The Tim Ferriss Show - #633: Chris Palmer, MD, of Harvard Medical School — Optimizing Brain Energy for Mental Health, The Incredible Potential of Metabolic Psychiatry, Extraordinary Case Studies, and Harnessing Mitochondria for Anxiety, Depression, OCD, PTSD, and More
Episode Date: November 10, 2022Brought to you by Levels real-time feedback on how diet impacts your health, Athletic Greens all-in-one nutritional supplement, and LinkedIn Marketing Solutions marketing ...platform with 800M+ users.Dr. Christopher M. Palmer (@chrispalmermd) is a Harvard psychiatrist and researcher working at the interface of metabolism and mental health.Dr. Palmer is the director of the Department of Postgraduate and Continuing Education at McLean Hospital and an assistant professor of psychiatry at Harvard Medical School. For over 25 years, he has held administrative, educational, research, and clinical roles in psychiatry at Harvard. He has been pioneering the use of the medical ketogenic diet in the treatment of psychiatric disorders—conducting research in this area, treating patients, writing, and speaking around the world on this topic.He has developed the first comprehensive theory of what causes mental illness, integrating existing theories and research into one unifying theory—the brain energy theory of mental illness. You can learn more in his new book Brain Energy: A Revolutionary Breakthrough in Understanding Mental Health—and Improving Treatment for Anxiety, Depression, OCD, PTSD, and More.Please enjoy!*This episode is brought to you by Athletic Greens. I get asked all the time, “If you could use only one supplement, what would it be?” My answer is usually AG1 by Athletic Greens, my all-in-one nutritional insurance. I recommended it in The 4-Hour Body in 2010 and did not get paid to do so. I do my best with nutrient-dense meals, of course, but AG further covers my bases with vitamins, minerals, and whole-food-sourced micronutrients that support gut health and the immune system. Right now, Athletic Greens is offering you their Vitamin D Liquid Formula free with your first subscription purchase—a vital nutrient for a strong immune system and strong bones. Visit AthleticGreens.com/Tim to claim this special offer today and receive the free Vitamin D Liquid Formula (and five free travel packs) with your first subscription purchase! That’s up to a one-year supply of Vitamin D as added value when you try their delicious and comprehensive all-in-one daily greens product.*This episode is also brought to you by LinkedIn Marketing Solutions, the go-to tool for B2B marketers and advertisers who want to drive brand awareness, generate leads, or build long-term relationships that result in real business impact.With a community of more than 800 million professionals, LinkedIn is gigantic, but it can be hyper-specific. You have access to a diverse group of people all searching for things they need to grow professionally. LinkedIn has the marketing tools to help you target your customers with precision, right down to job title, company name, industry, etc. To redeem your free $100 LinkedIn ad credit and launch your first campaign, go to LinkedIn.com/TFS!*This episode is also brought to you by Levels! I wrote about the health benefits of using continuous glucose monitors (CGMs) more than ten years ago in The 4-Hour Body. At the time, CGMs were primitive and hard to use. Levels has now made this technology, and the unique insights that come from it, easy and available to everyone. Levels is making glucose monitoring simple, helping you see how food affects your health through real-time feedback. I started tracking my glucose years ago to learn more about what I should and shouldn’t be eating (including quantities, time of day, etc.), based on objective data from my own, unique physiology. Keeping my blood sugar stable is critical to my daily and long-term health and performance goals. Furthermore, poor glucose control is associated with a number of chronic conditions like diabetes, Alzheimer’s disease, heart disease, and obesity. It’s important.If you’re interested in learning more about Levels and trying a CGM yourself, go to Levels.link/Tim.*[07:14] How a woman overcame her 53-year streak of chronic paranoid schizophrenia.[11:16] The backstory of Brain Energy‘s dedication.[16:31] Chris’ thoughts on DSM-5 diagnostic categories.[21:51] Chris’ first exposure to the ketogenic diet.[28:35] Metabolic psychiatry.[30:33] How ketosis affects the human body (e.g., sleep, mood, weight).[39:35] Examining the mood elevation of ketosis on a bio-cellular level.[44:24] When ketosis can be dangerous.[46:44] How mitochondrial dysfunction can trigger a host of ailments.[58:07] Dietary methods for sustaining ketosis over the long term.[1:04:54] Common ketosis mistakes.[1:07:53] Psychiatric medications, metabolism, and controversy.[1:15:29] Indications that a medication impairs more than improves a patient’s condition.[1:18:06] Resources to share with doctors open to conversation about these issues.[1:20:41] Why quitting psychiatric medication cold turkey is a bad idea.[1:23:20] Thoughts on the efficacy of exogenous ketones.[1:30:32] Ketogenic diet as treatment for schizophrenia.[1:38:34] Why you need to take radical ownership of your own health advocacy.[1:40:33] Physical exercise for optimizing mitochondrial health.[1:44:59] A cautionary note for people using medication for off-label results.[1:48:49] Parting thoughts.*For show notes and past guests on The Tim Ferriss Show, please visit tim.blog/podcast.For deals from sponsors of The Tim Ferriss Show, please visit tim.blog/podcast-sponsorsSign up for Tim’s email newsletter (5-Bullet Friday) at tim.blog/friday.For transcripts of episodes, go to tim.blog/transcripts.Discover Tim’s books: tim.blog/books.Follow Tim:Twitter: twitter.com/tferriss Instagram: instagram.com/timferrissYouTube: youtube.com/timferrissFacebook: facebook.com/timferriss LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/timferrissPast guests on The Tim Ferriss Show include Jerry Seinfeld, Hugh Jackman, Dr. Jane Goodall, LeBron James, Kevin Hart, Doris Kearns Goodwin, Jamie Foxx, Matthew McConaughey, Esther Perel, Elizabeth Gilbert, Terry Crews, Sia, Yuval Noah Harari, Malcolm Gladwell, Madeleine Albright, Cheryl Strayed, Jim Collins, Mary Karr, Maria Popova, Sam Harris, Michael Phelps, Bob Iger, Edward Norton, Arnold Schwarzenegger, Neil Strauss, Ken Burns, Maria Sharapova, Marc Andreessen, Neil Gaiman, Neil de Grasse Tyson, Jocko Willink, Daniel Ek, Kelly Slater, Dr. Peter Attia, Seth Godin, Howard Marks, Dr. Brené Brown, Eric Schmidt, Michael Lewis, Joe Gebbia, Michael Pollan, Dr. Jordan Peterson, Vince Vaughn, Brian Koppelman, Ramit Sethi, Dax Shepard, Tony Robbins, Jim Dethmer, Dan Harris, Ray Dalio, Naval Ravikant, Vitalik Buterin, Elizabeth Lesser, Amanda Palmer, Katie Haun, Sir Richard Branson, Chuck Palahniuk, Arianna Huffington, Reid Hoffman, Bill Burr, Whitney Cummings, Rick Rubin, Dr. Vivek Murthy, Darren Aronofsky, Margaret Atwood, Mark Zuckerberg, Peter Thiel, Dr. Gabor Maté, Anne Lamott, Sarah Silverman, Dr. Andrew Huberman, and many more.See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
Transcript
Discussion (0)
This episode is brought to you by Levels.
Very excited about this one.
I wrote about the health benefits
of using continuous glucose monitors, CGMs,
more than 10 years ago in the four-hour body.
And at that time, CGMs were horribly primitive
and hard to use, super painful.
Levels has now made this technology
and the insights that come from it
easy and available to everyone.
Putting in the sensors, everything about it
is smooth, easy. I found it completely painless. And I started tracking my glucose way back in
the day to learn more about what I should and shouldn't be eating. Keeping my blood sugar
stable is critical to my daily and long-term health and performance goals. With levels,
you can see how different foods affect your health with real-time feedback. Poor glucose control, which you don't want, is associated with a number of chronic conditions,
not just diabetes, but also Alzheimer's and heart disease. It can impact your mood,
certainly affects my mood. Energy levels, right? That work in the afternoon, that dip that you
feel, for instance, that's just one example. And weight management. And we all respond differently,
sometimes a little bit, sometimes vastly differently, even to the same foods. So one type of carbohydrate that my body
might process well, let's say that's fruit or rice or sweet potato, your body might not. The
Levels app interprets your glucose data and provides a simple score after you eat a meal.
So you can see how different foods affect you and then develop a personalized diet that's right for you and your goals.
Seeing this data in real time, at least for me and for so many others who use Levels, is a really powerful behavioral change mechanism.
And many of the guests on the podcast have talked about this.
Marco Canora, a famous chef, used Levels to determine that, say, walking for him, just a few hundred steps after a meal
significantly affected his glucose levels.
Levels is backed by a world-class team
and group of advisors,
including names you've likely heard before,
including repeat podcast guest,
Dr. Dom D'Agostino and many others.
If you're interested in learning more about levels
and trying a CGM yourself,
learn all about it,
go to levels.link slash Tim. learning more about levels, and trying a CGM yourself. Learn all about it. Go to
levels.link slash Tim. That's levels.link slash Tim. I'll spell it out. L-E-V-E-L-S dot L-I-N-K
slash Tim. Check them out today. I highly encourage you to consider getting this data
on your own personal responses to the food that you eat, the food that maybe you
shouldn't eat, the food that you might want to eat more of, all of these things you can learn.
And that is at levels.link slash Tim. You can also find the link in this episode's description.
This episode is brought to you by Athletic Greens. I get asked all the time what I would
take if I could only take one supplement. I've been asked this for years. The answer is invariably
AG1 by Athletic Greens. I view it as all-in-one nutritional insurance, so you can cover your
bases. If you're traveling, if you're just busy, if you're not sure if your meals are where they
should be, it covers your bases. I've recommended it since the 4-Hour Body, which was gone eons ago, 2010, and I did not
get paid to do so.
With approximately 75 vitamins, minerals, and whole food sourced ingredients, you'll
be hard-pressed to find a more nutrient-dense formula on the market.
It has a multivitamin, multimineral greens complex, probiotics and prebiotics for gut
health, an immunity formula, digestive enzymes, and adaptogens. You get the idea. It is very,
very comprehensive. And I do my best, of course, to focus on nutrient dense proper meals, but
sometimes you're busy. Sometimes you're traveling. Sometimes you just want to make sure
that you're getting what you need. AG1 makes it easy to get a lot of nutrition when whole foods aren't readily available.
It's also NSF certified for sport, making it safe for competitive athletes as what's
on the label is in the powder.
It's the ultimate all-in-one nutritional supplement bundle in one easy scoop.
Right now, Athletic Greens is giving my audience a special offer on top of their all-in-one formula, which is a free vitamin D supplement and five free travel packs with your
first subscription purchase. Many of us are deficient in vitamin D. I found that true for
myself, which is usually produced in our bodies from sun exposure. So adding a vitamin D supplement
to your daily routine is a great option for additional immune support. Support your immunity, gut health, and energy by visiting athleticgreens.com slash Tim. You'll
receive up to a year's supply of vitamin D and five free travel packs with your subscription.
Again, that's athleticgreens.com slash Tim. At this altitude, I can run flat out for a half mile before my hands start shaking.
Can I ask you a personal question?
Now would have seemed an appropriate time.
What if I did the opposite?
I'm a cybernetic organism living tissue over metal endoskeleton.
The Tim Ferriss Show.
Hello boys and girls, ladies and germs. This is Tim Ferriss. Welcome to another episode of
The Tim Ferriss Show. This is your host, Tim Ferriss, obviously. And my guest today,
I'm very excited to have this guest with us today, Dr. Christopher M. Palmer. Dr. Christopher Palmer
is a Harvard psychiatrist and researcher working at the Interface of Metabolism and Mental Health.
And he probably doesn't know this, but I have wanted to have him on for probably six to 12 months and have been looking for the
right window and the right context. We'll come back to that. Dr. Palmer is the director of the
Department of Postgraduate and Continuing Education at McLean Hospital and an assistant professor of
psychiatry at Harvard Medical School. For 25 years, he has held administrative educational
research and clinical roles in psychiatry at Harvard. He has been pioneering the use of the medical ketogenic
diet in the treatment of psychiatric disorders, conducting research in this area, treating
patients, writing, and speaking around the world on this topic. He has developed the
first comprehensive theory of what causes mental illness, integrating existing theories
and research into one unifying theory, the brain energy theory of mental illness. You can learn
more, a lot more, and read many fascinating case studies in his new book, Brain Energy,
subtitled A Revolutionary Breakthrough in Understanding Mental Health and Improving
Treatment for Anxiety, Depression, OCD, PTSD, and more. You can find him on Twitter and Instagram
at ChrisPalmerMD, and you can find all things Chris Palmer at chrispalmermd.com. Chris,
welcome to the show. It's so nice to see you. It's great to be here, Tim. Thanks.
And I need to give credit where credit is due to Dr. Dominic D'Agostino, who first
put your work on my radar. And within several minutes of watching a closed session video within which you spoke on stage with one
of your patients, I knew this podcast had to happen. And that's in part because I think we
will find a very curious overlap, a Venn diagram of your clinical work and exploration and research and some of my own
personal experiences. So in a sense, this is a very selfish endeavor for me because I am so eager
to learn more about your work. And why don't we begin right in the action with a case study.
Could you please tell the story, and I do not know the full story at all. I really just
have a prompt in front of me. And that is the story of a 70-year-old woman who had chronic
paranoid schizophrenia for 53 years. Why don't we start there, if you wouldn't mind?
I'm going to actually use her real name because she gave me permission to use her real name. In
the book, I call her Mildred, but her real name is Doris. And Doris had a horrible
childhood. She had a lot of PTSD, depression, other things. By the time she turned 17,
she was diagnosed with schizophrenia. She had daily hallucinations and delusions.
Over the ensuing decades, she tried numerous antipsychotics, mood stabilizers, antidepressants, and other medicines.
None of them worked to stop her symptoms.
She slowly but surely gained massive amounts of weight.
And by the time she was 68, she was miserable, hated herself, hated her life.
From the ages of 68 to 70, she tried to kill
herself at least six times and was hospitalized for those suicide attempts. And at the age of 70,
she was referred to a weight loss clinic at Duke University, where they were using
the ketogenic diet as a weight loss method. And she decided to give it a try for whatever reason.
And within two weeks, not only did she begin losing weight,
but she spontaneously reported that her long-standing auditory hallucinations were going away.
Within months, all of her symptoms of schizophrenia were in full and complete remission.
Within six months, she was off all psychiatric medications and remained in full and complete
remission.
Doris went on to live for another 15 years.
She lost 150 pounds, so the weight loss thing was secured, but much more important,
she remained symptom-free from symptoms of schizophrenia, she remained off psychiatric
medications, she remained out of psychiatric hospitals, she never tried to kill herself again.
And when I last spoke with her, she actually said she was happy to be alive.
She attributed her recovery primarily to God, that she really felt that it was a miracle from God.
And she asked me to tell her story far and wide to anyone who would listen,
in the hopes that it might help even one other human being spare the suffering she endured for
decades. Sadly, Doris passed away this past January of COVID pneumonia.
That's an incredible story. I mean, it's an incredible story on a whole lot of levels. And
lest people say, that's an N of one, I find it fascinating, but the plural of anecdote does not equal data.
There are not only many other case studies, and I'm familiar with some of your clinical case
studies, but there seems to be an increasingly high volume of literature, studies, and other evidence to support some of the mechanisms that you're
exploring with your patients. And before we get to exploring some of the mechanisms, which I have
quite a few questions about because I'm so personally interested, and for those who don't know, I have had lifelong challenges related to hereditary
depression and other psychiatric, I hesitate to call them disorders, but that's probably,
I mean, the most awkward but appropriate label at the moment. Let's dive into some of your
personal history. And I think perhaps an easy way to do that is to look at the dedication,
start with the dedication of your new book, Brain Energy, and this dedication is to your mother.
And it reads, my futile attempts to save you from the ravages of mental illness lit a fire
in me that burns to this day. I'm sorry I didn't figure this out in time to help you.
May you rest in peace. If you're open to it, would you mind sharing
the backstory on that dedication? I haven't really done this publicly yet.
So my mom actually is a woman who had two lives. The first part of her life up until about age 42 was that she wanted a simple, middle-class family life.
She and my father wanted a big family.
They were Catholic.
They wanted four kids.
They ended up with eight kids.
You know, it's a Catholic thing.
And that's all she wanted.
My father was a pharmacist.
He started his own pharmacy, and he needed help.
So she helped him.
She and he both worked 12-hour days, six days a week to get that pharmacy started. She would
always take the youngest kid with her to work. She was often breastfeeding one of them,
but that was the life she wanted. When she was 42, some horrible stuff happened in her family of origin with her siblings and everyone,
all beyond her control. She had nothing to do with any of it, but it put enormous stress and
burden on her. She had what she called a nervous breakdown. That's how it started. And I think it
started with what we would call depression. It quickly led to depression with suicidal ideation. And then shortly thereafter,
it led to psychotic symptoms. She began to think that she was Mary Magdalene reincarnated.
She thought the world was ending. She thought this priest that she had gone to for counseling was Jesus Christ reincarnated. And it was the second coming of Christ, and she was somehow
involved. She would get paranoid, and she became convinced that my father was actually the actual
devil incarnate. And that led to them getting divorced. And the divorce courts were not kind to her at all. She lost everything.
She lost all of her savings. She got none of it. She didn't get any partial ownership of the
business she had worked her ass off to help start. And she lost custody of all eight kids. I was, I think, about 13 when that happened.
And I knew she was going to die. And so I went to live with her. And it was not a good scene.
It was not good at all. We were actually homeless for a while. So my first day of high school was from a homeless shelter.
And I could go on and on, but the fast forward of her story is that she lived the rest of her
life with a psychotic disorder. She never got better. Her life was decimated. She was able to take care of herself, which was great. She worked
various part-time jobs and bought a small home and paid for it with her own money.
And she inherited a chunk of money from my grandfather, like $100,000, but she was extraordinarily frugal. So that was enough
for her to live on for pretty much the rest of her life. She had obesity and diabetes and
eventually a massive heart attack and died of heart failure.
Thank you for being willing to share that.
Sure.
And it's hard to say anything, of course. And i hesitate to even follow that with anything but
number one i'm grateful that you shared it because i think it informs who you are and
informs the work that you do in the world and has helped to forge this drive and passion and dedication that you have with your clients.
And I have to imagine with the many case studies and the many more certainly that have not been
discussed publicly for a million different reasons that you have helped save a lot of people from life sentences to psychotic disorders. And my hope with this
conversation, it's not even really a hope. It is a hope, but it's almost a certainty that people
will be listening who are either directly affected personally or directly affected with family
members or somehow indirectly affected by what we would consider
psychiatric disorders or psychotic disorders. It is incredibly, incredibly prevalent.
And this might be a clumsy segue, but I do think it could be a helpful one,
especially for those who feel lost in a world of infinite information and conflicting advice. Let's begin with definitions. So could you
explain your position on, well, first defining what the DSM-5 diagnostic categories are,
what this is as a tool, and then your current evaluation or perspective on DSM-5 diagnostic categories.
You know, DSM-5 is kind of the Bible of psychiatry, and it's what all mental health
professionals have to use to make a diagnosis.
If you want to treat patients and get reimbursed by insurance, you have to assign a diagnostic
label.
If no label is assigned,
you don't get paid. If pharmaceutical companies want to develop pills for psychiatric disorders,
they have to abide by these labels and study pills for specific labels.
And the assumption is that these labels are all discrete, separate illnesses. And they define a set of symptoms,
but more importantly, they define a prognosis and a life trajectory sometimes. They also define
treatments that can work and treatment approaches and how long people might need treatment.
And in many of those ways, the diagnostic labels are
actually useful. And I'm not here to challenge any of that. I think understanding what symptoms
people are having and understanding what treatments might be helpful to reduce those
symptoms is actually really invaluable. And that's great. But the reality is that every diagnostic label in DSM is a syndrome. And what that means is that
it's just a constellation of signs and symptoms that we put together, and no one knows what causes
any of them. And the real answer is that when researchers have looked at all of the diagnostic categories,
it turns out that there are two major problems with DSM.
And the two major problems with DSM are heterogeneity and comorbidity.
And what that means is, so heterogeneity means that if you see two people with OCD
or with autism spectrum disorder, they can have extraordinarily different symptoms and look
and function very differently from each other. And it can seem like there's no way they have the same
brain disorder or brain illness or whatever we want to call it. So that's heterogeneity.
The comorbidity part is even more confusing because it turns out if you have one psychiatric
disorder and you're getting mental health treatment, there is an overwhelming probability that you have more than one.
And you can mix and match them however you'd like.
This is really important because it implies that maybe our diagnostic labels, number one,
are not valid constructs.
And number two, maybe our diagnostic labels are not as distinct
as we think they are. You know, if I look at people with eating disorders, and they're all
more likely to have depression and OCD. But I look at people with schizophrenia, and they're
all more likely to have depression and OCD. And I look at people with personality disorders,
and they're more likely to have depression and OCD,
the boundaries between these diagnostic labels really start to fall apart, and you kind of start
to wonder what's going on. Much more importantly, when we look at the root causes, the root causes
that we do know about for mental disorders, it turns out there is no single root cause for any singular psychiatric diagnosis.
And this goes all the way down to the level of genetics. Specific genes even do not confer risk.
There is no one gene that confers risk for only one disorder like schizophrenia or bipolar or
autism. One gene confers risk for numerous different disorders.
So there might be one gene that confers risk for schizophrenia and bipolar and autism and epilepsy
and other diagnoses. And so even if you look at a single root cause, like something so concrete as a gene. They're not distinct entities.
And the reality is that the National Institute of Health
abandoned the DSM-5 diagnoses about a decade ago,
recognizing these aren't valid constructs,
and we're not really getting anywhere assuming they are.
Man, but it's a bitch to get insurance reimbursement
if you don't have the right codes to work with, I guess.
Absolutely, absolutely.
So you got to play the game, I suppose.
You know, when you're talking about the no one gene conferring
singularly increased risk for one isolated psychiatric disorder,
I was thinking, wow, I got to buy one, get one free
with my card that I pulled from the deck. Buy one, get four free. Oh, what luck.
Absolutely.
So, this begs all sorts of questions, including what are, if any, the plausible underlying
mechanisms that could explain these constellations of comorbidities.
And perhaps we could start with the ketogenic diet and just how it landed on your radar. And
I understand the scope of your research and work is far beyond the ketogenic diet, but I think it may be a useful wedge for working into
some valuable terrain. How did that first end up on your radar? Was it because of patients like
Doris, if I'm remembering her name correctly, who were by not necessarily happenstance,
but outside of your care were sent to weight loss clinics
using the ketogenic diet, and you observed these ancillary but very powerful benefits.
And how did your familiarity develop from there?
So my familiarity actually began with my own story.
So I told you a little bit about my mom and, you know, when I went to live with her.
Even before that happened, I had my own challenges with mental illness. And after I went through that
hell with her and homelessness and everything else, it only spiraled down. And by the time that I was in my 20s,
I actually had gotten to a good place. I was not clinically depressed anymore. I wasn't impaired.
I was actually getting through medical school. I had finished medical school, actually won an
award for being one of the top students. And I was doing my psychiatry residency at Harvard.
And so, you know, anybody looking from the outside would say this guy's doing well enough.
He clearly is not impaired by a mental disorder. But I had metabolic syndrome. So,
blood pressure was up, cholesterol and lipid levels were awful. I had prediabetes. And year after year,
my doctor kept telling me diet and exercise. I was doing a super low fat diet. I was exercising
regularly. It was not doing anything. It was the all the numbers were just getting worse.
And he finally kept pushing meds and was like, you're gonna have to go on meds. And I'm like,
damn, dude, I'm like in my 20s. You're putting me on
meds already. And that means I'm gonna have a heart attack by the time I turn 45. Like that is not
okay. And I am not going to accept this as my final answer. And so I'd heard through the grapevine
about low carb diets. At that point, it was the Atkins diet. And I had heard that it was helping
some people reverse their diabetes or improve their cholesterol levels and other things. low-carb diets. At that point, it was the Atkins diet. And I had heard that it was helping some
people reverse their diabetes or improve their cholesterol levels and other things.
It went against everything I'd been taught, but I decided to give it a shot,
really just kind of as my Hail Mary pass. And within three months, my metabolic syndrome was
completely gone. Everything was better. But the thing that I noticed
was I had dramatic improvement in mood, energy, sleep, confidence.
I became a different person, a person I had never been in my entire life, even during good times. I had never felt that good. So I, of course, I'm, you know,
recommending this to friends and family who want to lose weight or shed a few pounds, and some of
them are reporting equal results. So within a couple years, I start using it in patients with
treatment-resistant depression, and lo and behold, it worked for at least some of them. It didn't
work for everyone, but it worked for some of them. It didn't work for everyone,
but it worked for some of them. I think the pivotal moment that really changed everything for me was actually in 2016, when I had a longstanding patient, schizoaffective disorder, which is
crossed between schizophrenia and bipolar. And he asked for my help to lose weight. He had tried 17 different medications.
None of them worked. He was tormented by his illness in similar ways to Doris. I start this
diet. Within two weeks, he's losing weight. And I start to notice this antidepressant effect in him.
I'm like, well, that's interesting. Within six to eight weeks, he too spontaneously
started. It didn't happen right away for him. It took six to eight weeks, but he spontaneously
reports hallucinations, delusions are going away. That man went on to lose 160 pounds.
He has kept it off to this day and has had a new life, has had the ability to do things he had not been able to do.
So, to kind of get back to your question, those were the serendipitous things that just happened
in my life that I didn't set out on a path to prove the ketogenic diet is a thoughtful
intervention, right? Like it was...
It snuck in the side door.
It totally, it actually snuck in the side door and smacked me in the face. I was like,
what the hell is going on here? Like this is impossible. And, you know, for people who know
the keto diet is like a fad weight loss diet or whatever, It is a 100-year-old evidence-based treatment for epilepsy.
And that was a really important clue to me
because we use epilepsy treatments in psychiatry all the time.
Medications like Depakote, Tegretol, Lamictal,
Topamax, Valium, Klonopin, Xanax,
all of those are anti-seizure treatments.
And we use them in tens, if not hundreds of millions of
people worldwide all the time. And so I quickly recognized, well, wait, if this diet actually
stops seizures, and we use anti-seizure treatments all the time, maybe that's the reason it's working.
And wow, this is shocking because it's like really working. And then I learned about the decades of neuroscience
research that we have documenting what exactly the ketogenic diet is doing to the brain,
changes neurotransmitters, changes calcium channel regulation, changes gene expression,
actually. The gut microbiome is involved, inflammation. it's doing all sorts of things. And armed with all of that
information, my career took off. I started doing more research, collaborating with researchers
around the world and everything else. Is it fair, this term came up in the video
that I watched, and in fact, the conference name, I think, had at least some descriptor of this,
metabolic psychiatry. Is that a fair description of at least some descriptor of this. Metabolic psychiatry,
is that a fair description of at least a component of what you do? Or would you use a different
label? I think metabolic psychiatry is definitely an emerging field. There are lots of researchers,
neuroscientists, clinicians, philanthropists backing this right now, the Bazooki Brain Research Fund,
funded by David and Jan Bazooki, founders of Roblox, they are really backing this with passion.
I think at the end of the day, the brain energy theory is bigger than just psychiatry. The brain energy theory is about metabolism,
ultimately mitochondria, and how it affects human health and how that can have an impact on the
brain, but it's more than the brain. I mean, you know, the brain is part of the human body and the
human body impacts the brain. And so, I'm actually more interested in like the big picture, and the human body impacts the brain. And so I'm actually more interested in
the big picture. If you climb the mountain and look down, or if you see the entire forest from
the trees, you see the big picture. We're really talking about a new way to understand human
health. And that includes mental health, but it also easily segues into physical health. So my only qualm with metabolic psychiatry
is that it's focused on psychiatry. And I am a psychiatrist. I'm passionate about helping people
with mental disorders, make no mistake. I'm not looking to start a weight loss clinic for just
any Joe or Jane who want to lose weight. That's not really my passion. But yeah, I am going to
be helping people lose weight and
improve their physical abilities and prevent cancer and prevent diabetes or reverse diabetes.
So it's more than psychiatry. Yeah, the Cartesian mind-body duality doesn't actually
pan out very well when everything is connected with blood vessels and so on and so forth. So let's take a closer look
at some of the outcomes and I'll share some of my personal history as a way of making that segue.
So I have experimented with the ketogenic diet since 96 or 97, I would say, and initially experimented with the ketogenic diet, a cyclical
ketogenic diet with one day of carbohydrate loading following a glycogen depletion workout.
It's a bit of a long story for athletic purposes. So I was using it to lose body fat and improve my
body composition while maintaining some degree of muscular growth and anabolism
by spiking insulin once a week with this carbohydrate loading. And it worked spectacularly
well. I was using it for athletic performance, but much later now, I've done a fair amount of
fasting, quite a bit of ketogenic dieting. And when people ask me for fat loss,
there are many options. There are actually quite a few really good options. But the point I make is
if you suffer from depression or anxiety, personally, I have found nothing close to
as dramatic as the ketogenic diet for eliciting a significant change. And it's so
noticeable for me that if I'm using, say, an Abbott Labs precision extra device to measure
ketone concentrations and millimolars, predictably, based on how I feel in terms of not just mood,
but mental acuity, So speed of cognitive turnover,
I know it's not a technical term, but just speed of computation, short-term memory.
I can tell when my body clicks over past, say, 0.7 millimolars. Predictably, I can guess where
I am between 0.7 and say 1.0 millimolars based on mood and cognition. And furthermore, over the span of
several days, and typically I kickstart ketosis with a period of fasting. I just find that the
easiest for me personally, but I recognize the sort of adherence challenges that can pose for
a lot of folks. I also seem to, and this is leading to a question, don't worry.
I also noticed that when I am in reasonably established ketosis, because I think a lot of
people think they're in ketosis when they're eating a ketogenic meal once a day and that we
can get to. But when I am measurably in ketosis, my need for sleep also goes down dramatically.
And I would say I wake up whether I want to or not after six hours of sleep and I feel
fully refreshed. I don't experience the morning grogginess that I typically do.
The question is, what the hell is going on? So biochemically, from a genetic on-off switch perspective,
what is happening in the body that contributes to some of these experiences and effects?
I don't think we have all the answers because this is a relatively new field in terms of looking at
the effects of the ketogenic diet on mental states. And certainly in terms of looking at the effects of the ketogenic diet on mental states, and certainly
in terms of looking at it in terms of people with exclusive or primary mental disorders,
you know, researchers have looked at it for other things. So the first thing I'll say is you're
actually, everything you described is spot on with what I see clinically in dozens of patients and
what I hear from patients around
the world. And it's one of the challenges. I want to point this out. You're highlighting
the decreased need for sleep is one of the biggest risks of using this intervention in people who
have had a history of psychosis. And the reason is because, you know, for you, it sounds like it has not been a major
problem. I've definitely seen people who have gotten hypomanic while they, especially while
they're keto adapting to the point that they're actually only getting two hours of sleep a night
and they can't sleep more than that. And sometimes they recognize this may not be optimal for me. And
other times they just think, well, you know, I've got a lot of time now to be productive and get all
sorts of shit done. So, I mean, one guy actually was going for 20 mile runs starting at like 3am
in the morning. And he complained that he couldn't maintain a normal weight, and he wondered why.
And I'm like, dude, you're like sleeping two hours a night, and you're running 20 miles
every day.
What did you expect?
Some basic math can explain this.
Yeah.
Yes, absolutely.
You know, the effects on sleep are complicated because some studies, like in epilepsy patients, for instance,
have found that the ketogenic diet actually dramatically improves sleep overall. But a lot
of those patients are sleeping too much, and often because they're on medications that are
extraordinarily sedating. And so those studies come to the conclusion ketogenic diet improves
sleep, it normalizes it. People wake up feeling
more refreshed. It's a great thing. This issue of hypomania and mania is very poorly understood.
I'm one of the only people on the planet who seems to recognize it as hypomania and mania.
So we've got a lot of work to do in terms of understanding it. I'll give you an evolutionary
speculation about what I think is happening.
Widely speculative. We don't have the research for this. But I've seen this a lot, not just with
ketogenic diet, but with anything that induces a kind of ketosis and a fasting state or a fasting
mimicking state. So I've seen this in patients who fast for five, seven days or whatever.
And there are actually some studies in Muslim patients during Ramadan, especially patients
who have bipolar disorder during Ramadan, they start fasting, they're much, much more likely
to have sleep problems, and they are much, much more likely to have subsequent mood episodes,
primarily hypomanic and manic, but also depressive for some people. So I think that we've got enough evidence,
and I certainly have enough anecdotal evidence to say decreased sleep is a thing. It's a real thing.
It's observed. We've got some studies to document it. Why would the body need less sleep? Or why would the body get less sleep
while in a ketogenic state? My assumption is just going with a common sense evolutionary perspective,
which is the body thinks it's actually starving. It's drought. There's a drought or famine or
something. Something is going on. Food supply is scarce. That's why you have high ketones. And so the
high ketones are actually activating brain regions to get you, number one, more energy,
more confidence, and more time. You don't need to be sleeping right now. You've got to find food
and find it fast. And so it gives people more energy to actually go out, seek, explore, hunt, whatever,
looking for food sources. Again, wild speculation, but at least in my mind, it kind of makes sense.
Just a quick thanks to one of our sponsors, and we'll be right back to the show.
This episode is brought to you by LinkedIn Marketing Solutions. Time and place are everything with so many things, and especially this is true
in marketing. But in today's age of a million messages per minute, I've seen my phone, have you?
And seemingly not enough hours in the day, how do you really catch your target audience's attention?
Fortunately, there's a simple way. LinkedIn can help you speak to the right people at the right time. With LinkedIn becoming number one in B2B display advertising in the US,
you've got a great advantage right in front of you. You can stand out against your competitors
while nurturing customer relationships and growing your brand. LinkedIn delivers you both
quantity and quality. Its targeting tools allow you to reach your precise audience down to their
job title, company name, location, and more, which means your ads can be seen by those who matter.
Scale your marketing and grow your business with LinkedIn advertising. Companies of all
sizes and sectors are using it, and now yours can too. It's easy to try. LinkedIn is now offering
a $100 credit on your next campaign. Go to linkedin.com slash TFS to claim your credit. That's like
a Tim Ferriss show. So check it out, linkedin.com slash TFS.
From an evolutionary perspective, definitely it makes sense. And does the mood improvement
reflect, in your opinion, increased release of norepinephrine or something along
those lines? Or is it remedying via ketones, this alternate fuel source, which the brain and the
heart and some other tissues really love? Is the presence of ketones remedying an underlying glucose metabolism disorder that is in part causal with the
conditions that end up getting pulled from the DSM-5. How would you explain, even if it's just
a tentative hypothesis, the mood elevation that people experience? Because it is so
noticeable. It is not subtle for me in the least.
And it's not been, I will share my personal story too, because I've been in and out of
ketosis for many years, and I find the exact same thing. And quite honestly, sometimes the
inability to sleep or sleep an adequate amount of time is the rate limiting factor for me.
And I'm like, I can't go with this little sleep
for this long.
This is not going to turn out well for me
if I stay on this trajectory, I know enough.
There are lots of people with lots of different opinions.
And we know at least like 40 different mechanisms of action
of the ketogenic diet.
Like I said, neurotransmitters, all sorts of things.
So how exactly is it resulting in this
improved mood? There's going to be debate. I actually firmly believe, based on this larger
theory and kind of connecting all of the dots, I actually firmly believe that it really does
come down to mitochondria. And some people call it mitochondrial dysfunction.
There's another group of researchers that like to call it suboptimal mitochondrial function.
Wouldn't want to upset this mitochondria.
Because that's different than dysfunction. Whatever. What it means at the end of the day,
so we may get to this, mitochondria are actually much,
much more than just powerhouses. But powerhouse function is a critically important function.
And we have evidence from numerous data sources, from blood work, from, you know,
lumbar punctures, from autopsy studies, to all of the neuroimaging studies that we're doing,
functional MRI, PET scans, SPECT scans, all of these studies, all of them converge on mitochondria
and functions of mitochondria. And what all of these studies suggest is that people with mental disorders across the board tend to have regions of the brain,
so it's not the entire body. Metabolism is cell-specific and tissue-specific. So you can
have one cell that's actually ready to die because it's metabolically failing, and you can have
another brand new healthy cell that's actually thriving
in the same human body. So it's important to keep that in mind. But what all of this research says
is that some brain regions in some people are metabolically compromised. Their brain tissue
is not getting enough energy, and it also has higher levels of reactive oxygen species, which can produce
inflammation and all sorts of problems. But we know this, and again, tons of evidence and different
lines of evidence all pointing in the same direction, even genetic studies. Like when you
look at, well, what is this gene doing and what's happening in the brains of people with these
genetic defects, you time and again see mitochondrial
or metabolic impairment or dysfunction. And what I think the ketogenic diet is doing is it is,
imagine a cell that's only running on, it's a six-cylinder engine, and it's only running on three cylinders. And you give it ketones, and ketones
are like rocket fuel for this engine. And all of a sudden, all six cylinders come online,
and that cell is firing. And for most people, that's a good thing. And it gives people energy
and everything else. If that metabolically
compromised cell actually is in great disrepair, if it is like really miserably kind of maintained
and in great disrepair, giving it all this rocket fuel all at once can actually be really dangerous
and can result in a whole host of other symptoms. So could you elaborate on what a dangerous case would look like?
Because presumably we're not talking about, and please correct me if I'm wrong, ketoacidosis,
right?
In the case of, say, a type 1 diabetic who has comorbidities and they have high ketones
and high glucose, dangerous situation.
In what way or in what fashion would this manifest as dangerous?
One of the consequences of metabolic dysfunction of a cell,
you know, one of the big themes,
there are several consequences.
I kind of break them into five buckets
depending on where and when.
There are two primary ones for an adult, say,
who is just developing new onset symptoms. And the shocking
thing is that they're polar opposites. So the cell can either become underactive, which means it's
failing to work because it doesn't have enough energy. And that kind of makes sense, common
sense, really easy to understand. But the other consequence of metabolic dysfunction is actually that cell can
become what's called hyper excitable. It can actually become overactive. And, you know,
some easy examples of overactive or hyper excitable cells are a muscle spasm, or a heart
arrhythmia, or somebody with chronic pain who's experiencing pain because their pain nerve is hyper excitable.
It's firing when it really shouldn't be firing or it's not stopping when it should stop.
And so metabolically compromised cells are prone to this hyper excitability.
And the challenge with ketones for some people is that you rush in this ultra clean kind of high octane fuel
and the cell becomes hyper excitable. And the way that translates in terms of brain function
is for somebody who's got a hyper excitable or a metabolically compromised anxiety pathway or anxiety system,
they could have a panic attack or feel more anxious early on. But for other people,
it can result in psychosis, it can result in OCD symptoms, it can result in all sorts of things.
Agitation, the extreme case of hyper excitability in the brain is actually a seizure.
Wow, the more you know, folks, be careful out there. So mitochondria, just to underscore
mitochondria for a moment. So the powerhouses of the cell, I mean, the origin story of mitochondria,
we can leave aside. I mean, it's fascinating just to look into how we ended up with mitochondria
in our bodies. But for the purposes of this conversation,
the powerhouses of the cell,
I think it's oxidative phosphorylation,
they generate the vast majority or all of ATP,
adenosine triphosphate.
So let's just consider that for our purposes
and feel free to pick this apart.
But the basic energy of the body for
most people most of the time, there are a bunch of exceptions.
The reason mitochondrial function and dysfunction is of great interest to me personally is not just
because of the depression, but a pet theory slash hypothesis that I developed after a severe case of Lyme disease about
eight to 10 years ago. I don't remember the exact timing. I grew up on Eastern Long Island.
Everybody gets Lyme disease, almost everybody. My mom also has the alpha galactose allergy
inflicted by an infection from the lone star tick. So she can have anaphylactic shock if she consumes
any mammalian
protein, including gelatin, which is in everything. So I grew up surrounded by ticks and tick-borne
disease. And I developed very severe Lyme symptoms. It was confirmed through a number of different
tests as a Lyme infection. There are other co-infections, but let's focus on Lyme for the
minute. And the first thing that this lab told me was, number one, you're aware you've already had Lyme,
are you not? And they highlighted the fact that I had long-term antibodies,
which raised questions for me about whether my depressive episodes, which started around
adolescence, were in fact as simple, I mean,
that's probably not the right word, as a hereditary genetic predisposition, which there appears to be
a component of that, at least based on my genome sequencing. Or if in addition to that, maybe a
catalyst or accelerant was this first infection with Lyme disease. And the reason I mentioned
that is the second time I had Lyme disease, I made a very significant mistake. And that was,
I looked for the bullseye rash, the bullseye rash didn't appear, and therefore I didn't start any
type of antibiotic treatment. And it turned out, this is going somewhere, don't worry, it's a little long-winded,
but it'll go somewhere, that even without the dermatological symptoms,
many people can be dermatologically asymptomatic and still develop Lyme disease,
which is exactly what happened to me.
And the only reason I went in to get tested is my speech started to slur.
I was forgetting close friends' names,
common words. It was taking me five to 10 minutes to get out of bed in the morning because my joints
were in so much pain from inflammation. And I went through all of the standards of care.
I did the antibiotics, which had some effect, but I was in this energetic no-man's
land. I was incredibly fatigued all the time. I felt as a result, these two things are often
correlated for me, depressed, what I would describe as depressed. And I continued to have
what felt like dementia on some level for probably six to nine months until I decided,
and I can't remember what catalyzed this. I don't think it was the Lyme, but I did a week-long
extended fast. And by two and a half days in, and I was measuring my ketone levels, which I think is
actually really helpful if people are trying to get a grasp on these things, all of those symptoms literally vanished by the time I got to 1.2, 1.3 millimolars.
And not only did the symptoms evaporate, but I continued to fast and then I continued
on a subcaloric ketogenic diet for a period of time afterwards. And that was in effect. And again,
I'm not a doctor. I don't play one on the internet, so I'm not giving medical advice.
But this approach with Lyme and ketogenic diet has now been replicated across probably half a
dozen of my friends. I should say this is true Lyme disease and not someone who is dissatisfied with life
and depressed and diagnosis shopping for Lyme disease, looking for an external cause,
which is a different story.
But in this case, once I saw the remission of symptoms and then I got off of the ketogenic
diet with the well-founded fear that I would revert back to my previous state, I did not
revert to my previous state. I did not revert to my previous
state. So that's probably explaining that maybe beyond the grasp or beyond the scope of this
conversation. But what that raised for me as a question was, are the symptoms of Lyme disease
caused by some type of impairment of mitochondrial function or glucose metabolism? It just seemed
like a very fair question to ask. And I know this
is an interview about Lyme disease, but what should we know about mitochondria? If someone
is not familiar with mitochondria, or maybe they just have the basics, like I laid out,
what do you find interesting about mitochondria or perhaps aspects of mitochondria that would
be helpful for this conversation? Sorry for the TED Talk.
Thanks for listening.
No worries.
It's a perfect segue into this.
So the real answer is that mitochondria connect all of the dots of every factor known to play
a role in mental illness, whether it's neurotransmitters, stress, trauma, hormones, all of them.
I can come back to them if you want, but let me follow up on your story.
So you had an infection, high levels of inflammation.
Those high levels of inflammation are good.
They're good for your body because your body is being assaulted by this bacteria, and it's going to kill you if
your body doesn't mount a defense. So the inflammation that you were experiencing was
good and healthy, but yes, it made you feel like shit, and it impaired your brain function.
We have direct evidence that inflammation and inflammatory cytokines and specific ones
actually impair mitochondrial function and or change mitochondrial gene expression.
So we know that that's happening.
For the most part, that might be a normal adaptive response. Because again,
your body's mounting a defense for its survival. And so, it is allocating resources to fighting
off this bacteria. And that means resources need to come away from somewhere else.
Some cells are going to suffer as a result of the need to fight off this kind of life-threatening
thing.
And we have direct evidence that some brain cells have a reduction in mitochondrial function, I think for people who are already
on the edge, people who've had depression in the past, maybe people who have a genetic vulnerability
or other type of vulnerability, that reduction can be too much for them because those brain cells
are already maybe operating at slightly reduced capacity or even maybe moderately
reduced capacity. And then when you throw an infection on top of it, it just pushes those
cells over the edge and then they begin to malfunction. And that results in what we call
symptoms of mental illness. It's not just Lyme disease though. So we've got lots of research, decades of research showing that inflammation, especially from
infections, can result in brain disorders, mental disorders, neurological disorders.
We know this with certainty.
So one study looked at kids who developed an infection that was serious enough to be
hospitalized, and they had, again, 80-something
percent increased risk of developing a mental disorder, most of them within the three months
following hospitalization. And the mental disorders were across the board. These kids in the next
three months developed autism, schizophrenia, OCD, learning disabilities, seizures, all sorts of problems, which again,
is consistent with this more unifying model of how to think about mental illness. These aren't
discrete entities, but they're obviously discrete symptoms, and symptoms matter. So, to maybe follow up and just share, well, I can stop
there or I can share two. No, no, keep going. I'll share one or two tidbits to highlight why
mitochondria are so important to this theory. Yeah, please. So, one, neurotransmitters,
everybody knows neurotransmitters play a role in mental illness. Turns out mitochondria play a critical role in the
direct production, but also the release and the regulation of major neurotransmitters,
including dopamine, serotonin, GABA, glutamate, and others. So mitochondria actually are taking
food, you know, broken down food, whether that's carbohydrates, fats, proteins, and they're
converting it into two different things primarily. They're converting it into a fuel source, they're
burning it all the way down, and then that fuel gets used to create either ATP or heat.
So, it's fuel or it's building blocks for other things. It's building blocks to make new proteins or make membranes or other things.
And the mitochondria are actually producing some of the primary building blocks for those
neurotransmitters.
But in fact, researchers have looked at cells and if they take the mitochondria out of the
synapse, for instance, but flood the synapse with ATP, so it's still got lots of energy,
it's got energy available, the neurotransmitters actually don't get released. The mitochondria
are playing a direct role in actually releasing the neurotransmitters. And then I'll just share
hormones too. So everybody has heard about steroid hormones, cortisol, estrogen, testosterone,
progesterone. Mone, mitochondria actually control the
first step in the synthesis of all of those hormones. And so if they are dysfunctional,
if there is a problem with mitochondria, you may have a problem with producing those hormones.
Stars of the show, top of the marquee, mitochondria. All right. I'm definitely going to be doing more reading on mitochondria. Now, let me ask a question or present a situation and a question that I imagine is coming on to the minds of many people listening. And that is, Tim Ferriss, if ketogenic diets are so amazing and you feel so much better, why aren't you always in ketosis?
So I want to answer that and then ask for your input.
First, I will just lay out that for the sleep piece, what I've noticed in myself, this is especially true with extended fasting,
is that whether the sleep, let's just say six hours long, feels restful or not,
often depends on my electrolyte consumption. So if I am not consuming carbohydrates and I'm
just splitting off tons of water because I don't have the retention capabilities,
sometimes, at least personally, I can develop lower back pain, might be kidney-related,
and it might be a cholinergic response. I'm getting a little
outside of my depth here, but in terms of rapid heart rate, trying to go to sleep, that seems to
largely be remedied by additional electrolyte, supplemental electrolyte intake. However,
the challenge for me is often one of not dietary compliance. I happen to be a cholesterol
hyperabsorber, So sometimes on the ketogenic
diet, I do see my lipid profiles go completely cuckoo bananas. And for many people, that's not
the case. But for me, I have witnessed that. So I have some long-term considerations. I'm already
taking things like ezetimibe to control for some of the risk factors. Personally, I'm not recommending
that for anybody. Talk to your doctor. But for people who have no familiarity with the ketogenic diet and you're trying to
help someone sustain ketosis for a period of time, what approach do you take? Do you use
cream like they did with children for a long time in the studies looking at epilepsy?
What is the approach that you take to make it as easy as possible for people to stick with it? Well, and I think you raise a really good
point that not everybody should be or needs to be on a ketogenic diet or in ketosis long term.
But for the patients that I'm working with, they usually have serious brain disorders that
almost all of them are disabled by their symptoms. And so like epilepsy,
where somebody's having multiple seizures every single day,
they have a very serious brain disorder
that needs immediate and consistent medical intervention.
And so if you're using the ketogenic diet
in those situations,
most of those patients do need it consistently.
In a way, I know people want a one-size-fits-all answer, and I have to
tell you, I just have to level with you, there isn't one. With somebody who's really obese,
say weighs 340 pounds, I might use carb restriction alone. So tell them to just eat less than 20 grams
of carbs a day. I don't really even have to get into any limits on protein. And I usually don't have
to recommend that they eat more fat or fat sources because they have so much body fat to tap into.
And usually in those cases, we want to tap into that body fat because they're usually interested
in losing some of it. And so in those people, I'm going to recommend carb restriction, and that's about it. And usually, it's pretty easy
for them to maintain very high levels of ketones and get the therapeutic brain effects as a result.
Once that same person loses enough of that body fat, or if I have a different patient coming to
me who's already thin or athletic, that person is going to need to probably
moderate the amount of protein they're eating and consume more fat than they really think they
should be eating. I mean, so... We're both laughing because I know what that means.
Yeah. No, when I introduce people to a ketogenic
diet and I tell them how much fat I want them eating, they're just like, you've got to be
joking. There's no way that's healthy. There's no way I can do that. But yeah, so lots of ways
to do it. I mean, you can create like fat bombs. Heavy whipping cream is really a great tool. Some
people drink it straight and just, you know,
they drink it like milk. You can actually put a little bit of water in it to water it down if you
want it to be a little more like milk. It's also really good in coffee. Really good in coffee.
Yeah, great in coffee. It's great if you whip it and then it's whipped cream. It's delicious.
You can use artificial sweeteners if you want. I usually recommend something like
stevia or monk fruit. You can put vanilla in it. You can put cocoa powder in it, and then it's
chocolate or vanilla, and you can freeze it, and it becomes ice cream. I mean, you can do a lot of
things with it to make it palatable and sustainable. So do you start people off with directions? Let's
just say they have lower
percent body fat. So they're not necessarily bodybuilders, but let's just say they're
somewhere between 20% body fat or less. And assuming that means they're going to need to
modify their intake to increase the percentage of their dietary calories from fat, would you,
rather than say change each meal to have X, Y, and Z composition, say, have supplemental
fat bombs, have some supplemental heavy cream. And that's how you'll basically move the slider
such that you're getting something like 70% of your calories from that. I'm not sure if that's
the target range, but you would add the fat as opposed to change all the meals? I'm usually adding the fat.
So low carb is the baseline.
And then the protein may need to vary.
I want to make sure they're getting adequate protein, but it's not an all-you-can-eat
meat fest necessarily.
And for most people, quite honestly, it's usually a work in progress because everybody
has different dietary preferences.
Some people like salads and if they like salads, I'm going to say, okay, have lots of salads,
but put some crumbled blue cheese on it, maybe some almonds in there and avocado in there and
douse it with as much olive oil as you can tolerate. And, you know, whatever that is, but vinegar and
oil, a lot of oil, that could become a very high fat thing. And some people may love that,
other people hate it. And so, other people are going to lean more toward really fatty steaks,
or they want sweets, in which case, yeah, we're going to be doing fat bombs and whipped cream
and ice cream and other things. So there are lots of strategies, which is good, because that way we
can figure out what does this person like, and let's make it sustainable.
I have one friend who's an MD, very, very competent MD, who was in ketosis for two years,
two to three years straight. And his general approach was skip breakfast,
so intermittent fast, maybe some coffee with heavy cream, and then have a large salad,
lots of greens, but in terms of actual net carbohydrates, pretty low with steak, cheese, tons of oil, and then having sort of a moderate protein dinner that would be on the
smaller side. And just so people know, and please correct me if I'm getting this wrong, but the
reason a lot of folks have an aversion, I think a lot of it is cultural conditioning, to attempt to do ketosis by simply going low carb. And they end up going very,
very high protein. So they think that they can do a green salad with a mountain of lean chicken
breast and make it work. But the body's really crafty. It happens to like ATP. So the body will take the excess protein or a portion of it and convert it in the liver,
I think, through a process called gluconeogenesis to glucose. So then, oops, you end up not being
able to sustain the higher levels of ketones because your body just does not need them.
If you have high glucose levels, your body is getting what it needs and your body's pretty
smart about resource allocation. Let's talk, definitely feel free to, if there's anything you'd like to add to that,
any other common mistakes that you observe or things that people don't think will affect
ketosis that tends to affect ketosis in unexpected ways, any common pitfalls you'd like to highlight?
You know, honestly, there are so many.
It's hard to put them into one category.
The nice thing about the ketogenic diet is that there is an objective measure of whether
you're doing it right or not.
And it's measure your ketones.
If you're able to measure your blood ketones, measure your blood ketones, and then do the
detective work to figure out why you're not achieving the results you want.
And, you know, with a variety of patients, so the detective work, which gets to your exact question, like what are the pitfalls?
I've seen people eating a lot of keto-labeled junk food from the grocery store, Costco.
Keto brownies all day long.
It's got keto on the label, so it must be okay. And
it's filled with soluble corn fiber and sugar alcohols and other stuff that clearly is not
necessarily natural and lo and behold, takes a lot of people out of ketosis and prevents weight
loss and prevents the brain benefits and lots of other things that you want to be achieving. So that's probably the single biggest pitfall is all the
keto labeled junk food. Yeah, if it seems too good to be true, folks, probably is. I remember doing
keto way back in 97, 98, 99. And man, the landscape was barren. I mean, it was pork rinds
and heavy cream and meat and eggs and water and unsweetened iced tea. That was basically it.
But you can make it work. Let me ask you about a note I have in front of me, which I would love to
hear you elaborate on. And that is some psychiatric medications impair metabolism, even though they can reduce some of the symptoms of
presumably associated disorders in the short run. Could you speak to that, maybe give examples,
because this is certainly deeply interesting to me. Let me at least preface this discussion with
kind of a caution up front. So I'm going to say some
things that may get people really upset, especially if you're on these psychiatric medications.
And I want to just say for the record, it is really difficult and dangerous to get off
psychiatric medications, especially if you've been on them for years or decades. So please do not stop your medication on your own.
Please don't taper it on your own.
Work with your healthcare professional
and do it in a safe way.
You're gonna hear that I am an advocate
of sometimes trying to help people get off medication.
So I'm not trying to say you must take your meds
for the rest of your life,
but I'm just saying,
please don't do it in a dangerous way
because lots of people end up in the hospital or suicidal or dead.
Yeah. No DIY folks, please. I know people who have committed suicide after
stopping things cold turkey or attempting to taper but not informing their doctors. So
please be very careful and only do any type of removal of meds with professional supervision.
Thank you. So with that said, this is probably going to be the single most controversial part
of the theory. Ultimately, what I'm saying is that mental disorders are metabolic disorders
of the brain. And so that means metabolic impairment in the body and or
brain can result in mental symptoms. And yet we know many of our treatments directly impair
metabolism. So we know a lot of antipsychotics, mood stabilizers, even some antidepressants
and others cause people to gain weight, sometimes massive amounts of weight.
They can cause type 2 diabetes.
They can cause cardiovascular disease and all of the risk factors for cardiovascular
disease.
So they can cause hypertension.
They can cause abnormal lipids, which we think contribute to cardiovascular disease.
And those are all metabolic problems.
That's not controversial at all. They're metabolic problems. These pills are causing
these metabolic problems. They are right on the FDA package inserts of these meds. So everything
I just said is fact, non-controversial. So the logical question for many people is, well, then, Chris, your theory must be wrong
because these pills work.
And if they're impairing metabolism, then that pretty much disproves your theory.
How would this make sense otherwise?
And quite honestly, this was actually one of the biggest things I struggled with in
developing this theory.
I kind of was on this path, metabolism, mitochondria,
wow, that seems to be the connecting, it's connecting a lot of dots. And that was actually
one of the obstacles for me was that exact question. Like, how can I understand that?
And it's not that I want to deny that the medications do reduce symptoms, because they
do reduce symptoms. I've seen it work firsthand as a psychiatrist. I've seen these medications reduce symptoms. And I'm not here to say all of
the clinical trials are a big lie and scam from pharmaceutical companies. I don't think they are.
So I had to try to understand, like, well, then what's going on? It kind of does disprove my theory. So
I've got to come up with an explanation. And at the end of the day, the explanation is this
dichotomous reaction of a cell to metabolic impairment. So when a cell is metabolically
compromised, you know, there are some other things that it can do, but the two for our purposes right now are underactive or overactive or hyper excitable. And what we're really focused on are hyper
excitable cells. So hyper excitable cells are producing experiences from your brain networks,
but they're producing these experiences at the wrong time or the wrong intensity,
or they're not
stopping when they should. That's what hyperexcitability does. So a hyperexcitable pain
cell causes pain when you shouldn't have pain. A hyperexcitable brain cell is producing an
experience, sensation, cognition, something that should not be happening when it happens. And that could be anxiety,
depression, hallucinations, whatever. In order to stop a hyper excitable cell,
there are kind of two strategies you can use. So one would be to slowly but surely restore
the metabolic health of that cell through strategies that, Tim, you've used
yourself, exercise, ketones, fasting, meditation, other things. Those are going to restore metabolic
health to those cells and allow those cells to function normally again. But the other way to
stop a hyper excitable cell is to basically put a straitjacket on it and to stop a hyperexcitable cell is to basically put a straight jacket on it
and to stop it from functioning almost altogether. And that's what a lot of the pills that we
prescribe are doing. They are impairing mitochondrial function so that that cell has trouble firing at all.
And that means that symptoms of hyperexcitability can stop. And so for some people, if you're having
a panic attack and somebody gives you a pill and it makes that stop, that can feel really good.
If you're having a seizure, it can be life-saving. If you're psychotic and violent,
that can be life-saving. So I'm not trying to say these pills should never be used or they don't
have a time and a place because I think they do. But if you take that pill long-term, that pill is
like putting a straitjacket on that cell. It's suppressing the function of that cell over the long run.
And what that means is that that cell becomes weaker over the long run. And that may very well
end up making the illness even worse in the long run. That is the theory. There are lots of people
who have been preaching that message for decades who are going to say, duh, Chris Palmer, where the hell have you been?
And then there are other people who are going to say, Chris Palmer, how dare you say that?
That is blasphemy and you are now a dangerous quack.
So I know I'm going to get responses from all over the place.
But if you understand the science, if you understand the basic science and all of the evidence, that is a real possibility. Having a time and a place to be used, but that are particularly powerful at disrupting
metabolic integrity if they're used chronically without any type of cycling off.
The easy answer is, and I could get into all of the science documenting at the cellular level
how and why this has been supported, but we really don't
need that. The easy answer is just look at the human being in front of you. If they are gaining
massive amounts of weight, if they feel extraordinarily slowed down and now they're
sleeping 14 hours a day, 16 hours a day, and they can barely function, and their cognition is trashed, and they can't think anymore,
they can't read a book anymore, they can't hold a job, they can't do school.
Those are all signs of metabolic impairment of brain cells. So those are the medications that
I would be most worried about. And it can differ among people. If one
person is taking a medication and having all of those side effects that I just listed,
and yet another person is taking maybe a lower dose of that same medication
and is finding it beneficial and still able to function in life and still able to do everything
they want to do and not gaining lots of weight and not becoming type 2 diabetic, then all the power to that person and all the power to
that treatment. And I would be in full support of that treatment. And I'm not at all here to deny
that treatments can work for some people. But, you know, I didn't really say this,
but I would just want to say this in case people think Chris Palmer is way too pessimistic.
Who the hell is this guy?
The real answer is that mental disorders are now the leading cause of disability on our
planet.
And it's not because people aren't getting treatment.
A lot of those people are getting treatment, and it's because our current treatments fail to work
for them. That is a fact. And that is why I am so passionate about this work because I want to help
those people who are being told there's nothing more we have to offer you. There's nothing more
we can do. Just take your pills and stop complaining. I want to help them.
If we wanted to take a moment to act as patient advocates, so many patients, many people who
are taking psychiatric medications or medications for psychiatric conditions will not have doctors who are familiar with the many functions and purposes of mitochondria,
how the ketogenic diet and ketones interplay with energetic production and can alleviate,
say, inflammation. For those people who don't know, you can find lots of literature to support
this. Many types of ketones, including I think beta-hydroxybutyrate is probably one of the most obvious to search for, are highly anti-inflammatory.
I mean, another observation I had when deep into ketosis is that many of my chronic pains decreased significantly, including tendinosis and other issues.
So for people who don't have a doctor who's well-versed in these things, but let's assume for the moment that their doctor is open-minded to continued education, are there any resources
that you would suggest?
I mean, I would imagine that your book is certainly one of them, the book being Brain
Energy.
Are there other resources you might suggest that a patient ask their doctor if they're
willing to read up on so that they can have these conversations?
So you can go to my website, chrispalmermd.com, or you can go to a website that is about to launch,
brainenergy.com. And I will be posting free resources, studies, lay articles. So already
on my website, I've got lay press articles if you just want to better
understand these treatments and the science behind them. But I've also got links to the medical
peer-reviewed literature. And that's important if you're trying to get your healthcare practitioner
to take this seriously and at least have a discussion with you
about using this as a treatment option.
Even if you can't understand what that article is saying
because it's written in medical language,
you can print it out
and give it to your healthcare provider
and that will build some credibility.
So don't go and just say,
oh, I saw this YouTube video on the internet,
and it was great, and I think you should do this. If you arm yourself with some of this scientific
literature, you're more likely to get a good response from your healthcare practitioner to
at least work with you or consider it with you. Mention Harvard when you mention Dr. Christopher Palmer and not YouTube.
Mention Harvard before you mention YouTube. Pro tip. So the next question I'd love to ask,
well, actually, I'll make an observation, which is not necessarily an accurate observation,
but as I'm thinking about your description of some of these common medications that can disrupt metabolic function,
sometimes to good short-term clinical effect, as you mentioned, right? If somebody is psychotic
and at risk of injuring or killing themselves, these medications have a role. And if someone
is currently on these medications, let's say they recognize some of the symptoms, weight gain, lethargy, sacrificed cognition, they don't necessarily, and this is not medical advice,
but just a hypothesis, need to rush to get off of these medications. It seems to me they could also
potentially consider adding dietary interventions, exercise, et cetera., that could act as a counterbalance so that they are
facilitating some cellular rejuvenation or metabolic efficiency while they are continuing
to use these medications. So it's not all or nothing. It's not remove all of these components
and then add all these components. They can be parallel tracks.
Is that fair to say? It is essential to say. So when I have patients come to me who say,
I want to try this ketogenic diet thing, they stay on all their current meds. Taking people
off their meds is dangerous. Please hear that. And the way that I think about it is it means
that those cells are now almost
shriveled up. Those cells are struggling because they have been suppressed for so long. So when
you take those meds away, they're going to become hyper excitable immediately. As energy rushes into
those cells, they're going to become hyper excitable. It's like taking a cast off of a broken leg and then saying, go run.
It's not a good idea. The first step is exactly what you said. Maybe implement some other
strategies, dietary change, ketogenic diet or otherwise. Sometimes it's just let's remove all
the junk food and the sugar and some other stuff that's inflammatory. And that might be enough of a
first step for some people.
But add some exercise, try to get your sleep under control. And then if that is working,
and especially if it's working in a profound way, then maybe slowly but surely over time,
see if you can slowly but surely taper your meds for people who may be in my position which is huge fan convert true believer in the
certainly the psycho-emotional and i suppose we're looking a little under the hood energetic
benefits of the ketogenic diet but concerned about some of the long-term cardiac effects due to my cholesterol
hyperabsorption, or I should say sterile, really, because desmosterol and all these other plant
sterols are also hyperabsorbed, which can cause issues. What is your current position on use of exogenous ketones or ketone supplements as a way to perhaps partially achieve some of
what you have seen with the dietary interventions? Is it possible? Is it contraindicated? I always
have a divided position on this because I look at, and this may be an unfair comparison,
but I look at say ketoacidosis and I think to myself, it really doesn't make sense to me from an evolutionary perspective that it would be good for you to have normal or elevated glucose levels while simultaneously pushing ketones to two or three millimolars with exogenous ketone consumption that it doesn't at least at face value seem like that
would be without risk. How would you suggest I think about this? The real answer is I don't
think anybody knows for sure. A lot of people are really interested in exogenous ketones.
And obviously, it's so much easier to drink ketones than do a ketogenic diet. So no question about that. The first just fact I want to just
share, the first observation I want to share is that there are tens of thousands of children
with treatment-resistant epilepsy who are using ketogenic diets to control their epilepsy.
Exogenous ketones have been around for years.
We do not yet have even one case report
of one child being able to transition off a ketogenic diet
to exogenous ketones and maintain the benefits
of seizure improvement or seizure freedom.
Trust me, thousands of parents and neurologists and
others have almost certainly tried it. Do I have documentation of that? No, because they're not
reporting it because it didn't work out. But it would be a hell of a lot easier for everybody
involved. So you have to assume they would have tried it. I mean, I think that's reasonable.
I have to assume that some of these patients with epilepsy gave it a shot.
I know with certainty, I've talked with patients with bipolar disorder and other disorders,
for instance, who are using a ketogenic diet to control their symptoms.
They did.
Tri-exogenous ketones went off the diet and symptoms came back sometimes with a vengeance.
And I've used it in clinical practice as well with patients,
and I have not seen a significant benefit of exogenous ketones.
So those observations make me think a couple of things.
One is that the ketogenic diet is doing a lot.
It's improving insulin signaling.
It's changing the gut microbiome, improving hormones, you know, all sorts of
things. But when you force your liver to make ketones, because that's where most of the ketones
in the human body are made. And interestingly, they're made by mitochondria. So it is actually
the mitochondria in the liver that are making the ketones.
Help me help you, mitochondria.
And well, so one of the things that's happening when somebody's on a ketogenic diet is actually
you're getting this thing called mitochondrial biogenesis in the liver, which means that
your liver cells are actually making more mitochondria to meet this demand.
Yeah, that's a big deal.
That in and of itself might be improving the health of your liver and the ability of your
liver to send kind of healthier metabolic signals to your brain and throughout your
body.
You know, the liver plays a profound role in terms of metabolic health.
We know that.
And there are lots of signals.
It gets really complicated really quickly. But the bottom line is increasing mitochondria in cells confers health benefits pretty much across the board. As long as they're
healthy mitochondria, if you increase defective ones, that's not going to do very much. So I
actually sadly think exogenous ketones are not going to be the magic answer. Could they play a role for some people?
Probably. They might be good on an as-needed basis, or they might be a good rescue for somebody who's
using a ketogenic diet, falls off the wagon, gets really sick, needs a quick rescue. Maybe
exogenous ketones would help that person in that situation i don't know
from a first person subjective experience i can say having consumed a lot of exogenous ketones
of many many different types that for certain types of physical performance for physical performance at altitude in any hypoxic state, the supplemental ketones can
be very helpful. And that applies in my case to intermittent fasting also. So if I'm intermittent
fasting and let's say I have podcasts to record in the morning, but I haven't eaten in 12 hours,
whatever it might be, supplemental ketones plus some caffeine does a lot of heavy lifting for a short period of time.
But I have not experienced the extended, durable mood-elevating effects or cognitive benefits
from exogenous ketones that I have from the ketogenic diet. There's no comparison
in my experience. I do find, and I'll sound like a broken record,
not medical advice. Fasting, it's a shame that you just can't get extended fasting studies in
humans through IRB these days. I really wish that were different, but don't just DIY a long-term
fast, folks. But for me personally, when I am segueing into, say, a three-day fast, which would be my
most typical duration of fast, I have done up to 10 days, but more typically I'll do three days,
I will use exogenous ketones on my first day of full fasting, which is typically 12 to 18 hours
after beginning a fast after an early dinner, to allow me to eke out one more productive
day of work on a Friday. The use of exogenous ketones as a booster shot or an accelerant
that assists with the segue into ketosis I do find quite helpful, but I do not find it in any
way to replicate the psychological or energetic benefits of the ketogenic diet. Sadly, it would be a lot easier.
It would. And I think that's so helpful, but it certainly lines up with what I've seen in
other people too. Now, if you had to specifically, and I know we've been going for a while, so we're
going to probably, maybe we'll do a round two sometime. But a quick note, because I thought
from a historical perspective, this was fun to see at
least so we were talking about ketogenic diet and epilepsy now not using the term ketogenic diet no
doubt but this knowledge this observation goes all the way back to hippocrates that fasting can
stop seizures i always get a dumb smile plastered on my face
when I see that, which is all just once new again, in a sense. I mean, and look, I mean,
people had humors and spirits and all sorts of things that, at least as it stands right now,
we believe to be false, but it doesn't mean they got everything wrong. So, I do find the fasting,
maybe in the same bucket, cold baths for depression, which were prescribed
for a long time. I think there may be something to that as well. Like you can do that and get
some norepinephrine in the system, or you could use a selective norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor,
but really, is it that different? I'm not sure. So that is a digression. I just had to mention
that because I love the historical note. In the case of schizophrenia specifically, because this can be such a challenging diagnosis slash condition with
the recognition that one person next to the other, both with the same diagnosis could present very
differently. Do you have any additional color to add theories for why this type of metabolic intervention, the ketogenic diet, seems to
help specifically with schizophrenia. So this goes back again to, in many ways,
this is nothing new, folks. Although this may sound new and groundbreaking. So in the 1940s,
some of the first biological studies of people with mental illness included actually
drawing blood from the veins of people with bipolar disorder and schizophrenia. At that time,
they were usually labeled the same thing. They were usually just called schizophrenic.
Oh, man. I would have been schizophrenic also. Man, another two for one.
Probably, sadly.
So be careful when you're born, folks.
Be careful when you're born.
Exactly.
They would draw blood from their veins, and they noticed that people with these diagnoses
had higher levels of lactate in their blood than people who did not have a psychiatric diagnosis. And that if they exercised them,
the spike in lactate was even more pronounced. So this difference in lactate production
has been observed for 80 years now. And that is a, for those of you who don't know, this is a metabolic marker of stress,
either hypoxia, which directly stresses mitochondria, because mitochondria are the
only thing in the cell that's using oxygen, or it's a direct kind of indication of mitochondrial
impairment, that the mitochondria can't keep up with the
energy demands. And so the cell starts using glycolysis as kind of a backup fuel source
and spills out lactate into the bloodstream as a consequence. Now, that's actually probably a
really good thing because the lactate actually can be used as a fuel source
from other cells. And so this lactate is a signal of metabolic stress, but it's an adaptive response.
So the increased lactate, we don't want to just get rid of it and not address the metabolic problem.
But then all of the neuroimaging studies beginning in the 1990s in particular,
when we had functional neuroimaging studies,
the PET scan, SPECT scan, all of the lines of evidence were converging on mitochondria
and oxidative stress or glucose hypometabolism or other things. In 2000, that was the year that the
first group of researchers proposed the mitochondrial theory of bipolar disorder.
By 2004, numerous other researchers were jumping on the bandwagon of the mitochondrial theory of
bipolar disorder. Within a couple of years, that quickly segued also to include schizophrenia,
and within a few more years, that quickly also included major depressive disorder.
So depression, bipolar, and schizophrenia have all had enormous support from numerous
lines of evidence.
This goes to what do these genetic things do?
Like people who have these genetic predispositions to bipolar disorder, what are those genes actually
causing? They're causing metabolic impairment in the cells. That's what they're causing.
They're causing dysfunction at the synapse, which almost always includes mitochondria,
because mitochondria are hyperpopulated at synapses. And so in many ways,
the mitochondrial theory of schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, depression is actually nothinges. And so in many ways, the mitochondrial theory of schizophrenia, bipolar disorder,
depression is actually nothing new. And I know those researchers, if this theory takes off,
those researchers are going to be pissed because they're going to say like, you know, F Chris Palmer,
we came up with this theory. This is our theory. This is not his theory. And in many ways, I fully respect and acknowledge and
am filled with gratitude to all of his people. I just climbed up on their shoulders and just
added to what they've been doing. It's not like I'm creating this new fanatical theory of what
causes mental illness. I'm simply putting all of the foundation together and climbing up on other people's shoulders. underlying physiology and how all these things tie together with respect to the presentation of,
in quotation marks, psychiatric disorders, map perfectly to my personal experience.
And just because Tim considers himself an NF1 doesn't prove scientific truth. However,
it makes a lot of sense. There's no aspect of this that to me seems out of left
field and a non sequitur from the understanding of basic cellular metabolism. It just makes sense
to me that, sure, if you have 20 children in a preschool class and you don't feed any of them lunch, that three hours later, you're going to
have 30 grumpy kids and each grumpy kid is going to have a different behavior. Maybe one's throwing
blocks, maybe one's crying in the corner, but the underlying cause is actually fairly straightforward
and it is a fundamental underlying cause that can explain all of these different emergent behaviors
rather than trying to treat the block throwing and the crying all separately with the different a fundamental underlying cause that can explain all of these different emergent behaviors,
rather than trying to treat the block throwing and the crying all separately with a different combination of drugs. That is a perfect analogy, because right now, the mental health field says,
this child has block throwing disorder, this child has grumpy disorder. This child has handwriting disorder. And this child has defiant disorder. He spoke back to me in a really, you know, poor manner. And we label those different things. And then we assume they are different disorders. And they're certainly different behaviors, and they might require different interventions. Like one child might need discipline and another maybe not.
But you can solve all of it by feeding them.
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
Yeah, exactly.
Perfect.
I'm very excited by not just the presentation of these ideas, but hopefully the conversation and the debate that this will produce. And I'm always so happy to
have conversations like this on the podcast because I hate to say it, folks, but you need
to be your own advocate. You have to be your own health advocate, and you cannot expect other
people to do it for you. Even the best intentioned and most competent of doctors, the way things are
currently structured in our healthcare system, they may simply not have the available bandwidth and time, depending on where and how they operate,
to do the requisite research or quarterback some of the exploration of these metabolic
interventions. And so you really need to take ownership, radical ownership
of your own advocacy. And this podcast, your book, the resources that you'll have on your website
are some simple ways to do that. And fortunately, also the mechanisms, if you take an afternoon to
try to educate yourself, they are reasonably easily understood. I mean, this is not quantum
physics we're talking about, which is not to minimize it in any sense, but you can gain a
basic understanding as a lay person of the building blocks that you are dealing with.
And I should say also, because this is important, that brain energy is not solely focused. I know we've dedicated a lot
of time to the ketogenic diet, but it explores many other levers and factors. So not just diet,
and not just the ketogenic diet within diet, but exercise, relationships,
removing metabolic toxins. There are other levers that you can pull with the objective of this type of metabolic reboot or metabolic rejuvenation.
And I suppose I would ask just a few questions in closing.
And one is, knowing what you do of exercise, having looked at that as a variable. Are there any particular forms of exercise that seem to
demonstrate effectiveness for mitochondrial health or addressing some of the conditions
that you're used to seeing as a clinician? At this point, we don't have great evidence
across the board for exactly which ones. So, there's one large study
over a million Americans that looked at exercise as a prevention tool for mental illness or poor
mental health. And what they found was that group sports, cycling, gym activities were best. And I think the theme is cardio and pairing exercise with relationships,
pairing exercise with social contact. And so, you're getting a twofer with that one. You're
getting, you know, some bonding and friendships and other things. So, I would say those are great. The research on exercise as a
treatment for mental illness is actually very, it's a mixed bag. And some meta-analyses have
actually found that exercise does not appear to be an effective treatment for mental illness.
And I talk about some of the confounding variables in that. And one of the biggest ones is that a lot of medications
that impair mitochondrial function, which include a lot of psychiatric medications,
but also include like diabetes medications and some others. If you're taking medications that
impair mitochondrial function, those people do not get the same benefits from exercise
as people not taking those medications. And we have decent studies, randomized controlled trials
of older adults exercising. Half of them get metformin, half of them don't. The ones who did
not get metformin had more mitochondrial benefits and
adaptations than the ones who got metformin. Oh, that's interesting.
And we know that metformin appears to impair mitochondrial function, at least in some people
in many ways. But again, when it comes to psychiatric patients, antipsychotics and others are even more powerful.
So with that said, I think the one thing I would say is zone two training.
So let me just go to zone two training.
And we know that if you improve mitochondria quantity, quality, that even if you're just doing it in the muscle cells, that translates to brain benefits and that you actually get more mitochondria and you actually get more neuroplasticity in the brain as a consequence of improving your muscle size.
And probably zone two training is the be all end all.
If you have enough time to do a lot of different types of exercise, I would absolutely say mix it
up. Do some cardio, zone two training, maybe include some high intensity, but also, you know,
do some isometrics, try to grow your muscles as large as you can or as large as you want.
And sure, do some stretching and stress reduction, yoga, other things.
Those can be helpful too.
All right.
Zone 2 training, folks.
Get after it.
And I will say also there is a book.
It is somewhat outdated.
But for people who are interested in some of the growth factor adaptations related to exercise, like release of brain drive, neurotrophic factor, and things like that, there is a book.
It is older, so I don't recommend it unreservedly because I think that there have been recent discoveries that would probably modify it, but called SPARK, The Revolutionary New Science of Exercise in the Brain.
This is from 2013. So I think that it's worth reading at least a Wikipedia entry on. But zone two training,
and I will also just add to that, that for people who may or may not recognize the word
metformin, I just want to underscore something. Again,
feel free to interject. There's no biological free lunch, guys. If you take a drug that has
a high amplitude of effect in X, chances are that's not completely isolated within this complex
closed system known as the human body. So there are people who have used metformin for life
extension purposes. And I have long been, this is based on conversations with scientists, to
focus on metformin, skeptical of the upside benefit of using metformin if you are in reasonably good
metabolic shape. And this example you gave just goes to show it is not just naive, but it is sometimes
dangerous, certainly not without risk, to take drugs like this. And for people who have no
context, I believe Metformin is predominantly used as a medication in type 2 diabetes. Is that?
Absolutely. Yes. Type 2 diabetes.
Yeah. And it's probably off patent now and generics are everywhere.
I don't know.
But I think it was glucophage or glucophage.
I never know how to say that.
Autophagymacrophage, I guess.
So glucophage.
Is that right?
Am I getting that pronunciation right?
I always screw it up.
One of the two.
Anyway, you guys get the idea.
But if you're repurposing drugs, which many people are, and you got to be careful. And some of them are very interesting, like rapamycin, which is an immunosuppressant
that is not a joke, does exhibit some life extension in various species and animal models.
But you got to be careful before you introduce sort of a red hot variable like that. You got to
do lots and lots of homework. So anyway, that's a good cautionary note as well. So I think, is there anything you'd like to add to that before we
begin to wind? I think the only thing I'd like to add to the last thing you said is that if you've
got type 2 diabetes and you're on metformin, there's almost no doubt metformin is the best
drug for you to probably be taking. Agreed. be taking. If you need a drug.
However, I would also encourage you,
if you've got type 2 diabetes,
type 2 diabetes can be reversed.
You can use dietary strategies,
especially low-carb or ketogenic dietary strategies,
to reverse your diabetes, get off medication,
and dramatically improve your health.
I have seen it time and again,
and I did it with my father. It was nothing short of miraculous for him.
I'll just add another side note, which is probably going to get me in trouble. So I'm
going to say it again, folks. I'm not a doctor. I don't play one on the internet. However,
one of the reasons I wish it were easier to study extended fasting in humans, which way back in the
day you could. I mean, there were some astonishing studies with extended fasting in humans, which way back in the day you could. I mean,
there were some astonishing studies with extended fasting and then that changed. But
I have multiple anecdotes. I recognize the plural of anecdote does not equal randomized control,
you know, controlled trial. However, I have numerous anecdotes of people I have direct contact with, probably five or six now, who have seemingly regenerated their pancreas' ability through, I guess, what, the beta-isod cells to produce insulin as long-term type 1 diabetics using one month of fasting per month. So for five to six months, they do first week of the month
fasting for five to six months. And in multiple cases, it appears to be the case that some people
regain the ability to produce at least small quantities of insulin. And that, I think, is thought to be probably
entirely implausible by most folks out there. But this is why I'm so excited to be engaged
with the science. My foundation supports so much science because we just don't know.
There are so many open questions. And in the meantime, that gives me all the more excitement about books like yours, Brain Energy, subtitle, A Revolutionary Breakthrough at Understanding Mental Health and Improving Treatment for Anxiety, Depression, OCD, PTSD, and more. of people very limited downside risk and that are compatible with many other therapies. They
don't need to be a monotherapy. It's not either or. Is that fair to say? I mean, it seems fair
to say, and that's part of why I'm so enthusiastic about this. Absolutely. I think that we definitely
have a mental health crisis in the world today. I mean, record, sky-high record numbers of people suffering from depression, anxiety,
burnout, etc.
And there's no question that a lot of the strategies that I've discussed in the book
will address those easy cases.
I think the much more shocking and revolutionary thing is that I'm also talking about things like bipolar disorder, which you are,
again, you are a perfect testament to so many people that if you have bipolar disorder,
you do not have to be disabled for life from it. You do not have to take pills that are going to
make you overweight or obese, type 2 diabetic, impaired cognitively. you can find other strategies to address bipolar disorder.
You are simply a model person who figured it out on your own or talked to great smart people who
gave you hints along the way or whatever. I don't know how the hell you figured it all out,
but you are a shining example
for lots of people. And what I want to say is for all of you who know somebody with schizophrenia
or bipolar disorder who are not like Tim Ferriss, there is a better way.
So I really appreciate you saying that. I have had a lot of help along the way. And as I've had help, I've tried to showcase the people who have helped me on this podcast.
And I think your work is going to help so many people.
And it took me a long fucking time to grope through the darkness to find certain tools.
And what made me so resolute in my desire to have you on the podcast is I listened to you
and I looked at the case studies and I listened to the case studies and I looked at the interventions
and I said, for fuck's sake, pardon my French, but you have assembled many of the tools that
took me decades to stumble into eventually and then assemble into some type of portfolio for myself.
And for God's sake, if I can save people a whole bunch of time and angst and maybe
help them reduce the frequency or intensity or duration of their episodic experiences of these conditions, then I'm
all for it.
And the easiest way I can do that is to have somebody like you on the podcast.
So, Chris, I really appreciate you taking the time.
And people can find you on Twitter and Instagram at ChrisPalmerMD.
All things Chris Palmer at Chris Palmer.
That's my phrasing, not yours.
Chris Palmer MD.com. The book again is Brain Energy, subtitle Revolutionary Breakthrough
in Understanding Mental Health and Improving Treatment for Anxiety, Depression, OCD, PTSD,
and More. I would emphasize the end more because as we've mentioned multiple times,
really, you see, I'm going to really make the most of this
preschool example. Just because the kids are all behaving differently, if they didn't eat in three
hours, it is entirely possible that there is a shared underlying cause. So why not attempt to
address that, especially when the downside risk is minimal and the approaches, the implementation is known.
There are many ways to approach these things.
So Chris, thank you again.
I really appreciate you taking the time.
And I am very optimistic that your work in this book will help many, many people.
Thank you, Tim.
Thanks for everything you've been doing and you continue to do.
Thank you.
And for everybody listening,
we'll link to everything in the show notes.
So all the names, various studies, et cetera,
the book, of course, and everything else
we'll link to as usual in the show notes
at Tim.blog slash podcast.
And until next time,
be just a little kinder than necessary.
And that includes being kinder to yourself.
If your compassion does not include
yourself, it is incomplete. Thank you for tuning in. Hey guys, this is Tim again. Just one more
thing before you take off. And that is Five Bullet Friday. Would you enjoy getting a short email from
me every Friday that provides a little fun before the weekend? Between one and a half and two million
people subscribe to my free newsletter, my super short newsletter called Five Bullet Friday. Easy to sign up, easy to cancel. It is
basically a half page that I send out every Friday to share the coolest things I've found or
discovered or have started exploring over that week. It's kind of like my diary of cool things.
It often includes articles I'm reading, books I'm reading, albums perhaps,
gadgets, gizmos, all sorts of tech tricks and so on that get sent to me by my friends,
including a lot of podcast guests. And these strange esoteric things end up in my field,
and then I test them, and then I share them with you. So if that sounds fun, again, it's very short,
a little tiny bite of goodness before you head off for the weekend, something to think about.
If you'd like to try it out, just go to Tim.blog.com slash Friday.
Type that into your browser, Tim.blog.com slash Friday.
Drop in your email and you'll get the very next one.
Thanks for listening.
This episode is brought to you by Athletic Greens. I get asked all the time what I would take if I could only take one supplement.
I've been asked this for years. The answer is invariably AG1 by Athletic Greens. I view it as
all-in-one nutritional insurance. So you can cover your bases. If you're traveling, if you're just
busy, if you're not sure if your meals are where they should be, it covers your bases. I've
recommended it since the 4-Hour Body, which was god eons ago, 2010,
and I did not get paid to do so. With approximately 75 vitamins, minerals, and whole food source
ingredients, you'll be hard-pressed to find a more nutrient-dense formula on the market.
It has a multivitamin, multimineral greens complex, probiotics and prebiotics for gut health,
an immunity formula, digestive enzymes,
and adaptogens. You get the idea. It is very, very comprehensive. And I do my best, of course,
to focus on nutrient-dense proper meals, but sometimes you're busy. Sometimes you're traveling.
Sometimes you just want to make sure that you're getting what you need. AG1 makes it easy to get a lot of nutrition when whole foods
aren't readily available. It's also NSF certified for sport, making it safe for competitive athletes
as what's on the label is in the powder. It's the ultimate all-in-one nutritional supplement bundle
in one easy scoop. Right now, Athletic Greens is giving my audience a special offer on top of their
all-in-one formula, which is a free vitamin D supplement and five free travel packs with your first subscription purchase.
Many of us are deficient in vitamin D.
I found that true for myself, which is usually produced in our bodies from sun exposure.
So adding a vitamin D supplement to your daily routine is a great option for additional immune support.
Support your immunity, gut health, and energy by visiting
athleticgreens.com slash Tim. You'll receive up to a year's supply of vitamin D and five free
travel packs with your subscription. Again, that's athleticgreens.com slash Tim.
This episode is brought to you by Levels. Very excited about this one. I wrote about the health
benefits of using continuous glucose monitors, CGMs, more than 10 years ago in the four-hour body. And at that time,
CGMs were horribly primitive and hard to use, super painful. Levels has now made this technology
and the insights that come from it easy and available to everyone. Putting in the sensors,
everything about it is smooth, easy. I found it
completely painless. And I started tracking my glucose way back in the day to learn more about
what I should and shouldn't be eating. Keeping my blood sugar stable is critical to my daily and
long-term health and performance goals. With Levels, you can see how different foods affect
your health with real-time feedback. Poor glucose control, which you don't want, is associated with a number of chronic conditions,
not just diabetes, but also Alzheimer's and heart disease.
It can impact your mood, certainly affects my mood.
Energy levels, right, that work in the afternoon, that dip that you feel, for instance, that's
just one example, and weight management.
And we all respond differently, sometimes a little bit, sometimes vastly differently,
even to the same foods.
So one type of carbohydrate
that my body might process well,
let's say that's fruit or rice or sweet potato,
your body might not.
The Levels app interprets your glucose data
and provides a simple score after you eat a meal.
So you can see how different foods affect you
and then develop a personalized diet
that's right for you and your goals.
Seeing this data in real time, at least for me and for so many others who use Levels,
is a really powerful behavioral change mechanism.
And many of the guests on the podcast have talked about this.
Marco Canora, a famous chef, used Levels to determine that, say, walking, for him, just
a few hundred steps after a meal significantly affected his glucose levels.
Levels is backed by a world-class team
and group of advisors,
including names you've likely heard before,
including repeat podcast guest,
Dr. Dom D'Agostino and many others.
If you're interested in learning more about levels
and trying a CGM yourself,
learn all about it,
go to levels.link slash Tim. That's levels.link
slash Tim. I'll spell it out. L-E-V-E-L-S dot L-I-N-K slash Tim. Check them out today.
I highly encourage you to consider getting this data on your own personal responses to the food
that you eat, the food that maybe you shouldn't eat,
the food that you might want to eat more of, all of these things you can learn. And that is at levels.link slash Tim. You can also find the link in this episode's description.