The Tim Ferriss Show - #562: Dr. Michio Kaku — Exploring Time Travel, the Beauty of Physics, Parallel Universes, the Mind of God, String Theory, Lessons from Einstein, and More

Starting point is 00:00:00 This episode is brought to you by 99designs, the go-to graphic design platform from Vista that makes it easy for you to find and work with amazing designers online. I have used them for a long, long time. We'll come back to that. Long-time listeners of this podcast know just how much attention I pay to details, a lot of details, and how obsessively I approach all elements of my work because often the small things end up being the big things, whether it's your logo, your business cards, even your email templates, think of my newsletters, all these visual elements tell your customers who you are and what you're about. So it's worth sweating the details. I've been using 99designs for years now to ensure that many of my creative projects, whether big or small, are as cohesive, professional, and beautiful as possible.

Starting point is 00:00:43 Most recently, you may have noticed, I've been working with a designer at 99designs to create distinct illustrations for my podcast episodes. You see them on Instagram and other places. I've developed a great relationship with the designer, and I intend to continue working with her for a long, long time. From logos to websites to packaging and books, I've also used 99designs for book designs and all sorts of illustrations. 99designs is the designs and all sorts of illustrations. 99designs is the go-to creative resource to build your brand on any budget. Right now, my listeners can get $20 off plus a free $99 upgrade on their first design contest. A contest is a great way to get started and find the right designer for long-term work.

Starting point is 00:01:20 You can also book a free design consultation with a brand expert at 99designs.com slash Tim to receive personalized branding advice over the phone. Their hands-on team has helped thousands of business owners. It's a great way to get the most out of your experience with 99designs by Vista. Head to 99designs.com slash Tim, that's 99designs.com slash Tim for your discount and to sign up for a design consultation today. This episode is brought to you by Athletic Greens. I get asked all the time what I would take if I could only take one supplement. I've been asked this for years. The answer is invariably AG1 by Athletic Greens. I view it as all-in-one nutritional insurance, so you can cover your bases. If you're traveling, if you're just busy, if you're not sure if your meals are where they should be, it covers your bases. I've recommended it since the 4-Hour Body, which was gone eons ago,

Starting point is 00:02:16 2010, and I did not get paid to do so. With approximately 75 vitamins, minerals, and whole food source ingredients, you'll be hard-pressed to find a more nutrient-dense formula on the market. It has a multivitamin, multimineral greens complex, probiotics and prebiotics for gut health, an immunity formula, digestive enzymes, and adaptogens. You get the idea. It is very, very comprehensive. And I do my best, of course, to focus on nutrient dense proper meals, but sometimes you're busy. Sometimes you're traveling. Sometimes you just want to make sure that you're getting what you need. AG1 makes it easy to get a lot of nutrition when whole foods aren't readily

Starting point is 00:02:56 available. It's also NSF certified for sport, making it safe for competitive athletes as what's on the label is in the powder. It's the ultimate all-in-one nutritional supplement bundle in one easy scoop. Right now, Athletic Greens is giving my audience a special offer on top of their all-in-one formula, which is a free vitamin D supplement and five free travel packs with your first subscription purchase. Many of us are deficient in vitamin D. I found that true for myself, which is usually produced in our bodies from sun exposure. So adding a vitamin D supplement to your daily routine is a great option for additional immune support. Support your immunity, gut health,

Starting point is 00:03:34 and energy by visiting athleticgreens.com slash Tim. You'll receive up to a year's supply of vitamin D and five free travel packs with your subscription. Again, that's athletic a metal endoskeleton. The Tim Ferriss Show. Hello boys and girls, ladies and germs. This is Tim Ferriss and welcome to another episode of The Tim Ferriss Show. My guest today is Dr. Michio Kaku. You can find him on Twitter at Michio Kaku. He is a professor of theoretical physics at the City College of New York, co-founder of Stringfield Theory, and the author of several widely acclaimed science books, including Beyond Einstein, The Future of Humanity, The Future of the Mind, Hyperspace, Physics of the Future, Physics of the Impossible, and his latest bestseller, The God Equation, subtitled The Quest for a Theory of Everything. So we will have no

Starting point is 00:04:45 shortage of things to discuss. He is the science correspondent for CBS This Morning, the host of the radio programs Science Fantastic and Exploration, and a host of several science TV specials for the BBC and the Discovery and Science channels. We will link to all of his social, including Facebook, Instagram, Twitter in the show notes, but you can find him quite easily at Michio Kaku in most cases. And Dr. Kaku, welcome to the show. Thank you for taking the time. Yeah, glad to be on. I thought I would start by rolling the clock back to your childhood.

Starting point is 00:05:19 And my understanding is you did not come from a wealthy family, far from it, but that you certainly found time to build things. And I was wondering if there were any notable examples or examples that come to mind that you could share with the audience. Well, you're right. Ever since I was a child, I knew that my parents were locked up during World War II in a relocation camp in California. Their assets were frozen. They were penniless when they were released from jail. And just because they were, you know, Japanese Americans, even though they were citizens, they were both citizens

Starting point is 00:05:58 of the United States. They were both born in California, for God's sake. So when I was a child, I realized that if I was to do anything in this world, I would have to do it myself. So when I was eight years old, something happened which completely changed my life. I still remember everyone was talking about the fact that a great scientist had just died. And on the evening paper, all they showed was a picture of his desk. That's it. That's a picture of his desk with an open book. And the caption said, the greatest scientist of our time could not finish this book. Well, I was fascinated by this story. Why couldn't he finish it? I mean, he could ask his mother, right? He could go to the

Starting point is 00:06:46 library. I mean, he could just look it up. What was so hard that a great scientist could not finish that book? Well, I went to the library, and over the years, I began to find out this man's name was Albert Einstein. And that book, that book was to be the theory of everything, the God equation, an equation perhaps no more than one inch long that would allow us to, quote, read the mind of God. Well, I was hooked. I had to know what was this unified field theory, the theory of everything that was supposed to summarize all the laws of nature into such a compact form. So when I was in high school, I said to myself, this is it. I want to be part of this great search for the theory of everything. So I went to my mom and I said, mom, can I have permission to build an atom smasher in the garage? A 2.3 million electron volt

Starting point is 00:07:46 electron accelerator in the garage? She kind of stared at me and said, sure, why not? And don't forget to take out the garbage. Well, I took out the garbage and I got 400 pounds of transformer steel, 22 miles of copper wire, so much wire that we had to wind it on the football field in my high school. And the atmosphere consumed six kilowatts of power, all the energy that my house had. Finally, it was ready. I plugged it in. I heard this huge crackling sound as six kilowatts of energy surged through my capacitor bank. And then I heard this pop, pop, pop sound as I blew out all the fuses in the house and the whole house was plunged in darkness. My poor mom, you know, she'd come home from a hard day's work and then she'd say to

Starting point is 00:08:38 herself, why couldn't I have a son who plays baseball? Why can't he play basketball? And for God's sake, why can't he find a nice Japanese girlfriend? Why does he build these machines in the garage? Well, yeah, because of these machines, I went to the National Science Fair. I won a grand prize, and I met the physicist who built the atomic bomb. I met Edward Teller, father of the hydrogen bomb, and he offered me a scholarship that if I could get into Harvard, he would fund it. Well, I got into Harvard, and yes, true to form, he financed a scholarship so I could go and fulfill my dream. Well, when I graduated from Harvard, he offered me a job, a job at Los Alamos Labs, Livermore Labs, designing hydrogen warheads. But you see, I had a different scenario. You see, for me, the hydrogen bomb was puny. It was not powerful enough. I wanted to work on the biggest explosion

Starting point is 00:09:47 in the universe, the Big Bang. That is, the God equation set into motion the expansion of the universe itself. Now that's for me. So I respectfully declined this very generous offer, but I said to myself, I want to work on the theory of everything, an equation no more than one inch long that will allow us to summarize all the laws of the universe into one compact form. I said to myself, that's for me. I must ask, how did your patron, this person who paid your way through Harvard, respond when you declined his job offer? Well, the war in Vietnam was going full blast.

Starting point is 00:10:34 He knew that a lot of his young recruits could not get a job because they were going to go into the military. And that's what I did. My draft board pretty much told me that I would go to Vietnam. And so I basically volunteered to go into the military, hoping to be part of Signal Corps. That is, I figured I could use some of my physics education in order to support telecommunication of our troops. Unfortunately, they put me in infantry. I went to Fort Benning, Georgia, where I learned how to go through machine gun fire. I went to Fort Lewis, Washington, where I learned to fire machine guns.

Starting point is 00:11:18 In fact, I fired the entire United States Army's infantry, the whole slew of weapons fielded by the United States infantry. I fired them all. So I said to myself, yeah, I have to serve my country. What can I do? Was there a conflict in your heart or mind having seen how your parents were treated in internment camps in serving this country? Was there any upset or any hesitation? I'm just wondering emotionally if there was anything there that's worth discussing. Not really, because I realized that what had happened during the war, well, let's face it, the United States was at war. And as a

Starting point is 00:12:00 consequence, in wartime, people do strange things. And however, my parents' attitude was that, well, first of all, we have to make sure that it doesn't happen again. That if the war clouds start to rise again, we have to make sure that the locking up of huge sectors of the population, 100,000 Japanese Americans were locked up, that it wouldn't happen again. But my parents also believed that you shouldn't have a chip on your shoulder. You shouldn't hold it against the country because the country was, you know, very kind and generous, made my education possible. And so you shouldn't hold a grudge. And the thing to do is to contribute contribute to society and that's what i decided to do to contribute to society not have a chip on my shoulder and do good you've really in in some

Starting point is 00:12:55 respects i mean you've created many careers for yourself but you've combined technical skill and fluency with communication and i want to focus for a second on the technical side of things, because you mentioned that you asked your mom if you could build an atom smasher. And I think for a lot of people listening, they wouldn't immediately know what an atom smasher is. Were your parents technical? Did they have technical backgrounds? No, they barely got out of grade school with an education. And as a consequence, they didn't have a clue as to what I was doing. They just knew that it sounded very scientific and it sounded important. And so they said, go for it. They were very encouraging. They said,

Starting point is 00:13:38 go for it. Go as far as you can go. Was there anything that sparked that initial curiosity in the sciences? Well, there was this mystery. Curiosity is one of the great drivers of human behavior. Curiosity coupled with passion, those I think are the two great ingredients that allow people to rise above poverty and rise above hardship, curiosity and passion. So I had a curiosity. I had to know what was in that book. Now today, of course, I can read that book. I know exactly all the different incorrect avenues that Einstein was looking at in a

Starting point is 00:14:19 desperate search, which he failed ultimately, to create a theory of everything. So curiosity is one thing that drove me. But also you, to create a theory of everything. So curiosity is one thing that drove me. But also you have to have a passion. Curiosity by itself is not enough. You have to be able to pay your dues. You have to be able to sit down, learn the math, learn the physics, get up to a PhD so that you can become a professor. And so you have to have a passion that takes you all the way to the top. I've read in preparation for this conversation that you were fascinated

Starting point is 00:14:51 with Isaac Asimov's Foundation Trilogy as a child. I don't know if that's true. Please fact check me if that's incorrect. Did any particular sci-fi stand out to you as impactful or cultivating that passion and curiosity? Well, yes. You see, when I was eight years old, I wanted to be like Einstein. But on Saturday mornings, I used to watch TV, and I used to watch Flash Gordon on TV. And once again, I was hooked. I mean, starships, rocket ships, invisibility shields, cities underwater, cities in the sky. What's there not to love with Flash

Starting point is 00:15:33 Gordon? But then over the years, I began to realize that the two passions of my life, that is physics on one hand, and the future on the other, were more or less the same thing. That if you understood physics, you understood what is possible, what is plausible, and what is simply impossible. So when I read science fiction, I began to realize that if you have a background in physics, you can sort of put things into place. You know when certain technologies are going to go to fruition. You know when certain technologies will never happen. And it allows you to see into the future. So those are the two things that I do. On one hand, I work on the unified field theory, the God equation, the theory of everything. But I'm also a futurist, that as I look to see what trends will take us into the next five, ten,

Starting point is 00:16:26 hundred years, thousand years into the future. And so watching Flash Gordon really impressed upon me that if you know physics, you know the outlines of the future. Not totally, of course, because we make mistakes, but you know what is possible, what is plausible, and what is impossible. I have many questions to follow up that answer. And we're going to also veer into trends and a few related questions. And I'll ask you about physics of the future. But first, I wanted to go back to Harvard for a moment and to ask you if it's true that for a stint at least you studied philosophy and if so if you could describe that experience well that was very practical i knew that you had that plan b if plan a doesn't work out what are you going to do for plan b you see for einstein and i studied

Starting point is 00:17:22 his life very carefully in fact even wrote a biography of Einstein, I realized that, well, he made enemies of his faculty. He would cut classes a lot because he knew the material already. He was way ahead of everyone. But he cut class. The professors hated that. So he got horrible letters of recommendation. So he had to go to plan B, which is become a menial worker. He applied for a job selling life insurance. Can you imagine opening the door one day,

Starting point is 00:17:51 and there's Albert Einstein trying to sell you life insurance? And he finally got a job as a low-level clerk at the Platinum office in Bern, Switzerland, from which he could launch the greatest revolution of modern times, relativity, which gives us the atomic bomb, gives us computer technology, lasers, gives us the power of the sun, in fact. And so he had plan B and take a low-level clerical job. Well, I had to have plan B too. So I said to myself, why not learn computer technology? Computers were just beginning to surface and Stanford University was not too far away. When I grew up there, it was all apple orchards and alfalfa fields and farm workers. But yeah,

Starting point is 00:18:38 Stanford was slowly rising and you could learn how to program computers. And so I said to myself, that's what I'm going to do for plan B. But I was also interested in philosophy. But I still remember a quote from Einstein, and that philosophy, he said, is sort of like honey, that at first is delicious and tastes great. But then you realize there's nothing really there. It's not going to show you the future. It just tastes good. And so he decided that, well, yes, he will learn philosophy. It'll guide him to a degree, but it's not going to pioneer new branches of science. Philosophy is how you sort of like look at the entire terrain of physics. So yeah, Einstein was a philosopher, but he realized he could not make a living doing philosophy. Now, do you think that there are certain branches

Starting point is 00:19:33 of philosophy or types of philosophical questioning or thought exercises that will become more practical in the sense that, for instance, if we look at the trolley problem and autonomous cars, programming machines to behave in certain ways if they have to choose between hitting, say, four people in their 80s versus two schoolchildren on the other side of the road or something like that. Are there types of philosophy or branches of philosophy that one might view as more practical or. That is, is God knowable? Can you prove the existence of God? So I was fascinated by that question. Can you prove or disprove the existence of God?

Starting point is 00:20:33 And then I began to realize that there are certain things outside of science. Science is what is testable, reproducible, and falsifiable. But certain things are beyond that, that cannot be tested, that cannot be reproduced. For example, the existence of God. So I think that a thousand years from now, people will still be debating whether or not God exists because it's not a provable statement. Like, for example, the unicorn. Can you prove or disprove the existence of unicorns? And the answer is no, because if you say unicorns don't exist, maybe somewhere in a cave, someplace where we've never explored before, there's a unicorn. So it is impossible to disprove the non-existence of

Starting point is 00:21:21 unicorns. And the same thing with God. God is also not a provable statement, so a thousand years from now we'll still be debating the existence of God because there's no proof, no definitive proof one way or the other that can prove or disprove the existence of God. Another example, I was at a party once where somebody came up to me and said that she was Cleopatra. She was the reincarnation of Cleopatra. Well, I got into a conversation, asked her some simple questions about the history of Cleopatra, and she got all the answers wrong. And I said to myself, aha, she's not really Cleopatra at all. But then she came back at me and left me floored. She said, the history books are wrong. Why do I know that? Because I am the reincarnation of Cleopatra. You can't believe the

Starting point is 00:22:13 history books. And I was stumped. At that point, I realized that that's a statement that's not provable. Therefore, it is outside the boundary of science. Do angels exist? Well, maybe, maybe not, but it's outside the boundaries of what science can test, because if you say there's no such thing as angels, maybe they just are in a place that you haven't looked. So that was one area that I found interesting, epistemology, the limits of what is testable, what is reproducible, and what is falsifiable. The other thing that was interesting to me was the question of human thought. Is it possible to build a robot that can think like a human? And then I read about the work of Alan Turing, the founder of artificial intelligence theory, the guy who helped to win World War II by breaking the German code. And sadly enough, even though he was a hero, it was top secret

Starting point is 00:23:11 because the British had to keep code breaking secret. And he basically committed suicide for the end of his life. There was a police raid and the founder of artificial intelligence theory turned out to be gay, and he was put on trial. He was forced to take hormones, and he went crazy, and he committed suicide. But anyway, the point I'm raising is, if you have a robot that acts like a human, talks like a human, then for all intents and purposes, it is indistinguishable from a human, then for all intents and purposes, it is indistinguishable from a human and therefore is a human. Now that really set me into motion because here was a very concrete test that you could make as to whether or not something is human. In other words, if it looks like a duck, quacks like a duck, and waddles like a duck, maybe it is a duck. Maybe it is indistinguishable from a duck. If you hold to that philosophy, then you come to the realization that

Starting point is 00:24:12 one day we will create humans out of the laboratory because it'll be asymptotically indistinguishable from a human. Now, right now, it's pretty easy to tell that something is a robot. You ask it a simple question, it gets the answer wrong, so bingo, you know that it's fake. But one day it'll be so close to us that it will be indistinguishable from us, in which case maybe artificial intelligence is really possible. Here's another example. Science is getting to the point where we can digitize everything known about you. For example, all of Einstein's papers, lectures, notes can be digitized. And I would love to talk to Einstein. I'd love to sit down and talk to a robot that has digitized all of Einstein's memoirs and videotapes and what have you, everything that's

Starting point is 00:25:05 known. And so then that becomes, at some point, indistinguishable from Einstein himself. And so in other words, it may be possible that the soul, the soul of a human might be digitized because we're getting closer and closer to creating things that are indistinguishable from people. In other words, this gives us digital immortality. You can live forever, of course, as a computer program, but you can live forever because your memories, your personalities will allow you to talk to your great, great, great, great grandkids, and your great, great, great grandkids will be able to talk to you great-great-great-great-grandkids, and your great-great-great-great-grandkids will be able to talk to you because your computer program is indistinguishable from who you are.

Starting point is 00:25:52 So these are philosophical questions that I think are actually quite interesting. How do you think of burden of proof in the sense that while it may be impossible to prove the non-existence of unicorns, the current expanse of human exploration has, as of yet, not turned up any unicorns. So in terms of choosing what to believe or not believe, and I know some scientists will say, I believe in the data, and that's their kind of stock response. But reality seems to be, at least in real life, messy around the corners. How do you think of burden of proof, whether it's, say, unicorns or something like time travel? Well, first of all, if you take a look at detectives, are detectives scientists? Detectives have data, but you see scientists like to create experiments.

Starting point is 00:26:47 They like to redo the experiment many, many, many times so that something is reproducible, falsifiable, and testable on demand. A detective is in a situation where the crime has been committed. You cannot recreate the crime. You can approximate the crime, but you cannot recreate the crime. It's not testable, may not be falsifiable, but is it a science? Well, then you have to realize that most of physics is a detective story, that the Big Bang happened 13.8 billion years ago. It happened in the past. It was the crime. And so you begin to realize that all of science is in some sense not testable, because you cannot recreate the Big Bang. You cannot test aspects of the Big Bang. You only have the remnants of what happened after the Big

Starting point is 00:27:42 Bang 13.8 billion years ago. And as a consequence, you have to be a little bit humble, humble realizing that there are limits to what we can do in the laboratory, because we cannot recreate cosmic events like the creation of the Earth, the creation of the Sun, and the creation of the universe. But we do what we can with the physics that we are given. Now, you mentioned something else. What was that again that pushed the boundaries of what we can do? I guess the underlying question was just around how you think of burden of proof. And part of the reason that term came to mind is, and I know we're jumping around and that's okay, in an interview from 2003 in Scientific American, you had said about 10 years ago, meaning 1993, if you were a serious physicist

Starting point is 00:28:29 talking about time travel, you'd be laughed out of the scientific establishment. So I wanted to ask you what had happened post 1993 that had made that less the case. And it seemed, at least I have a line here, and please fact check this. Originally, the burden of proof was on physicists to prove that time travel was possible. Now the burden of proof is on physicists to prove there must be a law forbidding time travel. And I found that very interesting. And I was just wondering if you could kind of expand on how you think about wrapping one's head around something like time travel and whether it is possible or impossible. Well, it used to be, of course, that we have a giggle factor in physics, that if you talk about higher dimensions, you talk about time travel, most physicists would simply giggle and eyes would roll up in the

Starting point is 00:29:16 heavens and they'd shake their head. Well, they don't do that anymore. Physicists like Stephen Hawking have taken these things very seriously. You see, after the war, Einstein's roommate at the Institute for Advanced Study, he had an office right next to Einstein, Kurt Gödel, found the first solution of Einstein's equations, which allowed for time travel. Time travel. In other words, if the universe rotated, if the universe rotated and then you rotated around the universe and came back, you could come back yesterday. You could come back before you left, which, of course, is time travel. Now, Einstein, of course, was horrified by this. He said in his memoirs that we can eliminate this possibility for physical reasons, i.e., the universe expanded, the

Starting point is 00:30:07 universe did not spin. If the universe spun, then time travel would become in place. Well, since then, we have found hundreds of solutions of Einstein's equations in which time travel is a possibility. For example, if I have a black hole or something similar to a black hole, a very dense star, and it rotates, and it rotates, it does not collapse to a dot. It collapses to a ring, a ring. And if you fall through the ring, you wind up in a parallel universe. These are legitimate solutions of Einstein's equations, found in 1963, in fact, by mathematician

Starting point is 00:30:46 Roy Kerr, and it means that we have to take it seriously. And then Stephen Hawking jumped into the game, and he came up with the chronology protection hypothesis, and that is there must be a law of physics preventing time travel. Okay, that was a challenge. He challenged the world of physics to find a law that once and for all would disprove the existence of a time machine. Well, what happened? Nobody could find such a law.

Starting point is 00:31:17 And so Hawking was forced to admit that, well, maybe time travel is possible because there's no law preventing it. Well, now we have wormholes. In fact, string theory, which is what I do for a living, is full of wormholes. You can't move in string theory without bumping into a wormhole someplace. And a wormhole is the looking glass of Alice. Alice stuck her hand through the looking glass and her hand wound up on the other end of forever in Wonderland. Well, that looking glass is the black hole. A spinning black hole collapses not to a dot but to a ring. That ring is the looking glass of Alice.

Starting point is 00:31:59 So that if you stick your hand through the looking glass, you wind up in another parallel universe. And this gives us, therefore, a new way of looking at the Big Bang. Einstein said that the universe is a bubble, a bubble of some sort, and it's expanding. That's called the Big Bang theory. However, string theory says there are other bubbles out there. In fact, there's a bubble bath, a bubble bath of universes. And when these universes collide, well, that gives you the Big Bang. Or when these universes split in half, that could also be the Big Bang. And so we realize that there's a multiverse of universes out there, some of which make time travel possible. Now, at the next question that people often ask me is, if there's this bubble bath of universes,

Starting point is 00:32:54 parallel universes, then is Elvis Presley still alive in one of these parallel universes? And the answer is possibly yes, that if you are dead in one universe, you are not necessarily dead in a twin universe, that people who have perished in one universe may keep on living in another universe. Now this sounds crazy, right? But it goes by a name, quantum physics. We physicists telling people that some of their loved ones could still be alive in another parallel universe, we tell them, get used to it. This is called quantum physics. Now, of course, to visit these parallel universes would require technology far beyond anything we can muster. So don't think you can visit Elvis anytime soon. But it does mean that, well,

Starting point is 00:33:45 yeah, these universes are possible. the 2008 crisis, you would have missed out on 50%, 5-0% of your returns. Don't miss out on the best days in the market. Stay invested in a long-term automated investment portfolio. Wealthfront pioneered the automated investing movement, sometimes referred to as robo-advising, and they currently oversee $20 billion of assets for their clients. Wealthfront can help you diversify your portfolio, minimize fees, and lower your taxes. It takes about three minutes to sign up, and then Wealthfront will build you a globally diversified portfolio of ETFs based on your risk appetite and manage it for you at an incredibly low cost. Wealthfront's software constantly monitors your portfolio day in and day out so you don't

Starting point is 00:34:38 have to. They look for opportunities to rebalance and tax loss harvest to lower the amount of taxes you pay on your investment gains. Their newest service is called autopilot and it can monitor any checking account for excess cash to move into savings or an investment account. They've really thought of a ton. They've checked a lot of boxes. Smart investing should not feel like a rollercoaster ride. Let the professionals do the work for you. Go to wealthfront.com slash Tim and open a wealth front investment account today and you'll get your first $5,000 managed for free for you. Go to wealthfront.com slash Tim and open a Wealthfront investment account today, and you'll get your first $5,000 managed for free for life. That's wealthfront.com slash Tim. Wealthfront will automate your investments for the long term,

Starting point is 00:35:13 and you can get started today at wealthfront.com slash Tim. I want to double click on time. Let's talk a bit more about time. And actually, before we get to time, because that's understandably a pretty big subject, could you just define what you mean by parallel universe? Well, take two sheets of paper and put them side by side so that they are parallel to each other, and then get a pencil and just stick a pencil right through both sheets of paper. That pencil is the wormhole. It's a gateway. It's a gateway connecting two separate universes. And guess who came up with this idea? It was Einstein himself in 1935. In 1935, Einstein was playing with black holes, mathematically of course, and realized that

Starting point is 00:36:07 if you took two black holes and stuck them together back to back, if you fell into one funnel, you would go blasting out the other funnel. So today we call them wormholes, or in this case, white holes. A black hole is this ultimate vacuum cleaner. Everything gets sucked into this vacuum cleaner called the black hole. But where does that stuff go? We're not sure. But in one theory, it's blown out the other end as a white hole. And so this white hole is connected to the black hole through this gateway. And the gateway is a wormhole, and this gateway in turn may be a passageway to another universe, a passageway to a distant point in your same universe, or perhaps even a gateway into the past.

Starting point is 00:36:57 Time travel can no longer be totally ruled out. It's something that we physicists actually study now. I'm looking at the cover of one of my books, and the cover is The Order of Time by Carlo Rovelli, who is an Italian physicist. I think he does a lot of work in quantum gravity, if I'm recalling correctly. And in one of his presentations, video presentation, I remember him holding two different handwatch watches, one above his head and one down by his waist and saying something to the effect. And I'm paraphrasing here because I'm not technical. I don't have any physics chops.

Starting point is 00:37:35 But he said that effectively time unfolds at different speeds at these different heights due to different gravitational effects and so on. I'm curious if there are any statements or characteristics of time that you can mention that might be counterintuitive or seem otherworldly to people who are listening, just because I think you're in a better position than I am, certainly. Well, most people think that time beats at the same rate. So the one hour on the Earth is one hour on the moon is one hour in outer space. But that's not true. It turns out that if you were in a rocket ship orbiting the Earth, like in a GPS satellite, time can actually slow down a bit or actually speed up depending upon how fast you are

Starting point is 00:38:25 moving. So when you use your cell phone to calculate where you are located on the earth, that cell phone has to calculate Einstein's theory, the general theory and the special theory of relativity. They calculate exactly what time it is because it depends on how fast you move. In general, the faster you move, the slower time beats. So twins, one of our astronauts was a twin, went into outer space. When the twin came back, most people assumed that they were still the same age. Nope. The twin that went into outer space is actually younger, slightly younger by a fraction of a second, than his twin on the Earth. Now on the Moon, time beats faster on the Moon. So if I have a clock on the Moon, it beats a little

Starting point is 00:39:14 bit faster than a clock on the planet Earth. A clock on Jupiter would beat a little bit slower than a clock on the Earth. And this is not science fiction we measure this in fact we use it for the GPS system so when a Pentagon general fights a war the war depends on Einstein's theory of general relativity and special relativity or else the troops wind up too late to fight that war because their clocks are all wrong so Newton of course thought that time was like an arrow. One second on the earth is one second on the moon is one second throughout the universe. 12 o'clock is 12 o'clock everywhere in the universe. Einstein comes along and says, not so fast. Time is a river. It's a river that can speed up and slow down so that time beats faster on the moon

Starting point is 00:40:07 than it does on the earth. Time in outer space on a rocket ship beats slower than time on the earth. A clock on Jupiter beats slower than a clock on the earth. And we measure it. That's why we have the GPS system. And then we can even go one step beyond that. The river of time can have whirlpools, whirlpools in the river of time and can fork, fork into two rivers. And that allows us to resolve the time travel paradoxes. When you go backwards in time and meet yourself as a child, and you kill yourself as a child, how can you survive as an adult when you just committed suicide in the past? This is the grandfather paradox. How can you still be alive if you killed your ancestors? Well, there's a way around it, and that is if the river of time forks into two rivers, and in one river, Abraham Lincoln was assassinated at Ford Theater.

Starting point is 00:41:09 He died. But if the river of time forks, and you jump stream, and you're now on this other river, you can save Abraham Lincoln from being assassinated at the Ford Theater. But you've saved somebody else's Abraham Lincoln, a parallel Abraham Lincoln, because the quantum theory allows for parallel universes. Now the quantum theory allows for parallel electrons. Electrons can be two places at the same time. And how do we use that? In lasers. That's how lasers work. That's how transistors work. Anything quantum mechanical is based on the simple idea that an electron can be two places at the same time. Now, if electrons can do it, why not people? Or for that matter, why not the universe? So at this point, you may

Starting point is 00:42:00 say to yourself, this is weird. Well, get used to it. It's called physics. And for those interested, at least one pair of twins who were studied extensively, to my knowledge, Scott Kelly and his brother, Mark Kelly. I had Scott, actually astronaut Scott Kelly on this podcast for people who are interested in digging into that further. I wanted to ask you next about consciousness and your views of consciousness, because you could, as you mentioned, have someone who looks and quacks like a human, let's just say, and passes the Turing test, is convincingly human from the outside looking in effectively

Starting point is 00:42:44 or looking at. How do you think about consciousness yourself, if you do at all? There are many ways of thinking about consciousness. Let's take a look at the human brain. There's something called the connectome project, which is just as earth-shaking as the genome project. The genome project, of course, sequenced our genes and changed the face of medicine. You cannot go to the doctor's office without at some point bumping into an application of the Genome Project. It's changed everything. Criminals can now be caught because of the Genome Project. Well, there's another project out there just as powerful.

Starting point is 00:43:32 It is called the Connectome Project, and it wants to map the human brain, every single cell in a map of the entire human brain. Now, we've already mapped the brain of a fruit fly, believe it or not. A fruit fly has about 100,000 neurons. These 100,000 neurons can be sliced and diced and put on a computer, and we have a map, a roadmap of every single neuron in the brain of a fruit fly. And therefore, in principle, if you were to replace every neuron with a transistor, you could create a working model

Starting point is 00:44:06 of the brain of an insect. Now the next question is, well, what about going up to a mouse? What about going up to a rat, and then going up to a rabbit, and then going up to a dog or a cat? Well, is it possible that we could slice and dice their brain so that we would have a roadmap of every single neuron in the brain of a dog? Well, what's to prevent it? I'm a physicist, and I realize that there's nothing in the laws of physics preventing us from creating a roadmap of the brain of a dog. And if that's possible, then why not the brain of a human? A human has 100 billion neurons in it. That's the number of stars in the Milky Way galaxy, 100 billion. Each neuron in turn is connected to 10,000 other neurons to create this vast jungle of connections called the human brain. Can we

Starting point is 00:45:08 have a map of the human brain, neuron for neuron? And the answer is yes. When will it happen? Well, let's be honest. It may take 100 years for us to be able to create the connectome project, but it is certainly possible, in which case it may be possible to create a twin, a twin of the human brain, neuron for neuron, that is identical to that of a human. And then the big question is, is it conscious? Well, of course, we can debate that question that we're blue in the face, but like I said, as Alan Turing, the father of artificial intelligence once said, that if it looks like a duck, quacks like a duck, maybe it is indistinguishable from a duck. So that could be digital consciousness.

Starting point is 00:45:58 Do you think that it would be, I don't want to say as simple, because of course it wouldn't necessarily be simple, as recreating this neuron map or sort of in some ways mechanical model of the brain and then switching it on and that that would in some way create what we experience as consciousness? Or could there be other forces involved? Do you think there are other forces or elements involved that would make it more difficult than that? Well, actually, I have a definition of consciousness. The problem with consciousness is that everyone has their own pet definition or no definition at all. And we're basically debating ghosts because there's no definition. But you see, I have a definition of consciousness that I laid out in my bestseller, The Future of the Mind, because as a physicist, we're fascinated by the human brain. My definition of consciousness is the sum total of all the feedback loops

Starting point is 00:46:58 necessary to create a model, a model of yourself in space and time in society. So by that definition, the simplest level of consciousness is a thermostat. A thermostat has a feedback loop, one feedback loop, and it creates a model of itself in temperature. It regulates the temperature in a room. So I say that a thermostat has one unit of consciousness. And then let's take a plant. Let's take a plant in your backyard. I say that has maybe 10 units of consciousness. It's conscious of its temperature, moisture, direction of the sun, oxygen, carbon dioxide content, a few sensors that give you maybe 10 feedback loops, and that is the consciousness of a plant. So I think that a plant is also conscious. But let's go up the scale. The next level of consciousness is a reptile. A reptile has an understanding of space, but not much more. It has to understand

Starting point is 00:48:07 where the food is located, where its potential mates are, where its enemies are. So it has to be able to create feedback loops that understand space, its location in space. I call that level one. Level one consciousness is the thousands of neurons necessary to create a representation of space for a reptile. That's called the reptilian brain. Then the center of the brain, because the brain evolves from the back to the front, the back of the brain is the reptilian brain. The center of the brain evolved later, and that's the monkey brain, the limbic system, and that governs consciousness in society.

Starting point is 00:48:49 That is your role in society. Who's top dog? Who's the leader of the pack? Who's the guy who is the fall guy in society? How do you defer to these people? Consciousness of a social type. You have to understand your place in society just like a reptile is consciousness decides where it is physically located then the big question is

Starting point is 00:49:15 what is human consciousness what feedback loops does the human brain give a human that differs from monkeys, differs from reptiles? That is the key question of which I have an answer. The front part of your brain is what distinguishes us from the animals. And what does that brain do? It creates a model of yourself in time. It is a time machine. It daydreams. It imagines worlds that don't exist.

Starting point is 00:49:51 Let's do an experiment to test my theory. Let's go to your dog tonight in your house and teach your dog the meaning of tomorrow. Such a simple concept. Such a simple thing. Teach your dog the meaning of tomorrow well your dog understands space that's the reptilian brain the back of your brain your dog understands society that is the society of dogs that's the center of the brain but the front of the brain the prefrontal cortex is not well developed in dogs. Dogs do not daydream to the best of our knowledge. They have

Starting point is 00:50:27 no understanding of time other than where food is because it was not necessary. It was not necessary for a dog to understand and daydream. Why does a dog have to daydream for God's sake? And a bear, it understands when to hibernate, but that's automatic. It's reflex that governs the time behavior of most animals. Now humans, on the other hand, what do we do? We constantly daydream. We can't help it. We're constantly imagining, what am I going to do tomorrow? What am I going to do to meet Sally tomorrow? Where's the best path to go? It's constantly creating alternate worlds of consciousness. So I say that there are three levels of consciousness. There is location, geometric consciousness, consciousness of space, spatial consciousness,

Starting point is 00:51:20 that is the reptile. Then there is social consciousness of a monkey, of a wolf in a wolf pack. And then there is temporal consciousness, which is what humans do. And that is my definition of human consciousness. Human consciousness is the sum total of all feedback loops of a human assessing its place in time, essentially the future, constantly daydreaming about what can I do in the future. Thank you for that definition. I'm very happy you took the time to do that. And it can help prevent a lot of disagreements if people first agree on terms, definition of the terms, because it varies so tremendously. And I'm going to use that as a segue to the word God, but I know another scientist whose basic question for test of consciousness, although this is a much more elaborate conversation, is in effect, are you

Starting point is 00:52:15 aware that you are aware? So the point being, not that that is useful or accurate, but that definitions can differ. Yeah, well, I have a definition. I have a definition of self-awareness. Some people say consciousness is self-awareness. Well, then what is self-awareness, right? What is consciousness is your ability to instigate all these feedback loops to create a model, a model of yourself in space, in society, and in time. And if you think about it, every thought, every thought that goes through your mind does this. Every thought in your mind is constantly creating a picture of yourself in space, in time, and in society. In fact, I tell people, if you want to disprove my theory, all you have to do is create a chain of thinking that is not part of the feedback loops that I mentioned concerning space, time, and society, three levels of consciousness.

Starting point is 00:53:13 If you can think of a thought, a thought that is outside the domain of these three levels of consciousness, then you can disprove my theory. Well, I'm not going to attempt to do that, but I do want to ask you about Einstein, since certainly you're more qualified than I on all things Einstein. Although I did take Mandarin language classes inside a classroom where Einstein once taught. That's about as close as I get to, in any way, being close and being familiar with Einstein. The theory of everything that he tried to accomplish, the quote that I have in front of me is that it would allow him to, quote, read the mind of God, end quote. What do you think Einstein might have meant or did mean by God in this instance? Was it glimpsing the source code

Starting point is 00:54:06 of everything that would allow you to have perfect predictive powers? What did he mean by reading the mind of God? Well, Einstein wrote prolifically about the question of God. In fact, the God letter, a letter that he just dashed off one day years ago to a friend about God, it sold for millions of dollars, shocked everyone because everyone wanted to know what was Einstein's thoughts about God. Well, basically, it's very simple. He rejected the idea of a personal God, the God that you pray to, that gives you Christmas presents, smites the Philistines. He did not believe in a personal God, but he believed in the God of Spinoza, that is, the God of harmony, elegance, beauty, simplicity. The universe could have been

Starting point is 00:54:55 ugly. The universe could have been random. The universe could have been chaotic, but it's not. The universe is gorgeous. The universe is rather simple. On a sheet of paper, you can write down the theory of almost everything. You can write down Einstein's equations and the quantum standard model of hundreds of subatomic particles. It's ugly as hell, but hey, it works at low energies. But on a sheet of paper, the low energy universe can be summarized by one sheet of paper. It didn't have to be that way. And so Einstein thought of himself as a young child entering a library for the first time, this huge, gigantic library.

Starting point is 00:55:37 And here's this little boy marveling at all these books. And all he could do was open the first book, chapter 1, verse 1, and read the first page. And so Einstein had a very definite opinion about how we as human beings live in an ordered, gorgeous, simple world. And then Galileo was also asked that question. Galileo said that the purpose of science is to determine how the heavens go. That's the purpose of science. The purpose of religion is to determine how to go to heaven. So in other words, religion is about ethics, how to go to heaven.

Starting point is 00:56:22 While science is about natural law, how the heavens go. So as long as you keep these two domains separate, they're actually complementary. There's no problem at all. The problem occurs when people in the natural sciences begin to pontificate about ethics, and when people who are religious begin to pontificate about natural law. That's when we get into trouble. If you use, and you've used it, but I don't know if you normally do, in the course of this conversation, you've mentioned the word God. Does that have a personal meaning to you?

Starting point is 00:56:57 Well, yes. When I was a child, I realized that my parents were Buddhists. And in Buddhism, the universe had no beginning, no end. There's just timeless nirvana. That's the essence of one aspect of Buddhism. But they put me in Sunday school, a Presbyterian Sunday school. So I read the Bible. I learned all the parables and all the stories.

Starting point is 00:57:24 And of course course there is Genesis chapter 1 verse 1 when the God sets the universe into motion. So the universe had a beginning. So I've had these two contradictory ideas in my head. Either the universe had a beginning or it didn't. No two ways around it, right? Wrong. Now we can meld these two ideas into one theory, the multiverse theory. You see, our universe had a beginning. Our universe had a genesis. It had a moment of the Big Bang. But Big Bangs are happening all the time because the Big Bang is a quantum event, meaning that

Starting point is 00:58:01 it could happen again and again and again, creating a bubble bath of universes. And so what is the universe expanding into if we have this larger arena called the bubble bath? This empty arena is hyperspace, the hyperspace of string theory. So string theory allows you to meld these two diametrically closed theories into one theory, that our universe had a beginning, a big bang. But in a multiverse, we have a bubble bath. A bubble bath of universes being born all the time, even as we speak. That is the essence of the quantum principle. If there's a probability of it happening, it could happen if you wait long enough. I know nothing about string theory. I'm embarrassed to say. Fortunately, we are talking, and so I feel like I can ask you

Starting point is 00:58:57 anything and everything about it. My layman's understanding is that string theory is controversial. Is that an accurate statement? Are there proponents and detractors and controversy around string theory, or is that not the case? Oh, sure. In fact, that shows you how healthy science is, that in science, truth comes out of incorrect debate with untruth. And so, good thing we have controversies, but let's break down the controversies. Some people say that the theory of everything is not testable directly. That is, you cannot create a laboratory that will test the theory of everything, because string theory is a theory of universes. Every solution of string theory is a universe. And so to test this theory, you have to be God to create a baby universe in a laboratory. That's a direct proof of string

Starting point is 00:59:52 theory. Well, I think that misses the whole point. You see, science is not done directly. Most of science is done indirectly. How do we know that the sun is made out of hydrogen how do we know what's inside a dna molecule how do we know what's inside a proton i mean we've never been to the sun but how do we know these things because we look for echoes echoes from the sun called sunlight we look for echoes from life called dna so in other, we have indirect proof of these things. And in my book, The God Equation, I give five, five indirect proofs of string theory. The first indirect proof is, well, it happened just a month ago outside Chicago. At Fermi Laboratory outside Chicago, they found a crack,

Starting point is 01:00:48 the first crack in the standard model of particles. As I mentioned, the standard model is an ugly theory, but it works. At low energies, you cannot deny that the universe obeys the laws of the standard model, the quantum theory. But eventually it must fail because the theory is so ugly that only a mother could love it. It has 36 quarks and anti-quarks, three identical generations of particles, 20 free parameters that you can adjust any way you want. It's horrible, but it works. So we found the first crack, meaning that there's a fifth force out there beyond gravity, beyond the nuclear force, a fifth force out there which could

Starting point is 01:01:30 be the next octave of a vibrating string. String theory may give you the next theory beyond the standard model. Next, LISA is a satellite that the European Space Agency is funding, which will give us baby pictures, baby pictures of the infant universe. It's a gravity wave detector in outer space that will pick up gravity waves from the instant of creation, giving us baby pictures, baby pictures of the infant universe as it's coming out of the womb. And maybe, just maybe, we'll find evidence of an umbilical cord, an umbilical cord connecting our infant universe as it emerges from the womb to a parent universe in the multiverse of universes. That's well within the cards as the European Space Agency and NASA launched LISA into orbit in the coming years. Next, we have dark matter. What is the universe made of? Well,

Starting point is 01:02:35 atoms, right? Wrong. Most of the universe is not made of atoms. Most of the universe is made out of dark matter, and we're clueless, clueless to understand what is dark matter. Most of the universe is made out of dark matter and we're clueless, clueless to understand what is dark matter. It holds the galaxy together. It's invisible. That's why it's so hard to prove, but no one's been able to determine what it is. String theory predicts what dark matter is. It again is the next octave. The next octave of the vibrating string is dark matter, which makes up most of the invisible universe. Then next, the Japanese, the Chinese, and the Europeans are laying the groundwork for the next generation of atom smashers, much bigger than the one that I built when I was in high school. And we hope to find evidence of the fifth force by creating particles that are only

Starting point is 01:03:27 seen beyond the standard model. And then the fifth testable way to prove the theory is to look for deviations from Newton's laws of gravity. Newton's laws is based on the idea of the inverse square law. If you double the distance away from a star, gravity goes down by a factor of four. But why four? Why not eight? Why not 16? Because we live in a three-dimensional world. The world is three-dimensional. But string theory says, nope, the world is 11-dimensional. And we are a three-dimensional bubble, a three-dimensional bubble floating in a much larger 11-dimensional nirvana. So what is nirvana? Nirvana is 11-dimensional hyperspace. And what is our universe? A bubble, a three-dimensional bubble floating in nirvana which is expanding and that's called the Big Bang Theory.

Starting point is 01:04:21 Anyway, so we're looking for deviations from Newton's laws of gravity, which could then clinch the existence of these higher dimensions. So these are five experimental ways that we can test string theory. So let's say, flashing forward, that the God equation is, I don't know if the correct term would be solved for, but that we arrive at the answer. The quest for a theory of everything comes to an end. What are the possible applications? Because I'm sure that there are people listening just to step into their shoes who are saying,

Starting point is 01:04:55 this is incredibly fascinating. I could listen to this and explore this for many, many more hours, but I'm worried that in 20 or 30 or 50 years due to climate change, we will not have the luxury of pursuing these types of questions. What are some of the applications? What are the outcomes? Well, some of the greatest philosophical questions of all time, what happened before creation? Is time travel possible? Cannot be answered using the standard model. Einstein's equations break down at the instant of the Big Bang, at the center of a black hole. All the interesting questions, well, they break down at the point where string theory starts.

Starting point is 01:05:40 This is called the Planck energy, 10 to the 19 billion electron volts. That's the energy of the Big Bang. And Einstein's equations fail at that point. That's where string theory comes in. For example, what happened before the Big Bang? If string theory is correct and there's a multiverse, we now can say what happened before the Big Bang. The Big Bang was the collision or the splitting of universes.

Starting point is 01:06:08 And we hope to get pictures, pictures verifying this picture with LISA, a satellite to be launched into outer space with funding from the European Space Agency and from NASA. And so that's one application is to define what happened before creation. Is there really a multiverse? And what's on the other side of a black hole? Well, most theories say that a black hole is a dot, a dot of infinite density. Anything falling into this dot will die. But that's the old picture. We don't believe in that anymore because these black holes are all spinning, spinning rapidly. And a spinning black hole collapses to a ring, not a dot at all, but a ring. And if you fall through the ring, you wind up in Alice's looking glass. The ring is a wormhole.

Starting point is 01:07:00 But are wormholes stable? If you watch Star Trek, you realize that one of the problems with wormholes is that sometimes they collapse on you. So you're halfway through the wormhole and whoops, it collapses on you and cuts you in half. Well, the stability of wormholes can be calculated with string theory. String theory is the theory of everything, including wormholes, and we should be able to calculate the stability of these wormholes. And then time travel. Is time travel possible? Well, as I mentioned, Einstein's equations do allow for time travel, but how stable are they? That is, when you enter the time machine, will it blow up? Hawking thought so. Hawking redid the calculation, showed that time travel is possible in Einstein's

Starting point is 01:07:45 equations, but, and this is a huge but, as soon as you enter the time machine, it blows up. Well, it blows up because, again, of quantum corrections. But string theory allows you to calculate these quantum corrections, not speculate about them. He speculated that they are infinite, but maybe they're finite, in which case you can go backwards in time and visit yourself as a child. And then perhaps the greatest application of all is the fact that the universe is dying. Physics is the ultimate death warrant for our universe. Physics says, the law of thermodynamics says, the second law, says that in a closed system everything must eventually rust, decay, fall apart, and die.

Starting point is 01:08:36 In other words, trillions of years from now, the universe will consist of dead black holes, dead neutron stars, and the temperature will be near absolute zero and we'll all freeze to death. This is called the big freeze. And it seems that the laws of physics are a death warrant for the universe. But you see, there's a loophole here. In a closed system, the universe must die. But you see, maybe the universe is not a closed system. Maybe there are wormholes, which means that the universe is an open system. And the second law of thermodynamics does not apply for open systems. And so what do we do?

Starting point is 01:09:17 Trillions of years from now, we'll be so advanced that we'll be able to play with the Planck energy, create wormholes to order, and create a lifeboat, an interdimensional lifeboat that we can flee into and go to another younger, warmer universe and start all over again. In which case, we'll have yet another universe to mess up. We've already messed up this universe, so we'll have yet another universe to mess up. We'll have two universes to mess up. Complements of string theory. You've mentioned the phrase, you know, the next octave and terminology that seems to, in some way, echo of music. My understanding is that you used to play, maybe still play, the trumpet. Does music inform or act as a complement to

Starting point is 01:10:10 any of your thinking around physics or inside of physics? Well, I live in Manhattan, where playing the trumpet is impossible, because all of a sudden you have everyone within 50 feet of you complaining about your trumpet playing. And so I had to give up playing the trumpet, unfortunately. That's a sacrifice of living in Manhattan. But you see, there's a joke. The joke is that you put four mathematicians together, and what do you get? A string quartet.

Starting point is 01:10:41 Einstein played the violin. Many great physicists were also violinists because there's a certain order. Out of the chaos comes something beautiful. And to a physicist, what is beauty? Beauty to a physicist is symmetry. There's a symmetry in music. For example, the simplest symmetry is a rubber ball. You rotate the ball and it remains the same. Why is a kaleidoscope beautiful? A kaleidoscope is beautiful because you rotate it and it turns into itself. Why is an ice crystal beautiful? Because you rotate an ice crystal by 60 degrees and it rotates into itself. So that's what beauty is, that if I rearrange the

Starting point is 01:11:28 components of an object, it remains the same. Now you can apply that to music and you can apply that to physics. When you apply that to physics, it means that I have an equation, I rotate its components in a certain precise way and it rotates into itself. That's called symmetry. Now the ultimate symmetry would take the universe, just like the prongs of an ice crystal, rotate all the prongs so that the universe rotates into itself. That is string theory. String theory is the only theory that has a symmetry called supersymmetry, that if you rotate all the particles of a vibrating string, it rotates into itself just like a kaleidoscope, just like an ice crystal rotates into itself. That is beautiful. It's so beautiful in fact that if Einstein had never been born, I repeat,

Starting point is 01:12:22 if Einstein had never been born, we would have discovered gravity theory anyway as the lowest octave of the string. The lowest octave of string theory is relativity. This is amazing. I mean, think about it. If Einstein had never been born, we would have discovered general relativity anyway as nothing but the lowest set of music, musical notes on a vibrating string. But string theory, of course, goes farther. It goes beyond that to the next octave where we have new forces, new particles emerging, and we think that's where dark matter comes in, dark matter being this thing that holds the galaxy together. And I have a challenge for young people out there.

Starting point is 01:13:08 For you young people out there listening to this interview, if you ever discover the God equation and figure out the mystery of dark matter, then I'll give you a word of advice. What should you do? First of all, tell me first. Tell me first and we'll split the paper we'll split the nobel prize and we'll both be considered the next einstein i like it all right so everybody take note out there as you're working on this i would love to

Starting point is 01:13:39 ask you about your decision and maybe it was a set of decisions, or maybe it came about in some emergent way organically, to really be public-facing and to teach and explain science, physics, these concepts that might otherwise not enter the awareness of the general public. And I had read an interview with you where you mentioned a name, and I don't know how to pronounce this last name. Is it George Gamow? G-A-M-O-W? Gamow.

Starting point is 01:14:19 Gamow, who I suppose now it seems is recognized as one of the great cosmologists of the last hundred years. But could you speak to, if it's still the case, why you think he probably didn't win the Nobel Prize? Well, the Big Bang was a controversial theory for many years, especially back in the 30s and 40s. And people wanted proof. You know, show me the beef. What's the proof that there was this explosion out there? And then George Gamow and his students had this idea

Starting point is 01:14:50 that if there was a Big Bang, it was very hot and it exploded, but it cooled down. And we should be able to measure that temperature even today. It should be the temperature of outer space. The temperature of outer space should be the temperature of outer space. The temperature of outer space should be the embers, the afterglow of creation itself, which is a measurable quantity. Well, they did the calculation and they came out with the fact that the universe today should be about five degrees above

Starting point is 01:15:21 absolute zero, okay, which is awfully close to the real value, which is 2.7 degrees Kelvin. So you realize that they came awfully close to calculating the experimental proof of the Big Bang itself. Unfortunately, they did their work so early that it would take a few more decades before we could begin to measure the

Starting point is 01:15:45 temperature of outer space and show that the radiation of the Big Bang is still with us today. Believe it or not, if you get a transistor radio and you tune it between frequencies, you get the static. The static, we've all heard that static, right? A certain amount of that static comes from Jupiter. Jupiter actually gives you a lot of the static on radio and also the Big Bang itself. This is amazing. When you listen to the static on a radio, as predicted, about 2.7 degrees above absolute zero in Kelvin. And it was George Gamow who had this brilliant idea, which unfortunately he never won the Nobel Prize for. But it shows you with the power of the imagination. And George Gamow, by the way, was also a cartoonist, and he loved to write children's books. In fact, that's when a lot of kids first get interested in cosmology by reading the books of George Gamow,

Starting point is 01:16:51 and he illustrated them himself because he was an amateur cartoonist. That was the impetus for my asking the question because it seems like his colleagues judged him somewhat harshly, or some of them, for, or no, I shouldn't say they judged him harshly, but they believed that his writing of these children's books had an adverse effect on his scientific reputation. I suppose much like some felt Carl Sagan had sullied himself by being on television, and my understanding is he was denied admission to the National Academy of Sciences. So it seems like there's tremendous value and it's of great service to engage with the public, but at least there used to be certain risks as a scientist in doing so. Have those risks largely disappeared or how did you think about making that decision for yourself? Well, there are definite risks because I'm a research physicist. I'm not a

Starting point is 01:17:41 popularizer. That's not what I do for a living. What I do for a living is work on string theory. But there was a turning point. That turning point came in the 1990s when the physics community was backing the super collider. The super collider was this machine outside Dallas, Texas, costing billions of dollars. And in the last days of hearings one congressman asked the physicist quote will we find god with your machine if so i will vote for it well the poor guy didn't know what to say so he basically said we're gonna find the higgs boson well you could hear the jaws hit the floor of the united states congress billions of dollars for another goddamn subatomic particle. Well, the vote was taken and it was canceled.

Starting point is 01:18:32 And since then, we physicists have racked our brains saying to ourselves, what should we have said? The next time someone asks you, are we going to find God with your machine? If so, I will vote for it. Well, I would have said this. I would have said, God, by whatever signs or symbols you ascribe to the deity, this machine, the super collider, will take us as humanly possible to his greatest achievement, Genesis. This is a Genesis machine. It will recreate on a small scale the greatest event in the history of the universe, its birth. Unfortunately, we said Higgs boson,

Starting point is 01:19:18 and the machine was canceled. But the moral of the story is that unless you engage the public, they're not going to give you tax money to do your research. See, during the Cold War, we physicists had to say just one word to the United States Congress to get our next atom smasher. All we had to do was say, Russia. And then Congress would whip out the checkbook and say, how much? Well, those days are gone. We physicists have to sing for our supper now.

Starting point is 01:19:50 We can't just go to Congress and assume they're going to fund our next atom smasher. I mean, come on, give me a break. It's the European Union which built the Large Hadron Collider. And we were more or less bystanders as the Europeans took the lead in physics. So the Mecca, the Vatican of physics is now in Geneva, Switzerland, not in Dallas, Texas, because we didn't know how to answer that question. Will we find God with your machine? But there's another reason why I got interested in popularizing science.

Starting point is 01:20:25 When I was eight years old, as I mentioned, I was fascinated by this book that Einstein couldn't finish. So I went to the library because I knew there was going to be lots of stuff in that book. Things about the fourth dimension, about antimatter, about wormholes and higher dimensions. I went to the library and I found nothing. about antimatter, about wormholes and higher dimensions. I went to the library and I found nothing, absolutely nothing. Yeah, a few primaries about relativity, but nothing about the fourth dimension, nothing about space warps, nothing about hyperdrive, nothing.

Starting point is 01:21:02 And then I said to myself, when I grow up and I become a theoretical physicist, I want to write books for myself, for myself as an eight-year-old kid. I want to be able to explain the most advanced concepts to an eight-year-old child because that's how old I was when I got hooked on physics. And today, sure enough, 80-year-old kids email me, and they say that, yes, my books are the first introduction they've had, the things that normally they see in a science fiction movie. But of course, it's real science, not science fiction, that they hunger for. Because once you put down a science fiction book, you realize it's

Starting point is 01:21:44 entertainment. I mean, give me a break. book, you realize it's entertainment. I mean, give me a break. It's entertainment. It's not the universe at all. But when you learn physics, you learn that some of the things that you find in science fiction are, in fact, the cutting edge of physics. In fact, my favorite quote from Arthur C. Clarke is that any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic. That is a great quote. So I want to actually use another quote from a science fiction author to frame a question. And this quote, which is often used and abused in all sorts of ways, but it's from William Gibson, or more accurately, I think it is and abused in all sorts of ways, but it's from William Gibson, or more accurately, I think it is actually pulled from Neuromancer, but it may

Starting point is 01:22:28 be a William Gibson quote, which is along the lines of, the future is already here, it's just not evenly distributed. And just a few more questions left on my side. For the physics of the future, you interviewed 300 or so of the world's top scientists, many of them Nobel laureates, about their vision for the next 20 to 100 years in a whole variety of fields, computers, robotics, biotech, space travel, and so on. So here we are in 2021. Are there any examples in your mind that you're particularly excited about of samples of the future being here right now that are going to be more widespread or known,

Starting point is 01:23:07 say, 10 years, 20 years from now? Well, in that book, I anticipated, of course, Moore's Law, that computer power doubles every 18 months. And that's an exponential increase in computer power, not linear. See, our brain is linear. When we talk about the future, we talk linearly in terms of five years, 10 years, 20 years, as if it's a straight line. But if it's exponential, it could blow up. It could just blow up. And that's what's happening in my books. When I write about these things, many people say to me, oh, come on, give me a break. This is not going to happen. I mean, this is just science fiction. Well, bingo, a few years later, it happens. And then people come up to me and they say, how did you do that? How did you do that? And it's actually rather simple. I interview the

Starting point is 01:23:57 people who are working on these technologies. They're well aware of Moore's law. And as a consequence, their timeframe is much different from the average person's timeframe. Look at the genome project. When the genome project was first proposed, scientists could only sequence maybe one gene at a time. It was painful, one gene at a time. And the idea of sequencing 3 billion base pairs was just out of the question. In fact, I gave a talk in Frankfurt, Germany once, I'll still remember that, a scientist stood up and said, your predictions are all wrong. There's no way the human genome completely sequenced by 2020. Come on, it's not going to happen. And he just ranted and raved because he said, I sequenced these genes. I know how long

Starting point is 01:24:45 it takes to sequence one gene. But guess what? Even before 2020, we sequenced the entire genome, and now you can do it for a few hundred bucks. I mean, who would have thought? Because our brain is linear. It is not exponential. But what drives a lot of these technologies is computer power, which obeys Moore's law, which is exponential. If we look back, this is going to come back to science instead of science fiction. But right now, for fun, I am reading a bunch of Heinlein because I haven't done, I haven't read any Robert Heinlein in a long time. I'm reading Time Enough for Love. And Lazarus Long is one of the main characters, as he is in many of Heinlein's novels. And it's incredible for when this book was written, how prescient in some ways he was with respect to technology. But there are a couple of misses. They're still using pens and

Starting point is 01:25:39 paper for just about everything. So I think maybe 20, 30 years ago, people would have predicted flying cars. We don't have flying cars, but perhaps they wouldn't have seen the internet and drones and certainly some of the medical technologies and advances in neuroscience. Are there any particular predictions or trends that you would like to or could mention that you think are sort of paving the way for an exciting future in the next five to 10 or even 20 years, but not a thousand years? A lot of the breakthroughs are going to be happening with the human brain. The human brain was a black box for generations and generations. We didn't know what the hell was happening in the brain.

Starting point is 01:26:24 We knew it was important, but it was just magic the way the brain did things. Now, of course, we're picking apart the brain with MRI machines. We can actually extract images. If you think about a person's face, we can actually extract that image out of the living brain using MRI machines, which is incredible. In fact, memories. Memories can now be taken from the brain, the brain of mice, let's be fair about it, but now the brain of monkeys, we can actually take memories, simple memories, and put them on the internet so that other monkeys can enjoy these memories. Next will be Alzheimer's patients. Alzheimer's patients will have a memory chip so that when you push a button, then memories

Starting point is 01:27:06 come flooding into their mind, reminding them of who they are, where they live, so they don't wander the streets endlessly, unaware of who they are and where they're going. And so that is going to be this huge process by which we create BrainNet. BrainNet is the future of the internet. The internet is digital, but why does it have to be digital? It's so clumsy. Why can't it be neural? Because that's how the brain works. And so we're going to have BrainNet where memories, emotions, feelings are sent on the internet. And think about that. What is television? What are the movies? It's nothing but a two-dimensional flat screen with sound. That's it. How primitive. In the future,

Starting point is 01:27:52 we'll have the internet of emotions and feelings so that we'll send feelings on the internet. And who wants to see a movie anymore where you can't feel what the actors and actresses are feeling. And so think of teenagers. Teenagers will love it because they put a happy face at the end of every sentence. In the future, they just put the memory, the sensation at the end of every sentence. So this will change the way humans interact with each other. And it also means that we'll be able to feel the suffering of other people. When you means that we'll be able to feel the suffering of other people. When you read that certain people are suffering, we say to ourselves, oh, come on, give me a break. Yeah, yeah, yeah, sure, sure. But if you could really feel what

Starting point is 01:28:35 they're feeling, you could begin to realize that some people's sufferings are genuine, not fake at all. So we'll be able to put ourselves in other people's shoes. So in the same way that the invention of the telephone opened up human interactions on a new scale, the internet, of course, made it numerically possible to communicate around the world. But now we'll be able to dream about feelings and emotions. And this will replace the movies. It'll replace television. It will be the way humans communicate with each other in the future, not digitally, but with neurons. What a future it will be. Dr. Kaki, you've been so generous with your time. Your latest bestseller, and you have many bestsellers, Your latest is The God Equation. The subtitle is The Quest for a Theory of Everything. Is that where you would suggest people start? You have certainly

Starting point is 01:29:30 a spectrum of books that you've published. You do a lot of work in many different areas and many different types of media. Would you suggest people start with The God Equation? Is there another book of yours you'd pair with it? Well, it depends on which way you want to go. The God equation would be a very good introduction to what I do for a living, and that is the theory of everything, which is the crowning achievement, once we get it, of 2,000 years of science. But if you're interested in science fiction, you can get a copy of my book, Physics of the Impossible, where I break down time travel, ray guns, flying cars, everything you see on the silver screen, I break down in Physics of the Impossible. But if you are interested in the quantum applications of all this, get a copy of my book, Parallel Worlds, where I talk

Starting point is 01:30:19 about what the quantum means and how it already is changing the way we view the universe. Einstein and Newton were wrong about this. The universe really is probabilistic, which means that electrons can be two places at the same time, which means that maybe people can also be two places at the same time. So that's my book, Parallel Worlds. But just go to the internet. My internet website is mkaku.org, Mk-a-k-u.org and on facebook i have about four and a half million fans on facebook wonderful we will link to all of those certainly

Starting point is 01:30:56 people can find you at mkaku.org on facebook instagram twitter they can find you michio kaku easy to find and we'll link to all of those at tim.blog forward slash podcast in the show notes for everyone is there anything else before we wrap up that you would like to say to my audience any closing comments any requests that you would like to make of listeners or anything at all uh no I think pretty much we've covered everything by the way my favorite Einstein quote is that if a theory cannot be explained to a child, then the theory is probably worthless. Meaning that all great theories are based on simple principles, which are pictorial.

Starting point is 01:31:37 Principles that even a child can visualize. Newton's laws can be summarized by billiard balls bumping into each other. Einstein used clocks and meter sticks to illustrate his principles. General relativity can be explained in terms of bedsheets. And so we realize that if a child can understand it, it's because it is explained pictorially and because it's based on principles rather than memorization of details, which you're going to forget anyway. That is a great place to wrap up and a great place to end.

Starting point is 01:32:09 And I think you do an excellent job of not just popularizing science, but taking complex subjects and reducing them to principles and painting pictures in a way that enable people to understand. So I thank you for your work. And I also thank you for the time. This has been incredible fun. So thank you very much. Yep. And my other motto is, if it ain't fun, don't do it. That's a great pairing. That is an exceptional pairing. Thank you so much, Dr. Kaka. I really

Starting point is 01:32:40 appreciate your time today. Okay. My pleasure. Hey guys, this is Tim again. Just one more thing before you take off, and that is Five I really appreciate your time today. Okay, my pleasure. Bullet Friday. Easy to sign up, easy to cancel. It is basically a half page that I send out every Friday to share the coolest things I've found or discovered or have started exploring over that week. It's kind of like my diary of cool things. It often includes articles I'm reading, books I'm reading, albums perhaps, gadgets, gizmos, all sorts of tech tricks and so on that get sent to me by my friends, including a lot of podcast guests. And these strange, esoteric things end up in my field, and then I test them, and then

Starting point is 01:33:31 I share them with you. So if that sounds fun, again, it's very short, a little tiny bite of goodness before you head off for the weekend, something to think about. If you'd like to try it out, just go to tim.blog slash Friday. Type that into your browser, tim.blog slash Friday. Drop in your email and you'll get the very next one. Thanks for listening. This episode is brought to you by Athletic Greens. I get asked all the time what I would take if I could only take one supplement. I've been asked this for years. The answer is invariably AG1 by Athletic Greens. I view it as all-in-one nutritional insurance,

Starting point is 01:34:06 so you can cover your bases. If you're traveling, if you're just busy, you're not sure if your meals are where they should be, it covers your bases. I've recommended it since the 4-Hour Body, which was God, eons ago, 2010, and I did not get paid to do so. With approximately 75 vitamins, minerals, and whole food source ingredients, you'll be hard-pressed to find a more nutrient-dense formula on the market. It has a multivitamin, multimineral greens complex, probiotics and prebiotics for gut health, an immunity formula, digestive enzymes, and adaptogens. You get the idea. It is very, very comprehensive. And I do my best, of course, to focus on nutrient-dense

Starting point is 01:34:46 proper meals. But sometimes you're busy. Sometimes you're traveling. Sometimes you just want to make sure that you're getting what you need. AG1 makes it easy to get a lot of nutrition when whole foods aren't readily available. It's also NSF certified for sport, making it safe for competitive athletes as what's on the label is in the powder. It's the ultimate all-in-one nutritional supplement bundle in one easy scoop. Right now, Athletic Greens is giving my audience a special offer on top of their all-in-one formula, which is a free vitamin D supplement and five free travel packs with your first subscription purchase. Many of us are deficient in vitamin D.

Starting point is 01:35:25 I found that true for myself, which is usually produced in our bodies from sun exposure. So adding a vitamin D supplement to your daily routine is a great option for additional immune support. Support your immunity, gut health, and energy by visiting athleticgreens.com slash Tim. You'll receive up to a year's supply of vitamin D and five free travel

Starting point is 01:35:45 packs with your subscription. Again, that's athleticgreens.com slash Tim. This episode is brought to you by 99designs, the go-to graphic design platform from Vista that makes it easy for you to find and work with amazing designers online. I have used them for a long, long time. We'll come back to that. Long-time listeners of this podcast know just how much attention I pay to details, a lot of details, and how obsessively I approach all elements of my work. Because often the small things end up being the big things, whether it's your logo, your business cards, even your email templates. Think of my newsletters. All these visual elements tell your customers who you are and what you're about. So it's worth sweating the details.

Starting point is 01:36:26 I've been using 99designs for years now to ensure that many of my creative projects, whether big or small, are as cohesive, professional, and beautiful as possible. Most recently, you may have noticed, I've been working with a designer at 99designs to create distinct illustrations for my podcast episodes. You see them on Instagram and other places. I've developed a great relationship with the designer, and I intend to continue working with her for a long, long time. From logos to websites to packaging and books. I've also used 99designs for book designs and all sorts of illustrations. 99designs is the go-to creative resource to build your brand

Starting point is 01:37:00 on any budget. Right now, my listeners can get $20 off plus a free $99 upgrade on their first design contest. A contest is a great way to get started and find the right designer for long-term work. You can also book a free design consultation with a brand expert at 99designs.com slash Tim to receive personalized branding advice over the phone. Their hands-on team has helped thousands of business owners. It's a great way to get the most out of your experience with 99designs by Vista.

Starting point is 01:37:27 Head to 99designs.com slash Tim. That's 99designs.com slash Tim for your discount and to sign up for a design consultation today.

Pet Camera - EBO Air 2

The Tim Ferriss Show - #562: Dr. Michio Kaku — Exploring Time Travel, the Beauty of Physics, Parallel Universes, the Mind of God, String Theory, Lessons from Einstein, and More

There aren't comments yet for this episode. Click on any sentence in the transcript to leave a comment.

Your Ad Here

Pet Camera - EBO Air 2

The Tim Ferriss Show - #562: Dr. Michio Kaku — Exploring Time Travel, the Beauty of Physics, Parallel Universes, the Mind of God, String Theory, Lessons from Einstein, and More

There aren't comments yet for this episode. Click on any sentence in the transcript to leave a comment.