The Tim Ferriss Show - #560: Zen Master Henry Shukman — 20 Minutes of Calm, Plus the Strange and Powerful World of Koans
Episode Date: December 29, 2021Zen Master Henry Shukman — 20 Minutes of Calm, Plus the Strange and Powerful World of Koans | Brought to you by GiveWell.org charity research and effective giving, Laird Supe...rfood clean, plant-based creamers, and LinkedIn Jobs recruitment platform with 770M+ users. More on all three below.Henry Shukman (@mountaincloudzencenter) teaches mindfulness and awakening practices to a wide range of students from all traditions and walks of life. Henry is an appointed teacher in the Sanbo Zen lineage and is the Guiding Teacher of Mountain Cloud Zen Center. He has an MA from Cambridge and an MLitt from St Andrews and has written several award-winning books of poetry and fiction.Henry’s essays have been published in The New York Times, Outside, and Tricycle, and his poems have been published in The New Republic, The Guardian, The Sunday Times (UK), and London Review of Books. He has taught meditation at Google, Harvard Business School, UBS, Esalen Institute, Colorado College, United World College, and many other venues. He has written of his own journey in his memoir One Blade of Grass: Finding the Old Road of the Heart, a Zen Memoir.Henry has also recently created a new meditation program, Original Love, which aims to provide a broad, inclusive path of growth through meditation.Please enjoy!*This episode is brought to you by Laird Superfood. Founded by big-wave surfer Laird Hamilton and volleyball champion Gabby Reece, Laird Superfood promises to deliver high-impact fuel to help you get through your busiest days. Laird Superfood offers a line of plant-based products designed to optimize your daily rituals from sunrise to sunset.My two favorite products are their Turmeric Superfood Creamer and Unsweetened Superfood Creamer. I put one of them in practically everything. Both can really optimize your daily coffee or tea ritual, and a $10 bag will last you a long time. For a limited time, Laird Superfood is offering you guys 20% off your order when you use code TIM20 at checkout. Check out LairdSuperfood.com/Tim to see my favorite products and learn more.*This episode is also brought to you by GiveWell.org! For over ten years, GiveWell.org has helped donors find the charities and projects that save and improve lives most per dollar. GiveWell spends over 20,000 hours each year researching charitable organizations and only recommends a few of the highest-impact, evidence-backed charities they’ve found. In total, more than 50,000 people have used GiveWell to donate as effectively as possible.This year, support the charities that save and improve lives most, with GiveWell. Any of my listeners who become new GiveWell donors will have their first donation matched up to $250 when you go to GiveWell.org and select “PODCAST” and “Tim Ferriss” at checkout.*This episode is also brought to you by LinkedIn Jobs. Whether you are looking to hire now for a critical role or thinking about needs that you may have in the future, LinkedIn Jobs can help. LinkedIn screens candidates for the hard and soft skills you’re looking for and puts your job in front of candidates looking for job opportunities that match what you have to offer.Using LinkedIn’s active community of more than 770 million professionals worldwide, LinkedIn Jobs can help you find and hire the right person faster. When your business is ready to make that next hire, find the right person with LinkedIn Jobs. And now, you can post a job for free. Just visit LinkedIn.com/Tim.*For show notes and past guests, please visit tim.blog/podcast.Sign up for Tim’s email newsletter (“5-Bullet Friday”) at tim.blog/friday.For transcripts of episodes, go to tim.blog/transcripts.Discover Tim’s books: tim.blog/books.Follow Tim:Twitter: twitter.com/tferriss Instagram: instagram.com/timferrissFacebook: facebook.com/timferriss YouTube: youtube.com/timferrissPast guests on The Tim Ferriss Show include Jerry Seinfeld, Hugh Jackman, Dr. Jane Goodall, LeBron James, Kevin Hart, Doris Kearns Goodwin, Jamie Foxx, Matthew McConaughey, Esther Perel, Elizabeth Gilbert, Terry Crews, Sia, Yuval Noah Harari, Malcolm Gladwell, Madeleine Albright, Cheryl Strayed, Jim Collins, Mary Karr, Maria Popova, Sam Harris, Michael Phelps, Bob Iger, Edward Norton, Arnold Schwarzenegger, Neil Strauss, Ken Burns, Maria Sharapova, Marc Andreessen, Neil Gaiman, Neil de Grasse Tyson, Jocko Willink, Daniel Ek, Kelly Slater, Dr. Peter Attia, Seth Godin, Howard Marks, Dr. Brené Brown, Eric Schmidt, Michael Lewis, Joe Gebbia, Michael Pollan, Dr. Jordan Peterson, Vince Vaughn, Brian Koppelman, Ramit Sethi, Dax Shepard, Tony Robbins, Jim Dethmer, Dan Harris, Ray Dalio, Naval Ravikant, Vitalik Buterin, Elizabeth Lesser, Amanda Palmer, Katie Haun, Sir Richard Branson, Chuck Palahniuk, Arianna Huffington, Reid Hoffman, Bill Burr, Whitney Cummings, Rick Rubin, Dr. Vivek Murthy, Darren Aronofsky, and many more.See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
Transcript
Discussion (0)
This episode is brought to you by Laird Superfood, founded by big wave surfer Laird Hamilton and volleyball champion Gabby Reese.
Laird Superfood, that's L-A-I-R-D, delivers high impact fuel to help you get through your busiest days.
And I know these two people, they walk the walk.
I love their new Aloha Oat Mac. You heard me right. Aloha Oat Mac Superfood Creamer.
I use the unsweetened version, made from real plant-based ingredients, including organic oats, macadamia nuts. That's where the oat mac comes from. Avocado oil and
Aquaman. Aquaman is a natural source of seaweed derived calcium with 72 minerals and trace
amounts. Laird's creamers can really optimize your daily coffee or tea ritual. I use them all
the time and a $10 bag will last you a long time. For a limited time, Laird Superfood is
offering you guys, my listeners, 20% off when you use code TIM20 at checkout. That's T-I-M-2-0.
Visit lairdsuperfood.com slash TIM to see some of my favorite products and learn more.
Again, that's lairdsuperfood.com slash TIM, L-A-I-R-D, LairdSuperfood.com slash Tim, and use code Tim20 for 20% off of your
order. LairdSuperfood.com slash Tim, promo code Tim20. This episode is brought to you by GiveWell.
I love these guys. Donating money to help other people is wonderful, but how can you be confident
that your donations are
actually doing things? Are they improving or saving lives effectively? It can be really hard
to parse. You could do weeks of research to find the charities that are out there, what programs
they run, what their admin overhead is, how effective, blah, blah, blah, on and on. It can
take forever. I know from experience. Doing the research is really hard. Or you could simply visit
givewell.org for a short vetted list
of the charities they've found to be best per dollar in donations at saving or improving lives.
GiveWell spends more than 20,000 hours each year researching charitable organizations and only
recommends a few of the highest impact evidence-backed charities they've found. They do
all of this without any signup fees and without taking a cut of your tax-deductible donation.
GiveWell wants to empower as many donors as possible to make informed decisions about their donations, so GiveWell is free. I've recommended GiveWell.org for a while now,
and donations from listeners of this podcast, that's you guys, amount now to roughly $483,399.27,
so close to $500,000, which is incredible. So first and foremost, thanks to
everyone who has donated. In total, more than 50,000 people have used GiveWell to donate as
effectively as possible. And rigorous evidence suggests that these donations will save tens of
thousands of lives and improve the lives of millions more. So go right now to GiveWell.org.
And when you make your first donation,
your gift will be matched up to $250. This matching offer is good for as long as the funds last.
So it's time sensitive and is a great opportunity to multiply your impact,
which is something I always look for. How can I get the maximum multiplicative effect out of my
dollars that I give? To participate, just go to givewell.org.
And when you get to checkout, pick podcast and enter Tim Ferriss Show. It's that simple. So one
more time, get your first donation matched up to $250 at givewell.org. Be sure to select podcast
and Tim Ferriss Show at checkout. At this altitude, I can run flat out for a half mile before my hands start shaking.
Can I ask you a personal question?
Now would have seemed an appropriate time.
What if I did the opposite?
I'm a cybernetic organism, living tissue over a metal endoskeleton.
The Tim Ferriss Show.
Hello, boys and girls. This is Tim Ferriss, and welcome to another episode of The Tim Ferriss
Show. My guest today is Henry Schuchman, S-H-U-K-M-A-N. You can find him on Instagram
at MountainCloudZenCenter. Henry teaches mindfulness and awakening practices to a
wide range of students from all traditions and walks of life. Henry is an appointed teacher in the Sambo Zen lineage and is the guiding teacher of Mountain Cloud Zen Center. He was introduced to
me by my very close friend, Kevin Rose. That is how this came to be. He has an MA from Cambridge
and an AMLET from St. Andrews and has written several award-winning books of poetry and fiction.
His essays have been published in the New York Times, Outside, and Tricycle, and his poems
have been published in the New Republic Guardian, Sunday Times, that's in the UK,
and the London Review of Books. Henry has taught meditation at Google, Harvard Business School,
UBS, Esalen Institute, Colorado College, United World College, and many other venues.
He has written of his own journey in his latest book, One Blade of Grass, subtitle, Finding the Old Road of the Heart, a Zen memoir.
And that book was gifted to me by the aforementioned Kevin Rose, affectionately known as Kev Kev
on this podcast very often. The website is mountaincloud.org. You can find both Henry
and Mountain Cloud Zen Center on Instagram at MountainCloudZenCenter,
Facebook, facebook.com slash mtncloudzen.
And you can find Henry on LinkedIn, linkedin.com slash in slash Henry hyphen Shukman, S-H-U-K-M-A-N.
Henry, welcome back to the show.
I promised everyone a round two.
I promised myself a round two because I have all of these notes that we didn't even touch in the last conversation, which was wide ranging.
And I want to focus on koans and delve deeply into many remaining questions about zen and
practices and so on. And I thought we might start, as I mentioned before we started recording,
with a live example, a real-world case study. And that is, I'm coming down with some kind of cold.
I've got a scratchy throat. I feel turbulent in my internal state right now because I was feeling a little sick, also got agitated earlier this morning, and that has continued
to the present moment. So I'm wondering, when you have a lot going on, or life has thrown you a
curveball, or who knows, you just wake up on the wrong side of the bed, assuming that still happens
occasionally, what do you do with your toolkit and training and so on? What happens?
Okay. Okay. Thank you so much for asking that. I like it a lot. And it's dear to my heart because alas, I do have to deal with that. You know, it's not gone as perhaps it ought to have in some
marvelously, you know, awakened practitioner or something, but I'm evidently not there yet.
So I can definitely, I think I can offer a few tools. But actually, I want to just say, I've got to say this, Tim,
thank you very much for having me back. I'm kind of bowled over, actually, amazed. And I know you
said it last time, but I thought somehow it'll just get postponed and won't happen. Because I
mean, you know, you have the people you have on are just so sort of amazing, and I'm unknown and weird. So, you know, it's a real honor.
Sort of my sweet spot, actually. But I kid, in part. It's great to have you back on, and thank you for saying that. And I had to have you back on, I promised it. Well, I really am sort of humbled and very grateful. So let's see. Yeah,
so I can totally relate to your question about where you're at right now. I mean, actually,
to be honest, I can relate because I've got, I'm in the situation I'm in right now, first of all,
talking to Tim Ferriss, my God. But then secondly, actually, I've got to do a teaching
tonight to something like 400 people
as a guest teacher. And so that's a little bit sort of in my system. And tomorrow morning,
my wife and I are flying back to the UK for just under two weeks, the first time in two years or
more to see our aging, aging parents who we haven't been able to be face-to-face with in person. My system is sort of, it knows all that's going on. Now, you've got a cold or something coming on,
you had some kind of, should we call it sort of a triggering event or some kind of activating event?
A kerfuffle earlier today, yes.
A kerfuffle, okay, a kerfuffle happened. Yeah, right. So, the system got sort of a little bit riled up and hasn't fully settled down again.
It's not settled down at all.
At all, okay.
I appreciate the generous phrasing, but yes.
Okay, well, look, I mean, first of all, let's acknowledge clearly that that's the situation.
There's a system here with a little bit of up-regulation.
The sediment is churning. Yes. So that's the first thing is just to know it, to state it,
to be clear about it. This is what I do. And then the second thing, I mean, really the key
to the whole thing is letting it be that way. It's like, okay, here's a highly sensitive creature, a human being.
And among human beings, some by temperament have more sensitivity than others.
All of us have fluctuations in our levels of sensitivity. And some of us do, I mean, in a sense, do the kind of inner work that
leads to more sensitivity. Let's note that in a way to be sensitive to things is a good thing.
It means that we're more aware of life, put very broadly. But with it comes the possibility of getting more easily riled up.
Those of us who've had, for whatever reasons and whatever shape, traumatic elements in our
childhoods, especially also if we are of a sensitive nature, that sort of comes into us. It's a wound that, you know, is in us. So when we're allowing ourselves to be in,
let's say, an agitated or somehow distressed state, when we're allowing that,
it helps to also allow with compassion that, you know, somehow things have made us be sensitive like this.
And we're still, we still know, we know that we still have wounds. And maybe in some sense,
there's a core wound, and we don't want to close that off. And one way to not close it off is to be ready to accept
and allow our states of agitation and distress in the present moment.
If we can do that and see how, in a way, it's a kind of,
if it's allowed, it becomes a kind of opening
to perhaps a sort of deeper wound,
at least there's some recognition that that's there too,
and both are allowed.
That we have, as well as having that stuff,
we also have all of us come pre-installed with access to a sort of wider, more loving,
in this case, really meaning more self-loving awareness. Our hearts have the capacity
to love ourselves. And we need to tap into that.
Henry, may I jump in for one second?
Please, please, please.
I would love to be a dork and ask some technical questions about this word allowing.
So when you allow these feelings to exist, or you allow yourself to recognize
and accept your current state, so allow and accept. These are the two words I have questions about.
How would you describe how that manifests? For instance, what is the self-talk or
what do you do with the feelings? In other words, if you were to try to describe for someone what not accepting or not allowing looks like and what allowing and
accepting look like on the other hand what are the characteristics of those two things like
practically for people listening if they're like great i want to allow and accept how do i do that
what does it look like again i'll tell you what i do but remember this is on the back of decades of being still a bit each day. Because really, I'd say the ideal is like this, that we can be still. We might close our eyes and be still and first say, wow, I'm agitated. I'm distressed, maybe I'm a bit overwhelmed,
if that's appropriate. Acknowledge it, state it, to declare it, what do they say, to name it is to
tame it. I've never heard that. I like that. Yeah, it makes it a little bit easier if we can just identify what's going on in a clear,
kind, matter-of-fact, internal voice. I'm feeling a bit overwhelmed.
I'm feeling a bit agitated. I'm feeling somewhat distressed. Okay, so the first thing is stating it.
Now, there's forks in the road all the way along,
so there are lots of ways of doing this. But let's say for somebody who's got a certain amount of
sort of somatic awareness, that's to say we can find feelings in the body. I've actually heard
you on a podcast saying, I don't know how old the podcast was, though, that like, you get the throat and not much else kind of thing. So has that, have you done work on the somatic stuff at all,
like feeling things in the body? I have, I feel like for all the sensitivities that I have in
so many other places, I don't want to say that I'm physically insensitive, but when
I'm in, say, a Hakomi therapy session, which is really, if I could simplify it, a somatic-focused mindfulness practice, it's constantly answering the question, what are you feeling?
But in great detail.
And I don't think I have a great vocabulary for it.
Maybe that's part of the handicap.
Yeah.
Because someone could say, I feel like my friend is being unreasonable. And it's like,
well, it's not really a feeling. What are the actual kinesthetic sensations? And I would say
I'm probably a step broader than just tightness in the throat. There's more to it than that. But I wouldn't say,
I've seen group sessions where exercises are being done and someone can go on for five minutes in
a mini TED Talk of their bodily sensations. I do not do that.
Okay. Well, let's just see right now now and i don't know if you're if you
would be happy to close your eyes but it's usually a bit easier if you do i will close my eyes yes i
can i can comply with that this is very good i hope everybody's uh sort of okay with this and
if by the way i suppose if anybody's driving don't follow along right yeah i mean if we have to tell you that also like seriously be careful with
natural selection but yes if you're driving don't close your eyes if you're operating heavy
machinery don't close your eyes in other words consult with your closest common sense phd please
yes i will i will close my eyes and share my experience with the audience.
So we'll keep it to that.
So let's say we're sitting.
You can feel the seat of the chair.
Let yourself just feel that. Let yourself feel your feet on the floor.
Whatever your hands are doing, just feel them as well.
It doesn't matter whether they're free floating or holding each other
or resting on the thighs or something. It doesn't matter. Resting on a desk. Just feel them and again feel
the feet and again feel the seat. See if you can feel all three zones at once, hands, feet,
and seat. And you don't have to do anything special it's just just kind of recognizing that they're
there as sensations and just let me check in is that is that sort of working for you feeling them
i am and i i should probably clarify that one thing i feel very capable of,
I have a lot of sensitivity for,
is feeling different parts of my body.
So if I wanted to take the kind of locus
of my conscious awareness
and put it in my right big toe
or in my left Achilles tendon,
this type of practice that we're doing right now
comes very easily to me.
And I don't want to interrupt
the flow, so please keep track. But when people usually ask in a therapy session, what are you
feeling in your body? They're wanting to sort of tie it to some emotional tenor, and that's where
I have a harder time. But yes, I can feel, I can easily pay attention to the sensation of my hands on the table, my
feet on the ground, and my ass on this very, very hard white chair that I'm sitting on.
Okay.
Well, that's, I mean, honestly, that's probably nine-tenths of the battle, so to speak.
Sweet.
That's the key thing.
So let's just, we'll keep on with it.
So we've got feet, we've got hands, we've got a seat.
If you've got any back to the
chair, maybe your lower back or something is just touching that as well, just feel that. If it is,
it's fine if it is or isn't. And now let's go to the shoulders, just feel them. Let them settle a
bit. Let them kind of, as it were, sort of slump on their sockets kind of thing. Let's feel the jaw now.
So here's a key thing, it's really great
to slacken the jaw.
It's a common thing in our sort of fast-paced world,
our sort of hasty world, to have tightness in the jaw.
So see if you can let the jaw sink
about an eighth of an inch,
probably forward and down.
And see if that at the same time brings some kind of softness
into the throat.
And you might also just bring your attention to your tongue
because the tongue is, you know, it's a massive muscle
that's incredibly full of micro muscles.
It's incredibly busy.
Let it rest right now.
I know you're going to have to be talking shortly,
but it's okay to rest it.
Let it settle on the floor of your mouth.
And maybe you get a sense that it sort of lightly expands,
like if you're camping and you leave your down sleeping bag
in a sunny tent all day, it kind of inflates.
Let your tongue do that just for a few seconds.
Maybe you're getting a sort of little enveloping kind of,
just a little taste of softness, like almost a soft cloud around tongue, around throat, jaw, all of them easing, becoming easier.
So I'm just going to check in.
Are you getting anything like this?
Yeah, I'm following along.
Definitely.
Great.
Okay, so we're still with our softness in that area.
Now we're going to let it melt down.
So it melts down into the shoulders and the arms, by the way, become really limp
and it melts on down into the upper chest, middle chest, lower chest,
and then right through and around the midriff, kind of the solar plexus area right in the middle of the body, either side of it and
whatever, to some extent through it, down into the upper belly, middle belly, lower belly, seat,
upper legs, lower legs, feet, all becoming quite kind of maybe a bit warm and soft. So now, already, we're getting a bit more balanced in ourselves,
probably already a little bit calmer, likely, we hope.
Yes.
Yeah, yeah. And a bit more sort of easy. And in this state of mind where we've managed to sort of diffuse
a certain ease all through the body, and we, you know,
under other conditions we might take longer with this,
and go a little more minutely just to really tasting the quality of ease.
And now we can bring our attention to sort of the whole atmosphere around the heart.
Don't go for the middle of the heart, just sort of the whole area around the heart.
If the chest was a kind of snow globe, you know,
and the heart was a little structure in the bottom in the middle of a snow globe.
We want to be aware of the whole snow globe,
those little things you shake in snowfalls.
You know what I mean?
I do.
I hope you do.
Yeah, good.
Okay, so that whole area.
So just feeling how is this whole area?
And it might be that much of it is relatively sort of clear,
maybe sort of spacious, and that parts of it are a bit contracted and tight,
with some tension in them. Could be that there's also, if we go a little lower in the body,
like the solar plexus, like right in the middle, above the belly and below
the chest kind of thing. Around there, there's often some tightness and contraction. So we're
going to be aware of any tension contraction we're finding, and we're not going to try to change it.
Instead, we're going to be soft around it. We're just going to let a real get a sense of the body,
the fabric tissue of the body actually softening
to the sides of the chest, the sides of the flanks.
And whatever there may be by way of tension,
more in the middle of the body,
in the middle of the trunk,
the intention is to allow it to be there.
This is the allowing in a slightly more somatic sense. We're softening around it and welcoming it
and allowing it, meaning, yes, you're welcome. You're welcome to be here. That's the kind of vibe.
I welcome you.
I want to treat you tenderly.
I want to be kind to you.
I know that I'm a sensitive creature.
I know that I'm a suffering being.
And my intention isn't to try to eradicate that or deny that or banish that, exile that.
No, or reject that. No, my intention is to welcome this, and I know I'm maybe imperfect at it, but I'm trying, and I want you, little tension, little tightness, little contraction,
to know that I'm welcoming you.
And, ah, maybe there's just a little more ease in finding that at least there's a kind of sense of vague possibility of doing this.
In other words, you don't have to be rejecting
your feelings. Now, we're looking at feelings right now in a very somatic way. We're not so
interested in any of the storylines, any of the cognitive side of emotion. We're really just
feeling it out in the body. Okay, now, Tim, I've been going on quite a while.
How's this going?
You can stay in it as you're reporting
or you can just pop out, whichever you prefer.
Oh, it's great.
It's like a therapy session that I don't have to pay for.
It's fantastic.
And without the cognitive overlay of the story.
So this is, I imagine, we're about 20 minutes in. This is 20 minutes that I could
listen to very regularly and I could use your, what's the right word? Malifluous? Malifluous?
What did, Malifluous? Hold on, this is a word I have to find. This is a word that my fancy GRE
friend used once. Malifluous. Yeah, Malifluous. Yeah, I think you nailed it. That's the one.
Sweet or musical, pleasant to hear.
The voice was mellifluous and smooth.
So, as I was saying,
without any type of hesitancy in my vocabulary,
listening to your mellifluous voice for 20 minutes.
But moreover, the kinesthetic focusing and relaxing without story is actually
really effective for calming my system. And it's a contrast to what I struggle with,
which often exacerbates the situation, which is, for instance, perhaps I'm asked,
which of the five dominant emotions are you feeling? Joy, anger, sadness, etc. And there's a list. Now, where are you feeling that emotion? Those are questions that are, the second in particular, very hard for me to answer. sequencing this like sort of boot up or boot down or scanning sequence that we just did
really calm my system without any labeling of emotion right well i mean you know part of me
wants to just say sort of welcome to the male gender because i mean we're sort of notoriously
poorly socialized or poorly educated in our socialization in having any emotional literacy at all.
I feel that by the time I was cognizant that there was such a thing as emotion, all I knew was kind of I'm feeling okay and I'm feeling awful.
I couldn't parse out whether it was, I like like mad, glad, sad, afraid.
I find that very easy to remember.
Yeah.
Right.
It's four primary emotions.
I don't know.
I know people have different lists.
I think four is quite good because it's just so easy to remember.
Mad, glad, sad, afraid.
And I wouldn't have a clue.
I mean, of course, if I was feeling glad, I'd know that I wasn't feeling awful.
That was about the extent of my emotional literacy.
So, God, I think for many guys, I hope it's okay to talk like this, it's a journey.
Well, I'll take this episode and I'll put it on my new podcast, which is actually called
Poorly Socialized.
So, it'll be okay on that podcast.
Please continue.
So, you know, it's not surprising for many of us that we really have to go on a journey that might take some time to start to understand, in any sense, really understand our emotional life.
And it's so critical because what can you do with emotions, negative emotions, difficult emotions,
if you don't know what they are, other than try to banish them? And, you know, if we try to banish
them, we're sort of, inevitably, we're banishing part of ourself or parts.
It just doesn't work. And it's the type of realization that I would have thought by now
I would have translated to consistent, reliable,
self-relating. Do you know what I mean? I know that divorcing a part of yourself and stuffing or
refusing feelings doesn't work. I know it just leads to more problems. And yet,
here we are again. The dog chasing its tail once again.
Right.
But, you know, we have to sort of compassionately bear in mind what happened to us in childhood,
because for many of us, that lays down some kind of a template for how we're going to
handle difficult emotions.
And if we have things that are really basically too much for us to handle in childhood,
and we're alone trying to handle these difficult feelings without support,
without being met by anybody, without connection to anybody,
it's overwhelming.
And there's kind of no choice.
It's like either I die, and often for an infant,
especially, it seems like it is life or death, or I somehow have to make it so I don't feel this
somehow. Then we may have caregivers who chastise us for showing emotion. We may have stressed
parents who just can't handle it.
They don't need another screaming toddler or infant. They've got so much on their plate already,
and who knows what. And so I think it's not surprising that we would ongoingly have to be working on this stuff. But I mean, the good news, as far as I'm concerned, is that inside of these difficulties, I think there's ways to access, well, I don't know, God,
I'm cutting off the deep end again, like last time. But, um,
I think that's why I'm having you back on. So, in for a penny, in for a pound. Let's go for it.
Okay, I guess so. Okay, I'll go all in. The inside of many of us, I believe there's some
kind of deep primordial wound. There's some deep ancient grief. I don't know,
partly it's probably part of the human race and all the things it's been through over thousands
of generations and all the killing and famine and slavery and the most painful things that
have gone on. Endless loss of children, so many difficult things human
beings have been through. But somehow, I think most of us probably, I mean, I don't know whether
you could ever scientifically prove this, but I suspect that anyway, a lot of us have got some
deep grief inside us. And actually, there are various methods, I think a lot of good therapists somehow tap into that or can find ways to kindly,
gently give us opportunities to sort of open up to that. And it can be incredibly cathartic
and incredibly healing actually to open in that kind of way and find that grief is not an enemy.
Personally, I feel that some of the most significant,
most important sort of pivot points in my growth so far as a fallible, ailing, fucked up human
being has been through things like that. When suddenly a gate of my heart opened and I could
feel all this grief, but somehow in that grief, I could also feel just great love.
And I don't know how this works exactly. But my hunch is that grief, and love and hurt and love
and pain and love, they're joined at the hip somehow. And so our acts, I mean, I've gone
deeper than we was like how to handle and know emotions. But yeah, it all relates really.
If we allow our emotional challenges and tightness and reluctance and to feel,
if we're given a supportive framework where we can open to that, then we might open to this sort
of deeper well of grief. And it's so beautiful because then we find, wow, in the depths of this, somehow I don't feel so alone.
There's a truth in this that somehow joins me to the human race or something like that.
I don't know, maybe I'm getting off the rails here. Not only off the deep end, but off the rails.
But there's something here for us. I really think this is a part of our healing that's been anyway
my experience and so not being afraid of feelings allowing piece, you know, is that instead of feeling this way,
being wrong and bad, and I got to not feel this way, kind of flip it. I'm going to allow this
to teach me something. I don't really know what it is. And it's probably quite hard for me to
believe it could teach me anything. It just seems like wrong. But actually, maybe it's not wrong.
Maybe it's just that my map of myself has got a lot of terra incognita, unknown lands
in my map of myself.
And hey, why don't I allow myself to be on a journey of discovery, of not knowing all
of who I am, and being willing to let parts of myself show themselves
that I didn't think I wanted to know, or I didn't even think were there to be known, but maybe they
are. Just a quick thanks to one of our sponsors and we'll be right back to the show. This episode
is brought to you by LinkedIn Jobs. Today, many small business
owners like me are busier than ever. Time spent searching for and interviewing candidates can
take time away from managing and most importantly, growing your business. That's why LinkedIn Jobs
has made it easier to get to the candidates worth interviewing faster and for free. Create a free
job post in minutes on LinkedIn Jobs to reach your network and beyond
to the world's largest professional network of more than 770 million people. Focus on candidates
with the skills and experience you need and use screening questions to get your role in front of
only the most qualified people. Then use the simple tools on LinkedIn Jobs to quickly filter
and prioritize who you'd like to interview and hire. It's why small businesses
rate LinkedIn Jobs number one in delivering quality hires over leading competitors. LinkedIn
Jobs helps you find the candidates worth interviewing faster. Did you know every week,
nearly 40 million job seekers visit LinkedIn? So try to post your job for free at linkedin.com slash tim, T-I-M. That's linkedin.com
slash tim to post your job for free. Terms and conditions do apply.
You know, I was listening to you, of course, one would hope, just now. And what I heard you say was, given your more sophisticated accent,
the Queen's English and such, I heard terror incognita. And I thought to myself, you know,
that's actually... Then I realized, of course, that you're saying terra incognita, as I would
say it. And I was like, well, maybe to get to the terra incognita, the undiscovered territory or
the unexplored territory where one reaps the rewards, you have to go through the terror incognita,
which is the fear in the middle. But I'm starting to really, I'm grasping at straws here. So
let me try to land this plan, if that's okay. Just so we can pile on as many mixed metaphors
as possible. This has been extremely helpful.
I want to sit with this.
We may come back to it, but I want to make sure that I cover a topic that is of great
interest to me.
It is of great interest to our mutual friend, Kevin Rose.
And there are a number of words that you brought up that led me to think about it. Framework, truth, especially framework is not something that most people would associate
with koan, the word koan or what people might think of as koans.
I think we should start from scratch because not everyone will have heard the first episode.
But before ever speaking to
Kevin about some of what he's learned, I didn't know that koans, which we'll define in a minute,
have checking questions, that there may be such a thing as passing or not passing a koan,
which kind of blew my mind because for me, and perhaps you could give an example,
but what is the sound of one hand clapping?
That may or may not be a real example that there may be some nuance to that or one that I had kind of bookmarked for myself, which is somewhat different maybe, which is not knowing is most
intimate, which again, may or may not be a real koan. You could certainly clarify. But these are statements of
paradox that are intended to be meditated upon as a way of perhaps stepping outside the confines of
logical, rational, hyper-intellectualized existence. Maybe that's how I would look
at these types of things. What is a koan? Proper definition.
Well, I'll try my best. Okay, so a koan is a phrase. It may be a few words, or it can be a few lines long. It may even be the longest two that I know are about a page long each. But even
in those ones, we just kind of pull out a phrase here and a phrase there.
And that's really the heart of what the koan really is. And these phrases, generally,
they sort of don't make sense to our normal, rational mind. And it varies a bit. I mean,
like, not knowing is most interpretable. It is a, by the way, it's a
totally bona fide koan. Yeah, absolutely. Koan. It's with this master called Hogan.
It's supposed to be the moment he had a great awakening, actually, when he heard another master
tell him that. And maybe I'll come back to the story in a moment. That's almost a bit more,
you could kind of wrap your head around some idea of not knowing is most
intimate. Well, actually, it's a little bit hard, but you could sort of think, well, actually,
Tim and Henry were just a moment talking about not knowing, like going into unknown land as a
sort of reclaiming parts of the self by recognizing that there's limits to what I know of myself.
So maybe there's some aspect to not knowing that's
connected with personal growth of some kind. And actually, I think, Tim, your comment about terror
in terror. That was great. That was great. Because actually, we know that we're moving
into not knowing if we get a little bit afraid. Fear is a hallmark of that,
because it sort of is scary, nearly always. But so you could kind of maybe think about not knowing
as most intimate as, well, not knowing will help me know something about myself that I don't yet
know, or something like that. You could sort of rationally approach it a little bit. But what about this sound of one hand? Actually, the real, I don't know, the old formulation of that koan is like
this. You know the sound of two hands clapping, but what is the sound of one hand? In other words,
you know what two hands clapping sounds like. What does one hand sound like? Do you know
what the sound of one hand is? That's kind of meaningless, really, isn't it? I mean,
some people try, I've had people sort of snap their fingers or something, you know,
because only one hand, you know, to make a noise. No, no, no, no, no. It's not. The basic thing with koans is the frame I think I've got to give to
understand what they're sort of for and why they're beautiful and why they're not just
often in seemingly infuriating little riddles that can't be unpuzzled out. They're not just that. They're
actually, okay, so the origin of them in almost, I think, in every single case is something that
one of these deeply awakened masters said, or in some cases did. Sometimes somebody just does something weird. And most of the people
doing or saying the things in them are these Zen practitioners, perhaps we should say Chan
practitioners, because Zen was called Chan in China, where it really comes from. And the Japanese kind of took it on about 1800 years ago,
and did a great job of sort of conveying it and practicing with it and passing it on, so to speak.
But the original practitioners who gave us a lot of the comments, most of them were Chinese,
and they were mostly in this period of Chinese history called the Tang dynasty,
which was 600 to 900 approximately. And that's when Zen is sort of said to have had its first real flourishing. There were just a lot of people around apparently at that time who were really
doing this practice and got kind of really helped by it and clarified in certain key ways.
And the key way that koans sort of pass on or allow us to maybe taste is a dry way of putting
it is we could say non-dual experience. That's sort of a bit boring, really, to put it that way. It's to realize
through personal experience that there are actually sort of other dimensions to our experience
than we normally experience. And what they are like is a kind of incredible, overwhelming sense that somehow everything
is one thing. That's one common experience that koans are trying to convey, that all these
separate things in this world, just like they seem to be, there's a table, there's a cup, there's a tree outside, there's Tim.
Are you still on the East Coast, Tim, somewhere?
Yes.
So Tim on the East Coast, Henry in New Mexico, Santa Fe.
And, you know, they're obviously quite separate.
But at the very same time, there is actually also a level of our experience,
of our reality, where nothing is separate. And this isn't an idea. It's an actual experience that quite a number of people through the ages and today still attest to being something they've
discovered and found to be real that does not in any way impair their functioning as a normal
human being. So it's not psychotic, and it's not delusional.
It doesn't generally sort of take us off into dysfunction. Quite the reverse. It can actually
lead to better mental health than we've had before. And it's kind of good for us, apparently, to find this. And koans Is there anything so far that sort of doesn't
make sense or anything? Or am I going in a direction of interest, do you think?
It is of interest. Let me just share a few things that may be of interest to folks. And
I want you to bookmark, you were just about to get into the way they work,
which is a hell of a cliffhanger. So I want you to remember that that's where you
are. I had a bee in my bonnet about the actual term koan, and I had to look it up because it
was really bothering me because the characters are super strange for the association that I
have with the meaning of koan. And I pulled it up on Wikipedia and the etymology.
If you look at it, the origin, as you mentioned, of this expression is Chinese,
gong an, gong an, that's the two, or gong an, depending on whether it's first or fourth tone
on the second syllable. And then koan are the same characters in the onyomi in Japanese.
But it literally could be translated as public case.
Yeah.
Like gong, I guess this would be gong an, yeah, fourth tone.
But if you had gong an, first tone, it would be like public safety, like public security.
Public, you would see that on the People's Liberation jackets in Beijing,
these huge green jackets that in some cases you would see that. So I was looking at this and I'm
just like, what the hell does this mean? Because it's public and then case or plan. And I was just
like, where does that come from? And so it turns out that that is exactly, according to Wikipedia, what it is. It's referring
to a public record, and the terminology came from the Tang Dynasty in China. And thus, the koan
serves as a metaphor I'm reading directly from Wikipedia for principles of reality beyond the
private opinion of one person, and a teacher may test the student's ability to recognize and understand that principle. That is the thing I really want to dig into.
But suffice to say, as stated here in Wikipedia, Zen koan collections are public records of the
notable sayings and actions of Zen masters and disciples attempting to pass on their teachings.
So whether or not we agree 100% with that, I just had to get a better understanding of why these characters are used
for this, because it is not obvious at all why they're connected.
So let's jump back to where you were in terms of how they work. And I just want to tease this
for people. And that is, and I am going into the abyss here because I
don't know the answer, but the idea that a teacher may test the student's ability to recognize and
understand that principle seems on its face just absurd, right? Because it just does. So I can't
wait to hear you tie it together. I will also say that this experience of unity or non-duality,
all is one, et cetera, sounds really abstract. And I suppose it is for those who have not
experienced it. These are experiences that can be captured or reflected at least in,
on some level, functional MRI scans with the administration of something like psilocybin
at a sufficiently high dose. So you see, and it's much more complex than this, but some down
regulation of, or decrease in activity in what people might consider the default mode network,
this constellation of neural components thought to be associated with, among other things, conception of ego and
self-referential thinking and so on. So even though it sounds very woo-woo and how would
anyone ever document this, this is a phenomenon that is routinely documented and assessed with
questionnaires at places like Johns Hopkins when they're working with psychedelic compounds.
Not to say that the
experiences are identical, but it's just to point out that it's not completely outside the reach of
experience and observation. Although Zen or Chan Buddhism had a head start of a few thousand years.
No, look, all of that is fantastic. I'm so happy to hear you say that, both parts, because,
you know, my own little sort of hobby horse these days kind of thing is that I'm so happy about the
psychedelic research, because it's giving us new tools for once again, resuming the study of
meditation at deeper levels. Because a lot of the study of meditators' brains
over the last 30 years or whatever it's been,
has been about mindfulness.
It's been about, yeah,
quieting the default mode network
and just getting into maybe more compassionate states of mind
or just more equanimous states of mind.
But it hasn't really tapped into the capacity
or it's minimally tapped into the capacity of meditation to yield,
to bring us to these non-deal states, which are really what the heart of the matter. And so now
the psychedelic research is opening that up again and it's creating new ways of measuring
longevity of change in people who've been through experiences like this, you know,
which was so hard to do before because you couldn't, you can't really get somebody in an MRI
and say, have Kensho, you know, Kensho being the Zen name for, you know, awakening to the principle,
which is non-dual. So, psychedelic research is really helping with that. And it's actually, it's funny that Zen, you know, had a real popularity in the West back
in the 50s, 60s, 70s, 80s even still, in the kind of heyday and then aftermath of psychedelic
culture.
People recognized, wow, Zen seems to know about what I tasted on that last acid trip.
It seems to have some congruence with
that. And maybe meditation is a way to sort of get there in a more stable way kind of thing,
and without having to take a substance. And maybe that's the case, you know, really.
So I think now, Zen got a little bit sort of, I mean mean it was almost kind of mainstream really for a while
yeah uh you had uh like judy salinger alan ginsberg jack kerouac right i mean and uh i mean
not not to mention you know alan watts and so on right so it was in the it was in the zeitgeist
for sure and i think it maybe is due for a reappraisal at the moment, and maybe
co-ants can be a part of this. I'm so convinced because, because now, okay, public case,
that's exactly right. Now, one interpretation that I've heard of what the public, the term
public case means is that actually it was taken from Tang Dynasty legal processes.
So essentially, a public case was a public record of some point of legislation,
or what we would call a legal precedent today.
Case record of a public law court, at least according to Wikipedia.
Right, okay, great. So I'm not off track there. So basically, meaning that
you could point to, actually, it was a master called Etchew, who was an amazing master in the
late 7th, early 8th century, if I remember right, who said the single hand doesn't sound
without reason. That was what he said, the single hand sounds.
You know, so that's a little obscure. Of course, it's very obscure. But actually,
he was trying to express his experience of, quote unquote, awakening. In other words,
he's trying to use language to convey what is basically a non-linguistic experience,
and even an experience that we don't really have language for, but it's a very vivid and real
experience in which the sense of self has been swallowed up by everything, kind of thing. And so what we feel we are is everything. And koans are records of
that in a sense. It's a great practitioner expressing through words what he or she has
realized. Therefore, the idea is the ordinary way of constructing reality where I am a self in this body and
everything else is outside of me, that way of constructing reality won't understand the koan,
can't get at what the koan is getting at. The koan is a little drill bit that's drilling into the wall of my house of self, so to speak.
It's trying to actually puncture the membrane of my sense of self, switching metaphors.
You know, it's trying to, I sometimes have talked to them of like, they're like,
they're like little explosives.
We take them into the psyche by sitting with them.
You kind of do best with them if you have a meditation
practice. You let them sort of somehow simmer away inside you and they will possibly do something
to deep assumptions that I have. And one of those deep assumptions is that I'm me in my body, in my mind, and I'm not what's outside of me. And that's a deep assumption.
And the koan can kind of blow a hole in it, in the assumption. And suddenly, I discover
that's not true. Or it's true, but it's not the whole truth. There's another reality that is real.
I mean, it is a dimension of our reality where there isn't separation between things.
There isn't distance between things.
Somehow there's one fabric, one sort of tissue.
That's what they mean, by the way, when you were quoting the word principle.
That's what it means.
It means a single tissue, a single fabric
that is what everything's made of.
Henry, may I jump in here for one second?
Please, please, please.
No, no, no, because I have a tendency of saying no, no, no. And what I really mean is yes,
yes, yes. So some psychoanalyst or therapist can really do a deep dive on that, I'm sure. But returning to the point I wanted to make,
there are no doubt going to be people listening who are like,
what the fuck are these people talking about?
So what I'd love to do, because they might assume you have to do a lot of drugs
or lock yourself in a room in a robe until you basically go crazy
for any of this to make sense.
Let me ask some super specific questions.
And if you wouldn't mind, I think this will be a way,
because this is the itch that I want to scratch for myself also.
And it's related to the extent that one exists,
the system around or that includes colons.
So one of the questions that kevin wanted me to ask you
is how many colons are there and how many have you passed so give me the short answer to that
and then we can we can go from there because yeah i think it people will be like what okay
and it might it might pull people in so how many colans are there that you're aware of and how many have you
passed? Okay, I'm aware that I've read that there are 1,700 that are kind of classically
recognized koans, nearly all from that Tang Dynasty period and a few from way earlier.
Actually, a few have come out of the Indian phase of Buddhism, you know, way back in the
fourth century BCE.
So apparently 1700.
But in practice, what happens is there are these different sort of schools of Zen that
will use certain collections.
So to my knowledge, no school uses 1700 koans.
No training involves that many.
In a school that I'm part of called Sambo Zen,
we use something like, I believe it's around 420,
is what I've heard fairly recently, actually,
from one of my colleagues who sort of counted it up.
And they're in five collections of koans.
So these koans got collected mostly in Song Dynasty China.
That's around 1100, 1200.
And these sort of classic collections were compiled.
And there are several of them.
There are maybe three really major collections.
The earliest was put together in 1028.
It's called the Blue Cliff Record.
And that has 100 koans in it. And then there's another one called the Book of Equanimity.
There's also got 100. And there's another one called the Gateless Gate that has 48.
And actually, there's quite a bit of overlap among those volumes. And then there's another
volume that we use. And there's a preliminary kind of volume of just a sort of hodgepodge of koans that one of our teachers in the lineage put together called the miscellaneous
koans, because they are just miscellaneous. And so what we do, okay, so this is how it works,
is that if somebody's really kind of got a steady meditation practice, and they have found ways to
get to the point where they kind of like meditating.
Henry, hold your thought. But if I had to answer Kevin's question, maybe it's a bad question.
I don't know because I don't know what I'm talking about. But how many of those
1,700 or 420 have you passed? Because I think that's a concept that is going to be interesting
to people. Okay, so I can modestly and humbly say that I have been
passed on all of the ones that we do, the 420, at least two at the minimum times, in some cases,
multiple times. The reason I say multiple times is because I first went through them all with
one teacher, and then actually my teacher teacher John Gaynor Roshi in the UK
and then I moved to New Mexico and picked up with my teacher Joan Rick Roshi and sort of carried on
with her and so between those two teachers I did one go through them all. Then I did another go
through all of them with my teacher Rubenen Habito Roshi, who's a professor
of comparative religion at SMU in Dallas, a fantastic guy. They're all fantastic,
fantastic people, by the way. And also, I've done many with my current teacher, Yamada Roshi.
And I've also done, I mean, I've done a lot of them at least three times. And I probably,
I'd say hazard that I've done just about all of them three times, but definitively probably
three and I don't know, three quarters of them, two and three quarters of them, three times.
You know, I thought that i would have a set a
finite list of questions but now i just have more questions about questions of all things so if i
may just dance with me here a little bit so there are there there are these many cons but there is
for practical purposes subsets that are practiced by different schools
you are in the sambo i guess sambo kbo Kyodan, right? Sambo school, the three treasures,
is that right? Something like that? Yeah, that's right. Yeah. And you have been passed,
and we haven't yet explained what that is, on these various koans, some of them two or three
times. Now, in my head, I'm thinking like, once you have an answer, don't you just kind of have
the answer? What does it mean to be passed two or three times? And then I'm going to give you
another question from Kevin, and then I'm going to let you run wild. And that is, what are the
checking questions? What are the checking questions? Because when I first had these sent to
me from Kevin, I thought to myself, well, this is interesting because in my head, I'm imagining this koan using your earlier description as this sort of Trojan horse software that puts a little snippet of code in your head and your computer can't run the program.
So you basically just like beach ball your way into giving up on rationality.
And then somehow, poof you have this kensho unity
experience because you break your computer and whether that happened or not is kind of your word
against somebody else's word right so the idea that there there is there are checking questions
and passing i'm like okay i want to know all about that. So with that, please go crazy.
Yeah, well, it all ties into what you just said. It's your word against somebody else's as to whether you've had Kensho. That's the point, really. It's not. It's not. It's really not. And
the reason it isn't is that if somebody's had Kensho, oh my God, the way they experience the koan will have changed utterly. And the way they
are, if they meet with a teacher, if they do, I mean, we've got to bear in mind that this is not
the only way of working with koans. Actually, there's nothing wrong with somebody just deciding
they want to sit with a koan. Fine. I've got a friend who doesn't even sit with them he likes reading them fine there's no ban on that you know it's totally up to you but this system
of training you can actually i mean like with on sam harris's app for example we got these koan
meditations and you just sit with them and it's a bit like for example in the zendo when we're open
or even when we're i I mean, in live,
but when we're on Zoom, people come and they just, you know, they hear a talk on a koan. They get to
sort of bask in the weird waters of a koan for a while, while the teacher's giving a disquisition
on the koan. It may be opaque, and yet there may be moments when suddenly they feel some weird movement inside,
a stirring of something within, and some weird little pool of limpid clarity opens.
They don't know what the hell is this, but it's beautiful.
Limpid clarity.
That's my third podcast.
Poorly socialized.
And then to offset the damage from that podcast i have
limpid clarity please continue so there are different ways of working with them but this
way whereby you have sort of decided to engage a teacher with them if you have this kensho
experience i mean in a way the very point of the koan is it's a meeting place where two people,
two practitioners, one more experienced than the other, can actually meet through the koan
in the very reality they've awakened to. I mean, to me, that's the most precious and amazing thing
about it is that far from this sort of awakening
thing, you know, this awakening to non-dual being just a personal experience, of course
it is that, but actually through koans, you can meet in it.
You meet in the boundless wonder of this other dimension of our experience.
I think I said last time we were talking, and I talk about in my book, I had a couple of these, what I felt to be very powerful experiences
of non-duality, and they were slightly different, each one prior to connecting with a teacher.
I'd been trying to find a teacher actually, but sort of wasn't ready. But then eventually,
when I did connect with the first teacher that I really
engaged with, John in the UK, John Gaynor, I got my first koan from him, which was this,
often it's the first koan, which is, it's so inscrutable. I mean, it's just sort of damnable.
I mean, I'm embarrassed to even say it, but it's this koan that a lot of people start with,
which is mu,
M-U, mu. That's it. That's the whole thing.
That's it, mu. I mean, it has a little background story. A monk asked Joshu, this great master, Jaojo, Joshu in Sino-Japanese, does a dog have Buddha nature? Buddha nature
meaning this awakened nature or principle as it was referred to earlier. Does a dog, even a dog,
have that? He asks. And Joshu answers, moo, which ostensibly means not. It does mean not,
literally, but it's sort of a principle of Buddha nature that it's everything. So how could a dog not have it sort of thing? And yet
Joshu says moo. So we don't worry about that. We just sit with moo. We just sit with moo.
We could almost take it like when Joshu says moo, he's sort of just dismissing the whole question.
Moo. I'm not going to deal with that. Something like that. But he's also presenting that very reality in that little
word mu. Because actually, that very reality is showing up all the time, right here, right now.
It's always present, this so-called principle. It's always present. It's always here. It's just
we're not conditioned to know it clearly. What you mean by that is the principle of not or the principle of emptiness.
Is that what you mean?
Is that what you're referring to?
Yes, it is.
Yes.
Basically, the principle of what I was calling non-duality, which also happens to be empty.
The principle of total oneness, which is also empty.
That's always here.
So when Joshu says mu, he's expressing that in his way.
Mu, just then, he's expressing it.
And so a student sits with this question, mu,
if and when they have an opening, you know, with sitting with mu.
And to be clear, that is not done by thinking about it.
No, it's not.
You're not reflecting and ruminating.
You're just kind of sitting there with this software, this code that's been installed.
Yes.
Okay.
All right.
Yeah, you're usually just sort of repeating it softly.
You sort of add it to your breath meditation usually, just softly voicing this sound move with each breath and you
just sort of patiently do it the more patiently you do it the better because you'll be more
comfortable and it starts to just sort of sort of in a way take over your sitting in a very nice
gentle kind of way kind of thing it's a little bit like a mantra you know it's a little
bit like that but anyway so it's a little unlike other coins in that regard because you use it that
way let's say something happens when you go to see the teacher you both sort of light up in this
other dimension kind of thing it's i know i'm sorry i'm not expressing it very well you meet
in a way that i mean i certainly coming back to when i was working with
my teacher john when i went in to see him after i'd had some experience with moo
i don't know if there's any interest but i could tell you what that was like
sure anybody yeah please and then i'm not gonna let go i'm like a dog with a bone on this checking
questions thing i'm not gonna let that go but I'm like a dog with a bone on this checking questions thing. I'm not going to let that go. But please, yes, I would love to hear about the
experience. And I'm truly going to the checking questions. Truly. It's a long journey together.
We're long and winding road to checking questions. So this is also just to exemplify how much this
can happen in the midst of ordinary life. I was busy as a writer and
as a poet. I was doing lots of readings. I was working on my next book. I just sold a book and
working out the contract with my agent. All of that stuff going on, you know, busy and kind of
productive. And I've got a fellowship in poetry at Oxford Brookes University at the time. And one
day, and I've
been sitting with Moo. And often when I'm riding my bike to the office in the college, you know,
I'm using Moo. And as I'm riding along, it just comes to mind. And I said, what is this thing?
You know, just doing it. And then one day I'm home, I've just made dinner and our two boys are
young and they're watching a movie and I'm bringing a
plate of food upstairs for Claire, my wife, who's the boys have already eaten. They're watching
Who Framed Roger Rabbit, a great movie, you know, on the video with Bob Hoskins. And I bring in
Claire's plate of food and I think I'm still holding mine. And I'm watching this scene on the movie where Roger Rabbit goes whirring
round and round a kitchen while his rear end is on fire.
I don't know if you've seen it.
Oh, yeah.
I've seen it more times than I should probably admit.
It's been a while, but yes, I've seen it.
It's a fantastic film, I thought.
At least that's the last time I saw it, 20 years ago, whatever that was.
And I was watching that scene, and it just suddenly seemed just so funny.
And then all of a sudden, this crazy sort of like a cyclone energy sort of whips up
through my body and blam, it's really like I sort of black out.
I'm on my feet and everything's disappeared.
Everything's just gone. It's just a empty,
vast, empty space that's so beautiful and nothing there. And then I sort of come back. I realize
I'm sort of standing in this room holding a plate, which somehow I haven't dropped. And
it's like the house is still here, but it's sort of not really made of anything.
It's totally discombobulating and marvelous.
And I'm just trembling with some sort of overwhelming gratitude and love.
And it's like somehow this empty space that everything's in
is just so overwhelmingly beautiful.
And it's just like a huge love.
And I'm overwhelmed. I can't believe how fortunate it is to be a human being. You know, it's like,
it's just indescribable. So, and this is all coming out of this little word,
moo. I've been sitting assiduously with moo. And at the time, I didn't even realize it had
anything to do with moo. You know, it's just like this mind blowing experience. So I go downstairs,
I sort of, you know, I think, well, I better sit and light a stick of incense. And maybe I'll just
kind of calm down. And I don't. I'm supremely happy. I'm overwhelmed with happiness. Tears are flowing down my cheeks and it's just so
beautiful. And so then, you know, two weeks later or something, I get to visit with John, a teacher,
and I tell him this thing. And he says something like, ah, so Moo has paid you a visit or something like that.
And I thought, what's he talking about?
How could Mu have anything to do with that?
But suddenly the penny drops and I realize,
oh my God, this is what a koan is for.
It's for precipitating.
It's for sharing this fucking reality you know excuse my greek it's it's it's a koan isn't an annoying boring little pointless thing it's got an
incredible purpose which is sharing this sort of deepest reality of our existence.
And how can it do it?
I mean, I still don't really understand how it can do it.
I can sort of piece it together a little bit that,
so yeah, Joshu knew this world incredibly well.
He was accustomed to it.
It becomes second nature to him.
He was at ease in it.
And he knew that this sort of normal way things are
and this mind-blowing way things also are,
are not in the end separate.
That's the point of the training ongoing in Coen's
is to go beyond this either life is this mind-blowing,
boundless, oneness, emptiness thing,
or it's my ordinary life.
But the point of training – damn, am I going ahead?
Can I just finish that thought?
Finish the thought, yes, please.
Wow, God, Kevin, I hope this isn't too much for everybody listening.
No, it's not, and I also like being Kevin, so please continue.
God, you can tell how my mind is blown.
I'm sorry.
I think Lou's got a hold of you right now.
You've got to be careful.
Oh, my God.
So that is why we sit with coins,
is because they can open us up to this boundless reality.
But ongoing, beyond a first experience,
they train us more and more in realizing that our ordinary life
and that mind-blowing reality, they're not separate.
And that's a very hard thing to understand.
But that's why so many koans are about things.
So now, okay, I want to talk about koans are about things and koans love the world
so much. And they love us, they want us to share in it. And basically, of course,
they don't really, but the masters, the practitioners who created the koans,
they're deeply compassionate, and they wanted to share somehow what they had realized
and it's pretty amazing so checking questions so when i yeah okay okay it's gonna be he's on it
he's on the sent trail i oh my god this is gonna be a bit of a letdown probably, an anti-climax. Can we finally get that?
I'll be the judge of that.
Okay. Well, the checking questions were what John started to ask me about Mu that enabled him and me to meet more thoroughly and to know more deeply, basically, what experience had just happened in
this student, me. They're questions like, actually, I don't know how much of this I could sort of
reveal, but yeah, I think I can. They're things like, well, show me Mu. What is Mu? How old is Mu?
How tall is Mu? How would you show Mu to a baby? They're weird questions like that.
But after that experience, they're easy. They're easy. And so they're kind of,
yeah, this is a system for sharing what we mean by awakening, right? As sort of being able to, as in the sort of legal precedent, sort of to kind of meet in
the same place, so to speak. All right, I have so many follow-ups. So I want to preface all of
the follow-ups by saying I am genuinely fascinated by all of this. Simultaneously, I have to act as
a stand-in for the audience listening. So you can understand, I have to both be enthusiastic. I don't have to, but I am
enthusiastic. And I have to present, or I should ask questions on behalf of the audience who might
be thinking to themselves, at least a handful of them, what the hell is going on?
Yes.
So this is great. This is great. We're getting, I like it. We're rolling in the mud here. It's good.
So the first question that hopped to mind for me is related to, I'm sure, an observation that many
people had or a thought that occurred to them, which is, if you were to go to a psychiatrist
and describe your experience with your dinner plate, there is a very good
chance they would consider that a psychotic break or label it a delusion of grandeur and
prescribe medication for you. That would be one very likely psychiatric treatment response, right?
And what I'm curious to know is, or just to get your opinion on, and this is by no means meant to imply that people who have
destabilizing experiences shouldn't seek professional help. I think they should. But
do you think that these types of experiences, Kensho, in the benefit or detriment of an
experience like that is dependent on the container and framework that you have within which
to try to metabolize that and building on top of that. And I've wondered this quite a bit because
with psychedelic experiences, you come to have over time, I think, tremendous empathy for people
who appear to be suffering from mental illness, say homeless people who
seem disconnected from reality. In your opinion, right, this is not medical advice, it's just
curiosity. Do you think that some subset of people we view as completely mentally detached are just
people who had experiences of Kensho, perhaps identical to what you experienced, but have no
means for trying
to make any sense of it and therefore become lost at sea? I think it's quite possible that that's
the case. Tragically, I do. Quite a number of people that, you know, who've reached out to me
report having had something like this earlier in life. I can think of several people who did as teenagers
and had no idea. They somehow, in the depths of the experience, they felt this was a kind of
vastly benevolent thing to perceive, to undergo, to experience. And then afterwards,
got terribly scared and didn't know what was going on, what had just happened
to them, were they going crazy, and in some cases got unhappy, got depressed, anxious for some years.
And I think that it could be that in some cases it could be graver than that. And if somebody is already perhaps
traumatized anyway, as so many are, it might initially be, yeah, a very benevolent thing,
but then there's no container, there's no understanding, they're completely alone with it,
and it could be really scary and it could become another
traumatizing factor i think that happens and it's it's very sad and i feel part of what i want to do
is get the word out widely that this is a feature of human nature it is something we we're built
with the capacity to have these kinds of experiences. And they are, you know,
vastly benevolent in the end. And they may also be really pretty fucking weird at the beginning.
And so I want people to know, you know, that this is a feature of human nature. And therefore,
there are places you can reach out, people you can reach out to. And you don't have to be doing koans for this, by the way.
The koan method, I think, is a beautiful thing because it makes it more accessible to more of us. It's not a freak thing if somebody has that kind of experience with a koan. It's still,
by no means, totally predictable or reliable or something, but it's not a freak thing. And it also, the Koan training
subsequently is exactly a sort of way of grounding it, integrating it, getting more familiar with it,
probably deepening it, clarifying further, and learning how to just effortlessly live from it in your normal life and not feel you've got to quit everything and go and live
on a mountaintop or something. You don't have to. The mountaintop's right here anyway, kind of
thing. So the more that people are aware of this and the more it becomes part of the conversation,
the public discourse, the better. And so far in the world of meditation, a lot of the conversation, the public discourse, the better. And, you know, so far in the world of meditation,
a lot of the public discourse around meditation,
most of it has been about the nervous system calming benefits of mindfulness.
Absolutely right, right on.
It's great that that's happening.
And then you've got people like Sam, Sam Harris,
who are bringing
this experience of waking up, waking out of the dualistic separate sense of self into a much more
inclusive kind of awareness that is deeply beneficial to experience in principle because it shows our infinite connectedness.
And if trauma is about ultimate separation and isolation, you know, the poor child with
their overwhelming emotions, totally alone, Kensho, if we call it that using Japanese terminology,
is exactly the opposite. It's about infinite connectedness. And that is the most wonderful
thing to discover. It cannot but flood us with love, at least briefly. And if we're then really
freaked out, I want people to know that it's okay. You haven't gone mad. You've in fact discovered something
really beautiful and real about your human nature. And there is follow-up. There are ways of
gradually integrating it. And hallelujah that you've seen this. It's amazing. And okay, I'll
pause there.
Thank you for the pause.
I would imagine though,
that this puts you in sometimes a very tricky position where you have an audience now,
you're on a larger platform,
you're on podcasts like this,
and people must reach out to you
some percentage of which describe an experience
that they have interpreted
as Kensho.
And for people who are interested,
Kensho is actually written
in a really cool way.
It's Kensho,
which is like seeing nature
or essence.
And it's a cool combination
of characters,
which does make a lot of sense.
Unlike my original exposure
to Koan. And I would suspect that you have some
subset of people who come to you who really should have psychiatric treatment just out of the
ether, right? Kind of over the transom from the public. And I would expect that puts you in a
tricky situation because having spent time around people who are having breakdowns and maybe not breakthroughs, sometimes one in the same, but not always.
Yeah.
Is that something that has been challenging for you when someone who is perhaps going through a manic episode or having some type of potentially destructive experience
that is quite isolating for them, right? It's kind of separating.
Perhaps reaches out to you to validate it as Kensho and therefore
something that does not require intervention.
So far, it's been comparatively rare. And I think the reason is that um that's good yeah i know i mean
i can think of one clear time it did actually there's somebody who wanted to come on a retreat
and we were we meaning myself and the little team at the zendo was a little bit wary because of some
of the things she said and we asked about her psychiatric background and there was some things
she told us and then she came and it was clear that you know she really was in much worse shape
than she'd let on and one guy who was part of the zender team then who was a therapist
he sort of spent some time with her and then actually he decided that she really needed to be taken to the psych ward for an evaluation. So that was
what we did there. And she was compliant with that. But usually people know that there's kind of
whatever exactly role I'm in is I teach meditation. And so you kind of got to be into meditation.
Really? It's like, really. And not everybody is.
And it's quite, I don't know if I'd say it's demanding,
but it's the main method here.
I don't teach just, hey, let's talk about koans.
No, I teach meditating.
And one of the ways I teach meditation is meditation with koans.
It's not the only way, but for those that are inclined,
we can do that. But also, like I said, there's a large number of people, I think,
getting interested in koans who don't really feel the need to engage with the teacher,
and that's okay. They find their meditation is deeper if they've got a koan that they're touching, they're repeating or thinking of a little bit while they meditate it just sort of enriches
the meditation some people have reported to me just having really deep sits peaceful
lovely deep joyful peaceful sits when they bring a koan in they have no idea really what
what the koan is kind of saying what it's's about, or what even, no interesting how it might lead to kensho.
They just sort of find the phrases somehow absorbing
and relaxing perhaps and cast a kind of little bit of a spell
over their meditation, and they find it's really deep.
And that's lovely.
No problem there.
And I think this kensho business and the real deep koan training is lovely. No problem there. And I think this Kensho business and the real
deep commentating is not for everybody. Yeah. Yeah. True of a lot of things.
So let me follow up with a couple of exploratory points. I'm going to get into some of the weirder
stuff in a minute, but let's start with the assumption that the
experience as you described it is absolutely true. This is where I want to start just as a basis for
the question I'm going to ask you. In other words, that this experience of Kensho is not an everyday
by all people thing, but it is not a freak thing. Another way to put it would
be it's reasonably common. It's been reasonably common for hundreds or thousands of years.
There are shared characteristics, and it kind of takes one to know one,
if that makes any sense, right? Like one Obi-Wan can kind of look at another Obi-Wan
in training, and the force is strong with this one, you have passed. You have passed this call.
So after asking the checking questions, right? I mean, I'm obviously joking around a little bit,
but let's just take it as true that that exists as an experience, as a phenomenon, as a training.
How does someone who is brand new to Zen separate someone who is legitimate as a teacher from a
charlatan because i have been exposed and overexposed to the let's just call it the
you know the so-called self-development fields the personal development fields, to the medical fields, to the medical and quotation marks
fields for decades. And all of them are rife with charlatans or people who claim to have
a set of expertise and skills that they do not, or people who make promises they cannot deliver.
And I have to imagine on
some level, there are people running around claiming to be masters or experts in Zen who
aren't. How can one who hasn't had these experiences assess who is real and who is not?
If I just describe a little bit how it works in Sambo Zen, that would be a starting point.
Great. Let's do it. Okay. In Sambo Zen, somebody called it a sort of equal hierarchy kind of thing.
Everyone is equal, but there are grades of responsibility. So there's an assistant teacher,
there's an assistant Zen. An assistant teacher can do, usually they work with a Zen teacher
as an assistant to them, and they can
do a certain amount of things as the teacher wants. A Zen teacher can do everything. They can,
meaning they can give talks, they can use the koans, they can meet with students, and they can
sort of run a Zendo completely, you know. Then there's so-called associate masters, and this is all within Sambo Zen.
I'm just giving you sort of a framework so you can get some sense of how it works.
And these associate masters can appoint a personal teacher. They can't appoint a Sambo Zen teacher.
And then there are so-called sort of, they're called authentic masters or just masters,
and they can appoint Sambo Zen teachers. So they can sort of appoint people in
the name of the lineage. And there aren't many of them, and they tend to do it sort of collaboratively
if they're going to appoint people. So in other words, there's quite a, I don't know if it's
elaborate, but there's a certain sort of careful system for who gets what level of responsibility as a teacher. Now,
I feel that I'm happy that it's like that because it means that at every step of the way,
there's some accountability. It's not just, I tell everybody I had this awakening experience, I'm an awakened master, I want to
be a teacher now. In fact, in Sambo Zen, there's almost a bit of a view that if somebody wants to
be a teacher, they may not be ready yet. If they're going to get something out of being a teacher,
I mean, it's hard to be perfect about this, to be honest, but if somebody is needing the
affirmation of being a teacher, you know, and after all, it's kind of a, whoa, you're
a spiritual teacher.
That's pretty exalted, right?
If somebody is needing that kind of affirmation, they're probably not ready to do it.
And we just wait.
And every year, all the teachers of all levels and all the senior students who their teachers
have thought this person might be ready to start training to be a teacher they all gather we all
gather for a week-long retreat and workshop and we do a lot with the co-ans and people have to
give talks in front of the others it's pretty terrifying because i mean one of the most
frightening things more frightening than being on the Tim Ferriss podcast, actually, which, by the way, I'm finding very enjoyable.
It's not as frightening as I thought. Terror incognita.
Exactly. Oh, my God. But, you know, one of the most frightening things I've done really was have
to give, I've done it twice now, give a talk to, you know, 80, 90 Zen teachers. Oh my God, all my seniors. And anyway, in other words,
it's totally not down to me to say I'm a teacher. In fact, it's rather carefully
titrated over the years. You get more and more responsibility as you're ready for it,
if you see what I mean. So, okay, so that's how we do it. Now, those quote-unquote masters, they get this formal old-style
Zen authorization called Dharma Transmission, which is, you know,
it's very moving to get that because it really means the whole body
is really trusting you, and why would they do that?
But they've decided they do, and so so you just accept it and you hope you'll
do your best and it's it's a very moving thing what do you mean by the whole body if i heard
you correctly i guess i mean like the whole organization of sambos and now is the dharma
transmission so i've heard transmission used in yogic practices in very specific ways. Is that a promotion effectively,
or is it a transmission? That sounds really crass, I know, but in other words, is it like a titular,
if that's the right way to pronounce that, titular? I don't know. You get the idea. Involving titles,
honor that is bestowed upon you, and it's sort of a formal recognition, or is there an actual
transmission from one person to another?
Does that make sense?
It totally does.
It's kind of got at least two meanings.
One would be, yeah, somebody really gets it.
They really get the Dharma.
They really get what this is all about.
And they do it in conjunction with their teacher.
And that is a kind of dharma transmission, in a sense. But it's not really that there's anything
transmitted, because you're realizing that it's all one. So nothing can be transmitted it's like you're truly discovering that we're all one one thing
it's no distance no space no time no separation that all is clear and it's clear here and now
it's clear in the company of a teacher of another and maybe in some sense the teachers help that become clear.
So is the moral of your description or the lesson, the take-home lesson from your description of how
Sambo Kyodan handles structure of the organization, responsibilities,
in essence to say, beware of rogue Zen masters running around?
That is to say, that you should look for a recognized organization with some type of
self-governance and so on as a starting point?
I just think if you do find somebody who's in that kind of realm,
it's probably safer. Because for one thing, they will have been fairly closely vetted
over quite a number of years by somebody else. Now, who that other person was and how reliable
they were, who knows. But at least they've then further been sort of
vetted by a number of people, by a sort of body of people. And, you know, that means that you feel,
and of course we develop relationships with our peers, and I don't want to let them down by
misbehaving, for example. You know, I feel that I have a real deep responsibility, obviously,
to people who want to study with me. What an
honor that anybody would. And also to my buddies, my friends, my colleagues who are other Zen
teachers, and to my own teachers. I don't want to let people down. And so there's a sense of
the way it's organized at Samson would bring quite a few breaks on, would exert quite a bit of
resistance on anybody who wanted to go rogue kind
of thing they've got some endorsement i think it's a bit safer they've got an organization that has a
code of ethics and i'm not saying at all that samba is the only one like that there's there's
many other zen organizations and non-zen organizations that have this kind of some sort of levels of responsibility that are bestowed or
whatever on their teachers. So it's not the teacher just setting themselves up and that have
accountability to one another and of course to students. And actually, I think there are many
quite well-organized spiritual sort of institutions, organizations in the West today,
which is just great. And Vipassana has a number of really big really well organized outfits and that's
fantastic tibetan buddhism does i think as well and zen certainly does and so the rogue teacher
thing i mean it's always a hazard isn't it I don't think there's any total foolproof way, but I would
think that things to watch out for would be, does somebody seem to have some kind of accountability
to a wider organization? Do they have fellow teachers that they're in contact with?
Sort of accountability, I think. So this is also a thing with the koans. You see, they're trying
to set up a system whereby there can be some shared sort of agreement about what this awakening
experience is. And the koans themselves, they are sort of checking points, not knowing is most intimate. How might a student and
teacher handle that if they meet with that koan? And they are also a way of checking that we're
sort of on the same page. So let's talk about that page. And this is a good segue to Strangeville.
So let's do that because I'm always eager to take my occasional jaunt into Strangeville.
And I want to preface this exploration by saying that I pay a lot of attention to two ends of a spectrum when it comes to...
I know people will dispute this word, they're not going to like it
because I'll say the plural of anecdote does not equal data. But when I'm considering the potential
veracity of something, on one end, you have randomized controlled trials. Fantastic. I'm
highly supportive and engaged with a lot of studies and clinical trials and so on. This is really,
really important. Very, very powerful framework, that scientific method as implemented in RCTs
for asking questions of nature, testing hypotheses and getting answers back. Fantastic.
But there are limited researchers, limited funding for studies. Not everything
is going to be studied. So we have to make decisions or interpret reality by and large
in the absence of RCTs. So on the other end of the spectrum, you have direct experience.
So if I trust the fidelity of my own senses.
What have I experienced?
And what I've experienced multiple times over and over again,
what patterns have I identified?
I pay a lot of attention to those things and testing.
And For Our Body, actually, my second book is a good example of this.
There are many things in that book that were highly controversial,
seemingly highly speculative, but tested and measured multiple times across multiple people.
And many of those particular items now have more and more widely accepted scientific support. So
it can start off with an N of one is what I'm saying. But I want to dig into this checking
question business. And I will offer something on my side just so it doesn't seem like an
inquisition. So on my side, I will say something that I have observed and experienced and also
compared with the experiences of dozens, at least, of other people at this point,
is the apparent phenomenon of shared visions on certain types of psychedelics. And what that
means is people are seeing, hearing, or feeling the same thing simultaneously. And by any kind of secular scientific
stretch of the imagination or assessment, these are hallucinations. But
even if they are hallucinations, it's interesting to me that consistently shared visions,
let's just use visions for the time being, seem to be a common reported
characteristic of certain psychedelics like ayahuasca going back hundreds of years. These
are in fact so consistent that they are relied upon in certain implementations and usages of
ayahuasca in South America. Okay, putting aside whether that is true or not, it is widely reported
and experientially, it appears to be a real phenomenon. That's what I would say.
Can I prove it? No, I can't prove it. Just like you can't stick me in, or anyone for that matter,
you into an MRI machine and be like, okay, three, two, one, and Kensho, right? It just
doesn't seem to work that way. And I recognize all of the criticisms that could be
kind of levied against what I'm describing. So I'm well aware of it. And moving on.
When you talk about this experience of Kensho, and then having the check-in questions,
how tall is Mu? How would you introduce a baby to Mu? These types of questions,
and I'm probably not phrasing them
exactly correctly. That sounds super bizarre, right? I mean, to anyone listening who's never
experienced something like this, it sounds super strange, even to me, where I spent a lot of time
in some pretty unusual spaces, and it still sounds pretty strange. So what do you think is happening
there? Because to me, there have been surveys, I guess you could
look at them as observational studies, but surveys performed by different universities looking at
so-called entity encounters with compounds like NNDMT. So when I hear you talk about these
questions, like how tall is Mu, it sounds like we're describing an entity or something that exists independently of the
observer or the experiencer, in this case, you. How would you explain what the hell is going on?
Or describe this further? Okay, first of all, let me just, how do I put this? So, I mean,
I love what you're saying about the shared visions. I get that,
actually. I really, yeah, it's fantastic to hear. Now, with, say, this sort of Kensho thing is,
it's actually the questions are doing, there's got a dual function. One is,
we will be able to answer these questions if we've had kensho and especially if we've had
it fairly recently so it's still kind of alive and vivid say within a few months or even weeks
or days or even hours if it happens on a retreat so they are number one the way we respond to them will confirm that we've really experienced this thing.
Secondly, they will somehow help us explore it even more deeply. Now,
that actually doesn't mean that it's an entity other than us that we've experienced
no it's more like my experience has shifted in a certain way which has really opened up a
different way of experiencing altogether and these probing questions allow me to inhabit this new way of experiencing more.
And they allow me, or they help me, to realize that this new way of experiencing
is actually not contradictory to my ordinary way of experiencing.
In other words, I can start to see that this mind-blowing sort of other dimension,
for want of better phrasing, is in fact present in my everyday experience.
That's what it's really trying to do,
is to help me to sort of less know it as this other weirdness,
mind-blowing and lovely though it may be, it's other,
and to sort of actually, wow, I'm living this all the time and I didn't realize, and it's not actually
foreign and other. And that gives hope really that there is a way of integrating it. There's a way of
having it be present in a very positive way in our life, that's non-problematic, quite the reverse.
And I'm going to point to my master Yamada Roshi, who is an extremely successful businessman.
He was head of Mitsubishi Securities with something like 30,000 employees under him,
and could do all that while practicing Zen very seriously and earnestly and deeply,
while having mind-blowing experiences or whatever, while doing a lot of Koan training,
none of it interfered with his work life. In fact, he thinks that he said he wasn't,
he said he's a reasonably good student, he felt, but not the best. And he thinks the reason he had a very good career is his Zen. It gave him more
balance, more clarity, more empathy, more compassion, and more openness to seeing things
from other people's points of view. And yeah, a sort of wisdom, perhaps, in how to approach things.
May I hop in for a second, Henry?
Yeah, please.
All right.
So I absolutely agree that Zen practice, there are many practices that might be thought to be antithetical or somehow compromising to your normal waking reality, let's just say. And so I certainly don't think
Zen practice is incompatible, right? It seems highly compatible. And if Kevin's experience,
limited as it may be, is any indication, that's certainly true, right? It's been nothing but an
enhancer for him. And I want to come back just for a second, again, not to beat a dead horse, but to these checking questions with respect to Moo, and to also clarify for people listening that
when I asked about the entity, sort of the relating to these questions and to Moo,
and whether or not there was the perception of independent entity. It's not so much that I'm saying there is an independent entity
because that's not the part that I find interesting.
If we're just looking at the perceptual experience of multiple people,
what I find so bizarre and tantalizing at the same time
is that whether or not these things are happening for the reasons
we believe them to be happening whether or not the explanations are accurate yeah if we take it
as true for now that you and many other people are having consistent enough experiences in this
non-dual state in this experience that is labeled Kensho within Sambo
Kyodan, right?
That you can consistently answer,
similarly answer the questions. How tall is Mu?
How would you introduce Mu to a baby? And so on.
Yes.
Is fucking weird, right?
And that's not to say it's untrue.
I want to be super clear here.
But I want to hear,
like if you had had three drinks
and we were just at a steakhouse in London
and I was like,
Henry, what the fuck is going on here?
What do you think is happening here?
Like how is it that multiple people could answer these questions with similar or the same answers with respect to this
go on what is happening here like what what would you what would you say well i'd say i think it's
so beautiful i mean i think it's not that the thing is, it's not that, you know, we're each having our own experience,
and there's consistency among what those experiences are. It sort of sounds like that.
But I actually believe there are kind of different levels of our experience. And I think many
traditions seem to attest to the same kinds of thing. I'm not sure it's all one mountain. People say that. I think
it's a mountain range, personally, so to speak, so that different spiritual traditions have slight
different emphases and stuff. But there's a lot of congruence, you know, that I just think this
is real, that we've got this level on which we normally experience things and which we're
socialized into and conditioned into where we feel that we are a separate self and the world is out there. And I just think that it actually is true that there's
another level of our reality where somehow the separate self is inactive and we feel we're more
part of what seems to be outside us, that we sort of belong to it and it belongs
to us and we're not so separate from it. And it's a decisive shift. And I think it's sufficiently
widely reported in the traditions and here and there in literature, people getting to this level
by one means or another, suddenly dropping into it, where they just feel not so separate from
what would seem to be separate to them and external to them, number one. And number two,
it goes even deeper. Underneath that, there's this reality, again, of our experience that we
can get to, where we sort of somehow see that things don't have the
solidity they seem to have and that actually they're empty. And what that means, it can be
understood in a number of different ways. I just feel convinced by now that these are real human
experiences and they're not separately induced in each case.
It's more like in each case, what obscures them is somehow blown away or blown open or
temporarily suspended or punctured.
It's more like that.
That's reality.
Oneness and emptiness are actual features of, I sort of think,
somehow the way things really are. And it's just obscured by our ordinary way of construing
reality and these practices. And be it something that pops in the middle of an ayahuasca experience
or 5-MeO-DMT or something. A couple of students of mine have done that and
had something like this, you know.
It's a big gun, that one.
Right. Big and fast, I gather, right?
Yeah.
Yeah. Well, I've never done it. But, you know, I think in Kensho,
it's not like the practice is inducing an experience. I don't see it that way. It's more like the practice is allowing us
to release something. And when that is released, naturally, this other stuff becomes clear.
Yeah, it's an observation. Well, not the last part, but I think what you're in some respects alluding to this idea that
our realities are constructed in a way by everything around us this reality being being filtered through a reducing valve of sorts, right? To use Aldous Huxley's term.
And this seems like some hand-wavy, or it might seem like some really hand-wavy spiritual stuff
to a lot of people listening, but there's actually a great TED Talk I wanted to recommend from a cognitive scientist named Donald Hoffman, H-O-F-F-M-A-N.
He is faculty at UC Irvine and a recipient of the Trolland Award of the U.S. National
Academy of Sciences.
So this is a legitimate scientist.
He has a TED Talk called, Do We See Reality As It Is?
And I highly recommend it to folks.
I put it in my newsletter in Five Below Friday and gave some time code points for people. You can kind of hop ahead, I want to say 10 minutes or so, to get to
the meat and potatoes of it. But he makes a very similar point. And he's running computer science
simulations and using a totally different toolkit for inquiry, but arriving at perhaps what is a very, very similar conclusion.
And that is, we are operating within a construction. And these things that we
think of as solid, these things that we think of as real, are more like icons on a desktop computer.
They're representations that allow us to interact with something far
different. So it makes sense to me that one way, one explanation or description of these
Kensho's experiences would be, okay, this is kind of just what naturally happens if you temporarily
remove the gating mechanisms of your perception so that more of the raw data hits you.
In a sense, right?
I think that's very good. I just recently read his book, The Case Against Reality.
Ah, nice, nice.
Which is a sort of detailed dive. It's not too long too long it's very readable he writes well you know it's a dive into that realm and absolutely i'll tell you though the one thing that i feel
i mean that's a really helpful really helpful way to to come at it the only thing though that it
doesn't necessarily sort of account for or quite cover is why does it feel so amazing? Why does it feel so good?
You know, it's not just we see it differently. You see, the thing about this non-dual experience,
and it does have different flavors, by the way, different comes in certain varieties. So the one
that I described earlier, that's not the only way it can show up.
It has this weird property, this kind of experience, that we are profoundly implicated in it.
We don't just see it. In a way, we can only see it when we discover that we're part of it.
It's unlike other things we see. You can look at a tree from six inches away.
You can take three steps back.
You can still look at the tree.
Of course, it looks a bit different.
You could walk 100 feet away, and again, it looks different.
But you're still seeing it.
This isn't like that.
You can only see it when we discover we're part of it.
And so that I find really wonderful that in other words in using donald hoffman's approach we'd have to sort of say that if we're using that kind of a frame to look at what happens in kensho it's
discovering that we're made of the same code as everything else kind of thing whatever the raw
data is we're made of it too if you see what i
mean do you get what i mean like oh i totally do no no you're you're you're you're one in the same
yeah i i totally totally understand what you're saying absolutely yeah you're not looking at the
ocean you're one of the drops in the ocean so to speak yeah yeah exactly exactly and you know to
really have that as a vivid personal experience,
it's just profoundly benevolent and sort of, I feel it's the sort of ultimate healing in a way. I don't mean that we'll be instantly healed by it, of all our trauma and all our dynamics that
are unhelpful, etc. But man, it'll move things along and give us all kinds of help in our healing journey.
Hear, hear.
Well, I think that is a beautiful place to begin our initial descent.
Since you also have a big evening ahead of you and a big day tomorrow.
This has been so much fun.
I expected it would be.
I'm glad that you were so game to go into uncharted waters with me.
So thank you for playing along.
I wanted to share something super random with you also, because you mentioned Pardon My Greek.
So you know how we
say in English, it's all Greek to me? Well, I was in Greece at one point, and I asked them, I said,
what do you say when you want to use an expression like that? Because you can't say it's all Greek
to me because you speak Greek. And they go, oh, yes. We say, which means it's all Chinese to me. So,
in Greece, they say it's all Chinese to me. And apologies to any Greek friends if I screwed up
that pronunciation. But I feel like all of this is much less Greek to me after getting your help
walking through a lot of it. Certainly still quite a lot of mystery and many,
many questions, but very grateful that you were willing to take the time to dance this dance with
us again. Well, I'm truly humbled and honored and very, very happy to get this chance to talk with
you again. And you're an exceptional conversationalist and interviewer, truly. I mean,
I suppose that's no surprise to anybody. But really, you really are. It's wonderful.
Thank you. I only see the warts. That's my own work. That's my own work to do. So I appreciate
you saying that. And it really means a lot. And I encourage people to go to mountaincloud.org.
That is a good jumping off point, I suppose, for many, many resources
and many things that you're up to. So mountaincloud.org, we'll link to all these in the
show notes. And Henry's memoir, which describes his own journey in detail, is One Blade of Grass,
subtitle, Finding the Old Road of the Heart, a a zen memoir henry is there anything else that
you would like to mention instagram is at mountain cloud zen center if people want to check that out
anything else that you would like to suggest people check out or anything at all that you'd
like to say or suggest or ask before we close up i might just mention we got another site, originallove.org, where we're running a
program called Original Love, which is like a broad approach to meditation that includes
approaches to awakening, but other stuff too. I think it has more attention to the sort of
healing side of meditation as well as the awakening side. So that's something that
I would just mention. And thanks to Kevin again for encouraging this. And thanks to you. Very,
very sincere thanks to you, Tim. It's great to connect with you. I hope you feel a bit better.
How do you feel actually now? Thank you. You know, I feel emotionally much better. My throat is super sore, but I'm welcoming the throat soreness
more than I was two hours ago. So that's a step in the right direction.
And I think I'm just going to take a hot bath and watch some Disney shorts or something. I really
need one of those nights, I think. And I'm sounds lovely. And I'm looking forward to it.
And originallove.org, people should check it out.
We'll put it right at the top of the show notes.
So tim.blog slash podcast,
if you just search Zen or Shukman,
S-H-U-K-M-A-N, or Henry for that matter,
I'm sure they will pop right up.
And Henry, once again, thank you so much
for taking the time.
I really,
really appreciate it.
Well,
not at all.
Huge.
Thanks to you and to everybody listening until next time.
Thank you for tuning in.
Hey guys,
this is Tim again.
Just one more thing before you take off.
And that is five bullet Friday.
Would you enjoy getting a short email from me every Friday that provides a little fun
before the weekend?
Between one and a half and two million people subscribe to my free newsletter, my super
short newsletter called Five Bullet Friday.
Easy to sign up, easy to cancel.
It is basically a half page that I send out every Friday to share the coolest things I've
found or discovered or have started exploring over that week. It's kind of like my diary of cool things. It often includes articles I'm reading,
books I'm reading, albums perhaps, gadgets, gizmos, all sorts of tech tricks and so on that
get sent to me by my friends, including a lot of podcast guests. And these strange esoteric things
end up in my field and then I test them and then I share them with
you. So if that sounds fun, again, it's very short, a little tiny bite of goodness before you head off
for the weekend, something to think about. If you'd like to try it out, just go to tim.blog
slash Friday, type that into your browser, tim.blog slash Friday, drop in your email and you'll get
the very next one. Thanks for listening.
This episode is brought to you by GiveWell. I love these guys. Donating money to help other people is wonderful, but how can you be confident that your donations are actually doing things?
Are they improving or saving lives effectively? It can be really hard to parse. You can do weeks
of research to find the charities that are out there, what programs they run, what their admin
overhead is, how effective, blah, blah, blah, on and on. It can take forever. I know from experience.
Doing the research is really hard. Or you could simply visit givewell.org for a short vetted list
of the charities they've found to be best per dollar in donations at saving or improving lives.
GiveWell spends more than 20,000 hours each year researching charitable organizations and only Thank you. So GiveWell is free. I've recommended GiveWell.org for a while now, and donations from listeners of this podcast, that's you guys, amount now to roughly $483,399.27.
So close to $500,000, which is incredible.
So first and foremost, thanks to everyone who has donated.
In total, more than 50,000 people have used GiveWell to donate as effectively as possible.
And rigorous evidence suggests that
these donations will save tens of thousands of lives and improve the lives of millions more.
So go right now to GiveWell.org. And when you make your first donation, your gift will be matched up
to $250. This matching offer is good for as long as the funds last. So it's time sensitive and is
a great opportunity to multiply your impact,
which is something I always look for. How can I get the maximum multiplicative effect out of my
dollars that I give? To participate, just go to givewell.org. And when you get to checkout,
pick podcast and enter Tim Ferriss Show. It's that simple. So one more time, get your first
donation matched to $250 at givewell.org.
Be sure to select podcast and Tim Ferriss show at checkout.
This episode is brought to you by Laird Superfood,
founded by big wave surfer Laird Hamilton and volleyball champion Gabby Reese.
Laird Superfood, that's L-A-I-R-D,
delivers high impact fuel to help you get through your busiest days.
And I know these two people, they walk the walk. I love their new Aloha Oat Mac. You heard me right. Aloha Oat Mac
Superfood Creamer. I use the unsweetened version. Made from real plant-based ingredients,
including organic oats, macadamia nuts, that's where the oat mac comes from, avocado oil,
and aquamin. Aquamin is a natural source of seaweed-derived calcium with 72 minerals and
trace amounts. Laird's creamers can really optimize your daily coffee or tea ritual. I
use them all the time, and a $10 bag will last you a long time. For a limited time,
Laird's Superfood is offering you guys, my listeners, 20% off when you use code TIM20
at checkout. That's T-I-M-2-0. Visit lairdsuperfood.com slash Tim to see some of my favorite products and
learn more. Again, that's lairdsuperfood.com slash Tim, L-A-I-R-D, lairdsuperfood.com slash Tim,
and use code TIM20 for 20% off of your order. lairdsuperfood.com slash Tim, promo code TIM20.