The Trish Regan Show - 🚨 BREAKING: ILHAN OMAR NOW BROKE?! New Filing Raises Questions About Her 'Missing' Millions

Episode Date: June 23, 2026

$30 million. Then zero. Then $200. Ilhan Omar has some explaining to do. Join me for today’s full episode of The Trish Regan Show. ✅ Help support independent journalism — become a TRISH TEAM member: ▶️ https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCBlMo25WDUKJNQ7G8sAk4Zw/join ✅ Get my newsletter and start investing today! Https://76research.com ✅🔔 CHECK OUT MY NEW SPOTIFY SHOW AND PLEASE SUBSCRIBE FOR FULL DAILY EDITIONS: https://open.spotify.com/show/2blgbg4OaN5dqFhkBy12ii?si=HPdSujPDRrapZWtxbsgAjQ&nd=1&dlsi=979e048c08c04e13 Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Ilhan Omar, things are getting kind of tricky, wouldn't you say? I mean, when you have to come back with yet another revision on your financial disclosures, I would say something's up. Yeah, just a little something. Meanwhile, ABC, oh my gosh, they're freaking out. They just launched this big ad campaign to try and save the view. They think the view is going to get taken off the air because it may be in violation of FCC rules. Meanwhile, Donald Trump, the president of the United States, touching down in Pennsylvania to cheers of go USA. USA USA, they chant. Welcome to the program. Make sure you subscribe. We begin today, everyone.

I'm Trish Rigan on Ilhan Omar. Ilhan Omar with the third set of records that she is putting out there for everyone's review. Because, you know, apparently she's not worth $30 million. I don't know what happened to that money. But now it's actually inviting a whole new set of questions. I mean, this doesn't smell right. It's never smelled right. You know the president of the United States has very little use for one Ilhan Omar,

who he doesn't think has the highest IQ. Democrats, I call them the Democrats. The Democrats. When I watched that where one of them thought it was World War 11, she said World War 11. She bet World War II. You know about that, but this is one of their potential leaders, Elon Omar, who married her brother to get into the country, by the way, illegally.

You like that one. Anyway, here is round three. Okay, like, have you ever heard of anything like this? I've never heard of anything like this. Honestly, I've never heard of anything like this ever. So here we go. Round three shows the hubby made like $200, if that, that were being generous with the $200. I mean, before it was like he was up to $30 million. It was between $6 million and $30 million. Well, now it is between $0 and $200. Unbelievable stuff. This is, according to $3,000. the very latest and greatest. I just honestly can't believe this. I mean, one to $200, forgive me, it's not zero. It's one to $200 that he has in his savings account that he is worth, and they're alleging that he made absolutely no money off of Rose Lake Capital. This was the one that he was making like a million bucks off of before, and then Easy Street. That's what that is, E Street Crew, the Easy Street Crew, LLC, that was the winery, right? The winery, I guess,

guess he's now saying, oh, forgive me, between $201 and $1,000 and $1,000. I mean, I don't want to stiff them that, right? Unbelievable. Unbelievable. And then the liabilities that they have, they get some student loans. It's kind of amazing. She's got kids in college, and yet she still has her student loans. Well, you know, no one said she was smart. I mean, of course, if she's worth $30 million, what is she doing with the student loans? Like, none of this adds up, guys. None of it adds up. Citibank, apparently, she owes some money to between, you. $15,000 and $50,000. And then on page three here, just a little bit more on what she may owe. And I just got to say, this is looking really, really suss. Like, there's three versions of these

financial records. That doesn't happen. I mean, unless you're trying to get one by us, which, you know how I feel about this. I mean, everybody's innocent until proven guilty, but this woman has done nothing to help herself. This woman is not actually coming forward and telling us why. There are all these changes. It's just oopsie daisy and then another oopsie daisy. So the original one was like back in 25, I guess, and she was accounting for 24's income for the year 2024.

And that's back, that's the top line one, where Easy Street Crew LLC, you know, the winery, the winery that isn't, the winery that has no vineyard and no vines and no grapes, that one had between $5 million in valuation and $15,000 in income. So she's valuing, that's kind of weird, right? Because let's say we value something at 10 times earnings. Why would it be valued at $5 million if it's only making $15,000? And then Rose Lake Capital wasn't earning a dime, apparently, but it was valued at $25 million.

And there's even emails going back and forth between her hubby and the exes. accountant and the lawyers where they're talking about how this thing at least has like $8 million in worth. I mean, what's going on? Really? Okay, let's go through the numbers here. Okay, now we look at how in March 2026, this would have been for the year 2025. They said there was no income whatsoever at Easy Street Crew. And then there was no income, but maybe up to a million at Rose Lake Capitol. And actually the Wall Street Journal had done some reporting on that. they were like issuing dividends or something out of the venture capital firm, which didn't make any sense because we had also read that the firm didn't have anything of value. In fact, these guys

got sued. The hubby and his business partner got sued by investors, and they were told it all came out in the lawsuits that not only did they not have anything, but if they did have anything, everything was tied up because the Treasury Department, this would have been Biden's Treasury Department was investigating them and had frozen their accounts. Whoa, okay? Like, and by the way, the arm of the Treasury Department that was investigating them happened to be the arm of the treasury that looks into terrorist financing. Whoa, okay? So I'm like, now, I'm like, I don't know what to say. I don't know how she's still in Congress. I don't know what, you know, and I'm as angry as anybody else because clearly, this doesn't look right. Okay, it's just,

doesn't look right and it keeps getting worse and worse and worse and frankly she keeps digging herself in deeper every single time she comes out with one of these revisions and now we're to assume that 30 million bucks just went up and smoke and that none of this is worth anything so why was it that way in the beginning was this a money laundering operation oh and let's not forget what she was paying her husband right i mean so so on the one hand you have the potential for a money laundering up of some kind and there might have been an incentive for him him to, shall we say, inflate the valuations on, say, the private venture capital firm so that he could wash people's money. I'm being hypothetical here. Again, you know, they haven't been proven in the

court of law. But I have a feeling there's some wacky stuff going on. And then you think about USAIT and all that money that was going overseas. And you think about how he was bragging about some solar panel investments that they were doing in Africa. And I'm like, okay, this is getting really suss. Really, really suss. And then I lay around the $250 million feeding our future frenzy. And it looks really bad. Okay, really, really bad.

I talked to Steve Forbes a couple of months ago about this. And Steve Forbes has been all over it. And Steve is like, you know, I mean, he's not even hedging at this point. he's just like, this is bad. And she seems to be trying to make, she's out there making money, like the Al Capone way. She's not actually trying to do this the legal way in his view. Let's go to a quick clip of Steve Forbes with me just a short time ago. Here we are. When people see where the money's going, it's very easy to imagine it's going for illicit purposes overseas. So the key thing is the exposure. Nobody had any idea how bad this thing was. And now we're beginning to get it. And this is a

case of the old cliche where the genie's out of the bottle, they ain't going to put it back, people are going to find a way to do it. Okay, so what he was getting out there is that the whole media crowd knows, right? And you know, we're like, you know, we smell blood. We're like sharks in the water, right? And so I know that me, myself and I, just here on this show, back when the initial documentation came out in 25, I was like, you've got to be kidding me. This makes absolutely no sense.

Look, I have a background in finance, okay? But it doesn't take a background in finance to understand that none of this added up. I mean, in this particular case, we're going with a guy here who had like a net worth of $30 million and tried to justify that. And as soon as you questioned it, remember how she'd say?

Oh, you're just going after me because you're racist. I understand, you know, people don't want me to live the American dream. No, we don't want you to, as Steve Forbes said, live the Al Capone version of the American dream. That's not what we're going for here, okay? Ilhan baby, it's the, you know, straight up American dream that we wish you could embrace and everybody else. But this did not look like that. And the minute you started to say, you know, gee, how can the guy be worth 30 million bucks? That doesn't make sense with this winery and his cannabis companies and his venture capital firm that was nothing more than a lobbying front.

Believe me, I mean, I've looked at that website. They've taken it down. They took it down because it was so suss. They're bragging about how they've worked and somehow managed $60 billion in assets under management. There's no way they were looking at $60 billion in assets under management. There's no way they had that, even in their expertise. They said they were involved in 80-some-odd countries. They had all these different ambassadors. Remember, guys, they had the ambassadors.

They were involved in 80-some-odd-old different countries. and don't forget Biden's Treasury Department had the terrorist financing arm of Treasury allegedly locking her accounts. This is for the business partner. So, you know, I'm just adding one and one and getting two here, all right? This isn't rocket science. $30 million, and then poof, it goes by bye. I don't think that's an accounting error.

I think that's a story here, and I think she's going to find herself sweating it. out in a jail cell at some point if they prove all this out. Now, I know they're working on it, but, you know, these things are a little bit tricky, and especially if you get some money laundering vis-à-vis the Huala network, which is the Middle Eastern sort of person-to-person network where they're dealing in cash and they don't keep a lot of records, et cetera, it makes it harder. But I know Scott Bessent, and Scott Besson is not going to, like, sit by and allow this to go on. We have a lot of arrests being made today. 400, and I think the number was 455.

We'll double check that in a second, but Todd Blanche coming out and announcing all of these fraud arrests all over the country with all these doctors and these Medicaid fraud things. Wow, okay. So they're trying to piece all this together. I'm wondering if Ilhan's name is going to come up in any of this. They're going to go through all those bank records of all of these fraudsters, and they're going to figure it out.

That's what they're doing with feeding our food. future right now. They are looking at all the froncers that have been arrested. They were going through all their bank records. And once they have it, they're going to have it. But the IRS doesn't tell you when they're investigating them. The IRS, once they're, you know, once it's done, like once it's a done deal, then they're going to come forward with something. Here's the first set of records. Remember this? You know, and I remember actually this video from back when it first happened. So this was released in May of 25 about a year ago. And if you look at this set of records, let me see if I can go back here. Take a look. Okay, so now we're looking at E Street Crew. That is the winery. And that's valued

at anywhere between $1 million and $5 million with a partnership income of $15,000 at best. That, again, doesn't really make sense to me. It really, really doesn't make sense to me. I mean, I don't know why they're coming up with such a sky-high valuation on a that really doesn't seem to exist. And then I go down to Rose Lake Capital. That's the venture capital company, again, another we work office. And I'm looking at asset value of $5 million to $25 million with no income. I mean, no income, and yet it's worth all this. So ask yourself, why was he trying to suggest he had this massive valuation? And don't forget, like, he had to have known that this was going to cause a lot of reporters, like yours truly, to say, huh, that doesn't really make all that

much sense. Like, everybody was going to be asking questions about this. Comer was bound to be asking questions about this. And yet they put this in there anyway. So it was kind of reckless. And then, like, a year later, just recently a couple of months ago, they came and amended all of this. And they're like, oops, you know, nothing. Nope, no, we're not worth anything. And then it got even worse. Because in that one, they had like a million dollars in some kind of dividend income that was coming from one of these ventures, and now they don't even have that. Now he's down to only making $200 a year. I'm having a problem here.

I'm not buying this. I'm not buying any of it. And I would say that I'm not the only one, right? The president saying this recently. Do you think Ily and Omar is in a lot of trouble. Give me, this is James Comer. The president has a few things to say, too. But this is James Comer.

I want to go to James Comer, who is running an investigation in the House. ethics committee into what is going on, which I think we have an idea what's going on, but they want all the financial records and she won't turn anything over. So again, this is kind of ratcheting up. The heat, the pressure is on. I suspect the IRS is doing things behind the scenes that we don't yet know about. I know that Besson's not going to allow this to just kind of get slipped under the rug, so to speak, swept under the rug. There we go. He's not going to, and I know everybody's frustrated. Believe me, I'm frustrated too, but they have to have their ducks in a row when they come out with this one, and I think it's going to be a biggie.

Let's go over to Comer, who's pointing out on Miranda Devine's New York Post podcast that you got a real problem here, Ilhan. I do think Ily and Omar is in a lot of trouble. She's got that big question mark on how her network jumped up to, you know, at least six million and then went back down to zero over a one-year period. So are you saying that Ilhan Omar... the congressman from Minnesota that she was getting federal money and feeding it into these corrupt Somali networks, her cronies.

I think one of the projects she requested was a proved to be a fraudulent Somali scheme. Yeah. Indeed. Feeding our future turned in to be, it turned out to be, a fraudulent primarily. Somalian scheme, right? The majority of people were all from Somalia. They were all from her district. Heck, the guy who worked with her husband on her campaign, one of the campaign staffers, he was accused, and by the way, pled guilty to. Let me just, let me reframe that. He pled guilty to stealing millions of dollars from that. The guy who hosted, remember her big dinner on the

night that she won, ooh, he was like one of the ringleaders. I mean, I don't know how she wouldn't have known what was going on. You've got whistleblower. that have come out and said as much there. I mean, this is really, really disgusting. It's just disgusting. You know who really is disgusted by all of it? Not just James Comer? Not just me.

But the president of the United States, I mean, he's been doubling down in his rhetoric against Juan Ilhan Omar because I have a feeling, I mean, we've heard some things, right? What have we heard? We've heard from J.D. Vance That the government, the U.S. government, is convinced that she committed immigration fraud,

that there was something with that second marriage, the president says she married a brother, but something in that second marriage that has them all saying, whoa, this is not normal. Now, she could be deported, I kid you not, because the law, the penalty is very significant if you, in fact, commit marriage fraud, which is immigration fraud, and that's what it's believed on that second marriage to. Ahmed number two. There was Ahmed number one, Ahmed number two. A med number two was like the formal marriage, but that didn't really last. She went back and had kids with a men number one, and then the next thing you know, Timmy comes on the scene.

And Timmy eventually gets quite a deal, like an $800,000 payday as the boyfriend to run Ilhan Omar's campaign. And then, once they got married, interestingly, it was announced the same day, feeding our future debuted as a bill that you. she was bringing forward. They got married the same day, or at least it was announced the same day. I keep joking. It must have been a really expensive wedding. Hmm. What's crazy, absolutely crazy, is that then she advanced his pay to nearly $3 million. Now, nobody makes $3 million running a campaign for Congress. Nobody. I'm sorry, like it just doesn't, like those numbers don't exist. The New York Times, you know this. I've told you before, they were all worked up because Joe Biden's

campaign manager was going to get $4 million. If Joe won, I mean, It's a presidential campaign, and after all, I mean, you kind of had to sweeten the pot, right? Considering your candidate? Well, they were horrified that anybody would make $4 million running a campaign for the presidency of the United States. Do you really think somebody's making three? When they're running a congressional campaign, I can tell you, the short answer, it's no, no, and no. Here's the president just yesterday in the Oval Office, yesterday afternoon, talking about Ilhan Omar. Again, let's play this.

Democrats, I call them the Democrats. the Democrats. When I watched that where one of them thought it was World War 11, she said, World War 11, she read World War II. You know about that, but this is one of their potential leaders, Elon Omar, who married her brother to get into the country, by the way, illegally. Okay, so then the marriage claim came up again. He doesn't think she's very bright. He brought up World War 11, which I keep saying, you know what, I could write for one of these liberal comedy shows and give them a little bit more diversity in their coverage because how could you not

get a real kick out of this? I mean, this one, if you want a good laugh, guys, if you want, just go back and replay this clip because I laugh all day when I see it. How could anybody say such a thing? Like, really, I mean, think about the stupidity, honest to God, here. The last time the Alien Enemies

Act was invoked, it was used to detain and deport German, Japanese, Italian immigrants doing World War I. I'm sorry, I laugh. Every single time I see it. Unbelievable. It was the Roman numeral, of course, but if you're like her and you kind of don't know what day it is, I mean, actually, you know, maybe she's got some credence there. You know, if she goes back and she just pretend she's really dumb when they come and they hit her with the lawsuit and they say, hey, lady, you're going to jail

because that's on the table. You're going to jail. She could say, well, I just didn't know. I mean, And I really didn't know. It was all Timmy's fault. And it was my accountant. And I just, I didn't understand numbers. I mean, after all, I'm the one. I'm the one who said World War II was World War 11. These are crooked people.

These are thieves. This is it like a mistake. Just talking about one person, he got hundreds of thousands, millions of dollars for securing one man, for taking care of one elderly man. He was a service. He got paid millions of dollars for taking care of one man. Total crook. They're all crooks.

The Somalians are what they've done to Minnesota, the Somalian, crooked as hell. Elon Omar, crooked as hell. They're all crooks. And we got them. We got them. Now we're putting the clamps on, but boy, that's an impressive group of guys that got behind you.

I was watching that. And a couple of very strong women too. But I was watching that last night. I said, I'm proud of you guys. Whoa. So have we got them? Have we got them really? I mean, we might.

Again, there's been a lot of public pressure. You get James Comer circling. You get Treasury and probably the IRS, although they can't disclose that until it's all said and done. So a lot of people are looking into this. I imagine the DOJ, of course, is looking into the concerns about the second marriage. And so we got her here on many, many fronts.

I want to go back to my interview with Steve Forbes. What we have here is a classic case of connecting to government and using that as a means to get money. And one of the favorite forms is you set up a consulting firm. The nice thing about that is they really can't measure the product. You can just turn out a lot of paper and get a lot of money from the government for all of this great advice that means absolutely nothing. It's just money laundering, scam, whatever you want to call it.

And that's how we got the Learing Center in Minnesota, where they can't even spell the thing right. No kids are there. So there's no there except a lot of wasted and stolen taxpayer money. And it's amazing how it's quite something when you mix Marxism with joining the government, how these people, these socialists suddenly become brilliant investors,

brilliant entrepreneurs, who knew that Marx had that in him? Exactly, right? I mean, how did this guy suddenly have a net worth of $30 million collectively together with Ilhan Omar? Except that, well, I believe, and I think Steve believes, and I think James Comer, and I think the president, and I think a whole lot of people believe there was nefarious activity here. And so she was up to no good. On top of which, again, I want to remind you,

she was paying her husband $3 million, nearly $3 million a year to run the campaign. Well, how does that work, you might say? I mean, why would that be illegal? Well, I mean, if nothing else, it's certainly very suss, right? Because if you go out and you solicit donations to Ilhan Omar's campaign, and she's paying her husband, her campaign manager, and he's making, you know, multiples of what anybody normally would make as a campaign manager, then it really just becomes part of the family pot, right?

It's the family pie that you're contributing to when you contribute to Ilhan Omar's campaign. And so it's just flat out wrong. I mean, you really should not be paying your spouse $3 million to run your campaign, not heard of. And then you factor in the little things like the winery. And let's not forget, this is a guy. who, I mean, you know, we're all adults here. We're going to call a spade of spade. He's running cannabis companies, for goodness sakes. These are like all cash businesses, all cash businesses, all cash businesses,

all right, that are really, well, you know, at least up until recently, you have Donald Trump to thank for that, getting it off Schedule A, right? Those were all illegal in most federally illegal. I mean, it might have been legal in places like California and Colorado at some points. Now, of course, thanks to Donald Trump, it's off schedule A. It's, no longer considered as dangerous, et cetera, a substance. And so I know this. I did a couple of documentaries on the underground industry when I was back at CNBC.

In other words, that was a shady industry to begin with. And he's in the shady industry. He's getting sued by everyone. And when he gets sued by everyone, his partner comes out and says, well, you know, the real reason we can't give you any money is because the Treasury Department, the terrorist.

financing arm of the Treasury Department under Joe Biden's Treasury Secretary locked up our money, froze our accounts. Don't forget, they were worried about her relationship with what they said was a foreign national. What would that have been about? That was the DOJ under Biden in 2024, saying we're concerned about a foreign national, the Ilhan Omar, who was on the Foreign Relations Committee at the time is perhaps having an inappropriate whatever relationship with. Okay, so I'm guessing that the financial inappropriate relationship. I'm guessing that person may have been the head of Somalia, the head of Somalia who was campaigning for her in Minneapolis saying, you need to vote for this woman because the interests of this woman are not that of

Minneapolis. They are not that of the U.S. of A. They are that of Somalia. So this is, dare I say, a little bit of a financial mystery. I've never met a financial mystery I didn't really like. So this one's increasingly complex, increasingly interesting, and increasingly problematic. And I would say, the DOJ is serious. Look at this today, 455 people charged with fraud. This is the biggest fraud bust in the history of this country. Under this administration, Todd Blanche came out and named

455 people, they allege that they stole $6.5 billion in Medicaid. So again, I just want to remind you, before you say, well, nothing's going to happen, nothing's going to happen. I know that they're working on this. I also know that they can't come out and give the whole thing away until they're ready to stand up there with Todd Blanche and say, we got her, okay, and we really got her because they have a case to prove. Here is Blanche earlier today. The indictment also alleges that these individuals then used the taxpayer money to bankroll multi-million dollar homes, luxury vehicles like a $135,000 mazzarade, jewelry like an $865,000-Belgari necklace, and to top it all off, to fund the construction of a $4.6 million hotel at a beach resort in the Philippines. We're taking back the money, the luxury cars, the jewelry, and these alleged fraudsters will face justice. The coordinated actions of the past two weeks have resulted in over $182 million in cash and other assets seized,

making clear our health care fraud enforcement efforts generate a significant return on investment for our taxpayers. I kind of like that, because, you know, once again, you can tell he knows his boss, as a business guy. He's like, I don't want you doing all this stuff and going after all this. If we're not actually going to get some money back, if we're not actually going to see a profit out of this thing, we want to get all that money back. I mean, did you hear one of those necklaces was worth over $800,000? And they're spending the money on a hotel in the Philippines, $4.5 million? I mean, wow. Okay, so welcome to the world of money laundering. They're laundering your money.

And this has got to stop. I mean, you look at our debt. Yeah, look at our deficits. You've heard me go on and on and on about those things. Well, you've got a real shot of fixing this stuff because you just have to clean up the federal government. Back to what Steve Forbes was saying, right? You know, wow, you know, who knew these Marxists could be such great investors.

Yeah, you know, they just want more, more and more living high off the hog with your money. Government, taxpayer, dollars at work, it is got to end, all right? It has got to end. And when I think about how this woman went from a net worth of somewhere in the vicinity of $6 to $30 million, and now is saying, nope, there's nothing. Nothing, nothing. And then twice came back and amended these filings. This doesn't make sense, all right?

It just doesn't make sense. And I have a feeling. She's going to be up a creek without a palo really, really soon. And it's just going to become a question of, do you deport her or do you put her in jail? and then you deport her. I think they're going to put her in jail, and then they're going to deport her. Because we got word today.

Supreme Court just out with a big new announcement. Guess what? They voted on this thing. And those green card holders that have committed crimes that decide to go back to their country and then want to come back in, they're not going to be allowed back in.

Yeah, you're going to actually have the ability to say, sorry, you know, you committed a crime. You left. and now it's game over. I mean, how is this even something that's debatable? Honest to God, like I ask you that question. If someone is here and they're trying to get their status and they've got a green card and they're working here

and they're accused of committing a crime and then they decide to take off for, oh, let's just call it Somalia, right? What if those fraudsters? What if one of them is supposed to come up for his court date, right? in Minneapolis. One of the fraudsters in the feeding our future thing, and he says, oh, you know, I want to go back and see the family in Somalia, check on my houses.

So we're supposed to let them back in. Like, you've been accused of a crime. You leave the country. I think you're kind of like losing your rights at that point. I mean, you had me accused of a crime, but, you know, innocent till proven guilty, fine, you deserve your day in court. If you stick around for it, if you leave,

then I think we have the ability, we should have the ability to say you're not coming back. Well, this is what the Supreme Court decided today. By the way, it is Clarence Thomas's birthday, so happy birthday to him. He's the one who authored the majority opinion on this, a nice little birthday gift for him as a conservative anyway. But again, this doesn't really strike me as something that should be even up for debate. It kind of strikes me as completely obvious, and it's so twisted and weird that we're at the state where, well, Katanji Jackson Brown would have to say,

no, no, no, we got to stick up for the people that are accused of a crime that choose to leave this country. And somehow we're looking out for them. I mean, I'm sorry. So here we go. Six, three decisions. Scotus rules that DHS can strip green card holders, lawful permanent residents of their legal status if they leave the country.

I mean, they're choosing to leave, right? they're choosing to travel abroad while they are facing criminal charges you're facing criminal charges you say i'm going to go for a nice little vacation down to mexico and i think i'm going to be able to come back no can do no because the supreme court just made this decision yay give me a thumbs up if you like this one i'll tell you i like this one so this is a big big deal and yet you look at what was in katanji brown jackson dissent, and then you had three liberals, all the liberals dissenting on this one, you know, they don't even make any sense, but I'll just give you her opinion in a nutshell. She said the government must, of course, make some determination about the applicability

of one of the statutory exceptions before a lawful permanent resident can be deemed seeking an admission and paroled back into the country. The government needs to have the requisite certainty about the applicability. Okay, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah. Here, this is more interesting. Warning about the majority's approach. the majority's view, she said, allows the government to deem a legal permanent resident, lawful permanent resident, to be seeking an admission first and justify the applicability

of the exception later, undermining the statutory scheme as well as the benefits and security that come with having a green card. So again, she's very concerned about the benefits and the security of having that green card. Okay, you got a green card. The government says you committed a crime. You hightail it out of the country and you think you're coming back in with a red carpet? I don't think so. Again, logic, people logic. A demotion to the status, she writes, of seeking an admission is not costless. It comes with significant deprivations.

It thrusts the LPR, the lawful permanent resident, into a state of uncertainty about his immigration status. God forbid he might be uncertain. I mean, you know, you've just committed a crime. Allegedly, you're supposed to show up in court. you decide to leave the country, and this woman thinks, this is not good because you're going to be nervous about your legal status. I mean, I'd be nervous about a heck of a lot more than my legal status at that point. His future and his access to the protections, the immigration system affords him. Well, sorry. Katanji, you lost that round. Democrats, you lost that round. The Supreme Court has voted,

and they are saying indeed that the Department of Homeland Security has this right to say, you're out, you bang, alleged to have committed a crime, you voluntarily left the country, guess what, you're not coming back. So Ilhan Omar, I guess unless we actually take away your citizenship, I'm trying to think how this might work out, because she is actually a lawful, you know, she's been naturalized, et cetera, they would have to denaturalize her citizenship. And by the way, they can do that. I mean, they absolutely can do that.

Again, if you go to marriage number two and you figure out that that indeed was fraud, I mean, she doesn't even have to have married her brother. It could have just been arranged, you know, sham marriage. And she's out, okay? I mean, the brother kind of adds an interesting layer, shall we say, to all of it, but she's going to be out big time. Fascinating, fascinating stuff. And I think more is going to come forward.

and I'm going to pour through these documents a little bit more so that we have a better perspective on this, so more to come tomorrow. But again, this is pretty shocking here, and it's amazing sort of the gall. I would say the gall of some people, the chutzpah, if you would, of some people. She's got a heck of a lot, a lot in spades.

Does she not? Yes, she does. You know who else does? The Ladies on the View. Oh, my gosh. I mean, that's just a terrible show. It's just an awful, terrible show. I don't know when it was ever a good show.

I think, like, maybe in the very beginning, Barbara Walters had this idea. first show and boy, oh boy, ABC is freaking out. The ladies on the viewer freaking out, everybody's freaking out because, you know, Brandon Carr, he's not messing around over at the FCC, and he's kind of sick and tired of the games that they play. So now ABC is out with a brand new commercial begging you, begging you, please, please, please, please, pretty pleased with the cherry on top, would you go and say

how great we are to the FCC? Oh yeah, take a look, guys, take a look. I had this idea for a show. Different women, different points of view. The View has welcomed your favorite guests and covered the issues you care about for nearly 30 years. Now, the FCC wants to control who is allowed to appear on the show. Viewers, use your voice. Scan this QR code you have until July 6th.

Ooh, there's a deadline in everything. Okay, so they're worried because you see the FCC has basically put their their license for eight crucial affiliates in their biggest markets on the line. And the FCC has invited the public to weigh in on this. So, you know, curious reporter that I am, I, of course, had to click on that code. And this is what you get, okay? So they're going to give you the opportunity to figure out, or to weigh in, I should say, as they figure out whether or not anybody needs the view.

What do you think? Do we need it? Do we not need it? I don't think we need it. And that's a tough position for the view to be in. Don't forget, 1934 Communications Act. The 1934 Communications Act basically says, you know what? You get your license from the FCC,

and that license is subject to the provisions of this section. The commission shall determine in the case of each application, whether the public interest, convenience, and necessity will be served by granting such an application. So you only get the license. to be an operation in network television if, in fact, the federal government thinks you were deserving of it. Oh, and then there's another one, Section 307A, 47A, 47A, it writes the commission, if public convenience, interest or necessity, will be served, thereby, subject to the limitations of this chapter, shall grant to any applicant, therefore, a station license. So Brandon Carr's coming along. He now runs the

FCC. He's digging this thing out from 1934, and he's like, well, I don't have to give you a license. because I don't know as this is really deemingly, you know, deemed to be that important. Actually, I should qualify this because he actually hasn't gotten them quite on that. He could. He could. But he's getting them, actually, where it hurts a little bit more, he's getting them on discrimination charges because they're not following the law because of all their ridiculous DEI stuff. I'm going to get to that in a second.

But first, do consider, you've got a myriad of individuals there on that show. let's go back and just watch that briefly because I think it's interesting to see. I had this idea for a show. Different women, different points of view. Sure. Different women, different points of view. Are there any different points of view? I don't think so. I think there's sort of one point of view only. And it's just you know, regurgitated over and over and over again by all of them. I don't even know how many. And there used to be five. Now there's like multiples. They keep multiplying. Anyway, they all think the same and they say the same. And now it's becoming increasingly an issue, obviously because the 1934 Communications Act, obviously because the DEI concerns that they were not following federal

law will get to that. But remember this? Apparently, well, you know, the Carmelo Anthony's story and that horrible murder. And of course, he's been seen as guilty. And you know which side the ladies on the view are on. I probably don't even have to tell you, but we'll go and listen to all of them carry on. They're getting called out. Actually, on X right now about this one. Take a listen to. The case has a lot of people divided.

Some people believe that race was a factor in the trial because there were no black jurors. The three black jurors that were there were educators, and they were released. They were struck. They were struck for that. And some folks think, no, no, he got a fair trial. But is this a jury of his peers?

I don't think so. And you know, this has been an issue for such a long time in the judicial system where prosecutors use what are called, you know, bats and challenges. And they- Explain what that is. It's a challenge that is used to strike a juror, generally a juror of color,

for a race-neutral reason. Because you're not supposed to, you're supposed to have a jury of your peers, And you're not supposed to just strike someone because they're black. Now, that's kind of an interesting question there. If you believe inequality, if you believe that we shouldn't see race, then why would you be picking someone just because of their color? I mean, shouldn't you not be looking specifically a color if you want a jury of peers?

I mean, this is what, and you saw the note that got put on X, horrible, terrible, sad, awful, awful story with that young boy dying at the hands of this complete lunatic animal, if you ask me, who just decided it was okay to stab him and attract me. And whose side did the ladies on the view you take? Exactly. You know, they side with the criminal. I mean, I'm seeing this over and over again. But why do the victims not deserve any empathy and sympathy?

Why is it always the criminal? I mean, I kind of, again, I just go back to common sense. I don't understand where they're heading unless they just absolutely want to destroy this country. I mean, think about it, sunny, whoopey, if it were your child. Race doesn't really matter. Okay? There's a young boy that's dead because somebody stabbed him to death, period, full stop, end of story. and the jury found him guilty.

And by the way, his defense team okayed the jury. And now you're going to come back and say, oh, it was all prejudiced because we don't agree with the jury's decision because, oh, all the jury members were white. Come on. So you see how ABC keeps digging himself in,

digging, digging, digging, digging, digging, dig in, they're digging hard? Well, it gets even worse for ABC. ABC is out there asking everybody, oh, please weigh in, and please make a comment, tell, tell Brandon Carr at the FCC how great we are, because they've opened this process to public comments. By the way, Brandon's done the same thing.

He's like, hey, you know, weigh in. Tell me, do we need the view on the air? I know what you're going to say. No, no, no, no. And I would second that. No, we don't need it on the air. But anyway, Brennan Carr is saying he's looking at those licenses, not because they don't have a diversity of opinion on there and they don't,

but actually because of DEI concerns and discrimination. Here we go. He put this out there. He said, I have asked the FCC's Enforcement Bureau to open an investigation into Disney and ABC. While Disney started as an iconic American company, it recently went all in in DEI. I'm concerned that their DEI practices may violate FCC prohibitions on invidious forms of discrimination. I mean, Harvard learned this the hard way, right? Harvard actually had to learn that it couldn't discriminate against.

Asian students or white students because they wanted to stack it with a bunch of black students because that was discriminatory. And ABC might learn the hard way. It can't just hire certain groups to be on air because in fact, that in and of itself is discriminatory. You're just supposed to get the best person for the job, period, full stop. And so this is what is all coming out. And this is what is so scary. and this is why ABC is asking everybody to please go and plead our case.

But I don't think they're going to have many takers on that. I really don't think many people care about the view. It's just kind of interesting to kind of see where they are at times, only because they are so whacked out. I mean, well, Donald Trump threatening to sue ABC. Like the news goes from bad to worse. On the one hand, FCC is saying, hey, you know, we may not renew these licenses. You may be off the year altogether.

And then you've got another lawsuit heading your way on top of the, what, $16 million that they already paid, one Donald Trump because of some things that Georgie Poo had to say. Remember those? All right, here we go. Trump threatens to sue ABC News over Reflecting Pool Renovations coverage. Oh, wow. Okay, so here he is on true social last night. I want to share with you in describing the vandalism that took place at the reflecting pool

in Washington, D.C. ABC fake news, he writes, one of the worst in the business, even paying. me $16 million for bad and inaccurate reporting. Well, that's fair. Failed to report that their close friends, Obama and Biden, Democrats he called them, spent over $100 million on the reflecting pool, and it never worked. In fact, it was rarely open due to leaks and stench. They wanted to spend $300 or $400 million, but just let it rot. I spent approximately $16 million, and it came out. great, except for the vandalism, which we are now fixing. It was a much bigger job than originally envisioned, including the outer areas and sidewalks. We are preparing lawsuits against ABC for false

reporting. I like their money, he writes, which will be given to the U.S. Treasury. Thank you for your attention to this matter. President Donald J.T. Ooh, okay, another lawsuit heading your way. Disney. Oh, my gosh. You know, maybe you just need to get Jimmy. out of that time. I actually watched a show last night. I really did. And it's not good. Like he started, some of it was sort of funny. I can have a sense of humor about these things, but it took a really ugly turn. I don't know if this was a repeat or what, but it took this ugly, nasty, like, ugh, kind of turn. And I was like, whoa, he's like crossed the line. He's no longer funny. This is not a funny show. No wonder his ratings. Absolutely stink. Let's go to the president,

who was speaking earlier today about that reflecting pool watch. They've arrested, I think, six people on the reflecting pool. So the reflecting pool looks fantastic. I just got pictures of it. It's beautiful. But somebody went in with a knife and cut it. They cut it up good. And then they cut a 200, 350-foot slip in the form of lots of little slips,

real horrible stuff, and they destroyed the grass. We put a brand new big load of grass out there. They destroyed it. So it's all being fixed. But it's a shame. So I understand five or six people are all. arrested, the interior department can refer to you on that. And I hear, I hear they have six people under investigation. Whoa, okay, six people under investigation. And again, he did not appreciate

the reporting on this. So, ABC, consider yourself warned. You know, you don't have to give him all positive coverage. I don't, I, I, I, no, like nobody wants that, but heck, you know, one, keep your comedians funny. I'm telling you, this guy, he had this monologue and it was kind of funny and lighthearted and sort of, you know, and then it just took this really negative, nasty turn. And you can tell how much he hates the president. Like, you shouldn't feel that as a viewer. Like it should be kind of light and whatever. He hates him. Okay, really, really hates him. So you could feel that energy just coming right through the screen and you get somebody holding up the sign, clap now, clap now, clap now, just like they do with the view.

So they got some problems. I realize they don't like him. I realize, you know, he's out there shutting off USAID. Was Disney getting any of that money overseas? I wonder. I wonder. That would be an interesting little factoid to know. Now, would it not?

I'll tell you that stock has been just a disaster. It's not in any of our portfolios, any of them. Go check out 76research.com when you can. I know the market. Ooh, we have volatility back. I actually bought today. Full disclosure. I bought some semiconductors.

and some NASDAQ and tech stuff. You know, I'm a long-term investor. But anyway, I encourage you to go look at my portfolios. They're American Resilience, Inflation Protection, Income Builder. Go check them all out, 10 to 15 stocks in each one. You can use code word dollar if you just want to get the regular report, 76 report, there for a dollar a month for the first two months. Or you can get those portfolios, and that's where the real value at is.

So I encourage you to do that. But boy, oh boy, ABC, not a stock. Disney is not a stock I want to own right now. I want to get over to what's going on in the Middle East. It looks like we're making some progress there. You've got Marco touching down in Saudi Arabia, and you got the president speaking in Pennsylvania just moments ago about the status check of where we are. Let's listen in.

As you know, we just achieved a historic peace agreement with Iran to end the conflict in the Strait of Hormuz. And by the way, yesterday 19 million barrels of oil flowed out of the Strait of Hormuz. a very beautiful place. That's the most oil in the history of the strait. It's never been any, you've never seen anything like that. It's called an oil gusha. And most importantly, we are ensuring one thing very importantly,

because this is why I did it. I did it for this reason, 99% for this. Iran will never have a nuclear weapon. And they've agreed to that. But remember, this wasn't easy. We had 47 years worth of presidents and other people, other countries too. We're not the only one that never did anything. They were the bully of the Middle East.

And now we're leaving Iran with no Navy, no Air Force, no anti-aircraft, no missile capability, no nuclear program. We're leaving them without any nuclear capacity, and they've agreed to that. And we're getting along quite well, although if you read the fake news, you never know. Think of it. The fake news, they have no army, they have no Navy, they have no air force, they have no anti-aircraft, we can fly over terrain, just at will, nobody going to do anything to us. And then I read the fake news that they're doing quite well. They're not doing quite well. These people right there, look at all of them. Whoa. Whoa. That's a lot of press. That's almost as much press is Boh had at the White House last week when he knocked out his opponent in the first round.

I think you had more. Bo had more press. But the Iran economy has been crushed and their defense industrial base has been damaged so severely that it'll take them many years to rebuild, many, many years. And now we're trying to work out a deal that's fair. So we may be getting there. We'll see. We'll see again how it all shakes out.

But I think it's important to know that, you know, you got the oil coming back online with 19 million barrels going out. That's actually really, really, really impressive. He said as much there in Pennsylvania, also speaking with reporters outside kind of wet and rainy en route to Pennsylvania. He also echoed this. You want to see trouble? Let them have a nuclear weapon. We're doing very well with Iran. They've been decimated.

And we're making a deal with them. And we'll see how that all goes. And right now, as you probably heard, yesterday, we had 19 million barrels of oil, 19 million barrels of oil come off. And that's the biggest in the history of the strait, the Harmoor Strait. Our stock market is through the roof, and oil prices are tumbling. We actually hit for a moment today. In fact, I think it's going to break it. $70 a barrel that's lower than we were when we started.

And it's been amazing. And the big thing is Iran will not have a nuclear weapon. I don't have a nuclear weapon. Like, look, it's kind of like the be all and all, right? Be all and all. Anyway, just looking at the market today, I'll tell you, we were down actually a heck of a lot more earlier in the session, but, you know, we rallied back a little bit. We still ended in the red, so important to keep that in mind. But I think that there's some optimism there that, you know, we will get something. Because if I look at oil right now, it's still coming down, guys. This is a really good. sign, a really good sign indeed. Oil coming down again today in trading down, basically oil at 7305. I mean, gosh, darn it, you're going to get into the 60s sooner rather than later.

And heck, you know, that's great. Like, that's great. I mean, the only thing that gives me a little bit of pause, and I played you some sound yesterday from General Jack Keene, who I have a lot of respect for, and he was saying, listen, we can't have the UN inspectors in there. We need our team. We need our people. They need to be in there figuring out whether or not there's any shenanigans going on. Well, the president said something interesting on inspections today and whether or not those are going on right now. Let's listen and listen carefully here because it's important. The Iranians are saying there's no scheduled visit for the IAE inspector. Does that part of your agreement? They're wrong. They're wrong. They know they're wrong. They told us inside and we have it down

100% inspections. And if they were right, I'd cancel the meetings right now. And a rod Taylor is still. By act Friday. When will you, Mr. President? When will those inspectors actually be on the ground at the appropriate time? At the appropriate time. There's no rush, but they'll be on the ground at the appropriate time. Okay, I'm fair.

I don't like that. Like, the inspectors aren't there yet. Like, get them. He said there's no rush. I actually think there kind of is a rush because we're opening up the street or moves. And we're giving them access to things that they're going to get on the condition that they played by the rules. So if we don't have the inspectors in there, that actually gives me a little

bit of trepidation. Let's go over to Marco Rubio, who, as I said, touchdown in Saudi Arabia earlier. He's talking about how they have to open the strait, how there's no condition here. It is just, you know, game over if they don't. Watch. Let me ask you about hormones, if possible. Can the U.S. and allies, can they guarantee navigation, freedom of navigation in the state? Well, that's the law. It's an international waterway. No country has allowed to charge tolls or fees on an international waterway. That's existing international law. That's the way it is. And international waterways all over the world. And that's the way we expect it'll be here. So I don't think we have anybody to convince around here in that regard. I think all the

countries in this region would agree with us. All right? See you tomorrow. Thank you. Okay. So fair. Okay. They're not allowed to. It would be against the law for them to do that. But in the meantime, if we're going to open it up and we're going to take down our blockade, which is what we have done, we need to have some assurance. And we need our people in there. And we need to be doing these inspections. I mean, the UN, forget about the UN guys. Like, it's game over with the UN.

The UN has the UN's interests at heart. And the UN cares more about, oh, I don't know, Iran, frankly, than we do, right? So let me say, I have a really good soundbite from Marco Rubio. This is him talking about the UN a couple months ago. Remember we got Maduro, and then the U.M. was out saying, oh, you know, why are they going after Maduro? Well, he just put them right in their place really, really fast. So remember this. We don't want the U.N. inspectors in there.

We want our team in there. Here is Marco explaining why we don't like the U.N. at all. No, no, you're wrong in your question. Number one, Venezuela is a major source. And the reason why is the following. And I've seen a lot of this reporting, and it's fake reporting, and I'll tell you why. It says that somehow Venezuela is not involved. in the drug trade because the UN says they're not involved in the U.

judge. I don't care what the U.N. says. The U.N. doesn't know what they're talking about. Maduro is indicted by a grand jury in the Southern District of New York. That means the Southern District of New York presented the evidence to a grand jury and a grand jury indicted him. And then a superseding indictment came out that was unsealed about a year and a half ago that specifically detailed Maduro's actions.

So number one, let there be no doubt. Nicolaus Maduro is an indicted drug trafficker in the United States, and he's a fugitive of American justice. Anyway, I would just say, listen, Marco's right. I mean, so that puts us in the position of saying, okay, we have to have our own team in there. And from my perspective, the sooner, the better. I actually disagree with it.

You know, like I like them a lot, and we agree on most everything. Sometimes I'm like, wow, like, how is it that I, but I do think that time is of the essence, and you do want to make sure that you get those inspectors, are inspectors in there sooner rather than later. Because, sure, oil's coming down. I know he likes that. But there's a lot at stake right about now, right?

You agree with me? You agree with me? Yes, no. I'm always curious. Anyway, great to have you guys here. Yes, I'm up in New Hampshire this week. So thank you for your patience with me as I put together in my sort of makeshift studio here. Some of you guys have seen me up here before,

and there's a piano way over there in the living room. but, you know, I normally take over my mom and dad's family room when I have that shot, and I promise them I'd try not to do that this week because, you know, it's kind of, you get the operation right here with the whole show. So they put me off in this little corner and I got a nice little pretty window behind me. No piano, but a very pretty window. Anyway, I'm going to have to play that piano a little bit for you guys at some point, right? Maybe just take a little video and I'll show you.

It is great to have you. Thank you for the kind words, by the way. Zimmerman, thank you so much. I appreciate that. It is really good to have you guys here. Please spread the word. I got word from a lot of you. I read all your comments, by the way, all of your comments.

I try to make sure I read every single one. And I saw some comments that said people had somehow gotten unsubscribed from the channel. And that happens. It does happen. So like sometimes the algorithm thinks you may not like this. And if you may not like it, then it unsubscribed you. Well, you should know what you like. So if you like the show, go and check.

Make sure you are still subscribed. Make sure that you hit the alert so you get all of my. alerts and you know when I am live. Oh, Texas Greenwich, you like the back job. Thank you so much. I kind of like it too. I wasn't sure. You know, I'm like, you know, I don't know if I can like look straight into a window, but it's, it's kind of nice. Yeah, it's kind of nice. And there's like a little fence out there. You see the white picket fence there behind me? This is, I grew up here. It's a pretty good place to be back. And the kids are visiting the grandparents and they're having a good week. We came up here, of course, for Father's Day. And for all those dads out there, if I didn't tell you on Father's Day,

Happy, happy Father's Day. Peace of my mind saying no early notices, only when this show starts. Well, that's no good. I got to fix that somehow. I'm on it. I'll talk to my friends over at YouTube. We'll see if we can get that fix somehow. But thank you again for being here and for catching up on all of it.

If you didn't see the show live, you can watch it. We always pin it to the very top of the channel. And like I said, I look at the comments after the fact. So don't think you're not getting seen. I do take a look. Ah, Cat Crazy Sam. Thank you. I know we are jumping. We're jumping, jumping, jumping quickly. We're at nearly 1.3 million. Do you know that I'm at almost 2 billion views? I couldn't believe it. Two billion views.

Mark Chavez says he and his wife are planning a 10-year anniversary. I got to beat. We are celebrating 25. 25. It's our silver anniversary, right, this summer? 25. I can't believe it. Like I really, really go, oh my gosh, time flies, right? 25 years. I have been married. I got to beat there. Silver anniversary. What are they, Trish loves gold and silver.com. I'm teasing. I got to think about what I want, right?

Now, I don't actually want for anything. I'm very fortunate. I'm very lucky. I have a wonderful family. And for everybody to just be healthy, that's all I could ever want. Thank you guys for being here and being so supportive. I'll see you right back here. Live free or die New Hampshire tomorrow.