The Tim Ferriss Show - #487: Dr. Martine Rothblatt — A Masterclass on Asking Better Questions and Peering Into the Future
Episode Date: December 16, 2020Dr. Martine Rothblatt (@skybiome) is Chairman and CEO of United Therapeutics, a biotechnology company she started to save the life of one of her daughters. The company offers FDA-ap...proved medicines for pulmonary hypertension and neuroblastoma and is working on manufacturing an unlimited supply of transplantable organs.Dr. Rothblatt previously created and led Sirius XM as its Chairman and CEO and launched other satellite systems for navigation and international television broadcasting. In the field of aviation, her Sirius XM satellite system enhances safety with real-time digital weather information to pilots in flight nationwide. She also designed the world’s first electric helicopter and piloted it to a Guinness world record for speed, altitude, and flight duration.In the legal arena, Dr. Rothblatt led efforts of the transgender community to establish their own health law standards and of the International Bar Association to protect autonomy rights in genetic information via an international treaty. She also published dozens of scholarly articles and papers on the law of outer space, resulting in her election to the International Institute of Space Law, and represented the radio astronomy community’s scientific research interests before the Federal Communications Commission.She has bachelor’s (communications studies, summa cum laude), JD (Order of the Coif) and MBA degrees from UCLA, which in 2018 awarded her its highest recognition, the UCLA Medal, and she holds a PhD in medical ethics from the Royal London School of Medicine and Dentistry. Her patented inventions cover aspects of satellite communication, medicinal biochemistry, and cognitive software.Dr. Rothblatt’s recent books are on xenotransplantation (Your Life or Mine), gender identity (Transgender to Transhuman), and cyberethics (Virtually Human). She occasionally posts on Instagram at @transbinary and Twitter at @skybiome.Please enjoy!*This episode is brought to you by FreshBooks. I’ve been talking about FreshBooks—an all-in-one invoicing + payments + accounting solution—for years now. Many entrepreneurs, as well as the contractors and freelancers that I work with, use it all the time.FreshBooks makes it super easy to track things like expenses, project time, and client info, and then merge it all into great-looking invoices. FreshBooks can save users up to 200 hours a year on accounting and bookkeeping tasks. Right now FreshBooks is offering my listeners a free 30-day trial, and no credit card is required. Go to FreshBooks.com/Tim and enter “Tim Ferriss” in the “How did you hear about us?” section!*This episode is also brought to you by Athletic Greens. I get asked all the time, “If you could only use one supplement, what would it be?” My answer is usually Athletic Greens, my all-in-one nutritional insurance. I recommended it in The 4-Hour Body in 2010 and did not get paid to do so. I do my best with nutrient-dense meals, of course, but AG further covers my bases with vitamins, minerals, and whole-food-sourced micronutrients that support gut health and the immune system. Right now, Athletic Greens is offering you their Vitamin D Liquid Formula free with your first subscription purchase—a vital nutrient for a strong immune system and strong bones. Visit AthleticGreens.com/Tim to claim this special offer today and receive the free Vitamin D Liquid Formula (and five free travel packs) with your first subscription purchase! That’s up to a one-year supply of Vitamin D as added value when you try their delicious and comprehensive all-in-one daily greens product.*If you enjoy the podcast, would you please consider leaving a short review on Apple Podcasts/iTunes? It takes less than 60 seconds, and it really makes a difference in helping to convince hard-to-get guests. I also love reading the reviews!For show notes and past guests, please visit tim.blog/podcast.Sign up for Tim’s email newsletter (“5-Bullet Friday”) at tim.blog/friday.For transcripts of episodes, go to tim.blog/transcripts.Discover Tim’s books: tim.blog/books.Follow Tim:Twitter: twitter.com/tferriss Instagram: instagram.com/timferrissFacebook: facebook.com/timferriss YouTube: youtube.com/timferrissPast guests on The Tim Ferriss Show include Jerry Seinfeld, Hugh Jackman, Dr. Jane Goodall, LeBron James, Kevin Hart, Doris Kearns Goodwin, Jamie Foxx, Matthew McConaughey, Esther Perel, Elizabeth Gilbert, Terry Crews, Sia, Yuval Noah Harari, Malcolm Gladwell, Madeleine Albright, Cheryl Strayed, Jim Collins, Mary Karr, Maria Popova, Sam Harris, Michael Phelps, Bob Iger, Edward Norton, Arnold Schwarzenegger, Neil Strauss, Ken Burns, Maria Sharapova, Marc Andreessen, Neil Gaiman, Neil de Grasse Tyson, Jocko Willink, Daniel Ek, Kelly Slater, Dr. Peter Attia, Seth Godin, Howard Marks, Dr. Brené Brown, Eric Schmidt, Michael Lewis, Joe Gebbia, Michael Pollan, Dr. Jordan Peterson, Vince Vaughn, Brian Koppelman, Ramit Sethi, Dax Shepard, Tony Robbins, Jim Dethmer, Dan Harris, Ray Dalio, Naval Ravikant, Vitalik Buterin, Elizabeth Lesser, Amanda Palmer, Katie Haun, Sir Richard Branson, Chuck Palahniuk, Arianna Huffington, Reid Hoffman, Bill Burr, Whitney Cummings, Rick Rubin, Dr. Vivek Murthy, Darren Aronofsky, and many more.See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
Transcript
Discussion (0)
This episode is brought to you by Headspace. Life can be stressful, even under normal circumstances.
2020 has challenged even the most resilient people I know. It's highlighted just how much
we all need stress relief that goes beyond quick fixes, or really the hope for just a
one-and-done band-aid. Quick is fine, but we need stuff that is durable, and that's where
Headspace comes in. Headspace is your daily dose of mindfulness in the form of guided meditations in an easy-to-use app. Now,
you might ask yourself, very reasonably, there are 2,000-plus apps for meditation. Why would I
use Headspace? Headspace is one of the only meditation apps advancing the field of mindfulness
and meditation through clinically validated research. Headspace is backed by 25 published studies on
its benefits, 600,000 five-star reviews, and more than 60 million downloads. So if people keep
telling you to try meditation and you're like, when would I do that? When would I possibly have
time? You should check out Headspace. If you have 10 minutes, Headspace can change your life.
Headspace offers a really light lift and a lot of features to keep you going, which is
part of the reason that I've used Headspace for years now. So whatever the situation, Headspace
can really help you feel better. Overwhelmed? Headspace has a three-minute SOS meditation for
you. Need some help falling asleep? Headspace has wind-down sessions their members swear by. And for
parents, Headspace even has morning meditations you can do with your kids. Headspace's approach to mindfulness can reduce stress, improve sleep, boost focus, and
increase your overall sense of well-being. And it really starts with very, very simple practices.
And if you look at my case, for instance, I just went through one of the basics today with the
co-founder, Andy, I think it's Pudicombe. Could be Pudicombe. I'm
not sure. But former monk turned into co-founder of Headspace, has the most soothing hypnotic voice
imaginable. And I did a three-minute meditation, something like that. It's easy, it's fundamental,
and it always puts me in a better space. So I'm going through the basics. Even though I've
meditated for years, I'm going through the basics. Even though I've meditated for years,
I'm going through the basics once again.
And I would suggest to anyone
that they consider starting there.
Headspace makes it easy for you
to build a life-changing meditation practice
with mindfulness that works for you
on your schedule, anytime, anywhere.
We all want to feel happier.
We all want more peace.
And Headspace is meditation made simple.
Go to headspace.com slash simple. Go to headspace.com
slash Tim. That's headspace.com slash Tim for a free one-month trial with access to Headspace's
full library of meditations for every conceivable possible situation. You can break glass in case
of emergency in almost any situation and find something on Headspace. This is the best deal
offered right now for Headspace. So check it out. Go to headspace.com slash Tim today.
This episode is brought to you by FreshBooks. Thousands of listeners and a lot of the
contractors I use and my readers use FreshBooks. If you've been thinking about turning your part
time side business into a full time small business or big business for that matter, you may be feeling some extra uncertainty
these days. And that's obviously completely natural. There are a lot of questions that can
come up. How do you create a professional appearance and experience? Who can help you
with support? How do you manage the billing and all of that, but still focus on the primary work
of your business and on growing your business.
FreshBooks is an all-in-one invoicing and accounting solution. It does a lot more than that. That helps you take your business from part-time to full-time, and it only takes
minutes to set up. They have one of the best sign-up flows in the business. I've seen very
few better. They have been helping people turn their passions into small businesses for 15 years,
and they can help you too. I've met the founders. I've looked at this product very closely. With automated invoicing,
billable time, and expense tracking, and an intuitive dashboard that ties it all together,
it's like having a full-time financial assistant with you every step of the way.
You can create, customize, and send branded and professional-looking invoices in about
30 seconds. You get paid up to twice as fast with fees as low as 1%
using ACH payments on FreshBooks. It's a fast, easy, and secure way for clients to pay you for
your work and pay you more quickly. One of the many things that sets FreshBooks apart is their
award-winning Toronto-based customer service. A real person picks up fast and will help you until
you are completely satisfied and have your
questions answered. There's a lot of uncertainty in the world right now, but your ability to build
a business that you're passionate about, that you're proud of, doesn't have to be one of those
things. Business owners all over the world rate FreshBooks as the easiest accounting software to
use. Try it out. Check it out for free for 30 days at freshbooks.com slash Tim. Just enter Tim Ferris
in the how did you hear about us section. Again, that's freshbooks.com slash Tim to check it out
and try it for free for 30 days. One more time, freshbooks.com slash Tim.
This episode is brought to you by AG1, the daily foundational nutritional supplement that supports
whole body health. I do get asked a lot
what I would take if I could only take one supplement. And the true answer is invariably
AG1. It simply covers a ton of bases. I usually drink it in the mornings and frequently take
their travel packs with me on the road. So what is AG1? AG1 is a science-driven formulation of
vitamins, probiotics, and whole food sourced nutrients. In a single scoop, AG1 gives you
support for the brain, gut, and immune system. So take ownership of your health and try AG1 today.
You will get a free one-year supply of vitamin D and five free AG1 travel packs with your first
subscription purchase. So learn more, check it out. Go to drinkag1.com slash Tim. That's drinkag1, the number one, drinkag1.com slash Tim.
Last time, drinkag1.com would have seemed an appropriate time. What if I did the opposite?
I'm a cybernetic organism living tissue over metal endoskeleton. The Tim Ferriss Show.
Hello boys and girls, ladies and germs, everything and anyone out there who is listening. This is Tim Ferriss. Welcome to another episode of The Tim Ferriss Show. It is my honor and I'm very excited to have as my guest today,
Martine Rothblatt. Who is Martine? Martine Rothblatt is chairman and CEO of United Therapeutics,
a biotechnology company that she started to save the life of one of her daughters. We will talk
about that. We'll talk about a lot of things. The company offers FDA-approved medicines for pulmonary hypertension and neuroblastoma,
and is working on manufacturing an unlimited supply of transplantable organs.
Dr. Rothblatt previously created and led SiriusXM as its chairman and CEO,
and launched other satellite systems for navigation and international television broadcasting.
In the field of aviation, her SiriusXM satellite system enhances safety with real-time digital weather information to pilots in flight nationwide. She also designed the world Bar Association to protect autonomy rights in genetic information via an international treaty.
She also published dozens of scholarly articles and papers on the law of outer space, resulting
in her election to the International Institute of Space Law and represented the radio astronomy
community's scientific research interests before the Federal Communications Commission.
She has a bachelor's, JD, and MBA degrees from UCLA, which in 2018 awarded her its highest recognition, the UCLA
Medal, and she holds a PhD in medical ethics from the Royal London School of Medicine and Dentistry.
Her patented inventions cover aspects of satellite communication, medicinal biochemistry,
and cognitive software. Dr. Rothblatt's recent books are on xenotransplantation,
Your Life or Mine, Gender Identity, Transgender to Transhuman, and Cyber Ethics, Virtually Human.
She occasionally posts on Instagram at transbinary and Twitter at skybiome.
Martine or Dr. Rothblatt, both, welcome to the show. Thank you for making the time.
Thanks so much, Tim. Just Martine's fine. All right. And this interview, as my listeners might imagine, was challenging in the best way
to prepare for because there are a million and one directions that we can go with just this bio
alone, which is, of course, a snapshot, a distillation of much more that you have done.
I thought we could start in perhaps an unlikely place,
and that is Alan Watts. I have read that you are a fan of Alan Watts, and specifically the book
subtitled On the Taboo Against Knowing Who You Really Are. Could you please explain,
if that is true, why that is the case. Yes, thanks, Tim. Alan Watts has a really
unique ability to see the dialectic aspect of everything in nature. By that, I mean that
there's a kind of a yin-yang aspect to everything in nature. And he points out that, for example,
you can't have a crest of a wave without the bottom of a wave. And it has helped
me whenever I see things in life that seem negative to be able to look at it in another way
and see the positive in it. When were you first introduced to his work? How did that come about?
I was first introduced to it through the literature of this
philosophy called transhumanism, sort of the idea that people can transcend some biological human
limitations. A friend of mine, Frank Sazanowski, who is the head of the National Organization on
Rare Diseases, pointed me in the direction of some Jesuits. He himself is both a Jesuit and an
FDA lawyer, but he pointed me in the direction of some Jesuits, such as Teilhard du Chardon from
France and other individuals here in the U.S., and then from those Jesuits, they referred to Alan
Watts. I'm not sure if he was actually a Jesuit, but he
undertook some religious training both in China, I think, and in the US. He was a radio announcer
for many years in San Francisco, I think during the 70s or 80s. I don't know if you remember,
Tim, the film of a few years ago, Her, in which like a computer-
Tim Cynova I do. Yep. So I was watching that movie, which kind of is interesting to me because it epitomized or
it visualized the concept of computers becoming sentient. And in the middle of that movie,
there's a scene in which Alan Watts appears. And I stood up in the movie theater and I said,
oh my God, Adam Watts.
Did you ultimately find the presentation in that movie to be compelling as it relates to sort of sentient intelligence?
I did.
I thought it was an accurate depiction of a likely way that sentience would begin to
arise in our society, basically by being very, very useful
to people, cleaning up their inboxes, stuff like that.
This may be a good place, and we're going to be all over the place in non-linear fashion.
Bina48, who or what is Bina48, if I'm pronouncing that correctly?
Yep, you've got it perfectly.
So Bina's the name of my partner, and we've
been married for about 40 years. And when she was 48, we undertook a joint project to try to create
a digital simulacra, or a digital copy of her basic personality with a lot of her memories and
thoughts. And we thought this would be a very nice project as a combination
of science and art to encourage young people, get them more excited about computer science and
women in particular, girls in particular. So we contracted with a couple of companies
who were experts in both the software engineering side and in the physical modeling of a face that moves exactly
like a human face does. You might imagine there's this exhibit at Disney World, Disneyland of like
Lincoln and whatnot, something like that, but more realistic. And we built this project. And
since that time, Bina48 has thrilled audiences all around the world. I'm sure she has inspired hundreds, if not thousands, of girls to go into very strong. And in one of them, a significant
other is effectively resurrected by pulling data and patterns and therefore mannerisms and so on
from effectively social media accounts. So pulling from the cloud and feeding into
this simulacrum or model of someone who used to be, or in this case still is,
how far away do you think we are from being able to do something along those lines convincingly?
Yes, Tim. So I am a fan of the Black Mirror series, and there are a few other somewhat
similar series that are streaming now, Upload and whatnot.
So it's an idea that's catching on.
And even at a very basic level, social media firms like Twitter, for example, and probably
Facebook as well, offer an opportunity that after a person passes away, their account
can remain active. And I believe
in the case of Twitter can even continue tweeting in the way that you once tweeted.
So I think this general idea is it's a trend. It's only going to grow more and more prevalent
as software does a better and better job of copying the human personality. Sometime in this century,
for sure, and maybe in just like two or three decades, I think that there will be a digital
copy of a person, and another word is like a digital doppelganger of a person, who will
claim to be the original person. And they may make that claim before or after the person
died. And then psychologists and lawyers and theologians and philosophers will have to grapple
with, is this just like a really super fancy digital photo album, or is this actually some
form of digital sentience? When you were growing up, who were your role models or inspirations? Was there
anyone in particular who stood out to you when you were in high school or at the very beginning,
let's just call it freshman year, of your undergrad as icons worth emulating or lesser-known
role models worth emulating? Did anyone really stick out for
you? I think that in terms of authors, I was very influenced by Robert Heinlein,
the science fiction author. Sure. Yeah. Stranger in a Strange Land and so on.
Absolutely. It was so brilliant. And then a few years ago when his widow released the uncensored, unedited version of Stranger in a Strange Land.
It's like three times larger and like no holds barred. I just savored every page of that.
My favorite book of all of his is Time Enough for Love, in which he covers almost every topic
under the sun. So Heinlein's characters were somewhat of role models for me,
like Lazarus Long is a common character in some Heinlein books. In the public sphere,
I was very much enamored with Robert Kennedy. His positive, progressive approach to the world
was something that endeared me to him. So I looked up to him.
Those are a couple of the role models that I had at that time.
You seem to be good at many things, of course, just based on the bio alone. But what strikes me
is how quickly you're able to develop expertise in new fields. And I'd like to use this as an opportunity to
bring up what was mentioned at the very beginning of your bio, and that is United Therapeutics,
a biotechnology company. She started to save the life of one of her daughters.
I'd love for you to provide some context for this and tell a bit of the story just because people will want
to hear it. And then the follow-up, just to plant the seed for it, is how you learned biology.
Because my understanding is you didn't have much in terms of background in biology. That's a huge mouthful of a question, but if you could give us a bit of
the background, that would be extremely helpful and we can use that as a jumping off point.
Sure. So it's kind of funny that you can go all the way through undergraduate at a great place
like UCLA and never be required to take a life science course, but that was the case.
So the last biology class I had was in high school. And here, suddenly I was faced with a situation as an adult while running SiriusXM that our youngest daughter is diagnosed with
a fatal illness. She can't even walk up a couple of stairs to the front door,
and there are no medicines approved for it. I finally got her to the best doctor one could find,
the head of pediatric cardiology at Children's National Medical Center in the middle of
Washington, D.C., and the doctor said, you know, this is an extremely rare disease. No one knows
why it arises. All the patients die within two to three years. He had only seen two or three other
kids with it, and they both died. And all you can do is hope for a lung transplant.
So, Tim, I was completely crushed. I just saw black. I mean, I didn't know what to do.
And the only thing I could think of doing while she was in the intensive care ward night after
night and myself and Bina Wood tag team staying there with her was once she fell asleep to go
down into the library and to just begin learning about what was this illness she had, which they
told me was called pulmonary arterial hypertension, and why were there no treatments available for it.
So I just began reading and reading and reading. Most of the time I read things, I didn't understand
what they were talking about because there were these long medical words and chemical words that I never learned in law school or we never had to deal with in electrical engineering.
But of course, there were dictionaries, and I looked up the words in a dictionary, and they had college-level anatomy textbooks. So what I didn't know, I just kept going backwards in
academia, I guess you would say backwards in learning or pedagogia, until I would even get
to a high school-level textbook that would explain something. And I said, okay, I get that.
And I kept taking notes and just educated myself night after night until I learned everything I needed to know.
How did you, and I know this is a story you've told before, but ultimately in searching for
possible solutions, and as we were chatting about before recording, there's a lot of luck involved,
and it doesn't mean that your path is replicable by any set of parents who are caught in
a tragic situation similar to what you experienced. But nonetheless, you were able to ultimately track
down, I suppose it's fair to say, a molecule, a drug of some type. Would you mind describing for listeners the process then of attempting to secure the ability to utilize in any fashion this drug or to license it? If you could describe that, I have a number of questions published on every type of medical research you could imagine.
I mean, it's just a bottomless well.
There are literally hundreds of different types of medical journals, and each of those
journals have, you know, every year thousands of articles published across them.
So it's difficult to find the information that you
need. But in law school, we learn a very useful skill. This skill goes by the name of
shepherdizing after this type of index that they have in law school called shepherds.
So what shepherdizing involves is when a judge writes a decision, like the Supreme Court issues a decision,
they drop a lot of footnotes. And of course, one thing lawyers love to do is make footnotes
and references. And then what you're supposed to do as a good lawyer is to look up all of the
footnotes and the references that that Supreme Court or lower court case referred to. And then the shepherdizing process
is after you get all of those references to then look up all of the references in those other
articles. And ultimately, you get to a point of diminishing returns where three, four, five levels
down, the references are all circling back around on themselves. So I applied that
shepherdizing process to these medical articles. And somewhat like doctors, whenever a researcher
publishes an article, they make footnotes and citations to other people's research who they
relied upon. So I would get all of those articles and read those, and then I would follow up on all
of the references in those. Finally, I read about a molecule that a researcher at GlaxoWellcome
had written in which they described testing this molecule for congestive heart failure,
and it failed in its test of congestive heart failure. It did not work. But in the article, they had
charts of what the molecule did. And the one thing that the molecule did that grabbed my attention
was that it reduced the pressure between the lung and the heart, which is called the pulmonary
artery. It reduced the pulmonary artery pressure while leaving the pressures in all of the rest of the body perfectly fine.
Well, that's exactly the problem with pulmonary arterial hypertension,000 people in the US had the disease.
Because medicines have become so much better and because we've been able to, like you mentioned in the introduction, get all these approvals, there are now 50,000 people in America alone
living with it.
So it's likely that people listening to your podcast will know somebody or another who
has pulmonary arterial hypertension. And I read this article,
and I said, wow, just when I need this tiny stretch of artery, just between the heart and
the lungs, this molecule somehow talks to that tiny stretch of artery and leaves the whole rest
of the body alone. That was the holy grail that I was looking for. So I looked at where the author of the article was from.
He was from GlaxoWelcome in Research Triangle Park, North Carolina. And I made a beeline down
to him and asked him if he could develop this molecule that he'd found for my daughter's
disease. Was it an immediate handing over of the keys to the kingdom? A big all caps yes?
No, it was actually a big all caps no. Unfortunately, the individual who had written
the article had actually retired a few months earlier. And the person that I ended up meeting
with who was in charge of research and development said that this was just one article. It was an
incidental finding. In any event, this disease afflicted so few people, it was completely
unrealistic to expect GlaxoWelcome to develop this molecule for my daughter and other people
with that disease. And I asked him, his name's Bob Bell. He's now
a venture capitalist and very successful gentleman. I asked Dr. Bell, I said, what would it take for
you to develop this medicine? He said, well, it probably would take, you couldn't do it. We only
develop medicines if they have more than a billion dollars a year in revenue potential. He said, but it's possible you could buy it from us if you had a real pharmaceutical company with
real pharmaceutical expertise. I could then introduce you to the business development
people at GlaxoWelcome. So over the course of the next several months, I created a brand new biotechnology company. I was able to
have a Nobel laureate who was formerly associated with GlaxoWelcom become head of a scientific
advisory board. And I re-approached GlaxoWelcom and I said, I have all the things that you asked
for. Can you sell me this drug and we'll develop it ourselves. Well, Tim, it turns out that everybody
I asked said, well, you have to get somebody else in the company to agree. And that's how it is in
a big bureaucracy. It turned out that we had to have 15 different executives sign the same piece
of paper to agree to license this drug to me. Finally, it happened. And all they wanted
really was $25,000 and a promise of 10% of any money that I would ever get from this molecule.
I think they agreed to that only because I kept bugging them. I was in their face all the time.
Also because I believe a serendipitous factor was that Dr. Bell's sister had contracted a form of
pulmonary hypertension from the time I first met him toward the end of this process. And he became
a product champion for me within GlaxoWelcome. I mean, that was just purest luck or serendipity,
whatever you want to say. And then they really didn't think this molecule
had any chance at all. And they were really just doing it to get rid of me, I think.
But still, all 15 people had to sign it. After we successfully developed this molecule,
we have over time paid more than a billion dollars just in royalties to GlaxoWelcome because that molecule has saved thousands of people's
lives. It has produced a billion dollars a year in revenue year after year after year for us.
And Bob Bell, when I invited him to our 15th anniversary, and he came with his sister who
is still alive and on our medicine, and he said this was the absolute best transaction that
GlaxoWelcome had ever done. So in hindsight, what did they miss? What accidentally got deleted from
the spreadsheet or what assumption or assumptions were incorrect that they missed this opportunity
so completely? I think there were probably like maybe three main
ones. The first one, and I can say this kind of from firsthand knowledge since I am now
the head of a pharmaceutical company, the odds of any molecule actually working in the human body
are less than one in a hundred. I mean, the human body is so complicated. It's like a massive set of very precisely
keyed locks, and every molecule is like a random key. And the chance that you would have a molecule
that opened a lock that fixed some dysfunction in the body rather than causing some harm to the body
is less than 1 in 100. So first of all,
they figured the chance of this thing working just in general was less than 1 in 100.
Secondly, they thought to themselves, even if it worked a little bit, there's only 2,000 people
in the whole country with this disease. They didn't really think that if it worked really well,
the number of people would keep accumulating.
I see what you're saying. If you have these people who would have died otherwise not dying,
then that treatment cohort is just going to grow and grow and grow. Is that what you mean?
Exactly. I thought about it like I was getting subscribers at SiriusXM. People said to me,
oh, Martin, you'll be lucky to have 100,000 subscribers. I said, well, if I keep them and I get another 100,000 the next year, then I'll be up to 200,000. And then maybe 400,000,
800,000. Now we have 30 million. So they didn't think in that subscriber mindset. That was the
second problem. The third problem is that they didn't really imagine that the healthcare system would pay
something like $100,000 per year for this medicine.
And at the time, this was in the early to about 20 years ago, early 2000s, I think like
the average price for an expensive medicine was perhaps $10,000 a year for a patient or $10,000 for a
course of treatment. Because of advances in things like precision medicine and gene therapy, there
are many, many medicines now that cost over $100,000 a year, mostly for rare diseases.
And the healthcare system pays for them because so few people have these diseases
that even though the medicines are expensive, it's a drop in the bucket compared to diseases like
hypertension or common illnesses, asthma, that afflict tens of millions of people.
So the healthcare system doesn't really mind paying a lot of money if it's a rare disease.
And the people at GlaxoWelcome were clueless about this.
They were actually looking for the big billion-dollar blockbusters, not for the rare diseases.
So those were their three omissions.
They failed to be Alan Watsian.
You know, they failed to see that because something is big underneath, that means that there's something else that's small.
And that was what Alan Watts would always say.
He says something is good only because something else is bad.
At the very least, I mean, it's a valuable thought exercise when you're looking at the assumptions that you're making.
And what an incredible story.
Just a quick thanks to one of our sponsors, and we'll be right back to the show.
This episode is brought to you by Athletic Greens. I get asked all the time what I would take if I could only take one supplement. The answer is invariably Athletic Greens. I view it
as all-in-one nutritional insurance. I recommended it, in fact, in the 4-Hour Body. This is more than 10 years ago, and I did not get paid to do so.
With approximately 75 vitamins, minerals, and whole food sourced ingredients,
you'd be very hard-pressed to find a more nutrient-dense and comprehensive formula
on the market. It has multivitamins, multimineral greens complex, probiotics,
and prebiotics for gut health, an immunity formula,
digestive enzymes, adaptogens, and much more. I usually take it once or twice a day just to make sure I've covered my bases if I miss anything I'm not aware of. Of course, I focus on nutrient
dense meals to begin with, that's the basis, but Athletic Greens makes it easy to get a lot
of nutrition when whole foods aren't readily available. From travel packets, I always have them in my bag when I'm zipping around. Right now, Athletic Greens is
giving my audience a special offer on top of their all-in-one formula, which is a free vitamin D
supplement and five free travel packs with your first subscription purchase. Many of us are
deficient in vitamin D. I found that true for myself, which is usually produced
in our bodies from sun exposure. So adding a vitamin D supplement to your daily routine is
a great option for additional immune support. Support your immunity, gut health, and energy
by visiting athleticgreens.com slash Tim. You'll receive up to a year's supply of vitamin D
and five free travel packs with your subscription. Again, that's athleticgreens.com
slash Tim. You mentioned Sirius. We haven't spent any time on Sirius just yet. When did you first
fall in love or become intoxicated or enchanted by satellite systems or electrical engineering, I suppose. But you can
take whichever one is more interesting to tackle. You're absolutely right that I fell in love and I
was intoxicated by satellite communications. It seemed to me kind of magical that we can put a
machine way out in space and that machine can do amazing things across the
whole face of the planet. And my first real moment of first love, if you will, was at a
remote NASA tracking station in the Indian Ocean. And I had left UCLA to travel around the world,
really hitchhike around the world.
And I found myself in the Indian Ocean on a set of islands called the Seychelles.
And on these islands, at the top of the mountain, in the middle of one of the main islands,
of the main island, there was a NASA tracking station.
And I went up into it, and I was probably a pretty grungy 19-year-old at that point in time.
But the engineers inside there were kind and patient with me, and they explained to me
how their satellite antennas were communicating with satellites in all different orbits around
the Earth and even all the way out to Jupiter.
I asked them, I said, would it be possible for somebody to put a satellite up there and have it broadcast information back to the
entire earth? And they said, if you made a powerful enough satellite, then the receiving
equipment on earth could be so small that you could hold it in the palm of your hand. And I could have kissed the guy. I just said, wow, that's
the purpose of my life. And I made a beeline back to UCLA. I changed my major to communication
studies. I did an undergraduate thesis on direct broadcast satellites. I did a joint JD MBA degree
where I published multiple articles on satellite communications.
I worked at Hughes Aircraft Company, which was a big manufacturer of satellites back then, and helped design a satellite to cover South America.
And then ultimately went out on my own with my dream goal, which was SiriusXM. serious sex him. What did it feel like, if you can remember, to have that answer given to you,
or that direction rather, given to you, the purpose given to you at that age? I mean,
did it feel a certain way, that type of conviction or that type of belief? What do you recall?
Yeah, Tim, it's the best feeling. It's the best feeling. And actually,
I don't think it really has anything to do with age. I felt like the same kind of feeling when
I was driving one of the first Teslas, and I was looking at the manual, and I saw how much
electrical power it output. And there's a very simple correlation between horsepower and electrical power, between kilowatts and horsepower.
It's almost one-to-one, not exactly.
And I was already a helicopter pilot, and helicopter engines are always quoted in terms of their horsepower.
So right away, I said, wow, this car has enough power to actually lift a helicopter. I had that same kind
of, this is the purpose of my life, is to make an electric helicopter. So you can get this kind of
excitement at any point in life. I think probably the best way to describe it, Tim, would be like a lightning bolt to your soul. Tim Ferriss You know, I was asking about biology earlier,
but I would be very curious, since you mentioned also that there were no, well, the requirements
as such in undergrad did require you to take any additional biology classes. If you were
trying to teach, let's just say, a class, and you could pick the age, or it could be a set of classes, scientific literacy, being able to have enough basic fluency to provide more surface area for those lightning bolts, if that makes any sense, when you're looking at a manual or having a conversation with an engineer or reading a scientific study. Do you have any thoughts on how we could
cultivate more scientific literacy, if that's the right phrase to use?
Yeah, I think that's a great phrase to use. I think what's necessary is that you have to
relate science to people's everyday lives. And one of the greatest people
at doing this, and to go back to the beginning of the interview when you asked me who was a
role model for me, I should have said Carl Sagan was like an amazing, amazing role model to me.
I watched the Cosmos series over and over again, and Carl Sagan was a genius at being able to take scientific concepts and relate them to people's everyday life. a dandelion and blowing it and describing that this is how a star spreads out its gas
throughout the galaxy.
Those type of step-by-step instructions, ladders to get from one place to another, is the way
I think to build scientific literacy.
And I would ask my students to think about anything that's important in their life, whatever it might be.
And from whatever they said was important to their life, I would then begin wrapping that
in kind of layers and layers of basic scientific concepts that pertain to what was important to
them. Are there any, how should I phrase this, not science fiction authors per se, but science authors or elucidators
of science who have written anything that would be appropriate for a lay audience. If someone is
listening and they see their blind spots, which I know by definition is kind of impossible,
but if they recognize they don't have enough scientific fluency or as much as they would like,
but they want to try to cultivate that.
Do you have any recommendations for them?
Yes, there's a lot of books like that. One of my favorites is a book by a historian of science named Thomas Kuhn. He was one of the most famous historians of science. And his book is perennially in print.
It's called The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. And in this book, he goes through
about 10 different revolutions in science where everybody thought the world was one way,
and then kind of like a crazy person would say, no, I think it's
like a different way, and gradually set about proving it's a different way and created a
revolution in science. And he explains this in very lay terms. He takes you through the science
of gravity, for example, with Isaac Newton, science of relativity with
Einstein, electricity with Maxwell, and so on, in a very step-by-step fashion to make the science
accessible. And in the way, his main point in writing this book is to teach people critical
thinking, to teach people to question authority.
Ultimately, all science is about is just saying, why? Why? Like every two, three,
four-year-old kid knows how to do that, right? Why? Why? Why? And I think Thomas Kuhn does a
great job of that in his book. I should also point out, and please feel free to correct me if I'm oversimplifying, but
the why, why, why is not just for four-year-olds. It's not just for scientists in lab coats or
whatever people envision scientists to be. It's also extremely helpful in situations like those
you found yourself in with GlaxoWelcome and attempting to license.
I mean, constantly pushing for explanation and clicking on those footnotes to go to the
footnotes to go to the footnotes to ultimately get to some point of leverage where you can move
things around. It seems like it's also not just an intensely interesting and academically rewarding approach to thought, but an immensely practical approach to life. At least that's how it seems from reading so many of your stories. gazillions of neurons are lighting up in your brain, and it's lighting up the pleasure centers
too. So I really believe that there's nothing more exciting than having a realization about
something, coming to an inspiration about something, which is why books and reading
are so magical. Another science fiction writer who I feel does such a great job of
explaining concepts that can inspire people is Octavia Butler. She wrote a lot of books. One of
them very well known is Parable of the Sower, Parable of the Talents. And in these books,
she gives people an appreciation of questioning authority. So I'm not sure what
it was that my parents did. I don't really remember them specifically encouraging my
questioning of them. In fact, I do remember my father discouraging it. But nevertheless,
what happened to me was I absorbed the American culture.
And the American culture is a culture of questioning authority. I recently heard one of the latest interviews with Tony Fauci when people were asking him,
why is it that Americans won't do these basic public health steps to stop the pandemic. And he said, you know,
American culture does not like to be told what to do. American culture is dyed-in-the-wool
question authority. So there could probably, you'd be hard-pressed to find another country
where it would be more difficult to get people to follow a single rule for everybody
than the United States. So it's that American cultural ethic of questioning authority that
I know is deep in my mental DNA.
So we were chatting just a few minutes ago about realizations, inspiration. I'd like to ask if we flashback to, well, we could flashback
to any point in time that you choose, really. How did you relate to or think about gender
in your youth? And you can choose what youth means. And I guess I'm wondering if there were
any flashes of realization, or if you came sort of pre-installed
with a certain orientation or way of thinking about it or feeling about it. Whatever you could
say to speak to your experience of gender when you were younger, I would love to hear it.
Sure. So, you know, it is related to this question of authority, Tim. Around teenage years, I had a constant vision of myself,
not as a male, but as a female. And of course, I said to myself, WTF, why am I thinking like this?
I can't imagine anybody else is thinking like this. But nevertheless, it was the thoughts were real, and the feelings were real, and the
feelings were visceral, I could say.
Could you describe the feelings?
Because I think I'm certainly very interested in what form that takes.
Is it a discomfort of some type?
Is it a longing?
How did it feel for you? So first I should say that I think the transgender feeling is different for every single transgender
person. And talking about my feelings, I don't want to give the impression that these are going
to be the feelings of other transgendered people because as a community, we're as heterogeneous as anybody else. So for me, it was really a matter of just
visualizing myself in a female form. And there was not any dislike of my male form. Again,
it was kind of very Alan Wattsian in that I saw myself as male only because the opposite of male was female.
So I could also see myself as female. And this was the way my mind was working. And when I say
I saw myself, it was just kind of like a physiologic embodiment. Obviously, I knew like
boys and girls and men and women's bodies were different.
So I was stuck with this visualization of myself as a woman when I was very much trapped in a male body.
It was the prevailing view that this was a completely unacceptable way to be.
So the authority was, no, this is not possible.
People are only male or female and never the twain shall meet.
So again, this American, Paul Revere-ish question authority mindset got me reading,
and I found, once again, that there was a vast literature on transgenderism, transsexualism, Native American people who were
two-spirited, communities in India and other parts of Asia that identified as neither male nor female.
So even though this was never something I learned in junior high or high school or elementary school
or really anywhere in American culture in, say, the 1990s,
I learned through books that humanity was not either strictly male or strictly female.
And as I began to question authority, I began to say to myself,
why can't I also come out as not strictly male and not strictly female?
I'd love to ask a follow-up question to that, which is when I think a lot of listeners hear the words male and female, they think of the
physiological differences that you might put side by side looking at physical characteristics.
When you say not totally male or female or not cleanly bifurcated into solely those two categories. Do you mean to say masculine
and feminine traits are what we would often find labeled as such, or do you mean something else?
I mean, predominantly the masculine and feminine traits that you refer to.
Now, oftentimes those masculine and feminine traits are just a short hop, skip and a jump from masculine and
feminine apparel. Right. Okay. Depending on how people dress, they're a short hop, skip and a jump
from masculine and feminine hairstyles in an age, you know, that was the time of Prince and Boy
George and whatnot. And then you get to masculine and feminine manicures,
like why can't a guy paint his nails? And then you get to next questions of secondary and primary
sex organs and some people wishing to take hormones to alter their actual physiology
and ultimately go through surgery to alter their
physiology. And I found that there was actually like a vast literature following, again, footnotes
to footnotes, references to references. I was like, oh my God, it is possible to, in fact, alter your physiology to match your psychology. And what appears to be the most
intelligent researchers in this area are opining that this is a safe and healthy thing to do
for people who feel that they are kind of quote-unquote trapped in the wrong body.
Do you, from say zero to 100%, how well do you feel you have your physiology matching
your own psychology at the moment?
100%.
100%.
100%.
What were the biggest or the most important decisions, actions that you took? Did any surprise you to have a
disproportionate effect on increasing that percentage?
No. Nope. I think that every part of the transition process kind of fell in place.
It was not something that happens on a day. You get to a point of diminishing returns. So over a period of years, I gradually
transitioned. And I think even to this point, I'm still in a transition process. I kind of went from
a pure male to a more, I would say not pure, but I would say knocking on the female door
to a point today where I feel very comfortable identifying
as trans-binary, meaning that I embrace both the masculine and feminine aspects of myself completely.
Looking at the introduction, which I read at the top of the show, so to speak,
there is a line about leading efforts of the transgender community to
establish their own health law standards and of the International Bar Association to protect,
and this is the part I want to ask you to elaborate on, autonomy rights and genetic
information via an international treaty. What are autonomy rights and genetic information?
Sure. So autonomy, it's just a fancy word for saying that people should be able
to make up their own mind, that people should have the power, the authority, the freedom to
decide what to do with their own body. And genetic rights, of course, refers to the human genome,
the DNA that we all have. Now, there is a tremendous diversity of human genomes out there.
There are people who, because of their DNA, they are pretty much immune to some kind of cancers,
whereas other people, because of their DNA, it's very likely that they'll get those type of
cancers. There are some people, because of their DNA, they almost cannot feel pain. They have an extremely high tolerance for pain.
There are other people, because of their DNA, that the slightest pinprick will send them
screaming. So once Craig Venter and Francis Collins led the effort to decode the human genome. And about the year 2000, all types of pharmaceutical
companies and academic researchers began scouring the world to engage in what's called genetic
mining or genome mining, meaning going to different populations of people around the world,
often that have been intermarried for quite a while.
So their genomes are kind of concentrated and trying to learn something from those communities'
DNA that can then be translated into useful pharmaceuticals to help everybody else have
some of the strengths or less of the weaknesses of those isolated populations.
What I was concerned with is that if people extract the DNA from these remote communities,
that they in fact do so only with the consent of those communities or with the consent of
the elected representatives of those communities so that they can have some fair financial return for their natural endowment.
I see. So it's similar in a sense to preventing, say, biopiracy from the Amazon, where you have
these tribes who are not providing their own human genetic information, but are, say, acting as a
wellspring of ethnobotany and providing source materials for creating pharmaceuticals.
And you would want there to be some recompense to those groups.
Translating that into your own sort of endogenous genetics would be what you're referring to.
That's fascinating.
Never even thought about that. What types of groups, are there any examples you could give of these sort of tightly knit clusters, maybe the clusters of mind to me, Tim, right now, because it's such a fascinating story and it relates to my own activities in organ manufacturing, is a community of people living in Ecuador and Peru, very close-knit, intermarried, that are all a kind of dwarfism. And these individuals,
they rarely grow taller than four feet tall. And it was discovered just over the past 15,
20 years that they are descendants of Jews from 2,000 years ago who were forced into a diaspora across the Mediterranean after the Roman occupation
of Palestine. And in that ancient time, these people were a very small stature, but it was just
part of the human diversity. They ended up as a group, mostly ending up in Spain. And then when
the Inquisition took hold, their descendants, who were still very small,
they left Spain, they went to the New World. And because the Inquisition still had some type of a
hand in the larger population centers of what's now Peru and Ecuador, they went out into the
rural areas, and there they lived for several hundred years. And it turns out that this population,
they have one gene that makes their body not receptive to growth hormone. All of us,
naturally, we produce growth hormone, and the cells of our bodies have a receptor for that
growth hormone. And when the growth hormone locks into the receptor, we begin growing. This population of people in Peru and Ecuador,
they lack the growth hormone. That gene fell off like 2,000 years ago, and they kept passing it on
and on, not much growth hormone receptor, not much growth hormone receptor. So they're perfectly
intelligent. They live normal lives. They just don't grow very large.
So I found this population fascinating because in my company, United Therapeutics, we're
trying to create an unlimited supply of transplantable organs.
And one of the ways we do this is by modifying the genome of the pig.
And it's kind of like a fluke of nature, Tim, that the pig's organs, their heart, their kidneys,
their lungs, are very much the same size and functionality as human kidneys, hearts, and lungs.
The only problem is that if you leave a pig on its own, they'll actually grow extremely large.
And when these first transplants were done, they had to euthanize the animal recipients of the transplants
because the organs from the pig had grown too large. So what we did is we took a page from
this population of people in Peru and Ecuador. Western medicine gives them a disease name.
It's called Laron's disease, L-A-R-O-N, after this Israeli scientist who
discovered what was going on here. So we said, well, why don't we modify a growth hormone receptor
knockout just like the Laron's population has into these pigs? So when we transplant the kidneys of
these pigs into people, the kidneys won't keep growing and
growing as a normal pig can be many hundreds of pounds. Instead, the kidney will just stop
growing at the same size as when we transplanted it. And that's working out really well.
Let's talk more about organ manufacturing. So what are some of the other precursors or requirements for having a sufficient supply
of organs to meet whatever demands there are in the US or in the world today?
So the demands, whether it's in the US or outside the US, are huge and are way,
way in excess of the supply. I would say that one of the greatest
unmet medical needs today is an adequate supply of transplantable organs. Now, it's a beautiful
thing that before people like Tom Starzl questioned authority and said it was possible to do an organ
transplant, in our parents' teenage
years and adult years, that would have just been like crazy stuff. Like you take an organ from a
dead person, you put it in a live person who has a bad organ, and the person comes back to health.
I mean, that's about as crazy as it gets. But they did it. You know, they did it. And now,
standing on their shoulders, we have hundreds of thousands of people clamoring
for these organs, yet each year there are only about 30,000 kidneys available for transplant,
only around 3,000 hearts, only around 2,000 lungs. And so the gap between the need for these organs
and the supply is humongous. Are you still, or I should say United Therapeutics, currently trying to manipulate the vagus nerve?
Is that in process?
Yes, that is in process.
And it's a fascinating area, Tim.
We are very fortunate to work with the father of bioelectronic medicine, Dr. Kevin Tracy. He's the chief
medical officer at the Northwell Medical Complex up in the New York area. And by the way,
that reminds me, speaking of how can lay people get access to scientific knowledge easily,
subscribe to Scientific American. I'm sorry to put an advertisement in here.
Scientific American. I'm sorry to put an advertisement in here. Scientific American.
I find Scientific American and National Geographic two of the greatest ways for lay people,
which I do consider myself a lay person, to learn about all different types of science that they
might not know anything about. So one day I got my Scientific American in the mail, and on the cover, it was using electronics to cure
diseases. Well, here I am. My whole career has just been electronic engineering, building
satellites, and now, because of my daughter, I'm in this medical field, so I'm so excited.
It was one of those lightning bolts to the soul. Now I have a chance to bring my male and female
side together, to bring my male and female side together,
to bring my satellite and my biology side together and merge them. So I got very excited,
and I had the chance to meet and now work with and support the work of Dr. Tracy.
And he taught me a very simple sentence, Tim, which I've subsequently found to be absolutely true in all the research I've read,
it is that the nervous system touches every single cell in your body. The nervous system
touches every single cell in our body. The largest nerve in the body, there's one nerve that is way,
way larger than all the rest of them. It's the vagus nerve. It starts in our mind.
It wraps around our heart, our lungs, our gut. It's an immense nerve. And by stimulating this
vagus nerve, it's possible to have positive therapeutic effects in the body. By a fluke
of nature, a positive fluke, the vagus nerve comes out to the skin in two and
only two places around the left and right ears.
You know, there are like a couple of different ridges in your earlobe or your ear, I guess
how you would say it.
And one of them called the simbaconchi is the place where the vagus nerve comes out.
And if you electrically stimulate the simba
conky on either the left or the right ear, it's been proven now, and again, in lots of published
literature, to have positive therapeutic effects on the body.
What are some of those positive therapeutic effects?
Sure. So one which has been documented quite extensively is the ability to
control Crohn's disease and irritable bowel syndrome, which are two gastrointestinal problems,
as well as very high-priced and, I would say, tinged with some potential side effect, biologic medicines that are approved by
the FDA to treat Crohn's disease and irritable bowel syndrome. Another illness that has been
shown to mediate against is rheumatoid arthritis. And the common factor here is that we have two
types of nervous systems. We have a fight-or-flight nervous system,
which is the sympathetic nervous system, and we have a rest and digest nervous system,
which is called the parasympathetic nervous system. When diseases occur, it's because one
of those two nervous systems, the sympathetic one, the fight or flight, takes more of a dominant
position in the body and causes a state of inflammation or over-activation. And by stimulating
the vagus nerve, you can ramp up the power of the parasympathetic nervous system and calm down this
kind of overstressed state that leads to an irritable bowel syndrome or to
the inflammation of arthritis. This is in the course of doing all the reading for this
conversation. One of those things that really woke me up and made me pay attention for a bunch
of reasons. One is relevance to my current life because I've been working with a doctor for about 10 weeks doing heart rate
variability training. And there are some researchers with claims, I want to say out
of Rutgers and elsewhere, that certain types of HRV training affect vagal tone and via affecting
that vagal tone have a host of cascading therapeutic benefits. Whether or not that holds
up to scrutiny or not, I don't know. But the second, and I'm embarrassed to even give voice
to this, so hopefully this won't just destroy any tiny shred of credibility that I might have
as I mention it. But I lived in China for a period of time in college, went to two universities there in Beijing
as effectively an exchange student, but it was a one-way exchange. I don't think we had any students
in return from China. And the ears are very much utilized in the world of acupuncture.
And I'm curious to know if you think that whether by trial and error or
otherwise, it's possible that acupuncture stumbled upon the effects without knowing the mechanism
of stimulating or affecting the ears to then in turn affect the vagus nerve. I know it's quite a
stretch, but when I first read about this access via the ears, that is one thing that jumped to
mind because I always kind of poo-pooed and, if I'm being honest, ridiculed the idea of using the
ears to access these deep inner points. But here we are. So I don't know if you have any
thoughts. Tim, first, your credibility is immense. So you would have to actually say something crazy
to Denton, or what you said is the opposite of crazy. What you said is extremely insightful
and prescient. So as convinced as I was that putting a satellite in geostationary orbit
would enable people across the planet to receive radio signals, as convinced as I was that we could
have a molecule that would halt the progression of my daughter and other people's disease,
that's exactly how convinced I am that the acupuncturists of traditional Chinese medicine did, in fact, come upon the nerve patterns that are accessible from the earlobe. a very medically accurate from a Chinese traditional medicine practitioner map of the
earlobe in terms of exactly where you put, I'm sorry, I don't know what the official name is,
of the pins or needles that they put in your earlobe and how they map to different parts of
the body. And then he showed me on an anatomy map how that traces the lines of the vagus nerve.
That's wild.
Wow.
Yeah, it is totally true.
And why really would it not be true?
I mean, thousands of years of Chinese civilization, they have had a chance to do so much trial
and error, and they were a literate civilization for so long.
So the results of that trial and error could And they were a literate civilization for so long. So the results of that
trial and error could be passed on and passed on. So I do think it's entirely rational that they
would have figured this out. And what I'm hoping for now and what I'm trying to support is there
is an opportunity to what I call, in my own words, crack the human neurome.
So what that means is that there are a unique pattern of amplitudes and signal lengths and
signal voltages that will activate some different part of the vagus nerve than others. And each of these different voltages
and wavelengths will correlate to a different part of the human body. We don't know what those are.
Right now, we are just kind of, in a way, I would say we're dumber than the acupuncturist
because almost all of the work that the FDA has allowed to go forward on vagal nerve stimulation, they all use the same pulse width, the same pulse power, and it works. So that's great, you know. future, people will be able to put on a pair of like beat headsets and those beat headsets will
have gel-less, meaning like you don't need like the EKG kind of gel, gel-less electrodes, will
rest across your Simba conky and your Traga and the different parts of your earlobe and will provide
you a stimulation that matches the particular ailment that you have. Eliminate the ailment
without taking any pills,
without paying any money to anybody. This is an area I want to keep digging
in because it's rare, well, it's pretty much non-existent that I have the opportunity to speak
with someone with so much electrical engineering background about the possible applications or implications of technology like this. I'd love to just throw out another group of devices to see if you have any opinions on them one way or the other. or TMS, so transcranial direct current stimulation, or other means of stimulating the brain,
typically using some type of conducive gel, but not always in the case of a TMS paddle.
Have you looked at these technologies or done any reading in the literature related to them?
A little bit. I'm aware of a friend of mine has a company that obtained an FDA approval for treating a particular form of brain cancer with this type of technology.
So there's a very solid scientific benefit that's been documented.
After many years of working through the FDA, I have a world of respect for the rigor that they put into any decision to approve something.
So when they approved it, it meant that it was scientifically proven to work. Something that is quite different
from that, but at the same time related to it, Tim, is on the last day of 2019, which was like
the last day of the decade, it turned out to be a weekday. I forget if it was
a Tuesday or whatever, but the US Patent Office only issues patents on one day of a week. And it
was like the one day of a week that they issue them on, whether it was Tuesday or whatever.
And it was a patent that I received for a device that I call a Alzheimer's cognitive enabler.
And this device is worn over the cranium, as you mentioned, and it senses nerve impulses
inside the brain. It is connected to a computer with a visual recognition and a speech comprehension system so that if a patient with Alzheimer's
is not able to adequately communicate and appear to recognize the people who are coming
into their room, the computer vision recognition system and sound recognition system will talk
on behalf of the Alzheimer's patient, say, you know, hello, son, thank you for coming
to see me. And it is actually being triggered by recognitions that are deep in the Alzheimer's
patient's mind so that more people will come to visit the patient, the patient's stress levels
may be lower. So I believe this kind of bridging of electronics in the mind is really right around
the corner. What inspired putting the work into that research and filing that patent?
I think part of it was seeing my mother-in-law suffer pretty badly from somewhere on the
spectrum between dementia and Alzheimer's, was never
really completely clear where she was at that. And she would recognize us coming in,
but she couldn't communicate. And it would have meant a lot to everybody if she would be able to
communicate. My own mother is more or less at that point right now as well.
Secondly, the work on the BINA48 computer showed me that it was really possible for people to
strike up meaningful relationships with the digital version of BINA, the BINA48 robot.
And so it was just like a very short step from instead of putting all of Bina's or even a
good portion of her memories and her personality into this computer, why not actually have the
computer's interaction capability, input-output capability triggered by something like a NeuroSky
type of EEG brain interface? And the last piece of it was I was
given a Christmas present by a friend of mine, which was one of these NeuroSky headsets that
lets you kind of like play a game just with your thoughts by controlling your EEG signals. So
that's a consumer product anybody can buy, and it really works.
Wow. This conversation brings back a lot of
memories for me because I have Alzheimer's disease. It's very prevalent on both sides of
my family and observed both sets of my grandparents deteriorate to the point where at least some of
them couldn't recognize immediate family members. And was recently re-watching segments of a documentary I saw called Alive Inside,
and the subtitle is A Story of Music and Memory. And what struck me most about this documentary is
that not that they could play music from someone's youth to them through headsets and watch them come alive in some really spectacular
ways, both physically in terms of kinesiology moving around, but also psychologically.
The most impressive part to me is that they would play music for, say, a handful of minutes,
five to 10 minutes from someone's youth, and then turn off the music and that person could have a perfectly coherent, reasonably fast-speed
conversation, whereas prior to the administration of the music, they were, from the outside,
catatonic, basically. And it makes me wonder what music is doing—I'm sure there are people
who study this and probably have a better mechanistic explanation, and how it could be incorporated into therapies intended to counter dementia or advanced Alzheimer's
disease, things of this type.
Tim, you see, just in this conversation, we are uncovering so many vast new oceans of
opportunity for people to learn and study about. Music, to me, music is the foundational human technology,
because the first thing that we ever could become aware of would be the beat of our mother's hearts
while we were still in utero. And that beat, that's a rhythm, okay? And after we're born,
people may have better or worse rhythm, but there's nobody
that cannot detect the sound of a beat and move to it. And then all the different types of melodies
and chords that build upon rhythm, it's just fancier and fancier forms of music. So I believe
that there's tremendous therapeutic properties to music. It's just been scratched.
Not even scratched.
It's been kind of like blown on, like.
And it's there for like all the thousands of young people today
who have come up, grown up with more music than ever before
to begin to apply this great human cultural technology of music
to the biggest mystery
in the entire universe, which is the human mind.
I want to come back to the mind, or more accurately, consciousness in a moment. But first,
this will seem like a left turn, and it is. I was reading a piece in the Washington Post that covered quite a lot of your life,
and there was a segment on Love Night. I don't know if that's enough of a prompt,
but can you tell us what Love Night is?
So when Dina, my partner, and I got married, we each had one child from a previous marriage that each of us had custody of. And then we had two children
together. And we were kind of trying to build a blended family that would feel like nobody was a
stepmom or a stepdad, that everybody was just like in one family. And in fact, we cross-adopted each other's kids from our previous marriages.
So I was taking the kids to music classes. All of the kids were in the Yamaha music program,
where they learn piano and violin, instruments like that. And we would practice songs. And I
was brought up Jewish, where every Friday night was something that was special.
It was the Sabbath and the family sat down together and had dinner and said a couple of prayers.
So Bina and I tried to think, how can we merge all these things together?
The Jewish tradition, the need to create a blended family, the music that we were all enjoying from watching the kids
learn to play piano and violin. And we decided to, every Friday night, have a special family
ceremony, which we would call Love Night. And we sang a song, which the melody was actually
based on one of the kids' songs that they had learned in the Yamaha Music Program.
The words were very simple and affirming.
And at Love Night, the core of Love Night was that each person around the table
would have an opportunity to say what love meant to them during the past week, during the week from
the previous Friday to this Friday. What does love mean to you? And, you know, Bina and I,
as the adults, we would say something either sophisticated or simple, like, I love Bina,
I love Martine, I love the kids. The kids started off just saying like, what love means to me is like our dogs or
our car, you know, very basic things. But as they grew older, they came into more and more
sophisticated definitions and expressions of love until, you know, after a couple of decades of this,
I have heard all of them, all of us have heard thousands of different things that love can mean to a person.
Now, I'd like to fast forward, and sorry to be in a little riff here, but I want to fast forward
to the current COVID pandemic. Our kids are all adults now. They've flown the coop. They have
their own kids. And suddenly, we are in a situation where we can't all gather together in
any one house for love night. You don't want to travel, you don't want to endanger people,
so on and so forth. So we decided to continue the love night tradition, but on Zoom or to be fair, Google Meet. So every Friday night from my son, who's a captain in the army in Iraq,
to his wife, who's on a base in El Paso, to my other son with four grandchildren in Florida,
to my daughter in Brooklyn and her kid and her husband and me and I, we all get together on Zoom
plus friends of all of ours. The kids
were not embarrassed by Love Night. In fact, they wanted to share it with their friends,
and their friends were saying like, whoa, this is crazy. This is beautiful.
And so we get together every Friday night. We sing our Love Night song. And now there's about
20 of us. We go around virtually what love meant to us during that previous week.
And I would say Love Night is one of the most beautiful parts of my life.
I'm so glad that I asked that question.
And Love Night, could you give a few more examples of possible answers just to give people a flavor for how people might answer this question. Because I, for instance, would love to
try this with my girlfriend, with some of our friends, family, etc. But I would be nervous as
the orchestrator that I might get that question and not have the ability to kick things off
effectively. So every morning, Bina, my partner, goes out for, takes our two dogs out
for a walk with one of her best friends who lives a few houses away. And that best friend now joins
our love nights. And last Friday, she said, what love means to me is every morning going out for a
walk with Bina and the dogs. Last week, our youngest grandson,
Saturn, he was born in 2010, so he's 10 years old. He said, what love means to me is this.
And he pulled a piece of paper. He said, I got a 95 on my math test. And he was just so proud of himself and shared it with us.
So those are typical examples of, I think I last time said what love means to me
is sitting down at the piano and playing different songs from memory.
So to use this as a skipping stone, but I think I'm getting my metaphors mixed up. I say a launch pad,
a lily pad, pick your choice, to consciousness. Do you think that we will be able to, as I've
heard you put it once, recapitulate or recreate consciousness synthetically? And does that mean we'll have machines that can love, for instance,
in the not-too-distant future? What would it mean to have created consciousness?
Sure. I do believe it's possible. And a great book that I would recommend that goes into this
subject in beautiful detail is called The Emotion Machine
by Marvin Minsky. And Marvin Minsky is often thought of as the father of artificial intelligence.
He was a professor at MIT for a great many years. So in The Emotion Machine book, he really
describes exactly how you would go about creating a computer and the type of software
that it would take in order for the machine to feel what we feel when we say that we love somebody.
And I think it's likely to occur, Tim, because it's hard for me to think of any aspect of life that cannot be replicated if one
had sufficiently advanced technology. One of my favorite sayings from another role model,
Arthur C. Clarke, is that magic is indistinguishable from sufficiently advanced technology. So I think just like we have been able to create an artificial hip, artificial knees,
artificial hearts, in my own company, we are building lungs and kidneys.
People are creating artificial nerves.
People like Elon Musk has formed a whole company, Neuralink, where he's working on downloading
a whole human brain.
I have little doubt that humans will end up being able to replicate a human mind.
Now, whether or not the rest of society accepts it as a human mind or not, I think is going
to be a long pitch battle.
And that's what is the subject of my book, Virtually Human. That whole book talks about
how and when will society accept digital consciousness as being as conscious as a human.
But even if that digital consciousness is not yet at human level, what I think that the individual
alive today that has the best understanding of this topic is a guy at Google named Ray Kurzweil.
He's a director of engineering at Google. And what I love about Ray is he never tires of pointing out that this digital human consciousness, it's human. Human consciousness
is a human phenomena. So when we create a digital analog or doppelganger or simulcra,
whatever you want to call it, when we create a her, that her is human. It's not us versus them. It's one. We
will have been able to move our mind into a digital substrate, just like if our knees give out,
you move it to a mechanical substrate, or if an organ gives out, you transplant it with another
organ. Where would you, if you had to, kind of Price is Right style,
put a timeline on this? When do you think we'll have rodent or canine level consciousness plus
intelligence? Yeah, it's pretty hard to say, Tim, because one thing I am not is I'm not a soothsayer,
I'm not a prophet, I'm not a visionary, any of those things. I'm just a humble technologist,
and all the projects I work on, they have five-year time horizons because I have difficulty
really seeing beyond five years. So every technology I'm working on, it's like,
I want to get this thing done and out to the public within five years. Also, I am totally a believer in this adage that futurists usually over-promise
in the near term and under-promise in the long term. So what that would mean in this context is
you will hear a lot of futurists saying, oh, we'll have digital rats or digital dogs or digital people in 10, 20, or 30 years.
They have probably over-promised in the near term. What they have under-promised in the long term
is in not 10, 20, 30 years, but in say 80, 90, or 100 years, there won't be just digital rats,
digital dogs, and digital people, but most people
will be digital. Exciting, and I suppose for some people, very terrifying at the same time.
What are some of the most important ethical questions or considerations related to technology as we move into future decades, in your mind?
Yes. In my mind, the biggest problem with technology is that people only think about
the rights to implement a technology, and they don't think about the obligations they have
as somebody creating a technology. And what I mean by that is, you know, there was this
great philosopher of the 20th century, Isaac Berlin, I believe he was German, and he had a
real simple message. His message was that for every right, there is an obligation. It's again,
it's a very Alan Wattsian, sorry to keep coming back to Alan Watts, but it's a very Alan Wattsian point of view that a right only means something in. You only have that right to be a parent so long as you comply with your
obligation to be at least not a horrible parent. If you're a horrible parent, you will have your
children taken away from you, and you'll no longer, in that sense, be a parent.
So with regard to technology, I think there is a point of view that anybody who can create a
technology has a right to make that technology. But I dispute
the ethics of that perspective. I think that every right to make a technology is coupled to an
obligation to have the consent of anybody who would be adversely affected by that technology.
So for example, my right to build an atomic power plant or a nuclear
power plant someplace, I don't just have that right. That right is coupled to an obligation
that I have to have the consent of all the surrounding communities of people who could be
adversely affected by the implementation of that technology.
And it comes into this domain of, in my own field, say, the transplantation of genetically modified pig organs into people.
For me to have a right to do that technology, I have to have the consent of the larger community
that that's a safe thing to do. In a democratic country, that consent is issued
on behalf of the country by the government. And in the field of health, it's issued by the FDA.
So before the FDA permits us to transplant these genetically modified pig organs into people,
they want us to demonstrate to them that there is no risk,
not a small risk, but no risk of any kind of animal virus seeping into the human population
as a result of these animal transplants. So in summary, I believe like an amazing field for the
future, a field that will probably in the future have almost as many people with this career as our web designers today is the field of technoethics. Everybody who wants to create a technology will need to wrap that technology in an ethical envelope of consent. If we look at science over, well, we could look at it over the last few thousand years,
but let's just say the last few hundred years, you mentioned earlier that, as I think you
were discussing the structure of scientific revolutions, how these breakthroughs, these
massive scientific leaps forward seem like complete madness at the time to the vast majority. And we don't have to go that far back to find,
say, surgery without or with minimal use of anesthetics on newborns and infants. I mean,
this is not the dark ages. This is less than 100 years ago. You see some really appalling things
that were taken as best practices or common practice. And one of my friends,
who's an outstanding doctor, likes to repeat this, I suppose, adage that you hear among good doctors,
which is 50% of what we know is wrong, we just don't know which 50%. And that seems to always
be true. So if we flash forward 10 or 20 years, and I know you're not a prophet
or a sucerer, but I'm curious, or it could be five years as a technologist, what do you think
are any of the things we're doing now or believe now that will be shown to be patently absurd
or viewed as barbaric or crazy or naive in the near future?
Well, probably a lot of things.
Since a lot of what we look back in the past that seems to be barbaric,
building on top of your example of the tortuous procedures put onto neonates,
people forget that the founder of the American Medical Association,
the first doctor who created the American Medical Association, his name was Dr. Gross.
And he lived in Philadelphia, and he did not believe in asepsis at all. And so he would do all of his procedures right in his
street clothes, infecting everybody. And countless women lost their lives because of having those
type of quote-unquote doctors helping with the delivery of the children and ending up creating
a septic condition in the mothers. And one of the most famous painters in American history, Thomas Eakins, painted this
picture of the Gross Clinic, where Dr. Gross was teaching all the young doctors how to do a
procedure, and you see dirt in his shoes and scuffy hands. Then he was followed. The second president of the American Medical Association
was a Dr. Agnew, who was the student of Gross. And he had read about the research of Lister
in England and became a believer that even though we can't see these things, germs, they're real.
And we need to practice strict septic procedures before we do an operation. A few
years later, Thomas Eakins painted the Agnew Clinic. And you see that the doctor is in white
smocks and everybody is looking super sterile and clean. So these type of revolutions can occur
just like one generation to the next. It's not something that takes a long time.
I think that looking at what's going on today in our world, I think the fact that we burn our own
house will look to be absolutely bonkers. People would say, well, let me get this right. You've got
a super thin atmosphere. I mean, you guys saw that from
space since the 60s, at least. This atmosphere around your planet is super thin. You have an
undeniable record of measurements of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere going up year after
year after year. And you continue to just spew without limit greenhouse gases into this atmosphere,
despite the fact that people are dying on the shorelines, dying of diseases, etc., etc.,
I think they will think we are as stupid as somebody who would light a fire in the middle
of their house to try to keep warm and not bother with the smoke that they were choking on.
And then if I could add an addendum to that, I'll say, well, when it happened,
did you guys know that the earth receives 10,000 times the amount of solar energy falls right on
the earth each day than it uses? 10,000 times the amount of energy it flows. And that's not
to talk about the wind, and that's not to talk about the wind, and that's not to talk about the waves, and that's
not to talk about the nuclear energy.
I mean, I think the people in the future may think we were pretty stupid to be so scared
of nuclear energy, which has killed a few dozens of people, that we went ahead and just
stopped all the nuclear plants and began pouring
ungodly amounts of greenhouse gases into the atmosphere that will kill millions of people.
That will seem ludicrous to them.
I think this is, and I won't keep you too much longer, but I think this,
I would be remiss if I didn't ask you to comment on or describe your own engineering projects with carbon neutrality or zero emissions as an objective.
Because this is not just kind of idle hand-waving for you.
This is something that you've taken a keen engineering mind to.
And I think that was not mentioned in your bio, even though it's yet another one of these examples of your sort of
extreme curiosity and capability. Could you just describe what you've done in that arena, please?
So this is another area that gives me immense enjoyment. Again, another kind of like lightning
bolt to my soul is to try to create infrastructure, buildings and cars and planes and things that
have a zero carbon footprint. And I look at it as an intellectual challenge. When I've read that
people said, well, we cannot have a zero carbon footprint society until 2050. That's what the
authorities say. You know already, Tim, I'm going to say,
why? Why not? Why not? Why not? I'm going to question that authority.
So about three years ago, we undertook to build a new headquarters for a company in Silver Spring,
Maryland, that would have a zero carbon footprint, not in the best climate, Maryland. It's got its good seasons and its bad
seasons. Right in the middle of a city, Silver Spring, Maryland, is a built-up suburb of Washington,
D.C., and for the manufacture of medicines and stuff, which is somewhat of an energy-intensive
activity. So we built a 150,000-square carbon footprint building, which turned out to be the largest zero carbon footprint building in the entire world. And we inaugurated it a couple years ago. It turns out we produce more energy than we use each year now, two years running. this by just thinking carefully about energy and how to manage it. So, for example, we have
underneath the building 50 wells, each of which go down 500 feet, and they exchange heat from the
building with the coolness of the earth in the summer, bring the coolness back up, and in the
winter, they exchange coolness of the building with the
steady temperature of the earth in the winter to keep the building warm. The sides of the building
are clouded with solar panels. The entire building has a brain that automatically opens the windows
and closes the windows to allow natural ventilation. It's a role model for many other buildings,
and lots of designers and engineers have come over there. Another example is in the delivery
of our organs. Right now, we refurbish organs, lungs in particular, that a decedent has donated,
or the decedent's family has agreed to the donation. But when the transplant surgeons
look at that lung, they say it's too full of fluid and mucus. We can't use it. Throw it away.
So what United Therapeutics says is give us your lonely, unwanted, unloved lungs.
Fly them to Silver Spring, Maryland. We will refurbish them. We'll show through a high-speed
digital network to the transplant surgeons all across the country that the organ is good as new through this digital network and bronchoscope and x-ray and all that stuff.
And then we fly the lungs back out to them.
We've saved over 150 lives this way, Tim.
How do you refurbish a lung?
First, you have to remove it from the dying body.
A dying body is a terrible place to be.
So we remove it from the decedent.
We cool it down.
So we kind of give it a, I won't say we freeze it, but we cool it down very, very low temperature.
We fly it to Maryland and we put it in a glass dome.
And in this glass dome, we have tubes.
We have a kind of artificial blood and air pumping. So we've made a kind of
isolated artificial body just for that lung. And we have expert technicians who work these,
sorry, I don't know the exact name of the equipment, but it sucks out mucus and they
operate on the lungs like it was a person, but it's just an isolated pair of lungs.
And the transplant doctors who could be in Texas or Florida, wherever, they tell us through the digital screen and the voice, put the bronchoscope down the left side or down the right side or go
further. They see this and they know what they want. So our technicians know how to do this. And within four hours, in almost two
thirds of the time, we were able to take what was a non-compliant dead piece of tissue and turn it
into a nicely breathing lung. It's so beautiful to watch, Tim, the lungs go in and out like a
butterfly's wings going up and down. In fact, you could see a video of it on that Washington Post article you were mentioning. And then we cool the lungs back down and we fly it to the
transplant surgeon. And 100% of the time that they have accepted these lungs, they have had
successful lung transplants with, like I mentioned, over 150 people walking out of the hospital.
But I mentioned this because this is a lot of flying around,
flying here, flying there, helicopters going back and forth, planes. And if I'm going to make an
unlimited supply of organs, and you remember all those numbers we talked about at the beginning of
the call, the hundreds of thousands of people who needs these organs, that is going to be a
humongous carbon footprint. We could have said to ourselves,
well, we're doing such a good thing. We're saving all these lives. We could be permitted to foul
our atmosphere because it's balanced by the good things we're doing. But instead, we like to ask
ourselves the challenging question, how can we do the good thing and the right thing at the same time? How can we manufacture
all these lungs and deliver them with a zero carbon footprint? And the solution came from
the technology of electric helicopters, which are powered by renewable energy that can fly these
organs from one place to the other without adding any carbon footprint at all.
And I will be a little bit of a soothsayer here.
I am absolutely convinced that in this decade, the 2020s,
we will be delivering manufactured organs by electric helicopter.
I love it.
I have, I will say one, I may cheat and sneak in one or two more, but a question- I love talking with you.
Well, likewise, this is just endlessly interesting. So many different pathways into the labyrinth.
But I need to make sure, I suppose, since my job is supposedly interviewer,
that I can find my way back out. I have read that-
Alan Watts will show you the way.
Alan Watts will show you the way. Alan Watts will show you the way.
He does have a most seductive and hypnotic voice.
For those who haven't heard, I recommend.
I've read that a favorite saying of yours is, quote,
identify the corridors of indifference and run like hell down them, end quote.
Can you please speak to that or explain what that means for you?
Yes. So identify the corridors of indifference and run like hell down them means to try to
find a, I'll put it in business terms, a market area that is ignored, a unmet need, but it
doesn't really have to just apply to medicine.
It can apply to any area of life.
And the way I would phrase it, Tim, in just like a very natural, almost folklorish way,
is that it's better to be a big fish in a small pond than a small fish in a big pond.
In business school back at UCLA, one person we studied a lot was the experience of General Electric under Jack Welch. And he had an adage, which from a business sense was, I think, very,
very smart. He said, if you can't be number one or number two in a market, don't even try,
because you will have to spend an amount of money equal to the revenues of the number
one or number two in that market to become the number one or number two in the market.
If you're not the number one or number two, you will always struggle to be profitable.
But if you are the number one or number two, your profitability is assured.
So what that means, translated to all of our activities, is if there's an area,
like, for example, a number of people have said, you know, we should get involved. We,
when I say we, my company, Knight Therapeutics, should get involved in creating a vaccine for
COVID. And to me, well, you know, it's not a corridor of indifference. There are dozens of companies
working on a vaccine for COVID. So that's not what we would want to do. It's very unlikely
we'd ever be successful on that. Somebody else said, well, how about these people,
the COVID long haulers, the people who have survived from a very difficult course of COVID
and they've got chronic lung problems that are
bothering them months and likely years after the effect. I said, yes, that's a corridor of
indifference. Nobody is thinking about the long haulers, the people who now have chronic lung
problems because of the havoc that COVID wracked in their lungs. Let's develop some medicines for these chronic long haulers.
Makes a lot of sense. That makes a lot of sense. And on a related, maybe a related note in some
respects, and this is a question that doesn't always work, so I'll take the blame if it doesn't. But if you had a billboard, metaphorically speaking,
to get a message, a quote, a word, an image, a question, anything out to billions of people,
let's just assume they all speak English for the sake of argument, what might you put on that
billboard? I think Apple Computer and Steve Jobs got there before me. Think different. Think different.
Why is that important?
Because the solutions, you know, Albert Einstein said, you can't solve a problem on the same level
that it was created. You have to solve it on a different level. If we all think the exact same
way, we will never get out of the ruts that we're in.
The only way to get out of the problems that we face is to think differently, to go down
the corridor of indifference, to question authority, to be diverse.
Thinking different is the pathway to solving problems that exist today. You know, looking back at everything we've talked about
and looking at all of the copious pages of notes for prep in front of me,
it strikes me that you've forged many paths for yourself
and helped others to do the same by thinking different,
but also thinking brightly, coming back to Alan Watts
yet again, right? The yin and the yang and seeing the positive, looking for the positive in different
circumstances, different situations. Do you have any advice or recommendations for people who
struggle to do that, who are maybe mired in a sense of, hopelessness might be too strong a word, but
those who tend to see the glass as half full and perhaps as a result of that tend to see
half the spectrum of options or solutions? It's a really difficult question to answer,
Tim, because everybody's situation is so unique and so different. And I do not doubt that for many,
many people, it is just a bad life, whether it started that way or ended up the way,
and it's almost impossible to see a way out. The perspective that I take is that I try to stay in touch with my ancestors. I think about the great-grandmothers who had to
bear children in the worst of possible circumstances. I think about all of the,
like my partner Bina's great-grandmothers, who were picking cotton as slaves and had to work all day being bitten up by bugs, burning in the sun,
feet deep in mud, and then bear a child at the last moment. So whether it's like my great
grandparents from Eastern Europe or hers from the African diaspora, they had nothing to look
forward to other than just the hope that they were going to
have some children and that maybe those children might have a little bit of a better life than
they did.
And if not their children, their children's children.
So their only purpose in life, their only hope in life, their only joy in life was to
make a generation and that maybe that generation would be better.
Now, here we are in America or really most any other country in the world. We're at a point now
where like eight out of 10 people have a smartphone with access to all the world's
knowledge and information, with access to countless amounts of music and training through
YouTube. There are many people in the world still in dire
circumstances, but the vast majority of people are doing better than people have ever done before in
history. So I say to myself, and I would ask somebody else looking through the world darkly
right now, looking at the glass half full, I would say, how much worse it must have been in the past. What do I owe
to my grandparents and great-grandparents and great-great-grandparents who suffered and toiled,
who barely managed to survive to produce another generation? What do I owe to them?
I owe to them to make the absolute most possible out of my life, and that's what I'm going to do.
Hot damn, Martian. I'm ready to get out there and get amongst it. I have so enjoyed this conversation. There are 79 more hours we could do just in round one. I won't subject you to that.
And I'm so grateful that you were willing to make the time to have this conversation. Thank you so much.
My pleasure being with you, Tim.
And is there anything else you would like to say, to suggest or ask of those listening before we
bring this to a close?
Two of my best friends and people who I think are the smartest, most creative, most happy-loving people I know, Paul Mann and D.A. Wallach, both said to me that your podcast is the best.
And, Martine, if Tim Ferriss invites you on his podcast, you have to go on it.
So thank you, D.A., and thank you, Paul.
Well, thanks to them also for me. I have for many months, my whole team
knows this, been hoping to have you on. I had high hopes coming into it. You exceeded all of
those high hopes, which seems to be a pattern for you. And I'm just very grateful and happy that we had a chance to connect.
So thank you again.
And for everyone listening, you can find Martine on Instagram at transbinary, Twitter at skybiome.
We will link to everything in the show notes that have mentioned in this conversation,
the books and everything you can imagine that we discussed
will be available in the show notes at Tim.blog forward slash podcast. And until next time,
be kind, practice love night, think different, think brightly, and thanks for tuning in.
Hey guys, this is Tim again. Just a few more things before you take off. Number one, this is Five Bullet Friday.
Do you want to get a short email from me?
Would you enjoy getting a short email from me every Friday that provides a little morsel of fun for the weekend?
And Five Bullet Friday is a very short email where I share the coolest things I've found or that I've been pondering over the week.
That could include favorite new albums that I've found or that I've been pondering over the week. That could include favorite new albums that
I've discovered. It could include gizmos and gadgets and all sorts of weird shit that I've
somehow dug up in the world of the esoteric as I do. It could include favorite articles that I've
read and that I've shared with my close friends, for instance. And it's very short. It's just a
little tiny bite of goodness before you head off
for the weekend. So if you want to receive that, check it out. Just go to 4hourworkweek.com. That's
4hourworkweek.com all spelled out and just drop in your email and you will get the very next one.
And if you sign up, I hope you enjoy it. This episode is brought to you by FreshBooks.
Thousands of listeners and a lot of the contractors
I use and my readers use FreshBooks. If you've been thinking about turning your part-time side
business into a full-time small business or big business for that matter, you may be feeling some
extra uncertainty these days. And that's obviously completely natural. There are a lot of questions
that can come up. How do you create a professional appearance and experience? Who can help you with support? How do you manage the billing and all of that, but still focus
on the primary work of your business and on growing your business? FreshBooks is an all-in-one
invoicing and accounting solution. It does a lot more than that. That helps you take your business
from part-time to full-time, and it only takes minutes to set up. They have one of the best
sign-up flows in the business. I've seen very few better. They have been helping people turn their passions into small businesses for 15
years, and they can help you too. I've met the founders. I've looked at this product very closely
with automated invoicing, billable time and expense tracking, and an intuitive dashboard
that ties it all together. It's like having a full-time financial assistant with you every
step of the way. You can create, customize, and send branded and professional-looking invoices in about 30 seconds.
You get paid up to twice as fast with fees as low as 1% using ACH payments on FreshBooks.
It's a fast, easy, and secure way for clients to pay you for your work and pay you more quickly.
One of the many things that sets FreshBooks apart is their award-winning
Toronto-based customer service. A real person picks up fast and will help you until you are
completely satisfied and have your questions answered. There's a lot of uncertainty in the
world right now, but your ability to build a business that you're passionate about, that
you're proud of, doesn't have to be one of those things. Business owners all over the world rate
FreshBooks as the easiest accounting software to use. Try it out. Check it out for free for 30 days at
freshbooks.com slash Tim. Just enter Tim Ferriss in the how did you hear about us section. Again,
that's freshbooks.com slash Tim to check it out and try it for free for 30 days. One more time,
freshbooks.com slash Tim. This episode is brought to you by Headspace.
Life can be stressful, even under normal circumstances. 2020 has challenged even the
most resilient people I know. It's highlighted just how much we all need stress relief that
goes beyond quick fixes, or really the hope for just a one and done bandaid. Quick is fine,
but we need stuff that is durable,
and that's where Headspace comes in.
Headspace is your daily dose of mindfulness
in the form of guided meditations in an easy to use app.
Now you might ask yourself, very reasonably,
there are 2000 plus apps for meditation,
why would I use Headspace?
Headspace is one of the only meditation apps
advancing the field of mindfulness and meditation
through clinically validated research. Headspace is backed by 25 published studies on its benefits,
600,000 five-star reviews, and more than 60 million downloads. So if people keep telling
you to try meditation and you're like, when would I do that? When would I possibly have time? You
should check out Headspace. If you have 10 minutes, Headspace can change your life. Headspace offers a really light lift and a lot of features to keep you going, which is part of the
reason that I've used Headspace for years now. So whatever the situation, Headspace can really
help you feel better. Overwhelmed? Headspace has a three-minute SOS meditation for you.
Need some help falling asleep? Headspace has wind-down sessions their members swear by.
And for parents, Headspace even has morning meditations you can do with your kids.
Headspace's approach to mindfulness can reduce stress, improve sleep, boost focus, and increase
your overall sense of well-being. And it really starts with very, very simple practices. And if
you look at my case, for instance, I just went through one of the basics today with the co-founder, Andy.
I think it's Pudicombe.
Could be Pudicombe.
I'm not sure.
But a former monk turned into co-founder of Headspace, has the most soothing, hypnotic voice imaginable.
And I did a three-minute meditation, something like that.
It's easy.
It's fundamental.
And it always puts me in a better
space. So I'm going through the basics. Even though I've meditated for years, I'm going through the
basics once again. And I would suggest to anyone that they consider starting there. Headspace makes
it easy for you to build a life-changing meditation practice with mindfulness that works for you on
your schedule, anytime, anywhere. We all want to feel happier. We all want more peace.
And Headspace is meditation made simple.
Go to headspace.com slash Tim.
That's headspace.com slash Tim
for a free one-month trial
with access to Headspace's full library of meditations
for every conceivable possible situation.
You can break glass in case of emergency
in almost any situation
and find something on Headspace.
This is the best deal offered right now for Headspace.
So check it out.
Go to headspace.com slash Tim today.