The Tim Ferriss Show - #792: Seth Godin on Playing the Right Game and Strategy as a Superpower

Episode Date: January 29, 2025

Seth Godin is the author of 21 internationally bestselling books, translated into more than 35 languages, including Linchpin, Tribes, The Dip, and Purple Cow. His latest book is This Is Strategy.Sponsors:Cresset prestigious family office for CEOs, founders, and entrepreneurs: https://cressetcapital.com/tim (book a call today) AG1 all-in-one nutritional supplement: https://DrinkAG1.com/Tim (1-year supply of Vitamin D (and 5 free AG1 travel packs) with your first subscription purchase.)Shopify global commerce platform, providing tools to start, grow, market, and manage a retail business: https://shopify.com/tim (one-dollar-per-month trial period)*For show notes and past guests on The Tim Ferriss Show, please visit tim.blog/podcast.For deals from sponsors of The Tim Ferriss Show, please visit tim.blog/podcast-sponsorsSign up for Tim’s email newsletter (5-Bullet Friday) at tim.blog/friday.For transcripts of episodes, go to tim.blog/transcripts.Discover Tim’s books: tim.blog/books.Follow Tim:Twitter: twitter.com/tferriss Instagram: instagram.com/timferrissYouTube: youtube.com/timferrissFacebook: facebook.com/timferriss LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/timferrissPast guests on The Tim Ferriss Show include Jerry Seinfeld, Hugh Jackman, Dr. Jane Goodall, LeBron James, Kevin Hart, Doris Kearns Goodwin, Jamie Foxx, Matthew McConaughey, Esther Perel, Elizabeth Gilbert, Terry Crews, Sia, Yuval Noah Harari, Malcolm Gladwell, Madeleine Albright, Cheryl Strayed, Jim Collins, Mary Karr, Maria Popova, Sam Harris, Michael Phelps, Bob Iger, Edward Norton, Arnold Schwarzenegger, Neil Strauss, Ken Burns, Maria Sharapova, Marc Andreessen, Neil Gaiman, Neil de Grasse Tyson, Jocko Willink, Daniel Ek, Kelly Slater, Dr. Peter Attia, Seth Godin, Howard Marks, Dr. Brené Brown, Eric Schmidt, Michael Lewis, Joe Gebbia, Michael Pollan, Dr. Jordan Peterson, Vince Vaughn, Brian Koppelman, Ramit Sethi, Dax Shepard, Tony Robbins, Jim Dethmer, Dan Harris, Ray Dalio, Naval Ravikant, Vitalik Buterin, Elizabeth Lesser, Amanda Palmer, Katie Haun, Sir Richard Branson, Chuck Palahniuk, Arianna Huffington, Reid Hoffman, Bill Burr, Whitney Cummings, Rick Rubin, Dr. Vivek Murthy, Darren Aronofsky, Margaret Atwood, Mark Zuckerberg, Peter Thiel, Dr. Gabor Maté, Anne Lamott, Sarah Silverman, Dr. Andrew Huberman, and many more.See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

coming up in this episode. And the mistake people make is if you find yourself saying, I just need to get the word out. I've done all the hard part. Now I just need to get the word out. You haven't done the hard part. What you've done is waited for a miracle. Hello, boys and girls, ladies and germs. This is Tim Ferriss. Welcome to another episode of the Tim Ferriss show. My guest today is a fan favorite. It is Seth Godin. The one and only he is the author of 21 internationally bestselling books translated into more than 35 languages, including linchpin tribes, the dip and a purple cow. His latest book, this is strategy really caught my attention attention and it offers a fresh lens

on how we can make bold decisions, embrace change and navigate a complex rapidly evolving world. We cover a ton of ground including sets of questions that you can use to catalyze personal and professional growth, maxims, different concepts to unpack that can productively shake the snow globe of your mind so that you can settle on new realizations, different ways to create competitive advantage in an increasingly crowded world. Seth is also the founder of the alt MBA and the akimbo workshops transformative online programs that have helped thousands of people take their work to the next level. His blog sets dot's dot blog, that's plural Seth's dot blog, is one of the most widely read in the

world and has been such for a very long time. Seth is also the creator of the Carbon Almanac, a global initiative focused on climate action. This is a very practical episode, as all of Seth's are on this podcast podcast and I'll leave it at that. So after a few words from the people who make this podcast possible, please enjoy. Listeners have heard me talk about making before you manage for years. All that means to me is that when I wake up, I block out three to four hours to do the most important things that are generative, creative, podcasting, writing, etc. Before

I get to the email and the admin stuff and the reactive stuff and everyone else's agenda for my time for me, let's just say I'm a writer and entrepreneur, I need to focus on the making to be happy. If I get sucked into all the little bits and pieces that are constantly churning, I end up feeling stressed out. And that is why today's sponsor is so interesting. It's been one of the greatest energetic unlocks in the last few years. So here we go.

I need to find people who are great at managing. And that is where Crescent Family Office comes in. You spell it C-R-E-S-S-E-T. Crescent Family Office. I was introduced to them by one of the top CPG investors in the world. Crescent is a prestigious family office for CEOs, founders, and entrepreneurs. They handle the complex financial planning, uncertain tax strategies, timely exit planning,

bill pay, wires, all the dozens of other parts of wealth management and just financial management that would otherwise pull me away from doing what I love most, making things, mastering skills, spending time with the people I care about. And over many years, I was getting pulled away from that stuff at least a few days a week and I've completely eliminated that. So experience the freedom of focusing on what matters to you with the support of a top wealth management team. You can schedule a call today at CrescentCapital.com.com.

That's spelled C-R-E-S-S-E-T CrescentCapital.com.com. To see how Crescent can help streamline your financial plans and grow your wealth. That's CrescentCapital.com.com. And disclosure, I am a client of Crescent. There are no material conflicts other than this paid testimonial and of course all investing involves risk including loss of principal So do your due diligence? This episode is brought to you by Shopify one of my absolute favorite companies and they make some of my favorite products Shopify is the commerce platform revolutionizing millions of businesses worldwide and I've known the team since 2008 or 2009.

But prior to that, I wish I had personally had Shopify in the early 2000s when I was running my own e-commerce business. I tell that story in the four hour work week, but the tools then were absolutely atrocious and I could only dream of a platform like Shopify. In fact, it was you guys, my dear readers, who introduced me to Shopify when I polled all of you about best ecommerce platforms around 2009 and they've

only become better and better since. Whether you're a garage entrepreneur or getting ready for your IPO, Shopify is the only tool you need to start, run and grow your business without the struggle. Shopify puts you in control of every sales channel. Doesn't matter if you're selling satin sheets from Shopify's in-person POS system or offering organic olive oil on Shopify's all-in-one e-commerce platform. However you interact with your customers, you're covered.

And once you've reached your audience, Shopify has the internet's best converting checkout to help you turn browsers into buyers. Shopify powers 10% of all e-commerce in the United States. And Shopify is truly a global force as the e-commerce solution behind Allbirds, Rothy's, Brooklyn and millions of other entrepreneurs of every size across more than 170 countries. Plus Shopify's award-winning help is there to support your success every step of the way if you have questions. This is Possibility powered by Shopify.

Established in 2025, has a nice ring to it, doesn't it? So sign up for your $1 per month trial period at Shopify.com slash Tim, all lowercase. Go to Shopify.com slash Tim to start selling today with Shopify. One more time, Shopify.com slash Tim. Optimal minimum. At this altitude I can run flat out for a half mile Shopify. One more time, Shopify.com slash Tim. I suppose I want to ask the question that I always ask. What would make this time well spent for you? What would make this a home run? Looking back.

I have to confess that I've never had a conversation with you that wasn't well spent. What would make it a home run for me is if you considered it one of the best episodes of the year or maybe even longer. I want to be on the greatest hits. That's what we're pushing for. All right. Perfect. To kick that off out of the gate, what would be a sensible place to start? Is there a particular story or a lead question that you think would help us start with bang, anything come to mind? There are a million places I could start, of course. You know best, but it seems to me that many of your listeners actually want a job without a boss. Seek to build something and they need

to be woken up about that. And number two, people who misunderstand your breakthrough books think they're about tactics and they follow the steps instead of realizing they're about strategy and then find a resilient way forward. And strategy, this philosophy is something you've been doing your entire career, but never called it that. Well, let's start there. So strategy like success or God, if we want to really get out there are words that a lot of people use, but oftentimes they're in their minds referring to different things. So when you use the word strategy, what does that mean to you? I think it's a philosophy of becoming. I don't think it's a set of tactics. I don't think it's about winning in the short run. I think it's about being very clear about the change we seek to make and who we seek to change,

understanding the systems and the games around us, and then committing to the long-term process of getting to where we're going. Meaning our tactics will change all the time, but our strategy does not. And most people, because we've been indoctrinated to have a job, want tactics instead. And I could do much better if I was peddling tactics, but I'm not. I'm never going to write a story, a book called, this is God. The tactic monger, volume one. Exactly. So if I'm not going to write this is God, or this is tactics, at least I could write this is strategy. And what would be a real world example of good strategy? Any particular company or project come to mind? So some famous strategies, an elegant strategy. Bill Gates says, we are going to have the strategy that no one

ever got fired for buying Microsoft. He stole that strategy from IBM. So IBM had a 50 year run where their products weren't the most cutting edge, they weren't the best priced, but they had enough salespeople and support and infrastructure that if you worked for a big company, buying IBM was easy. Every time Microsoft followed that strategy, they did fine. And when they veered away from it, they had a problem. A strategy when I was at Yahoo, we had the chance to buy Google for about $10 million. We didn't buy them. I didn't get a vote. But Yahoo's strategy was the web is a dark and nasty place. Come to Yahoo and don't leave.

And the homepage had 183 links on it. At Google, their strategy was the web has grown up, come here and go somewhere else. And Marissa Mayer built the most profitable marketing engine of all time by making sure, fighting for years to make it so there's only a couple links on the homepage because that was built into the strategy, which is if you're leaving Google, we're doing something right. And that's where all the ads came from. And that's why Yahoo couldn't buy Google because the strategies were completely the opposite. And Starbucks had strategy that took them a very long way for a very long time. But it's not about Frappuccinos, it's about understanding who is this for and how can we incrementally help them get there.

What did that look like for Starbucks and what did it look like for them to stray? Howard Schultz did not start Starbucks. When he got there, there were two Starbuckses, and neither one of them sold cups of coffee. They only sold beans. Howard had been to Italy and he realized that there was a deep human desire, A, to go from being pre-caffeinated to caffeinated and that gets refreshed every single day. And two, to be able to do it with other people who you see yourself in.

People like us do things like this. So in the Northeast there was Dunkin' Donuts, but the idea of Dunkin' Donuts is you're not happy that you're getting coffee. Your coffee isn't that delicious. Let's just get this over with. And every time Howard built more of that feeling that you could go to any Starbucks in the world and feel like you were with your people. And that for five bucks, you could feel like a rich person. He could repeat it over and over and over again, and the tactics would take care of themselves. CB. If not the tactics, what are the core ingredients

of enacting a strategy like that? RW. There's all sorts of surprising ways that we can challenge ourselves once we start down this path. But to start down the path, there are four things we're looking for. We're looking for systems, we're looking for time, we're looking for games, and finally, empathy. And all four of them are really unexplored and mysterious. But once you see all four of them, strategy is much easier to take care of itself. So I'm happy to take them one by one or give examples, but those four keep interweaving over and over again. And that unfolds for us what a strategy can be. Great. Let's go through the four. And maybe if it's not too cumbersome, if there's an

example that's easy to give, that's great too. However you want to land it. Systems are invisible and they hide themselves because they don't want people to see who's operating things. They invent culture to defend themselves. The most famous one is the solar system. There's this invisible gravity. The Earth doesn't go around the Sun because it wants to. It goes around the Sun because gravity makes that its easiest path. If you grew up in the United States to middle-class parents, you'll be under pressure from the time you're five years old to get good grades. Why do I need to get good grades? So you can get into a famous college,

but you're not supposed to call it a famous college, you're supposed to call it a good college. That system with tuition and tenure and student debt and football teams and cheerleaders and college tours and the sticker on the back of a car and the SATs, all of it is just taken for granted as normal. And so, Danela Meadows has done brilliant writing before she passed away way too early about all the dynamics of systems, systems in our world, systems that we want to build. So when we see a system under stress, then we can see the system, that we can see the climate when temperatures start to rise. But before the temperature started to rise, when the climate was normal, no one paid attention

to it because the system, the thing that keeps it going was sort of invisible. So if you're going to start any enterprise, a little plumbing business, a giant internet company, if you're going to run for office, you should be able to see and name the elements of the system. Where is their gravity? What is seen as normal? And there's pushback if you don't do it. And so I'll finish the rant by asking a simple question. How much should a wedding cost? And I'm especially unqualified to answer this. No, it's super simple.

The answer is exactly what your best friend spent, but a little more. Yeah. And that's why a wedding in New York City cost more than $100,000. Not because you need monogrammed matchbooks to have a good wedding. You need them to be part of the wedding industrial complex to show your status to the people who've been invited because that's what the thing is for. So we have to see systems and then either we work for the system, or the system works for us. We can linger on this one for a bit because next one is time. So I feel like we should take our time plus it's long form. So could you give an example on a smaller scale of a, you mentioned plumbing doesn't need to be plumbing, but a solopreneur or a very, very small startup, but a solopreneur or a very, very small startup, two to four employees, and how they might start to ask questions around systems to identify the systems that are at work.

Because for instance, in my life, I'm good at identifying what is normal, like what are the unquestioned assumptions. I'm good at that, but that seems like I'm, I'm holding the tail of the elephant, like one of the blind men and the parable. It's like, I've got a piece of it, but it's not the whole elephant. I don't think you're giving yourself enough credit. The whole tango thing. I mean, you have been doing this for a very long time.

Or the archery thing by me. So let's say you're going to build a small business that supports medium sized businesses with their Google workspace. So you're a couple nerds and you're going to be the person who helps people set up their Google drive and across the organization reasonably secure for a company with 100 employees, right? Because you're in there, in the factory, seeing how things are made, it's very tempting to imagine

that everyone you're serving wants what you want and that you think your customer is the person who's buying stuff from you and what they need is a tech solution. None of these things are true. That the system of a company with 100 people, it's probably not the CEO's job to set this thing up. So it's someone else's job.

There's a system, a hierarchy of jobs. What does that person want? It's not their money. So lowering your price to get new customers is not going to help you get new customers. That in fact, what that person wants is a story to tell their boss, a story of why did I pick these people, and even better, a story of if it fails, why they are not going to be in trouble. So, when we show up at an organization to tell our story to that system, we have to

do it understanding how do they buy everything else? What do they measure? What would happen to us if we were bigger than the other people bidding or smaller than the other people bidding? All of these things go into how the system works the same way the admissions office at the famous college doesn't always pick the people with the highest SAT scores because there's this complicated mechanism at play that is historical to feed and maintain the system. So in the case of this Google workspace thing, let's say you decide to close on Thanksgiving Day and you've just got a message on your voicemail, we'll close on Thanksgiving Day,

leave a message, we'll call you back tomorrow. That seems normal unless what got you into the system was an unbreakable promise that you will never get in trouble because we will always answer the phone. That decision, that tactical decision has to be driven by what you seek to stand for, but that's only going to happen if you see the system of what this company, your client does and what stories do they tell themselves. And Hollywood is a system and the senior prom is a system. And there are all these factors that go into all of them, subtle signals that people are sending to each other.

And if you're going to make a living, taking money from people to solve their problems, it has to be to help them dance with the system that they're part of. All right, shall we bookmark that and come to time, games or empathy? Which would you like to tackle next? Time is really interesting. James Click wrote a brilliant book about the history of time

travel. Now, of course, there are no actual time machines, but we know who invented the time machine. And it was actually H.G. Wells. Before H.G. Wells wrote his book, nobody in the world talked about time machines. The concept.G. Wells wrote his book, nobody in the world talked about time machines. The concept that you and I take for granted, like if you go back in time or if you go forward, no one ever said that, ever. And time, we're all very familiar with it and no one can define it. And we know what now is. And the now of a week ago isn't now anymore, it's back then, and it feels different. So if you want to build a company with a thousand employees in it, if you want to go public,

if you want to be somebody with a lot of zeros in your bank account, that is not going to happen in the next three seconds. There's something that's going to happen between now and then. And each one of the steps as we look through time is not today. So when we want to have a forest, we don't get a forest, we start planting trees because 20 years from now we'll have a forest. And when you're growing up in Long Island or when you're growing up training for the Olympics, you know you're not going to be doing the Olympics when you're 50. So what exactly are the purpose of these steps? And what does it mean to fail? Does it mean that you failed

right this moment in service of getting where you want to go later? Or does it mean you failed forever? What does it mean to quit? Does quitting now mean you failed forever or does it just open the door to succeeding later? And so we have this opportunity to see time the way our competition doesn't. So in 2001, I was at a conference and we were in this small group setting, there were eight people and said go around the circle and say who you are and the guy to my left said my name is Steven I'm a judge. Turn out he was Stephen Breyer he was on the Supreme Court and the person next to him said my name is Sergey and I have this new search engine. And so it's it so Sergey what's your marketing strategy. And he said well here's, what's your marketing strategy? And he said, well, here's the deal.

We think Google is going to get better every day. So we don't want people to use Google for the first time right away. We want them to use it for the first time later so it's better by the time they get there. So we're not doing any promotion whatsoever, because the Google of now only exists to get us to the Google of tomorrow. And when we're at the Google you're ready for, that's when you'll come use it. And at the same time, Yahoo was busy trying to defend the plunging stock price in the moment as opposed to saying, what are we going to be in 10 years?

Remember the TV commercials at exactly that time for Yahoo. Okay. So framing time differently. I mean, I suppose Bezos and Amazon would be an example of that as well. I mean, who dog-tran Wall Street to expect no profitability for God knows how long, a decade, I mean, and set out in the very first annual shareholder letter that was subsequently, I believe, re-read every year or re-presented in some fashion. Yeah. So let's just break that into pieces, right? Because in the moment, Morgan Stanley says, don't do that. That's dumb. It's going to hurt your stock price today. But what Jeff said was, if I don't establish the conditions for Wall Street to send us the investors we want,

our stock price will be zero in five years. So the only way to get to five years from now is to do this today, even though it feels expensive because compared to the alternative, it's really cheap. Setting the conditions. Yeah. I have a sneaking suspicion we're going to come back to conditions at some point. Games. I like the sound of this. I like games. Some games, I suppose, depends on which one I choose and if I choose it consciously, but

what does games mean? So again, back to the indoctrination. So we grew up with Candyland and Partizzi and Monopoly. Those are board games and they're okay, but that's not the kind of games I'm talking about. Any situation where there are multiple people and variable outputs with scarcity, there's a game. So it is the game to decide when two lanes merge,

which car is gonna go first. And it is a game to decide when two lanes merge, which car is going to go first. And it is a game to decide when you're working for Jack Welch and the bottom 10% of the people lose their job, which people are going to lose their job. And it is a game to exchange money for a hot dog at the baseball game because that exchange happens in a way where two players come together for mutual benefit. So we should not deny that games exist. We should learn how games work. And when we make a move in a game that doesn't seem to work, we should not say, we are a bad person. We should say, I made a move that did not work. Those are totally different things. And so the only way you've been able to achieve all the things you've achieved between the archery and the dancing and

everything in between is you make more moves than most people. And you measure them, and you don't do the ones that don't work again. But it is impossible to innovate if it has to work. Innovation must always be accompanied by the phrase, this might not work. And so if you and your team aren't saying this might not work in service of innovation, you're not innovating. This is my entire notebook full of training logs and experiments. And let's say 50% is least, if not 70% things that did not work and required tweaks so that I would not repeat the same mistake the next time doesn't always work. But over time, it tends to round towards improvement. At the very least, we've only been going at this for a few minutes, but already I can hear it. People are saying,

wait, wait, wait, I too didn't have someone vindicate the tactics I am already using, that that is what I am listening for, to hear that I am on the right track. When are you guys going to get to the tactics part? And the very fact that we don't hear this kind of description of the world we're in is like the fish that doesn't realize it's in water. And what I'm trying to help people see in a world that is changing faster than it has ever changed in history is when you see these threads and these systems under stress, that is when you know there's an opportunity for you. And if it feels uncomfortable, imagine how it feels to people who don't get the joke. When this discomfort shows up, that's the opportunity.

CB. Yeah, for sure. And one of the many reasons I've been looking forward to the conversation is I spend a lot of time thinking about many of these constituent parts, but I haven't necessarily explicitly woven them together into something that combines into strategy. But in terms of time horizon, and for me, a lot of it is trying to find or create a category of one for quote unquote competitive advantage. And part of that is choosing a game I can win, which entails also understanding the rules of the game that you have chosen or inherited or somehow deliberately or accidentally ended up playing. I was really trying to parse the rules of the game, the time I do think about that a lot. It's one of the simplest ways to have a competitive advantage, just have a longer time horizon, but it requires having a lot

of other things fall online. And then certainly the systems and in part, depending on what game you're playing, but the, as you said, what are the gravitational pulls? What are the incentives of different stakeholders who has what degree of respective influence. So it's fun to hear these all combined. Empathy is one, and I would like to think of myself as an empathetic person, but this isn't maybe one that I would initially have thrown into the ring as an integral piece of strategy. So what does this mean? You just gave it away. I'd like to think of myself as an empathetic person implies that there's a moral component to what we're talking about. And at some level, of course there is, but that's not what I'm talking about. What I'm talking about is this. Everything we build and

everything we make only works in a voluntary exchange if someone else wants it more than they want the money or time they have to trade for it. Meaning someone's not going to buy the thing you're selling at a craft fair because you worked really hard to make it. They're going to buy it because they want it. And all empathy is, is being very clear about who it's for and why they want it. And we get so busy and so exhausted making something, we forget. We hustle people and hassle people to buy from us because it's important to us. CB. Sounds like some of my blog posts. RL. Yes. The notebook, you didn't need to publish the notebook if your goal was for you to read it because you already read it. You are publishing it so other people will read it. So your description of the book is not, please buy this because I worked really hard to write it. It's I have a thing here that when I describe it, if I create the conditions for

information exchange to happen, you will bang down the door to get it. You will be angry if you can't get a copy. Now, that implies that it cannot be for everyone, no matter what we make, because you cannot be empathic to everyone. Unless you're selling, I don't know, oxygen on a planet that doesn't have any, there's nothing that everyone wants the same way. So where all of this must begin and end is with the minimum, the smallest viable audience. Who are the people? Just them. That when they hear about this, they're going to say, that's exactly what I was looking

for. That's all you need. You pick that group, you delight them, and you forgive everybody else. like them and you forgive everybody else. And here's proof that you're not doing it. If someone comes to you and you are not regularly sending folks to your competitors or people who are thought of as your competitors, you are not serious about this, about picking the audience who it's for and forgiving everybody else. When someone shows up at the Ferrari dealership and says, I got six kids, how am I going to get them to school? You don't try to persuade them to get an Enenzo. You send them down the street to the Volvo dealership. That was one of your many questions, I suppose 40 or so questions in the book that I wanted to ask about. Am I positioned as a service?

Can I happily send others to people who might be seen as competitors? And I was like, huh, interesting. I wanted to clarify that, which you just did. And it makes sense if you can't do that, then you very likely did not have your 1,000 true fans or minimal viable audience to find. Positioning is why are the people who don't choose to buy from you right to make that choice? And if you have this attitude that everyone should buy from you, you can't answer that question.

So the people at Nestle's don't get upset if you buy an Askenosie chocolate bar for $14 because Sean and his daughter aren't selling a chocolate bar to people who might buy a Nestle's bar. They're completely different groups of people. And the same thing is true for people who play Dungeons and Dragons versus people who want to go watch Ultimate Fighting Championship. In that given moment, there are two different groups of people. I'm glad you said in that given moment, because I happen to be the perfect overlap. There are some people who do both, but they don't do both at the same time. No, no, no, very hard to do at the same time. Just a quick thanks to one of our sponsors and we'll be right back to the show.

This episode is brought to you by AG1, the daily foundational nutritional supplement that supports whole body health. I do get asked a lot what I would take if I could only take one supplement. And the true answer is invariably AG1. It simply covers a ton of bases. I usually drink it in the mornings and frequently take their travel packs with me on the road. So what is AG1? AG1 is a science-driven

formulation of vitamins, probiotics, and whole food source nutrients. In a single scoop, AG1 gives you support for the brain, gut, and immune system. So take advantage of this exclusive offer for you, my dear podcast listeners, a free one-year supply of liquid vitamin D plus five travel packs with your subscription. Simply go to www.drinkag1.com.com.com.com.com.com.com.com.com.com.com.com.com.com.com.com.com.com.com.com.com.com.com.com.com.com.com.com.com.com.com.com.com.com.com.com.com.com.com.com.com.com.com.com.com.com.com.com.com.com.com.com.com.com.com.com.com.com.com.com.com.com.com.com.com.com.com.com.com.com.com.com.com.com.com.com.com.com.com.com.com.com.com.com.com.com.com.com.com.com.com.com.com.com.com.com.com.com.com.com.com.com.com.com.com.com.com.com.com.com.com.com.com.com.com.com.com.com.com.com.com.com.com.com.com.com.com.com.com.com.com.com.com.com.com.com.com.com.com.com.com.com.com.com.com.com.com.com.com.com.com.com.com.com.com.com.com.com.com.com.com.com.com.com.com.com.com.com.com.com.com.com.com.com.com.com.com.com.com.com.com.com.com.com.com.com.com.com.com.com.com.com.com.com.com.com.com.com.com.com.com.com.com.com.com.com.com.com.com. All right. So we have then this might be a good segue, many Maxence or ideas that we could discuss from the book. And I circled a few for myself, mostly for clarification. And I'll let you pick from one of these three and feel free to revise the wording. But I'm very curious. I'll read the three and then you can pick whichever one you want to start with. So the first is systems don't start out selfish, but resilient

ones often end up that way. The next one is you're not sitting in traffic. You are the traffic. And then the third is don't try to burn big logs if you only have a little bit of kindling. Perfect. Let's do all three. We'll start with the last one. If you've ever gone camping, you know what I mean by that. I do have enough kindling. Freezing my ass off in a rural archery range yesterday and realized they had a nice wood burning stove, but all the logs were as big around as my torso. And I thought, well, that's going to be a really tough fire to start.

Exactly. Unless you had an enormous amount of kindling and then it would go up in no time. Yeah. Too often, because of the media, entrepreneurs think if they don't start something that sounds giant, they're failures. Too often we give entrepreneurs credit for raising a lot of money from venture capital. That's probably not the right path for you. The money you're raising from investors is kindling, and the logs you're starting are the markets you're trying to get to. So if you want to build a dialysis chain in 40 cities where people can go get reliable kidney treatment, you can't start that with a $100,000 loan. You just can't. But a $100,000 loan is more than enough to

get yourself doing very, very well with a hot dog cart somewhere. So we first got to make a smart decision based on time, based on the systems we're confronting, do we have enough kindling? Do I have enough reputation to even take this on? The one about systems is this. Systems aren't people. They are collections of people, and they act in ways that maybe the people who started the system and maybe the people who work in the system wouldn't choose, but that's the system they've got. So if you think about the healthcare system in the United States, it's not a healthcare system, it's a treatment system. Because everyone in the system gets rewarded for giving treatments, not for making you healthy. And so it's quite likely that once you start working with the medical industrial complex,

you'll get more and more tests and more and more probing and more and more bills because that's what the system does. And every time someone moves out of where the system ended up, the system exerts a feedback loop to push them back into the spot where they belong. And so if we look at how we ended up with college educations that cost almost $300,000, it's because the combination of accreditation and ranking and tenure and parent status and placement offices all supported going in only one direction. And if you show up, say, look at me, I'm really smart, I went overseas and in two years I learned X, Y, and Z, the system's going to push back and say, yeah, but we require this kind of degree

from this kind of accredited thing. The NCAA is a system that started with people playing football in the backyard and now they're taking private jets to stadiums with 100,000 people in them because the system kept churning in one direction. And you might not like the output, but you probably can't change the system by yourself. What you might be able to do is, back to your second thing, you're not sitting in traffic. You are traffic. When you participate in a system, you're either going to make that system more successful and get a prize, or you could try to fight that system, but you're going to need a lot

of kindling to do so because being in the system actually changes the system one way or the other. So the challenge that we have is Google didn't show up and say, we're going to have meetings with all the ad agencies in the world and change the way advertising works. Instead, they walked away completely from that multi-billion dollar world of ad spend, and instead built a tiny little engine for direct marketers where someone would buy the word Chanel and they'd buy it for a nickel. And then what would happen is a brand manager from Chanel would Google themselves, don't do it too much, you can go blind, but they would Google themselves and they would see someone had bought their name for a nickel.

So they'd pay 10 cents to take it back and the auction was on. So Google changed the system, but they didn't change it with a frontal assault. They changed it by moving away from the system, finding people who weren't part of the system and then the system chased them. Now I wanted to mention also just a footnote to the kindling comment, which is some people listening to myself, man, well, takes money to make money. And I would just say there are many ways to get that kindling. You can do joint ventures, you could do licensing, you could do non-dilutive financing, which is a fancy way of saying, for instance, two startups that I've been chatting

with have raised money from the government. They're really good at doing that from DARPA and so on. And they get a nice big fat check. It's delivered within six weeks and it does not affect, actually enhances with lots of leverage their ability to raise money in the future. So there are very off menu approaches to gathering your kindling. Yeah. And there's also the choice you make, you know, if you want to be in the movies, you could invest years of your life and pay an enormous number of dues and wait for Hollywood to pick you. Or you could sharpen your writing skills and make a two-minute YouTube video and that YouTube video could then find you an audience. And Alana Glazer went on to be in a popular Comedy Central thing and then a movie star.

But she didn't go in the front door because she didn't have enough kindling to go in the front door. Instead, she found her audience and then multiplied. Yeah, there's an amazing story. People can check it out in a book called Rebel Without a Crew by Robert Rodriguez. And when he made, I think it was Mariachi way back in the day, he basically came up with his list of assets and he's like, all right, we got a turtle. Turtles going to be in the movie. All right. My friend has a broken down school bus. School bus is going in the script and like his cousin has a pit bull. Great. We'll figure out how to fit it in and retrofitted the entire script around this. And people thought, wow, this must be like a legitimate, well-budgeted film. It's like, no, I just made a list of everything I had and then tried to insert them somehow. And he is very good at operating with, I would

say lateral approaches to creative output. Are there any other examples of taking the side door, so to speak, that stick out to you? Could be for entering a well-established sector, it could be for anything at all. In fact, that's almost always what happens. And the mistake people make is if you find yourself saying, I just need to get the word out. I've done all the hard part. Now, I just need to get the word out. You haven't done the hard part. What you've done is waited for a miracle. And the people who have gone on to build, for example, useful businesses on top of a Kickstarter, stepwise said, all right, I don't have enough money to build a factory, get into Best Buy, do national advertising, but I do have enough money to get 1,000 people to pay me $200 for a coffee maker, and then I can do the next one, and then I can do the

next one. So this stepwise process back to time says the shortcuts are illusory, that the most direct way forward feels long in the moment, that I'm going to serve a group of people that so need what I'm doing, that they pay for it, and that are so delighted by it that they tell their friends, and that I'm going to repeat it, and I'm going to repeat it. And if you look at articles on TechCrunch and places like that, at companies that raised 50 or $100 million who are going to change the whole world overnight, they're all gone. Because you just can't shortcut that on demand. What you can do is find that group of people and bring empathy to them and make a change. Yeah. Also with raising that amount of money, some of them, a handful out of hundreds,

will figure out a way to make it work. But in most cases, they're like, all right, we have an idea on the back of a napkin. I think this space shuttle will work. Let's raise a bunch of money. And then they put together soapbox, derby, space shuttle, and then just incinerate themselves, break into a million different pieces. That's the usual outcome. But you know, all cast, no breaks. Sometimes it works, but not all the time. And I think that also, I suppose I have a reputation for shortcuts, but it's not really, Also, I suppose I have a reputation for shortcuts, but it's not really, I don't think of myself that way. I like to find elegant workarounds if they exist, but I'm doing a shit ton of experimentation

and taking all the notes that I had in that notebook for anything so that I can hopefully make sure I'm not fooling myself and that I can replicate. And then if I can do that, I'm like, all right, let me try that with two or three other people. And then I'm like, okay, well, let's expand the scope a little bit. Yeah. And so that's where feedback loops and network effects come in. So people don't really understand feedback loops. Feedback loops are not feedback, right? The feedback of, I'm going to give you criticism. That's not what we're talking about. Feedback loops, there are two kinds, positive and negative. So a negative feedback loop is an actually negative, it's a thermostat. And what that means is if it gets really warm in the hotel room,

the air conditioning kicks on, if it gets really cold, the heat kicks on. It's negative in that it keeps it in a central place. And a positive feedback loop is like the microphone at a bad wedding that gets that screeching sound that goes around and around and around because it keeps getting amplified. So what we seek to do is build a project that the next time we do it, it's going to work even better. We want to find an insatiable desire and start the path of filling it. So the insatiable desire could be something like status, but it could be something like I need caffeine every single morning. That doesn't fade over time. And as you become the reliable purveyor of caffeine, then risk averse people are just

going to keep coming back again and again. So once you had a small head start with this podcast, you could keep that head start by creating ever better episodes of the podcast and no one could ever catch up. My blog in April is going to have post number 10,000 and no one's ever going to catch up to me. But each time there's another post, it becomes more of what people signed up for. And this doesn't work quite as well when you're talking about shoes because once someone's closet is filled, the only way for them to buy new shoes is to get rid of the old ones. So a Christian Louboutin can't scale to infinity because sooner or later you run out of people who have the money or you run out of people who have the closet space. But what we're looking for is to build these networks with feedback

where it works better when I tell my friends, it works better when I have more of it, it works better when I do it again. And these insatiable desires are everywhere, but we ignore them and instead try to steal market share from somebody else. So I think this ties into one of the questions also that I was going to ask you about, which is how can I create the conditions for a network affected developer on my project? I suppose is ensuring that you have an answer to hopefully hopefully an affirmative answer to, can you say, or would your clients say, or customers, it works better when I tell my friends? That would seem to be one.

RG There are some very pure examples of this, but not many. So a pure example is the fax machine or email. If it's 40 years ago and you have friends who don't have email, you need to get them to get email because you can't send email to people if they don't have an email address, right? That Krispy Kreme priced the donuts so that it was cheaper to buy a dozen than to buy four. And Krispy Kremes were scarce.

So if you showed up at work with a dozen Krispy Kremes, you were a hero. And so that spread the idea. The more times people shared Krispy Kremes, the happier the sharer was, and the word spread. So a lot of things that people build don't have a network effect because there's no incentive to tell the others. On the other hand, something like The Big Lebowski, I can't talk to you about it unless you've seen it. So I got to get you to go see The Big Lebowski so we can talk about bringing the room together. So that's built into the idea of a certain kind of movie is we're going to talk about it. Where is the network effect? Why does it work better? Not better for you, but better for the user if their friends have it too.

So I'm wondering where you would draw the demarcating lines between below average, non-existent, moderate, excellent network effects in the sense that you give a few examples. I'm wondering, for instance, where something like Magic the Gathering would fall. It seems sort of intrinsic to the nature of games themselves that if you want to play a game and it's not a solo venture, you need other people to play. Magic was very beautifully designed by blanking on his first name, something Garfield, I believe, but the collectible aspect to it also, and the competitive aspect, all of these things combined to help make it a real incredible phenomenon, but it's ultimately a game you need other people to play with

you. But how would you think about that or any other examples that come to mind? If you're really trying to dial this to 11 to use a spinal tap for, but it works better when I tell my friends, right? There are some obvious examples that spring to mind, Facebook, something like that, but Krispy Kreme, another good example. It's a better one. You tell your friends, you end up being a hero. Great. So that is a meandering caffeine infused, speaking of caffeine lead into what I think is a question, but I'll let you take that wherever you want. So for people at home, I'm cheating. I made these decks of cards that people can get and

they have 200 questions on them. And what you do is you play them out so that you can challenge your peers to work with you to start working your way through these questions. The book has more than a thousand questions in it because the questions are how we open the door. So in the case of the network effect, what do people want? Well, at some level, there is a desire for mechanical efficiency. You want everyone to drive on the right side of the road if you live in North America because if some people drive on the other side of the road, someone's going to die. And so, there's very much of a network effect about which side of the road are we going to drive on. There's no disagreement whatsoever. Those spots are mostly taken. So now we have to say, what do

people want? And I think people only want two things. Three, freedom from the feeling of fear. Let's leave that aside. The other two are status and affiliation. Affiliation is who are you hanging with, who are your friends, who's at the table with you, are you alone? Affiliation is, I got invited to a fancy wedding in the Hamptons a couple of months ago. We pull up, you had to park your car and then a golf cart would take you in. And there's three of us waiting. It's Helene, my wife and I, and I'm wearing a suit. And there's a guy who's also waiting. He's wearing a tuxedo. And I'm like, oh, it's going to be a long night. And I'm feeling really bad for myself. Didn't I read the invitation? And then two

more cars pull up and three people in suits get out. So now you can hear this guy going, oh, oh, because he was the only person in a tuxedo. Why should it matter? It's still closed. Well, it does matter because where do you fit in? And status is who's up and who's down, who's winning, right? So something like Magic the Gathering said to a kid who might see themselves as lonely, this is a really good way for you to hang out with other people without having the kind of conversations that make you uncomfortable. You can talk about dragons and orcs and stuff like that. But by making them collectible, they also built in status. Because if you have a thicker deck or a more valuable deck,

you're moving up with people that you're competing with. And those two things kept dancing back and forth and back and forth and back and forth. So what we're probably doing when we build a modern entity that's going to use the network effect is we are offering people either affiliation, everybody else is doing this, you are being left behind, or status, which is you're in the right room and other people aren't, and if you leave this room, your status is going to go down. And so if you do the math of the TED conference, that's all it is, status and affiliation. If you do the math of why people have the latest version of earbuds or whatever, status and affiliation, over and over again,

are we giving people, creating the conditions for them to get the status they seek or the affiliation they crave? And that brings up one of the scariest non-sequiturs in the book, which is the creation of tension. If you want to make change happen, you have to create tension on purpose. Not stress. Stress is bad. Stress is you're trapped. Stress is life is bad. Stress is you want to leave but

you can't. Tension is what happens if I pull a rubber band back and then let go. I had to pull it backwards to get the rubber band to go across the room. So if I say Taylor Swift is playing in Amsterdam and there's only 400 seats left, I created tension because everyone who wants to go knows that there are more than 400 other people who want to go. They better hurry and get their mom to give them the money or else they're going to be left out. By creating tension, the concert promoter fills the venue. If there is no tension, no one's going to come because they think, I'll just stroll in if I feel like it. So scarcity creates tension. Lack of affiliation creates tension. The desire for status creates tension. When you're out trying to raise money and someone says to you, who else is invested,

why would they ask that question? They're asking about affiliation. They're asking about status. If you say, I have term sheets from three people and I only have room for one more person, you create a tension. And so we're constantly doing it, but we rarely do it on purpose. Could you say a bit more about affiliation status sidebar? Richard Garfield is the mathematician who designed magic, the gathering. There's a great episode on a podcast called think like a game designer that has Richard Garfield on it, which I suggest to people affiliation and status. Could you perhaps give an example from book writing or from podcasting. Yeah, let's talk about books. So why do authors blurb each other's books? You don't see Tim Cook blurbing an Android phone. So why are authors so eager to put their names on each other? Why do they not only permit

but celebrate the idea that they're sold next to all the other books? Books don't sell at the supermarket, they sell next to the competitors. Because you get status if you're published, used to be more by a famous publisher. You get status if you're reviewed in a certain kind of review. You get status if you're face out, you get affiliation if you're seen in the same category as Stephen King or Elmore Leonard. It's high school over and over and over again. Okay. So that applies to the authors. What about writing books? If people are trying to pull some of these levers for pressing the buttons of affiliation and status for readers. Yeah.

What might that look like? There are a couple of elements here in the idea of fiction. If someone says, have you read Middlemarch or have you read Catcher in the Rye? And you say, well, of course. And you say something smart from it, your affiliation with that person was established. If you said, what book? Catcher in the Who? Your status goes

down. You don't have a bridge to talk about it. So, on the Upper West Side and those fancy apartments at the Dakota, that's all people are doing is signaling to each other, I belong here because I just read what you read and I have an opinion about it. And the same thing is true a thousand miles away, but people are talking about NASCAR. It's exactly the same thing. We don't need the cars to go around in a circle. We need the conversations that we have about the cars going around in a circle. CB. And how can you design a product or a company or a book to do that more effectively rather than less effectively.

Exactly. Because there's certain things that culturally when they reach a critical mass, Game of Thrones, as an example, there was a point where that was such appointment viewing and such a dominant conversation that people just felt completely out of the loop and like schmucks if they weren't able to have at least that common touchstone for conversation. I'm not saying everyone, but a lot of people, it was that dominant Harry Potter, another example, but those are already stratospheric successes. So in the early stages, what types of questions should people ask or what types of thought experiments should people do when trying to run their idea through or their product or whatever it might be through

the filter of affiliation status and then the other one that we tabled? It's back to the conditions. Create the conditions for the people in the smallest viable audience to have to talk about it. So Tina Brown took over the New Yorker, it was failing, the New Yorker magazine. And what she did, it cost a fortune, is it used to come out on Mondays. By messenger on Sundays, 4,000 people got the New Yorker delivered to their apartment. Now, if you're one of the 4,000, your status goes up. But it only goes up if people know that you are one of

the people on Tina's list. So the first thing you're going to do when you get to work on Monday, talk about the New Yorker. Yes, the New Yorker. Because you talking about it is the only way for your status to go up. And now people who want to be in your circle feel left out, so they have to quickly go read it, and it becomes a topic of conversation. But only for 4,000 people, it was enough because of that center. Alcoholics Anonymous, which isn't anonymous at all, the first rule of Alcoholics Anonymous is you talk about Alcoholics Anonymous, only started with 12 people in a room. No one knows where the headquarters are. No one knows who runs it. Each person got one of the steps. No, I'm kidding.

Well, good point. And so once you have that tiny circle of people and you do everything you can to create the conditions to change the lives of those 12 people. Their desire for affiliation to pay back to those they've harmed as a form of establishing a new status in the world begins the kernel of its spreading, but back to the axis of time. It took decades before Alcoholics Anonymous was Alcoholics Anonymous. You can't make something like that work overnight. If you're going to talk about a TV show, what's the biggest strategic mistake Netflix made? And it's hard to criticize Netflix strategy because of what they built, but it's this. They forgot to stop the binge watching. When they started with the binge watching,

the strategy was this. And this is one of the questions in the book. What are we willing to do that our competitors aren't? And they knew that the TV networks and the cable networks would never be willing to show all the episodes of a series at once because they had to defend their whole model and the way they paid for the shows. So Netflix said, we're just going to let you see the whole series in one day. The more you watch Netflix, the less you're watching somebody else. We're going to get you hooked on this because you're not going to get involved in other shows because you're going to be impatient. And it worked. They really struck a blow by doing that. But what it cost them is the water cooler because you're afraid to talk about episode four of Secession because your friends are not caught up yet and you're going to spoil it for them. So we don't talk about it as much as if it was every week. And so shifting gears, and I talked to Ted about this, and he didn't have a good answer. It's like about four years ago, they then dial it back to more appointment viewing.

Exactly. Because then the only people who aren't paying for Netflix are going to keep feeling worse and worse because everyone's going to be constantly talking about the new show on Tuesday. They're not in, so that's going to be the incentive for them to become one of the last people who isn't paying for Netflix. Let me pick up a few other questions. We can of course move in some methodical way, but I kind of like the scattershot improv jazz. So there are two and I'm selfishly asking because I want to hear your thoughts on this since I am experimenting as you know, with the currently code named notebook and will

be releasing serially initially. So I want to set the conditions such that good things can come as domino effect later. So one of the questions I'll give you to you can pick or we can do both. So one is how will early successes of my project make later successes more likely? And then how big is my circle of us and circle of now? What can I do to expand them? The second one we're going to treat a little differently, but the first one I think is really important. The challenge of nonfiction writing in this world today is TLDR. And for people who never read the dictionary because they were too

busy, it stands for too long didn't read. Which means I don't have time to watch all of Dune, just tell me in three sentences what it's about. People don't usually say that about a movie like Dune, but they say it a lot about the books that people like you and I write. And James did a great job with Atomic Habits, but I will be delighted to wager that many people didn't read the whole thing because they bought it so they could understand what it was about. And then once they understood what it was about, their problem went away. Same thing's true with the four-hour work week, same thing's true with permission marketing. If you read the first three chapters of permission marketing, you know what it's about. And now you say, I don't need to go into more detail. I've solved my problem here. So the challenge you face with

the notebook is if someone says, Tim's got a new book, you just create a tension because they don't know what it's about. And then if someone says, it's about this, and they solve the tension problem, their problem goes away and they're going to move on. Early successes don't lead to later successes. This is not what happens with the Bible because the Bible is part of a cultural thing that people keep coming back to over and over again, and status is accorded to people who spend more time reading it. And so the key to making a nonfiction book work is to put it at the center of a community. And so a weird, seemingly unrelated story. Back when I was starting out and I was really struggling,

there were many days when no money was coming in whatsoever. Someone said to me, why don't you do something useful? Like, I don't know, invent the seedless cherry. And I took this personally. The next morning I called the US Department of Agriculture, and I asked, this was before the internet, and I asked the US Department of Agriculture. This was before the internet, and I asked for the cherry department. And they had a cherry department. This guy answers the phone, he says, cherries. And I say, I'm on a quest. I want to figure out how to make a seedless cherry. And he said, well, a seedless cherry is actually quite easy, but you wouldn't want to do it because it would still have a pit. And the thing is the seeds inside the pit. And if you don't

have a pit, you can't have a cherry. Because the way droops, that's the kind of fruit, like peaches, grow is they have to have a pit and it all grows around the pit. So no pit, no cherry. That's the way it goes. And so the book is the pit. And in the case of permission marketing, I wrote a book, but it turned into a $100 billion a year industry that MailChimp and HubSpot and all the others, they were built around the idea in that book. So your status at work would go up if you knew more of the detail, your connection would go up if you could stay current with it. But if that hadn't happened, then my career wouldn't have happened either because all I did was show up with a pit and then the fruit showed up around it. So what you have done is somewhat with intent and somewhat

without is there is now a vibrant community of more than a million people who talk about what you do, who listen to your interactions, and you are the pit, but they're the fruit. CB. Sure. RW. And they need you to keep narrating these conversations. If you're going to make it a book work, you're going to have to figure out how to make it drip in a way that keeps making each installment worth more because you've read the previous one. Yeah, that's part of what I'm excited about and a little nervous about, but I really think it'll work is to workshop the book effectively, right? Because there are already 500 plus

pages and a lot of them are polished, but by creating a community of beta testers and early readers on something like mighty networks or circle or one of these platforms. And it's a challenge worth attempting. I really think because I've also just done it the other way. So many, not as many times as you have, but done it five times more successfully than me. So you, So, but I mean, let's think about volunteer firemen for a minute. Yep, I'm just gonna use that interjection from now on. I love it. Thankfully there are, except for tragedies

like in California, there are far fewer house fires than ever before because of building codes and other things. And yet volunteer firefighters continue to show up. They show up at the fire station, they connect with each other around firefighting. But firefighting isn't the point. The point is the volunteer part, the connection part, the affiliation part. And so, what Gina's done with Mighty Networks is very cool, but at its heart, it's what do I get from the other members of the network? Not do I, what do I get from the pit? Yep. 100%. And so that's where your opportunity is. Yeah. It doesn't work for me otherwise. Also, I don't want

to be, you know, time to make the donuts for people who are old enough to get that reference for the Dunkin donuts commercials from the eighties. Let's come back. We don't need to spend time on this, but I'm curious. How big is my circle of us and circle of now? What can I do to expand them? AC This was the most heartfelt part of the book for me, and it's the one that people ask me about the least. So I'm thrilled that you brought it up. The circle of now goes back to time. A toddler has a circle of now that lasts seven seconds. If they don't get what they want within seven seconds, they have a tantrum. Somebody at the peak of their maturity might have a circle of now that lasts a decade. I am going to go through medical school and pay out money and have no fun for

six or eight years because after that, I will be able to achieve my dreams. That's a very big circle of now. So when you pick your partners, when you pick your investors, when you pick your customers, it would really help if you would pick people whose circle of now is sort of similar to your circle of now. And one of the giant crises that we're all going to live with is what's happening to the climate because a whole bunch of people have a circle of now that's fairly short. It says, yeah, but my house is cold, so I'm going to chop down the furniture to put it in the fireplace to warm things up. And other people have a circle of now that's much longer that says, I'm here for the seventh generation. What do I sacrifice today to help them later? That's circle of now.

The circle of us is a toddler cares about themselves and maybe their parents. It's a very small circle. Whereas someone like my friend Jim, who runs the Fuller Center in Neurochelle, who's been providing housing and sustenance for strangers for decades, his circle of us is tens of thousands of people. It's a much bigger circle. So when we think about our strategy, we got to keep coming back to, well, how big is my circle? Because even Ayn Rand cared about more than one person, that the circle of us generally is more than just me, and the circle of now is generally more than just the next 30 seconds. The exception is if you're drowning. If you're drowning, the circle is you and the circle is now. That's all there is.

drowning. If you're drowning, the circle is you and the circle is now. That's all there is. But we're not drowning. So how do we grow into big enough circles and how do we create the conditions for the people around us to have similar circles? Because if we're measuring the right things, they're going to measure the right things and we're going to get what we seek to get. In addition to affiliation and status, there was one other need. I want to say something like extinguishing fear, something like that. It's the freedom from the feeling of fear. There we go. All right. Where does that fit in? It can short circuit everything. If you are

in a movie and the fire breaks out, you're not really going to focus on affiliation or status. You're just going to focus on survival. Most of us are lucky out, you're not really going to focus on affiliation or status. You're just going to focus on survival. Most of us are lucky enough that we're not in burning buildings, but it's very easy to be persuaded by marketers or manipulators. And it's very easy to get into a doom loop where you imagine that you are in a burning building. And so, all these things happen. So when we think about how do we get somebody in a hospital to allow us to do an operation on them or make an incision, well, that's because they believe that the fear will go away if they can get through this. It's not about affiliation, it's not about status. So I put it to the side because most of us should not be in the business of dramatically inflicting fear

on other people. And so that's why I keep coming back to the other two because in civilization, it's mostly status and affiliation. AC What are other portions of the book could be questions, themes that you think are important for entrepreneurs or would be entrepreneurs to understand that might get glossed over. So I can think of things from all of my books where I'm like, man, there's this one piece, maybe I didn't emphasize it enough. People tend to skip over it. And that is a very important piece of the whole puzzle. I'm wondering if there's anything that comes to mind for this strategy. We'll talk to the freelancers in the room first. I'm a freelancer. I have no employees.

You're looking at my whole team. I've been an entrepreneur. It's a different job. Entrepreneurs build something bigger than themselves to get paid when they sleep. They use outside resources to build something they could sell. Whereas freelancers do a craft. And the only way to move up as a freelancer is to get better clients. You can't work more hours and hiring junior versions of you is not sustainable because if someone, a junior version of you is better than you, they're not going to take the gig and if they're worse than you, your clients are going to be unhappy. So getting better clients is the defining step, the goal if you're going to be a successful

freelancer. And you don't get better clients by doing a good job for bad clients. You get better clients by becoming the kind of freelancer good clients want to hire. Which leads to the two big insights that people skip over, which is when you pick your customers, you pick your future. And when you pick your competitors, you pick your future. So let's take them one at a time. When you pick your customers, if you pick people who are cheap frazzled in a hurry, don't read the instructions and are disloyal. Well, now you know, how are you going to spend your days? I can't believe you got to throw me under the bus like that. Yeah, it's gonna be a rough ride. If that's what you're signing up for. But that's what most people do because those are the easiest customers to pick.

And if instead you pick customers, it might be harder to acquire, but demand better quality and insist on paying for it, who are eager to talk about what you do and blah, blah, blah, blah, blah. Your future is going to change. So when you pick your customers, you pick your future. And the second one, which goes with it, when you pick your competitors, if your competitors are ruthless, cutthroat, immoral, and constantly racing to the bottom, you're going to be pressured to do the same. And so the industry you walk into, and I've been in many industries, and the reason I've stuck with the book business is that my competitors are my friends. I have no secrets from them and I delight in spending time with them. That's not true, for example, in the toy business. The people in the toy business who compete with each other, there's secrets and there's lawsuits

and everything else. So we should make these decisions on purpose. And the same thing is true with who you're going to get your funding from because if you show up in Silicon Valley, you've decided what kind of company you're building. And if you get raised money from dentists in Iowa, you could build a different kind of company. AC Yeah. And if you bootstrap yet another kind of company altogether. Let me just make this into a private consulting session. Got to strike while the iron is hot here. So with communities, because you have worked with and helped cultivate many different communities for different purposes. You've got Alt-MBA, you had a mass collaboration for the Carbon Almanac, and you have experience with this, whereas I really do not, at least in a community management perspective.

And one thing that's been rattling around in my head and I haven't landed anywhere where I feel a high degree of conviction is in building a community for say this serial release of the notebook, the principle goal of which is to make the book as good as possible, but also to get people excited and to see if things work. And that is part of making the book as good as possible. We have already tested pretty much everything, but it has to work for a certain critical mass. It doesn't need to be everybody, but a certain critical mass of people. And I have wondered whether the community should be limited and free or limited and paid. Even if it's a nominal fee, I have a lot of fear associated with paid because sometimes people, they pay $5 a month. They expect me to be their 24 seven life coach

on demand. And that is not something I want to sign up for. And we could and will boot people who end up just being too high maintenance, but how might you think about this? So I've leaned towards free because I mean, the money wouldn't really matter. But for instance, when I've done in real life gatherings, I don't care about the money that comes in through ticket sales. I do care about having an accurate head count so we can plan for the event. And if people have to even just put in their credit card for a $1 payment, they are more likely to show up. So these are some of the thoughts rattling around. How would you chew on that stuff? Robert Leonard The money always matters because money is nothing but a story. It is not a pile of green things or a Bitcoin. It's a story. So years ago, I did an event in New York for nonprofit leaders. I wanted to make sure they

showed up, but I didn't want their money. And so I said to them, you got to bring a check for $100 made out to a charity I pick. And at the end of the event, if you don't think it's worth it, you can take the check back. But I knew that everyone would have skin in the game. And I was heartbroken that some people took the money back because their mindset of donation was I'm already working in a nonprofit, I don't give money to anybody else, which was heartbreaking. But it helped me see how deep the money is a story thing. So you mentioned three communities that I've been lucky enough to be part of, and in each

case the money was different. So at the Carbon Almanac, it was my full-time job for a year and a half. I was a volunteer and so were the other 1900 people. No one got paid, no one paid. And I don't think community management is as important as community leadership. Community leadership is about creating, again, there creating, again, creating the conditions for the community to lead itself. So my job was, what are things like around here? How do we talk to each other? Who gets to stay and who has to leave? But once I could do that, then the amount of actual management I had to do was fairly minimal because the right people were in the room.

The Alt MBA, we wanted to establish that it was a bargain compared to $200,000 at Stanford and that it wasn't some simple online course. You had to show up every single day, and so we charged $3,000 to $5,000 and thousands of people went through it. And the fact that people paid a lot was very important because they got more than that. And the minute that wasn't going to be true, I should stop doing it because the whole premise was your time is worth even more than the tuition. We're never going to cut a corner because we have unlimited money to spend on this facility. And the third one is called Purple Space, which runs now, costs $20 a week. And the reason people pay to be in it,

that I need them to pay to be in it, is so that they'll show up. Because like many asynchronous online communities, it's easy to join, but then it fades on your priority list. So what I would push back on is you said that the purpose of the community is to make sure the book works and to make sure the book is good. I don't think that's the purpose of the community. Now it's your community. So you get to decide. Yeah, no push back. I think the purpose of the community is to build a place where using some of these core ideas, the people who engage with each other, supercharge their journey to where they want to go. If that's what it's for, then a side effect is the book's going to be good.

That will be my indicator for the book working. Right? If people have successes, help one another, and I see that as a natural outgrowth of their engaging with the material. If those are the tendrils that grow out of the soil, then it will have worked nothing less than that. But that's why you're charged for it. You charge for it, not because please come here and help Tim make his book. But I work so hard on it, Seth. You're charging for it because you're saying, if you're going over there, over there, that's where I'm taking people. If you're going over there, If you're going over there, over there, that's where I'm taking people. If you're going over there, I think this is worth a lot of your time and $100 out of your

wallet. At any time, you don't think it's worth $100, you just hit this button and you'll get the $100 back. That means I have to work overtime to make sure that people would rather stay in it than click that button and get their money back. Cool. All right. Lots to chew on.

Could you say more about community leadership? So management and leadership. Ray Kroc and Henry Ford were pioneers of management. Frederick Taylor had a stopwatch and we got the phrase human resources from the idea of treating people like a machine. If you've ever heard the phrase being jerked around or calling someone a jerk, it comes from the Henry Ford Model T plant because you would watch the workers and they would be dancing around like marionettes because there was someone like a

stopwatch on every single motion. This is management. And management is super effective at a fast food restaurant or any process that you need people to act like a machine. If you don't do it, no one's going to show up for the shift, your productivity may go down. Leadership says, I don't know the right way, but I might be able to build a community of people in a place where they find the right way. And so I can't tell people what to do at every step because I don't know. But if I get the right people in the room, so here's an example I love from the leadership

category. And I'm talking about Google a lot today. I'm not sure why. So early on, Google was going to go out of business and it wasn't from lack of revenue. It was because the internet was too big and the computers they were using to index the web weren't fast enough to keep up. And so doing a search on Google went from taking a tenth of a second to seconds and people just weren't sticking around. And two engineers worked over time and figured out how to hack Dell hard drive controllers so that they put the

data that was most needed near the outside of the spinning disk so that the hard drive could get there faster. That's awesome. This is like the greatest hack of all time. And I promise you that Sergey and Larry did not think to tell them to do this. So leadership says, let's get the right engineers in the room, give them the right resources and the right problems to go solve things with an incentive of status and affiliation for doing so. And now with AI doing most of the jobs where we can write down specifically what we need done, management is going to get less and less important.

Leadership becomes more and more important, which is why strategy matters so much, because you want to tell people the strategy and let them find tactics. You want to tell people the strategy and let them find tactics. The fancy hotel that says to its frontline workers, the people who are changing the sheets and stuff, here's 250 bucks per customer. You can spend it any way you want. If a customer is unhappy, give them free dinner, give them whatever you want. 250 bucks, we're never going to question you doing it. That lets your frontline have tactical control, but you're not changing the strategy,

which is this is a luxury hotel. AC There's a book I'll recommend to folks if they're interested. It's very fast read. It's by Will Guidara, Unreasonable Hospitality. And it's a great example of how far you can push that. Will lives this. He's a great guy and so is his wife, Christina. And he understands that you don't manipulate people with hospitality, which is easy to try to do, but ultimately gets you in trouble. to try to do, but ultimately gets you in trouble. Instead, you serve them with hospitality and you can see it break down at places like Madison Square Garden when he has a temper tantrum and starts scanning the faces of people walking in and kicks lawyers and their kids out of the venue. CB. Wait, who are you talking about? RL. That's not hospitality. CB. Who's doing that? RL? The guy who owned Madison Square Garden. I can't remember his name. There were people who were

challenging him in the outside world and he just started acting like the emperor. The point is, hospitality is a point of view and it's a point of view that sits right next to leadership. So it doesn't mean you're giving away free candy all day long. What it means is we agree on where we are going and then I trust you to help us get there. Yeah, as far as storytelling also, or setting conditions such that your customers

will tell stories, it's a fun book to listen to. And it was recommended to be my one of the top game designers in the world who has nothing to do at face value with hospitality. But he was like, I'm halfway through this. You have to listen to it. And there's still stories that have stuck in my mind from that book.

And for those who don't know, just very briefly, tells the story primarily of 11 Madison Park going from scrappy startup to one of the top, if not the top ranked restaurant in the world. And is a very fun listener read. Can we tell the hot dog story? Go for it. So let's be clear. Anyone who goes to a clothing store is already wearing clothes. You speak for yourself. I didn't say they were nice clothes. Anyone who goes to 11 Madison Park for dinner in the old days to spend $400 already has food in their house. You're feeding people who already had lunch. So you're not selling the food. Will was the front of house person, maitre d'en stuff, and he trained the staff relentlessly. One of the staff is serving a couple that's celebrating their 40th

or 50th wedding anniversary. And there's like 14 courses. And during the third course, the waiter overhears the wife saying to the husband, do you remember our first date? Our first date in New York was right in that park and you bought me a hot dog because that's all we had, it was 25 cents. You bought me a hot New York City hot dog with the roll and substitute it out for the sixth course. And so, instead of bringing them clams, casino, whatever it is, on their plates, wrapped in

the greasy paper is a New York City hot dog. That's hospitality. It makes me cry every time I hear that story. Oh yeah, there are a lot of really good stories in that one. All right, Seth, so for somebody who's thinking to themselves, all right, I wanna sit down and I'd like to sort of shake the snow globe of my mind with some questions, some more questions

that I can use to land on approaches or solutions strategy as it were. Do you have any other favorite questions or perhaps counterintuitive questions? Any questions that you might toss out there as good fuel for the fire? I have one question to get you started and then two interesting challenges. The question to get you started is if you were forced to increase your prices by 10X, what would you do? This really unsettles people because they know how to think about if they were forced to have their prices because their competitors are racing to the bottom. But if your competitors weren't changing and you had to charge 10X, what would you do different? Well, for example, this is where

Concierge Medicine came from, right? Because all these other doctors are saying, how can I take more insurance? And one doctor shows up and says, I'm going to charge 10 times more and this is why people are going to get in line to pay for it. But it doesn't have to be luxury goods for the ultra wealthy. There are lots of things where you could imagine charging 10 times more. This is where the bottled water industry in the United States came from, charging infinite times more. So that's one question I like to ask. Another one is, if you were sure you were going to fail, what would you do anyway? And I think that tells me a lot about who you are and

what you stand for. So two ideas then to follow that up with. The first one comes from a social scientist in the 1920s and Adam Grant wrote about this in a recent book, which is the idea of scaffolding. Scaffolding is what effective teachers do. That pedagogy teaches us that the way we learn almost everything that matters, walking, talking, is on our own. We're autodidex. We teach ourselves to failure. But when things get more complicated, like fractions, people get stuck. Scaffolding is creating the condition so on those stuck moments, you work your way through it and then you get back on track. And scaffolding or the lack of it explains in large measure why people in some communities can't figure out how to get out of their rut and move up different status categories. Because when they hit a speed bump

at nine or 10 or 12 years old, there isn't a learned wise focused adult maybe who could help them through that moment. The scaffolding are the ladders we build to help people get through the tough stuff. Now are those traits like grit, resilience, whatever it might be, are they lenses of looking at things like failure as feedback? Are they other tools? What is the scaffolding? All of it. So if you've ever tried to use Fusion 360 from Autodesk, I have not. The scaffolding is almost non-existent. Like I've been building and using software for 50 years. I can't figure out how to use this software. When I get stuck, there's nothing to hold on to. Whereas part

of the magic when the team built the first Mac is every app had the same structure. So there was scaffolding building, you knew where to go to get to the next thing. If you're trying to build an entity of any scale, where is the scaffolding for when a customer gets frustrated? Where is the scaffolding for when someone's going to veer off and use a competitor? Where's the scaffolding if they don't know what to tell their boss or their friends? If you give them handholds right where the handholds belong, you belong, think about a rock climbing wall, people are going to grab the handhold. So you can't take them through the whole thing, but you can make sure there are handholds in the right place. So where is the scaffolding? The idea that Yahoo had was to put buttons everywhere, hundreds and hundreds of buttons.

And the idea Google had was to give you a fill in the blank, that when chat GPT came out, the scaffolding was type something. And that puts a lot of pressure on what it writes back. Because if you had typed something that says, I don't know, you're not going to use it three times. You're going to stop. So you're making these bets on what's it going to be like, what's going to happen after that. And now I want to talk about probability and games and decisions. So if I have a standard deck of cards. What is your deck of cards called, by the way? It's called the strategy deck. The only place you can get it is at Sethstoplog slash TIS, and it's really cool. If I have a deck of 52 cards and I say, Tim, pick a card, what are the odds you're going to get an ace?

Four and 52, right? One out of 13, right? There we go. Yeah. Because the deck is stacked. There are 48 non-aces and four aces. Every time we engage in any probabilistic thing, the deck is stacked. And it is on us to know before we make a bet how many aces are in the deck. So if you're applying to get into a famous college in Boston So if you're applying to get into a famous college in Boston and you are fully qualified by every one of the published measures, you have a one in 15 chance of getting it. Because after they take all the qualified people, now it's pretty random one in 15. That's how the deck is stacked. If you are super, super good at football and you're applying to a small college and they have football scholarships, you have a way better chance than 1 in 15 of getting in because that deck is stacked differently.

So what we seek to do when we're making a bet is show up in a place where the odds that the card we need is going to be in the deck. That's what probability is. Probability means that when you see poll results that says there's a 60% chance this person is going to win the election, that doesn't mean it's a tug of war between six and four and the sixth side is going to win every time. It doesn't mean that at all. It just means there are six aces and four non-aces, and there's going to be a random selection, and you're going to get the card you get. So what we need to do when we're thinking about our strategy is not focus on how hard we're working or how much we want it to work out. We need to focus on what's the deck like. And so your journey into archery is partly based on the fact that you have thought through who else is going to show

up at this tournament. Because if there were a million people who had devoted their lives to archery, I think you would understand your chances of winning a medal were very small. I would pick something else. Probably just given the time constraints and the fact that yeah, I'm coming in with, I guess, five to six months of serious training and some of these folks have been shooting seriously since they were eight years old. So got to pick the right category, got to pick the right category. Got to pick the right deck. And so then the thing that goes with that is from our friend Annie Duke, which is what's the difference between a good decision and a good outcome? And the question that I would ask

entrepreneurs who think they're innovating and leading is, are you okay making good decisions that don't lead to good outcomes? And most people, if they're telling the truth, the answer is no. And in my case, the answer is yes, I have disciplined myself. That's one of the things I'm really proud that I'm good at. What are we talking about here? So in her book, she talks about the Seattle Seahawks. It's the Super Bowl. It's fourth down. They're on the two or three yard line. If they score, they win. If they don't score, they lose. Pete Carroll calls a pass play. Calling a pass play is a really good decision because if you do the math, if you analyze all the situations, a pass is more likely to score than a run. He calls a pass, it's incomplete, they lose.

Everyone says, Pete made a terrible decision, he should be fired. No, he made a good decision, but he didn't get an ace. He just got one of the other cards. That's okay. You should celebrate that because you still made a good decision. If you buy a lottery ticket and you win, you made a bad decision. You should never buy a lottery ticket. Winning is just a weird anomaly, but the deck is stacked against you. Don't do that. Don't play games. You can't reliably win. So when I'm talking to people about decision-making, I say, tell me the last time you made a really good decision. And they do and it always has a good outcome because they're measuring the wrong thing. And corporations are terrible at this.

Corporations promote people who make bad decisions and have lucky outcomes. And they don't promote people who make great decisions but didn't get lucky. Well, Wall Street's probably the greatest breeding ground for that particular selection process. Put that aside, that Petri dish is fascinating environment for sure. So how do you cultivate that then? How would you suggest cultivating that? I mean, I do think learning to play a game, maybe doing some very lightweight investing is another way to do this. We're certainly in the early stage game. Anyone who's going to last and be successful in long term playing that game is going to have to get very good at accepting losses where they

made a lot of good decisions because there's so much outside of your control as well. How do you think about cultivating that? Good decisions over good outcomes? One of the things we're trying to do is avoid false proxies. And false proxies are easy to measure, but ultimately not useful. So how fast someone types is a false proxy for whether they're going to be a good programmer. It's easier to measure typing speed than programming speed, but we measure the easy thing. We measure, does that person look like me or look like I think someone should look? I was talking to someone, he said, the last nine

people this company hired had rode varsity crew at one of three colleges. This is not a useful proxy, right? This is just a lazy shortcut. And then we turn it around when we think about decision-making, and we say, are we going to insulate our decision-makers from useless information. So if you're a stock trader and we work at an organization where we've promised our investors we're making five-year plans, that we're here for the long run, and you have a big Bloomberg ticker on the wall, you have really confused things because now you're measuring the wrong thing in the wrong way. And so the discipline, as you pointed out in investing and making small investments, you don't even have to spend money. You just have to write down your prediction. And you have to be able to, when you're working with other people, articulate why did you make that decision? It's not okay to

say, well, I just feel like it. That's a hunch. That's not how we actually need to make our decisions. Show your cards, make your argument, make your assertions. Then your peers can talk to you about whether that's a good decision or not. If it's a good decision, you get rewarded regardless of the outcome because the outcome is out of your control. That's just, did you get an eight or did you get an ace? How have you corrected course or spotted false proxies in your own life or many projects, industries, et cetera. Here's a really useful one. I was arrogant and thought I was good at hiring people because I was looking for signals that

were ultimately false proxies. And I could see those signals faster than most people, certain questions or certain attitudes in interviews and things like that. But as I thought about it afterwards, what I really wanted from people who I was hiring to work with to do a job was for them to do the job, not to be good at interviewing. And so I made the decision to only work with people I've worked with before. That doesn't mean only people I've met before. It means if I'm going to hire you, I'm going to give you a project and pay you to do it. And that's your interview.

And we never even need to meet in person. But if I've seen you work on a project like I want you to work on a project, there's no more false proxy. And as a result, I've been able to work with a much more diverse group of people, geographically, background-wise, skill set. Because now it doesn't matter if I want you to come over for dinner. It matters that we're doing this project together and I know you know how to do this part of the project. So the Carbon Almanac, every single person could do anything they wanted once. And then if the community said, we really like that, they got to do it more. And so one guy from India, Vivek, he showed up and he wrote one article and it was terrible. And someone gave him some feedback and the second one was better. And he was going to

quit, but he got some more feedback in the third one. What's so good he ended up writing seventeen of the articles. Because he figured it out and like we trust you now just go and go and go and do it. And in a world that's so open to connection to strangers. It feels like that's the appropriate way to interact with the work, which is to work with people who want to do the work and who can show you they can do it. AC How do you read if someone is open to receiving feedback? I guess the answer might be you give them a project and you give them feedback. That's the only way to know. So maybe you've already

answered my question, but are there other indicators? So I think back to this idea of Jeff Bezos creating the conditions for who wants to invest, you creating the conditions for your community. There are certain projects that I want to work on where I'm the creator or I want to work with other people where taking feedback isn't an asset, where you're looking for somebody who has a point of view, and this is what I do, take it or leave it. And there are other things where taking feedback is super important because that's going to keep things in sync. And for me, it's not giving someone who doesn't match that a pass just because they're good at what they do. This is analogous to having bullies who work in your company. I had a guy who worked for me years

ago who was a yeller. He wasn't a bully, but he was a yeller. We had one big open office. The second time I heard him yell at someone, I quietly took him aside and I sat him down. I said, if you ever yell at anyone ever again, I'm going to fire you on the spot. It doesn't matter that you're the most valuable person in the company because you are. It doesn't matter that you're the most senior and skilled person. If I let you do that, I have made a statement about what it's like around here. And he sent me a thank you note 10 years later because he never yelled at anyone at work ever again, even after we stopped working together. Because I was the first person

who had the guts to say, we don't want bullies around here. And the same thing's true. If you really need someone who can take feedback in a role, you've got to say, if you can't take feedback, you can't stay. And it doesn't have to be a confrontation. It can just be, what are things like around here? People like us do things like this. We'll be an example of someone who you don't want or you don't require to take feedback. I mean, I can probably come up with a few as a search. You probably can be faster on your feet with this.

A surgeon. Yeah, I was just going to say neurosurgeon. I went to a dermatologist four months ago and he was terrible. He not only was terrible with his bedside manner and terrible in that he didn't read the notes that I gave him, and he was terrible that he prescribed a drug I already had a prescription for. He just, he didn't make me better, right? So I wrote a letter to the head of medicine for the whole thing and they have obviously systems in place to make people like me be quiet, but not to actually listen to people like me. Because they're taking the position,

don't come here if you don't want to do what our doctors tell you to do. Because we're busy enough already. We just want patients who aren't going to push back. And there are plenty of people who, if you need something that is way outside your area of expertise, right, if you hire Chip Kidd to make the cover for your notebook, which you should because he's a genius, Chip should not listen to your feedback because he's Chip Kid, damn it. Fair enough. How do you use AI? And how do you foresee using AI yourself? I use it every day for more than an hour. I think it's electricity for our century. In the late 1800s, there were companies that said, yeah, this electricity thing's interesting, but we're not going to be an electricity company. And they're all gone. You're not

an electricity company, you're just a company that uses electricity. And the same thing is true, I believe, with AI. I will tell you, and I'm not afraid to say it out loud, I think ChatG GPT is arrogant and lazy, and I use it as a last resort. Claw.ai is a dear friend. I love Claw.ai. We have great conversations. It's empathic. It's self-aware. It warns you it might be hallucinating. And when it makes a mistake, it's eager to correct it. And I use perplexity exclusively. I almost never do a search with a search engine. But what I'll do with Claude, every word I publish, I wrote. But what I will do with Claude, for example, is I will say, here's a list of three bullet points. Can you think of four more? And it's great at that. And then I'll rewrite

them and now I'll have five bullet points and I'll be, it's much better than if I hadn't engaged with Claude. If there's a concept in the world that I don't understand, I'll say to Claude, can you please explain it in 300 words to a college student? And that helps. But I did it once and I still didn't understand it. And then I said, can you write it to me like a Seth Godin blog post? And it did, and it did a terrible job, but now I understood it. So I rewrote it and I said, do you think this is better? And it said, oh yeah, that's much better. And I said, thank you, I'll tell Seth. And Claude said, do you know Seth Godin? And I wrote, actually, I am Seth Godin. And I'm not making this up.

He then wrote, I can't believe I'm talking to you. Your books have changed my life and then named like four of my books and it changed what I like All right. I'm in forever. You got me. I don't know how you did that, but we're friends for life All right. So I've seemed to have a similar use pattern with Claud and perplexity also, although Yes, and bag them Just yet, but what do you think people are getting right and wrong about AI? I think that they are getting wrong their expectation that it be fully baked and a magic trick every day. When I think about the dawn of the internet and how creaky it was and how fast this is going, what it is now is amazing.

But when we add to it persistence and when we add to it ubiquity and when we add to it the ability to make connection, it's a whole different thing. It's just a whole different thing. It's just a completely different thing. The second thing is people tend to use it as a one-shot, like a search engine. Ask a question, get an answer. But what it's already good at is a protracted dialogue back and forth. So I had a pump in my house that stopped working and I couldn't find someone to service it. I took a picture of it. I put it up to Claude and I said, this isn't working. Work with me for the next 10 backs and forth. Let's figure this out. And it would say, go downstairs and take a picture

of this part. All right, try this. And we went back and forth and back and forth. And it suggested something and I said, that's not going to work. And we figured it out and we fixed it. and I said, that's not going to work. And we figured it out and we fixed it. That idea, the fact that Claude is already better at many medical diagnoses over time than a human, and well, it should be because it knows so much of the past of every single case, not just the cases your doctor has seen. If we're willing to engage with that for people who are knowledge workers, I think it's a game changer. And then the other thing I think people need to wake up to is if you do average work for average pay, AI is going to be able to do it cheaper than you. For example, radiology,

AI is going to be able to do it cheaper than you. For example, radiology. Already we can use AI to do a wrist X-ray as well as a mediocre radiologist. So we can do it instantly and for free. Other than licensing, you got some problems. So the opportunity is either get AI to work for you or be prepared to work for AI. **Jay What was that word? Oxford dictionary word of the year, two years ago, in shitification. Okay. Yeah. In shitification is what happens after a business that uses the network effect gets locked in and decides to aggressively make things worse for its users to make more money. And we could think of 400 examples right now, but we're not going to do that,

right? Because you say, well, I can't switch cable companies. Is this too much of a hassle? And the same thing is true for social networks and everything else. That capitalism has built into it this doom loop that is getting faster and faster that says the race to the bottom pushes companies to mistreat the people they've locked in to make more money because that's what they get rewarded for. Most things that the internet touches start as a miracle. There are huge prizes for the early adopters. And then soon, the desire to serve a different constituency kicks in and it gets worse. And one of the things that makes it worse in a hurry is advertising.

So I'm really nervous that these organizations that have raised billions and billions and billions of dollars are going to start short-cutting things to either get bigger or get more profitable faster. And because we don't know how they work, we have no clue because it's going to be hard to switch because there aren't going to be many competitors. It often leads to just a yucky mess. So I think that's way more likely than a general artificial intelligence that takes over the world and turns us all into paper clips. I don't think that's going to happen anytime soon. More likely just to have business incentive driven gentrification. Yeah, I would say that seems like a safer bet. That seems like a safer bet. Well, Seth, are there any closing comments or challenges you'd like to issue to my listeners as we begin to wind to a close or anything that you'd like to add

that I have managed to somehow dance around? There's nothing better than starting a Tim Ferris podcast and nothing worse than ending one because you don't know if it's going to happen again anytime soon. Yeah, the challenge is super simple. The people who listen to your podcast have their hands on the levers and they have influence and they have resources and they don't have to hustle for a nickel. They could make things that really matter. And so the challenge is take a deep breath and say, what can I build that the me of five years from now is going to say thanks? Thanks for walking away from those sunk costs. Thanks for ignoring those false proxies. Thanks for asking uncomfortable questions in service of making things better because that person five years from now, they're going to be

here soon. And it's really great to pay the price and put in the work to become that person. And today is a good day to start. The best day to start. Thank you, Seth. It's always so nice to see you. And I encourage people to check out, of course, this is strategy. You can find all things Seth at Seth's dot blog, love show notes and links to everything attend up blog slash podcast. Is there anything else you'd like to mention? We could of course include and we will include Seth's dot blog slash TIS, which is where people can also get the deck of cards, if I'm not mistaken.

And the chocolate bar. And the chocolate bar. Something for everybody. We didn't even get to talk about the system of cheap chocolate. We'll do that next time. Okay. Cliffhanger. For next time, we will talk about the system of cheap chocolate and I'm sure much, much more. Well, Seth, as always, what a pleasure. Nice to see you. And to everybody listening, till next time, be just a bit kinder than is necessary to others, also to yourself. But do ask those uncomfortable questions. That's being kind to your future self, to your long-term self. And as always, thanks for tuning in. newsletter, my super short newsletter called Five Bold Friday. Easy to sign up, easy to cancel.

It is basically a half page that I send out every Friday to share the coolest things I've found or discovered or have started exploring over that week. It's kind of like my diary of cool things. It often includes articles I'm reading, books I'm reading, albums perhaps, gadgets, gizmos, all sorts of tech tricks and so on that get sent to me by my friends, including a lot of podcast guests and these strange esoteric things end up in my field. And then I test them and then I share them with you. So if that sounds fun, again, it's very short, a little tiny bite of goodness before you head off for the weekend, something to think about. If you'd like to try it out, just go to Tim.blog.friday.

Type that into your browser, Tim.blog.friday. Drop in your email and you'll get the very next one. Thanks for listening. This episode is brought to you by Shopify, one of my absolute favorite companies, and they make some of my favorite products. Shopify is the commerce platform revolutionizing millions of businesses worldwide and I've known the team since 2008 or 2009. But prior to that, I wish I had personally had Shopify in the early 2000s when I was running my own ecommerce business. I tell

that story in the 4 hour work week, but the tools then were absolutely atrocious and I could only dream of a platform like Shopify. In fact, it was you guys, my dear readers, who introduced me to Shopify when I polled all of you about best e-commerce platforms around 2009, and they've only become better and better since. Whether you're a garage entrepreneur or getting ready for your IPO, Shopify is the only tool you need to start, run,

and grow your business without the struggle. Shopify puts you in control of every sales channel. Doesn't matter if you're selling satin sheets from Shopify's in-person POS system or offering organic olive oil on Shopify's all-in-one e-commerce platform. However you interact with your customers, you're covered. And once you've reached your audience,

Shopify has the internet's best converting checkout to help you turn browsers into buyers. Shopify powers 10% of all ecommerce in the United States. And Shopify is truly a global force as the ecommerce solution behind all birds, Rothy's, Brooklyn and millions of other entrepreneurs of every size across more than 170 countries. Plus Shopify's award winning help is there to support your success every step of the way if you have questions. This is

possibility powered by Shopify. Established in 2025. Has a nice ring to it, doesn't it? So sign up for your $1 per month trial period at Shopify.com slash Tim, all lowercase. Go to Shopify.com slash Tim to start selling today with Shopify. One more time, Shopify.com slash Tim. Listeners have heard me talk about making before you manage for years. All that means to me is that when I wake up,

I block out three to four hours to do the most important things that are generative, creative, podcasting, writing, etc. Before I get to the email and the admin stuff and the reactive stuff and everyone else's agenda for my time. For me, let's just say I'm a writer and entrepreneur, I need to focus on the making to be happy. If I get sucked into all the little bits and pieces that are constantly churning, I end up feeling stressed out. And that is why today's sponsor is so interesting.

It's been one of the greatest energetic unlocks in the last few years. So here we go. I need to find people who are great at managing. And that is where Crescent family office comes in. You spell it C-R-E-S-S-E-T. Crescent family office. I was introduced to them by one of the top CPG investors in the world. Crescent is a prestigious family office for CEOs, founders, and entrepreneurs. They handle the complex financial planning, uncertain

tax strategies, timely exit planning, bill pay, wires, all the dozens of other parts of wealth management, just financial management, that would otherwise pull me away from doing what I love most. Baking things, mastering skills, spending time with the people I care about. And over many years, I was getting pulled away from that stuff at least a few days a week and I've completely eliminated that. So experience the freedom of focusing on what matters to you

with the support of a top wealth management team. You can schedule a call today at crescentcapital.com slash Tim that's spelled C-R-E-S-S-E-T, crescentcapital.com slash Tim to see how CrescentCapital.com slash Tim that's spelled C-R-E-S-S-E-T CrescentCapital.com slash Tim to see how Crescent can help streamline your financial plans and grow your wealth. That's CrescentCapital.com slash Tim. And disclosure, I am a client of Crescent. There are no material conflicts other than this paid testimonial. And of course, all investing involves risk, including loss of principle. So, do your due diligence.