The Tim Ferriss Show - #511: Hamilton Morris on Iboga, 5-MeO-DMT, The Power of Ritual, New Frontiers in Psychedelics, Excellent Problems to Solve, and More
Episode Date: April 29, 2021Hamilton Morris on Iboga, 5-MeO-DMT, The Power of Ritual, New Frontiers in Psychedelics, Excellent Problems to Solve, and More | Brought to you by Dry Farm Wines natural wines desig...ned for fewer hangovers, LMNT electrolyte supplement, and Oura smart ring wearable for personalized sleep and health insights. More on all three below.Hamilton Morris (@HamiltonMorris) is a chemist, filmmaker, and science journalist. A graduate of The New School, he conducts chemistry research at The University of the Sciences in Philadelphia.Hamilton is the writer and director of the documentary series Hamilton’s Pharmacopeia, in which he explores the chemistry and traditions surrounding psychoactive drugs. His research has allowed him to study psychoactive plants, fungi, and chemicals, as well as the culture that surrounds them, in more than 30 countries, using an interdisciplinary approach that combines anthropology and chemistry.Hamilton’s recent republishing of a book on Bufo alvarius has, at the time of writing, raised more than $205,000 for Parkinson’s disease research.Please enjoy!This episode is brought to you by Dry Farm Wines. I’m a wine drinker, and I love a few glasses over meals with friends. That said, I hate hangovers. For the last few months, most of the wine in my house has been from Dry Farm Wines. Why? At least in my experience, their wine means more fun with fewer headaches. Dry Farm Wines only ships wines that meet very stringent criteria: practically sugar free (less than 0.15g per glass), lower alcohol (less than 12.5% alcohol), additive free (there are more than 70 FDA-approved wine-making additives), lower sulfites, organic, and produced by small family farms.All Dry Farm Wines are laboratory tested for purity standards by a certified, independent enologist, and all of their wines are also backed by a 100% Happiness Promise—they will either replace or refund any wine you do not love. Last but not least, I find delicious wines I never would have found otherwise. It’s a lot of fun. Dry Farm Wines has a special offer just for listeners of the podcast—an extra bottle in your first box for just one extra penny. Check out all the details at DryFarmWines.com/Tim.*This episode is also brought to you by Oura! Oura is the company behind the smart ring that delivers personalized sleep and health insights to help you optimize just about everything. I’ve been using it religiously for at least six months, and I was introduced to it by Dr. Peter Attia. It is the only wearable that I wear on a daily basis.With advanced sensors, Oura packs state-of-the-art heart rate, heart-rate variability, temperature, activity, and sleep monitoring technology into a convenient, non-invasive ring. It weighs less than 6 grams and focuses on three key insights—sleep, readiness, and activity.Try it for yourself. The Oura Ring comes in two styles and three colors: Silver, Black, and Matte Black. For $299, you can give or get the gift of health by visiting OuraRing.com.*This episode is also brought to you by LMNT! What is LMNT? It’s a delicious, sugar-free electrolyte drink-mix. I’ve stocked up on boxes and boxes of this and usually use it 1–2 times per day. LMNT is formulated to help anyone with their electrolyte needs and perfectly suited to folks following a keto, low-carb, or Paleo diet. If you are on a low-carb diet or fasting, electrolytes play a key role in relieving hunger, cramps, headaches, tiredness, and dizziness.LMNT came up with a very special offer for you, my dear listeners. They’ve created Tim’s Club: Simply go to DrinkLMNT.com/Tim and select “Subscribe & Save” on any 30-count box of LMNT for only $36. This will be valid for the lifetime of the subscription and you can pause it anytime. And perfect for the warm days, they have a new flavor, Watermelon Salt, which I've been quite enjoying.*If you enjoy the podcast, would you please consider leaving a short review on Apple Podcasts/iTunes? It takes less than 60 seconds, and it really makes a difference in helping to convince hard-to-get guests. I also love reading the reviews!For show notes and past guests, please visit tim.blog/podcast.Sign up for Tim’s email newsletter (“5-Bullet Friday”) at tim.blog/friday.For transcripts of episodes, go to tim.blog/transcripts.Discover Tim’s books: tim.blog/books.Follow Tim:Twitter: twitter.com/tferriss Instagram: instagram.com/timferrissFacebook: facebook.com/timferriss YouTube: youtube.com/timferrissPast guests on The Tim Ferriss Show include Jerry Seinfeld, Hugh Jackman, Dr. Jane Goodall, LeBron James, Kevin Hart, Doris Kearns Goodwin, Jamie Foxx, Matthew McConaughey, Esther Perel, Elizabeth Gilbert, Terry Crews, Sia, Yuval Noah Harari, Malcolm Gladwell, Madeleine Albright, Cheryl Strayed, Jim Collins, Mary Karr, Maria Popova, Sam Harris, Michael Phelps, Bob Iger, Edward Norton, Arnold Schwarzenegger, Neil Strauss, Ken Burns, Maria Sharapova, Marc Andreessen, Neil Gaiman, Neil de Grasse Tyson, Jocko Willink, Daniel Ek, Kelly Slater, Dr. Peter Attia, Seth Godin, Howard Marks, Dr. Brené Brown, Eric Schmidt, Michael Lewis, Joe Gebbia, Michael Pollan, Dr. Jordan Peterson, Vince Vaughn, Brian Koppelman, Ramit Sethi, Dax Shepard, Tony Robbins, Jim Dethmer, Dan Harris, Ray Dalio, Naval Ravikant, Vitalik Buterin, Elizabeth Lesser, Amanda Palmer, Katie Haun, Sir Richard Branson, Chuck Palahniuk, Arianna Huffington, Reid Hoffman, Bill Burr, Whitney Cummings, Rick Rubin, Dr. Vivek Murthy, Darren Aronofsky, and many more. See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
Transcript
Discussion (0)
This episode is brought to you by Aura, O-U-R-A. It is the only wearable that I wear on a daily
basis. Aura is the company behind the Smart Ring that delivers personalized sleep and health
insights to help you optimize just about everything. And I've tried every device out
there that you can imagine. This one really makes the cut. I've been using it religiously for at
least six months now, and I was introduced to it by Dr. Peter Attia, who's also vetted just about everything. With advanced sensors,
AuraPak's state-of-the-art heart rate, heart rate variability, HRV, super important to me,
temperature activity, and sleep monitoring technology into a convenient non-invasive
ring. It's tiny. It weighs less than six grams and focuses on three key insights, sleep, readiness, and
activity. So I can use it to help focus my attention on the type, volume, intensity of
exercise that I should do in a given day. I use it to determine how certain types of alcohol at
different times of the day affect my sleep, which they do. And I can see all of that in graph form
trended over time. There are tons of actionable insights that have come from using this ring for me. They have a number of incredible
people on their team. Dr. Matthew Walker, a professor of neuroscience and psychology at UC
Berkeley, and also author of Why We Sleep, the mega hit, is Aura's chief science advisor as just
one example. The Aura Ring is one of the most
accurate wearables available because it measures your vitals directly from your finger. So it's not
deducing that or making a best guesstimate based on a bunch of other things and trying to triangulate.
Compared to a medical grade electrocardiogram, the Aura Ring is 99.9% accurate for resting heart rate and 98.4% accurate for heart
rate variability. And I work with HRV doctors and they recommend that I use the Oura Ring.
So try it yourself. It is super cool and super practical, very actionable. The Oura Ring comes
in two styles and three colors, silver, black, and matte black. I use matte black. For $299, you can give or get the
gift of health by visiting OuraRing.com. That's O-U-R-A-R-I-N-G.com. Again, that's OuraRing.com.
This episode is brought to you by Element, spelled L-M-N-T. What on earth is Element?
It is a delicious sugar-free electrolyte drink mix. I've stocked up on boxes and boxes of this.
It was one of the first things that I bought when I saw COVID coming down the pike,
and I usually use one to two per day. Element is formulated to help anyone with their electrolyte
needs and perfectly suited to folks
following a keto low carb or paleo diet or if you drink a ton of water and you might not have the
right balance that's often when i drink it or if you're doing any type of endurance exercise
mountain biking etc another application if you've ever struggled to feel good on keto low carb or
paleo it's most likely because even if you're consciously consuming electrolytes you're just
not getting enough and it relates to a bunch of stuff like a hormone called aldosterone,
blah, blah, blah, when insulin is low. But suffice to say, this is where Element,
again spelled L-M-N-T, can help. My favorite flavor by far is citrus salt,
which as a side note, you can also use to make a kick-ass no sugar margarita.
But for special occasions, obviously, you're
probably already familiar with one of the names behind it, Rob Wolf, R-O-B-B, Rob Wolf, who is a
former research biochemist and two-time New York Times bestselling author of The Paleo Solution
and Wired to Eat. Rob created Element by scratching his own itch. That's how it got started. His
Brazilian jiu-jitsu coaches turned him on to electrolytes as a performance enhancer. Things clicked and bam, company was born.
So if you're on a low carb diet or fasting, electrolytes play a key role in relieving hunger,
cramps, headaches, tiredness, and dizziness. Sugar, artificial ingredients, coloring,
all that's garbage, unneeded. There's none of that in Element. And a lot of names you might recognize
are already using Element. It was recommended to be by one of my favorite athlete friends.
Three Navy SEAL teams as prescribed by their master chief, Marine units, FBI sniper teams,
at least five NFL teams who have subscriptions. They are the exclusive hydration partner to Team
USA weightlifting and on and on. You can try it risk-free. If you don't like it, Element will
give you your money back, no questions asked. They have extremely low return rates. Element has come up
with a very special offer for you, my dear listeners. They've created Tim's Club. Simply go
to drinkelement.com slash Tim, that's L-M-N-T, drinkelement.com slash Tim, and select subscribe
and save on any 30-count box of Element for just $36. This will be valid for the lifetime
of the subscription, and you can pause it any time. Again, that's drinkelement.com slash Tim
for this exclusive offer. And now perfect for warm days, they have a new flavor,
watermelon salt, that I cannot recommend highly enough. It is delicious. The Tim Ferriss Show That's with two R's, one S. Hamilton is a chemist, filmmaker, and science journalist.
A graduate of the New School, Hamilton conducts chemistry research at the University of the
Sciences in Philadelphia. He's the writer and director of one of my favorite documentary series
that you can find anywhere, Hamilton's Pharmacopia, Pharmacopia? Tomato, Tomato,
take your pick. Lots of vowels at the end, in which he explores the chemistry and traditions surrounding psychoactive drugs. His research has allowed him to study psychoactive
plants, fungi, and chemicals, as well as the culture or cultures that surround them in more
than 30 countries using an interdisciplinary approach that combines anthropology and chemistry.
His recent republishing of a book on Bufo Alvarez has, at the time of this writing,
raised more than $150,000 for Parkinson's disease
research. You can find him, as I mentioned, on Twitter, at Hamilton Morris, Instagram,
at Hamilton Morris, Facebook, Hamilton Morris, and on Patreon, at patreon.com,
forward slash Hamilton Morris. And the reissued pamphlet on what some of you may refer to as 5-MeO-DMT, at least derived from the
Sonoran Desert Toad, can be found at www.psychedelictoadofthesonorandesert.com.
Hamilton, welcome back to the show.
Thank you so much for having me.
And I'm looking at a summary of our first conversation, and we covered a lot.
We will have no shortage of new material,
but for people who didn't listen to episode one,
I'll just provide a few points
that we explored quite deeply.
Alexander, a.k.a. Sasha Shulgin,
we spoke a lot about him.
There's some news on him as well.
What is the news?
Did I tell you about his new book that's coming out?
No. Oh, yeah. I don't even know if this has been publicly announced, on him as well what is the news can i tell you about his his new book that's coming out no oh
yeah i don't even know if this has been publicly announced but sorry to cut you off right as you
were about to summarize please cut me off should i allow you to finish what you were saying no no
you shouldn't okay okay i guess just very briefly for anyone that doesn't know who alexander shulgin
is he was this brilliant medicinal chemist who was responsible for the discovery of an estimated 200 novel psychedelic compounds.
And he wrote these two amazing books, P. Call and T. Call, that came out in the 90s.
And he died maybe five or six years ago.
And they recently found some tape recordings of a class that he gave in 1987.
And they're publishing it as a three-volume
set and I was sent a review copy of the first volume and it is so cool. It is one of the most
amazing because this man is, no matter how you define it, the greatest expert that has ever lived
on the gigantic subject of drugs he understood the anthropology
the chemistry the botany the mycology the law the history he understood every dimension of it and
was truly a genius and at this time in 1987 it was i think a very important moment in the history of
drug policy and the history of that sort of research.
1987 being when this class was recorded.
Yes. And it was, I think, a moment when he was becoming radicalized, when he was realizing that
there could be no more playing nice the way he had in the past, because he'd had this very
close relationship with law enforcement throughout his career and then things were getting worse in part not to go back to episode one but in
part because he'd done a lot of work for established pharma companies yes yeah he'd work for dao chemical
he'd done pharmaceutical research he'd worked with enforcement. He'd had deep ties to the
counterculture. He'd done a little bit of everything. He was friends with everyone.
But during the Reagan administration, it was becoming increasingly clear that things were
getting worse and worse with every passing year. There was an idea that, okay, psychedelics have
to be illegal because they cause hallucinations,
and that's unacceptable in our society. But MDMA is different. MDMA doesn't cause hallucinations,
and it can be used therapeutically. And physicians were recognizing that in the 1980s. And then it
was placed in Schedule I. So that was the first moment, I think, where he started to think, this can't go on the way it's been going on because
they will destroy every new medicine that I create. And then on top of that, they had just
passed the Federal Analog Act as well. So this was a law that exists to this day where they said,
if you're making something that we will arbitrarily define as an analog
of a Schedule I controlled substance, we can prosecute as if it is that controlled substance.
So if you are making DMT plus an arbitrary number of carbon atoms, we can just say that
that is DMT and charge you accordingly.
So those two things combined, the destruction of any potential use of MDMA
and the passage of the Federal Analog Act
had made him enraged.
This was also the period that led to his writing
and publication of P. Call.
So this class that he's teaching is razor sharp
and extremely educational,
and I think it's going to be wonderful
when these books are published this summer.
Will the audio also be made available?
I haven't asked them yet.
I certainly hope so.
Please ask them if they would like
a cross-promotional opportunity
to put some of the audio on this podcast.
I would be very interested to help them.
And so that shares a bit about
Sasha Shulgin,
who also,
I think it was
Dave Nichols.
Dave Nichols or Nichol?
Nichols.
Yeah, Dave Nichols,
who is featured prominently
in one of the episodes
of season three
of your television show,
who had a lot of correspondence
with Sasha
and said that he was more,
he considered him more
of an alchemist
than a scientist because he was almost, he considered him more of an alchemist than
a scientist because he was almost like an ethnobotanist, not trying to preserve a first
person objectivity. I mean, he consumed and tested many of the, if not all of the compounds
that he produced, at least for tasting parties and things like that.
Yes. And was proud of it. He made no secret of the fact that he consumed the compounds that he synthesized.
And I think that there's an idea, it's a very widespread idea,
that if you have personal experience with a psychoactive drug,
this biases you in such a way that the research that you do is not trustworthy.
But this is something that we don't evenly apply to other
disciplines. No one would ever say that an ethnomusicologist is biased because they've
listened to music or because they enjoy music themselves or that a sports commentator is biased
if they have a past as an athlete. Instead, we would say that this is something that makes him an expert who is qualified
to discuss the subject. So he was very open about the fact that he'd tried an enormous number of
substances, but was not dependent on any of them. He did it in order to better characterize them so
that he could speak authoritatively to his students, to law enforcement, and to inform
his own research. Really brilliant guy. And this book is a very exciting text. It actually
gave me chills as I was reading it because it's so good.
Can you tell people where they should look for this?
Yes. I mean, I think you can pre-order it on Amazon. Alexander Shulgin's family has a press
called Transform Press. It's called The Nature of Drugs.
That's a great title.
That's a great title.
And for people who don't know PCOL, T-COL,
those are phenethylamines I have known and loved
and tryptamines I have known and loved, respectively.
I mean, these are encyclopedic compilations of not just trip reports or descriptions of experiences, but also details related to synthesis.
Yes.
And back to the experience, I mean, that's been a big part of this psychedelic renaissance is talking about how the new wave of researchers are these sort of objective, dispassionate people who have
never used them themselves. But not only is that not true, most of, in fact, all of them have used
psychedelics, but they sometimes publicly say that they haven't, which I think is not a good
way to go about this. You know, there's a big difference, I think, between long-term and
short-term strategies when it comes to being part of a marginalized subculture. The short-term
strategy is to be dishonest and to hide and to lie about who you are and what you care about.
Because if the dominant culture tells you that it is wrong, that it's
immoral, that it's illegal, that's what you do. You hide. And that way you can protect yourself.
But that only protects you. What if you have children who feel the same way? They're not
protected. What about your grandchildren? If you want to actually create a cultural change,
you have to be open about who you are and what you care about
and so one of the most disturbing things that i get sometimes in response to my show as a
is when people say oh you should never talk about this chemistry don't you realize if you talk about
this chemistry then they'll make it illegal you can't talk about that synthetic route we've got
to keep it secret you can't show yourself consuming a drug then that acknowledges the
fact that people actually use these things and we've got to keep it secret. You can't show yourself consuming a drug, then that acknowledges the fact that people actually use these things
and we've got to keep it an objective clinical domain.
And sure, if the point is to distort reality
in order to sell something, fine.
But that's not what it really is
and that's not going to help people long term.
Yeah, I could not agree more.
This is also part of the reason why slightly different
example but in the process of fundraising for say the psychedelic and consciousness research center
at johns hopkins or for phase three studies for mdma assisted psychotherapy when i was talking
to potential donors it was a prerequisite in my mind that they be willing to use their names and not
donate as anonymous and thereby reinforcing stigma that I think is largely unearned.
So I wanted people to not just take a public stance, but to be proud of their involvement
and to show there were some,
I know these are slightly different examples, but reputational upside potential, not just
reputational downside potential. And also coming back to your ethnomusicology example,
we don't even apply the same standard to researchers of other drugs or compounds,
right? So if you're studying opiates or you're studying morphine
and you happen to have been administered morphine in the course of being a patient in a hospital,
right? I don't think it is assumed that that somehow jeopardizes your scientific integrity
for studying those things later. Oh, of course not. No, there's a tremendous amount of
inconsistency and hypocrisy in the way these things are discussed.
And I think a lot of it boils down to puritanical objections to euphoria and joy.
You know, I don't think anyone would care about scientific self-experimentation with topical capsaicin or something like that.
Why?
Because it's not going to cause any sort of euphoria and might even cause pain.
And pain is dignified.
Pain is good.
Pain shows that you're working hard. You pain is dignified. Pain is good.
Pain shows that you're working hard, you're self-sacrificing. That's all right. But if you're having a good time, that's a different story. Yeah. I'm contemplating where to go next.
I still have three pages from our last conversation. I don't think we'll make it
through. Just to give a quick disjointed recap of a few things i underlined
from our previous conversation bullet he realized in high school after taking salvia
that psychedelics were misunderstood and likely had more potential than people realized
jump forward for those who would like to learn more about psychedelics
neuropsychedelia by nicholas langitz. Is that correct? That's right.
He's got a new book as well.
Wow, so many updates. Is it
out already? It's out, yeah. What's it called?
It's a meta-primatology
book that's about
not about primatology, but about
primatologists. It's like the primatology
of primatologists.
It's really good. We will put a link
in the show notes to that new book as well. So, Tim.b It's really good. We will put a link in the show notes
to that new book as well.
So tim.blog forward slash podcast.
We will have that.
We talked about your experience
with your cameraman in a hotel in Shino
with the synthetic cannabinoid UR-144,
which led to a, quote,
fractal of uncertainty, end quote,
that was very unsettling.
We have covered a number of stories of the unsettling experiences one can have,
or the, put a different way, the dangers of use of some psychedelics,
or more accurately, use of psychedelics in uncontrolled or improperly supervised settings,
which includes documented
fatalities. So I don't want to give anyone the impression here that these compounds are without
risks because there's so many other factors that also come into play, not just the compound itself.
And I have to give a disclaimer here. So excuse me, Hamilton, while I do so, but nothing we're
going to talk about in this episode is intended to constitute medical advice. We are not doctors, neo-shamans,
and this is all for informational purposes only. So caveat emptor, be safe out there,
don't break any laws. But jumping to the next point real quick, low doses, and I want you to
fact check me if I'm getting any of these recaps wrong but low doses of drugs including say cocktails like ayahuasca can be more beneficial
than the overwhelming what do i do with this experience at high doses that you have had low
dose experiences that helped you to see i think in this case quote the nicotine gum was inside of me, end quote. So there's a long story about the nicotine
in our first conversation.
And we also talked a bit about Ibogaine,
a bit about 2CD,
and then topics that we might cover next time,
which is now this time,
including Oliver Sacks and Claudio Naranjo.
So now, here we are in the present moment.
We didn't discuss,
we've already talked about Sasha Shulgin a bit, Oliver Sacks or Claudio. How do those figure into your life as influences, or how would you explain either of them, either of those figures? Just to go back to what we were saying earlier about people who are in the closet about their drug use.
Of course, when Oliver Sacks wrote The Man Who Missed His Wife for a Hat and described the medical student who's having the olfactory hallucinations after using PCP, he's talking about himself.
But he didn't want to acknowledge that he'd used PCP because he didn't want to acknowledge that he'd used drugs at all.
He was addicted to
amphetamine for a period as well, possibly methamphetamine. I don't know. There's a
biography written by Lawrence Weschler that came out recently that I know Lawrence Weschler,
but I haven't had the opportunity to read it. It might go into that. But yeah, he didn't want
people to know, as did many people. Carl Sagan would be another example. He wrote a portion of Lester Grinspoon's
Marijuana Reconsidered and talked about his revelatory experiences with cannabis,
but didn't want his name attached to it. So you have all these prominent, brilliant minds that
have benefited from the use of these things, but they're afraid to publicly acknowledge that fact. And that is, I think, damaging.
But Oliver Sacks in general,
he's wonderful, he's an amazing writer.
I think he's one of the greatest science writers
that has ever lived.
Uncle Tungsten, the man who mistook his wife for a hat.
These are really beautifully written books.
His book on hallucinations is also very good.
So you can hear that airplane overhead, folks.
This is audio verite.
If you hear palm fronds in the background,
also part of our experience in the world of COVID.
I would imagine you have had to pause for audio a fair amount in your life.
Oh, so much pausing.
The joke that I remember someone told me at one point
is they said,
why does thunder come after lightning?
Because even God has to wait for sound.
All right, so Claudio.
Yeah.
Did you ever interview him or talk to him?
No, sadly.
Yeah, me neither.
He wrote some enormous number of books, and I've only read The Healing Journey.
I really enjoyed that book.
Me too. Me too. I mean, I can't imagine being a psychologist and working with a patient for
months or years and seeing such gradual change, maybe no change at all. It must be very discouraging
for someone that really wants to affect some kind of positive change in
somebody that they're working with. And then when you look at the sorts of accounts that are
described in The Healing Journey, it's like a psychological fantasy of having these immediate
revelations that affect profound and lasting change in the people that use these substances.
And of course, there are
similar, you know, for people that are interested in books that describe
psychologists administering psychedelics and their patients having very positive experiences.
There's another book written by William Richards called Sacred Knowledge.
Excellent book.
It's a really, really good book.
It's kind of half clinical primer on best practices with psychedelics,
but then it also has a number of biographical sections on Bill Richards' life,
which is just fascinating.
And I've been moved to tears by,
have you seen the video of him administering DPT to the dying cancer patient? No, I have not. This was, it was on 60 Minutes in the 70s.
And I mean, it's one of the most moving pieces of television I've ever seen.
Did you say DPT? Yeah, DPT. Although I don't believe they specify it in the report.
I uploaded it to my
YouTube channel recently for anyone that's looking for it. And watching people who are at the end of
their life make peace with their own mortality in the presence of their family and the effect that
that has on their family, it causes so many emotions. One of which is it's almost infuriating to think that this wouldn't be
available to everyone that might want it when you see how beneficial it is and i remember when i
first heard about end-of-life psychedelic psychotherapy when i was in my early 20s i kind
of thought what's the point of that if the people are at the end of their life wouldn't that be the
lowest priority psychologically wouldn't you want to help people that have their entire life ahead of them? That way you can
affect the greatest change. But I had no idea that the way somebody ends their life can have
a tremendous impact on their family. And if they are at peace with their own mortality at the end
of their life, that can relieve a lot of the trauma of losing a loved one.
I have not seen that video,
and I'll look for it on your YouTube channel.
Bill Richards, for those who want a little bit more context on him,
is a beautiful human being.
I've felt very privileged to be able to spend time with him.
I don't know if he's still associated with Johns Hopkins,
but he was for a very long period of time. He, along with Mary Cusimano, who I want
to give a nod because she's just an exceptional human and also very experienced. I suppose
therapist, therapist may not be the right term, facilitator. I don't know what term they actually
use within Johns Hopkins, but she and Bill have, they have one of the kind of larger sample sets
that is in the hundreds of sessions that they have administered legally,
mostly involving, I would say psilocybin at this point, probably in the kind of 30 milligram range,
something like that. But Bill is not just an excellent, from my perspective, clinician, but he also thinks
very deeply about the philosophical, theological underpinnings and or implications of administering
these compounds.
So for all those reasons and more, I definitely recommend that people check out his book.
Have you met him before?
I've spoken with him.
I've never met him in person, though.
And he's so good, it almost worries me a little bit.
Because when people talk about the potential of psychedelics, I think one thing they don't
realize is that the people that are working on this right now are the best people in the
world.
Bill Richards is one in a million.
And by definition, one in a million people are hard to come by. You're not going to have someone as compassionate and skilled the most talented and passionate people to ever enter the field.
And it might not be the case that all of these results generalize to a larger population, though of course I hope they will.
It's a really important point.
I mean, these are people who have been able to withstand, in many cases, decades of not just resistance, but abuse by various establishments. So they're not fair
weather entrants to this space. They've really endured a lot. And that includes many people at
Hopkins, including Roland Griffiths and many other research institutions. And I suppose this is as
good a place as any to say that since you and I last spoke on the podcast, which was a few years ago, a lot has happened. An extraordinary amount of acceleration has occurred in the research
space as well as in the for-profit sector related to psychedelics. Is there anything in particular
that worries you? We could talk about the promise, but then there are maybe the concerns, one of which
I'm just inferring from what you said would be the assumption that we can scale results and scale
in therapists based on, say, the results obtained through someone like Bill Richards.
Although there has been a high level of replicability within the MDMA phase three
trials because they had similar concerns
or similar questions at least related to Michael and Annie Mithoffer, who are very, very skilled
therapists in the MDMA-assisted psychotherapy space. And do any particular concerns come to
mind for you? Well, yeah. I mean, back to the Shulgin book, there's a really funny moment
where he says that every drug has no side effects for the first five years.
So if you're going to use a drug, you have to use it in the first five years when it
comes out before people realize that it has any problems associated with it.
And every new drug does have a hype phase.
Ketamine is in its hype phase right now. Then after the hype phase, you enter a more
sobering confrontation with its limitations. Right now, you have a lot of people with
treatment-resistant depression taking ketamine and they're experiencing miraculous results.
Five years from now, some of those people might start to suffer urogenital toxicity of one kind or another that could make people
less optimistic about using this as a treatment casually, right? It's known to cause damage to
the urinary bladder under some circumstances. And we're going to see in a few years what happens
with more widespread use of it?
And cannabis is also somewhat in its hype phase,
where if we're talking about cannabis as an intoxicant relative to alcohol,
which sets the bar very low in my opinion, yeah, it's great.
It's not going to cause liver damage.
It's not associated with overdose.
It doesn't cause the same sort of physical addiction in the vast majority of instances, though, of course, some people do develop problematic relationships with
it. But I predict in a few years, we're going to start to scrutinize a little bit whether or not
it's a good idea to be as stoned as many people are all the time. I mean, again, I think it's almost
certainly, it is certainly better than being drunk all the time. But there's the cannabis
hyperemesis disorder, which is something that wasn't discovered until relatively recently.
And it seems that that's a product of new patterns of cannabis consumption. Just a quick thanks to one of our sponsors and we'll be right back to
the show. This episode is brought to you by Dry Farm Wines. I'm a wine drinker. I love it. Love
a few glasses over meals with friends. That said, I hate hangovers. It kills me often for multiple
days. Right now, all of the wine in my house is from Dry Farm Wines. Also, for my last two book launch parties, all the wine has been from Dry Farm Wines.
Why is that?
Because in my personal experience, their wine means more fun with fewer headaches.
Dry Farm Wines only ships wine that meet very stringent criteria.
Close to sugar-free, so less than 0.15 grams per glass.
Lower alcohol, less than 12.5% alcohol.
Additive-free, there are more than 70 FDA-approved win less than 12.5% alcohol, additive free. There are more than
70 FDA approved winemaking additives. The fewer, the better. In your wine, lower sulfites, organic,
and produced by small family farms. All Dry Farm wines are laboratory tested for purity standards
by a certified independent enologist, and all of their wines are backed by a 100% happiness promise.
They will either replace or refund any wine you don't love.
Last but not least, I find delicious wines I never would have found otherwise.
So it's a lot of fun, saves me time and research, and I have fewer headaches.
Other fans of Dry Farm Wines include the incredible Dr. Dom D'Agostino, who's been on this podcast,
very popular guest.
You remember the guy who did a 10-day fast and then did 10 repetitions of
deadlifts with 500 pounds? That guy. He drinks their wine, even when on a ketogenic diet,
which can work. Dry Farm Wines is offering you an extra bottle in your first box for a penny
because it's alcohol. It can't be free. Find all the details and collect your wine at dryfarmwines.com
slash Tim. Check it out, dryfarmwines.com slash Tim. And one more time,
I love this stuff, dryfarmwines.com slash Tim.
Are there any other compounds that you think are undervalued or overhyped at the moment
for therapeutic purposes? So let's just say,
and this could segue to your experience actually, which I'd love to hear about,
iboga or ibogaine for opiate use disorder or opiate addiction. What is your evaluation of that?
I think there's a lot of promise there. I think there's a lot of promise for pretty much all substance abuse disorders. And I predict many sorts of compulsions and addictions in general, which is something I didn't fully come to appreciate until I went to Central West Africa and participated in these Iboga rituals, which gave me a far greater appreciation of both the ritual
elements and kind of the larger spirit of iboga beyond its antagonism of the alpha-3, beta-4
nicotinic acetylcholine receptor. I think that's the first time I've personally ever heard you
use spirit. I know. As I said it, I said, oh, did I go there?
And I just said the S word.
Could you tell us more about your experience?
I thought that episode of season three,
and do you say pharmacopoeia
or pharmacopoeia? I ask this
every time. Pharmacopoeia is correct, but I say
pharmacopoeia. Pharmacopoeia. It's always the
battle of, do you say,
yeah,
there's endless ones of these
where you look like an asshole
and say kratom,
or do you say kratom like an American
and say it wrong?
Both ways are annoying.
Leaving aside psilocybin
and our friends across the pond,
what was your experience like?
Could you speak to some of the experience,
whether sort of phenomenologically in the drug experience or plant experience, if people prefer, or considering the ritual elements,
what were some of the bits and pieces that you felt were particularly impactful? Because in that
particular episode, in contrast to some episodes like the Xenon gas episode,
there's relatively little footage of you
in the actual ceremony.
Yes, and that was very important to me.
I wanted to be entirely absent from it,
and I have almost complete creative control of my show
within the bounds of the law,
but one thing that was very problematic...
That means just within the bounds of the law
just refers to showcasing chemical synthesis.
I mean, even then I do pretty much everything that I want to do.
But, you know, I can't, I don't know, depict myself committing a crime.
I don't know that I would want to either.
But the one thing that was real, there's a lot of pushback was showing myself.
And I didn't want to be a part of that episode.
There have been a number of Boga documentaries made
where a white outsider goes to Central West Africa
and participate in Bwiti rituals.
And I felt that this was one time I didn't want to do that.
I wanted to show the tradition.
And more importantly, I wanted to show that the tradition is changing.
I think a lot of people have this idea
of traditions as being the static,
unchanging force.
And in some cases, actually,
there are many aspects of the Bwiti religion
that appear unchanged
since anthropologists documented them in the 60s.
But one big cultural shift that has occurred
is there are now opioids
in Cameroon and Gabon that were not there previously. There is no tradition of using
opioids in that region. There is no heroin trade there. Historically, pharmaceutical opioids have
been far too expensive to be street drugs. It just wasn't a market, and the naturally occurring opioids don't exist there. So you have a new pharmacological class of drugs introduced to a new culture that
didn't grow up watching Trainspotting and Requiem for a Dream and Christian F and Permanent Midnight
and daytime television specials about addiction. We're inundated with this stuff. Imagine if you'd
never even heard that an opioid is addictive before, how much more difficult it could be to
develop a responsible pattern of use. And so tramadol is being pressed in ultra high potency
tablets specifically for the West African market. And they're extremely inexpensive
and the addiction has become pretty widespread.
So what I found so interesting is that...
What is the clinical application of tramadol?
What's the indication?
Tramadol is sort of like codeine.
It is a low-potency opioid analgesic
that is unregulated in many countries.
It is in Canada.
It's not a prescription drug in Canada until a few years ago in the United States.
It wasn't a prescription drug.
It wasn't controlled.
So because it's considered to have a low abuse potential, it paradoxically ends up being
one of the more used compounds because it's more available.
This is why it's really hard to talk
about abuse potential as some sort of intrinsic factor of a drug's chemistry or pharmacology,
because it's so much dependent on these social regulatory factors as well.
So tramadol is relatively unregulated because it's considered relatively non-abusable, but ironically gets used all over the place for that reason.
And it's a mild kind of codeine-like effect.
But if you take a lot of it, it becomes less mild.
And like all opioids, if you use it chronically,
it can induce dependence and in some instances problematic addiction.
So the idea that Ibogaine is an anti-addictive drug is not an African tradition.
That is something that was discovered in the United States by a New York-based heroin addict
named Howard Lotsoff.
Do you know this story?
I don't.
Yeah.
He was a guy who, in the 60s, was using heroin.
He was friends with a chemist.
The chemist said, there's a psychedelic called Ibogaine. You might think it's fun. And that's all it was. He was friends with a chemist. The chemist said,
there's a psychedelic called Ibogaine.
You might think it's fun.
And that's all it was.
It was just a psychedelic.
And he tried it.
He tripped.
He had a fine time with the Ibogaine.
And then when he came down,
he realized that he hadn't used heroin and he wasn't experiencing withdrawals.
And his concept of heroin had changed. Suddenly he didn't experiencing withdrawals. And his concept of heroin had changed. Suddenly,
he didn't consider heroin desirable. He saw it as symbolic of death and repulsive and had no
desire to ever use it again and didn't. And dedicated the rest of his life to being a sort
of crusader for the anti-addictive effects of Ibogaine, which he had discovered. And they were later validated in laboratory experiments with rodents.
So it is pretty well confirmed at this point in humans and rodents and a number of different
models that Ibogaine is in fact an anti-addictive drug. I don't know the names of many researchers
involved with Ibogaine, Iboga, or any similar compounds.
Was that in Debra Mash's laboratory that those studies were done with rodents,
or was that somewhere else? Debra Mash may have been one of the early researchers on it. It's been
replicated in a number of different labs. This is one thing that's pretty well characterized at this
point. And of course, there are also synthetic derivatives of Ibogaine
like 18MC that have slightly different pharmacologies that also exert the same
anti-addictive effect that's hypothesized to be derived from antagonism of this one subtype of
the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor, the alpha-3, beta-4 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor.
So this is not part of the tradition in Gabon because A, there's no tradition of using opioids,
and because it's a religious sacrament.
It's part of a religion called Bwiti.
So now that opioids are present in that region,
they are modifying their traditions
to accommodate the treatment of local addicts. And that's what I
wanted to document in my piece. I thought the documenting of a local being shepherded through
the process by these Bwiti elders was really well done. I thought that was a very strong episode.
Yeah. And I think it is important that they understand that they have this amazing medicine available to them because it always also struck me as ironic that everywhere else in the world, people are exclusively using and talking about Ibogaine as an anti-addictive drug.
But the one place where there's actually a tradition of using it, where there's now a problem with tramadol, they're just now beginning to recognize that they can use their own medicine
to treat people in their community.
And it was really cool to see that happening and to see how well it worked.
Providing that as sort of historical and cultural backdrop, what elements of the experience
stood out for you personally?
Since I can't ask anyone else about the experience that was depicted in that episode. It is, for those who
may have some experiences with psychedelics in the, let's just call it, perhaps in the Western
kind of psychotherapeutic or pseudo-psychotherapeutic model where you lay down, you listen to spa music,
basically, with eye shades on. This ritualized setting could not be more different.
It's the opposite of sensory deprivation. It's the most stimulating thing I have ever
been a part of. It's continuous dancing, continuous music, continuous drumming,
no sleep, no food, no water, no break, maximum exertion.
And they divide the ceremonial space into different regions dedicated to different purposes.
So for people that are there for medicinal purposes, they occupy a sort of recessed zone
where they lay side by side and everyone dances around them. And they take such high
doses of iboga that it has an almost anesthetic effect. They'll even prick people to make sure
that they're still responsive to the sensation. And if they are unresponsive, that's the indication
that they've had enough iboga. It's time to stop and allow them to recover a little bit.
But there's continuous consumption
and everyone must consume, babies, children, adults,
the elderly, everybody takes iboga.
But there is a different dose for each person,
depending on who they are,
what they're doing in the ceremony,
and what sort of treatment
they're trying to receive and then it's really very amazing they have people that wear military
outfits and they are an army a spiritual army who guard the iboga ceremony from bad spirits and they
have iboga guns and iboga knives that they use to prevent
anyone from entering that might interfere with the healing of the participants. There's a lot
of incredibly beautiful symbolism in these rituals, including burying people alive. And I had read
about this and I had always wondered if this is still something that's practiced, but they will dig a grave and you will lay in the grave on
Iboga with your face up looking at the stars and just your head protruding from the ground.
And you spend the night in the ground to contemplate your own mortality.
Now, I can't see that being integrated into our western medical practice but i can imagine
how profound that could be even without a psychedelic do they observe any cardiac complications
in their tradition i ask because my understanding is that there have been documented cardiac issues associated with perhaps not iboga,
maybe it's ibogaine administration in places like Mexico. Do they appear to run into any
health complications? I asked about that and they told me that they were aware of people that had
died using it. And so it seems that they are aware. There's no pretense that this is a
medicine that can't hurt anyone under any circumstances. They're aware that it is very
powerful and has to be dosed very carefully because Ibogaine binds to something called
Herg channels. And these are potassium ion channels that regulate heart rhythms. A lot of
topical anesthetics bind to Herg channels and Ibogaine actually has a mild topical anesthetic
effect. So if you take high doses of it, it can cause fatal arrhythmias. They didn't say that
specifically. They didn't talk about, you know, observing QT interval prolongation or something like that, but they knew that it had to be
used very cautiously and you had to observe each person as they used it.
There's certainly a lot more to say about how the Bwiti use
Iboga. There are many different directions we could go. This is as good a place
as any to ask you to
describe, or actually just answer the question, is iboga itself,
this plant from which they derive this sacrament, at risk or threatened in any way?
And this is a question of sustainability as the global demand for this continues to accelerate.
Yes, Yeah. No, I've been thinking about this a lot recently. And I was thinking that it's funny that these drug laws were
ostensibly drafted to protect us from drugs, but may have actually had the only benefit of protecting drugs from us. And now that more and more people
are recognizing the benefit of these substances, there is going to be a tremendous burden on the
natural reserves of things like iboga, ayahuasca, bufuel various, venom, not to mention the even more unusual things that are out there.
And for anyone that does recognize the benefits of these things, it's very important to
take sustainability seriously because medicinal plants and especially medicinal animals are widely documented to be destroyed when they
are integrated into a popular medical practice. It doesn't even need to exert a therapeutic effect.
Rhinoceros horn, pangolin scale, these are things that have no pharmacological effect whatsoever.
Although pangolin scales were reputed to contain tramadol at one point, but they absolutely do not.
But that's all it takes is someone to say something like that.
And before you know it, pangolins are severely threatened or even worse.
Human intervention with some of these animals can cause the transmission of viruses, cause pandemics. I mean, there's a lot of reasons to be very careful
about the way that you interact with animals
in medical practices unless it's absolutely necessary to do so.
And I feel conflicted about Iboga
because on one hand, I want so much to sing its praises
and talk about the tremendous benefit that I think it had
for me, even using it just this one time. But I know that when people hear that and understand
that, the natural response is going to be, well, I want to try that myself. And an iboga tree has
to be about five years old before you can even begin to harvest the roots. There's talk about sustainable
harvesting where you only cut off half the roots and leave the rest of the shrub alive. I certainly
never observed that in Gabon. Every time I saw anyone harvesting roots, they would kill the
entire tree. There's talk about different types of hydroponic growth or hairy root culture that can be done to increase
the yield. It could also be grown on a larger scale. I did see some people that had small iboga
farms in both Cameroon and Gabon. It's possible, but there has to be a strong incentive and the
consumer has to be willing to pay the price to know that what
they're consuming has been responsibly sourced. So you know that I recently wrote and published
a blog post on considering a more ethical menu. The piece was targeted at psychedelic users or
people who use compounds that often overlap with psychedelic use or
administration like combo.
Yeah.
And discussing some of the telescoping potential ramifications of these things becoming 10
times more popular, 100 times more popular, 1,000 times more popular, which is not outside
the realm of imagination or possibilities.
Not at all.
Actually, very easily could be the case.
And there are a lot of points that I tried to describe or make in this piece, and people can
find it at tim.blog forward slash conservation. It's kicked up quite a lot of discussion and also
blowback because some of my recommendations hit a lot of people directly in the wallet
who are providers of various things. If we grab one example, let's just take Bufo Alvarez and 5MEO DMT as an example.
How contained is the ecological impact of synthesizing versus procuring it from these
toads?
I mean, this is a fairly, I suppose, easy example. And this is maybe a good example to
start with because others become maybe a bit more complex to talk about in the sense that if we're
talking about MDMA, people can point to deforestation in Cambodia, or they can look at
the dumping of various chemicals used in producing MDMA in Holland and so on and in other locations. But how should people think of
synthetics and environmental impact? Is there a way to minimize the impact in the case of,
say, 5-MeO-DMT? Oh, absolutely. Absolutely. Yeah. A lot of the examples that you just gave
are interesting because they're completely true. Yes, there's deforestation in Cambodia
to extract saffron from these trees.
But that doesn't need to be a source of saffron.
That's a product of the black market.
That's just because it can be done that way.
You can make saffron any number of other ways.
You can make MDMA from black pepper.
You can make it from catechol.
You can make it from just endless different petroleum products, whatever.
It's a relatively simple molecule.
There's hundreds of ways that it conceivably could be made that don't involve the destruction
of old growth trees in Cambodia.
The only situation where that is a necessity is where MDMA is a schedule one controlled
substance and the manufacturing distribution of it is controlled by the black market and
it's completely unregulated.
It's sort of like when people say, well, how could you possibly do cocaine?
You're supporting the cartels.
And I understand the point, but the issue isn't doing cocaine.
The issue is the prohibition of cocaine that makes it a black market commodity that has to be sold by cartels.
It could just as easily be a regulated market
like anything else, like aspirin.
So I think that there's a lot of misplaced moralism
in some of these areas.
And synthesis does not have to involve
destruction of the environment at all.
5-amino DMT especially,
because you can make 5-amino DMT from melatonin. And melatonin, I think,
is produced microbially. At least a lot of amino acids are produced microbially. Or there's such
an enormous industry for the production of amino acids like tryptophan. And they've figured out
ways to produce those on an enormous scale with minimal ecological repercussions. So you can take
100 grams of melatonin and convert that to about 100 grams of 5-MeO-DMT, which is the equivalent
of milking thousands and thousands and thousands of toads. And so the question is, why not do that? Well, one reason is that there's a sort of vitalist, animist interest in the fact
that it comes from a toad, which I understand. I actually think that's really interesting myself.
I don't want to discount that entirely. And so then the issue is, how can we make
synthetic materials have the same value as something that is derived from nature? How could
you feel that same connection to a synthetic material? Because we think of a synthetic
material as something that is soulless, something that is bad. Oh, it comes from some laboratory in
China. That means it's bad. It's dirty. It doesn't have the sacred goodness of something that is
derived from this toad that lives in Sonora and estivates underground for nine months,
just like the period of human gestation. And there's so much beautiful symbolism there that,
of course, this is a transformative, good experience. How could you find that same
beautiful symbolism in a synthetic compound? Well, what if you knew that the compound was
synthesized by someone who cared, who did it lovingly, who is very dedicated to purity. I mean,
you hear stories of Nick Sand clutching the flask of LSD as he synthesizes it and trying to project love into the molecule itself. You know, you can do this to a synthetic compound if you want,
and you can confer those same sorts of positive associations. You can have animist, essentialist attachments to
anything if you want, if you choose. And that's what I think is so funny when people say,
how dare you say there's no difference between synthetic and natural? That's actually not what
I'm saying. I do believe that there is a difference, but I think we have control over
that difference. I think that difference is a product of the value system that we have,
and we could just as easily shift it ifritical to inflict
ecological damage or encourage increasing levels of ecological damage in the name of pursuing
one's own healing if other tools may be adequate. And for that reason, also, if we're just looking at this from a historical and cultural
perspective, I think lots of people, and not to malign this, but they want to kind of put a stamp
for every plant or animal experience into their psychedelic passport. And I understand the drive.
I'm a novelty seeker. I get it. But it's hard to find, I don't think,
I would say impossible to find any single indigenous culture that has used the entire
pantheon of psychedelics. It's just not something that we see demonstrated by these traditions that
are venerated by the very same people who then reject a synthetic. Let me ask a question before
I lose the thread.
For those people who might synthesize,
because I watch footage, whether it's in your show or I do reading, and I hear about the dumping of solvents
and other things after illicit manufacture
of different compounds,
what would your advice be to someone
who is synthesizing anything
in terms of minimizing,
how to dispose of their waste or otherwise to minimize damage?
Are there any considerations?
And I'm asking this as a non-chemist.
I've never synthesized anything.
Right.
It completely depends on what chemicals you're using because there are many things that are
relatively innocuous.
You could be using alcohol as a solvent and then
you could just evaporate it into the air and it's just alcohol. It doesn't matter. Or sodium
borohydride might form various borate salts that are innocuous and then you can do whatever you
want with them. You can probably put them in your garden if you want. And other times you might be
working with mercury salts that are deadly poisons. And in that case, it is your responsibility
not to introduce them into the environment where they could hurt someone or enter the groundwater.
And again, this is why having a regulated system is ideal because you don't have to depend on
good intentions of every single person that's making these sort of things. You can leave it up to people that are professionally invested in doing the right thing.
That said, for every story that you hear
about clandestine chemists dumping solvents
and waste material into the environment,
there are actually a good number of people
who are aware of that stereotype
who go far out of their way not to
be like that. Casey Hardison, who's a sort of controversial LSD chemist who many people now
have some problems with. But one of the things that he was most proud of was that in his entire
LSD lab, all of the waste could be put in one trash can. He was extremely aware of, you know,
I'm doing something that society says is wrong.
So I'm going to go above and beyond to do it as well as I possibly can so that no one can accuse
me of having damaged the environment in the process of creating this chemical. And I've known
a number of other chemists who have the same attitude, who actually not only do they do the
right thing, they almost take neurotic pride in never doing any harm to
the environment with their synthesis. And there's a whole subclass of chemistry called green chemistry
that is dedicated to finding the most environmentally friendly way of producing a
given chemical or a given reaction. If someone, let's just say, ends up with their garbage can
of waste, I don't know if this is something we can talk about, but hypothetically, how would they dispose of that in a responsible way? And I know it depends on the chemicals involved, but let's just say some of them are toxic, while minimally identifying themselves as someone who is engaged in illegal behavior. Does that make sense? Of course. Of course. It's a really good question. And again, I hate to keep saying this again and again, but it comes down to one of the
problems when something is illegal is you could be somebody that genuinely wants to
do the right thing.
I've got a little bit of mercury waste.
I don't want to just pour this down the drain.
I want to do the right thing and give it to a hazardous waste disposal company.
But I'm afraid that in doing so,
I will incriminate myself and end up in prison.
And so I don't want to risk it.
This is another attitude that you find.
And in those cases, I don't know how to advise people.
I would say that before you get involved
in anything like that,
make sure that you have a plan for absolutely everything. I'm not suggesting that people
indiscriminately start synthesizing these compounds. That's not what I'm saying. I'm
saying that synthesis is an alternative to harvesting them from the natural world for
chemists that are trained and want to do so.
I do have a sort of utopian vision where more people are involved in chemistry,
because I actually think that one of the best ways to reduce problematic relationships with drugs
is to have people make their own drugs and grow their own plants. And I think the same is also
true of food, by the way. I think if more people grew their own food and prepare their own food, they'd have much, much healthier
diets. No one would be eating gummy worms. There would be a lot less obesity. And it's because we
are detached from the process of manufacturing a lot of the things that sustain our life. And if people grew their own mushrooms,
I think that they would have a much better experience
with those mushrooms because they would know
everything that went into producing them.
I think the same is true of cannabis.
I think the same is true of mesclun-containing cacti.
And I think, although this is where it enters
a slightly idealistic and unrealistic territory,
I think that it's also true of synthetic drugs as
well. If you spent a year figuring out how to make MDMA and how to dispose of the waste effectively,
there's no way that you would abuse it by the time you were done. You'd have so much respect
for what you had created and the work that went into creating it that you would have to take it
seriously. So to recap, just for the benefit of this podcast, with the assumption that most people
are not going to read the piece that I wrote, even though I'll plug it again, it's nothing
for sale there.
Well, actually, that's not true.
There's one link to your pamphlet related to 5-MeO and synthesis, but all proceeds from
that go to supporting research related to Parkinson's
disease. So people can read this at Tim.blog forward slash conservation, but a few options
in terms of lessening damage. And I say this, I should say, because we're talking a lot about
synthetics as someone who's very fond, extremely fond, of whole plant-derived or fungi-derived psychedelics,
whether they be psilocybe mushrooms or ayahuasca, which is a combination of the
Benisteriopsis copy vine and most commonly the Chacruna or Psychrodria viridis shrub leaves
thereof, I've derived incredible therapeutic value from these things. And I've had to accept the uncomfortable truth that a lot of
the sourcing that is currently going on in the psychedelic world is just unsustainable. It is
not scalable and totally unsustainable. I'll offer a few alternatives. For people who may be
interested in peyote, I would say please do not use peyote. Reserve that for indigenous use. Consider,
like you mentioned, other mescaline-containing cacti. San Pedro regenerates much more quickly.
Kambo, I would say just don't do it. Most civilizations have survived and thrived and
developed deep spiritual practices without using toads of any type, psychedelic animals.
So I would argue that you do not need to either,
or you shouldn't until you have exhausted all other options. The Sonoran Desert Toad,
Pufolvarius, we talked about synthesis options that have, I mean, the yield is pretty incredible.
Oh, yes. I mean, this is the other thing is if you believe in this medicine and you want people
to have access to it, this is the way to actually make it available.
There's no comparison to toads in terms of how much can be produced this way.
This is how to actually get it out there.
And there hasn't been a lot of research published on how toad populations have been altered by their recent popularity.
But I think it's very telling.
If somebody is selling a product and they say it's great,
you have to really scrutinize the claim.
But if someone has everything to gain
and they're telling you that they're doing something bad not to do it,
you have to listen very carefully.
So people that were making their living harvesting toad venom
were telling me, this is not sustainable.
The populations are dwindling.
And they had every reason to lie about that.
They could have just as easily said, don't worry about it.
There's so many.
They're probably just hibernating.
But they did not say that.
They said that there needs to be an alternative available to people.
And I actually see it as a, you know, a source of inspiration.
If you care about these things, then you can show your admiration by studying them and trying to
recreate them synthetically to better understand them. You know, I think that there's a tribute
to nature in all natural product chemistry, where you're recognizing this amazing feat of enzymatic
synthesis that was conducted by a plant or an animal. And you're recognizing this amazing feat of enzymatic synthesis that was
conducted by a plant or an animal. And you're saying, all right, that's a great challenge.
I'm going to see if I can do it as well. I'm going to see if I can do it. And if there's more
in the venom, although I don't actually think that there is all that much that is contributing,
why not try that out as well? You can synthesize bufotinine. You can synthesize serotonin
o-sulfate if you want. You can synthesize any of these compounds and try them in different
combinations and let that be a challenge and a way of showing your admiration to the toad.
Let's stay on 5-MeO-DMT for a little bit longer. Well, specifically the toad-derived
quote-unquote toad, as it's often referred to. And I want to preface the question
that I'm going to ask, because it's going to upset people, by saying I am in love with many
of the traditions related to sacred plants in Central and South America. I've spent a lot of
time in both places. I've read libraries full of books and have tremendous respect for these indigenous cultures
and traditions.
That said, let me ask the question, how much evidence is there to support that there is
a long history of indigenous use of the Sonoran Desert Toad?
As far as I can tell, there's absolutely no history whatsoever.
Yeah.
And it's a complicated point that I tried to make in my piece,
and I think I ended up confusing a lot of people,
because the history is that there was an anthropologist named Jeanette Runquist
who had found a Cherokee midden pile that contained a lot of toads and had concluded,
I think maybe even partially on the basis of some work Alexander Shulgin had done
and her correspondence with Shulgin, that it was maybe possible that they were using it
as a psychoactive drug, which was a compelling hypothesis and it's worthy of consideration.
But subsequent investigations have shown that those toads
could not have been Bufo alvarius, which is the only species that produces 5-MeO-DMT,
and that there's really almost no way that it was any psychoactive toad, and that there's very
strong evidence that they were using the toads as food. So you have no evidence of a psychedelic
toad in that region and a history of using toads as food by those same people.
It seems pretty clear that you can't point to that and say this is evidence of ancient smoking
of Bufal various venom. It simply isn't. But to make things more complicated, this misconception
served as the inspiration for an independent researcher named Ken Nelson in the 80s. So he read this article,
which got a little bit of popular press and magazines like Omni, which were very,
very influential in the 1980s. And he decided to investigate it himself, thinking that he was
rediscovering an ancient practice, but he wasn't rediscovering it. He was actually discovering it
for the first time, which is just a really actually very confusing turn of events. But that is what happened. He is,
according to known history, the first human being to smoke the venom of Bufalvarius.
I mean, just the trial and error and balls and also intelligence that are encapsulated by Ken. I mean, it's really
mind-boggling how much he was able to do and document.
Oh, yeah. I mean, I think it's inspiring because it shows during the same period in the 1980s
when things were looking really, really bad for
psychedelic research, how one person could make such an interesting and now culturally very
important discovery just on the basis of their own curiosity. I'll also add one more thing,
and please, Hamilton, call me out if I'm wandering astray and getting things wrong. But I think another element or aspect of this
that might be confusing to people is,
I think what you're saying, if I'm hearing you correctly,
is that there's no compelling evidence to suggest
indigenous or historical use
up until a handful of decades ago
of the Sonoran Desert Toad
as a source of 5-MeO-DMT.
That is correct, yes.
What you are not saying is that there's no historical evidence of indigenous use of 5-MeO-DMT
containing plants.
That is correct, yes.
That is the case. But if we're looking at
toad specifically, and I'm kind of beating this dead horse, folks, because I have seen how popular
toad has become in psychedelic circles, and it's very, very worrisome to me, just in terms of
scalability. So that's why we're spending so much time on this. I should also say, just as a caveat, that I have, quite apart from the ecological impact,
seen some very experienced psychonauts get knocked sideways and untethered by 5-MeO-DMT
experiences. Not to say that that is always going to be the case, but at least anecdotally, among the circles that I
know well, it has been alarming how many examples there are of people getting destabilized by their
experiences. I don't know if you have any thoughts on that. Oh, yes. I mean, I think one of the
unfortunate things about 5-MeO-DMT is its name. So people think 5-MeO-DMT, that must be
a version of DMT. It must be similar to DMT, but it's more distant from DMT than
psilocin and psilocybin. It's a pharmacologically and chemically and experientially, crucially,
different compound. It's so different that I don't even think the word psychedelic
really fully captures what it is and what it does. It's operating on a level that is different from
any other psychedelic. And I'm not just talking about its potency. There's something else going
on. It doesn't cause visual hallucinations for most people. It dissociates you entirely from your environment.
You become largely unresponsive at high doses,
almost as if you've taken an anesthetic.
And it can produce very violent physical reactions for people as well.
It's really like a near-death experience
more than what people think of when they think of a psychedelic experience.
For all of those reasons and more, folks, please consider other options or a synthetic
route with respect to Toad.
In the new season, not to go from horror to horror, you explored xenon gas.
Yes.
So I think this is a useful place to talk about not necessarily risks of compounds,
but risks that can exist external to the compound or even the dose of a compound itself.
So we were texting about this a few days ago, but can you provide a little bit of background on why you have a gas in the most recent season,
what some of its effects are, and then talk about what you observed
in this clinic that scared the living shit out of me.
Yes, yeah. So for those that aren't aware of X xenon, it is an element. It's on the periodic
table of elements in a column called the noble gases. It's on the rightmost side. And at the
top, you have helium, which everyone is familiar with, then neon, which again, everyone is familiar
with, then argon, which maybe a few less people are familiar with, then krypton, and then xenon.
Xenon is the heaviest noble gas that is not radioactive.
Then you have radon, which is unstable. And if you've heard of xenon, you probably only know about it in the context of lighting. It's used in car headlights and projector lights and things
like that. And it's very, very rare in our atmosphere. It's 0.000087% of Earth's atmosphere. So there's a little tiny bit in every
breath that you take. But in order to concentrate enough of it to fill a tank, you need to
distill millions of liters of air. You have to compress it and cool it down to a liquid and then
fractionally distill off the nitrogen and the oxygen. And
finally, after you've removed all the other gases, you're left with a small xenon fraction,
which is why it's so expensive. A single breath of xenon costs somewhere in the range of
$60. And that's unfortunate because for anesthesiologists that have examined xenon clinically, they've concluded that
it has a number of attributes that make it essentially the perfect anesthetic. It is not
metabolized in any way. It can be recycled indefinitely. It's extremely potent, more potent
than nitrous oxide. When it's given to a patient, they recover very, very rapidly after the xenon gas is removed within seconds.
And the anesthesia also begins within seconds.
And it has no known toxicity.
So it is arguably the perfect anesthetic and maybe even the perfect drug.
It's incredibly, incredibly euphoric.
But, and this actually goes back to
these, again, I was saying earlier about how there's so many different factors that determine
addiction when people are talking about addiction potential. There could be the greatest drug in the
world, but it doesn't matter if a single dose of it costs thousands of dollars or it's impossible
to obtain. And I think Xenon is an example of that. It is a drug that is extremely enjoyable,
but it's just something that nobody has access to.
I never thought I would have the opportunity to use it. And it wasn't until I was visiting a
chemist friend in New Zealand. I was in 2014. I was on my way back to the United States. I was
about to get on the plane. And he said, before you go, I need to show you I have this tank of xenon.
And I couldn't believe it, that it seemed so
absurdly extravagant. It seemed almost on par with, you know, using gold or diamonds as a
psychoactive drug. And I had that opportunity to inhale one balloon full of xenon. And I,
it was a cherished memory of this, you know, one absurd extravagant encounter with xenon gas,
which is a source of fascination for anyone that cares about the periodic table.
Now, when you say balloon...
It was a balloon of sorts.
May or may not have been a condom.
Aha!
So you talk about this perfect drug.
I think you're talking about it as a perfect drug from
the standpoint of euphoria. I want you to correct me if I'm wrong. The first time that Xenon ever
came on my radar, outside of hearing about it in passing maybe in high school on the periodic table,
was as a possible performance-enhancing drug at the Sochi Olympics for endurance.
I think it was for biathlon or any number of other sports,
but that it was being used for endurance-enhancing properties as a performance-enhancing drug.
I don't know if there's any real plausible mechanism to explain that, but what are the medical uses of xenon outside of inducing euphoria?
First as an anesthetic, but it's not used for that in the United States at this time. It was
used experimentally for a brief period by an anesthesiologist named Mervyn Mays and a few
others have investigated it, but it has not been approved by the FDA for
that purpose and all use is experimental. There is a pharmaceutical company called Nobilis that's
trying to develop and release a xenon inhaler for PTSD. They actually sent me a prototype of it,
which is the first time I've heard of a psychoactive drug inhaler for treatment of a
psychological disorder. Very interesting idea. I don't know
if it will ever come to market, but it was really cool to see somebody looking into that. In terms
of performance enhancing, I think that it's basically working as a sort of oxygen deprivation
type intervention where in addition to the anesthetic euphoriant effects that conceivably could allow
an athlete to get a little extra workout in. I mean, this is, I think among elite Olympic type
athletes, it would be far too expensive to use under any sort of normal training. And that was
about it. You know, I had this one experience, I wrote it up as a fun novelty
that I would never get to do again. And then somebody wrote to me and they said, you know,
I was just in the sauna at the gym and some guy said that he owns a xenon clinic. What's the deal
with that? And I thought, well, I don't know what the deal is with that. I've never heard of a xenon
clinic. And I said, you know, could you get me this guy's phone number
and could I talk to him?
And he said, oh, you know, I'll do what I can.
He sends me his phone number.
We start talking.
In the English language,
there's almost nothing about this.
This is all happening in Russia, Czech Republic,
India as well, apparently.
But if you look online,
at least before I released my episode,
there was almost nothing about xenon as a psychoactive drug. But these clinics are opening
up where they give people xenon as a therapy for a variety of different ailments. And so I went and
spent some time at one of these clinics, and it was a fascinating and somewhat frightening experience. It was one of the most surreal,
I would say, maybe that's the word,
surreal 20 or 30 minutes of television I've ever seen.
I won't ruin the surprise,
but there's xenon gas,
there's operatic singing,
there are breatharians, other words people who claim to survive on prana alone without eating
food which ends up being particularly relevant when we get to the horror story that i hope you'll
share it's uh and also the bizarreness of hearing how deep your voice becomes on xenon.
Yes, yes.
It's really funny.
It's also funny.
There's a number of videos on YouTube of people inhaling xenon exclusively for the purpose
of altering the sound of their voice.
I think this is another example of this sort of puritanical attitude that people have. So all these, if you inhale xenon gas to change the sound of your voice for a YouTube video,
that's totally fine. I upload a video of myself inhaling xenon gas. My voice has changed,
but like everyone else, I get high. The only difference is in the other videos,
they want to change their voice. The highness is incidental. In my video, I want to get high and the voice change is
incidental. But in my case, the video is demonetized. You bacchanalian hedonist.
I think that it is sort of emblematic of the way these things are carried out in our culture. Two
people can inhale the exact same gas,
but if you're doing it with the intention
of feeling euphoria, that's unacceptable.
But if you're doing it to playfully alter
the sound of your voice, then sure, that's fine.
We can advertise with that.
Since I've been dragging this out with foreshadowing,
what was the horror story?
Okay, okay, the horror story, yes.
So in order to do the work that I do,
I've had to cultivate a very nonjudgmental attitude.
And I often get messages from people saying,
how could you have possibly let this person say this?
Or how could you have talked to this or that sort of person?
But I think the best strategy,
if you're trying to learn from someone else,
is just to listen and to not judge them.
And I've never been the sort of person
that wants to catch people looking their worst.
I always want to give people the opportunity
to be shown the way they want to be seen.
And I certainly did not go to this clinic
with the intention of making anyone look bad.
The novelty of Xenon being used as a therapy
was more than enough for me.
And if people had had a perfectly good time
and everyone had benefited, that would have been the episode.
There was footage of people having positive experiences.
Yes, my experience was extremely positive.
But over the time that I was there,
it became clear that there were some risks
associated with Xenon therapy.
They were giving it to children.
That I don't think is inherently bad,
but it does raise the bar in terms of medical supervision.
A lot of the research that has been done
in the use of xenon as an anesthetic
has actually been done on neonates.
So it's not as if there's something inherently bad
about giving this to children, or in that
case, infants.
But you want to make sure that there's someone with training, at least as an anesthetist,
who is available should anything go wrong.
Then there was the issue with people potentially developing a problematic relationship, some
sort of dependence.
And again, you would never hear Xenon discussed as
an addictive drug because most people don't have a tank of Xenon. They could never hope to become
addicted to Xenon. But I think for some of these people who are working with it continuously,
they may have developed a slightly problematic relationship with it. And I even heard a rumor
that is unconfirmed, so maybe I shouldn't say it, but I heard a rumor that there was another xenon clinic operator in the Czech Republic who died as
well. So this is an occupational hazard. The same thing is true of nitrous oxide. It's a problem in
dentistry that dentists and dental hygienists develop addiction to nitrous oxide because they
have tanks of it available, and it's very easy after a stressful day to sit down in the dentist chair and unwind for a few hours. I spoke with one
dentist who, um, you know, had pretty much lost everything because he enjoyed, he told me that he
wasn't addicted to nitrous oxide and he wasn't addicted to Prince,
but he was addicted to the combination of listening to Prince on nitrous oxide.
Dangerous cocktail for your professional future.
Yes. So that's something to avoid. So the other thing, of course, is that when you're
administering an anesthetic,
somebody is, by definition, unconscious.
And if they vomit while they're unconscious, it can very easily be fatal if they inhale any of their vomit.
So you have people laying on their backs who haven't fasted, which is standard before...
In this clinic, you mean? Fasting was not...
It was not standard, yes.
Required.
But it should, before the administration of a general anesthetic,
someone should always fast.
Because if you vomit while you're unconscious, it can be fatal.
So they were not asking anybody to fast.
This, ironically, breatharian, someone who claims to never consume food,
started to vomit while they were unconscious,
while wearing this mask, which is quadruple strapped to the
face in order to prevent any leakage of the precious xenon gas. And it was absolutely
terrifying. And that was a moment where I realized, you know, I don't want to make anyone look bad.
That's not what I got into this to do. But I also don't want to hide bad things that I observe because you can
very easily hurt people that way as well. And it was a kind of difficult moment of realizing that
there was something potentially dangerous going on and I had to acknowledge it.
The final thing that was not captured on film and was not part of the episode,
because again, Xenon is so precious, it has to be
recycled. When it's recycled, it's passed through a closed loop that contains calcium hydroxide,
which scrubs the CO2. I wanted to film a time-lapse of this color change indicator in these
calcium hydroxide beads changing just to show the passage of time. So I asked a producer that I was
working with to just inhale into the calcium
hydroxide repeatedly so I could film this color change reaction. And he's doing that. I'm filming
the time lapse. I go into another room to film something else. When I come back, someone who's
working at the clinic said, why don't we just give him some xenon as well? You know, he's here,
he's sitting. And I said, oh, it's very expensive. You don't have to do that. He said, oh no, I
insist. I insist that we give him some xenon. And I said, okay, well, it's very expensive. You don't have to do that. He said, oh no, I insist. I insist that we give him some Xenon.
And I said, okay, well, it's very generous of you.
And the producer wanted to try the Xenon.
And so he hooked him up to the Xenon and I left again.
And then when I came back 20 minutes later,
not only was this producer unconscious
under the influence of Xenon,
the proprietor of the clinic was using xenon himself and was also unconscious
and wasn't watching him he couldn't wait to use it himself and that's when i thought okay
there's something that's terrifying there's something terrifying going on here and that
same person tragically died shortly after we finished filming the episode. So, you know, I don't want to claim that Xeon is dangerous.
I don't even know that I think that those clinics should be shut down.
But I think that it's very clear that additional caution is required.
You have a very interdisciplinary bent and interdisciplinary approach. You have a journalistic eye,
you have scientific training, you are a practicing chemist, you are doing research,
and you have become this figurehead and magnet for all sorts of correspondence. So I think you have a very good 30,000 foot view of a lot of
intersecting areas of interest and activity within the, let's just call it the psychedelic
realm. Does anything come to mind if I ask what would you like to see more or less of
in the psychedelic space? Yes. One thing that comes to mind
that I don't have a good answer for,
but something that I've come to appreciate
more and more as I've gotten older,
is when I first started researching the subject,
I was a pure reductionist.
And I had very little appreciation
for the ritual associated with a lot of these things.
And the more I experienced these rituals, the more I came to respect them.
And the iboga ceremony was the moment where I realized that the ritual could be as powerful as the substance itself. And the integration of that ritual could dramatically
magnify the therapeutic properties of the drug. The reason that I felt that way is because this
is an endurance ritual. It's five days of fasting, five days of almost continuous dance and drumming.
And with the iboga, you start to appreciate things that are very difficult to
articulate. I had a rattle in my hand and I was tired at times. I didn't want to rattle anymore.
And I would think there's 20 people around me that are rattling. Do I really have to rattle continuously all night long?
Haven't we rattled enough?
And then it hit me that yes, I did have to rattle because my rattle motivated everyone else's rattle
in the same way that their rattle motivated my rattle.
And every single person's movement
played off of everyone else's movement.
And it was my responsibility,
no matter how tired I was, to put every ounce of energy
that I had into this ceremony because I was a part of it and because we were all connected.
Now, that sounds like a pretty kind of new age idea, but it felt entirely logical.
It felt completely rationalist to me.
I am a part of this.
Everything that I do influences everyone else.
If I let my motivation slip for a moment,
it could have an effect on someone else.
It could have a butterfly downstream effect
that diminishes the entire ceremony,
and I can't allow that to happen.
I have to give this every ounce of energy
and enthusiasm that I have.
And that was part of it.
The other part of it,
I would actually liken, bizarrely enough, to breatharianism, which is, I've watched some documentaries on breatharianism. And I, you know, after this experience, I started
reading about it and learning about it. And it's very, very easy to make fun of breatharians.
I, of course, would have made fun of them because, of course, you need
food to survive. Of course, you need water to survive. Obviously, this is one of the most obvious
things in the world. But then I started thinking, well, wait a second. Is it really fair to just
call these people idiots? Why might somebody do this? Why might somebody even think about the idea
of breatharianism? And what I came to realize is that it's a tremendously
empowering idea to think that there are reserves of energy within you that you can tap into. And
if you have enough will, enough power within you, you can subsist off your own life force
indefinitely. And while there was no breatharianism in the Iboga ceremony, I think that spirit of reserves
of energy within you was a tremendous part.
There is no need to get tired because there's more inside you.
There's no need to eat.
You can keep going.
There's no need to drink water.
You're not going to die of dehydration right there and then.
You'll be okay.
You don't even need to pee.
You can just keep going.
It's all within you.
And that was a really empowering
idea. And it doesn't matter if you are addicted to drugs or not. It doesn't matter if you're
religious or not. The idea that there are tremendous reserves of energy within you
is something that can benefit everyone. And I don't know how that could be applied
in our current medical practice. Yeah, the translation of ritual, although I suppose we already have
ritual in our medical practices, they just differ very widely from the indigenous
rituals, right? There's certain protocols and outfits and hierarchies. I'm not saying they're unnecessary, but they form in some ways their own
codified set of rituals. And they've started to introduce them. Bill Richards does talk about
the things that are done in Johns Hopkins. And they serve the psilocybin capsule, which of course
is synthetic psilocybin, in a copal burner that's sort of like a chalice and they have a rose at the end of the
session that people examine and which has become a sort of psychedelic tradition in 20th century
psychotherapy in and of itself where people can see the rose at the end and in the petals they
can recognize their own mortality so there there are rituals that are being integrated.
How widespread these will become is another question. But I think that's actually as big
a question as the chemistry and the pharmacology of these substances is how can we develop the
best rituals to ensure that people are getting the best and the most out of them.
Yeah, set and setting, right? I mean,
I want to pursue this same question a little bit further, but before I do, let me ask,
given the multiplication of fly-by-night rent-a-shamans in South America and the fraud and disaster and sexual abuse and other things that can befall a tourist in South America,
are there also fly-by-night operators who are dealing in Iboga?
Oh, I'm sure.
And by the way, I am not saying this to make any sort of claim
like you have to have a traditional Bwiti Iboga ceremony.
That's not what I'm saying at all.
I'm really just trying to appreciate the power of some of these traditions.
And I actually think that they can paradoxically be disempowering as well. If you think that you need someone else to
give you this experience, that you have no intuitive understanding of your own psychology,
that you need someone else to explain life to you, that's a problem as well. There's a balance.
And I actually think that it probably helped me a little bit that I don't speak French. And so I was able to absorb some of the symbolism.
I was able to absorb some of the rituals,
but I didn't fully understand any of it.
And I learned what I could.
I had a translator.
I asked questions,
but it would be a huge mistake to say
that I fully understood their rituals.
I just think that there's a lot
to be done in the way that we administer these substances and the cultures that have spent a
few generations figuring it out. Some of them seem to have done a really remarkable job,
but that's not to say that people should invalidate their own intuition, and they should obviously be very, very careful.
There are some really outstanding scientists
who are not first and foremost psychedelic researchers
who are going to be coming into this field,
who I think will do a really nice job of looking at context
and some of these inputs,
although they might not put transplanting of ritual
on their initial list.
They might be looking at olfactory cues and things like that. But Adam Ghazali at UCSF
is going to be stepping into this world. I'm really excited to see what he does.
I'm sure there are others. Let's talk about the ritual a little bit further. So I may
get a little far from shore with the initial question, which was, what would you like to see more or less of?
We can just bookmark that. of, say, tramadol addiction or addiction that they're experiencing in their society or surrounding societies, that these traditions and rituals are not static in the sense that
one shouldn't feel that in order to have the one and only authentic ayahuasca ceremony,
they need to go find a certain person from a certain tribe because the real thing has been
frozen in the ember, ember? Amber, has been frozen in the ember in a certain village in South America.
That is to say that people have been mixing and matching all along. So if you look at the
traditional ayahuasca, and by traditional, I mean pre-Spanish Inquisition, kind of pre-Mestizo tradition ayahuasca ceremonies.
Very often it was only the ayahuasquero, only the shaman, although they wouldn't call themselves that, who would drink for purposes of diagnosis or divination or whatever the purpose might be a prophecy. And that if you look at,
even in the remotest parts of the upper Amazon,
for instance, some of these ceremonies, you're going to find elements of other languages,
say certain types of Quechua
that don't occur natively in those regions.
You're going to find things like Agua de Florida,
Florida water, which we both had experiences with,
which was originally manufactured in the United States
and is a very strong cologne.
I don't know how it made its way
into the remotest parts of the Amazon.
Maybe you do.
I suspect it might have something to do
with the rubber industry.
That's a great question.
I'd love to know the answer.
But you find it all over
the place. Agua de Cananga, Cananga water also, at least one of the most common versions of it,
initially manufactured in the United States. And so these kind of syncretic hybrids are found
everywhere, which is to say, I think we should give ourselves license to continue to experiment with these new combinations. Oh, absolutely, yes. I mean, Christianity has permeated every great psychedelic tradition
internationally. It's part of the Bui Ti tradition, you bow down to Christ. It's part of Mazatec
salvia and mushroom ceremonies. It's part of the Native American church in the United States. It's part of huichol traditions as well.
It's certainly present in a lot of South American shamanism.
So I don't think I can think of a single psychedelic tradition that doesn't strongly include Christianity
and Christian symbolism.
So that right there is evidence that these traditions are evolving. They evolve to reflect the environment,
to reflect the best practices of the people
who are engaging with these plants.
And I think that we have a lot of room
for growth and improvement.
Is there anything else that worries you right now
with respect to the explosion of attention and popularity and capital, the influx of new participants in the psychedelic space? What are you most optimistic about and what are you most concerned by? by the hype phase that we talked about, that there's a lot of people that are interested in
the money and that's okay. I don't think there's anything wrong with money and I don't think
there's anything wrong from wanting to sell or profit from psychedelics, but it's definitely
a problem if that interferes with people's appreciation of them, if they start behaving
in corrupt or unethical ways. And journalists right now
love to write positive stories about psychedelics because the pendulum of novelty has swung in the
direction of describing psychedelics as something new and good. And it's fashionable to talk about
how prohibition is a mistake and these psychedelics are valuable medicines. And look at all these
people at Johns Hopkins University. They just did this or that.
So that's the big new thing.
Well, what happens when that gets a little bit old?
And what happens when, I don't know,
someone has a bad experience?
Maybe a celebrity has a bad experience and they decide that mushrooms caused their psychosis.
And then what?
And we start writing stories about that.
Maybe we went too far.
Maybe someone has some
kind of problem i mean historically that is the way these things go they become very popular then
art link letters daughter jumps out a window or someone decides that timothy leary is crazy and
he's emblematic of the problems with psychedelics and that becomes the story. So I just hope that everyone will be responsible in
their use and will recognize that it is up to them to ensure that the mistakes of the past
aren't repeated. What books, there's a long list. I've seen your library. You have a lot of books
related to psychedelics. If you could assign required reading for anyone involved with psychedelics whether using
administering pursuing them in the form of a business i know that's very very broad but are
there any books that stand out to you oh well p call and t call are the two that i would say
read those first and thankfully they're
long enough that i think if people actually took my advice and read them by the time they got to
the end they wouldn't need advice on further book recommendations but those are the the big ones you
know with iboga and buiti religion there's a very rare book that you can find PDFs of online by UChicago
anthropologist whose last name is Fernandez. I'm trying to remember his first name. It's called
Bwiti. That's the name of the book, published in the 60s or early 70s. That's a great text. That's
pretty much all that's out there in English. Most of the Bwiti literature is in French,
unfortunately. When it comes to psilocin, psilocybin mushrooms,
obviously there's Terence McKenna and Paul Stamets that have contributed really interesting books on
the subject, depending on whether you're interested in cultivation or mushrooms in general.
For mesclun-containing cacti, Douglas Sharon wrote a beautiful book called The Wizard of the Four Winds that goes
into Peruvian cactus shamanism that I recommend. I could recommend a lot of books. They might
be a little bit on the technical side for the average reader. I mean, there's a lot. It really
depends on what you want to learn about. In some of these areas, there's less literature. There
aren't many books that I would recommend on 5-MeO-DMT
and Bufo Alvarez. And this is very self-serving, I'm aware, with the exception of this book that
I am republishing right now. It's the original book. It's maybe 10 pages long, something like
that, 15 pages long. It's very short, but I think that it tells you everything that you need to know
about Bufo Alvarez, written by the man who discovered that the venom could be smoked,
Ken Nelson. And then I expanded it a little bit to include some historical background.
The whole thing is 30 pages long. It's a booklet, very, very short, but I think it's good. And I
think that the other books that are not scientific texts, like there's a Utexas monograph called
Evolution of the Genus Bufo, but that's chemical analysis. I mean, it's great if
you're a scientist who's interested in Bufo Alvarius, but in terms of a larger appreciation
of 5-MeO-DMT, I mean, you have other books, but they tend to be a little bit more in the new age
vein. There's a lot of garbage out there on all of these things that we're discussing. What is the URL again for the pamphlet?
Yes, that is www.psychedelictoadofthesinorindesert.com.
I wish I'd just gotten psychedelic toad.
Well, Hamilton, we've covered a lot of ground
and we could go for another five hours,
but maybe we'll save a little in reserve for our next round.
I don't think there will be,
even if I exhausted myself,
I think we would still have lots of material.
It's about to get really interesting.
I think there's going to be a lot to talk about
in the coming years.
Oh, I think so too.
I think there's going to be an absolute
cyclone of activity
and also conflict,
intellectual property being one of the flagpoles
that I'm going to watch very closely, and innovation.
I mean, a lot of novel psychedelics being pursued
by many for-profit companies,
bigger and bigger players coming into the space,
lots of research centers being established at various universities. And I'm thrilled that this
appears to be a field that is more and more viable as a career path for researchers and scientists.
Yes, me too.
Is there anything else that you'd like to say to my audience,
request of my audience, a haiku that you'd like to read, anything at all?
No, it's just great talking to you.
Yeah, you too, man. It's good to see you.
Yes.
And special thanks to the Red Baron,
who did many flybys in our Audio Verite conversation here in downtown Austin.
And for everybody listening, we will put show notes at TimedUpBlog.com with links to everything that we've discussed.
And until next time, be safe, be open-minded, and try the Hippocratic Oath when it comes to psychedelics. First,
do no harm, or at the very least, do as little harm as possible. And thanks for listening.
Hey guys, this is Tim again. Just a few more things before you take off. Number one,
this is Five Bullet Friday. Do you want to get a short email from me? Would you enjoy getting a short email from me every Friday
that provides a little morsel of fun for the weekend?
And Five Bullet Friday is a very short email
where I share the coolest things I've found
or that I've been pondering over the week.
That could include favorite new albums that I've discovered.
It could include gizmos and gadgets
and all sorts of weird shit that I've somehow dug up
in the world of the
esoteric as I do. It could include favorite articles that I've read and that I've shared
with my close friends, for instance. And it's very short. It's just a little tiny bite of goodness
before you head off for the weekend. So if you want to receive that, check it out. Just go to
fourhourworkweek.com. That to 4hourworkweek.com.
That's 4hourworkweek.com all spelled out and just drop in your email and you will get the very next
one. And if you sign up, I hope you enjoy it. This episode is brought to you by Element,
spelled L-M-N-T. What on earth is Element? It is a delicious sugar-free electrolyte drink mix.
I've stocked up on boxes and boxes of this.
It was one of the first things that I bought when I saw COVID coming down the pike.
And I usually use one to two per day.
Element is formulated to help anyone with their electrolyte needs and perfectly suited
to folks following a keto, low-carb, or paleo diet.
Or if you drink a ton of water and you might not have the right balance, that's often when
I drink it.
Or if you're doing any type of endurance exercise, mountain biking, etc., another application.
If you've ever struggled to feel good on keto, low-carb, or paleo, it's most likely because even if you're consciously consuming electrolytes, you're just not getting enough.
And it relates to a bunch of stuff like a hormone called aldosterone, blah, blah, blah, when insulin is low.
But suffice to say, this is where Element, again spelled L-M-N-T, can help. My favorite flavor by far is citrus salt,
which, as a side note, you can also use to make a kick-ass no-sugar margarita. But for special
occasions, obviously, you're probably already familiar with one of the names behind it,
Rob Wolf, R-O-B-B, Rob Wolf, who is a former research biochemist and two-time
New York Times bestselling author of The Paleo Solution and Wired to Eat. Rob created Element
by scratching his own itch. That's how it got started. His Brazilian jiu-jitsu coaches turned
him on to electrolytes as a performance enhancer. Things clicked and bam, company was born. So if
you're on a low-carb diet or fasting, electrolytes play a
key role in relieving hunger, cramps, headaches, tiredness, and dizziness. Sugar, artificial
ingredients, coloring, all that's garbage, unneeded. There's none of that in Element.
And a lot of names you might recognize are already using Element. It was recommended to be
by one of my favorite athlete friends. Three Navy SEAL teams as prescribed by their master chief, Marine units, FBI sniper teams,
at least five NFL teams who have subscriptions.
They are the exclusive hydration partner
to Team USA weightlifting and on and on.
You can try it risk-free.
If you don't like it,
Element will give you your money back, no questions asked.
They have extremely low return rates.
Element has come up with a very special offer
for you, my dear listeners.
They've created Tim's Club. Simply go to drinkelement.com slash Tim. That's L-M-N-T, drinkelement.com slash
Tim, and select subscribe and save on any 30-count box of Element for just $36. This will be valid
for the lifetime of the subscription, and you can pause it any time. Again, that's drinkelement.com
slash Tim for this exclusive offer.
And now perfect for warm days,
they have a new flavor, watermelon salt,
that I cannot recommend highly enough.
It is delicious.
This episode is brought to you by Aura, O-U-R-A.
It is the only wearable that I wear on a daily basis.
Aura is the company behind the Smart Ring
that delivers personalized sleep and health insights
to help you optimize just about everything.
And I've tried every device out there that you can imagine.
This one really makes the cut.
I've been using it religiously for at least six months now,
and I was introduced to it by Dr. Peter Attia,
who's also vetted just about everything.
With advanced sensors,
Aura packs state-of-the-art heart rate, heart rate variability, HRV, super important to me,
temperature activity, and sleep monitoring technology into a convenient non-invasive ring. It's tiny. It weighs less than six grams and focuses on three key insights, sleep,
readiness, and activity. So I can use it to help focus my attention on the type, volume, intensity
of exercise that I should do in a given day. I use it to determine how certain types of alcohol at
different times of the day affect my sleep, which they do. And I can see all of that in graph form
trended over time. There are tons of actionable insights that have come from using this ring
for me. They have a number of incredible
people on their team. Dr. Matthew Walker, a professor of neuroscience and psychology at UC
Berkeley, and also author of Why We Sleep, the mega hit, is Aura's chief science advisor as just
one example. The Aura ring is one of the most accurate wearables available because it measures
your vitals directly from your finger.
So it's not deducing that or making a best guesstimate based on a bunch of other things and trying to triangulate. Compared to a medical grade electrocardiogram, the Oura Ring is 99.9%
accurate for resting heart rate and 98.4% accurate for heart rate variability. And I work with HRV doctors and they recommend
that I use the Oura Ring. So try it yourself. It is super cool and super practical, very actionable.
The Oura Ring comes in two styles and three colors, silver, black, and matte black. I use
matte black. For $299, you can give or get the gift of health by visiting OuraRing.com. That's O-U-R-A-R-I-N-G.com.
Again, that's OuraRing.com.