kapil Gupta is an accountant on Twitter. He has a couple of great books. Direct Truth is a
fantastic book, you know, written very recently and pulls no punches. But, you know, all of these
are basically there to inspire you to self-reflect. And if you're not interested in self-reflection, if you're not at that stage in life, then
don't do it.
It's a waste of time.
In fact, I would say the reason to do these things is just because they make your life
better, because they make you more effective, because they have some utility to you.
If they do not have utility to you, if they don't make your life better, then drop it.
It's useless.
I will also second the reading of philosophy,
and this is not for kind of idle or abstract, like semantic tail chasing, right? It's
for whatever reason on a very pragmatic level, deeply soothing to read the insights and
observations of those who are considering things that are not of today,
they're not of this week, they're not of this month, they are for much broader periods of time
or timeless in some capacity, right? It alleviates some of the manufactured emergency and urgency
of the bullshit that is foisted upon us by every possible input.
Oh yeah, the news and Twitter are so toxic. The human brain is not designed to manage every
emergency in the world in real time. We're not designed to process all the breaking news on the
planet in our heads. And this is one of my recent tweets, but the goal of the media these days is
to make every problem your problem.
That's how they get attention.
That's how they get clicks.
You know, you have tribal wars going on, zombies battling each other, and they want to pull you in where even non-participation is not allowed anymore.
Neutral bystanders are not allowed.
So it's a crazy world out there.
There's a circus going on with the monkeys flinging feces at each other, and they want
to drag you into the fight.
Really, what you want to focus on is what's timeless.
Timeless is great.
You know,
the old questions all have old answers and they're best consumed from the old
practitioners because they were very clear minded about it.
They weren't busy trying to fit into the politics of this time.
They're fitting to the politics of that time,
but that's lost to us now.
So actually another great source is I have your Tao of Seneca series in
Audible and I listen to it on repeat when I'm working out a lot. So that's a very good thing.
Yeah, there's letters to Lucilius. Amazing, amazing stuff. And every time I go through it,
I learn something new. Yeah, the Tao of Seneca, the moral letters to Lucilius, if people want to
look on public domain sources, you can find these letters. The moral letters to Lucilius,
also spelled as you might read Lucilius by Seneca. And so that's an audiobook series that I've
produced. And you can find the PDFs for free online as well. Let's talk about some brass
tack stuff, since I think people will be very interested. You mentioned monkeys throwing feces, tribalism.
In times like this, this is being recorded in 2020, and first day of October, a lot of folks
are interested in stores of value. They are fearful of what could happen and considering
investments like gold or cryptocurrency. And I wanted you to explain one
of your recent tweets is just from the last few days. And it is crypto stable coins. Dash choose
between blow up risk, censorship risk and fraud risk. What are crypto stable coins? And what does
this tweet mean? Yeah, just backing up for a second. I think cryptocurrencies are probably
one of the greatest inventions in human history.
And the reason why they're interesting
is because if you look at the technology industry,
technology plays in unregulated spaces.
It's very hard for technology to change regulated spaces
as Uber and Postmates and companies like that find out.
But generally, the reason technology works
is because it creates its own frontier.
It is a digital frontier that is being created, not the physical frontiers are all closed, and the new
world has been colonized, and the Wild West has been tamed. Where do you go to create new things
free of interference and regulation and kind of exercise maximum creativity? And so that's been
done mostly in the technology space. And one of the areas that has been protected by technological innovation from
technological innovation is Wall Street, because they're, it's, you know, they have regulatory
capture, very bureaucratic, you know, the money industrial complex that runs a lot of our economy
and runs a lot of Washington, DC, where 20% of our GDP goes into financial engineering and into
the Wall Street casino. And so cryptocurrencies are kind of how we get around that. And so they're
sovereign resistant, they're designed to be completely decentralized, you don't need the
violent power of the state to enforce the value of a cryptocurrency. And it allows for truly
trustless transactions between humans without some king or authority or government or corporation
having to be in the middle. And so it's very liberating to disconnect wealth creation,
wealth storage, and wealth protection from the state. And that's what cryptocurrencies really
enable. One second, let me just pause to say that at one point, you and I did a very thorough
cryptocurrency 101 conversation with a domain super expert named Nick Szabo, S-Z-A-B-O, which people can also find
for more on kind of the history and basics of some of the crypto.
Yeah, Nick is a bona fide genius and a pioneer in the space. He also has a great blog called
Unenumerated that I highly recommend. But anyway, so the best known cryptocurrency is Bitcoin. And
Bitcoin is trying to be the new gold or the new Swiss bank account kind of all rolled into one. And it has so much advantages, you know, as a store of value, it can be stored
digitally, so it's hard to seize. It's very easy to verify, technologically speaking, unlike gold,
it's easy to send across national boundaries and electronically over the internet. It's easily
divisible and verifiable down to its authenticity is very verifiable, where gold is hard to do.
It can be divided down to millions and trillions of a Bitcoin very, very easily.
It is somewhat programmable, so you can put it inside smart contracts and you can do some
intelligent things with it. So it has a lot going for this store of value. What's difficult about it
is it's not really private. It doesn't, although there are parts of it that are private, it's not
completely private and it's untrusted. It's brand, as far as stores of value go, it's only from 2009. And so people don't know
if it'll be around forever, and how dependent it is on the internet, and people aren't really
certain about the proof of work mining algorithm that makes it possible. And can it be hijacked?
Can it be centralized? Can it have a bug? Can it break? And every year that Bitcoin survives and
goes through one of the various challenges facing it, it gets more valuable as people entrust it a little bit more and more.
But it is extremely volatile. You buy Bitcoin, you're buying a very speculative asset at the
moment. And you're speculating that it will become digital gold or possibly even, you know,
all store of value and so be incredibly valuable. But along the way, there's lots of hiccups. And
at any point, it could could break it could go to zero
and so a lot of people who are now participating in the crypto world they're building a decentralized
wall street they call it defy d-e-f-i for decentralized finance but i actually think
it's more like defy as in just defy the government d-e-f-y and so i think we're seeing yeah governments
love that yeah exactly we're we're seeing a whole new casino that's better than Wall Street spring up in decentralized finance.
Unlike Wall Street, this one is 24-7 open.
It's 365 days a year.
It's available around the world to everybody.
It's trustless in that, you know, there's math and algorithms and code underneath that, not Goldman Sachs front running your trades or whatever.
Not that I'm saying they do, but, you know, there's Flash Boys and kind of all that kind of craziness that goes on. And you can program it to do things and to make bets or hedges or
calls that you just can't even do on Wall Street. So I think we're building a better Wall Street
using cryptocurrencies. But everyone who participates in that doesn't necessarily want
to take on the volatility of these cryptocurrencies. So we've created these things called stable coins, which
track the value of the US dollar, so that when you're trading, for example, you can still do it
in dollar denominated terms. And this is a tricky thing, because the moment you're now trying to
track some asset in the real world, like dollars, then you have to basically peg the value somehow to something
that exists in the real world and cryptocurrencies do best when everything is on the blockchain when
everything is electronic and digital and controlled by computers in the cloud so these stable coins
have come along that mimic the value of the u.s dollar and the best known ones are tether
usdc which is coin basis coin and uh andDAI, which is an algorithmically stable coin.
But there's no free lunch in life.
Hold on for one second.
Should people think of what would be a comparable
that people might be more familiar with?
It's not an index.
It's like an ETF.
Or how would you think about...
Is there another...
Digital dollars.
These are designed so that you can live in crypto land.
This is living on a blockchain. It's math-based code. But really, your value is pegged to dollars. So it's not going up or down with Bitcoin. It's just worth a dollar all the time. So if you want to hold a dollar in crypto land, the way you're actually doing underneath is you have crypto and crypto is incredibly volatile. And you're trying to convert a volatile asset into a stable asset. So there has to be a cost for that. saying is that the three main categories of stable coins today, they each impose one or more of these costs.
And so one cause is fraud risk, where people suspect this of Tether, where like, actually, this thing says it's backed by dollars, but it's not actually backed by dollars.
I don't know if this company has dollars underneath.
So you have to kind of take their word for it.
Underneath, meaning they would have actual physical dollars, like you'd have physical gold.
Correct. Yeah. So for every Tether they issue you, they claim to have a dollar dollars, much like you would have physical gold. Correct.
Yeah, so for every tether they issue you,
they claim to have a dollar somewhere, but what if they don't?
And you just don't know, so you're trusting them,
and there could be fraud underneath.
I'm not saying there is.
I have no evidence, but you're basically now back to the trusted third-party model that exists
in just putting your money in the bank.
The second kind is where you're dealing with someone like Coinbase
or some company that is well-known and trusted and is regulated. But then it's no different than holding normal
dollars. There's censorship risk, where if the government says, hey, we don't like this character,
seize their bank account, Coinbase can turn off your USDC account and your stablecoin is basically
been seized. You're no longer decentralized and sovereign like you are with Bitcoin.
And the last kind of risk is
a blow-up risk so something like a maker you know it's collateralized but it's collateralized with
bitcoin and ethereum and so what they're hoping is that the price of bitcoin ethereum won't move
so drastically if the peg breaks and you lose money on your so-called stable coin it's just
it's just an observation there's no free. And so if you're trying to create this
mythical stable currency out of thin air in what is inherently a very volatile space,
you have to pay for it. And people think today they're not paying for it. They're just getting
these free crypto stable dollars or they're getting the stability aspect for free, but they're
not. They're either taking on fraud risk or censorship risk or blow-up risk
or some combination of them. So if you're advising, and this is not financial advice,
this is just two friends talking, obviously, for informational purposes only. But if you're
talking to a friend who has a fair amount of savings or investable capital, and they say,
Naval, I want to do something with crypto. How can I get started or how should I get started?
What do you say to them?
Because there's such a broad spectrum of options.
It's still, even though it's been simplified a lot,
crypto is still quite confusing.
It's very complicated.
To people who are very smart, I would consider,
it's still quite confusing.
Incredibly confusing. Yeah, it's a domain of mathematicians, hackers,
tech entrepreneurs, and a few people who really dig in but it's still too
hard to handle man it's just dangerous like i can't hold my own crypto i have to stick it inside
funds and custodians because i'm a known public figure and it's a bearer asset so ironically i
can't actually be dangerous you don't hold it because you would be i'd be a risk yeah exactly
it's a bearer asset so you know you don't want to bear a bearer asset. You have
to put it inside vaults, you know, the equivalent of the Goldman Sachs in this space. So like
they're custodians, like Anchorage is, you know, an amazing one. There's BitGo, there's Coinbase.
So there are these large custodians or Coinlist, which is a company I helped start, who can hold
onto your crypto assets for you. But that's not really the point of crypto. The point of crypto is to be your own bank. So if
the government is coming to seize money or if they're printing lots of it, you can always
withdraw your crypto assets from these organizations and you can carry it yourself. You can put on your
laptop, which is kind of crazy and risky and hard. You can do it through a hardware wallet,
like a Ledger or Trezor, which are pretty well-known hardware wallets, where you have a small specific device that's designed just for carrying crypto.
But you have to understand you're replacing the banking system.
You're literally replacing the government, all the guns and the police that back up the banking system.
You're replacing all that and all the control that comes with it.
So, of course course it's going to
require some level of sophistication you're literally building your own swiss bank so it is
it is quite complicated where to start well i don't i don't like giving people buy signals
because if you're going to be a good investor you also have to have your own conviction because then
you'll know when to sell if you call me and ask me when to buy are you going to call me every day
and say should i sell should i sell you don't know that it's a really really important right so you have you have to
fundamentally understand it yourself so i would say the first thing is go down the crypto rabbit
hole listen to the interview we did with nick sabo go online and start reading up on bitcoin
read up on ethereum read up on the privacy coins like zcash and monero learn about the different
high level stuff in the crypto space.
Decide how much exposure that you want.
Go buy it at a CoinList or a Coinbase or what have you.
Figure out which custodian you want to use.
Put it somewhere safe, probably in the cloud,
unless you really know what you're doing.
And if you really know what you're doing,
then you can use one of the hardware wallets
or one of the offline schemes.
Make sure that it is protected in case that you're attacked or kidnapped or someone comes to your house or steals your computer.
You know, you have to cover all those base cases.
So it's not easy, but you're literally creating extra sovereign money.
You're creating money where, you know, if you ever have to flee the country, you know, like the Jews had to leave Vienna back in the 1930s.
You're not like scrambling for gold.
You're using crypto you're not if you're living in some country where they tend to seize all the money in your bank account then you have unseizable money if you're worried about
hyperinflation as we print too many dollars then you have a hedge against the mmt and all the
various excuses that they're going to use to print money i mean probably the scariest thing that
happened in 2020 from a financial perspective is both the Republican and the Democratic Party figured out
that, oh, actually, we can just print lots and lots of money. And the US has this reserve currency
status with the dollar, where most of our dollars, I think something like 70%, are held by foreigners
because of the trusted reserve currency of the world. They use it for trading oil. They use it
for settling international transfers. They use it just to kind of the world. They use it for trading oil. They use it for settling international transfers.
They use it just to kind of hide money.
They use it to protect money
from their local inflationary authorities.
So because of that, when we print a dollar,
70% of that inflationary effect is cost,
is borne by the rest of the world, not borne by us.
And so the US government's kind of figured this out
and we printed $6 trillion to fight the coronavirus.
And so now both parties can agree that they can just print money to get out of any problem that they're in.
A great tweet that I saw was somebody wrote that now we know what would happen if aliens were to invade the earth.
The Fed would just lower interest rates.
The Fed would cut interest rates, right?
And so unfortunately, that's just the situation we're in so they're going to keep doing
that until at some point the you know the rest of the world throws in the towel and says you know
this dollar thing is not working for us and what we rely upon is that the european euro or the
chinese renminbi and these other currencies are in worse situations but that's not necessarily
always true i think there are well-managed currencies
like the Swiss franc and the Singaporean dollar.
There's also hard assets like gold and crypto
and real estate and even the run-up in tech stocks
at some levels because equities
are a tax-efficient inflation hedge
or a relatively tax-efficient inflation hedge
because someone like Google can just raise prices
and they don't have to hire more people because they're a monopoly. They can lay off half their engineers and the
company will work just fine. So people are realizing this and there's a flight into hard
assets to get away from inflation. And crypto is one of the few places where you can really put
your money in and defend against something like the dollar reserving its reserve currency status.
And these are black swans. It's very hard to talk about black swans because obviously since the dollar became the U.S. reserve currency, it hasn't
lost the status, even when we went off the gold standard. But at the same time, the pound sterling
used to be the reserve currency of the world, and it lost its status at one point. Money used to be
gold back, and that went away. So it's not inconceivable that'll happen. And if it were to
happen, then you would basically have the true reckoning.
Then our ability to print our way out of recessions would go away.
You would probably have an inflationary collapse in the US.
And you would just see kind of our global economic system start breaking down.
In those scenarios, crypto does really well, assuming the internet stays up, right?
There are scenarios where the internet goes down too, and then all hell breaks loose and you better have golden guns, but we're not
talking about that. It depends. Cigarettes and tampons to trade for your water. Yeah, that's
right. Well, bullets are the ultimate one, right? As we also see in 2020, when we have 5 million
new gun owners in the US. But it just depends how much of a prepper you are, how paranoid you want
to be and how many standard deviations out you want to handle risk. But I think this is the year where a lot of people feel like risks that were
inconceivable have suddenly gotten pulled in. Let me ask a dumb newbie question. As a hypothetical,
so speaking as someone who, I'm a great example of someone who can use words associated with
crypto who really has no fundamental understanding. I'm the guy pointing at the bird who thinks he's got it all figured out because he's able to name the yellow-throated
warbler. I don't think I have it all figured out. But let's just say I managed somehow,
like a thousand monkeys typing out Shakespeare on a million laptops given infinite time,
I somehow managed to get a bunch of cryptocurrency onto a hardware ledger,
right? Or a hardware wallet, rather. So I have this thing, US is going to hell in a handbasket.
I somehow managed to get that to fill in the blank. I'll just arbitrarily choose Spain.
I land in Spain. I'm like, oh my God, that was so close. Thank God I got out in time.
I managed to make it over.
How the hell do you buy an apartment or pay your rent or anything like that with crypto
when it still feels like the crypto landscape
and the tools are kind of computers
pre-graphic user interface?
Do you know what I mean?
Like even smart people can't quite figure it out.
But how would you you if that were
two years in the future i mean i think that's unlikely but let's just say uh yeah for most of
my friends this scenario i recommend is like you go buy it on something like you know coinbase
coinlist whatever uh you move it into a dedicated custodian like an anchorage uh or a bitco um then
you kind of hold it there now if the shit is hitting the fan and
you decide you want to get out of town, then you contact your rep there, you move it into a hardware
wallet, and then you flee the country, right? Or go wherever you're going. And when you land on
the other side, now you have this crypto in your hardware wallet. In theory, you can log into a
local crypto exchange, you know, go through their verification processes and upload it. Now you've got Bitcoin that can be traded for cash. Or you can go find any of the local Bitcoin meetup
people in groups, the enthusiasts, the so-called maximalists, the diehard believers and the holders,
and you can trade any of them Bitcoin for cash. Now, in the distant future, it's possible that
people will just take Bitcoin directly because it is a
fungible, high quality, hard asset that can be transported and held like cash. But if you can't
do that, you can always find either a local believer or you can find a crypto exchange where
you can convert it. The thing that makes Bitcoin so interesting is not that it's necessarily the
best technology. It is definitely robust and it's the OG. What makes it really interesting
is it has the most diehard believers.
And because it has the most diehard believers,
as long as there's 5,000 or 50,000
wealthy, brilliant people.
That wealthy part is really important.
They will always trade it with you for hard assets.
I think recently MicroStrategy started, it's a company,
it started moving half of its treasury into Bitcoin. And the CEO, Michael Saylor, was quoted
as saying something along the lines of, I can't believe people are willing to sell me Bitcoin.
He figured out what it was, and then he was just like, I want to get as much as possible. So
here, take pieces of my company, but give me Bitcoin. And there are lots of people like him.
There are lots and lots of people like him.
And they exist in every major country in the world.
And as long as there are believers, because it's as much a movement or a religion as it is a currency.
Because what is a currency at the end of the day?
Money is just the bubble that never pops, right?
It's just if we all agree tomorrow, that if we all manage
to come upon the story tomorrow, that it's not the US dollar, it's actually the euro that is
really money, then the world will switch to the euro. Heck, if we agree that clamshells were money,
the world would switch to clamshells. Now, obviously, there are underlying characteristics
that make euros and dollars better than clamshells. And so therefore, we converge upon those.
But if the world were to decide that Bitcoin is better money than us dollars the world would switch to bitcoin it's a story it's a consensus
belief and the beauty of bitcoin is that there are these diehard maximalists and i fight with
them on the internet all the time they don't like me by the way so i've had twitter battles with
them running but i still really appreciate that they exist because they are actually the core of what makes Bitcoin always tradable, always valuable.
There's always some guy in some location somewhere in the world who will give you his house for Bitcoin.
And as long as that is true, and I don't see why it would stop being true, because if anything, more and more people are being added to that list every day.
It has real value and it has redeemable value.
What do you think the conceivable near term looks like with the possible entrance
of more institutional investors? In other words, if we see, let me ask a better question.
It was very noteworthy and newsworthy when Paul Tudor Jones
wrote his memo detailing why he was investing, I think it was something like 100 million,
into Bitcoin or Bitcoin-like equivalents, some type of crypto equivalent, if not crypto itself.
Do you anticipate that more institutionals are going to come in, sovereign wealth funds,
things like that? And how do you think the story and the landscape could change over the next
handful of years? I think it's inevitable. Look, Bitcoin and crypto still have risks, right? A lot
of these algorithms and schemes are new. Even Bitcoin through its proof of work mechanism,
you could argue that it tends towards centralization because it gets managed by these anonymous miners and data centers and data centers
of economies of scale. And so it will end up being more centralized than people would like.
There are up-and-coming competitors like Ethereum. There's privacy issues. On the Bitcoin
blockchain, you can be tracked forever. So it's not perfect. People talk about quantum computing
breaking it. I don't think that's
true i think you can upgrade the encryption algorithm you know just as well or better
but there are always potential problems right which are not completely resolved but every time
we face one of these reckonings and that problem gets resolved the value goes up the story becomes
stronger and so the same way when paul tudor Jones or MicroStrategy buy Bitcoin, the story is becoming stronger. The set of believers is increasing, the validation is increasing,
and now more people can come in and hang their hat on this and say, okay, if Paul Tudor Jones
agrees and Michael Saylor agrees, then I agree to be in that set of people who believe that this is
going to be the new way to store value and wealth. And so now I'm joining their wealth storage scheme.
And the early people
then get rewarded for it. So one way to think about Bitcoin in particular is, or even actually
any of the cryptocurrencies is it's a Swiss bank account. But it's a Swiss bank account with finite
space. And if you want shelf space in that Swiss bank account with finite space, you have to buy
out one of the existing holders in that space.
So imagine a Swiss bank account that's impregnable. It's a new one. No government can break into it.
It's secured by consensus across millions of people using massive computation power around
the globe. And if you want one of those safety deposit box, you got to buy it from someone
who's already there. So as long as the demand for new people trying to get in the Swiss bank account is greater
than the supply of people who are trying to get out of that Swiss bank account, then you're
going to pay more for that box.
And that's where the speculative power of it comes from.
And I think it's going to take a good crisis to really see what crypto is worth.
And actually, so far, it's been weird because...
Yeah, the people have said that crypto failed the crisis
test with covet right i mean it did and didn't what it didn't do was it didn't skyrocket right
it didn't like go you know bitcoin didn't go to 100k as everybody fled the u.s dollar
but that kind of shows you how resilient the dollar is and how far we are from losing global
reserve currency status but at the same time it didn't collapse either you know it didn't go down
it went down briefly as
people needed cash to meet various margin calls and loans, but overall stayed very stable.
And I would say the number of people who have gotten involved in crypto recently
as a true wealth protection mechanism is the largest I've ever seen.
So I do think that the holder base has gone up. I don't know if we're going to see real
$3,000 Bitcoin ever again in my lifetime. We might see zero if something breaks completely. But I don't think we're going to see
like a, you know, a bunch of people leaving and losing faith in it. And that's why it goes to 3k.
Bitcoin tends to hit these highs, then crash back down to a plateau, hang out in a plateau for a
while and then go back to a new high. And I kind of feel like we're, you know, around the 10k level,
who knows, I don't want to make price predictions,
but, you know, I feel like there's a stronger base
of holders now than there has ever been.
So each one of these people comes and validates it.
You know, Paul Tudor Jones validates it
for other hedge fund managers.
Hedge fund managers validate it for sovereign wealth funds.
Sovereign wealth funds, you know,
will validate it for central banks.
Eventually, some country out there is going to say,
actually,
we inflated our currency too much, our currency collapsed, nobody trusts us anymore.
We have to adopt a new national currency instead of pegging to the dollar, let's peg to Bitcoin, or let's use Bitcoin, or let's use some other cryptocurrency. Or let's be clever and buy up a
bunch of Bitcoin and then announce we're going to use Bitcoin and then Bitcoin will skyrocket,
we're all rich, right? So I think there are other scenarios
where it ends up being a lot more valuable,
but it's going to be stumbling steps forward and backward.
It's not going to be like necessarily,
you know, in one fell swoop until it is, right?
That's the nature of black swans.
You can't predict them.
When it happens, it happens suddenly.
Like I had a friend who used to tell me,
he's now a hardcore Bitcoin.
It's funny.
He actually helped write a book on Bitcoin now.
But when I first talked to him about Bitcoin years and years ago, he said, what's the big
deal?
He's like, if I ever have to flee the country, I'll just buy Bitcoin then.
And I said, yeah, when you have to flee the country, your entire fortune is going to buy
you one Bitcoin, right?
That's the problem.
It's scarce.
It's supply and demand.
So it's like anything else, a store of value.
It's a hedge.
You can't wait till the last second.
And I do think more and more smart people
are coming into it every single day.
And I think the psychological dynamics
of crypto volatility are a lot like
a casino slot machine, right?
This variable reward with high variability
where you just see things spiking
and dropping and then they stay flat and then they spike and they drop in a way that is unlike most
equities that you or i would buy on the public market even wall street at some level is this
big casino with a potential positive expected value and creating some value for society in
terms of hedging and liquidity for companies raising money and so on uh and crypto is doing
the same thing.
It's a global 24-7, 365 casino
where anybody in the world can play.
But through decentralized finance underneath,
you're actually making loans,
you're protecting wealth,
you're storing it,
you're letting people buy derivatives,
you're letting people hedge.
So all of these things are coming up.
We now have insurance in the crypto markets.
We now have lending in the crypto markets. now have lending in the crypto markets we have shorting in the crypto markets uh you know we have computation going
on that requires crypto underneath look if if two computers are talking to each other if two
mini ais are talking to each other and high speed uh exchanging resources to run a company
how are they going to exchange money you think they're going to send us dollars through paypal
or through fedwire hell no they're going to use crypto crypto they going to exchange money? You think they're going to send US dollars through PayPal or through Fedwire? Hell no, they're going to use crypto. Crypto is the native
currency of the internet. Of course, the internet is going to have its own currency. Otherwise,
like saying like the internet is going to use email through the USPS, US Postal Service,
it's going to have its own native on-chain, on-wire protocol for communicating data.
And so what cryptocurrencies really are, Bitcoin isn't a thing.
Bitcoin is not like there's a coin sitting somewhere.
Bitcoin is an entry in a ledger.
What?
Yeah, exactly.
No, I'm kidding.
I'm kidding.
It's an entry in a virtual ledger.
And that virtual ledger is maintained by tons of machines running across the world. And what you're doing is you're
communicating value securely across the internet with no third parties in the middle validating
that that is the correct communication. It's done by the entire network at once. And you're
communicating and transmitting scarcity and value to the internet. And that's a new thing.
What the internet gave us before was digital abundance. I can make copies of everything.
And that was a very big idea.
I can make one podcast and ship it to everybody.
I can make one webpage and ship it to everybody.
That was a very big idea and created huge fortunes and huge revolutions.
The same way digital scarcity is an equally interesting idea, which is I can only have
one of this thing.
If Naval has a Bitcoin, then Tim Ferriss doesn't have that Bitcoin or vice versa.
That ability to create scarcity
and transmit scarcity and value through the internet
is just as important as the ability to create abundance
and transmit that through the internet.
And so the native language of the internet
in communications and protocols around valuable things
and on finance is going to be in cryptocurrencies.
It's not going to be any other way.
So I want to bring up two more tweets, and then we can bring this to a close and put a bow on it. First, I just want to mention again, and I very rarely do this, but I'm very
happy with how this discussion turned out. If people want more of the history and the design
of cryptocurrency, which is endlessly fascinating, just Google Nick Szabo, S-Z-A-B-O. And then if
you're interested in diving into audio, Naval and I spoke with him. Two tweets. These are both from
September. One I'm going to read just because I agree with it super strongly. And I also have observed you following this advice very well, which is all self-help boils down to choose long-term over short-term.
I would modify the tweet to say, though, all truly effective self-help boils down to choose long-term over short-term.
I mean, that is the entire challenge uh which is long-term thinking gets
you long-term results uh and i've said this a thousand different ways in business you want to
play long-term games with long-term people in your modern life and and addictions and kind of just
dealing with the avalanche of all the the abundance of things that are thrown at you that are really
traps like video games are trapped
there there's a shadow career that substitutes for your real career or you know smoking weed
or drinking alcohol substitutes for like pleasure through uh more simple things like sunlight and
walks and porn substitutes for sex and the list just goes on and on i thought you were saying
walking sunlight and porn i was like we're Yeah, that sounds about the trifecta.
So the related tweet I had is the modern devil is cheap dopamine.
And some interesting people on Twitter pointed out to me, actually, the ancient devil is cheap dopamine as well.
But in modern times, we've just hyper, hyper accelerated it.
You know, the modern mind is overstimulated.
The modern body is understimulated. We've just taken all the creature comforts and we've maximized them to a thousand times. And so
literally all the success in life boils down to a variation on the marshmallow test where, you know,
can the kid like hold off on eating the marshmallow for 15 minutes in exchange to get two marshmallows.
And the claim is it turns out to be a big predictor for future success. Although like
many psych experiments, I don't think it replicates well but anyway so it just boils down to long-term versus short-term and if you can just
adopt long-term thinking in your mindset you're just going to have a much easier life or as our
favorite trainer jersey gregorik says hard choice is easy life easy choice is hard life that's it
right so just can you take a long-term view in anything? Compound interest applies everywhere. It applies in relationships, it applies in money, it applies
in health and fitness. Can you change your habits to read the kinds of books that you think will
serve you best in the long term, the foundational books? Can you change your eating habits so that
you're eating healthy food as opposed to unhealthy food? Can you create an exercise routine that you can do every day or every other day so that it's a consistent part
of your life? And so I think a lot of it boils down to just choosing the long term or the short
term. And all the hacks, the good hacks, basically help make the long term choice palatable, or they
help inspire you to kind of keep your eyes focused on the long term. So an example is if you're doing something that you love, if you're running a business that you enjoy, it's probably going to be more fun than playing a video game.
If you come home at night from work and your first instinct is to play a video game, you're suffering at work.
You're working just as hard in the video game.
But the rewards are all fake because they're going to change the rules on you or some 13-year-old kid on the internet will destroy you because they just play that video game all day long. And I used to be a
hardcore video gamer. I had a lot of fun doing it and I did learn playing games for sure. But,
you know, at this point, this age, I pick up a video game, I'm doing it to get away from suffering
and I'm not really getting anything out of it. I could play the video game of investing or I could
play the video game of starting companies or I could play the video game of starting companies, or I could play the video game of, you know, go and play tennis and that would be good for my health. So it's good to find.
So I think a lot of it is about finding the thing that you can do that is fun for you,
that looks like play, that feels like play to you, but looks like work to others that you can do that
sustains you for the long term. So for example, in foods, what you want to find is you want to find
what is the health food out there that other people consider healthy and is nutritionally
healthy profile, but that I find tasty. Because if I can create those foods, if I can become a good
cook, and create great foods that I enjoy eating, and I like them, and I can eat them regularly,
but they're actually super healthy. That's amazing. That's a hack now. Now I'm eating for
the long term, but I'm not giving up too much of the short term pleasure. The same way being in a good relationship
is, you know, is going to beat watching porn and having a good career or working an enjoyable job
or hacking on some code that I enjoy is going to be far more productive than playing a video game.
I don't want to sound preachy, but I will just say that as my love for reading came from,
another one of my tweets is, read what you love until you love to read. So just fall in love with
the idea of reading itself. So it's okay to read the junk food stuff. Just fall in love with reading
and eventually get bored of the simple stuff and you'll go to the more interesting stuff.
And I love to read enough that I don't like watching TV. I don't watch movies. You know,
people start talking about shows that they're watching on Netflix or what have you, and I give them this empty look. I don't watch shows
on Netflix. They're not interesting. It's far more interesting to me to go for a walk and be
meditative, and I'll be in a very happy place, or to read a book, which will be intellectually
stimulating. And sure, once in a while, watch a movie with friends or with my wife, but it's a
social thing. You know, I'm doing it as a way of being on
the same common ground as them. I would never watch a movie on my own unless maybe I was trapped
in a 15-hour airplane flight and I was really bored and I ran out of everything else to do,
and I just want to zone out. Even then, I don't think I would watch a movie anymore.
So I just feel like a lot of it is finding the hacks, finding the things that make the long-term feel effortless to you,
and then you win. Okay. Last question. First recommendation, if you ever do decide to watch
something- Sorry, before we finish that topic, very important on people. Find the people that
doesn't take work to be around. The best relationships don't feel like work. You make
the other person happy being yourself. They make you happy by being themselves. Everyone's honest. No one's putting on an act they can't carry on for the next decade.
Same thing with friendships. You know, the best friendships are friendships that were formed over
nothing. It's not because you went to school. It's not because you studied on the same thing.
It's not because you're working together. It's not because you enjoy rugby or whatever. It's
because your chemistry matches. Your temperament is similar. And so you can be
friends with this person for 30 years, 50 years. So the compound interest in relationships part,
ironically, means that the best relationships, whether friendships or family or love, are the
ones where you don't have to work too hard at them. So you don't have to sustain that workload
for the rest of your life, and you can do it effortlessly. Yeah, totally. Well, one of your
quotes that I think of often, and i might be paraphrasing
this is if you want to avoid conflict rule number one is avoid people who are constantly involved
with conflict right i mean something along those lines i mean for example when you're in a
relationship just watch how the other person treats their worst enemy because eventually
they'll just redefine you as enemy and you'll get to feel that behavior. So I think the number one criteria I look for in a relationship is that
person has to be kind. They just have to be a nice person. And because eventually they'll,
in a certain context, you can always be reclassified from friend to enemy.
So you just want to see the boundaries of someone's ethics. If you see someone
being bad
to a server or someone engaging in unethical behavior or suing other people or fighting other
people all the time, it's only a matter of time before they fight you. So just stay away from
these high conflict people. Everyone has conflict. No one is clean. But that said, there are
definitely people who engage in conflict and do it regularly, and they make it a part of their lifestyle.
Just walk away.
It's not worth it.
There are plenty of people who are low-conflict and easy to get along with.
Yeah, low-conflict, low-maintenance, who can also be brutally candid when necessary, right, which doesn't equal high-conflict.
Well, one thing I've noticed, and I haven't written a tweet on this because I've had a hard time figuring out how to say it, but the people that I want to spend time around these days, when I look at what the common characteristic is, they're highly self-aware.
They're very, very aware of themselves.
They're not running on autopilot.
They don't get angry easily.
They don't get unhappy easily.
They don't take themselves too seriously. They have a certain separation from their own thoughts and personality that prevents circumstances and their personality
from overwhelming them. They don't have a victim mentality. They're not caught up in some story of
what happened to them when they were younger. They've had those issues for sure, but they've
just gotten past them and been like, I don't want to be that person. I don't want to be trapped in
that mindset. They're not trying to signal all the time how important they are or who they know
or what they've done or how virtuous they are. They're not virtue signaling or bigoteering.
They have low egos. Generally, I can literally plot on a line, the more self-aware somebody is,
I guarantee you, the more attractive that they are to a large number of people. And to the degree
that I've achieved any modicum of fame, and fame is a trap, and I'm going to pay for this, I know I
will pay for this, but any modicum of fame that I've achieved, I think is because I am one of the
few people who has been successful in business that thinks out loud in public. And because I'm
willing to think out loud in public,
that's a risk that I take on. It improves my thinking, but other people say, oh yeah,
he's somewhat self-aware. He's thinking about himself. And I think that helps inspire other
people to also say, okay, it's okay for me to think about myself. And I just find hanging
around self-aware people is a lot easier than people who are running on autopilot,
almost like NPCs.
NPCs.
What does that mean?
Non-player characters.
It's a reference to certain kinds of video games
where it's like a computer-controlled character, right?
They're predictable.
I got it.
All right, so speaking of games,
this is the final tweet in the podcast.
Here it is. The reason to win the game is so that you can be free of it. And my questions about this
are, I'll read it one more time. The reason to win the game is so that you can be free of it.
I would be curious to know what game you are free of or what game you're playing so that you can be free of it?
I like to think I'm free of almost all the games at this point. What are the games? All of life is
games, right? You start out with the family game, you do the school game, the grades game,
the getting girlfriends and boyfriends game, the getting married game, the having kids game,
the making money game, the having a career game, the getting famous game, the
dressing well game.
You know, it's so much of a social games.
There are a few that are not games like meditation.
You're not doing if you're scoring points in meditation, you're doing it wrong.
Yoga.
These are single player games, right?
So it's really the multiplayer games are the ones that suck you into society and into anxiety.
Now, you kind of have to play them.
You have two choices towards peace in your life.
One is you can play these games and you can win them.
And when you win them, this is the hard part,
realizing you've won and stop playing new ones
or setting new goals for yourself
that are even higher and higher.
It's like my friends who have made so much money
and they continue, all they try to do is make money
and they just don't seem very happy about it.
It's fine if they're happy.
Elon Musk seems like he's having a grand old time.
That's fine, but if it's making you miserable,
and you continue doing it, and you only have one life,
and you kind of can't see past that,
then I would argue you're playing the game too far.
So there's kind of two ways out of the trap.
One is not wanting something is as good as having it.
I think it was Lad shabbo said
this on twitter i thought it was really good or there's a recent socrates quote that i retweeted
where he was taken to uh the story is he was taken to a market back in ancient greece and it was full
of luxurious and fine items and he said there are so many things that i do not want right and it was
he looked at all these fineries said so many things here that i do not want, right? And it was, he looked at all these fineries and said,
so many things here that I do not want. And I thought that is freedom. That is power. That
is self-contained. That is a person who has found himself and needs nothing outside of himself.
That is so inspirational. So the same way I look upon the world and I say, well, I could just say
that, right? You can't just say that. If I just said, there's so many things that I don't want,
it's not true. I want the money. I want the girl. I wanted the fame or I wouldn't have
gone on podcasts and I wouldn't be on Twitter. At some level, that is true. So obviously,
there's certain things that I want. I'm not a monk. I'm not living in an ashram. But what I can
do is I've gotten the things that I want and I'm careful not to want more. I don't want more fame.
I don't want more money.
If I get it, it's fine.
It's part of the craft, part of the bonus, you know, so I have to be careful about what
I, about not unconsciously taking on new desires.
If I'm taking on a new desire, I better go fulfill that.
So these are all just games that I'm playing and, you know, you got to play some game.
You're on this planet, you're alive.
You might as well play something.
Now the question is, what game do you play and how do you get out of the game so you're
not just trapped playing that game forever?
And one way is you choose your games very carefully.
If you're a monk, you only choose very, very few games to play or you play no games and
you live content, blissful, harmonious, peaceful.
Or the other is you play the game and you win it and then you say i'm now free of this so what that
tweet is that tweet is the reason to play the game sorry the reason to win the game is to be free of
it it's a reminder to myself that for the games that i've won it's time to let go of them and to
be free of them and not to unconsciously double down by comparing myself to the Joneses
and continuing to level up and level up and level up and level up. And then one day you die.
And then you're like, okay, that was pointless. Like, you know, I did all that work for what?
Like for nothing. So if you're not enjoying it anymore, if you've already won the game by the
definition you had when you started playing the game. And one hack is to set the definition early on so that when you go past it, you know you've won. To not get trapped into playing this game
forever and just living in some anxious future as opposed to actually enjoying yourself in the
present, you have to know when to stop playing the game. And so to me, the reason to play these games
is to win them and then you can be free of them and to see what else then
that you want to do or not do not to keep playing the same game forever because these games are
the adult games are very cleverly designed you can keep playing them infinitely and they're all
ups and downs and ups and downs and i guarantee you every time you get money you'll be afraid
you're going to lose it or you're going to compare it to the next person who has it or every time you
get famous now that's uh let's say that's the image that you have to live up to. And now insults can hurt you. And now you
don't have your privacy anymore, as you've written about. So all of these games have downsides. Or if
you're good at dating, you have a lot of men or women in your life, then you're also going to have
a lot of relationship trauma. And you've got a lot of tumultuousness. You've got a lot of hurt
people. You've got a lot of emotional drama in your life so you just have to kind of realize when you won the game and say i'm done
with this so i would i would aspire to be like socrates and say there are so many things in this
world that i do not want and i like to think that i'm kind of there for the most parts either i
don't want it or i have it now of course there's a fear of losing it which is always there but i
don't want to pick up new desires unconscious there but i don't want to pick up new
desires unconsciously and i don't want to keep upgrading my lifestyle and my expectations to
match my circumstances otherwise i'll be on this treadmill forever we are all playing games and
the key is knowing which game you are playing so you can at least attempt to consciously choose
the game finite and infinite games by j James Kars is an interesting read.
And I just want to close with,
and then you're certainly more than welcome to add any closing comments,
but a quote that really makes me think of you.
It's one of my favorite quotes from Feynman.
It's Richard P. Feynman, once again.
Here's the quote.
The first principle is that you must not fool yourself,
and you are the easiest person to fool.
I love that quote.
I love that quote.
I read it when I was nine or 10 years old, and I've never forgotten it.
It is so important, and none of us are perfect.
We all have flaws.
We all have weaknesses.
We all have vices, or I'll speak for myself.
Certainly, that's true of me.
But you, Naval, as much as anyone else, perhaps more than anyone
else I know, have gone to great lengths to become self-aware. Furthermore, and this is, I think,
one of the distinguishing characteristics for me that you represent, becoming self-aware and
spending time on the timeless while also reserving the right with competency to be a very
high-level operator in the real world, right? Because you can be not of this world by opting
out completely and go into a world of introspection, but in truth, lack the resilience and
emotional awareness to interact with any type of real stressor,
which doesn't appeal to me, certainly. And you can be so engulfed by being in the world
that you lose self-awareness. You stop realizing that you're playing certain games. You become
addicted and self-identified with things that come from sort of consensus reality, that's also not appealing.
But you have managed in a way that I find fascinating to combine the cultivation of
self-awareness with operating in the world at a high level.
I wouldn't say I'm necessarily there yet, but it gets a little easier every year.
Like, yeah, the Feynman quote is a brilliant one. He's right. We fool ourselves all the time. And
I still fool myself all the time because I still have strong beliefs and opinions. For example, even though I
don't tweet a lot about politics, I do have strong political opinions. And that is a form of fooling
myself because, you know, politics is a man-made game. It doesn't really exist in the real world.
There's no trees aware of politics. And I do, even though I don't like to, even some of my beliefs
are filtered and line up in bundles based on my chosen media sources and whatnot.
So I fool myself all the time.
But just if you can fool yourself a little bit less, then you can navigate reality much better.
It doesn't take a lot.
Most people are just living very unconsciously, you know, unexamined life.
So it just gives you kind of a leg up.
And I agree with you in that you can always check out of the game and it's easier that
way, but then you're fragile, right?
You kind of build resilience by working out hard.
And it's hard to be calm until you've lost a lot and won a lot.
Like you have to see the ups and the downs and the ups and the downs before you get tired
of the dopamine chase.
And you sort of realize like, okay, this is down, but eventually there'll be an up or there's an up, there'll be a down. I know how this game works.
So one of the things I've been tracking recently is I've been trying to kind of make a list of
what are the activities that are sort of non-dual in nature that don't create their own opposite
down the road. So chasing money does create anxiety and suffering down the road as you
compare and you win and lose and so on. You know, chasing fame also has downsides where you're not open to insults and
attacks and being canceled and whatnot. So what activities are intrinsically true in and of
themselves and kind of are a free lunch? And so those include things like meditation, yoga,
creating art, playing, reading for fun, not necessarily
for knowledge or education, writing, journaling. You can even be building a business as long as
you're doing it for the craft of it, for the flow of it, not necessarily for a given outcome,
although it's hard to do that. At least externally, it seems like Elon Musk is doing that.
He's building rockets to get to Mars, not to make money or to be famous, although he's getting those as byproducts.
So I think that kind of this whole not fooling yourself,
paying attention to yourself,
not taking yourself too seriously,
examining your own thoughts from first principles,
and kind of doing activities
that are done intrinsically for you,
as opposed to for the external world.
They just make your life better.
I'm not doing these things to be a Stoic sage, right?
Honestly, one of the downsides of the Stoics is they don't look like they were having a lot of fun.
I still like that a lot, right?
Now, obviously, a lot has been Latin translation.
I know they had their vomitoriums and they had their orgies and whatnot.
But, you know, the Stoics, just at least the way it's modern projected and this is one of the
reasons why i do like osho you know people give osho a lot of flack and and they should he he was
a little crazy in some ways but he was having fun he had a good time and you, you're alive. You have one very short life. When your life ends, it goes to zero. It's to you, it's indistinguishable from your perspective. Your death is indistinguishable from the end of the world. As far as you're concerned, the world has disappeared. Because when you came into existence, the world appeared. When you go out of existence the world disappears and that is so consequential that it makes the
rest of your life inconsequential and that is a form of freedom and so you should enjoy yourself
you should not suffer in this life if you are just constantly suffering then figure out how to get
out of that suffering if you can't get out of that suffering then figure out how to redefine
your internal worldview so that you don't necessarily view it as suffering any more than the extent that you need to to get out of it. These days, we borrow a
lot of suffering on behalf of other people. A lot of people want to be a little Christ carrying
crosses for others. It's a miserable existence. You're actually not doing them any favors either.
You carrying their cross isn't making their life any better. The better way is for you to be happy
and successful and healthy and then
go save them, like literally save them physically, not necessarily just, you know, sit around
suffering for them. Or at least that's the life that I choose to live. I'm going to end with one
story. There was a guy that I met in Thailand, Craig, I forget his last name, but he used to
work for Tony Robbins. And I met this guy and we were on vacation in Thailand.
And he was just the happiest person.
He was just happy all the time.
And he just seemed to be able to laugh it off.
And as far as he had a good life, he had stuff going for him.
But it wasn't like, you know, he had this incredibly enviable life where you would drop
everything and move to Thailand, adopt his lifestyle.
He had an okay life.
But he was just happy and not in a
forced way, but he was genuinely happy. And so I asked him, I said, like, you know, what's your
secret? Why not? And he said that, you know, he used to work for Tony Robbins and he used to fly
around setting up events for Tony. And, you know, he was always sitting in the front row and taking
notes and setting things up and learning and listening. And he just kind of started seeing
through his own internal BS.
He got to this point where, like you said,
like he was fooling himself into unhappiness.
And he just decided one day, he said,
you know what, I have no responsibility
to anybody in this world other than me.
And like, or if I do have a responsibility,
there's kind of this weight of responsibility
that goes on where we're like,
oh, I need to live up to some imagined self. What he realized was he said, somebody in this world, somebody has to be
happy all the time. That is somebody's job to be that role model for people in the world. That
might as well be me. I'll be that guy. I'll take on that burden. And he decided to be the happy one.
And I just thought that was simple and brilliant. And he did it. He lived
it. So, you know, I want to be that guy who is successful, peaceful, happy, enjoying life,
blissful, meditative, spiritual, successful, and, you know, as healthy as I can be, and famous,
and rich, and not give a damn about any of it. So if I lose it all tomorrow,
I still want to be happy. That's it. That's where I want to be. And I'll just make that decision
because somebody has to be that person. It might as well be me.
I love it, man. Naval Ravikant, otherwise known, aka Naval Ravikant, but Naval Ravikant, at Naval on Twitter, N-A-V-A-L. And he has the podcast,
of course, Naval, N-A-V-A-L. You can find that anywhere you find your podcasts, the blog,
nav.al. Previous conversations we've had, and we've had quite a few, you can just search Naval
on the website, tim.blog forward slash Naval. Anything else you would like to add?
Any other resources, places people can say hello on the internet, recommendations,
asks of the audience, Naval? I'm mostly on Twitter. Eric Jorgensen recently put out a book
which had a bunch of my sayings called The Almanac of Naval Ravikant. It was very nice of him.
I don't make any money off of it. It's free on the internet. You can just download it,
I think, at Navalmanac.
Clever little turn of phrase.
Yeah, I think that's it.
We'll see you on the interwebs.
You know, I wish everybody has a wealthy, healthy, and happy life.
Like, go get it.
Thanks so much, Naval, for taking the time.
This is awesome.
And to everybody listening, thank you for tuning in.
And until next time, don't fool yourself,
sit down, spend some time with your mind and don't be too hard on that roommate in your head.
Hey guys, this is Tim again. Just a few more things before you take off. Number one,
this is five bullet Friday. Do you want to get a short email from me? Would you enjoy getting a short email from me every Friday that provides a little morsel of fun for the
weekend? And Five Bullet Friday is a very short email where I share the coolest things I've found
or that I've been pondering over the week. That could include favorite new albums that I've
discovered. It could include gizmos and gadgets and all sorts of weird shit that I've somehow dug up
in the world of the esoteric as I do.
It could include favorite articles that I've read and that I've shared with my close friends,
for instance.
And it's very short.
It's just a little tiny bite of goodness before you head off for the weekend.
So if you want to receive that,
check it out. Just go to 4hourworkweek.com. That's 4hourworkweek.com all spelled out and
just drop in your email and you will get the very next one. And if you sign up, I hope you enjoy it.
This episode is brought to you by ShipStation. The holiday season is fast approaching and we
know that people will be buying more stuff online than ever before.
All of these trends to e-commerce have been accelerated due to COVID and much more.
If you're an e-commerce seller, are you ready to meet the demands of a record-breaking online shopping season?
Be ready with ShipStation.
ShipStation.com is the fastest, easiest, and most affordable way to manage and ship your orders.
In just a few clicks,
you're managing orders, printing out discounted shipping labels, and getting your products out fast. Happier holidays for you and your customers. ShipStation takes the hassle out of holiday
shipping. No matter where you're selling, on Amazon, Etsy, your website, via Shopify,
or other platforms, ShipStation brings all of your orders into one simple interface.
And ShipStation works with all of the major carriers, USPS, FedEx, UPS, even International.
You can compare and choose the best shipping solution every time, and you can access the same postage discounts that are usually reserved for large Fortune 500 companies.
It's no wonder that ShipStation is the number one choice of online sellers.
And right now, my listeners, that's you guys, can try ShipStation free for 60 days when you use offer code TIM.
Just go to the homepage, ShipStation.com, click on the microphone at the top of the homepage, and type in TIM, T-I-M.
That's it.
Go to ShipStation.com, then enter offer code TIM.
ShipStation.com.
Make ship happen.
This episode is brought to you by Tonal,
T-O-N-A-L. I'm super excited about this one, and I was skeptical of it in the beginning. Tonal,
quote, Tonal is the world's most intelligent home gym and personal trainer, end quote. That's the tagline from their website, folks, to give you the one-sentence summary. And this device, it's
really a system, is perfect for
anyone looking to take their home workouts to the next level or someone who just wants to get
maximum bang for the buck in a tiny, tiny footprint of space. Tonal is precision engineered to be the
world's most advanced strength studio and personal trainer. It uses breakthrough technology of all
different types to help get you stronger, faster. I was introduced to Tonal by three different friends. All of them are tech savvy. One of them is a
former competitive skier who's doubled his strength in a number of movements using Tonal,
even though he has a long athletic background. And I'll paint a picture for you. By eliminating
traditional metal weights, dumbbells and barbells, Tonal can deliver 200 pounds of resistance,
which doesn't sound like a lot, but it's actually, it feels like a lot more at the high end,
in a device smaller than a flat screen TV. And you can perform at least 150 different exercises.
And these different technologies are exclusive to Tonal. And you can dial weights up and down
with the touch of a button in one pound increments using magnets and electricity so the movement is extremely smooth and even though I have a home gym
already in my garage I'm still getting a tonal installed I've used tonal for
multiple workouts now to do things I just cannot do in my home gym such as
the chop and lift exercises from the 4-hour body all sorts of cable
exercises that would usually involve much, much bigger piece of equipment. Eccentric training. For instance, you can do,
to give a simple example, bicep curls where you are lifting, let's just say 20 pounds in each hand
up, and then Toto will automatically increase the weight because you can lower more than you can
lift to say 25 or 30 pounds on the way down.
And I do kettlebell swings. I do all sorts of deadlifts, this, that, and other thing. And after
one workout on tonal focusing on pulling, I was blasted for a full week. It's really incredible
what you can do with eccentrics. They also have all sorts of other really, really cool
advantages that you can apply to any of your favorite movements.
Tonal learns from your strength and provides suggested weight recommendations for every move,
detailed progress reports to help you see your strengths grow. Tonal also has a growing library of expert-led workouts by motivating coaches from strength training to cardio. So you can do
really just about everything. Every program is personalized to your body using artificial
intelligence and other aspects of the engineering.
And smart features check your form in real time just like a personal trainer.
So check it out.
Tritonal, T-O-N-A-L, the world's smartest home gym for 30 days in your home.
And if you don't love it, you can return it for a full refund.
Visit www.tonal.com, T-O-N-A-L.com. And for a limited time,
get $100 off of smart accessories
when you use promo code TIM21.
Like I'm ready for my first drink at checkout.
That's www.tonal, T-O-N-A-L.com,
promo code TIM21, T-I-M-21.
Tonal, be your strongest.