The Trish Regan Show - BREAKING: Ilhan Omar “Married Her Brother,” DHS Chief Says — DEPORTATION NEXT?
Episode Date: September 14, 2026Ilhan Omar is facing new problems as the head of DHS confirms the president’s comments regarding marriage fraud and, as Tom Homan says she’s facing a criminal investigation. Plus, the Brits are ...having a breakdown amid new comments from President Trump pushing for a united Ireland. Wow! He knows exactly how to get under their skin. Meanwhile, Meloni has a warning for all of Europe… German conservatives are rising and they won’t stop. This, as Ceuta, Spain reaches its breaking point. Perhaps most tragic? We’ve learned that Pedro Sanchez’s own intelligence division warned of the border surge — but, Spain did NOTHING to protect its people. Ask yourself WHY… Get Trish’s research newsletter at: https://76research.com ● Get 15% off OneSkin with the code REGAN at https://www.oneskin.co/REGAN #oneskinpod Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Transcript
Discussion (0)
Do you wish you could just hit skip on the worst parts of your life?
You know, the same way you can skip an ad?
I get it.
I'm Siaia and I live in Ice Cove.
I've made some questionable decisions that didn't end up the way I planned.
And today, I'm still figuring it out.
Somehow things usually get worse before they get better.
Apparently, that's how I roll.
So bundle up and come along for the bumpy ride.
Stream a new episode of North of North Tuesdays on CBC Gem.
She married a brother.
So says DHS. Oh my goodness. This is a doozy, guys. Ilhan Omar in the hot seat. She ought to be panicking just about now.
Plus, we want to talk a little bit about Ireland and what the president had to say that was so provocative.
I mean, not to me, but, you know, I'm an Irish American who has always wanted unification.
This is, let's just say, poking at some serious wounds. And he's in a lot of trouble with those Brits who are just coming right about now, totally undone.
Plus, gosh, it's been 45 days, 46 days since Seuta, Spain in that total massive breach
with all those migrants pouring in.
And we're getting word that the Spanish government knew the entire time that it was about to happen.
So what did they do?
Nothing.
No surprise there, right?
Welcome to the show.
I'm Trish Riggum.
Please make sure you subscribe.
Dun-Tana.
She married a brother.
Oh, boy, oh boy.
Ilhan Omar, are you in trouble now?
And then she married a brother to come in.
I don't know, you know, you're not.
But I think I would imagine they're looking at her.
I have nothing to do with it.
We know that she married her brother to try to bring him in the United States.
We know he lives now in London.
Woo! Oh my gosh.
Okay, so you heard first from President Trump.
And, you know, maybe you didn't recognize the second guy, but that second guy,
he's a pretty big deal.
He runs DHS right now.
So that's the sitting secretary of Homeland Security, Mark Wayne Mullen, publicly declaring the Democrat Congresswoman Ilhan Omar actually did marry her brother, as the president has suggested over and over again.
He had a lot to say to Benny Johnson saying that, yeah, yeah, we know that she married him in order to bring him to the United States.
I mean, this is a big accusation, okay, from the man that's overseeing the entire federal agency that's responsible for enforcing America's immigration laws.
So this is no longer just about this allegation, right, that's been circulating online for years.
This is about federal law enforcement officials.
First you had the vice president.
Now you've got DHS saying, yep, there's an active criminal investigation involving Ilhan Omar.
So what do investigators want to know?
And what does Ilhan Omar's highly unusual marital timeline actually show us quite a bit, if you ask me?
I was looking through this.
Nice little graphic that we put together.
You know, back in 2002, she had...
I guess, a religious marriage with the man who happens to be the father of her children.
She came to America in 1995, reportedly became a citizen back in 2000 when she was about 17 years old,
although there were a lot of questions about her age, which may be material.
So remember that.
In 2002, again, she has this religious marriage with a guy named Ahmed Hersey.
Here he is, what a winner.
He is the father of her children, and that marriage was recognized within their faith.
but it was never recognized by the government. It was never considered a legal civil marriage.
They happen to have two kids together, and she says they separated through their faith in 2008.
And then, what do you know?
2009 comes along, and she legally marries her second husband.
I guess he would technically be her first husband in the eyes of the law.
This is a British Somali man named Ahmed Neur Saeed Elmi.
Take a good look at him there.
if he looks much like Ilhan, because this is the man who Mullen and Trump are both alleging
is actually Ilhan Omar's brother.
I mean, Ilhan Omar, I should point out, she categorically denies this.
Absolutely not.
But the Daily Mail did this big investigation back in 2020,
and they basically interviewed this guy named Osman,
who is a community leader described as a prominent member of the Minneapolis-Somali community,
and he was claiming that Omar had introduced El-Eman.
Omi is her brother and that the members of the community understood that he needed papers in order to remain in the United States.
Now, that's one individual's allegation.
It's not actual judicial proof, but is a named on the record allegation from somebody who claimed direct knowledge of the family.
And then again, you go back to this timeline, right?
This lovely little timeline here because it says that Omar separated from Elmi through her faith in, what did they say, 2011?
That was the divorce.
Now, during that period, she had actually reunited with Hirsey, and they had a third get together.
What do you know?
I mean, come on.
She legally divorced Elmi in 2017, then legally married Hersey in 2018, and then she divorces
Hersey in 2019, and then, oh, in 2020, she meets the love of her life.
Timmy Minet.
Okay, so I get it.
none of this proves that Elmi was her brother, but it leaves investigators with a lot of important
questions here. Why did Omar legally marry Elmi? What immigration status did Elmi possess before and after
during the marriage? And did either party seek an immigration benefit, right? Based upon all of this.
And let me go, if you would, back to Mark Wayne Mullen, who explains it all in terms of what
federal agencies are looking at what documents they want to see and what they believe really transpired.
So listen here to the full exchange between Secretary Mullen and Benny Johnson. Watch.
Okay. Well, what's going to happen? This is a second.
Something's going to happen.
And this is an ongoing investigation. We know that she married her brother to try to bring
in the United States. We know he lives now in London. We feel that this may, you know, there's
even made more be, there may be more to this, the whole family migration and possibly some
illegal activity for them to come to the United States to begin with. But all of us in the
best, we're investigating. Here's what I want to make sure we do. If we actually move a case
forward, it's not a political case, it's actual a case because they did things wrong.
If you decided to break the law or lie on the information you gave in the United States,
the bail to come into the United States through either asylum or because you were just wanting to seek a better lie,
but you didn't tell us who you actually were.
You lied about certain things about your application.
Those things, there's no expiration to that.
If we can prove it that you shouldn't have been here in the first place, we'll deport you.
And so we're looking at, it's more than just her case.
We're looking at a lot of cases that are very similar to this, that we feel like there may have been fraud from the get-go.
But when we move forward, it's not political, it's because you chose to break the nation's laws.
And I've said this multiple times, and I continue to say it.
I don't make the laws anymore.
I'm in charge of enforcing laws, and I will not pick and choose which laws I'm going to enforce and which laws I'm not.
I'm going to enforce all of them, regardless of who you are, regardless of your Omar,
or some other individual in that community,
we're going to enforce it equally.
Wow, okay, that's a big deal.
And we should unpack that.
First, I just want to point out.
I'm actually going to be on Benny's show
tomorrow morning at 10.40 a.m. Eastern Time,
so make sure you turn into Benny Johnson tomorrow.
But that is a big deal.
What he's saying there, I mean, let's think about,
first of all, he's saying,
we know that she married her brother.
Second of all, he's saying,
something is going to happen.
And third, he's saying investigators may be examining more than just the 2009 marriage.
They're actually raising the possibility that Omar's entire family migration and the possibility
of illegal activity surrounding how members of her family originally entered the country is coming
into play. And that is critical. Okay, that is like the key part of all of this.
That final little nugget there is the key to whether or not deportation is even legally possible
legally possible for one, Ilhan Omar.
I'm going to explain that in just a minute because there's a distinction.
But first, look at what the Department of Justice was saying.
Just about a month ago, this is Todd Blanche.
These charges and the indictments now unsealed,
they show how far people will go to cheat our immigration system.
Gaining American citizenship and legal status to reside in this great nation
is a sacred privilege,
and we will ensure it is always done in accordance with the law
protecting our communities and national security.
These schemes have real costs.
They rob our country of its ability to know who should be
and should not be allowed in America.
And this department and the Department of Homeland Security
will not stand for this.
And I think this prosecution and the hard work
that went into it with the agents
and the prosecutors show that.
Okay.
Our efforts to protect our immigration system
and our country's borders are aggressive and exhaustive.
No matter how.
It's a big deal.
Okay, so the Justice Department in that particular case just about four weeks ago charged
11 defendants in what Blanche is describing as the largest marriage fraud prosecutions
in American history.
According to this indictment, the network allegedly orchestrated more than a thousand sham
marriages over about a decade.
Most of those foreign clients were reportedly Chinese nationals seeking lawful permanent
residency in the United States.
and according to prosecutors,
foreign nationals paid the operation
as much as 100K a pop,
whoa, to get matched with an American citizen.
Now, the American participants
were allegedly paid as much as 30K
to enter the marriages,
so it was a financial arrangement
with recruiters getting like 5K
every time they delivered an American.
How about that?
Payments were allegedly divided
into installments,
tied to immigration milestones.
You had to have the marriage,
then you had to file the application,
you had to attend the interview,
obtain the green card, et cetera, et cetera.
In other words, there's a premium on this stuff.
And, you know, it's, it's a big deal. And they're going after it because there was a heck of a lot of
fraud going on. You had staged weddings and banquets and stage photographs. I mean, you've seen
like sitcoms like this, right? I've seen sitcoms, you know, it's kind of like this funny thing.
And they've had movies. Yeah, they've romanticized this. Think about that. That's Hollywood at work,
baby. Anyway, they get to make sure that these people are legit. And so that's what they're digging into.
And now the question becomes, was Ilhan legit?
And it doesn't look like it.
I mean, it's just, they're telling us, now the president, the vice president,
and now DHS is telling us that something's going to happen.
And they're also looking into how she got her citizenship in the first place.
Again, remember that I'm getting back to it.
Stay with me, stay with me, stay with me, because this is really important stuff.
Very, very important right now.
Oh, you know what else is?
My hair, right? My hair, of course. Yeah. Why not have a hair commercial by all means, right?
Anyway, so this is a company called One Skin, OS1, as I call it, One Skin. And it's just really, really kind of remarkable. It's a really, really kind of special product. I love their skin products, which is how I grew to know them. They sent me some skin products. And I get a lot of these things in the mail and for, you know, variety. You know, people want to advertise on the show. But most of them, I'm like, yeah, yeah, no, no, no, no.
In this case, this was one heck of a product. I loved their moisturizer. I loved it. And, you know,
without getting into too much detail, it, like, really penetrated your skin, like, in a way,
it doesn't sit on top. It, like, gets in there. And so I love it. It makes makeup go on easier.
And so they told me they were coming out with a hair product. And I'm like, seriously.
And so I tried the hair product. And I loved the hair product. I loved the hair product. And I feel
like, you know, I don't know if it's, like, stress or just getting older or something. Like,
my hair isn't quite, you know, whatever.
And I feel like it's coming back in a big way.
So I love it.
And you can get 15% off if you want to give your hair that extra boost.
Check it out.
Code Regan.
It helps the show.
It helps you.
It helps me.
So make sure you use the code Regan, R-E-G-A-N.
I can tell you that they spent a lot of time working on this 10 years of longevity
research.
One Skids OS-O-1 peptide is engineered to support your hair to make it look visibly
fuller and thicker at any age.
So for a limited time, try one skin with 15% off using code Regan at oneskid.co, CO, forward slash
Reagan.
Again, 15% off at oneskin.com forward slash Regan.
It's code Regan.
So after your purchase, they're going to ask you, where did you hear about us?
Make sure you support the show and you tell them the Trish Regan show.
Anyway, I'm just blown away by everything that's happening right now with Ilhan because there's,
you know, a part of us, right?
guys like let's just be honest we're getting a little frustrated and we're kind of like when is this
when is this happening i mean we've talked at length about the daily mail investigation where they talked
to that prominent member the Somali community who said yeah that was just like a sham marriage right
like she's marrying her brother she had introduced him all around town as her brother said he needed his
papers apparently there was no one willing to marry him but her so that's what the allegation is
That's what the allegation is now from Mark Wayne Mullen, who runs DHS.
So she's married to one guy, one Ahmed, and then the brother comes into the picture, allegedly.
She separates from the first Ahmed, gets together with the second Ahmed, the brother, and then...
Don't you wish you could just hit skip on the worst parts of your life?
You know, the same way you can skip an ad?
I get it.
I'm Siyaya and I live in Ice Cove.
I've made some questionable decisions that didn't end up the way I planned,
and today I'm still figuring it out.
Somehow things usually get worse before they get better.
Apparently, that's how I roll.
So bundle up and come along for the bumpy ride.
Stream a new episode of North of North Tuesdays on CBC Gem.
Continues to have a relationship with the first Ahmed because she's still having kids with him.
Third kid, right?
Well, she's supposedly married to the other guy.
So, you know, investigators are left with all of these questions, and they have determined, at least according to this explosive interview, thank you, Benny Johnson for this one, that she, in fact, married her brother.
We know that she married her brother to try to bring him in the United States.
We know he lives now in London.
So he's over there in London.
He apparently got some degree in North Dakota, apparently the same school that she.
went to, I don't know how long they ever lived together, but, you know, these are kind of important
things and these things need to be established. So what happens now, right? Apparently this is bigger
than just him. So they're looking at the whole family migration and the possibility that there
was illegal activity around the entire family when they originally entered the country. Now,
why is that important? Because here's the deal, okay? Say what you want. The reality is if you,
if you come to this country legitimately as a refugee and your child is naturalized as a citizen,
then she's a citizen, right? So that would mean even if she goes out on that criminal limb
and brings her brother in through a false marriage, it's kind of hard to get rid of her.
I mean, you could get rid of him. But if she is a legitimate citizen, naturalized, whatever,
then it would be very hard to get rid of her.
her. You could put her in jail, right? She could pay a big fine. I think there's a jail time up to five
years, but you're not going to be able to deport her. What he's talking about is something very,
very different here. He's talking about deportation. So what they're talking about is a much
broader investigation that would look at the father, that would look at the mother, that would look at
all of those applications for citizenship that were filed back when Ilhan Omar first came here
and when she was 17 years old. And if they can prove that there is some discrepancy,
shall I say, if they're, you know, for example, if the dad was not really all that great a guy
and was actually not really a refugee, but maybe actually partook in some of the destruction
that was going on in Somalia, then that would make his citizenship null and void,
and it would make us her citizenship null and void.
So that's what they're looking into. Could it happen? Oh yeah, you better believe it could
happen. Ton Holman said as much yesterday. Well, he also confirmed this investigation was going on.
want. If someone committed immigration violation, someone committed marriage fraud or anything like
that, regardless if they're a congressman or not, no one's above the law. So I'll leave it at that.
We'll let the HSI, Homeland Security investigations, continue the investigation.
Okay, so you're confirming. She went on to say, wait a second. So you're confirming it? Let's listen to the
rest. Someone committed immigration. There is an investigation into, is an investigation and to, is an investigation
into Congresswoman Omar?
I'm confirming that ISIS, yeah, look, I said months ago
that is something that's been reported
and needs to be looked at.
Wow, okay, so he has been saying that for quite some time.
So then it becomes, wait a second,
can she actually be denaturalized?
Look, as I was explaining,
if this investigation goes so broad
as to tackle her father, for example,
and suggest that maybe her father,
who became the naturalized citizen and therefore she became the naturalized citizen.
If the father was not a legitimate refugee and they can prove that out,
then her relationship becomes null and void.
Obviously, if they're telling us, and they are telling us,
that she married her brother, his citizenship is quite clearly null and void.
He better not try and come back into the United States of America.
He better stay over there in the UK, you know,
because it's going to be game over if he comes here.
But for her now, sure, they could send her to jail or maybe they could send her out of the country.
And that's what they're looking at doing.
That's sort of the bigger stakes, if you would.
Let's go back to Holman on denaturalization because the reporter's asking this question, gee, you know, she's already a citizen.
So how would you do this?
Holman takes it away.
No, I've been around 40 years and we've done denat's cases.
We have denaturalized citizens based on fraud, based on lying under applications.
relying through the process, misrepresenting themselves,
or maybe risk-representing organizations they belong to or beliefs they have.
But denaturalization is a process.
It's a very serious process.
So if someone lies through that process to become a citizen,
and we can prove they, in fact, lied or misrepresented themselves.
We can absolutely denaturalize them.
We've done it before many times over the last 40 years I've been around.
So it's a process.
All right.
So again, the big cahuna here is going back and figuring out what happened with the entire family.
I think they've somehow determined that this marriage application, if you're watching on video,
you see it right here above my left hand shoulder.
This is the marriage application and the certificate, the license that says she's married to allegedly her brother,
and his name being Ahmed Elmi, now apparently living in London.
So one would have to assume that this marriage is null and void in the sort of eyes of the federal government.
And so Ahmed can't come back into the U.S.
He has no status if they're proving this out.
But the bigger question then is what happens to her?
Look, you know, I said it.
You can get five years up to five years in prison.
This is a felony.
Okay.
So if you say, hey, you know, I'm going to marry my brother, you just can't do that.
But remember, if she is a naturalized citizen, these are the options, right?
You get up to a $250,000 penalty, potentially three years of supervised release.
The penalty can apply to both the immigrant and the U.S. citizen who knowingly participates.
The deportation, meanwhile, happens to the brother in this case.
But if they figure out that the dad, who's now deceased, came here under false pretenses,
well, then that's the whole other ballgame, right?
That's what Holman's talking about.
That's the big deal.
Because in that case, and he said, look, I've been in this business 40 years,
and over the last 40 years, he called him denat cases.
Dena, a little inside baseball lingo for you.
The denat realization, denat cases, we've had them, and they've happened.
And look, you just have to be able to prove it out.
So that's the next question.
And that's what DHS is looking at.
Let's go back to the president, because he's been going on about this, right, for some time.
I want to see people that contribute.
I don't want to see Somalia.
I don't want to see a woman that, you know, marries her brother to get in and then becomes a congressman, does nothing by complain.
All she does is complain, complain, complain, and yet her country is a mess, you know, it's one of the worst in the world.
Let her go back, fix up her own country.
So, no, Somalia, and I was right about it.
You know, I started complaining about Somalia long before the scandal.
the horrible things they're doing to Minnesota, it's incredible.
They have an incompetent governor there too.
The Democrats are running some bad chips.
Ooh, okay.
So he's been kind of singing a similar tune, right, for a while.
And what is her response to that?
Her response is this is nothing but a bunch of political BS that he's racist, he's this,
he's that, well, let's listen to Ilhan Omar.
in her own words.
He's always been a racist, a bigot, sinophobic, and Islamophobic.
We know that he called African nations a shithole in his first administration.
We know that when he came down that escalator, he said he was going to stop Muslim immigration into this country.
And so it is not surprising that he is going after black immigrants.
in this country, and it's certainly not surprising that he's choosing a black immigrant community
that is also Muslim.
But what I would like to say is that most of us are citizens on our passport.
It says we are nationals of this country.
We love that Minnesota has welcomed us.
Many of us have not been settled in Minnesota.
We chose it as a home because the Minnesota people and the state is beautiful and very welcoming,
and we are going to be here regardless of what the president has.
has to say. I agree. I love the Twitter. She agrees. Okay. Well, I think it in this case, you know,
is it political? All right. You know, maybe, maybe a little teeny bit political. In other words,
she's made it political. She's the one who said, you know, some people did something on 9-11.
She's the one who still refuses, still refuses to apologize for those comments. She is the one who
embraces socialism. She is the one that was at the tip of that 250,
million dollar feeding our future frenzy scandal that blew up really and truly in her face and we're
still asking questions about where that money went. I have more on that. I'm going to get to it.
But the point is being that, you know, is it political? Here's the reality. It doesn't matter.
I'm just going to tell you. And Homan's saying no because you know what? We're just doing our jobs.
And he's right. In other words, Congress makes the laws. And then he's got to enforce him, right?
What do you think DHS is doing? They got to enforce them. It's not their fault, Ilhan.
that you apparently broke the law.
There's nothing political about it.
ISIS enforcing law that Congress wrote.
I mean, these are all laws that are in statute
in the Immigration Nationality Act,
which was written by Congress,
enacted by Congress, and signed by president.
ICE and ICE, HSI, DHS, none of us are making this up.
Our jobs in enforcer laws enacted by Congress,
and that's exactly what we're going to do.
Boom.
So he made the point that they can denaturalize somebody who came here and secured citizenship under false pretenses.
They absolutely can.
And that's what Ilhan has to be most worried about right now,
because the Justice Department has recently increased the number of civil denaturalization cases that they've taken on,
involving people accused of concealing crimes, accused of concealing fraudulent identities,
disqualifying conduct while obtaining citizenship. These are all things that would we cause for
denaturalization. So remember, this is one little complication in Ilhan Omar's case.
She came here and became a citizen in the year 2000 when she was apparently 17 years old.
she did not marry
Ahmed Elmi until 2009.
Therefore, even if investigators proved
that the Elmi marriage was fraudulent,
that later act would not automatically establish
that citizenship Omar obtained nine years earlier
was invalid.
She could potentially face criminal liability
without automatically becoming deportable.
That said,
that said, if her dad
came here under false pretenses,
misrepresented who he was,
than his citizenship, even though he's deceased, becomes null and void, and thus Ilhan Omar and Stas too.
Okay, so that's the big cahuna. That's what they're really striving for. That's what they think
they're going to get. And that's why they're kind of holding out as they broaden this investigation,
would somehow, way to go, Benny, got him to leak all that. But again, you know, even if they don't
get that, and I wouldn't be surprised if they do because they're pretty darn determined,
you're still looking it up to five years in federal prison, right, a fine of 250K.
You know, it's a big deal.
It's a very big deal to have been trying to evade immigration law.
And if you married your brother, you would be evading immigration law.
So that's what she's facing.
And basically a naturalized American citizen, while they're not ordinarily stripped of their citizenship,
just for participating in this crime,
the possibility here is that the citizenship was never real to begin with.
And that's a massive, massive allegation.
So a big deal to hear Mullin reference the, quote,
whole family migration.
And for him to say that matters so much more.
Again, I want to play it and I want you to listen to it with those particular words,
whole family migration, those words in mind.
Okay, well, what's going to happen, Mr. Secretary?
Something's going to happen.
This is an ongoing investigation.
We know that she married her brother to try to bring him in the United States.
We know he lives now in London.
We feel that this may, you know, there's even more be, there may be more to this, the whole family,
migration and possibly some illegal activity for them to come the United States to begin with.
Boom.
But all of us were investigating.
Here's what I want to make sure we do.
Boom.
The whole family migration and how they came to the United States were the underlying asylum residency
and citizenship applications basically not accurate.
Were they lying on those?
was every family relationship legitimate?
And did the records contain any material falsehoods
that could come back to haunt Ilhan Omar right now
and her legal eligibility?
That's a big deal.
That is a big deal because I've said all along,
I'm not sure how they're going to get her
unless they've got some kind of intel that suggests
something got screwed up
back when she was applying for citizenship to begin with.
and when he says they're looking at the whole family migration, who, that tells you exactly
what you need to know. So in other words, the marrying the brother thing, that may be nothing.
Like the whole point is, the entire family may not legitimately be allowed to be here.
And that, ladies and gentlemen, is huge. I mean, just absolutely positively huge.
a watchdog group meanwhile is demanding more from ilhan a watchdog group is coming on saying we need to see
these financial records we need to understand just exactly whether or not there was fraud when it
pertains to ilhan omar and the feeding our future scandal and thus somehow reported net worth of like
up to 30 million bucks i mean that was kind of massive right remember that and then it kind of
all went away, sort of, kind of, when she said, no, no, no, no, just a little mistake.
I mean, my accountant, my accountant somehow didn't know that, you know, I wasn't worth
$30 million.
In actuality, I'm more somewhere between, what was the latest number, under $95,000,
between $18,000 and $95,000?
Are you kidding me?
Like, he really, I mean, he must have gone to the Leering School.
He really must have gone to the Leering School.
Anyway, some people are not buying this.
there was a report that came out that effectively tried to clear her name.
And this watchdog group came out going into the weekend saying, no, no way, no way.
They're saying, we need the original financial documents because this was an astonishing correction, right?
You don't go from 30 million to 18,000.
Like that does not happen.
So you've got the marriage debacle, the possibility that's,
that this woman was never a citizenship to begin with.
And now you've got this doozy out there,
a watchdog group demanding these records.
They want the financial records of Ilhan Omar and her husband.
You know, Timmy Mina and his $5 million winery that doesn't seem to exist,
that's like not going to be something that we're going to sweep under the rug, okay?
We can't sweep away a multi-million dollar fortune somehow,
just because it's convenient for some people in Washington to make it go away.
Okay, the accountant made a mistake.
I mean, that's a big mistake, right?
Like, that's not just a misplaced decimal, thank you very much.
That is like a $29.9 million mistake.
That's a lot.
That's a lot of money.
And, you know, some people, they're just not buying it.
I want to go back to Steve Forbes and some of his original comments on this.
Here he is speaking on Fox business, and he's like, yeah, he's not buying any of it.
A lot of smelly stuff here, and that's why in the American Dream,
her American Virgin of the American Dream is the Al Capone version of the American Dream,
Tony Soprano version of the American Dream, and that is steal it, steal it from the taxpayers.
And so there's a lot of stuff here.
And so when somebody cloaks themselves in the, oh, the American Dream,
and so you have numbers like this from minus 1,000 to 30, 40 million,
you know something is not right.
Yeah, not right, which is why it was kind of surprising to see this story,
last week. Ilhan Omar cleared of wrongdoing after overstating assets by millions. The Wall
Street Journal was the first to report this. Interesting. So they get some kind of source in
Ilhan Omar's office, and she's looking for a favor. This came out, and the next thing you
know, nonpartisan congressional ethics body, they voted five to one to just dismiss allegations
that Omar submitted false or incomplete financial information. They just, like, okay, it's going to go
away. Are you kidding me? I mean, the OCC apparently concluding that there was, quote, no substantial
reason to believe Ilhan Omar knowingly filed false information. Omar's office, they're treating this as a
total victory lap, as you can imagine they would, right? Unbelievable. Well, not everybody is. I mean,
this Paul Kamalimar from National Legal and Policy Center is calling it stunning that the Office of
Congressional Conduct voted five to one to recommend the House Ethnic.
Committee dismissed this, despite Ilhan Omar saying, you know, she's free and clear, for goodness
sakes.
Unbelievable.
Unbelievable.
I'm just looking at the Wall Street Journal article here because they quote her spokesperson
as saying, quote, this vote clearly underscores that the congresswoman did nothing wrong
and attempts by the far right to manufacture controversy and distract from the facts are pathetic
and nothing more than a desperate distraction from their own failures.
I'm sorry, lady.
like the far right did not come up with the $30 million valuation on her assets, okay?
So good for these guys, the National Legal and Policy Center, again, a watchdog group,
they're like, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no.
They're now demanding that the House Ethics Committee obtain the original financial records.
Duh, because how the heck do you know what's going on unless you see the original financial records?
I mean, you've got to have your own accounting and your own accountant because correcting a form,
I'm like, that's just, I'm sorry, it's not the same thing, right?
How do we know that the correction is accurate?
Omar's original disclosure said they had between $6 million and $30 million.
That's a fortune that apparently Timmy Minet was responsible for through his winery called East Street
crew and then his venture capital firm called Rose Lake Capital.
The winery, it had been valued at $15K to $50,000.
and suddenly appeared on the disclosures
as an asset that was worth $1 million to $5 million.
And you and I have talked about this before, right?
I kept saying, I'm wondering
if they're padding this valuation
deliberately to kind of use this Rose Lake Capital venture
capital firm as some kind of facade,
I'll just say it, for alleged money laundering.
That is my concern.
So, you know, it just doesn't make any sense.
I mean, this Rose Lake Capital used to be worth less than $1,000.
Now suddenly it's worth $5 to $25 million,
thereby producing a household fortune of $30 million.
None of this adds up, literally, does not add up.
You know, you get no income off the winery,
no income from Rose Lake Capital,
and somehow you're worth $30 million.
I'm not buying it.
No one's buying it.
Comer wasn't even buying it back in the day.
better get going on this one or I'll tell you people are going to be very angry. Look, who makes a
multi-million dollar mistake on their financial disclosure form? Either her accountant went to one of
those quality leering centers in Minnesota or she lied about it. If she lied about it, that's a
felony, Sean. If her accountant went to one of the quality leering centers, then she should work
with us as a whistleblower to help us prosecute all of her fellow Somalis who were involved in
this massive welfare scheme in Minnesota. Either way, she's never explained to the public
how her net worth was $30 million, and if she made a mistake, how the mistake happened.
I mean, it's not possible. You review that financial disclosure form. Before you hit in or,
you enter all the assets in, and then it pops up, and you review it, and you hit it again.
So it's highly unlikely that she made a mistake. This isn't going to go away from her,
So we're going to continue to try to push for answers and see if she,
if her name pops up in any of these frauds that Vice President Vance and the House Oversight Committee are detecting in Minnesota.
Okay.
Well, we want answers.
We need answers, right?
The watchdog group is going to push you to get those answers because what businesses did they actually possess?
What were the revenues on those businesses?
What were the liabilities on those businesses?
Who was investing?
Important.
Who was investing in those businesses?
Who did business?
with those businesses? What contracts did they execute? You know, and was there any money directly
or indirectly tied to any government programs or entities that receive taxpayer funds, right? All those
people out in Minneapolis that were part of feeding our future, where they, I'm just asking,
investing in Timmy Minutes, venture capital firm, doing deals in what, 81 different countries,
as his website once purported? This is extremely suspicious. You cannot sweep this under the
You need the actual accountant statements. You need the bank statements. You need the tax returns. You need the ballot sheets.
You need it all. Okay. You need it all. And maybe the IRS is doing this. They can't tell us, by the way, if they are, they can't because that would be a breach of confidence. They're not allowed to tell us. But, you know, ethics. Where are you? I mean, this is the ethics committee. For goodness sakes. Come on. Back to Steve Forbes.
Also like, you know, blaming people bullying, doing race baiting, race bullying.
There's no evidence, public evidence, there's even a winery.
She valued it a $5 million.
His investment firm is real.
Well, it's supposedly real.
It's D.C. headquarters appear to share office space at a we work, Steve.
There's no track record of his firm managing money doing M&A deals.
No clients we see investment deals or any work it's done.
They say they do work in 80 nations operating in.
There's no SEC registrations for them as investment advisors.
What is going on here?
This increasingly looks sketchy, both the winery and his investment firm.
Yeah, the winery may not exist, and the firm may be just really a name only, as you say, a we work office, big deal.
So that's why the investigation needs to be done.
And suddenly all that 30 million, I think you're going to find, I'll make a speculation and prediction,
that 30 million came from sources that are illegal, period.
I think he's right, okay?
I don't think this is a simple accounting mistake.
I think Ilhan Omar, my just suspicion, okay,
and my suspicions are often quite right, strangely, weirdly so.
But my suspicion is that there is some funny stuff going on.
Now she's innocent until proven guilty.
But she has no desire for whatever reason to help prove her innocence.
She won't come forward with any of the records.
They've been asking for him.
out in Minnesota, right? She won't give anybody any of the records there. And now we learn that
the OCC is just like saying, hey, case closed, nothing to see here. I don't think so. Ilhan thinks
this is a victory. No, no, no, no, no, no, no. I think it's really important for all of us,
right, for all of us to stay on this story and continue to demand them to put the pressure on
or whoever we need to be putting the pressure on. I mean, clearly DHS is doing their part, right?
They're following through on the deportation front. But where's trekkers?
Treasury on this. Okay, Scott Besson, we're looking at you, all right? You guys, it balls in your court.
I would think that the IRS would be looking at this. I would think that Treasury's Department
of Terrorist financing would be looking at this. We already got wind that perhaps they were
because according to some kind of legal back and forth with Timmy Minet's business partner
at Rose Lake Capitol, apparently they couldn't access certain funds because the Treasury Department
and put a hold on them because the Treasury Department suspected them of being involved with,
terrorist financing.
I mean, that's a pretty big thing.
So why don't we know more?
And how is this woman still sitting there in Congress?
I'm really troubled by it.
I really am.
And I see no desire from her to come forward with any numbers or any of the original financial records
that would help prove her innocence.
So it's going to come down to James' Congress.
Homer, and I'm just telling you, he's going to have to get,
huts a shot on this one.
Because he was everywhere, right? Remember?
Back in February, he was like all over this.
He couldn't get off the airwaves. He kept talking about this, as he should.
It didn't make any sense.
He kept pointing out the obvious concerns with Timmy Minet's business over and over again.
He requested the financial records related to East Street Capital and Rosley Capital,
and nothing came forward.
Like, she just blew it off, like tell it to the hand.
And then he deferred it to the ethics committee, and now the OCC is coming back and saying,
all right, we're not going to do anything with it.
But the ball is still in his court, so he still has room to run here.
The ethics committee is not required to accept the OCC's recommendation, not at all.
And it's evenly divided between Republicans and Democrats on the matter.
And so the dismissal arrived around the beginning of a 60-day pre-election period
during which the new ethics investigations generally cannot be reopened.
And so if everyone simply points to the OCC's five to one vote and moves on, the controversy
disappears from the public view.
And that's that.
We'd have no accountability in that case.
And I'm not okay with that.
I know you're not, you tell me you're okay with that?
I don't think so, right?
That's what they're hoping.
Somebody's hoping.
Ilhan's spokesperson is hoping.
You're going to be okay with this.
But no, no, no, no, no.
You say you did nothing wrong.
I want to see you prove it.
Show us the original valuations.
Show us the original documents.
because this doesn't add up.
Can you imagine that OCC committee there saying,
well, you know, she just had a typo?
You don't think you want to see the actual documentation,
the underlying financial records to support whatever conclusion
the accountant was coming up with?
I mean, come on, people, really and truly come on.
I joke.
I get my Irish up sometimes, right?
Because I get kind of annoyed with these things.
Well, who knew the Brits were so Irish?
They had their Irish all up over the weekend.
My gosh, they're flipping up because the president said this.
I love to see it unified.
Woo!
He's talking about Ireland.
I'd love to see it unified, he said.
He's talking about Mother Ireland and bringing the UK, which is Northern Ireland,
Belfast, right together with the rest of the island. And this is huge, guys. This is absolutely
positively huge. And having just visited there recently, I can tell you, you know, those wounds
are really, really raw. My bias, full disclosure, because, you know, I'm an Irish-American girl
myself, full red-blooded, capitalist American, but, you know, you go back a few hundred years.
the Regans were all from Ireland.
And there's nothing more that we would like to see,
then we would like to see,
than a United Ireland.
So he came out and said this, and I'm thinking,
yeah, that's great.
That's my president, right?
That's my president.
He doesn't care.
He's open up all kinds of Pandora boxes all around him,
and he does it anyway.
Listen to this question and answer.
What's your Irish identification?
Mr. President.
What are Irish?
Unification.
What's your view on?
Well, I don't want to cause any problems, but I will tell you. I'd love to see it unified.
I have friends on both sides. Great people. They're Irish people. How can they be bad, right?
I'd love to see it uniform. I think it would be a great, a great feather in everybody's cap. Did that happen?
It's going to happen eventually.
You know what? It's going to happen eventually.
It will happen now. We're talking about it. And you got the right man over here.
to get it moving. But yeah, I'd think it would be a fantastic thing. Now, the UK will have something to
say about it, obviously, but I think it would be a great thing. I mean, how can it be bad?
Exactly, right? They're all Irish. Let them be one country together. Maybe they could fight back
against the immigration challenges collectively together instead of having the UK send all those
migrants into Northern Ireland and then they pour down through the very poorest border,
basically becoming a financial liability and challenge to the rest of Mother Ireland.
Now, this is a very sore subject, like very, very sore subject.
So somehow he just wandered into perhaps the most explosive possible subject for Ireland, period,
and for Great Britain, right?
He suggested there that Britain just ought to give it back.
Just give it back.
He's saying, I want to see it united, right?
How bad can that be?
It's going to happen eventually.
Might as well happen now.
So he openly endorsed a United Ireland.
This really hasn't happened before.
It just has not happened.
All U.S. presidents have tried to stand the sidelines and be very diplomatic about this.
But, you know, you figure he's actually going for the Falkland Islands, too, right?
The Islas Navinas, right, as they call them down in Argentina.
He's like, you know, they ought to give those back to Argentina, and they ought to just give Ireland back to Ireland.
This is an American president.
openly contemplating, breaking up the UK.
So the British reaction, oh my gosh, it was visceral.
They absolutely positively loved it.
Even on my favorite channel over in the UK, GBNews, GbNews.com,
they, I mean, and they're conservative, right?
But they did not appreciate this, not one bit.
I just think the fact that we're having to have this conversation,
a U.S. president coming out and emphatically endorsing a United Ireland,
shows yet again how completely unfit for office President Trump is.
I wouldn't be surprised at all if this was a vindictive pot-stirring move by President Trump.
Really? Oh, that's what you think it is, okay?
And then somebody else was like, well, I'm going to give him the benefit of the doubt.
I'm going to blame his team.
Yeah, right.
I think if it was a mistake and he wasn't briefed properly, that he's unforgivable,
given his position and his team.
So if it genuinely was something that was not thought about,
questions need to be answered about his advisors and the people around him.
Oh, I see.
You know, perhaps he just didn't understand what he was saying, right?
His handlers failed to educate him about the sensitivities surrounding Northern
Act.
Trust me, he gets it.
Heck, he's got a big golf resort, for goodness sakes that he was also at over there.
He gets it, he gets it.
Here's the article coming out over the weekend in the New York Times.
Trump says Irish unification would be fantastic, fantastic,
breaking with precedent.
And then, you know, yesterday the Sky News put out backlash grows over Trump's completely
wrong comments on Irish unification.
Completely wrong.
Really?
You think that guys?
I don't think that.
I actually think that, you know, it would be fantastic if you could bring them all together
because, hey, if you're in Northern Ireland, think about the economic opportunities
you've had.
You would have.
You got nothing up there in Northern Ireland.
You just got the UK and the UK has an invested squat in Northern Ireland.
And then you look at Dublin.
and you got Google and you got meta and oh well the president's talked about that before i've always
called them shock on marriages where a u.s company goes and buys some company over in dublin right because
then they get the low 12% tax rate but you know it was smart on ireland's part very very smart not smart
for us to have crazy high tax rates but smart for ireland to say hey come on come all we'll give
you a really low tax rate and what do you know these businesses come in they bring jobs they've now
got this amazing tech economy there in ireland because it's a heck of a lot cheaper to operate there
than it is out in Palo Alto, California, right? So if you're the UK, if you're Northern Ireland,
you're up there in Belfast without a hope and a prayer of ever making a living, you're looking down at
your southern neighbors saying, you know, maybe this would be better to be reunited with them
once and for all anyway, because it's a far better path to economic opportunity than anything we got
here. The UK is a mess, for goodness sakes, and all they do is keep throwing all the migrants right there
into Northern Ireland. I will say, though, it is a sensitive issue. It's a very sensitive issue.
I was there myself recently, and I was really stunned by it. I mean, like, I was up in the north,
and people would say to me, are you Irish or are you British? I'm like, do you care? Like, really?
Come on. Even, even like I had a couple rides with drivers, right, around Northern Ireland,
and they would keep asking me those questions because they were trying to determine where I stood.
people are extremely careful about what they say and how they identify in which community they belong to
because despite the Good Friday Agreement and despite nearly three decades of peace, thank goodness,
you still have these Protestant and Catholic tensions in these communities that are alive and well.
They've got different neighborhoods. They've got different schools. I was amazed by it.
Like one side of the street is Catholic. One side of the street is Protestant. So different schools,
different traditions, different political loyalties, big time. 90%. Do you know this?
90% of the kids still attend schools divided largely along religious lines.
So you have the Catholic Nationalists, aka the Green, who identify with Ireland and support
eventual unification.
And then you have the Protestant unionists, the Orange, who identify as British, and they
want Northern Ireland to remain part of the UK.
I mean, I think that they're crazy to want that, personally, because, you know, I like the economic
realities of what Ireland actually offers them. But these divisions, they're very, very real. And Trump
knows they're real. I mean, it's why, if you listen, what did he preface his answer with? He said
this may get me in a little trouble. What's your Irish identification? What's your view of?
Well, I don't want to cause any problem, but I will tell you. I'd love to see it unified. I have friends on both
besides great people. They're Irish people. How can they be bad, right? How can it be bad? But he knew
that it would be a little bit troublesome, but this is what I'm telling you, okay? He tends to tell
the truth. I know everybody wants to say that. He's lying through his teeth all the time. No,
no, no, no. My only experience with him, and every time I've interviewed him, he has told the truth.
Sometimes too much of the truth, and too much of the truth can get you in a heck of a lot of trouble.
So he knew that it might be troublesome to say that,
but he thought, you know, it makes sense for them to unify.
Totally makes sense.
And, you know, if you think about it,
he knew it would be problematic.
He said it anyway.
I think it's in part because, yes, he's very truthful,
but it's also in part because keep in mind,
he's trying to pressure Andy burn, right?
After Britain refused to support America's war against Iran,
he's kind of over it.
He's like, you guys got to get your own energy.
You guys got to get your own kind of.
contributions to NATO going, and you guys are going to have to figure it out, because we're not
going to back you up in Ireland with this Northern Ireland thing that really shouldn't exist,
and we're not going to back you up with the Islas Navinas, the Falkland Islands off the coast of
Argentina, you know, you don't back us up. Why should we back you? He doubled down on it,
by the way. He doubled down on it twice. This is really, really something to see. Watch,
here he is actually at his golf resort.
And he said it again.
What you think Andy Burnham, the British Prime Minister, made of your comments on a United
Ireland?
I don't know what he said to.
But he said there would be no referendum until the majority of people in Northern.
Everybody says that and then things happen.
By the way, I've spoken to him.
You hear that?
Everybody says that.
But hey, why not bring it to a referendum?
Why not have the vote?
Why not give people the opportunity to leave.
if they would so choose to. A lot of them would like to. You know why? Not just the better economic
opportunity, but this whole, you know, Brexit thing means that they get a harder time traveling
anywhere. It's true, you know, I mean, I was just over there. The line for the Europeans is like
the fast lane. And then for everybody else, for the Brits, for the Americans, everybody else
are in the slow lane. So it takes forever to go anywhere. And so there's just a little inconvenience
on top of everything else. But the economic one, I think that's a biggie. And then he went on
about windmills because he's like, Andy, for goodness sakes, get rid of the freaking windmills,
would you? I think he's very nice guy. He tends to be on the liberal side, unfortunately.
The one thing he is going to be doing, I think he's going to be stopping the stupid windmills
and he's going to be drilling in the North Sea. That's my impression.
I hope no windmills. If you have a windmill in your backyard.
I was the windmill girl in the old office that asked you and you said they were heinous.
Who were with?
Who were with? Real America's voice.
That's good. Yeah. No windmills. Windmills. If you have a windmill,
near your house. Your house is practically valueless. It's the most expensive one. It's so sad when I go over,
you know, Ireland's been very good at windmills. They have proportionally far less than Scotland.
Scotland is, it's a shame what they've done. Here's a good thing about a windmill. It can be taken
down. You know, there's an upside there somewhere. You know, keep in mind, Northern Ireland is
undergoing visible demographic and cultural changes, right, because of the immigration issue.
Remember a couple of weeks ago, I showed you in Belfast all the fires and all the, I mean,
it was unbelievable. Let me show it to you again, actually, just to jog your memory, this is what's
going on. This is just some of the examples of what we were seeing there in Belfast. There were a lot of
fires as well. There you go. House is torched. They were going.
and torching some of the migrant centers.
Basically, they wanted nothing to do with all the migrants that are coming in.
And they're really, it's becoming sort of reaching, dare I say, a tipping point.
I mean, we're seeing the same story play out over and over and over and over again.
We're seeing it in the UK.
We're seeing it in, obviously, in Northern Ireland.
You're seeing it in Germany.
You're seeing it in Italy.
You're seeing it in Spain.
And so people have just kind of reached that breaking point.
And for whatever reason, these leaders just don't seem to get it.
Northern Ireland is undergoing this massive demographic and cultural change because of immigration.
I couldn't believe it, actually.
I was there.
I was in Belfast.
And everywhere I looked, there were the head coverings.
And, like, it's strange because, you know, you're in Ireland.
And it's like the one place I can go where, you know, if I don't have a tan,
because I get this freckly Irish skin, I don't feel bad about it, right?
But I'm looking around, I'm like, gosh, you know, fewer and fewer people look like me here.
And I'm just saying I'm in Ireland.
It's a little bit strange.
But this is what's been going on, right?
In London, throughout all of Great Britain, it's partly why you saw Brexit.
It's partly why people are so frustrated.
We saw what happened in Portsmouth in the UK just last weekend where people were like,
we don't want the migrant boats coming in.
The orange community, the Brits, they want to preserve that British and Protestant heritage.
I get it. This has been going on for like 100 years.
The green community, they are the Irish Catholics, and they want to preserve that heritage.
But here's the funny thing.
I think all of them collectively are starting to say, gee, the orange and the green,
we better work hard to protect this communal heritage over what is coming in.
Right? Because suddenly, you know, we seem to have a whole lot more in common with each other
as much as we've been through and all the troubles, et cetera.
We got more in common with each other.
than we do with the people from Syria or from Bangladesh or from parts of Africa that are
infiltrating now our communities. And so I kind of wonder if this is going to be the one issue
that could actually bring, and Trump senses it. He knows it. That's why he said it, okay?
That's why he answered so honestly. He could have said, you know, I don't want to get into this,
but he knows it. He senses it. And he knows where the people are. He's got his
sort of pulse, if you would, on where the people are right now. And they are leaning so heavily
against illegal immigration. So heavily. Like there was a 2026 survey done. And in this survey,
they found that 78% of the people in Northern Ireland were concerned about illegal immigration,
78%. And if you think about where they were, you know, a few years ago, no way.
Nobody worried about this because it wasn't an issue. It's really come up since 2020. And so
that 78% is going to turn into 98% pretty darn fast. And that's going to be the communal
unity issue that brings the orange and the green. You know, maybe you'd prefer them to come
together for other reasons, but, you know, it just is what it is. That's what's going to bring them
together. I predict. I predict. You know, look, the Brits have benefited from this orange and green
thing forever. They had immigration policies that could create an issue, its own immigration policies,
I should say, could conceivably create an issue on which they would find a common ground now,
however, because at some point people say enough is enough is enough. And they start to push back.
And you're going to see those six counties up there in the north, they're going to come back.
I get to tell you, it's kind of personal to me. Some of you guys,
know this. Maybe some of you don't, but, you know, I might as well get my biases out there.
My family in Ireland, actually, was very supportive of the independence movement in the South.
And during the Troubles, one of my American cousins, actually, went over to visit them.
And he stopped, he was actually working in Belfast, which was interesting.
He was working at, I think, some of the salt mines up in Belfast.
And he went down to the South, and he went to visit for a week.
And he stopped at a local pub.
He got a pint.
and he picked up the IRA newsletter at the pub because someone had an IRA newsletter.
He's like, sure, I need something to read.
So he read the newsletter, drank his pint, and then got in his car to go up the hill to
the Regan family home.
And British police, they followed him right back up to the home.
And they got him out and they started questioning him.
They thought he was involved somehow in the cause.
He wasn't.
He was just an American kid, you know, visiting his family, you know, while working at the salt
mines up in Belfast.
But I'll tell you, the story illustrates how there was all this suspicion and all this
fear that permeated everyday life.
You always had the Brits watching you.
And so that's very much alive and well.
When you go to Ireland today, that's very present in their minds.
And so it's an emotionally charged issue.
and I think unity, however, could still be coming.
And maybe this is the issue, this immigration challenge is going to be what actually finally galvanizes everybody to come together and say, you know what, we are one.
We are one against a common enemy right now that wants to actually really destroy our culture.
Because I'll tell you, the Protestants and the Catholics in Ireland have a lot more in common with each other than they do with the Syrians that are Muslim or the,
Africans that are Muslim. I mean, let's just face the reality of it, right? So Donald Trump gets this,
knows this, and he's leaning into it. Same thing's going on in Germany. I mean, this just keeps
replaying and replaying and replaying. But, you know, when I look at Germany today and I see,
wow, what's happening there, I just got to tell you, I'm not surprised the AFD is doing the way it's doing.
Take a look.
Wow.
Man or a woman?
Hello.
Dear comrades, let's take a look at what's happened over the last three months.
Okay, well, you don't need to speak German.
Okay, well, you don't need to speak German to understand what's wrong with this.
this picture, right? You wonder why the AFD is Gaining. You wonder why the conservatives have a leg
to stand on in Germany right now. I mean, seriously, for goodness, Germany's political establishment,
they keep reacting to this rise of the AFD as being the enemy, right? And they act like millions
of German voters have suddenly lost their minds. It was like what we saw here in the U.S. How could
anybody vote for Donald Trump? How could that ever happen? You know, I'll tell you.
The ones that have lost touch with reality, it's not the everyday Germans, for goodness sakes.
It's these nut jobs out there.
I mean, here's a group that I guess they did this in 2023, a bunch of people that think they're dogs and like to act like dogs and get together in Berlin once a year and parade around like dogs and then go hiking.
Seriously.
And this is making the rounds again because, again, people are pointing to the insanity of it all.
Yikes. Okay. So again, I'll ask you my question, which is, are you surprised that AFD is winning the day?
I mean, they get a big election coming up next weekend, too, and I think they're going to take that one as well. I'll tell you, you know, you've got violent crime. You've got a lot of pressure on housing, a lot of pressure on schools. Energy prices are soaring, obviously. You've got an economy that's totally a mess.
When you look at inflation versus where the economy is, they are not growing at all.
I would call this stagflation.
They're not growing.
And yet you've got higher and higher and higher costs with inflation skyrocketing,
something like 20%, 25% overall in the last five years.
So, yes, you've got a group of people that are really struggling.
And then you see scenes like this where people are, you know, let's just say very special.
Like this is not a Star Wars or rather Star Trek.
convention. No, these are the members of the German left. Okay. So between that and the
Pup Walk video of, you know, hundreds of people crawling through the streets dressed and
behaving like dogs, I just got to say, like AFD, yeah, like this is your election to win,
for goodness sakes. You know, there's no way that this is going to be tolerated by everyday folks,
just like what was going on here in the US of A
was not tolerated by everyday folks.
It is why Donald Trump won the first time
and it is why he won the second time.
Well, German voters are delivering an earthquake.
An earthquake.
Okay?
And Maloney down in Italy says,
watch this because you guys are so stupid.
Today, Italy has gotten a great success.
You guys are so stupid.
that you think you can fight this conservative movement with some firewall.
Well, guess what?
That firewall's coming down bit by bit by bit, right?
We just saw it in Saxony-on-Halt.
The AFD, alternative for Germany, as it's known,
surged to basically 44% of the vote.
I mean, that's more than double what Mertz's party.
Fred Mertz is getting 17.2%.
And AFD won 39 seats.
The parliament's 83 seats, 39 of the parliament.
the 83 seats in Parliament, and that is massive.
Nothing like that has happened before.
So Georgia Maloney is right.
Like she's like, guys, this is what's happening.
Here's a German publication, Deutsche Press, whatever, you know, they came out with an
article over the weekend saying Italian PM Maloney says, German firewall against
AFD isn't working.
I mean, I hate to point out the obvious, guys, but you've been calling AFD unacceptable.
The deplorables, right?
They're untouchable.
You should have heard Mertz the other day going on and on and on.
I just, you know, this is not working anymore.
Every major party erected what it calls a political firewall.
They say, we're going to have no alliances, we're going to have no coalitions,
we're going to have no cooperation with the AFD.
They're accusing them of ethnic cleansing.
They're accusing them of basically, you know, I mean, this is Germany after all, right?
So they've got quite a history that we all very well-known.
know about. And so there's some things that are extraordinarily sensitive. And what do they do?
They keep going there and going there and going. They're basically trying to tell everybody you're a
Nazi if you vote for the AFD. And the people keep on voting for the AFD. And Georgia Maloney said,
it's going to keep on happening because you're not listening to the people. It's actually what I was
just saying last week, right? I mean, let me get you her quote. So Georgia is out there saying,
as we can see this is a strategy that does not work. This is in the article. You think? You're not going to be able to build a wall high enough to contain public anger when you refuse to deal with the reason that that anger exists. Right? You can't just put up all these firewalls without actually attacking, addressing the substantive issues at play. It's just like what Kamala was trying to do here. It's exactly the same playbook. They're like, we're just going to make people
feel bad about themselves. And if they, they feel bad, and if we shame them, you know, you can't
vote for Trump. You're not going to, you're not going to get a girlfriend or a wife if you vote for
Trump. This was the kind of stupid stuff that they were playing all along, and this is exactly what
Germany is trying to do. We're going to build a firewall because, you know, we're going to hold
our nose and we are just not going to come anywhere near this AFD party. We're going to keep smearing
them. We're going to call them Islamophobic and xenophobic. And we're going to
going to destroy them and make it so that they can't survive in society.
And Georgia keeps saying, you keep doing that, and they're going to keep voting for them,
right?
She's got a little challenge here because, you know, she tries to play both sides of the coin.
I've talked about this with you guys before.
You know, she's a bit of an enigma.
I like to say, la donnie immobilé, right?
La d'a immobilie.
the woman is fickle. It's a famous Verdiaria from Rigoletto that the tenor sings, you know,
talking about how women are kind of flighty. And she, unfortunately, is fitting that description
because she used to be all out in front of this issue and very, very big on making sure that
Italy was for Italy. And now she's kind of, she's kind of gotten soft, right? And maybe it's just
because she's got to appease Brussels all the time. And she doesn't want to look like she's
besties with AFD. But she is smart because she's telling,
Germany, listen, you have to make peace with the AFT. You have a large percentage of your population
that does not want to deal anymore with the migration challenges you have put upon them.
They don't want to deal with anymore paying so much money to Brussels. You know, you're taxing
them and taxing them and taxing them. They don't have anything left. So this is just not working.
It's not working for anyone. And I think, you know, Mertz,
effectively is going to be out at some point.
We were talking about his poll numbers
the other day, and they're just miserable,
absolutely miserable. He's the
most unpopular
sense.
I think you've got to go all the way back to
Olaf, right?
Olaf might have been that
the other one. You know, there's another election
that happened over the weekend, I should point out.
And that was the Swedish Democrats.
It was very, very close.
They lost a little bit of ground,
but not much.
And it's interesting, if you read the different right-throughs,
I think it was Reuters or Bloomberg today,
they're still freaking out because they're like,
oh, the Swedish Democrats, that would be the conservative wing.
They call themselves Democrats, but whatever.
They're the conservatives, all right?
And they're very anti-immigration.
They actually, they lost a little bit of ground.
However, you know what has happened?
The center left in Sweden has gotten much tougher on immigration policy.
And I think that that's peeling off some of the more,
extremists on the right in the Swedish Democrats. And so she's sort of telling them,
listen, guys, you've got to come to some kind of consensus here where you're recognizing
these threats and these concerns because otherwise they're just going to railroad you.
I mean, as for Sweden, you know, I think you've got the middle sort of adopting this
position now that this migration thing is just not working. It's not working for anyone.
And so as the parties start to coalesce around that idea, you'll start to see that thin
out in terms of the sort of extremism, if you want to call it that, that you're seeing among the
Swedish Democrats. Again, it depends on who you talk to because the Bloomberg right through was
really worried that they held as many seats as they did. And I'm like, I'm not surprised. Of course,
they're holding seats. And I'm just surprised they're not taking more. But the reason maybe they
didn't take more is because finally you have some of the other parties starting to recognize
that this is really how people feel and that this migration system.
It doesn't work. You cannot have open borders. It just doesn't. I mean, how dumb do you have to be to think that that's ever going to make sense? I would just ask. Apparently pretty dumb. I mean, but, you know, some people are. Either that or they're getting paid. They're getting paid over in Spain, maybe. Just saying, I'm wondering about the Chinese influence. Anyway, Berlin and Mecklesburg, Western.
Pomerania have a big election, September 20th. So that's actually this Sunday. People are going to be
going to be going to the polls in Berlin and Meckleburg Western Pomerania. And Berlin is going to be the
most symbolic, important test, right? Imaginable, the AFT won, just over 9% there in
2023. Now polling has them at 19% in Berlin, you know, where you have the pups. So that's roughly
doubled the previous amount of support. And so if that happens, and actually if you see another Eastern
state like Meckleburg, Western, Pomerania, then the AFD has a real chance to demonstrate that the
Saxony-on-Holt thing was not just a one-off protest, that this is a movement that is sweeping the
nation, it's what Georgia Maloney is telling them and warning them of. It is a big deal. And so I don't
think the firewall is going to work anymore. You are not stopping AFD. You are feeding it. Every insult,
every exclusion, every attempt to pretend that the voters don't count, and that the very argument of
their party that the governing class is trying to determine, you know, how they should live their
lives. Every time you do that, it's going to, it's going to like boomering against you.
It's just going to boomerang right back in your face and knock you down.
Because the people have spoken just like they did here, right?
And just like they're speaking out in Spain.
I mean, we're now into what, day 46 in Seuta, Spain's territory on the North African coast, and you know what?
Enormous numbers of migrants are still there.
Look at this.
Unbelievable video.
So this was taken over the weekend, and this is basically the reality of what the Spaniards, the European voters, are seeing in all of their towns.
I mean, this might be a little extreme.
This is tens of thousands, right?
They crossed into that little tiny European territory.
I mean, estimates between 60 and 80,000.
The whole town is only 80,000 of saved to Spain.
And they're all still there.
Camped out on the beach.
And, you know, people are complaining because they can't go for their regular walk.
They can't go to the beach.
They can't let their kids out because there's a group of young military-aged men from a Muslim country hanging out at the beach nonstop.
So this is not good.
This is not good. And you know what's really not good is what we just found out.
We found out that Spain had an opportunity to stop this. Spain knew.
And they allowed the Seuta border breach to happen anyway.
I ask you, why, why, why, why, why, why, why, why, why, why? Is it China? Is China paying?
Little Pedrito Sanchez, a little Kaching on the side to say, hey, just allow him in?
because we want to mess with everyone?
Like, why would you allow this?
Especially when your own intelligence department was coming out and saying,
hey, hey, hey, hey, hey, there's going to be a big uprising and a big border crossing.
You needed to get your troops there.
You needed to get the military there.
You needed to stop it, of course, unless you're Pedro,
and Pedro thinks that, you know, come one, come all,
because he's a big believer in these open border nonsense policies.
Well, this is the reality of that nonsense policy, okay?
Playing out in real time for all the people,
the 80,000 people in Seuta that got breached by anywhere from 60 to 80,000 Moroccans,
and now you get tens of thousands of Moroccans that are still living there.
And by the way, getting supported by the likes of the Red Cross.
New video coming into us of the Red Cross, handing out supplies and food and comfort things.
I mean, you know, at some point, guys, you know, you just can't.
You can't keep enabling them.
You just can't.
It's bad.
Here's a Fox report back when it was originally happening.
Remember, we're now into like day 46 with thousands of migrants still there, still stranded
in this little Spanish town with no intention of going home.
But it started a couple months ago.
...of Spain's North African enclave in Morocco.
This is a city called Suta.
You're watching as thousands of...
of migrants break through the fence and completely overwhelm the border police.
Their video showing huge groups of people, mostly young military-age guys cramming into inflatable
tubes or arriving on shore another way, some of them waiting in the water as they break
through the gates to get to the other side.
Sandra, this is reminiscent of kind of what we saw during the open border during the Biden administration through 2021-24,
kind of similar to what we saw in Del Rio back in 2021.
The socialist agenda, their platform literally says they want to abolish borders, abolish immigration
enforcement, have complete freedom of movement.
This is what it looks like in another country if they get what they want.
Notice there is no resistance from the government whatsoever.
These people are coming in without any obstruction.
And if people don't know, Spain has a very left-wing government.
Earlier this year they did a big amnesty program for over a million illegal immigrants living
in the country.
They had 1.3 million illegal immigrants apply for that amnesty program between April.
and June. So that's what we call a pull factor, Sandra. They're looking for something like that.
They know if they can just get their foot in the country. Maybe someday that left-wing government
will do another amnesty program. And you were just reading some of the wires. The locals want
an emergency declaration. It sounds like...
The ministry is saying no. And they will not deploy military to the border.
Apparently they don't think this is an emergency. I mean, look at this. This is a total free-for-all.
It does feel like we are looking at a few years ago when you're reporting at the border here in the
United States. This is unbelievable. And eventually, they did have to send the military.
but the military complained that they really didn't have the power to do anything.
All they could do was hope and pray and redirect
and encourage people to go back to Morocco.
But here's the astonishing thing.
The Spanish government knew the date.
The Spanish government knew the location.
The Spanish government, Pedro Sanchez's team,
they knew an enormous online campaign was out there mobilizing people to storm the border.
And Spain and Sanchez did nothing to stop it.
So you get 70,000 migrants pouring across in just like two days, and they do nothing to stop it.
This was not an unforeseen emergency, okay?
This was a warned-about border breach that the Spanish government knew was going to happen,
and they just refused to act.
They refused to act.
I mean, it's really pretty despicable and disgusting.
And you look at these images, right?
This is one of the most extraordinary.
One of the most extraordinary border class is modern Europe has ever witnessed.
Absolutely horrible.
Okay, so this is what happened, okay?
Let's see all the young children and all the women.
I don't see any, right?
Those are all young men.
And Pedro Sanchez wants you to believe that it was somehow a big shock
and a big surprise. No. No. Declassified documents now show that Spain's own national intelligence service,
which is known as the CNI, issued multiple warnings before the crisis. And on July 29th, just one day,
one day prior to this mass breach, intelligence officials alerted both Spain and Morocco that an organized
campaign was circulating on social media, calling for this mass crossing on July 30th, Morocco's
Morocco's throne day, and Spain didn't do anything.
I mean, they had groups that were reaching more than 180,000 followers, according to this intel that has since been declassified.
So let's be clear about what this means, okay? Spain knew.
Sanchez knew it was supposed to happen.
Sanchez knew it all along.
Sanchez knew it was being organized online.
Moroccan authorities, they were alerted as well.
And yet Spain, Pedrido Sanchez, did nothing, nothing, nothing, nothing.
So the warning came on the 29th.
The border collapsed on the 30th.
And I would just say it's unacceptable.
Like the people of Spain need to vote this guy out because if it can happen in Ceuta,
it can happen anywhere.
This is not some vague intelligence bulletin that was buried underneath some cabinet filing.
they went straight to the top and they were sounding the alarm with a very specific warning one day before the event.
And even after it happened, you heard the Fox report.
They were still in real time unwilling to send military.
So I'm sorry, there's no excuse for any of this, unless, of course, we are to assume that he just wants all the people coming in.
I mean, is that the goal?
Kind of like it was for the Democrats here in the U.S.?
I mean, they didn't care.
They just didn't care, right?
Kamala did not care.
She was going to address the root causes of migration.
Yeah, whatever.
You know who's addressing that right now in real time?
Marco Rubio.
He's down there saying,
we need to get rid of this socialism
that has caused such tremendous poverty,
bring capitalism in, liberty,
so that people actually have a place to live.
and not come north. But this is a disgusting example of a socialist government unwilling to pay attention
to reality. As you well know, if you look, this is right there at the tip of Northern Africa,
say, Uta, Spain, you see it right next to your door to Tanger. I was actually over in that area
as it was all going on, all going on. And I was just astonished. Anyway, we can't let that happen
here. You know that. I know that. Impossible to say what's going to happen, though, given I worry
the direction. You see some things happening right now. I mean, for goodness sakes, I'm looking at
poll after poll after poll after poll, and it keeps suggesting that the Democrats are going to
take midterms. I'm even looking at Polly Market, right, and Kalshi. And once again, I see
it's suggesting that while we may actually hold on to the Senate, you are seeing a lot of momentum
there with the blue. And that would be the socialists and the crazies and the El Saeeds and,
oh my gosh, like we're going to have a lot in front of us, guys, if in fact that happens.
And they're going to take every opportunity they can to go after this president who's just
trying to do the right thing for this country. Great to have you here. I'm curious to
what do you think? Who do you think is going to win the election? Are we going to be able to pull
this one off? I'm kind of curious. It's great to have you all here, as always. I've been telling you
we are the success we are because of your commitment.
Aunt Andy 47, I agree with you. Poland is looking really good these days.
Poland did it the right way, though.
They said, yeah, we're not going to have this.
We're not going to allow this.
And that was something they took a lot of grief for.
And people call them all kinds of names.
But, you know, sometimes you just have to stand up for your country, for your people,
and what is right, regardless of all the noise.
Anyway, thank you again.
much appreciate it. I'll see you back here live. More content coming your way throughout the
evening and we will speak tomorrow.
