The Trish Regan Show - BREAKING: Letitia James OVERPLAYS Her Hand in Epic New Meltdown! Trish Regan Sets Her Straight

Episode Date: February 17, 2025

Letitia James just cost herself, her party, and the entire state of New York a TON of federal money. Trish Regan sets the record straight on why Tish is going down. Elon and Trump WIN in Federal Court… breaking news to report on that! Plus, a CBS Host was just humiliated on her own program by Secretary of State Marco Rubio… we’ve got the tape! And…Baby Number 13 for Elon Musk? Ashley St. Claire is the reported new baby mama and Trish Regan has the inside scoop from sources close to the Maga influencer that know what’s really going down. And - Trish Regan shares pictures from her opera weekend! As a former soprano, she had a blast listening to some talented singers at an event for the Atlanta opera in Georgia over the weekend. Join Trish for more - LIVE! Subscribe to the channel: @TrishReganChannelhttps://Youtube.com/TrishReganChannel 🟢For independent views on the market - sign up for my financial newsletter The 76report at:▶️https://76research.com with CODE: DOLLAR today. Today’s show is sponsored by: 🟢https://TrishLovesGold.com — American Hartford Gold — go to: ▶️ Https://TrishLovesGold.com or TEXT TRISH to 65532 to receive up to $15,000 in free silver with American Hartford Gold or go to https://TrishLovesGold.com. You can also use Trish's name when calling 1-844-495-1115. 🟢 Go to ▶️https://balanceofnature.com and use CODE: TRISH for 35% off and FREE SHIPPING Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Letitia James may just be one of the craziest AG's most irresponsible AGs to have ever lived in the United States of America. Welcome to the program, everyone. I am Trish Regan and wow. Tish James really going off the rails. We're going to show you her latest meltdown. It all comes as a federal judge. An Obama pointed judge, by the way, is saying, you guys go for it. Elon, Donald Trump, you got access to everything.

So you can imagine how they are flipping out as all of this news is. coming to us on President's Day. Happy President's Day. Welcome to the program. Make sure you like, share. Hit the bell so that you know when I'm here. I get a lot to talk to you about today. This CBS host, Margaret Brennan, just getting absolutely torched by one Marco Rubio, because clearly the woman, like, needs to go and study her history, making some really bizarrely inaccurate comments. We're going to get to all of that as the left tries to cancel. cancel. Seriously, President's Day because, well, they don't like President's Day because there are some presidents that they just don't like. Wow, I mean, unbelievable. It's all coming as Elon Musk

increasingly is under fire. Now, guess what he has to deal with? You're not going to believe it. He has to deal with another baby mama. Yeah, coming out of the woodwork. Ashley Sinclair, mega, influencer of sorts, allegedly saying that she's the mama to baby number 13. I actually have a lot of inside scoop that I really shouldn't have. Honestly, like, I don't want to know these things, but I get to share it with you anyway. So we're going to talk about that. Ladies and gentlemen, good to have you here. Plus, I just got back from the opera in Atlanta, so I got a few pictures and stuff, and we'll talk about that, plus my crazy, crazy plane ride home. Delta, I love you, but man, oh man, this was not good. Okay.

Letitia James, everyone, you know the drill. You know who she absolutely despises and hates. That would be one Donald Trump that she tried to bankrupt and then, you know, throw Elon in on the mix. And you get the recipe of some people that might just drive this woman positively insane more than she already is. No one elected Elon Musk and his minions.

And no one has allowed him to have access to this information. This is a violation of the same thing. separation of powers. The United States Congress, the United States Senate has a sole discretion in having the power of the purse and not Elon Musk. We are here today to seek a preliminary injunction to stand up against those forces who believe that they can unilaterally have power and have control all in the hands of the president of these United States. Yeah, that didn't go so well. Letitia, it really didn't go so well.

So that is something we have to get to. But before, I mean, you got to understand the full scope of crazy here, okay? Sorry, but you need to know what Donald Trump, Elon Musk, what we as taxpayers are up against. Payments to the state of New York and to states all across this nation, it is unacceptable, unconstitutional, ultra-bias, they have exceeded. their authority and so it's important that attorneys general representing our respective states stand up and enforce the rule of law because Elon must individuals at the Treasury and the president of these United States is not above the law and we will continue you know as attorneys general

we've been we've been preparing for this. This is not the outcome that we wanted. With other Democratic AGs across this country to make sure that we would be ready to respond to any attempt to roll back our rights. So here we are. We've studied their platforms. We've identified certain possibilities, fact patterns.

We've created contingency plans. So no matter what the next administration throws at us, we're ready. We're ready to respond to their attacks. We're ready to respond to any attempts to cut or eliminate any funding to the great state of New York as the governor outlined. Well, you apparently weren't ready enough, Letitia, because guess what? They cut it all. Pambani went in and said, you know what, you're impeding the process of us, ICE, arresting people who are here illegally, people who have committed crimes and are here illegally. So because of that, we're going to cut your funding. You know what? We're going to go into the database. We're going to

see everything. We're going to do everything. And a federal judge just now, giving the green light, at least for Elon Musk and Donald Trump to continue looking for every single little dime they can find every single penny, right? They're not going to let anything go to waste. So this happening, judge taken out of D.C. saying, you know what? She's not going to rule. Like she's just, this is okay. This is going to happen. Well boy. He's tasked with the Department of Government Efficiency, Doge, Elon Musk. A federal judge has just declined to issue an order halting Elon Musk and Doge from accessing federal data and slashing personnel. Attorneys general from 14 states or attempting to stop Musk and Doge from accessing data in seven federal agencies and from firing or putting on leave employees in those agencies.

U.S. District Court Judge Chutkin just refused to issue a ruling from the bench. So at that point, she has not halted Musk and Doge from continuing their actions inside the seven agencies at issue here. just real quickly because of your illegal background, your quick thinking. All right. Two of the Supreme Court justices have subtly indicated that they would like to strike down the prevailing rule. It's not statutory, those two being Thomas and Kavanaugh, indicted in other decisions. They'd like to get rid of this rule that a single district court judge someplace in the country can issue a ruling that holds for the entire country. It's not what the founding fathers expected here, and it's been gained. And, you know, the right can do it too.

So the left shouldn't be too quick to oppose that. Okay. So a lot happening. A lot happening. But as we, and I want to get back to Letitia in a second, but first let's understand the scope and the importance of what's going on because Doge wants access, right, to get into the systems. And they were granted that by the Treasury Secretary Scott Besant.

And so they're in there looking at where every single dime is going. They're turning the money off for one, Latisha James. She's slipping out. She's saying they don't have the right to go in there. and see all our personal data. And now the judge saying, well, you know what, I'm not going to get in the way of this. And this is an Obama appointed judge.

So that's kind of a big deal. Yes, it may go all the way to the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court, as you just heard, that gentleman explained, really not liking the idea that one district court judge anywhere can kind of get in the way of what's happening on a federal level. So again, this is coming down to like federal versus state. And I'm going to just tell you, hey, Tissie, baby, you know what?

Federal wins that all. day long because there is this little thing called the supremacy clause, which we can get into. But first, Jonathan Turley, who's just a brilliant legal scholar from American University, appearing earlier on Fox and talking about the complexity of this, which, by the way, isn't that complex, okay? Where do you think this all goes next? I mean, this seems to be the moment for Doge. How will it go legally?

Well, I love the fact that one of these arguments occurred on President's Day. It's a sort of reminder that we actually do have a president. There's someone who is in charge of the executive branch. And you have states and judges that is a few that have seemed to have forgotten that. But you're now beginning to see judges come to a more sober realization. I've been mystified by many of these challenges. In my view, the president has this authority. They can see these records.

It's a bizarre type of argument, Sandra. It's sort of the Bernie Madoff approach to government. efficiency. You can go ahead and reform, but don't look at the books. I mean, they obviously need to look at the receipts. They need to look at where the money has gone in order to make these judgments, and they seem to be finding a great deal of waste. And I think that judges that aggressively try to prevent that are likely to be reversed. And Senator, I think that when they got Judge Chutkin, who is viewed as not exactly supportive of President Trump, they thought this would be a slam dunk. But even Judge Chutkin, they said, look, I don't understand where's my authority here and where's the imminent harm?

I mean, it's incredibly telling the way the judge responded here. Here's the words of the judge on the lawsuit from the 14 states, Jonathan, challenging Elon Musk and Doge, saying, quote, the building will be demolished and there will be something that can't be undone. The things that I'm hearing are serious and troubling indeed, but you're saying these are things that we're hearing. I'm not seeing it so far, Jonathan. Right. What she is seeing and what we're all seeing is what a president does when they come into office. Now, it's true that President Trump is being more aggressive.

You know, most people run for this office about shrinking government and then forget once they become the government. That's not the case here. I mean, he went and got someone who is famous for downsizing. He did that at X. And they are proceeding along those lines. What's curious about the protest to many of these members is that a lot of these voices were the same ones in the name of democracy that wanted to prevent voters from being able to vote for Donald Trump, who ultimately won both houses and a majority of votes.

And now in the name of democracy, they're arguing that they should be able to slow down or stymie or even prevent some of the things that he ran on. Well, he's carrying out those campaign pledges. He wants to shrink government. He wants to find fraud. And to do that, he needs to look at the books. And I just find any real effort to prevent that likely to be reversed on appeal. I mean, wow, right? This is, you know, they're saying it's a constitutional crisis.

I'm just going to say, no, it's not a constitutional crisis. You know why? Because this woman, and you're going to have to turn up her sound a little bit, I apologize for that. I'm going to tell you in advance, this woman is so freaking wrong. Okay, she's just wrong. She has no ability, no ability to say boo, because she's, He's flying in the face of federal law, so, bz, okay, Tishy, enough. Payments to the state of New York and to states all across this nation, it is unacceptable,

unconstitutional, ultra-bias, they have exceeded their authority. And so it's important that attorneys general representing our respective states, stand up and enforce the rule of law because Elon must individuals at the Treasury and the President of these United States is not above the law. And we will continue. You know, as attorneys general, we've been preparing for this. This is not the outcome that we wanted. Yeah, you've been preparing for this.

How many times have we heard this? We've been preparing for this. We're ready to. With other Democratic AGs across this country. country to make sure that we would be ready to respond to any attempt to roll back our rights. So here we are. We've studied their platforms. We've identified certain possibilities, fact patterns. We've- And you knew they were going to take your money. And by the way, if you were a better lawyer,

I don't know what Harvard law degree is worth these days, but if you were a better lawyer, Tishy, you know what? You would have understood that you didn't have a prayer. Because, you see, you are violating the law. And if there's one scope, there's one area that the federal government is so firmly able to handle and manage and do, and that would be the border. Okay, Article 1, Section 8, Clause 4.

Yes, you see, the federal government is in charge of the border. And in case you had any doubt, in case, you know, some of these states wanted to go rogue and do funny things, guess what? There is a supremacy clause in the Constitution, which provides that the laws of the United States shall be the Supreme Law and the Land,

anything in the Constitution, are the laws of any state to the contrary, notwithstanding. Congressional intent is paramount in preemption analysis. Accordingly, a court must determine whether Congress explicitly or implicitly intended to preempt state or local action. But in this particular case, you have Article 1, Section 8, Clause 4. Go use the Commerce Clause. Heck, if you want to, right?

Because the Commerce Clause also gives U.S. Congress the power to regulate commerce with foreign nations and among several states and with the Indian tribes and the simple clauses arguably provided the federal government with as much power as all the other powers in the Constitution combined. You know, the beauty, by the way, the beauty of the supremacy clause, and I wrote this in a book that I wrote years ago, so I'm literally reading my own words, I said, is that Congress has attempted to justify almost every law imaginable by simply saying it has direct or indirect effect on the economy. And believe me, immigration has director indirect effect on the economy. So you take your pick, Tishy, baby, everywhere you look,

the feds have the power over the states when it comes to migration, when it comes to people being in the country illegally. And when you're standing in the way, as you so are, of the feds being able to do their jobs, guess what? I'm kind of wondering if you're going to be the ones in cuffs. I mean, Tom Homan's talking about arresting one AOC. Are you next? New York a Attorney James, New York has laws that protect immigrants and limit cooperation with federal immigration enforcement efforts. Those laws should be followed by law enforcement and officials in our state. I'll always uphold our laws.

But the thing is, lady, you can't unless you want to go to prison yourself because you're now in total violation of the actual laws of the land. you can't actually do this. It's why when AOC is out there saying, oh, you know, I'm going to tell people to do this, that, and the other, and giving various webinars on how to avoid the federal government, you got Tom Homan going on Fox saying he's talking to Pam Bondi, and he's thinking about actually having her arrested.

But Tom, you got AOC out there, Alexandria O'SKortez, Congresswoman, putting out a webinar doing a webinar to help illegals avoid, I guess, apprehension, giving tips about how to continue to remain in the country and ultimately gain the system.

And I sent an email today to the Deputy Attorney General at what level is that impediment? Is that impediment? I'm not attorney. I'm not a prosecutor. Is that impediment? Is that impeding our law enforcement and efforts? It's so. What are we going to do about it? Is she crossing the line?

So I'm working with the Department of Justice and finding out. Where is that line that they cross? So maybe AOC is going to be in trouble now, but I need the AOG to opine on that. Because there's an impediment, it's impediment, in my opinion. I'm not a prosecutor, but we need some further guidance on that. But again, if we have to take every federal dollar out of the city, we'll do it. I mean, we're done.

This is. Yeah. Okay, so the money's gone. And I love it because when you cut off the money, you actually really reduce all of their power that they think they artificially have. Okay, so Letitia, now your state's out of money. Well, that's not very good, right? Now you get, you get all kinds of problems when they turn off the money spigot. And I don't think there's anyone that's going to stop them on this. I mean, what are you going to do? You're going to impeach it? Good luck on that. I think the Republicans

are in favor of everything that's happening. So you can continue to get out there and complain and complain and complain, but the truth is, the power of the purse is pretty darn compelling. And the power of the Constitution is damn compelling. And now you get a situation where you guys are kind of out there floundering in the face, you know, just actually trying to impede the law. And you're going to find yourself possibly in jail yourself. I mean, let's be honest about this. You are in total violation.

And I think that Mike Davis highlighted this not too long ago when he was talking about. Let me just say this to Big Tish James, the New York Attorney General. I dare you. I dare you to try to continue your lawfare against President Trump in his second term. Because listen here, sweetheart, we're not messing around this time. And we will put your fat ass in prison for conspiracy against rights. And I promise you that. So think long and hard before you want to violate President Trump's constitutional rights

or any other Americans' constitutional rights. It's not going to happen again. We've been warning people on the show, Mike. This isn't the same. Yeah. All right. So you're actually violating the rights of all the New Yorkers that live there and are entitled to have a safe existence. And Letitia, you're not the only one.

Every sanctuary city, every sanctuary state all throughout the country now. is hugely at risk of going straight down and getting their federal funds completely cut off. Okay, so you states are going to have to figure out a way to do things on your own. Because the spigot is not going to be open anymore. Absolutely positively not. You guys blew it. You know what? You're so obsessed with just going after Trump.

Leticia, you know, in the old days, which wasn't that long ago, that was just pre-Trump. Democrats actually pretended like they wanted to have borders. And actually, let me go so far as to say, no, they weren't pretending. Actually, it was one Barack Obama who was very, very adamant about going after illegal migrants and saying, listen, you come here legally or you don't come here. I mean, we got rules surrounding this, right? Don't we have rules like asylum? If you actually want to come to this country, you apply for asylum. And then if you're granted asylum, You get to come here in the U.S. Asylum is defined under 8 U.S.C. 1158, aligns at the 1951 Refugee Convention and the 1967 protocol to qualify for asylum. Guess what? Oh, two things. Not just one, you've got to meet two criteria, okay? Persecution of a well-founded fear or a well-founded fear of persecution, okay? So you're afraid that the government is basically going to kill you or lock you up because of something that's going on. The individual must have suffered persecution or have a genuine and reasonable fear of future.

persecution. And then there's number two, protected grounds. In other words, the persecution must be based on something like race, religion, nationality, political opinion, or membership in a particular social group. Well, I'm sorry, but you're coming here for a better future and a better life because, you know what? We still got the American dream going on, but that is not enough to actually qualify you for asylum. So what are they doing? What was Leticia doing? Well, they think that this is somehow going to be a constitutional crisis. I think it's actually not a crisis because of the supremacy clause, Article 1, Section 8, because of the Commerce Clause, but I'll tell you what I think they were trying to do. I think they were trying to buy votes in their own

little way by having all these people come here and suddenly getting them into the voting system. New York moves to allow 800,000 non-citizens to vote in local elections. Remember that story? at New York City to become the largest municipality in the country to allow legal residents to vote if the legislation is approved as expected in December. I don't believe it's actually been approved. I believe it's been challenged. And guess what? Even if it's not, you know who's going to challenge it now? Donald Trump, Donald Trump and his entire Justice Department, Pam Bondi, they are going to challenge it because you are now putting the rest of the country entirely at risk. And we haven't even talked about what she did to Donald Trump and how she's putting the entire. economy at risk with her antics, the insanity of going after somebody saying, I'm going to get in the way in between your private dealing with Deutsche Bank because I hate you. I hate you, and I don't want you to be the next president in the United States. Therefore, I'm going to go after you for something that no one's ever gone after anyone before. I mean, think about it. You know what?

You want to say, get a secondary mortgage on your home or a line of credit. equity line of credit on your home. And you write down what you think your home is worth. And you talk to your bank and your bank says, well, you know, okay, maybe we'll give you this loan. We're going to send somebody out an appraiser to figure out whether or not that home is really worth what you think it's worth. And if it appraises, then maybe you'll get that equity loan line of credit. Well, this is, you know, it's a different way of saying exactly what Trump was doing. In other words, he was trying to borrow money to be able to build more buildings. And in order to do that, he had to go to the bank, which was Stoich, a bank, a German bank,

and say, hey, can I do this? And they have New York officers, big, big presence, by the way, in the United States. And Deutsche Bank, very sophisticated group of people looked at it and said, okay, yeah. And we'll use Mar-a-Lago as collateral, because Mar-a-Lago is worth whatever. They thought it was worth. Donald Trump thought it was worth a lot. You know who didn't think it was worth a lot? One, Leticia James. And so then Letitia James basically went after him, based entirely on that, which was really kind of sort of weird. Right? So she goes after him

promising to put him in jail, not jail, forgive me, because this was a civil thing, bankrupt him. She wanted to bankrupt the former president because he did a deal that nobody lost money on. I mean, just think of how crazy and ridiculous. Well, did you see what happened yesterday where they found hundreds of millions of dollars of money was fraudulently given to newspapers and, I guess, Politico.

That's Donald Trump talking about the press coverage of everything that happened with him and everything else for that matter, because the media was right there, like, laughing it up. As Latisha James was threatening to send him to jail, they were loving every single minute of it. Right? Like, she was a hero to people as she got out there. Here she is on ABC News. Disney owned ABC News saying she's going to seize all his assets. She wanted to take over Trump Tower.

Four days after a judge ordered Donald Trump to pay $355 million for a decade of fraud. New York Attorney General Leticia James says she's prepared to do everything she can to make sure the former president pays his fine, including she told us, seizing the buildings that bear his name. If he does not have funds to pay off the judgment, then we will seek, you know, judgment. judgment enforcement mechanisms in court. And we will ask the judge to seize his assets. In the past week, Elon Musk and his so-called Department of Government Efficiency have accessed the personal private information. Okay.

Let me get to that other part on Elon. But let's first just discuss here. Okay. Seizing his assets. That was her goal because she wanted him to pay a half a billion dollars, nearly a half a billion dollars. And he doesn't have it hanging around. Well, we're going to go take it.

over Trump Tower. And there was this whole thing about why doesn't he have it hanging around. Like anybody just, you know, puts it under their mattress. I'm sorry, that's not how it works. I mean, mind-blowing. I have been especially disgusted by this entire ordeal, and part, I think, just because it offends my sensibility of sort of belief in our capitalist meritocracy that has made us the country you are. Because when you have, people like Letitia James going out there trying to go after someone just because of who they are politically and coming up with these grand excuses to attack them for the success that they have had financially, that really tells you you got a problem, right? I mean, you look at all of these

companies moving out of New York City left and right, not just because of taxes, but because of the threat of the political environment. And so this is what keeps coming up, if you would. In the Court of Appeals, as they examine what Leticia had going down. I mean, I think about Judith Vale, who's arguing on behalf of Letitia, because that's how it works at the appellate court. You know, you've got to get someone a little bit smarter or a little less political to try and argue this thing. And the judges are like, listen, this sounds like a private case. Why was an attorney general bringing this forward, wasting taxpayer dollars? It's not like she was out there actually doing good things for the New York community. No, she was bogged down in this crapola. It was using

I'm sorry, but what's being described sounds an awful lot like a potential commercial dispute between private actors. Well, to go back to the first question about whether there's other examples of this, there are other examples of this. In the first American case, the Attorney General brought a 6312 case where the transaction at issue was between a very big bank, Wells Fargo, and a professional appraisal firm. But it wasn't the concern there that the public would ultimately be negatively impacted, by what those corporate actors were doing. And that's, that concern is here as well, because when you have hidden risks getting injected into the market, that hurts the market and honest participants in the market.

And the legislature also decided, contrary to what defendants think, that making sure that business in New York stays honest is the way to attract and keep business in New York. To that point, the executive law 6312, I just want to read a section of it. Okay, so she was trying to instruct. assert herself in the middle of a private transaction in which no one, no one lost any money. And she was doing this saying that somehow his Mar-a-Lago was worth only $18 million, despite the fact that it was making, like $57 million a year. I mean, hey, you know, Letitia, honey, I'd take

that trade all day long. I'd go and buy Mar-a-Lago if it was $18, $19 million. I'd buy it for $25 right now, okay? We'll figure it out. Listen, the place next door, like just the dirt, just listed for $200 million. We'll see what it goes for. But the idea that somehow Letitia James was out there trying to say that Mar-Laga was worth $18 million. I mean, who the heck is she to decide? It was bonkers. You have a corrupt Attorney General who literally ran on the campaign promised to taking down my father. She goes, I'm going to go after Donald. I'm going to take down his family. I'm going to go after his children. I'm going to get her exact quote. I'm going to get to the Office of Attorney General every day. I'm going to sue Donald Trump and then I'm

going to go home. I mean, she fundraises. off of this nonsense. Like this was her entire platform going after Donald, right after my father. Then obviously she gets into office and she does exactly that. And you've got a crooked court and everything else. But actually, I think we're making a breakthrough with the judge. I think they're trying to realize there are no victims. First of all, my father's

statements are undervalued, not overvalued. Second of all, she's going after banks. She's trying to protect banks. That made hundreds of millions of dollars with Trump, meaning there were no aggrieved party. There were no defaults. There were no mismone covenants. You guys made money. That's why she made you. We would borrow. We borrow

money, you know, go do a great project, you know, be very successful. Jobs and homes. Pay a tremendous amount of interest and then pay the banks back at full. Like, we never had so much as a default. No one, so we're saying they're saying, is there a victim in this? I mean, you're suing us and there's no victim, but Carly, it's nonsense. The DOJ has told Letitia James to make my father's life hell, to keep him tied up in a courtroom, to cost him tens and tens of millions of dollars to distract him.

And that's what she did, but she didn't distract him. enough, right? Because guess what? Ladies and gentlemen, we have the 47th President of the United States being won Donald Trump. So it's like no matter what she did, all the lawfare that she inflicted on him and it wasn't just Letitia, you get Fannie Willis down in Georgia. I mean, she had her own special screw-ups. Then you had Jack Smith in D.C., who, by the way, Trump is now like, why were you using $140,000 worth of legal advice in the last couple of weeks before you left off? I mean, is that is that a gift that you should have to pay taxes on? Mm-hmm. Um, um, um, um, um, um, um, um, um, um, Jack Smith, he was rabid. He had, oh, that guy, brag, right, who just wanted to be able to get the

felony conviction. They just wanted to be able to say convicted felon. This is messed up. This is really messed up. And now we're finding out, as I played for you earlier, it turns out, oh my gosh, the media was entirely on the payroll to the tune of $52 million for the Associated Press. 8% of the income at the BBC. I mean, it's international, right? Coming from none of the U.S. AIDD. $8.2 million going to Politico pro subscriptions at $10,000 a pop that nobody even used. What on earth? HHS sending $30 million to the New York Times? I mean, all in the New York Times between USAID, HHS, National Science, I mean, they were getting

something like 50 million bucks. And now it's like, okay, I get it. This is why. And this was all sort of starting to accumulate over the last. four years. I mean, that's when you really started to see the uptick in the federal funding going for the media. And so there was an effort. There was an effort to take him down no matter what. And you know what they lost. Okay, they lost. He is now the president of the United States of America. And guess what? He is not messing around. So Letitia, this means you're going to have some problems. It really does.

I know you don't like Elon, but guess what? Elon just got a big win along with Trump. Here's Letitia, flipping out. No one elected Elon Musk. Well, guess what? It doesn't matter. You know, he's the consultant who's coming in and he's looking at everything and he's going to decide just exactly to present to the president whether or not things are really worth it because we had no idea that we were spending billions and billions and billions of dollars. We had no idea that we were spending according to Caroline Levitt and Doge, $2.7 trillion. I mean, like, what is the debt? 36 trillion outstanding when you spend 2.7 trillion going to overseas Medicare and Medicaid? What is that about? We need to know, okay? And Letitia, no one's on your side when you say this.

And the judge just confirmed it. No one elected Elon Musk and his minions. And no one has allowed him to have access to this information. This is a violation of the separation of powers. the United States Congress, the United States Senate has a sole discretion in having the power of the purse and not Elon Musk. We are here today to seek a preliminary injunction to stand up against those forces who believe that they can unilaterally have power and have control all in the hands of the president of these United States. Okay, well, so far, you're coming out on the losing end of that one. I mean, not just politically speaking in terms of where the people are, but actually in terms of the judge that just made the decision that she's not going to rule on this, that Elon Musk, Doge, Donald Trump can continue looking through all the data and finding out whatever they can,

which, by the way, can't happen quite soon enough because let me share this little headline with you guys, just breaking right now. This is pretty wild, all right? Pretty wild stuff. because we have just learned, let me bring it up for you, unbelievable, unbelievable. This is not a constitutional crisis. This is going to be sorted out because we're learning everything that was really going down. Elon Musk says millions of Social Security database recipients are between the ages of 100 and 159. According to Elon Musk, what Doge has discovered is that one person in the Social Security database has their aid, set between 360 and 369.

He just issued a tweet on Acts saying, and I quote, according to the Social Security database, there are numbers of people in each age bucket with the death field set to false. Maybe Twilight is real and there are lots of vampires collecting Social Security. Oh, wow. His post features a chart in it where there are more than 20 million listed with ages 100 and higher, including more than 3.9 million in the 130 to 139 range, more than 3.5 million in the 140 to 149 range, and more than 1.3 million in the 150 to 159 range. You guys, I mean, we knew it was

bad. We knew it was bad, but did we have any idea it was quite this bad? I got to show it to you. Oh my gosh, I'm just looking at this, at this age count range. I mean, how is this even possible? Other than you just have an enormous amount of mess. I mean, I could use another word, right? This is just pretty sickening. And so somehow all of this is, is going down and nobody's noticed. Like nobody's actually ever done an audit of this stuff before. I mean, we need to be thanking this guy. Thank you very much.

Look at this. Maybe Twilight is real, he writes. Look at this. Now, doesn't this make you angry? These are in the millions. There's 121 million people between the ages 160 and 169. Where are these checks going? They're getting printed and they're getting cashed.

And you know what we need to know? because this actually is illegal. If you are cashing a check for somebody who is supposed to be, what, 300 years old, that would actually put you in violation of the law. So this is what is going to get discovered. And this is what we're going to find out. In addition to figuring out where all these billions of dollars are going all over the world, I mean, this is really bonker stuff. And so this is what America voted for. On top of that, you know, America wants to make sure that everything is shored up. There's talk of the Fort Knox getting inspected right now, which is where we keep our gold. And this is something that is really important to Senator Rand Paul. He wants us. He's been

pushing for this 200-watt studio. Thank you so much. It's really great. I have such generous viewers here on this show, so I appreciate that. I'm going to get to your comment in a second, but, you know, basically you have all of these people like Rand Paul that are saying, listen, we want to make sure that the gold is really there. Apparently Steve Mnuchum went in and checked it out, so, you know, hopefully all is good. But again, if you're doing a really good forensic accounting job, I think that this is important to find out. So they're going to go in and they're going to look in the very near future at the Fort Knox gold just to make sure, right? Everything is there. If you're somebody who likes gold, somebody who's worried about inflation, somebody who's worried about

the direction of things. Even if you're not worried about the direction of things, I think that just inflation in general is a reality. And even though this administration is going to work really, really hard to cut it, it's just sort of where we are and it's going to continue. And so one of the best ways, in my estimation, to help navigate that as well as kind of have some something, if the world goes to A2L, L, is through an investment in gold. And so it's something I've always invested in and I continue to invest in. Lately, it's been a little harder because it's up around, What is it? $2,800 an ounce. We're going to have Max on the show, I think, later this week. My friend from American Heart for Gold, he runs American Heart for Gold to talk a little bit about this,

because these are just enormous, enormous numbers. You can get up to $15,000, actually, in free silver. I'm missing the punchline here for one of our great sponsors, American Heart for Gold. Just go to Trishlovesgold.com. Today, Trish Loves Gold. Text Trish to 655-3-2, or call them at 1-844-49.1.1.1.1. 1115, I'm really looking forward, though, to seeing what we get out of Fort Knox. It better be there, for goodness sakes, but you're looking at this and you're going, I don't know, maybe it's not. Like, it turns out that there's all kinds of people that couldn't possibly be alive that are still collecting social security checks. And if we didn't have Joe Doge, if we didn't have this transparency, guess what we wouldn't know? And these Democrats, they don't want you to have it. They're actually saying,

oh, this is a violation somehow that this is hurting our. privacy rights. No, we need and want this because if we continue on the course of this insanity and this, you know, printing press effectively for those who are in the know and can get some of the graft, then we're going to have a real problem. We really are. And Leticia, she's just on the wrong side of history. Not only does this administration's new policy put people at risk, but it is plainly unconstitutional. The president does not get to decide which laws to enforce and for whom. When Congress dedicates funding for a program,

the president cannot pull that funding on a whim. Yeah, but if you're not actually living by the law, then I think actually he's got a few little places to go. And let's face it, you're not living by the law. You've tweeted it out. You got your congresspeople saying, And we're going to give seminars. Ilhan Omar, by the way, has done the exact same thing in her native language. And so all of this is accumulating in a real, real problem, not a constitutional crisis like this Caitlin Collins would like you to think over at CNN.

We are three weeks into the second Trump presidency, three weeks. And tonight there are warnings that the U.S. is dangerously close to a constitutional crisis. No, it's not a constitutional crisis, okay? Because the Constitution is really just pretty darn clear on this stuff. And Letitia James and Kathy Holtz and the rest of them, they literally have nowhere to go. Because as Pam Bondi said, our new Attorney General, they're putting the rest of the people in jeopardy by not actually following federal laws when it comes to immigration. They're standing in the way with their green light stuff. And if you don't comply with federal law, we will hold you accountable. We did it to Illinois. Strike one. Strike two is New York.

And if you are a state not complying with federal law, you're next. Get ready. And the great men and women of law enforcement are standing behind me today. We have FBI, DEA, ATF agents. They put their lives on the line every single day to protect us. you have people like Letitia in the way of them doing their jobs, it becomes an impediment to their being able to get stuffed on. And once that happens, that's when the feds really have the power. So, Latisha, you can scream and holler and yell all you want. We know exactly what it's about. It's politics. And I don't know, maybe you get presidential aspirations

or something in there. Good luck. I mean, other than your little minute crowd that follows you and listens to this, it just makes me so angry, but listens to this junk that she spouts and you know what junk I'm talking about, okay? All right, bear with me. But, you know, for those that haven't watched the Trish Regan show, and we've got a lot of people here, I see a lot of actually new faces here, you need to know how vicious this woman really is and you have only to look at her on the campaign trial to understand it, okay? He's called me venomous. We will fight back to your attempt to bring Trumpism to New York City.

He's called me disgraceful. A respect that they start. He's called me radical. Listen. We know he's crazy. He's called me a racist. We've got to stand up to an administration, which is too male, too pale, and two stares. It kind of sounds pretty racist to me, right?

That's why the DEI is getting torn down in real time because DEI itself is racist. In a colorblind society, we don't notice what color you happen to have for skin. No, no, we only care about the merits and what you can do. So, Letitia James is going down and it's going to happen fast. And the courts are already making it clear that Elon Musk and Donald Trump can keep moving ahead. and they're going to keep doing it. I mean, they're going after the IRS as well. I'm going to get to that in a second.

But first, understand what we are up against here. It's basically an attempt to once again censor us. Please subscribe to this show, share, make a comment, hit the bell, because the censorship, police, they are working hard. They're working overtime. And this CBS host, she just proved, ladies and gentlemen, how little the mainstream media knows and understands about history. I say this, by the way, as somebody who was a history major at Columbia University back in the day when Columbia University was still a decent university. I can't say that now. I really can't, and it saddens me.

But I say this because I'm pretty damn steeped in history, if you would. I love it. I love my job because we're here on the front lines of history every single day. I'm living, breathing it with all of you. But this woman doesn't understand her history. And so when J.D. Vance went over to Germany and he met with somebody who the left just can't stand, right? It's the far right party in Germany, and they're making all of these comparisons saying that they're basically Nazis. Because that's what you do in Germany, just like, you know, you say the same. kind of stuff here if you're trying to cancel the other side because the other side is immediately

on its heels. I mean, this woman who runs this party, her name, and just give you a little bit of background, and this is coming from perplexity, AI. Her name is Elise Elizabeth Weidel. She was born 1979 in Gristichdischliff, Germany. She's a politician and economist. She studied economics at the University of Beirut. Graduating in 2004, as one of its top students, later earned a doctorate in international development in 2011. Her dissertation focused on China's pension system. She lived in China for six years where she learned to speak fluent Mandarin. She worked like I did actually at Goldman Sacks. She also worked at Bank of China, Alliance Global Investors before becoming a freelance business consultant. She also worked for Rocket Internet and Futura. She joined the far right.

Alternative for Germany, AFD party in 2013, has been its co-chair since 2020. two, Vidal is openly gay, and she lives with her Sri Lankan Swiss business, or partner, not business partner, partner in life, and their two sons in Switzerland. Her personal life contrasts, it says, with some of her party's conservative stances, but I'm just saying, like, this doesn't exactly fit the profile of, say, a Nazi as Margaret Brennan on CBS tried to suggest. And then she went so far as to say that the entire reason, reason Nazism was able to exist was because they hid behind the idea of the freedom of the press. And it was free press that led to Nazism and that the Nazis used free press.

And I'm like, what is she saying? Again, like, honey, you need to go back to school. Of course, school these days might even teach you this crazy stuff. Honestly, bonkers. And by the way, it comes out of this CRT nonsense that I won't bore you with. But here's Margaret Brennan. She gets completely smacked down by one Marco Rubio, University of Miami law school graduate

who basically put her in her place and did it fast. Ladies and gentlemen, this is epic. It needs to happen more. Watch. Well, he was standing in a country where free speech was weaponized to conduct a genocide. And he met with the head of a political party that has far right views

and some historic ties to extreme groups. The context of that was changing the tone of it. And you know that, that the censorship was specifically about the right. No, I have to disagree with you. Free speech was not used to conduct a genocide. The genocide was conducted by an authoritarian Nazi regime that happened to also be genocidal because they hated Jews

and they hated minorities and they hated those that they had a list of people they hated, but primarily the Jews. There was no free speech in Nazi. Germany. There was none. There was also no opposition in Nazi Germany. They were a sole and only party that governed that country. So that's not an accurate reflection of history. Boom. No, it's not an accurate reflection of history. I mean, that doesn't stop them. And by the way, what's really scary is what they're trying to do right now with the censorship

that's out there from this representative in Massachusetts to what we're hearing from AOC to what we did hear and continue to hear from Chuck Schumer. More on that. But first, quick note on 76 research, research, my own financial research company that I started with my very dear friend Rob Horton. We've got model portfolios right now. Invest in MAGA. Invest in yourself. Invest in America in the future. We have an American resilience growth portfolio for you there, 10 to 15 stocks in each one. We also have an inflation protection portfolio for you. And we have a basic income, builder portfolio, for those of you don't want to retire someday and still have some money. It's just for inflation. You're going to need it, right? Listen, it's all there for you.

You can go to 76 research.com, click on model portfolios. If you want to just sort of tiptoe in, get the 76 report. Code word dollar for a limited time, although I keep throwing it out there. Rob is probably going to kill me because I want to give it to you. Code word dollar, D-O-L-L-A-R. This is mine. This is not an ad. This is just my baby that I started with him.

And by the way, like our numbers are just fantastic. And I'm so proud of this. Let me see if I can pull this up for you because the portfolio. have just been killing it vis-a-vis the S&P. And when you look at some of these picks and some of these names, I think it tells the whole story there. So really just a tremendous opportunity to be investing in this future, which is going to grow and grow and grow,

because finally we've got some decent people in charge. And things are changing in real time in just a spectacular way. So I don't think I've ever been so optimistic. But I am concerned that the left wants to keep doing what they're doing on speech. I mean, here's Ianna Presley out of Massachusetts, censoring the American people. She wants to censor the American people. By the way, they're taking their cues from Germany where it's a crime, a crime to insult someone

to their face or online. And the penalties worse, online. 60 Minutes just did a big piece on this. And they were rounding someone up, sending the police after somebody because they put out a meme. that's how bad it is in Europe. And Ayanna Presley, the congresswoman from Massachusetts, she kind of likes that idea, right? Look, let me tell you something.

I'll take a bit of umbrage here. I'll speak on behalf of my colleagues. I think I can say, we are all willing to work with anyone who's serious about doing the work of censoring the American people and advancing progress. But they are not serious. You heard that, right?

We're willing to work with anybody who, willing to work with us to censor the American people. I mean, forget about that little thing called freedom of speech in the Constitution. That basically, that basically says there's no way. There's just no way, right? Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof or bridging the freedom of speech or of the press or the right of the people, for goodness sakes. And yet this isn't stopping them. This is what they're trying to do. They're modeling themselves after Germany right now. They're holding this up and saying, well, look at what they're doing, because they got to get rid of that.

That party, that party that they don't like, run by the lesbian woman who has two children with her partner and is like, not exactly the poster child of the far right, but because she believes in freedom of speech, they're trying to equate that somehow with Nazism. This is bad guys. Let me go to the sound on tape of AOC, okay, wanting to reign in media. You know, I do think that several members of Congress, in some of my discussions, have brought up media literacy because that is a part of what happened here. And we're going to have to figure out how we reign in our media environment so that you can't just spew disinformation and misinformation.

It's one thing to have differing opinions, but it's another thing entirely to just say things that are false. And so that's something that we're looking into. Okay. So again, like Germany, might as well just be able to arrest people. Yeah, they're having a hard time. Ever since Elon went out and bought X. Because back in the day, they used to be able to control all this, right? They had people from the State Department influencing and emailing people at Twitter and meta and the whole lot of it saying, well, this can be said that can't be said. I mean, they were paying people off. You got 50. X spooks that put their little letter into political that was getting $8.2 million from the federal government USAID for those political pro subscriptions. And then you had people like Chuck Schumer

that would publicly go out and attack anybody that offered a different viewpoint. I mean, yours truly, right? I used to work at Fox, Fox Business. Some of you may remember me from there or CNBC or Bloomberg, but a lot of you might have known me on at 8 o'clock, I was on the red-headed. Stepchild Network, Fox Business, opposite Tucker Carlson on Fox News. But one of the things that really just did not sit well was when I called out this coronavirus nonsense. I warned everybody. I said, you know what they're going to do? They're going to shut down the economy, which you shouldn't be doing. This is crazy. The market's tank in 2,000 points for goodness sakes because CNN wants to make this into their new plane story. That should not be happening. And I also pointed out exactly what they would do,

that they would manipulate the situation so as to effectively crucify Donald Trump politically, which is exactly what they did. And then suddenly, somehow, I lost my show. You think about that, right? I mean, hey, it all worked out. Reminder to subscribe, share, like, all the good stuff. And by the way, I'd do it all over again because I am so passionate about reporting the truth. allowing you to hear what I'm really thinking. And Tucker, you know, he also wanted to report the

truth and his view of what he believed, for example, was going down on J6 and Chuck Schumer wasn't having it. Here's Chuck Schumer back in the day saying basically you got to fire the guy, Fox, because of what he did. Millions of Americans tuned into one of the most shameful hours we have ever seen on cable television. Fox News host Tucker Carlson, ran a lengthy segment last night, arguing the January 6th Capitol attack was not a violent insurrection. I don't think I've ever seen a primetime cable news anchor manipulate his viewers the way Mr. Carlson did last night.

Thank you, David Lorenzo. I'm just writing back to him. We are live right now. And he said, you know what, you leaving that network, Trish, was the best thing that ever happened to you. I love you on this channel. and I appreciate that. You know what I love about this channel

is that it's just us, it's just me, there's no middle management looking at my scripts. In fact, we don't even have any scripts, right? Which is even better. So a lot of you are like, wow, like I really, like I just like you better in this format. I like me better in this format because in the other, it's so restricted.

And, you know, you can only go within the margins here, there, and everywhere within the context of what they're saying. You know, the funny thing for me is that I actually had management approve my script, my notorious script. that somehow really angered a lot of people on the left and the right. But hey, you know what? I'm just a realist. I'm just a realist.

And I understand that, you know, people were panicked, and we didn't know a lot back then. But the one thing I did know was that the market shouldn't be trading off 2,000 points in a day, and that we needed a strong economy in order to fight that thing. And I also knew that they were going to take advantage of whatever they could in terms of trying to derail Trump and his presidency, but I'm also going to tell you this, guys, and this is actually an important point.

You know what? We are better off as a nation. I'm better off, right, over here, but we as a nation collectively are better off with Donald Trump having gone away and now having come back because he is that much stronger and he has the will of the people behind him.

And he has had four years to have his lawyers and brilliant, you know, Stephen Miller is really, really smart. I'm going to play you some sound from him coming up. People that actually could examine where we were constitutionally speaking, and in order to get some of the things through, they had to have the planning process. So they spent the last four years with their heads down, planning, planning, planning. Donald Trump took it, took it, kept taking all those, you know, Latisha's going after him, Malvin Bragg's going after him. Fannie Willis is going after him. Jack Smith is going after him.

And he took it all in stride and he fought back. They weren't going to stop him. And you know what? Now he comes back stronger than ever. Stronger than ever. I come back stronger than ever. We've got more viewers over here. I mean, I was on the redheaded stepchild network where they don't get a lot of viewers. Let's just say, you know, I mean, maybe you guys would turn over during the commercial and check out Fox's business. But the truth be told, It was definitely the Red Head of Stepchild Network, which means I have more viewers here and more influence here than there, which is incredible. And this is the future, right? This is new media, and that's what's exciting. And that's what's scary, really, really scary to the left.

The left that wants to manipulate and control the media, the left that is now emulating Germany and saying, why can't we be like them when you get arrested for the meme? The left wants to even cancel President's Day. Uh-huh. You know why? They don't want to honor Trump. Think of this. I mean, they are so ridiculous and out over their skis, as I like to say.

New Hampshire girl did a lot of skiing as a kid. Here is MSNBC speaking with a presidential historian saying we just need to get rid of President's Day because we don't like some presidents. Huh. So the headline here is presidential historian says, President's Day is ridiculous we should scrap it what do you mean it is a little bit silly I mean we have had some real duds so I'm not sure we really want to be celebrating all presidents and the tradition actually comes from celebrating birthdays which is a celebration that we inherited from celebrating the king and I'm just

not sure that that's exactly what we want yeah I mean I just I'm not sure that we necessarily want to celebrate the people I think that we want to have a certain respect for the office I totally get that and some have done extraordinary things. What? Celebrating all of them. I do think it causes us to think of the president as somehow other when in reality they are a citizen just like everyone else. So you mentioned this earlier in this. Uh-huh. Okay, did I, did I not tell you? They want to cancel some people because they don't like certain people. And in their ears and eyes and minds, you just, you know, you just cover your ears, you close it out, and you rewrite history. And that's what they're trying to do,

still. It's like, guys, you know what? That ship sailed. And it's going to keep on sailing because you've got nothing. I mean, I realize you want to hold hands and sing kumbaya and sing lovely little songs. Actually, not so lovely little songs. Did you see them recently? Oh, definitely not a lovely little song. Which side are you on? Which side are you on? Tell me, which side are you? Which side are you on? This is Ben. Oh my gosh. I mean, I'm sorry.

I actually am starting to feel bad for them because it tells me they really have no chance in H.E. Double L. Like, it's not going to happen for them. They don't understand. They don't understand basic human nature. I don't think. When you think about it, the left used to be the party for the working class.

Well, guess who's the party for the working class now? Maga. Donald Trump. Look what the left did. They sent all the jobs to Mexico. NAFTA. Fine. They sent jobs to China.

Fine. They didn't care. And they still don't care. I mean, you got the left out there wanting to expand the IRS. Boy, was Biden happy that he could hire 80,000 new IRS agents. we've learned today, Donald Trump is firing them. Yep, they're going to be laying off a whole bunch of these IRS agents. The word is, is that properties are going on the market left and right in D.C. right now. The word is that the most Googled term in D.C. right now is lawyer. They all

need lawyers. Well, anyway, the IRS is going to be laying off thousands. Right in the middle of tax season. Remember what Elon did to Twitter when he took it over and it became X? I believe he got rid of something like 80,000, forgive me 80% of their employees. So he's really quite capable of doing more with less. And this freaks everyone out. But meanwhile, Donald Trump is creating an ERS, right? So the IRS is the Internal Revenue Service. He wants an ERS external revenue service so that we can actually, with those tariffs, put more money back into the government.

Here's Stephen Miller talking about the issue today. So Stephen, so just when it comes to, and maybe we're getting a little too in the weeds here, but I think you have to. When you look at the integrated data retrieval system, the IDRS, I guess this is where some red flags are going up about access to that personal information. This would give the tax agency employees access to IRS accounts, and certainly you can correct me if I'm wrong, but wouldn't they then have access to personal identification numbers and bank information? No. What we're talking about is at the programmatic level, being able to analyze and assess for signs and symptoms of fraud that would involve established criminal organizations and establish fraud rings. and looking at how IT systems are failing to detect and interdict this fraud.

Again, if you were to just eliminate fraud alone in our tax and entitlement systems, you're talking about trillions of dollars in long-term savings. We need to protect the integrity of these systems that Americans rely on. Right now, the federal government doesn't even catch a tiny fraction of the criminal fraud that takes place. that is ripping off and abusing American taxpayers. And the notion that we would trust the same bureaucracy that has overseen this endemic fraud, waste, corruption, and abuse for decades without installing basic political controls on that system,

basic accountability on that system. Again, when we talk about Doge, who are we talking about? We are talking about staff that serves the president of the United States, that is appointed by the president, that reports to the White House, that is part of the formal infrastructure of the federal government. That is the highest level of accountability that you can possibly have, as opposed to some career civil servant who is up until now,

been completely immune from any form of accountability. I mean, you remember when President Trump's private tax information was leaked and weaponized. Politicization at the IRS has been a huge problem. Do you remember that scandal going back? Lewis Lerner at the IRS and weaponizing the tax system against small conservative non-profits, I give you my word, John. The only thing that is happening here is restoring neutrality, ethics, accountability to the IRS to make sure at the payment level, at the systems level, that we can identify signs and warning symptoms

that large-scale fraud has taken place, that unfair politicization is taking place, that unfair targeting is taking place and that we have faith and confidence in the IRS and that no dollars are being stolen from the American people. Wow. I remember that. Do you guys remember that, Lois Lerner? Targeting conservative Tea Party groups? That was Obama's IRS. Again, it's a weaponization. Steve Fischman,

good to have you here. Thank you so much for all your generosity. Please remember, guys, subscribe, share, like. That was Lois Lerner. That was Obama's IRS. If you have an IRS that is weaponized like that, then you have a lot of problems. I mean, you are basically full-on banana republic. And we've seen this in more ways than one, right? And so they're trying to change that. And Doge is working actively to create some accountability.

Think about it in the public markets, right? In the public markets, if you are a company, you have a board of directors, you have a CEO, what is their responsibility? They have a fiduciary responsibility to maximize shareholder value. What is the responsibility of our government? They don't have any responsibility. Their only responsibility is to themselves to get elected again and again and again and again. And so they get giveaways to maybe certain people and certain lobbying groups, et cetera,

that's all for them. The selfishness of the process is really pretty intense and gross. I don't know exactly how you fix it, but you don't want to turn the government into some kind a publicly run company, but at least publicly run companies, there's some accountability there. And shareholders will just trade you down. Your stock is going to, you're going to be like Disney, right? It's cut in half because you start doing all this DEI nonsense and people figure it out. But where is the accountability for Letitia James? Where's the accountability for Fannie Willis? and how do we actually fix this? I will say that Doge is onto something, and they've created all kinds

of different chapters. This is amazing. Our crypto, our cryptos are David Sacks tweeting this out, saying basically there's like a doge everything, okay? They've got a doge arm to create all these reporting vehicles for all of these different aspects of government. And they're not going to be stopped. The judge just said A-O-K. He's tasked with the Department of Government Efficiency, Doge, Elon Musk. A federal judge has just declined to issue an order halting Elon Musk and Doge from accessing federal data and slashing personnel. Attorneys general from 14 states are attempting to stop Musk and Doge from accessing data in seven federal agencies

and from firing or putting on leave employees in those eight. agencies, U.S. District Court Judge Chetkin just refused to issue a ruling from the bench. So at that point, she has not halted Musk and Doge from continuing their actions inside the seven agencies at issue here. Just real quickly because of your legal background. Boom. Okay. So it's moving forward. It's happening. And they really can't do much about this. And this is fantastic because I'll tell you, you know, we're losing money, hand over fist. And you can't continue as a society to keep losing money. I mean, you know what happened to Rome, right?

That was, in large part, economic. The fall of Rome, you can actually trace back to all these people living off a dull, all these wars that they couldn't actually afford, the expansionary efforts, and just bad governance. Like, we don't want to be Rome. We really. And it's like Elon's coming around at the right time, at the right moment, and the American people are with Trump. The American people want change.

And, hey, I mean, little stuff, little stuff. Like, you got to show up to work if you're a federal worker. I'm starting to think that Donald Trump's sensibility on, hey, you got to show up for work. You can't do the Zoom stuff. If you're a federal worker, six percent of workers in D.C. are actually coming to the office every day. So he's like, you know what? You're fired. You don't come to work? You're fired. And this is actually spreading to lots of other companies now that feel empowered to say, hey, guess what? You're not coming to work? You're fired. So this guy apparently decided to ask a question of Jamie Diamond,

Jamie Diamond, who runs J.P. Morgan Chase and is a pretty sensible guy. in most respects. I mean, I don't agree with him on everything, but, you know, I agree with him on this. This guy's like, you know, what about this work-from-home thing? Can't we still continue this? Listen to this. Jamie Diamond, head of the biggest bank in the country. He totally loses it, totally loses it. And I think it might have had some inspiration from Trump Watch. A lot of you were on the fucking Zoom, and you were doing the following, okay? You know, look at your mail, sending text to each other, but we're going to the other person. is, okay, not paying attention, not reading your stuff, you know, and if you don't think

that's closed down efficiency, creativity, creates rudeness, and it does, okay? And when I found out that people are doing that, you don't do that at my goddamn meetings. You're going to mean with me, you got my attention, you got my focus, I don't bring my goddamn phone, I'm not saying texts to people, okay? It simply doesn't work. The CEO of J.P. Morgan Chase laying down the law. I don't know. I think it can get a job at those. I do. I do. That's for my shorts feed the other day. And I wanted to play that exact version of the soundbite because there are a few little F-bombs scattered along the way, which, you know, we were trying to keep it

clean for the kids, and we had edited that out. But I do think that Jamie may have gotten a little bit of inspiration from the big guy. Just for clarification purposes, because it was incorrectly reported yesterday, we have informed the federal workforce, which they've looked to do for many years, that if they're working for the federal government, they must show up to the office on time and on schedule. We don't want them. We don't want them to work from home because, as everyone knows, most of the time,

they're not working, they're not very productive, and it's unfair to the millions of people in the United States who are, in fact, working. And that are paying their salary, right? So it turns out this guy who asked the question, he works in tech support or something, He was fired, I guess, but then they unfired him. So, I don't know.

J.P. Morgan's still trying to work it out. But I think Jamie Demme was pretty clear. And so was the President of the United States, for that matter. Elon Musk has a new baby mama, allegedly. Just see this one? I've spoken to some people who know her very well. And let's just say, they are not surprised. They think that, you know, she kind of was eyeing.

him for years and that she is scheming now. This is per one of my sources that has known her for some time, scheming to try to get as much as she can out of one Elon Musk. So this would be Ashley Sinclair. She's a popular influencer for MAGA online and she just dropped a bombshell on Valentine's day that she is the mother of baby number 13. Yeah, baby number 13. Here she is with Cash Patel. And she's saying that, you know, she's upset. She wouldn't have to come forward with this, that, you know, she really has no other choice. Apparently, per my sources, she got a little angry because it was Valentine's Day and he was ignoring her more on that in the second. But first, her statement from Ashley Sinclair, she put this out five months ago, I welcomed a new baby

into the world. Elon Musk is the father. I have not previously disclosed this to protect our child's privacy and safety, but in recent days it became clear that tabloin media intends to do so, regardless of the harm it will cause. I intend to allow our child to grow in a normal and safe environment, for that reason. I ask that the media honor our child's privacy and refrain from invasive reporting. And then interestingly, she just adds her PR person. and his email at the bottom of the message, just in case you want to report a little bit on it. So, you know, maybe tip off number one. Then her PR person puts this out regarding Ashley Sinclair.

Ashley and Elon have been privately working towards the creation of an agreement about raising their child. Ah, I see. Okay, so does it come down to money? That agreement about raising their child for some time. It is disappointing that a tabloid reporter who repeatedly ambushed Ashley and her family made it impossible to complete that process confidentially. We are waiting for Elon to publicly acknowledge his parental role with Ashley and to end unwarranted speculation. And Ashley trusts that Elon intends to finish their agreement quickly in the best interests of the well-being and security of the child that they have. And then he's got his email again in case you have any more questions.

So, does your antenna go up? So at first of all, you know, poor girl, whatever, you know, but, you know, Elon will do the right thing, whatever. I don't, like, on a personal level, I don't love the idea of, you know, running around having all these kids. And this apparently has to do with his belief in population, needing to be like, you know, the worth needing to be populated more and more and more and more. And so there's that. but, you know, from a woman's standpoint, like I'm looking at it, first of all, like, you know, any guy who doesn't pay for his child is a schmuck. I'm sure Elon is not trying to put her in a situation where he's not going to take responsibility. But at what point then is she trying to use this as a kind of leverage? Like, that didn't sit well with me because my antenna went up and said, okay, well, what exactly is she trying to get out of this? So I asked around, I have a source who actually knows her very well, And this source is impression, but she's trying to get a lot, okay? And this is all about what she's going to get.

And she was also actually angered because she sees other baby mamas with their kids getting lots of attention in the White House. I mean, did you see little ex, you know, who was all over the place the other day? This was Grimes' child. And there's another woman that Elon had children with artificial insemination. She's somebody he used to work with. And her children are getting a lot, including A-30, million-dollar ranch apparently down there in Texas.

And so the belief is amongst some that know this young woman well was that she was trying to get something too. I mean, one of the things that was pointed out to me was how weird it was that in one statement she's like, oh, I don't want any reporting. And then what did she do? She invited the New York Post in the New York Post for this big spread. They had this one-on-one article on her, and it was complete with the pictures of the feet. There were lots of pictures, lots of pictures.

But my source said she got kind of upset because this, Chavon Zillis is the woman that he did have some children with. And Chavon is actually spending a lot of time down at Marlago and at the White House. and apparently no sooner than she tweeted her statement, this big revelation that she has a baby with Elon, that Elon actually responded to a tweet that Chavon put out, talking about the little loves of her life, and he responded to it, and then not only did he respond to it,

but May Musk, the mother, then retweeted it with lots of hearts. And so that was really annoying, apparently, to one, Ashley St. Claire, the alleged new baby mama. It turned into kind of a ruckus over the weekend, Valentine's Day weekend, on X, and you have someone named Milo, who's a popular influencer, there on X, talking about how Ashley Sinclair had actually plotted for like nearly half a decade to somehow ensnare Elon Musk. And he dug up these old tweets in which she was talking to somebody saying, can you introduce me to

Elon and I need to get Elon must's attention for a marriage proposal. Please, Greg, was she joking, not joking? Anyway, Elon did see that and he retweeted it. This guy says back to her, you know, Ashley, he's got a kid already, kind of a few kids. It seems unlikely that anything's going to really work out. And she's like, oh, who cares? You know, he's got seven kids and he goes through women pretty fast. So I guess she wanted her shot. Here's the communication that she sent to him after he sent that out. She's like, Elon, what the heck? We've been trying to communicate for the past several days. You have not responded. When are you publicly, or when are you going to reply to us, instead of publicly responding to smears from an individual who posted photos of me? Gosh, when she was

15 years old, that's a little weird. I think that actually, though, this woman had some kind of account where she was posting stuff of herself when she was underage. Not great. Like this whole thing's kind of seedy. My one take is, you know, Elon, the prime minister of Italy, like she was looking really good, okay? Like, let's like, let's try and kick it up a notch. All right?

Just my advice. His mother might say the same thing. This woman, on the other hand, at 26 years old, And now she's going sort of crazy here on social media. She's deleted a bunch of stuff. She was tweeting stuff. Again, sources close to her say she tends to be a little bit overly emotional. And, you know, hey, Elon, who had quite an emotional rollercoaster relationship with Amber Hurd,

may be in for a whole other level of cray craye, I hear. You know, look, I feel bad, but I don't feel bad. Do you feel bad? Let me know. Let me know what you guys think in the chat down below. I mean, isn't there a party that's kind of like, hey, you know, look, granted, a man should always take care of his responsibilities, but a woman should too. And like for this to be playing out and for her to be like getting all jealous because the other woman has her kids at the White House, like, I'm sorry, but like you kind of probably should have known a little bit of what you were getting into with this one. Right. And I don't think

you got a lot of leverage given that he's not going to care. Okay. So, every, Everybody knows he's got a 13th kid. It's not like he's hanging his head in shame. He's already told us how much who wants to populate the world. So what do you got? Like, what is your angle here? And what are you trying to get? And why don't you think about these things before you bring a child into the world,

unless that was the intention all along, right? To kind of ensnare him, if you would. Again, Elon. George Maloney. I mean, I think we need to kind of go a little more upscale, just a little more upscale. Speaking of upscale, I was at the opera this weekend. I was at the opera this weekend, and I want to show you some of these pictures and tell you all about that because I had so much fun. I really, really did.

We'll talk about that. But I guess before I talk about that, we should get to what just happened on Delta Airlines, because this is, this is kind of frightening to me. And I'm going to tell you this as somebody who just flew Delta home last night. Delta, you know, normally just a really great airline. And this is nothing against the crew. The crew was actually just wonderful. But I can report today that a Delta plane has just crashed at the Toronto Pearson Airport.

I do believe that the passengers are okay but have been injured. there are multiple injuries after this Delta Airlines flight crashed upside down at a Toronto airport. This is at the Pearson International Airport. Don't forget, like, the weather's been really bad. There's been a lot of wind, of course, and a lot of planes have been rerouted. I myself was dealing with that just yesterday. I left Atlanta, Georgia, at 1 o'clock in the afternoon. Actually, a 1.30 flight and I didn't get home until around 1.30 in the morning last night. That plane didn't land until nearly midnight at JFK. We were supposed to land at a smaller airport in White Plains, New York. That didn't happen. We tried twice. So we took off in very, very heavy winds,

actually, out of Atlanta on this regional jet. We went into HPN, which is Westchester County. We tried twice. Two times they attempted this landing, and I thought it was actually pretty brazen to attempt the landing. I didn't even tell you, they grounded us in Philadelphia at one point for three hours, three hours in Philadelphia. Ooh, that was lots of fun. And then they took us back to the gate because, you know, I'm like, where's my passenger bill of rights? Didn't Congress get a passenger bill of rights after three hours? They have to take you to the gate, and you have the option of leaving the plane. So they took us all back to the gate, but then they didn't give us the option of leaving the plane. They say, well, you can, but if you do, it's going to be kind of a problem because your luggage is on the

plane and then we're going to have to figure out how to get it off and, you know, the passengers are going to be kind of mad. So you really couldn't get off. And they said that we were just refueling and we were going to go back up. So that's what happened. We went back to the gate. People were not allowed off. And then we tried to make our way back into Westchester County. Again, winds at 25, 27, 28 miles an hour. And I'm looking at the weather report saying, how are we going to get into this airport? Like, these winds are way too strong, you guys. And they're picking up minute by minute, hour by hour. And they said, no, no, the stewardess assured me, we are not going to leave unless we know that we can land. So they tried to land. They tried to land twice, not once, but twice. You're like a thousand feet off the ground there. The planes going this

way and every way. I mean, honestly, I was really scared. I was sending family members messages. you remember how much I love you, and I was very relieved that my husband and I had taken different flights, but this was bonkers, okay? Bonkers. And now I see this story today, and I'm like, what is going on? Are they pushing the pilots too hard to try and land these things? So this, this story shows that this plane went actually upside down, upside down, just horrible. And I believe at this point, but again, it's a breaking news story. I believe everybody is accounted for, just sad stuff and I don't know what's going on. I really don't. Like we got to we got to fix the FAA. We get to fix Boeing. We got to fix these airlines. We got a lot of problems, right?

But I did have a really good weekend and I did get to go to the opera. And some of you may know this. I originally wanted to be an opera singer. I studied opera. I went to a conservatory. This is me all dressed up for the night and I studied as a lyric, Lyric Coloratura soprano, saying a lot of Mozart Puccini, a lot of Italian opera, but I speak a lot of languages. A little German in there too. I loved opera and it's what I wanted to do. So this was Belcanto night at the opera there in Atlanta and they were raising money for the Atlanta Opera. Here I am inside at the dinner and I got to hear these two amazing, amazing, amazing singers, just incredible. And I love it because, you know, opera, you're taught to sing out over a 40-piece orchestra. And you're, you're,

your voice just has to cut through all of that. And so there they were on stage. And typically, you know, you're in the opera house and you can't really see people close up. And it was just a delight to see both of these singers who were enormously talented. I guarantee you, I was like the only one in the room. I'm sure. There were like 500 people there. But like, I know every line, every line of everything they sang. And I'm like telling my table, okay, get ready, get ready. There's like a high C. It's not easy for the tenor. High C coming up the end. This is the last acts from La Boe M. It's a big moment. Let's see if he gets it. He was terrific. He also sang Nessundorma from this is Puccini's Turindote. You know that Vincereau, Vincereo. I'm singing

him just my speaking voice right now, but that's the big aria that actually Donald Trump plays a lot at some of his rallies. It means I will win, I will win, I will win. And we got to hear mi chiammonomimish, the lyric soprano sang the main aria from La Boe M. It was just great. Like, you know, I loved it. And it was so great that I'm actually inspired to actually go back and do a little singing for fun on the side. And then I'll bring it to you guys and I'll show it to you. Okay.

So I'm not on the opera stage, but you know what? I am on this stage, right? And we can appreciate music together. Great, great music. I did put out an album a couple years ago of God bless America. And the National Anthem. National Anthem. I mean, it was important to do at the time because nobody was singing the national anthem.

And I thought that was just crazy. Quick reminder, American Hartford Gold, one of our sponsors here. Go to Trishlovesgold.com, up to $15,000 dollars in free silver. Text Trish to 655-3-2-844-495-1-1-1-1-5 for more information. And, you know, I cannot forget to have to tell you about my balance in nature. By the way, like, I'm glad I'm here today. I'm just going to say, like, I'm really, really glad I'm here. It was extremely scary and extremely dicey.

And I did not like that trip on Delta Airlines, not at all. But I think it speaks to some of the other things that we need to also accomplish. Anyway, balance of nature. Another one of our great sponsors here on the Trish Regan show, 1-800-246-8751, 1-800-800-8-8-751, 1-800. 246, 8751. That's where you want to go if you get the, I take the fruits and veggies every single day, my vitamins. And so far, so good. You know, it's important as a singer, by the way. As an opera singer, I said, gosh, you know, I'm going to be out of work all the time because I would get a cold every single season.

Seriously, every season. And I was wearing masks before they had masks, right? Because I had my scarf around. I was like, I always was drinking water. I'd have like a bottle of water with me everywhere. it's your voice, right? And, you know, when you start to lose your voice, you can't sing, which is just, you know, I would have been out of work, right? Anyway, this year, I wouldn't have been because this year I haven't had any colds. And I credit, balance of nature with that, balance of nature, which is just been phenomenal for me because this is the first year, despite having three kids who always seem to have a cold, I have been able to really, really, be healthy. So it's all good stuff. I'm just looking at some of the other news stories,

obviously the Delta one, a very, very big one. And I think that we've got to ask more questions and demand more accountability, you know, from the airline system in general, whether it be the FAA, whether it be Delta Airlines and the other airlines themselves, or whether it be Boeing, which also, you know, they just had to get rid of the DEI program as well. I mean, because I'm sorry, you're flying a plane, right? You're flying a plane. It's like medicine. Like you can't be all DEI when it comes to medical school because if somebody can't actually graduate that knows how to operate on someone, do you really want somebody operating on someone? I mean, that's when you're really threatening actual lives. So thank you again, everyone for tuning in. Lots of news today.

We're going to have much more coming up on the show tomorrow. I will see you then.